a contribution to the critique of political autonomy-
Post on 12-Mar-2016
223 Views
Preview:
DESCRIPTION
TRANSCRIPT
-
1|G i l l e s D a u v
2| A C o n t r i b u t i o n t o t h e C r i t i q u e o f P o l i t i c a l A u t o n o m y
-
3|G i l l e s D a u v
4| A C o n t r i b u t i o n t o t h e C r i t i q u e o f P o l i t i c a l A u t o n o m y
ACONTRIBUTIONTOTHECRITIQUEOFPOLITICALAUTONOMYGILLESDAUV
ITSVERYDIFFICULTTOFORCEINTOOBEDIENCEWHOEVERHASNOWISHTOCOMMAND.
J.J.ROUSSEAUNocritiquebeyondthispoint
Anycritiqueofdemocracyarousessuspicion,andevenmoresoifthiscritiqueismadebythosewhowishaworldwithoutcapitalandwagelabour,withoutclasses,withoutaState.
Publicopiniondislikesbutunderstandsthosewhodespisedemocracyfromareactionaryorelitistpointofview.Someonewhodeniesthecommonmansorwomansabilitytoorganizeandrunhimselforherself,logicallywillopposedemocracy.Butsomeonewhofirmlybelievesinthisability,andyetregardsdemocracyasunfitforhumanemancipation,isdoomedtothedustbinsoftheory.Atthebest,heislookeddownuponasanidiot;attheworst,hegetsthereputationofawarpedmindwhollendupinthepoorcompanyofthearchenemiesofdemocracy:thefascists.
Indeed,iftheemancipationoftheworkingclassesmustbeconqueredbytheworkingclassesthemselves,itseemsobviousthatinordertoemancipatethemselves,theexploitedmustnotonlydoawaywiththepowerstructuresthatenslavethem,butalsocreatetheirownorgansofdebatinganddecisionmaking.Exercisingonescollectivefreedom,isntthatwhatdemocracy
-
5|G i l l e s D a u v
isallabout?Thatassumptionhasthemeritofsimplicity:tochangetheworldandlivethebestpossiblehumanlife,whatbetterwaythantobasethislifeoninstitutionsthatwillprovidethelargestnumberofpeoplewiththelargestfreedomonspeechanddecisiontaking?Besides,whenevertheyfight,thedominatedmassesgenerallydeclaretheirwilltoestablishtheauthenticdemocracythatsbeensofarlacking.
Forallthesereasons,thecritiqueofdemocracyisalostorforgottenbattle.Setthecontrolsfortheheartofthematter
Democracyclaimstobethemostdifficultobjectivetoachieve,andalsothemostvital,theidealthatallhumanbeingsdesire:thetheoryandpracticeofcollectivefreedom.Democracyisequatedwithorganizingsociallifebycommondecisionswhichtakeintoaccounteverybodysneedsanddesiresasmuchascanbe.
Butthatidealalsoclaimsthattobemorethanjustanideal,thisprocessofcommondecisionmakingshouldhappeninconditionsofequalitybetweenusall.Merepoliticalequalitygiveseachcitizenrightsbutnoteffectivepowers:realdemocracyimpliessocioeconomicequality,withnomorerichandpoor,nomoremasterandservant,nomorebossandemployee.Soafairtotalreorganizationandsharingofricheswillenableeachofustogetafairshareindecisionmakingonbigissuesaswellasonminorones.Wellhaveademocracythatsnotjustformal,butreal.
Thisiswherewebumpintoalogicalflaw.Sharingisabasicandelementarynecessaryhumanattitude,butnoone
seriouslyexpectsittosolvethesocialquestion.Atbest,itcanalleviateit.Nomoralistorprophethaseverconvincedtherichandthemightytodividetheirwealthandpowerfairlybetweenallhumanbeings.Wereentitledtoaskwherethissocial(andnotjustpolitical)fairnessisgoingtocomefrom?Democracycantachieveitonitsown.Thissocalledrealdemocracylacksreality.
Democracyisacontradiction:itpretendstogiveandguaranteesomethingessentialwhichinevitablyevadesit.
Still,whilemostpeoplegoonatlengthaboutthefailingsofdemocracy,veryfewarewillingtodiscussitsnature,becauseitappearsasthebestframeworkforhumanemancipation,andtheonlywaytogetit.Anyresistancetoexploitation,andanyendeavourtocreateaworldwithoutexploitation,isfacedwiththehardfactoftheexploiterscontrolovertheexploited.Theendlessstruggleagainstfactorydespotism,againstbossruleontheshopfloorand
6| A C o n t r i b u t i o n t o t h e C r i t i q u e o f P o l i t i c a l A u t o n o m y
outsidethefactory,andalsothestruggleforrankandfilecontroloverastrike,gobeyondthemererefusaltodependuponaboss,alocalpolitician,orevenaunionorpartyleader.Thatnegativehasapositivedimension.Itsthefirststeptodirect,noncompetitive,solidarityrelations,whichentailnewwaysofmeeting,discussingandmakingdecisions.Nosocialmovement,bigorsmall,canevadetheissue:Whorules?Otherwise,withoutproceduresandstructuresdifferentfromtopdownones,thelowerclasseswilleternallybetreatedasinferior.Betheycalledacommune,acommittee,acollective,asoviet,acouncil,orasimplegeneralmeeting,everyparticipantinthesebodiesrealizeshisindividualfreedomaswellashiscollectiveexistence.Libertyandfraternityarelivedthroughacts.
Now,dotheseformscreatethemovementorjustexpressandstructureit?
Itsnousedisclaimingourquestiononthegroundsthattheseformsdoboth
becausethenatureofdemocracyistotreatthespacetimeofdebateanddecision,notaswhatitis,acomponentofsociallife(andthereforeofallpositivechange),butastheprimeconditionofsociallife(andthereforeofallpositivechange).Thatswhatwellbediscussing.
Ontheway,wellalsohavetoshowhowthisblindinglightisevenmoreattractivelydeceptivebecausetheworddemocracyitselfisconfusedandconfusing.
Butfirst,alittlehistoricalmeandering,toseewhatcritiqueisnotours.Thetraditionalistorreactionarycritique
Inspiteoftheirdifferences,theopponentsoftheFrenchRevolutionlikeBurke,latemonarchistslikeCh.Maurras,ortheGermanthinkersoftheConservativeRevolutioninthe20thcentury,sharedacommondistastefortheRightsofMan,becausetheyalldismissthenotionoftheuniversalityofthehumanspecies.Inmylife,IveseenFrenchmen,Italians,Russians,etc.;asforMan,ImustconfessIvenevermethim(...)(J.deMaistre,1796)Theypreferthesupposedlyrealabstractionofthesoil,thenation,thepeople,theVolk,thenatives,etc.,tothemoreobviouslyabstractabstractionofthemodernvotingcitizen.Tothem,humanbeingscanonlybebrothersandsistersiftheybelongtoacertaingroupororigin.Thatgroupcanevenbe(German)labourinE.JungersTheWorker(1932),butitsstilllimited.Communism,onthecontrary,isthepossibilityoftheuniversal.
-
7|G i l l e s D a u v
OurcritiqueaddressestheState,democraticordictatorial.ReactionarycritiqueaddressesthedemocraticState.Fascismhasadeephatredofdemocracyand,ifitcomestopower,itdoesawaywithpoliticalcompetition,butwhathehatesaboutthedemocraticsystemisparliamentaryprocedures,nottheStateinstitutionswhichfascistsseduce,conquer,occupyandfortify,therebytakingtotheirextremepotentialswhichexistinallparliamentaryregimes.
CommunismopposesdemocracybecauseitisantiState.Fascismonlyopposesdemocracy,becauseitisproState.WetakeondemocracyasaformoftheState,whereasreactionariestakeitonasapoliticalformtheyconsidertoofeebletodefendtheState.MussoliniandHitlerdestroyedparliamentarianisminordertocreateanalmightycentralexecutiveandadministrativepower.Communistshavehadtodealwithparliamentarianismasoneoftheforms(andnotafeebleone)ofgovernmentandrepression.Reactiondenouncesfreewillandbourgeoisindividualismtoreplacethemwith(oldornew)formsofoppressiveauthority.Theywantlessthanindividuals.Thecommunistperspectiveaimstorealizetheindividualsaspirationstoafreedomthatisbothpersonalandlivedwithothers.Itwantsmorethantheindividual.Nietzschescritique
IntheeyesofNietzsche,asocietyofmastersrulingoverslaveshasbeensucceededbythesocietyoftheaverageman,themanofthemasses,whereonlyslavesaretobefound.Zarathustrasauthorstoodforanewaristocracy,nolongerbasedonbirth,noronmoney,nor(astheNaziinterpretationwouldhaveit)onpower,evenlessonrace,butonthefree/mind/spirit/whosnotafraidofsolitude.ItsbecausehewouldlikeeveryoneofustoriseabovehimselfandabovetheherdthatNietzscheishostiletosocialism(heseesanycollectivismasanothertypeofgregariousness),andtoanarchism(anautonomousherd,ashecallsitinBeyondGood&Evil).
Forwhatconcernsushere,theflawinNietzschesvisiondoesnotlieinhiselitism,whichisundeniable(inthatrespect,theThirdReichdidnotdistorthiswritingstoomuch).Morebasically,asolutionwhichisneitherhistoricalnorpolitical,butmythicalandpoetic,canonlyhavemeaningandvalueasanartistsmorals.Nietzscheanpoliticscantberecuperatedbecauseitdoesnotexist.Hewasnotdealingwiththesocialquestion.Hisethicsisonlytobelivedbytheindividual,attheriskoflosingonesmind,ashappenedtothephilosopherhimself.
8| A C o n t r i b u t i o n t o t h e C r i t i q u e o f P o l i t i c a l A u t o n o m y
Theindividualistcritique
Thedemocraticsystemisoftenblamedforcrushingtheindividualunderthecollective.ThepoetanddandyCharlesBaudelaire(182167)wrote:Nothingmoreridiculousthanlookingfortruthinnumbers(...)theballotboxisonlythewaytocreateapoliceforce.Andinthe20thcentury,KarlKraus:Democracyistherightforeveryonetobetheslaveofall.
Whateverelementoftruththispointofviewmaycontain,thepartisansofdemocracyhavetheiranswerready.Theydonotdenythepressureofdemocracyovertheindividual.Theysaythedemocraticsystemgiveseveryonealargerscopeforfreedomthanhewouldgetifhisindividualitywaslockedwithinitself,orifithadtogointoanunpredictablecongregationofindividualatoms.
Someindividualistsaremoresocialthanothers.Theysuggestanassociationoffreelyconsentingindividuals.Thisispreciselyoneofthevariantofthedemocraticcontract,perhapsoneofthemostprogressive.Ignoringdemocracy
Before1848,largesectorsofsocialismdidnotexpectanythingfromdemocracy,becausetheystoodoutsidepolitics.Inspiteoftheirquarrels,theseschoolsofthoughtagreedonthegeneralizationofassociations,asaremedytothedissociation(P.Leroux)broughtaboutbythetriumphofindustryandmoney.Allthatwasneededwastocombinepassions(Fourier),creativemindsandproductiveabilities(SaintSimon),ormutualbonds(Proudhon).UnliketheneobabouvistswhodinheritedBabeufsexperienceandadvocatedtheseizureofpoliticalpowerbyorganizedmassviolence,alltheabovementionedthinkersbelievedinthesupremacyofmorals:anewworldwouldbebornlessoutofnecessitythanbyanethicalimpetus.Someevenhopedthatsocialismcouldbefounded(funded,actually)bygenerousenlightenedbourgeois,onasmallscaleatfirst,andthendevelopasthebulkofsocietywouldfollowitsexample,politicalpowerhavinglittleornothingtodoaboutit:thereforetherewasnoneedforrevolution.
Thisisneitheracritiqueofpoliticsnorofdemocracy.Thecommunistperspectiveisantipolitical,notapolitical.
-
9|G i l l e s D a u v
TheRevolutionarySyndicalistcritique:circumventingdemocracy
Thoughitmayseemtohaveonlyahistoricalinterest,thiscritiqueisstillactivetoday,inadifferentwayfrom1910ofcourse.Theideatoabsorbpoliticsintotheeconomy,i.e.tohaveadirectlysocialdemocracy,issurfacingagaininthecurrentutopiaofaseizureoflocalpowersogeneralizedthatitwouldtakeawaythesubstanceofcentralpoliticalpower(theState),andthusrelieveusfromthenecessityofdestroyingtheState.InChangingtheWorldWithoutTakingPower(2002),J.Hollowayarguesthatradicaltransformationisnowsoembeddedinourdailylivesthatweregraduallytransformingthefabricofsociety,withouttheneedforapotentiallydictatorialbreak.Evolutioninsteadofrevolution,whatelse?Theslowrevolutionsnotion,recentlytheorizedbyA.Bartra,partlyinspiredbythesituationinMexicoandtakenupbysomeradicals,amountstonorevolution.
Inthemid19thcentury,too,insteadofaddressingdemocracy,somehopedtogoroundit.
Proudhonbelievedthatworkgavethetoilingmassesapoliticalcapacity:letsfindanewwayofproducinggoods,letsmakethebourgeoisuseless,therestwillfollow,andtheworkshopwillreplacegovernment.Democracywasneitheracceptednorfoughtagainst,butdirectlyrealizedbywork,withoutanymediation.
Aboutfiftyyearslater,revolutionarysyndicalismhadaloathingforparliamentarydemocracy.Thevehicleforchangewastocomefromlabourorganizedinindustrial(asopposedtotrade)unions,whichwouldunitethewholeclass,skilledandunskilled.Proudhonhadbeentheideologueofcraftsmenandsmallindustry.Anarchosyndicalismwasadaptedtotheageoftrustsandhugefactories,buttheprinciplewassimilar:afusionbetweenindustryandgovernment.Afteractingasanegalitarianbodyfightingthebossesandpolice,theunionwouldlatermanagetheeconomyduringandaftertherevolution.Somesyndicalists,likeDeLeonintheUS,wantedparallelpoliticalandindustrialaction,buttothempoliticswasclearlyoutsideandagainstparliament.
Revolutionarysyndicalismhasbeenreproachedforitselitism.Itstrueitemphasizedtheroleofactiveminoritiesthatwould/spur/push/thelessadvancedintoaction.Butmostrevolutionarysyndicalistsaimedatanactiveclassconsciousmasselite,utterlydifferentfromwhattheysawasthepassivemassofsheeplikesocialdemocratvoters.GeorgesSorel(18471922)thoughtthatthelabourunion,unlikeparliamentandpartylife,bredafairandrealorganizedequality,asallmemberswerewagelabourersandinsolidaritywitheachother.
10| A C o n t r i b u t i o n t o t h e C r i t i q u e o f P o l i t i c a l A u t o n o m y
Thenewpoliticalprincipleoftheproletariatisthegovernmentbyvocationalgroupsselforganizedintheworkplace.Resistancebodieswillfinallyenlargetheirscopeandrangesomuchthattheywillabsorbnearlyallpoliticsinasuccessfulstruggletosuckbourgeoispoliticalorganizationdryofalllife.
Ononeessentialpoint,Sorelhadapoint:Marxbelievedthatthedemocraticregimehastheadvantagethatasworkersarenolongerattractedtofightingthemonarchyorthearistocracy,thenotionofclassbecomeseasiertograsp.Experienceteachesustheopposite;democracyisquitegoodatpreventingtheadvanceofsocialism,bydivertingworkersmindstowardtradeunionismundergovernmentprotection.(1908)
Sorel,however,onlyscoredanegativepointagainstMarx,becauseexperiencewasalsoteachingtheoppositeofwhathewasexpecting:theunionfailedaswellastheparty,andunionselforganizationwasoftensuckeddryofalllifebybourgeoisdemocracy.
Youcantdestroyasocietybyusingtheorganswhicharetheretopreserveit(...)anyclasswhowantstoliberateitselfmustcreateitsownorgan,H.Lagardellewrotein1908,withoutrealizingthathiscritiquecouldbeappliedasmuchtotheunions(includingasupposedrevolutionarysyndicalistFrenchCGTonafastroadtobureaucratizationandclasscollaboration)astothepartiesoftheSecondInternational.Revolutionarysyndicalismdiscardedthevoterandpreferredtheproducer:itforgotthatbourgeoissocietycreatesandlivesoffboth.Communismwillgobeyondboth.Antiparliamentarianism
Understandinguniversalsuffrageastheactbywhichthattheworkersswaptheirpotentialviolenceforavotingpaper,ispartoftheessentialsofsocialcritique.Attackingelectionshasbeenaconstantthemefortheanarchists,andwasnotuncommonamongsocialistsbefore1914.AllleftfactionsandpartiesintheSecondInternationalagreedthatanyparliamentremainsunderthecontroloftherulingclass,andelectiondayisalwaysasetbackforradicalism.After1917,thisremainedafundamentaltenetofallvarietiesofcommunists.Eventhosewhoadvocatedtacticaluseofelectionsregardedthesoviets,andnottheParliament,asthepoliticalbasisandorganofafuturerevolution.
Thatbeingsaid,anditmustbesaid,rejectingparliamentdoesnotsumupnordefineourperspective,nomorethandespisingtherichorhatingmoney.Mussolinialsowantedtobringdownoldbourgeoisinstitutions,andhesucceeded,uptoapoint.
-
11|G i l l e s D a u v
TheBolshevikcritique:dictatorshipversusdemocracy
In1920,againstKautskysTerrorism&Communismpublishedayearbefore,Trotskywroteabookwiththesametitle.Kautskyopposeddemocracyandmassfreedomtocivilwarandsystematicuseofviolence.Trotskydistinguishesbetweendemocracyasuniversalsuffrage,anddemocracyasthemassofthepeopleitself:tounderstandwhatismeantbypeople,onehastogointoaclassanalysis.
Beforeparliamentarianismasweveknownitsincetheendofthe19thcentury,Trotskyexplains,therewereexamplesofearlyconservativedemocracy:theagrariandemocracyofthefarmersintheNewEnglandtownmeeting,theSwissselfgovernmentoftheurbanlowermiddleclassesandtherichpeasantry(praisedbyRousseauinTheSocialContract,1762).Then,ascapitalandlabourbecamethepolarclassesofsociety,bourgeoisdemocracydevelopedastheweaponofdefenceagainstclassantagonisms.TrotskyremindsthereaderwhatWesterncivilizeddemocracyhasledto:aworldwar.
AsforRussia,Trotskyjustifiesterrorandcoercionmethodsonthegroundsthattheyretheonlymethodsavailableiftheproletariatistodefenditselfagainstafarmoreterroristandbloodthirstycounterrevolution.Whenthecivilwarisover(...)Bymeansofasystematicallyappliedlabourservice,andacentralizedorganizationofdistribution,thewholepopulationofthecountrywillbedrawnintothegeneralsystemofeconomicarrangementandselfgovernment.
KnowingthatTrotskywasatthesametimeadvocatingforcedmilitarizationoflabour,onecanonlyreadthoselinesasstatesmantalkjustifyinghisownpoweroverthecommonpeople.Forwhatconcernsushere,Trotskyonlytargetsdemocracybecauseofwhatitsbecomeundercapitalism:animperialistdemocracy.So,(...)werepudiatedemocracyinthenameoftheconcentratedpoweroftheproletariat.Heisinterestedintheformstakenbydemocracy(andclaimsBolshevismwilllaterachieveasuperiorform),notinthedemocraticprinciple.Theanarchistcritique:dispersingpower
Leninismishauntedbytheseizureofpower,anarchismbyitsobsessivefear.Asareplytoauthorityanddictatorship,anarchismstandsforthecollectiveversusleadership,bottomversusup,horizontalversusvertical,communeversusgovernment,decentralizationversuscentralization,selfmanagementversustop
12| A C o n t r i b u t i o n t o t h e C r i t i q u e o f P o l i t i c a l A u t o n o m y
management,localcommunityversusmasselectorate:apluralityoftruedemocraciesinsteadofafalseone,andultimatelytheStatewillbedestroyedbyuniversalizeddemocracy.Lotsofsmallscaleproductionandlivingunitswillbedynamicenoughtogettogetherwithoutanyofthemalienatingitsautonomy.LikethepolisofAncienttimes,themodernmetropolisfallspreytooligarchictendencies:myriadsoffederatedcoops,collectivesanddistrictswillbeabletorunthemselves,andthusremaindemocratic.Ifpowerissplitbetweenmillionsofelements,itbecomesharmless.
Wewontsolvetheproblemofpowerbyspreadinglittlebitsofiteverywhere.Bordigascritique:theoppositeofdemocracy
AmedeoBordigaisoneoftheveryfewwhotookdemocracyseriously:hedidntlookatitsmethods,butatitsprinciple.However,helikenedsomuchproletariandemocracytobourgeoisdemocracythatheendedupmissingtheprincipleitself.
Hisstartingpointisthatdemocracyconsistsinindividualsregardingthemselvesasequals,eachmakinghisownopinionaccordingtohisfreewill,thencomparingitwiththeopinionofothers,beforetakingadecision(usuallyafteravoteandaccordingtomajorityrule:thisisimportant,yetnotessentialtothedefinition).Parliamentstiflestheproletariansbyforcingthemintoapoliticalpartnershipwiththebourgeois.Nothingoriginalinthatlaststatement,butthedeductionthatfollowsisnotsocommon:Bordigathinksworkerdemocracyisalsotoberejected,becauseitdecomposestheproletarianfightingspiritintoindividualdecisions.Democracymeansareunionofequalrightsandwills,whichisimpossibleinbourgeoisparliamentarianism,andpointlessinproletarianclassactivity:revolutiondoesnotdependonamassofindividualdecisionsgettingtogether,noronmajorityorproportionalprocedures,butontheabilityoftheorganizedproletariattoactasacentralizingbodyandacollectivemind.(Bordigacallsitaparty,buthispartyisverydifferentfromtheLeninistone,sinceitisnotbasedonsocialistintellectualsintroducingsocialismintotheworkingclassfromoutside.Tomakethingsmorecomplicated,BordiganeveropenlycriticizedLeninsconceptionoftheparty.)
(...)theprincipleofdemocracyhasnointrinsicvalue.Itisnotaprinciple,butratherasimplemechanismoforganization(...)revolutionisnotaproblemofformsoforganization.Onthecontrary,revolutionisaproblemofcontent,aproblemofthemovementandactionofrevolutionaryforcesinanunendingprocess(...)(Thedemocraticprinciple,January1922)
-
13|G i l l e s D a u v
Indeedcommunistrevolutionisthecreationofnonprofit,nonmercantile,cooperativeandfraternalsocialrelations,whichimpliessmashingtheStateapparatusanddoingawaywiththedivisionbetweenfirms,withmoneyastheuniversalmediator(andmaster),andwithworkasaseparateactivity.Thatisthecontent.
WhatBordigafailstosee,isthatthiscontentwontcomeoutofanykindofform.Someformsareincompatiblewiththecontent.Wecantreasonliketheendwastheonlythingthatmattered:theendismadeoutofmeans.Certainmeansgetusclosertotheendwewant,whileothersmakeitmoreandmoreremoteandfinallydestroyitspossibility.Thecontentofcommunism(whichBordigawasrighttoemphasize)canonlybebornoutoftheselforganizedactionofthevastmajorityoftheproletariat(CommunistManifesto).Thecommunistmovementisnotdemocratic:neitherisitdictatorial,ifthedictatorisonepartoftheproletariatoppressingtherest.Soonenoughthatpartloseswhateverproletariancharacterithadandturnsintoaprivilegedgrouptellingpeoplewhattodo.ThisiswhathappenedinRussia,assomelikeOttoRhleunderstoodasearlyas192021.
Bordigalacksacritiqueofpolitics.Heperceivesofrevolutionasasuccessionofphases:firstitwouldreplacebourgeoispower,thenitwouldcreatenewsocialrelations.ThisiswhyhehasnotroublebelievingthattheBolshevikscouldhaveruledRussiaforyearsand,evenwithoutbeingableoftransformingthecountryinacommunistway,stillpromoteworldrevolution.Yetpowerisnotsomethingrevolutionariescanholdontowithnorevolutionhappeningintheircountryoranywhereelse.Likemanyothers,Bordigaequatespowertoaninstrument.WhenJanAppelwasstayinginMoscowasaKAPDdelegateintheSummer1920,hewasshownfactorieswithwelloiledmachinesthatcouldnotbeoperatedforlackofspareparts:whentherevolutionbreaksoutinEurope,theRussianworkerswouldtellhim,youllsendussparesandwellbeabletooperatethesemachinesagain.AfterOctober1917,theBolsheviksmusthavethoughtofthemselvesassomethingsimilar:amachinerystillpartlyidlebutpreparingforworldrevolution.Unfortunately,power(andevenmoresoStatepower)isnotatoolwaitingtobeproperlyhandled.Itsasocialstructurethatdoesnotremainonstandbyforlong.Ithasafunction:itconnects,itmakespeopledothings,itimposes,itorganizeswhatexists.Ifwhatexistsiswagelabourandcommodityexchange,evenintheoriginalandmakeshiftexistenceithadinRussiain1920,powerwillmanagethatkindoflabourandthatkindofexchange.LenindiedaheadofState.Onthecontrary,arevolutionarystructureisonlydefinedbyitsacts,andifitdoesnotactitsoonwithers.
14| A C o n t r i b u t i o n t o t h e C r i t i q u e o f P o l i t i c a l A u t o n o m y
LikeTrotsky,Bordigatheorizesthenecessitytodoviolencetoparticularproletariansinthenameofthefutureinterestsoftheproletariansingeneral:aslateas1960,hewouldstilljustifytheBolshevikrepressionoftheKronstadtrisinginFebruaryMarch,1921.HeneverunderstoodthatatthetimehewaswritingTheDemocraticPrinciple,theRussianexperiencethatheextensivelyusedtobackuphisthesiswaseliminatingwhateverrevolutionwasleftinRussia.Bordigawasattackingdemocraticformalismonbehalfofarevolutionthatwasalreadymoreformalthanreal.Dictatorshipistheoppositeofdemocracy.Theoppositeofdemocracyisnotacritiqueofdemocracy.Councilcommunism:thequestfornonviolence
TheGermanCommunistLeftagreedwiththeItalianLeftontherejectionofbourgeoisdemocracy.Thedisagreementfocusedonworkerdemocracy.
WhathascometobeknownascouncilcommunismwasoneoftheearliestcriticsofthefailureofBolshevism,andremainsoneofthebest.Butastimepassed,councilcommunistshavetendedtobewaryaboutanythingthatmightbeaconstraintupontheworkingclass.Theircritiqueofbureaucracyasthemainobstacletorevolutionledthemtodemocracy.Notbourgeoisdemocracy,needlesstosay,workerdemocracy,butinthatrespectbothbourgeoisandworkerformsproclaimthesamepurpose:topreventorlimitencroachmentsonpersonalfreedom.
Wewontreply(asBordigawould)thatindividualfreedomisanillusionandisirrelevanttocommunism.Weonlysaythatinanycasesuchfreedomcantbeguaranteedbythedemocraticprinciple.
Whatthisquestfornonpressureboilsdowntoisthedesiretoavoidtheilleffectsofconflicts.Asithappens,theprotectionprovidedforbydemocracyonlyworksintheabsenceofanyseriouscrisisamongthepersonsconcerned,betheyproletariansinsteadofbourgeois.Assoonasdebateisnotenoughtoresultintoadecisionwillinglyacceptedbythegroupasawhole,thegroupcantcarryonasamereconfrontationoffreewills(unlessitsonlyafriendlydebatingsociety).Eitherthegroupthinksthatmaintainingthecommunitymattersmorethanthedisagreement.Oritsplits.Oritforcesadecisionuntotheparticipants.Inallcases,thedemocraticprinciplehasbeensuspended.
Theultimateresultofturningfreewillintoanabsolutewouldbeforaradicalgrouptodonothingbutcirculatedataandinformation:notheory,exceptthetheoryofexchange,thetheoryofthenecessityofautonomy.Notheory,exceptthetheorythatnotheorymustbeimposedontotheworkingclass.Such
-
15|G i l l e s D a u v
anontheorywouldofcoursebeinaccessibletocriticism,whichwouldhelpthegroupdevelopingitsowninformalbureaucracy.
Bordigastheoryofthepartydeniestheproblem.Councilismevadesitbywaitingforsuchanoverwhelmingproletarianmajoritythatallconflictwillberesolvedwithoutanyverbalorphysicalviolence.Thepartyorautonomyalternativewasbornoutofourpastfailures.Afuturerevolutionarymovementwillhavetogobeyondthatalternative.Thecritiqueofformaldemocracy
TraditionalMarxistanalysishasthemerit/ofstressing/tostress/thatdemocracygivespossibilitiesthatonlybecomerealitiesforthoseabletousethem:inaclasssociety,themembersoftherulingclasswillalwaysbeinamuchbetterpositiontodoso.Everyoneis(nearly)freetopublishapaper,buttheadsnecessarytofinanceadailyoramagazinewontgotoananticapitalistpress.TheballotpaperofHenryFordiscountedasonevoteliketheballotpaperofoneofhisworkers,butMr.Fordwillholdmoreswayonpublicaffairsthananyofhisworkers,orevenofthousandsofthem.
Likesomepreviouscritiques,thisonepointstoanessentialfeatureofdemocracy,butitsshortcomingistotreatdemocraticformsasiftheylackedreality,whereastheyarereal,witharealityoftheirown.
Itsoftensaidthatthelibertiesallowedbyademocraticregimeareonlycosmetic:thatistrue,butonlypartofthetruth.Everybodyknowsthatfreedomofspeechfavoursthebusinesslawyermorethanhiscleaninglady.Inanunequalsociety,knowledge,culture,politicsandaccesstothepublicscenearealsounequal.Yet,todayasyesterday,byusingandenlargingpossibilitieslefttothem,theworkers,thecommonpeoplehavebeenabletobettertheirlot,andthustheyvegivensomecontenttolibertiesthatarentjustemptyshells.True,thisbettermentwascausedmorebydirectoftenviolentactionthanbydemocracyproperlyspeaking:nevertheless,legalunions,litigationbodies,aswellaslocalauthorities,membersofparliamentorevengovernmentsfavourabletolabourhavehelpedchannelthesedemands,moderatingthemandpushingthemforwardatthesametime.Democracyandreformismhaveledacoupleslifefornearly150yearsnow,althoughtheyveoftenbeenstrangebedfellows.
Explainingthataworkersballotpaperonlyformallyweighthesameashisbosss,onlyprovesthatsocalledpoliticalequalitydoesnotmakeforsocialinequality.Yetreformistshaveneversaidtheopposite.Theysay:SinceMr.Fordsballotpaperweighsamilliontimesmorethanoneofhisworkers,lets
16| A C o n t r i b u t i o n t o t h e C r i t i q u e o f P o l i t i c a l A u t o n o m y
gettogetherthevotesofmillionsofworkersandwellbestrongerthantheFordfamily.Wellturnintorealitytheappearanceofpowerthatthebourgeoishavegrantedus.Againstthemightofcapital,labourhasthestrengthofnumbers:speakinginpublic,havingpapersindependentfromthebossespress,organizingintheworkplace,meetinganddemonstratinginthestreet,areafteralleasierindemocracy,astheexploitedandoppressedhaveexperienced.Ingeneral,themassofthepopulationhasmorewaystoimproveitsconditionsofworkandlifewithAdenauerthanHitler,withDeGaullethanPtain,withAllendethanPinochet,withFelipeGonzalesthanFranco,etc.
Ifparliamentwasonlyasham,andfreedomofspeechonlyadeception,therewouldntbeanymoreparliaments,partiesorpoliticalcampaigns,andtheywouldntstillrallyvoters,andevenstirpassions.(Unlesswethinkthisisduetocontinuouscraftybourgeoisconditioning:butsurelyoveracenturyofdemocraticregimeshouldhaveactedasaneyeopener...)Democracyisnotashownotjustashow.SoChurchillwasright...?
Thisbriefsurveyseemstoleaveuswithonlyoneoption,summedupbyW.ChurchillintheHouseofCommonsonNovember11,1947:Democracyistheworstformofgovernmentexceptforallotherforms,thathavebeentriedfromtimetotime.
Itssignificantthatthebestknowndefinitionofdemocracyshouldbebasedonaparadox,evenaplayonwords.Infact,everybodymakesfunofChurchillsphrase,andyeteverybodyacceptsit,withonereservation:everybodythinkshehasthesolutiontoreallygetthebestoutofthislesserevil.
(ItsalsosignificantthatthefamousBritishstatesmanshouldhaveaddedcynicismtopragmatisminanotherphrase:Thebestargumentagainstdemocracyisafiveminuteconversationwiththeaveragevoter.Thissecondsentenceislessoftenquoted:thescornitdisplaysfortheactorsextraswouldbemoreappropriateofdemocracymightdiscreditthefirstdefinition.)
Letsgobacktotheworditself.WestminsterisnotontheAcropolis
Ifweputbackinitsplace,i.e.inhistory,thisrealitycommonlycalleddemocracy,werealizehowpoorlythewordisadaptedtowhatithaslabeledforacoupleofcenturies.
-
17|G i l l e s D a u v
ModerntimeshavegivenanutterlynewusagetoanotionborninAncientGreece.Nowadays,themaninthestreet,theacademicorthepoliticalactivist,everyoneusestheworddemocracyfor5thcenturyB.C.Athensand21stcenturyItalyorSweden.ThepeoplewhowouldneverdaretalkaboutaprehistoriceconomyorworkamongNewGuineatribesmenseenoanachronisminapplyingthesametermtoasystemwherecitizenshipmeantanability(theoreticalbutalsopartlyeffective)togovernandbegoverned,andtoasystemwhere,for99percentofthecitizens,citizenshipcomesdowntotherighttoberepresented.
Thisgapwasmorereadilyadmittedintheearlydays.JamesMadison,oneofthefoundingfathersoftheUSConstitution,differentiatedbetweendemocracy,wherethepeoplemeetandexercisetheirgovernmentinperson,andrepublic(atermofRomanandnotGreekorigin),wheretheyassembleandadministeritbytheirrepresentativesandagents.WiththepassingoftimeandtheriseofthemodernbureaucraticState(whichMadisonopposed),democracyhasbecomeameresynonymforpowervestedinthepeople.
CommonwisdombemoansthelimitsofaGreekdemocracyclosedtowomen,slavesandforeigners,andrejoicesovertheopennessofmoderndemocracytolargerandlargersectionsofthepopulation.Theidealofradicaldemocratsisademosthatwouldwelcomeallhumanbeingslivingonagiventerritory.TheyforgetthattheAncientAthenianfortunateenoughtoenjoycitizenshipwasnotacitizenbecausehewasahumanbeing,butbecausehehappenedtobeacoownerofthepolis:hewasalandowner,smallorbig.Thedemocraticsystememergedasawaytomanageassmoothlyaspossiblethecontradictionswithinacommunityofmalefamilyheads,inexorablydividedbyagrowingunequaldistributionoffortune.
Itsonlybecauseitwaslimitedtoagroupthatsharedsomethingvital(asuperiorsocialposition,albeitunderminedbymoneydifferences)thatGreekdemocracycouldaffordtobeparticipatory(whichdidnotsaveitfromperiodiccrises).InEuropeortheUStoday,nothingcanbecomparedtothedemosofPericlestime.Whenitsappliedtosocietiesruledbythecapitallabourrelationship,theworddemocracytellsusmoreaboutwhatthesesocietiesthinkofthemselvesthanabouttheirreality.Aquestionofwords?Ifwewishtosticktothewordcommunismandobjecttodemocracy,itsnotfortraditionssake,butforhistoricalmotives.Inspiteofitsimperfections,communismexpressestheendeavouroftheexploitedandofthehumanspecies
18| A C o n t r i b u t i o n t o t h e C r i t i q u e o f P o l i t i c a l A u t o n o m y
toliberateitself.Thewordandthenotionweremeaningful(thatis,debatableanddebated)in1850or1900.TherevolutionthatfailedinRussia,andStalinismlater,loadedthetermwithatotallydifferentmeaning.AstheS.I.onceexplained,captivewordsbecomelikeprisonersputtohardlabour:theytooareforcedtoworkforthebenefitofthosewhovecapturedthem.Communismisnotbureaucraticbynature.
Onthecontrary,democracyhasbeenadistortedwordeversinceitsreturninthemouthofbourgeoisrevolutionariesfromthe18thcenturyonwards,andofmost(butnotall)socialistsinthe19thand20thcenturies.ThedistortiondoesnotconsistinanoutrightlieliketheMaoistdescriptionsoflifeinChina,butinamentaldisplacementofreality:asitidentifiesmodernparliamentstoAncientagoras,andthe21stcenturycitizentoa5thcenturyB.C.Atheniancitizen,andasitsuggeststhemodernonehasalotmorepower,itcompresseshistoryandconfusesus.Exploitationand/ordomination?
Doinequality,povertyandmiseryexistbecauseafewprivilegedonesmakedecisionsforusall?Orhavethesehappyfewgotanearmonopolyoverdecisionsbecausetheyalreadyarerichandthereforepowerful?Thequestionissterile.
MountainsofbooksandarticleshavebeenandarestillwrittentorefutetheallegedMarxistclaimthattheeconomyexplainsnexttoeverything.Whoevermadesuchaclaim?
Accordingtothematerialistconceptionofhistory,theultimatelydeterminingfactoristheproductionandreproductionofreallife.OtherthanthisneitherMarxnorIhaveeverasserted.(Engels,lettertoJ.Bloch,September21,1890)
Theeconomysurelydoesnotexplainpower.Profitmakingstrictlyspeakingdoesnotaccountfor(localorworld)wars.Asimilarsocioeconomicinfrastructurecancoexistwithverydifferentandopposedpoliticalforms.CapitalistGermanywassuccessivelyrunbyamonarchistcaste,bybourgeois,bytheleadersofanationalistracistonepartyState,thenafter1945bybourgeoisintheWestandbybureaucratsintheEast,thenagainbybourgeoiswhenthecountrywasreunified.Historyprovidesuswithmanyexamplesofnoncoincidencebetweeneconomicmightandpoliticalauthority,andofamodernStateoccasionallyrulingagainstthebourgeois,forcingthegeneralinterestofthesystemuponreluctantindustrialistsorbusinessmen.FacedwithalargestrikeintheRuhr,Bismarkhimselfcompelledthebossestograntawagerise.Although
-
19|G i l l e s D a u v
usuallyinEuropemoneybringsaboutpower,inAfricaandintheEast,powerisoftenthequickwaytofortune,withfamilyorclanmisappropriatingpublicfundsorsiphoningoffforeigntrade.Also,itsnotuncommonforpoliticalrulerstodispossesstherich,asweveseeninRussiaoverthelasttenortwentyyears.
Yet,inthevastmajorityofcases,politicalleadersandmastersoftheland,oftradeandofmanufacturinggohandinhandorcomedowntothesamething.Commandingmenusuallygoestogetherwithputtingthemtowork.Thetwoformsofcontrolcanclashwithoneanother,butnotforlong:oneconsolidatestheother.Powerdoesnotcreateitself.Politicalruleandpossessionofthemeansofproductionrarelycoincide,butinmodernsocietytheresneitherexploitationwithoutdomination,nordominationwithoutexploitation:thesamegroupshavedirectorindirectcontroloverwealthandpower.
Theexploiterneedstobeabletoputpressureonthepersonheexploits:heonlyexploitswhathehassupremacyover.Dominationisapreconditionandanecessaryformofexploitation.Letsnottryanddecidewhichonelogicallyorchronologicallycomesfirst.Exploitationisneverjusteconomic(Ihavesomeoneworkforme,inmyplaceandformybenefit),butalsopolitical(insteadofsomeonemakingdecisionsabouthislife,Itakethedecisionsmyself,forinstanceIdecidewhentohireandfirehim).Societyisnotdivided,asCastoriadisthoughtinthe1960s,betweenordergiversandordertakers.Orrather,thisdivisionexists,buttheseordershavetodowithwhatstructurestodaysworld:thecapitalwagelabourrelation(whichdoesnotmeanitdetermineseverything).Thereisnoneedtoopposeexploitationtodomination.Humansocietiesingeneral,andcapitalisminparticular,canonlybeunderstoodbythelinkbetweenexploitationanddomination.Firmsarenotjustprofitmakers:theyarealsopowerstructures,buttheyremaininbusinessaslongastheycreateandaccumulatevalue,otherwisetheygobankrupt.Politicsasthefoundationofdemocracy
Ifpoliticsmeanstakingintoaccountsocietyasawhole(includingtherealityofpower),andnotjustasanadditionoflocalortechnicalissues,thenanysocialchangeispolitical,anysocialcritiqueispolitical,andrevolutionhastodowithpolitics.
Politics,however,issomethingelsethanthisconcernfortheglobal,thegeneral,thetotal,becauseitturnsthistotalityintoanewspecialization,intoanactivityremovedfromdirectsocialinterests.Thatspecialdimensioncannotignoresocioeconomichierarchiesandoppositions.Butitdealswiththemby
20| A C o n t r i b u t i o n t o t h e C r i t i q u e o f P o l i t i c a l A u t o n o m y
shiftingthemonalevelwheretherootsoftheseconflictswillneverbechanged,onlytheirconsequences.
AncientGreecesrealcontributiontohistorywasnottheprincipleofdemocracyasasetofrulesandinstitutionsbywhichcitizensmakecollectivedecisions.Theinnovationwentdeeper.Itinventedwhatdemocracyisbasedupon:aspecialtimespacereservedforconfrontation,anddistinctfromtherestofsociallife.Inthatspecificsphere,apersonistakenawayfromhisprivateinterests,fromfortuneandstatusdifferences,fromhissocialsuperiorityorinferiority,andplacedonanequalfootingwithalltheothercitizens.Equalityofrightsalongsidesocialinequality:thatisthedefinitionofpolitics.Societyisfullyawareofitsinabilitytosuppressgrouporclassantagonism,soittransferstheantagonismontoaparallellevelthatssupposedtobeneutral,whereconflictsareacknowledgedandsoftenedinthebestpossibleinterestofthecontinuationofthesystemasawhole.ItsthisseparationthatMarxsearlywritingsweredealingwith.Directorworkerpeoplesdemocracymaintainstheseparationwhileitclaimstogobeyonditbyinvolvingeveryoneinthedemocraticprocess,asifpopularempowermentcouldsolvetheproblemofpower.Unfortunately,gettingeverybodyinsideaseparatespheredoesnotsuppressseparation.
Anyhumangroupthinksofandreactstothewholeofitssituation.Butclasssocieties,inathousandwaysandthroughtrialanderror,havedivorceddebating,managinganddecisionmakingfromtherest.Logically,thesesocietiesregardthisdissociationasthenaturalanduniversallydesirablebestpossiblewayofsolvinghumanconflicts.
Classdivisions,incertainconditions,havecreatedpolitics:doingawaywithclassdivisionswillentailgoingbeyondpolitics.
Democracyisnottobedenouncedandsmashed,butsuperseded.Likeotheressentialcritiques,thecritiqueofdemocracywillonlybecomeeffectivebythecommunizingofsociety.
Aslongaspeoplecontentthemselveswithafairredistributionofwealth,theyinevitablyalsogoforafairredistributionofpower.Onlyanaltogetherdifferentworldwillnolongerbeobsessedwithpower,withtakingit,sharingit,orscatteringit.Wellsolvethepoliticalquestionwhenwestoptreatingitastheprimeissue.Manufacturingconsentanddissent
WhenwriterslikeN.ChomskyexposetheconditioningofpublicopinionbytheState,mediaandlobbies,theyfailtoaskthemselveswhatisbeingconditioned.
-
21|G i l l e s D a u v
Opinionisthoughtofasacollectivemotleyandficklespiritthatsometimesdetermineseventsandsometimesistossedaboutbythem,asiftheseeventswerewithinitsreachoneday,andoutofreachthenext.Forinstance,GermanopinionisreportedtohavebeenindifferentorhostiletoHitlerin1923,thentohavelistenedtohimafter1929,beforemovingawayfromhimforgoodafterthefalloftheThirdReich.ItslikethesesuccessivepointsofviewhadbeentakenregardlessofwhatGermanindividuals,groups,classes,unions,parties,etc.,weredoingeachtime.
AnotherexampleisthedaytherewasareversalofFrenchopinionin1968:thehugerightwingdemonstrationontheChampsElyses,May30,isdescribedasthedeathknellfortherebellioninthestreetsandinthefactories.Yetthisshowswhatpublicopinionreallyis.InApril,mostfuturerebelshadnoideatheywouldbesoonmarchinginthestreetorstoppingwork.Afewdayslater,pushedonbytheearlystreetfightingandtheinitiativeofaminorityofworkers,millionsofpeoplediscoveredwhattheywantedtodoandcoulddo.Acoupleofweekslater,theebbofthestrikewave(andformany,thesatisfactionofseeingtheirdemandsatleastpartlymet)woreouttherevoltandenabledconservativeforcestogetagriponthemselves.
Thus,frombeginningtoend,theshockofthelargestgeneralstrikeinhistorydeterminedtheflowofevents,andsuccessivelymadepeopleawareofpossiblechanges,enabledlawandordersupporterstoresurface,andcreateddespairamongtherebelsbutalsonumerousreboundsoverthenexttenyears.
Menssocialbeingdeterminestheirconsciousness.Admittedly,itworksbothways,butcertainlyalotmorethiswaythantheother.After1945,inFranceaselsewhere,theworkersattheBillancourtRenaultplantnearParishadbeenfedwithStalinistslanderdepicting(realor/invented/imagined/)Trotskystsasfascistsandagentsprovocateursinthepayofthebossandthepolice.TheCPledunion,theCGT,hadunrelentinglyandusuallysuccessfullypreventedworkstoppages:ThestrikeistheweaponofbigbusinessIntheSpring1947,theBillancourtworkerswentonatwoweekstrike,partlymanagedbytherankandfile,andelectedawellknownTrotskyst,PierreBois,onthestrikecommittee.Yettheydbeenconditionedbyyearsofpropaganda,andthetinyrevolutionaryminoritycouldonlyanswerbackbypoorlydistributedleaflets,withtheriskofbeingbeatenuporsacked,astheCGTheldswayovertherunningoftheplant.Ifinsuchnegativecircumstances,asubstantialnumberofworkersdaredlaydowntoolsanddesignateaTrotskysttorepresentthem,itsnotbecausetheywouldhavehadaccessatlasttoTrotskysRevolutionBetrayedorothercriticalanalysesofthebureaucracy.Moresimply,thepressureoftheirconditionsofworkandlife,andtheirownresistancetoexploitationledthemtodisobeyunionorders,
22| A C o n t r i b u t i o n t o t h e C r i t i q u e o f P o l i t i c a l A u t o n o m y
tofightalongsidepersonslikeP.Bois,andtreatascomradesthosetheydistrustedbefore.Insomeways,therewasmoremilitancyonthepremisesin1947thanin1968:in47,afewstrikersdebatedaboutmanufacturingfirearms,andtheunionvanwasturnedoverbyrebelliousworkers.
Bythesamelogic,whenthestrikewasover,withtheCPbeingexpelledfromgovernmentandthebeginningoftheColdWar,theCGTtookonatougherantibourgeoisline.Onereason(orpretext)forthegovernmentgettingridofitsCPministerswastheStalinistsgettingonthebandwagonandsidingwiththestrikers.Theworkerbureaucracygotbackitsinfluenceoverthemassoftheworkforce.Notentirely,though:theTrotskyststriedtotakeadvantageofthestriketolaunchasmallunion(calledSyndicatDmocratiqueRenault),whichstruggledalongforacoupleofyearsbeforedyingaway.Ifveryfewworkershadconfidenceinit,itsnotbecauseStalinistslanderwouldhaveretrievedtheefficiencyithadlostintheSpring1947.Thereasonismoredowntoearth:theCGTwasbetterintunewiththeneedsoftheproletarians,pressedsomeoftheirdemandsandstructuredtheirstruggles.TheCGTdefendedandrepresentedthembetterthanaunionwhichwasasmallminorityinRenaultandhadhardlyanysupportintherestofthecountry.Frompropagandisttoeducationist
Opinionisasetof(individualorgroup)ideasabouttheworld.Representativedemocracywisheseachofustoformhisideasonhisown,andonlyafterwardstocomparethemtootherpersonsideas.Directdemocracyprefersacollectivemakingofideas.Butboththinktheonlywaytofreethoughtistobecorrectlyeducatedorevenbetter,selftaught,thisselfbeinghereagainpreferablycollective.
Becauseoftheriseandfalloftotalitarianisminthe20thcentury,thewordandtherealityofpropagandaarenowcommonlylookeddownupon.In1939,S.ChakotinpublishedTheRapeofthemasses(translatedintoEnglishin1940;neweditionbyHaskellHouse,1982):adiscipleofPavlov,hearguedthattotalitarian(especiallyNazi)methodsofmindcontrolwerebasedontheuseofemotionalurgestocreateconditionedreflexes.Chakotinwastheorizinghisownpractice:hedbeeninchargeofantifascistpropagandafortheGermanSPDintheearly1930s.Hesaidheappealedtoreason,nottothesensesastheNazisdid,butthatdidnotpreventhimfromdevisingcrowdconditioningtechniquesformassmeetings.ChakotinsfailuretobeattheNazisattheirowngameisasignthatHitlerssuccesswasonlymarginallycausedbycrowdmanipulationtechniques.GermanyturnedtoHitlerwhentheWeimarrepublicproved
-
23|G i l l e s D a u v
incapableofofferinganyother(radical,reformistorconservative)solutiontoitscrisis.
EdBernays,perhapsthefirstprofessionaladvertiseronpublicrelations,hadalreadydescribedinPropaganda(1928)howaninvisiblegovernmentruleddemocraticsociety.HeclaimedtobeabletoactonthecollectivesubconsciouswithacombinationofFreudismandcrowdpsychology,andinventedadvertisingtechniquesthathesoldtobigbusinessaswellaspoliticians.In1954,hewasinstrumentalindestabilizingthe(democratic)governmentofGuatemalathattheUSfinallytoppled.Inthosedays,itwasstillanoveltytosellacandidatetotheWhiteHouselikeasoftdrink,andbysimilarmethods.UnpalatableBernayswasaheadofhistime,andheraldedours,whennopartydaresengageintopropaganda:itcommunicates.Commercialsdontsellgoods,theyselllifestyles.Partiesdontpromoteprograms,theypromotemeaningandimagery.
Unlikethesimplisticagitpropofyesteryear,todaysmostadvancedpoliticaladvertisingdoesnotpretendtochangeourviews:itpresentsitselfasahelpinghandthatwillallowustomakeupourownopinions.Advertisingnowcallsitselfinformation,needlesstosayinteractiveinformation.Everythingissupposedtobebottomup.Modernmanagementhasbecometheidealmodelofallrelations.Theprogressivebossgivesthestaffalargemarginofselforganizingintheirworkaslongastheyreachtheobjectivesetbythecompany.Theteacheraimsatbringingouthisstudentsautonomy.Thepsychologist(counsel,sorry...)repeatstohispatient:BeYourself!Thecontradictionremainsthesameineveryfieldofactivityandendsupinmorecontroloverstaff(particularlythankstocomputerization),morebureaucraticguidelinesinschools,andmorecounseling.
Howcoulditbeotherwise?Thecritiqueofeducationfirst(orselfeducationfirst)wasexpressedasearlyas1845:
Thematerialistdoctrineconcerningthechangingofcircumstancesandupbringingforgetsthatcircumstancesarechangedbymenandthatitisessentialtoeducatetheeducatorhimself.Thisdoctrinemust,therefore,dividesocietybetweentwoparts,oneofwhichissuperiortosociety.(Marx,ThesesonFeuerbach,III)
Nobodybelievesmuchofwhatcommercialorpoliticaladvertisingsays,yetitworks.NodriverwatchingaPeugeottvcommercialregardsthenewSW407asthebestestatecarevermade,andnovoterexpectsthepresidentialcandidatetokeepallhispromises,butpeoplebuycars,takepartinelections,andthatswhatmatters.Thecontentofthemessageisfarlessimportantthanpopularparticipationinandacceptanceofthewholesystem.
24| A C o n t r i b u t i o n t o t h e C r i t i q u e o f P o l i t i c a l A u t o n o m y
Themoreinformationanddiscussionthereis,thebetter
Democrats,moderateorradical,allthinkthattheinadequaciesofdemocracycomefromthefactthatthereisneverenoughofit:notenoughgoodschooling,notenoughqualitypapers,notenoughserioustalksontvandourinformationresourcesareneverwideandvariedenough.
Democracyisindeedbasedon(individualand/orcollective)freewill,butthisfreedommustbeproperlyfuelledbythelargestpossibleinformationanddiscussion.
Thisvisionistobeexpectedfrompartyprofessionalorganizers,teachers,mediapeople,publishersandallthosewhomakealiving(andasense)outofcommunication.Butitissurprisingthatsomanyrevolutionariesalsoshouldregardgettingandexchangingideasastheprimemoverofhistory.
InOrwells1984,Winstoniswatchedbyatelescreenforciblyinstalledinhislivingroomandwhichheisforbiddentoswitchoff.Intheearly21stcentury,televisionisnolongerthemainpopularscreenitwasin1960or1990.OntheInternet,athomeoronportablecellphones,peoplehavedirectaccesstoforumswherethousandsoftalkstakeplacebetweenagovernmentminister,anecologist,abusinesswoman,agayactivist,anunemployed,anantiglobalizer,orsometimesananarchist.Attheclickofamouse,IcangetloadsofdataanddifferingviewsonwhatsgoingontodayinPekingorLaPaz.Afewmoreclicks,andIchallengethesedataandviewsinthecompanyofanInternautfromSydneyorMontreal,andhavemyownviewsontheseeventscirculatedworldwideinamatterofminutes.Thisinstantanduniversalavailabilityalsoappliestothepast.UnlessIhaveaspecialfondnessforthecanalsinAmsterdam,InolongervisittheInternationalInstituteofSocialHistorytoknowabouttheRuhrRedArmyin1920.Noteverythingisavailableonline,buttheresmoreontheInternetnowthanonanysinglepubliclibraryorofcoursenewspaperkiosk.Mostofall,itsnotjusttheretoberead,butexchangedanddebated.
Sinceeverythingismademeasurablethesedays,itslikelysomeonewillinventasystemthatmonitorsandquantifiesallverbalexchange(includingconversationsontheweb,onphones,etc.)takingplaceatoneparticularmomentonthisplanet.Eventakingintoaccountthegrowthinpopulation,thefigureislikelytobehigherthanin1970.
Modernmanisaparadox.Hekeepsrepeatingheisincreasinglybeingdispossessed(andheputstheblameonentitieshecallstheeconomy,financeorglobalization)andyet,whenhisworkdayisover,hefeelsheisrepossessinghisexistencebyreadingaboutdispossessioninthepaper,or(betterandmoreinteractive)bychattingaboutitincyberspace.
-
25|G i l l e s D a u v
Thelesspowerwehaveoverourlives,themorewetalkaboutit.Thecontemporarycitizenisdissatisfiedwithheavyandremotetraditionaldemocraticmechanisms.Atthesametime,heisgivenacontinuousinstantdemocracymadeofopinionpolls,webtalk,participatoryradioandtv,andtelerealityshows.Hesnotjustaskedhispoliticalpreferenceseveryfourorfiveyears:everydayisnowelectionday.MixingLatinandGreek,wecouldsaywenowliveinahomecentreddomocracywhichgivesusthelibertytochangethingsfromourownhome:Ihelpsolveenvironmentalworldproblemsbybuyingenergysavinglightbulbsformylivingroom.
PeopleusedtomakefunofSpeakersCorneratHydeParkasasymbolofsociallyharmlessfreespeech.Todaysgeneralizedselfmanagedspeechisuniversallyandimmediatelycirculated.Intheworkplace,intheclassroom,inacouple,inafamily,betweenprofessions,betweenperformersandspectators,betweencultures,religions,media,amongneighbours,everywhere,everythingoughttobediscussedandallinformationtobeshared,sothatpowershouldconstantlyflowandnevercrystallize,sonoonecouldmonopolizeit.The1999KosovowarwasthefirstwithmassInternautinvolvement.Everyoneofusbecomesaselfappointedreporter:Donthatethemedia:Bethemedia!
Toimposeuswhattothink,democracytellsuswhatwehavetothinkabout.WhenHabermasextolledthevirtuesofthepublicspherein1962,healsobemoaneditsunderminingbycommercialmassmedia.Hecouldbemoreoptimistictoday,whenuniversaldebateseemstorevivetheopennesshefavours:acitizenisnowapersonwithaccesstothepress,tothemediaandtotheInternet.Yetthisnewcitizenshipamountstothelibertytovoiceourviewsonworldaffairs,i.e.onwhatiscurrentlybeingsaidonworldaffairsbythepress,themediaandontheInternet.ThepublicspherepassesoffasarealitythatcanputacheckonStatepower,butwhendiditreallydeterminethecourseofevents,orwasabletostopthedescentintocatastropheslike1914,Hitler,thesecondworldwar,orcolonialandpostcolonialmassacres?Givingonesopinionisasrelevantasopinionsaredecisive,andtheyrenotdecisive,notmuch.TheliberalconservativeTocquevillewasmoretothepoint:
(...)itisanaxiomofpoliticalscienceintheUnitedStatesthattheonlywaytoneutralizetheimpactofnewspapersistomultiplythem(DemocracyinAmerica,1835)
Mostofall,democracytriumphsbytellinguswheretothink.The1900paperreadercouldchoosetobuyasocialistorarightwingdaily,buthehadhardlyanyinfluenceonthestructureandevolutionofthepress.TheorganizationoftheInternetisequallybeyondthereachofawebsitebrowserorwriter:forastart,hewasneveraskedaboutthebirthofthewebitself.Saying
26| A C o n t r i b u t i o n t o t h e C r i t i q u e o f P o l i t i c a l A u t o n o m y
theInternetwascreatedby(andwouldnotexistwithout)millionsofInternauts,isastrueassayingthatmillionsofdriversareresponsibleforthedevelopmentofthecarindustry.Makingaprincipleofmaximuminformationanddiscussion,isinevitablyprioritizingtheframeworkwhereinformationcirculatesanddiscussiontakesplace.Ofcourse,everyonewishesthechannelsofcommunicationtobeasmuchbottomupaspossible,buthowcouldtheybeifthewholelifeofthecommunicatorsistopdownorganized?Societyisnottheadditionofmillionsofpubliclysharedexperiencesorviews.
Theideaoftherulingclassareineveryepochtherulingideas:thisisasmuchtrueasin1845.Thedifferenceisthatbillionsofideasarenowbeingcirculatedand(nearly)universallyavailable.Butwhohasthepower?Thepoliticalsystemisstilltunedtogeneralandpresidentialelections,andtherestisanaccessorytotherhyme.In1900or1950,politicswastalkedaboutbutnotmadeinvillagehalldebates.NeitherisitmadetodayontheInternet.Spectacleinducedpassivity(asanalysedbytheS.I.)hastakentheformofaconstantshowofactivity.Howabouttakingdirectdemocracyatitsword?Accordingtoitssupporters,hereiswhatdirectdemocracyisaimingat:[1]Therespectofamajority.[2]Theexpressionofminorities,whicharegrantedalargelatitudeofaction.[3]Thepossibilityoffreespeech,inordertoavoidpressureandviolence:Letstalkfirst.[4]Theprimacyofacollectivewill,notthewillofanindividualorofahandfulofpersons.[5]Therespectofdecisionstakenincommon.Letstakethemonebyone.[1]Majorityrule.Alotofsocialmovementshavebeenlaunchedbyaminority,oftenaverysmallone.Inthe1930s,atthetimeoflargestrikesbyunskilledlabourintheUS,twositdownsinvolvingabout10,000peoplewerestartedinAkronbyhalfadozenworkers.In1936,atGoodyear,whiletheunionwasnegotiatingwiththebossaboutwages,98unskilledworkerslaiddowntools,followedby7,000others,whichforcedthemanagementtoyieldafter36hours.Onemightobjectthatinallsuchcases,aminorityonlyinitiatesactionssoon
-
27|G i l l e s D a u v
takenupbyamajority.True,butthisveryfactshowshowlittlerelevantthemajoritycriterionis.
Theparticipantsinapicketlineputtheirinterests(andtheinterestoflabouraswhole)abovetheinterestsofthenonstrikers:theydonotrespecttherighttoworkofthosewhowanttowork.Democratsmightarguethatthestrikeissupportedbyagreatmajorityoftheworkforce:thatwouldbeforgettingthatdemocracyisalsotheprotectorofminorities.Bytheway,whatisamajority?51percent?60percent?95percent?Wearefacedwiththeinadequacyoftheselfprinciple.LettheworkersthemselvesdecideWholldecidewhenaminorityceasestobeaminorityandstartsbecomingamajority,andwhenamajoritygetsbigenoughtobeconsideredasthecommonwill?[2]Minorityrights.Anydeepmovement,whetherforsimpledemandsormore,willpullalonginitswakeanumberofyetundecidedpersonsandaskthemtodowhattheydidnotpreviouslyfeellikedoing.Whenpiqueterosgoroundtheneighbourhoodandaskfor50peopletocomeandreinforcetheirroadblock,thepicketmembersarenotactingasabosssummoninghispersonnel,oranarmyofficercallinghissoldierstoorder:theyexpectotherproletarianstofulfilltheirobligationtothepiqueterosaswellastothemselves.
Therearedifferencesbetweenthebulkoftherankandfileanditsmostactiveelements:fortheseelementstoturnintoanewrulingeliteintheplantandpossiblyinsociety,ittakesmorethantheminitiatingunrestontheshopfloor.Bureaucratizationisnearlyalwaystheresultofreformism,nottheotherwayround,anditcanriseoutofactivistminoritiesaswellasofconsentingmajorities.Theexistenceofamajorityandaminorityisnotavalidenoughindicatorhelpingustoassessasituationandtodealwithit.Themajority/minoritydualityfunctionsincombinationaswellasinopposition.Nobodyeverthinksaboutthisinavacuum.Ifyouagreewithadecision,younaturallytendtobelieveitcomesoutofasufficientnumberofpeople.Thosewhodisagreeareinclinedtobelievetheopposite:tothem,thismajorityisnotenoughofamajority,theydlikeanother,amorenumerousone[3]Freespeech.Itspointlesstowonderifspeechtakesplacebefore,afterorduringtheactofrebellion.In1936,intheGeneralMotorsplantatToledo,alltheworkforcegatheredforageneralmeetingbut,asaparticipantsaid,itwaslikeeveryonehadmadeuphismindbeforeasinglewordwasuttered,andasitdownstrikestarted.Thoseworkerswerenotbrainlessrobots.Exchangingwordsthenwasunnecessarybecauseithadtakenplacebefore,inhundredsofinformal
28| A C o n t r i b u t i o n t o t h e C r i t i q u e o f P o l i t i c a l A u t o n o m y
discussionsandsmallmeetings.Theactionthatwasbornoutofthemspokeforitself.
Ifweequatedemocracywithexchange,theseencounterscanbecalleddemocratic,butitwasnotthedemocraticprinciplethatmadeitpossible.
Ontheotherhand,inmanyconflicts,urgingtheparticipantstogettogetherandspeakcanresultinthemovementbecomingmoreawareofitselfandstronger,orlosingitsmomentumwhenitwasjuststartingtogatherspeed.Anexpressionwhichceasestobeactionandexperiencedissolvesintofreewheelingtalk.Inthesameway,lookingformoreinformationcanbeanexcellentwayofforgettingtheessentialinformation:thecommondeterminationtofighton.
UnlikeGodsWordthatwasturnedintoflesh,humanwordsexpressideas,partakeofevents,strengthen(orsometimesweaken)ourbehaviour,buttheydonotcreate.
Astrikeorariotisforcedtotakeactionandtochoosebetweenoptions.Butitdoesnotrelatetothemlikeaphilosopherorscientisttestingasetofhypothesesandthen,bymerereasoningandwithnooutsideinterference,optingforthebest.Inasocialmovement,speechhelpssortoutwhathasbeenmaturingintheparticipantsmind,inrelationtotheirpastandpresent.
Socialcritiqueusuallyrejectsthesecretballotpaperinfavourofopenpublicvotingthatdoesnotcutupthecontinuityofthevotersaction.Theelectionmomentseparateseachvoterfromtheothersandfromtherestofhislife(thepollingboothiscalledanisolatorinFrench).OneofThatchersmainantistrikemeasureswastomakeitillegaltogoonstrikewithoutasecretballotprocedure.Nevertheless,historyprovidesuswithamanyexamplesofpeopleandworkersbeingmanipulatedbyapublicshowofhands,agameinwhichStalinistshadbecomeexperts.
Thepointwearemakingisthathistoricalevolutionisnottheresultofamajorityrulebasedonaconfrontationofopinionsandonthemaximumavailabilityandsharingofinformation.Thisisnotsayingthatinformationanddiscussionarepointless.Noactissufficientinitself,norisitsmeaningsoobviousthatitwouldrequirenoexpressionatall.IntheGeneralMotors,1936,examplementionedabove,verbalexchangedidoccur,butbeforethedecisiontostrike,anditcontributedtothedecision.Insuchacase,respectingdemocracywouldhavemeantforcingadiscussionupontheworkforce:thismayhaverevealedthedeterminationoftheworkers,oritmayhavedeflectedit.Debateisnevergoodorbadinitself.
-
29|G i l l e s D a u v
[4]Commonwill.Democracyalwayspresentsitselfasaprotection,asthemeanstosecurenonviolenceamongitsparticipants,becausedemocratstreateachotherasequals.
Actingonbehalfofothersdoesnotnecessarilyturnanyoneintoaleader.Mostbureaucratsdonotbuilduptheirauthoritybypositioningthemselvesabovethemass,ratherbyshelteringbehindthemass.Abureaucratpretendstohavenopersonalambitionandtoservetheinterestsoftherankandfile.Whilewerecertainlynotlookingforcharismaticfigures,theresnoneedtobeafraidofindividualinitiativeseither.
Insistingoncommunityasaprincipleleavesusstuckwiththemajorityversusminorityintractabledilemmaalreadydiscussed.Amongthosewhoshareacommonperspective,someoneoftenbecomesawareofanopportunitybeforetheothers:tryingtoconvincetheothersthatthisopportunitymustbeseizedwontbeapurelyintellectualexercise.Argumentsaregoingtobethrownaboutanditslikelytherewillbeaconflictofwillsatsomepoint.Ideaswontmeetonneutralgrounduntiloneisrecognizedasthebestbecauseofitsinnerlogicalsuperiority.Truthbelongstonoone.Itrushesandshoves.Truthisasimmodestaslight(...)Itpossessesme(Marx,1843).Consistencyreachingisnotapeacefulprocess.Anessentialideashattersmycertaintiesanddoesnotcometomewithoutsomeviolence.Ifdemocracymeanschoosingbetweenoptionswiththeonlyguidanceofindividualfreewillandnotoutsideinterference,thentruthisnotdemocratic.
Makingitaprincipleofhavinganyactiondecideduponbythewholegroup,andthenanychangeofactionalsodebatedandredecideduponbyanewgroupmeeting(orsomegeneralconsultation),meansnoaction.Thosegroupswhosaytheyoperateonsuchatotalselfmanagementbasisonlyselfmanagetheirownspeech.[5]Respectingcommondecisions.Everybodysallforrespectingcommondecisionsunlessoruntilthedecisionisdeemedwrong.
InFrance,1968,thePeugeotplantatSochaux(atthetime,oneofthebiggestconcentrationsofskilledworkersinthatcountry)wentonasitdownstrikeonMay20.WhenagreatmajorityofthelabourforcevotedtoreturntoworkonJune10,aminorityreoccupiedthepremises,andwasviolentlyexpelledbythepoliceintheearlyhoursofthe11th.Atthatmoment,thousandsonnonstrikerswerearrivingbybusforthemorningshift:insteadofresumingworkastheyhadintendedto,theyimmediatelyjoinedtheexoccupiersandfoughtthepolicewiththemforthewholeday.Twoworkersgotkilled.Rumourslatersaidthatsomeriotershadusedguns,andthatcopshadbeenkilledbutthepolice
30| A C o n t r i b u t i o n t o t h e C r i t i q u e o f P o l i t i c a l A u t o n o m y
wouldnotadmitit.Trueor(probably)false,theserumoursshowhowtoughthefightingwas.ThelocalworkingclasslivedtheeventasanoutrightconfrontationwithbossesandState.ThereturntoworkonlytookplaceonJune20,andlabourgotabetterdealthanhadbeengrantednationally.
Inotherwords,aftervotingtogoback,alargeproportionofthelabourforcenotonlydecidednottogoback,butralliedwhathadbeenuntilthenaminorityofisolatedextremists.Thefirstoccupationhadinvolvedbetween100and1,000persons,outofaworkforceofover35,000,with3,000unionmembers.True,thegeneralmeetingscouldbecallednondemocratic:theytookplaceunderthecombinedpressureoftheCGTandthemedia.Buttheveryfactofcontradictingonesvote,andwhatsmore,withouthavinghadapropermeeting,showsthat,unlikewhatthedemocraticprinciplemaintains,thedebatingandvotingspacetimeisnotdecisive.
Whathappenedwasnotsimplyareflexofinstinctiveworkersolidarity.AttheBillancourtRenaultplant,in1972,themurderofaMaoistworkerbyasecurityguardhardlycausedanyreactionamonghisworkmates,whowereindifferenttowhattheysawasuselessleftisttroublemaking.In1968,thePeugeotworkersfelttheyhadsomethingincommonwitharadicalminoritythatwasnotalientothem.Besides,afewyearsbefore,wildcatstrikeshadbrokenoutatSochaux,ofteninitiatedbyyoungworkers.Also,duringthefirst1968occupation,ahundredradicalshadsetupashortlivedforumthatservedasamediumforopendiscussionsonavarietyofcontroversialissues.TheJune11eruptiondidnotcomeoutoftheblue:ithadbeenpreparedbypastinformaldebatesandunofficialmeetings,which(betterthandemocraticprocedures)pavedthewayforanapparentlyspontaneousoutburst.Facelessresistanceisnotjustcanteenorcoffeemachineconversations:itservesasaspringboardforopenconflict.
Assessingthesefivecriterionsshowsfirstthatalotofpositiveeventshavehappenedwithoutoragainstthem,secondlythattheyhaveoftenfailedtopreventwhattheyweresupposedtoprevent.Noneofthestandardsofdirectdemocracyreallyworks.
Actually,adefenderofdirectdemocracywontaskforthemtobefullyimplemented.Hemightevenagreewithmostofthepointswevebeenmaking,buthellsaydemocraticstandardsarenottobetakenasabsolutes:itstheguidelinebehindthemthatmatters,themotive,theimpetus:ButifyebeledbytheSpirit,yearenotunderthelaw.(SaintPaul,Galatians,5:18)
Thatsthewholepoint:thistrickyinterplaybetweentheletterandthespirit,thelawandtheSpirit.TherewasnocontradictionforSaintPaul.Thereisonefordemocracy,becauseitisindeedthequestforformalcriterions:it
-
31|G i l l e s D a u v
pretendstogiveusrulesofconductthatprovidethebestpossiblefreedom.Sothissuddennonformalitygoesagainsthowdemocracydefinesitself.Democracyisnottheadhocrunningofsociallife.Itscommunismthatreliesontheabilityoffraternal(noncompetitive,nonprofitseeking,etc.)socialrelationshipstocreatetheorganizationbestfittedtothem.Democracyistheexactopposite:itsetsproceduresandinstitutionsasaprerequisiteandaconditionoftherest.Itsayssocietyisbasedonitspoliticalorganization(topdownorbottomup).Andthen,whenexperienceprovesdemocraticstandardsdontwork,democracysayswecandowithoutthemoreventhatwemustdowithoutthem.Democracyistheretosolveconflicts,yetwhentheyretooserious,itcantsolvethemanymore.Whatstheuseofaprinciplethatcanonlybeappliedwhensocialliferunssmoothlyandwedontneedtheprinciple?Democracyfunctionsasfarassocietycanremaindemocratic.
Thisletterversusspiritisacontradictionfordemocracy,butdemocraticrulersleftorrightcanmanageit.Theyknowperfectlywellthatdemocracyhastobeandwillbesuspendedintimesofcrisis.Suspendedpartly,whenBritainfoughttheIRA.Ortotally,whentheAlgerianarmycancelledthe1991electionsafterthefirstroundhadbeenwonbytheIslamists,andtookoverpower,withfullsupportfromWesterncountries.Thebourgeoishavenoqualmsprovisionallyturningintodictatorsinthelongterminterestofdemocracy:nodemocracyfortheantidemocrats.Beingalesserevil,democracysometimesceasestobedemocratictoavoidaworseevil.
Forradicalswhobelieveindirectdemocracy,however,thiscontradictionisatrap:theywontgetafullandpermanentrealityoutofasystemthatcantprovideit.
Prioritizingdirectdemocracydoesnotproducedirectdemocracy.Whateverpositivecontentdemocracy(ifwewishtokeeptheword)mayhave,cantbetheresultofdemocracy.Contradictionincommunisttheory
EvenacursoryreadingofMarxisenoughtorealizehewasatthesame
timeastaunchsupporterandanenemyofdemocracy.AshistextscanbefoundinpaperbackorontheInternet,afewveryshortquoteswillsufficehere.
Marxarguesthatdemocracyistheculminationofpolitics,andthatapoliticalemancipationispartial,selfish,bourgeoisemancipation,theemancipationofthebourgeois.If,ashewrites,thedemocraticState[is]therealState,assumingwewantaworldwithoutaState,wevegottoinventalifewithneitherStatenordemocracy.However,whenMarxpresentsdemocracyas
32| A C o n t r i b u t i o n t o t h e C r i t i q u e o f P o l i t i c a l A u t o n o m y
theresolvedmysteryofallconstitutions,wherebyTheconstitutionappearsaswhatitis,thefreeproductofmen(CritiqueofHegelsphilosophyofRight,1843),heisopposingrealdemocracytotheexistenceoftheState,andthereforesupportingdemocracy.
Besides,Marxwasonlyindirectlyaddressingdemocracythroughacritiqueofbureaucracy,andtargetingpoliticsthroughthecritiqueoftheState,particularlythroughitstheorizationbyHegel:AllformsofStatehavedemocracyfortheirtruth,andforthatreasonarefalsetotheextentthattheyarenotdemocratic.(Id.)
Onelastquote,interestingbecauseitswrittendecadesaftertheearlyworks,andbysomeonewhowascomingclosetoadmittingthepossibilityofapeacefultransitiontosocialism:Onemustneverforgetthatthelogicalformofbourgeoisdominationispreciselythedemocraticrepublic(...)Thedemocraticrepublicalwaysremainsthelastformofbourgeoisdomination,theforminwhichitwilldie.(Engels,lettertoBernstein,March14,1884)
Intuitionsleavemuchroomforinterpretation,andthecontextoftenblursthemessage.Tounderstandtheseconflictingviews,wemustbearinmindthat,inthemid19thcentury,agroundswellofsocialmovements,fromIrelandtoSilesia,waspressingforradicaldemocraticdemandsandsocialdemands,bothatthesametime,combinedandopposed,andthisconfrontationresultedinacritiqueofpoliticsasaseparatesphere.Letsnotidealizeourpast.Thesamethinkersandgroupsoftenmixedthesedemandsandthatcritique.ThepurposeofTheGermanIdeologywastoprovethathistorycannotbeexplainedbytheconflictsofideasorpoliticalplatforms,butbythesocialrelationsbywhichhumanbeingsorganizetheirlivesand,aboveall,bythematerialconditionsoftheirlives.ThosepagesaretobereadinconnectionwithTheJewishQuestion,CritiqueofHegelsPhilosophyofRight,ContributiontothecritiqueofHegelsPhilosophyofLaw,TheKingofPrussia&SocialReform,theThesesonFeuerbachandothersimilartextswhichaddressthedemocraticbourgeoisrevolution,butalsotheRightsofMan,andrejectarevolutionthatwouldonlyhaveapoliticalsoul.Forexample,Marxsees1789andespeciallythe179394TerrorinFranceastheculminationofpoliticalwillthatdeludesitselfintobelievingitcanchangetheworldfromthetop.ThereslittledoubtthatMarxwishedtoapplyhismaterialistmethodnotonlytohistory,religion,philosophyandtheeconomy,butalsotothequestionofpowerandtopoliticsasafieldofspecialknowledge,asseparatescienceandtechnique.Yetatthetimehewasdescribingthepoliticalsphereasanotherformofalienation,hewasalsopressingonwiththecompletionofthebourgeoisdemocraticrevolution,andafewyearslaterhe
-
33|G i l l e s D a u v
becametheeditorofaliberalprogressivepaper,theNeueReinischeZeitung,subtitledOrganOfDemocracy.
Thedeeperthecommunistmovementgoes,thehigheritscontradictionsare.Marxhappenstobeamongthefewthinkerswhocomeclosesttoasynthesisandthereforeinevitablycombineitsmostopposingelements,thedimensionsourmovementisatmostpaintoreconcile.ItsnoaccidentthatKarlMarxshouldhavegivenoneofthebestapproachesofcommunism(inparticular,butnotonly,inhisearlyworks)andwelcomedtheadventofcapitalismasaworldsystem.andcontradictioninproletarianpractice
IfMarxwasperhapsthewriterwhowentthefurthestinextollingandrejectingdemocracy,itsbecausehewasaconcentratedexpressionoftheforcedsituationinwhichtheproletariatusedtoliveandstilllives.Intellectualdiscrepanciesmirrorapracticaldilemmawhichtheproletarianshavetosolvetoemancipatethemselves.
Likeothersinhistime,likeR.Luxemburglater,liketheGermanLeftafter191418,Marxreflectedacontradiction:theselfawarenessandthecommunityculture(SelbstverstndigungandVersammlungskultur,astheywerecalledinGermanyaround1900),intheworkplaceandintheworkersdistrict,confrontbourgeoisdemocracywithproletariancommunity.Butusingonesconditionasamajorweaponisadoubleedgedswordfortheproletarians.GuyDebordmaynotbethemostacutecritiqueofdemocracy,buthepointstosomethingessentialinTheSocietyoftheSpectacle,theses87&88.Thebourgeoisiewasabletouseitssocioeconomicpowerasthemaininstrumentofitspoliticalascent.Theproletarianscantusetheirsocialroletoemancipatethemselves,becausethisroleisgiventothembycapital.Sotheironlyradicalweaponistheirnegativepotentialcloselylinkedtothepositiveparttheyplayinthereproductionofcapital.Thebourgeoiswonbyassertingthemselvesonthebasisofwhattheyalreadysociallywere.Theproletarianscanonlywinbyfightingagainstthemselves,i.e.againstwhattheyareforcedtodoandbeasproducers(andasconsumers).Theresnowayoutofthiscontradiction.Orrather,theonlywayoutiscommunistrevolution.
Itwasenoughforthebourgeoistogettogetherandfindthemeanstorunsociety:socreatingsuitabledecisionmakinginstitutionswasenough(thoughittookcenturies).Itwasnotonlyforthesakeofcultureandknowledgethatfromthe18thcenturyonwardtheascendingelitespromotednetworksofdebatingandscientificsocieties,clubs,publiclibrariesandmuseums,andof
34| A C o n t r i b u t i o n t o t h e C r i t i q u e o f P o l i t i c a l A u t o n o m y
courseagrowingpress:therisingmerchantandindustrialclasseswerebuildingupanewtypeofsociabilitythathelpedthemchallengemonarchsandaristocrats.Theproletariansalsoneedtogettogether:butforthem,justgettingtogetherisstayingwithincapitalism.
Forwhatsitworth,democraticreunionisenoughforthebourgeoisie.Theproletariatneedssomethingelse.Proletarianselforganizationwhichfailstodevelopintoaselfcritiqueofwagelabourreinforceslabourasthepartnerofthecapitallabourcouple:theforcedcouplinggoesonandsodoesthemanagementofthecouple,hencethepeacefulcoexistenceofoppositescalleddemocracy.
Thepartial,confusedyetdeepcommunistmovementthatdevelopedinthefirsthalfofthe19thcenturyinitiatedanequallyconfusedyetpersistentcritiqueofdemocracy.Bothmovementandcritiqueweresoonpushedinthebackgroundbytheriseoforganizedlabourthattriedtomakethemostofbourgeoisdemocracy.Yeteverytimethemovementreemerged,itgotbacktobasics,andrevivedsomeaspectsofthecritiqueofdemocracy.
TheresnoneedtobeanexpertinMarxologytoknowthatmostofthesefundamentalsfellintooblivion:sometextsgothardlyanyresponse,whileotherswereputasidebyMarxandEngelsandpublishedmuchlater.Therealmovement,asMarxcalledit,seemedtohaveverylittleuseforthesewritings.Inthefirsthalfofthe20thcentury,newproletarianshockwavesledtoareborncritiquethat(re)discoveredtheselongforgottenintuitions,butfailedtobeuptothem.Indeed,BolshevikpracticeafterOctober1917couldfallwithinMarxscritiqueoftheFrenchrevolutionandofJacobinism.Asfortheworldwide196080earthquake,inspite,orratherbecauseofitsantibureaucraticstand,itturnedouttobeazenithofdemocracy(though,unlikethepost1917period,therewasnorevolutionaryattempttotakeoverpoliticalpowerinthe1960sand70s).Thetheoreticalinroadsmadeover150yearsagohaveyettobetakenup.Thedemocraticappeal
Democracyisattractivebecauseitgivesmorethantherighttoselectleadersnowandthen.Itsappealistoprovideeveryonewiththemeanstogobeyondtherestrictingcirclesoffamily,neighbourhoodandwork,andtointerrelate,tomeetothers,notjustthosewhoareclose,butallthoselivingonthesameterritory,andpossiblyovertheborderstoo.Thedemocraticdreampromisesapotentialuniversality,theearthlyrealizationofabrotherhoodandsisterhoodthatreligionoffersinitsownway.MarxwasnottheonlyonetoemphasizetheintimateconnectionbetweenChristianityandthemodernState:
-
35|G i l l e s D a u v
theformerseeseachmanasthebearerofanindividualsoulthatmakeshimequaltoothersinspirit(everyonecanbesaved);thelatterseeseachmanaspoliticallyequaltoothers(everycitizenhasarighttovoteandbeelected).
Tofullyappreciatethedemocraticappeal,weshouldbearinmindwhatexistedbefore,whenformal(i.e.political)equalitywasunheardof.Notjusttherulingelite,butmanythinkersandartistsshowedopencontemptforthemassofpeasantsandworkmenthatwerethoughtofasaninferiorspecies.MostfamousFrenchwriterstreatedtheParisCommunefightersasiftheydbeenoutsideorbelowhumanstandards.Untilthemid20thcentury,hatredoftheworkerswaswidespreadamongthemiddleandupperclasses,inGermanyforinstance.193945wasthedefinitivetamingoftherabble:withfewexceptions,thetoilingmassesoftheworldbehavedinapatrioticway,sothebourgeoisstoppedbeingscaredofapopulacethatlookedlikeitwasacceptinglawandorderatlast,andnownearlyeveryoneinaWesterntypedemocracyacceptsatleastverballythenotionthatonehumanbeingisworthanother.Yetthisequivalenceisachievedbycomparingquantifieditems.Indemocraticcapitalism,eachhumanpersonismyfellowbeinginasmuchashisvoteandmineareaddedandthencomputed.Moderncitizenshipisthebourgeoisformoffreedom.Asystemwhichisnotitsowncausenoritsowncure
Democracyisnotresponsibleforwhatisorwhatmightberegardedasitspositiveaspects.Universalfranchisenevercreateditself.Civilrightsrarelycameoutofelectionsorpeacefuldebates,butoutofstrikes,demonstrations,riots,usuallyviolent,oftenwithbloodshed.Later,onceinstalled,democracyforgetsaboutitsoriginandsaysthesourceofpowerisnotbefoundinthestreetwhereindeeditcamefrom.Politicsclaimstobethebasisofsociallife,butitresultsfromcausesthatitmerelystructures.TheadventoftheSpanishrepublicin1931wascausedbydecadesofstrife,riotingandclasswarthatthenewregimeprovedincapabletocontrol,andittookacivilwarandadictatorshiptorestoreorder.AfterFrancosdeath,thecoolingdownofsocialconflictsmadepossiblethetransitiontoaparliamentarysystemthat(unlikeinthe1930s)couldworkasapacifierandconciliator.
Democratscontendthat,contrarytodictatorship,democracyhasthemeritofbeingabletocorrectitself.Thisistruesolongasthemerebalanceofpowerisupset.Ifthestructureofpoliticalruleisinjeopardy,itsacompletelydifferentmatter.Asdemocracyhasnotgotitscauseinitself,neitherhasitgottheremedy:thesolutionhastocomefromoutsideelectoralproceduresandparliamentaryinstitutions.ThesubtletiesofCapitolHillpoliticalbargainingwere
36| A C o n t r i b u t i o n t o t h e C r i t i q u e o f P o l i t i c a l A u t o n o m y
unabletosolvethecrisisbetweenNorthandSouthinthe1860s:ittooknolessthanabloodycivilwar,aforerunnerof20thcenturyindustrializedslaughter.ItwasnotforumsorballotpapersthattoppledMussoliniin1943,butasuccessionofuncontrollablestrikes.ItwasnotareturntotheWeimarrepublicthatputanendtoNazism,butaworldwar.ItwasonlywhentheFrencharmyillegallytookovercivilianpowerinAlgiers,May1958,thatinParispoliticianswereforcedtoinstituteamorestablepoliticalsystem,andstartedrealizingthecolonialerawasover.
Democracyisaremarkableviolencefilter.Butbecauseitisbornoutofviolence,itonlyovercomesitstragediesbygivingwaytomoreviolence.Biologistssaythatoneofthedefinitionsofalifeformisitsabilityatreproduction,organizationandreorganization.Howpolitically,socially(andintellectually)validisaphenomenonthatsunabletoexplainitselfandtocureitself?Howconsistentisit?Whatsortofrealityaredemocracysupporterstalkingabout?Andyetitholdsout
Afternearlytwocenturiesofelectoralandparliamentaryexperiences,includingendeavourstomakesomerevolutionaryuseoftheuniversalfranchisebyradicalsfromProudhontoLenin,andinspiteofathousandbetrayalsandrenunciationsofitsownprinciples,moderndemocracystillsoldiersonandthrives.
Inalargepartoftheworld,andinwhatisknownasthedevelopedorrichcountries,democracyremainsareality,andadesirableone,becauseitfitsinwiththeinnerlogicoftheindustrial,merchantandwagelabourcivilization,thereforewithcapitalism.Notallcapitalismisdemocratic,farfromit,asisshownbyStalinsRussiaandHitlersGermany,andnowbyChina.ButtheThirdReichandtheUSSRyieldedtotheirdemocraticrivals,andplutobureaucraticChinasboomwillonlygoonifitacceptssubstantialdosesoffreedomofspeech.Capitalismiseconomiccompetitionandtherecanbenoefficientcompetitionamongcapital(aswellasanefficientlabourmarket)withoutsomecompetitioninpoliticstoo.Democracyisthemostadequatepoliticalcapitalistform.
Whetherwelikeitornot,democracyisanexcellentexpressionoflifeundercapitalism.Ithelpsmaintainingthedegreeoflibertyandequalityrequiredbycapitalistproductionandconsumptionand,uptoapoint,alsorequiredbythenecessaryforcedrelationshipbetweenlabourandcapital.Whiledemocracyisoneoftheobstaclesthatstandinthewayofcommunistrevolution,itdoesservetheinterestsoflabourinitsdailyinevitablereformistaction.
-
37|G i l l e s D a u v
Toputitbluntly,theresnopracticalcritiqueofdemocracyunlesstheresacritiqueofcapitalism.Acceptingortryingtoreformcapitalismimpliesacceptingortryingtoreformitsmostadequatepoliticalform.
Theresnopointinsortingoutbad(bourgeois)democracyandgood(direct,worker,popular)democracy.Buttheresnopointeitherindeclaringoneselfanantidemocrat.DemocracyisnottheNumberOneenemy,theultimatesmokescreenthatveilstheproletarianeyes,theunveilingofwhichwouldatlonglastclearthepathtorevolution.Therearenoantidemocraticspecificactionstobeinvented,nomorethansystematiccampaignsagainstadvertisingbillboardsortvbothcloselylinkedtodemocracy,actually.
Theparticipantsinmillionsofactsofresistanceorofattack,betheystrikes,demonstrations,flyingpickets,insurrections,arewellawarethatthesepracticeshavelittletodowithparliamentarygames,andindeedthattheyretheexactoppositeofparliamentarygames.Knowingitdoesnotstopthemfromcallingsuchpracticesdemocratic,andfromregardingthesepracticesastheonlytruedemocracy,becausetheparticipantsconsiderasidenticaldemocracyandcollectivefreedom,democracyandselforganization.Theysaytheyarepractisingtruedemocracybecausetheyselfmanagetheirstruggle,doawaywiththeseparationbetweenthoserepresentedandtheirrepresentatives,andbecausethegeneralmeeting(unlikeparliament)isanassemblyofequals:sotheyoftenbelievetheyareatlastgivingrealitytowhatis/asham/makebelief/inthebourgeoisworld.Eachofthemregardsdemocracyasthefactoftreatinghisworkmate,thepersonmarchingbesidehim,erectingabarricadewithhim,orarguingwithhiminapublicmeeting,asafellowhumanbeing.
Itwouldbepointlessforustogointoaheadonconfrontationwithhimtotryandpersuadehimtostopusingtheworddemocracy.Democracysshortcomingistotreatanindispensableelementofrevolutionarychangeastheprimaryconditionofchange,orevenasitsessence.So,infuturetroubledtimes,ourbestcontributionwillbetopushforthemostradicalpossiblechanges,whichincludethedestructionoftheStatemachinery,andthiscommunizationprocesswilleventuallyhelppeoplerealizethatdemocracyisanalienatedformoffreedom.Ifdemocracymeansgivingprioritytoformovercontent,onlyatransformationofthesocialcontentwillputbackformwhereitbelongs.
WheneveramovementkeepsmovingforwardandconfrontingbossandStatepower,itisnotdemocratic.Democracyistheseparationbetweenactionanddecision.
When,however,andthisisboundtobeoftenthecase,thecontentofthemovementiscompatiblewithindustrialdisputearbitrationandconciliation,thenitsnormalthatformandprocedureshouldcometothefore.
38| A C o n t r i b u t i o n t o t h e C r i t i q u e o f P o l i t i c a l A u t o n o m y
Intheeyesofnearlyallparticipants,organizingthegeneralmeetingaccordingtorulesbecomesmoreimportantthanwhatthemeetingdecides.Themeetingisseenasacauseofthestrike,moreexactlyasthecauseofitscontinuation:becauseitcanputanendtothestrike,itisnowperceivedofasitsdetonator.Realityisputonitshead.Democracyisthesupremacyofmeansovertheend,andthedissolutionofpotentialitiesinforms.Sowhentheseworkersideologizetheirownbehaviourasdemocratic,theyarenotwrong:theyreasonaccordingtotheactuallimitsoftheirbehaviour.
Whenthefactofaskingtherankandfileforitsopinionbreaksthedeterminationoftherankandfile,itsusuallybecausethisdeterminationhasalreadydeclined.In1994,inoneofitsFrenchplants,theenergyandtransportmultinationalAlstomterminatedastrikebycallingforareferendum:thepersonnelvotedtoreturntowork.Theunionsretaliatedbyhavingasecondreferendum:itconfirmedthefirst.Company(orplant)democracywasnotkillingtheconflict,itwasfinishingitoff.Infact,afteraninitialmilitantphase,thestrikehadlostitsvigour.Bysubmittingtoanindividualsecretballot,theworkersconfirmedtheyhadceasedtothinkofthemselvesasanactingcollective.Acommunitythatagreestogiveonlyindividualopinionsnolongerexistsasacommunity.Communismasactivity
Equalityisavitaltenetofdemocracy.Itsstartingpointistheexistenceofindividuals:itcomparesthemfromacriterion,andwondersifeachofthemiseitherinferiororsuperiortotheotheraccordingtothechosencriterion.OldtimedemocracycontenteditselfwithOneman,onevote.Moderndemocratswillaskforequalpay,equalrightsincourt,equalschooling,equalaccesstohealthservice,equaljoboffers,equalopportunitytocreateonesbusiness,equalsocialpromotion,somewouldsayanequalshareofexistingwealth.Assoonaswegetintorealsocialanddailylife,thelistbecomesendlessand,tobecomprehensive,ithastobenegativeatsomepoint:equalityimpliestherightnottobediscriminatedagainstonaccountofonessex,colour,sexualpreferences,nationality,religion,etc.Thewholepoliticalspectrumcouldbedefinedbyhowmuchisincludedinthelist.Rightwingliberalsmightlimitequalityrightstoelectoralrights,whilefarleftreformistsextendequalitytoaguaranteedsubstantialincome,ahome,jobprotection,etc.,inanendlessdebatebetweenpersonalfreedomandsocialfairness.Therejectionof,andthesearchforsocial(andnotjustpolitical)equalityaretwosidesofthesamecoin.Theobsessionwithequalityisbornoutofaworldladenwithinequality,aworld
-
39|G i l l e s D a u v
thatdreamsofreducinginequalitybygivingmoretoeachindividual,morerightsandmoremoney.
Equalityprotectsindividuals.Wedratherstartbyconsideringwhatthemembersofsocietyaredoingtogether,andwhattheyhaveanddonthaveincommon.Humanbeingslosetheirmasteryovertherunningoftheirpersonalandgrouplifewhentheylosethemasteryovertheirconditionsofexistence,andfirstofallovertheproductionofthematerialbasisoftheseconditions.Ourproblemisnottofindhowtomakecommondecisionsaboutwhatwedo,buttodowhatcanbedecideduponincommon,andtostoporavoiddoingwhatevercannotbedecideduponincommon.AfactoryrunaccordingtoTaylorsmethods,anuclearpowerstation,amultinationalortheBBCwillnevercomeunderthemanagementofitspersonnel.Onlyabankthatconfinesitselftomicrocreditcanremainundersomedegreeofcontrolbythepeopleworkingthereandbythosewhoreceiveitsmicroloans.Whenacoopoperatesonascalethatenablesittorivallargecompanies,itsspecialdemocraticfeaturesbegintofade.Aschoolcanbeselfmanaged(bystaffandschoolkids)aslongasitrefrainsfromselecting,gradingandstreaming.Thatisfine,anditsprobablybettertobeateenagerinSummerhillthanatEton,butthatwontchangetheschoolsystem.
Whoeverdoesnotsituatetheproblemofpowerwhereitbelongs,isboundtoleaveitinthehandsofthosewhopossesspower,ortotryandshareitwiththem(associaldemocracydoes),ortotakepowerfromthem(asLeninandhispartydid).
Theessenceofpoliticalthoughtistowonderhowtoorganizepeopleslives,insteadofconsideringfirstwhatthosetobeorganizedpeopledo.
Communismisnotaquestionoffindingthegovernmentorselfgovernmentbestsuitedtosocialreorganization.Itisnotamatterofinstitutions,butofactivity.Selfisnotenough
Itseemsonlydiehardpartybuilderscouldobjecttoautonomy:whowantstobeadependant?Yetwemaywonderwhyautonomyhasbecomeabuzzwordlately.Trotskystsarenotauthoritariananymore.Anyleftwingernowisallforautonomy,likenearlyeverypoliticianlookingforworkingclassvotetalkedofsocialismin1910.Thepopularityofthisnotionmaybeasignofgrowingradicalism.Itcertainlyalsohasalottodowithcontemporarydailylifeandthespacesoffreedomitgrantsus:moreopencommunicationchannels,newtypesofleisure,newwaysofmeeting,makingfriendsandtravelling,the
40| A C o n t r i b u t i o n t o t h e C r i t i q u e o f P o l i t i c a l A u t o n o m y
networksociety,theInternet,etc.Alltheseactivitieshaveonethingincommon:everyoneisatthesametimeconstantlyonhisownandconstantlyrelatingtoeveryoneandeverything.
Norevolutionwithoutautonomy:quite!Autonomyisnecessary.Butitsnotenough.Itisnottheprincipleonwhicheverythingcanormustbebased.Autonomymeansgivingoneselfonesownlaw(nomos).Itsbasedontheself(auto).
Isthiswhathappensinreallife?Everybodywishescollectivedecisions.Sodowe.Andthebestwaytoget
itisforeachofustotakepartinthedecisionmaking.ButonceyouandIarepartofit,westillhavetomakethedecision.Isthisselfstrongenough?Autonomistshavetheiranswerready;theindividualselfmaybeweak,butthecollectiveselfisstrong.Whosbeingnavehere?Addingindividualwillsonlytransformsthemintosomethingqualitativelydifferentifandwhentheyactdifferently.Sowerebacktowherewestarted.Aggregatingselveswidensthescopeoftheproblemwithoutsolvingit.Thesolutioncanonlycome,notfromwhatautonomyissupposedtogiveus,butfromwhatitisfoundedupon.Autonomyinitselfisnomorecreativethananyformoforganization.
Manyradicalsbelieveintheequation...autonomy+antiStateviolence=revolutionarymovement...andseeitvindicatedforinstanceintheOaxacaprotracted
insurrection.Whilethiseventisoneofthestrongestoutburstsofproletarianactivityintherecentyears,itdemonstratesthatautonomousviolenceisnecessaryandinsufficient.Arevolutionarymovementismorethanaliberatedareaorahundredliberatedareas.Itdevelopsbyfightingpublicandprivaterepression,aswellasbystartingtochangethematerialbasisofsocialrelationship.Noselfmanagedstreetfightingandgrassrootsdistrictsolidarity,howeverindispensabletheyare,inevitablycontaintheactsandtheintentionsthatbringaboutsuchachange.Soitsthenatureofthechangewevegottoinsistupon:creatingaworldwithoutmoney,withoutcommodityexchange,withoutlabourbeingboughtandsold,withoutfirmsascompetingpolesofvalueaccumulation,withoutworkasseparatefromtherestofouractivities,withoutaState,withoutaspecializedpoliticalspheresupposedlycutofffromoursocialrelationshipsInotherwords,arevolutionthatisbornoutofacommonrefusaltosubmit,outofthehopetogettoapointofnoreturnwherepeopletransformthemselvesandgainasenseoftheirownpowerastheytransformreality.
-
41|G i l l e s D a u v
42| A C o n t r i b u t i o n t o t h e C r i t i q u e o f P o l i t i c a l A u t o n o m y
-
43|G i l l e s D a u v
44| A C o n t r i b u t i o n t o t h e C r i t i q u e o f P o l i t i c a l A u t o n o m y
top related