考績丙等制度設計評估: - exam.gov.t · pdf...
Post on 06-Feb-2018
234 Views
Preview:
TRANSCRIPT
984 145-170
145
***
William N. Dunn
[]
98 3 19 98 4 17 * **
984
146
2005
09400055851
10235
2005
2009
2009
147
1
2
1
3
1
2 443 3
984
148
1
1. 2.
1. 2.
1. 2.
149
2000153
984
150
1992185
443
2007931.
2.
3.
4. 5.
151
Der Grundsatz der Bestimmtheit
200771
4
2002249-258
1.
2.
3.
4 623
984
152
5
1. 2
2. 2
3.
5 432
153
2
(91)
0342
(87)
0031
()(86) 0836
(96)
0770
0960101243
(92)
0289
0920127300
984
154
(91)
0323
89A000853
26
7
rules of natural justice
no man shall be a judge in his own causeboth
sides shall be heard20038
6 2358 3257
2437 1605 2758 7
2002257
155
1998114
200211-28 3
3
984
156
008393
1.
2.
3.
157
1
1
984
158
298
2
159
2
William N. Dunn1994: 282-289
policy recommendation
decision criteriaDunn
Effectiveness
984
160
200116
2004231
Efficiency
227,980 2009
161
4,560
Adequacy
desired
Equity
Responsiveness
984
162
8
Appropriateness
assumption
2000
401
2009
2009
9
Dunn
8
9
2002356
163
984
164
491
165
A E
984
166
C. H. Ule
187
167
10
2008 12 18
http://lis.ly.gov.tw/lgcgi/ttsweb?@@884743891
2000
20092009 4
13 http://www.cpa.gov.tw/public/Attach-
ment/93913381495.xls
2008
2008 12 24 http://www.exam.gov.tw/
newshow.asp?1306
2001
10 295 312 323 338 378 382 430
459 462 483 491 563
984
168
138 11-24
2007
20092009 3
11 YAHOO http://tw.news.yahoo.com/article/
ur1/d/a/090218/5/1/leo50.html
20092009 4 13
YAHOO http://tw.news.yahoo.com/marticle/url/d/a/090313/
110/1fzu9.html?type= new&pg=3
2000
20092009
3 11 YAHOO http://tw.news.yahoo.com/article/
ur1/d/a/090210/17/le7xh.html
1998 40 114-
120
20092009
3 11 YAHOO http://tw.news.yahoo.com/
article/ur1/d/a/090210/17/le7xs.html
2002
88 249-258
1992
2002
2004
39 5 10-19
2003
Dunn, W. N. (1994). Public Policy Analysis: An Introduction (2nd Ed.). Englewood Cliffs, N.J.: Prentice-Hall International, Inc.
169
Assessing the Design of the Performance-C Rating System for Civil
Servants in Taiwan
Jong Huang*, Chien-Hung Lin**
Abstract
The study tries to review the proposed amendments to the Civil Ser-vice Performance Evaluation Act and its enforcement rules which the Ex-amination Yuan has drafted, particularly those dealing with the Perform-ance-C Rating. From the design-evaluation perspective, the study aims to clarify if the new regulations meet the general principles of appropriate laws and correspond closely to the six selection criteria specified in the model of policy recommendation by William N. Dunn. The research results can be outlined as follows. First of all, the proposed provisions of performance-C-Rating run the risk of violating the legal reservation principle. Second, the conditions leading to a C-performance rating are not sufficiently specified. Third, due process of law and the grievance-redressing system to be invoked and executed when rendering performance evaluation are far from thorough or comprehensive. In addition, imposing a limit of two percent of the work-force as qualified for the C-performance rating will invite tough challenges and great difficulties, virtually making it impossible to implement. Accord-ing to the analysis above, the study puts forth a few suggestions for the Ex-
* Associate Professor, Department of Public Policy and Management, Shu-Hsin University. ** Section Assistant, Personnel Department, Ministry of Economic Affairs.
984
170
amination Yuan to consider as it continues to fine-tune the relevant provi-sions. For one thing, specific conditions and circumstances should replace the two-percent threshold rule, while the C-rating as part of the performance appraisal system should be explicitly regulated by law. Also, due process of law should be fulfilled in administering the evaluation process. A concluding point is that the right to commence a proceeding of Administrative Litigation by anyone unsatisfied with a C-rating disposition, be it the first or second time in sequence, should be respected and granted.
Keywords: design evaluation, policy recommendation, performance appraisal system, the principle of legal reservation, due process of law
top related