1 state aviation system plan update 2007 airport sponsor briefing december 2007 and january 2008...
Post on 20-Jan-2016
216 Views
Preview:
TRANSCRIPT
1
State Aviation System Plan Update 2007
AIRPORT SPONSOR BRIEFING
December 2007 and January 2008
PENNDOT Multi-Modal Planning
2
2007 SASP Update Objectives
Element 1 - Classifications & Performance Criteria• Refine the airport classification system for advanced and some intermediate airports• Upgrade the SASP data management system• Assess the “State of the System” in terms of facility amenities and services performance criteria
Element 2 – NPIAS Coverage• Review the FAA’s NPIAS entry standards and guiding principles• Perform case studies on SASP airports to decide if they should be in the NPIAS• Assess how well Pennsylvania’s NPIAS airports meet NPIAS entry standards and guiding principles and if the state has proper coverage from airports of national significance
3
2007 SASP Update Objectives
Element 3 – System Capacity Needs & Prioritization• Define performance criteria that enable the BOA to identify projects that provide the greatest system operational benefit• Define demand versus capacity ratios at Pennsylvania’s key airports• Develop a simple benefits analysis for proposed projects in terms of their operational contribution to the system • Assemble the components of the project contribution analysis into a decision-support matrix
Element 4 - Ideal Funding Levels• Develop project implementation timelines with major milestones and their durations for various project types• Define “ideal” or “realistic” funding levels for all SASP airports based on implementation timelines and four year funding needs
4
Element 1 Findings
5
1 Advanced airports had to meet at least two of these criteria and pass the sensitivity tests
2 Unless they were reclassified to or from Advanced, Intermediate, Basic, and Limited/Special Use airports in the 2002 SASP remained in their classifications in the 2007 SASP
Commercial Service Advanced1 Intermediate2
14 CFR Part 139 Certification – Class I, II
& III
4,500 foot main runway 3,800 foot main runway
Visibility Minimums: 400 ft & ¾ mile Visibility Minimums: 600 ft & 1 mile
HIRLs or MIRLs MIRLs
Airport Classification CriteriaAirport Classification Criteria
Sensitivity Tests
NPIAS Designation
Steady or increased aviation activity from 1999 to 2005 Steady or increased based aircraft from 1999 to 2005
Note: Sensitivity tests were used to determine the extent to which each airport was serving its role in the system
6
Commercial Service (15)Altoona-Blair County (AOO)Arnold Palmer Regional (LBE)Bradford Regional (BFD)DuBois-Jefferson County (DUJ)Erie International (ERI)Harrisburg Intl (MDT)Johnstown-Cambria Co. (JST)Lancaster (LNS)Lehigh Valley Intl. (ABE)Philadelphia Intl. (PHL)Pittsburgh Intl. (PIT)University Park (UNV)Venango Regional (FKL)Wilkes-Barre/Scranton Intl. (AVP)Williamsport Regional (IPT)
Advanced (15)Allegheny County (AGC)Beaver County (BVI)Bedford County (HMZ)Butler County (BTP)Capital City (CXY)Chester County (40N)Hazelton Municipal (HZL)Mifflin County (RVL)Northeast Philadelphia (PNE)Penn Valley (SEG)
Port Meadville (GKJ)Reading Regional (RDG)Schuylkill County (ZER)Washington County (AFJ)York (THV)
Intermediate (21)Bradford County (N27)Brandywine-West Chester (OQN)Carlisle (N94)Clearfield-Lawrence (FIG)Connellsville (VVS)Donegal Springs Airpark (N71)Doylestown (DYL)Indiana County (IDI)New Castle Municipal (UCP)New Garden Flying Field (N57)Northumberland County (N79)Perkiomen Valley (N10)Pocono Mountains Municipal (MPO)Pottstown Municipal (N47)Pottstown Limerick (PTW)Quakertown (UKT)Queen City-Allentown (1N9)Rock-Tarentum (9G1)Rostraver (FWQ)Wings Field (LOM)Zelienople Municipal (PJC)
Reclassifications
Intermediate to AdvancedAdvanced to Intermediate
2007 SASP Airport Classifications1
1 Refer to footnote on previous slide on which airports were evaluated
7
• The 12 individual spreadsheets were combined into an Access-based data management system
• This conversion allows BOA to continuously update the data and to print reports:– Specific to each airport– For various regions within the Commonwealth– To compare airport or regional status between different years
Inventory Data Management System
8
Amenity/Service1 Commercial Service2 Advanced Intermediate
Runway Length 5,000 ft 4,500 ft 3,800 ft
Runway Width ARC C-II ARC B-II ARC B-II
Runway Strength >60,000 lbs SW >30,000 lbs SW >12,500 lbs SW
Taxiway Full parallel Full parallel Full parallel
NAVAIDS 200 ft & ½ mile 400 ft & ¾ mile 600 ft & 1 mile
Approach AidsBeacon, wind cone,
REILS, PAPIs, MALSRBeacon, wind cone, REILS, PAPIs, ALS
Beacon, wind cone, REILS, VGSIs
Runway Edge Lights HIRLs HIRLs or MIRLs MIRLs
Weather ASOS/AWOS ASOS/AWOS ASOS/AWOS
FacilitiesFBO, phone, bathroom, jet fuel, repairs, ground
transportation
FBO, phone, bathroom, jet fuel, repairs, ground
transportation
FBO, phone, bathroom, jet fuel, repairs, ground
transportation
ServicesAircraft & auto parking,
storage, terminalAircraft & auto parking,
storage, terminalAircraft & auto parking,
storage, terminal
1 Amenity/service criteria categories are from the 2002 SASP
2 Commercial Service airports must also have a CFR Part 139 Class I, II or III Certification
2007 SASP Amenities & Services Criteria
9
Amenity/Service Commercial Service Advanced Intermediate
Runway Length 100% 100% 43%
Runway Width 100% 100% 62%
Runway Strength 73% 73% 71%
Taxiway 73% 80% 43%
NAVAIDS 73% 40% 62%
Approach Aids 67% 33% 52%
Runway Edge Lights 100% 100% 71%
Weather 100% 100% 52%
Facilities 100% 100% 76%
Services 100% 100% 57%
State of the System – Meeting Performance Criteria
10
Element 2
Element 2 Findings
11
64Pennsylvania
NPIAS Airports
64Pennsylvania
NPIAS Airports
10Primary Commercial
Service
10Primary Commercial
Service
5 Non-Primary Commercial Service
5 Non-Primary Commercial Service
12Reliever
12Reliever
37General Aviation
37General Aviation
NPIAS Guiding Principles
• Does the airport have sufficient runway length to accommodate the most demanding aircraft that regularly use the airport?
• Does the airport have room to expand if necessary?
• Is the airport compatible with surrounding development?
Pennsylvania's NPIAS Airports
12
Case Study Decision Tree
NPIAS EligibleNPIAS Eligible
Adheres to guiding principles
Adheres to guiding principles
• 10 Based Aircraft• >30 Minutes to Nearest NPIAS Airport
• 10 Based Aircraft• >30 Minutes to Nearest NPIAS Airport
Public Use AirportPublic Use Airport
Yes
Yes
Yes
NotNPIAS Eligible
NotNPIAS Eligible
Meets Alternative and/or Heliport Criteria
Meets Alternative and/or Heliport Criteria
No
No
No
Yes
No
Note: Airports that are AIP grant obligated can be NPIAS-eligible
13
Case Study Airports (8)
IDOwner-
ShipBased Aircraft
Nearest NPIAS Airport (min)
Meets Primary Criteria
Meets Guiding
Principles
Grant Obli-gated
Now In NPIAS
Recom-mended
for NPIAS
Carlisle N94 Private 58 25-30 Yes Yes No Yes Yes
Cherry Ridge N30 Private 41 30 Yes No No Yes Yes1
Sky Haven 76N Private 29 30-35 Yes No No No No
Mid-State PSB Public 8 30-35 No No Yes Yes No2
Ebensburg 9G8 Public 5 25 No No Yes Yes No2
Deck 9D4 Private 37 30-35 Yes Yes No No Yes
Pennridge N70 Private 50 15-20 No Yes No No No
Penn’s Landing Heliport
P72 Private 4 30 No N/A No No Yes
1 A new site is needed as Cherry Ridge cannot expand to accommodate it’s design aircraft2 These airports are presently in the NPIAS because of grant obligations
Case Study Recommendations
Notes: Recommendations are based on existing conditions and may be reconsidered if local changes justify such actions Except for designated relievers, NPIAS airports must be publicly owned to be eligible for AIP (federal) funding
14
• The GIS-based map depicts statewide coverage by existing AIP-eligible NPIAS airports based on 30-minute drive time contours
• This map also ties Pennsylvania’s NPIAS airports to the: Proposed Core Transportation System Tier 1 and 2 airports Proposed Core Transportation System Economic Centers Population centers greater than 40,000
• This map illustrates that: Every major population and economic center is adequately covered
by a NPIAS airport Every county has at least partial coverage by a NPIAS airport
NPIAS Airport Coverage
15
NPIAS Airport Coverage
16
1 This amount reflects the state funding used to match AIP projects and to fund non-FAA eligible projects. It equals $3.5 million per year for four years plus $2.3 million from the FYP
FindingsCommercial
ServiceAdvanced Intermediate
Amount of FYP Allocated to Each
Classification$16.3 million1 $20.4 million $43.3 million
Number of Airports/Percent of
State System
15 airports11% of State
System
14 airports10% of State
System
22 airports16% of State System
Amount allocated to Capacity
$3.0 million $18.3 million
Amount allocated to Safety, Security &
Standards$13.2 million $17.8 million
Amount allocated to Planning &
Environmental$622,000 $790,000
Amount allocated to Reconstruction
$3.4 million $6.2 million
NPIAS Airports & the SFY 07/08-10/11 Four Year Plan
17
1 This percent reflects the $2.3 million programmed in the FYP. It does not include the $3.5 million per year that the BOA uses to match AIP projects.
FindingsCommercial
ServiceAdvanced Intermediate
Percent of FYP Allocated to Each Classification
2.9%1 25.1% 53.2%
Number of Airports/Percent of State
System
15 airports11% of State
System
14 airports10% of State
System
22 airports16% of State System
Percent allocated to Capacity
3.7% 22.5%
Percent allocated to Safety, Security, &
Standards16.3% 21.8%
Percent allocated to Planning & Environmental
0.8% 1.0%
Percent allocated to Reconstruction
4.2% 7.6%
NPIAS Airports & the SFY 07/08-10/11 Four Year Plan
18
Findings
Element 3Element 2
Element 3 Findings
19
Airport Demand/Capacity Ratios
20
• Define the annual service volume (ASV) of individual airports and the system as a whole
• Determine the incremental operational gain (contribution) from specific projects in terms of increased ASV
• Weight projects at airports with higher demand levels more than at airports with lower demand levels
• Recognize sponsors who demonstrate a higher level of readiness to implement projects
Project Benefits Analysis – Basic Components
21
• Cost per increased annual operation – for increased demand and operational benefit
• Cost per weighted increased annual operation
• Weighted system contribution for operational gains
• Sponsor and project readiness using a readiness checklist
System Contribution Calculator – Calculates:
22
AirportProject
Old Rwy New Rwy Costs
Clarion County/AXQ - Rwy 6-24Includes extension of parallel taxiway
4,100 x 75
5,000 x 75
$1,441,112
Butler County/BTP - Rwy 8-26Includes extension of parallel taxiway
4,005 x 100
4,805 x 100
$4,929,394
Penn Valley/SEG - Rwy 17-35Includes extension of parallel taxiway
3,700 x 75
4,760 x 75
$5,120,500
System Contribution Calculator – Test Cases
23
System Contribution Calculator – Test CaseFindings – “System Contribution Calculator”
24
Findings
Element 4Element 2
Element 4 Findings
25
Project Type Implementation Range Average
New runways 6 – 12 years 9.5 years
Runway extensions 5 – 10 years 7.5 years
New passenger terminals 5 – 9 years 7 years
Terminal expansions 4 – 8 years 6 years
New taxiways 3 – 6 years 4.5 years
Taxiway extensions 2 – 5 years 3.5 years
Roadway access improvements 5 – 9 years 7 years
New NAVAID development 3 – 6 years 4.5 years
Land acquisition/obstruction removal 2 – 5 years 3 years
New parking apron 2 – 4 years 3 years
Pavement rehabilitation 1 – 3 years 2 years
New fuel storage facilities 2.5 – 5.5 years 4 years
New airport buildings 2 – 5 years 3.5 years
Implementation Timelines by Project Type
26
Project Purpose Implementation Range Average
Capacity 4.5 – 13.5 years 9 years
Environmental 2 – 6 years 4 years
Planning 2 – 5 years 3.5 years
Reconstruction 5.5 – 11.5 years 8.5 years
Safety and Security 4.5 – 9.5 years 7 years
Standards 5.5 – 11.5 years 8.5 years
Other N/A 7 years1
1 The typical project duration for “Other” projects was assumed to be the average of all the average durations or 7 years
Implementation Timelines by Project Purpose
27
• The total sum (federal, state, and local) of the capital improvement needs for the four year period from SFY 2007/08 through 2010/11 is $249.3 million
• This was considered the four-year statewide “demand” for funds for airports in all classifications
AIP1 ADP2
Approved Unapproved Approved Unapproved
$76.4 million $120.1 million $19.1 million $33.7 million
$196.5 million $52.8 million
$249.3 million
1 Only includes Airport Improvement Program (AIP) projects for airports in the State Block Grant Program.
2 Includes Aviation Development Program (ADP) projects only; TAP/Capital Budget projects not included.
Ideal Funding Levels – Four Year “Demand”
28
Project Purpose Funding Percent
Safety, Security & Standards $139.3 million 56%
Capacity $42.5 million 17%
Reconstruction $43.3 million 17%
Planning & Environmental $15.2 million 6%
Other $9.0 million 4%
Total $249.3 million 100%
Ideal Funding Levels – Needs by Purpose
29
PurposeFour Year Demand
($ million)
Average Duration (years)1
Duration divided by
four (years)
Four Year Demand divided by Duration/4
($ million)Percent
Safety, Security & Standards
$139.3 8.4 2.10 $66.2
Reconstruction $43.3 8.5 2.13 $20.4
Capacity $42.5 9.0 2.25 $18.9
Planning & Environmental $15.2 4.0 1.00 $15.2
Other $9.0 7.5 1.88 $4.8
Total $249.3 $125.5 50.3%
Ideal Funding Levels – SFY 2007/08 thru 2010/11
1 The average duration for “Safety, Security, & Standards” and for “Planning & Environmental” projects is a weighted average of the timelines for the individual project purpose categories
30
• The recommended “realistic” or “ideal” four year funding level equals $125.5 million
• Compared to the approved 2007 FYP = $76.4 AIP + $19.1 ADP = $95.5 million = 76% of “ideal”
• BOA should target between 80-90% of the realistic funding level in each FYP which equals:– $100 to $113 million every four years– $1.2 to $4.4 million more per year than the 2007 FYP
• This equals 50% of the funding “demand” over any four year period
• This amount does not include the four-year $20 million Aviation Transportation Assistance Program (assumed at $5 million per year)
Ideal Funding Levels - Recommendations
31
• Finalize report, technical summary, and brochure
• SASP Update Briefings for Airports – East & West
• Complete project documentation by January 31
Next Steps
32
State Aviation System Plan Update 2007
AIRPORT SPONSOR BRIEFING
December 2007 and January 2008
PENNDOT Multi-Modal Planning
top related