central community high school
Post on 08-Jan-2016
16 Views
Preview:
DESCRIPTION
TRANSCRIPT
-
Central Community High School 2004-2005 SIP Presentation
-
Welcome Kevin Meyer - Superintendent
-
IntroductionsSchool Improvement TeamMr. Kent Jones PrincipalMr. Pat Ashby Guidance, Careers, MediaMs. Andrea Bequette Special PopulationsMr. Kevin Crask Social StudiesMr. Dirk Garrett Physical Ed, Health, Drivers EdMr. Greg Kruse MathematicsMrs. Ami Shanafelt Language ArtsMr. Jeremy Shubert ScienceMrs. Lisa Wiegmann VocationalMr. Mike Wilimzig Foreign Language
-
Purpose of School Improvement TeamImprove instruction to enhance student skills by:Implementing a process to effectuate changeDeveloping a formative process of growth and improvementDeciding upon instructional and curricular strategiesServing as an advisory panel to the Administration and Board of EducationGenerating ownership and involving all staff members as stakeholdersViewing the improvement of student achievement as the main purpose
-
Components of SIPTeam Composition and ProcessSchool and Community ProfileAnalysis of DataTarget Area Goals and StrategiesProfessional DevelopmentRemediation Plans
-
Component I Team Composition and Process
-
Team Composition and ProcessSubject Area RepresentativesRegular Meetings and DiscussionInternal ReviewAnnual Development of SIP
-
2003-2004 ActivitiesSIP FoundationSIP StructureSubject Area IdentitiesEfforts at CollaborationCurriculum Study CycleAnalysis and Measurement FormsNeeds Assessment SurveyTarget Area GoalsProgram Recommendations04-05 SIP Sessions
-
Component II School and Community Profile
-
Community8 communities feed into Central Community High School District #71Clinton County is the 13th fastest growing county in the State, as seen by the enormous amount of construction taking place throughout the district.
-
School/DistrictProjection of continuous growth is predicted 1998 Enrollment: 5432004 Enrollment: 615Faculty: 35 Teachers23 Teachers have obtained their masters degree
-
Curriculum Levels OfferedHonors/College PrepGeneralTech PrepRemedial
-
Component III Analysis of Data
-
Data AnalysisSurveysCollege ArticulationHigh School ClassesIowa Test of Basic Skills ITBSPrairie State Achievement Exam PSAE
-
Sheet1
Total Students-131IEPs-14Non-IEP-117Females-57Males-74Low Income-11Not Low Income-120
#%##%#%#%#%#%
ReadingExceeds53.8054.335.322.70054.2
Meets5138.905143.63052.62128.4327.34840
Below4836.614740.22238.62635.1763.64134.2
Academic Warning2720.6131412.023.52533.819.12621.7
MathematicsExceeds21.5021.711.811.40021.7
Meets6549.606555.63663.22939.2654.55949.2
Below5138.954639.31933.33243.2436.44739.2
Academic Warning139.9943.411.81216.219.11210
WritingExceeds43.1043.435.311.40043.4
Meets5038.505042.73459.61621.9436.44638.7
Below6146.955647.92035.14156.2654.55546.2
Academic Warning1511.5876.0001520.519.11411.8
ScienceExceeds75.3076.04734.10075.8
Meets4635.114538.52442.12229.7436.44235
Below6348.145950.42747.43648.6654.55747.5
Academic Warning1511.5965.123.51317.619.11411.7
Social ScienceExceeds96.9097.735.368.10097.5
Meets4836.624639.32340.42533.8654.54235
Below5642.735345.33152.62635.1436.45243.3
Academic Warning1813.7997.711.8172319.11714.2
131 Total StudentsIEPs-14Non-IEP-117Females-57Males-74Low Income-11Not Low Income-120
#%##%#%#%#%#%
ReadingMeets & Exceeds5642.705647.93357.92331.1327.35344.2
Warning & Below7557.2146152.22442.15168.9872.76755.9
MathematicsMeets & Exceeds6751.106757.337653040.6654.56150.9
Warning & Below6448.8145042.72035.14459.4545.55949.2
WritingMeets & Exceeds5441.605446.13764.91723.3436.45042.1
Warning & Below7658.4136353.92035.15676.7763.66958
ScienceMeets & Exceeds5340.415244.52849.12533.8436.44940.8
Warning & Below7859.6136555.52950.94966.2763.67159.2
Social ScienceMeets & Exceeds5743.5255472645.73141.9654.55142.5
Warning & Below7456.41262533254.44358.1545.56957.5
&C&"Arial,Italic"&18 &U2002-03 PSAE Breakdown/Comparison to the State AveragesClass of 2004
Sheet2
Sheet3
-
Data AnalysisSurveysCollege ArticulationHigh School ClassesIowa Test of Basic Skills ITBSPrairie State Achievement Exam PSAEACT
-
WeaknessesMales not scoring as well as the females
-
Sheet1
Central StudentsFemalesMales
%%
ReadingMeets & Exceeds57.931.1
MathematicsMeets & Exceeds6540.6
WritingMeets & Exceeds64.923.3
ScienceMeets & Exceeds49.133.8
Social ScienceMeets & Exceeds45.741.9
&C&"Arial,Italic"&18 &U2002-03 PSAE Breakdown/Comparison to the State AveragesClass of 2004
Sheet2
Sheet3
-
WeaknessesMales not scoring as well as the femalesReading & Writing scores are not where we want them
-
Sheet1
131 Central Students
%
ReadingMeets & Exceeds42.7
WritingMeets & Exceeds41.6
&C&"Arial,Italic"&18 &U2002-03 PSAE Breakdown/Comparison to the State AveragesClass of 2004
Sheet2
Sheet3
-
WeaknessesMales not scoring as well as the femalesReading & Writing scores are not where we want themIEP students take the tests
-
Sheet1
14 - Central Students with IEPs
#
ReadingMeets & Exceeds0
Warning & Below14
MathematicsMeets & Exceeds0
Warning & Below14
WritingMeets & Exceeds0
Warning & Below14
ScienceMeets & Exceeds1
Warning & Below13
Social ScienceMeets & Exceeds2
Warning & Below12
&C&"Arial,Italic"&18 &U2002-03 PSAE Breakdown/Comparison to the State AveragesClass of 2004
Sheet2
Sheet3
-
WeaknessesMales not scoring as well as the femalesReading & Writing scores are not where we want themIEP students take the testAs a public school, we are mandated to report all student scoresWe feel that the ITBS is a better and more reliable test than the state mandated PSAE
-
StrengthsFemale students are scoring well
-
Sheet1
Sheet1
57.931.1
6540.6
64.923.3
49.133.8
45.741.9
Females
Males
Percentage
2002-03 PSAE Students Who Meet and Exceed Class of 2004
Sheet2
Sheet3
-
StrengthsFemale students are scoring wellPSAE is much better after incentive program
-
Sheet1
Class of 2004Class of 2005% +/- ChangeMeets&Exceeds
ReadingExceeds3.85.21.417
Meets38.954.515.6
Below36.632.8-3.8
Academic Warning20.67.5-13.1
MathematicsExceeds1.54.5315.3
Meets49.661.912.3
Below38.926.9-12
Academic Warning9.96.7-3.2
WritingExceeds3.13-0.117.4
Meets38.55617.5
Below46.935.8-11.1
Academic Warning11.55.2-6.3
ScienceExceeds5.38.22.918.5
Meets35.150.715.6
Below48.134.3-13.8
Academic Warning11.56.7-4.8
Social ScienceExceeds6.911.24.320.7
Meets36.65316.4
Below42.729.1-13.6
Academic Warning13.76.7-7
&C&18&UPercentage Change from the Class of 2004 & the Class of 2005
Sheet2
Sheet3
-
Sheet1
StateCentral
PercentagesPercentages
ReadingMeets & Exceeds56.859.7
MathematicsMeets & Exceeds53.166.4
WritingMeets & Exceeds59.659
ScienceMeets & Exceeds52.958.9
Social ScienceMeets & Exceeds59.464.2
&C&"Arial,Italic"&18 &UPSAE : Comparing Central to the StateClass of 2005
Sheet2
Sheet3
-
Sheet1
FemaleFemale
StateCentral
PercentagesPercentages
ReadingMeets & Exceeds59.965.5
MathematicsMeets & Exceeds51.263.6
WritingMeets & Exceeds65.374.6
ScienceMeets & Exceeds50.556.4
Social ScienceMeets & Exceeds55.569.1
&C&"Arial,Italic"&18 &UPSAE : Comparing Central to the StateClass of 2005
Sheet2
Sheet3
-
Sheet1
MaleMale
StateCentral
PercentagesPercentages
ReadingMeets & Exceeds53.855.7
MathematicsMeets & Exceeds55.268.4
WritingMeets & Exceeds53.748.1
ScienceMeets & Exceeds55.360.8
Social ScienceMeets & Exceeds63.460.8
&C&"Arial,Italic"&18 &UPSAE : Comparing Central to the StateClass of 2005
Sheet2
Sheet3
-
StrengthsFemale students are scoring wellPSAE is much better after incentive programITBS at or above grade level in all areas
-
Sheet1
Sheet2
Sheet3
MBD000DE052.xls
2004readingvocab
9.58.89.1
10.19.910.1
11.710.611.2
Vocabulary
Reading
Reading Total
Grade Equivalent
Class of 2004 ITBS Reading/Vocabulary
Chart1
9.510.111.7
8.89.910.6
9.110.111.2
Grade 9
Grade 10
Grade 11
Grade Equivalent
2004 ITBS Vocabulary and Reading
Chart2
9.99.7
11.110.5
11.811.4
Written Expression Advanced Skills
Written Expression
Grade Equivalent
2004 ITBS Written Expression
Sheet1
Grade 9Grade 10Grade 11VocabularyReadingReading Total
Vocabulary9.510.111.7Grade 99.58.89.1
Reading8.89.910.6Grade 1010.19.910.1
Reading Total9.110.111.2Grade 1111.710.611.2
Written Expression Advanced9.911.111.8
Written Expression9.710.511.4
Math Concepts & Adv. Skills10.912.113.2Written Expression Advanced SkillsWritten Expression
Math Concepts & Problem Solving10.811.812.9Grade 99.99.7
Core Total9.910.912Grade 1011.110.5
Social Studies9.610.711.7Grade 1111.811.4
Science9.61111.9
Information Processing9.810.512
Composite9.810.911.9
Math Computation13.113.914.6
Sheet2
Sheet3
-
Sheet1
Sheet2
Sheet3
MBD000DE87D.xls
2004readingvocab
9.58.89.1
10.19.910.1
11.710.611.2
Vocabulary
Reading
Reading Total
Grade Equivalent
Class of 2004 ITBS Reading/Vocabulary
Chart1
9.510.111.7
8.89.910.6
9.110.111.2
Grade 9
Grade 10
Grade 11
Grade Equivalent
2004 ITBS Vocabulary and Reading
Chart2
9.99.7
11.110.5
11.811.4
Written Expression Advanced Skills
Written Expression
Grade Equivalent
2004 ITBS Written Expression
Sheet1
Grade 9Grade 10Grade 11VocabularyReadingReading Total
Vocabulary9.510.111.7Grade 99.58.89.1
Reading8.89.910.6Grade 1010.19.910.1
Reading Total9.110.111.2Grade 1111.710.611.2
Written Expression Advanced9.911.111.8
Written Expression9.710.511.4
Math Concepts & Adv. Skills10.912.113.2Written Expression Advanced SkillsWritten Expression
Math Concepts & Problem Solving10.811.812.9Grade 99.99.7
Core Total9.910.912Grade 1011.110.5
Social Studies9.610.711.7Grade 1111.811.4
Science9.61111.9
Information Processing9.810.512
Composite9.810.911.9
Math Computation13.113.914.6
Sheet2
Sheet3
-
Sheet1
Sheet1
10.912.113.2
10.811.812.9
9.910.912
13.113.914.6
Grade 9
Grade 10
Grade 11
Grade Equivalent
2004 ITBS Math
Sheet2
Sheet3
-
Sheet1
Sheet1
9.610.711.7
9.61111.9
9.810.512
9.810.911.9
Grade 9
Grade 10
Grade 11
Grade Equivalent
2004 ITBS Social Studies/Science/Info. Processing/Composite
Sheet2
Sheet3
-
StrengthsFemale students are scoring wellPSAE is much better after incentive programITBS at or above grade level in all areasACT Core students at or above the state average in all areas most years
-
Sheet1
Sheet2
Sheet3
MBD000E09FF.xls
2000-01ACT overall
17.918.520.5
19.619.820.7
18.919.521.3
18.819.521
18.919.421
Central
State
National
2000-01 ACT Overall Average
2001-2002 ACT overall
17.418.820.2
18.919.720.6
17.319.621.1
18.819.520.8
18.219.520.8
Central
State
National
2001-02 Overall ACT Average
2002-03 ACT Overall Average
1718.720.3
19.219.520.6
17.319.621.2
18.519.520.8
18.119.420.8
Central
State
National
2002-03 ACT Overall Average
Chart1
21.221.6
23.922.1
22.322.1
23.321.7
22.922
Central
State
ACT AnalysisClass of 2004Core Students
Sheet1
2000-01 School YearClass of 2002
Core - 27 Students = 19%Non-Core - 115 Students = 81%Overall Average
CentralStateNationalCentralStateNationalCentralStateNational
English23.021.521.516.716.618.8English17.918.520.5
Math24.622.521.718.418.019.0Math19.619.820.7
Reading23.722.322.217.817.719.8Reading18.919.521.3
Science23.121.921.817.817.919.8Science18.819.521.0
Composite23.722.221.917.817.719.5Composite18.919.421.0
2001-02 School YearClass of 2003
Core - 18 Students = 12%Non-Core - 127 Students = 88%Overall Average
CentralStateNationalCentralStateNationalCentralStateNational
English19.821.921.417.116.918.4English17.418.820.2
Math20.822.621.618.617.918.8Math18.919.720.6
Reading20.622.422.216.917.919.5Reading17.319.621.1
Science20.722.121.718.517.919.4Science18.819.520.8
Composite20.722.421.817.917.819.2Composite18.219.520.8
2002-03 School YearClass of 2004
Core - 22 Students = 17%Non-Core - 110 Students = 83%Overall Average
CentralStateNationalCentralStateNationalCentralStateNational
English21.221.621.416.216.718.5English17.018.720.3
Math23.922.121.618.317.818.9Math19.219.520.6
Reading22.322.122.216.317.919.7Reading17.319.621.2
Science23.321.721.717.518.119.5Science18.519.520.8
Composite22.922.021.817.117.719.3Composite18.119.420.8
&C&"Arial,Italic"&18&UACT Analysis - Central Community High School
Core and Non-Core
1981
1288
1783
Core
Non-Core
Year
Percentage
Percentage of Students Core and Non-Core Curriculum
Sheet2
YearCoreNon-Core
2000-011981
2001-021288
2002-031783
Sheet3
-
StrengthsFemale students are scoring wellPSAE is much better after incentive programITBS at or above grade level in all areasACT Core students at or above the state average in all areas most yearsStudents have a level of satisfaction from the school services offered to themParents have an overall good image of CentralGood Image is thought about schools technology
-
Component IV Target Area Goal and Strategies
-
Target Area GoalReading and Writing SkillsTeachers at CHS will develop and implement teaching and learning strategies throughout the curriculum that will improve the students reading comprehension and writing skills.
-
Strategies for Reading and Writing SkillsDevelop programs to enhance reading comprehensionDevelop ways to incorporate writing activities in all classesDevelop consistent expectations for written work
-
04-05 Reading Plans and TimelineAll teachers will develop at least one lesson each quarter that focuses on reading comprehension.The material will be related to the curriculum, but it will be from sources outside the textbook.Students will read in class and respond to critical thinking questions.A copy of the lesson will be submitted to the SIP team.Professional development activities will help teachers generate ideas and strategies.
-
04-05 Writing Plans and TimelineAll classes will continue to include writing in course work.Teachers will be encouraged to use writing in conjunction with the reading comprehension activity.Professional development will be offered to help teachers generate ideas for assignments.Consistent grading techniques will be shared with the faculty.
-
Target Area GoalArticulationTeachers at CHS will structure their respected curriculums in a vertical and horizontal manner to be most beneficial educationally to students.The Illinois State Learning Standards will serve as the foundation for aligning the individual subject areas.
-
Strategies for ArticulationDevelop a system of curriculum outlines for each course offered at CHS.Coordinate curriculum content between interdisciplinary subject areas with hopes to eliminate overlap.Communicate and establish lines of vertical articulation with elementary systems to ensure future preparation
-
04-05 Articulation Plans and TimelineSIP Team will develop a template to be used by all faculty for course outlines (October 1, 2004).Subject area teachers will submit their course outlines to their respected SIP Team member for review (February 1, 2005).SIP members will conduct periods of review and revisions for course outlines for all classes offered.Final and Complete submissions (May 6, 2005).
-
Target Area GoalCurricular ExpectationsCentral Community High School will review and develop curricular changes by researching what classes are offered, along with reviewing when they are offered.Restructuring classes, changing graduation requirements, new class offerings, and recognition programs will be recommended based on the needs of the student body.
-
Strategies for Curricular ExpectationsEstablish a subcommittee for detailed study of programmatic expectations for review and recommendationConduct a survey of students, graduates, school districts
-
04-05 Curricular Expectations Plans and TimelineThe School Improvement Team will establish a committee to serve as an advisory panel, represented by students, graduates, community members, guidance personnel and teachers. (October 1st)The SIP will develop a task list for the committee to include the study of programmatic expectations.Departments will be involved in curricular studies and reviews which will include studying existing courses, reviewing new textbooks, and recommending new classes.
-
Component V Professional Development
-
Professional DevelopmentFocus on Target Area GoalsInformation based upon interests and needs of facultySchool Improvement Team monitors effectiveness of presentations
-
2004-2005 Professional Development RecommendationsReading and Writing PresentationsCourse OutlinesDepartmental DiscussionsTeam Building RetreatFacilitated LearningOther Presentations
-
2004-2005 Professional Development Timeline & TopicFriday, September 3rdSIP Presentation to Faculty and Subject Area MeetingsFriday, October 8thReading Activities Training and Writing Skills and Assessment Training
-
Timeline ContinuedFriday, October 29thTechnology Training Session (a.m.)Team-Building Retreat (p.m.)Friday, January 14thFollow-up Session on Reading and Writing ActivitiesUpdate on Criterion ETS System
-
Timeline ContinuedFriday, April 15thInformational Presentations (NCLB)Friday, May 6thEnd of Year MeetingSubject Area Meetings
-
Component VI Remediation Plan
-
Rationale Promote student achievement, provide necessary educational services to at risk students, and fulfill the obligations mandated by recent Illinois State Board of Education guidelines.
-
CriteriaIn order to identify students who are in need of academic remediation, specific criteria must be followed which identifies the need for additional services and assistance.
-
Criterion #1A student will be identified as in need of remediation by lacking the number of sufficient credits earned during a school year.
-
Criterion #2Students will be identified in each subject area as at risk by performing sufficiently below expectations on the Iowa Test of Basic Skills.
-
Remediation ServicesAt Risk ListIdentified students will be placed on an at risk designation list for progress toward graduation and subject area reference.
-
Referral to Tutorial ServicesStudents will be referred to tutorial services available at Central Community High School.
-
Referral to Summer SchoolCentral Community High School offers Summer School courses through the Regional Office of Education.
-
Other ServicesStudents in need of remediation can also be referred to other services as needed and appropriate to the individual situation.
-
Central Community High School 2004-2005 School Improvement Plan Presentation Summary
-
Question and Answer Session
top related