cognitive grammar ronald w. langacker keynote

Cognitive Grammar

1

Freitag, 6. Januar 12

[[[PIN]/[pin]]–[[PL]/[z]]]

(Langacker 1987, p. 82)

2

Freitag, 6. Januar 12

Ronald Langacker

3

Freitag, 6. Januar 12

Evolution of cognitive theory

4

Freitag, 6. Januar 12

‘No comprehensive and unified theoretical framework’

in linguistics.(Langacker 1987, p. V)

5

Freitag, 6. Januar 12

1976 essays and chapters about

‘Space Grammar.’

6

Freitag, 6. Januar 12

Foundations of Cognitive Grammar

1987: Volume ITheoretical Prerequisities

1991: Volume IIDescriptive Application

7

Freitag, 6. Januar 12

Volume I

8

Freitag, 6. Januar 12

Archetype of grammar

Explains every language phenomenon and is accurate.

Unfortunately cannot be formulated.

(Langacker 1987, p. 56)

9

Freitag, 6. Januar 12

‘It is useful for theoretical purposes to consider

what a grammar of this sort would look like.’

But:

(Langacker 1987, p. 56-57)10

Freitag, 6. Januar 12

Hence, Cognitive Grammar.

11

Freitag, 6. Januar 12

Grammar=

Convention=

Sharing

12

Freitag, 6. Januar 12

Three claims:

13

Freitag, 6. Januar 12

1. ‘Semantic structure is not universal.’(Langacker 1987, p. 2)

14

Freitag, 6. Januar 12

2. ‘Grammar is symbolic in nature.’

(Langacker 1987, p. 2)

15

Freitag, 6. Januar 12

3. ‘There is no meaningful distinction between

grammar and lexicon.’(Langacker 1987, p. 3)

16

Freitag, 6. Januar 12

Meaning=

Conceptualization=

Cognitive processing(Langacker 1987, p. 5)

17

Freitag, 6. Januar 12

Cognitive Grammar(Langacker 1987, p. 5)

Artificial intelligenceCognitive psychology18

Freitag, 6. Januar 12

[ ] = Unit status

( ) = Nonunit status

MAJUSCULE = semantic

minuscule = phonological

19

Freitag, 6. Januar 12

What is a linguistic unit?

20

Freitag, 6. Januar 12

A linguistic unit is used and understood.

21

Freitag, 6. Januar 12

[COFFEE] =Semantic unit

22

Freitag, 6. Januar 12

kɒfɪ[coffee] =Phonological unit

23

Freitag, 6. Januar 12

kɒfɪ+

= Symbolic unit

Phonological unitSemantic unit

24

Freitag, 6. Januar 12

Convention and usage:

25

Freitag, 6. Januar 12

‘Putting together novel expressions is something that speakers do, not

grammars.’(Langacker 1987, p. 65)

26

Freitag, 6. Januar 12

Coding.

Target structure.

Usage event.

27

Freitag, 6. Januar 12

Conventional units sanction

the degree of conventionality of the

target structure.(Langacker 1987, p. 66)

28

Freitag, 6. Januar 12

Full sanction.

29

Freitag, 6. Januar 12

‘This is a triangle.’(Langacker 1987, p. 67)

30

Freitag, 6. Januar 12

(Langacker 1987, p. 67)31

Freitag, 6. Januar 12

([[TRIANGLE]/[triangle]]→((TRIANGLE’)/(triangle’)))

Sanctioning structure Target structure

Categorizing judgment with full sanction.

32

Freitag, 6. Januar 12

Partial sanction.

33

Freitag, 6. Januar 12

‘Look at this pencil.’(Langacker 1987, p. 69)

34

Freitag, 6. Januar 12

(Langacker 1987, p. 70)35

Freitag, 6. Januar 12

([[PENCIL]/[pencil]]⇢((PENCIL’)/(pencil’)))

Sanctioning structure Target structure

Categorizing judgment with partial sanction.

36

Freitag, 6. Januar 12

Semantic space and phonological space as separate areas?

That is too easy.

37

Freitag, 6. Januar 12

38

(Langacker 1987, p. 80)

Freitag, 6. Januar 12

Example noun: pins

composite phonological unit [pin–z] composite semantic unit [PIN–PL]

39

Grammatical constructions:

(Langacker 1987, p. 83)

Freitag, 6. Januar 12

Example noun: pins

symbolic units

[[PIN]/[pin]] and [[PL]/[z]]

(Langacker 1987, p. 82)

40

Freitag, 6. Januar 12

[[[PIN]/[pin]]–[[PL]/[z]]]

(Langacker 1987, p. 82)

41

Freitag, 6. Januar 12

42

[[[THING]/[...]]–[[PL]/[z]]]

→[[[PIN]/[pin]]–[[PL]/[z]]]

(Langacker 1987, p. 92)

Freitag, 6. Januar 12

Idioms:

43

Freitag, 6. Januar 12

Idioms have a literal sense and a figurative

sense.

44

Freitag, 6. Januar 12

45

(Langacker 1987, p. 93)

Freitag, 6. Januar 12

Volume II

46

Freitag, 6. Januar 12

‘Vol. 2 now applies [the basic theoretical framework], often in painful detail, to a substantial range of representative grammatical constructions.‘ (Langacker 1991, p. 9)

47

Freitag, 6. Januar 12

Generalized-phrase Structure Grammar

Montague Grammar

Lexical-functional Grammar

X-bar Syntax

Functional Grammar

Similar grammar approaches

48

Freitag, 6. Januar 12

Sociolinguistics:

Grammar must describe the speech situation and the sociolinguistic value of

conventional units.(Langacker 1987, p. 63)

Similar grammar approaches

49

Freitag, 6. Januar 12

Construction Grammar:

‘Claims that all syntax is built from constructions clipped together.’

‘Langacker‘s version[s] of Construction Grammar claim[s] that all syntactic

structures are form-meaning pairings.’(Jackendoff 2002, p. 179)

Similar grammar approaches

50

Freitag, 6. Januar 12

Chomsky:

‘Direct opposition.’‘The central object of interest [...]

was syntax.’‘Governed by principles independent

of meaning.’(Kemmer 2010)

Different grammar approaches

51

Freitag, 6. Januar 12

Ex. 1:Explain the term unit status and give an example for a nonunit expression.

Ex. 2: Write down the formula for a

full sanction, including sanctioning and target structure, of (BOOK’).

52

Freitag, 6. Januar 12

Solution Ex. 1:

An expression has got unit status if it is used habitually and is easily understood by other speakers of the same language. p. 57

A nonunit expression is e.g. (kɒfɪ–ɪʃ). I guess it means something is similar to

coffee.

53

Freitag, 6. Januar 12

Solution Ex. 2:

([[BOOK]/[book]]→((BOOK’)/(book’)))

54

Freitag, 6. Januar 12

- Jackendoff, Ray: Foundations of Language. Brain, Meaning, Grammar, Evolution, New York 2002.

- Kemmer, Suzanne: About Cognitive Linguistics. Historical Background, (http://www.cogling.org/cl.shtml, last acessed on the 4th of january).

- Langacker, Ronald W.: Curriculum Vitae, (http://idiom.ucsd.edu/~rwl/rwl_cv.pdf, last acessed on the 4th of january).

- Langacker, Ronald W.: Foundations of Cognitive Grammar. Volume 1, Theoretical Prerequisites, Stanford 1987.

- Langacker, Ronald W.: Foundations of Cognitive Grammar. Volume 2, Descriptive Application, Stanford 1991.

Bibliography:

55

Freitag, 6. Januar 12

• p. 1 http://www.simpsonstrivia.com.ar/simpsons-photos/wallpapers/homer-simpson-wallpaper-brain-1024.jpg

• p. 1 http://tristanverboven.wordpress.com/2010/05/04/grammar-i-ain’t-got-time-for-grammar/

• p. 3 http://foreign.swu.edu.cn/lcs/• p. 4- p. 7 http://www.kryptozoologie.net/wp-content/files/2010/03/HomerSapien.jpg • p. 7 private photo• p. 9 http://www.dianakohne.de/Arbeiten/Illustration/Illustration1/8Kita_Arche_Noah.jpg• p. 12 http://www.home-designing.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/06/fb-twitter.jpg• p. 18 http://minus.com/mkQFa5dtz#1o• p. 18 http://dicenwrite.wordpress.com/2010/09/27/auf-ein-wort-psiabwehr/• p. 22 and 24 http://openclipart.org/detail/155473/cup-of-coffee-by-gr8dan• p. 28 http://openclipart.org/image/800px/svg_to_png/11125/

raffaella_biscuso_Judge_hammer.png • p. 30 and p. 34 http://openclipart.org/image/800px/svg_to_png/1006/

johnny_automatic_pointing_hand.png• p. 34 http://openclipart.org/detail/164437/marker-by-waider

Last accessed on the 4th of january.

Picture sources:

56

Freitag, 6. Januar 12