AFPProject Organization and Next Steps

Next steps to the approval process

Organization chart

IB composition

Marco Bruschi (CERN/INFN Bologna) AFP Kick Off meeting – September 20th 2012

1

Next steps to the approval process In the next slides I will address the formal steps leading to the approval of the

project (LHCC and RRB approval is the final step)

This process was initiated for AFP with the Technical and Physics review we passed at the beginning of this week. Another iteration has been requested

The outcome of these two reviews is encouraging, although some important points should be seriously considered by the AFP group, namely: The finalization of the design of the HBP and its final qualification Providing more quantitative details about the physics potential of AFP

The next weeks should be devoted to answer in a documented way the questions risen from the Technical and Physics review

The next appointment should then be the presentation of a set of milestones until the detectors installation: agreed by the extended institute board presented at the next AUW (Nov 18th -23rd) finally presented to the ATLAS management

Use the AFP session at the next ATLAS week to start discussion about organization of AFP management and activities (October 2nd)

2

APPROVAL PROCESShttps://edms.cern.ch/document/1093133/5

3

fall 2013/spring 2014 summer 2014 fall 2014 end 2014

(Sep 18th )

(Sep 17th )

(Sep 20th )

TB: spring 2014

APPROVAL PROCESS

4

Organization chart (Management)

5

AFP INT. PL C. Royon (Saclay)

FD PLM. Bruschi (Bologna)

FD IB H. Stenzel (Giessen)

FD TC Interface with LHC:

D. Macina(CERN)

AFP TC

TBA

Movable Beam Pipe G. Spigo (CERN)

Physics A. Kupco (Prague)

???

Si TrackerP. Sicho (Prague)

C. Davia (Manchester)

TimingM. Rijssenbeek (S. Brook)

A. Brandt (Arlington)

AFP PL elected by the AFP institutes at the end of the TDR A TC is URGENTLY NEEDED. Procedure to select her/him should start asap Upgrade Project Coordination meeting (Frequent, to follow the regular

development of the activity): PL, AFP TC, FD TC, Physics coords, Silicon Coords, Timing Coords

General meetings: Organized frequently by the PL, Opened to all the members which are contributing to the project. All the main decisions, status of the project and general strategy are discussed at these meetings

Full Organization Chart: Physics

6

Physics: A. Kupco (Prague), Deputy?Physics topics: L. Schoeffel (Saclay), O. Kepka (Prague)

Detector design: A. Kupco (Prague)

Simulation: L. Schoeffel (Saclay), T. Sykora (Prague)

Alignment and Calibration: P. Bussey (Glasgow)

Proton tracking: J. Chwastowski (Cracow), O. Kepka (Prague)

Reco, integration: T. Sykora (Prague)

MC production: L. Schoeffel (Saclay)

7

Silicon Tracker: P. Sicho (Prague), C. Davia (Manchester)Mechanics: F. Cadoux (Geneva), N. Grouas (Saclay)

Cooling: V. Vacek (Prague)Sensors: GF Dalla Betta (Trento), S. Grinstein (Barcelona)Bump Bonding: G. Darbo (Genova), GL Alimonti (Milano), S. Grinstein (Barcelona)

FEI4b: P.Sicho (Prague), G. Darbo (Genova)

Module assembly: F. Cadoux (Geneva), C. Gemme (Genova)

Internal electrical services and Optobox: S. Welch (Oklahoma)

Optoboard: S. Smith (Ohio)

Voltage Regulators: M. Citterio (Milano)

DCS: P. Sicho (Prague), D. Caforio (Bologna)

ROD-BOC: G. Avoni (Bologna)

Optical links:M. Weber (Bern)

External services: P. Sicho (Prague)

DAQ: P. Morettini (Genova)

System tests: Su Dong (SLAC), P. Sicho (Prague)

Radiation tests: S. Seidel (New Mexico)

Test beam: D. Caforio (Bologna), P. Grenier (SLAC)

8

Physics: A. Kupco (Prague), Deputy: ?Physics topics: L. Schoeffel (Saclay), O. Kepka (Prague)

Detector design: A. Kupco (Prague)

Simulation: L. Schoeffel (Saclay), T. Sykora (Prague)

Alignment and Calibration: P. Bussey (Glasgow)

Proton tracking: J. Chwastowski (Cracow), O. Kepka (Prague)

Reco, integration: T. Sykora (Prague)

MC production: L. Schoeffel (Saclay)

Timing Detector: M. Rijssenbeek (St. Brook), A. Brandt (UTA)

Detector: A. Brandt (Texas)

Simulation: M. Przybycien (Cracow)

QUARTIC: J. Pinfold (Alberta), A. Brandt (Texas)

MCP-PMT: A. Brandt (Texas)

Electronics: M. Rijssenbeek (S. Brook)

CFD:J. Pinfold (Alberta), M. Rijssenbeek (S. Brook)

ADC: M. Rijssenbeek (S. Brook)

HPTDC: J. Pinfold (Alberta)

Sampling chip: E. Delagnes, H. Grabas (Saclay)

Pulser: T. Kubo (S. Brook)

Reference Clock: V. Shah, A. Davis (Texas)

Optomodules: S. Khanov (Oklahoma)

RCE: D. Tsybychev (S. Brook)

Mechanics: J. Pinfold (Alberta)

Testing: A. Brandt (Texas)

Beam and laser tests: A. Brandt (Texas), D. Caforio (Bologna)

DCS: NN

Trigger: M. Rijssenbeek (S. Brook)

LV/HV: NN

FD and AFP Institutes 20 FD Institutes 20 Institutes expressed strong

interest to join AFP 12 NEW Institutes 9 Institutes are considering to join Final list at the end of TDR/MOU

9

FDIBPrague CU

Olomouc

Prague AS

Cracow AGH-UST

Cracow IFJ PAN

Orsay LAL

DESY

Berlin HU

Giessen

Lund

Portugal Lip

CERN

Alberta

Bologna

BNL

Columbia

NYU

Stony Br.

Valparaiso

USP

Interested to joinAFP INSTITUTESCanada/Alberta

Czech Rep/Olomouc

Czech Rep/Prague AS

Czech Rep/Prague TU

France/Saclay

Italy/Bologna

Italy/Genova

Italy/Milano

Italy/Trento

Poland/Cracow AGH UST

Poland/Cracow IFJ PAN

Portugal Lip

Spain/Barcelona

Switzerland/Bern

Switzerland/Geneva

UK/Glasgow

USA/Arlington

USA/New Mexico

USA/Oklahoma SU

USA/Stony Brook

AFP (considering to join)

Canada/Toronto

Italy/Lecce

Italy/Cosenza

Norway/Bergen+OSLO

UK/Manchester

USA/Albany

USA/Ohio

USA/SLAC

USA/Washington

Conclusions Big effort from the AFP 210m community from January 2011

to become one of the upgrade project

Intense and successful work of a group which is becoming stronger and stronger

The forthcoming year will be crucial to obtain the final approval from the ATLAS collaboration

This time should be devoted to: Finalize the HBP design + final prototyping Finalize other R&D + final prototyping Improve the present knowledge on as many as possible

physics cases strengthen the collaboration and finally reinforce the

weak points about manpower and funding writing the TDR and aim to final approval in 2014

10

LET’S MOVE FORWARD !

11

Backup

12

Upgrade Project Management Team

13

MOU

14

Upgrade Project Institute Board

15

ATLAS Phase-I LoI Timeline20114th March: Phase-I Sub-committee presentation to ATLAS Week29th July: 2011 Phase-I Sub-committee report competed14th Oct: LoI Sub-section author presentations to ATLAS week4th Nov: “Independent Readers” appointed in consultation with EB29th Nov: LoI Draft-0 released on CDS for comment to collaboration6th Dec: LHCC status report and presentation to ATLAS weekly13th Dec: Deadline for ATLAS comments to Draft-020th Dec: Draft-1 released and made available to LHCC for comment201211th Jan: Deadline for Draft-1 comments12h Jan: EB endorsement 17th Jan: Draft-2 sent to ATLAS CB and for information to LHCC 3rd Feb: Request CB approval 17th Feb: Final minor corrections and submit for printing 22nd March: Next LHCC 27th March: Next UAB (Stanford during ATLAS Upgrade Week) 23rd April: Next LHC RRB

Reminder: Cost Estimation

https://cdsweb.cern.ch/record/1402470/

(CERN-LHCC-2011-012 )

- First cost estimation presented in the LOI

NEXT STEPS:

Def. 5 projects Internal review process EB, CB approval TDR + MOUs (2012/2013)

(2013/2014) (Next cost estimation revision with TDRs)

= 36 MCHF

LHC RRB Meeting April 2012: M. Nessi on behalf of the ATLAS Collaborationhttps://indico.cern.ch/materialDisplay.py?contribId=21&sessionId=3&materialId=slides&confId=174803

ATLAS Resources Coordination 18

ATLAS CORE Guidelines Basic idea

Focus on direct production costs (“externalized costs”) Exclude basic infrastructure, personnel costs Guidelines in consultation with W Bartel (DESY)

CORE thus includes things like components (but not necessarily spares, except in TDAQ) production (incl. industrial manpower but not institute

manpower) outsourced parts of assembly outsourced parts of installation, commissioning

CORE does NOT include items such as infrastructure (i.e. production area, halls, tech support

etc.) R&D, design, (early stage) prototyping institute manpower, physicists taxes contingency