afterglow studies
DESCRIPTION
Afterglow Studies. Eric Torrence University of Oregon 183 nd LMTF Meeting 10 October 2013. Overview. Test afterglow model by single-bunch addition Originally studied by Mika Will need to be used for 25 ns operations Try to test assumptions in method - PowerPoint PPT PresentationTRANSCRIPT
![Page 1: Afterglow Studies](https://reader036.vdocuments.mx/reader036/viewer/2022062305/56814c1c550346895db91e3c/html5/thumbnails/1.jpg)
Afterglow StudiesEric Torrence
University of Oregon
183nd LMTF Meeting10 October 2013
![Page 2: Afterglow Studies](https://reader036.vdocuments.mx/reader036/viewer/2022062305/56814c1c550346895db91e3c/html5/thumbnails/2.jpg)
2Eric Torrence September 2013
Overview
•Test afterglow model by single-bunch addition
-Originally studied by Mika
-Will need to be used for 25 ns operations
•Try to test assumptions in method
-Afterglow is universal with time and μ
-Afterglow is additive to the prompt luminosity signal(not true if there are migration effects)
•Look at expected afterglow levels in 2015(using 2012 templates)
•Look at 2012 25 ns fills
![Page 3: Afterglow Studies](https://reader036.vdocuments.mx/reader036/viewer/2022062305/56814c1c550346895db91e3c/html5/thumbnails/3.jpg)
3Eric Torrence September 2013
Fills
•Single-bunch templates
-r200804 - 2 bunches, μ~20, first fill of 2012
-r206717 - 1 bunch, μ~50, high-mu test
•Test runs
-r212529 - 6 bunches in mini-train
-r214651 - 50 ns physics fill - during BCM noise period
-r215541 - 50 ns physics fill - after BCM noise period
-r216399 - 25 ns fill - 97 bunches
-r216432 - 25 ns fill - 373 bunches
Large range in mu, 3 months apart
![Page 4: Afterglow Studies](https://reader036.vdocuments.mx/reader036/viewer/2022062305/56814c1c550346895db91e3c/html5/thumbnails/4.jpg)
4Eric Torrence September 2013
Details
•Looked only at OR algorithms (simpler), mainly:
-BcmH_EventOR
-BcmV_EventOR
-Lucid_HitOR
•No absolute calibrations applied, everything scaled to some relative luminosity
•Simple log formulas, no complicated Lucid mu dependence L = -ln(1-Rate)
![Page 5: Afterglow Studies](https://reader036.vdocuments.mx/reader036/viewer/2022062305/56814c1c550346895db91e3c/html5/thumbnails/5.jpg)
5Eric Torrence September 2013
BCMV single-bunch response
r206717 - BcmVOR
Single-bunch, high μPeak = 1, used to normalize
relative responseAfterglow falls below noise
level after ~500 BCIDs
Colliding bunch
Afterglow
Noise
![Page 6: Afterglow Studies](https://reader036.vdocuments.mx/reader036/viewer/2022062305/56814c1c550346895db91e3c/html5/thumbnails/6.jpg)
6Eric Torrence September 2013
BCMV single-bunch response
r206717 - BcmVOR
Single-bunch, high μ
Averaged over many LBs
AfterglowReflections
More plots in appendix...
![Page 7: Afterglow Studies](https://reader036.vdocuments.mx/reader036/viewer/2022062305/56814c1c550346895db91e3c/html5/thumbnails/7.jpg)
7Eric Torrence September 2013
Stability over short time
QuickTime™ and aVideo decompressor
are needed to see this picture.
BCMV: http://physics.uoregon.edu/~torrence/BcmVOR.movLucid: http://physics.uoregon.edu/~torrence/r200804_LucORA.mov
![Page 8: Afterglow Studies](https://reader036.vdocuments.mx/reader036/viewer/2022062305/56814c1c550346895db91e3c/html5/thumbnails/8.jpg)
8Eric Torrence September 2013
Stability over long times
r206717
r200804
BcmVOR
~ identical over x2 in muand three months!
![Page 9: Afterglow Studies](https://reader036.vdocuments.mx/reader036/viewer/2022062305/56814c1c550346895db91e3c/html5/thumbnails/9.jpg)
9Eric Torrence September 2013
Lucid HitOR
r200804
No reflectionsShort-term falloff
Similar mid-term slopeLonger tail
(or just lower noise?)
![Page 10: Afterglow Studies](https://reader036.vdocuments.mx/reader036/viewer/2022062305/56814c1c550346895db91e3c/html5/thumbnails/10.jpg)
10
Eric Torrence September 2013
Single-beam Templates
r200804BCM - 500 BCIDsto reach ~10-7 level
LucidHit - 1500 BCIDsto reach ~10-7 level
(ran into next bunch)
Constant backgroundsubtracted from -100 BCIDs
![Page 11: Afterglow Studies](https://reader036.vdocuments.mx/reader036/viewer/2022062305/56814c1c550346895db91e3c/html5/thumbnails/11.jpg)
11
Eric Torrence September 2013
Maximum BCM afterglow
Just add 500 copies of this template (without peak), each shifted by 1 BCID
Asymptotic value 0.8% reached in ~200 BCIDs
![Page 12: Afterglow Studies](https://reader036.vdocuments.mx/reader036/viewer/2022062305/56814c1c550346895db91e3c/html5/thumbnails/12.jpg)
12
Eric Torrence September 2013
Maximum Lucid Hit afterglow
Even with longer tail, less ‘integral’ afterglow (no reflections)
Asymptotic value 0.3% reached in ~300 BCIDs
![Page 13: Afterglow Studies](https://reader036.vdocuments.mx/reader036/viewer/2022062305/56814c1c550346895db91e3c/html5/thumbnails/13.jpg)
13
Eric Torrence September 2013
50 ns limits
BCID-1 worksfor BCM in 2012!
(coincidental,only for BcmV)
Afterglow undercollisions ~ 10-3
Difference w/ BCID-1~ 1 x 10-3
(worse in 2011)
0.4% is half of 25 ns limit (expected)
colliding
bcid ± 1
![Page 14: Afterglow Studies](https://reader036.vdocuments.mx/reader036/viewer/2022062305/56814c1c550346895db91e3c/html5/thumbnails/14.jpg)
14
Eric Torrence September 2013
Realistic 25 ns fill pattern
14
25ns_2604b_2592_2288_2396_288bpi12inj.sch
2604 bunches collidingin P1/5
Mostly saturated(except at
start-of-train)
![Page 15: Afterglow Studies](https://reader036.vdocuments.mx/reader036/viewer/2022062305/56814c1c550346895db91e3c/html5/thumbnails/15.jpg)
15
Eric Torrence September 2013
Data subtraction procedure (per LB)•Start with raw luminosity by BCID for each lumi block
•Identify colliding bunches, and divide out average colliding luminosity from full distribution
-not strictly necessary, but useful for averaging over LBs
-also avoids need for calibration, everything relative...
•Build model of afterglow by adding up templates, one template per collision BCID, weighted by relative lumi
•Subtract this afterglow from raw luminosity in all BCIDs
•Iterate if desired (practically makes little effect)
•Measure residual background in abort gap (last 50 BCIDs)
•Subtract background as well to produce corrected lumi
![Page 16: Afterglow Studies](https://reader036.vdocuments.mx/reader036/viewer/2022062305/56814c1c550346895db91e3c/html5/thumbnails/16.jpg)
16
Eric Torrence September 2013
Example
6 colliding bunches (normalized response)
500 BCIDtemplate length
constant term‘fit’ here
Raw Luminosity
After.+Bgd. Prediction
![Page 17: Afterglow Studies](https://reader036.vdocuments.mx/reader036/viewer/2022062305/56814c1c550346895db91e3c/html5/thumbnails/17.jpg)
17
Eric Torrence September 2013
Example Zoomed
6 colliding bunches
rather excellent agreementbetween predicted and observed afterglow
undercollisions
![Page 18: Afterglow Studies](https://reader036.vdocuments.mx/reader036/viewer/2022062305/56814c1c550346895db91e3c/html5/thumbnails/18.jpg)
18
Eric Torrence September 2013
Lucid artifacts
Finite Lucid template leads to (small)artifacts with few bunches
1500 BCIDs
constant term‘fit’ here
![Page 19: Afterglow Studies](https://reader036.vdocuments.mx/reader036/viewer/2022062305/56814c1c550346895db91e3c/html5/thumbnails/19.jpg)
19
Eric Torrence September 2013
Lucid HitOR
Prediction close to luminous bunches looks right on(high μ template, 28 tubes)
![Page 20: Afterglow Studies](https://reader036.vdocuments.mx/reader036/viewer/2022062305/56814c1c550346895db91e3c/html5/thumbnails/20.jpg)
20
Eric Torrence September 2013
Lucid - 50 ns fill
Works fine withfull fill pattern
Remember: simple logformula applied,
no mu dependence
![Page 21: Afterglow Studies](https://reader036.vdocuments.mx/reader036/viewer/2022062305/56814c1c550346895db91e3c/html5/thumbnails/21.jpg)
21
Eric Torrence September 2013
BcmV noise comparison
During BCM noise period
After BCM noise period
<< 10-3 discrepancies
![Page 22: Afterglow Studies](https://reader036.vdocuments.mx/reader036/viewer/2022062305/56814c1c550346895db91e3c/html5/thumbnails/22.jpg)
22
Eric Torrence September 2013
25 ns runs
Can’t prove afterglow under collisions is correct,but procedure seems to work fine
![Page 23: Afterglow Studies](https://reader036.vdocuments.mx/reader036/viewer/2022062305/56814c1c550346895db91e3c/html5/thumbnails/23.jpg)
23
Eric Torrence September 2013
25 ns runs
Can’t prove afterglow under collisions is correct,but procedure seems to work fine
Same train length and gap expected in 2015
![Page 24: Afterglow Studies](https://reader036.vdocuments.mx/reader036/viewer/2022062305/56814c1c550346895db91e3c/html5/thumbnails/24.jpg)
24
Eric Torrence September 2013
Lucid reduced HV
Lucid ran with reduced HV for most runs from r215433,includes all 25 ns runs
Template clearly not accurate
![Page 25: Afterglow Studies](https://reader036.vdocuments.mx/reader036/viewer/2022062305/56814c1c550346895db91e3c/html5/thumbnails/25.jpg)
25
Eric Torrence September 2013
Lucid reduced HV 2
Scale up fast component (BCID+1, 2) by ~30%
Seems to work fine!
![Page 26: Afterglow Studies](https://reader036.vdocuments.mx/reader036/viewer/2022062305/56814c1c550346895db91e3c/html5/thumbnails/26.jpg)
26
Eric Torrence September 2013
25 ns Lucid Hit OR
Use scaled template to look at 25 ns Lucid dataMuch larger afterglow (~2%) due to HV settings
normalized
background error
slight mismatch
![Page 27: Afterglow Studies](https://reader036.vdocuments.mx/reader036/viewer/2022062305/56814c1c550346895db91e3c/html5/thumbnails/27.jpg)
27
Eric Torrence September 2013
25 ns comparison
Compare afterglow-subtractedrelative luminosity
collisions only
Shape looks familiar, butmagnitude is larger...
![Page 28: Afterglow Studies](https://reader036.vdocuments.mx/reader036/viewer/2022062305/56814c1c550346895db91e3c/html5/thumbnails/28.jpg)
28
Eric Torrence September 2013
50 ns comparison
28
Similar to Benedetto’s plots?
Remember, no complicated Lucid corrections, just log formula
![Page 29: Afterglow Studies](https://reader036.vdocuments.mx/reader036/viewer/2022062305/56814c1c550346895db91e3c/html5/thumbnails/29.jpg)
29
Eric Torrence September 2013
Trigger Counters•Special-purpose counters to look at 6 L1 items
before and after veto to study deadtime by BCID
•Can try to use before veto as a proxy for luminosity
•Triggers available- Counter 0 is trigger 93 L1_MU11
- Counter 1 is trigger 85 L1_EM30
- Counter 2 is trigger 102 L1_J50
- Counter 3 is trigger 128 L1_FJ75
- Counter 4 is trigger 118 L1_XE50
- Counter 5 is trigger 97 L1_J10
•Must be skeptical, many trigger-related issues with bunch train position...
•Trigger rates ~1% error per BCID (over many LBs)
Most linear with lumi
![Page 30: Afterglow Studies](https://reader036.vdocuments.mx/reader036/viewer/2022062305/56814c1c550346895db91e3c/html5/thumbnails/30.jpg)
30
Eric Torrence September 2013
50 ns run
L1_EM30
L1_MU11
L1_MU11 low at start of train (retriggering?)L1_EM30 rises in early train (calo noise?)
![Page 31: Afterglow Studies](https://reader036.vdocuments.mx/reader036/viewer/2022062305/56814c1c550346895db91e3c/html5/thumbnails/31.jpg)
31
Eric Torrence September 2013
50 ns run
L1_EM30
Now referenced to Lucid, L1_MU11 looks pretty OK...
![Page 32: Afterglow Studies](https://reader036.vdocuments.mx/reader036/viewer/2022062305/56814c1c550346895db91e3c/html5/thumbnails/32.jpg)
32
Eric Torrence September 2013
25 ns run
Back end of bunch train seems to be more consistent with BcmV
![Page 33: Afterglow Studies](https://reader036.vdocuments.mx/reader036/viewer/2022062305/56814c1c550346895db91e3c/html5/thumbnails/33.jpg)
33
Eric Torrence September 2013
25 ns run
Really had to draw any conclusions from this
![Page 34: Afterglow Studies](https://reader036.vdocuments.mx/reader036/viewer/2022062305/56814c1c550346895db91e3c/html5/thumbnails/34.jpg)
34
Eric Torrence September 2013
Conclusions•Single-bunch template method seems to work for
2012
-Templates quite universal over all 2012
•Afterglow error using BCID-1 appears smaller than 2011for BcmVOR
•No evidence of anything weird in BCM noise period
•25 ns data shows larger (as expected) but manageable afterglow levels, Lucid larger due to HV settings
•First look at Lucid/BCM ratios is rather alarming, but probably lots to understand here
•Trigger rates don’t seem to help
![Page 35: Afterglow Studies](https://reader036.vdocuments.mx/reader036/viewer/2022062305/56814c1c550346895db91e3c/html5/thumbnails/35.jpg)
35
Eric Torrence September 2013
Appendix A
Single-bunch plotsRun 200804
2 bunches, μ ~ 20
![Page 36: Afterglow Studies](https://reader036.vdocuments.mx/reader036/viewer/2022062305/56814c1c550346895db91e3c/html5/thumbnails/36.jpg)
36
Eric Torrence September 2013
Lucid Hit OR
![Page 37: Afterglow Studies](https://reader036.vdocuments.mx/reader036/viewer/2022062305/56814c1c550346895db91e3c/html5/thumbnails/37.jpg)
37
Eric Torrence September 2013
Lucid OR
![Page 38: Afterglow Studies](https://reader036.vdocuments.mx/reader036/viewer/2022062305/56814c1c550346895db91e3c/html5/thumbnails/38.jpg)
38
Eric Torrence September 2013
Lucid OR A
![Page 39: Afterglow Studies](https://reader036.vdocuments.mx/reader036/viewer/2022062305/56814c1c550346895db91e3c/html5/thumbnails/39.jpg)
39
Eric Torrence September 2013
Lucid OR C
![Page 40: Afterglow Studies](https://reader036.vdocuments.mx/reader036/viewer/2022062305/56814c1c550346895db91e3c/html5/thumbnails/40.jpg)
40
Eric Torrence September 2013
Lucid AND
Raw rate only!
![Page 41: Afterglow Studies](https://reader036.vdocuments.mx/reader036/viewer/2022062305/56814c1c550346895db91e3c/html5/thumbnails/41.jpg)
41
Eric Torrence September 2013
BcmH OR
![Page 42: Afterglow Studies](https://reader036.vdocuments.mx/reader036/viewer/2022062305/56814c1c550346895db91e3c/html5/thumbnails/42.jpg)
42
Eric Torrence September 2013
BcmV OR
![Page 43: Afterglow Studies](https://reader036.vdocuments.mx/reader036/viewer/2022062305/56814c1c550346895db91e3c/html5/thumbnails/43.jpg)
43
Eric Torrence September 2013
BcmH OR A
From Rates: A + C = OR + AND
![Page 44: Afterglow Studies](https://reader036.vdocuments.mx/reader036/viewer/2022062305/56814c1c550346895db91e3c/html5/thumbnails/44.jpg)
44
Eric Torrence September 2013
BcmV OR A
From Rates: A + C = OR + AND
![Page 45: Afterglow Studies](https://reader036.vdocuments.mx/reader036/viewer/2022062305/56814c1c550346895db91e3c/html5/thumbnails/45.jpg)
45
Eric Torrence September 2013
BcmH OR C
![Page 46: Afterglow Studies](https://reader036.vdocuments.mx/reader036/viewer/2022062305/56814c1c550346895db91e3c/html5/thumbnails/46.jpg)
46
Eric Torrence September 2013
BcmV OR C
![Page 47: Afterglow Studies](https://reader036.vdocuments.mx/reader036/viewer/2022062305/56814c1c550346895db91e3c/html5/thumbnails/47.jpg)
47
Eric Torrence September 2013
Appendix A
Single-bunch plotsRun 206717
1 bunch, μ ~ 40
![Page 48: Afterglow Studies](https://reader036.vdocuments.mx/reader036/viewer/2022062305/56814c1c550346895db91e3c/html5/thumbnails/48.jpg)
48
Eric Torrence September 2013
Lucid Hit OR
![Page 49: Afterglow Studies](https://reader036.vdocuments.mx/reader036/viewer/2022062305/56814c1c550346895db91e3c/html5/thumbnails/49.jpg)
49
Eric Torrence September 2013
Lucid AND
Raw rate only!
![Page 50: Afterglow Studies](https://reader036.vdocuments.mx/reader036/viewer/2022062305/56814c1c550346895db91e3c/html5/thumbnails/50.jpg)
50
Eric Torrence September 2013
BcmH OR
![Page 51: Afterglow Studies](https://reader036.vdocuments.mx/reader036/viewer/2022062305/56814c1c550346895db91e3c/html5/thumbnails/51.jpg)
51
Eric Torrence September 2013
BcmV OR
![Page 52: Afterglow Studies](https://reader036.vdocuments.mx/reader036/viewer/2022062305/56814c1c550346895db91e3c/html5/thumbnails/52.jpg)
52
Eric Torrence September 2013
BcmH OR A
From Rates: A + C = OR + AND
![Page 53: Afterglow Studies](https://reader036.vdocuments.mx/reader036/viewer/2022062305/56814c1c550346895db91e3c/html5/thumbnails/53.jpg)
53
Eric Torrence September 2013
BcmV OR A
From Rates: A + C = OR + AND
![Page 54: Afterglow Studies](https://reader036.vdocuments.mx/reader036/viewer/2022062305/56814c1c550346895db91e3c/html5/thumbnails/54.jpg)
54
Eric Torrence September 2013
BcmH OR C
![Page 55: Afterglow Studies](https://reader036.vdocuments.mx/reader036/viewer/2022062305/56814c1c550346895db91e3c/html5/thumbnails/55.jpg)
55
Eric Torrence September 2013
BcmV OR C