all material in this presentation, including text and images, is the property of noel-levitz, inc....
TRANSCRIPT
![Page 1: All material in this presentation, including text and images, is the property of Noel-Levitz, Inc. Permission is required to reproduce information. Does](https://reader035.vdocuments.mx/reader035/viewer/2022062712/56649c735503460f94925574/html5/thumbnails/1.jpg)
All material in this presentation, including text and images, is the property of Noel-Levitz, Inc. Permission is required to reproduce information.
Does Financial Aid Impact Student Retention Among Pell Grant Recipients in Louisiana?
Review of Findings for the Governance Commission
Kevin Crockett, President/CEOOctober 24, 2011
![Page 2: All material in this presentation, including text and images, is the property of Noel-Levitz, Inc. Permission is required to reproduce information. Does](https://reader035.vdocuments.mx/reader035/viewer/2022062712/56649c735503460f94925574/html5/thumbnails/2.jpg)
About the research partnership
![Page 3: All material in this presentation, including text and images, is the property of Noel-Levitz, Inc. Permission is required to reproduce information. Does](https://reader035.vdocuments.mx/reader035/viewer/2022062712/56649c735503460f94925574/html5/thumbnails/3.jpg)
Project outcomes for Louisiana
• Custom policy research• Assist in advancing policy changes as
needed• Develop report shells based on findings• Develop internal capacity to analyze and
monitor data in the future
![Page 4: All material in this presentation, including text and images, is the property of Noel-Levitz, Inc. Permission is required to reproduce information. Does](https://reader035.vdocuments.mx/reader035/viewer/2022062712/56649c735503460f94925574/html5/thumbnails/4.jpg)
The Research Questions
![Page 5: All material in this presentation, including text and images, is the property of Noel-Levitz, Inc. Permission is required to reproduce information. Does](https://reader035.vdocuments.mx/reader035/viewer/2022062712/56649c735503460f94925574/html5/thumbnails/5.jpg)
Research questions: Pell Study
• How does the level and mix of financial assistance affect fall-to-fall same school student retention in Louisiana among Pell Grant recipients?
• Can we observe differences in the retention of Pell Grant recipients versus students in other financial classifications (needy non-Pell recipients and no-need students)?
![Page 6: All material in this presentation, including text and images, is the property of Noel-Levitz, Inc. Permission is required to reproduce information. Does](https://reader035.vdocuments.mx/reader035/viewer/2022062712/56649c735503460f94925574/html5/thumbnails/6.jpg)
Research questions: Pell Study
• Can we identify flex points in the size and composition of financial aid awards where additional dollars yield diminishing or no returns? Can we help Louisiana package aid more efficiently by eliminating “overpayment” to some students and shifting that money to students who might otherwise be inclined to drop out?
![Page 7: All material in this presentation, including text and images, is the property of Noel-Levitz, Inc. Permission is required to reproduce information. Does](https://reader035.vdocuments.mx/reader035/viewer/2022062712/56649c735503460f94925574/html5/thumbnails/7.jpg)
Research questions: Pell Study
• How does the GO Grant interact with the Pell Grant in terms of impact on student retention?
• What is the best use of the state’s financial aid investment in TOPS Scholarships and GO Grants?
![Page 8: All material in this presentation, including text and images, is the property of Noel-Levitz, Inc. Permission is required to reproduce information. Does](https://reader035.vdocuments.mx/reader035/viewer/2022062712/56649c735503460f94925574/html5/thumbnails/8.jpg)
Additional planned research
• Replicate the Louisiana study in Oklahoma to make certain these patterns are not idiosyncratic
• Analyze potential differences in the Oklahoma and Louisiana data sets resulting from a need-sensitive state aid program versus a largely merit-sensitive program
![Page 9: All material in this presentation, including text and images, is the property of Noel-Levitz, Inc. Permission is required to reproduce information. Does](https://reader035.vdocuments.mx/reader035/viewer/2022062712/56649c735503460f94925574/html5/thumbnails/9.jpg)
Additional planned research
• Community college completion study (150% time)
• Study the impact of changes in financial aid over time
![Page 10: All material in this presentation, including text and images, is the property of Noel-Levitz, Inc. Permission is required to reproduce information. Does](https://reader035.vdocuments.mx/reader035/viewer/2022062712/56649c735503460f94925574/html5/thumbnails/10.jpg)
The Data Set and
Methodology
![Page 11: All material in this presentation, including text and images, is the property of Noel-Levitz, Inc. Permission is required to reproduce information. Does](https://reader035.vdocuments.mx/reader035/viewer/2022062712/56649c735503460f94925574/html5/thumbnails/11.jpg)
Final study database: 37,251 records
![Page 12: All material in this presentation, including text and images, is the property of Noel-Levitz, Inc. Permission is required to reproduce information. Does](https://reader035.vdocuments.mx/reader035/viewer/2022062712/56649c735503460f94925574/html5/thumbnails/12.jpg)
Final study database (37,251 records) continued
![Page 13: All material in this presentation, including text and images, is the property of Noel-Levitz, Inc. Permission is required to reproduce information. Does](https://reader035.vdocuments.mx/reader035/viewer/2022062712/56649c735503460f94925574/html5/thumbnails/13.jpg)
Key finding #1
In predicting fall-to-fall same
school retention, high school grade point average was
the strongest academic
preparation variable
![Page 14: All material in this presentation, including text and images, is the property of Noel-Levitz, Inc. Permission is required to reproduce information. Does](https://reader035.vdocuments.mx/reader035/viewer/2022062712/56649c735503460f94925574/html5/thumbnails/14.jpg)
![Page 15: All material in this presentation, including text and images, is the property of Noel-Levitz, Inc. Permission is required to reproduce information. Does](https://reader035.vdocuments.mx/reader035/viewer/2022062712/56649c735503460f94925574/html5/thumbnails/15.jpg)
This parity in performance is
encouraging given the vast difference in
family income between the Pell
students ($24,675) and students with
demonstrated financial need without Pell Grants ($59,887)
![Page 16: All material in this presentation, including text and images, is the property of Noel-Levitz, Inc. Permission is required to reproduce information. Does](https://reader035.vdocuments.mx/reader035/viewer/2022062712/56649c735503460f94925574/html5/thumbnails/16.jpg)
Key finding #2
After controlling for high school
performance, financial aid matters in
predicting which Pell Grant students
retain
![Page 17: All material in this presentation, including text and images, is the property of Noel-Levitz, Inc. Permission is required to reproduce information. Does](https://reader035.vdocuments.mx/reader035/viewer/2022062712/56649c735503460f94925574/html5/thumbnails/17.jpg)
Increasing the gift percentage from <30 percent to 55-<60 percent corresponds to a 26 percentage point increase in the retention rate, while increasing the percentage of need met with gift aid from 55 to <60 percent to 70-<80 percent increases retention by only 4 points.
![Page 18: All material in this presentation, including text and images, is the property of Noel-Levitz, Inc. Permission is required to reproduce information. Does](https://reader035.vdocuments.mx/reader035/viewer/2022062712/56649c735503460f94925574/html5/thumbnails/18.jpg)
Key finding #3
Pell recipients who also received the
Louisiana GO Grant had stronger overall financial aid
awards and retained at higher
rates
![Page 19: All material in this presentation, including text and images, is the property of Noel-Levitz, Inc. Permission is required to reproduce information. Does](https://reader035.vdocuments.mx/reader035/viewer/2022062712/56649c735503460f94925574/html5/thumbnails/19.jpg)
Adding the Go Grant alone increases the percentage of need met with gift aid by 14 percentage points and provides a 5.6
percentage point improvement in retention
Pell Only Pell + GO Pell + TOPS Pell + GO + TOPS0.0%
10.0%
20.0%
30.0%
40.0%
50.0%
60.0%
70.0%
80.0%
34.0%
47.5%
63.0%
73.9%
53.8%59.4%
73.3% 74.9%
Need Met with Gift Aid Retention Rate
All pairwise comparisons of means are significant except for retention rate between Pell+TOPS and Pell+GO+TOPS
![Page 20: All material in this presentation, including text and images, is the property of Noel-Levitz, Inc. Permission is required to reproduce information. Does](https://reader035.vdocuments.mx/reader035/viewer/2022062712/56649c735503460f94925574/html5/thumbnails/20.jpg)
Key finding #4
A simulation showed that you could
improve retention by increasing the GO
Grant to $4,000 and targeting it at students with
weaker overall financial aid awards
![Page 21: All material in this presentation, including text and images, is the property of Noel-Levitz, Inc. Permission is required to reproduce information. Does](https://reader035.vdocuments.mx/reader035/viewer/2022062712/56649c735503460f94925574/html5/thumbnails/21.jpg)
Simulation parameter
• We repackaged student’s GO Grants in the range of $0 to $4,000 with a target of meeting 55 percent of need with gift aid
• In some cases, $4,000 grants were not sufficient to bring a group of students up to the 55 percent of need met w/gift target
• In other cases, totally eliminating their GO Grants did not bring them down to the 55 percent
• We took the resulting financial aid package for each subset and estimated a new retention rate based on actual historical behavior of students who had received that level of financial assistance with that level of academic preparation
![Page 22: All material in this presentation, including text and images, is the property of Noel-Levitz, Inc. Permission is required to reproduce information. Does](https://reader035.vdocuments.mx/reader035/viewer/2022062712/56649c735503460f94925574/html5/thumbnails/22.jpg)
The simulation results show that you could increase retention and it would be cost-neutral*
Gift % Actual Results (2007-08 and 08-09) Simulated Results Change
Retention % # Students Retention % # Students Retention % # Students
<30% 41% 138 57% 192 +16% +54
30-40 56% 445 62% 496 +6% +51
40-50 59% 1,037 64% 1,121 +5% +84
50-55 63% 567 65% 590 +2% +23
55-60 72% 442 67% 412 -5% -30
60-70 69% 808 69% 806 -- -2
70-80 74% 664 74% 669 -- +5
80+ 81% 1,145 77% 1,083 -4% -62
* The simulation at 55% actually projected a two-year savings of $780,000
![Page 23: All material in this presentation, including text and images, is the property of Noel-Levitz, Inc. Permission is required to reproduce information. Does](https://reader035.vdocuments.mx/reader035/viewer/2022062712/56649c735503460f94925574/html5/thumbnails/23.jpg)
We are suspect that you would really lose the 62 students in the 80%+ category
Profile by Percent of Need Met With Gift Aid of 2007-08 and 2008-09 FTF Students With Both Pell Grants and GO Grants Louisiana Statewide and Regional Universities
Percent of Need Met With Gift Aid
Description Less than 80% 80% and Higher Overall
Total cases 6,481 1,407 7,888
% of total 82% 18% 100%
Number retained 4,101 1,145 5,246
Percent retained 63% 81% 67%
High school GPA 2.98 3.48 3.08
ACT composite 19.6 23.1 20.2
College GPA 2.11 2.84 2.24
Dependent students 5,808 1,370 7,178
% retained 64% 82% 67%
Parents’ income1 $28,952 $32,704 $29,661
Need $13,796 $11,094 $13,281
% of need met 70% 100% 76%
% of need met with gift aid 54% 97% 62% 1Average of reported incomes greater than zero
![Page 24: All material in this presentation, including text and images, is the property of Noel-Levitz, Inc. Permission is required to reproduce information. Does](https://reader035.vdocuments.mx/reader035/viewer/2022062712/56649c735503460f94925574/html5/thumbnails/24.jpg)
Policy Implications
![Page 25: All material in this presentation, including text and images, is the property of Noel-Levitz, Inc. Permission is required to reproduce information. Does](https://reader035.vdocuments.mx/reader035/viewer/2022062712/56649c735503460f94925574/html5/thumbnails/25.jpg)
Policy implications
1. Everything should be done to restore original GO Grant funding levels
2. Maintain the campus-based status of the GO Grant
3. Increase the maximum GO Grant to $4,000 and target it towards students who have less than 55%-60% of their need met with gift aid
4. Ascertain campus ability to package according to this rule
![Page 26: All material in this presentation, including text and images, is the property of Noel-Levitz, Inc. Permission is required to reproduce information. Does](https://reader035.vdocuments.mx/reader035/viewer/2022062712/56649c735503460f94925574/html5/thumbnails/26.jpg)
Discussion and Questions
![Page 27: All material in this presentation, including text and images, is the property of Noel-Levitz, Inc. Permission is required to reproduce information. Does](https://reader035.vdocuments.mx/reader035/viewer/2022062712/56649c735503460f94925574/html5/thumbnails/27.jpg)