air quality committee environmental management commission november 13 and 14, 2013
DESCRIPTION
Proposed Amendments to Motor Vehicle Emission Control Standard in 15A NCAC 02D .1000 Rules Steven Vozzo, Supervisor - Fayetteville Region North Carolina Division of Air Quality. Air Quality Committee Environmental Management Commission November 13 and 14, 2013. Overview. - PowerPoint PPT PresentationTRANSCRIPT
1
Proposed Amendments to Motor Vehicle
Emission Control Standard in 15A NCAC 02D .1000 Rules
Steven Vozzo, Supervisor - Fayetteville RegionNorth Carolina Division of Air Quality
Air Quality CommitteeEnvironmental Management Commission
November 13 and 14, 2013
2
Overview• General Assembly passed Session Law 2012-199 (HB 585) • Change emissions testing program for newer vehicles• Incorporate revised exemption of 3 most recent model year
vehicles with < 70,000 miles from emissions inspection • Still require safety inspection with visual inspection of
vehicles emissions components • Public hearing held in Raleigh on Sept 18, 2013 • Take comments on amendments of five rules
3
DAQ Rule Changes To Align with Statute
15A NCAC 02D .1002, Applicability• Proposed amendment to extend exemption from current model
year vehicles to 3 most recent model years with < 70,000 miles
15A NCAC 02D .1003, Definitions• Proposed for amendment to consolidate, add, modify definitions• New terminology reflecting advancements in new technologies
15A NCAC 02D .1005, On-Board Diagnostic Standards• Proposed for amendment to align rule with new statute • To update language for hybrid, electric, and fuel-cell vehicles
4
DAQ Rule Changes To Align with Statute – cont’d
15A NCAC 02D .1006, Sale and Service of Analyzers• Proposed to be amended to update language reflecting
advancements and capabilities • Track emission inspection analyzer vendor service calls
15A NCAC 02D .1009, Model Year 2008 and Subsequent Model Year Heavy Duty Diesel Vehicle Requirements
• Proposed to be repealed as duplicative of USEPA rules • No longer necessary
5
Discussion of Comments • 15 comments on proposed rules
- 5 on various implementation issues- 5 on various aspects of applicability- 2 on emissions control tampering- 1 on sovereign immunity for federal facilities- 1 on agency affordability of revenue loss- 1 requesting DMV/DAQ study report
6
Mileage Provision Implementation Comments
Questions on 70,000 mileage exemption- How will provision be enforced- What preparations to enforce by effective date - How inspection stations going to police themselves
Responses• Use education and oversight to enforce new program - Update material in certification courses to address changes - Oversight with audits, checks, safeguards to minimize fraud - Hold accountable for performing valid inspections - If fraud identified, DMV will prosecute
7
ApplicabilityComments• Perspective that exemption favors tax breaks for more affluent• Number defining how many recent model years exempt• Claim inspections are waste of money and scam • Why inspections only in certain counties?
Responses• Study revealed emissions controls on newer cars seldom fail • Study concluded exemption from emissions test in first 3 model
years save consumers with negligible effects on air quality • Model showed exemption not interfere with air quality standards• G.A. identified counties based on population and air quality
8
Tampering with Emission Controls Comment: Allows owners to disconnect controls to improve performance,
then re-connect later without penalty
Response: On-board diagnostics (OBD II) on all gas-powered vehicles since 1996 model
• OBD II monitors status of various sub-systems and diagnostic trouble codes
• Enables mechanic to identify / remedy malfunctions• Certified analyzers connected to OBD II verify emissions
systems functionality along with visual inspection • Penalty for violation
9
Comment on Inspecting Exempt Vehicles with Check-Engine-Light On
Comment• Whether / how inspectors deal with exempt vehicles with
trouble code warnings
Response• Inspector not fail vehicle only because check-engine-light on • Inform customer of issues and recommend servicing vehicle
10
Financial Impact to State Agencies Comment:
• How agencies afford $11+ million revenue loss in next 3 years
Response: • Agencies absorb losses by planning and adjustments • Adjustments enabled by e-sticker investments in IT systems • Increase in number of future vehicles offset loss• New system reduce State’s operations by $5.7 million per year - Offset loss, pay for system within 4 years, save State thereafter
11
Applicability for Vehicles Operated on Federal Installations
Comment• Object to rule language in 02D .1002(a)(3) applying to federal
installations due to sovereign immunity • Request repealing applicability to federal facilities
Response • NC statute and DAQ rule consistent with EPA rule• Therefore, NC cannot accommodate repeal request without
further study and consultation with EPA
12
Rule Implementation
Comment• Language too ambiguous without upgraded electronic system
to determine whether emissions inspections required • Oppose relaxing OBD specifications in Rule 02D .1006
Response • Prompt change in 2 definitions to clarify inspection
requirements • DMV develop flowchart to determine if inspection required • Qualified staff and management familiar with flowchart can
implement rule • DAQ agrees existing rule language best carries out legislative
intent
13
Hearing Officer’s Recommendation • Recommend proposed amendments with changes as presented
in Chapter II be adopted by EMC • Also recommend DAQ study concerns on sovereign immunity
- Report back to AQC of EMC no later than March 2014 - Provide concept for rule change contingent upon need