2-day idapp meeting inaf-iasf bologna student: pietro procopio dr. carlo burigana university of...

2-Day IDAPP meeting

INAF-IASF Bologna

Student:

Pietro Procopio

Dr. Carlo Burigana

University of Ferrara

Dr. Nazzareno Mandolesi

Internal tutor:

External tutor:

CMBR Spectrum - Foreground Analysis - Component Separation

First Year Activities

External co-tutor

Dr. Jacques Delabrouille

Brief summary

CMBR and spectral distortions: a precise numerical code

CMBR and foregrounds

A new release of the IRAS map: IRIS and angular power spectrum analysis

Conclusion and prospectives

Component Separation: the stage in Paris

Cosmic Microwave Background Radiation

Anisotropies

Angular power spectrum

Polarization

P 2 = Q 2 + U 2

Example:

Scattering Thomson of radiation with quadrupole anisotropy generates linear polarization

Spectrum

Photon distribution function

CMBRSPECTRUM

T0 = 2.725 ± 0.002 °K(Mather et al. 1999)

Redshift

Dimensioneless frequency

Has the CMBR a black body spectrum?

Spectral distortions

In the primordial universe some processes can lead the matter-radiation fluid out of the thermal equilibrium(energy dissipation because of density fluctuations,Physical processes out of the equilibrium,radiative decay of particles, energy release related to the first stages of structures formation,free-free distortions)

The photon distribution function isn’t a Planckian one

The Kompaneets equation in cosmological contest provides the best tool to compute the evolution of the photon distribution function, but a numerical code is needed!

KYPRIXAn extremely precise fortran based code, able to simulate the effects of the primordial physical processes that can affect the thermodynamic equilibrium of the CMBR

KYPRIX

How does it work?

Subroutine for boundary cond.in point A

D03PCFDiscretization of the Kompaneets

Increasing time y

Subroutine for boundary cond.in point B

FUNCTIONFor specific phys. quant.Cosmic exp

Output files(,t)Integral quan.

Input parameters

a)cosmological par. b)integration par.

MAIN PROGRAM

Initialization of the solution vector U

Subroutine PDEDEF

Discretization in the x axis

Computation of the rates of the physical processes

KYPRIX’ update(s)

2004-2005 update related to the NAG libraries* sensitivity e efficiency increased** introduction of the cosmological constant**

2006 CPU platform transfer (still in progress)activity

update related to the relative abundances of H and He

introduction of the ionization fraction of e-

‘90 first KYPRIX release by Carlo Burigana

* Updating a numerical code for the solution of the Kompaneets equation in cosmological context, P.Procopio and C.Burigana, INAF-IASF Bologna, Internal Report, 419;

**Accuracy and performance of a numerical code for the solution of hte Kompaneets equation in cosmological context, P.Procopio and C.Burigana, INAF-IASF Bologna, Internal Report, 420;

Cosmological applications

BIG

BANG z

today

zterm zBE zricz

Superposition of black bodies

where

Primordial distortions

Late distortions Related (mainly) to the reionization history of the universe

Free-free distortions

Bose-Einstein like spectrum

with µ function of X

Cosmological application of a numerical code for the solution of the Kompaneets equation, P.Procopio and C.Burigana, INAF-IASF Bologna, Internal Report, 421;

Cosmological application

Distortions dued to reionization of the universe at low redshifts

Ωm = 1 Ω = 0 Ωm = 0.29 Ω = 0.73

One of the rapresentative cases

ReionizationNowday, the most precise measurements related to the parameters of the standard model (of the universe) are those realized by the NASA satellite WMAP

optical depth of the universe =0.09±0.03• (3-years WMAP data)

Effects of a reionization are visible in all the properties of the CMBR:--- Temperature anisotropies suppression at high multipoles*--- gain of power in T-E cross-correlation PS and in the E and B modes mainly at low and middle multipoles--- raising of free-free and compotonization like distortions in the spectrum

Given that, we need a performing tool able to simulate the stages of evolution of the reionization as better as possible not only for effects

related to the anisotropies, but also for what concern the CMBR spectrum

*Planck-LFI scientific goals: implications for the reionization history

L.Popa, C.Burigana, N.Mandolesi,…,P.Procopio,et. al., Publ. By New Astronomy

CMBR and Foregrounds

2 main classes

Galactic foregrounds

Synchrotron emission

Dust emission

Free-free emission

+ anomalus component+ dark matter annihilation+ diffuse emission with origin in the solar system (ZLE)+ discrete components

From radio to IR

Extragalactic foregrounds

AGNRadio sources -Flat and steep spectrum

Far-IR galaxiesDust emission(primordial galaxies)

From radio to far-IR

SZ effect

The dust emission

Diffuse morphology in our Galaxy

Detection and characteristic frequency ranges

H region - Survey IR and far-IR

Dust emission dominates at 70 GHz, both in temperature and polarization

2 components modeld≈nm emission at 6-60 m

d≥0.1 m emission at >100 m

Thermal emissionTypical spectrum is a modified BB:

I(,Td)≈ B(,Td) ≈ +2 in RJ regimewith ≈1; FIRAS,WMAP ≈2

The Infrared Astronomical Satellite (IRAS)

Impact on many areas of modern astrophysics

It revealed the ubiquity of infrared cirrus that are a spectacular manifestation of the interstellar medium complexity but also an important foreground for observational cosmology

With the forthcoming Planck* satellite there is a need for all-sky complementary data sets with arcminute resolution that can bring informations on specific foreground emissions that contaminate the CMB radiation

With its ~4' resolution it matches perfectly the high-frequency bands of Planck*

* The Low Frequency Instrument on board the Planck satellite: characteristics and performance L.Valenziano, M.Sandri, G.Morgante,…..,P. Procopio, et. al., Publ. By New Astronomy* The Planck LFI RCA Flight Model test campaign L.Terenzi, F.Villa, A.Mennella,…,P.Procopio,et. al., Publ. By New Astronomy

The IRIS maps

It is a new generation of IRAS images It benefits from a better zodiacal light subtraction, from a calibration and zero level compatible with DIRBE, and from a better destriping

Main features of the IRIS data

Tests

The aim of the analisys is to get a better knowledge of the statistical properties of this component of the foregrounds that affect the measurement of the cosmic signal

About the first release of the IRIS maps…

• Not in galactic coordinates

• Covering the 98% of the sky, extended to 100% using DIRBE data set at frequencies of interest

• Loss of power when rotating from equatorial coord. to galactic (not related to the map itself)

• Residuals of ZLE after its subtraction (still present)

Tests Tools:

IDL + HEALPix fortran & IDL facilities + anafast

• Galactic cut at different |b| (with 2 different method)• “Galactic keep” at different |b|• Separeted APS for north and south emisphere, each of Them at different |b|• WMAP Galactic masks• Comparison with between the 100 m map and the Schlegel map

Maps: in Galactic coord. Nside = 1024

resolution 4’ MJy/sr

We started with computing the angular power spectrum of the map in several cases of Galactic cut

Some APS

Angular power spectrum of the 100µm map with a Galactic cut equal to |b|=5°

Same as above,But with a cut |b|=60°

B cut 30

Cl of the map with cut At |b|=60°

After the tests

The target is to reach a good knowledge of the statistical properties of this component of the galactic foreground.

Knowing correlation function, behaviour of the angular power spectrum of different patches of the sky is useful in understanding how to model (maybe a bit better) the dust emission properties across the sky, i.e. his behaviour with respect the galactic latitude.

Then, performing local analysis one can find out cleaner zones of the sky, where the contamination of this component is less prominent, with clear advantages for observational sessions.

Component Separation

Signals and images contain contributions from several components or sources.

Component separation consist in separating the emission of interest from all the other components present in the data set

The most popular CS model in CMB analysis is the linear mixture: all components are assumed to have an emission which can be decomposed as the product of a spatial template indipendent of the frequency of observation and of a spectral emission law which does not depend on the pixel.

The Spectral Matching method

Multi Detector Multi Component Analysis

Blind separation and SMICA

Our analysis

Our data set

The aim is that to recover the CIB from a set of infrared maps, to separate and recognize the Galactic dust emission, to fix problems related to residual in ZLE subtraction.Possibly to realize a better destriping of IRAS maps.

IRIS maps (12, 25, 60, 100 micron)IRAS maps (by which the IRIS maps were derived)DIRBE (only the channels with these fequencies)

Preliminary analysis

Starting using SMICA

Comparison of the zero level between IRAS maps and DIRBE maps

Checking for holes in the maps

Finding out relevant differencies between maps of different frequency

4 frequencies + 2 (then 3) different map sets = 8 (12) maps

Sources detection and subtraction

Finding the right masking map for all the maps

Repixelization of te DIRBE data set

…

ConclusionsSpectral distortions are not simple to detect, the signal is very low and to get the sensitivity needed it is required a fine calibration with a reference BB and great control of systematic.A study about observational experiment from the Moon is in progress: no atmosphere = great results from ground based experiments.With KYPRIX and other codes like CMBfast we have a complete set of instruments to probe the primordial universe in a theoretical way.

Identifying and mapping the emission of all the astrophysical processes that a Planck like satellite will detect is one of the most important step in the exploitation of CMB data analysis. We are going into the era of high precision cosmology, so we have to know in the best possible way how to deal with contamination generated by our own Galaxy.

The work on component separation is about T, but new cosmology is also pointing to the polarization signal of the CMBR: we’ll stay tuned!