ambient environmental hazards in the or kay ball, rn, msa, cnor, faan lewis center, oh...
TRANSCRIPT
Ambient Ambient Environmental Environmental
Hazards in the ORHazards in the OR
Ambient Ambient Environmental Environmental
Hazards in the ORHazards in the OR
Kay Ball, RN, MSA, CNOR, FAANKay Ball, RN, MSA, CNOR, FAAN
Lewis Center, OHLewis Center, OH
[email protected]@aol.com
Red Team – April 17, 2007
ObjectiveObjectiveObjectiveObjective
Discuss control measures Discuss control measures for inhalation hazards for inhalation hazards
in the OR.in the OR.
Inhalation HazardsInhalation Hazards
Transmissible diseasesTransmissible diseases Toxic fumesToxic fumes
Anesthesia gasesAnesthesia gases GlutaraldehydeGlutaraldehyde Surgical smokeSurgical smoke
Spaulding’s ClassificationsSpaulding’s Classifications
Critical (Sterilize) Critical (Sterilize) Semi-critical (Disinfect)Semi-critical (Disinfect)Non-critical (Clean)Non-critical (Clean)
Glut HistoryGlut HistoryGlut HistoryGlut HistoryTanning agent for leatherTanning agent for leatherTissue fixativeTissue fixativePreservative in cosmeticsPreservative in cosmeticsTherapeutic agent for warts & other Therapeutic agent for warts & other
infectionsinfectionsX-ray processing solution & film X-ray processing solution & film
emulsionemulsion
Glutaraldehyde DisinfectionGlutaraldehyde Disinfection
Broad spectrum antimicrobial “cold” disinfectantBroad spectrum antimicrobial “cold” disinfectant
Glut action – bonds proteinGlut action – bonds protein
Device preparation – thorough cleaning and rinsingDevice preparation – thorough cleaning and rinsing
Efficacy monitoringEfficacy monitoring
Soak time controversySoak time controversy
ControversyControversyFDAFDA
45 min soak45 min soak
25 degrees C.25 degrees C.
Prof. OrgProf. Org20 min soak20 min soak
Room temp.Room temp.
Glut HazardsGlut Hazards Skin & mucous membrane hazardsSkin & mucous membrane hazards Ingestion hazards Ingestion hazards Respiratory hazardsRespiratory hazards Chronic exposure hazardsChronic exposure hazards
Exposure LevelsExposure LevelsExposure LevelsExposure Levels 0.04 ppm Detect odor0.04 ppm Detect odor 0.2 ppm Exposure level0.2 ppm Exposure level 0.3 ppm Irritant0.3 ppm Irritant 0.4 ppm Pouring0.4 ppm Pouring
AAMI DocumentAAMI DocumentAAMI DocumentAAMI Document
““Safe use and handling of Safe use and handling of glutaraldehyde-based products glutaraldehyde-based products
in health care facilities”in health care facilities”
Glut AdvantagesGlut AdvantagesGlut AdvantagesGlut Advantages Effective for HLDEffective for HLD Highly compatibleHighly compatible Sterilization with long soak timesSterilization with long soak times Low cost, convenientLow cost, convenient
Glut LimitationsGlut LimitationsGlut LimitationsGlut Limitations Unstable - Effective life 2-4 weeksUnstable - Effective life 2-4 weeks Thorough rinsing - mandatoryThorough rinsing - mandatory Skin, respiratory hazardsSkin, respiratory hazards Glut bonds proteinsGlut bonds proteins
Options for alternatives: Other soaking Options for alternatives: Other soaking solutions (Cidex OPA) or sterilization methodssolutions (Cidex OPA) or sterilization methods
Cidex - OPA Cidex - OPA ORTHO-PHTHALDEHYDEORTHO-PHTHALDEHYDE
Cidex - OPA Cidex - OPA ORTHO-PHTHALDEHYDEORTHO-PHTHALDEHYDE
HDL in 10 min at 20 degrees CHDL in 10 min at 20 degrees C Ortho-phthaldehyde (.55%) + insert Ortho-phthaldehyde (.55%) + insert
ingredents (99.45%)ingredents (99.45%) No sterilant claimsNo sterilant claims Reuse 14 days (test strip)Reuse 14 days (test strip) Endorsed by many manufacturersEndorsed by many manufacturers Stains skin, eye & resp irritant, causes Stains skin, eye & resp irritant, causes
headachesheadaches
Sterilization OptionsSterilization Options
SteamSteam Ethylene OxideEthylene Oxide Peracetic AcidPeracetic Acid Gas PlasmaGas Plasma OzoneOzone
Sterilize
Miners – Air ProblemsMiners – Air ProblemsMiners – Air ProblemsMiners – Air Problems
OR Team Serving as the Biological Indicator for Poor Air QualityOR Team Serving as the Biological Indicator for Poor Air Quality
AORN RPAORN RPAORN RPAORN RP
Personnel working with an ESU or Personnel working with an ESU or laser should avoid exposure to laser should avoid exposure to smoke plume generated during smoke plume generated during tissue cutting and coagulation.tissue cutting and coagulation.
Surgical smoke causes headaches, watery eyes, Surgical smoke causes headaches, watery eyes, respiratory problems in healthcare workersrespiratory problems in healthcare workers
NIOSHNIOSHNIOSHNIOSH19881988““Smoke generated during laser Smoke generated during laser
surgery presents a potential surgery presents a potential health hazard.”health hazard.”
NIOSHNIOSHNIOSHNIOSH19851985““There’s a potential hazard from There’s a potential hazard from
smoke generated by smoke generated by electrosurgical knives.”electrosurgical knives.”
ResearchResearchTomita et al, 1989Tomita et al, 1989
Laser: 1gm tissue Laser: 1gm tissue
3 unfiltered cigarettes3 unfiltered cigarettes
ESU: 1gm tissueESU: 1gm tissue
6 unfiltered cigarettes6 unfiltered cigarettes
Laser and ESU smoke are very similar!Laser and ESU smoke are very similar!
Hazards of PlumeHazards of Plume
OdorOdorParticulate Matter SizeParticulate Matter SizeViabilityViabilityEndoscopy concernsEndoscopy concerns
Odor from Toxic GasesOdor from Toxic GasesOdor from Toxic GasesOdor from Toxic Gases
*Polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons*Benzene*Toluene*Formaldehyde*Acrolein
ODORODOR
Toxic Fumes and VaporsToxic Fumes and VaporsToxic Fumes and VaporsToxic Fumes and Vapors
AcroleinAcrolein BenzeneBenzene FormaldehydeFormaldehyde
Possible carcinogens!!!!Possible carcinogens!!!!
Particulate MatterParticulate Matter American College of Surgeons: American College of Surgeons:
5 microns = bacterial colonization 5 microns = bacterial colonization Regular surgical mask: Regular surgical mask:
5 micron filtration 5 micron filtration Research - 77% of surgical smoke is 1.1 Research - 77% of surgical smoke is 1.1
microns in size and smaller microns in size and smaller (Mihashi et al., 1975)(Mihashi et al., 1975)
Particulate ends up in the alveoli of your Particulate ends up in the alveoli of your lungslungs
ResearchResearchBaggish et al, 1988Baggish et al, 1988
Rats breathed unfiltered & filtered plumeRats breathed unfiltered & filtered plume
Unfiltered plume: Rats developed hypoxia, Unfiltered plume: Rats developed hypoxia, pulmonary problemspulmonary problems
Filtered plume: No changesFiltered plume: No changes
Viability ResearchViability Research
Garden et al, 1988Garden et al, 1988• Used CO2 laser on cow papillomavirusUsed CO2 laser on cow papillomavirus• Found intact viral DNA in plumeFound intact viral DNA in plume• Injected viral DNA from plume into cowInjected viral DNA from plume into cow• Grew same viral lesionGrew same viral lesion• Potential of transmission of viable Potential of transmission of viable
viral contaminantsviral contaminants
Transmission of virus to Dr.Transmission of virus to Dr.
Hallmo et al, 1991Hallmo et al, 1991• 44yo laser Dr developed laryngeal 44yo laser Dr developed laryngeal
papillomatosispapillomatosis• Lesions show same DNA type as Lesions show same DNA type as
anogenital condyloma from patientsanogenital condyloma from patients
Endoscopy Endoscopy Ott et al, 1993Ott et al, 1993
• Laparoscopy & plumeLaparoscopy & plume• Increase methemoglobin & Increase methemoglobin &
carboxyhemoglobincarboxyhemoglobin• (methemoglobin-(methemoglobin-OO22 carrying carrying
• capacity of RBCs)capacity of RBCs)
• Delay in healing?Delay in healing?
RecommendationsRecommendationsRecommendationsRecommendations AORNAORN ANSIANSI NIOSHNIOSH CDCCDC OSHAOSHA Global recommendationsGlobal recommendations
All say to evacuate All say to evacuate surgical smoke!surgical smoke!
SolutionsSolutionsSolutionsSolutions
Appropriate smoke Appropriate smoke evacuation systemevacuation system
In-line FilterIn-line FilterIn-line FilterIn-line FilterFor small amounts of plume use For small amounts of plume use
in-line filterin-line filter
Correct positioning neededCorrect positioning needed
Patient
Wall Suction
AORN Pilot Survey: Most popular methodAORN Pilot Survey: Most popular method
Wall SuctionWall SuctionWall SuctionWall Suction Corrodes pipesCorrodes pipes Contaminates buildingContaminates building Flow may not be high enough Flow may not be high enough
to capture surgical smoketo capture surgical smokeWall suction 2 cfmWall suction 2 cfm
Evacuator 30-50 cfmEvacuator 30-50 cfm
Smoke EvacuatorSmoke EvacuatorSmoke EvacuatorSmoke Evacuator
Needed when larger amounts of Needed when larger amounts of smoke createdsmoke created
Critical FeaturesCritical Features Efficiency Efficiency
Filtering capabilityFiltering capability Charcoal filter – removes odorCharcoal filter – removes odor ULPA filter – removes small ULPA filter – removes small
particulate (.1 microns, 99.999% particulate (.1 microns, 99.999% efficiency)efficiency)
Suction powerSuction power
Filter ChangingFilter Changing
Follow manufacturer’s recommendations when
changing
Occupational Hazard NOT Occupational Hazard NOT Environmental HazardEnvironmental Hazard
SolutionsSolutionsPosition smoke tube close to the Position smoke tube close to the
tissue impact sitetissue impact site
SolutionsSolutionsSolutionsSolutionsHigh Filtration MasksHigh Filtration Masks
0.1 micron
filtration
Not the first line of defenseNot the first line of defense