coloureds and indians - michael cole
Post on 03-Apr-2018
216 Views
Preview:
TRANSCRIPT
-
7/28/2019 Coloureds and Indians - Michael Cole
1/30
Coloureds and Indians: a cohort analysis of
labour market behaviour, 1995-2011
By Michael Cole1
Abstract
1
This paper is dedicated to Jesus Christ. Special thanks to Ingrid Woolard, Nicola Branson and Philip Cole who allprovided me with valuable input and guidance.
South Africas labour force still remains scarred by its former political
regime. Africans were undoubtedly the worst affected by Apartheid
policies. However Coloureds and Indians have had to overcome similar
constraints, yet their story is often eclipsed by that of Africans in the
literature. This paper constructs a synthetic panel using October
Household Surveys (OHSs), Labour Force Surveys (LFSs) andQuarterly Labour Force Surveys (QLFSs) to analyse the labour market
behaviour of Coloureds and Indians relative to their African and White
counterparts between 1995 and 2011. Locally Weighted Scatterplot
Smoothing (LOWESS) is used to produce age profiles by year and birth
cohort. The age profiles show that the labour market experiences of
Coloureds (particularly Coloured males) have worsened since 1995.
Indians appear to be moving towards White levels of lower
unemployment, benefitting significantly from higher levels of education,
employment equity and an increasingly skills based economy.
-
7/28/2019 Coloureds and Indians - Michael Cole
2/30
1
1 Introduction
Apartheid systematically discriminated against Africans, Coloureds and Indians subjecting them to
inferior education, constrained mobility and limited employment opportunities relative to Whites. As a
result, South Africas labour force still remains scarred by its former political regime. Africans were
undoubtedly the worst affected by Apartheid policies. Coloureds and Indians have had to overcomesimilar constraints, yet their story is often eclipsed by that of Africans. Numerous authors have
investigated the labour market experiences of Africans from both the supply and demand side (Bhorat,
2004; Bhorat, 2006; Branson, 2006; Dias & Posel, 2006; Dinkelman & Pirouz, 2002; Fedderke, 2012;
Kingdon & Knight, 2004; Kingdon & Knight, 2005; Wittenberg, 2002; & Von Fintel, 2007 amongst
other). Few authors however have drawn significant attention to the experiences of Coloureds and
Indians post-Apartheid.
Coloureds and Indians constitute 9.0% and 2.6% of the population respectively while Africans and
Whites hold 79.5% and 9.0% (Stats SA, 2011). Given that Apartheid inherently benefitted Whites over
the African majority, the literature has focused on contrasting White privilege with African disadvantage.
Moreover, cross-sectional datasets tend to provide small samples of Coloureds and Indians (in particular)that make parametric analysis highly problematic (Von Fintel, 2007:27). Avoiding analysis on Coloureds
and Indians is by no means desirable. Like Africans, Coloureds face exceptionally high levels of
unemployment, reaching 23% in 2011 (QLFS, 2011). Indians appear to have benefitted from higher
average levels of education over time, yet they remain unequal to Whites in terms of employment.
This paper constructs a synthetic panel using October Household Surveys (OHSs), Labour Force
Surveys (LFSs) and Quarterly Labour Force Surveys (QLFSs) to analyse the labour market behaviour of
Coloureds and Indians relative to their African and White counterparts between 1995 and 2011. Synthetic
panels do not provide a study of individual transitions as do regular panel datasets (Von Fintel, 2007;
Duval-Hernandez & Romano, 2009). Instead it is assumed that, on average, the behaviour of individuals
within a group of individuals is well approximated by the behaviour of other individuals of the same age
group or birth cohort (ibid). Applying non-parametric graphical techniques to the dataset provides an
alternative means of analysing employment, unemployment and the non-economically active.
Locally Weighted Scatterplot Smoothing (LOWESS) is used to observe long-run labour market trends for
Coloureds and Indians relative to Africans and Whites. Despite small samples for Indians, LOWESS
appears to produce graphs with consistent trends. This same approach has been used by Wittenberg
(2002), Branson (2006) and Branson & Wittenberg (2007) on Africans to produce age profiles by year and
birth cohort. Age profiles plot the proportion of working, unemployed or non-economically active
individuals in the working age population against age. These profiles are constructed by year and birth
cohort group2
for Coloured and Indian males and females.
The age profiles show that the labour market experiences of Coloureds (particularly Coloured males) have
worsened since 1995. Coloured men and women face increasingly similar unemployment profiles to
Africans, but are still better absorbed into employment. Younger cohorts of Coloured males are revealed
to be working significantly less than older cohorts. Indians appear to be moving towards White levels of
lower unemployment, benefitting significantly from higher levels of education, employment equity and an
increasingly skills based economy. Indian women are seen to have a higher propensity to drop out of the
labour (perhaps to take care of young children) than other races.
2
A birth cohort refers to the group of individuals born within a particular year (e.g 1983). A birth cohort group therefore refersto all the individuals born within a particular period (e.g. 1983-1987).
-
7/28/2019 Coloureds and Indians - Michael Cole
3/30
2
The sections in this paper are organised as follows. Section 2 will begin by giving a background of
Coloured and Indian labour market behaviour during and post-Apartheid. The purpose of this section is
to contextualise the analyses in sections 3, 5 and 6. Section 3 will provide an overview of Coloured and
Indian labour market experiences between 1995 and 2003 through various summary statistics. Section 4
will describe the data used to construct the synthetic panel as well as the methodology employed. Section
5 will present the working, unemployed and not economically active age profiles generated usingLOWESS by year and cohort. After presenting the various age profiles, section 6 will provide a brief
discussion before section 7 concludes.
2 Background
Apartheid
The structure of the labour force under Apartheid was largely influenced by discriminatory policies that
conferred rights of mobility, education and employment to individuals based on their race. ThePopulation Registration Act of 1950 formalised racial classification through a defined taxonomy that
divided all South Africans into four major groups (African, Coloured, Indian and White).
The term Coloured was given to people of mixed descent. Their heritage can largely be traced back to
interracial relationships between early Dutch farmers, Khoi-Khoi, Malay and Asians living in the Western
Cape in the late 1600s (Du Pr, 1994:14). Indians, on the other hand, are the direct descendants of Indian
indentured labourers and trades people who immigrated to South Africa in the 1860s (Jithoo, 1991:344).
These immigrants largely worked in the sugar industry in Kwazulu Natal.
Following the Population Registration Act came a wave of Apartheid legislation that enforced racial
segregation (Group Areas Act 1950), prohibited interracial sexual relations (Immorality Act of 1950) andimposed inferior education and job reservation that inherently benefited Whites over Africans, Indians
and Coloureds (Bantu Education Act 1953) (Du Pr, 1994). The Homeland Act of 1958 constrained the
mobility of African, Coloured and Indian South Africans to their respective homeland or land of origin
without appropriate permits. This not only discouraged labour mobility, but sustained large information
asymmetries and increased the cost of job search for Africans, Coloureds and Indians (Kingdon &
Knight, 2005:4). Although not to the same extent as Africans, both Coloureds and Indians were most
notably discriminated against in terms of education and the availability of employment opportunities.
The Apartheid government provided education to Africans, Coloureds and Indian that suited unskilled
and semi-skilled professions. Given the unequal distribution of government resources devoted to
Africans, Coloureds and Indians, the quality of education followed a racial hierarchy. White learnersreceived the best quality education, followed by Indians, Coloureds and lastly Africans (Bunting, 2006).
African education was especially dire; however the situation for Coloureds was by no means far better.
Coloureds were notoriously subject to gutter education, with overly crowded classrooms (in excess of
50 pupils per class) and poorly qualified teachers (Du Pr, 1994:111). Opportunities for tertiary education
were severely limited. Coloureds and Indians could enrol at a number of technical schools (technikons)
and at the University of the Western Cape and University of Durban-Westville respectively (Bunting,
2006: 49). The future benefit of such tertiary education, however, was limited by White job reservation
and disincentivised by wage discrimination in favour of Whites (Du Pr, 1994:109).
Many Coloureds that did acquire tertiary education became teachers as teaching offered more stability andremuneration relative to other Coloured occupations at the time (carpenters, mechanics, electricians and
-
7/28/2019 Coloureds and Indians - Michael Cole
4/30
3
nurses) (Du Pr, 1994). Furthermore, the Coloured Labour Preference policy of the Western Cape
ensured preferential access to skilled jobs and training over Africans (Nattrass & Walker, 2005:504).
Indians too occupied a number of semi-skilled professions. The 1990 Manpower Survey found 54% of
technicians to be Indian males and a large number of working Indian women to hold jobs as pharmacist
assistants (Crankshaw, 1996: 645). White men and women held the largest share in skilled professions
which included doctors, lawyers, accountants, head nurses and journalists.
Coloureds and Indians were indeed more advantaged than Africans; however their experiences were still
from being equal with Whites. As a result, the end of Apartheid brought about severe challenges in the
labour market.
Post-Apartheid
South Africas labour market in general has told a dismal story post-Apartheid. With the new South Africa
came increased labour force participation by Africans, Coloureds and Indians. However this has been met
with low labour market absorption and high unemployment as the economy has pursued a skills-based
growth path. South Africas labour market situation has been extensively researched and documentedover the years, looking at both the supply and demand side of the market.
On the supply side, authors have drawn attention to the fact that since 1994 there has been an influx of
largely unskilled workers into the labour force (Banerjee et al, 2008:2). More specifically, there has been
an unprecedented increase in the supply of African women in the labour market (ibid). The end of
Apartheid brought an end to job reservation and segregation which availed more potential working
opportunities for Africans, Coloureds and Indians. This unfortunately took place amidst a demand shift
away from primary employment to tertiary employment (Banerjee et al, 2008:2). Dias & Posel (2006) and
Bhorat (2004) note how economic growth has provided employment disproportionally in favour of more
educated (skilled) individuals, a phenomenon exacerbated by the inherited educational disparities of
Apartheid. What this has meant is that many unskilled workers have struggled to find employment as thedemand for skilled labour has increased.
While the ANC government has been successful in improving access to education for Africans, the
quality of their education remains largely sub-standard (Spaull, 2012:60). Furthermore the high cost of
tertiary education automatically prevents many poorer matriculants from acquiring further education
(Von Fintel, 2007). This is not only the case for Africans, but for Coloureds and Indians too. When the
economy is increasingly biased towards those with higher education, the result is that the youth with
insufficient education and experience are then marginalised (ibid).
South Africa has seen increasing levels of youth unemployment, sitting at over 30% in 2011 while the
regular unemployment rate sat at 24.7% (QLFS, 2011). In an environment of mass unemployment,unskilled individuals may find it rational not to search for employment (Dinkelman & Pirouz, 2002).
Kingdon & Knight (2004) note this as a reason behind high levels of discouragement (particularly
amongst Africans) where the costs of searching for employment far outweigh the benefits. Banerjee
(2008) attributes this high cost to a lack of high density employment centres in South Africa.
Unemployment on the broad definition (including discouraged workers) for Coloured and Indians is fairly
large relative to Whites. Of those who are actively searching for jobs, 50% of Africans and 45% of
Coloureds are actively searching after 6 months, whereas 30% of Indians and Whites remain in this state
(Banerjee et al, 2008: 19). The unemployed in South Africa tend to be unemployed for quite some time.
Different authors cite a number of reasons for such high unemployment rates. One reason relates to theinability of the informal sector to absorb the unemployed while another relates to the high costs that
-
7/28/2019 Coloureds and Indians - Michael Cole
5/30
4
labour legislation, union activity and crime bring to businesses (Banerjee et al, 2008). Although the
informal sector absorbs a significant amount of the South African population, low levels of
entrepreneurship prevent the informal sector from fully absorbing the unemployed (ibid).
On the other hand, businesses in the formal sector face considerably high wage bills relative to
productivity. Bhorat (2005) refers to the prescriptions in the Labour Relations Act as being a hindrance toemployment creation while Fedderke (2012) points out that labour is mispriced in the South African
market. Strong union activity has played a role in increasing formal sector wages (Benerjee, 2008).
Consequently, low labour productivity has made hiring irrational at the prevailing wage rates (Fedderke,
2012:15). Crime acts as a further deterrent for new businesses and imposes additional security and theft
costs for existing businesses. Demanding legislation, low productivity and the difficult business
environment has undoubtedly dampened the demand for labour.
Unemployment in post-Apartheid South Africa is clearly far more structural than it is transitional
(Banerjee et al, 2008). After looking at literature, one has a better sense of the South African labour
market and the context in which Coloureds and Indians operate. The following section sheds deeper
insight into the labour market experiences of Coloureds and Indians relative to Africans between 1995and 2011. This is done as a preliminary overview before applying LOWESS graphical techniques to the
synthetic panel.
3 Summary statistics
The previous section gave a clear overall picture of the labour market during and post-Apartheid. This
section presents three different tables that allow one to assess the experiences of Coloureds and Indians
relative to Africans. The tables present percentages (e.g. unemployment) and relative values3. Africans
were used as the benchmark for the relative values. This allows one to see the degree to which Colouredsand Indians have overcome the structural constraints they faced under Apartheid compared to Africans.
Table 1 presents the various labour market indices of Coloureds and Indians relative to Africans for 1995,
2003 and 2011.
Coloureds and Indians have held roughly the same percentage of the population over the period
investigated, 9.0% and 2.6% respectively. Labour force participation has not adjusted much for Coloureds
and Indians, yet Coloureds and Indians consistently participate more so than Africans. Higher levels of
labour force participation by Africans after 1995 however have caused these relative levels to decline
somewhat. Coloured and Indian levels of unemployment (on both the strict and broad definition) are
consistently below that of Africans between 1995 and 2003. This means that Africans are still the worst
off in the labour market.
Broad unemployment includes discouraged workers who have not actively searched for employment over
the last four weeks (Stats SA, 2011). Furthermore, broad unemployment rates better capture the adequacy
of the economy to provide employment (Von Fintel, 2007). What one should then notice is that the
relative levels of broad unemployment have increased slightly for Coloureds (0.64 in 2011) while they
3Relative levels are given by the various labour market rates for Coloureds and Indians divided by the same rate for Africans
(E.g. ).
A relative value of 1.4 for Coloured labour force participation rates, for example, would indicate that a larger proportion ofColoureds are participating the labour market than Africans. A value less than 1 would indicate the opposite.
-
7/28/2019 Coloureds and Indians - Michael Cole
6/30
5
have decreased for Indians (0.35 in 2011). Indians have much lower levels of broad unemployment than
Africans and Coloureds.
Absorption rates reflect the proportion of working age individuals (aged 15 to 64) that are employed.
These rates have remained relatively steady for Coloureds while they have slightly increased for Indians
between 1995 and 2011. Both Coloureds and Indians are still being absorbed into employment more sothan their African counterparts, although at a decreasing rate in relative terms. Such trends may be
attributed to higher average levels of education for Coloureds and Indians. However this is less likely to
be the case for Coloureds who have similar education levels as Africans.
Table 1: Coloured and Indian Labour Market Indices relative to Africans for 1995, 2003 and 2011
Coloured
Relativeto
African Indian
Relativeto
African
1995
Percentage of Population 9.1% 2.6%
Labour Force Participation 61.1% 1.40 57.7% 1.32
Unemployment - strict 15.8% 0.73 10.5% 0.49
Unemployment - broad 22.5% 0.60 13.6% 0.36
Absorption rate 51.5% 1.50 51.6% 1.50
Average Education (years)2 8.3 1.04 11.2 1.40
2003Percentage of Population 9.0% 2.6%
Labour Force Participation 64.5% 1.22 62.2% 1.18
Unemployment - strict 21.8% 0.62 19.7% 0.56
Unemployment - broad 28.8% 0.59 23.1% 0.47
Absorption rate 50.4% 1.48 50.0% 1.47
Average Education (years) 9.1 1.06 11.4 1.31
2011
Percentage of Population 9.0% 2.6%
Labour Force Participation 65.2% 1.16 57.7% 1.03
Unemployment - strict 21.1% 0.76 8.5% 0.31
Unemployment - broad 26.3% 0.64 14.5% 0.35
Absorption rate 51.5% 1.27 52.8% 1.30
Average Education (years) 10.2 1.02 12.1 1.21
Source: OHS 1995, LFS 2003(1,2) and QLFS 2011:Q4, own calculations
Overall, levels of education have increased for Coloureds, Indians and Africans since 1995. Mean
Coloured education has increased from 8.3 years in 1995 to 10.2 years in 2011 and remains marginallygreater than Africans post-Apartheid. Yet despite these gains, the average Coloured individual in 2011 still
-
7/28/2019 Coloureds and Indians - Michael Cole
7/30
6
does not complete high school. This finding is consistent with Lam et al (2008) and Hofmeyer et al (2011)
who found Coloureds to face high opportunity costs (forgone wages) to remaining in school, resulting in
high dropout rates.
Indians, on the other hand, went from a mean education level of 11.2 in 1995 to 12.1 in 2011. Relative to
Africans, Indians consistently surpass Africans in terms of educational attainment. Table 2 takes thisanalysis further by looking at the highest levels of education obtained for working, unemployed and non-
economically active Coloureds and Indians in 1995 and 2011.
From table 2, one can see that smaller proportions of Coloureds (with primary, incomplete secondary and
secondary education) are working in 2011 than in 1995. Coloureds with more than a primary school
education appear to be better absorbed into the workforce than Africans in 2011. A larger proportion of
Indians across all education levels are working more so now than before.
Looking at unemployed Coloureds with only a primary education, the relative levels have increased from
0.73 in 1995 to 0.96 in 2011 (almost equal to Africans in 2011). Coloured levels of unemployment for
those with incomplete secondary education and secondary education are below those of Africans.Amongst Coloureds with tertiary education there has been a significant decreased in relative
unemployment from 1.84 in 1995 to 0.73 in 2011. This decrease however is more likely a result of lower
labour market activity. The ratio of unemployed Indians to Africans with secondary education decreased
to 0.26 in 2011, while it increased for tertiary education. It appears that the proportion of unemployed
Indians with tertiary education is almost equivalent to that of Africans.
Observing the non-economically active, Africans are still relatively less economically active than
Coloureds in 2011. This is, however, not the case with Indians who reflect lower levels of economic
activity across education levels. This finding can be attributed to two factors: firstly, labour force
participation amongst educated Africans has increased substantially since 1995; and secondly, Indian
women tend remain out of the labour force more so than women of other races. A further point ofinterest is the type of occupations Coloureds and Indians have post-Apartheid. Table 3 presents the
percentages of Coloureds and Indians in 10 different job categories as well as column for all races.
Coloureds have remained largely employed in elementary professions since 1995. Elementary
professions include occupations such as petrol attendants, wine farm workers and taxi assistants.
Coloureds appear to have moved with the SouthAfrican economy towards technical and associate
professionals. Indians went from mostly being employed in craft and related trades in 1995 to
legislators, senior officials and management in 2011. Indians appear to have benefited the most from
higher levels of education, employment equity and the move towards tertiary services in an economy with
severe skills shortages. Africans (not displayed) still remain concentrated in elementary professions, but
there has been a significant move to service, shop and market sales workers.
Coloureds and Indians have had different labour market experiences post-Apartheid. In the sections to
follow, LOWESS graphical techniques are applied to a synthetic panel dataset to construct age profiles by
year and birth cohort. These graphs will reveal Coloureds to be in a worse situation in 2011 than they
were in 1995 and significant improvements for Indians.
-
7/28/2019 Coloureds and Indians - Michael Cole
8/30
7
Table 2: Coloured and Indian working, unemployment and non-economically active rates by highest level of education obtained.
Working
1995 2011
Coloured
Relative
toAfrican Indian
Relative
toAfrican Coloured
Relative
toAfrican Indian
Relative
toAfrican
Primary 83.4% 1.08 90.8% 0.91 75.0% 1.01 100.0% 1.35
Incomplete Secondary 80.8% 1.07 88.6% 0.96 73.2% 1.09 86.9% 1.29
Secondary 84.6% 1.17 88.8% 0.92 81.1% 1.18 91.8% 1.34
Tertiary 92.1% 0.96 99.0% 1.00 95.0% 1.02 93.4% 1.00
Unemployed - strict
Primary 16.6% 0.73 9.2% 0.41 25.0% 0.96 0.0% 0.00
Incomplete Secondary 19.2% 0.79 11.4% 0.47 26.8% 0.82 13.1% 0.40
Secondary 15.4% 0.55 11.2% 0.40 18.9% 0.60 8.2% 0.26
Tertiary 7.9% 1.84 1.0% 0.23 5.0% 0.73 6.6% 0.97
` Not Economically Active
Primary 45.0% 0.78 56.0% 0.96 45.5% 0.81 74.7% 1.33
Incomplete Secondary 41.8% 0.66 51.2% 0.81 40.1% 0.85 62.8% 1.33
Secondary 22.0% 0.48 28.9% 0.63 19.8% 0.83 33.5% 1.41Tertiary 10.5% 0.54 14.9% 0.77 5.7% 1.06 11.6% 2.18
Source: OHS 1995, QLFS 2011: Q4, own calculations
-
7/28/2019 Coloureds and Indians - Michael Cole
9/30
8
Table 3: Coloured and Indian Job Occupations Proportions relative to Africans for 1995 and 2011
Coloured Indian All Races
1995 2011 1995 2011 1995 2011
Legislators, senior officials and management 2.4% 5.4% 13.1% *19.5% 5.6% 5.8%
Professionals 1.4% 3.2% 7.5% 9.0% 3.4% 3.7%
Technical and associate professionals 6.8% ***9.9% 12.1% ***12.6% 10.8% ***8.9%
Clerks 10.5% **10.6% *19.9% **18.7% 11.0% 8.1%
Service workers and shop and market sales 11.4% 9.2% ***13.9% 11.3% 10.9% **10.8%
Skilled agricultural and fishery worker 0.8% 0.4% 1.0% 0.0% 1.9% 0.5%
Craft and related trades workers **14.2% 9.0% **14.7% 7.4% ***11.8% 8.6%
Plant and machine operators and assemblers 11.4% 6.5% 11.2% 7.4% 10.5% 6.0%
Elementary occupation *29.2% *18.5% 5.9% 4.3% *22.1% *17.0%
Domestic workers ***12.7% 4.5% 0.8% 0.0% **11.9% 5.8%
Note: * largest proportion; ** second largest proportion; *** third largest proportion
Source: OHS 1005, LFS 2003 and QLFS 2011, own calculations
-
7/28/2019 Coloureds and Indians - Michael Cole
10/30
9
4 Data and Methodology
Data
This paper attempts to compare the labour market experiences of Coloureds and Indians relative to their
African and White counterparts from 1995 to 2011. Such an analysis required the construction of asynthetic panel, which is essentially a pooled cross-sectional dataset that covers the period 1995-2011.
Panel datasets allow one to capture the dynamic experiences of individuals by tracking them over time
(Wooldridge, 2009). These panels however often suffer from attrition which can make samples
unrepresentative as more and more individuals fall out of the sample (Deaton, 1985; Romano & Duval-
Hernandez, 2009). Synthetic panels dont provide a study of individual transitions, but rather assume that
on average, the behaviour of individuals within a group of individuals is well approximated by the
behaviour of other individuals of the same cohort or age-group (Von Fintel, 2007; Duval-Hernandez &
Romano, 2009). In other words, it is possible to assess the labour market behaviour of a group, by
assuming that their experiences are the same on average.
The Post-Apartheid Labour Market Survey (PALMS) is an already existing synthetic panel constructed byKerr & Lam (2011) that pools data from the OHS surveys from 1994-1999 and LFS surveys from 2000-
2007. The Standard OHS surveys consisted of 30 000 households in 3000 Primary Sampling Units
(PSUs), covering a range of cross-sectional labour market variables (Stats SA, 2005). A number of
improvements were made each year after their introduction, which brings some results from earlier years
into question (Von Fintel, 2007). The 1994 OHS, for example, utilised 1000 PSUs and is not used in this
paper because of its skewed demography (Branson & Wittenberg, 2007). Branson & Wittenberg (2007)
also express concern over anchoring ones analysis on the 1995 OHS; however most comparative analyses
base themselves on 1995 and so does this paper.
The LFS surveys were provided biannually with 20% of each sample rotated out of the sample every
successive survey; this introduced a small panel dimension to the LFS which a few authors have exploited(Von Fintel, 2007:20). Regarding the comparability of OHS and LFS surveys, Wilson, Woolard & Lee
(2004) caution against comparisons of total employment figures given methodological changes. This
paper however does not work with total employment figures but employment as a proportion of the
working age population.
Together, the OHS and LFS surveys made PALMS. The variables in PALMS have been cleaned to
remain consistent over all the years in question, hence PALMS provides a better alternative to
constructing ones own synthetic panel. In order to cover the period 2007-2011, the QLFS surveys were
appended to PALMS.
The QLFS surveys were introduced in 2008 with a revised methodology, questionnaire, frequency of dataand survey process systems (Stats SA, 2012). The variables of interest remained largely the same across
LFS and QLFS; however there is a slight discrepancy with the labour market status variable that needs to
be brought to attention. Yu (2009) finds that there is no longer a clear distinction between strict and
broad labour market status in QLFS, making it difficult to derive long-term trends in labour force
participation and unemployment. Changes to the QLFS questionnaire make the QLFS algorithm for
labour market status more complicated than its predecessor (ibid). Section 5, however, reveals that it is
still possible LOWESS is still able to capture distinct trends over time after pooling all the QLFS surveys
to PALMS. QLFS surveys from Q1 2008 to Q4 2011 were all included in the synthetic panel.
An important issue when constructing the synthetic panel was the issue of sample weights. Stats SA
assigns weights to each individual in its surveys that allow one to adjust estimates to conform to the
population distribution at the time. However, since the OHS, LFS and QLFS surveys are cross-sectional,
-
7/28/2019 Coloureds and Indians - Michael Cole
11/30
10
their purpose is to produce representative data for the particular year in question (Branson & Wittenberg,
2011). These datasets were not designed to be used as a time series (ibid). Branson & Wittenberg (2011)
employed a cross-entropy approach to produce a set of sample weights that create consistent aggregates
over time. These cross-entropy rates however are only available from 1994 to 2007. Given that generating
such weights between 2008 and 2011 is beyond the scope of this paper, the normal sampling weights are
used. As sections 5 and 6 will reveal, using the normal weights still allows one to examine significanttrends over time.
LOWESS graphing techniques are applied to the synthetic panel to generate age profiles for all four races
by year and Coloureds and Indians by cohort. Similar analysis has been done by Wittenberg (2002),
Branson (2006) and Branson & Wittenberg (2007); however their focus has been almost exclusively on
Africans. By extending this analysis to Coloureds and Indians as well as period in question, it will allow
one to better understand the labour market experience of Coloureds and Indians post-Apartheid relative
to Africans and Whites.
Methodology
Locally Weighted Scatterplot Smoothing (LOWESS) is a graphical approach that uses locally weighted
least squares regressions to smooth a scatterplot of data. Regressions are run within a selected bandwidth
of observations that give the greatest weight to observations closest to the focal observation (Cleveland,1979). The approach is summarized below:
A bandwidth of observations is selected which essentially specifies the proportion of allobservations used to smooth each point.4
Weighted least squares regression of on uses Clevelands (1979) Tri-Cube weights and arecarried out for each observation in the data. The Tri-Cube weight is specified below:
() {( ||) || ||
Where () and is the distance between and its furthest neighbour within the band.Observations that are further away from receive declining weights while if , theweighting allocates a value of 1.
Fitted values () are then used in () , where is white noise with a mean of 0,and plotted on a scatterplot to generate a smooth curve (Cleveland, 1979)
The advantage of employing LOWESS is that it does not require that one specify a restrictive functional
form, allowing for a non-parametric model (Wittenberg, 2002). Attempting to capture age, period and
cohort effects of unemployment, employment and labour market activity becomes problematic when
using a parametric model. These types of parametric models face the identification problem (where
cohort= year-age). Such models need to be specified accordingly to avoid perfect multi-collinearity or
employ advanced techniques such as the use of intrinsic estimators (Black et al, 2010; Yang et al, 2007).
A caution when using LOWESS is to be aware of the trade-off between bias and variance. If the
bandwidth specified is too small, this will result in insufficient data falling into the window of
observations, increasing the variance (Cleveland, 1979). If the span is too large, regressions may over-
4Following Wittenberg (2002), Branson (2006) and Wittenberg & Branson (2007) the bandwidth of 0.3 was selectedfor the age profiles by year. A bandwidth of 0.35 was selected for the age profiles by cohort.
-
7/28/2019 Coloureds and Indians - Michael Cole
12/30
11
smooth the data and lead to a large bias (ibid). The balance is then to select the smallest bandwidth that
produces the smoothest fit.
Von Fintel (2007) notes that because sample sizes are small for Coloureds, Whites and Indians, estimates
may be inconsistent and biased. As a rule of thumb, age group sizes and cohort sizes for Coloureds and
Indians should not be lower than 100 observations so as to appeal to the law of large numbers (ibid). ForColoured age-groups and cohorts, observations generally exceed 100; however the same does not apply
for Indians (See Appendix). This is problematic when one wants to compare Indian labour market indices
against Africans.
A sensitivity analysis was conducted to assess the best way of addressing the issue of small Indian samples
(see Appendix A). Possible solutions were to group by age, group by year and group by cohort to increase
the sample sizes. For the age-profiles by year, it was found that neither grouping by age nor year
significantly affected trends, albeit at the end points. Samples of Indians over 45 were incredibly small in
the 1995 OHS (with some samples having only 3 observations). The unemployment profile, in particular,
revealed highly inconsistent trends after age 45. This age profile is therefore restricted to age 45 in 1995.
Wittenberg (2002) applied LOWESS to Indians in two of his figures despite small sample sizes, using onlyindividual cross sectional datasets (OHS 1993, 1994, 1995). One reason for this is that LOWESS is still
able to capture the overall trend of labour market indices, though imperfectly, without producing
controversial results (ibid). Regarding birth cohorts, grouping cohorts together proved to be effective in
generating large sample sizes and meaningful trends.
Section 5 to follow applies the LOWESS approach firstly to construct an age-unemployment profile for
Coloureds and Indians by year. The age profiles for working, unemployed and not economically active
males and females are presented to examine the experiences of Coloured and Indian men and women
against their African and White counterparts post-Apartheid. The situation for Coloureds appears to have
worsened since 1995, but improved for Indians.
5 Age Profiles by Year
By using LOWESS to plot the age profiles of working, unemployed and not economically active South
Africans, it is possible to observe the experiences of different age groups at different periods of time.
Plotting age profiles allows one to examine the lifecycle distribution of a particular labour market status
(e.g. level of unemployment amongst 18 year olds compared to 35 year olds). Looking at age profiles for
1995, 2003 and 2011 will therefore provide a sense of the net flows into a particular labour market status
over the period. This section will look at how labour market status profiles have changed post-Apartheid
and show that Coloured experiences have converged to those of Africans somewhat while Indians haveimproved significantly.
Figure 1 presents the unemployment profile for Coloureds in four year intervals from 1995 to 2011. Note
that this figure shows the unemployed as a percentage of working population, that being individuals
between the ages of 15 and 64 years old. The reason for employing this measure as opposed to the
unemployed as a percentage of the labour force is for two reasons. Firstly, presenting the level of the
unemployed allows one to view the inflow of non-economically active youth into the labour force and see
where the unemployment levels peak. Presenting the unemployment ratewould simply portray a curve
that decreases monotonically, offering little meaningful interpretation. Secondly, Wittenberg (2002),
Branson (2007) and Branson & Wittenberg (2007) apply the same approach making this papers results
directly comparable.
-
7/28/2019 Coloureds and Indians - Michael Cole
13/30
12
0
.05
.1
.15
.2
.25
10 20 30 40 50 60Age
1995 1999
2003 2007
2011
Year
1995-2011
Age-Unemployment (strict) Profile for Coloureds
Figure 1: The age profile of unemployed Coloureds using the strict definition from 1995 to 2011.
Figure 1 offers a horizontal and vertical interpretation. Looking at the graphs horizontally, it is clear that
unemployment follows the expected trend. Unemployment for Coloureds consistently peaks at around 22
and 23 years of age across the time period. From there, unemployment follows a downward trend before
levelling out briefly in the mid to late 30s/early 40s and declining into the 50s and 60s. Looking at thegraphs vertically, one is able to look at how unemployment levels differ for each age group across the
years. However, one sees a peculiar exogenous shift in the curves prior to and after the year 2000.
Banerjee et al (2008) note how dramatic changes in labour force participation between 1999 and 2000 can
be attributed to changes in the sampling methodology between the OHS and LFS surveys. Wilson,
Woolard & Lee (2004) highlight the incomparability of OHS and LFS unemployment levels given that
some people who would have described themselves as economically inactive in the OHS would be
classified as working (economically active) in the LFS. Consequently this makes it difficult to assess the
true unemployment experiences of the youth. However the graphs still give us a sense of the age profile.
Figure 2 depicts the very same age profile of unemployment, but for Indians. Indians reflect a similarpeak level of unemployment for 22/23 year olds to Coloureds. This also closely coincides with the peak
age of unemployment for Africans which sits at around 25 years of age (Branson, 2006).
-
7/28/2019 Coloureds and Indians - Michael Cole
14/30
13
0
.1
.2
.3
10 20 30 40 50 60Age
1995 1999
2003 2007
2011
Year
1995-2011
Age-Unemployment (strict) Profile for Indians
Figure 2: The age profile of unemployed Indians using the strict definition.
From figures 1 and 2, one can see that the lifecycle of unemployment peaks between 20 and 25. Indian
unemployment levels out strongly from the mid-30s. Figures 3 and 4 now separate Coloureds and Indians
by gender to examine their working, unemployment and labour inactivity experiences relative to Africans
and Whites. These figures show that Indians are converging at a fast pace to White levels of
unemployment, while the Coloured experience increasingly resembles that of Africans.
Figure 3 presents the working, unemployed and not economically active age profiles for males in 1995,
2003 and 2008. These graphs paint a negative picture for Coloured males. In 1995, Coloured males
between the ages of 18 and 25 were absorbed fairly quickly into employment relative to Africans. By
2011, their rate of absorption was almost identical to Africans5. This was not as a result of improvements
among Africans. Note that by 2011, absorption rates had declined for all races. Furthermore, 76% of 25
year old Coloured males in 1995 were working, while by 2011, the figure had dropped to 47%.
The 1995 OHS severely downplayed the level of unemployment for Africans, Coloureds and Indians.
Along with an increase in economic activity, the Coloured unemployment profile has converged closer to
that of Africans. This is particularly the case after age 25. Although not displayed, this trend in
unemployment is clearly evident when one looks at the years in between 2003 and 2011. These trends
contrast strongly against Indian males, who appear to be moving closer to lower White levels of
unemployment, although not converging.
5The rate of absorption is given by the slope of the working curve.
-
7/28/2019 Coloureds and Indians - Michael Cole
15/30
14
Figure 3: Working, unemployed and non-economically active males for 1995, 2003 and 2011 across race
Source: OHS 1995, LFS 2003, QLFS 2011, own calculations
As highlighted in section 1, Indians have higher average levels of education than both Africans and
Coloureds, but lower than Whites. This order is reflected in the working profiles of Indians that are
consistently above Africans, distanced away from Coloureds and remained fairly close to Whites. Indian
unemployment peaks at age 26 at 13% in 2011, down from 26% at age 22 in 2003. Such levels should be
treated with caution as Indian sample sizes are still very small and open to bias. What can be said is that
Indian unemployment appears to have declined post-Apartheid and moved closer to that of Whites.
Section 2 saw Indian unemployment to have decreased from 2003 to 2011. Economic activity has
remained relatively constant between 1995 and 2003 for Indian males.
Looking at women, all trends have occurredwithin the context of a rapid feminisation of the labour
force that has taken place in South Africa since the 1995 (Casale & Posel, 2002: 163). Women of all raceshave traditionally occupied the role of homemakers and caregivers, remaining out of the labour force to
0
.1
.2
.3
10 20 30 40 50 60Age
Unemployed Males 2003
0
.1
.2
.3
10 20 30 40 50 60Age
Unemployed Males 2011
0
.2
.4
.6
.8
1
10 20 30 40 50 60Age
Working Males 2011
0
.2
.4
.6
.8
1
10 20 30 40 50 60Age
Working Males 1995
0
.2
.4
.6
.8
1
10 20 30 40 50 60Age
Working Males 2003
0
.1
.2
.3
10 20 30 40 50 60Age
Unemployed Males 1995
0
.2
.4
.6
.8
1
10 20 30 40 50 60Age
Non Economically Active Males 1995
0
.2
.4
.6
.8
1
10 20 30 40 50 60Age
Non Economically Active Males 2003
0
.2
.4
.6
.8
1
10 20 30 40 50 60Age
Non Economically Active Males 2011
African Coloured
Indian White
Race
-
7/28/2019 Coloureds and Indians - Michael Cole
16/30
15
take care of children and attend to domestic duties. In line with a global shift, South African women have
become increasingly more active in the labour market (Casale & Posel, 2002). Higher levels of
participation can be attributed to a number of factors.
Firstly, rising levels of education among women have increased their employment prospects as well as
their opportunity cost of having children (Casale & Posel, 2002:172). Additionally, employment equitypolicy in South Africa favours women over men in employment selection. This presents a further
incentive to pursue employment. Secondly, higher levels of male unemployment have led more women to
look for work (Casale & Posel, 2002: 175). When women are living with unemployed men (or are living
by themselves) there is increased pressure for women to earn an income (ibid). Other factors affecting
female labour force participation include: the age that women are getting married, the age they decide to
have children and the number of children they choose to have. Such factors can lead women to stop
working for a period of time, before re-entering the labour force at a later stage. These trends are
reflected in figure 4.
Figure 4: Working, unemployed and non-economically active females for 1995, 2003 and 2011 across race
0
.2
.4
.6
.8
10 20 30 40 50 60Age
Working Females 1995
0
.2
.4
.6
.8
10 20 30 40 50 60Age
Working Females 2003
0
.2
.4
.6
.8
10 20 30 40 50 60Age
Working Females 2011
0
.1
.2
.3
.4
10 20 30 40 50 60Age
Unemployed Females 1995
0
.1
.2
.3
.4
10 20 30 40 50 60Age
Unemployed Females 2003
0
.1
.2
.3
.4
10 20 30 40 50 60Age
Unemployed Females 2011
.2
.4
.6
.8
1
10 20 30 40 50 60Age
Non Economically Active Females 1995
.2
.4
.6
.8
1
10 20 30 40 50 60Age
Non Economically Active Females 2003
.2
.4
.6
.8
1
10 20 30 40 50 60Age
Non Economically Active Females 2011
African Coloured
Indian White
Race
Source: OHS 1995, LFS 2003, QLFS 2011, own calculations
-
7/28/2019 Coloureds and Indians - Michael Cole
17/30
16
Similarly to figure 3, figure 4 displays the age profiles by year of the different labour market states for
women. Looking at Coloured women, the working profiles have remained fairly similar in relation to
other races, levelling out at around 60% after age 30. Comparing the 1995 and 2003 working curves, one
can see the trend amongst Coloured and White women to remain working for a longer period of time.
This is illustrated by the steep inflow of Coloured and White women into work between about 18 and 29,
before plateauing in the 30s and declining in the 40s. These trends are reflected in the non-economicallyactive curves, which (for Coloured women) have decreased from a minimum of 31% in 1995 to 20% in
2011.
Compared to Africans, Coloured women are working more until about the late 40s. In terms of its
position in relation to Africans, the Coloured unemployment profiles are consistently to the left over the
period, peaking at around age 21. What this means is that Coloured women have continued to transition
into the labour force sooner than African women. This can be linked to higher levels of education
amongst Coloured women who then transition into the labour force after leaving school. By 2011,
Coloured and Indian women appear below the age of 40 have a working profile that is almost identical.
Indian women have tended to transition into work at a similar rate as Coloured women. However lookingat the working curves for each of the three periods, it is clear that Indian women tend to transition out of
the labour force at a younger age than women of any other race. This is evident by the fact that the peak
levels of work and minimum levels of non-economic activity correspond roughly to the same ages, at
around 25, 28 and 40 for 1995, 2003 and 2011 respectively. These findings suggest that, despite higher
labour market participation amongst females, Indian women are more likely to drop out of the labour
force (perhaps to care for young children) than women of other races. One should notice that in 1995 the
working curve peaked at age 25 while in 2011, it peaked at age 40. This implies that Indian women are
working for longer periods before dropping out of the labour force.
By 2011, the unemployment profile for Indian women had moved considerably closer to that of White
women however not quite converging. Posel & Dias (2006) found that Indian women (as well as
Coloured women) with tertiary education to have benefited the most since the end of Apartheid with
much lower probabilities of unemployment. This is most certainly related to employment equity policy
that has favoured Indian females in job selection (CEE, 2011:22).
From looking at the age profiles of men and women by year, one can see that the situation for Coloured
males has become worse while remaining roughly the same for Coloured women post-Apartheid.
Coloured unemployment experiences appear to be progressively similar to Africans. Indians on the other
hand, appear to have benefitted significantly since 1995. Indians have lower unemployment levels and
consistently high employment levels relative to Africans and Coloureds. The next section will plot the
age-profiles by birth cohort, allowing one to assess the extent to which Coloured and Indian experiences
have differed across generations.
6 Age Profiles by Birth Cohort
The following graphs reflect the age profiles (by birth cohort) of Coloured and Indian males and females.
The intuition behind these graphs is that one is able to track the average labour market experiences of a
particular birth cohort over time and compare them to that of younger cohorts. One can plot a single
curve that say tracks the average level of unemployment of individuals born in 1988. These individuals
would be 15 in 2004, 16 in 2005 and so forth. This then allows one to examine the lifecycle distribution
of unemployment for different birth cohorts. To combat the recurring problem of small Indian sample
sizes, cohorts are divided into 5 year groups (See Appendix A). These groups are defined by their ages in
-
7/28/2019 Coloureds and Indians - Michael Cole
18/30
17
2003 (i.e. 16-20, 21-25, 26-30 and 31-35 year olds)6. Figure 5 below presents the age profiles by birth
cohort for Coloured and Indian males.
Figure 5: Working, unemployed and non-economically active Coloured and Indian males by birth cohort.
Source: OHS 1995-1999, LFS 2003-2007, QLFS 2008-2011, own calculations
6
More explicitly, 16-20 year olds were born between 1983 and 1987; 21-25 year olds between 1978 and 1982; 26-30 year oldsbetween 1973 and 1977; and 31-35 year olds between 1968 and 1972.
0
.2
.4
.6
.8
1
10 20 30 40 50Age
Working Indian Males by Birth Cohort
0
.2
.4
.6
.8
1
10 20 30 40 50Age
Working Coloured Males by Birth Cohort
0
.1
.2
.3
10 20 30 40 50Age
Unemployed Coloured Males by Birth Cohort
0
.1
.2
.3
10 20 30 40 50Age
Unemployed Indian Males by Birth Cohort
0
.2
.4
.6
.8
1
10 20 30 40 50Age
Non Economically Active Coloured Males by Birth Cohort
16-20 21-25
26-30 31-35Note: age of cohort group defined by age in 2003
0
.2
.4
.6
.8
1
10 20 30 40 50Age
Non Economically Active Indian Males by Birth Cohort
-
7/28/2019 Coloureds and Indians - Michael Cole
19/30
18
Looking at the working and unemployment curves reveals a deeply discouraging story for Coloured
males. The working curves show that younger Coloured cohorts have experienced lower levels of
employment than their older counterparts. This is evident by the fact that none of the curves cross after
the age of 24, nor do their trends reveal any propensity to do so. The proportion of working 24 year olds
in the 16-20 cohorts peaked at just over 60% while the proportion of working 31-35 cohorts peaked at
around 75%. One should also notice that the orders of the curves, from top to bottom, are perfectlysequential, with the 16-20 cohorts, followed by the 21-25 cohorts and so on.
The unemployment curves illustrate a similar picture, with no interaction in the curves after around 23
years of age. Coloured males are still more likely to find employment as they get older; however younger
cohorts are finding this employment in declining proportions. What this picture implies is that there has
been barely any improvement for Coloured males (as a group) post-Apartheid. In fact younger Coloured
males are worse off in terms of employment than their older counterparts.
The working age population comprises of the unemployed, employed and non-economically active.
Therefore one may anticipate that higher levels of economic participation amongst younger cohorts of
Coloured males are driving the higher unemployment levels. However, the proportion of non-economically active Coloured males appears relatively constant across cohorts. This is in contrast to that
of Africans where labour force participation has steadily increased for younger cohorts (See Appendix C).
This means that the increase in the proportion of unemployed Coloured males is largely offset by the
decrease in the proportion of those who are working.
Looking at Indians males one sees a different picture from that of Coloured males. Careful inspection of
the curves reveals a positive story for the 26-30 cohorts. These cohorts experienced higher levels of
participation and a faster flow into employment compared to their older and younger counterparts. This
is given by the steep gradient of the curve between 18 and 22 and working levels consistently above that
of the 31-35 cohorts. The 21-25 cohorts show a peculiar trend with working levels peaking at age 26
before swiftly declining. This same trend is reflected in the unemployment and non-economically active
curve. Possible explanations for this may be an improved QLFS survey design or LOWESS capturing an
inaccurate trend at the end points.
Figure 6 below looks at the same labour market experiences for Coloured and Indian women. The
working curves for Coloured women have remained relatively constant across cohorts. The flows into
unemployment after 18 are particularly steep for all cohort groups and unemployment appears to have
become progressively worse for younger cohorts. The 21-25 cohort peaks at an unemployment level of
27% (7% more than that of the 26-30 cohorts). The 31-35 cohorts appear to be abnormally high in the
early 20s. Younger cohorts of Coloured women are also more economically active than older cohorts.
Indian women reveal an interesting trend. Looking at the working curves one can see a similar profileacross all birth cohorts where after reaching its peak, the proportion of women working experiences a dip
for a few years before increasing again. The level of unemployment and non-participation compensate the
dip in employment. This may confirm the finding in section 4 where Indian women display a higher
propensity to stop working and take care of young children than do women of other races. More
specifically, looking at the 31-35 cohorts, one sees the level of working Indian women to peak locally at
33, before dipping for 3 years and increasing again. This is reflected in the non-economically active curve.
It appears to be very common for Indian women to stop working for a period of 3 to 4 years before
working again. Given that the drop out period is consistently 3 to 4 years, one would expect this to be
related to Indian women dropping out of the labour force to take care of young children.
-
7/28/2019 Coloureds and Indians - Michael Cole
20/30
19
Figure 6: Working, unemployed and non-economically active Coloured and Indian Females by birth cohort.
Source: OHS 1995-1999, LFS 2003-2007, QLFS 2008-2011, own calculations
Younger cohorts of Indian women appear to be leaving their working professions at a younger age than
older cohorts. This must be interpreted with caution given that at the end points LOWESS only has
observations to the left that fall within the bandwidth. What one should notice is that employment for the
16-20 cohorts at age 25 is above that of all the older cohorts. Additionally, between age 20 and 25 the rate
of absorption into employment for the 16-20 cohorts exceed that of its older counterparts. Looking
carefully at the horizontal differences between the curves at 20%, one can see that younger cohorts of
Indian women are working at age 20 while older cohorts are working at 19 and 18 respectively. This canbe attributed to higher levels of education for younger cohorts of Indian women.
0
.2
.4
.6
.8
10 20 30 40 50Age
Working Indian Females by Birth Cohort
0
.2
.4
.6
.8
10 20 30 40 50Age
Working Coloured Females by Birth Cohort
0
.1
.2
.3
10 20 30 40 50Age
Unemployed Coloured Females by Birth Cohort
0
.1
.2
.3
10 20 30 40 50Age
Unemployed Indian Females by Birth Cohort
.2
.4
.6
.8
1
10 20 30 40 50Age
Non Economically Active Coloured Females by Birth Cohort
.2
.4
.6
.8
1
10 20 30 40 50Age
Non Economically Active Indian Females by Birth Cohort
16-20 21-25
26-30 31-35Note: age of cohort group defined by age in 2003
-
7/28/2019 Coloureds and Indians - Michael Cole
21/30
20
6 Discussion
After examining the various age profiles, it is clear that Coloured and Indian experiences are still centred
between the two extremes of White privilege and African disadvantage. Coloured labour market
experiences have (in some respects) closely come to resemble Africans while Indian experiences have
moved towards that of Whites. The case for Coloureds is an area of serious concern that should notdisregarded by policymakers.
Although second to Africans, Coloured unemployment is particularly high, reaching 23% in 2011 (QLFS,
2011). For both Coloured males and females, age profiles of unemployment have come to closely
resemble that of Africans. Both Coloureds and Africans face severe youth unemployment as direct
consequence of low levels of education relative to Indians and Whites; increased labour force
participation; a labour market that favours skilled workers and an informal sector that is unable to absorb
the unemployed. Working age profiles by year and cohort have remained fairly steady for Coloured
women. However, increased labour force participation by Coloured women appears to have translated
into higher levels of unemployment.
On the other hand, labour force participation for Coloured males has remained relatively constant since
1995, indicating that increased unemployment is largely offset by decreases in the proportion of those
who are working. There are a number of possible reasons for this. One reason may be that in 1995,
21.1% of Coloured males in the Western Cape were employed in the agricultural sector.7 By 2011, this
proportion had dropped to 2.72%. The Western Cape agricultural industry includes farming in viticulture
and various fruit (Van Burg et al, 2005). According to Van Burg et al (2005:4), the impact of open
markets and a more flexible labour market has led to an increase in mechanisation and an increase in
casualization of labour. Casualization of labour refers mainly to the use of labour brokers where workers
are contracted on a temporary basis to avoid compliance with labour market legislation (ibid).
Furthermore, many small farms in the Western Cape have been consolidated into fewer larger farms
(Aliber et al, 2007:135). As a result, the Western Cape agricultural sector has shed thousands of jobs since
1995, many of which have been Coloured males (ibid).
Another reason may be related to high levels of gang activity amongst Coloured males in the Western
Cape. Predominantly Coloured areas such as Mitchells Plain in Cape Town are notorious for burglary and
drug dealing associated mostly with Coloured gangs (Legget, 2012:67). Such activities may present a
viable alternative for Coloured males living in a climate of high unemployment. More research, however,
is needed to verify to what extent this is an issue.
Looking at Indians, one sees a more positive story. Indian unemployment is consistently lower than that
of Africans and Coloureds, yet more so than Whites. Indian mean levels of education are only marginally
lower than that of Whites at 12.1 and 12.9 years respectively. Moreover, South African firms particularlydesperate for skilled candidates from designated groups (Africans, Coloureds, Indians, Women and the
disabled) (CEE, 2011). Consequently, the Commission for Employment Equity in 2011 found employers
more likely to hire Indians than Africans and Coloureds (ibid). Such opportunities have prompted many
Indian women to reject their traditional role as homemakers, seek employment and remain working for
longer.
The age profiles by year revealed Indian women to have a greater propensity to dropping out of the
labour force than women of other races. Such trends reflect the cultural role typically played by Indian
women as homemakers and caregivers. The persistence of these trends may be partially explained by the
7This figure comes from the authors own calculation using the synthetic panel
-
7/28/2019 Coloureds and Indians - Michael Cole
22/30
21
Indian family setting. Many Indian families still live in joint (3 generation) households, pooling resources
and income from working family members (Singh, 2005:32). Such a situation may reduce the opportunity
costs for women to drop out of the labour force and take care of children. Although Indian women still
have a greater propensity to drop out of the labour force (often for 3 or 4 years before re-entering),
section 5 found that more Indian women are working for longer.
7 Conclusion
From this paper, one can see that Apartheid policies enforced a structural hierarchy on the South African
labour market that still persists today. Whites remain in the most favourable position, followed by Indians
and then Coloureds. Africans are unambiguously the worst off in the labour market, with lower relative
levels of education, poor labour market absorption and high unemployment. Applying LOWESS
graphing techniques to the synthetic panel has proved to provide meaningful analysis. Since 1995
Coloured and Indian labour market experiences appear to have moved closer towards that of Africans
and Whites respectively.
Coloureds have obtained more education on average, although only marginally more than Africans by
2011. Higher education levels amongst Coloured women have seen higher levels of labour force
participation by younger cohorts. This has unfortunately not translated into greater labour market
absorption, but rather high youth unemployment. Consequently, the age profile of Coloured women has
come to closer resemble that of Africans. Like Coloured women, the age profile of Coloured males has
converged closely to that of Africans since 1995. Younger cohorts of Coloured males are working
significantly less than their older counterparts, indicating that the labour market has not favoured young
Coloured males. These trends are very clear and may be at least partially explained by massive job
shedding in the Western Cape agricultural industry since 1995. Other possible explanations include: lower
levels of education (relative to Indians and Whites); an increasingly skills biased labour market; aninformal sector that does not absorb the unemployed; and the monetary incentives of illegal gang activity
within Coloured areas in the Western Cape.
For both Indian males and females, higher levels of education have translated into greater employment.
Employment equity has clearly favoured Indians who now hold a large number of jobs as legislators,
senior officials and management. Indian unemployment profiles have moved progressively closer to lower
White levels of unemployment. However, Indians are not quite on equal terms with Whites in terms of
employment. Across all education levels, Indian women display a stronger tendency to drop out of the
labour force to take care of children than do women of other races. This finding is consistent across birth
cohorts and may be explained by the tendency among Indians to live in joint households and pool
together resources. Such a setting may reduce the opportunity cost of dropping out of the labour force totake care of children.
Coloureds and Indians have clearly had different labour market experiences post-Apartheid. While
employment equity has been successful in providing opportunities for Indians, Coloureds have not been
so fortunate. Coloured unemployment, amongst the youth in particular, is an area of serious concern and
highlights the broader issue of youth unemployment in South Africa. Policymakers should ensure that
Coloureds are not marginalised in any efforts to curb youth unemployment. If the appropriate policies
are put in place, then perhaps one will see decreases in unemployment for not only Africans, but
Coloureds as well.
-
7/28/2019 Coloureds and Indians - Michael Cole
23/30
22
References
Aliber, M., Baiphethi, M. & Jacobs, P. 2007. Agricultural Employment Scenarios. Centre for poverty,employment and growth. Human Sciences Research Council (HSRC). :112-144.
Banerjee, A. and others. 2008. Why Has Unemployment Increased in the New South Africa.Economics ofTransition. 16(4):715-740.
Bhorat, H. 2004. Labour Market Challenges in the Post-Apartheid South Africa. South African Journal ofEconomics. 72(5):940-977.
Bhorat, H. & Kanbur, R. 2006. Poverty and Well-being in Post-ApartheidSouth Africa:An Overview of Data, Outcomes and Policy. HSRC press. :1-18.
Black, D., Tseng, Y. & Wilkins, R. 2010. The Decline in Male Employment in Australia: a CohortAnalysis.Australian Economic papers , Blackwell publishing Ltd/University of Adelaide and Flinders University.
Branson, N. 2006. SALDRU Working paper 06/07. The South African Labour Market 1995 -2004: ACohort Analysis. 18-20 October 2006.
Branson, N. & Wittenberg, M. 2007. The Measurement of Employment Status in South Africa UsingCohort Analysis, 1994-2004. South African Journal of Economics. 75(2):313-326.
Branson, N. & Wittenberg, M. 2011. Re-weighting South African National Household Survey Data tocreate a consistent series over time: A cross entropy estimationapproach.A Southern Africa Labour and Development Research unit working paper number 54. Cape Town:SALDRU, University of Cape Town.
Bunting, I. 2006. The Higher Education Landscape under Apartheid. In Transformation in Higher Education:Global Pressures and Local Realities. N. Cloete, and others, Eds. 10th ed. Dordrecht: Springer. 35-52.
Casale, D. & Posel, D. 2002.The Continued Feminisation of the Labour Force in South Africa: AnAnalysis of recent data and trends.The South African Journal of Economics. 70(1): 156-184.
CEE. 2011. 11th Commission for Employment Equity Annual Report, 2010-2011. Pretoria: Department ofLabour Republic of South Africa.
Cleveland, S. 1979. Robust Locally Weighted Regression and Smoothing Scatterplots.Journal of theAmerican Statistical Association. 74(368):829-836.
Crankshaw, O. 1996. Changes in the Racial Division of Labour During the Apartheid Era.Journal ofSouthern African Studies. 22(4):633-656.
Deaton, A. 1985. Panel Data from Time Series of Cross-Sections.Journal of Econometrics. 30(1):109-126.
Dias, R. & Posel, D. 2006. Unemployment, Education and Skills Constraints in Post-Apartheid SouthAfrica. DPRU/TIPS Conferance on Accelerated and Shared Growth in South Africa: Determinants, constraintsand opportunities. Birchwood hotel. Johannesburg.
Dinkelman, T. & Pirouz, F. 2002. Individual, Household and Regional Determinants of Labour ForceAttachment in South Africa: Evidence from the 1997 October Household Survey. South African
Journal of Economics. 70(5):865-891.
-
7/28/2019 Coloureds and Indians - Michael Cole
24/30
23
Du Pre, R. 1994. The 'Coloured' People of South Africa - A Political History.Johannesburg: Jonathan BallPublishers (Pty) Ltd.
Duval-Hernndez, R. & Orraca Romano, P. 2009. A Cohort Analysis of Labor Participation inMexico, 1987-2009. [Online]. Available: http://www.politiquessociales.net/IMG/pdf/dp4371.pdf.
Fedderke, J. 2012. The Cost of Rigidity: The Case of the South African Labour Market.Economic ResearchSouthern Africa.Working Paper 290:1-26.
Jithoo, S. 1991. Indians in South Africa: Tradition vs Westernization.Journal of Comparative Family Studies.22(3):343-357.
Kerr, A. & Lam, D. 2011. Post-Apartheid Labour Market Series 1994-2007. [dataset]. Version 1.0.7. ofthe harmonised dataset based on Statistics SA's OHS and LFS surveys. Cape Town: DataFirst [dataproducer and distributor], 2011.
Kingdon, G. & Knight, J. 2004. Unemployment in South Africa: The Nature of the Beast. World
Development. 32(3):391-408.
Kingdon, G. & Knight, J. 2005. Unemployment in South Africa, 1995-2003: Causes, Problems andPolicies. Global Poverty Research Group.
Leggett, T. 2012. Still Marginal: Crime in the Coloured Community. In Being Coloured. M. Peach, Ed. CapeTown: WB Peach Media and Communication. 59-67.
Natrass, N. & Walker, R. 2005. Unemployment and Reservation Wages in Working Class Cape Town.South African Journal of Economics. 73(3):498-509.
Singh, A. 2005. Indians in Post-Apartheid South Africa. New Delhi: Concept Publishing.
Smith, K. 2005. The Status of Cape Town: Development Overview. Cape Town: Isandla Institute.
Spaull, N. 2012. Equity & Efficiency in South African Primary Schools - A Preliminary Analysis ofSACMEQ III South Africa. Department of Economics. University of Stellenbosch.
Stats SA, 2011.Mid-year Population Estimates. Pretoria: Statistics South Africa.
Stats SA, 2012.Quarterly Labour Force Survey - Quarter 1, 2012. Pretoria: Statistics South Africa.
Van Burg, A., Lindoor, E. & Messina, S. 2009. Going for Broke: A Case Study of Labour Brokerage on Fruit
Farms in Grabouw. Stellenbosch: Centre for Rural Legal Studies.
Von Fintel, D. 2007. Rising Unemployment in South Africa: An Intertemporal Analysis using a BirthCohort Panel. Masters of Commerce. University of Stellenbosch.
Wilson, R., Woolard, I. & Lee, D. 2004. Developing a National Skills Forecasting Tool for South Africa.Warwick Institute for Employment Research & Human Sciences Research Council. :24.
Wittenberg, M. 2002. Job Search in South Africa: a Non-Parametric Analysis. South African Journal ofEconomics. 70(8):1163-1197.
Wooldridge, J. 2009. Introductory Econometrics a Modern Approach. Canada: South-Western Cenage.506-609.
-
7/28/2019 Coloureds and Indians - Michael Cole
25/30
24
Yang, Y., Schulhofer-Wohl, S. & Land, C. 2007. A Simulation Study of the Intrinsic Estimatorfor Age-Period-Cohort Analysis. Department of sociology, university of chicago.
Yu, D. 2009. The Comparability of Labour Force Survey (LFS) and Quarterly Labour Force Survey(QLFS). Stellenbosch working paper series no. WP08/2009.
Appendices
A. Investigating the sample sizes & Sensitivity Analysis
Table A1 below gives a picture of the sample sizes of African, Coloured, Indian and White of a particular
age, year and gender. For example there will be a sample of 18 year old African females for each year
between 1995 and 2011. There will be similar samples for each race, gender and age for every year in
question.
Table A1: Summary statistics of age sample sizes by race, gender and year
Males
Populationgroup
Meansample
sizeStandarddeviation Minimum Maximum
Numberof agegroups
-
7/28/2019 Coloureds and Indians - Michael Cole
26/30
25
There are a number of possible ways to mitigate the problem of small sample sizes in the Indian
population. By exploring these different methods, one can assess the sensitivity of such specifications and
decide on a preferred approach.
One can work with 5 year age groups so as to increase the number of sample observations in excess of
100. Doing so, however, produces a singular plot at each five year interval as opposed to a plot at eachage. As a result, employing LOWESS produces jagged edged curves with a profile that differs
significantly from those obtained using ungrouped ages. Working with 2 year age intervals improves the
curves substantially; however it differs very little from using singular ages.
Another option is to look at more than one year at a time, effectively working out a 2 or 3 year average
unemployment rate. Such an approach secures larger sample sizes, resulting in means that are more
precise; however one loses out on assessing the transition from one year to another by calculating an
average rate over 2 or 3 years.
The strict unemployment age profiles for 1995 are displayed below using the approaches described. The
1995 year was selected as it is the most problematic with Indian sub-samples that are particularly small.LOWESS was surprisingly able to produce consistent trends for the working and not economically active
curves in 1995.
Figure A1: Graphical sensitivity analysis using age categories and year groups
Using 5 year age intervals Using 2 year age intervals
Using 3 years of data Using 2 years of data
From these figures, it is clear that using age intervals does little to improve the appearance of the graphs.
In fact, using 5 year age intervals makes the graphs look even more irregular. A wider LOWESS
bandwidth could be used to make the graphs appear more regular, however doing so does not take away
from the biasness reflected at the endpoints. Using 2 and 3 years of data improves the distribution at the
end points, but it is more the unemployment of younger individuals which is of more interest. The peak
0
.05
.1
.1
5
.2
10 20 30 40 50 60Age
Unemployed (strict) Males 1995
0
.05
.1
.15
10 20 30 40 50 60Age
Unemployed (strict) Males 1995
0
.05
.1
.15
10 20 30 40 50 60Age
Unemployed (strict) Males 1995-1997
0
.05
.1
.15
10 20 30 40 50 60Age
Unemployed (strict) Males 1995 & 1996
-
7/28/2019 Coloureds and Indians - Michael Cole
27/30
26
of unemployment level in fact remains similar to the one year case at around 10%. For these reasons, the
author has decided not to group by age nor by year. The unemployment profile for 1995 however will be
restricted to age 45 to correct for its irregular trend.
Similarly to Table A1, Table A2 presents the same summary statistics only by cohort instead of year.
Cohort sizes appear to be inherently larger. Cohorts were divided into 5 year groups covering the period1968 to 1988. Cohort groups were defined by their ages in 2003.
The Indian male and female age sub-samples only have 8 and 9 groups with less than 100 observations
respectively. Constructing the age-profiles by cohort group was therefore not particularly problematic.
Table A2: Summary statistics of birth cohort sample sizes by race, gender and age
Males
Populationgroup
Meansample
sizeStandarddeviation Minimum Maximum
Numberof agegroups
-
7/28/2019 Coloureds and Indians - Michael Cole
28/30
27
0
.2
.4
.6
.8
10 20 30 40 50 60Age
1995 1999
2003 2007
2011
Year
1995-2011Age-Working Profile for Coloureds
0
.2
.4
.6
.8
10 20 30 40 50 60Age
1995 1999
2003 2007
2011
Year
1995-2011
Age-Working Profile for Indians
B. Additional Age Profiles for Coloureds and Indians
-
7/28/2019 Coloureds and Indians - Michael Cole
29/30
28
.2
.4
.6
.8
1
10 20 30 40 50 60Age
1995 1999
2003 2007
2011
Year
1995-2011
Age Non-Economically Active Profile for Coloureds
.2
.4
.6
.8
1
10 20 30 40 50 60Age
1995 1999
2003 2007
2011
Year
1995-2011
Age Non-Economically Active Profile for Indians
-
7/28/2019 Coloureds and Indians - Michael Cole
30/30
C. Age Profiles by Birth Cohort for African and White males and females
0
.2
.4
.6
.8
1
10 20 30 40 50Age
Working African Males by Birth Cohort
0
.2
.4
.6
.8
10 20 30 40 50Age
Working African Females by Birth Cohort
0
.1
.2
.3
10 20 30 40 50Age
Unemployed (strict) African Males by Birth Cohort
0
.1
.2
.3
10 20 30 40 50
Age
Unemployed (strict) African Females by Birth Cohort
0
.2
.4
.6
.8
1
10 20 30 40 50Age
Working White Males by Birth Cohort
0
.2
.4
.6
.8
10 20 30 40 50Age
Working White Females by Birth Cohort
0
.1
.2
.3
10 20 30 40 50Age
Unemployed (strict) White Males by Birth Cohort
0
.1
.2
.3
10 20 30 40 50
Age
Unemployed (strict) White Females by Birth Cohort
top related