california air resources board re ......8150 sunset boulevard mixed‐use project los angeles, ca...
Post on 22-Jan-2021
2 Views
Preview:
TRANSCRIPT
80 South Lake, Suite 570, Pasadena, California 91101 INTERNET www.pcrnet.com TEL 626.204.6170 FAX 626.204.6171
January 29, 2014 CALIFORNIA AIR RESOURCES BOARD
Re: GREENHOUSE GAS EMISSIONS METHODOLOGY AND DOCUMENTATION PURSUANT TO THE “JOBS AND ECONOMIC IMPROVEMENT THROUGH ENVIRONMENTAL LEADERSHIP ACT” FOR THE 8150 SUNSET BOULEVARD MIXED-USE PROJECT
To California Air Resources Board:
On behalf of the Project Applicant, AG-SCH 8150 Sunset Boulevard Owner, L.P., PCR Services Corporation has prepared a Greenhouse Gas Emissions Methodology and Documentation assessment for the 8150 Sunset Boulevard Mixed Use Project (the “Project”), to demonstrate that the Project meets the greenhouse gas emissions requirements of the Jobs and Economic Improvement Through Environmental Leadership Act (“the Act”). We greatly appreciate the time and consideration that Air Resources Board (ARB) Staff has granted us regarding this important Project.
As is detailed in the assessment, the Project would incorporate a number of project characteristics and project design features to avoid, minimize, and reduce greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions. Our findings conclude that the Project would result in no net additional GHG emissions in accordance with the requirements of the Act.
We look forward to your review of this assessment. Please do not hesitate to call me at 626-204-6170, should any questions or comments arise regarding this assessment. We appreciate this opportunity and look forward to hearing from you.
Sincerely, PCR SERVICES CORPORATION Heidi Rous Vice President/Director
ApplicationforCEQAStreamliningUnderthe“JobsandEconomicImprovementthroughEnvironmentalLeadershipAct”(PublicResourcesCodeSection21178etseq.)
GREENHOUSEGASEMISSIONSMETHODOLOGYANDDOCUMENTATION
FortheProposed
8150SunsetBoulevardMixed‐UseProjectLosAngeles,CA90046
JanuaryMarch2014
Preparedfor:
AG‐SCH8150SUNSETBOULEVARDOWNER,L.P.P.O.Box10506
BeverlyHills,CA90213
Preparedby:
PCRSERVICESCORPORATION80SouthLakeAvenue,Suite570
Pasadena,CA91101TEL626.204.6170FAX626.204.6171
8150SunsetBoulevardMixedUseProject GreenhouseGasEmissionsMethodologyandDocumentationPCRServicesCorporation i
TABLE OF CONTENTS
Page
1.0EXECUTIVESUMMARY..................................................................................................................................................1 2.0INTRODUCTION...............................................................................................................................................................3
2.1 Purpose......................................................................................................................................................................................3 2.2 ProjectDescription...............................................................................................................................................................3 2.3 AssemblyBill900..................................................................................................................................................................4
3.0GREENHOUSEGASEMISSIONSMETHODOLOGY..................................................................................................7 3.1 GlobalClimateChangeandGreenhouseGases.........................................................................................................7 3.2 BaselineOperationalEmissions......................................................................................................................................8 3.3 ProjectOperationalEmissions......................................................................................................................................19
4.0COMPARISONOFPROJECTTOBASELINECONDITION....................................................................................37
APPENDICES
APPENDIXA:BASELINECONDITIONGREENHOUSEGASEMISSIONSAPPENDIXB:PROJECTGREENHOUSEGASEMISSIONS
LIST OF FIGURES
Figure Page1 AerialPhotographwithSurroundingLandUses....................................................................................................5 2 ProposedSitePlan...............................................................................................................................................................6 3 GreenhouseGasEmissions–BaselineandFutureProjectYearTrends...................................................40
LIST OF TABLES
Table Page1 BaselineConditionFloorArea........................................................................................................................................9 2 BaselineConditionElectricalDemandGreenhouseGasEmissions.............................................................11 3 BaselineConditionNaturalGasCombustionGreenhouseGasEmissions................................................13 4 BaselineConditionMobileSourceGreenhouseGasEmissions.....................................................................15 5 BaselineConditionSolidWasteDisposalGreenhouseGasEmissions.......................................................16 6 BaselineConditionWaterandWastewaterGreenhouseGasEmissions...................................................18 7 BaselineConditionAreaandStationarySourceGreenhouseGasEmissions..........................................19 8 SummaryofAnnualGHGEmissionsundertheBaselineConditions..........................................................20 9 ProjectFloorArea.............................................................................................................................................................20 10 EstimatedUnmitigatedProjectConstructionGreenhouseGasEmissions...............................................22
LIST OF TABLES (Continued)
Table Page
8150SunsetBoulevardMixedUseProject GreenhouseGasEmissionsMethodologyandDocumentationPCRServicesCorporation ii
11 ProjectElectricalDemandGreenhouseGasEmissions.....................................................................................25 12 ProjectNaturalGasCombustionGreenhouseGasEmissions........................................................................26 13 ProjectMobileSourceGreenhouseGasEmissions.............................................................................................30 14 ProjectSolidWasteDisposalGreenhouseGasEmissions...............................................................................31 15 ProjectWaterandWastewaterGreenhouseGasEmissions...........................................................................33 16 ProjectAreaandStationarySourceGreenhouseGasEmissions..................................................................34 17 SummaryofAnnualGHGEmissionsundertheProject....................................................................................35 18 EvaluationofNetGHGEmissionsfortheProject................................................................................................38
– PRELIMINARY WORKING DRAFT –
8150SunsetBoulevardMixedUseProject GreenhouseGasEmissionsMethodologyandDocumentationPCRServicesCorporation 1
1.0 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
PCR Services Corporation (PCR) has been retained to conduct a comprehensive greenhouse gas (GHG)emissionsassessmentforthe8150SunsetBoulevardMixedUseProject(“theProject”)andtodemonstratethat the Projectmeets the requirements of the JobsandEconomic ImprovementThroughEnvironmentalLeadershipAct(“theAct”)(PublicResourcesCodeSection21178etseq.),alsoreferredtoasAssemblyBill(AB) 900. In September 2011, the Governor signed the Act, which required the Governor to establishproceduresforapplyingforstreamlinedenvironmentalreviewundertheCaliforniaEnvironmentalQualityAct (CEQA) forprojects thatmeetcertain requirements. TheOfficeofPlanningandResearch (OPR)hasprovidedapprovedguidelinesforsubmittingapplicationsforstreamlinedenvironmentalreviewpursuanttotheAct.WithrespecttoGHGemissions,aprojectmustdemonstratethatitwouldnotresultinanynetadditional GHGs including GHG emissions from employee transportation in accordance with PublicResourcesCodeSection21183(c).
TheProjectwouldredeveloptheexisting2.56‐acrecommercialpropertylocatedat8150SunsetBoulevardintheCityofLosAngeleswithamixofnewresidentialandcommercialuses.ConstructionoftheProjectisanticipatedtobeginin2014andbecompletedinmid‐2017.TheProjectsiteiscurrentlyoccupiedwithtwostructures built in 1960 and in 1988 and contain 80,000 square feet of retail tenancy inclusive of thefollowinguses:fast foodrestaurants,checkcashingfacility,dry‐cleaners(off‐sitedrycleaning), icecreamshop,walk‐inbankfacility,fitness,massageparlor,petgroomingservices,storagefacilityanddentaloffice.Operationof theseusescurrentlygeneratesGHGemissions fromenergydemand(electricityandnaturalgas), mobile sources traveling to and from the site, waste generation, water demand and wastewatergeneration,andotherareaandstationarysourcessuchaslandscapingequipment.TheemissionsofGHGsfromthecurrentsiteconstitutetheBaselineCondition.
TheProjectwoulddemolish theexistinguses anddevelopup to333,903square feetof commercial andresidentialspace.WhilethetotalsquarefootagewouldincreaseundertheProjectrelativetotheexistingsquare footage, the Project would be built to meet and exceed today’s energy and water efficiencystandardsandwould incorporateamixofresidential,commercial,retail,andrestaurantusesthatwouldreduce vehicle trips to and from the site, Project‐related vehicle miles traveled, and associated GHGemissions.
Under the Baseline Condition, the site generates approximately 7,407 metric tons of carbon dioxideequivalents (MTCO2e) per year. This excludes any one‐time construction GHG emissions that weregenerated when the existing uses and related infrastructure were originally built. Construction of theProjectwould generate one‐timeGHG emissions of approximately 1,589 1,631MTCO2e, during the firstyear and 2,608 2,346 MTCO2e during the second year. At Project buildout, the Site would generateapproximately 6,406 6,400 MTCO2e during the first full year of operation. Compared to the BaselineCondition, theProject’soperationalGHGemissionsrepresentanetreduction inGHGemissions fromthesiteofapproximately1,0011,007MTCO2eduringthefirstfullyearofoperation.
Future year emissions would decline as a greater percentage of motor vehicles meet more stringentemissions standards, including the Pavley Phase I and Phase II emissions standards and the 33 percentRenewables Portfolio Standard. The Project would reduce emissions through the use of grid‐source,renewable energy technologies and carbonmitigation projects for approximately seven years to ensurefutureyearcontemporaneousGHGemissionsdonotexceedtheBaselineConditionatanytime.Afterthis
1.0 Executive Summary – PRELIMINARY WORKING DRAFT – March 2014
8150SunsetBoulevardMixedUseProject GreenhouseGasEmissionsMethodologyandDocumentationPCRServicesCorporation 2
sevenyearperiod,futureyearemissionswoulddeclinetobelowtheBaselineConditionwithouttheneedtopurchaseGHGreductioncredits.
Basedonthisassessment,theProjectwouldnotresultinanynetadditionalGHGsincludingGHGemissionsfromemployeetransportationinaccordancewithPublicResourcesCodeSection21183(c).Therefore,theProjectwouldmeettheGHGemissionsrequirementsforstreamlinedenvironmentalreviewunderCEQA.
– PRELIMINARY WORKING DRAFT –
8150SunsetBoulevardMixedUseProject GreenhouseGasEmissionsMethodologyandDocumentationPCRServicesCorporation 3
2.0 INTRODUCTION
2.1 PURPOSE
PCRhasbeen retained to conducta comprehensivegreenhousegas (GHG)emissionsassessment for the8150SunsetBoulevardMixedUseProject (the “Project”) and todemonstrate that theProjectmeets therequirements of the Jobs and Economic Improvement Through Environmental LeadershipAct (“the Act”)(PublicResourcesCodeSection21178etseq.),alsoreferredtoasAssemblyBill(AB)900.Thisassessmentdescribes the methodology used to estimate the GHG emissions from baseline and Project conditions,providesanestimateofthenetchangeinGHGemissionsfortheproposedProjectascomparedtobaselineconditions,anddescribesthemethodologyusedtoquantifyGHGemissionreductionsfromprojectdesignfeaturesandmitigationmeasures.ThefollowingbaselineandProject‐relatedemissionsourceshavebeenevaluated:
Construction Activities – Fossil fueled on‐ and off‐road vehicles and equipment needed fordemolition,massandfinegrading,buildingconstruction,paving,andarchitecturalcoating;
DirectEmissionSources–Consumptionofnaturalgason‐siteforcooking,spaceheatingandwaterheating, combustion of fossil fuels for lawn care andmaintenance activities, andmotor vehiclesincludingemployeetransportation;and
Indirect Emission Sources – Off‐site electricity generation, wastewater treatment and waterconveyance,andsolidwastedisposal.
2.2 PROJECT DESCRIPTION
AG‐SCH8150SunsetBoulevardOwner,L.P.,(the“Applicant”)proposestoredevelopthe2.56‐acrepropertylocated at 8150 Sunset Boulevard (the “Project Site”) in the Hollywood community of the City of LosAngeles(the“City”).TheProjectSiteandsurroundingusesareshowninFigure1,AerialPhotographwithSurrounding Land Uses. The Project Site currently contains two commercial structures and otherimprovements,allofwhichwouldbedemolishedandremoved fromtheProjectSite. TheProjectwouldconsistoftwobuildingsoverasinglepodiumstructurewithvariouselementsranginginheightfromtwostories to 16 stories in height as measured from the intersection of Sunset and Crescent HeightsBoulevards.TheNorthBuildingwouldincludethreelevels(onesubterranean)ofentirelycommercialusesandwouldhaveamaximumheightofthreelevelsabovegradealongSunsetBoulevard.TheSouthBuildingwould include commercial uses on the first two levels, twelve levels of residential uses above thecommercialfloors,andarooftoprestaurant/loungelevelonLevel16.TheProjectwouldinclude111,339squarefeetofcommercialretailandrestaurantuseswithinthreelowerlevels(onesubterranean)andonerooftop level,249apartmentunits, including28affordablehousingunits,within the twelveupper levelsrepresenting222,564grosssquarefeetofresidentialspace.TheProjectwouldalsoprovideanew,9,134square‐footpublicspace(“CornerPlaza”)atthenortheastcornerofthesite(thisareais,andwillcontinueto be, owned by the City, although the Applicantwill be required to improve andmaintain the area), a34,050‐square‐foot central public plaza at the site interior (“Central Plaza”), public rooftopdeck/gardenareas (“SunsetTerrace”) along SunsetBoulevard, a private pool andpool deck area for residents (“PoolTerrace”), aswell as other resident‐only amenities totaling approximately 6,900 square feet thatwouldincludearesidentiallobby,residentrecreationroom,fitnesscenter,businesscenter,changingrooms,andlibrary, aswell as awrap‐around landscaped terrace on the fourth floor of the SouthBuilding (“Garden
2.0 Introduction – PRELIMINARY WORKING DRAFT – March 2014
8150SunsetBoulevardMixedUseProject GreenhouseGasEmissionsMethodologyandDocumentationPCRServicesCorporation 4
Terrace”). Parkingforallproposeduseswouldbeprovidedon‐siteviaaseven‐level(threesubterraneanandsemi‐subterraneanlevels)parkingstructure(“ParkingStructure”)housedwithinthepodiumstructurethat includes 849 total parking spaces (295 for residential uses and 554 for commercial retail andrestaurantuses).Short‐andlong‐termbicycleparkingtotaling985spaceswouldalsobeprovidedon‐site,including 428 spaces for residential uses and 557 spaces for commercial uses. The total developmentwouldincludeupto333,903squarefeetofcommercialandresidentialspacewithamaximumfloor‐arearatio(FAR)of3:1.ThesiteplanisillustratedinFigure2,ProposedSitePlan.
2.3 ASSEMBLY BILL 900
InSeptember2011,theGovernorsignedtheAct,whichrequiredtheGovernortoestablishproceduresforapplyingforstreamlinedenvironmentalreviewundertheCaliforniaEnvironmentalQualityAct(CEQA)forprojects that meet certain requirements. The Office of Planning and Research (OPR) has providedapprovedguidelinesforsubmittingapplicationsforstreamlinedenvironmentalreviewpursuanttotheAct.WithrespecttoGHGemissions,aprojectmustdemonstratethat itwouldnotresult inanynetadditionalGHGs includingGHGemissions fromemployee transportation inaccordancewithPublicResourcesCodeSection21183(c).ForpurposesofCaliforniaPublicResourcesCodesection21183(c)thefollowingprocessapplies:
1. The applicant shall submit electronically to AB900ARBsubmittals@arb.ca.gov a proposedmethodologyforquantifyingtheproject’snetadditionalGHGemissions.TheCARBwillreviewandcommentonthemethodology,atitsdiscretion,within30daysofsubmission.
2. At the same time, the applicant shall submit to AB900ARBsubmittals@arb.ca.govdocumentation that the project does not result in any net additional GHG emissions. Thedocumentationmustatleastquantify:
a. Bothdirect and indirectGHGemissionsassociatedwith theproject’s constructionand operation, including emissions from the project’s projected energy use andtransportationrelatedemissions;and
b. Thenetemissionsoftheprojectafteraccountingforanymitigationmeasuresthatwill be monitored and enforced consistent with Public Resources Code section21183(d).
3. Within60daysofreceivingthedocumentation(in2.above),theCARBwilldeterminewhethertheconditionspecified inPublicResourcessection21183(c)hasbeenmetor, ifmore time isneeded,notifytheapplicantoftheexpectedcompletiondate.
4. TheCARBwilldetermineandreporttotheGovernorinwritingthataprojectdoesnotresultinany net additional emissions of greenhouse gases if the project demonstrates through acombinationofprojectdesignfeatures,compliancewith(orexceedingminimumrequirementsof)existing regulations,andmitigation that itwouldresult inzeroadditionalgreenhousegasemissions.
W Sunset Boulevard
Ha
ven
hu
rst
Dri
ve
N C
resc
en
t H
eig
hts
Bo
ule
vard
Selm
a A
venue
Laurel Ca
nyon B
oulevard
COMMERCIAL
COMMERCIALCOMMERCIAL
MULTI-FAMILYRESIDENTIAL
MULTI-FAMILYRESIDENTIAL
MULTI-FAMILYRESIDENTIAL
MULTI-FAMILYRESIDENTIAL
MULTI-FAMILYRESIDENTIALSINGLE-FAMILY
RESIDENTIAL
FIGURE
Source: ESRI, 2010; PCR Services Corporation, 2013.
0 100 200 Feet
8150 Sunset Boulevard Mixed-Use ProjectGreenhouse Gas Emissions Methodology and Documentation
Aerial Photograph with Surrounding Land Useso 1
Project Boundary
FIGUREProposed Site Plan8150 Sunset Boulevard Mixed-Use Project
Greenhouse Gas Emissions Methodology and Documenta on2
Source: Hart | Howerton, 2013.P C R
0 40 Feet
N
– PRELIMINARY WORKING DRAFT –
8150SunsetBoulevardMixedUseProject GreenhouseGasEmissionsMethodologyandDocumentationPCRServicesCorporation 7
3.0 GREENHOUSE GAS EMISSIONS METHODOLOGY
3.1 GLOBAL CLIMATE CHANGE AND GREENHOUSE GASES
Thenaturalprocess throughwhichheat isretained in the troposphere1 iscalledthe“greenhouseeffect.”The greenhouse effect traps heat in the troposphere through a three‐fold process as follows:(1)short‐waveradiationintheformofvisiblelightemittedbytheSunisabsorbedbytheEarthasheat;(2)long‐waveradiationre‐emittedby theEarth; and (3)GHGs in theatmosphereabsorbingor trapping thelong‐wave radiation and re‐emitting it back towards the Earth and into space. This third process is thefocusofglobalclimatechangeactions.
ThemostcommonlyemittedGHGfromanthropogenic(i.e.,human)activitiesiscarbondioxide(CO2).NotallGHGspossessthesameabilityto induceclimatechange;asaresult,GHGcontributionsarecommonlyquantified in the units of equivalent mass of carbon dioxide (CO2e). Mass emissions are calculated byconvertingpollutant‐specificemissionstoCO2eemissionsbyapplyingtheproperglobalwarmingpotential(GWP)value.2ByapplyingtheGWPratios,project‐relatedCO2eemissionscanbetabulatedinmetrictonsofCO2e(MTCO2e)peryear.Typically,theGWPratiocorrespondingtothewarmingpotentialofCO2overa100‐year period is used as a baseline. The CO2e values are calculated for construction years aswell asexisting and project build‐out conditions in order to generate a net change in GHG emissions forconstructionandoperation.CompoundsthatareregulatedasGHGsarediscussedbelow.
Carbon Dioxide (CO2): CO2 is the most abundant GHG in the atmosphere and is primarilygeneratedfromfossilfuelcombustionfromstationaryandmobilesources.CO2isthereferencegas(GWPof1)fordeterminingtheGWPsofotherGHGs.
Methane (CH4): CH4 is emitted from biogenic sources (i.e., resulting from the activity of livingorganisms), incomplete combustion in forest fires, landfills, manure management, and leaks innaturalgaspipelines.TheGWPofCH4is21.
Nitrous Oxide (N2O): N2O produced by human‐related sources including agricultural soilmanagement,animalmanuremanagement,sewagetreatment,mobileandstationarycombustionoffossilfuel,adipicacidproduction,andnitricacidproduction.TheGWPofN2Ois310.
Hydrofluorocarbons (HFCs): HFCs are fluorinated compounds consisting of hydrogen, carbon,andfluorine.Theyaretypicallyusedasrefrigerantsinbothstationaryrefrigerationandmobileairconditioningsystems.TheGWPsofHFCsrangesfrom140forHFC‐152ato11,700forHFC‐23.
Perfluorocarbons (PFCs): PFCs are fluorinated compounds consisting of carbon and fluorine.They are primarily created as a byproduct of aluminum production and semiconductormanufacturing.TheGWPsofPFCsrangefrom5,700to11,900.
1 Thetroposphereisthebottomlayeroftheatmosphere,whichvariesinheightfromtheEarth’ssurfaceto10to12kilometers.2 GWPsandassociatedCO2evaluesweredevelopedbytheIntergovernmentalPanelonClimateChange(IPCC),andpublishedinits
SecondAssessmentReport,in1996. InaccordancewithinternationalandUnitedStatesconventiontomaintainthevalueofthecarbondioxide“currency,”GHGemissioninventoriesarecalculatedusingtheGWPsfromtheIPCCSecondAssessmentReport.
3.0 Greenhouse Gas Emissions Methodology – PRELIMINARY WORKING DRAFT – March 2014
8150SunsetBoulevardMixedUseProject GreenhouseGasEmissionsMethodologyandDocumentationPCRServicesCorporation 8
SulfurHexafluoride(SF6):SF6isafluorinatedcompoundconsistingofsulfurandfluoride.Itisacolorless,odorless,nontoxic,nonflammablegas.Itismostcommonlyusedasanelectricalinsulatorinhighvoltageequipmentthattransmitsanddistributeselectricity.SF6hasaGWPof23,900.
TheClimateRegistry(TCR)haspreparedtheGeneralReportingProtocolforcalculatingandreportingGHGemissionsfromanumberofgeneralandindustry‐specificactivities.3Nospecificprotocolsareavailableforlandusedevelopmentprojects;however,theGeneralReportingProtocolhasbeenadaptedtoaddressthelandusedevelopmentGHGemissionsinthisassessment. Theinformationprovidedinthisassessmentisgenerally consistentwith theGeneralReportingProtocolminimumreporting requirements. TheGeneralReportingProtocolrecommendstheseparationofGHGemissionsintothreecategoriesthatreflectdifferentaspectsofownershiporcontroloveremissions.Theyinclude:
Scope 1: Direct GHG emissions from human activity (e.g., stationary combustion of fuels,mobilecombustionoffuelsintransportation).
Scope 2: Indirect GHG emissions associated with activities of the reporting entity but occur atsourcescontrolledbyanotherentity(e.g.,purchasedelectricityorpurchasedsteam).
Scope3: Indirectemissionsassociatedwithotheremissions sources, suchasemployeecommuteandbusinesstravelandwastedisposal.
AccordingtotheCaliforniaAirResourcesBoard(CARB),theconsiderationofso‐calledindirectemissionsprovides amore completepicture of theGHG footprint of a facility: “As facilities consider changes thatwouldaffecttheiremissions–additionofacogenerationunittoboostoverallefficiencyevenasitincreasesdirectemissions,forexample–therelativeimpactontotal(directplusindirect)emissionsbythefacilityshouldbemonitored.Annuallyreportedindirectenergyusagealsoaidstheconservationawarenessofthefacilityandprovidesinformation”toCARBtobeconsideredforfuturestrategiesbytheindustrialsector.4Additionally,theOfficeofPlanningandResearchdirectsleadagenciesto“makeagood‐faitheffort,basedon available information, to calculate, model, or estimate…GHG emissions from a project, including theemissionsassociatedwithvehiculartraffic,energyconsumption,waterusageandconstructionactivities.”5Therefore,directandindirectemissionsareconsideredinthisassessment.
3.2 BASELINE OPERATIONAL EMISSIONS
3.2.1 Description of Baseline Condition
The Project Site encompasses approximately 2.56 acres (111,339 square feet) of land area currentlyoccupiedbytwocommercialbuildingsandassociatedparking,asshowninFigure1.Thetwostructuresonthesitewerebuilt in1960and in1988andcontain80,000square feetof retail tenancy inclusiveof thefollowing uses: general retail, restaurants, ice creamparlor,walk‐in bank facility, fitness center, storagefacility,anddentaloffice.ThesquarefootageforeachoftheselandusesareprovidedinTable1,BaselineConditionFloorArea.
3 TheClimateRegistry,GeneralReportingProtocol,Version2.0,(2013).4 CaliforniaAirResourcesBoard, Initial Statement ofReasons forRulemaking,ProposedRegulation forMandatoryReporting of
GreenhouseGasEmissionsPursuanttotheCaliforniaGlobalWarmingSolutionsActof2006(AB32),(2007).5 OfficeofPlanningandResearch,TechnicalAdvisory,p.5.
March 2014 – PRELIMINARY WORKING DRAFT – 3.0 Greenhouse Gas Emissions Methodology
8150SunsetBoulevardMixedUseProject GreenhouseGasEmissionsMethodologyandDocumentationPCRServicesCorporation 9
The main retail structure, completed in 1988, is a three‐level concrete and light‐gauge steel structureinclusive of a one‐level, partial below‐grade parking garage, three levels of above‐grade retail uses andsurface parking. The second structure is a two‐story building constructed in 1960 that fronts SunsetBoulevard. Inaddition, there is a standard‐sizedbillboardat the site thatuntil recentlywasdigital. Allexisting on‐site structures, parking, signage, and landscaping would be removed from the site prior toconstructionoftheProject.TheProjectSiteisgenerallyflat,withatopographythatslopesdownfromthenorthtothesouth.Landscapingonthesiteislimitedtoasmallnumberofornamentaltrees.
3.2.2 Baseline GHG Emission Sources and Calculation Methodology
(a) Construction
TheProjectSiteiscurrentlybuilt‐out.Asdiscussedpreviously,thetwostructuresontheProjectSitewerebuilt in 1960 and in 1988. Construction of the two structures and associated parking areas andinfrastructure resulted in one‐time GHG emissions of carbon dioxide (CO2) and smaller amounts ofmethane(CH4)andnitrousoxide(N2O)fromheavy‐dutyconstructionequipment,haultrucks,andworkervehicles. However,sufficientdetail isnotavailablewithrespecttotheconstructionschedule,equipmentusage,andnumberofhaultripstoprovideaquantitativeconstructionGHGemissionsassessmentforthebaseline condition. Therefore, construction‐related GHG emissions are not included for the baselinecondition. This is a conservative approach since, by excluding the baseline construction‐related GHGemissions, the Project would need to provide slightly greater GHG reductions in order to meet therequirementsofAB900ofnonetadditionalGHGemissions.
(b) Operational Energy – Electricity
The generation of electricity in California is achieved through the combustion of fossil fuels, primarilynaturalgas,usingsteamboilers, internalcombustionengines,andcombustionturbines. AportionoftheelectricitygeneratedinCaliforniaandimportedfromoutsidethestateisderivedfromthecombustionofcoalandothernon‐gaseousfossilfuels.ThecombustionoffossilfuelstoproduceelectricityresultsinGHG
Table 1
Baseline Condition Floor Area
Land Use Square Feet (sqft)
GeneralRetail 14,647StorageFacility 27,625
Walk‐inBankFacility 20,172Restaurant 2,056
IceCreamParlor 800FastFoodRestaurantwithoutDrive‐Thru 3,720FastFoodRestaurantwithDrive‐Thru 5,070
DentalOffice 2,360FitnessCenter 3,550
TotalFloorArea 80,000
Source: AG‐SCH 8150 Sunset Boulevard Owner LP, 2013
3.0 Greenhouse Gas Emissions Methodology – PRELIMINARY WORKING DRAFT – March 2014
8150SunsetBoulevardMixedUseProject GreenhouseGasEmissionsMethodologyandDocumentationPCRServicesCorporation 10
emissionsofCO2andsmalleramountsofCH4andN2O.TheseemissionsoccurduetotheelectricaldemandofthecommercialandretaillandusesthatcurrentoperateontheProjectSite.Theelectricitygenerationoccursoff‐site;therefore,electricityuseresultsinGHGemissionsthatareconsideredtobeindirect.
Emissions of GHGs associatedwith the Baseline Condition energy demand are based on the size of thecommercialandretaillanduses,theelectricaldemandfactorsforthelanduses,theGHGemissionfactorsfor the electricity utility provider, and the GWP values for the GHGs emitted. Annual electricity GHGemissionsinunitsofMTCO2earecalculatedasfollows:
Electricity:
AnnualEmissions[MTCO2e]=(∑i(Units×DE×EFE×GWP)i)÷2204.62 [Equation1]
Where: Units = Numberoflanduseunits(samelandusetype)[1000sqft] DE = Electricaldemandfactor[megawatt‐hour(MWh)/1000sqft/year] EFE = GHGemissionfactor[poundspermegawatt‐hour(MWh)] GWP = Globalwarmingpotential[CO2=1,CH4=21,N2O=310] 2204.62 = Conversionfactor[pounds/MT] i = Summationindex
Electrical demand is based ondata from theCaliforniaEnergyCommission (CEC)CaliforniaCommercialEndUseSurvey(CEUS),whichlistsenergydemandbybuildingtype.6ThedatafromtheCEUSisfrom2002.Since1978,theCEChasestablishedbuildingenergyefficiencystandards,whichareupdatedperiodically.Asdiscussedpreviously,theexistingbuildingsontheProjectSitewerebuiltin1960and1988.Thus,theuse of the CEUS 2002 survey data to represent the electrical demand for the Baseline Conditionwouldprovideaconservativeassessmentasfuturebuildingenergyefficiencystandardsaremorerestrictivethanprior standards. The CEUS provides data on a limited statewide basis or for each of the four largestpublicly owned utilities (Pacific Gas& Electric, Southern California Edison (SCE), SacramentoMunicipalUtilityDistrict,andSanDiegoGas&Electric).Forthepurposesofthisassessment,demandfactorsforSCEwereusedasmostrepresentativeoftheProjectSite.
TheLosAngelesDepartmentofWater andPower (LADWP)provideselectric service to theProject Site.Emission factors for GHGs due to electrical generation to serve the electrical demands of the BaselineConditionwere obtained from the LAWDP 2012 Power IntegratedResource Plan, which provides a CO2intensityof1,1561,094poundsofCO2perMWh.7Currently,LADWPprovides20percentofelectricityviarenewable sources.8 Emission factors for CH4 and N2O were obtained from the California EmissionsEstimatorModel(CalEEMod).9
6 California Energy Commission, California Commercial End‐Use Survey, http://capabilities.itron.com/CeusWeb/Chart.aspx.
AccessedNovember2013.7 LosAngelesDepartmentofWaterandPower,20122013PowerIntegratedResourcePlan,(2012)C‐11(2013)C‐12.8 LosAngelesDepartmentofWaterandPower,20122013PowerIntegratedResourcePlan,(2012)111(2013)ES‐31.9 CaliforniaAirPollutionControlOfficersAssociation,CaliforniaEmissionsEstimatorModel,http://www.caleemod.com/.Accessed
November2013March2014.
March 2014 – PRELIMINARY WORKING DRAFT – 3.0 Greenhouse Gas Emissions Methodology
8150SunsetBoulevardMixedUseProject GreenhouseGasEmissionsMethodologyandDocumentationPCRServicesCorporation 11
The estimated annual emissions from electrical demand from the Baseline Condition are provided inTable2,BaselineConditionElectricalDemandGreenhouseGasEmissions. DetailedemissionscalculationsareprovidedinAppendixA.
Table 2
Baseline Condition Electrical Demand Greenhouse Gas Emissions
Land Use
Units (1000 sqft)
Annual Electrical
Demand Factora (MWh/1000 sqft/year)
CO2 Factor b
(pounds/MWh)CH4 Factor
b (pounds/MWh)
N2O Factor c
(pounds/MWh)
Annual GHG Emissions d
(MTCO2e/year)
GeneralRetail 14.65 15.36 1,156 1,094 0.029 0.0062 118.21 111.89StorageFacility 27.63 4.29 1,156 1,094 0.029 0.0062 62.25 58.92
Walk‐inBankFacility 20.17 13.24 1,156 1,094 0.029 0.0062 140.39 132.88Restaurant 2.06 46.18 1,156 1,094 0.029 0.0062 49.90 47.23
IceCreamParlor 0.80 46.18 1,156 1,094 0.029 0.0062 19.42 18.38FastFoodRestaurantwithoutDrive‐Thru
3.72 46.18 1,156 1,094 0.029 0.0062 123.05 116.46
FastFoodRestaurantwithDrive‐Thru
5.07 46.18 1,156 1,094 0.029 0.0062 90.28 85.45
DentalOffice 2.36 20.30 1,156 1,094 0.029 0.0062 25.17 23.82FitnessCenter 3.55 20.30 1,156 1,094 0.029 0.0062 37.86 35.84TotalGHGEmissions
667 631
a California Energy Commission, California Commercial End Use Survey, http://capabilities.itron.com/CeusWeb/Chart.aspx. Accessed November 2013. Factors are based on the Southern California Edison (SCE) sector as representative of the Project Site location.
b Los Angeles Department of Water and Power, 2012 2013 Power Integrated Resource Plan, (2012) C‐11 (2013) C‐12.
c California Air Pollution Control Officers Association, California Emissions Estimator Model, http://www.caleemod.com/. Accessed January March 2014.
d Totals may not add up exactly due to rounding in the modeling calculations.
Source: PCR Services Corporation, 2014. Detailed emissions calculations are provided in Appendix A.
(c) Operational Energy – Natural Gas
TheexistinglandusesundertheBaselineConditionutilizenaturalgasprimarilyforheatingneeds.Naturalgas isalsousedforcooking. Thecombustionofnaturalgasresults inGHGemissionsofCO2andsmalleramountsofCH4andN2O.Thecombustionofnaturalgasoccurson‐site;therefore,theGHGemissionsareconsideredtobedirect.
TheemissionsofGHGsassociatedwithnaturalgascombustionundertheBaselineConditionarebasedonthesizeofthecommercialandretaillanduses,thenaturalgascombustionfactorsforthelandusesinunitsofmillionBritish thermal units (MMBtu), theGHG emission factors for natural gas combustion, and theGWPvaluesfortheGHGsemitted.AnnualnaturalgasGHGemissionsinunitsofMTCO2earecalculatedasfollows:
3.0 Greenhouse Gas Emissions Methodology – PRELIMINARY WORKING DRAFT – March 2014
8150SunsetBoulevardMixedUseProject GreenhouseGasEmissionsMethodologyandDocumentationPCRServicesCorporation 12
NaturalGas:
AnnualEmissions[MTCO2e]=(∑i(Units×DNG×EFNG×GWP)i)÷2204.62 [Equation2]
Where: Units = Numberoflanduseunits(samelandusetype)[1000sqft] DNG = Naturalgascombustionfactor[MMBtu/1000sqft/year] EFNG = GHGemissionfactor[pounds/MMBtu] GWP = Globalwarmingpotential[CO2=1,CH4=21,N2O=310] 2204.62 = Conversionfactor[pounds/MT] i = Summationindex
Natural gasdemand isbasedondata from theCECCaliforniaCommercialEndUseSurvey (CEUS),whichlistsenergydemandbybuilding type.10 Thedata from theCEUS is from2002. Since1978, theCEChasestablishedbuildingenergyefficiencystandards,whichareupdatedperiodically.Asdiscussedpreviously,theexistingbuildingson theProject Sitewerebuilt in1960and1988. Thus, theuseof theCEUS2002surveydata to represent the electrical demand for theBaselineConditionwouldprovide a conservativeassessmentas futurebuildingenergyefficiencystandardsaremorerestrictivethanpriorstandards. Forthepurposesofthisassessment,demandfactorsforSCEwereusedasmostrepresentativeoftheProjectSite.
The combustion of natural gas results in relatively equal amounts of GHG emissions per unit of gascombustedinthestate.EmissionfactorsforGHGsduetonaturalgascombustiontoservetheheatingandcooking demands of the Baseline Condition were obtained from the CalEEMod tool, which providesstatewideemissionfactors.11
TheestimatedannualemissionsfromnaturalgascombustionfromtheBaselineConditionareprovidedinTable 3, Baseline Condition Natural Gas Combustion Greenhouse Gas Emissions. Detailed emissionscalculationsareprovidedinAppendixA.
(d) Operational Mobile
Mobile source emission calculations associated with the Baseline Condition are calculated using theCalEEModtool,which incorporates theCARBemissions factormodel foron‐roadvehicles(EMFAC2011).EmissionsofGHGsassociatedwithmobilesourcesundertheBaselineConditionarebasedontheaveragedailytriprate,tripdistance,theGHGemissionfactorsforthemobilesources,andtheGWPvaluesfortheGHGsemitted.ThetypesofvehiclesthatvisittheSiteincludeallvehicletypesincludingautomobiles,light‐duty trucks,delivery trucks, andwastehaul trucks. Modeling for theBaselineConditionwas conductedusingthevehicle fleetmix fortheSouthCoastAirBasin forallvehicletypesasprovidedinEMFAC2011.AnnualmobilesourceGHGemissionsinunitsofMTCO2earegenerallycalculatedinCalEEModasfollows:
10 California Energy Commission, California Commercial End‐Use Survey, http://capabilities.itron.com/CeusWeb/Chart.aspx.
AccessedNovember2013.11 CaliforniaAirPollutionControlOfficersAssociation,CaliforniaEmissionsEstimatorModel,http://www.caleemod.com/.Accessed
November2013March2014.
March 2014 – PRELIMINARY WORKING DRAFT – 3.0 Greenhouse Gas Emissions Methodology
8150SunsetBoulevardMixedUseProject GreenhouseGasEmissionsMethodologyandDocumentationPCRServicesCorporation 13
Mobile:
AnnualEmissions[MTCO2e]=(∑i(Units×ADT×DTRIP×EF×GWP)i)÷2204.62 [Equation3]
Where: Units = Numberofvehicles(samevehiclemodelyearandclass) ADT = Averagedailytriprate[trips/day] DTRIP = Tripdistance[miles/trip] Days = Numberofdaysperyear[days/year] EF = GHGemissionfactor[poundspermile] GWP = Globalwarmingpotential[CO2=1,CH4=21,N2O=310] 2204.62 = Conversionfactor[pounds/MT]
i = Summationindex
TheCalEEModtoolallowstheinputofseveralvariablestoquantifymobilesourceemissions.ThenumberofmotorvehiclesthattraveltoandfromtheexistingProjectSiteisbasedontripgenerationratesforthe
Table 3
Baseline Condition Natural Gas Combustion Greenhouse Gas Emissions
Land Use
Units (1000 sqft)
Annual Natural Gas Demand
Factor a (MMBtu/1000 sqft/year)
CO2 Factor b
(pounds/MMBtu)CH4 Factor
b (pounds/MMBtu)
N2O Factor b
(pounds/MMBtu)
Annual GHG Emissionsc
(MTCO2e/year)
GeneralRetail 14.65 2.46 117.65 0.0023 0.0022 1.94StorageFacility 27.63 2.46 117.65 0.0023 0.0022 3.64Walk‐inBank
Facility 20.178.05 117.65 0.0023 0.0022 8.72
Restaurant 2.06 249.14 117.65 0.0023 0.0022 27.50IceCreamParlor 0.80 249.14 117.65 0.0023 0.0022 10.70
FastFoodRestaurant
withoutDrive‐Thru
3.72 249.14 117.65 0.0023 0.0022 67.82
FastFoodRestaurantwithDrive‐Thru
5.07 249.14 117.65 0.0023 0.0022 49.76
DentalOffice 2.36 68.32 117.65 0.0023 0.0022 8.66FitnessCenter 3.55 68.32 117.65 0.0023 0.0022 13.02TotalGHGEmissions
192
a California Energy Commission, California Commercial End Use Survey, http://capabilities.itron.com/CeusWeb/Chart.aspx. Accessed November 2013. Factors are based on the Southern California Edison (SCE) sector as representative of the Project Site location.
b California Air Pollution Control Officers Association, California Emissions Estimator Model, http://www.caleemod.com/. Accessed January March 2014.
c Totals may not add up exactly due to rounding in the modeling calculations.
Source: PCR Services Corporation, 2014. Detailed emissions calculations are provided in Appendix A.
3.0 Greenhouse Gas Emissions Methodology – PRELIMINARY WORKING DRAFT – March 2014
8150SunsetBoulevardMixedUseProject GreenhouseGasEmissionsMethodologyandDocumentationPCRServicesCorporation 14
BaselineCondition.TheProjecttrafficstudy12occasionallyreferencestripsonapassengercarequivalent(PCE)basisinordertoevaluatetrafficcongestiononroadways,whichisatypicalmethodologyforprojectsin the Los Angeles area. For the purposes of evaluating traffic congestion, PCE trips count passengervehicles as a singlevehicle andheavy‐duty trucksasusually twoor threepassengervehicle equivalentsdepending on the truck type (buses may also be counted as multiple passenger vehicle equivalents).However,airqualityandGHGassessmentstypicallydonotreferencePCEtripratesandusuallyestimateemissionsbasedonactual tripratesandemissionfactors forallvehicletypes. Thus, forthepurposesofestimatingemissions, thisassessmentuses theactual triprates(notadjusted forPCEtriprates)andtheassociated emissions factors for each vehicle type, as well as the vehicle fleet mix, as provided inEMFAC2011. Trip lengthvalues arebasedon the residential and commercial tripdistancesprovided inCalEEMod. The trip distances were applied to the maximum daily trip estimates, based on standardInstituteofTransportationEngineers(ITE)tripgenerationrates,foreachexistinglanduseprovidedbytheProjecttrafficstudy13toestimatethetotalvehiclemilestraveled(VMT).ThetripstakeintoaccountVMTreductions from characteristics including the existing site’s proximity to existing public transit and itsurbaninfilllocation.TheestimatedVMTreductionsarecalculatedusingtheequationsandmethodologiesprescribed in the California Air Pollution Control Officer’s Association (CAPCOA) guidance document,QuantifyingGreenhouseGasMitigationMeasures,whichprovidesVMTreductionvaluesfortransportationcharacteristicsandmeasures.14 BasedontheCAPCOAguidance,theexistingsiteresultsinapproximately16.5 percent less VMT compared to theVMT calculated using standard ITE trip rates and standard tripdistancevalues.
Emissionsfrompassengervehicles(i.e.,light‐dutyautomobilesandlight‐dutytrucks)idlingon‐siteduetoqueuingatthefastfoodrestaurantdrive‐thruwereestimatedoutsideoftheCalEEModsoftwarebasedonindustrydataregardingthepercentageofvisitorsatahamburgerfastfoodrestaurantusingthedrive‐thruandtheaveragewaittimes.Accordtotheindustrysurveydata,hamburgerfastfoodrestaurantshave57percentofvisitorsutilizingthedrive‐thru15withaveragewaittimesover130seconds(overtwominutes).16Inordernottooverestimateemissionsfromtheexistingfastfoodrestaurantandthusnotoverestimatetheamountofexistingemissionscredits,avalueof120second(or2minutes)wasusedinthisassessment.
EmissionsofGHGs frommotorvehiclesaredependentonmodelyearsand thespecific typesofvehiclesthat are used to travel to and from the existing Project Site. The emissions were calculated using arepresentative motor vehicle fleet mix for year 2013 as provided in CalEEMod. The estimated annualemissions frommobile sources from theBaselineCondition are provided inTable4,BaselineConditionMobileSourceGreenhouseGasEmissions.DetailedemissionscalculationsareprovidedinAppendixA.
12 Hirsch/Green Transportation Consulting, Inc., Traffic Impact Analysis Report, ProposedMixed‐Use Development, 8150 Sunset
Boulevard,Hollywood,California,November2013.13 Hirsch/Green Transportation Consulting, Inc., Traffic Impact Analysis Report, ProposedMixed‐Use Development, 8150 Sunset
Boulevard,Hollywood,California,November2013.14 CaliforniaAirPollutionControlOfficersAssociation,QuantifyingGreenhouseGasMitigationMeasures,(2010).15 The NPD Group, Drive‐Thru Windows Still Put the Fast in Fast Food Restaurants, Reports NPD, May 2012,
https://www.npd.com/wps/portal/npd/us/news/press‐releases/pr_120530a/.AccessedDecember2013.16 QSRMagazine,2012QSRDrive‐ThruStudy,http://www.qsrmagazine.com/print/50631.AccessedDecember2013.
March 2014 – PRELIMINARY WORKING DRAFT – 3.0 Greenhouse Gas Emissions Methodology
8150SunsetBoulevardMixedUseProject GreenhouseGasEmissionsMethodologyandDocumentationPCRServicesCorporation 15
(e) Operational Waste
Theexisting landusesunder theBaselineConditiongeneratemunicipalsolidwaste (MSW) fromday‐to‐day operational activities, which generally consists of product packaging, grass clippings, furniture,clothing,bottles, foodscraps,newspapers,plastic,andother itemsroutinelydisposedof in trashbins. AportionoftheMSWisdivertedtowasterecyclingandreclamationfacilities.Wastethatisnotdivertedisusuallysenttolocallandfillsfordisposal.MSWthatisdisposedinlandfillsresultsinGHGemissionsofCO2andCH4fromthedecompositionofthewastethatoccursoverthespanofmanyyears.
EmissionsofGHGsassociatedwithsolidwastedisposalundertheBaselineConditionarecalculatedusingtheCalEEModtool.Theemissionsarebasedonthesizeofthecommercialandretaillanduses,thewastedisposal rate for the land uses, the waste diversion rate, the GHG emission factors for solid wastedecomposition,andtheGWPvaluesfortheGHGsemitted.AnnualwastedisposalGHGemissionsinunitsofMTCO2earegenerallycalculatedinCalEEModasfollows:
Waste:
AnnualEmissions[MTCO2e]=(∑i(Units×DMSW×EFMSW×GWP)i)÷1.1023 [Equation4]
Where: Units = Numberoflanduseunits(samelandusetype)[1000sqft] DMSW = Wastedisposalrate[tons/1000sqft/year] EFMSW = GHGemissionfactor[tons/tonwaste] GWP = Globalwarmingpotential[CO2=1,CH4=21,N2O=310] 1.1023 = Conversionfactor[tons/MT] i = Summationindex
The CalEEMod tool allows the input of several variables to quantify solidwaste emissions. Themodelrequirestheamountofwastedisposed,whichistheproductofthewastedisposalratetimesthelanduseunits.AnnualwastedisposalratesusedinCalEEModarebasedondatafromtheCaliforniaDepartmentofResourcesRecyclingandRecovery(CalRecycle). Forcommercialandretaillanduses,theratesarebasedonstatewideaverages.ThetotalamountofwastedisposedwasreducedbythediversionratefortheCity
Table 4
Baseline Condition Mobile Source Greenhouse Gas Emissions
Land Use Fleet Mix Year
Estimated Annual VMT/ OR
Annual Idling Hours Annual GHG Emissions
(MTCO2e/year)
ExistingSite(Traveling) 2013(AllVehicleClasses)
13,291,777(VMT)a 6,358a
ExistingSite(IdlingatOn‐SiteDrive‐Thru)
2013(LDA,LDT1,LDT2)
17,442(IdlingHours) 98.28
TotalGHGEmissions 6,456
LDA = Light‐duty automobiles; LDT = Light‐duty trucks a Calculated using the California Emissions Estimator Model, http://www.caleemod.com/. Accessed January March 2014.
Source: PCR Services Corporation, 2014. Detailed emissions calculations are provided in Appendix A.
3.0 Greenhouse Gas Emissions Methodology – PRELIMINARY WORKING DRAFT – March 2014
8150SunsetBoulevardMixedUseProject GreenhouseGasEmissionsMethodologyandDocumentationPCRServicesCorporation 16
of Los Angeles of 60 percent, according to themost recent data available.17 The GHG emission factors,particularlyforCH4,dependoncharacteristicsofthelandfill,suchasthepresenceofalandfillgascapturesystemandsubsequentflaringorenergyrecovery.Thedefaultvalues,asprovidedinCalEEMod,forlandfillgas capture (e.g., no capture, flaring, energy recovery), which are statewide averages, are used in thisassessment.
The estimated annual emissions from solidwaste disposal from the Baseline Condition are provided inTable5,BaselineConditionSolidWasteDisposalGreenhouseGasEmissions.DetailedemissionscalculationsareprovidedinAppendixA.
Table 5
Baseline Condition Solid Waste Disposal Greenhouse Gas Emissions
Land Use Waste
Diversion a
Waste Disposal Rate after Diversion b
(tons/year) Landfill Gas (no capture) c
Landfill Gas (capture with
flaring) c
Annual GHG Emissions
(MTCO2e/year)
ExistingSite 60% 136.86 6% 94% 62.26TotalGHGEmissions 62
a County of Los Angeles, Countywide Integrated Waste Management Plan, 2012 Annual Report (2013).
b Waste generation factors for commercial and restaurant uses are from the Integrated Waste Management Board, Targeted Statewide Waste Characterization Study: Waste Disposal and Diversion Findings for Selected Industry Groups, June 2006.
c California Air Pollution Control Officers Association, California Emissions Estimator Model, http://www.caleemod.com/. Accessed January March 2014.
Source: PCR Services Corporation, 2014. Detailed emissions calculations are provided in Appendix A.
(f) Operational Water and Wastewater
WaterandwastewatergeneratedfromtheexistinglandusesundertheBaselineConditionrequiresenergyto supply, distribute and treat. The combustion of fossil fuels to produce electricity results in GHGemissionsofCO2andsmalleramountsofCH4andN2O.Theelectricitygenerationoccursoff‐site;therefore,theelectricityusefromwaterandwastewaterresultsinGHGemissionsthatareconsideredtobeindirect.WastewateralsoresultsinemissionsofGHGsfromwastewatertreatmentsystems(e.g.,septic,aerobic,orlagoons)aswellasfromsolidsthataredigestedeitherthroughananaerobicdigesterorwithco‐generationfromcombustionofdigestergas.
The emissions of GHGs associated with water demand and wastewater generation under the BaselineConditionarecalculatedusingtheCalEEModtool.Theemissionsarebasedonthesizeofthecommercialandretaillanduses,thewaterdemandfactors,theelectricalintensityfactorsforwatersupply,treatment,anddistributionandforwastewatertreatment,theGHGemissionfactorsfortheelectricityutilityprovider,andtheGWPvaluesfortheGHGsemitted. AnnualwaterdemandandwastewaterGHGemissionsduetoelectricityaregenerallycalculatedinCalEEModasfollowsforindoorandoutdoorwaterdemand:
17 CountyofLosAngeles,CountywideIntegratedWasteManagementPlan,2012AnnualReport(2013).
March 2014 – PRELIMINARY WORKING DRAFT – 3.0 Greenhouse Gas Emissions Methodology
8150SunsetBoulevardMixedUseProject GreenhouseGasEmissionsMethodologyandDocumentationPCRServicesCorporation 17
WaterSupply,Treatment,andDistribution;WastewaterTreatment(electricity):
AnnualEmissions[MTCO2e]=(∑i(Units×DW×(EIW÷1000)×EFW×GWP)i)÷2204.62 [Equation5]
Where: Units = Numberoflanduseunits(samelandusetype)[1000sqft] DW = Waterdemandfactor[milliongallons(Mgal)/1000sqft/year] EIW = Electricityintensityfactor[kilowatt‐hours(kWh)/Mgal] 1000 = Conversionfactor[kWh/MWh] EFW = GHGemissionfactor[pounds/MWh] GWP = Globalwarmingpotential[CO2=1,CH4=21,N2O=310] 2204.62 = Conversionfactor[pounds/MT] i = Summationindex
TheCalEEModtoolcalculateswaterdemandbasedonannualratesinthePacificInstituteWasteNotWantNotreport.18 TheCalEEModtoolprovidesoptionstoaccountfortheuseofwatersavingfeaturessuchastheuseoflow‐flowwaterfixtures(e.g.,low‐flowfaucets,low‐flowtoilets).
TheCEC’sestimate forenergy intensityof thewateruse cycle inSouthernCalifornia, asprovided in the2006 CEC report Refining Estimates ofWater‐Related Energy Use in California, is used to calculate theenergyusagerelatedtowatersupply,treatment,anddistributionandwastewatertreatment.19 ThesameelectricityGHGemissionsfactorsdiscussedinSection3.2.2(b),OperationalEnergy–Electricity,areusedforwaterandwastewaterenergyusage.
TheemissionsofGHGsassociatedwithwastewatertreatmentprocessemissionsarealsocalculatedusingtheCalEEMod tool. The emissions arebasedon the typeof treatment (e.g., aerobic, facultative lagoons,septic systems). The emissions are calculating using the default settings in CalEEMod for the type ofwastewater treatment. Calculation formulasaredescribed indetail in theCaliforniaEmissionsEstimatorModel User’s Guide, Appendix A.20 As stated in the User’s Guide, the GHGs emitted from each type ofwastewatertreatmentarebasedontheCARB’sLocalGovernmentOperationsProtocol(LGOP),21whicharein turn based onUnited States Environmental ProtectionAgency (USEPA)methodologies.22 The defaultCalEEMod settings forwastewater treatment are: 10.33percent septic tank, 87.46percent aerobic, 2.21percentfacultativelagoonsand100percentanaerobiccombustionofgas.
TheestimatedannualemissionsfromwaterandwastewaterfromtheBaselineConditionareprovidedinTable 6, Baseline Condition Water and Wastewater Greenhouse Gas Emissions. Detailed emissionscalculationsareprovidedinAppendixA.
18 Gleick,P.H.;Haasz,D.;Henges‐Jeck,C.;Srinivasan,V.;Cushing,K.K.;Mann,A.2003.WasteNot,WantNot:ThePotentialforUrban
WaterConservation inCalifornia.Publishedby thePacific Institute forStudies inDevelopment,Environment,andSecurity.Fullreport available online at: http://www.pacinst.org/reports/urban_usage/waste_not_want_not_full_report.pdf. Appendicesavailableonlineat:http://www.pacinst.org/reports/urban_usage/appendices.htm.
19 CaliforniaEnergyCommission,RefiningEstimatesofWater‐RelatedEnergyUseinCalifornia,PIERFinalProjectReport,CEC‐500‐2006‐118,(2006).
20 CaliforniaAirPollutionControlOfficersAssociation,CaliforniaEmissionsEstimatorModelUser’sGuide,(2013).21 CaliforniaAirResourcesBoard,LocalGovernmentOperationsProtocol,Chapter10:WastewaterTreatmentFacilities,(2008).22 United States Environmental Protection Agency, Inventory ofUS Greenhouse Gas Emissions and Sinks: 1990‐2006, Chapter 8:
Waste,(2008).
3.0 Greenhouse Gas Emissions Methodology – PRELIMINARY WORKING DRAFT – March 2014
8150SunsetBoulevardMixedUseProject GreenhouseGasEmissionsMethodologyandDocumentationPCRServicesCorporation 18
(g) Operational Area and Stationary
Area sourcesofGHGemissions resulting from theoperationof the existing landuses at theProject Siteunder theBaselineCondition includeequipmentusedtomaintain landscaping,suchas lawnmowersandtrimmers.ThecombustionoffossilfuelstooperatetheseequipmentresultsinGHGemissionsofCO2andsmalleramountsofCH4andN2O. Theemissionsoccuron‐siteandareadirectresultofactivityfromtheexistinglanduses;therefore,theGHGemissionsareconsideredtobedirect.Therearenoothersubstantialstationarysourceson‐site,suchasgeneratorsorindustrialsizedboilers.
The emissions of GHGs associated with operational area sources under the Baseline Condition arecalculatedusingtheCalEEModtool.Theemissionsforlandscapingequipmentarebasedonthesizeofthecommercialandretaillanduses,theGHGemissionfactorsforfuelcombustion,andtheGWPvaluesfortheGHGs emitted. Annual GHG emissions from landscaping equipment in units of MTCO2e are generallycalculatedinCalEEModasfollows:
LandscapingEquipment:
AnnualEmissions[MTCO2e]=(∑i(Units×EFLE×ALE×GWP)i)÷106 [Equation6]
Where: Units = Numberoflanduseunits(samelandusetype)[1000sqft] EFLE = GHGemissionfactor[grams(g)/1000sqft/day] ALE = Landscapingequipmentoperatingdaysperyear[day/year]
Table 6
Baseline Condition Water and Wastewater Greenhouse Gas Emissions
Land Use
Indoor Water
Demand a (gal/year)
Outdoor Water
Demand a (gal/year)
Supply Water b
(kWh/Mgal)
Treat Water b
(kWh/Mgal)
Distribute Water b
(kWh/Mgal)
Wastewater Treatment b (kWh/Mgal)
Annual GHG Emissions c
(MTCO2e/year)
GeneralRetail 339,452 208,048 9,727 111 1,272 1,911 3.96StorageFacility 258,420 – 9,727 111 1,272 1,911 2.09Walk‐inBank
Facility467,535 286,555 9,727 111 1,272 1,911 5.45
Restaurant/IceCreamParlor/Fast
Food1,534,346 97,934 9,727 111 1,272 1,911 12.97
DentalOffice 231,483 44,092 9,727 111 1,272 1,911 2.13FitnessCenter 82,373 50,487 9,727 111 1,272 1,911 0.96ParkingLot – 542,755 9,727 111 1,272 1,911 3.17TotalGHGEmissions
31
a City of Los Angeles, Department of Public Works, Bureau of Sanitation. Indoor and outdoor water demand rated rates are derived based on the ratio of indoor to outdoor water demand in CalEEMod.
b California Air Pollution Control Officers Association, California Emissions Estimator Model, http://www.caleemod.com/. Accessed January March 2014.
c Totals may not add up exactly due to rounding in the modeling calculations.
Source: PCR Services Corporation, 2014. Detailed emissions calculations are provided in Appendix A.
March 2014 – PRELIMINARY WORKING DRAFT – 3.0 Greenhouse Gas Emissions Methodology
8150SunsetBoulevardMixedUseProject GreenhouseGasEmissionsMethodologyandDocumentationPCRServicesCorporation 19
GWP = Globalwarmingpotential[CO2=1,CH4=21,N2O=310] 106 = Conversionfactor[g/MT] i = Summationindex
The CalEEMod tool uses landscaping equipment GHG emission factors from the CARB OFFROAD2011model and the CARB TechnicalMemo: Change in Population and Activity Factors for Lawn and GardenEquipment(6/13/2003).23TheCalEEModtoolestimatesthatlandscapingequipmentoperatefor250daysperyearintheSouthCoastAirBasin.
The estimated annual emissions from area and stationary sources under the Baseline Condition areprovided inTable7,BaselineConditionAreaand Stationary SourceGreenhouseGasEmissions. DetailedemissionscalculationsareprovidedinAppendixA.
Table 7
Baseline Condition Area and Stationary Source Greenhouse Gas Emissions
GHG Emissions Source Annual GHG Emissions
(MTCO2e/year)
LandscapingEquipment 0.004TotalGHGEmissions 0.004
Source: PCR Services Corporation, 2014. Detailed emissions calculations are provided in Appendix A.
(h) Summary of Baseline Condition GHG Emissions
AsummaryoftheGHGemissionsundertheBaselineConditionisprovidedinTable8,SummaryofAnnualGHGEmissionsundertheBaselineCondition.
3.3 PROJECT OPERATIONAL EMISSIONS
3.3.1 Description of Project Condition
TheProjectwoulddemolishandremovedthetwoexistingstructuresandassociated infrastructure fromtheProject Site. TheProjectwould construct twobuildings over a single podium structure. TheNorthBuildingwould include three levels (onesubterranean)ofentirelycommercialuses. TheSouthBuildingwould include commercial uses on the first two levels, twelve levels of residential uses above thecommercialfloors,andarooftoprestaurant/loungelevelonLevel16.TheProjectwouldinclude111,339squarefeetofcommercialretailandrestaurantuseswithinthreelowerlevels(onesubterranean)andonerooftop level,249apartmentunits, including28affordablehousingunits,within the twelveupper levelsrepresenting222,564grosssquarefeetofresidentialspace.TheProjectwouldalsoprovideanew,9,134square‐foot Corner Plaza at the northeast corner of the site, a 34,050‐square‐foot Central Plaza, publicrooftopdeck/gardenareasalongSunsetBoulevard,aprivatepoolandpooldeckareaforresidents,aswell23 CaliforniaAirResourcesBoard,OFFROADModelingChangeTechnicalMemo:ChangeinPopulationandActivityFactorsforLawn
andGardenEquipment,(6/13/2003),http://www.arb.ca.gov/msei/2001_residential_lawn_and_garden_changes_in_eqpt_pop_and_act.pdf.AccessedNovember2013.
3.0 Greenhouse Gas Emissions Methodology – PRELIMINARY WORKING DRAFT – March 2014
8150SunsetBoulevardMixedUseProject GreenhouseGasEmissionsMethodologyandDocumentationPCRServicesCorporation 20
asotherresident‐onlyamenitiestotalingapproximately6,900square feet. Parkingforallproposeduseswould be provided on‐site via a seven‐level Parking Structure housedwithin the podium structure thatincludes849totalparkingspaces.Short‐andlong‐termbicycleparkingtotaling985spaceswouldalsobeprovidedon‐site,including428spacesforresidentialusesand557spacesforcommercialuses.Thetotaldevelopmentwould includeup to333,903 square feetof commercial and residential space. The squarefootageforeachoftheselandusesareprovidedinTable9,ProjectFloorArea.
Table 9
Project Floor Area
Land Use Dwelling Units (DU) or Square Feet (sqft)
Residential 249DU(incl.28affordableunits)ResidentialAmenities(e.g.,pool,etc.) 49,840sqft
ParkingStructure 305,652 sqft
GeneralRetail 51,150 sqftSupermarket 24,811 sqftWalk‐inBank 5,094 sqft
QualityRestaurants 22,189 sqftDance/YogaStudios 8,095 sqft
TotalCommercialFloorArea(excludingParkingStructure) 111,339
Source: AG‐SCH 8150 Sunset Boulevard Owner LP, 2013
Table 8
Summary of Annual GHG Emissions under the Baseline Conditions
GHG Emissions Source Annual GHG Emissions a
(MTCO2e/year)
Electricity 667 631NaturalGas 192
Mobile(Traveling) 6,358Mobile(IdlingatOn‐SiteDrive‐Thru) 98
Waste 62WaterandWastewater 31AreaandStationary 0.0
Total 7,407 7,372
a Totals may not add up exactly due to rounding in the modeling calculations. Source: PCR Services Corporation, 2014.
March 2014 – PRELIMINARY WORKING DRAFT – 3.0 Greenhouse Gas Emissions Methodology
8150SunsetBoulevardMixedUseProject GreenhouseGasEmissionsMethodologyandDocumentationPCRServicesCorporation 21
Forthepurposesofthisassessment,inordertoprovideacomparisonoftheProject’sGHGemissionswiththeBaselineCondition, and toassess futureGHGemissions trendsof theProject, emissionsofGHGsareestimatedformilestoneyearstheinitialproposedconstructionyearof2015throughyear2025,whenGHGemissionsareprojectedtogenerallystabilize.Withinthe2015through2025period,thereareseveralkeymilestoneyears.Themilestoneyearsassessedcorrespondscorrespondtothefollowingcircumstances:
2015:InitialyearofProjectconstruction;
2016:SecondyearofProjectconstruction;
2017:Expectedinitialoperationalyear;
2020:Theyear inwhichelectricutilities, includingLADWP,areexpectedtosupply33percentofelectricityviarenewablesources;
2023:Theyear inwhich theProjectwouldmeet theminimumrequirements for thepurchaseofgreenpower,carbonoffsets,and/orrenewableenergycertificates(RECs)andwouldnolongerberequiredtopurchaseinaccordancewiththeUSGBCLEED®EnergyandAtmosphereCredit7[v4];and
2025:Theyear inwhichthe2017‐2025 light‐dutyvehicleGHGemissionsandCorporateAverageFuelEconomystandardsaretobefullyimplementedfornewvehicles.
3.3.2 Project GHG Emission Sources and Calculation Methodology
(a) Construction
ConstructionoftheProjectwouldresultinone‐timeGHGemissionsofCO2andsmalleramountsofCH4andN2O fromheavy‐duty constructionequipment,haul trucks, andworkervehicles. Constructionemissionsare forecasted by assuming a conservative estimate of construction activities (i.e., assuming allconstructionoccursattheearliestfeasibledate)andapplyingtheoff‐roadandon‐roademissionsfactors.Theemissionsare estimatedusing theCalEEMod tool,which incorporates theCARBOFFROAD2011andEMFAC2011models. TheoutputvaluesusedinthisanalysisareadjustedtobeProject‐specificbasedonequipment types and the construction schedule. These values are applied to the construction phasingassumptions togenerateGHGemissionsvalues foreachconstructionyear. TheCalEEMod toolprovidesoptionsforspecifyingequipment,horsepowerratings,loadfactors,andoperationalhoursperday.Sinceaconstructioncontractor(s)hasnotyetbeenretainedfortheProject,specificequipmentspecificationsarenot yet known. Therefore, recommended default equipment and vehicle horsepower ratings and loadfactorsprovidedinCalEEModareusedinthisassessment.Thisassessmentalsoassumesequipmentwouldoperatefor8hoursduringaworkday.
ConstructionoftheProjectwouldoccuroveranumberofphasesandincludeactivitiessuchasdemolition,debrisandsoilhauling,buildingconstruction,architecturalcoating,andpaving.Informationregardingtheactivitiesthatwouldoccurduringthesephasesisprovidedbelow:
Demolition: This phase is anticipated to begin in 2015 and last for approximately twomonths.Constructionequipmentwould includeanexcavator, loader, concretesaw,haul trucks,andotherconstructionequipment.Approximately6,500cubicyards(cy)ofdebriswouldbehauledoff‐site.
3.0 Greenhouse Gas Emissions Methodology – PRELIMINARY WORKING DRAFT – March 2014
8150SunsetBoulevardMixedUseProject GreenhouseGasEmissionsMethodologyandDocumentationPCRServicesCorporation 22
GradingandExcavation:Thisphaseisanticipatedtobeginafterthedemolitionphaseandlastforapproximately fourmonths. Construction equipmentwould include a drill rig, excavator, dozer,loaders,scraper,watertruck,andhaultrucks.Approximately58,500cyofsoilwouldbeexported.
BuildingConstruction: Thisphaseisanticipatedtobegininmid‐2015andlast forapproximately18 months. During this phase, the parking structure and residential and commercial buildingswould be constructed. Construction equipment would include a concrete pump, generator, off‐highwaytruck,cranes,lifts,welders,andotherconstructionequipment.
SiteWork/Closeout: This phase is anticipated to begin in 2016 and last for approximately ninemonths. During this phase, concretewould be poured during construction of the buildings andinfrastructure and surfaces would be paved. Construction equipment would include a concretepump,concretetrucks,andpavingequipment.
ArchitecturalCoating: Thisphase isanticipated tobegin inmid‐2016and last forapproximatelyfivemonths.Duringthisphase,theinteriorandexteriorcoatingwouldbeappliedtotheresidentialand commercial buildings. Coating equipment would include a mixer, mobile crane, and aircompressor.
The emissions of GHGs associated with construction of the Project were calculated for each year ofconstruction activity. Detailed emissions calculations are provided in Appendix B. Results of the GHGemissionscalculationsarepresentedinTable10,EstimatedUnmitigatedProjectConstructionGreenhouseGasEmissions.AlthoughGHGsaregeneratedduringconstructionandareaccordinglyconsideredone‐timeemissions, it is important to themwhen assessing all of the long‐termGHGemissions associatedwith aproject.
Table 10
Estimated Unmitigated Project Construction Greenhouse Gas Emissions
Emission Source Annual GHG Emissions a
(MTCO2e/year)
ConstructionYear1(2015) 1,631ConstructionYear2(2016) 2,346Total 3,977 a Totals may not add up exactly due to rounding in the modeling calculations Detailed emissions calculations
are provided in Appendix B.
Source: PCR Services Corporation, 2014
(b) Operational Energy – Electricity
The emissions of GHGs associated with electricity demand for the Project are calculated using theCalEEMod tool. EmissionsofGHGsassociatedwithoperationof theProjectarebasedon thesizeof thecommercial,retail,restaurant,andresidentiallanduses(includingresidentialamenitiessuchastheprivatepool and pool deck), the electrical demand factors for the land uses, the GHG emission factors for theelectricityutilityprovider,andtheGWPvaluesfortheGHGsemitted.AnnualelectricityGHGemissionsarecalculatedusingthegeneralformulashownpreviouslyasEquation1. Forresidentiallanduses,emission
March 2014 – PRELIMINARY WORKING DRAFT – 3.0 Greenhouse Gas Emissions Methodology
8150SunsetBoulevardMixedUseProject GreenhouseGasEmissionsMethodologyandDocumentationPCRServicesCorporation 23
factorsarespecified inunitsofdwellingunits (DU) insteadof1,000sqft. Thisassessmentalso includeselectricity‐related GHG emissions from the proposed enclosed parking structure, which would includeelevators,lighting,andaventilationsystem.
TheCalEEModtoolcalculateselectricaldemandbasedondatafromtheCEUS,whichlistsenergydemandbybuildingtype.24 However,sincethedatafromtheCEUSisfrom2002,theCalEEModtoolincorporatescorrectionfactorstoaccountforcompliancewiththe2008/2010Title24BuildingStandardsCode.While,therecentlyamended2013Title24BuildingStandardsCode isscheduledtogo intoeffecton January1,2014,theProjectwouldmeetorexceedtheamendedstandardsviameasuresimplementedtoachievetheUnited States Green Building Council (USGBC) Leadership in Energy and Environmental and Design®(“LEED®”)Silverrating.TheProjectwouldbedesignedtoincorporateProjectDesignFeatures(PDFs)thatwouldreduceitsenergydemandwiththegoalofachievingorexceedingtherequirementsoftheStateofCaliforniaGreenBuildingStandards(CALGreen)Code,theCityofLosAngelesGreenBuildingCode,andtheUSGBC LEED® Silver rating. Thus, the Project would reduce its electricity demand as compared to thedefault electricity factors in the CalEEMod tool. The PDFswere accounted for in the CalEEMod tool byselecting the appropriate options in the “mitigationmeasures” section of themodel. A summary of theenergy‐efficiencyPDFsisprovidedbelow:
GreenBuildingMeasures:TheProjectwouldbedesignedandoperatedtomeetorexceedtheapplicablerequirementsof theStateofCaliforniaGreenBuildingStandardsCodeandtheCityofLosAngelesGreenBuildingCodeandachievetheUSGBCLEED®SilverCertification.TheProjectwouldincorporatemeasuresandperformancestandardstosupportitsLEED®SilverCertification,whichincludebutarenotlimitedtothefollowing:
TheProjectwould implementaconstructionwastemanagementplantorecycleand/orsalvageaminimum of 75 percent of nonhazardous construction debris or minimize the generation ofconstructionwaste to 2.5 pounds per square foot of building floor area. (LEED®Materials andResourcesCredit5[v4]25);
TheProjectwouldbedesignedtooptimizeenergyperformanceandreducebuildingenergycostby10 percent for new construction compared to ASHRAE 90.1‐2010, Appendix G and the Title 24BuildingStandardsCode.(LEED®EnergyandAtmosphereCredit2[v4]);
TheProjectwouldreduceemissionsthroughtheuseofgrid‐source,renewableenergytechnologiesandcarbonmitigationprojects.TheProjectwouldengageinacontractforqualifiedresources,foraminimumoffiveyears,tobedeliveredatleastannually.Thecontractwouldspecifytheprovisionof 100percent of theProject’s energy fromgreenpower, carbonoffsets, and/orRECsduring thefirstfiveyearsofoperation.TheProjectwouldcommittoprovidingaminimumof1015percentofthe Project’s energy from green power, carbon offsets, and/or RECs for two years after theminimumfiveyearperiod.(LEED®EnergyandAtmosphereCredit7[v4]);and
TheProjectwouldreduceindoorwaterusebyaminimumof35percentbyinstallingwaterfixturesthatexceedapplicablestandards.(LEED®WaterEfficiencyCredit2[v4]).
24 California Energy Commission, California Commercial End‐Use Survey, http://capabilities.itron.com/CeusWeb/Chart.aspx.
AccessedNovember2013.25 Thebracketedtext“v4”denotesversion4oftheLEED®BuildingDesignandConstructioncredits.
3.0 Greenhouse Gas Emissions Methodology – PRELIMINARY WORKING DRAFT – March 2014
8150SunsetBoulevardMixedUseProject GreenhouseGasEmissionsMethodologyandDocumentationPCRServicesCorporation 24
The LADWP provides electric service to the Project Site. Emission factors for GHGs due to electricalgenerationtoservetheelectricaldemandsoftheProjectwereobtainedfromtheLADWP20122013PowerIntegrated Resource Plan, which provides a CO2 intensity of 1,156 1,094 pounds of CO2 per MWh.26Currently,LADWPprovides20percentofelectricityviarenewablesources.27By2020,LADWPisexpectingtoprovidemeettheState’sRenewablesPortfolioStandardofatleast33percentofelectricityviarenewablesourcespursuanttotheState’sRenewablesPortfolioStandard. BasedondataobtainedfromCARBstaff,“[i]fanapplicantwouldliketouseanEF[emissionfactor]thatrepresentsthestate’sRenewablePortfolioStandard (RPS) law and growth in electricity demand, the EF of 595 lbs CO2/MWh may be used.”28According to CARB staff, the “EF represents a ‘marginal’ supply profile for new generation that will beadded to the grid in the years 2020 and beyond, and is consistentwith themethodology used in stateemission rule impact assessments.”29 Therefore, consistentwith theCARB staff recommendation, aCO2intensityfactorof595poundsofCO2perMWhwasusedforelectricityemissionsforyears2020through2025. Thus, by 2020, the CO2 intensity should be reduced to 968 pounds of CO2 per MWh if LADWPreplaces its2011energyportfoliowith renewable sourcesonaproportionatebasis (e.g., calculatedasaproportionwhere1,156poundsofCO2perMWhrepresentsa20percentrenewablesportfolio).EmissionfactorsforCH4andN2OwereobtainedfromtheCaliforniaEmissionsEstimatorModel(CalEEMod).30 Themilestone year 2017 emissions Emissions for years 2017 through 2019 take into account the currentLADWPrenewablemixofapproximately20percent(1,1561,094poundsofCO2perMWh).Themilestoneyears2020,2023,and2025emissionstakeintoaccountarenewablemixof33percent(968poundsofCO2perMWh).
TheestimatedannualemissionsfromelectricaldemandfromtheProjectatmilestoneyearsareprovidedinTable 11, Project Electrical Demand Greenhouse Gas Emissions. Detailed emissions calculations areprovidedinAppendixB.
(c) Operational Energy – Natural Gas
The emissions of GHGs associated with natural gas demand for the Project are calculated using theCalEEMod tool. EmissionsofGHGsassociatedwithoperationof theProjectarebasedon thesizeof thecommercial,retail,restaurant,andresidentiallanduses(includingresidentialamenitiessuchastheprivatepool andpool deck), thenatural gas demand factors for the landuses, theGHGemission factors for thenaturalgascombustion,andtheGWPvaluesfortheGHGsemitted.AnnualnaturalgasGHGemissionsarecalculatedusingthegeneralformulashownpreviouslyasEquation2. Forresidentiallanduses,emissionfactorsarespecifiedinunitsofDUinsteadof1,000sqft.
26 LosAngelesDepartmentofWaterandPower,2012PowerIntegratedResourcePlan,(2012)C‐11.27 LosAngelesDepartmentofWaterandPower,2012PowerIntegratedResourcePlan,(2012)111.28 CaliforniaAirResourcesBoard,StatewideEmissionFactors(EF)ForUseWithAB900Projects,March2014.Theemissionfactorof
595 lbs CO2/MWh is from the California LEV III Initial Statement Of Reasons (ISOR, Dec. 7, 2011),http://www.arb.ca.gov/regact/2012/leviiighg2012/leviiighg2012.htm,basedonanalysiswithCA‐GREETmodel.ThisdocumentisprovidedinAppendixB.
29 CaliforniaAirResourcesBoard,StatewideEmissionFactors(EF)ForUseWithAB900Projects,March2014.30 CaliforniaAirPollutionControlOfficersAssociation,CaliforniaEmissionsEstimatorModel,http://www.caleemod.com/.Accessed
January2014.
March 2014 – PRELIMINARY WORKING DRAFT – 3.0 Greenhouse Gas Emissions Methodology
8150SunsetBoulevardMixedUseProject GreenhouseGasEmissionsMethodologyandDocumentationPCRServicesCorporation 25
TheCalEEModtoolcalculatesnaturalgasdemandbasedondatafromtheCEUS,whichlistsenergydemandbybuildingtype.31 However,sincethedatafromtheCEUSisfrom2002,theCalEEModtoolincorporatescorrectionfactorstoaccountforcompliancewiththe2008/2010Title24BuildingStandardsCode.While,therecentlyamended2013Title24BuildingStandardsCode isscheduledtogo intoeffecton January1,2014,theProjectwouldmeetorexceedtheamendedstandardsviameasuresimplementedtoachievetheUSGBC LEED® Silver rating. The Projectwould be designed to incorporate PDFs thatwould reduce itsenergydemandwiththegoalofachievingorexceedingtherequirementsoftheCALGreenCode,theCityofLosAngelesGreenBuildingCode,andtheUSGBCLEED®Silverrating. Thus,theProjectwouldreduceitsnatural gasdemandascompared to thedefault electricity factors in theCalEEMod tool. ThePDFswere
31 California Energy Commission, California Commercial End‐Use Survey, http://capabilities.itron.com/CeusWeb/Chart.aspx.
AccessedNovember2013.
Table 11
Project Electrical Demand Greenhouse Gas Emissions
Land Use
Units (DU or
1000 sqft)
Annual Electrical Demand Factor a (MWh/unit/year)
CO2 Factor b
(pounds/MWh)CH4 Factor
c (pounds/MWh)
N2O Factor c
(pounds/MWh)
Annual GHG Emissions d
(MTCO2e/year)
2017‐2019 Residential 249 3.46 1,156 1,094 0.029 0.0062 434.17 410.93
ResidentialAmenities 49.84 11.78 1,156 1,094 0.029 0.0062 305.30 288.96GeneralRetail 51.15 14.68 1,156 1,094 0.029 0.0062 390.62 369.72Supermarket 24.81 38.63 1,156 1,094 0.029 0.0062 455.47 431.09Walk‐inBank 5.09 13.97 1,156 1,094 0.029 0.0062 37.02 35.03
QualityRestaurants 22.19 45.92 1,156 1,094 0.029 0.0062 511.40 484.03Dance/YogaStudios 8.10 11.78 1,156 1,094 0.029 0.0062 49.59 46.93ParkingStructure 305.65 6.35 1,156 1,094 0.029 0.0062 1,009.37 955.35
TotalGHGEmissions 3,193 3,0222020‐2025/2023/2025
Residential 249 3.46 968 595 0.029 0.0062 363.71 223.92ResidentialAmenities 49.84 11.78 968 595 0.029 0.0062 255.75 157.45
GeneralRetail 51.15 14.68 968 595 0.029 0.0062 327.23 201.46Supermarket 24.81 38.63 968 595 0.029 0.0062 381.55 234.90Walk‐inBank 5.09 13.97 968 595 0.029 0.0062 31.01 19.09
QualityRestaurants 22.19 45.92 968 595 0.029 0.0062 428.41 263.75Dance/YogaStudios 8.10 11.78 968 595 0.029 0.0062 41.54 25.57ParkingStructure 305.65 6.35 968 595 0.029 0.0062 845.56 520.57
TotalGHGEmissions 2,675 1,647
a California Air Pollution Control Officers Association, California Emissions Estimator Model, http://www.caleemod.com/. Accessed November 2013 March 2014. Demand factor accounts for a 10 percent reduction in Title 24 energy demand.
b Los Angeles Department of Water and Power, 2012 Power Integrated Resource Plan, (2012) C‐11.
c California Air Pollution Control Officers Association, California Emissions Estimator Model, http://www.caleemod.com/. Accessed January March 2014.
d Totals may not add up exactly due to rounding in the modeling calculations.
Source: PCR Services Corporation, 2014. Detailed emissions calculations are provided in Appendix B.
3.0 Greenhouse Gas Emissions Methodology – PRELIMINARY WORKING DRAFT – March 2014
8150SunsetBoulevardMixedUseProject GreenhouseGasEmissionsMethodologyandDocumentationPCRServicesCorporation 26
accounted for in the CalEEMod tool by selecting the appropriate options in the “mitigation measures”sectionofthemodel.Asummaryoftheenergy‐efficiencyPDFsisprovidedaboveinPDF‐GHG‐1.
The combustion of natural gas results in relatively equal amounts of GHG emissions per unit of gascombustedinthestate.EmissionfactorsforGHGsduetonaturalgascombustiontoservetheheatingandcookingdemandsoftheProjectwereobtainedfromtheCalEEModtool,whichprovidesstatewideemissionfactors.32 TheemissionsofGHGsduetonaturalgasdemandwouldberelativelysteadyforthemilestoneyearsassessed(2017,2020,2023,and2025).
The estimated annual emissions from natural gas combustion from the Project Baseline Condition areprovided in Table 12, Project Natural Gas Combustion Greenhouse Gas Emissions. Detailed emissionscalculationsareprovidedinAppendixB.
Table 12
Project Natural Gas Combustion Greenhouse Gas Emissions
Land Use
Units (DU or
1000 sqft)
Annual Natural Gas Demand
Factor a (MMBtu/unit
/year)
CO2 Factor b
(pounds/ MMBtu)
CH4 Factor b
(pounds/ MMBtu)
N2O Factor b
(pounds/ MMBtu)
Annual GHG Emissions c
(MTCO2e/year)
Residential 249 6.30 117.65 0.0023 0.0022 84.28ResidentialAmenities 49.84 17.37 117.65 0.0023 0.0022 46.49
GeneralRetail 51.15 1.58 117.65 0.0023 0.0022 4.34Supermarket 24.81 21.56 117.65 0.0023 0.0022 28.71Walk‐inBank 5.09 9.88 117.65 0.0023 0.0022 2.70
QualityRestaurants 22.19 228.49 117.65 0.0023 0.0022 272.20Dance/YogaStudios 8.10 17.37 117.65 0.0023 0.0022 7.55TotalGHGEmissions 446
a California Air Pollution Control Officers Association, California Emissions Estimator Model, http://www.caleemod.com/. Accessed November 2013 March 2014. Demand factor accounts for a 10 percent reduction in Title 24 energy demand.
b California Air Pollution Control Officers Association, California Emissions Estimator Model, http://www.caleemod.com/. Accessed January March 2014.
c Totals may not add up exactly due to rounding in the modeling calculations.
Source: PCR Services Corporation, 2014. Detailed emissions calculations are provided in Appendix B.
(d) Operational Mobile
MobilesourceemissioncalculationsassociatedwiththeProjectBaselineConditionarecalculatedusingtheCalEEModtool.EmissionsofGHGsassociatedwithmobilesourcesfromoperationoftheProjectarebasedontheaveragedailytriprate,tripdistance,theGHGemissionfactorsforthemobilesources,andtheGWP
32 CaliforniaAirPollutionControlOfficersAssociation,CaliforniaEmissionsEstimatorModel,http://www.caleemod.com/.Accessed
November2013March2014.
March 2014 – PRELIMINARY WORKING DRAFT – 3.0 Greenhouse Gas Emissions Methodology
8150SunsetBoulevardMixedUseProject GreenhouseGasEmissionsMethodologyandDocumentationPCRServicesCorporation 27
values for the GHGs emitted. The types of vehicles that would visit the Site include all vehicle typesincludingautomobiles, light‐dutytrucks,deliverytrucks,andwastehaultrucks. ModelingfortheProjectwasconductedusingthevehiclefleetmixfortheSouthCoastAirBasinasprovidedinEMFAC2011.AnnualmobilesourceGHGemissions inunitsofMTCO2earegenerallycalculated inCalEEModusingthegeneralformulashownpreviouslyasEquation3. Forresidential landuses, tripgenerationratesarespecified inunitsoftripsperDUinsteadofper1,000sqft.
TheCalEEModtoolallowstheinputofseveralvariablestoquantifymobilesourceemissions.ThenumberofmotorvehiclesthattraveltoandfromtheProjectSiteisbasedontripgenerationratesasdocumentedinthe traffic study for the Project.33 As was discussed previously, the Project traffic study34 occasionallyreferences trips on a PCE basis in order to evaluate traffic congestion on roadways. However, for thepurposes of estimating emissions, this assessment uses the actual trip rates (not adjusted for PCE triprates) and the associated emissions factors for each vehicle type, as well as the vehicle fleet mix, asprovided inEMFAC2011. Trip lengthvalues arebasedon the residential andcommercial tripdistancesprovidedinCalEEMod.CalEEModprovidestripdistancesforhome‐work,home‐shopping,andhome‐otherforresidentialtripsandcommercial‐customer,commercial‐work,andcommercial‐nonwork(e.g.,deliverytrips)fornon‐residentialtrips.Sincetheprojectwouldincludebothresidentialandcommerciallanduses,allofthesetriplengthswereincludedinthemodel.ThetripdistancesaremultipliedbytheaveragedailytripestimatestoestimatetheaveragedailyVMT.TheProjectwouldincorporatecharacteristicsandPDFsthat would reduce trips and VMT as compared to standard ITE trip generation rates. The Projectcharacteristics listedbeloware consistentwith theCAPCOAguidancedocument,QuantifyingGreenhouseGas Mitigation Measures,35 which provides emission reduction values for recommended mitigationmeasures, and would reduce VMT and vehicle trips to the Project site by approximately 35.5 percentcomparedtoadevelopmentwithoutthesecharacteristics.TheywouldthereforeresultinacorrespondingreductioninVMTandassociatedairpollutantemissions
ProjectCharacteristics:TheProjectcharacteristicslistedbelowareconsistentwiththeCAPCOAguidancedocument, andwould reduce vehicle trips to and from theProject site compared to a business‐as‐usualprojectwithouttheseProjectcharacteristics.TheywouldthereforeresultinacorrespondingreductioninVMTandassociatedGHGemissions.
IncreasedDensity: Increaseddensity,measuredintermsofpersons, jobs,ordwellingunitsperunitarea,reducesemissionsassociatedwithtransportationasitreducesthedistancepeopletravelforworkorservicesandprovidesafoundationfortheimplementationofotherstrategiessuchasenhanced transit services. The Project would increase the site density to approximately 97dwelling units per acre and 118 jobs per acre (refer to Section 4.H, Population, Housing, andEmployment,ofthisDraftEIR).
LocationEfficiency:LocationefficiencydescribesthelocationoftheProjectrelativetothetypeofurbanlandscapesuchasanurbanarea,compactinfill,orsuburbancenter.Ingeneral,comparedto
33 Hirsch/Green Transportation Consulting, Inc., Traffic Impact Analysis Report, ProposedMixed‐Use Development, 8150 Sunset
Boulevard,Hollywood,California,November2013.34 Hirsch/Green Transportation Consulting, Inc., Traffic Impact Analysis Report, ProposedMixed‐Use Development, 8150 Sunset
Boulevard,Hollywood,California,November2013.35 CaliforniaAirPollutionControlOfficersAssociation,QuantifyingGreenhouseGasMitigationMeasures,(2010).
3.0 Greenhouse Gas Emissions Methodology – PRELIMINARY WORKING DRAFT – March 2014
8150SunsetBoulevardMixedUseProject GreenhouseGasEmissionsMethodologyandDocumentationPCRServicesCorporation 28
thestatewideaverage,aprojectcouldrealizeVMTreductionsupto65percentinanurbanarea,upto 30 percent in a compact infill area, or up to 10 percent in a suburban center from landuse/location strategies. The Project Site represents an urban/compact infill locationwithin theHollywood community of the City of Los Angeles. The Project Site is served by existing publictransportationlocatedwithinaquarter‐mile.TheProjectSiteiswithinanactiveurbancenterwithmanyexistingoff‐sitecommercialandresidentialbuildingsandservesasaneasterngatewaytotheSunset Strip. The location efficiency of the Project Sitewould result in synergistic benefits thatwould reduce vehicle trips and VMT compared to the statewide average and would result incorrespondingreductionsintransportation‐relatedemissions.
Increased LandUseDiversity andMixed‐Uses: The Project would co‐locate complementarycommercial and residential land uses in close to proximity to existing off‐site commercial andresidentialuses. TheProjectwould includeon‐siteretailandresidential landusesandwouldbelocatedwithinaquarter‐mileofoff‐sitecommercialandresidentialuses. TheProjectSite isalsolocatedwithinaquarter‐mileofopenspace/parkusesatHavenhurstPark. Theincreasesinlanduse diversity and mix of uses on the Project Site would reduce vehicle trips and VMT byencouraging walking and non‐automotive forms of transportation, which would result incorrespondingreductionsintransportation‐relatedemissions.
IncreasedDestinationAccessibility:TheProjectwouldbelocatedinanareathatoffersaccesstomultipleothernearbydestinationsincludingthe8000Sunsetcommercialcenter,whichincludesamovie theater, fitnesscenter,restaurants,andgrocerystore, theLaughFactorycomedyclub,andmany other commercial and recreational destinations along the Sunset Strip. The access tomultiple destinations in close proximity to the Project Sitewould reduce vehicle trips and VMTcompared to the statewide average and encourage walking and non‐automotive forms oftransportationandwouldresultincorrespondingreductionsintransportation‐relatedemissions.
IncreasedTransitAccessibility: The Project would be locatedwithin a quarter‐mile of publictransportation,includingexistingMetrobusroutes(e.g.,2/302,218,and780Rapid).TheProjectwouldprovideaccess toon‐siteuses fromexistingpedestrianpathways. TheProjectwouldalsoprovideapproximately985totalbicycleparkingspaces(428bicycleparkingspacesforresidentialuses and 557 spaces for commercial uses to encourage utilization of alternative modes oftransportation.TheincreasedtransitaccessibilitywouldreducevehicletripsandVMTversusthestatewideaverageandencouragewalkingandnon‐automotiveformsoftransportationandwouldresultincorrespondingreductionsintransportation‐relatedemissions.
IntegratedAffordableandBelowMarketRateHousing: Belowmarket ratehousingprovidesgreater opportunity for people to live closer to job centers and to accommodatemorepeople inurbaninfillareas.TheProjectwouldinclude28belowmarketratedwellingunits(approximately11percentofthetotalnumberofdwellingunits),whichwouldresultinanincreaseinalternativetransitusageandacorrespondingreductionintransportation‐relatedemissions.
Provide Pedestrian Network Improvements: Providing pedestrian access that minimizesbarriersand links theProjectSitewithexistingorplannedexternalstreetsencouragespeople towalkinsteadofdrive. TheProjectwouldprovideaninternalpedestriannetworkthatlinkstotheexisting off‐site pedestrian network including existing off‐site sidewalks,would result in a smallreductioninVMTandassociatedtransportation‐relatedemissions.
March 2014 – PRELIMINARY WORKING DRAFT – 3.0 Greenhouse Gas Emissions Methodology
8150SunsetBoulevardMixedUseProject GreenhouseGasEmissionsMethodologyandDocumentationPCRServicesCorporation 29
EmissionsofGHGs frommotorvehiclesaredependentonmodelyearsand thespecific typesofvehiclesthat are used to travel to and from the existing Project Site. The emissions were calculated using arepresentativemotorvehicle fleetmix foryears2017 through2025and2020asprovided inCalEEMod.ThemobilesourceGHGemissionsforyear2017wereestimatedbasedonthedirectresultoutputfromtheCalEEMod tool. However, the CalEEMod tool may not adequately reflect future year GHG emissionsbecauseitmilestoneyears2023and2025wereestimatedbyusingtheresultsofthe2017modelrunandapplyingareductionfactorbasedontheaverageGHGemissionsfactorforthe2016and2023/2025vehicleemissionsstandards.ThiswasdonebecausetheCalEEModtooldoesnotincorporatetheemissionfactorsfor the 2017‐2025 vehicle emissions standards. The national policy for fuel efficiency and emissionsstandards for the United States auto industry requires that new passenger cars and light‐duty trucksachieveanaveragefueleconomystandardof35.5milespergallon(mpg)and250gramsofCO2permilebymodel year 2016 (Phase I standards), based on USEPA calculation methods. In August 2012, morestringentphased‐instandardswereadopted fornewmodelyear2017through2025passengercarsandlight‐dutytrucks.By2020,newvehiclesareprojectedtoachieve41.7mpg(ifGHGreductionsareachievedexclusivelythroughfueleconomyimprovements)and213gramsofCO2permile(PhaseIIstandards).By2023,newvehiclesareprojectedtoachieve49.4mpg(ifGHGreductionsareachievedexclusivelythroughfueleconomyimprovements)and180gramsofCO2permile(PhaseIIstandards).By2025,newvehiclesare required to achieve 54.5 mpg (if GHG reductions are achieved exclusively through fuel economyimprovements)and163gramsofCO2permile(PhaseIIstandards). CARBstaffhasprovidedfutureyearCO2 emission factors for statewide on‐roadmobile sources thatmay be used for AB 900 projects if theproject’smobilesourcesinclude“allvehicleclassifications.”36 Asdiscussedabove,itwasassumedthatallvehicle typeswouldvisit thesite. Therefore, thisassessmentuses theCO2emission factorsprovidedbyCARBstafftoestimatefutureyear(2018through2025)GHGemissionsfrommobilesources.EmissionsofCH4andN2Owereestimatedbasedon thedirectresultoutputs fromtheCalEEModtool foryears2018through 2025. From a GHG emissions standpoint, the 2020, 2023, and 2025 Phase II standards areapproximately14.8percent,28.0percentand34.8percentlowerthanthePhaseIstandards,respectively.Thus,a14.8percent,28.0percent,and34.8percentreductionfactorwasappliedtothe2017modelresulttoestimatethe2020,2023,and2025mobilesourceGHGemissions,respectively.Thereasonthatthe2017modelrunwasusedwasbecausethe2017modelrungenerallycoincideswiththeendingmodelyearforthePhase Istandards(i.e.,2016); therefore, the fleetmixwouldgenerallyreflect theappropriatevehicleturnover rates for older vehicles that are replaced with newer vehicles meeting the adopted neweremissionsstandards.
Theestimatedannualemissions frommobilesources fromtheProjectareprovided inTable13,ProjectMobileSourceGreenhouseGasEmissions.DetailedemissionscalculationsareprovidedinAppendixB.
(e) Operational Waste
The Project would generate MSW from day‐to‐day operational activities, which generally consists ofproductpackaging,grassclippings,furniture,clothing,bottles,foodscraps,newspapers,plastic,andotheritems routinely disposed of in trash bins. A portion of the MSW is diverted to waste recycling andreclamationfacilities.Wastethatisnotdivertedisusuallysenttolocallandfillsfordisposal.MSWthatisdisposed in landfills results inGHG emissionsof CO2 andCH4 from thedecompositionof thewaste thatoccursoverthespanofmanyyears.
36 CaliforniaAirResourcesBoard,StatewideEmissionFactors(EF)ForUseWithAB900Projects,March2014.
3.0 Greenhouse Gas Emissions Methodology – PRELIMINARY WORKING DRAFT – March 2014
8150SunsetBoulevardMixedUseProject GreenhouseGasEmissionsMethodologyandDocumentationPCRServicesCorporation 30
Emissions of GHGs associated with solid waste disposal under the Project are calculated using theCalEEModtool. Theemissionsarebasedonthesizeofthecommercial,retail,restaurant,andresidentiallanduses,thewastedisposalrateforthelanduses,thewastediversionrate,theGHGemissionfactorsforsolid waste decomposition, and the GWP values for the GHGs emitted. Annual waste disposal GHGemissions in units of MTCO2e are generally calculated in CalEEMod using the general formula shownpreviouslyasEquation4.
The CalEEMod tool allows the input of several variables to quantify solidwaste emissions. Themodelrequirestheamountofwastedisposed,whichistheproductofthewastedisposalratetimesthelanduseunits.AnnualwastedisposalratesusedinCalEEModarebasedondatafromCalRecycle.ThetotalamountofwastedisposedwasreducedbythediversionratefortheCityofLosAngelesof60percent,accordingto
Table 13
Project Mobile Source Greenhouse Gas Emissions
Land Use Fleet Mix Year
(All Vehicle Classes) Estimated Annual
VMT CO2 Emission Factor
(grams/mile) Annual GHG Emissions
(MTCO2e/year)
ProjectSite 2017 12,427,524 CalEEMod 1 5,414ProjectSite 2018 12,427,524 430 5,344ProjectSite 2019 12,427,524 423 5,257ProjectSite 2020 12,427,524 415 5,158ProjectSite 2021 12,427,524 408 5,071ProjectSite 2022 12,427,524 400 4,971ProjectSite 2023 12,427,524 391 4,859ProjectSite 2024 12,427,524 384 4,772ProjectSite 2025 12,427,524 375 4,660
2017(FullImplementationofPavleyPhaseI)
ProjectSite2017
(AllVehicleClasses)12,427,524 5,414.21
TotalGHGEmissions 5,4142020(PartialImplementationofPavleyPhaseII)
ProjectSite 2020(AllVehicleClasses)
12,427,524 4,612.73
TotalGHGEmissions 4,6132023(PartialImplementationofPavleyPhaseII)
ProjectSite2023
(AllVehicleClasses)12,427,524 3,898.08
TotalGHGEmissions 3,8982025(FullImplementationofPavleyPhaseII)
ProjectSite 2025(AllVehicleClasses)
12,427,524 3,529.93
TotalGHGEmissions 3,530
Source: PCR Services Corporation, 2014. Detailed emissions calculations are provided in Appendix B. 1 Mobile source GHG emissions for 2017 are based on the direct model result output from CalEEMod.
March 2014 – PRELIMINARY WORKING DRAFT – 3.0 Greenhouse Gas Emissions Methodology
8150SunsetBoulevardMixedUseProject GreenhouseGasEmissionsMethodologyandDocumentationPCRServicesCorporation 31
themostrecentdataavailable.37TheGHGemissionfactors,particularlyforCH4,dependoncharacteristicsof the landfill, such as the presence of a landfill gas capture system and subsequent flaring or energyrecovery. Thedefault values, asprovided inCalEEMod, for landfill gas capture (e.g., no capture, flaring,energyrecovery),whicharestatewideaverages,areusedinthisassessment.
The estimated annual emissions from solid waste disposal from the Project are provided inTable 14,ProjectSolidWasteDisposalGreenhouseGasEmissions. The emissions of GHGsdue towaste generationwould be relatively steady for the milestone years assessed (2017, 2020, 2023, and 2025). DetailedemissionscalculationsareprovidedinAppendixB.
Table 14
Project Solid Waste Disposal Greenhouse Gas Emissions
Land Use Waste
Diversion a
Waste Disposal Rate after Diversion b
(tons/year) Landfill Gas (no capture) c
Landfill Gas (capture with
flaring) c
Annual GHG Emissions d
(MTCO2e/year)
Residential 60% 222.30 6% 94% 101.13GeneralRetail 60% 75.95 6% 94% 34.55Supermarket 60% 165.78 6% 94% 75.42Walk‐inBank 60% 7.56 6% 94% 3.44
QualityRestaurants 60% 434.76 6% 94% 197.78Dance/YogaStudios 60% 12.02 6% 94% 5.47TotalGHGEmissions 418
a County of Los Angeles, Countywide Integrated Waste Management Plan, 2012 Annual Report (2013). b Waste generation factors for residential units are based on factors provided in the L.A. CEQA Threshold Guide. Generation factors
for others uses are from the Integrated Waste Management Board, Targeted Statewide Waste Characterization Study: Waste Disposal and Diversion Findings for Selected Industry Groups, June 2006.
c California Air Pollution Control Officers Association, California Emissions Estimator Model, http://www.caleemod.com/. Accessed
January March 2014. Waste disposal rate is based on the rates provided in CalEEMod minus the amount of waste diverted based on data from the City of Los Angeles. Landfill gas no capture and capture with flaring percentages are based on CalEEMod default statewide average values.
d Totals may not add up exactly due to rounding in the modeling calculations.
Source: PCR Services Corporation, 2014. Detailed emissions calculations are provided in Appendix B.
(f) Operational Water and Wastewater
Waterandwastewatergenerated fromtheexisting landusesunder theProjectwouldrequireenergy tosupply,distributeandtreat.ThecombustionoffossilfuelstoproduceelectricityaswellasthewastewatertreatmentprocessresultsinGHGemissionsofCO2andsmalleramountsofCH4andN2O.
TheemissionsofGHGsassociatedwithwaterdemandandwastewatergenerationunder theProjectarecalculated using the CalEEMod tool. The emissions are based on the size of the commercial, retail,
37 CountyofLosAngeles,CountywideIntegratedWasteManagementPlan,2012AnnualReport(2013).
3.0 Greenhouse Gas Emissions Methodology – PRELIMINARY WORKING DRAFT – March 2014
8150SunsetBoulevardMixedUseProject GreenhouseGasEmissionsMethodologyandDocumentationPCRServicesCorporation 32
restaurant, andresidential landuses, thewaterdemand factors, theelectrical intensity factors forwatersupply, treatment, and distribution and for wastewater treatment, the GHG emission factors for theelectricity utility provider, and the GWP values for the GHGs emitted. Annual water demand andwastewater GHG emissions due to electricity are generally calculated in CalEEMod using the generalformulashownpreviouslyasEquation5.
TheCalEEModtoolcalculateswaterdemandbasedonannualratesinthePacificInstituteWasteNotWantNotreport.38 TheCalEEModtoolprovidesoptionstoaccountfortheuseofwatersavingfeaturessuchastheuseoflow‐flowwaterfixtures(e.g.,low‐flowfaucets,low‐flowtoilets).TheProjectwouldincorporatePDFstoreduceindoorandoutdoorwaterusage,assummarizedpreviousinPDF‐GHG‐1.Implementationof thesePDFswouldreduce indoorwaterusagebyapproximately35percentcompared to typicalusagevalues fordevelopmentsmeeting theminimumrequirements. Thesewater reduction factorshavebeenaccountedforintheCalEEModtool.
TheCEC’sestimate forenergy intensityof thewateruse cycle inSouthernCalifornia, asprovided in the2006 CEC report Refining Estimates ofWater‐Related Energy Use in California, is used to calculate theenergyusagerelatedtowatersupply,treatment,anddistributionandwastewatertreatment.39 ThesameelectricityGHGemissionsfactorsdiscussedinSection3.3.2(b),OperationalEnergy–Electricity,areusedforwaterandwastewaterenergyusage.
TheemissionsofGHGsassociatedwithwastewatertreatmentprocessemissionsarealsocalculatedusingtheCalEEMod tool. The emissions arebasedon the typeof treatment (e.g., aerobic, facultative lagoons,septic systems). The emissions are calculating using the default settings in CalEEMod for the type ofwastewater treatment. Calculation formulasaredescribed indetail in theCaliforniaEmissionsEstimatorModel User’s Guide, Appendix A.40 As stated in the User’s Guide, the GHGs emitted from each type ofwastewatertreatmentarebasedontheCARB’sLocalGovernmentOperationsProtocol(LGOP),41whicharein turn based onUnited States Environmental ProtectionAgency (USEPA)methodologies.42 The defaultCalEEMod settings forwastewater treatment are: 10.33percent septic tank, 87.46percent aerobic, 2.21percentfacultativelagoonsand100percentanaerobiccombustionofgas.
Theestimatedannualemissions fromwaterandwastewater fromtheProjectareprovided inTable15,ProjectWaterandWastewaterGreenhouseGasEmissions. DetailedemissionscalculationsareprovidedinAppendixB.
38 Gleick,P.H.;Haasz,D.;Henges‐Jeck,C.;Srinivasan,V.;Cushing,K.K.;Mann,A.2003.WasteNot,WantNot:ThePotentialforUrban
WaterConservation inCalifornia.Publishedby thePacific Institute forStudies inDevelopment,Environment,andSecurity.Fullreport available online at: http://www.pacinst.org/reports/urban_usage/waste_not_want_not_full_report.pdf. Appendicesavailableonlineat:http://www.pacinst.org/reports/urban_usage/appendices.htm.
39 CaliforniaEnergyCommission,RefiningEstimatesofWater‐RelatedEnergyUseinCalifornia,PIERFinalProjectReport,CEC‐500‐2006‐118,(2006).
40 CaliforniaAirPollutionControlOfficersAssociation,CaliforniaEmissionsEstimatorModelUser’sGuide,(2013).41 CaliforniaAirResourcesBoard,LocalGovernmentOperationsProtocol,Chapter10:WastewaterTreatmentFacilities,(2008).42 United States Environmental Protection Agency, Inventory ofUS Greenhouse Gas Emissions and Sinks: 1990‐2006, Chapter 8:
Waste,(2008).
March 2014 – PRELIMINARY WORKING DRAFT – 3.0 Greenhouse Gas Emissions Methodology
8150SunsetBoulevardMixedUseProject GreenhouseGasEmissionsMethodologyandDocumentationPCRServicesCorporation 33
(g) Operational Area and Stationary
AreasourcesofGHGemissionsresultingfromoperationoftheProjectincludeequipmentusedtomaintainlandscaping,suchaslawnmowersandtrimmers.Thecombustionoffossilfuelstooperatetheseequipmentresults in GHG emissions of CO2 and smaller amounts of CH4 and N2O. There are no other substantialstationarysourceson‐site,suchasgeneratorsorindustrialsizedboilers.ResidentialhearthswouldnotbeinstalledintheProject’sresidentialuses.
TheemissionsofGHGsassociatedwithoperationalareasourcesundertheProjectarecalculatedusingtheCalEEModtool. Theemissionsforlandscapingequipmentarebasedonthesizeofthecommercial,retail,
Table 15
Project Water and Wastewater Greenhouse Gas Emissions
Land Use
Indoor Water
Demand a (gal/year)
Outdoor Water
Demand a (gal/year)
Supply Water b
(kWh/Mgal)
Treat Water b
(kWh/Mgal)
Distribute Water b
(kWh/Mgal)
Wastewater Treatment b (kWh/Mgal)
Annual GHG Emissions c
(MTCO2e/year)
2017‐2019(CO2IntensityFactor:1,1561,094 poundsperMWh)Residential 5,423,736 5,260,435 9,727 111 1,272 1,911 73.26 69.70GeneralRetail 770,487 726,505 9,727 111 1,272 1,911 10.29 9.79Supermarket 584,769 27,821 9,727 111 1,272 1,911 4.75 4.53Walk‐inBank 76,784 72,402 9,727 111 1,272 1,911 1.03 0.98
QualityRestaurants
1,900,314 186,605 9,727 111 1,272 1,911 16.01 15.27
Dance/YogaStudios
121,942 114,982 9,727 111 1,272 1,911 1.63 1.55
ParkingStructure – 2,856,125 9,727 111 1,272 1,911 16.67 15.78TotalGHGEmissions
124 118
2020‐2025/2023/2025(CO2IntensityFactor:968 595 poundsperMWh)Residential 5,423,736 5,260,435 9,727 111 1,272 1,911 62.46 41.04GeneralRetail 770,487 726,505 9,727 111 1,272 1,911 8.77 5.77Supermarket 584,769 27,821 9,727 111 1,272 1,911 4.10 2.80Walk‐inBank 76,784 72,402 9,727 111 1,272 1,911 0.87 0.57
QualityRestaurants
1,900,314 186,605 9,727 111 1,272 1,911 13.78 9.39
Dance/YogaStudios
121,942 114,982 9,727 111 1,272 1,911 1.39 0.91
ParkingStructure – 2,856,125 9,727 111 1,272 1,911 13.97 8.60TotalGHGEmissions
105 69
a City of Los Angeles, Department of Public Works, Bureau of Sanitation. Indoor and outdoor water demand rated are derived based on the ratio of indoor to outdoor water demand in CalEEMod.
b California Air Pollution Control Officers Association, California Emissions Estimator Model, http://www.caleemod.com/. Accessed
November 2013 March 2014. c Totals may not add up exactly due to rounding in the modeling calculations.
Source: PCR Services Corporation, 2014. Detailed emissions calculations are provided in Appendix B.
3.0 Greenhouse Gas Emissions Methodology – PRELIMINARY WORKING DRAFT – March 2014
8150SunsetBoulevardMixedUseProject GreenhouseGasEmissionsMethodologyandDocumentationPCRServicesCorporation 34
restaurant,andresidentiallanduses,theGHGemissionfactorsforfuelcombustion,andtheGWPvaluesfortheGHGsemitted. AnnualGHGemissions from landscapingequipment inunitsofMTCO2earegenerallycalculated in CalEEMod using the general formula shownpreviously as Equation 6. The CalEEMod tooluses landscaping equipment GHG emission factors from the CARB OFFROAD2011model and the CARBTechnicalMemo:ChangeinPopulationandActivityFactorsforLawnandGardenEquipment(6/13/2003).43TheCalEEModtoolestimatesthatlandscapingequipmentoperatefor250daysperyearintheSouthCoastAirBasin.
The estimated annual emissions from area and stationary sources under the Project are provided inTable16,ProjectAreaandStationarySourceGreenhouseGasEmissions.DetailedemissionscalculationsareprovidedinAppendixB.
Table 16
Project Area and Stationary Source Greenhouse Gas Emissions
GHG Emissions Source Annual GHG Emissions
(MTCO2e/year)
LandscapingEquipment 4.29TotalGHGEmissions 4
Source: PCR Services Corporation, 2014. Detailed emissions calculations are provided in Appendix B.
(h) Summary of Project GHG Emissions
A summary of the GHG emissions under the Project is provided inTable 17, Summary of Annual GHGEmissionsundertheProject.
43 CaliforniaAirResourcesBoard,OFFROADModelingChangeTechnicalMemo:ChangeinPopulationandActivityFactorsforLawn
andGardenEquipment,(6/13/2003),http://www.arb.ca.gov/msei/2001_residential_lawn_and_garden_changes_in_eqpt_pop_and_act.pdf.AccessedNovember2013.
March 2014 – PRELIMINARY WORKING DRAFT – 3.0 Greenhouse Gas Emissions Methodology
8150SunsetBoulevardMixedUseProject GreenhouseGasEmissionsMethodologyandDocumentationPCRServicesCorporation 35
Table 17
Summary of Annual GHG Emissions under the Project
GHG Emissions Source
Annual GHG Emissions a
(MTCO2e/year)
2015 2016 b 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 c 2023 c 2024 2025
Construction 1,631 2,346 – – – – – – – – –Electricity 252 3,022 3,022 3,022 1,647 1,647 1,647 1,647 1,647 1,647Electricity
(GreenPower/RECs) (252) (3,022) (3,022) (3,022) (1,647) (1,647) (247) (247) – –NaturalGas 37 446 446 446 446 446 446 446 446 446Mobile 451 5,414 5,344 5,257 5,158 5,071 4,971 4,859 4,772 4,660Waste 35 418 418 418 418 418 418 418 418 418
WaterandWastewater 10 118 118 118 69 69 69 69 69 69AreaandStationary 0.3 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4
Total(withGreenpower/RECs) 1,631 2,879 6,400 6,330 6,243 6,095 6,008 7,308 7,196 7,356 7,244
Construction 1,631 2,346 – – – –Electricity – 266 3,193 2,675 2,675 2,675
Electricity(100%GreenPower/RECs)
– (266) (3,193) (2,675) – –
NaturalGas – 37 446 446 446 446Mobile – 451 5,414 4,613 3,898 3,530Waste – 35 418 418 418 418
WaterandWastewater – 10 124 105 105 105AreaandStationary – <1 4 4 4 4
Total(withGreenpower/RECs) 1,631 2,880 6,406 5,586 7,546 7,178
a Totals may not add up exactly due to rounding in the modeling calculations. b Based on the expected construction schedule, the Project could be operational during the last month of year 2016. Therefore, estimated
operational emissions associated with approximately one month of operational activity are included for year 2016. c The purchase of a minimum of 15 percent of the Project’s annual electricity use in 2022 and 2023 would result in a GHG emissions reduction
of approximately 247 MTCO2e. Source: PCR Services Corporation, 2014.
– PRELIMINARY WORKING DRAFT –
8150SunsetBoulevardMixedUseProject GreenhouseGasEmissionsMethodologyandDocumentationPCRServicesCorporation 37
4.0 COMPARISON OF PROJECT TO BASELINE CONDITION
Table18,EvaluationofNetGHGEmissionsfortheProject,providesasummaryofthedeterminationofnetadditional GHG emissions comparing the existing site GHG emissions and the Project GHG emissionsincluding construction‐related emissions. The GHG emissions trends are also presented graphically inFigure3,GreenhouseGasEmissions–BaselineandFutureProjectYearTrends.
BasedontheseGHGemissionsestimates,theProjectwouldnotresultinnetadditionalcontemporaneousGHGemissionscomparedtothebaselineannualoperationalemissionsatanytimewiththeexceptionofaslightincreaseinGHGemissionsinyear2023iftheProjectdoesnotcontinueitspurchaseofgreenpower,carbonoffsets,and/orRECsbeyondtheminimumof fiveyearsasrequiredunder theLEED®EnergyandAtmosphereCredit.
TheProjectshallcommittoextendingitscontracttopurchaseatleast1015percentofitselectricityfromgreenpower, carbonoffsets, and/orRECs for at least an additional twoyearsbeyond theminimum fiveyearrequirement.Basedontheanticipatedoperationalyearof2017(firstfullcalendaryear),theProjectwouldnotresultinnetcontemporaneousGHGemissionscomparedtotheBaselineCondition,takingintoaccounttheadditionaltwoyearsofgreenpower,carbonoffsets,and/orRECsofatleast1015percentoftheProject’selectricity. Therefore, thisanalysisdemonstrates that theProjectmeets theGHGemissionsrequirements of the “Jobs and Economic Improvement through Environmental Leadership Act” (PublicResourcesCodeSection21178etseq.)andwouldresultinnonetGHGemissions.
4.0 Comparison of Project to Baseline Condition – PRELIMINARY WORKING DRAFT – March 2014
8150SunsetBoulevardMixedUseProject GreenhouseGasEmissionsMethodologyandDocumentationPCRServicesCorporation 38
Table 18
Evaluation of Net GHG Emissions for the Project
GHG Emissions Source Annual GHG Emissions a
(MTCO2e/year)
2015 2016 c 2017 d 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 2025
BaselineAnnualOperationsb 7,372 7,372 7,372 7,372 7,372 7,372 7,372 7,372 7,372 7,372 7,372Project Construction 1,631 2,346 – – – – – – – – –Electricity 252 3,022 3,022 3,022 1,647 1,647 1,647 1,647 1,647 1,647Electricity(GreenPower/RECs) (252) (3,022) (3,022) (3,022) (1,647) (1,647) (247) (247) – –NaturalGas 37 446 446 446 446 446 446 446 446 446Mobile 451 5,414 5,344 5,257 5,158 5,071 4,971 4,859 4,772 4,660Waste 35 418 418 418 418 418 418 418 418 418Water&Wastewater 10 118 118 118 69 69 69 69 69 69AreaandStationary 0.3 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4
Total(withGreenpower/RECs) 1,631 2,879 6,400 6,330 6,243 6,095 6,008 7,308 7,196 7,356 7,244NetChange (5,741) (4,492) (972) (1,042) (1.129) (1,277) (1,364) (64) (176) (16) (128)ExceedsBaseline? No No No No No No No No No No No BaselineAnnualOperationsb 7,407 7,407
7,407 7,407 7,407 7,407
Project Construction 1,631 2,346 – – – –Electricity – 266 3,193 2,675 2,675 2,675Electricity(100%GreenPower/RECs)
– (266) (3,193) (2,675) – –
NaturalGas – 37 446 446 446 446Mobile – 451 5,414 4,613 3,898 3,530Waste – 35 418 418 418 418WaterandWastewater
– 10124 105 105 105
AreaandStationary – <1 4 4 4 4Total(withGreenpower/RECs) 1,631 2,880 6,406 5,586 7,546 7,178NetChange (5,776) (4,528) (1,001) (1,821) 139 (229)NetChangewithGreenpower/RECsExtensionforTwoYears(10%minimum)
(129)e
ExceedsBaseline? No No No No No No
a Totals may not add up exactly due to rounding in the modeling calculations. b As of December 30, 2013, 5,761 square feet of the existing 80,000 square feet is unoccupied due to expired lease agreements or because the
Applicant bought out the lease in order to facilitate the proposed development. The Applicant may sign new lease agreements or extend existing lease agreements at any time for the full 80,000 square feet retail space without the need for discretionary approvals.
c Based on the expected construction schedule, the Project would be operational during the last month of year 2016. Therefore, estimated operational
March 2014 – PRELIMINARY WORKING DRAFT – 4.0 Comparison of Project to Baseline Condition
8150SunsetBoulevardMixedUseProject GreenhouseGasEmissionsMethodologyandDocumentationPCRServicesCorporation 39
emissions associated with approximately one month of operational activity are included for year 2016. d Year 2017 is expected to be the first full year of Project operations. e The purchase of a minimum of 10 15 percent of the Project’s annual electricity use in 2022 and 2023 would result in a GHG emissions reduction of
approximately 268 247 MTCO2e.
Source: PCR Services Corporation, 2014.
FIGUREGreenhouse Gas Emissions –
Baseline and Future Project Year Trends3
Source: PCR Services Corpora on, 2014.P C R8150 Sunset Boulevard Mixed-Use Project
Greenhouse Gas Emissions Methodology and Documenta on
0
1,000
2,000
3,000
4,000
5,000
6,000
7,000
8,000
2015 2016 2017 2020 2023 2025
GHG
Emis
sion
s (M
TCO
2e)
Year
Project
Baseline AnnualOpera ons
2015-2016: Project Construc on
2017: Project Opera ons (First full calendar year, 100% greenpower/offsets/RECs)2020: Project Opera ons (100% greenpower/offsets/RECs, 33% RPS, Pavley Phase II -
par al implementa on)2023: Project Opera ons (At least 10% greenpower/offsets/RECs, 33% RPS, Pavley
Phase II - par al implementa on)
2025: Project Opera ons (33% RPS, Pavley Phase II - full implementa on)
– PRELIMINARY WORKING DRAFT –
8150SunsetBoulevardMixedUseProject GreenhouseGasEmissionsMethodologyandDocumentationPCRServicesCorporation
APPENDIX A BASELINE CONDITION GREENHOUSE GAS EMISSIONS
8150 Sunset Boulevard Mixed Use ProjectDraft EIRAppendix A, Baseline Condition Greenhouse Gas Emissions
Appendix A.1Baseline Condition GHG Emissions – Electricity
8150SU
NSETBOULEVARDMIXED
USE
PROJECT
Greenhouse
Gas
EmissionsMethodology
andDocumentation
Baselin
eConditionElectricalD
eman
dFactors
EndUse
EndUse
FloorStock
AnnualEn
ergyUsage
1PerUnitAnnualEn
ergyUsage
(1000sqft)
(GWh/year)
(MWh/1000sqft/year)
Health
106,471
2,161
20.30
Restaurant
61,623
2,846
46.18
Retail
309,601
4,755
15.36
SmallO
ffice
157,884
2,091
13.24
Wareh
ouse
353,765
1,517
4.29
Notes:
1.
Source:PCRServices
Corporation,2013.
Baselin
eConditionElectricalD
eman
dGreenhouse
Gas
Emissions
LandUse
Units
PerUnitAnnualEn
ergyUsage
CO2Factor1
CH4Factor2
N2OFactor2
AnnualGHGEm
issions
(1000sqft)
(MWh/1000sqft/year)
(pounds/MWh)
(pounds/MWh)
(pounds/MWh)
(MTC
O2e/year)
Gen
eralRetail
14.65
15.36
1,156
0.029
0.0062
118.21
Storage
Facility
27.63
4.29
1,156
0.029
0.0062
62.25
WalkinBankFacility
20.17
13.24
1,156
0.029
0.0062
140.39
Restaurant
2.06
46.18
1,156
0.029
0.0062
49.90
IceCream
Parlor
0.80
46.18
1,156
0.029
0.0062
19.42
FastFoodRestaurantwithDrive
Thru
5.07
46.18
1,156
0.029
0.0062
123.05
FastFoodRestaurantwithoutDrive
Thru
3.72
46.18
1,156
0.029
0.0062
90.28
Den
talO
ffice
2.36
20.30
1,156
0.029
0.0062
25.17
FitnessCen
ter
3.55
20.30
1,156
0.029
0.0062
37.86
TotalG
HGEm
issions
80.00
666.53
Notes:
1.
LosAngelesDep
artm
entofWater
andPower,2012Power
IntegratedResourcePlan,(2012).
2.
CaliforniaAirPollutionControlO
fficersAssociation,CaliforniaEm
issionsEstimatorModel,http://w
ww.caleemod.com/.
AccessedNovember
2013.
Source:PCRServices
Corporation,2014.
CaliforniaEnergy
Commission,CaliforniaCommercialEndUse
Survey
,http://capabilities.itron.com/Ceu
sWeb
/Chart.aspx.
AccessedNovember
2013.Factorsarebased
ontheSouthernCaliforniaEdison(SCE)
sectoras
representative
oftheProject
Site
location.
Appendix A.2Baseline Condition GHG Emissions – Natural Gas
8150SU
NSETBOULEVARDMIXED
USE
PROJECT
Greenhouse
Gas
EmissionsMethodology
andDocumentation
Baselin
eConditionNaturalG
asCombustionFactors
EndUse
EndUse
FloorStock
AnnualEn
ergyUsage
1MillionBritish
therm
alPerUnitAnnualEn
ergyUsage
(1000sqft)
(10,000therm
s/year)
units[M
MBtu]perYear
(MMBtu/1000sqft/year)
Health
106,471
7,274
7,274,000
68.32
Restaurant
61,623
15,353
15,353,000
249.14
Retail
309,601
762
762,000
2.46
SmallO
ffice
157,884
1,271
1,271,000
8.05
Wareh
ouse
353,765
869
869,000
2.46
Notes:
1.
Source:PCRServices
Corporation,2013.
Baselin
eConditionNaturalG
asDeman
dGreenhouse
Gas
Emissions
LandUse
Units
PerUnitAnnualEn
ergyUsage
CO2Factor1
CH4Factor1
N2OFactor1
AnnualGHGEm
issions
(1000sqft)
(MMBtu/1000sqft/year)
(pounds/MMBtu)
(pounds/MMBtu)
(pounds/MMBtu)
(MTC
O2e/year)
Gen
eralRetail
14.65
2.46
117.65
0.0023
0.0022
1.94
Storage
Facility
27.63
2.46
117.65
0.0023
0.0022
3.64
WalkinBankFacility
20.17
8.05
117.65
0.0023
0.0022
8.72
Restaurant
2.06
249.14
117.65
0.0023
0.0022
27.50
IceCream
Parlor
0.80
249.14
117.65
0.0023
0.0022
10.70
FastFoodRestaurantwithDrive
Thru
5.07
249.14
117.65
0.0023
0.0022
67.82
FastFoodRestaurantwithoutDrive
Thru
3.72
249.14
117.65
0.0023
0.0022
49.76
Den
talO
ffice
2.36
68.32
117.65
0.0023
0.0022
8.66
FitnessCen
ter
3.55
68.32
117.65
0.0023
0.0022
13.02
TotalG
HGEm
issions
80.00
191.75
Notes:
1.
CaliforniaAirPollutionControlO
fficersAssociation,C
aliforniaEm
issionsEstimatorModel,http://w
ww.caleemod.com/.
AccessedNovember
2013.
Source:PCRServices
Corporation,2014.
CaliforniaEnergy
Commission,C
aliforniaCommercialEndUse
Survey
,http://capabilities.itron.com/Ceu
sWeb
/Chart.aspx.
AccessedNovember
2013.Factorsarebased
ontheSouthernCaliforniaEdison(SCE)
sectoras
representative
oftheProjectSite
location.
Appendix A.3Baseline Condition GHG Emissions – On Site Mobile SourceQueuing at existing Fast Food Drive Thru
8150 SUNSET BOULEVARD MIXED USE PROJECT
Draft Environmental Impact Report
Air Quality Operational Emissions
Baseline Condition Estimated Fast Food with Drive Thru On Site Idling Emissions
Existing Land Use
Size
(sf) Daily Trips1
Percent Using
Drive Thru2
Drive Thru
Daily Trips
Idling Minutes
per Drive Thru
Trip3Total Idling
Hours per Day
Total Idling
Hours per
Year
Fast Food with Drive Thru 5,070 2,515 57% 1,434 2 48 17,442
Notes:
1. Hirsch/Green Transportation Consulting, Inc., Traffic Impact Analysis Report, Proposed Mixed Use Development, 8150 Sunset Boulevard,
Hollywood, California, November 2013.
2. The NPD Group, Drive Thru Windows Still Put the Fast in Fast Food Restaurants, Reports NPD, May 2012,
https://www.npd.com/wps/portal/npd/us/news/press releases/pr_120530a/. Accessed December 2013. A value of 57 percent
was used corresponding to the drive thru percentage for hamburger fast food restaurants.
3. QSR Magazine, 2012 QSR Drive Thru Study, http://www.qsrmagazine.com/print/50631. Accessed December 2013. Based on the study,
an average wait time of 129.75 seconds was recorded for Wendy's, which was faster than other hamburger fast food restaurants.
In order not to overestimate emissions from the existing fast food restaurant and thus not overestimate the amount of existing
emissions credits, a value of 120 second (or 2 minutes) was used in this assessment.
Air Basin VMT Emission Rates (grams per mile)
(miles per day) CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
2013 LDA Gas 474,344.67 1,013.04 – 0.0092 –
2013 LDA Diesel 1,518.49 399.09 – 0.0110 –
2013 LDT1 Gas 54,821.31 1,185.50 – 0.0273 –
2013 LDT1 Diesel 71.68 385.81 – 0.0115 –
2013 LDT2 Gas 165,153.32 1,420.34 – 0.0187 –
2013 LDT2 Diesel 73.55 391.63 – 0.0113 –
Weighted Average 1,121.81 0.0570 0.0129 1,127.00
Emission Rates (grams per hour)
Weighted Average 5,609.03 0.2850 0.0644 5,634.99
Emission Rates (metric tons per hour)
Weighted Average 5.61E 03 2.85E 07 6.44E 08 5.63E 03
Note:
1. California Air Resources Board, EMFAC2011, http://www.arb.ca.gov/msei/modeling.htm. Accessed December 2013. Emission factors
are based on running exhaust emissions from EMFAC2011 for Years 2013, LDA, LDT1, and LDT2 at 5 miles per hour per CARB guidance.
Existing Land Use Emissions (metric tons per year)
CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Fast Food with Drive Thru 97.83 0.0050 0.0011 98.28
Source: PCR Services Corporation, 2014.
Emission Factors
(grams/mile @ 5 MPH)1
EMFAC2011 Emission RatesRegion Type: Air BasinRegion: South CoastCalendar Year: 2013Season: AnnualVehicle Classification: EMFAC2011 CategoriesRegion CalYr Season Veh_Class Fuel MdlYr Speed VMT ROG_RUNEX TOG_RUNEX CO_RUNEX NOX_RUNEX CO2_RUNEX CO2_RUNEX(Pavley I+LCFS) PM10_RUNEX PM2_5_RUNEX SOX_RUNEX
(miles/hr) (miles/day) (gms/mile) (gms/mile) (gms/mile) (gms/mile) (gms/mile) (gms/mile) (gms/mile) (gms/mile) (gms/mile)South Coast 2013 Annual LDA GAS Aggregated 5 474344.67 0.237076095 0.333857713 3.137562711 0.220739842 1101.868558 1013.041646 0.012494462 0.011427214 0.0036094South Coast 2013 Annual LDA DSL Aggregated 5 1518.493 0.169760222 0.193260717 1.091999023 0.880313341 452.3122042 399.0904211 0.128349403 0.118081457 0.0031967South Coast 2013 Annual LDT1 GAS Aggregated 5 54821.314 0.595923234 0.777769465 8.343011389 0.657325778 1268.639344 1185.498091 0.028630856 0.026224635 0.0041729South Coast 2013 Annual LDT1 DSL Aggregated 5 71.676197 0.297942256 0.339187445 1.772520941 1.223692682 431.7922214 385.8110745 0.251489648 0.231370475 0.0033402South Coast 2013 Annual LDT2 GAS Aggregated 5 165153.32 0.293968262 0.426849124 4.132392612 0.45042172 1503.999815 1420.341119 0.013225691 0.012137507 0.0049172South Coast 2013 Annual LDT2 DSL Aggregated 5 73.549358 0.225335426 0.256529401 1.425179668 1.196024554 432.8498527 391.6300667 0.18435689 0.169608344 0.00328
Title : LDA; LDT CH4
Version : Emfac2011 LDV V2.50.58.094 Sp: Trip Assign Santa Clara County
Run Date : 2013/12/06 12:22:08
Scen Year: 2013 All model years in the range 1969 to 2013 selected
Season : Annual
Area : South Coast
*****************************************************************************************
Year: 2013 Model Years 1969 to 2013 Inclusive Annual
Emfac2011 LDV Emission Factors: V2.50.58.094 Sp: Trip Assign Santa Clara County
South Coast Basin Average Basin Average
Table 1: Running Exhaust Emissions (grams/mile; grams/idle hour)
Pollutant Name: Methane Temperature: 60F Relative Humidity: 30%
Speed LDA LDA LDA LDA LDT1 LDT1 LDT1 LDT1 LDT2 LDT2 LDT2 LDT2 ALL ALL ALL ALL
MPH NCAT CAT DSL ALL NCAT CAT DSL ALL NCAT CAT DSL ALL NCAT CAT DSL ALL
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
5 0.776 0.049 0.008 0.052 0.805 0.073 0.014 0.08 0.795 0.062 0.01 0.065 0.784 0.054 0.008 0.057
EMFAC2011 Emissions InventoryRegion Type: Air BasinRegion: South CoastCalendar Year: 2013Season: AnnualVehicle Classification: EMFAC2011 CategoriesRegion CalYr Season Veh_Class Fuel MdlYr Speed Population VMT Trips Fuel_GAS Fuel_DSL Fuel_DSL Fuel_DSL Fuel_DSL
(miles/hr) (vehicles) (miles/day) (trips/day) (1000 gallon(1000 gallons/day) (gallons/day(gallons/mile(gallons/veh hour)South Coast 2013 Annual LDA DSL Aggregated Aggregated 19553.64 604666.77 112931.86 0 20.087031 20087.031 0.03322 0.0428033South Coast 2013 Annual LDT1 DSL Aggregated Aggregated 968.62073 29350.192 5088.5683 0 1.0187834 1018.7834 0.0347113 0.0438245South Coast 2013 Annual LDT2 DSL Aggregated Aggregated 886.19568 30108.384 4994.3971 0 1.0262687 1026.2687 0.0340858 0.0482525
Appendix A.4Baseline Condition GHG Emissions – CalEEMod Outputs forMobile, Area, Waste, andWater
Cal
EE
Mod
Ver
sion
: Cal
EE
Mod
.201
3.2.
2P
age
1 of
1D
ate:
11/
25/2
013
5:55
PM
8150
Su
nse
t B
lvd
Mix
ed U
se P
roje
ct -
BA
SE
LIN
E (
Mo
bile
, Are
a, W
aste
, Wat
er)
So
uth
Co
ast
Air
Bas
in, A
nn
ual
1.0
Pro
ject
Ch
arac
teri
stic
s
1.1
Lan
d U
sag
e
Land
Use
sS
ize
Met
ricLo
t Acr
eage
Flo
or S
urfa
ce A
rea
Pop
ulat
ion
Str
ip M
all
14.6
510
00sq
ft0.
3414
,647
.00
0
Unr
efrig
erat
ed W
areh
ouse
-No
Rai
l27
.63
1000
sqft
0.63
27,6
25.0
00
Gen
eral
Offi
ce B
uild
ing
20.1
710
00sq
ft0.
4620
,172
.00
0
Fas
t Foo
d R
esta
uran
t w/o
Driv
e T
hru
6.58
1000
sqft
0.15
6,57
6.00
0
Fas
t Foo
d R
esta
uran
t with
Driv
e T
hru
5.07
1000
sqft
0.12
5,07
0.00
0
Hea
lth C
lub
3.55
1000
sqft
0.08
3,55
0.00
0
Med
ical
Offi
ce B
uild
ing
2.36
1000
sqft
0.05
2,36
0.00
0
Par
king
Lot
58.1
110
00sq
ft0.
7358
,109
.00
0
1.2
Oth
er P
roje
ct C
har
acte
rist
ics
Urb
aniz
atio
nU
rban
Win
d S
pee
d (
m/s
)2.
2P
reci
pit
atio
n F
req
(D
ays)
31
Clim
ate
Zo
ne
11O
per
atio
nal
Yea
r20
13
Uti
lity
Co
mp
any
Los
Ang
eles
Dep
artm
ent o
f Wat
er &
Pow
er
CO
2 In
ten
sity
(l
b/M
Wh
r)11
56C
H4
Inte
nsi
ty
(lb
/MW
hr)
0.02
9N
2O In
ten
sity
(l
b/M
Wh
r)0.
006
1.3
Use
r E
nte
red
Co
mm
ents
& N
on
-Def
ault
Dat
a
Pro
ject
Cha
ract
eris
tics
- C
O2
Inte
nsity
Fac
tor:
Los
Ang
eles
Dep
artm
ent o
f Wat
er a
nd P
ower
, 201
2 P
ower
Inte
grat
ed R
esou
rce
Pla
n, (
2012
).
Land
Use
- G
ener
al R
etai
l (14
.647
ksf
); S
tora
ge F
acili
ty (
27.6
25);
Wal
k-in
Ban
k F
acili
ty (
20.1
72);
Fas
t Foo
d w
/o D
rive-
Thr
u (2
.056
+0.
800+
3.72
0); F
ast
Foo
d w
/ Driv
e-T
hru
(5.0
70);
Den
tal O
ffice
(2.
360)
; Fitn
ess
Cen
ter
(3.5
50);
Par
king
Lot
(58
.109
).V
ehic
le T
rips
- R
efer
to "
Trip
Gen
erat
ion
Rat
e" w
orks
heet
pro
vide
d in
this
App
endi
x.
Wat
er A
nd W
aste
wat
er -
Ref
er to
"B
asel
ine
Con
ditio
n W
ater
Dem
and
Rat
es"
wor
kshe
et p
rovi
ded
in th
is A
ppen
dix.
Sol
id W
aste
- R
efer
to "
Bas
elin
e C
ondi
tion
Sol
id W
aste
Dis
posa
l Rat
es"
wor
kshe
et p
rovi
ded
in th
is A
ppen
dix.
Sol
id w
aste
rat
e is
bas
ed o
n ex
istin
g si
te-
wid
e ra
te a
nd n
ot b
roke
n do
wn
by la
nd u
se ty
pe a
nd is
incl
usiv
e of
60%
div
ersi
on.
Tab
le N
ame
Col
umn
Nam
eD
efau
lt V
alue
New
Val
ue
tblL
andU
seLa
ndU
seS
quar
eFee
t14
,650
.00
14,6
47.0
0
tblL
andU
seLa
ndU
seS
quar
eFee
t27
,630
.00
27,6
25.0
0
tblL
andU
seLa
ndU
seS
quar
eFee
t20
,170
.00
20,1
72.0
0
tblL
andU
seLa
ndU
seS
quar
eFee
t6,
580.
006,
576.
00
tblL
andU
seLo
tAcr
eage
1.33
0.73
tblP
roje
ctC
hara
cter
istic
sC
O2I
nten
sity
Fac
tor
1227
.89
1156
tblP
roje
ctC
hara
cter
istic
sO
pera
tiona
lYea
r20
1420
13
tblS
olid
Was
teS
olid
Was
teG
ener
atio
nRat
e75
.79
0.00
tblS
olid
Was
teS
olid
Was
teG
ener
atio
nRat
e58
.40
0.00
tblS
olid
Was
teS
olid
Was
teG
ener
atio
nRat
e18
.76
0.00
tblS
olid
Was
teS
olid
Was
teG
ener
atio
nRat
e20
.23
0.00
tblS
olid
Was
teS
olid
Was
teG
ener
atio
nRat
e25
.49
0.00
tblS
olid
Was
teS
olid
Was
teG
ener
atio
nRat
e15
.38
136.
86
tblS
olid
Was
teS
olid
Was
teG
ener
atio
nRat
e25
.97
0.00
tblV
ehic
leT
rips
ST
_TR
696.
0037
2.87
tblV
ehic
leT
rips
ST
_TR
722.
0341
4.20
tblV
ehic
leT
rips
ST
_TR
2.37
76.9
9
tblV
ehic
leT
rips
ST
_TR
20.8
727
.61
tblV
ehic
leT
rips
ST
_TR
8.96
30.0
8
tblV
ehic
leT
rips
ST
_TR
42.0
435
.64
tblV
ehic
leT
rips
ST
_TR
2.59
2.10
tblV
ehic
leT
rips
SU
_TR
500.
0037
2.87
tblV
ehic
leT
rips
SU
_TR
542.
7241
4.20
tblV
ehic
leT
rips
SU
_TR
0.98
76.9
9
tblV
ehic
leT
rips
SU
_TR
26.7
327
.61
tblV
ehic
leT
rips
SU
_TR
1.55
30.0
8
tblV
ehic
leT
rips
SU
_TR
20.4
335
.64
tblV
ehic
leT
rips
SU
_TR
2.59
2.10
tblV
ehic
leT
rips
WD
_TR
716.
0037
2.87
tblV
ehic
leT
rips
WD
_TR
496.
1241
4.20
tblV
ehic
leT
rips
WD
_TR
11.0
176
.99
tblV
ehic
leT
rips
WD
_TR
32.9
327
.61
tblV
ehic
leT
rips
WD
_TR
36.1
330
.08
tblV
ehic
leT
rips
WD
_TR
44.3
235
.64
tblV
ehic
leT
rips
WD
_TR
2.59
2.10
tblW
ater
Indo
orW
ater
Use
Rat
e1,
997,
251.
8386
6,38
0.00
tblW
ater
Indo
orW
ater
Use
Rat
e1,
538,
915.
9266
7,96
6.00
tblW
ater
Indo
orW
ater
Use
Rat
e3,
584,
889.
7046
7,53
5.00
tblW
ater
Indo
orW
ater
Use
Rat
e20
9,95
8.16
82,7
37.0
0
tblW
ater
Indo
orW
ater
Use
Rat
e29
6,13
4.07
231,
483.
00
tblW
ater
Indo
orW
ater
Use
Rat
e1,
085,
162.
4433
9,45
2.00
tblW
ater
Indo
orW
ater
Use
Rat
e6,
389,
437.
5025
8,42
0.00
tblW
ater
Out
door
Wat
erU
seR
ate
127,
484.
1655
,299
.00
tblW
ater
Out
door
Wat
erU
seR
ate
98,2
28.6
842
,635
.00
tblW
ater
Out
door
Wat
erU
seR
ate
2,19
7,19
0.46
286,
555.
00
tblW
ater
Out
door
Wat
erU
seR
ate
128,
684.
0350
,487
.00
tblW
ater
Out
door
Wat
erU
seR
ate
56,4
06.4
944
,092
.00
665,
099.
5620
8,04
8.00
tblW
ater
Out
door
Wat
erU
seR
ate
0.00
542,
755.
00
tblW
ater
Out
door
Wat
erU
seR
ate
2.0
Em
issi
on
s S
um
mar
y
SO
2F
ugiti
ve
PM
10E
xhau
stP
M10
PM
2.5
Tot
alB
io-
CO
2N
Bio
- C
O2
2.2
Ove
rall
Op
erat
ion
al
Un
mit
igat
ed O
per
atio
nal
RO
GN
Ox
CO
Tot
al C
O2
CH
4N
2OC
O2e
Cat
egor
yto
ns/y
rM
T/y
r
PM
10T
otal
Fug
itive
PM
2.5
Exh
aust
PM
2.5
Are
a0.
5940
2.00
00e-
005
1.86
00e-
003
0.00
001.
0000
e-00
51.
0000
e-00
51.
0000
e-00
51.
0000
e-00
50.
0000
3.43
00e-
003
3.43
00e-
003
1.00
00e-
005
0.00
003.
6500
e-00
3
Mob
ile5.
1530
11.7
901
49.3
490
0.07
415.
0317
0.21
125.
2429
1.34
600.
1938
1.53
980.
0000
6,35
0.88
69
6,35
0.88
690.
3311
0.00
006,
357.
840
7
Was
te0.
0000
0.00
000.
0000
0.00
0027
.781
30.
0000
27.7
813
1.64
180.
0000
62.2
598
Wat
er0.
0000
0.00
000.
0000
0.00
000.
9245
27.0
601
27.9
846
0.09
562.
3800
e-00
330
.731
4
SO
2F
ugiti
ve
PM
10E
xhau
stP
M10
PM
2.5
Tot
alB
io-
CO
2N
Bio
- C
O2
Mit
igat
ed O
per
atio
nal
RO
GN
Ox
CO
Tot
al C
O2
CH
4N
2OC
O2e
Cat
egor
yto
ns/y
rM
T/y
r
PM
10T
otal
Fug
itive
PM
2.5
Exh
aust
PM
2.5
Are
a0.
5940
2.00
00e-
005
1.86
00e-
003
0.00
001.
0000
e-00
51.
0000
e-00
51.
0000
e-00
51.
0000
e-00
50.
0000
3.43
00e-
003
3.43
00e-
003
1.00
00e-
005
0.00
003.
6500
e-00
3
Mob
ile5.
1530
11.7
901
49.3
490
0.07
415.
0317
0.21
125.
2429
1.34
600.
1938
1.53
980.
0000
6,35
0.88
69
6,35
0.88
690.
3311
0.00
006,
357.
84
Was
te0.
0000
0.00
000.
0000
0.00
0027
.781
30.
0000
27.7
813
1.64
180.
0000
62.2
598
Wat
er0.
0000
0.00
000.
0000
0.00
000.
9245
27.0
601
27.9
846
0.09
562.
3800
e-00
330
.729
9
RO
GN
Ox
CO
SO
2F
ug
itiv
e P
M10
Exh
aust
PM
10P
M10
To
tal
Fu
git
ive
PM
2.5
Exh
aust
PM
2.5
PM
2.5
To
tal
Bio
- C
O2
NB
io-C
O2
To
tal C
O2
CH
4N
20C
O2e
Per
cen
tR
edu
ctio
n0.
000.
000.
000.
000.
000.
000.
000.
000.
000.
000.
000.
000.
000.
000.
000.
00
CO
SO
2F
ugiti
ve
PM
10F
ugiti
veP
M2.
5E
xhau
stP
M2.
5P
M2.
5T
otal
Bio
- C
O2
4.0
Op
erat
ion
al D
etai
l - M
ob
ile
4.1
Mit
igat
ion
Mea
sure
s M
ob
ile
RO
GN
Ox
NB
io-
CO
2T
otal
CO
2C
H4
N2O
CO
2e
Cat
egor
yto
ns/y
rM
T/y
r
Exh
aust
PM
10P
M10
Tot
al
Unm
itiga
ted
5.15
3011
.790
149
.349
00.
0741
5.03
170.
2112
5.24
291.
3460
0.19
381.
5398
0.00
006,
350.
886
96,
350.
8869
0.33
110.
0000
6,35
7.84
07
Miti
gate
d5.
1530
11.7
901
49.3
490
0.07
415.
0317
0.21
125.
2429
1.34
600.
1938
1.53
980.
0000
6,35
0.88
69
6,35
0.88
690.
3311
0.00
006,
357.
840
7
4.2
Tri
p S
um
mar
y In
form
atio
n
Ave
rage
Dai
ly T
rip R
ate
Unm
itiga
ted
Miti
gate
d
Land
Use
Wee
kday
Sat
urda
yS
unda
yA
nnua
l VM
TA
nnua
l VM
T
Fas
t Foo
d R
esta
uran
t w/o
Driv
e T
hru
2,45
3.48
2,45
3.48
2453
.48
4,44
3,36
84,
443,
368
Fas
t Foo
d R
esta
uran
t with
Driv
e T
hru
2,09
9.99
2,09
9.99
2099
.99
2,21
0,00
72,
210,
007
Gen
eral
Offi
ce B
uild
ing
1,55
2.89
1,55
2.89
1552
.89
5,00
2,56
95,
002,
569
Hea
lth C
lub
98.0
298
.02
98.0
220
9,63
320
9,63
3
Med
ical
Offi
ce B
uild
ing
70.9
970
.99
70.9
918
4,13
518
4,13
5
Str
ip M
all
522.
1352
2.13
522.
1399
3,39
499
3,39
4
Unr
efrig
erat
ed W
areh
ouse
-No
Rai
l58
.02
58.0
258
.02
248,
670
248,
670
Par
king
Lot
0.00
0.00
0.00
Tot
al6,
855.
526,
855.
526,
855.
5213
,291
,777
13,2
91,7
77
4.3
Tri
p T
ype
Info
rmat
ion
Mile
sT
rip %
Trip
Pur
pose
%
Land
Use
H-W
or
C-W
H-S
or
C-C
H-O
or
C-N
WH
-W o
r C
-W
H-S
or
C-C
H-O
or
C-N
WP
rimar
yD
iver
ted
Pas
s-by
Fas
t Foo
d R
esta
uran
t w/o
Driv
e T
hru
16.6
08.
406.
901.
5079
.50
19.0
051
3712
Fas
t Foo
d R
esta
uran
t with
Driv
e T
hru
16.6
08.
406.
902.
2078
.80
19.0
029
2150
Gen
eral
Offi
ce B
uild
ing
16.6
08.
406.
9033
.00
48.0
019
.00
7719
4
Hea
lth C
lub
16.6
08.
406.
9016
.90
64.1
019
.00
5239
9
Med
ical
Offi
ce B
uild
ing
16.6
08.
406.
9029
.60
51.4
019
.00
6030
10
Str
ip M
all
16.6
08.
406.
9016
.60
64.4
019
.00
4540
15
Unr
efrig
erat
ed W
areh
ouse
-No
Rai
l16
.60
8.40
6.90
59.0
00.
0041
.00
925
3
Par
king
Lot
16.6
08.
406.
900.
000.
000.
000
00
LDA
LDT
1LD
T2
MD
VLH
D1
LHD
2M
HD
HH
DO
BU
SU
BU
SM
CY
0.00
4287
0.00
0607
0.00
2072
SB
US
MH
0.51
7496
0.06
0616
0.17
9855
0.14
1540
0.00
1931
0.00
2544
0.04
1435
0.00
6630
0.01
4687
0.02
6300
NO
xC
OS
O2
Fug
itive
P
M10
Fug
itive
PM
2.5
Exh
aust
PM
2.5
PM
2.5
Tot
alB
io-
CO
2
6.0
Are
a D
etai
l
6.1
Mit
igat
ion
Mea
sure
s A
rea
RO
GN
Bio
-C
O2
Tot
al C
O2
CH
4N
2OC
O2e
Cat
egor
yto
ns/y
rM
T/y
r
Exh
aust
PM
10P
M10
Tot
al
Unm
itiga
ted
0.59
402.
0000
e-00
51.
8600
e-00
30.
0000
1.00
00e-
005
1.00
00e-
005
1.00
00e-
005
1.00
00e-
005
0.00
003.
4300
e-00
33.
4300
e-00
31.
0000
e-00
50.
0000
3.65
00e-
003
Miti
gate
d0.
5940
2.00
00e-
005
1.86
00e-
003
0.00
001.
0000
e-00
50.
0000
3.65
00e-
003
1.00
00e-
005
1.00
00e-
005
1.00
00e-
005
1.00
00e-
005
SO
2F
ugiti
ve
PM
10E
xhau
stP
M10
0.00
003.
4300
e-00
33.
4300
e-00
3
PM
2.5
Tot
alB
io-
CO
2N
Bio
- C
O2
6.2
Are
a b
y S
ub
Cat
ego
ry
Un
mit
igat
ed
RO
GN
Ox
CO
Tot
al C
O2
CH
4N
2OC
O2e
Sub
Cat
egor
yto
ns/y
rM
T/y
r
PM
10T
otal
Fug
itive
PM
2.5
Exh
aust
PM
2.5
Arc
hite
ctur
alC
oatin
g0.
0947
0.00
000.
0000
0.00
000.
0000
0.00
000.
0000
0.00
000.
0000
0.00
000.
0000
Con
sum
erP
rodu
cts
0.49
910.
0000
0.00
000.
0000
0.00
000.
0000
0.00
000.
0000
0.00
000.
0000
0.00
00
Land
scap
ing
1.90
00e-
004
2.00
00e-
005
1.86
00e-
003
0.00
001.
0000
e-00
51.
0000
e-00
51.
0000
e-00
51.
0000
e-00
50.
0000
3.43
00e-
003
3.43
00e-
003
1.00
00e-
005
0.00
003.
6500
e-00
3
To
tal
0.59
402.
0000
e-00
51.
8600
e-00
30.
0000
1.00
00e-
005
0.00
003.
6500
e-00
31.
0000
e-00
51.
0000
e-00
51.
0000
e-00
51.
0000
e-00
50.
0000
3.43
00e-
003
3.43
00e-
003
SO
2F
ugiti
ve
PM
10E
xhau
stP
M10
PM
2.5
Tot
alB
io-
CO
2N
Bio
- C
O2
Mit
igat
ed
RO
GN
Ox
CO
Tot
al C
O2
CH
4N
2OC
O2e
Sub
Cat
egor
yto
ns/y
rM
T/y
r
PM
10T
otal
Fug
itive
PM
2.5
Exh
aust
PM
2.5
Arc
hite
ctur
alC
oatin
g0.
0947
0.00
000.
0000
0.00
000.
0000
0.00
000.
0000
0.00
000.
0000
0.00
000.
0000
Con
sum
erP
rodu
cts
0.49
910.
0000
0.00
000.
0000
0.00
000.
0000
0.00
000.
0000
0.00
000.
0000
0.00
00
Land
scap
ing
1.90
00e-
004
2.00
00e-
005
1.86
00e-
003
0.00
001.
0000
e-00
51.
0000
e-00
51.
0000
e-00
51.
0000
e-00
50.
0000
3.43
00e-
003
3.43
00e-
003
1.00
00e-
005
0.00
003.
6500
e-00
3
To
tal
0.59
402.
0000
e-00
51.
8600
e-00
30.
0000
1.00
00e-
005
1.00
00e-
005
1.00
00e-
005
1.00
00e-
005
0.00
003.
4300
e-00
33.
4300
e-00
31.
0000
e-00
50.
0000
3.65
E-0
3
7.0
Wat
er D
etai
l
7.1
Mit
igat
ion
Mea
sure
s W
ater
Tot
al C
O2
CH
4N
2OC
O2e
Cat
egor
yt o n
MT
/yr
Unm
itiga
ted
27.9
846
0.09
562.
3800
e-00
330
.731
4
Miti
gate
d27
.984
60.
0956
2.38
00e-
003
30.7
299
CO
2e
0.02
847.
0000
e-00
4
7.2
Wat
er b
y L
and
Use
Un
mit
igat
ed
Indo
or/O
utdo
or U
seT
otal
CO
2C
H4
N2O
5.40
00e-
004
5.64
76
Land
Use
Mga
lt o n
MT
/yr
Fas
t Foo
d R
esta
uran
t w/o
D
rive
Thr
u
0.86
638
/ 0.
0552
996.
5123
5.00
980.
0154
3.80
00e-
004
7.32
51
Fas
t Foo
d R
esta
uran
t with
D
rive
Thr
u
0.66
7966
/ 0.
0426
355.
0209
0.02
19
5.45
16
Hea
lth C
lub
0.08
2737
/ 0.
0504
870.
8853
2.72
00e-
003
7.00
00e-
005
0.96
34
Gen
eral
Offi
ce
Bui
ldin
g0.
4675
35 /
0.28
6555
2.00
00e-
005
3.16
86
Med
ical
Offi
ce
Bui
ldin
g0.
2314
83 /
0.04
4092
1.91
087.
5900
e-00
31.
9000
e-00
4
3.63
730.
0112
2.80
00e-
004
2.12
83
Par
king
Lot
0 /
0.54
2755
3.16
198.
0000
e-00
5
3.95
81
Unr
efrig
erat
edW
areh
ouse
-No
Rai
l
0.25
842
/ 0
1.84
648.
4600
e-00
32.
1000
e-00
42.
0886
Str
ip M
all
0.33
9452
/ 0.
2080
48
To
tal
27.9
846
0.09
562.
3900
e-00
330
.731
4
N2O
CO
2e
0.02
847.
0000
e-00
4
Mit
igat
ed
Indo
or/O
utdo
or U
seT
otal
CO
2C
H4
5.40
00e-
004
5.64
72
Land
Use
Mga
lt o n
MT
/yr
Fas
t Foo
d R
esta
uran
t w/o
D
rive
Thr
u
0.86
638
/ 0.
0552
996.
5123
5.00
980.
0154
3.80
00e-
004
7.32
47
Fas
t Foo
d R
esta
uran
t with
D
rive
Thr
u
0.66
7966
/ 0.
0426
355.
0209
0.02
19
5.45
14
Hea
lth C
lub
0.08
2737
/ 0.
0504
870.
8853
2.72
00e-
003
7.00
00e-
005
0.96
34
Gen
eral
Offi
ce
Bui
ldin
g0.
4675
35 /
0.28
6555
2.00
00e-
005
3.16
86
Med
ical
Offi
ce
Bui
ldin
g0.
2314
83 /
0.04
4092
1.91
087.
5900
e-00
31.
9000
e-00
4
3.63
730.
0112
2.80
00e-
004
2.12
82
Par
king
Lot
0 /
0.54
2755
3.16
198.
0000
e-00
5
3.95
79
Unr
efrig
erat
edW
areh
ouse
-No
Rai
l
0.25
842
/ 0
1.84
648.
4600
e-00
32.
1000
e-00
42.
0885
Str
ip M
all
0.33
9452
/ 0.
2080
48
To
tal
27.9
846
0.09
562.
3900
e-00
330
.729
9
8.0
Was
te D
etai
l
8.1
Mit
igat
ion
Mea
sure
s W
aste
Cat
ego
ry/Y
ear T
otal
CO
2C
H4
N2O
CO
2e
t o n
MT
/yr
Miti
gate
d27
.781
31.
6418
0.00
0062
.259
8
Unm
itiga
ted
27.7
813
1.64
180.
0000
62.2
598
CO
2e
0.00
000.
0000
8.2
Was
te b
y L
and
Use
Un
mit
igat
ed
Was
teD
ispo
sed
Tot
al C
O2
CH
4N
2O
0.00
000.
0000
Land
Use
tons
t o n
MT
/yr
Fas
t Foo
d R
esta
uran
t w/o
D
rive
Thr
u
00.
0000
0.00
000.
0000
0.00
00
0.00
00
Fas
t Foo
d R
esta
uran
t with
D
rive
Thr
u
00.
0000
0.00
00
0.00
00
Hea
lth C
lub
00.
0000
0.00
000.
0000
0.00
00
Gen
eral
Offi
ce
Bui
ldin
g0
0.00
000.
0000
Med
ical
Offi
ce
Bui
ldin
g0
0.00
000.
0000
0.00
00
27.7
813
1.64
180.
0000
0.00
00
Par
king
Lot
00.
0000
0.00
00
62.2
598
Unr
efrig
erat
edW
areh
ouse
-No
Rai
l
00.
0000
0.00
000.
0000
0.00
00
Str
ip M
all
136.
86
To
tal
27.7
813
1.64
180.
0000
62.2
598
N2O
CO
2e
0.00
000.
0000
Mit
igat
ed
Was
teD
ispo
sed
Tot
al C
O2
CH
4
0.00
000.
0000
Land
Use
tons
t o n
MT
/yr
Fas
t Foo
d R
esta
uran
t w/o
D
rive
Thr
u
00.
0000
0.00
000.
0000
0.00
00
0.00
00
Fas
t Foo
d R
esta
uran
t with
D
rive
Thr
u
00.
0000
0.00
00
0.00
00
Hea
lth C
lub
00.
0000
0.00
000.
0000
0.00
00
Gen
eral
Offi
ce
Bui
ldin
g0
0.00
000.
0000
Med
ical
Offi
ce
Bui
ldin
g0
0.00
000.
0000
0.00
00
27.7
813
1.64
180.
0000
0.00
00
Par
king
Lot
00.
0000
0.00
00
62.2
598
Unr
efrig
erat
edW
areh
ouse
-No
Rai
l
00.
0000
0.00
000.
0000
0.00
00
Str
ip M
all
136.
86
To
tal
27.7
813
1.64
180.
0000
Hor
se P
ower
Load
Fac
tor
Fue
l Typ
e
10.0
Veg
etat
ion
62.2
598
9.0
Op
erat
ion
al O
ffro
ad
Equ
ipm
ent T
ype
Num
ber
Hou
rs/D
ayD
ays/
Yea
r
Appendix A.5Baseline Condition GHG Emissions – CalEEMod Inputs for WasteandWater
8150SU
NSETBOULEVARDMIXED
USE
PROJECT
Greenhouse
Gas
EmissionsMethodology
andDocumentation
Baselin
eConditionSolid
Waste
DisposalR
ates
LandUse
Units
Waste
DisposalR
ate1
Waste
DiversionRate1
Waste
DisposalR
ateafterDiversion
(1000sqft)
(tons/1000sqft/year)
(%)
(tons/year)
ExistingLandUses
80.000
4.28
60%
136.86
Notes:
1.
Refer
toSection4.K.3,Solid
Waste,ofthe8150SunsetBoulevard
Mixed
Use
ProjectDraftEIR.Based
onannualwaste
generationof342.14tonsper
year.
Source:PCRServices
Corporation,2014.
Baselin
eConditionSolid
Waste
Greenhouse
Gas
Emissions
Refer
toCalEEM
odoutputfiles.
8150SU
NSETBOULEVARDMIXED
USE
PROJECT
Greenhouse
Gas
EmissionsMethodology
andDocumentation
Baselin
eConditionWaterDeman
dRates
LandUse
Units
BasedonCalEEMod
IndoorWaterDeman
dRate1
OutdoorWaterDeman
dRate1
IndoorWaterDeman
dOutdoorWaterDeman
d
(1000sqft)
LandUse
Type
(gal/1000sqft/year)
(gal/1000sqft/year)
(%)
(%)
Gen
eralRetail
14.647
Stripmall
74,073
45,399
62%
38%
Storage
Facility
27.625
Unrefrigerated
wareh
ouse
231,250
100%
0%
WalkinBankFacility
20.172
Bank/Gen
eralofficebuilding
177,734
108,934
62%
38%
Restaurant
2.056
Fastfoodrestaurantw/o
drive
through
303,534
19,374
94%
6%
IceCream
Parlor
0.800
Fastfoodrestaurantw/o
drive
through
303,534
19,374
94%
6%
FastFoodRestaurantwithDrive
Thru
5.070
Fastfoodrestaurantw/drive
through
303,534
19,374
94%
6%
FastFoodRestaurantwithoutDrive
Thru
3.720
Fastfoodrestaurantw/o
drive
through
303,534
19,374
94%
6%
Den
talO
ffice
2.360
Med
icalofficebuilding
125,481
23,901
84%
16%
FitnessCen
ter
3.550
Healthclub
59,143
36,249
62%
38%
Parking
58.109
ParkingLot
0%
100%
LandUse
Units
TotalW
aterDeman
dRate2
IndoorWaterDeman
d3
OutdoorWaterDeman
d3
TotalW
aterDeman
d
(1000sqft)
(gal/1000sqft/year)
(gal/year)
(gal/year)
(gal/year)
Gen
eralRetail
14.647
37,380
339,452
208,048
547,500
Storage
Facility
27.625
9,355
258,420
258,420
WalkinBankFacility
20.172
37,383
467,535
286,555
754,090
Restaurant
2.056
IceCream
Parlor
0.800
FastFoodRestaurantwithDrive
Thru
5.070
FastFoodRestaurantwithoutDrive
Thru
3.720
Den
talO
ffice
2.360
116,769
231,483
44,092
275,575
FitnessCen
ter
3.550
37,425
82,373
50,487
132,860
Parking
58.109
9,340
542,755
542,755
TotalW
aterDeman
d2,913,609
1,229,871
4,143,480
Notes:
1.
2.
Refer
toSection4.K.1,W
ater
Supply,ofthe8150SunsetBoulevard
Mixed
Use
ProjectDraftEIR.Based
ondailywater
dem
andratesmultipledby365daysper
year.
3.
Indoorandoutdoorwater
dem
andratesarederived
based
ontheratioofindoorto
outdoorwater
dem
andinCalEEMod.
Source:PCRServices
Corporation,2014.
Baselin
eConditionWateran
dWastewaterGreenhouse
Gas
Emissions
Refer
toCalEEM
odoutputfiles.
Gleick,P.H.;Haasz,D
.;Hen
gesJeck,C.;Srinivasan,V
.;Cushing,K.K.;Mann,A
.2003.W
aste
Not,WantNot:ThePotentialforUrban
Water
ConservationinCalifornia.Published
bythePacificInstitute
forStudiesinDevelopmen
t,Environmen
t,andSecurity.Fullreportavailableonlineat:
http://w
ww.pacinst.org/rep
orts/urban_u
sage/w
aste_n
ot_want_not_full_report.pdf.Appen
dices
availableonlineat:h
ttp://w
ww.pacinst.org/rep
orts/urban_u
sage/appen
dices.htm
.http://w
ww.caleemod.com/.
AccessedNovember
2013.
DefaultRates
Site
SpecificRates
PercentofTo
tal
140,158
1,534,346
97,934
1,632,280
– PRELIMINARY WORKING DRAFT –
8150SunsetBoulevardMixedUseProject GreenhouseGasEmissionsMethodologyandDocumentationPCRServicesCorporation
APPENDIX B PROJECT GREENHOUSE GAS EMISSIONS
8150 Sunset Boulevard Mixed Use ProjectDraft EIRAppendix B, Project Greenhouse Gas Emissions
Appendix B.1GHG Emissions Summary
8150 SUNSET BOULEVARD MIXED USE PROJECTDraft EIRGreenhouse Gases - Operational EmissionsGreenhouse Gas Emissions Methodology and Documentation
Summary of Estimated Unmitigated Annual GHG EmissionsSource Baseline Project GHG Emissions a
GHG Emissions a, b 2015 2016 c 2017 d 2020 2023 2025
Baseline ConditionArea 0.0 Energy - Natural Gas 192 Energy - Electricity 667 Water 31 Waste 62 Mobile - Traveling 6,358 Mobile - On-site Drive-Thru Idling 98
Subtotal 7,407 7,407 7,407 7,407 7,407 7,407 7,407
ProjectConstruction 1,631 2,346 - - - - Area 0.3 4 4 4 4 Energy - Natural Gas 37 446 446 446 446 Energy - Electricity 266 3,193 2,675 2,675 2,675 Energy - 100% Green Power/RECs (266) (3,193) (2,675) - - Water 10 124 105 105 105 Waste 35 418 418 418 418 Mobile 451 5,414 4,613 3,898 3,530
Subtotal (without 100 % Green Power/RECs) 1,631 3,146 9,599 8,261 7,546 7,178 Subtotal (with 100% Green Power/RECs) 1,631 2,880 6,406 5,586 7,546 7,178
Net Change from Baseline Condition (5,776) (4,528) (1,001) (1,822) 139 (229) (268)
Net Change with Green Power/Offsets/RECs Extension (5,776) (4,528) (1,001) (1,822) (129) (229) Exceeds Baseline? No No No No No No
Notes:
a Totals may not add up exactly due to rounding in the modeling calculations.
b As of December 30, 2013, 5,761 square feet of the existing 80,000 square feet is unoccupied due to expired lease agreements or because the Applicant
bought out the lease in order to facilitate the proposed development. The Applicant may sign new lease agreements or extend existing lease agreements
at any time for the full 80,000 square feet retail space without the need for discretionary approvals.
c Based on the expected construction schedule, the Project would be operational during the last month of year 2016. Therefore, estimated operational
emissions associated with approximately one month of operational activity are included for year 2016.
d Year 2017 is expected to be the first full year of Project operations.
e The purchase of a minimum of 10 percent of the Project’s annual electricity use in 2023 would result in a GHG emissions reduction of approximately
268 MTCO2e.
Source: PCR Services Corporation, 2014.
Green Power/Offset/RECs Extention for 2 Years (10% minimum) e
Appendix B.2Project GHG Emissions – CalEEMod Inputs and Outputs forConstruction
8150SunsetBoulevard
Mixed
Use
Project
ConstructionEm
issions
ConstructionSched
uleandCaliforniaEm
issionsEstimatorModel(CalEEM
od)Inputs
ModelRunPhase
StartDate
EndDate
No.W
ork
Days
Dem
oTo
ns
Dem
oTruck
TotalO
ne
Way
Trips
ExportCY
ImportCY
HaulTruck
TotalO
ne
Way
Trips
Ven
dorOne
Way
Trips/Day
Worker
One
Way
Trips/Day
Demolition
Demolition
1/5/2015
3/10/2015
47
3,250
321
013
Grading/Excavation
Grading
3/11/2015
7/15/2015
91
58,500
11,700
015
BuildingConstruction
BuildingConstruction
5/21/2015
12/2/2016
402
95
346
Sitework/Closeout
BuildingConstruction
3/11/2016
12/2/2016
191
95
346
ArchitecturalCoating
ArchitecturalCoating
4/29/2016
10/19/2016
124
069
ConstructionActivityPhase
Source:PCRServiceCorporation,(2013).Constructionschedule,equipment,andmodelinputsareadaptedforuse
intheCaliforniaEm
issionsEstm
atorModel(CalEEMod)basedondataprovidedbytheProjectManagementConsultant(AMAManagement[An
AnthonyMasonAssociates,Inc.Company]).
8150 Sunset Boulevard Mixed Use Project
Construction Emissions
Construction Equipment and California Emissions Estimator Model (CalEEMod) Inputs
Heavy Duty Equipment No. of HD Equip
Hours of
Operation/Day
Hours of
Operation/Week
Demolition Concrete/Industrial Saws 1 8 40
Excavators 1 8 40
Other Construction Equipment 2 8 40
Tractors/Loaders/Backhoes 1 8 40
Grading/Excavation Bore/Drill Rigs 1 8 40
Excavators 1 8 40
Rubber Tired Dozers 1 8 40
Scrapers 1 8 40
Tractors/Loaders/Backhoes 2 8 40
Building Construction Aerial Lifts 2 8 40
Cranes 2 8 40
Generator Sets 1 8 40
Off Highway Trucks 1 8 40
Other Construction Equipment 4 8 40
Pumps 1 8 40
Welders 1 8 40
Sitework/Closeout Off Highway Trucks 2 8 40
Paving Equipment 1 8 40
Pumps 1 8 40
Architectural Coating Air Compressors 2 8 40
Construction Activity Phase
Source: PCR Service Corporation, (2013). Construction schedule, equipment, and model inputs are adapted for use in the California Emissions Estmator Model (CalEEMod) based on data
provided by the Project Management Consultant (AMA Management [An Anthony Mason Associates, Inc. Company]).
1.3
Use
r E
nte
red
Co
mm
ents
& N
on
-Def
ault
Dat
a
Pro
ject
Cha
ract
eris
tics
- C
O2
Inte
nsity
Fac
tor:
Los
Ang
eles
Dep
artm
ent o
f Wat
er a
nd P
ower
, 201
2 P
ower
Inte
grat
ed R
esou
rce
Pla
n, (
2012
).
Land
Use
- U
nit S
izes
as
liste
d in
Sec
tion
2, P
roje
ct D
escr
iptio
n, o
f the
815
0 S
unse
t Bou
leva
rd M
ixed
Use
Pro
ject
Dra
ft E
IR; P
opu
latio
n 52
8 as
list
ed in
S
ectio
n 4.
H, P
opul
atio
n an
d H
ousi
ng, o
f the
Dra
ft E
IR.
Con
stru
ctio
n P
hase
- E
stim
ated
Con
stru
ctio
n S
tart
/End
: Jan
201
5/D
ec 2
016.
Off-
road
Equ
ipm
ent -
Air
com
pres
sors
.
CO
2 In
ten
sity
(l
b/M
Wh
r)11
56C
H4
Inte
nsi
ty
(lb
/MW
hr)
0.02
9N
2O In
ten
sity
(l
b/M
Wh
r)0.
00631
Clim
ate
Zo
ne
11O
per
atio
nal
Yea
r20
14
Uti
lity
Co
mp
any
Los
Ang
eles
Dep
artm
ent o
f Wat
er &
Pow
er
1.2
Oth
er P
roje
ct C
har
acte
rist
ics
Urb
aniz
atio
nU
rban
Win
d S
pee
d (
m/s
)2.
2P
reci
pit
atio
n F
req
(D
ays)
Sup
erm
arke
t24
.81
1000
sqft
0.50
24,8
11.0
00
Str
ip M
all
51.1
510
00sq
ft0.
5051
,150
.00
0
Apa
rtm
ents
Hig
h R
ise
249.
00D
wel
ling
Uni
t1.
0022
2,56
4.00
528
Qua
lity
Res
taur
ant
22.1
910
00sq
ft0.
2522
,189
.00
0
Hea
lth C
lub
8.10
1000
sqft
0.19
8,09
5.00
0
Enc
lose
d P
arki
ng w
ith E
leva
tor
305.
6510
00sq
ft0.
0030
5,65
2.00
0
Pop
ulat
ion
Gen
eral
Offi
ce B
uild
ing
5.09
1000
sqft
0.12
5,09
4.00
0
1.1
Lan
d U
sag
e
Land
Use
sS
ize
Met
ricLo
t Acr
eage
Flo
or S
urfa
ce A
rea
Cal
EE
Mod
Ver
sion
: Cal
EE
Mod
.201
3.2.
2P
age
1 of
1D
ate:
1/2
1/20
14 1
0:00
AM
8150
Su
nse
t B
lvd
- C
on
stru
ctio
n
So
uth
Co
ast
AQ
MD
Air
Dis
tric
t, A
nn
ual
1.0
Pro
ject
Ch
arac
teri
stic
s
tblL
andU
seLa
ndU
seS
quar
eFee
t30
5,65
0.00
305,
652.
00
tblG
radi
ngM
ater
ialE
xpor
ted
0.00
58,5
00.0
0
tblL
andU
seLa
ndU
seS
quar
eFee
t5,
090.
005,
094.
00
tblC
onst
ruct
ionP
hase
Pha
seS
tart
Dat
e12
/3/2
016
3/11
/201
6
tblG
radi
ngA
cres
OfG
radi
ng91
.00
2.56
tblC
onst
ruct
ionP
hase
Pha
seS
tart
Dat
e12
/3/2
016
4/29
/201
6
tblC
onst
ruct
ionP
hase
Pha
seS
tart
Dat
e7/
16/2
015
5/21
/201
5
tblC
onst
ruct
ionP
hase
Pha
seE
ndD
ate
1/27
/201
712
/2/2
016
tblC
onst
ruct
ionP
hase
Pha
seE
ndD
ate
8/28
/201
712
/2/2
016
tblC
onst
ruct
ionP
hase
Num
Day
s6.
0091
.00
tblC
onst
ruct
ionP
hase
Pha
seE
ndD
ate
5/25
/201
710
/19/
2016
tblC
onst
ruct
ionP
hase
Num
Day
s22
0.00
191.
00
tblC
onst
ruct
ionP
hase
Num
Day
s20
.00
47.0
0
tblC
onst
ruct
ionP
hase
Num
Day
s10
.00
124.
00
tblC
onst
ruct
ionP
hase
Num
Day
s22
0.00
402.
00
tblA
rchi
tect
ural
Coa
ting
Con
stA
rea_
Non
resi
dent
ial_
Ext
erio
r20
8,49
6.00
73,9
93.0
0
tblA
rchi
tect
ural
Coa
ting
Con
stA
rea_
Non
resi
dent
ial_
Inte
rior
625,
487.
0016
6,96
2.00
Arc
hite
ctur
al C
oatin
g -
Res
iden
tial:
Inte
rior
(222
,564
*2.7
*0.7
5 =
450
,692
), E
xter
ior
(222
,564
*2.7
*0.2
5 =
150
,231
); C
omm
erci
al:
Inte
rior
(111
,308
*2*0
.75
=
166,
962)
, Ext
erio
r (1
11,3
08*2
*0.2
5 =
55,
654)
+ E
xter
ior
Par
king
(30
5,65
2*0.
06 =
18,
339)
Con
stru
ctio
n O
ff-ro
ad E
quip
men
t Miti
gatio
n -
Fug
itive
Dus
t Miti
gatio
n pe
r S
CA
QM
D R
ule
403
(wat
er/s
tabi
llize
unp
aved
roa
ds a
nd e
xpos
ed a
reas
thre
e tim
es p
er d
ay, 6
1% P
M10
and
PM
2.5
redu
ctio
n).
Trip
s an
d V
MT
- A
ssum
es 1
0 cy
hau
l tru
cks
durin
g gr
adin
g ph
ase
(11,
700
one-
way
trip
s to
tal).
Tab
le N
ame
Col
umn
Nam
eD
efau
lt V
alue
New
Val
ue
Off-
road
Equ
ipm
ent -
Exc
avat
or, T
ract
or/L
oade
r/B
ackh
oe, C
oncr
ete/
Indu
stria
l Saw
, Con
cret
e B
reak
er (
Oth
er),
Chi
pper
(O
ther
).
Off-
road
Equ
ipm
ent -
Cra
ne, L
ift.
Off-
road
Equ
ipm
ent -
Dril
l Rig
, Exc
avat
or, R
ubbe
r T
ired
Doz
er, T
ract
ors/
Load
ers/
Bac
khoe
s, S
crap
er.
Off-
road
Equ
ipm
ent -
Pum
p, O
ff-H
ighw
ay (
Con
cret
e) T
ruck
, Pav
ing
Equ
ipm
ent.
Dem
oliti
on -
Dem
oliti
on D
ebris
: 6,5
00 c
ubic
yar
ds, e
quiv
alen
t to
abou
t 3.2
50 to
ns o
f was
te (
Mid
wes
t Res
earc
h In
stitu
te, G
ap F
illin
g P
M10
Em
issi
on
Fac
tors
for
Sel
ecte
d O
pen
Are
a D
ust S
ourc
es, 1
988)
.G
radi
ng -
Exp
ort:
58,5
00 c
ubic
yar
ds, T
otal
Acr
es D
istu
rbed
: 2.5
6 ac
res.
Off-
road
Equ
ipm
ent -
Cra
nes,
Lift
s, G
ener
ator
, Off-
Hig
hway
(C
oncr
ete)
Tru
ck, P
ump,
Con
cret
e G
rinde
r (O
ther
), P
laci
ng B
oom
(O
ther
), P
ower
Scr
eed
(Oth
er),
Fin
ishi
ng M
achi
ne (
Oth
er),
Wel
der.
0.00
003,
965.
021
23,
965.
0212
0.56
420.
0000
3,97
6.86
90
1.77
311.
1536
2.92
660.
5485
1.08
141.
6299
To
tal
5.14
2126
.160
923
.451
50.
0454
0.00
002,
338.
865
32,
338.
8653
0.33
680.
0000
2,34
5.94
0.99
320.
6378
1.63
090.
2663
0.60
010.
8664
2016
3.94
6214
.123
013
.925
30.
0273
0.00
001,
626.
156
01,
626.
1560
0.22
740.
0000
1,63
0.93
0.77
990.
5158
1.29
570.
2822
0.48
130.
7635
2015
1.19
6012
.037
99.
5263
0.01
81
CH
4N
2OC
O2e
Yea
rto
ns/y
rM
T/y
r
Fug
itive
PM
2.5
Exh
aust
PM
2.5
PM
2.5
Tot
alB
io-
CO
2N
Bio
- C
O2
Tot
al C
O2
Un
mit
igat
ed C
on
stru
ctio
n
RO
GN
Ox
CO
SO
2F
ugiti
ve
PM
10E
xhau
stP
M10
PM
10T
otal
tblT
ripsA
ndV
MT
Hau
lingT
ripN
umbe
r7,
938.
0011
,700
.00
2.0
Em
issi
on
s S
um
mar
y
2.1
Ove
rall
Co
nst
ruct
ion
tblO
ffRoa
dEqu
ipm
ent
Usa
geH
ours
7.00
8.00
tblP
roje
ctC
hara
cter
istic
sC
O2I
nten
sity
Fac
tor
1227
.89
1156
tblO
ffRoa
dEqu
ipm
ent
OffR
oadE
quip
men
tUni
tAm
ount
3.00
1.00
tblO
ffRoa
dEqu
ipm
ent
Usa
geH
ours
6.00
8.00
tblO
ffRoa
dEqu
ipm
ent
OffR
oadE
quip
men
tUni
tAm
ount
1.00
2.00
tblO
ffRoa
dEqu
ipm
ent
OffR
oadE
quip
men
tUni
tAm
ount
3.00
1.00
tblL
andU
seP
opul
atio
n71
2.00
528.
00
tblO
ffRoa
dEqu
ipm
ent
OffR
oadE
quip
men
tUni
tAm
ount
1.00
2.00
tblL
andU
seLo
tAcr
eage
1.17
0.50
tblL
andU
seLo
tAcr
eage
0.57
0.50
tblL
andU
seLo
tAcr
eage
0.51
0.25
tblL
andU
seLo
tAcr
eage
4.02
1.00
tblL
andU
seLa
ndU
seS
quar
eFee
t24
,810
.00
24,8
11.0
0
tblL
andU
seLo
tAcr
eage
7.02
0.00
tblL
andU
seLa
ndU
seS
quar
eFee
t22
,190
.00
22,1
89.0
0
tblL
andU
seLa
ndU
seS
quar
eFee
t24
9,00
0.00
222,
564.
00
tblL
andU
seLa
ndU
seS
quar
eFee
t8,
100.
008,
095.
00
Dem
oliti
onO
ther
Con
stru
ctio
n E
quip
men
t2
8.00
171
0.42
Dem
oliti
onE
xcav
ator
s1
8.00
162
0.38
Load
Fac
tor
Dem
oliti
onC
oncr
ete/
Indu
stria
l Saw
s1
8.00
810.
73
Off
Ro
ad E
qu
ipm
ent
Pha
se N
ame
Offr
oad
Equ
ipm
ent T
ype
Am
ount
Usa
ge H
ours
Hor
se P
ower12
4
Res
iden
tial
Ind
oo
r: 4
50,6
92;
Res
iden
tial
Ou
tdo
or:
150
,231
; N
on
-Res
iden
tial
Ind
oo
r: 1
66,9
62;
No
n-R
esid
enti
al O
utd
oo
r: 7
3,99
3
5A
rchi
tect
ural
Coa
ting
Arc
hite
ctur
al C
oatin
g4/
29/2
016
10/1
9/20
165
402
4S
itew
ork/
Clo
seou
tB
uild
ing
Con
stru
ctio
n3/
11/2
016
12/2
/201
65
191
3B
uild
ing
Con
stru
ctio
nB
uild
ing
Con
stru
ctio
n5/
21/2
015
12/2
/201
65
47
2G
radi
ng/E
xcav
atio
nG
radi
ng3/
11/2
015
7/15
/201
55
91
End
Dat
eN
um D
ays
Wee
kN
um D
ays
Pha
se D
escr
iptio
n
1D
emol
ition
Dem
oliti
on1/
5/20
153/
10/2
015
5
3.0
Co
nst
ruct
ion
Det
ail
Co
nst
ruct
ion
Ph
ase
Pha
seN
umbe
rP
hase
Nam
eP
hase
Typ
eS
tart
Dat
e
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
10.7
80.
006.
5317
.41
0.00
5.86
NB
io-C
O2
To
tal C
O2
CH
4N
20C
O2e
Per
cen
tR
edu
ctio
n0.
000.
000.
000.
00
Exh
aust
PM
10P
M10
To
tal
Fu
git
ive
PM
2.5
Exh
aust
PM
2.5
PM
2.5
To
tal
Bio
- C
O2
RO
GN
Ox
CO
SO
2F
ug
itiv
e P
M10
0.00
003,
965.
019
03,
965.
0190
0.56
420.
0000
3,97
6.86
68
1.58
191.
1536
2.73
540.
4530
1.08
141.
5344
To
tal
5.14
2126
.160
923
.451
50.
0454
0.00
002,
338.
863
92,
338.
8639
0.33
680.
0000
2,34
5.93
63
0.99
320.
6378
1.63
090.
2663
0.60
010.
8664
2016
3.94
6214
.123
013
.925
20.
0273
0.00
001,
626.
155
11,
626.
1551
0.22
740.
0000
1,63
0.93
05
0.58
870.
5158
1.10
450.
1868
0.48
130.
6680
2015
1.19
6012
.037
99.
5263
0.01
81
Tot
al C
O2
CH
4N
2OC
O2e
Yea
rto
ns/y
rM
T/y
r
PM
10T
otal
Fug
itive
PM
2.5
Exh
aust
PM
2.5
PM
2.5
Tot
alB
io-
CO
2N
Bio
- C
O2
Mit
igat
ed C
on
stru
ctio
n
RO
GN
Ox
CO
SO
2F
ugiti
ve
PM
10E
xhau
stP
M10
Use
Soi
l Sta
biliz
er
Wat
er E
xpos
ed A
rea
Cle
an P
aved
Roa
ds
6.90
20.0
0LD
_Mix
HD
T_M
ixH
HD
T
3.1
Mit
igat
ion
Mea
sure
s C
on
stru
ctio
n
Arc
hite
ctur
al C
oatin
g2
69.0
00.
000.
0014
.70
14.7
06.
9020
.00
LD_M
ixH
DT
_Mix
HH
DT
6.90
20.0
0LD
_Mix
HD
T_M
ixH
HD
T
Site
wor
k/C
lose
out
434
6.00
95.0
00.
00
Bui
ldin
g C
onst
ruct
ion
1234
6.00
95.0
00.
0014
.70
14.7
06.
9020
.00
LD_M
ixH
DT
_Mix
HH
DT
6.90
20.0
0LD
_Mix
HD
T_M
ixH
HD
T
Gra
ding
/Exc
avat
ion
615
.00
0.00
11,7
00.0
0
Dem
oliti
on5
13.0
00.
0032
1.00
14.7
0
Wor
ker
Trip
Le
ngth
Ven
dor
Trip
Le
ngth
Hau
ling
Trip
Le
ngth
Wor
ker
Veh
icle
C
lass
Ven
dor
Veh
icle
Cla
ssH
aulin
gV
ehic
le C
lass
Tri
ps
and
VM
T
Pha
se N
ame
Offr
oad
Equ
ipm
ent
Cou
ntW
orke
r T
rip
Num
ber
Ven
dor
Trip
N
umbe
rH
aulin
g T
rip
Num
ber
Arc
hite
ctur
al C
oatin
gA
ir C
ompr
esso
rs2
8.00
780.
48
Site
wor
k/C
lose
out
Pum
ps1
8.00
840.
74
Site
wor
k/C
lose
out
Pav
ing
Equ
ipm
ent
18.
0013
00.
36
Site
wor
k/C
lose
out
Off-
Hig
hway
Tru
cks
28.
0040
00.
38
Bui
ldin
g C
onst
ruct
ion
Wel
ders
18.
0046
0.45
Bui
ldin
g C
onst
ruct
ion
Pum
ps1
8.00
840.
74
Bui
ldin
g C
onst
ruct
ion
Oth
er C
onst
ruct
ion
Equ
ipm
ent
48.
0017
10.
42
Bui
ldin
g C
onst
ruct
ion
Off-
Hig
hway
Tru
cks
18.
0040
00.
38
Bui
ldin
g C
onst
ruct
ion
Gen
erat
or S
ets
18.
0084
0.74
Bui
ldin
g C
onst
ruct
ion
Cra
nes
28.
0022
60.
29
Bui
ldin
g C
onst
ruct
ion
Aer
ial L
ifts
28.
0062
0.31
Gra
ding
/Exc
avat
ion
Tra
ctor
s/Lo
ader
s/B
ackh
oes
28.
0097
0.37
Gra
ding
/Exc
avat
ion
Scr
aper
s1
8.00
361
0.48
Gra
ding
/Exc
avat
ion
Rub
ber
Tire
d D
ozer
s1
8.00
255
0.40
Gra
ding
/Exc
avat
ion
Exc
avat
ors
18.
0016
20.
38
Gra
ding
/Exc
avat
ion
Bor
e/D
rill R
igs
18.
0020
50.
50
Dem
oliti
onT
ract
ors/
Load
ers/
Bac
khoe
s1
8.00
970.
37
0.00
0058
.967
358
.967
30.
0152
0.00
0059
.286
30.
0136
0.04
050.
0541
2.05
00e-
003
0.03
800.
0400
To
tal
0.06
820.
6833
0.42
856.
3000
e-00
4
0.00
0058
.967
358
.967
30.
0152
0.00
0059
.286
30.
0405
0.04
050.
0380
0.03
80O
ff-R
oad
0.06
820.
6833
0.42
856.
3000
e-00
4
0.00
000.
0000
0.00
000.
0000
0.00
000.
0000
0.01
360.
0000
0.01
362.
0500
e-00
30.
0000
2.05
00e-
003
Fug
itive
Dus
t
Tot
al C
O2
CH
4N
2OC
O2e
Cat
egor
yto
ns/y
rM
T/y
r
PM
10T
otal
Fug
itive
PM
2.5
Exh
aust
PM
2.5
PM
2.5
Tot
alB
io-
CO
2N
Bio
- C
O2
Mit
igat
ed C
on
stru
ctio
n O
n-S
ite
RO
GN
Ox
CO
SO
2F
ugiti
ve
PM
10E
xhau
stP
M10
0.00
0014
.184
714
.184
72.
7000
e-00
40.
0000
14.1
904
6.10
00e-
003
9.00
00e-
004
7.00
00e-
003
1.64
00e-
003
8.30
00e-
004
2.48
00e-
003
To
tal
4.60
00e-
003
0.05
460.
0583
1.60
00e-
004
0.00
003.
2526
3.25
261.
8000
e-00
40.
0000
3.25
643.
3500
e-00
33.
0000
e-00
53.
3800
e-00
38.
9000
e-00
43.
0000
e-00
59.
2000
e-00
4W
orke
r1.
3600
e-00
32.
0000
e-00
30.
0208
4.00
00e-
005
0.00
000.
0000
0.00
000.
0000
0.00
000.
0000
0.00
000.
0000
0.00
000.
0000
0.00
000.
0000
Ven
dor
0.00
000.
0000
0.00
000.
0000
0.00
0010
.932
210
.932
29.
0000
e-00
50.
0000
10.9
340
2.75
00e-
003
8.70
00e-
004
3.62
00e-
003
7.50
00e-
004
8.00
00e-
004
1.56
00e-
003
Hau
ling
3.24
00e-
003
0.05
260.
0376
1.20
00e-
004
Tot
al C
O2
CH
4N
2OC
O2e
Cat
egor
yto
ns/y
rM
T/y
r
PM
10T
otal
Fug
itive
PM
2.5
Exh
aust
PM
2.5
PM
2.5
Tot
alB
io-
CO
2N
Bio
- C
O2
Un
mit
igat
ed C
on
stru
ctio
n O
ff-S
ite
RO
GN
Ox
CO
SO
2F
ugiti
ve
PM
10E
xhau
stP
M10
0.00
0058
.967
458
.967
40.
0152
0.00
0059
.286
30.
0348
0.04
050.
0753
5.27
00e-
003
0.03
800.
0433
To
tal
0.06
820.
6833
0.42
856.
3000
e-00
4
0.00
0058
.967
458
.967
40.
0152
0.00
0059
.286
30.
0405
0.04
050.
0380
0.03
80O
ff-R
oad
0.06
820.
6833
0.42
856.
3000
e-00
4
0.00
000.
0000
0.00
000.
0000
0.00
000.
0000
0.03
480.
0000
0.03
485.
2700
e-00
30.
0000
5.27
00e-
003
CO
2e
Cat
egor
yto
ns/y
rM
T/y
r
Fug
itive
Dus
t
PM
2.5
Tot
alB
io-
CO
2N
Bio
- C
O2
Tot
al C
O2
CH
4N
2OS
O2
Fug
itive
P
M10
Exh
aust
PM
10P
M10
Tot
alF
ugiti
veP
M2.
5E
xhau
stP
M2.
5
3.2
Dem
olit
ion
- 2
015
Un
mit
igat
ed C
on
stru
ctio
n O
n-S
ite
RO
GN
Ox
CO
0.00
0040
5.72
8140
5.72
813.
5500
e-00
30.
0000
405.
8026
0.10
780.
0318
0.13
960.
0295
0.02
930.
0588
To
tal
0.12
121.
9222
1.41
504.
4100
e-00
3
0.00
007.
2663
7.26
634.
1000
e-00
40.
0000
7.27
507.
4900
e-00
37.
0000
e-00
57.
5600
e-00
31.
9900
e-00
36.
0000
e-00
52.
0500
e-00
3W
orke
r3.
0500
e-00
34.
4700
e-00
30.
0464
9.00
00e-
005
0.00
000.
0000
0.00
000.
0000
0.00
000.
0000
0.00
000.
0000
0.00
000.
0000
0.00
000.
0000
Ven
dor
0.00
000.
0000
0.00
000.
0000
0.00
0039
8.46
1839
8.46
183.
1400
e-00
30.
0000
398.
5277
0.10
030.
0318
0.13
200.
0275
0.02
920.
0567
Hau
ling
0.11
811.
9177
1.36
864.
3200
e-00
3
Tot
al C
O2
CH
4N
2OC
O2e
Cat
egor
yto
ns/y
rM
T/y
r
PM
10T
otal
Fug
itive
PM
2.5
Exh
aust
PM
2.5
PM
2.5
Tot
alB
io-
CO
2N
Bio
- C
O2
Un
mit
igat
ed C
on
stru
ctio
n O
ff-S
ite
RO
GN
Ox
CO
SO
2F
ugiti
ve
PM
10E
xhau
stP
M10
0.00
0019
0.89
3119
0.89
310.
0570
0.00
0019
2.08
990.
2787
0.10
830.
3870
0.15
130.
0996
0.25
09T
ota
l0.
1929
2.30
801.
5003
2.00
00e-
003
0.00
0019
0.89
3119
0.89
310.
0570
0.00
0019
2.08
990.
1083
0.10
830.
0996
0.09
96O
ff-R
oad
0.19
292.
3080
1.50
032.
0000
e-00
3
0.00
000.
0000
0.00
000.
0000
0.00
000.
0000
0.27
870.
0000
0.27
870.
1513
0.00
000.
1513
Fug
itive
Dus
t
Tot
al C
O2
CH
4N
2OC
O2e
Cat
egor
yto
ns/y
rM
T/y
r
PM
10T
otal
Fug
itive
PM
2.5
Exh
aust
PM
2.5
PM
2.5
Tot
alB
io-
CO
2N
Bio
- C
O2
3.3
Gra
din
g/E
xcav
atio
n -
201
5
Un
mit
igat
ed C
on
stru
ctio
n O
n-S
ite
RO
GN
Ox
CO
SO
2F
ugiti
ve
PM
10E
xhau
stP
M10
0.00
0014
.184
714
.184
72.
7000
e-00
40.
0000
14.1
904
6.10
00e-
003
9.00
00e-
004
7.00
00e-
003
1.64
00e-
003
8.30
00e-
004
2.48
00e-
003
To
tal
4.60
00e-
003
0.05
460.
0583
1.60
00e-
004
0.00
003.
2526
3.25
261.
8000
e-00
40.
0000
3.25
643.
3500
e-00
33.
0000
e-00
53.
3800
e-00
38.
9000
e-00
43.
0000
e-00
59.
2000
e-00
4W
orke
r1.
3600
e-00
32.
0000
e-00
30.
0208
4.00
00e-
005
0.00
000.
0000
0.00
000.
0000
0.00
000.
0000
0.00
000.
0000
0.00
000.
0000
0.00
000.
0000
Ven
dor
0.00
000.
0000
0.00
000.
0000
0.00
0010
.932
210
.932
29.
0000
e-00
50.
0000
10.9
340
2.75
00e-
003
8.70
00e-
004
3.62
00e-
003
7.50
00e-
004
8.00
00e-
004
1.56
00e-
003
Hau
ling
3.24
00e-
003
0.05
260.
0376
1.20
00e-
004
Tot
al C
O2
CH
4N
2OC
O2e
Cat
egor
yto
ns/y
rM
T/y
r
PM
10T
otal
Fug
itive
PM
2.5
Exh
aust
PM
2.5
PM
2.5
Tot
alB
io-
CO
2N
Bio
- C
O2
Mit
igat
ed C
on
stru
ctio
n O
ff-S
ite
RO
GN
Ox
CO
SO
2F
ugiti
ve
PM
10E
xhau
stP
M10
0.00
0050
7.43
1650
7.43
160.
1334
0.00
0051
0.23
370.
3184
0.31
840.
2990
0.29
90T
ota
l0.
6079
6.10
523.
2742
5.48
00e-
003
0.00
0050
7.43
1650
7.43
160.
1334
0.00
0051
0.23
370.
3184
0.31
840.
2990
0.29
90O
ff-R
oad
0.60
796.
1052
3.27
425.
4800
e-00
3
Tot
al C
O2
CH
4N
2OC
O2e
Cat
egor
yto
ns/y
rM
T/y
r
PM
10T
otal
Fug
itive
PM
2.5
Exh
aust
PM
2.5
PM
2.5
Tot
alB
io-
CO
2N
Bio
- C
O2
3.4
Bu
ildin
g C
on
stru
ctio
n -
201
5
Un
mit
igat
ed C
on
stru
ctio
n O
n-S
ite
RO
GN
Ox
CO
SO
2F
ugiti
ve
PM
10E
xhau
stP
M10
0.00
0040
5.72
8140
5.72
813.
5500
e-00
30.
0000
405.
8026
0.10
780.
0318
0.13
960.
0295
0.02
930.
0588
To
tal
0.12
121.
9222
1.41
504.
4100
e-00
3
0.00
007.
2663
7.26
634.
1000
e-00
40.
0000
7.27
507.
4900
e-00
37.
0000
e-00
57.
5600
e-00
31.
9900
e-00
36.
0000
e-00
52.
0500
e-00
3W
orke
r3.
0500
e-00
34.
4700
e-00
30.
0464
9.00
00e-
005
0.00
000.
0000
0.00
000.
0000
0.00
000.
0000
0.00
000.
0000
0.00
000.
0000
0.00
000.
0000
Ven
dor
0.00
000.
0000
0.00
000.
0000
0.00
0039
8.46
1839
8.46
183.
1400
e-00
30.
0000
398.
5277
0.10
030.
0318
0.13
200.
0275
0.02
920.
0567
Hau
ling
0.11
811.
9177
1.36
864.
3200
e-00
3
Tot
al C
O2
CH
4N
2OC
O2e
Cat
egor
yto
ns/y
rM
T/y
r
PM
10T
otal
Fug
itive
PM
2.5
Exh
aust
PM
2.5
PM
2.5
Tot
alB
io-
CO
2N
Bio
- C
O2
Mit
igat
ed C
on
stru
ctio
n O
ff-S
ite
RO
GN
Ox
CO
SO
2F
ugiti
ve
PM
10E
xhau
stP
M10
0.00
0019
0.89
2919
0.89
290.
0570
0.00
0019
2.08
970.
1087
0.10
830.
2170
0.05
900.
0996
0.15
86T
ota
l0.
1929
2.30
801.
5003
2.00
00e-
003
0.00
0019
0.89
2919
0.89
290.
0570
0.00
0019
2.08
970.
1083
0.10
830.
0996
0.09
96O
ff-R
oad
0.19
292.
3080
1.50
032.
0000
e-00
3
0.00
000.
0000
0.00
000.
0000
0.00
000.
0000
0.10
870.
0000
0.10
870.
0590
0.00
000.
0590
Fug
itive
Dus
t
Tot
al C
O2
CH
4N
2OC
O2e
Cat
egor
yto
ns/y
rM
T/y
r
PM
10T
otal
Fug
itive
PM
2.5
Exh
aust
PM
2.5
PM
2.5
Tot
alB
io-
CO
2N
Bio
- C
O2
Mit
igat
ed C
on
stru
ctio
n O
n-S
ite
RO
GN
Ox
CO
SO
2F
ugiti
ve
PM
10E
xhau
stP
M10
0.00
0044
8.95
1144
8.95
110.
0180
0.00
0044
9.32
850.
3526
0.01
590.
3685
0.09
460.
0146
0.10
92T
ota
l0.
2013
0.96
462.
8499
5.42
00e-
003
0.00
0029
6.54
0929
6.54
090.
0168
0.00
0029
6.89
280.
3056
2.74
00e-
003
0.30
830.
0812
2.51
00e-
003
0.08
37W
orke
r0.
1244
0.18
231.
8926
3.76
00e-
003
0.00
0015
2.41
0315
2.41
031.
2100
e-00
30.
0000
152.
4357
0.04
700.
0131
0.06
020.
0134
0.01
210.
0255
Ven
dor
0.07
690.
7823
0.95
731.
6600
e-00
3
0.00
000.
0000
0.00
000.
0000
0.00
000.
0000
0.00
000.
0000
0.00
000.
0000
0.00
000.
0000
Hau
ling
0.00
000.
0000
0.00
000.
0000
Tot
al C
O2
CH
4N
2OC
O2e
Cat
egor
yto
ns/y
rM
T/y
r
PM
10T
otal
Fug
itive
PM
2.5
Exh
aust
PM
2.5
PM
2.5
Tot
alB
io-
CO
2N
Bio
- C
O2
Mit
igat
ed C
on
stru
ctio
n O
ff-S
ite
RO
GN
Ox
CO
SO
2F
ugiti
ve
PM
10E
xhau
stP
M10
0.00
0050
7.43
1050
7.43
100.
1334
0.00
0051
0.23
300.
3184
0.31
840.
2990
0.29
90T
ota
l0.
6079
6.10
523.
2742
5.48
00e-
003
0.00
0050
7.43
1050
7.43
100.
1334
0.00
0051
0.23
300.
3184
0.31
840.
2990
0.29
90O
ff-R
oad
0.60
796.
1052
3.27
425.
4800
e-00
3
Tot
al C
O2
CH
4N
2OC
O2e
Cat
egor
yto
ns/y
rM
T/y
r
PM
10T
otal
Fug
itive
PM
2.5
Exh
aust
PM
2.5
PM
2.5
Tot
alB
io-
CO
2N
Bio
- C
O2
Mit
igat
ed C
on
stru
ctio
n O
n-S
ite
RO
GN
Ox
CO
SO
2F
ugiti
ve
PM
10E
xhau
stP
M10
0.00
0044
8.95
1144
8.95
110.
0180
0.00
0044
9.32
850.
3526
0.01
590.
3685
0.09
460.
0146
0.10
92T
ota
l0.
2013
0.96
462.
8499
5.42
00e-
003
0.00
0029
6.54
0929
6.54
090.
0168
0.00
0029
6.89
280.
3056
2.74
00e-
003
0.30
830.
0812
2.51
00e-
003
0.08
37W
orke
r0.
1244
0.18
231.
8926
3.76
00e-
003
0.00
0015
2.41
0315
2.41
031.
2100
e-00
30.
0000
152.
4357
0.04
700.
0131
0.06
020.
0134
0.01
210.
0255
Ven
dor
0.07
690.
7823
0.95
731.
6600
e-00
3
0.00
000.
0000
0.00
000.
0000
0.00
000.
0000
0.00
000.
0000
0.00
000.
0000
0.00
000.
0000
Hau
ling
0.00
000.
0000
0.00
000.
0000
Tot
al C
O2
CH
4N
2OC
O2e
Cat
egor
yto
ns/y
rM
T/y
r
PM
10T
otal
Fug
itive
PM
2.5
Exh
aust
PM
2.5
PM
2.5
Tot
alB
io-
CO
2N
Bio
- C
O2
Un
mit
igat
ed C
on
stru
ctio
n O
ff-S
ite
RO
GN
Ox
CO
SO
2F
ugiti
ve
PM
10E
xhau
stP
M10
0.00
0075
3.13
1875
3.13
180.
1976
0.00
0075
7.28
080.
4394
0.43
940.
4124
0.41
24T
ota
l0.
8461
8.52
944.
8003
8.20
00e-
003
0.00
0075
3.13
1875
3.13
180.
1976
0.00
0075
7.28
080.
4394
0.43
940.
4124
0.41
24O
ff-R
oad
0.84
618.
5294
4.80
038.
2000
e-00
3
Tot
al C
O2
CH
4N
2OC
O2e
Cat
egor
yto
ns/y
rM
T/y
r
PM
10T
otal
Fug
itive
PM
2.5
Exh
aust
PM
2.5
PM
2.5
Tot
alB
io-
CO
2N
Bio
- C
O2
Mit
igat
ed C
on
stru
ctio
n O
n-S
ite
RO
GN
Ox
CO
SO
2F
ugiti
ve
PM
10E
xhau
stP
M10
0.00
0065
4.17
7165
4.17
710.
0247
0.00
0065
4.69
620.
5279
0.02
020.
5481
0.14
160.
0186
0.16
02T
ota
l0.
2691
1.27
973.
8906
8.10
00e-
003
0.00
0042
8.55
1742
8.55
170.
0231
0.00
0042
9.03
640.
4574
3.89
00e-
003
0.46
130.
1215
3.58
00e-
003
0.12
51W
orke
r0.
1676
0.24
622.
5583
5.62
00e-
003
0.00
0022
5.62
5422
5.62
541.
6400
e-00
30.
0000
225.
6598
0.07
040.
0164
0.08
680.
0201
0.01
500.
0351
Ven
dor
0.10
161.
0336
1.33
232.
4800
e-00
3
0.00
000.
0000
0.00
000.
0000
0.00
000.
0000
0.00
000.
0000
0.00
000.
0000
0.00
000.
0000
Hau
ling
0.00
000.
0000
0.00
000.
0000
Tot
al C
O2
CH
4N
2OC
O2e
Cat
egor
yto
ns/y
rM
T/y
r
PM
10T
otal
Fug
itive
PM
2.5
Exh
aust
PM
2.5
PM
2.5
Tot
alB
io-
CO
2N
Bio
- C
O2
Un
mit
igat
ed C
on
stru
ctio
n O
ff-S
ite
RO
GN
Ox
CO
SO
2F
ugiti
ve
PM
10E
xhau
stP
M10
0.00
0075
3.13
2775
3.13
270.
1976
0.00
0075
7.28
170.
4394
0.43
940.
4124
0.41
24T
ota
l0.
8461
8.52
944.
8003
8.20
00e-
003
0.00
0075
3.13
2775
3.13
270.
1976
0.00
0075
7.28
170.
4394
0.43
940.
4124
0.41
24O
ff-R
oad
0.84
618.
5294
4.80
038.
2000
e-00
3
Tot
al C
O2
CH
4N
2OC
O2e
Cat
egor
yto
ns/y
rM
T/y
r
PM
10T
otal
Fug
itive
PM
2.5
Exh
aust
PM
2.5
PM
2.5
Tot
alB
io-
CO
2N
Bio
- C
O2
3.4
Bu
ildin
g C
on
stru
ctio
n -
201
6
Un
mit
igat
ed C
on
stru
ctio
n O
n-S
ite
RO
GN
Ox
CO
SO
2F
ugiti
ve
PM
10E
xhau
stP
M10
0.00
0051
8.45
5751
8.45
570.
0196
0.00
0051
8.86
710.
4184
0.01
610.
4344
0.11
220.
0148
0.12
70T
ota
l0.
2133
1.01
423.
0834
6.43
00e-
003
0.00
0033
9.64
0633
9.64
060.
0183
0.00
0034
0.02
470.
3625
3.09
00e-
003
0.36
560.
0963
2.84
00e-
003
0.09
91W
orke
r0.
1328
0.19
512.
0275
4.46
00e-
003
0.00
0017
8.81
5217
8.81
521.
3000
e-00
30.
0000
178.
8424
0.05
580.
0130
0.06
880.
0159
0.01
190.
0279
Ven
dor
0.08
050.
8191
1.05
591.
9700
e-00
3
0.00
000.
0000
0.00
000.
0000
0.00
000.
0000
0.00
000.
0000
0.00
000.
0000
0.00
000.
0000
Hau
ling
0.00
000.
0000
0.00
000.
0000
Tot
al C
O2
CH
4N
2OC
O2e
Cat
egor
yto
ns/y
rM
T/y
r
PM
10T
otal
Fug
itive
PM
2.5
Exh
aust
PM
2.5
PM
2.5
Tot
alB
io-
CO
2N
Bio
- C
O2
Un
mit
igat
ed C
on
stru
ctio
n O
ff-S
ite
RO
GN
Ox
CO
SO
2F
ugiti
ve
PM
10E
xhau
stP
M10
0.00
0032
6.91
3532
6.91
350.
0876
0.00
0032
8.75
210.
1291
0.12
910.
1215
0.12
15T
ota
l0.
2731
2.88
221.
5770
3.52
00e-
003
0.00
0032
6.91
3532
6.91
350.
0876
0.00
0032
8.75
210.
1291
0.12
910.
1215
0.12
15O
ff-R
oad
0.27
312.
8822
1.57
703.
5200
e-00
3
Tot
al C
O2
CH
4N
2OC
O2e
Cat
egor
yto
ns/y
rM
T/y
r
PM
10T
otal
Fug
itive
PM
2.5
Exh
aust
PM
2.5
PM
2.5
Tot
alB
io-
CO
2N
Bio
- C
O2
3.5
Sit
ewo
rk/C
lose
ou
t -
2016
Un
mit
igat
ed C
on
stru
ctio
n O
n-S
ite
RO
GN
Ox
CO
SO
2F
ugiti
ve
PM
10E
xhau
stP
M10
0.00
0065
4.17
7165
4.17
710.
0247
0.00
0065
4.69
620.
5279
0.02
020.
5481
0.14
160.
0186
0.16
02T
ota
l0.
2691
1.27
973.
8906
8.10
00e-
003
0.00
0042
8.55
1742
8.55
170.
0231
0.00
0042
9.03
640.
4574
3.89
00e-
003
0.46
130.
1215
3.58
00e-
003
0.12
51W
orke
r0.
1676
0.24
622.
5583
5.62
00e-
003
0.00
0022
5.62
5422
5.62
541.
6400
e-00
30.
0000
225.
6598
0.07
040.
0164
0.08
680.
0201
0.01
500.
0351
Ven
dor
0.10
161.
0336
1.33
232.
4800
e-00
3
0.00
000.
0000
0.00
000.
0000
0.00
000.
0000
0.00
000.
0000
0.00
000.
0000
0.00
000.
0000
Hau
ling
0.00
000.
0000
0.00
000.
0000
Tot
al C
O2
CH
4N
2OC
O2e
Cat
egor
yto
ns/y
rM
T/y
r
PM
10T
otal
Fug
itive
PM
2.5
Exh
aust
PM
2.5
PM
2.5
Tot
alB
io-
CO
2N
Bio
- C
O2
Mit
igat
ed C
on
stru
ctio
n O
ff-S
ite
RO
GN
Ox
CO
SO
2F
ugiti
ve
PM
10E
xhau
stP
M10
0.00
0042
.213
842
.213
84.
9800
e-00
30.
0000
42.3
183
0.03
250.
0325
0.03
250.
0325
To
tal
2.32
740.
3922
0.31
154.
9000
e-00
4
0.00
0042
.213
842
.213
84.
9800
e-00
30.
0000
42.3
183
0.03
250.
0325
0.03
250.
0325
Off-
Roa
d0.
0609
0.39
220.
3115
4.90
00e-
004
0.00
000.
0000
0.00
000.
0000
0.00
000.
0000
0.00
000.
0000
0.00
000.
0000
Arc
hit.
Coa
ting
2.26
64
Tot
al C
O2
CH
4N
2OC
O2e
Cat
egor
yto
ns/y
rM
T/y
r
PM
10T
otal
Fug
itive
PM
2.5
Exh
aust
PM
2.5
PM
2.5
Tot
alB
io-
CO
2N
Bio
- C
O2
3.6
Arc
hit
ectu
ral C
oat
ing
- 2
016
Un
mit
igat
ed C
on
stru
ctio
n O
n-S
ite
RO
GN
Ox
CO
SO
2F
ugiti
ve
PM
10E
xhau
stP
M10
0.00
0051
8.45
5751
8.45
570.
0196
0.00
0051
8.86
710.
4184
0.01
610.
4344
0.11
220.
0148
0.12
70T
ota
l0.
2133
1.01
423.
0834
6.43
00e-
003
0.00
0033
9.64
0633
9.64
060.
0183
0.00
0034
0.02
470.
3625
3.09
00e-
003
0.36
560.
0963
2.84
00e-
003
0.09
91W
orke
r0.
1328
0.19
512.
0275
4.46
00e-
003
0.00
0017
8.81
5217
8.81
521.
3000
e-00
30.
0000
178.
8424
0.05
580.
0130
0.06
880.
0159
0.01
190.
0279
Ven
dor
0.08
050.
8191
1.05
591.
9700
e-00
3
0.00
000.
0000
0.00
000.
0000
0.00
000.
0000
0.00
000.
0000
0.00
000.
0000
0.00
000.
0000
Hau
ling
0.00
000.
0000
0.00
000.
0000
Tot
al C
O2
CH
4N
2OC
O2e
Cat
egor
yto
ns/y
rM
T/y
r
PM
10T
otal
Fug
itive
PM
2.5
Exh
aust
PM
2.5
PM
2.5
Tot
alB
io-
CO
2N
Bio
- C
O2
Mit
igat
ed C
on
stru
ctio
n O
ff-S
ite
RO
GN
Ox
CO
SO
2F
ugiti
ve
PM
10E
xhau
stP
M10
0.00
0032
6.91
3132
6.91
310.
0876
0.00
0032
8.75
170.
1291
0.12
910.
1215
0.12
15T
ota
l0.
2731
2.88
221.
5770
3.52
00e-
003
0.00
0032
6.91
3132
6.91
310.
0876
0.00
0032
8.75
170.
1291
0.12
910.
1215
0.12
15O
ff-R
oad
0.27
312.
8822
1.57
703.
5200
e-00
3
Tot
al C
O2
CH
4N
2OC
O2e
Cat
egor
yto
ns/y
rM
T/y
r
PM
10T
otal
Fug
itive
PM
2.5
Exh
aust
PM
2.5
PM
2.5
Tot
alB
io-
CO
2N
Bio
- C
O2
Mit
igat
ed C
on
stru
ctio
n O
n-S
ite
RO
GN
Ox
CO
SO
2F
ugiti
ve
PM
10E
xhau
stP
M10
0.00
0043
.972
543
.972
52.
3700
e-00
30.
0000
44.0
222
0.04
694.
0000
e-00
40.
0473
0.01
253.
7000
e-00
40.
0128
To
tal
0.01
720.
0253
0.26
255.
8000
e-00
4
0.00
0043
.972
543
.972
52.
3700
e-00
30.
0000
44.0
222
0.04
694.
0000
e-00
40.
0473
0.01
253.
7000
e-00
40.
0128
Wor
ker
0.01
720.
0253
0.26
255.
8000
e-00
4
0.00
000.
0000
0.00
000.
0000
0.00
000.
0000
0.00
000.
0000
0.00
000.
0000
0.00
000.
0000
Ven
dor
0.00
000.
0000
0.00
000.
0000
0.00
000.
0000
0.00
000.
0000
0.00
000.
0000
0.00
000.
0000
0.00
000.
0000
0.00
000.
0000
Hau
ling
0.00
000.
0000
0.00
000.
0000
Tot
al C
O2
CH
4N
2OC
O2e
Cat
egor
yto
ns/y
rM
T/y
r
PM
10T
otal
Fug
itive
PM
2.5
Exh
aust
PM
2.5
PM
2.5
Tot
alB
io-
CO
2N
Bio
- C
O2
Mit
igat
ed C
on
stru
ctio
n O
ff-S
ite
RO
GN
Ox
CO
SO
2F
ugiti
ve
PM
10E
xhau
stP
M10
0.00
0042
.213
842
.213
84.
9800
e-00
30.
0000
42.3
183
0.03
250.
0325
0.03
250.
0325
To
tal
2.32
740.
3922
0.31
154.
9000
e-00
4
0.00
0042
.213
842
.213
84.
9800
e-00
30.
0000
42.3
183
0.03
250.
0325
0.03
250.
0325
Off-
Roa
d0.
0609
0.39
220.
3115
4.90
00e-
004
0.00
000.
0000
0.00
000.
0000
0.00
000.
0000
0.00
000.
0000
0.00
000.
0000
Arc
hit.
Coa
ting
2.26
64
Tot
al C
O2
CH
4N
2OC
O2e
Cat
egor
yto
ns/y
rM
T/y
r
PM
10T
otal
Fug
itive
PM
2.5
Exh
aust
PM
2.5
PM
2.5
Tot
alB
io-
CO
2N
Bio
- C
O2
Mit
igat
ed C
on
stru
ctio
n O
n-S
ite
RO
GN
Ox
CO
SO
2F
ugiti
ve
PM
10E
xhau
stP
M10
0.00
0043
.972
543
.972
52.
3700
e-00
30.
0000
44.0
222
0.04
694.
0000
e-00
40.
0473
0.01
253.
7000
e-00
40.
0128
To
tal
0.01
720.
0253
0.26
255.
8000
e-00
4
0.00
0043
.972
543
.972
52.
3700
e-00
30.
0000
44.0
222
0.04
694.
0000
e-00
40.
0473
0.01
253.
7000
e-00
40.
0128
Wor
ker
0.01
720.
0253
0.26
255.
8000
e-00
4
0.00
000.
0000
0.00
000.
0000
0.00
000.
0000
0.00
000.
0000
0.00
000.
0000
0.00
000.
0000
Ven
dor
0.00
000.
0000
0.00
000.
0000
0.00
000.
0000
0.00
000.
0000
0.00
000.
0000
0.00
000.
0000
0.00
000.
0000
0.00
000.
0000
Hau
ling
0.00
000.
0000
0.00
000.
0000
Tot
al C
O2
CH
4N
2OC
O2e
Cat
egor
yto
ns/y
rM
T/y
r
PM
10T
otal
Fug
itive
PM
2.5
Exh
aust
PM
2.5
PM
2.5
Tot
alB
io-
CO
2N
Bio
- C
O2
Un
mit
igat
ed C
on
stru
ctio
n O
ff-S
ite
RO
GN
Ox
CO
SO
2F
ugiti
ve
PM
10E
xhau
stP
M10
Appendix B.3Project GHG Emissions – CalEEMod Outputs for Electricity,Natural Gas, Mobile, Area, Waste, andWater (First Full InitialOperational Year)
Cal
EE
Mod
Ver
sion
: Cal
EE
Mod
.201
3.2.
2P
age
1 of
1D
ate:
1/8
/201
4 11
:33
AM
8150
Su
nse
t B
lvd
Mix
ed U
se P
roje
ct -
PR
OJE
CT
So
uth
Co
ast
Air
Bas
in, A
nn
ual
1.0
Pro
ject
Ch
arac
teri
stic
s
1.1
Lan
d U
sag
e
Land
Use
sS
ize
Met
ricLo
t Acr
eage
Flo
or S
urfa
ce A
rea
Pop
ulat
ion
Gen
eral
Offi
ce B
uild
ing
5.09
1000
sqft
0.12
5,09
4.00
0
Enc
lose
d P
arki
ng w
ith E
leva
tor
305.
6510
00sq
ft0.
0030
5,65
2.00
0
Hea
lth C
lub
8.10
1000
sqft
0.19
8,09
5.00
0
Qua
lity
Res
taur
ant
22.1
910
00sq
ft0.
2522
,189
.00
0
Apa
rtm
ents
Hig
h R
ise
249.
00D
wel
ling
Uni
t1.
0019
1,32
4.00
528
Str
ip M
all
51.1
510
00sq
ft0.
5051
,150
.00
0
Sup
erm
arke
t24
.81
1000
sqft
0.50
24,8
11.0
00
Use
r D
efin
ed R
ecre
atio
nal
49.8
4U
ser
Def
ined
Uni
t0.
0049
,840
.00
0
1.2
Oth
er P
roje
ct C
har
acte
rist
ics
Urb
aniz
atio
nU
rban
Win
d S
pee
d (
m/s
)2.
2P
reci
pit
atio
n F
req
(D
ays)
31
Clim
ate
Zo
ne
11O
per
atio
nal
Yea
r20
17
Uti
lity
Co
mp
any
Los
Ang
eles
Dep
artm
ent o
f Wat
er &
Pow
er
CO
2 In
ten
sity
(l
b/M
Wh
r)11
56C
H4
Inte
nsi
ty
(lb
/MW
hr)
0.02
9N
2O In
ten
sity
(l
b/M
Wh
r)0.
006
1.3
Use
r E
nte
red
Co
mm
ents
& N
on
-Def
ault
Dat
a
Pro
ject
Cha
ract
eris
tics
- C
O2
Inte
nsity
Fac
tor:
Los
Ang
eles
Dep
artm
ent o
f Wat
er a
nd P
ower
, 201
2 P
ower
Inte
grat
ed R
esou
rce
Pla
n, (
2012
).
Land
Use
- U
nit S
izes
(re
fer
to S
ectio
n 2,
Pro
ject
Des
crip
tion,
of t
he 8
150
Sun
set B
lvd
Mix
ed-U
se P
roje
ct D
EIR
); P
opul
atio
n: 5
28
(ref
er to
Sec
tion
4.H
, P
opul
atio
n/H
ousi
ng, o
f the
Dra
ft E
IR);
Use
r D
efin
ed R
esid
entia
l=R
esid
entia
l Am
eniti
es/R
oof D
ecks
.V
ehic
le T
rips
- R
efer
to "
Trip
Gen
erat
ion
Rat
e" w
orks
heet
pro
vide
d in
this
App
endi
x.
Woo
dsto
ves
- N
o re
side
ntia
l woo
d-st
oves
; No
resi
dent
ial h
eart
hs.
Ene
rgy
Use
- C
alE
EM
od d
efau
lt en
ergy
dem
and
rate
s. U
ser
Def
ined
Rec
reat
iona
l=R
esid
entia
l Am
eniti
es/R
oof D
eck
(fac
tors
are
from
Hea
lth C
lub/
Rac
quet
C
lub)
.W
ater
And
Was
tew
ater
- R
efer
to "
Pro
ject
Wat
er D
eman
d R
ates
" w
orks
heet
pro
vide
d in
this
App
endi
x.
Sol
id W
aste
- R
efer
to "
Pro
ject
Sol
id W
aste
Dis
posa
l Rat
es"
wor
kshe
et p
rovi
ded
in th
is A
ppen
dix.
Sol
id w
aste
rat
e is
incl
usiv
e o
f 60%
div
ersi
on.
Ene
rgy
Miti
gatio
n -
LEE
D v
4 C
redi
ts: E
Ac2
(ex
ceed
Titl
e 24
by
10%
); E
Ac5
(1%
ren
ewab
le e
nerg
y ge
nera
tion)
(re
fer
to "
Pre
limin
ary
LEE
D S
core
card
" pr
ovid
ed in
this
App
endi
x); E
nerg
y E
ffici
ent A
pplia
nces
.W
ater
Miti
gatio
n -
LEE
D v
4 C
redi
ts: W
Ec2
(re
duce
indo
or w
ater
dem
and
by 3
5%)
(ref
er to
"P
relim
inar
y LE
ED
Sco
reca
rd"
prov
ided
in th
is A
ppen
dix)
.
Tab
le N
ame
Col
umn
Nam
eD
efau
lt V
alue
New
Val
ue
tblE
nerg
yUse
Ligh
tingE
lect
0.00
3.55
tblE
nerg
yUse
NT
24E
0.00
5.75
tblE
nerg
yUse
NT
24N
G0.
004.
45
tblE
nerg
yUse
T24
E0.
002.
75
tblE
nerg
yUse
T24
NG
0.00
14.3
6
tblF
irepl
aces
Fire
plac
eDay
Yea
r25
.00
0.00
tblF
irepl
aces
Fire
plac
eHou
rDay
3.00
0.00
tblF
irepl
aces
Fire
plac
eWoo
dMas
s1,
019.
200.
00
tblF
irepl
aces
Num
berG
as21
1.65
0.00
tblF
irepl
aces
Num
berN
oFire
plac
e24
.90
0.00
tblF
irepl
aces
Num
berW
ood
12.4
50.
00
tblL
andU
seLa
ndU
seS
quar
eFee
t5,
090.
005,
094.
00
tblL
andU
seLa
ndU
seS
quar
eFee
t30
5,65
0.00
305,
652.
00
tblL
andU
seLa
ndU
seS
quar
eFee
t8,
100.
008,
095.
00
tblL
andU
seLa
ndU
seS
quar
eFee
t22
,190
.00
22,1
89.0
0
tblL
andU
seLa
ndU
seS
quar
eFee
t24
9,00
0.00
191,
324.
00
tblL
andU
seLa
ndU
seS
quar
eFee
t24
,810
.00
24,8
11.0
0
tblL
andU
seLa
ndU
seS
quar
eFee
t0.
0049
,840
.00
tblL
andU
seLo
tAcr
eage
7.02
0.00
tblL
andU
seLo
tAcr
eage
0.51
0.25
tblL
andU
seLo
tAcr
eage
4.02
1.00
tblL
andU
seLo
tAcr
eage
1.17
0.50
tblL
andU
seLo
tAcr
eage
0.57
0.50
tblL
andU
seP
opul
atio
n71
2.00
528.
00
tblP
roje
ctC
hara
cter
istic
sC
O2I
nten
sity
Fac
tor
1227
.89
1156
tblP
roje
ctC
hara
cter
istic
sO
pera
tiona
lYea
r20
1420
17
tblS
olid
Was
teS
olid
Was
teG
ener
atio
nRat
e11
4.54
222.
30
tblS
olid
Was
teS
olid
Was
teG
ener
atio
nRat
e4.
737.
56
tblS
olid
Was
teS
olid
Was
teG
ener
atio
nRat
e46
.17
12.0
2
tblS
olid
Was
teS
olid
Was
teG
ener
atio
nRat
e20
.25
434.
76
tblS
olid
Was
teS
olid
Was
teG
ener
atio
nRat
e53
.71
75.9
5
tblS
olid
Was
teS
olid
Was
teG
ener
atio
nRat
e13
9.93
165.
78
tblV
ehic
leT
rips
ST
_TR
7.16
4.36
tblV
ehic
leT
rips
ST
_TR
2.37
96.3
9
tblV
ehic
leT
rips
ST
_TR
20.8
721
.25
tblV
ehic
leT
rips
ST
_TR
94.3
658
.41
tblV
ehic
leT
rips
ST
_TR
42.0
427
.90
tblV
ehic
leT
rips
ST
_TR
177.
5967
.47
tblV
ehic
leT
rips
SU
_TR
6.07
4.36
tblV
ehic
leT
rips
SU
_TR
0.98
96.3
9
tblV
ehic
leT
rips
SU
_TR
26.7
321
.25
tblV
ehic
leT
rips
SU
_TR
72.1
658
.41
tblV
ehic
leT
rips
SU
_TR
20.4
327
.90
tblV
ehic
leT
rips
SU
_TR
166.
4467
.47
tblV
ehic
leT
rips
WD
_TR
6.59
4.36
tblV
ehic
leT
rips
WD
_TR
11.0
196
.39
tblV
ehic
leT
rips
WD
_TR
32.9
321
.25
tblV
ehic
leT
rips
WD
_TR
89.9
558
.41
tblV
ehic
leT
rips
WD
_TR
44.3
227
.90
tblV
ehic
leT
rips
WD
_TR
102.
2467
.47
tblW
ater
Indo
orW
ater
Use
Rat
e16
,223
,352
.38
8,34
4,21
0.00
tblW
ater
Indo
orW
ater
Use
Rat
e90
4,66
4.78
118,
128.
00
tblW
ater
Indo
orW
ater
Use
Rat
e47
9,05
9.47
187,
603.
00
tblW
ater
Indo
orW
ater
Use
Rat
e6,
735,
413.
082,
923,
560.
00
tblW
ater
Indo
orW
ater
Use
Rat
e3,
788,
809.
471,
185,
365.
00
tblW
ater
Indo
orW
ater
Use
Rat
e3,
058,
284.
4189
9,64
4.00
tblW
ater
Out
door
Wat
erU
seR
ate
10,2
27,7
65.6
35,
260,
435.
00
tblW
ater
Out
door
Wat
erU
seR
ate
0.00
2,85
6,12
5.00
tblW
ater
Out
door
Wat
erU
seR
ate
554,
471.
9672
,402
.00
tblW
ater
Out
door
Wat
erU
seR
ate
293,
617.
0911
4,98
2.00
tblW
ater
Out
door
Wat
erU
seR
ate
429,
919.
9818
6,60
5.00
tblW
ater
Out
door
Wat
erU
seR
ate
2,32
2,17
3.55
726,
505.
00
tblW
ater
Out
door
Wat
erU
seR
ate
94,5
86.1
227
,821
.00
tblW
oods
tove
sN
umbe
rCat
alyt
ic12
.45
0.00
tblW
oods
tove
sN
umbe
rNon
cata
lytic
12.4
50.
00
tblW
oods
tove
sW
oods
tove
Day
Yea
r25
.00
0.00
tblW
oods
tove
sW
oods
tove
Woo
dMas
s99
9.60
0.00
2.0
Em
issi
on
s S
um
mar
y
SO
2F
ugiti
ve
PM
10E
xhau
stP
M10
PM
2.5
Tot
alB
io-
CO
2N
Bio
- C
O2
2.2
Ove
rall
Op
erat
ion
al
Un
mit
igat
ed O
per
atio
nal
RO
GN
Ox
CO
Tot
al C
O2
CH
4N
2OC
O2e
Cat
egor
yto
ns/y
rM
T/y
r
PM
10T
otal
Fug
itive
PM
2.5
Exh
aust
PM
2.5
Are
a3.
0754
0.03
032.
5998
1.40
00e-
004
0.01
410.
0141
0.01
410.
0141
0.00
004.
2061
4.20
614.
2400
e-00
30.
0000
4.29
52
Ene
rgy
0.04
670.
4196
0.32
002.
5500
e-00
30.
0323
0.03
230.
0323
0.03
230.
0000
3,86
4.06
32
3,86
4.06
320.
0942
0.02
613,
874.
141
8
Mob
ile3.
3237
7.96
3832
.393
70.
0700
4.70
910.
1033
4.81
241.
2601
0.09
511.
3552
0.00
005,
409.
597
95,
409.
5979
0.21
980.
0000
5,41
4.21
43
Was
te0.
0000
0.00
000.
0000
0.00
0018
6.42
080.
0000
186.
4208
11.0
172
0.00
0041
7.78
11
Wat
er0.
0000
0.00
000.
0000
0.00
004.
3332
147.
1114
151.
4446
0.44
880.
0113
164.
3629
To
tal
6.44
578.
4136
35.3
135
0.07
2711
.784
20.
0374
9,87
4.79
52
4.70
910.
1497
4.85
881.
2601
0.14
151.
4016
SO
2F
ugiti
ve
PM
10E
xhau
stP
M10
190.
7540
9,42
4.97
85
9,61
5.73
26
PM
2.5
Tot
alB
io-
CO
2N
Bio
- C
O2
Mit
igat
ed O
per
atio
nal
RO
GN
Ox
CO
Tot
al C
O2
CH
4N
2OC
O2e
Cat
egor
yto
ns/y
rM
T/y
r
PM
10T
otal
Fug
itive
PM
2.5
Exh
aust
PM
2.5
Are
a3.
0754
0.03
032.
5998
1.40
00e-
004
0.01
410.
0141
0.01
410.
0141
0.00
004.
2061
4.20
614.
2400
e-00
30.
0000
4.29
52
Ene
rgy
0.04
480.
4028
0.30
842.
4400
e-00
30.
0310
0.03
100.
0310
0.03
100.
0000
3,62
9.68
11
3,62
9.68
110.
0884
0.02
473,
639.
185
5
Mob
ile3.
3237
7.96
3832
.393
70.
0700
4.70
910.
1033
4.81
241.
2601
0.09
511.
3552
0.00
005,
409.
597
95,
409.
5979
0.21
980.
0000
5,41
4.21
43
Was
te0.
0000
0.00
000.
0000
0.00
0018
6.42
080.
0000
186.
4208
11.0
172
0.00
0041
7.78
11
Wat
er0.
0000
0.00
000.
0000
0.00
002.
8166
112.
3683
115.
1849
0.29
217.
4100
e-00
312
3.61
76
To
tal
6.44
398.
3969
35.3
019
0.07
264.
7091
0.14
844.
8575
1.26
010.
1402
1.40
0318
9.23
749,
155.
853
49,
345.
0908
11.6
218
0.03
219,
599.
093
6
RO
GN
Ox
CO
SO
2F
ug
itiv
e P
M10
Exh
aust
PM
10P
M10
To
tal
Fu
git
ive
PM
2.5
Exh
aust
PM
2.5
PM
2.5
To
tal
Bio
- C
O2
NB
io-C
O2
To
tal C
O2
CH
4N
20C
O2e
Per
cen
tR
edu
ctio
n0.
030.
200.
030.
150.
000.
870.
030.
000.
920.
090.
802.
862.
811.
3814
.22
2.79
CO
SO
2F
ugiti
ve
PM
10F
ugiti
veP
M2.
5E
xhau
stP
M2.
5P
M2.
5T
otal
Bio
- C
O2
4.0
Op
erat
ion
al D
etai
l - M
ob
ile
4.1
Mit
igat
ion
Mea
sure
s M
ob
ile
RO
GN
Ox
NB
io-
CO
2T
otal
CO
2C
H4
N2O
CO
2e
Cat
egor
yto
ns/y
rM
T/y
r
Exh
aust
PM
10P
M10
Tot
al
Miti
gate
d3.
3237
7.96
3832
.393
70.
0700
4.70
910.
1033
4.81
241.
2601
0.09
511.
3552
0.00
005,
409.
597
95,
409.
5979
0.21
980.
0000
5,41
4.21
43
Unm
itiga
ted
3.32
377.
9638
32.3
937
0.07
004.
7091
0.10
334.
8124
1.26
010.
0951
1.35
520.
0000
5,40
9.59
79
5,40
9.59
790.
2198
0.00
005,
414.
21
4.2
Tri
p S
um
mar
y In
form
atio
n
Ave
rage
Dai
ly T
rip R
ate
Unm
itiga
ted
Miti
gate
d
Land
Use
Wee
kday
Sat
urda
yS
unda
yA
nnua
l VM
TA
nnua
l VM
T
Apa
rtm
ents
Hig
h R
ise
1,08
5.64
1,08
5.64
1085
.64
3,70
9,79
73,
709,
797
Enc
lose
d P
arki
ng w
ith E
leva
tor
0.00
0.00
0.00
Gen
eral
Offi
ce B
uild
ing
490.
6349
0.63
490.
631,
580,
530
1,58
0,53
0
Hea
lth C
lub
172.
1317
2.13
172.
1336
8,13
636
8,13
6
Qua
lity
Res
taur
ant
1,29
6.12
1,29
6.12
1296
.12
1,84
5,19
41,
845,
194
Str
ip M
all
1,42
7.09
1,42
7.09
1427
.09
2,71
5,16
52,
715,
165
Sup
erm
arke
t1,
673.
931,
673.
9316
73.9
32,
208,
703
2,20
8,70
3
Use
r D
efin
ed R
ecre
atio
nal
0.00
0.00
0.00
Tot
al6,
145.
526,
145.
526,
145.
5212
,427
,524
12,4
27,5
24
4.3
Tri
p T
ype
Info
rmat
ion
Mile
sT
rip %
Trip
Pur
pose
%
Land
Use
H-W
or
C-W
H-S
or
C-C
H-O
or
C-N
WH
-W o
r C
-W
H-S
or
C-C
H-O
or
C-N
WP
rimar
yD
iver
ted
Pas
s-by
Apa
rtm
ents
Hig
h R
ise
14.7
05.
908.
7040
.20
19.2
040
.60
8611
3
Enc
lose
d P
arki
ng w
ith E
leva
tor
16.6
08.
406.
900.
000.
000.
000
00
Gen
eral
Offi
ce B
uild
ing
16.6
08.
406.
9033
.00
48.0
019
.00
7719
4
Hea
lth C
lub
16.6
08.
406.
9016
.90
64.1
019
.00
5239
9
Qua
lity
Res
taur
ant
16.6
08.
406.
9012
.00
69.0
019
.00
3818
44
Str
ip M
all
16.6
08.
406.
9016
.60
64.4
019
.00
4540
15
Sup
erm
arke
t16
.60
8.40
6.90
6.50
74.5
019
.00
3430
36
Use
r D
efin
ed R
ecre
atio
nal
16.6
08.
406.
900.
000.
000.
000
00
LDA
LDT
1LD
T2
MD
VLH
D1
LHD
2M
HD
HH
DO
BU
SU
BU
SM
CY
SB
US
MH
0.51
3125
0.06
0112
0.18
0262
0.13
9218
0.04
2100
0.00
6630
0.01
6061
0.03
0999
0.00
1941
0.00
2506
0.00
4348
0.00
0594
0.00
2104
5.0
En
erg
y D
etai
l
4.4
Fle
et M
ix
His
toric
al E
nerg
y U
se: N
top related