124657335 combined bending torsion
Post on 14-Apr-2018
250 Views
Preview:
TRANSCRIPT
-
7/30/2019 124657335 Combined Bending Torsion
1/12
ME2113 - 2
TORSION OF CIRCULAR SHAFTS
(EA-02-21)
National University of Singapore
SEMESTER 3
2012/2013
Students Profile
Name: Gilbert Lim Lee Hock
Matric No.: A0097755
Group: 2O2
Date & Time: 2pm5pm, 5th
October 2012
-
7/30/2019 124657335 Combined Bending Torsion
2/12
NOMENCLATURE
Dh outer diameter of hollow shaft
Ds diameter of solid shaft
dh inner diameter of hollow shaft
G shear modulus of the shaft material
Ip polar second moment of area about the shaft axis
K torsional stiffness
L length of the shaft
T applied torque
total angle of twist of the shaft over L
induced shear stress at any point on the shaft and
radial distance of that point on the shaft at which the shear stress is measured
-
7/30/2019 124657335 Combined Bending Torsion
3/12
Table of Contents
1. Objective 12. Introduction 1
3. Experimental Procedures 1
4. Sample Calculations 1
5. Results and Discussions 3
6. Conclusion 4
7. Appendix 5
-
7/30/2019 124657335 Combined Bending Torsion
4/12
1
1. ObjectiveThe objective of this experiment is to:
a) To analyse surface stresses of a shaft when subjected to combined bending and torsionloads thru measurements via the strain gauge technique
b) To compare the experimental values with theoretical values using bending moment andtorsion equations.
2. IntroductionShafts subjected to both bending and twisting are frequently encountered in engineering,
applications. By applying St. Venant's principle and the principle of superposition, the stresses at
the surface of the shaft may be analysed.
The main purpose of this experiment is to analyse problems of this kind using, the strain gauge
technique and to compare the experimental results with theoretical results.
As the strain gauge technique enables only the determination of states of strain at about a point.
Hooke's law equations are used to calculate the stress components. In this experiment, the elastic
constants of the test material are first determined.
3. Experimental ProceduresA. Determination of elastic constants
(1) Measure the diameter of the tensile test piece and mount it on the tensometer.
(2) Use a quarter bridge configuration and for each tensile load applied to the testpiece, record
the longitudinal and transverse strains in order to evaluate the Young's modulus and Poisson's
ratio.
B. Combined bending and torsion test
1. Measure the dimensions of a and b.2. Connect the strain gauges causes to the strain-meter using, a quarter bridge configuration and
balance all the gauges.
3. For each loading, on the shaft record the strain readings.4. From the strain readings compute the stresses.5. Using, a full bridge configuration in a manner illustrated in Figures (3a) & (3b) record the
strain-meter reading for each applied load.
-
7/30/2019 124657335 Combined Bending Torsion
5/12
2
a = (1+4)- (2+3) b = (1+2)- (3+4)
4. Sample Calculations4.1. Theoretical Values:
Bending Stress:
The average measurement for diameter of test specimen d, was found to be 16mm with
reference to table 1. Distance of b, was given as 100mm. Thus, for load P at 0.5kg,
1.22MPa
Shear Stress:
Similarly for shear stress, distance of a was given as 150mm. Thus for load P at 0.5kg,
4.2. Experimental Values
Bending Stress:
For load P at 0.5kg,
-
7/30/2019 124657335 Combined Bending Torsion
6/12
3
Shear Stress:
For load P at 0.5kg,
= 1.99Mpa
5. Results
Diameter of Tensile Test Piece (mm) Cross sectional area (mm2)
D1 D2 Davg71.7
9.58 9.53 9.555Table 1 - Physical dimensions of test specimen
Load P (N) Direct Stress, x (MPa) Longitudinal Strain, x (10-6) Transverse Strain, y (10
-6)
200 2.79 55.00 -16
400 5.58 93.00 -26
600 8.37 131.00 -38
800 11.16 164.00 -50
1000 13.95 177.00 -59
1200 16.74 226.00 -68
Table 2 - Results of tensometer test
Graph 1To determine Youngs Modulus
y = 0.0843x - 2.1302
0.00
2.00
4.00
6.00
8.00
10.00
12.00
14.00
16.00
18.00
0 50 100 150 200 250
Longitudinal Stress (MPa) vs Longitudinal Strain (10-6)
Youngs Modulus, E = 84.3Gpa
-
7/30/2019 124657335 Combined Bending Torsion
7/12
4
Graph 2To determine Poissons Ratio
Load P (kg)Strain (10
-6)
1 2 3 4
0.0 0 0 0 0
0.5 23 -9 -20 9
1.0 46 -19 -41 20
1.5 68 -29 -63 29
2.0 92 -39 -85 39
2.5 116 -49 -105 49
3.0 138 -59 -126 59Table 3Direct strain data from the 4 strain gauges
Load P (kg)Quarter Bridge Configuration Full Bridge Configuration
a (10-6) b (10
-6) a (10-6) b (10
-6)
0.0 0 0 0 0
0.5 61 25 65 23
1.0 126 48 128 45
1.5 189 73 193 68
2.0 255 99 256 91
2.5 319 123 320 115
3.0 382 146 387 138Table 4 - Comparison of Quarter bridge and Full bridge configuration
y = -0.321x + 2.4213
-80
-70
-60
-50
-40
-30
-20
-10
0
0.00 50.00 100.00 150.00 200.00 250.00
Transverse Strain (10-6) vs Longitudinal Strain (10-6)
Poisson's Ratio, = -0.321
-
7/30/2019 124657335 Combined Bending Torsion
8/12
5
Graph 3Plot of Load vs afor Quarter Bridge and Full Bridge
Graph 4 - Plot of Load vs bfor Quarter Bridge and Full Bridge
Load P (kg)Bending Stress, x (Pa) Shear Stress, xy (Pa)
Theoretical Experimental Theoretical Experimental
0.0 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 0.00E+00
0.5 1.22E+06 8.93E+05 9.15E+05 1.99E+06
1.0 2.44E+06 1.66E+06 1.83E+06 4.03E+06
1.5 3.66E+06 2.49E+06 2.74E+06 6.02E+06
2.0 4.88E+06 3.38E+06 3.66E+06 8.13E+06
2.5 6.10E+06 4.28E+06 4.57E+06 1.02E+07
3.0 7.32E+06 5.04E+06 5.49E+06 1.22E+07Table 5 - Theoretical and Experimental Stresses
0.0
0.5
1.0
1.5
2.0
2.5
3.0
0 50 100 150 200 250 300 350 400
Load
P(
kg)
a (x10-6)
Load vs a
Quarter Bridge
Full Bridge
0.0
0.5
1.0
1.5
2.0
2.5
3.0
0 20 40 60 80 100 120 140
Load
P(
kg)
b (x10-6)
Load vs b
Quarter Bridge
Full Bridge
-
7/30/2019 124657335 Combined Bending Torsion
9/12
6
Graph 5 - Bending Stress vs Load
Graph 6 - Shear Stress vs Load
6. Discussion6.1. Compare the theoretical stresses with the experimental values. Discuss possible reasons for
the deviations if any, in the results obtained.
6.2. From the results of step (B5), deduce the type of strain the strain-meter readings represent.
6.3. Apart from the uniaxial tension method used in this experiment, how can the elasticconstants be determined.
0.00E+00
1.00E+06
2.00E+06
3.00E+06
4.00E+06
5.00E+066.00E+06
7.00E+06
8.00E+06
0.0 0.5 1.0 1.5 2.0 2.5 3.0
Bending
Stress
(P
a)
Load P (kg)
Bending Stress vs Load
Theoretical
Experimental
-2.00E+06
0.00E+00
2.00E+06
4.00E+06
6.00E+06
8.00E+06
1.00E+07
1.20E+07
1.40E+07
0.0 0.5 1.0 1.5 2.0 2.5 3.0
ShearStress
(Pa)
Load P (kg)
Shear Stress vs Load
Theoretical
Experimental
-
7/30/2019 124657335 Combined Bending Torsion
10/12
7
6.4. Instead of using Equations (3) and (8) for strains, develop alternative equations to enable thedetermination of strains from the four gauges readings.
6.5. Develop stress equations for combined bending, and twisting, of hollow shafts with K as theratio of inside to outside diameter.
6.6. In certain installations shafts may be subjected to an axial load F in addition to torsional andbending loads. Would the strain gauge arrangement for this experiment be acceptable to the
determination of stresses?
Give reasons for your answer. For simplicity, a solid shaft may be considered.
-
7/30/2019 124657335 Combined Bending Torsion
11/12
Appendix
8
Graph 7 Torsional Stiffness for Solid Shafts
Graph 8 Torsional Stiffness for Hollow Shafts
-
7/30/2019 124657335 Combined Bending Torsion
12/12
Appendix
9
a
Graph 9
Strength and Stiffness of Hollow and Solid Shafts with the Same Volume
Graph 10 Strength and Stiffness of Hollow and Solid Shafts with the Same Outer Diameter
top related