appeal to appellate division, third … · cplr § 2105 certification ... order of transfer, ......
Post on 22-May-2018
218 Views
Preview:
TRANSCRIPT
Hon. Eric T. Schneiderman
Oice of the Attorney General
he Capitol
Albany, NY 12224-0341
Hon. Andrew M. Cuomo
Oice of the Governor
he Capitol
Albany, NY 12224-0341
Chief Judge Jonathan Lippman
New York State Court of Appeals
20 Eagle Street
Albany, New York 12207
APPEAL TO APPELLATE DIVISION, THIRD DEPARTMENT
from an order/judgment of a lower court
Town of MontaukPlaintif-Appellant
vs.
Hon. Lorraine Cortes-Vasquez, as Secretary of State of the State of New York, with control of, and respon-sibility for, the Director of Corporations of the De-partment of State
Defendant-Respondent
i Record on Appeal
Town of Montauk vs Hon Cortez Vasques
Index# _______________ Record on Appeal
Albany# 6703/10
Hon. Eric T. Schneiderman
Oice of the Attorney General
he Capitol
Albany, NY 12224-0341
Hon. Andrew M. Cuomo
Oice of the Governor
he Capitol
Albany, NY 12224-0341
Chief Judge Jonathan Lippman
New York State Court of Appeals
20 Eagle Street
Albany, New York 12207
APPEAL TO APPELLATE DIVISION, THIRD DEPARTMENT
from an order/judgment of a lower court
Town of MontaukPlaintif-Appellant
vs.
Hon. Lorraine Cortes-Vasquez, as Secretary of State of the State of New York, with control of, and responsibility for, the Director of Corporations of the Department of State
Defendant-Respondent
ii CPLR 5531 Statement
CPLR 5531 Statement
Statement Pursuant to CPLR 55311. he Index Number in the trial court was 6703/10
2. he full names are as set forth above. here have been no changes.
3. he action was commenced in Supreme Court, Albany County.
4. he complaint was iled on October 5th, 2010. he answer was served on May 15th, 2013.
5. he object of the action is to compel the Division of Corporations of the Department of State to ile the certiicates of merger/consolidation of the 1994 Montauk Friends of Olmsted Parks Corporation and the 1882 Trustees of Montauk Corporation and the Certiicate of Incorporation of the Township of Montauk.
6. he appeal is from an order of the Supreme Court, Albany County dated May 15th, 2013 and entered May 14th, 2013 by Teresi, J.
7. he appeal is being perfected on the full record method using the papers considered noted in the footnote to judge Teresis’s Decision and Order; Town of Montauk v. Vasquez, Teresi, J. May 14th, 2013.
APPEAL TO APPELLATE DIVISION, THIRD DEPARTMENT
from an order/judgment of a lower court
Town of MontaukPlaintif-Appellant
vs.
Hon. Lorraine Cortes-Vasquez, as Secretary of State of the State of New York, with control of, and responsi-bility for, the Director of Corporations of the Depart-ment of State
Defendant-Respondent
CPLR 5531 Statement
iiiCPLR § 2105 Certiication
Town of Montauk vs Hon Cortez Vasques
CPLR § 2105 CertiicationIndex no. 6703-2010
I, Steven J. Sherlock, Esq. an attorney at law admitted to practice within the courts
of the State of New York do hereby certify pursuant to CPLR § 2105 papers contained
in this Record on Appeal have been personally compared by me to the originals on ile with in
the oice of the Clerk of Supreme Court, Albany county in Albany county courthouse 16 Eagle
Street Albany, NY 12207 basement ile room 92 (tel. 518-487-5126), and that I have found them
to be true and complete copies of those papers.
Dated: Albany, New York
__________, ____, 2014
APPEAL TO APPELLATE DIVISION, THIRD DEPARTMENT
from an order/judgment of a lower court
TOWN OF MONTAUKPlaintif
vs
Hon. LORRAINE CORTÉS-VÁSQUEZ, as Secretary of State of the State of New York, with control of, and responsibility for, the Division of Corporations of the Department of State,
Defendant
iv Table of Contents
Table of Contents
Table of ContentsBrief & Appendix
Record on A ppe al . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . iCPLR 5531 Statement . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . i iCPLR § 2105 Cer t if icat ion . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . i i iTable of Contents . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ivMFOP board minutes Aug ust 2014 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1Decis ion and Order ; Town of Montauk v. Vasquez , Teresi , J. May 14th, 2013 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 9Receipt , Notice of A ppeal , 10/29/2013 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 14
Notice of A ppeal , Index# 6703-10, 10/24/2013 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 15Precalend ar statement , 10/24/2013 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 16
Notice of Entr y - Order of Transfer, NYS Cour t of A ppeals , 9/25/2013 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 17Order of Transfer : NYS Cour t of A ppeals ( Town of Montauk v. Vasquez) , 9/12/2013 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 19
Memorandum of Respondent , 09May2013 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 20May 2013 Aff id avit of Rober t A Ficalora- Table of Contents . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 32May 2013 Aff id avit of Rober t A Ficalora , A lbany Index# 6703-10 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 33Order to S how Cause, 4/18/2013 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 35
a . Aff id avit of Personal Ser vice , 4/24/2013 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 36b. Receipt (R JI/OSC), 4/18/2013 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 37c . Request for Judic ia l Inter vention, 4/18/2013 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 38
Cer t if icate of Incor porat ion:Township of Montauk . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 39C hecks stamped for deposit , 7/26/2010 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 42
Cer t if icate of Merger/Consol id at ion . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 43Depar tment of State re ject ion letter, 8/11/2010 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 44Complaint , 10/05/2010 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 45Cer t if icate of Incor porat ion, MFOP, 2/18/1994 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 46Declarat ion of Rig hts and Tr usteeship, 5/23/1996 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 50A ssemblyman T hiele acknowledgement , 5/26/1996 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 51C hapter 139, L aws of 1852, 4/2/1852 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 52Petit ion to cour t of A ppeals , 11/5/2002 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 54Order, Cour t of A ppeals , People v Vor pahl 5/6/2004 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 55Decis ion and Order, Town of Montauk , Inc vs Pataki et a l , 1/22/2007 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 56N.Y. Not for Prof it Cor porat ions L aw §904 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 59Bus Cor p L aw § 902: PL AN of MERGER or CON SOLIDAT ION . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 60Bus Cor p L aw § 403 Cer t of Inc : EFFECT . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 61L aws of the Colony of New York : T HE FIR ST A SSEMBLY, 4/9/1691. C hapters 1&2 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 62Dongan Patent and C har ter, 12/9/1686 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 65L etter to Gov. Patterson request ing an executive order, 9/27/2010 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 77T he Ar t iculated Rights and Const itut ion of the Township of Montauk . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 83L etter to Gov Spitzer and Cour t of A ppeals , 8/16/2007 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 89T he Montauk Gazette , July 2012: QUO WARR AN TO . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 90
2 MFOP board minutes August 2014
MFOP board minutes August 2014
July 2014 Montauk Brief of Robert A. Ficalora
his matter seeks a writ of mandamus to compel the Division of Corporations of the
Department of State to ile both:
1. the Certiicates of Incorporation of the Township of Montauk, and
2. the Certiicate of merger/consolidation of the Montauk Trustee Corporation (Chapter 139, Laws of 1852) Montauk Friends of Olmsted
Parks corporation (est.1994).
his brief is limited to discussing the documents submitted in this case and no new exhibits
are introduced.
he May 8, 2007 Appellate Division Decision and Order in the matter of Town of Montauk,
Inc. v Pataki, et al, 40 A.D.3d 772 (2007), 835 N.Y.S.2d 447. held that:
“Town of Montauk, Inc.,” is not an established corporation, since it has iled no incorporation papers with the Department of State (see Business Corporation Law § 403; Not-For-Proit Corpoation Law §§ 403, 904[a]). (p. 24)
I prepared a certiicate of incorporation pursuant to Section § 402 of the business
corporations law and gathered signatures in front of the Montauk Post Oice. he certiicate
reads:
We, the undersigned taxpaying owners of land in Montauk, understand that by signing this certiicate that we are the founding incorporators of the Township of Montauk. It will take efect immediately upon iling with the New York Department of State, Division of Corporations pursuant to N.Y. Business Corporation Law § 403 ... (p. 39)
his record includes the attachments to my 2013 Albany Aidavit (p. 30) that included
attachments to the October 5, 2010 Complaint (p. 42) with the signiicant addition of the
November 5, 2002 Petition to the New York State Court of Appeals:
In these past several years the Montauk Friends of Olmsted Parks Cor-poration bas acted according to its incorporated purposes, and its claim assumption of tbe powets at law of the 1852 Montauk Trustee Corpora-tion, for and on behalf of the proprietors cf Montauk to present to the
3MFOP board minutes August 2014
Town of Montauk vs Hon Cortez Vasques
court issues regarding our extensive properties, our sovereign rights of a township and of our suferings under unlawful government.
In consideration of this situation and with an attentive eye to the needs of this court, in December of 2000 our board of acting trustees adopted a Constitution for Montauk entitled “he Articulated Rights and Con-stitution of the Township of Montauk” (Montauk Constitution). As set forth therein we are returning to government by town meeting meeting in the same manner as our forebears and other towns of New Eag1and. What set forth in the Montauk Constitution is the process of a “Rep-resentative Town (RTM.) such as currently enjoyed by forty two Mas-sachusetts towns, seven Connecticut towns, one Maine town and one Vermont town.
We do beg the court to understand that we have lost no war, and we haven’t done anything wrong that we know of, but the very special liber-ties and privileges at law of our town - fundamental rights of sovereignty - have been suppressed and a new and despotic form of government has been imposed upon us. We do pray for the rule of law and your under-standing that our complaint is a matter that can and must be equitably settled.(p. 54)
As a result of the forgoing, and upon intervention in the matter in re: Stuart Bennett Vorpahl,
on the sixth day of May, 2004 the Court of Appeals in Albany with Hon. Judith S. Kaye, Chief
Judge, presiding in he People &c. v Stuart Bennett Vorpahl, Appellant, Town of Montauk, Inc,
Intervenor (2 NY3d 781), held that:
A motion for leave to intervene &c, in the above cause having been here-tofore made upon the part of the intervenor herein and. papers having been submitted thereon and due deliberation having been thereupon had, it is ORDERED, that the said motion for leave to intervene be and the same hereby is dismissed upon the ground that Robert A. Ficalora is not an attorney authorized to represent Montauk Friends of Olmsted Parks/Montauk Trustee Corporation on behalf of the Incorporated Township of Montauk (CPLR 321[a]). (p. 55)
A Notice of Intervention as of right had been iled pursuant to CPLR 1012(a)(3) upon an
historical claim of jurisdiction over Montauk’s isheries under the 1686 Dongan territorial Patent
and colonial charter. he Incorporated Township of Montauk was recognized as the intervenor
4 MFOP board minutes August 2014
MFOP board minutes August 2014
in the court’s order and the accompanying motion to convert Stuart’s criminal case to a civil one
was considered a motion for leave to intervene and used as the grounds for dismissal.
he contentious First Assembly of the Colony of New York, at Chapter 2 of the laws of 1691
holds that:
“..all Charters, Pattents, Grants, made made, given and granted and well and truley executed under the seal of this Province , Constituted and Authorized by their late and present Majtys the Kings of England, and registerd in the Secretaryes oice. unto the respective Corporations of bodys politick of dthe Cittys Towns and Mannors, and also the several and respective freeholders within this Province and shall forever be deemed, esteemed and reputed good and efectual Charters, Patents, and grants Authentick in Law agalnst their Majesties their heires and Successors for ever... (pp. 63-64)
he above law remains constitutionally protected under Article I Section 14 of the
Constitution ot State of New York. he New York State Legislature is the heir and successor to
their Majesties, the Kings of England and has caused grievous injury to the body politic of the
Townships Easthampton and Montauk; this court has jurisdiction.
he 1686 Dongan Patent established a proprietary Town of Easthampton with ownership
vested in its grantees (p. 64). he 1851 New York Supreme Court order of Hon. Nathan B.
Morse, J.S.C. in the matter of Henry P. Hedges, et.al. (Proprietors of Montauk) v. the Trustees
of the Freeholders and Commonaltv of the Town of Easthampton (citation unknown) divided
the lands within the Dongan Patent. It was efected by deed dated March 9th, 1852, with the
Trustees of the Freeholders and Commonalty of the Town of Easthampton (at that time the sole
government thereof) granting Montauk to Montauk’s proprietors. Because the charter rights
in the 1686 Dongn Patent are attached to and run with the land, the Proprietors retained equal
claim through its provisions.
Because of this division Montauk was let without lawful government, so on April 2nd,
1852, an Act of the State legislature at chapter 139 remedied this defect by incorporating the
5MFOP board minutes August 2014
Town of Montauk vs Hon Cortez Vasques
freeholder/proprietors of Montauk and establishing the corporation of the Trustees of Montauk
airming its power to govern. Because the rights granted in the Dongan Patent and Charter are
attached to and run with the land, Montauk is a Town with all the rights, liberties, privileges and
powers therein conferred.
In 1879 an action in partition brought by Robert M. Grinnell and his wife Soie against the
respective owners of Montauk led to Montauk being sold by them at auction together with their
Montauk trustee Corporation to Arthur W. Benson for One Hundred and Fity-one thousand
dollars. he deed, recorded at Liber 246 p.256, lists the names of the individual proprietors
(noting the trustees of Montauk) and the 1952 corporation of the Proprietors and lists the names
of the individual proprietors (noting the trustees of Montauk).
In 1882 the meets and bounds of the Township of Montauk within the Dongan Patent were
enlarged by 1,100 acres when Mr. Benson, then sole proprietor of Montauk, purchased the lands
at Napeague by deed recorded at Liber 246 p. 256.
On September 29, 2011 the Town of Montauk intervened as a defendant as matter of right
pursuant to CPLR § 1012(a)(3) in he Seaview at Amagansett, LTD, et al. (Sufolk no. 09-34714)
in a matter regarding the right to regulate driving on the beach. he other defendants are the
Town of East Hampton (which doesn’t legally exist) and the Trustees of the Freeholders and
Commonalty of the Town of Easthampton (that sold the property to Arthur W. Benson in 1882).
he case was reassigned to Judge Jerry Garguilo and Quo Warranto demands were served upon
defendants (p. 90).
I attended a scheduled conference on Jan. 30, 2014 at the new Hon. Alan D. Oshrin Supreme
Court Building in Riverhead but the other defendants did not appear and no hearing was
6 MFOP board minutes August 2014
MFOP board minutes August 2014
granted. However, I submitted copies of parties’ submissions into the record to show that the the
Town of Montauk had intervened and that the matter was joined.
Although I can intervene on behalf of the MFOP/ Montauk Trustee corporation and issue
Quo Warranto demands on behalf of the Township of Montauk, the court has repeatedly held
that I cannot move the court because I am not an attorney authorized to represent a corporation.
Upon attaining the relief requested, I will take action to gather Montauk Trustees, retain
counsel and return to Judge Garguilo’s court.
he start of the 1906 case of Pharoah v. Benson brought pursuant to chapter 177 of the laws of
1906 enabling claimant Indians to recover under historic agreements; the untimely 1907 death
of Frank Sherman Benson; the 1909 enactment of the Town Law and General Municipal Laws
of the State or New York; the 1910 decision in Pharoah declaring the Montaukett tribe of Indians
to be extinct estopping claims under ther 1661, 1654, 1687 and 1702/3 deeded agreements; the
1911 ire at the library at New York State Capitol Building that burned the historic records of the
State Assembly (while the Paroah case was on Appeal); Governor Andrew M. Cuomo’s recent
veto of a bill (2014) to recognizing a new Montaukett tribe of Indians; the unfortunate 1918 last
will and testament or Mary Benson; the 1924 purchase of a major part of Montauk lands by Carl
Fisher from the Estate of Mary Benson; the new 1909 Town Law Town Board government of the
Town of East Hampton (sic) that was set up circa 1925 with the support of the State legislature
(without a charter or Constitutional warrant); the 1957 liquidation of the Montauk real property
assets the Estate of Mary Benson; the 1960 name change of the Long Island Historical Society
to the Brooklyn Historical Society; the 1960 establishing of the Sufolk County legislature (an
ahistorical travesty); the purported 1962 Rockefeller, Duryea, Mangano et. al. repeal of Bill
of Rights Article I §10, §13 and §15 of the Constitution of the State of New York; the hurried
7MFOP board minutes August 2014
Town of Montauk vs Hon Cortez Vasques
enactment of Article IX of the Constitution pertaining to local governments and home rule
powers to ill the hole caused by the repeal of Article I §15.
Prior to the above, he Town of Easthampton had been a carefully protected proprietary
township. Filing the instant certiicate of Incorporation of the Township of Montauk and the use
of the Articulated Rights can reverse this.
he 1686 territorial patent and colonial charter for the Town of Easthampton included
language that granted sovereign jurisdiction found in the charters of the Many of the colonies
that would later become states:
To be holden of his said Majesty, his heirs and Successors in free and Comon Soccage according the Mannor of East Greenwich in the County of Kent within his Matyes Realm of England...(p. 71)
Feudalism, also known as Manorialism, is the root of our local laws. he Manor of East
Greenwich was the site of Greenwich Palace on the hames River by the city of London. he
most signiicant aspect of tlis grant to the English colonies in America - emphasized by Samuel
Adams - was that it placed the colonies outside of the jurisdiction of Parliament. A Town with
these powerful and constitutionally protected chartered rights have been referred to as having
“the rights of a State within a State”.
he 1686 Dongan Patent for the Town of Easthampton is attached to and runs with the land.
Upon the 1852 court-ordered deeded release of Montauk from Easthampton, the lands included
in the meets and bounds of the Patent were divided and the undivided lands of Montauk
were let without government. he State legislature promptly incorporated the proprietors of
Montauk at Chapter 139 of the Laws of 1852 establishing the Montauk Trustee corporation with
the rights of the Township of Montauk.
“Upon the iling of the certiicate of incorporation by the department of state, the corporate existence shall begin, and such certiicate shall be conclusive that all conditions precedent have been fulilled, and the
8 MFOP board minutes August 2014
MFOP board minutes August 2014
corporation has been formed under this chapter...” Bus Corp Law § 403, p. 61
Checks for the fees for the certicate of merger and of Incorporation were tendered and
stamped by the clerks oice for deposit (7/20/2010, p. 38) but on August 11th, 2010 the iling
was returned for specious reasons and suggested that we contact an attorney. he Complaint in
this action was iled 10/5/2010 (p. 42).
Conclusive evidence has been presented that all conditions precedent have been fulilled
and that the corporation will be formed under Business Corporations Law § 403. he defendant
should be compelled to ile the instant certiicates whereupon the corporate existence of
the Township of Montauk and of the Montauk Friends of Olmsted Parks/Montauk Trustee
Corporation within the State of New York shall begin.
14 Receipt, Notice of Appeal, 10/29/2013
Receipt, Notice of Appeal, 10/29/2013
Receipt, Notice of Appeal, 10/29/2013
15Receipt, Notice of Appeal, 10/29/2013
Town of Montauk vs Hon Cortez Vasques
Notice of Appeal, Index# 6703-10, 10/24/2013
16 Receipt, Notice of Appeal, 10/29/2013
Receipt, Notice of Appeal, 10/29/2013
Precalendar statement, 10/24/2013
17Notice of Entry - Order of Transfer, NYS Court of Appeals, 9/25/2013
Town of Montauk vs Hon Cortez Vasques
Notice of Entry - Order of Transfer, NYS Court of Appeals, 9/25/2013
18 Notice of Entry - Order of Transfer, NYS Court of Appeals, 9/25/2013
Notice of Entry - Order of Transfer, NYS Court of Appeals, 9/25/2013
19Notice of Entry - Order of Transfer, NYS Court of Appeals, 9/25/2013
Town of Montauk vs Hon Cortez Vasques
Order of Transfer: NYS Court of Appeals (Town of Montauk v. Vasquez), 9/12/2013
20 Memorandum of Respondent, 09May2013
Memorandum of Respondent, 09May2013
Memorandum of Respondent, 09May2013
32 May 2013 Aidavit of Robert A Ficalora- Table of Contents
May 2013 Affidavit of Robert A Ficalora- Table of Contents
May 2013 Aidavit of Robert A Ficalora- Table of Contents
33May 2013 Aidavit of Robert A Ficalora, Albany Index# 6703-10
Town of Montauk vs Hon Cortez Vasques
May 2013 Aidavit of Robert A Ficalora, Albany Index# 6703-10
34 May 2013 Aidavit of Robert A Ficalora, Albany Index# 6703-10
May 2013 Affidavit of Robert A Ficalora, Albany Index# 6703-10
35Order to Show Cause, 4/18/2013
Town of Montauk vs Hon Cortez Vasques
Order to Show Cause, 4/18/2013
36 Order to Show Cause, 4/18/2013
Order to Show Cause, 4/18/2013
a. Aidavit of Personal Service, 4/24/2013
37Order to Show Cause, 4/18/2013
Town of Montauk vs Hon Cortez Vasques
b. Receipt (RJI/OSC), 4/18/2013
38 Order to Show Cause, 4/18/2013
Order to Show Cause, 4/18/2013
c. Request for Judicial Intervention, 4/18/2013
39Certiicate of Incorporation:Township of Montauk
Town of Montauk vs Hon Cortez Vasques
Certiicate of Incorporation:Township of Montauk
42 Certiicate of Incorporation:Township of Montauk
Certificate of Incorporation:Township of Montauk
Checks stamped for deposit, 7/26/2010
43Certiicate of Merger/Consolidation
Town of Montauk vs Hon Cortez Vasques
Certiicate of Merger/Consolidation
44 Department of State rejection letter, 8/11/2010
Department of State rejection letter, 8/11/2010
Department of State rejection letter, 8/11/2010
46 Certiicate of Incorporation, MFOP, 2/18/1994
Certificate of Incorporation, MFOP, 2/18/1994
Certiicate of Incorporation, MFOP, 2/18/1994
50 Declaration of Rights and Trusteeship, 5/23/1996
Declaration of Rights and Trusteeship, 5/23/1996
Declaration of Rights and Trusteeship, 5/23/1996
51Assemblyman hiele acknowledgement, 5/26/1996
Town of Montauk vs Hon Cortez Vasques
Assemblyman hiele acknowledgement, 5/26/1996
52 Chapter 139, Laws of 1852, 4/2/1852
Chapter 139, Laws of 1852, 4/2/1852
Chapter 139, Laws of 1852, 4/2/1852
54 Petition to court of Appeals, 11/5/2002
Petition to court of Appeals, 11/5/2002
Petition to court of Appeals, 11/5/2002
55Order, Court of Appeals, People v Vorpahl 5/6/2004
Town of Montauk vs Hon Cortez Vasques
Order, Court of Appeals, People v Vorpahl 5/6/2004
56 Decision and Order, Town of Montauk, Inc vs Pataki et al, 1/22/2007
Decision and Order, Town of Montauk, Inc vs Pataki et al, 1/22/2007
Decision and Order, Town of Montauk, Inc vs Pataki et al, 1/22/2007
57Decision and Order, Town of Montauk, Inc vs Pataki et al, 1/22/2007
Town of Montauk vs Hon Cortez Vasques
58 Decision and Order, Town of Montauk, Inc vs Pataki et al, 1/22/2007
Decision and Order, Town of Montauk, Inc vs Pataki et al, 1/22/2007
59N.Y. Not for Proit Corporations Law §904
Town of Montauk vs Hon Cortez Vasques
N.Y. Not for Proit Corporations Law §904
60 Bus Corp Law § 902: PLAN of MERGER or CONSOLIDATION
Bus Corp Law § 902: PLAN of MERGER or CONSOLIDATION
Bus Corp Law § 902: PLAN of MERGER or CONSOLIDATION
61Bus Corp Law § 403 Cert of Inc: EFFECT
Town of Montauk vs Hon Cortez Vasques
Bus Corp Law § 403 Cert of Inc: EFFECT
62 Laws of the Colony of New York: THE FIRST ASSEMBLY, 4/9/1691. Chapters 1&2
Laws of the Colony of New York: THE FIRST ASSEMBLY, 4/9/1691. Chapters 1&2
Laws of the Colony of New York: THE FIRST ASSEMBLY, 4/9/1691. Chapters 1&2
63Laws of the Colony of New York: THE FIRST ASSEMBLY, 4/9/1691. Chapters 1&2
Town of Montauk vs Hon Cortez Vasques
64 Laws of the Colony of New York: THE FIRST ASSEMBLY, 4/9/1691. Chapters 1&2
Laws of the Colony of New York: THE FIRST ASSEMBLY, 4/9/1691. Chapters 1&2
65Dongan Patent and Charter, 12/9/1686
Town of Montauk vs Hon Cortez Vasques
Dongan Patent and Charter, 12/9/1686
77Letter to Gov. Patterson requesting an executive order, 9/27/2010
Town of Montauk vs Hon Cortez Vasques
Letter to Gov. Patterson requesting an executive order, 9/27/2010
78 Letter to Gov. Patterson requesting an executive order, 9/27/2010
Letter to Gov. Patterson requesting an executive order, 9/27/2010
79Letter to Gov. Patterson requesting an executive order, 9/27/2010
Town of Montauk vs Hon Cortez Vasques
80 Letter to Gov. Patterson requesting an executive order, 9/27/2010
Letter to Gov. Patterson requesting an executive order, 9/27/2010
81IMPORTANT Letter to Department of State, 7/21/2010
Town of Montauk vs Hon Cortez Vasques
IMPORTANT Letter to Department of State, 7/21/2010
82 IMPORTANT Letter to Department of State, 7/21/2010
IMPORTANT Letter to Department of State, 7/21/2010
83he Articulated Rights and Constitution of the Township of Montauk
Town of Montauk vs Hon Cortez Vasques
he Articulated Rights and Constitution of the Township of Montauk
84 he Articulated Rights and Constitution of the Township of Montauk
The Articulated Rights and Constitution of the Township of Montauk
85he Articulated Rights and Constitution of the Township of Montauk
Town of Montauk vs Hon Cortez Vasques
86 he Articulated Rights and Constitution of the Township of Montauk
The Articulated Rights and Constitution of the Township of Montauk
87he Articulated Rights and Constitution of the Township of Montauk
Town of Montauk vs Hon Cortez Vasques
88 he Articulated Rights and Constitution of the Township of Montauk
The Articulated Rights and Constitution of the Township of Montauk
89Letter to Gov Spitzer and Court of Appeals, 8/16/2007
Town of Montauk vs Hon Cortez Vasques
Letter to Gov Spitzer and Court of Appeals, 8/16/2007
90 he Montauk Gazette, July 2012: QUO WARRANTO
The Montauk Gazette, July 2012: QUO WARRANTO
he Montauk Gazette, July 2012: QUO WARRANTO
top related