arun shourie eminent historians

PRESENTATIONBASED ON A BOOK BY

ARUN SHORIE

Eminent Historians Their Technology, Their Line, Their

Fraud

During the British rule of India, History taught in schools was specially doctored to deprive the ‘natives’ of the knowledge of their own heritage and culture, and on the other hand to inculcate admiration of their rulers.

Arun Shourie

Arun Shourie’s ‘Eminent Historians’, informs the reader that this dangerous trend in the writing of Indian History is still rampant.

History must not be made a tool for serving political or other ends

Marxist historians have been suppressing facts and inventing lies by seizing control of institutions such as the Indian Council of Historical Research (ICHR),

the National Council of Educational Research Training (NCERT), large parts of Indian academia, and nearly all of the English-media newspapers and

publishing houses.

Scholars Project Status of project

K. Rajayan Before 1857 Submitted but not traceable

S.R. melhotra 1857-1885 Not submitted

Bipin Chandra 1885-1886, 1932-1934 Not submitted

B.R. Grover 1899-1902 Submitted and published

Sumit Sarkar 1905-1907, 1907-1909 Not submitted

M.N. Das 1920-1915 Not submitted

T.K. Ravindran 1915-1919 Not submitted

V.N. Dutta 1919-1920 Submitted and published

Sita Ram Singh 1920-1922 Submitted and published

Amba prasad 1924-1926 Not submitted

Bimal Prasad 1927-1929, 1930-1931 Not submitted

Gopal Krishna 1934-1937 Not submitted

Marxist historians and the corruption by them

Included as principals in this group of Marxist historians are Romila Thapar,

Satish Chandra, K.M. Shrimali, K.M.Pannikar, R.S. Sharma, D. N. Jha, Gyanendra Pandey, and Irfan Habib.

The Islamic conquest of India is probably the bloodiest story in

history.

Marxist party line is to project Hindus as exploitative feudalists and

Muslims as liberators!

Book: Bharat Katha, prepared by the Burdwan Education Society, Teachers Enterprise, published by Sukhomoy Das.

Page 113: “According to Islamic law non-Muslims will have to choose between death and Islam. Only the Hanafis allow non-Muslims to pay jaziya in exchange for their lives.”

After Edition:By paying jaziya to Alauddin

khaliji, Hindus could lead normal lives.”

Page 89: “sultan mahmud used force for widespread murder, loot, destruction and conversion.”

After Edition: “There was widespread loot and destruction by Mahmud.”

No reference to killing, No reference to forcible

conversions.

How the Buddhist priesthood perished by the swords of the Muslim invaders has been

recorded by Muslim historians themselves.

Still Marxist historians are suppressing this fact.

Sultan Mahmud bin Ibrahim Sharqi( AD 1440-1457):in Tabkat-i-akbari

“After sometime he proceeded to Orissa with the intension of jihad. He attacked places in the neighborhood of that province and laid them waste, and destroyed the temples after demolishing them…”

Sultan Sikandar Lodi

at Mathura(UP):In abu’llah’s

Tarikh-i-Da’udi

“He was so zealous a Musalman that he utterly destroyed diverse places of worship of the infidels, and left not a vestige remaining of them. He entirely ruined the shrines of Mathura…”

25 May 1679:Auragzeb’s

reign

“Khan-i-jahan Bahadur returned from Jodhpur after demolishing its temples, and bringing with himself several cart-loads of idols. The emperor ordered that the idols should be cast in the quadrangle of the court and under the steps of Jama masjid for being trodden upon”

The language of the record speaks for itself. It leaves no doubt that they took immense pride in doing what they did.

Sultan Ahmud Shah I Wali Bahmani(ad 1422-1435): in Tarikh-i-Firishta.

“…wherever he(Ahmud Shah) went put to death men, women, children, without mercy…”

“…Whenever the number of slain amounted to 20,000, he halted 3 days, and made a festival celebration of the bloody event…”

1 January 1705:Aurangzeb’s

reign

“The Emperor, summoning Muhammad Khalil and Khidmat Rai, the darogha of hatchet-men …,ordered them to demolidh the temple of Pandharpur, and to take the buthers of the camp there and slaughter cows in the temple… It was done.”

Even after records provided by Aurangzeb himself, Marxist historians

force us to believe that whatever Aurangzeb did was for economic

purposes. That there were no conflicts on the base of Religion.

The real color of ISLAM

Even after all this, such extracts were found from the textbook for Class V, saying: “…Islam and Christianity are the only

religions which treated man with honor and equality…”

Excerpts from Quran

Quran, 9:123 :"O you who believe, fight those of the unbelievers near you and let them see how harsh you can be...”

Quran, 4.89: “...take not from among them friends until they fly (their homes) in Allah’s way; but if they turn back [to their homes], then seize them and kill them wherever you find them...”

Historians shut their eyes to all this. “Composite culture” is all they

speak.

Excavation shows Harappan civilization covered areas from musa khel in the North – west to Kolapur in southern-maharashtra to the far east.

How a group of few invading Aryans over-ran this extensive culture without leaving any archeological or literary traces. It is never explained.

Still this ridiculous theory which has no historical records is taught in schools.

Historical records dose not support Aryan invasion theory. It is a

concoction of the Europeans to make Indians feel lowly of their culture.

But these historians still force us to believe it.

The main concern of our “eminent historians” is to completely forgive Islam

of these notions and of campaigns and deeds which flow from them.

These Historians have always malign Hinduism. But they don’t see

any fault with Islamic killing.

When anybody tries to rewrite the true history, they say it’s a

plot to distort the history.

Arun Shourie and K.M. Shrimali were invited on “aap ki adalat” ,a programme on Zee TV.

Raghuvanshi asked Shrimali whether Aurangzeb was a religious bigot.But, Shrimali gave no clear answer, only asserting that Aurangzeb's court had many Hindu nobles.

Foul play of Marxist historians

There are two pillars of present history-writing in India:

To produce evidence which will establish Hindus to be intolerant .

To respect and show an sympathetic understanding of Islamic communalism.

Foul play of Marxist historians

N. Jha says:The Brahmins depend on sacrifices. He even

said that “animal sacrifice was a source of their livelihood.”

So Ashoka preached Buddhism and non-violence to undermine Brahmin influence.

No need for any historical evidence.

Effect of History on Students

Effects on students of the history taught in schools and colleges

They get estranged from the real history.

They takes these assertions to be truth.They never ask for the evidences. For

them it becomes:

A truth which has been proven for ages.

The communist theory has failed in other parts of the world.

But not India.

Because these people occupy pivotal positions in media and the educational structure.

After 34 years scholarly work is again being done which reveals the real facts.

But it is not being allowed to reach a large number.

THANK YOU