bursts in virgo

Bursts in VIRGO

C5 run analysis

Data statisticsBurst filters

Non-stationarity investigationHardware injections

AC Clapson - LALOn behalf of the Virgo collaboration

Interest of VIRGO C5 run

• Stable recombined (no PR) optical configuration• Duration and quality

– Science mode for long stretches• Hardware injections

• Important transition from simulated Gaussian noise.

• Focus on – ‘Quiet’ data segment (~ 5h).– Dark fringe signal

(DC, in-phase, quadrature)

2

2/1

1

24)()(

1

1

)(

12)(

2)(

)(

M

ii fPSDfX

MfPSDf

iX

fiX

fR

Statistical studies: tools

dffPSDe

ffN

dffPSDffN

)(21

1

))(ln(21

1

• Spectrogram

• Rayleigh monitorR ≈ 1 GaussianR << 1 coherentR >> 1 non-coherent (fast fluctuations)

Plot |1-R|

• Frequency power 2 testOn log-spectrogram of whitened data, confidence level of non-stationarity.Event = confidence > 99.9%

• Frequency band spectral flatnessComputed after whitening.ξ ~1 for flat spectrum.Plot 1-ξ

3

Statistical studies: overview

2 test “Rayleighogram”

Frequency (Hz)

4

Statistical studies: frequency view

Approximately Gaussian

Specific line behaviours• non-Gaussian• frequency modulation?

Most variability 0 - 350 Hz 3000 - 4000 Hz 6000 - 7000 Hz

Non-equivalent tools.• Frequency range• Sensitivity to local features.

5

Statistical studies: time view

Overall limited fluctuations.

Small trend in PSD.

No systematic coincidence in peak

location.

Information extraction?

Gaussian data reference

6

Burst search methods

• Time domain– Mean Filter (MF)– Alternative Linear Fit Filter (ALF)

• Correlators– Gaussian (PC)– complex Exponential Gaussian (EGC)– Sine Gaussian –tiling based-

• TF domain– Power Filter (PF)– Fourier Domain Adaptive Wiener Filter (FDAWF)– S Transform

(involved methods)(not used here)

NB: Not all filters produce SNR consistent outputs.

7

Burst search methods II

Mean Filter Peak Correlator

EGC Power Filter

Type Time domain Correlator

(Gaussian)

Correlator / TF

(Exp. Gaussian)

Time-Frequency

Pre-processing

Static whitening.Mean and sigma normalized.

Static whitening.

Mean and sigma normalized.

Adaptivity Normalization of 300 s chunks.

PSD update every ~13 s

PSD update every ~13 s

Normalization of ~8 s chunks.

Methods involved in C5 investigations

8

Burst search summary

Using 40 highest energy events for each method:Single detection: 47, double 18, triple 11, quadruple 11.

Dots for all eventsOther symbols differentiate methods.

C5 “quiet”Segment.

Single detection Double detection

9

Burst search summary II

• Many non-coincident triggers.– Known filter-dependent coupling to waveforms.– Time varying outputs.

• Partial correlation with statistical overview.– Focus on different time scales.– Complementary approaches.– Quality flag relevance?

10

What do we trig on?

Seen by all methods

Highest SNRevent in segment.

Lower energy events hard tofind visually.

Veto candidate?

In-phase channel

11

Veto investigation with MFHighest SNR glitch in stretch : Weak on composite dark port and demodulated signals, … but clear in photodiode channels…

12

…yet invisible in acoustic and magnetometers channels from central building.

Veto investigation II13

Non-stationarity hint

Average SNR evolutionTrigger count evolution

Computed quantities– Trigger count

– Averaged SNR

(over 930s periods)

X 2

X 2

X 2

Clear increase of trigger density in the 3 channels.

(consistent with PSD trend)

<SNR> constant on demodulated signal, increasing on DC.

Quiet period: 5h Quiet period: 5h

14

Over 5h quiet period,MF trigger density increaseswith time…

… and investigations

Gaussian stationary models check• Compare to simulation data

Auto-regressive model derived from data PSD. Trend not reproduced in Gaussian data.• Change whitening coefficients

• Training set either at beginning or end of segment.• Trigger count variation but trend maintained.

Trend not caused by whitening errors.

Trigger typology• Observed trend is specific of short windows (< 3.5 ms)• Two local fluctuation periods found for larger windows.• Similar behaviour on all three dark port channels.

Throughout exploitation of method’s results. Importance of adaptivity time-scale. Local fluctuations issue.

15

MF principle – Multiple window sizes– Whitening (+normalization)– Event clusterization

11 Nk

kii

MFk x

Ny

Hardware injections searches

• Injections: numerical core collapse, Sine-Gaussian, NS-NS• Burst filters:

MF and PF.• Noise level issue.• SNR accuracy?

Low noise period, DFMa1b2g1

MF PF

FA (Hz) 0.09 0.03

Efficiency @ SNR 7 (%) 21 18

Efficiency @ SNR 14 (%) 97 98

16

Last word

• Relatively short stretch– Unique observations

• Prototype study– Involve many complementary tools– Investigation of deviation

from stationarity.

• Group activity– Commissioning “Mini-Runs”– LIGO-Virgo joint work

“Jump”

“Standard” noise

ALF on M1

Output ~ 4000

Output~40

Jump investigation

17

Conclusion: burst analysis in VIRGO

• Large toolbox for– Data characterization– Burst search.

• C5 most extensive analysis so far.• Expectations for C6

– Recycled ITF– Longer stretches of data.

• Topics to develop– Multi-channel coincidence– Integration of methods in synthetic picture.

18

Complements

B1 photodiode

99.6 %

BS

0.4 %

B1p

Data in WPR_B1p_DC

d1

d250 %

50 %

B1s

50 %d1

d2

50 %

Data in WPR_B1s_DC

OMC

B1

d8

d6

50 %

50 %

Data in WPR_B1_DC

Faraday

96 %

Signal construction

Statistical studies: encore

Lowest frequencies most affected by variability.

Flatness estimator

MF triggers : details

Burst filter performances

ROC for MF ROC for PF

SNR 10

SNR 8

SNR 7

SNR 5