aldergrove aquifer issues
DESCRIPTION
A presentation by Golder Associates to Township of Langley Council on a proposed Aldergrove fish farm, Jan. 18, 2010.TRANSCRIPT
![Page 1: Aldergrove Aquifer Issues](https://reader037.vdocuments.mx/reader037/viewer/2022110115/54b9296d4a795900608b45b2/html5/thumbnails/1.jpg)
Hydrogeological Assessment Phase 1 Information Review
PROPOSED GRAVEL EXTRACTION AND AQUA-FARMING OPERATION 753-264th STREET ALDERGROVE, BC
Matthew Munn
Jill Sacre
January 18, 2010
![Page 2: Aldergrove Aquifer Issues](https://reader037.vdocuments.mx/reader037/viewer/2022110115/54b9296d4a795900608b45b2/html5/thumbnails/2.jpg)
Introduction
Golder Associates Ltd. retained by Township (Sept. 2009) and prepared a Phase 1 Hydrogeological Assessment (Phase 1) report dated October 29, 2009:
Step #1 - Initial Data Review/Summary
Step #2 - Identify Data Gaps
Step #3 - Provide Recommendations for Phase 2
![Page 3: Aldergrove Aquifer Issues](https://reader037.vdocuments.mx/reader037/viewer/2022110115/54b9296d4a795900608b45b2/html5/thumbnails/3.jpg)
X
Step #1 - Initial Data Review/Summary
![Page 4: Aldergrove Aquifer Issues](https://reader037.vdocuments.mx/reader037/viewer/2022110115/54b9296d4a795900608b45b2/html5/thumbnails/4.jpg)
Step #1 - Data Summary
Property Development Plans
Application for Township Soil Removal Permit - January 2, 2009
Minutes of Owner’s Meeting with ALC - May 1, 2009
![Page 5: Aldergrove Aquifer Issues](https://reader037.vdocuments.mx/reader037/viewer/2022110115/54b9296d4a795900608b45b2/html5/thumbnails/5.jpg)
Step #1 - Data Summary
![Page 6: Aldergrove Aquifer Issues](https://reader037.vdocuments.mx/reader037/viewer/2022110115/54b9296d4a795900608b45b2/html5/thumbnails/6.jpg)
Step #1 - Data Summary
Property Development Plansx
Supplementary Owner Information (September 9, 2009) - Several hand-drawn figures - Written responses to Township questions - Copy of Piteau Associates Ltd. 1996 “hydrogeological assessment” report (confidential)
![Page 7: Aldergrove Aquifer Issues](https://reader037.vdocuments.mx/reader037/viewer/2022110115/54b9296d4a795900608b45b2/html5/thumbnails/7.jpg)
Step #1 - Data Summary
Owner’s Supplementary Information confirmed: the following property development plans/details:x
Multiple excavations ranging from 2.5 m to 6.2 m-bg Clay will be placed within the aquaculture pond excavation
to form four pond “cells” Base of aquaculture cells will be underlain by a sand layer
“drainage system” to intercept incidental leakage Buried geothermal array of unspecified depth and location
![Page 8: Aldergrove Aquifer Issues](https://reader037.vdocuments.mx/reader037/viewer/2022110115/54b9296d4a795900608b45b2/html5/thumbnails/8.jpg)
Step #1 - Data Summary
Owner’s Supplementary Information confirmed: the following property development plans/details: x
All facility ponds will initially be filled with water from an off-site source(s)
Groundwater will not be extracted on-site for facility use Waste management will include composting of fish and
worm waste at unspecified on-site locations, using clay pads to prevent leaching of compost product
![Page 9: Aldergrove Aquifer Issues](https://reader037.vdocuments.mx/reader037/viewer/2022110115/54b9296d4a795900608b45b2/html5/thumbnails/9.jpg)
Step #1 - Data Summary
Aquifer and Groundwater Information Sourcesx
Environment Canada (Halstead, 1986)
BC Ministry of Environment’s Water Resources Atlas
Township Groundwater Modelling (Golder, 2005)
Township Vulnerability Mapping (Golder, 2005)
Piteau Associates Ltd. (April 1996)
Levelton Consultants Ltd. (June 2009)
![Page 10: Aldergrove Aquifer Issues](https://reader037.vdocuments.mx/reader037/viewer/2022110115/54b9296d4a795900608b45b2/html5/thumbnails/10.jpg)
Step #1 - Data Summary (Aquifers)
Sand/gravel MoE Aquifer #15
High vulnerability to contamination (MoE)
Sand/gravel commonly exposed at ground surface
MoE Aquifer #34
Low vulnerability
Confined
![Page 11: Aldergrove Aquifer Issues](https://reader037.vdocuments.mx/reader037/viewer/2022110115/54b9296d4a795900608b45b2/html5/thumbnails/11.jpg)
Step #1 - Data Summary (Aquifers)
X
Golder groundwater vulnerability mapping (2005) concluded the entire Site and surrounding areas have a “Very High” vulnerability index
![Page 12: Aldergrove Aquifer Issues](https://reader037.vdocuments.mx/reader037/viewer/2022110115/54b9296d4a795900608b45b2/html5/thumbnails/12.jpg)
Step #1 - Data Summary (Receptors)
25 registered wells <500 m
Unregistered wells?
17 water licence POD’s in vicinity
14 licences on PH Creek
140,000 gal/day (irrigation and stockwatering)
![Page 13: Aldergrove Aquifer Issues](https://reader037.vdocuments.mx/reader037/viewer/2022110115/54b9296d4a795900608b45b2/html5/thumbnails/13.jpg)
Step #1 Data Summary – Piteau (1996)
Drilled seven exploration holes to max. 11 m-bg
Water table measured at 5 to 6 m-bg on Property (April 9, 1996)
“Radial” flow below Property
![Page 14: Aldergrove Aquifer Issues](https://reader037.vdocuments.mx/reader037/viewer/2022110115/54b9296d4a795900608b45b2/html5/thumbnails/14.jpg)
Step #1 Data Summary – Piteau (1996)
Drilled seven exploration holes to max. 11 m-bg
Water table measured at 5 to 6 m-bg on Property (April 9, 1996)
“Radial” flow below Property
![Page 15: Aldergrove Aquifer Issues](https://reader037.vdocuments.mx/reader037/viewer/2022110115/54b9296d4a795900608b45b2/html5/thumbnails/15.jpg)
Step #1 Data Summary - Levelton (June 2009)
Excavated three Test Holes to max. 7.3 m-bg
Water table not encountered in Test Holes (June 12, 2009)
No MW’s installed
Flow directions not confirmed
![Page 16: Aldergrove Aquifer Issues](https://reader037.vdocuments.mx/reader037/viewer/2022110115/54b9296d4a795900608b45b2/html5/thumbnails/16.jpg)
X
Step #2 - Identify Data Gaps
![Page 17: Aldergrove Aquifer Issues](https://reader037.vdocuments.mx/reader037/viewer/2022110115/54b9296d4a795900608b45b2/html5/thumbnails/17.jpg)
Step #2 - Identify Data Gaps
DATA GAP = Absence or deficiency of information required to satisfy impact assessment objectives
X
![Page 18: Aldergrove Aquifer Issues](https://reader037.vdocuments.mx/reader037/viewer/2022110115/54b9296d4a795900608b45b2/html5/thumbnails/18.jpg)
Step #2 - Identify Data Gaps
DATA GAP = Absence or deficiency of information required to satisfy impact assessment objectives
X
ALC objective: “determine precise location and depth of aquifer underlying the entire
extraction and aquaculture facilities”x
GAP = Site exploration to-date (Piteau & Levelton) lacks sufficient data to accurately estimate or confirm
either the thickness of the Abbotsford-Sumas aquifer or current groundwater depths within the proposed
development areas.
![Page 19: Aldergrove Aquifer Issues](https://reader037.vdocuments.mx/reader037/viewer/2022110115/54b9296d4a795900608b45b2/html5/thumbnails/19.jpg)
Step #2 - Identify Data Gaps
DATA GAP = Absence or deficiency of information required to satisfy impact assessment objectives
X
ALC objective: Assess “potential risk to the aquifer or use of the aquifer on other agricultural lands” x
GAP = Risk assessment requires confirmation of current water table depths, local groundwater flow directions
and location of all local groundwater receptors/users,
including all registered and unregistered wells, water licences and watercourses.
![Page 20: Aldergrove Aquifer Issues](https://reader037.vdocuments.mx/reader037/viewer/2022110115/54b9296d4a795900608b45b2/html5/thumbnails/20.jpg)
Step #2 - Identify Data Gaps
Typical Aquifer/Groundwater Impact Assessment ObjectivesX
Characterize current groundwater resource: - Abbotsford-Sumas Aquifer thickness - aquifer water table depths (seasonal high levels) - groundwater flow directions
Identify groundwater receptors: - confirm water licence intake field locations - confirm all water well locations and intake depths
Characterize development-groundwater interactions: - excavation depths relative to water table - drainage system depths relative to water table - locations of excavations and ponds - locations of geothermal array and compost pad
![Page 21: Aldergrove Aquifer Issues](https://reader037.vdocuments.mx/reader037/viewer/2022110115/54b9296d4a795900608b45b2/html5/thumbnails/21.jpg)
Step #2 - Identify Data Gaps
Typical Aquifer/Groundwater Impact Assessment ObjectivesX
Characterize current groundwater resource: - Abbotsford-Sumas Aquifer thickness - aquifer water table depths (seasonal high levels) - groundwater flow directions
Identify groundwater receptors: - confirm water licence intake field locations - confirm all water well locations and intake depths
Characterize development-groundwater interactions: - excavation depths relative to water table - drainage system depths relative to water table - locations of excavations and ponds - locations of geothermal array and compost pad
UNKNOWN
![Page 22: Aldergrove Aquifer Issues](https://reader037.vdocuments.mx/reader037/viewer/2022110115/54b9296d4a795900608b45b2/html5/thumbnails/22.jpg)
X
Step #3 - Recommendations (Phase 2)
![Page 23: Aldergrove Aquifer Issues](https://reader037.vdocuments.mx/reader037/viewer/2022110115/54b9296d4a795900608b45b2/html5/thumbnails/23.jpg)
Step #3 - Phase 2 Recommendations
To address identified data gaps:X
Confirm the layout of all gravel excavation locations, secondary ponds, composting pad(s), wetlands and geothermal array
Determine which of Piteau’s 1996 MW’s are functional/viable
Drill four to eight additional on-site MW’s on Property perimeter and within confirmed gravel extraction areas, to confirm Aquifer thickness and facilitate groundwater
monitoring program Continuously monitor on-site groundwater levels to
evaluate water table response to rainfall, determine groundwater flow directions, confirm water table depths
and seasonal high water table position
![Page 24: Aldergrove Aquifer Issues](https://reader037.vdocuments.mx/reader037/viewer/2022110115/54b9296d4a795900608b45b2/html5/thumbnails/24.jpg)
Step #3 - Phase 2 Recommendations
To address identified data gaps:X
Confirm the location of groundwater receptors, including unregistered water supply wells and water licence
intakes
Estimate maximum allowable excavation depths, as per typical ALC requirements
Analyze combined Property development details and groundwater monitoring data and identify potential on-
site and off-site sources for groundwater hydraulic impacts and/or groundwater quality impacts
![Page 25: Aldergrove Aquifer Issues](https://reader037.vdocuments.mx/reader037/viewer/2022110115/54b9296d4a795900608b45b2/html5/thumbnails/25.jpg)
PRIMARY CONCLUSIONSXx
Property entirely underlain by Abbotsford-Sumas Aquiferx
Unconfined = highly vulnerable to surface contaminant sources
Second deeper aquifer = low vulnerability
Confirmed and projected water depths (Piteau, 1996) infer proposed excavation depths of 4.5 to 6.2 m will directly intercept the Aquifer water table
Historic groundwater flow directions (Piteau, 1996) infer that groundwater below the site potentially supplies registered and unregistered wells, water licences and a natural receptor(s)
![Page 26: Aldergrove Aquifer Issues](https://reader037.vdocuments.mx/reader037/viewer/2022110115/54b9296d4a795900608b45b2/html5/thumbnails/26.jpg)
PRIMARY CONCLUSIONSXx
Available data does not satisfy ALC requirements for provision of “conditional approval”
Available information is insufficient to characterize potential on-site or off-site groundwater impacts related to either the gravel extraction or aquaculture components of proposed development
![Page 27: Aldergrove Aquifer Issues](https://reader037.vdocuments.mx/reader037/viewer/2022110115/54b9296d4a795900608b45b2/html5/thumbnails/27.jpg)
PRIMARY RECOMMENDATIONXx
Additional site groundwater exploration/monitoring and confirmation of development plans is required.
Without further investigation, potential impacts to local groundwater resources/aquifers cannot be confirmed to an acceptable degree of certainty.
This could be completed as Phase 2 of the Township’s “independent hydrogeology study”, or be required of others, to identify potential impacts to local groundwater flow, local groundwater quality and local groundwater users/receptors.
![Page 28: Aldergrove Aquifer Issues](https://reader037.vdocuments.mx/reader037/viewer/2022110115/54b9296d4a795900608b45b2/html5/thumbnails/28.jpg)
Hydrogeological Assessment Phase 1 Information Review
PROPOSED GRAVEL EXTRACTION AND AQUA-FARMING OPERATION 753-264th STREET ALDERGROVE, BC
Matthew Munn
Jill Sacre
![Page 29: Aldergrove Aquifer Issues](https://reader037.vdocuments.mx/reader037/viewer/2022110115/54b9296d4a795900608b45b2/html5/thumbnails/29.jpg)
Hydrogeological Assessment Phase 1 Information Review
PROPOSED GRAVEL EXTRACTION AND AQUA-FARMING OPERATION 753-264th STREET ALDERGROVE, BC
Matthew Munn
Jill Sacre
![Page 30: Aldergrove Aquifer Issues](https://reader037.vdocuments.mx/reader037/viewer/2022110115/54b9296d4a795900608b45b2/html5/thumbnails/30.jpg)
Introduction
Township resolution (July 20, 2009) commissioned an “independent hydrogeology study” to identify and evaluate potential impacts to groundwater resources resulting from gravel extraction and aqua-farming activities proposed for the property at 753 - 264th Street, Aldergrove BC.
ALC issued agreement-in-principle (May 7, 2009) with conditions the Owner assess “ … any potential risk to the aquifer or use of the aquifer on adjacent lands …(and) determine the precise location and depth of the aquifer underlying the entire extraction and aquaculture facilities …”
![Page 31: Aldergrove Aquifer Issues](https://reader037.vdocuments.mx/reader037/viewer/2022110115/54b9296d4a795900608b45b2/html5/thumbnails/31.jpg)
Introduction
Golder Associates Ltd. retained by Township (Sept. 2009) and prepared a Phase 1 Hydrogeological Assessment (Phase 1) report dated October 29, 2009:
Step #1 - Initial Data Review/Summary - Confirm Property development plans - Identify local groundwater resources and users/receptors
Step #2 - Identify Data Gaps - Interpret local groundwater conditions - Identify additional data required to assess potential groundwater impacts and/or fulfill agency requirements
Step #3 - Provide Recommendations for Phase 2 - To address identified data gaps
![Page 32: Aldergrove Aquifer Issues](https://reader037.vdocuments.mx/reader037/viewer/2022110115/54b9296d4a795900608b45b2/html5/thumbnails/32.jpg)
Step #1 - Data Summary
GENERALINFORMATION
Approximately 16.6 acres
Entire property within ALR
Perry Homestead Ck.
Residence, outbuildings and barns/stock buildings
![Page 33: Aldergrove Aquifer Issues](https://reader037.vdocuments.mx/reader037/viewer/2022110115/54b9296d4a795900608b45b2/html5/thumbnails/33.jpg)
Step #1 - Data Summary
Property Development Plans
Application for Township Soil Removal Permit - January 2, 2009 - 147,000 m3 gravel removal from unspecified 5 acre area - Sketch identifies a single large aquaculture pond and three small ponds for overall facility water management
![Page 34: Aldergrove Aquifer Issues](https://reader037.vdocuments.mx/reader037/viewer/2022110115/54b9296d4a795900608b45b2/html5/thumbnails/34.jpg)
Step #1 - Data Summary
![Page 35: Aldergrove Aquifer Issues](https://reader037.vdocuments.mx/reader037/viewer/2022110115/54b9296d4a795900608b45b2/html5/thumbnails/35.jpg)
Step #1 - Data Summary
Property Development Plans
Minutes of Meeting with ALC - May 1, 2009 - Owner’s “proposed facility layout” identifies four 84 m x 23 m
aquaculture ponds, two ancillary ponds for water quantity management and a wetland area for managing water quality - Maximum excavation depth of 6.7 m noted
![Page 36: Aldergrove Aquifer Issues](https://reader037.vdocuments.mx/reader037/viewer/2022110115/54b9296d4a795900608b45b2/html5/thumbnails/36.jpg)
Step #1 - Data Summary
![Page 37: Aldergrove Aquifer Issues](https://reader037.vdocuments.mx/reader037/viewer/2022110115/54b9296d4a795900608b45b2/html5/thumbnails/37.jpg)
Step #1 - Data Summary
Property Development Plansx
Township Meeting with Owner (September 3, 2009) - Owner informed of independent hydrogeology study - Township requested information to confirm Owner’s development plans
Supplementary Owner Information (September 9, 2009) - Several hand-drawn figures, including scaled cross sections through each proposed pond area - Written responses to Township questions relating to facility water management and on-site waste management - Copy of Piteau Associates Ltd. 1996 “hydrogeological assessment” report (confidential)
![Page 38: Aldergrove Aquifer Issues](https://reader037.vdocuments.mx/reader037/viewer/2022110115/54b9296d4a795900608b45b2/html5/thumbnails/38.jpg)
Step #1 - Data Summary
Owner’s Supplementary Information confirmed the following property development plans/details:x
Multiple excavations are required with a combined plan area of approximately 190 m length and width
Excavation depths will vary: - aquaculture ponds: 6.2 m - water detention and overflow ponds: 4.5 m - wetlands area: 2.5 m deep - geothermal array: unspecified depth and location
Clay will be placed within the aquaculture pond excavation to form four pond “cells”
Base of aquaculture cells will be underlain by a sand layer “drainage system” to intercept incidental leakage
![Page 39: Aldergrove Aquifer Issues](https://reader037.vdocuments.mx/reader037/viewer/2022110115/54b9296d4a795900608b45b2/html5/thumbnails/39.jpg)
Step #1 - Data Summary
Owner’s Supplementary Information x
All facility ponds will initially be filled with water from an off-site source(s)
Facility operations will depend entirely on incident rainfall to satisfy water requirements
Groundwater will not be extracted on-site for facility use Waste management will include composting of fish and
worm waste at unspecified on-site locations, using clay pads to prevent leaching of compost product
![Page 40: Aldergrove Aquifer Issues](https://reader037.vdocuments.mx/reader037/viewer/2022110115/54b9296d4a795900608b45b2/html5/thumbnails/40.jpg)
Step #1 - Data Summary
Aquifer and Groundwater Information Sourcesx
Environment Canada (Halstead, 1986) - Regional-scale mapping of major geological units - Review of reports and MoE well records over ~20 years
BC Ministry of Environment’s Water Resources Atlas - Regional-scale aquifer mapping and classification - Registered water supply well summary - Surface water licence summary
Township Groundwater Modelling (Golder, 2005) - Township-wide 3D numerical hydrogeological model - Interpret the extent of Township aquifers - Interpret regional-scale groundwater characteristics
![Page 41: Aldergrove Aquifer Issues](https://reader037.vdocuments.mx/reader037/viewer/2022110115/54b9296d4a795900608b45b2/html5/thumbnails/41.jpg)
Step #1 - Data Summary
Aquifer and Groundwater Information SourcesX
Township Vulnerability Mapping (Golder, 2005) - Groundwater vulnerability mapping using AVI approach - Township-wide map constructed
Piteau Associates Ltd. (April 1996) - Examined geology and groundwater depths within a formerly proposed 35 acre gravel extraction area - Directly explored water table depths within central and western Property areas
Levelton Consultants Ltd. (June 2009) - Reviewed existing hydrogeology data (excluding Piteau) - Cursory examination of Property geology (3 Test Pits)
![Page 42: Aldergrove Aquifer Issues](https://reader037.vdocuments.mx/reader037/viewer/2022110115/54b9296d4a795900608b45b2/html5/thumbnails/42.jpg)
Step #1 - Data Summary (Aquifers)
Sand/gravel MoE Aquifer #15
High vulnerability to contamination (MoE)
Unconfined Sand/gravel
commonly exposed at ground surface
MoE Aquifer #34
Low vulnerability
Confined
![Page 43: Aldergrove Aquifer Issues](https://reader037.vdocuments.mx/reader037/viewer/2022110115/54b9296d4a795900608b45b2/html5/thumbnails/43.jpg)
Step #1 - Data Summary (Aquifers)
X
Golder modelling (2005) identified the “Abbotsford Aquifer” as being equivalent to MoE’s Abbotsford-Sumas Aquifer
Modelling also identified a deeper aquifer (Aldergrove Quadra) below the Property that is separated from the Abbotsford- Sumas Aquifer by a 40 to 50 m thick silt/clay layer
Golder groundwater vulnerability mapping concluded the entire Site and surrounding areas have a “Very High” vulnerability index
![Page 44: Aldergrove Aquifer Issues](https://reader037.vdocuments.mx/reader037/viewer/2022110115/54b9296d4a795900608b45b2/html5/thumbnails/44.jpg)
Step #1 - Data Summary (Receptors)
25 registered wells <500 m
10 north of PH Creek
15 west or south of Property
Unregistered wells?
17 water licence POD’s in vicinity
14 licences on PH Creek
140,000 gal/day (irrigation and stockwatering)
![Page 45: Aldergrove Aquifer Issues](https://reader037.vdocuments.mx/reader037/viewer/2022110115/54b9296d4a795900608b45b2/html5/thumbnails/45.jpg)
Step #1 Data Summary – Piteau (1996)
Drilled seven exploration holes to max. 11 m-bg
Sand/gravel to full depths drilled at all locations
Five holes converted to MW’s
Water table measured at 5 to 6 m-bg on Property (April 9, 1996)
“Radial” flow below Property
![Page 46: Aldergrove Aquifer Issues](https://reader037.vdocuments.mx/reader037/viewer/2022110115/54b9296d4a795900608b45b2/html5/thumbnails/46.jpg)
Step #1 Data Summary - Levelton (June 2009)
Excavated three Test Holes to max. 7.3 m-bg
Primarily sand/gravel to full depths
Water table not encountered in Test Holes (June 12, 2009)
No MW’s installed
Flow directions not confirmed
Aquifer thick. estimated ~7 m
![Page 47: Aldergrove Aquifer Issues](https://reader037.vdocuments.mx/reader037/viewer/2022110115/54b9296d4a795900608b45b2/html5/thumbnails/47.jpg)
Step #2 - Identify Data Gaps
DATA GAP = Absence or deficiency of information required to satisfy impact assessment objectives
X
ALC objective: “determine precise location and depth of aquifer underlying the entire
extraction and aquaculture facilities”x
GAP = Site exploration to-date (Piteau & Levelton) lacks sufficient data to accurately estimate or confirm
either the thickness of the Abbotsford-Sumas aquifer or current groundwater depths within the proposed
development areas.
![Page 48: Aldergrove Aquifer Issues](https://reader037.vdocuments.mx/reader037/viewer/2022110115/54b9296d4a795900608b45b2/html5/thumbnails/48.jpg)
Step #2 - Identify Data Gaps
DATA GAP = Absence or deficiency of information required to satisfy impact assessment objectives
X
ALC objective: Assess “potential risk to the aquifer or use of the aquifer on other agricultural lands” x
GAP = Risk assessment requires confirmation of current water table depths, local groundwater flow directions
and location of all local groundwater receptors/users,
including all including registered and unregistered wells, water licences and watercourses.
![Page 49: Aldergrove Aquifer Issues](https://reader037.vdocuments.mx/reader037/viewer/2022110115/54b9296d4a795900608b45b2/html5/thumbnails/49.jpg)
Step #2 - Identify Data Gaps
Aquifer/Groundwater Impact Assessment Data Gaps ObjectivesX
Characterize current groundwater resource: - Abbotsford-Sumas Aquifer thickness - aquifer water table depths (seasonal high levels) - groundwater flow directions
Identify groundwater receptors: - confirm water licence intake locations - confirm all water well locations and intake depths
Characterize development-groundwater interactions: - excavation depths relative to water table - drainage system depths relative to water table - locations of excavations and ponds - locations of geothermal array and compost pad
![Page 50: Aldergrove Aquifer Issues](https://reader037.vdocuments.mx/reader037/viewer/2022110115/54b9296d4a795900608b45b2/html5/thumbnails/50.jpg)
Step #2 - Identify Data Gaps
Aquifer/Groundwater Impact Assessment Data Gaps ObjectivesX
Characterize current groundwater resource: - Abbotsford-Sumas Aquifer thickness - aquifer water table depths (seasonal high levels) - groundwater flow directions
Identify groundwater receptors: - confirm water licence intake field locations - confirm all water well locations and intake depths
Characterize development-groundwater interactions: - excavation depths relative to water table - drainage system depths relative to water table - locations of excavations and ponds - locations of geothermal array and compost pad
UNKNOWN
![Page 51: Aldergrove Aquifer Issues](https://reader037.vdocuments.mx/reader037/viewer/2022110115/54b9296d4a795900608b45b2/html5/thumbnails/51.jpg)
Step #3 - Phase 2 Recommendations
To address identified data gaps:X
Confirm the layout of all gravel excavation locations, secondary ponds, composting pad(s), wetlands and geothermal array
Determine which of Piteau’s 1996 MW’s are functional/viable
Drill four to eight additional on-site MW’s on Property perimeter and within confirmed gravel extraction areas, to confirm Aquifer thickness and facilitate groundwater
monitoring program Continuously monitoring groundwater levels in all MW’s
to evaluate water table response to rainfall, determine groundwater flow directions, confirm water table depths
and seasonal high water table position
![Page 52: Aldergrove Aquifer Issues](https://reader037.vdocuments.mx/reader037/viewer/2022110115/54b9296d4a795900608b45b2/html5/thumbnails/52.jpg)
Step #3 - Phase 2 Recommendations
To address identified data gaps:X
Confirm the location of groundwater receptors, including unregistered water supply wells and water licence
intakes
Estimate maximum allowable excavation depths, as per typical ALC requirements
Analyze combined Property development details and groundwater monitoring data and identify potential on-
site and off-site sources for groundwater hydraulic impacts and/or groundwater quality impacts
![Page 53: Aldergrove Aquifer Issues](https://reader037.vdocuments.mx/reader037/viewer/2022110115/54b9296d4a795900608b45b2/html5/thumbnails/53.jpg)
PRIMARY CONCLUSIONSXx
Property entirely underlain by Abbotsford-Sumas Aquiferx
Unconfined = highly vulnerable to surface contaminant sources
Second deeper aquifer = low vulnerability
Confirmed and projected water depths (Piteau, 1996) infer proposed excavation depths of 4.5 to 6.2 m will directly intercept the Aquifer water table
Historic groundwater flow directions (Piteau, 1996) infer that groundwater below the site potentially supplies registered and unregistered wells, water licences and a natural receptor(s)
![Page 54: Aldergrove Aquifer Issues](https://reader037.vdocuments.mx/reader037/viewer/2022110115/54b9296d4a795900608b45b2/html5/thumbnails/54.jpg)
PRIMARY CONCLUSIONSXx
Available data does not satisfy ALC requirements for provision of “conditional approval”
Available information is insufficient to characterize potential on-site or off-site groundwater impacts related to either the gravel extraction or aquaculture components of proposed development
![Page 55: Aldergrove Aquifer Issues](https://reader037.vdocuments.mx/reader037/viewer/2022110115/54b9296d4a795900608b45b2/html5/thumbnails/55.jpg)
PRIMARY RECOMMENDATIONXx
Additional site groundwater exploration/monitoring and confirmation of development plans is required.
This could be completed as Phase 2 of the Township’s “independent hydrogeology study”, or be required of others, to identify potential impacts to local groundwater flow, local groundwater quality and local groundwater users/receptors.
Without further investigation, potential impacts to local groundwater resources/aquifers cannot be confirmed to an acceptable degree of certainty.
![Page 56: Aldergrove Aquifer Issues](https://reader037.vdocuments.mx/reader037/viewer/2022110115/54b9296d4a795900608b45b2/html5/thumbnails/56.jpg)
Hydrogeological Assessment Phase 1 Information Review
PROPOSED GRAVEL EXTRACTION AND AQUA-FARMING OPERATION 753-264th STREET ALDERGROVE, BC
Matthew Munn
Jill Sacre