airac 1303

No 03/1203

Edition: AIRAC 1203

Monitoring Report: AIRAC 1303

7 March 2013 - 3 April 2013

EUROPEAN ORGANISATION FOR SAFETY OF AIR NAVIGATION

European Route Network Improvement Plan

(ERNIP) Implementation Monitoring

Monitoring Report: AIRAC 1303

7 March 2013 – 3 April 2013

DIRECTORATE NETWORK MANAGEMENT

E U R O C O N T R O L

Left blank intentionally

European Route Network Improvement Plan (ERNIP) – I mplementation Monitoring Monitoring Report AIRAC 1303 (7 March 2013 - 3 Apri l 2013)

- 1 -

TABLE OF CONTENT TABLE OF CONTENT................................... ................................................................................. 1 1. INTRODUCTION............................................................................................................... 3

1.1 SUMMARY........................................................................................................................ 3 1.2 EVOLUTIONS TOWARDS THE ACHIEVEMENT OF THE EUROPEAN TARGET............ 3 1.3 AIRSPACE DESIGN DEVELOPMENT AND IMPLEMENTATION MONITORING ............. 3 1.4 EXTERNAL DOCUMENT RELEASE................................................................................. 4

2. LIST OF PROPOSALS IMPLEMENTED AIRAC 1303 (7 MARCH 2 013) ......................... 5 2.1 SUMMARY OF MAJOR PROJECTS IMPLEMENTED ON 7 MARCH 2013 ...................... 5

3. AIRSPACE DESIGN INDICATOR .......................... .......................................................... 6 3.1 FLIGHT EFFICIENCY INDICATORS EVOLUTION ........................................................... 6 3.2 FLIGHT EFFICIENCY EVOLUTION PER AIRAC CYCLE ................................................. 6 3.3 EVOLUTION OF INDICATORS......................................................................................... 7 3.4 BENEFITS ........................................................................................................................ 7

ANNEX A: DETAILED LIST OF PROJECTS IMPLEMENTED 7 MA RCH 2013........................... 11 ANNEX B: ACRONYMS AND ABBREVIATIONS................ ........................................................ 18


- 2 -



- 3 -

1. INTRODUCTION

1.1 SUMMARY This Report informs on the progress achieved to further improve the airspace design and utilisation flight efficiency based on the improvement proposals implemented during the relevant AIRAC cycle. The methodology used for assessing flight efficiency is included in the WP9 of RNDSG/64. This document can be consulted on: https://extranet.eurocontrol.int/http://beid.eurocontrol.be:8980/Members/irc/eurocontrol/rndsg/home This edition focuses on AIRAC 1303 (7 March 2013).

1.2 EVOLUTIONS TOWARDS THE ACHIEVEMENT OF THE EUROP EAN TARGET

The Performance Scheme for air navigation services and network functions includes an environment/ flight efficiency Key Performance area: Average horizontal en-route flight efficiency: o the average horizontal en-route flight efficiency indicator is the difference between the length of

the “en-route” part of the trajectory and the optimum trajectory which, in average, is the great circle.

o “en-route” is defined as the distance flown outside a circle of 40 NM around the airport. o the flights considered for the purpose of this indicator are:

- all commercial IFR flights within European airspace; - where a flight departs or arrives outside the European airspace, only that part inside the

European airspace is considered; - circular flights and flights with a great circle distance shorter than 80NM between terminal

areas are excluded. For the performance reference period starting on 1st January 2012 and ending on 31st December 2014, the European Union-wide and EUROCONTROL performance targets will be as follows: Environment target: an improvement by 0,75 percentage points of the average horizontal en-route flight efficiency indicator in 2014 as compared to the situation in 2009.

1.3 AIRSPACE DESIGN DEVELOPMENT AND IMPLEMENTATION MONITORING

The Network Manager coordinates the following activities to achieve the required improvement in flight efficiency: � Enhancing European enroute airspace design through annual improvements of European ATS

route network, high priority being given to: o Implementation of a coherent package of annual improvements and shorter routes; o Improving efficiency for the most penalised city pairs; o Implementation of additional Conditional Routes for main traffic flows; o Supporting initial implementation of free route airspace.

� Improving airspace utilisation and route network availability through: o Actively supporting and involving aircraft operators and the computer flight plan service

providers in flight plan quality improvements; o Gradually applying route availability restrictions only where and when required; o Improving the use and availability of civil/military airspace structures.

� Efficient Terminal Manoeuvring Area (TMA) design and utilisation through: o Implementing advanced navigation capabilities; o Implementing Continuous Descent Operations (CDO), improved arrival/departure routes,

optimised departure profiles, etc. � Improving awareness of performance.


- 4 -

1.4 EXTERNAL DOCUMENT RELEASE The latest AIRAC report is available on the EUROCONTROL Airspace design website under the sub section ERNIP, ERNIP Implementation Monitoring: http://www.eurocontrol.int/articles/airspace-design as well as on the EUROCONTROL Network Operations Monitoring and Reporting website under European Route Network Improvement Plan - Monitoring Report: http://www.eurocontrol.int/articles/network-operations-monitoring-and-reporting The full list of monitoring reports is available on the EUROCONTROL Media & Info Centre website: http://www.eurocontrol.int/lists/publications/all-publications?type=3656 A copy of the AIRAC Report of the European Route Network Improvement Plan is also available via the restricted OneSky Online websites for access by other interested members of the RNDSG, ASMSG and NETOPS (see ref sub-sections under main section "LIBRARY"). EUROCONTROL OneSky Teams NETOPS, RNDSG and ASMSG Library: http://extranet.eurocontrol.int/http://beid.eurocontrol.be:8980/Members/irc/eurocontrol/ant/home http://extranet.eurocontrol.int/http://beid.eurocontrol.be:8980/Members/irc/eurocontrol/rndsg/home http://extranet.eurocontrol.int/http://beid.eurocontrol.be:8980/Members/irc/eurocontrol/asm-sg/home


- 5 -

2. LIST OF PROPOSALS IMPLEMENTED AIRAC 1303 (7 MARC H 2013)

2.1 SUMMARY OF MAJOR PROJECTS IMPLEMENTED ON 7 MARC H 2013

During the AIRAC cycle 20 packages of airspace improvements co-ordinated at network level have been implemented. Beside of several ATS route network improvement measures the list below provides an overview of the major improvement projects implemented on 7 MARCH 2013:

� Austria: - Free route Airspace Wien, FRAW Stage 2.

(Extension and creation of additional DCTs FL165/245+)

� Belgium: - Usage of FL240 allowed within Brussels FIR (withdrawal of RAD Annex EB Note 4

(EB6001)).

� Bulgaria: - Change of several CDR1 and CDR 1/2 routes to permanent H24 - ATS route availability improvements.

� Germany: - Free route Airspace Karlsruhe, FRAK Phase 4. - New Night ATS route.

� Norway:

- Harmonisation of Oslo Procedures and Environment - HOPE Phase 1. (Revised Point Merge System Oslo TMA - post ASAP development).

- Introduction of airspace Class C in Norway CTA, 10 TMAs and 1 CTR between FL95 and FL195.

� Norway / Russia:

- New ATS route segments.

� The Former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia: - Night Free Route within Skopje FIR.

� UK:

- New Night DCTs above FL245. - Revision of RAD restriction EG2148

A detailed list of all improvement measures implemented on 7 March 2013 is attached in Annex A. The list is an extract of the European Route Network Improvement Plan database accessible via: https://extranet.eurocontrol.int/http://prisme-web.hq.corp.eurocontrol.int/ernip_database/Index.action A description of the airspace improvements together with orientation maps due for implementation on the relevant AIRAC cycle is provided in the RNDSG Airspace Improvements Synopsis (RAIS).


- 6 -

3. AIRSPACE DESIGN INDICATOR

3.1 FLIGHT EFFICIENCY INDICATORS EVOLUTION

The graphs below show the evolution of the airspace design flight efficiency (RTE-DES) and of the last filed flight plan indicator (RTE-FPL) between 2007 and 3 April 2013 (yearly variation).

RTE-DES

3,53% 3,54% 3,45% 3,22% 3,04% 2,96% 2,86%

2%

3%

4%

5%

6%

2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013

RTE-FPL

4,91% 5,03% 4,90% 4,91% 4,73% 4,64% 4,62%

2%

3%

4%

5%

6%

2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013

3.2 FLIGHT EFFICIENCY EVOLUTION PER AIRAC CYCLE The graph below shows the evolution per AIRAC cycle of the flight efficiency indicators between 2007 and 3 April 2013 (AIRAC variation).

Route Efficiency KPI per AIRAC cycle20

11

2009

2009

2010

2012

2,5%

3,0%

3,5%

4,0%

4,5%

5,0%

5,5%

906

907

908

909

910

911

912

913

1001

1002

1003

1004

1005

1006

1007

1008

1009

1010

1011

1012

1013

1101

1102

1103

1104

1105

1106

1107

1108

1109

1110

1111

1112

1113

1201

1202

1203

1204

1205

1206

1207

1208

1209

1210

1211

1212

1213

1301

1302

1303

AIRAC

Rou

te E

xten

sion

0

0,1

0,2

0,3

0,4

0,5

0,6

0,7

0,8

0,9

1

RTE-DES

RTE-FPL

Note: FPL: Flight Plan data provided by DNM systems; SAAM analysis performed by DNM/COO/NOM/OPL. DES:Ttraffic demand provided by DNM systems; airspace environment data, profile calculations and SAAM analysis provided by DNM/COO/NOM/OPL.


- 7 -

3.3 EVOLUTION OF INDICATORS The current data indicates that, the average yearly route extension due to airspace design reduced between 2009 and April 2013 by 0.59 percentage points. The evolution of the airspace design indicator is on the right trend and the contributions of the airspace design projects are key for improving flight efficiency. The current data indicates that, the average yearly route extension based on the last filed flight plan reduced between 2009 and April 2013 by 0.28 percentage points. The difference between the airspace design indicator and the last filed flight plan indicator was 1.45 percentage points in 2009 and is 1.76 percentage points in April 2013, recording a slight increase compared to the previous AIRAC cycle (1.73). The current data indicates that the route extension due to airspace design in April 2013 stayed at a historically low level of 2.85%. The current data indicates that, the route extension based on the last filed flight plan went slightly up from 4.61% in March 2013 to 4.64% in April 2013. The differences between the two indicators shown above clearly indicate that more efforts must be made to improve the efficiency of the airspace utilisation and to ensure that the indicator based on the latest filed flight plan follows a similar trend like the airspace design indicator.

3.4 BENEFITS Due to the airspace design improvements, the potential savings achieved during the AIRAC cycle 1303 amount to 28 126 NMs flown less compared to the equivalent AIRAC cycle in 2012. This translates into 169 tons of fuel, or 562 tons of CO2, or 140 630 Euros. Based on the last filed flight plan indicator, the losses calculated during the AIRAC cycle 1303 amount to -206 119 NMs flown less compared to the equivalent AIRAC cycle in 2012. This translates into -1 237 tons of fuel, or -4 122 tons of CO2, or -1 030 595 Euros.

The comparison between the potential and actual savings/ losses related to the different parameters is visualised in the graphs below.

The losses recorded for the last filed flight plan data during AIRAC cycle 1303 compared to the same AIRAC cycle in 2012 were caused on a certain extent by regulations due to capacity and staffing issues in Langen ACC, Rhein UAC and Madrid ACC plus capacity issues in Cyprus. These events might have caused re-routings and consequently have had an impact on network efficiency.

Other special events like a software update in Zagreb ACC, a Paper Strip System (PSS) trial in Brest ACC, a military activity (Oceanis exercise) affecting Shanwick ACC, London ACC and Brest ACC, frequency problems in Langen ACC and weather disruptions due to significant snow fall in north western Europe might have had an impact on network efficiency as well.

The move of Ljubljana ACC to a new OPS room had no impact on network efficiency.


- 8 -

FLIGHT EFFICIENCY SAVINGS COMPARED TO EQUIVALENT AI RAC CYCLE IN THE PREVIOUS YEAR(In Thousands of Nautical Miles)

-400

-200

0

200

400

600

AIRAC CYCLE

NM

/100

0

NM DES

NM FPL

NM DES 6 157 96 236 169 121 134 146 137 130 113 88 205 28

NM FPL -200 139 82 331 151 241 271 506 -272 -70 -57 -176 -19 -206

1203 1204 1205 1206 1207 1208 1209 1210 1211 1212 1213 1301 1302 1303

FLIGHT EFFICIENCY SAVINGS COMPARED TO EQUIVALENT AI RAC CYCLE IN THE PREVIOUS YEAR

(In Tons of Fuel)

-2000

-1000

0

1000

2000

3000

4000

AIRAC CYCLE

TO

NS

OF

FU

EL

TONS FUEL DES

TONS FUEL FPL

TONS FUEL DES 36 942 577 1416 1014 727 804 876 822 780 678 527 1233 169

TONS FUEL FPL -1200 834 494 1986 905 1447 1626 3036 -1632 -420 -342 -1057 -114 -1237

1203 1204 1205 1206 1207 1208 1209 1210 1211 1212 1213 1301 1302 1303


- 9 -

FLIGHT EFFICIENCY SAVINGS COMPARED TO EQUIVALENT AI RAC CYCLE IN THE PREVIOUS YEAR

(In CO2)

-8000-6000-4000-2000

02000400060008000

1000012000

AIRAC CYCLE

TO

NS

OF

CO

2

TONS CO2 DES

TONS CO2 FPL

TONS CO2 DES 120 3140 1922 4720 3380 2422 2680 2920 2740 2600 2260 1756 4108 563

TONS CO2 FPL -4000 2780 1648 6620 3017 4823 5420 1012 -5440-1400-1140-3522 -379 -4122

1203 1204 1205 1206 1207 1208 1209 1210 1211 1212 1213 1301 1302 1303

FLIGHT EFFICIENCY SAVINGS COMPARED TO EQUIVALENT AIRAC CYCLE IN THE PREVIOUS YEAR

(In Thousands of EURO)

-2000

-1500

-1000

-500

0

500

1000

1500

2000

2500

3000

AIRAC CYCLE

EU

RO

/100

0

EURO DES

EURO FPL

EURO DES 30 785 481 1180 845 606 670 730 685 650 565 439 1027 141

EURO FPL -1000 695 412 1655 754 1206 1355 2530 -1360 -350 -285 -881 -95 -1031

1203 1204 1205 1206 1207 1208 1209 1210 1211 1212 1213 1301 1302 1303


- 10 -



- 11 -

ANNEX A: DETAILED LIST OF PROJECTS IMPLEMENTED 7 MA RCH 2013 The following table presents detailed information about each of the improvement proposals developed within the RNDSG and implemented 7 March 2013. The description of the proposals is based on the information available from different sources (e.g. AOs, ANSPs and EUROCONTROL). For the correctness and verification of the relevant aeronautical information consult official State AIP publication. The data from this document should not be used for operational purposes. The table includes:

� Proposal ID number: A reference number to identify each proposal allowing to trace at which RNDSG it was initiated.

� Project Name: Dedicated Name and Phase/ Step of the improvement project.

� Description: A detailed description of the planned improvement proposal.

� Objective: A brief description of the purpose of the enhancement measure.

� Implementation Status: The implementation status defined as Proposed, Planned, Confirmed or Implemented.

� Project Group: The Functional Airspace Block Group (FAB), Regional Focus Group (RFG), Sub-Group (SG) or any other Project Group(s) involved directly or indirectly by the proposed enhancement measure.

� Project Category: The nature of the proposed enhancement measure defined through Project Categories referring to:

o Airspace Structure; o ATC Sectors; o ATS Routes; o CDRs: o Civil/Military Airspace; o DCTs; o Free Route Airspace; o Night Routes; o PBN; o RAD; o Route Redesignation; o TMA.

� States and Organisations: The States and/or Organisations involved directly or indirectly by the proposed enhancement measure.

� Originator(s): The States, Organisations who have originated the proposal.

� Comments: The conditions and/or pre-requisites which have to be met in order to implement the proposal or any other relevant comment(s).

Note: The list of implemented changes for this AIRAC cycle does not claim to be complete.


- 12 -

Proposal ID : 57.023b Impl. Status: State(s) & Org. Comments:

1.

Description: 1. To implement southbound ATS route UP75 NENEM - NEA. 2. To change to northbound existing bi-directional ATS route segment

UM601 BLV - DELOG.

Objective: To further improve the ATS route network between France and Madrid UIR in order to avoid the existing dog-leg via BLV (Phase 2).

Implemented 07 MAR 2013

Project Category: ATS Routes

ESP FRA

Originator(s): IACA

• Proposal to be re-considered together with Brest ACC in order to find better solution.

• The "French part" was published on 25 SEP 2008 as ATS routes UP152 and UZ150.

Proposal ID : 62.049 Impl. Status: State(s) & Org. Comments:

2.

Description: To reshape and rename, as TRA, some of the existing lower and upper TSAs.

Objective: To further improve the airspace structure within Sofia FIR.


Project Category: Airspace Structure

BGR

Originator(s): BGR


3.

Project Name: HOPE - Harmonisation of Oslo Procedur es and Environment - Phase 1

Description: To further improve the existing STAR system and shorten the sequencing legs for Oslo/ ENGM arrivals moving the merge points close to the airport (HOPE, Phase 1).

Objective: To further improve airspace organisation in Norway FIR for flights to Oslo (ENGM) airport. (Revised Point Merge System Oslo TMA - post ASAP development).


Project Category: Airspace Structure TMA

NOR

Originator(s): NOR

• Winter 2015 - introduction of RNP approaches.

• HOPE Phase 2: tentatively 2015. Related proposals: • 78.029


4.

Project Name: Free Route Airspace Skopje

Description: To implement direct Night Free Route within Skopje FIR.

Objective: To further improve the airspace organisation within Skopje FIR.


Project Group: RFG SE

Project Category: Free Route Airspace

MKD

Originator(s): MKD

Night DCTs 23.00 - 05.00 (22.00 - 04.00) via RAD Appendix 4.


- 13 -

Proposal ID : 74.030 / 15.007 Impl. Status: State(s) & Org. Comments:

5.

Description: To implement bi-directional ATS route segment M745 KIK - LIMUS.

Objective: To further improve the ATS route network between Norway and Russian Federation.


Project Group: SG BALTIC


NOR RUS

Originator(s): SWE

• Connected to IATA proposal EN1: LIMUS - BUMET.

• Passing "NO FIR" area between Norway FIR and Murmansk FIR.

• Russian Federation further studies required.

Related proposals: 1. 75.051 / 15.044


6.

Description: To re-designate the existing ATS route segment T27 ABB - KUNAV as N20 (release of T27).

Objective: To rationalise the existing ATS route designators between UK and France in order to further facilitate flight planning and release RDs.



FRA GBR

Originator(s): EUROCONTROL

• RD N20 is currently used by the UK up to SAM.

• Extension in UK is planned for 19 SEP 2013.

Related proposals: • 71.066d

Proposal ID : 75.051 / 15.044 Impl. Status: State(s) & Org. Comments:

7.

Description: To implement bi-directional ATS route segment Z205 ATA - LIMUS.

Objective: To further improve the ATS route network between Norway and Russian Federation.


Project Group: SG BALTIC


NOR RUS

Originator(s): NOR

• Connected to IATA proposal EN1: LIMUS - BUMET.

• Passing "NO FIR" area between Norway FIR and Murmansk FIR.

• Russian Federation further studies required.

Related proposals: • 74.030 / 15.007


8.

Description: To re-designate the following existing ATS routes: a) UP40 BEGAS - DEMOS as UN728 (release of P40); b) UP46 XERES - BEGAS as UN981 (release of P46); c) UP178 DIXIS - STG as UN726 (release of P178); d) UP274 BERUX - PETEK as UP74; e) T101 NAPES - NIRAK as Y136; f) T102 NAPES - TUPIX as Y135; g) B/UB602 TFN - KONBA as N/UN602; h) H/UH200 GDV - TFN as T/UT274; i) W/UW770 LIMAL - TFS as T/UT770.

Objective: To rationalise the existing ATS route designators within Spain in order to further facilitate flight planning and release RDs.


Project Category: ATS Routes Route Redesignation

ESP


• In total 2 regional RDs are proposed to be released.

• ATS route UP274 was implemented as from 11 MAR 2010.P274 was not coordinated neither with ICAO nor EUROCONTROL, it is with status “reserved” by the ICAO HQ, it doesn’t belong to the ICAO EUR/NAT Office and normally shall not be used.

• RD T101 is currently reserved for ITA/AUT/DEU but not for Spain. Based on established procedures normally T101 shall not be used by Spain.


- 14 -


9.

Description: To allow the following 3 new Night Time DCTs above FL245 : a. SOMVA - BETAX for overflights via MAMUL and ARR EGNT/NV; b. SOMVA - ELVOS for ARR Manchester TMA; c. SOMVA - LESTA for ARR EGNM/NO/NH/NJ/CN and overflights via

RODOL.

Objective: To further improve airspace utilisation in UK.


Project Category: RAD

GBR

Originator(s): GBR

DCT time availability is 23.30 - 06.00 (22.00 - 05.00).


10.

Description: To implement as NIGHT ATS route Q/UQ163 KPT - LUPOL - DITBA - ETAGO - ETASA northbound.

Objective: To further improve the Night Route Network and improve flight efficiency for EDDF arrivals via BZO.


Project Category: Night Routes

DEU

Originator(s): DEU

• Night period 21:00 - 06:00. • Potential savings 16 NM per flight.


11.

Description: To redesignate existing waypoint PINOB with new 5-LNC OMIDO.

Objective: To further improve the ATS route network by eliminating confusion with other existing waypoints in the same area.



CHE

Originator(s): CHE


12.

Description: 1. To change the following ATS route segments from CDR to

permanent : a. L602 ATBOG - KOMAN from CDR 1 to permanent (whole L602

route is now permanent); b. L619 BALIK-ARGES from CDR 1 to permanent; c. L852 BALIK-KOMAN from CDR 1 to permanent; d. L863 from CDR 1 to permanent; e. M19 PENEV-LETVA from CDR 1/2 to permanent; f. N127 ROVAM-PENEV-BLO segment from CDR 1/2 to

permanent; g. N133 SOF-TODRO-OGOTA segment from CDR 1/2 to

permanent; h. N188 from CDR 1/2 to permanent; i. N605 NISVA-GOL from CDR 1/2 to permanent; j. N605 WRN-INKOM from CDR 1 to permanent;



BGR

Originator(s): BGR


- 15 -

k. P92 LETNI-EDADA from CDR 1 to permanent (whole P92 route is now permanent);

l. T228 OGOTA-BLO from CDR 1/2 to permanent; m. T777 route NUPVU-BALIK and BGS-BUVAK from CDR 1 to

permanent (whole T777 route is now permanent); n. Y505 NISVA-DOTAM from CDR 1 to permanent (whole T777

route is now permanent). 2. To improve the route availability on the following ATS routes:

a. L743 segment VADEN - BGS - NESAR; b. L746; c. L852; d. L919 segment DINRO - GOSLO - WRN and BGS - ADORU; e. N133 segment OGOTA - RESLA - ERDOM - LOMOS; f. N605 segment GOL - ALIVI.

Objective: To further improve the ATS route network and airspace structure within Sofia FIR.


13.

Project Name: Adaptation in AIP of ATS routes verti cal limits

Description: To adapt the lower vertical limits of ATS route L851 KARDE - TOLUN within Ankara FIR by changing of IFR FL090 to VFR FL085.

Objective: To adapt in State AIP ATS routes vertical limits.


Project Group: RFG SE


TUR


Proposal ID : 77.072a Impl. Status: State(s) & Org. Comments:

14.

Project Name: Free Route Airspace Wien, FRAW, Stage 2

Description: Extension and creation of additional DCTs (FL165/245+).

Objective: To further improve the flight planning options within Wien FIR as a second step for FRAW (Free Route Airspace Wien) implementation.


Project Group: FAB CE

Project Category: RAD Free Route Airspace DCTs

AUT

Originator(s): AUT

Phased implementation: • Stage 1 implemented 18 October 2012

(37 DCTs) • Stage 2 planned Q1/2 2013. • Stage 3 planned Q3/4 2014. • Stage 4 planned 2015. • Stage 5 planned Q1 2016.

Related proposals: • 76.047 • 77.072b • 77.072c • 77.072d


- 16 -


15.

Description: To allow the use of FL240 within Brussels FIR.

Objective: To further improve the airspace organisation within Brussels FIR.


Project Category: Airspace Structure

BEL

Originator(s): IATA

• Re-consideration required in respect of decreasing traffic, implementation of new more sophisticated systems and other developments in the ATC world.

• Blocking of FL240 in a large part of Central Europe is still necessary in today’s ATC environment.

• FL240 - Currently in accordance with RAD Annex EB Note 4: FL240 is not available for traffic overflying the Brussels UIR except on UM617/UN873/UY18/UZ717 (EB6001).

•


16.

Description: 1. To implement, as CDR1, the following ATS routes:

a. UM185 BPK - DIGSU (bidirectional) - ADGEG - TIPAN, southbound TIPAN - DIGSU / northbound ORTAC - DIGSU;

b. UP144 DIGSU - LATMU - LARGA northbound. c. UP5 DIGSU - CUTEL (bi-directional) - ELNAB

2. To re-designate existing ATS route UM185 BPK - CLN as UQ295. 3. To re-align existing ATS route UN866 as BPK - DIGSU - BANEM

(new waypoint).

Objective: To further improve ATS route network within London FIR (BUKUT bypass).


Project Category: ATS Routes CDRs

GBR

Originator(s): IATA

• BPK - New point DIGSU double designated UN866/ UM185.

• DIGSU - new intersection with UN866. • ADGEG - new crossing point with UL602. • LATMU - new crossing point with UL602. • ELNAB - new crossing point point with

UL602. 1a. CDR1 Fri 1700 to Mon 0800 (1 hr earlier in summer) RFL245+ overflying London FIR. Only available & compulsory (when CDR is available) for traffic overflying or departing EF**, EK**, EN**, ES** Via UPGAS then SAM. Not permitted for traffic landing UK. 1b. CDR1 Fri 1700 to Mon 1800 (1 hr earlier in summer) eastbound RFL245+. Only available and compulsory (when the airway is available) for traffic overflying or destination EF**, EK**, EN**, ES** Via CPT/MID then LARGA. Not permitted for traffic departing UK. 1c. CDR1 Fri 1700 to Mon0800 (1 hr earlier in summer) RFL245+ for traffic overflying London FIR. CUTEL UP5 LARGA only available for traffic overflying or depart EF**, EK**, EN**, ES** Via BPK. Not permitted for traffic departing UK. DIGSU UP5 CUTEL only available for traffic overflying or destination EF**, EK**, EN**, ES** Via BPK. Not permitted for traffic landing UK.


- 17 -

Proposal ID : 77.042a Impl. Status: State(s) & Org. Comments:

17.

Project Name: Class C Airspace

Description: To introduce airspace Class C in Norway CTA, 10 TMAs and 1 CTR between FL95 and FL195.

Objective: To further improve the airspace structure within Norway.


Project Category: Airspace Structure TMA

NOR

Originator(s): NOR

Related proposals: • 79.001 • 79.002


18.

Description: To revise RAD restriction EG2148 and allow DEP EGHL/LF/LK/TD/TF/VO/HH/HI via UN866 BPK - LEDBO.

Objective: To further improve airspace utilisation in UK.


Project Category: RAD

GBR

Originator(s): GBR

Currently UN866 BPK - LEDBO is not allowed for DEP Farnborough Group EGH / LF/ LK/ TD/ TF/ VO, London Group and EGHH/ HI/ HO/ LD/ TC. Traffic was requested to file dog-leg BPK UM185 CLN UL620 ARTOV UM604 LEDBO.


19.

Description: 1. To withdraw several temporary segregated areas (TSAs). 2. To change horizontal and/or vertical limits of several TSAs. 3. To implement temporary segregated/reserved areas (TSA/TRA) and

change one TSA to TSA/TRA. 4. To improve the availability of several ATS routes by changing

them from CDR 1 or CDR1/2 to permanent H24.

Objective: To further improve the airspace structure within Sofia FIR.


Project Category: ATS Routes Airspace Structure

BGR

Originator(s): BGR


20.

Project Name: Free Route Airspace Karlsruhe, FRAK P hase 4

Description: To implement Free Route Airspace Concept Karlsruhe UAC, Phase 4: 1. additional and improved DCTs available for flight planning as

described in RAD Appendix 4 for southeast and northwest traffic flows.

2. improved profile for EDDK/LW/LP arrivals.

Objective: To further expand implementation of Free Route Airspace Concept within Karlsruhe UAC.


Project Category: Free Route Airspace

DEU

Originator(s): DEU

Integrated into FRAMaK (SESAR founded Project FRA Maastricht UAC and Karlruhe UAC). • Phase 1: 30 JUN 2011 • Phase 2: 15 DEC 2011 • Phase 3a/3b: 18 OCT ‘12/ 13 DEC ‘12. • Phase 4: 2013. • Phase 5: 2014+. Related proposals: • 71.083b • 71.083c • 76.077 • 78.039 • 78.041


- 18 -

ANNEX B: ACRONYMS AND ABBREVIATIONS

1. The following ISO-3 coding of States is used in the column States and Organisation: ALB Albania IRQ Iraq ARM Armenia ITA Italy AUT Austria LBY Libyan Arab Jamahiriya AZE Azerbaijan LTU Lithuania BEL Belgium LUX Luxembourg BGR Bulgaria LVA Latvia BIH Bosnia and Herzegovina MAR Morocco BLR Belarus MDA Moldova, Republic of CHE Switzerland MKD The former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia CYP Cyprus MLT Malta CZE Czech Republic MNE Montenegro DEU Germany NLD Netherlands DNK Denmark NOR Norway DZA Algeria POL Poland EGY Egypt PRT Portugal ESP Spain ROU Romania EST Estonia RUS Russian Federation FIN Finland SRB Serbia FRA France SVK Slovakia GBR United Kingdom SVN Slovenia GEO Georgia SWE Sweden GRC Greece SYR Syrian Arab Republic HRV Croatia TUN Tunisia HUN Hungary TUR Turkey IRL Ireland UKR Ukraine IRN Iran, Islamic Republic of

MUAC Maastricht UAC


- 19 -

2. BLUMED FAB, DANUBE FAB and FAB CE proposals referenced in proposal number box are coded with a unique identification number abbreviated as BM or DN or CE, respectively, following by four digits (XXXX) (example BM0001 or DN0001 or CE0001).

3. Content of each proposal is an indication of State’s intention to implement the relevant airspace improvement but don't represent a copy of any official publication. For the correctness and verification of the relevant aeronautical information consult official State AIP publication. The data from this document should not be used for operational purposes.

airac 1303

Documents