amani elhouderi yvonne obiajulu panagiotis …amani elhouderi, yvonne obiajulu& panagiotis...

1
Method: 123 samples, previously tested on the ARCHITECT i2000 analyser, were tested on the ALINITY system. Of these samples, 114 were selected based on various ranges. Values below 1.00 S/CO (sample per cut-off ) were considered non-reacPve, while values greater than 1.00 S/CO were considered reacPve. All reacPve and discrepant results were confirmed using a third plaRorm (Vidas immunoassay analyser). Findings: Four out of 123 samples tested were idenPfied as discrepant. These were analysed by VIDAS confirmatory tesPng and concurred with ALINITY results (Table 1). From this, the ALINITY met the laboratory and manufacturer acceptance criteria (stated specificity of 99.89% (95%CI: 99.67% to 99.98%). Analysis of EQA NEQAS HIV samples on the ALINITY did not deviate from the expected results. The within-run and within-laboratory precision coefficient variant percentage (CV%) was esPmated using ALINITY QC posiPve materials 1,2 and 3 (Table 2). The analysis of the CV% revealed that the HIV tesPng performed as reported by the manufacturer CV% (using the F staPsPcal analysis described by Forkman J (2009)) and found that based on average CV % of (5.56%) from the QC data for the ALINITY a measurement of 1 S/CO carries a Measurement of Uncertainty of (0.8888 to1.1112). A good correlaPon was found between the ARCHITECT and the ALINITY measurements (R 2 =0.9926) (Figure 2). Bland-Altman analysis of the ARCHITECT and the ALINITY (Figure 3) showed a posiPve bias. Based on these findings, the ALINITY HIV Ag/Ab Combo assay has met the laboratory acceptance criteria for assay comparability with the Architect HIV Ag/Ab Combo measurements. Conclusion: The ALINITY HIV Ag/Ab Combo demonstrated a beeer sensiPvity and specificity than the ARCHITECT and met the manufacturers and laboratory acceptance criteria. In addiPon, its ease of use is anPcipated to have posiPve implicaPons in meePng turnaround Pmes, subsequently enhancing the quality and efficiency of the service. Overall the ALINITY HIV Ab/Ag Combo assay is considered fit for purpose and ready for future diagnosPc use. Introduc@on: The ARCHITECT i2000 and the ALINITY i HIV Ag/Ab Combo assays are based on a two-step chemiluminescent microparPcle immunoassay (CMIA) principle, for the simultaneous qualitaPve detecPon of HIV p24 anPgen and anPbodies to human immunodeficiency virus type 1 and/or type 2 (HIV-1/HIV-2) in human serum or plasma (Figure 1). The objec@ve is to compare and validate the performance of the new Abboe ALINITY i HIV Ag/Ab Combo assay against the current ARCHITECT i2000 HIV Ag/Ab Combo by staPsPcally analysing the data collected from running paPent samples, kit controls, in-house controls and external quality assessment (EQA) samples. Architect Alinity NonreacPve ReacPve Grand Total Nonreac@ve 24 4* 28 Reac@ve 0 95 95 Grand Total 24 99 123 ALINITY vs. ARCHITECT AMANI ELHOUDERI, YVONNE OBIAJULU& PANAGIOTIS PANTELIDIS North West London Pathology, Charing Cross Hospital, Infection and Immunity Department, London, W6 8RF Table 1: Alinity vs Architect raw data comparison. *Four samples idenPfied as discrepant. Following VIDAS resoluPon of discrepant results the Alinity i HIV specificity was 100% against the Architect/VIDAS result. This shows the ALINITY met the laboratory and manufacturer acceptance criteria (stated specificity of 99.89% (95%CI: 99.67% to 99.98%). Figure 2: Analysis of correlaPon between S/CO measurements indicate good correlaPon between Architect measurements and the ALINITY i with R 2 value of 0.9926. Acknowledgements: Dr Alison Cox (InfecPon and Immunity Laboratory Manager) for sourcing the EQA material, Graham Pickard (Senior Biomedical ScienPst) for filling change process forms and Abboe DiagnosPcs for providing kits free of charge. Figure 3: Bland-Altman analysis of ARCHITECT and ALINITY i S/CO measurements showed a posiPve bias The two analysers show good agreement in measuring the same parameter (HIV Ab/Ag Combo assay). Figure 1: Chemiluminescent microparPcle immunoassay (CMIA) principle and components for the qualitaPve detecPon of anPgen and anPbodies to HIV-1 and HIV-2 in human serum or plasma. References: 1. Cinquanta L (2017), Chemiluminescent immunoassay technology: what does it change in autoanPbody detecPon?, h#ps://link.springer.com/ar4cle/10.1007/s13317-017-0097-2accessed 12/03/2019 2. Forkman J (2009) EsPmator and tests for common coefficients of variaPon in normal distribuPons. CommunicaPons in StaPsPcs - Theory and Methods, using online MEDCALC heps://www.medcalc.org/calc/comparison_of_coefficientsofvariaPon.php ,accessed 20/09/2018 Table 2: StaPsPcal analysis of the manufacturers reported precision CV% and the observed verificaPon precision CV% using the Alinity i HIV Combo posiPve kit controls 1,2 and 3. Architect i2000 Alinity i Immunology/Virology

Upload: others

Post on 05-Aug-2020

6 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: AMANI ELHOUDERI YVONNE OBIAJULU PANAGIOTIS …AMANI ELHOUDERI, YVONNE OBIAJULU& PANAGIOTIS PANTELIDIS North West London Pathology, Charing Cross Hospital, Infection and Immunity Department,

Method: 123 samples, previously tested on the ARCHITECT i2000 analyser,were tested on the ALINITY system. Of these samples, 114 were selectedbasedonvarious ranges.Valuesbelow1.00S/CO(samplepercut-off )wereconsiderednon-reacPve,whilevaluesgreaterthan1.00S/COwereconsideredreacPve. All reacPve and discrepant results were confirmed using a thirdplaRorm(Vidasimmunoassayanalyser).

Findings:Fouroutof123samplestestedwereidenPfiedasdiscrepant.Thesewere analysed by VIDAS confirmatory tesPng and concurred with ALINITYresults(Table1).Fromthis,theALINITYmetthelaboratoryandmanufactureracceptance criteria (stated specificity of 99.89% (95%CI: 99.67% to 99.98%).AnalysisofEQANEQASHIVsamplesontheALINITYdidnotdeviatefromtheexpected results. The within-run and within-laboratory precision coefficientvariantpercentage (CV%)wasesPmatedusingALINITYQCposiPvematerials1,2 and 3 (Table 2). The analysis of the CV% revealed that the HIV tesPngperformed as reported by the manufacturer CV% (using the F staPsPcalanalysisdescribedbyForkmanJ(2009))andfoundthatbasedonaverage CV% of (5.56%) from the QC data for the ALINITY a measurement of 1 S/COcarries a Measurement of Uncertainty of (0.8888 to1.1112). A goodcorrelaPon was found between the ARCHITECT and the ALINITYmeasurements (R2=0.9926) (Figure 2). Bland-Altman analysis of theARCHITECTandtheALINITY(Figure3)showedaposiPvebias.Basedonthesefindings, the ALINITY HIV Ag/Ab Combo assay has met the laboratoryacceptance criteria for assay comparability with the Architect HIV Ag/AbCombomeasurements.

Conclusion:TheALINITYHIVAg/AbCombodemonstratedabeeersensiPvityandspecificity than the ARCHITECT and met the manufacturers and laboratoryacceptance criteria. In addiPon, its ease of use is anPcipated to have posiPveimplicaPons in meePng turnaround Pmes, subsequently enhancing the qualityand efficiency of the service. Overall the ALINITY HIV Ab/Ag Combo assay isconsideredfitforpurposeandreadyforfuturediagnosPcuse.

Introduc@on: The ARCHITECT i2000 and the ALINITY i HIV Ag/Ab Comboassaysarebasedonatwo-stepchemiluminescentmicroparPcleimmunoassay(CMIA) principle, for the simultaneous qualitaPve detecPon of HIV p24anPgenandanPbodiestohumanimmunodeficiencyvirustype1and/ortype2 (HIV-1/HIV-2) in human serum or plasma (Figure 1). The objec@ve is tocompareandvalidatetheperformanceofthenewAbboeALINITYiHIVAg/AbCombo assay against the current ARCHITECT i2000 HIV Ag/Ab Combo bystaPsPcally analysing the data collected from running paPent samples, kitcontrols,in-housecontrolsandexternalqualityassessment(EQA)samples.

Architect Alinity NonreacPve ReacPve GrandTotal

Nonreac@ve 24 4* 28Reac@ve 0 95 95

GrandTotal 24 99 123

ALINITY vs. ARCHITECT

AMANI ELHOUDERI, YVONNE OBIAJULU& PANAGIOTIS PANTELIDIS North West London Pathology, Charing Cross Hospital, Infection and Immunity Department, London, W6 8RF

Table 1: Alinity vs Architect raw data comparison. *Four samples idenPfied as discrepant. FollowingVIDASresoluPonofdiscrepantresultstheAlinityiHIVspecificitywas100%againsttheArchitect/VIDASresult.ThisshowstheALINITYmetthelaboratoryandmanufactureracceptancecriteria(statedspecificityof99.89%(95%CI:99.67%to99.98%).

Figure2:AnalysisofcorrelaPonbetweenS/COmeasurementsindicategoodcorrelaPonbetweenArchitectmeasurementsandtheALINITYiwithR2valueof0.9926.

Acknowledgements:DrAlisonCox(InfecPonandImmunityLaboratoryManager)forsourcingtheEQAmaterial,GrahamPickard(SeniorBiomedicalScienPst)forfilling change process forms and Abboe DiagnosPcs for providing kits free ofcharge.

Figure3:Bland-AltmananalysisofARCHITECTandALINITYiS/COmeasurementsshowedaposiPvebiasThetwoanalysersshowgoodagreementinmeasuringthesameparameter(HIVAb/AgComboassay).

Figure1:ChemiluminescentmicroparPcleimmunoassay(CMIA)principleandcomponentsforthequalitaPvedetecPonofanPgenandanPbodiestoHIV-1andHIV-2inhumanserumorplasma.

References:1.  CinquantaL(2017),Chemiluminescentimmunoassaytechnology:whatdoesitchangein

autoanPbodydetecPon?,h#ps://link.springer.com/ar4cle/10.1007/s13317-017-0097-2accessed12/03/2019

2.  ForkmanJ(2009)EsPmatorandtestsforcommoncoefficientsofvariaPoninnormaldistribuPons.CommunicaPonsinStaPsPcs-TheoryandMethods,usingonlineMEDCALCheps://www.medcalc.org/calc/comparison_of_coefficientsofvariaPon.php,accessed20/09/2018

Table2:StaPsPcalanalysisofthemanufacturersreportedprecisionCV%andtheobservedverificaPonprecisionCV%usingtheAlinityiHIVComboposiPvekitcontrols1,2and3.

Architecti2000Alinityi

Immunology/Virology