1 microboone: larsoft simulation & pmt response tests jessica esquivel august 6 2009 nevis labs,...

Post on 22-Dec-2015

219 Views

Category:

Documents

1 Downloads

Preview:

Click to see full reader

TRANSCRIPT

1

MicroBooNE: LarSoft Simulation & PMT Response Tests

Jessica EsquivelAugust 6 2009Nevis Labs, Columbia University

2

Outline/Acknowledgments

Mike Shaevitz Lesli Camilleri Willian Seligman Gary Cheng

MicroBooNE Overview SuperNova Neutrinos Hardware Software Future Work/Conclusion

3

MicroBooNE Overview

Liquid Argon Time Projection Chamber

– Booster neutrino beam– Neutrinos from the Main

Injector(NuMi)

Primary Physics done is studying the low energy excess seen in MiniBooNE Published: “Unexplained Excess of Electron-Like

Events from a 1 GeV Beam”, PRL 102, 101802 (2009)

4

MicroBooNE Overview

e+e-

5

MicroBooNE Overview

Ionization electrons drift to 3 recording planes

– 2 Induction planes U, V: +- 60 to vertical

– 1 collection plane Y: vertical.

Electrons

Induction planes U VInduction planes U V

Collection plane Y

6

MicroBooNE Overview

Scintillation light is collected by PMT's

– Used to determine the time when event occured

PMT's are coated with a Tetraphenyl-butadiene (TPB) to shift the scintillated light to visible light.

8” PMT

7

Super Nova Neutrinos

Neutrino Signal is the first to emerge from a Supernova.– Can give information about the early stages of core

collapse

All Large LArTPC's should have the capability of collecting supernova neutrino data.– MicroBooNE is the beginning of large scale LArTPC's – Cold Electronics will reduce electric noise– LAr purity for longer drifts

8

MicroBooNE Overview

9

Hardware: PMT point response

First tests tested the point dependency on the PMT.

0°22.5°45°

67.5°

90°

10

Hardware: PMT point response

Poor Correlation Unsteady Pulse

Generator

11

Hardware: PMT response as a function of angle

12

Hardware: Calculated vs Experimented

Fresnel's Equations shown below were used as a checkpoint calculations to make sure the data that was being collected was close to the calculated data.

13

Hardware: Angle of Incidence Vs Relative Mean

Plot shows the calculated mean using Fresnel's Equations plus the data collected at three different points on the PMT

14

Hardware: Angle of Incidence Vs. Relative Mean

Discrepancies calculated and measured data include:– Human error in measuring the angle of incidence.

2.65% on average over all the points 6.6% at point A 1.45% at point D 1.3% at point G

– Index of refraction of PMT was unknown, 1.5 was used for calculating purposes instead.

15

Hardware: Photodetector response in electrostatic field

In the MicroBooNE experiment, the PMT’s will be exposed to an electric field of 500V/50cm– We are recreating this by building a blackbox with

two aluminum plates mounted 50cm away.

16

Hardware: PMT E-Field Results

Turning on the +500V has no effect on the PMT pulse height

500V was then increased to 700V

– Still no effect The cathode is grounded

Therefore all outside field lines terminate on it.

– It acts as a Faraday cage

PMT was also reversed– Still no effect: There is an

electrostatic shield 16

LED

Pulser Oscilloscope+500V(Mesh)

50 cm

Ground(Cryostat)

17

Software

The LArSoft software package has been run for NUE-e interactions with incoming energies of:

– 50MeV50MeV – 100MeV – 150MeV

The reason why LarSoft was run for such low energies was to be able to simulate supernova neutrinos which happen on a low energy scale.

18

Software: Event Display

All events were shown in this form.

To extract information, a program was needed.

19

Software

Histograms have been created for:– Incoming Neutrino/Anti-Neutrino Energy– Outgoing Lepton Energy– Outgoing Neutrino/Anti-Neutrino Energy– Theta between the Incoming Neutrino Vector and

Outgoing Lepton Vector– Number of Voxels relative to the incoming Energy– Number of Voxels vs the Energy of Electrons

20

Software

21

Software

22

Software

23

Software

Neutrinos are left-handed and electrons are as well.

Before colision, the angular momentum is zero.

Direction isn't important after collision because in any direction, angular momentum will be conserved.

This results in a flat neutrino energy distribution

24

Software

Anti-Neutrinos are right-handed

Before Colision angular momentum is +1.

Direction is important because angular momentum needs to be conserved.

– Anti-neutrinos must emerge in the forward direction in the center of mass

This results in a peaked energy distribution.

25

Software: Theta between Neutrino and lepton

Mean Theta in Degrees is: 13.32 degrees

26

Software: Voxel

A Voxel is a 3D pixel that divides the energy deposited in the Liquid Argon into X, Y and Z cubes– These voxels are then what drifts to the simulated

wire chambers.

27

Software

Energy: 50MeV Mean: 57.04Energy: 100MeV Mean: 115.6Energy: 150MeV Mean: 172.6

28

Software

Plot shows the correlation between the Number of Voxels and the Energy of an Outgoing Electron

29

Future Work

Understanding why some events are thrown out. Plot the electrons coming from an NUEbar-e interaction

separately from a NUE-e interaction. Plot Energy of Voxels vs Energy of Electron Do PMT response tests on the PMT being used in

MicroBooNE– Using a more sophisticated setup to reduce human error

top related