alternative management structurecao.lacity.org/reports/zoopresentationalternate.pdf2011-12 2012-13...

Post on 15-Jul-2020

1 Views

Category:

Documents

0 Downloads

Preview:

Click to see full reader

TRANSCRIPT

Los Angeles Zoo

ALTERNATIVE MANAGEMENT STRUCTURE

City Administrative Officer

May 2011

City of Los Angeles Four-Year Budget Outlook

2011-12 2012-13 2013-14 2014-15 2015-16

4,379

4,7654,931

5,2005,086

4,484 4,627

4,9514,775

Revenues Expenses

-311-249

-281

-304

Mill

ions

City Administrative Officer

What have we done?

The City has addressed $1.0 Billion in collective deficit using:

•“Fiscal First Aid” techniques

•Long-Term Financial Planning Solutions

City Administrative Officer

Fiscal First Aid

• Evaluated overtime use

• Improved billing and collections procedures

• Explored fees for services

• Refinanced debt for lower interest rates

• Sought state and federal assistance

• Offered early retirement program

• Deferred and/or cancel capital projects

• Used Reserve Fund to soften the landing

• Instituted hiring freezes

• Reduced hours worked

City Administrative Officer

Long-Term Financial Planning• Reduced workforce by 4,000 positions

• Replenished the Reserve Fund and Placed Charter Amendment P on ballot requiring a 2.75% Emergency Reserve Account within the Reserve Fund (approved by voters)

• Addressing major drivers of future deficits

– Placed Charter Amendment to create a new pension tier for new sworn employees (approved by voters)

– Developing new pension tier for new civilian employees

– Negotiated increased co-pays and contribution amounts from employees for health care

• Pursuing alternative service delivery models

City Administrative Officer

Three-Year Plan to Fiscal Sustainability

• Smart fiscal policies

• Focus on core services

• Sustainable workforce

• Alternative service delivery models

Adopted by Council February 9, 2010

City Administrative Officer

Potential benefits of an alternative management structure

• Reduce or eliminate the General Fund subsidy

• Increased operational efficiencies

• Improved and expanded fundraising

• Improved marketing and advertising

• Greater operational flexibility

• Greater ability to pursue commercial activities

• Higher attendance and resultant higher revenue

• Improved concessions and resultant higher revenue

City Administrative Officer

Other Zoos that Transitioned

• Denver

• Dallas

• Tulsa

• Lincoln Park (Chicago)

• Woodland Park (Seattle)

• Zoo Atlanta

• Houston

• Fresno

City Administrative Officer

Government-owned facilities with alternative management structures

• Hollywood Bowl

• Los Angeles County Museum of Art

• Seattle Aquarium

• Central Park (New York City)

City Administrative Officer

Current Zoo Structure FY 2010-11

• Operated as a City Department

• $17.5 million operating budget

– $6.0 million General Fund subsidy

• $8.2 million in support costs subsidized by the General Fund

• 229 authorized full-time positions

City Administrative Officer

• Advisory Zoo Commission

• Council approves admission fee increases

• General Manager – Zoo Director

• Budget subject to annual appropriation through City budget process

• Operation and management under direct control by Mayor and Council

LA Zoo Adopted Budget FY 2005-06 to 2010-11

$14.35$15.20$15.37$15.24$15.02$14.47

$3.44$3.94 $3.96 $3.06 $3.13

$4.30

$17.91

$19.32$18.26

$19.33$19.18

$17.48

2005-06 2006-07 2007-08 2008-09 2009-10 2010-11

Salaries Expenses

Mill

ions

City Administrative Officer

2011-12 2012-13 2013-14 2014-15 2015-16

14.7

3.23.3

5.7

26.9

15.03.33.3

6.4

28.1

17.53.6

3.7

8.9

33.7

16.53.53.6

8.0

31.6

15.73.43.5

7.2

29.8

Salaries Expenses Other Support Costs Retirement and Health

Projected Zoo Expenditure Growth for the Next Five Years

City Administrative Officer

56% Increase

Retirement and Health

Millions

Projected City Costs

33.731.629.828.126.9

2011-12 2012-13 2013-14 2014-15 2015-16

Zoo Expenditures

12.0 12.3 12.7 13.1 13.4

10.1 15.8 17.3 18.8 20.8

4.8

Operating Revenues General Fund Deficit

Mill

ions

City Administrative Officer

Authorized Zoo Staffing FY 2005-06 to 2010-11

256263 268

257245

229

1

1

2

1

00

2005-06 2006-07 2007-08 2008-09 2009-10 2010-11

Regular Resolution

City Administrative Officer

Zoo Workforce

• The 2010-11 Adopted Budget includes 229 regular authority positions, one resolution authority position and one substitute authority position

• 109 are in classifications unique to the Zoo

• 122 are in classifications common among City Departments

City Administrative Officer

Common53%

Unique47%

Zoo Workforce - Labor Representation• 88 percent Coalition of City Unions

• 10 percent EAA

• 2 percent non-represented Non-Rep2%

Coalition88%

EAA10%

City Administrative Officer

Financial Consultant

• The CAO engaged the services of KPMG– To perform a financial analysis of the LA Zoo

– To determine what potential cost savings might be generated by an alternative management structure

– To identify an operating model that may present opportunities for improving cost efficiencies or revenues

City Administrative Officer

Request for Proposals

• The City Attorney recommended conducting a request for proposals (RFP) process to select an operator

• The City Attorney concluded that a competitive process is required to maintain transparency and fairness in the selection process

City Administrative Officer

SUMMARY

• The City’s goal is to improve and enhance Zoo operations while reducing or stabilizing the General Fund contribution

• Alternative Management Structure Benefits– Operational efficiencies– Improved and expanded fundraising– Improved marketing– Operational flexibility– Ability to pursue commercial activities– Higher attendance– Improved concessions

City Administrative Officer

Next Steps

City Administrative Officer

• Identify the labor relations issues

• Discuss challenges and solutions with the City Attorney

• Finalize the RFP in May 2011

• Present CAO report and draft RFP to the Arts, Parks, Health and Aging Committee on June 14, 2011

• Authority to release RFP from full Council

• Release RFP in the Summer of 2011

• Review of responses and selection of operator in the Fall of 2011

• Transition period from Winter 2011 through Spring 2012

• Alternative Management Structure – July 2012

top related