div class=ts-pagebuttonPage 1button div class=ts-image amp-img class=ts-thumb alt=Page 1: · 42 Whether such negligence caused electrocution of the plaintiff on 03 February 2011 43 Whether the plaintiff was himself negligent 5 The quantum of damages was separated src=https:reader030vdocumentsmxreader030viewer20220410135ec36e78ef0f6d18ff39470dhtml5thumbnails1jpg width=142 height=106 layout=responsive amp-img divdivdiv class=ts-pagebuttonPage 2button div class=ts-image amp-img class=ts-thumb alt=Page 2: · 42 Whether such negligence caused electrocution of the plaintiff on 03 February 2011 43 Whether the plaintiff was himself negligent 5 The quantum of damages was separated src=https:reader030vdocumentsmxreader030viewer20220410135ec36e78ef0f6d18ff39470dhtml5thumbnails2jpg width=142 height=106 layout=responsive amp-img divdivdiv class=ts-pagebuttonPage 3button div class=ts-image amp-img class=ts-thumb alt=Page 3: · 42 Whether such negligence caused electrocution of the plaintiff on 03 February 2011 43 Whether the plaintiff was himself negligent 5 The quantum of damages was separated src=https:reader030vdocumentsmxreader030viewer20220410135ec36e78ef0f6d18ff39470dhtml5thumbnails3jpg width=142 height=106 layout=responsive amp-img divdivdiv class=ts-pagebuttonPage 4button div class=ts-image amp-img class=ts-thumb alt=Page 4: · 42 Whether such negligence caused electrocution of the plaintiff on 03 February 2011 43 Whether the plaintiff was himself negligent 5 The quantum of damages was separated src=https:reader030vdocumentsmxreader030viewer20220410135ec36e78ef0f6d18ff39470dhtml5thumbnails4jpg width=142 height=106 layout=responsive amp-img divdivdiv class=ts-pagebuttonPage 5button div class=ts-image amp-img class=ts-thumb alt=Page 5: · 42 Whether such negligence caused electrocution of the plaintiff on 03 February 2011 43 Whether the plaintiff was himself negligent 5 The quantum of damages was separated src=https:reader030vdocumentsmxreader030viewer20220410135ec36e78ef0f6d18ff39470dhtml5thumbnails5jpg width=142 height=106 layout=responsive amp-img divdivdiv class=ts-pagebuttonPage 6button div class=ts-image amp-img class=ts-thumb alt=Page 6: · 42 Whether such negligence caused electrocution of the plaintiff on 03 February 2011 43 Whether the plaintiff was himself negligent 5 The quantum of damages was separated src=https:reader030vdocumentsmxreader030viewer20220410135ec36e78ef0f6d18ff39470dhtml5thumbnails6jpg width=142 height=106 layout=responsive amp-img divdivdiv class=ts-pagebuttonPage 7button div class=ts-image amp-img class=ts-thumb alt=Page 7: · 42 Whether such negligence caused electrocution of the plaintiff on 03 February 2011 43 Whether the plaintiff was himself negligent 5 The quantum of damages was separated src=https:reader030vdocumentsmxreader030viewer20220410135ec36e78ef0f6d18ff39470dhtml5thumbnails7jpg width=142 height=106 layout=responsive amp-img divdivdiv class=ts-pagebuttonPage 8button div class=ts-image amp-img class=ts-thumb alt=Page 8: · 42 Whether such negligence caused electrocution of the plaintiff on 03 February 2011 43 Whether the plaintiff was himself negligent 5 The quantum of damages was separated src=https:reader030vdocumentsmxreader030viewer20220410135ec36e78ef0f6d18ff39470dhtml5thumbnails8jpg width=142 height=106 layout=responsive amp-img divdivdiv class=ts-pagebuttonPage 9button div class=ts-image amp-img class=ts-thumb alt=Page 9: · 42 Whether such negligence caused electrocution of the plaintiff on 03 February 2011 43 Whether the plaintiff was himself negligent 5 The quantum of damages was separated src=https:reader030vdocumentsmxreader030viewer20220410135ec36e78ef0f6d18ff39470dhtml5thumbnails9jpg width=142 height=106 layout=responsive amp-img divdivdiv class=ts-pagebuttonPage 10button div class=ts-image amp-img class=ts-thumb alt=Page 10: · 42 Whether such negligence caused electrocution of the plaintiff on 03 February 2011 43 Whether the plaintiff was himself negligent 5 The quantum of damages was separated src=https:reader030vdocumentsmxreader030viewer20220410135ec36e78ef0f6d18ff39470dhtml5thumbnails10jpg width=142 height=106 layout=responsive amp-img divdivdiv class=ts-pagebuttonPage 11button div class=ts-image amp-img class=ts-thumb alt=Page 11: · 42 Whether such negligence caused electrocution of the plaintiff on 03 February 2011 43 Whether the plaintiff was himself negligent 5 The quantum of damages was separated src=https:reader030vdocumentsmxreader030viewer20220410135ec36e78ef0f6d18ff39470dhtml5thumbnails11jpg width=142 height=106 layout=responsive amp-img divdivdiv class=ts-pagebuttonPage 12button div class=ts-image amp-img class=ts-thumb alt=Page 12: · 42 Whether such negligence caused electrocution of the plaintiff on 03 February 2011 43 Whether the plaintiff was himself negligent 5 The quantum of damages was separated src=https:reader030vdocumentsmxreader030viewer20220410135ec36e78ef0f6d18ff39470dhtml5thumbnails12jpg width=142 height=106 layout=responsive amp-img divdivdiv class=ts-pagebuttonPage 13button div class=ts-image amp-img class=ts-thumb alt=Page 13: · 42 Whether such negligence caused electrocution of the plaintiff on 03 February 2011 43 Whether the plaintiff was himself negligent 5 The quantum of damages was separated src=https:reader030vdocumentsmxreader030viewer20220410135ec36e78ef0f6d18ff39470dhtml5thumbnails13jpg width=142 height=106 layout=responsive amp-img divdivdiv class=ts-pagebuttonPage 14button div class=ts-image amp-img class=ts-thumb alt=Page 14: · 42 Whether such negligence caused electrocution of the plaintiff on 03 February 2011 43 Whether the plaintiff was himself negligent 5 The quantum of damages was separated src=https:reader030vdocumentsmxreader030viewer20220410135ec36e78ef0f6d18ff39470dhtml5thumbnails14jpg width=142 height=106 layout=responsive amp-img divdivdiv class=ts-pagebuttonPage 15button div class=ts-image amp-img class=ts-thumb alt=Page 15: · 42 Whether such negligence caused electrocution of the plaintiff on 03 February 2011 43 Whether the plaintiff was himself negligent 5 The quantum of damages was separated src=https:reader030vdocumentsmxreader030viewer20220410135ec36e78ef0f6d18ff39470dhtml5thumbnails15jpg width=142 height=106 layout=responsive amp-img divdivdiv class=ts-pagebuttonPage 16button div class=ts-image amp-img class=ts-thumb alt=Page 16: · 42 Whether such negligence caused electrocution of the plaintiff on 03 February 2011 43 Whether the plaintiff was himself negligent 5 The quantum of damages was separated src=https:reader030vdocumentsmxreader030viewer20220410135ec36e78ef0f6d18ff39470dhtml5thumbnails16jpg width=142 height=106 layout=responsive amp-img divdivdiv class=ts-pagebuttonPage 17button div class=ts-image amp-img class=ts-thumb alt=Page 17: · 42 Whether such negligence caused electrocution of the plaintiff on 03 February 2011 43 Whether the plaintiff was himself negligent 5 The quantum of damages was separated src=https:reader030vdocumentsmxreader030viewer20220410135ec36e78ef0f6d18ff39470dhtml5thumbnails17jpg width=142 height=106 layout=responsive amp-img divdivdiv class=ts-pagebuttonPage 18button div class=ts-image amp-img class=ts-thumb alt=Page 18: · 42 Whether such negligence caused electrocution of the plaintiff on 03 February 2011 43 Whether the plaintiff was himself negligent 5 The quantum of damages was separated src=https:reader030vdocumentsmxreader030viewer20220410135ec36e78ef0f6d18ff39470dhtml5thumbnails18jpg width=142 height=106 layout=responsive amp-img divdivdiv class=ts-pagebuttonPage 19button div class=ts-image amp-img class=ts-thumb alt=Page 19: · 42 Whether such negligence caused electrocution of the plaintiff on 03 February 2011 43 Whether the plaintiff was himself negligent 5 The quantum of damages was separated src=https:reader030vdocumentsmxreader030viewer20220410135ec36e78ef0f6d18ff39470dhtml5thumbnails19jpg width=142 height=106 layout=responsive amp-img divdivdiv class=ts-pagebuttonPage 20button div class=ts-image amp-img class=ts-thumb alt=Page 20: · 42 Whether such negligence caused electrocution of the plaintiff on 03 February 2011 43 Whether the plaintiff was himself negligent 5 The quantum of damages was separated src=https:reader030vdocumentsmxreader030viewer20220410135ec36e78ef0f6d18ff39470dhtml5thumbnails20jpg width=142 height=106 layout=responsive amp-img divdivdiv class=ts-pagebuttonPage 21button div class=ts-image amp-img class=ts-thumb alt=Page 21: · 42 Whether such negligence caused electrocution of the plaintiff on 03 February 2011 43 Whether the plaintiff was himself negligent 5 The quantum of damages was separated src=https:reader030vdocumentsmxreader030viewer20220410135ec36e78ef0f6d18ff39470dhtml5thumbnails21jpg width=142 height=106 layout=responsive amp-img divdivdiv class=ts-pagebuttonPage 22button div class=ts-image amp-img class=ts-thumb alt=Page 22: · 42 Whether such negligence caused electrocution of the plaintiff on 03 February 2011 43 Whether the plaintiff was himself negligent 5 The quantum of damages was separated src=https:reader030vdocumentsmxreader030viewer20220410135ec36e78ef0f6d18ff39470dhtml5thumbnails22jpg width=142 height=106 layout=responsive amp-img divdivdiv class=ts-pagebuttonPage 23button div class=ts-image amp-img class=ts-thumb alt=Page 23: · 42 Whether such negligence caused electrocution of the plaintiff on 03 February 2011 43 Whether the plaintiff was himself negligent 5 The quantum of damages was separated src=https:reader030vdocumentsmxreader030viewer20220410135ec36e78ef0f6d18ff39470dhtml5thumbnails23jpg width=142 height=106 layout=responsive amp-img divdivdiv class=ts-pagebuttonPage 24button div class=ts-image amp-img class=ts-thumb alt=Page 24: · 42 Whether such negligence caused electrocution of the plaintiff on 03 February 2011 43 Whether the plaintiff was himself negligent 5 The quantum of damages was separated src=https:reader030vdocumentsmxreader030viewer20220410135ec36e78ef0f6d18ff39470dhtml5thumbnails24jpg width=142 height=106 layout=responsive amp-img divdivdiv class=ts-pagebuttonPage 25button div class=ts-image amp-img class=ts-thumb alt=Page 25: · 42 Whether such negligence caused electrocution of the plaintiff on 03 February 2011 43 Whether the plaintiff was himself negligent 5 The quantum of damages was separated src=https:reader030vdocumentsmxreader030viewer20220410135ec36e78ef0f6d18ff39470dhtml5thumbnails25jpg width=142 height=106 layout=responsive amp-img divdivdiv class=ts-pagebuttonPage 26button div class=ts-image amp-img class=ts-thumb alt=Page 26: · 42 Whether such negligence caused electrocution of the plaintiff on 03 February 2011 43 Whether the plaintiff was himself negligent 5 The quantum of damages was separated src=https:reader030vdocumentsmxreader030viewer20220410135ec36e78ef0f6d18ff39470dhtml5thumbnails26jpg width=142 height=106 layout=responsive amp-img divdivdiv class=ts-pagebuttonPage 27button div class=ts-image amp-img class=ts-thumb alt=Page 27: · 42 Whether such negligence caused electrocution of the plaintiff on 03 February 2011 43 Whether the plaintiff was himself negligent 5 The quantum of damages was separated src=https:reader030vdocumentsmxreader030viewer20220410135ec36e78ef0f6d18ff39470dhtml5thumbnails27jpg width=142 height=106 layout=responsive amp-img divdivdiv class=ts-pagebuttonPage 28button div class=ts-image amp-img class=ts-thumb alt=Page 28: · 42 Whether such negligence caused electrocution of the plaintiff on 03 February 2011 43 Whether the plaintiff was himself negligent 5 The quantum of damages was separated src=https:reader030vdocumentsmxreader030viewer20220410135ec36e78ef0f6d18ff39470dhtml5thumbnails28jpg width=142 height=106 layout=responsive amp-img divdivdiv class=ts-pagebuttonPage 29button div class=ts-image amp-img class=ts-thumb alt=Page 29: · 42 Whether such negligence caused electrocution of the plaintiff on 03 February 2011 43 Whether the plaintiff was himself negligent 5 The quantum of damages was separated src=https:reader030vdocumentsmxreader030viewer20220410135ec36e78ef0f6d18ff39470dhtml5thumbnails29jpg width=142 height=106 layout=responsive amp-img divdivdiv class=ts-pagebuttonPage 30button div class=ts-image amp-img class=ts-thumb alt=Page 30: · 42 Whether such negligence caused electrocution of the plaintiff on 03 February 2011 43 Whether the plaintiff was himself negligent 5 The quantum of damages was separated src=https:reader030vdocumentsmxreader030viewer20220410135ec36e78ef0f6d18ff39470dhtml5thumbnails30jpg width=142 height=106 layout=responsive amp-img divdivdiv class=ts-pagebuttonPage 31button div class=ts-image amp-img class=ts-thumb alt=Page 31: · 42 Whether such negligence caused electrocution of the plaintiff on 03 February 2011 43 Whether the plaintiff was himself negligent 5 The quantum of damages was separated src=https:reader030vdocumentsmxreader030viewer20220410135ec36e78ef0f6d18ff39470dhtml5thumbnails31jpg width=142 height=106 layout=responsive amp-img divdivdiv class=ts-pagebuttonPage 32button div class=ts-image amp-img class=ts-thumb alt=Page 32: · 42 Whether such negligence caused electrocution of the plaintiff on 03 February 2011 43 Whether the plaintiff was himself negligent 5 The quantum of damages was separated src=https:reader030vdocumentsmxreader030viewer20220410135ec36e78ef0f6d18ff39470dhtml5thumbnails32jpg width=142 height=106 layout=responsive amp-img divdivdiv class=ts-pagebuttonPage 33button div class=ts-image amp-img class=ts-thumb alt=Page 33: · 42 Whether such negligence caused electrocution of the plaintiff on 03 February 2011 43 Whether the plaintiff was himself negligent 5 The quantum of damages was separated src=https:reader030vdocumentsmxreader030viewer20220410135ec36e78ef0f6d18ff39470dhtml5thumbnails33jpg width=142 height=106 layout=responsive amp-img divdivdiv class=ts-pagebuttonPage 34button div class=ts-image amp-img class=ts-thumb alt=Page 34: · 42 Whether such negligence caused electrocution of the plaintiff on 03 February 2011 43 Whether the plaintiff was himself negligent 5 The quantum of damages was separated src=https:reader030vdocumentsmxreader030viewer20220410135ec36e78ef0f6d18ff39470dhtml5thumbnails34jpg width=142 height=106 layout=responsive amp-img divdivdiv class=ts-pagebuttonPage 35button div class=ts-image amp-img class=ts-thumb alt=Page 35: · 42 Whether such negligence caused electrocution of the plaintiff on 03 February 2011 43 Whether the plaintiff was himself negligent 5 The quantum of damages was separated src=https:reader030vdocumentsmxreader030viewer20220410135ec36e78ef0f6d18ff39470dhtml5thumbnails35jpg width=142 height=106 layout=responsive amp-img divdivdiv class=ts-pagebuttonPage 36button div class=ts-image amp-img class=ts-thumb alt=Page 36: · 42 Whether such negligence caused electrocution of the plaintiff on 03 February 2011 43 Whether the plaintiff was himself negligent 5 The quantum of damages was separated src=https:reader030vdocumentsmxreader030viewer20220410135ec36e78ef0f6d18ff39470dhtml5thumbnails36jpg width=142 height=106 layout=responsive amp-img divdivdiv class=ts-pagebuttonPage 37button div class=ts-image amp-img class=ts-thumb alt=Page 37: · 42 Whether such negligence caused electrocution of the plaintiff on 03 February 2011 43 Whether the plaintiff was himself negligent 5 The quantum of damages was separated src=https:reader030vdocumentsmxreader030viewer20220410135ec36e78ef0f6d18ff39470dhtml5thumbnails37jpg width=142 height=106 layout=responsive amp-img divdiv