ben shimshon
Post on 12-Apr-2017
264 Views
Preview:
TRANSCRIPT
The [continuing] rise of super-selectivism
Ben Shimshon | BritainThinks | October 2015
On recent projects, we have been struck
by the way in which people filter and
digest information
We conducted research into how swing voters
experienced the 2015 General Election
Glasgow
East
Taunton
Deane
DewsburyEaling
Central
and Acton
Thanet
South
Swing voters in marginal seats were inundated with
information every day for almost three months
And as you’d expect, they filtered out most of the noise
• The 7 way debate (personalities, not
policy)
• General coverage of the future of the
NHS
• The couple from Scunthorpe who won
the lottery twice
• Parliament was dissolved
• Lib Dems pledged an extra £2.5bn on mental
health
• 100 business leaders signed open letter
supporting Conservatives
• Party leaders took part in 7-way televised
debate
• Leaked memo alleged Sturgeon supported
Cameron
• Poll put Farage behind in Thanet South
In a week when… Our voters saw…
But these swing voters were selecting like
never before
“More than in any previous election, what swing voters saw and heard served to confirm existing views rather than prompt reappraisal. Those already leaning one way or another simply spent the campaign gathering evidence to support their view.”
“Labour are just ‘spend spend
spend’… I just don’t think
austerity would be dealt with
effectively enough by Labour. I’m
beginning to lack any trust at all
in them.”
13April
1Mention
“Ed blasted by 100 entrepreneurs saying Labour would be disastrous for business.”(Elizabeth, Ealing Central
and Acton)
13April
“Reduce the deficit - Ukip and the Conservatives are the only parties taking it seriously .”
(Jonathan, Taunton Deane)
“The Tories don’t care about
public services. They won’t
protect the things normal people
rely on to get by.”
“Pledging to
meet the £8bn…
why is the
money only
there at the
election?”(Paul, Taunton
Deane)
10April
… but no one
questioned
where the £££
would come
from...
Confirmation
Bias
Scepticism &
Marketing
Savvy
Online
Selection
Super
Selectivism+ + =
Scepticism &
Marketing
Savvy
Online
Selection
Super
Selectivism+ + =Confirmation
Bias
Confirmation bias is the tendency to
seek out and use information in a way that
confirms one’s beliefs or early impressions,
while giving disproportionately less
attention to information that contradicts it
“The human understanding when it has once adopted an opinion (either as being the received opinion or as being agreeable to itself) draws all things else to support and agree with it.”
Francis Bacon, 1620
It’s definitely not new …
Thucydides c.400 BC Dante Alghieri 1320 AD
It’s definitely not new … but it is important
Confirmation Bias: Seeking out and selecting
• Hypothesis confirmation – we gravitate towards information sources that confirm our existing view
• Cueing and selecting – we seek out new opinions from people and sources that we agree with on other issues• Politicians we agree with; words and phrases we endorse;
familiar brands;
• Social norms (most people, people like me)
Cues from ‘elites’, be they brands, political parties or
TV personalities, can make or break consensus on an
issue
Adapted from Zaller, J; University of California, 1992 – based on 1990 NES
Before elite split - -
consensus
After elite split –
partisan divergence
The more attentive you are, the more likely you are to
hear messages and filter them using cues
Messages reach more
attentive people
Attentive also most
likely to use cues
Issue polarises along
party lines
Adapted from Zaller, J; University of California, 1992 – based on 1980 & 82 NES
Confirmation Bias: Interpreting
Improves Worsens
WITH 223 75
WITHOUT 107 21
Ratio c.3:1
Ratio c.5:1
Kahan et al:Yale University, 2013
Improves Worsens
WITH 223 75
WITHOUT 107 21
+
+
Kahan et al:Yale University, 2013
Confirmation Bias: Interpreting
Worsens Improves
WITH 223 75
WITHOUT 107 21
+
+
Kahan et al:Yale University, 2013
Confirmation Bias: Interpreting
I want to declare
Opportunity Britain
‘open for business’
[TRANSLATION: “immigrants welcome”]
Confirmation Bias: (mis)Remembering
28%
3Days
40%
False recall
?Schwarz: University of Michigan, 2007
Qualitatively, it feels like people are filtering
and selecting increasingly effectively…
Confirmation
Bias
Online
Selection
Super
Selectivism+ + =Scepticism &
Marketing
Savvy
Consumers are increasingly dismissive of
communicators’ attempts to get heard
• You would say that, wouldn’t you?
(unless I already agree with you)• Politicians just want our votes; companies just want
our money etc. etc. etc.
• Another personalised offer, just for
me? • What’s arresting and disruptive one week, is tricksy
and manipulative the next
Of course they’re going
to say it’s safe, they
stand to make millions
out of it! Male, Fylde
I hate the way they
make it look like it’s a
real letter – get lost
what do you take me
for?Male, Derbyshire
Confirmation
Bias
Scepticism &
Marketing
Savvy
Super
Selectivism+ + =Online
Selection
The “filter bubble” works in (at least) two ways
Hard-Wired Selection
• Personalised search &
recommendation
algorithms
• Targetted advertising &
messaging
• Timeline editing
Social Selection
• Social networking as news source
• Recommendations from friends
• Network building based on preference-proximity
3xLess likely to see liberal content
10%Less exposure to
conservative news sources
Gentzkow & Shapiro: 2011
Corbyn
Supporter
My
“It will be very hard for people to watch or
consume something online that has not, in
some sense, been tailored for them”Eric Schmidt, Google
“The thing is, you don’t decide what gets in,
and more importantly, what gets edited out
of your filter bubble”Eli Pariser, “The Filter Bubble”
Confirmation
Bias
Scepticism &
Marketing
Savvy
Online
Selection
Super
Selectivism+ + =
So what does this mean for the way
organisations communicate and engage
with citizens?: Three starting thoughts
1. Start Early
• For most issues, parties
and brands, the story is
set very early
• Once those cues are in
place it’s much harder to
reach beyond your
‘natural’ audience
2. Identify & understand your swing voters
• Segment ruthlessly
• Understand the people you want to convince and convert• How do they think about
you/your issue?
• What are the cues they follow, the sources they trust?
• How will your voice be received?
• How will they find you?
3. Start from where people are (not where you wish they were)
• The arguments that convince your core vote are unlikely to win over your doubters
• Start from a belief that you hold in common
• Don’t rely on ‘the facts’ to carry you through • Myth busting rarely works
• If you’re explaining, you’re losing
“When it say’s
‘everyone’, I just think
of criminals who don’t
deserve anything getting
whatever they want”Female, Manchester, unsure about HRA
“That’s what I want to
know about, how can it
help someone like me.
That could be me, and
the act sorted it for
them”Male, Manchester, unsure about HRA
1. Start Early
2. Understand your swing voters
3. Start from where people are
Confirmation
Bias
Scepticism &
Marketing
Savvy
Online
Selection
Super
Selectivism+ + =
Thank You
Bshimshon@britainthinks.com
@benshimshon | @britainthinks
top related