Altus City Sales Tax Collections Momentum TrackYear 2005 – 2008

2008

2005

2006

2007

0.000

10.000

20.000

30.000

40.000

50.000

60.000

70.000

80.000

90.000

0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7Year / Year % Change

Cen

ter 12

-Mon

th A

vera

ge A

nnua

lized

% C

hang

e

.

Improving Leading

Lagging Slipping

Source: Oklahoma Tax Commission (OTC)

Anadarko City Sales Tax Collections Momentum Track

Year 2005 – 2008

2008

2005

2006

2007

-20

-10

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

-4 -3 -2 -1 0 1 2 3 4 5

Year / Year % Change

Cent

er 1

2-M

onth

Ave

rage

Ann

ualiz

ed %

Cha

nge

.

Improving Leading

Lagging Slipping

Source: Oklahoma Tax Commission (OTC)

Burns Flat City Sales Tax Collections Momentum Track

Year 2005 – 2008

2008

2005

2006

2007

-50

0

50

100

150

200

-15 -10 -5 0 5 10 15

Year / Year % Change

Cent

er 1

2-M

onth

Ave

rage

Ann

ualiz

ed %

Cha

nge

.

Improving Leading

Lagging Slipping

Source: Oklahoma Tax Commission (OTC)

Cheyenne City Sales Tax Collections Momentum Track

Year 2005 – 2008

2005

2006

2007

2008

-200

-100

0

100

200

300

400

500

600

700

800

-20 -10 0 10 20 30 40

Year / Year % Change

12-M

onth

Ave

rage

Ann

ualiz

ed %

Cha

nge

.

Improving Leading

Lagging Slipping

Source: Oklahoma Tax Commission (OTC)

Chickasha City Sales Tax Collections Momentum Track

Year 2005 – 2008

2005

2006

2007

2008

0

50

100

150

200

250

300

350

400

0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16 18 20

Year / Year % Change

Cent

er 1

2 - M

onth

Ave

rage

Ann

ualiz

ed %

Cha

nge

.

Improving Leading

Lagging Slipping

Source: Oklahoma Tax Commission (OTC)

Clinton City Sales Tax Collections Momentum Track

Year 2005 – 2008

2008

2005 2006

2007

0

50

100

150

200

250

0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14

Year / Year % Change

Cent

er 12

- M

onth

Ave

rage

Ann

ualiz

ed %

Cha

nge

Improving Leading

Lagging Slipping

Source: Oklahoma Tax Commission (OTC)

Cordell City Sales Tax Collections Momentum Track

Year 2005 – 2008

20052006

2007

2008

0

20

40

60

80

100

120

140

160

180

200

-2 0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16 18Year / Year % Change

Cent

er 1

2- M

onth

Ave

rage

Ann

ualiz

ed %

Cha

nge

.

Improving Leading

Lagging Slipping

Source: Oklahoma Tax Commission (OTC)

Duncan City Sales Tax Collections Momentum Track

Year 2005 – 2008

2005

2006

2007

2008

0

20

40

60

80

100

120

140

160

180

200

0 2 4 6 8 10 12

Year / Year % Change

Cent

er 12

-Mon

th A

vera

ge A

nnua

lized

% C

hang

e

.

Improving Leading

Lagging Slipping

Source: Oklahoma Tax Commission (OTC)

El Reno City Sales Tax Collections Momentum Track

Year 2005 – 2008

2005

20062007

2008

0

20

40

60

80

100

120

140

160

180

0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14

Year / Year % Change

Cent

er 12

-Mon

th A

vera

ge A

nnua

lized

% C

hang

e

.

Improving Leading

Lagging Slipping

Source: Oklahoma Tax Commission (OTC)

Elk City City Sales Tax Collections Momentum Track

Year 2005 – 2008

2005

2006

2007

2008

0

200

400

600

800

1000

1200

0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16 18 20

Year / Year % Change

12 -

Mon

th A

vera

ge A

nnua

lized

% C

hang

e

.

Improving Leading

Lagging Slipping

Source: Oklahoma Tax Commission (OTC)

Frederick City Sales Tax Collections Momentum Track

Year 2005 – 2008

2005

2006

2007

2008

-40

-20

0

20

40

60

80

100

120

-3 -2 -1 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7

Year / Year % Change

Cent

er 1

2-M

onth

Ave

rage

Ann

ualiz

ed %

Cha

nge

.

Improving Leading

Lagging Slipping

Source: Oklahoma Tax Commission (OTC)

Hobart City Sales Tax Collections Momentum TrackYear 2005 – 2008

2006

2007

2008

2009

-20

0

20

40

60

80

100

120

-4 -2 0 2 4 6 8

Year / Year % Change

Cen

ter 12

-Mon

th A

vera

ge A

nnua

lized

% C

hang

e

.

Improving Leading

Lagging Slipping

Source: Oklahoma Tax Commission (OTC)

Hollis City Sales Tax Collections Momentum TrackYear 2005 – 2008

2005

2006

2007

2008

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

80

-4 -2 0 2 4 6 8

Year / Year % Change

Cent

er 12

-Mon

th A

vera

ge A

nnua

lized

% C

hang

e

.

Improving Leading

Lagging Slipping

Source: Oklahoma Tax Commission (OTC)

Kingfisher City Sales Tax Collections Momentum Track

Year 2005 – 2008

2005

2006

2007

2008

0

100

200

300

400

500

600

-20 -15 -10 -5 0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35

Year / Year % Change

Cent

er 12

-Mon

th A

vera

ge A

nnua

lized

% C

hang

e

. Improving Leading

Lagging Slipping

Source: Oklahoma Tax Commission (OTC)

Lawton City Sales Tax Collections Momentum Track

Year 2005 – 2008

2008

2005

20062007

-50

0

50

100

150

200

250

-2 0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16 18

Year / Year % Change

Cent

er 1

2-M

onth

Ave

rage

Ann

ualiz

ed %

Cha

nge

.

Improving Leading

Lagging Slipping

Source: Oklahoma Tax Commission (OTC)

Mangum City Sales Tax Collections Momentum Track

Year 2005 – 2008

2005

2006

20072008

0

20

40

60

80

100

120

140

160

-2 0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14

Year / Year % Change

Cent

er 1

2-M

onth

Ave

rage

Ann

ualiz

ed %

Cha

nge

.

Improving Leading

Lagging Slipping

Source: Oklahoma Tax Commission (OTC)

Mustang City Sales Tax Collections Momentum Track

Year 2005 – 2008

2008

2005

2006

2007

-100

0

100

200

300

400

500

600

-2 0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14

Year / Year % Change

Cent

er 12

-Mon

th A

vera

ge A

nnua

lized

% C

hang

e

.

Improving Leading

Lagging Slipping

Source: Oklahoma Tax Commission (OTC)

Purcell City Sales Tax Collections Momentum TrackYear 2005 – 2008

2005

2006

2007

2008

0

200

400

600

800

1000

1200

1400

1600

1800

0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40

Year / Year % Change

Cent

er 1

2-M

onth

Ave

rage

Ann

ualiz

ed %

Cha

nge

.

Improving Leading

Lagging Slipping

Source: Oklahoma Tax Commission (OTC)

Sayre City Sales Tax Collections Momentum TrackYear 2005 – 2008

2005 2006

2007

2008

-2000

0

2000

4000

6000

8000

10000

12000

-10 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80

Year / Year % Change

Cent

er 12

-Mon

th A

vera

ge A

nnua

lized

% C

hang

e

.

Improving Leading

Lagging Slipping

Source: Oklahoma Tax Commission (OTC)

Taloga City Sales Tax Collections Momentum TrackYear 2005 – 2008

2005

2006

2007 2008

-200

-100

0

100

200

300

400

500

600

700

800

900

-50 -40 -30 -20 -10 0 10 20 30 40 50

Year / Year % Change

Cent

er 1

2-M

onth

Ave

rage

Ann

ualiz

ed %

Cha

nge

.

Improving Leading

Lagging Slipping

Source: Oklahoma Tax Commission (OTC)

Walters City Sales Tax Collections Momentum Track

Year 2005 – 2008

2005

2006

2007 2008

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

80

90

100

-2 0 2 4 6 8 10

Year / Year % Change

Cent

er 1

2-M

onth

Ave

rage

Ann

ualiz

ed %

Cha

nge

.

Improving Leading

Lagging Slipping

Source: Oklahoma Tax Commission (OTC)

Watonga City Sales Tax Collections Momentum Track

Year 2005 – 2008

2005

2006

2007

2008

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

0 0.5 1 1.5 2 2.5 3 3.5 4 4.5

Year / Year % Change

Cent

er 12

-Mon

th A

vera

ge A

nnua

lized

% C

hang

e

.

Improving Leading

Lagging Slipping

Source: Oklahoma Tax Commission (OTC)

Waurika City Sales Tax Collections Momentum Track

Year 2005 – 2008

2005

2006

2007

2008

0

50

100

150

200

250

-4 -2 0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16

Year / Year % Change

Cent

er 1

2 - M

onth

Ave

rage

Ann

ualiz

ed %

Cha

nge

.

Improving Leading

Lagging Slipping

Source: Oklahoma Tax Commission (OTC)

Weatherford City Sales Tax Collections Momentum Track

Year 2005 – 2008

2008

2005

2006

2007

0

100

200

300

400

500

600

700

800

0 5 10 15 20 25 30

Year / Year % Change

Cent

er 1

2-M

onth

Ave

rage

Ann

ualiz

ed %

Cha

nge

.

Improving Leading

Lagging Slipping

Source: Oklahoma Tax Commission (OTC)

Yukon City Sales Tax Collections Momentum TrackYear 2005 – 2008

2005

2006

2007

2008

0

200

400

600

800

1000

1200

1400

0 5 10 15 20 25 30

Year / Year % Change

Cent

er 1

2 - M

onth

Ave

rage

Ann

ualiz

ed %

Cha

nge

Improving Leading

Lagging Slipping

Source: Oklahoma Tax Commission (OTC)