3 일본인 식민자 사회가 바라본s-space.snu.ac.kr/bitstream/10371/160739/1/3....
Post on 17-Jul-2020
1 Views
Preview:
TRANSCRIPT
()
,
. : (, 2019) .
.
2019 .
3.1 ‘’ ‘’()
1910 ( 1920 ) ()
: , , , 1920.
73 3.1
1. ‘’
3.1
.
, ‘’ 3.1
.
‘’
‘’
. ‘’
.
‘’(, ) .
.
1970
.1
,
. ‘ ’
.
. ()
.
(colonizer) (the colonized)
.
.
1 ‘’ , , 8, 1976, 23; , , 15, 1978, 117~124 .
74 21
.
.
.
, ‘’, ‘ ’
.
.
.
,
.
.
.
‘
’ .
() .
.
. ‘ ’
.2
2 . ,
: , , 2004, 3~4.
75 3.1
3.1
.
.
.
.3
. ()
,
.
.
2000 .
()
. , ,
.
.4
3 1910
.
.
4 Jun Uchida, Brokers of Empire: Japanese Settler Colonialism in Korea, 1876~1945, Harvard University Asia Center, 2011.
76 21
3.1
(Peter Duus) .
.5
‘() ’(Settler colonialism) .
‘() ’
.
.
,
.6
‘
’ .
.
. ‘ ’
. 3.1 . ,
‘() ’
5 Peter Duus, The Abacus and the Sword: the Japanese Penetration of Korea, 1895~1910, University of California Press, 1995.
6 Settler colonialism Jun Uchida, Brokers of Empire, p. 18; Caroline Elkins and Susan Pedersen, “Introduction,” Caroline Elkins and Susan Pedersen eds., Settler Colonialism in the Twentieth Century: Projects, Practices, Legacies, New York: Routledge, 2005 .
77 3.1
.7
. 3.1 100
3.1
.8
1920
.
.
3.1
.9 1920
‘’(
) .
.
3.1 .
3.1
.10
3.1 1
7 ‘() ’
,
. , ,
. ‘(
) ’ . Caroline Elkins and Susan Pedersen, “Introduction”, p. 18.
8 3.1 3.1
. 31100 , 3.1
100, , 2019. 9 , , 92, , 2005.
10 , “ ” (1920~1929), 19, 2018; 3.1 100 4, 2019.
78 21
.11 3.1
1 .
3.1
.
.
. 3.1
. 3.1
.
3.1
‘’() .
‘’ 3.1
‘’()
.12 ‘’
‘’ .
.
3.1 “
” .
‘’
. ‘
’ 3.1
11 3.1 .
, 3.1 1919 , 39,
2015. 12 ‘’ , : 1910~1945, , 1984,
3 .
.
? 30~40
.
, ‘’()
.
‘’
.13 ‘’ “
,
, ‘’ ” , “
‘’
” .
‘’ .
‘’
. ‘’
.14
‘ ’ .
‘’ “
” .15
13 , : , , 1987, 275~276.
14 , : , , 1990, 42~45.
15 , , , 2012, 85.
80 21
.
. . ‘’
.16 ‘
’
.17 ‘’
‘’
.18
3.1 ‘’
. 1870
1910 ‘’ 17
.
16 , : , , 2008, 48~49.
17 .
.
,
.
.
.
.
.
.
18 ‘’ , : , , 2019 .
81 3.1
.19 3.1
‘’ .
(1919 3 4) 5 ‘’
,
. 3.1
‘’
.
3.1
() .20 3 1
3.1 . 2
() ()
.21
3.1
3 6.
‘’() 3 . ‘
1 ( )
’
19 1910 1920 .
‘’
, 2
.
20
. 1919 12 .
21 , , 1919 3 2().
82 21
) “
”
.22
,
.
3
.23 3.1 ‘’(), ‘’(), ‘’()
‘’(), ‘’(), ‘’, ‘
’() . ‘’()
‘’()
.
“ ”, “
”, “ 20 ”(3 6 ), “()
”, “ ”(3 7 ), “ :
”(3 8), “
1 ”(3 8 ), “ ”, “
”(3 10 ), “ ”(3 12
), “ ”(3 13 ), “ ”(3 14 ), “
”, “ 3 ”, “
22 , , 1919 3 6().
23 .
< 1> 1919 3 6()
83 3.1
”(3 16 ), “ 2 ”(3
27) .
. (
) 3
. 24
60 .25
.
.
2
.26 () ()
280 .27
3
.
.
.
, ,
.
.
.
24 , , 1919 3 6().
25 , , 1919 3 7().
26 , , 1919 3 6().
27 , , 1919 3 7(); ,
, 1919 3 8.
.28
.29
‘’
. 50
,
()
.30
.31
32 33
.
. ()
()
() .34
28 . ,
3.1(), 2014; ,
3.1(), 2015. 29 , , 1919 3 16().
30 , , 1919 4, 13~14.
31 : , , 1919 3 8().
32 ……, , 1919 4 2().
33 , 3.1(), 2014, 47.
34 , , 1919 3 12; : , , 1919 3 12().
85 3.1
.35
.
.36
3.1
.
37
.38
.
.39 3 1 “
”
.40
3 5
,
.41 ‘’
.
3.1 .
‘ ’() ‘ ’(
) ‘’ .42
35 , , 1919 3 19(); , , 1919 3 28.
36 , 3.1(), 2015, 52.
37 () .
38 .
. ()
“ ”
. , , 1919 3 10().
39 (), 1919 3 1, 3 5, 4 10, 7 1.
40 (), 1919 3 1.
41 , 1919 3 5.
42 , , 1919 4; , , 1919 4; , , 1919 5; .
86 21
.43
.
‘’
‘’ . ()
() “
. []
.”
.44 3 27
“ ” .45
()
“ ” ()
.46
() . ()
“ ”
“ ”()
.47 “
”,
.
3.1
.
‘’
43 , , 1919 3 20.
44 , 2.
46 , 59.
?
.
. ()
.48
1
.
1910 ‘’ “
() ”
.
“ ” , “ ”
.49
‘’ .
.
()
3.1 .50 ()
.51
.
.
. (
48 , , 1919 3 6.
49 , , 1919 3 7.
50 , , 1919 3 12().
51 , , 1919 3 14().
88 21
”
.53
.54 3.1
.
.
() () (
) ‘’()
“ [] .
”
.55
() . 3.1
“[
]
”
.56 ‘’
“
” .
52 , , 1919 3 12.
53 , 1919 3 11(), () 3 18 .
54 : , 73, 1919 4, 2~6.
55 , , 1919 3 17.
56 , , 1919 3 17(). , , 1919 4, 23~24 .
89 3.1
.
.
() “
”
“
” .57
‘’
.
.
()
‘’
. ‘ ’
.
. 10
.
…
.
.
.58
,
57 , 225, 1919 4, 22.
58 , , 1919 4, 16.
90 21
3.1
.
.
“ ”
.59 ‘’
‘’
“[]
” .60
‘’ ‘’
.
()
.61
. ‘’ ()
.
. 1919 9 ()
‘’ .
59 , 16~17.
91 3.1
‘’
.
5 ‘’
. ()
“ ()
” ,
3.1
.62
.
. ()
‘’
.63
.
.64
‘’
. 3.1
.
‘’
62 , , 1919 6, 3.
63 , , 1919 6, 32~33.
64
, . , 2~10.
92 21
,
.65
‘’
. ‘’
.
‘’ .66
.
() () “
[3.1] ” .67
‘’ .
‘’(,
) .
() “
” .68
. “()
” “
() ” .69
65 1920 8~10
. , , , 1920 .
66 , 2~10 , , 1919 7, 5~7 .
67 (), 77, 1919
8, 60.
69 , 3.
.
“ ‘’
” ‘’
.71
.
, 3
,
.72
.
, ,
.73
. ‘’
‘’ “
” , “
, , ” ‘’
.74 ‘’
70 : , , 1919 5, 28.
71 , 59.
72 , 8.
73 , 8.
74 , 7.
94 21
.
10 ‘’(
) .75
‘’
.76
.77
3.1
.
“
” .
‘’ ‘’
. (
)
“ ‘’
” .78
.
. “
” “
” “ ()
” .79
75 , , , 1920. 76 , 14~15; , , 133~135.
77 , 4.
79 , 29, 31.
.
“
” .80
“ ”
“ , 150
” .81 3.1
‘’ .
3.1 1
. ‘’
‘’
. ‘’ ‘
’
. ‘’()
. (),
(), ()
.82
‘’
.83 3.1
5 6
,
80 , 52.
83 () 1( )
8 , ()(1), , 1964 .
96 21
.
.
. 20
.
‘’
. “
”
.
‘’
.
.
“ ” “
” . ()
.
.
5.
3.1 ‘’
.
‘’
.
3.1 ‘’
‘’ .
97 3.1
. ‘’
.
. ‘’
.
.
.
3.1 ‘’
.
‘’ .
,
.
‘’ ‘’
.
‘’
.
3.1 ,
.
307
, , 4, , 1969.
, (1929), 2, , 1963.
, , , 1983.
, , , 1990.
, , , 1921.
3.1: ‘’ ‘’()
|
, “ ” (1920~1929), 19, 2018.
, 3.1(I), 2014.
, 3.1(II), 2015.
, , , 1920.
, : , , 2019.
, ·, 92,
, 2005.
, , , 1920.
()1~4( ).
, , 1928.
Jun Uchida, Brokers of Empire: Japanese Settler Colonialism in Korea, 1876~1945, Harvard University
Asia Center, 2011.
, : ,
27, 2010.
, 3.1 , 62, , 2003.
, · (1914.8~1918.6) , 87, 2016.
, 1910~1945, , 1984.
312 21
, .
,
.
,
, .
: , , , , ,
3.1: ‘’ ‘’()
|
: 2019. 6. 8 | : 2019. 6. 20 | : 2019. 7. 8
, ‘’
3.1 . 3.1 ‘’
.
‘ ’ .
3.1 ‘’ ‘‘
.
. ’‘
. ‘’
. ‘’
.
.
3.1 ‘’
. ‘’ ‘
’ . ‘’
.
3.1
.
() 3.1 |
: 2019. 5. 22 | : 2019. 6. 9 | : 2019. 7. 3
3.1 .
,
. , 3.1
3.1
.
316 21
colonialism of Chosun and Taiwan. They emphasized the need of policies in consideration of the interests of Chosun and Taiwan, while insisting on stopping assimilationism and employing autonomy as a governance policy. Their interest was naturally directed toward the expansion of the two colonies’ self-governance, but they showed deviations in the extent of self-governance that should be allowed in its implementation. Also with regard to representative institutions, they all acknowledged that the establishment of colonial parliament is more valid than having colonial representatives participate in the Imperial Diet, but they differed in the timing and regional feasibility of the establishment of the Chosun Parliament and the Taiwan Parliament. • Keywords: colonial policy studies, assimilationism, autonomy, Yamamoto Miono, Izumi Akira,
Yanaihara Tadao
the March First Movement and Japanese settlers in colonial Korea
| YEE Donghoon This article examines how Japanese settlers reacted to and perceived the March First Movement. To consider Japanese settlers’ perception towards the March First Movement, the paper analyzes the initial reaction and the fixed perception after time lapse. This study also focuses on Japanese settlers’ consciousness which had been cultivated and shared in the Japanese community.
Just after the March First Movement, most Japanese settlers looked down on and ridiculed the independence movement. They believed that Korean rioters misunderstood the national self-determination principle due to their ignorance about international affairs. Regarding the causes of the incident, they did not consider the cruel military government rule in the 1910s and Japanese settlers’ discriminatory behavior.
For the perception towards the March First Movement, a difference between Japanese in homeland and settlers in colonial Korea is recognized. Contrary to Japanese in homeland, Japanese settlers’ consciousness had been formed by encountering and contacting with the colonized. Therefore, Japanese settlers’ perception on Koreans was exclusive and closed towards Korean society. On the basis of this chauvinism, Japanese settlers insisted on imposing strong measures against Koreans after the March First Movement. • Keywords: the March First Movement, Japanese settler, colonizer, settler colonialism
the March First Movement in the Kokumin shinbun | PARK Eun-Young The March First Movement was an event that aroused the attention of the Japanese media community, which had been indifferent to Chosun for a long time. Most of the newspapers at that time were dragged into the situation by reporting the announcements of the government and the military, or posting editorials of the same purpose. Instead of conveying the reality of Chosun enough, the articles of exciting titles decorated the pages. This article focuses on the media characteristics that were not of interest in previous studies and examines
3. 1
3. 2
3. 3
3. 4
,
. : (, 2019) .
.
2019 .
3.1 ‘’ ‘’()
1910 ( 1920 ) ()
: , , , 1920.
73 3.1
1. ‘’
3.1
.
, ‘’ 3.1
.
‘’
‘’
. ‘’
.
‘’(, ) .
.
1970
.1
,
. ‘ ’
.
. ()
.
(colonizer) (the colonized)
.
.
1 ‘’ , , 8, 1976, 23; , , 15, 1978, 117~124 .
74 21
.
.
.
, ‘’, ‘ ’
.
.
.
,
.
.
.
‘
’ .
() .
.
. ‘ ’
.2
2 . ,
: , , 2004, 3~4.
75 3.1
3.1
.
.
.
.3
. ()
,
.
.
2000 .
()
. , ,
.
.4
3 1910
.
.
4 Jun Uchida, Brokers of Empire: Japanese Settler Colonialism in Korea, 1876~1945, Harvard University Asia Center, 2011.
76 21
3.1
(Peter Duus) .
.5
‘() ’(Settler colonialism) .
‘() ’
.
.
,
.6
‘
’ .
.
. ‘ ’
. 3.1 . ,
‘() ’
5 Peter Duus, The Abacus and the Sword: the Japanese Penetration of Korea, 1895~1910, University of California Press, 1995.
6 Settler colonialism Jun Uchida, Brokers of Empire, p. 18; Caroline Elkins and Susan Pedersen, “Introduction,” Caroline Elkins and Susan Pedersen eds., Settler Colonialism in the Twentieth Century: Projects, Practices, Legacies, New York: Routledge, 2005 .
77 3.1
.7
. 3.1 100
3.1
.8
1920
.
.
3.1
.9 1920
‘’(
) .
.
3.1 .
3.1
.10
3.1 1
7 ‘() ’
,
. , ,
. ‘(
) ’ . Caroline Elkins and Susan Pedersen, “Introduction”, p. 18.
8 3.1 3.1
. 31100 , 3.1
100, , 2019. 9 , , 92, , 2005.
10 , “ ” (1920~1929), 19, 2018; 3.1 100 4, 2019.
78 21
.11 3.1
1 .
3.1
.
.
. 3.1
. 3.1
.
3.1
‘’() .
‘’ 3.1
‘’()
.12 ‘’
‘’ .
.
3.1 “
” .
‘’
. ‘
’ 3.1
11 3.1 .
, 3.1 1919 , 39,
2015. 12 ‘’ , : 1910~1945, , 1984,
3 .
.
? 30~40
.
, ‘’()
.
‘’
.13 ‘’ “
,
, ‘’ ” , “
‘’
” .
‘’ .
‘’
. ‘’
.14
‘ ’ .
‘’ “
” .15
13 , : , , 1987, 275~276.
14 , : , , 1990, 42~45.
15 , , , 2012, 85.
80 21
.
. . ‘’
.16 ‘
’
.17 ‘’
‘’
.18
3.1 ‘’
. 1870
1910 ‘’ 17
.
16 , : , , 2008, 48~49.
17 .
.
,
.
.
.
.
.
.
18 ‘’ , : , , 2019 .
81 3.1
.19 3.1
‘’ .
(1919 3 4) 5 ‘’
,
. 3.1
‘’
.
3.1
() .20 3 1
3.1 . 2
() ()
.21
3.1
3 6.
‘’() 3 . ‘
1 ( )
’
19 1910 1920 .
‘’
, 2
.
20
. 1919 12 .
21 , , 1919 3 2().
82 21
) “
”
.22
,
.
3
.23 3.1 ‘’(), ‘’(), ‘’()
‘’(), ‘’(), ‘’, ‘
’() . ‘’()
‘’()
.
“ ”, “
”, “ 20 ”(3 6 ), “()
”, “ ”(3 7 ), “ :
”(3 8), “
1 ”(3 8 ), “ ”, “
”(3 10 ), “ ”(3 12
), “ ”(3 13 ), “ ”(3 14 ), “
”, “ 3 ”, “
22 , , 1919 3 6().
23 .
< 1> 1919 3 6()
83 3.1
”(3 16 ), “ 2 ”(3
27) .
. (
) 3
. 24
60 .25
.
.
2
.26 () ()
280 .27
3
.
.
.
, ,
.
.
.
24 , , 1919 3 6().
25 , , 1919 3 7().
26 , , 1919 3 6().
27 , , 1919 3 7(); ,
, 1919 3 8.
.28
.29
‘’
. 50
,
()
.30
.31
32 33
.
. ()
()
() .34
28 . ,
3.1(), 2014; ,
3.1(), 2015. 29 , , 1919 3 16().
30 , , 1919 4, 13~14.
31 : , , 1919 3 8().
32 ……, , 1919 4 2().
33 , 3.1(), 2014, 47.
34 , , 1919 3 12; : , , 1919 3 12().
85 3.1
.35
.
.36
3.1
.
37
.38
.
.39 3 1 “
”
.40
3 5
,
.41 ‘’
.
3.1 .
‘ ’() ‘ ’(
) ‘’ .42
35 , , 1919 3 19(); , , 1919 3 28.
36 , 3.1(), 2015, 52.
37 () .
38 .
. ()
“ ”
. , , 1919 3 10().
39 (), 1919 3 1, 3 5, 4 10, 7 1.
40 (), 1919 3 1.
41 , 1919 3 5.
42 , , 1919 4; , , 1919 4; , , 1919 5; .
86 21
.43
.
‘’
‘’ . ()
() “
. []
.”
.44 3 27
“ ” .45
()
“ ” ()
.46
() . ()
“ ”
“ ”()
.47 “
”,
.
3.1
.
‘’
43 , , 1919 3 20.
44 , 2.
46 , 59.
?
.
. ()
.48
1
.
1910 ‘’ “
() ”
.
“ ” , “ ”
.49
‘’ .
.
()
3.1 .50 ()
.51
.
.
. (
48 , , 1919 3 6.
49 , , 1919 3 7.
50 , , 1919 3 12().
51 , , 1919 3 14().
88 21
”
.53
.54 3.1
.
.
() () (
) ‘’()
“ [] .
”
.55
() . 3.1
“[
]
”
.56 ‘’
“
” .
52 , , 1919 3 12.
53 , 1919 3 11(), () 3 18 .
54 : , 73, 1919 4, 2~6.
55 , , 1919 3 17.
56 , , 1919 3 17(). , , 1919 4, 23~24 .
89 3.1
.
.
() “
”
“
” .57
‘’
.
.
()
‘’
. ‘ ’
.
. 10
.
…
.
.
.58
,
57 , 225, 1919 4, 22.
58 , , 1919 4, 16.
90 21
3.1
.
.
“ ”
.59 ‘’
‘’
“[]
” .60
‘’ ‘’
.
()
.61
. ‘’ ()
.
. 1919 9 ()
‘’ .
59 , 16~17.
91 3.1
‘’
.
5 ‘’
. ()
“ ()
” ,
3.1
.62
.
. ()
‘’
.63
.
.64
‘’
. 3.1
.
‘’
62 , , 1919 6, 3.
63 , , 1919 6, 32~33.
64
, . , 2~10.
92 21
,
.65
‘’
. ‘’
.
‘’ .66
.
() () “
[3.1] ” .67
‘’ .
‘’(,
) .
() “
” .68
. “()
” “
() ” .69
65 1920 8~10
. , , , 1920 .
66 , 2~10 , , 1919 7, 5~7 .
67 (), 77, 1919
8, 60.
69 , 3.
.
“ ‘’
” ‘’
.71
.
, 3
,
.72
.
, ,
.73
. ‘’
‘’ “
” , “
, , ” ‘’
.74 ‘’
70 : , , 1919 5, 28.
71 , 59.
72 , 8.
73 , 8.
74 , 7.
94 21
.
10 ‘’(
) .75
‘’
.76
.77
3.1
.
“
” .
‘’ ‘’
. (
)
“ ‘’
” .78
.
. “
” “
” “ ()
” .79
75 , , , 1920. 76 , 14~15; , , 133~135.
77 , 4.
79 , 29, 31.
.
“
” .80
“ ”
“ , 150
” .81 3.1
‘’ .
3.1 1
. ‘’
‘’
. ‘’ ‘
’
. ‘’()
. (),
(), ()
.82
‘’
.83 3.1
5 6
,
80 , 52.
83 () 1( )
8 , ()(1), , 1964 .
96 21
.
.
. 20
.
‘’
. “
”
.
‘’
.
.
“ ” “
” . ()
.
.
5.
3.1 ‘’
.
‘’
.
3.1 ‘’
‘’ .
97 3.1
. ‘’
.
. ‘’
.
.
.
3.1 ‘’
.
‘’ .
,
.
‘’ ‘’
.
‘’
.
3.1 ,
.
307
, , 4, , 1969.
, (1929), 2, , 1963.
, , , 1983.
, , , 1990.
, , , 1921.
3.1: ‘’ ‘’()
|
, “ ” (1920~1929), 19, 2018.
, 3.1(I), 2014.
, 3.1(II), 2015.
, , , 1920.
, : , , 2019.
, ·, 92,
, 2005.
, , , 1920.
()1~4( ).
, , 1928.
Jun Uchida, Brokers of Empire: Japanese Settler Colonialism in Korea, 1876~1945, Harvard University
Asia Center, 2011.
, : ,
27, 2010.
, 3.1 , 62, , 2003.
, · (1914.8~1918.6) , 87, 2016.
, 1910~1945, , 1984.
312 21
, .
,
.
,
, .
: , , , , ,
3.1: ‘’ ‘’()
|
: 2019. 6. 8 | : 2019. 6. 20 | : 2019. 7. 8
, ‘’
3.1 . 3.1 ‘’
.
‘ ’ .
3.1 ‘’ ‘‘
.
. ’‘
. ‘’
. ‘’
.
.
3.1 ‘’
. ‘’ ‘
’ . ‘’
.
3.1
.
() 3.1 |
: 2019. 5. 22 | : 2019. 6. 9 | : 2019. 7. 3
3.1 .
,
. , 3.1
3.1
.
316 21
colonialism of Chosun and Taiwan. They emphasized the need of policies in consideration of the interests of Chosun and Taiwan, while insisting on stopping assimilationism and employing autonomy as a governance policy. Their interest was naturally directed toward the expansion of the two colonies’ self-governance, but they showed deviations in the extent of self-governance that should be allowed in its implementation. Also with regard to representative institutions, they all acknowledged that the establishment of colonial parliament is more valid than having colonial representatives participate in the Imperial Diet, but they differed in the timing and regional feasibility of the establishment of the Chosun Parliament and the Taiwan Parliament. • Keywords: colonial policy studies, assimilationism, autonomy, Yamamoto Miono, Izumi Akira,
Yanaihara Tadao
the March First Movement and Japanese settlers in colonial Korea
| YEE Donghoon This article examines how Japanese settlers reacted to and perceived the March First Movement. To consider Japanese settlers’ perception towards the March First Movement, the paper analyzes the initial reaction and the fixed perception after time lapse. This study also focuses on Japanese settlers’ consciousness which had been cultivated and shared in the Japanese community.
Just after the March First Movement, most Japanese settlers looked down on and ridiculed the independence movement. They believed that Korean rioters misunderstood the national self-determination principle due to their ignorance about international affairs. Regarding the causes of the incident, they did not consider the cruel military government rule in the 1910s and Japanese settlers’ discriminatory behavior.
For the perception towards the March First Movement, a difference between Japanese in homeland and settlers in colonial Korea is recognized. Contrary to Japanese in homeland, Japanese settlers’ consciousness had been formed by encountering and contacting with the colonized. Therefore, Japanese settlers’ perception on Koreans was exclusive and closed towards Korean society. On the basis of this chauvinism, Japanese settlers insisted on imposing strong measures against Koreans after the March First Movement. • Keywords: the March First Movement, Japanese settler, colonizer, settler colonialism
the March First Movement in the Kokumin shinbun | PARK Eun-Young The March First Movement was an event that aroused the attention of the Japanese media community, which had been indifferent to Chosun for a long time. Most of the newspapers at that time were dragged into the situation by reporting the announcements of the government and the military, or posting editorials of the same purpose. Instead of conveying the reality of Chosun enough, the articles of exciting titles decorated the pages. This article focuses on the media characteristics that were not of interest in previous studies and examines
3. 1
3. 2
3. 3
3. 4
top related