common disease findings (case study on diabetes)

Post on 27-Jan-2016

18 Views

Category:

Documents

0 Downloads

Preview:

Click to see full reader

DESCRIPTION

Common Disease Findings (case study on diabetes). GWAS Workshop Francis S. Collins, M.D., Ph.D. National Human Genome Research Institute May 1, 2007. 1994. 2004. Estimates of Diagnosed Diabetes Among Adults in the U.S. - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

TRANSCRIPT

Common Disease Findings (case study on diabetes)

GWAS Workshop

Francis S. Collins, M.D., Ph.D.National Human Genome Research Institute

May 1, 2007

No Data <4% 4-4.9% 5-5.9% ≥6%

19941994 20042004

Estimates of Diagnosed Diabetes Among Adults in the U.S.

Diabetes Pathophysiology

Genetic Predisposition Environmentgenetic defects

Beta-cell Dysfunction Insulin Resistance

impaired insulin secretion

poor glucose utilization

obesity

TYPE 2 DIABETES

BETA-CELL EXHAUSTION

HYPERGLYCEMIA

Type 2 Diabetes:“The geneticist’s nightmare”

• Family history as a substantial risk factor– Relative risk to a sibling ~3

• Environment as a major contributor• Family linkage studies relatively disappointing• Validated genes prior to 2007:

– PPARG (candidate gene)

– KCNJ11 (candidate gene)

– TCF7L2 (linkage study)

Applying Genome Wide Association to Type 2 Diabetes

• Three groups, each with 1000 – 1500 cases and 1000 – 3000 controls in Stage 1:– FUSION (Boehnke, Bergman, Collins, Mohlke, Tuomilehto)– Diabetes Genetics Initiative of Broad, Novartis, and Lund

(Altshuler, Groop)– Wellcome Trust Case Control Consortium/UK Type 2

Diabetes Consortium (McCarthy, Hattersley, Donnelly)

• Genotyped with Illumina 317K or Affy 500K panel• Compared results across all three studies• Followed up promising signals in Stage 2 validation set

FUSION Two-Stage GWA Study of T2DStage 1: GWA

Stage 2: Validation of best hits

Cases

NGT

Controls Total

Familial /

population-based cases (%)

Stage 1 1161 1174 2335 68/32

Stage 2 1215 1258 2489 0/100

Total 2392 2432 4824 27/73

80% power to detect:• Stage 1: OR = 1.4 - 1.5 • Stage 1 + 2: OR = 1.3 - 1.4

• 317,503 SNPs genotyped on Illumina HumanHap300 BeadChip at the Center for Inherited Disease Research (CIDR)

• Dropped 1,868 SNPs from analysisFailed to meet expectations for Hardy-Weinberg< 90% successful genotypes> 3 Mendelian or duplicate sample errors< 10 detections of the rare allele

GWA Genotyping of Stage 1 Samples

FUSION Stage 1 Association Results-l

og

10(

p-v

alu

e)

1161 Finnish T2D cases + 1174 Finnish normal glucose tolerant controls

No results meet genome-wide significance (p < 1.7 x 10-7)

Known associations can serve as positive controls-l

og

10(

p-v

alu

e) TCF7L2

KCNJ11PPARG

1161 Finnish T2D cases + 1174 Finnish normal glucose tolerant controls

Three Groups Working Together

Sweden

Poland

United States

(off map)

# cases + controls

FUSIONS1: 1161 + 1174S2: 1215 + 1258

DGIS1: 1464 + 1467S2: 5065 + 5785

WTCCC/UKT2DS1: 1924 + 2938S2: 3757 + 5346

Totals S1 = 4549 + 5579S2 = 10053 + 12389 (n=32,554)

Combined Results Now Highly Significant-l

og

10(

p-v

alu

e)

Chromosome

15

10

5

0

49 TCF7L2

KCNJ11

PPARG

//

Top 10 Results From Combined Analysis

FUSION DGI WTCCC/UKT2D All Samples

Gene OR p-value OR p-value OR p-value OR p-value

TCF7L2 1.34 1.3 x 10-8 1.38 2.3 x 10-31 1.37 6.7 x 10-13 1.37 1.0 x 10-48

IGF2BP2 1.18 2.1 x 10-4 1.17 1.7 x 10-9 1.11 1.6 x 10-4 1.14 8.9 x 10-16

CDKN2A/B 1.20 .0022 1.20 5.4 x 10-8 1.19 4.9 x 10-7 1.20 7.8 x 10-15

FTO 1.11 0.016 1.03 0.25 1.23 7.3 x 10-14 1.17 1.3 x 10-12

CDKAL1 1.12 0.0095 1.08 0.0024 1.16 1.3 x 10-8 1.12 4.1 x 10-11

KCNJ11 1.11 0.013 1.15 1.0 x 10-7 1.15 0.0013 1.14 6.7 x 10-11

HHEX 1.10 0.026 1.14 1.7 x 10-4 1.13 4.6 x 10-6 1.13 5.7 x 10-10

SLC30A8 1.18 7.0 x 10-5 1.07 0.047 1.12 7.0 x 10-5 1.12 5.3 x 10-8

Chr 11 1.48 5.7 x 10-8 1.16 0.12 1.13 0.068 1.23 4.3 x 10-7

PPARG 1.20 0.0014 1.09 0.019 1.23 0.0013 1.14 1.7 x 10-6

Top 10 Results From Combined Analysis

FUSION DGI WTCCC/UKT2D All Samples

Gene OR p-value OR p-value OR p-value OR p-value

TCF7L2 1.34 1.3 x 10-8 1.38 2.3 x 10-31 1.37 6.7 x 10-13 1.37 1.0 x 10-48

IGF2BP2 1.18 2.1 x 10-4 1.17 1.7 x 10-9 1.11 1.6 x 10-4 1.14 8.9 x 10-16

CDKN2A/B 1.20 .0022 1.20 5.4 x 10-8 1.19 4.9 x 10-7 1.20 7.8 x 10-15

FTO 1.11 0.016 1.03 0.25 1.23 7.3 x 10-14 1.17 1.3 x 10-12

CDKAL1 1.12 0.0095 1.08 0.0024 1.16 1.3 x 10-8 1.12 4.1 x 10-11

KCNJ11 1.11 0.013 1.15 1.0 x 10-7 1.15 0.0013 1.14 6.7 x 10-11

HHEX 1.10 0.026 1.14 1.7 x 10-4 1.13 4.6 x 10-6 1.13 5.7 x 10-10

SLC30A8 1.18 7.0 x 10-5 1.07 0.047 1.12 7.0 x 10-5 1.12 5.3 x 10-8

Chr 11 1.48 5.7 x 10-8 1.16 0.12 1.13 0.068 1.23 4.3 x 10-7

PPARG 1.20 0.0014 1.09 0.019 1.23 0.0013 1.14 1.7 x 10-6

Top 10 Results From Combined Analysis

FUSION DGI WTCCC/UKT2D All Samples

Gene OR p-value OR p-value OR p-value OR p-value

TCF7L2 1.34 1.3 x 10-8 1.38 2.3 x 10-31 1.37 6.7 x 10-13 1.37 1.0 x 10-48

IGF2BP2 1.18 2.1 x 10-4 1.17 1.7 x 10-9 1.11 1.6 x 10-4 1.14 8.9 x 10-16

CDKN2A/B 1.20 .0022 1.20 5.4 x 10-8 1.19 4.9 x 10-7 1.20 7.8 x 10-15

FTO 1.11 0.016 1.03 0.25 1.23 7.3 x 10-14 1.17 1.3 x 10-12

CDKAL1 1.12 0.0095 1.08 0.0024 1.16 1.3 x 10-8 1.12 4.1 x 10-11

KCNJ11 1.11 0.013 1.15 1.0 x 10-7 1.15 0.0013 1.14 6.7 x 10-11

HHEX 1.10 0.026 1.14 1.7 x 10-4 1.13 4.6 x 10-6 1.13 5.7 x 10-10

SLC30A8 1.18 7.0 x 10-5 1.07 0.047 1.12 7.0 x 10-5 1.12 5.3 x 10-8

Chr 11 1.48 5.7 x 10-8 1.16 0.12 1.13 0.068 1.23 4.3 x 10-7

PPARG 1.20 0.0014 1.09 0.019 1.23 0.0013 1.14 1.7 x 10-6

How could IGF2BP2 be related to diabetes?

• IGF2BP2 codes for the insulin-like growth factor 2 mRNA binding protein 2

• But we know very little about what this does

• A related gene, IGF2BP1, codes for a protein that binds to the upstream leader sequence of the insulin-like growth factor 2 (IGF2) mRNA and regulates IGF2 protein production

• IGF2 is involved in development, growth, and stimulation of insulin action

rs13266634is in the codingregion of SLC30A8, andchanges a highlyconservedarginine to atryptophan

SLC30A8 - Beta Cell Zinc Transporter

Chimienti (2005) BioMetals 18:313

SNPs Upstream of CDKN2A/B

• Cyclin-dependent kinase inhibitors CDKN2A and CDKN2B, also known as p16INK4a and p15INK4b

• Inhibit the activity of cyclin-dependent protein kinases CDK4 and CDK6, have been implicated repeatedly in cancer.

• Cdk4 activity also influences beta cell proliferation and mass in mice; loss of Cdk4 leads to diabetes

Embargoed until 5 PM Thursday M

ay 3!

SNPs Within Introns of CDKAL1• CDK5 regulatory subunit associated protein 1-like 1

• Shares protein domain similarity with CDK5RAP1, which inhibits CDK5

• CDK5 activity is influenced by glucose, stimulates insulin gene transcription, and may influence other beta cell processes

• Over activity of CDK5 in pancreas may lead to beta cell degeneration

top related