afghanistan opium survey 2010
TRANSCRIPT
AfghanistanOpium Survey 2010
Summary Findings
September 2010
Vienna International Centre, PO Box 500, 1400 Vienna, Austria Tel.: (+43-1) 26060-0, Fax: (+43-1) 26060-5866, www.unodc.org
Government of AfghanistanMinistry of Counter Narcotics
ABBREVIATIONS AGE Anti-government Elements ANP Afghan National Police CNPA Counter Narcotics Police of Afghanistan GLE Governor-led eradication ICMP Illicit Crop Monitoring Programme (UNODC) ISAF International Security Assistance Force MCN Ministry of Counter-Narcotics UNODC United Nations Office on Drugs and Crime ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS The following organizations and individuals contributed to the implementation of the 2009 Afghanistan Opium Survey and to the preparation of this report: Ministry of Counter-Narcotics: Mohammad Ibrahim Azhar (Deputy Minister), Mohammad Zafar (Deputy Minister), Ahmad Haroon Shirzad (Director General), Policy &Coordination, Mir Abdullah (Deputy Director of Survey and Monitoring Directorate), Saraj Ahmad (Deputy Director of Survey and Monitoring Directorate).
Survey Coordinators: Eshaq Masumi (Central Region), Abdul Mateen (Eastern Region), Abdul Latif Ehsan (Western Region), Fida Mohammad (Northern Region), Mohammed Ishaq Anderabi (North-Eastern Region), Khalil Ahmad (Southern Region), Khiali Jan Mangal (Eradication Verification Reporter), Mohammad Khyber Wardak (Database officer), Mohammad Sadiq Rizaee (Remote Sensing), Shiraz Khan Hadawe (GIS & Remote Sensing Analyst), Mohammad Ajmal (Data entry), Sahar (Data entry), Mohammad Hakim Hayat (Data entry).
United Nations Office on Drugs and Crime (Kabul) Jean-Luc Lemahieu (Country Representative), Ashita Mittal (Deputy Representative, Programme), Devashish Dhar (International Project Coordinator), Ziauddin Zaki (National Project Coordinator), Abdul Mannan Ahmadzai (Survey Officer), Noor Mohammad Sadiq (Database Developer)
Remote sensing analysts: Ahmad Jawid Ghiasee and Sayed Sadat Mehdi Eradication reporters: Ramin Sobhi and Zia Ulhaq.
Survey Coordinators: Abdul Basir Basiret (Eastern Region), Abdul Rahim Marikh (Eastern Region), Abdul Jalil (Northern Region), Fardin Osmani (Northern Region), Sayed Ahmad (Southern Region), Fawad Ahmad Alaie (Western Region), Mohammad Rafi (North-eastern Region), Rahimullah Omar (Central Region),
Provincial Coordinators: Fazal Mohammad Fazli (Southern Region), Mohammad Alam Ghalib Eastern Region), Altaf Hussain Joya (Western Region), Lutfurhaman Lutfi (Northern Region)
United Nations Office on Drugs and Crime (Vienna) Sandeep Chawla (Director, Division for Policy Analysis and Public Affairs), Angela Me (Chief, Statistics and Surveys Section-SASS), Martin Raithelhuber (Programme Officer), Philip Davis (Statistician), Coen Bussink (GIS & Remote Sensing Expert) (all SASS), Yen-Ling Wong (Scientific Affairs Officer, Laboratory and Scientific Section), Suzanne Kunnen (Public Information Assistant, Studies and Threat Analysis Section).
The implementation of the survey would not have been possible without the dedicated work of the field surveyors, who often faced difficult security conditions. The MCN/UNODC Illicit Crop Monitoring activities in Afghanistan were made possible by financial contributions from the Governments of Germany, Norway, the United Kingdom and the United States of America.
Afghanistan Opium Survey 2010
Summary Findings
September 2010
Fact Sheet Afghanistan Opium Survey 20101
2009 Change from 2009 2010
Net opium cultivation (after eradication) 123,000 ha 0% 123,000 ha
in % of agricultural land 1.6%
Number of poppy-free provinces2 20 No change 20 Number of provinces affected by opium cultivation 14 No change 14
Eradication 5,351 -57% 2,316
Weighted average opium yield 56.1 kg/ha -48% 29.2 kg/ha
Potential production of opium 6,900 mt (5,100-8,800) -48% 3,600 mt
(3,300-4,000)
No. of household involved in opium cultivation3 245,200 +1% 248,700
in % of total population3 6% 6%
Average farm-gate price (weighted by production) of fresh opium at harvest time US$ 48/kg
Average farm-gate price (weighted by production) of dry opium at harvest time US$ 64/kg +164% US$ 169/kg
Current GDP4 US$ 10.7 billion US$ 12.7 billion
Total farm-gate value of opium production US$ 438 million +38% US$ 604 million
in % of GDP 4% 5%
Gross income from opium per ha US$ 3,600 +36% US$ 4,900
Indicative gross income from wheat per ha US$ 1,200 -36% US$ 770
1 Numbers in brackets indicate the upper and lower limits of the 95% confidence interval. 2 Poppy-free provinces are those which are estimated to have less than 100 ha of opium cultivation. 3 Estimates are based on a population of 24.0 million for 2009 and a population of 24.5 million for 2010 and an average household size of 6.2 persons. Source: Government of Afghanistan, Central Statistical Office. 4 Source: Government of Afghanistan, Central Statistical Office.
2
SUMMARY FINDINGS
The total opium poppy cultivation estimated for Afghanistan in 2010 did not change from 2009 and remained at 123,000 hectares. Ninety eight per cent of the total cultivation took place in nine provinces in the Southern and Western regions5, including the most insecure provinces in the country. This further substantiates the link between insecurity and opium cultivation observed since 2007.
Total opium production in 2010 was estimated at 3,600 metric tons (mt), a 48% decrease from 2009. The sharp decline was due to the spread of a disease that affected opium fields in the major growing provinces, particularly Hilmand and Kandahar. The disease started to appear in the fields after flowering in spring. This was too late to plant another crop, therefore the disease did not change the area under opium cultivation. The major effect of the disease was visible in the yield which dropped to 29.2 kg/ha, a 48% reduction from 2009.
Virtually all opium production (96%) took place in the same southern and western provinces where cultivation is concentrated. The other provinces produced only 4% of the country’s total opium in 2010.
All 20 provinces which were poppy free in 2009, remained poppy free in 2010.
The total estimated farm-gate income of opium growing farmers amounted to US$ 604 million. This is a significant increase from 2009, when farm-gate income for opium was estimated at US$ 438 million. Figure 1: Opium cultivation in Afghanistan (ha), 1994-2010
71,000
54,000
57,000
58,000
64,000
91,000
82,000
8,000
74,000
80,000
131,000
104,000
165,000
193,000
157,000
123,000
123,000
0
25,000
50,000
75,000
100,000
125,000
150,000
175,000
200,000
1994 1995 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010
Hect
ares
Source: UNODC (1994-2002), MCN/UNODC (since 2003).
5 Regions as designated by UNODC for analytical purposes. Please refer to Table 1 for a full list.
3
Table 1: Opium cultivation (2005-2010) and eradication (2009-2010) in Afghanistan
PROVINCE Cultivation 2005 (ha)
Cultivation 2006 (ha)
Cultivation 2007 (ha)
Cultivation 2008 (ha)
Cultivation 2009 (ha)
Cultivation 2010 (ha)
Change 2009-2010
(%)
Eradication in 2009
(ha)
Eradication in 2010
(ha)Kabul Poppy free 80 500 310 132 152 15% 1.35 0.48Khost Poppy free 133 Poppy free Poppy free Poppy free Poppy free 0% 0 0Logar Poppy free Poppy free Poppy free Poppy free Poppy free Poppy free 0% 0 0Paktya Poppy free Poppy free Poppy free Poppy free Poppy free Poppy free 0% 0 0Panjshir Poppy free Poppy free Poppy free Poppy free Poppy free Poppy free 0% 0 0Parwan Poppy free 124 Poppy free Poppy free Poppy free Poppy free 0% 0 0Wardak 106 Poppy free Poppy free Poppy free Poppy free Poppy free 0% 0 0Ghazni Poppy free Poppy free Poppy free Poppy free Poppy free Poppy free 0% 0 0Paktika Poppy free Poppy free Poppy free Poppy free Poppy free Poppy free 0% 0 0Central Region 106 337 500 310 132 152 15% 1.35 0.48Kapisa 115 282 835 436 Poppy free Poppy free 0% 31 1Kunar 1,059 932 446 290 164 154 -6% 11 0Laghman 274 710 561 425 135 234 73% 0 10Nangarhar 1,093 4,872 18,739 Poppy free 294 719 145% 226 16Nuristan 1,554 1,516 Poppy free Poppy free Poppy free Poppy free 0% 0 0Eastern Region 4,095 8,312 20,581 1,151 593 1,107 87% 269 27Badakhshan 7,370 13,056 3,642 200 557 1,100 97% 420 302Takhar 1,364 2,178 1,211 Poppy free Poppy free Poppy free 0% 0 12Kunduz 275 102 Poppy free Poppy free Poppy free Poppy free 0% 0 0N.-eastern Region 9,009 15,336 4,853 200 557 1,100 97% 420 314Baghlan 2,563 2,742 671 475 Poppy free Poppy free 0% 0 0Balkh 10,837 7,232 Poppy free Poppy free Poppy free Poppy free 0% 0 0Bamyan 126 17 Poppy free Poppy free Poppy free Poppy free 0% 0 0Faryab 2,665 3,040 2,866 291 Poppy free Poppy free 0% 261 0Jawzjan 1,748 2,024 1,085 Poppy free Poppy free Poppy free 0% 0 0Samangan 3,874 1,960 Poppy free Poppy free Poppy free Poppy free 0% 0 0Sari Pul 3,227 2,252 260 Poppy free Poppy free Poppy free 0% 0 0Northern Region 25,040 19,267 4,882 766 Poppy free Poppy free 0% 261 0Hilmand 26,500 69,324 102,770 103,590 69,833 65,045 -7% 4,119 1,602Kandahar 12,989 12,619 16,615 14,623 19,811 25,835 30% 69 0Uruzgan 2,024 9,703 9,204 9,939 9,224 7,337 -20% 74 15Zabul 2,053 3,210 1,611 2,335 1,144 483 -58% 0 0Day Kundi 2,581 7,044 3,346 2,273 3,002 1,547 -48% 27 0Southern Region 46,147 101,900 133,546 132,760 103,014 100,247 -3% 4,289 1,617Badghis 2,967 3,205 4,219 587 5,411 2,958 -45% 0 0Farah 10,240 7,694 14,865 15,010 12,405 14,552 17% 43 198Ghor 2,689 4,679 1,503 Poppy free Poppy free Poppy free 0% 0 0Hirat 1,924 2,287 1,525 266 556 360 -35% 67 159Nimroz 1,690 1,955 6,507 6,203 428 2,039 376% 0 0Western Region 19,510 19,820 28,619 22,066 18,800 19,909 6% 110 357Total (rounded) 104,000 165,000 193,000 157,000 123,000 123,000 0% 5,351 2,316 A province is defined as poppy free when it is estimated to have less then 100 ha of opium cultivation.
Source: MCN/UNODC.
Opium cultivation in 2010 remained at 2009 levels
There was no major difference in the level of opium cultivation between 2009 and 2010 as opium cultivation remained at 123,000 ha, the same rounded figure as 2009. 98% of the opium cultivation remains concentrated in the Southern and Western regions, however, significant changes occurred within these regions. Cultivation decreased in some of the main opium poppy growing provinces (Uruzgan, Zabul, Day Kundi, Badghis, Hirat) and increased in others (Kandahar, Farah, Nimroz). Opium cultivation in Hilmand remained stable with a small, statistically not significant decrease of 7%. The Northern region maintained the poppy free status reached in 2009.
4
Hira
t
Fara
h
Nim
roz
Hilm
and
Zabu
l
Kand
ahar
Pakt
ika
Gha
zni
Uru
zgan
Gho
r
Badg
his
Fary
ab
Jaw
zjan
Sari
Pul
Balk
h Sam
anga
n
Kund
uzTa
khar
Bada
khsh
an
Nur
ista
n
Kuna
rLa
ghm
anKa
pisa
Parw
an
Bagh
lan
Bam
yan
War
dak
Loga
r
Pakt
yaKh
ostN
anga
rhar
Panj
shir
Day
Kund
i
Kabu
l
360
1100
65045
25835
14552
2039
483
2958
1547 7337
719
154
152
234
75°E
75°E
70°E
70°E
65°E
65°E
35°N
35°N
30°N
30°N
Opi
umcu
ltiva
tion
inA
fgha
nist
an,2
008-
2010
TUR
KM
ENIS
TAN
IRA
N
PAK
ISTA
N
TAJI
KIS
TAN
UZB
EKIS
TAN
Sour
ce:G
over
nmen
tofA
fgha
nist
an-N
atio
nalm
onito
ring
syst
emim
plem
ente
dby
UN
OD
CN
ote:
The
boun
darie
san
dna
mes
show
nan
dth
ede
sign
atio
nsus
edon
this
map
dono
tim
ply
offic
iale
ndor
sem
ento
racc
epta
nce
byth
eU
nite
dN
atio
ns.
Cul
tivat
ion
Year
2008
2009
2010
Prov
inci
albo
unda
ry
Inte
rnat
iona
lbou
ndar
y
Geo
grap
hic
proj
ectio
n:W
GS
84
¯0
100
200
50km
5
Hira
t
Fara
h
Gho
r
Hilm
and
Nim
roz
Kand
ahar
Bada
khsh
an
Balk
h
Gha
zni
Zabu
l
Fary
ab
Pakt
ika
Badg
his
Bagh
lan
Bam
yan
Sari
Pul
Takh
ar
Day
Kun
di
Jaw
zjan
Uruz
gan
War
dak
Nuris
tan
Kund
uz
Sam
anga
n
Kuna
r
Loga
r
Pakt
ya
Kabu
l
Parw
an
Khos
tNang
arha
r
Panj
shir La
ghm
anKa
pisa
75°E
75°E
70°E
70°E
65°E
65°E
35°N
35°N
30°N
30°N
TUR
KM
ENIS
TAN
IRA
N
PAK
ISTA
N
TAJI
KIS
TAN
UZB
EKIS
TAN
020
010
0
Sour
ce:G
over
nmen
tofA
fgha
nist
an-N
atio
nalm
onito
ring
syst
emim
plem
ente
dby
UN
OD
CN
ote:
The
boun
darie
san
dna
mes
show
nan
dth
ede
sign
atio
nsus
edon
this
map
dono
tim
ply
offic
iale
ndor
sem
ento
racc
epta
nce
byth
eU
nite
dN
atio
ns.G
eogr
aphi
cpr
ojec
tion:
WG
S84km
50
Opi
umcu
ltiva
tion
inA
fgha
nist
an,2
010
(atp
rovi
nce
leve
l)
Lege
ndO
pium
culti
vatio
n(h
a)
Inte
rnat
iona
lbou
ndar
y
Popp
yfre
e
Less
than
1000
1000
-100
00ha
1000
0-3
0000
ha
Mor
eth
an30
000
haPr
ovin
cial
boun
dary
6
The regional divide of opium cultivation between the south and rest of the country continued in 2010. Most of the opium cultivation remained confined to the south and west, which are dominated by insurgency and organized criminal networks. This mirrors the sharp polarization of the security situation between the lawless south and relatively stable north of the country.
Poppy-free provinces in 2010
All 20 provinces which were poppy-free in 2009 continued to be poppy-free in 2010. No additional province became poppy-free.6
Table 2: Provinces with poppy free status in 2010 (<100 ha opium poppy cultivation)
Region Province Central region Khost, Logar, Paktya, Paktika, Panjshir, Parwan, Wardak, Ghazni Northern region Baghlan, Balkh, Bamyan, Faryab, Jawzjan, Samangan, Sari Pul North-eastern region Kunduz, Takhar Eastern region Kapisa, Nuristan Western region Ghor
In the Central and Eastern regions, Kabul and Kunar provinces continued to have low levels of cultivation and were close to reaching poppy-free status.
All provinces of the Northern region remained poppy-free
The Northern region consists of Baghlan, Balkh, Bamyan, Faryab, Jawzjan, Samangan and Sari Pul provinces. In 2010, all the provinces in this region remained poppy-free. Most of these provinces sustained moderate levels of opium cultivation in the past except Balkh. This province emerged as a major opium cultivating province in 2005 and 2006 (10,837 ha and 7,232 ha respectively), whereas the rest of the provinces contributed in the range of 17 to 3,000 ha each. The decline in opium cultivation in the Northern region started with strict law enforcement and counter-narcotic initiatives. In 2008, poppy cultivation in these provinces was already negligible and Balkh and Bamyan provinces have remained poppy-free since 2007.
6 A province is defined as poppy-free when it is estimated to have less then 100 ha of opium cultivation.
7
Figure 2: Opium poppy cultivation in the Northern region by province (ha), 2004-2010
0
2,000
4,000
6,000
8,000
10,000
12,000
Hec
tare
s
2004 2,444 2,495 803 3,249 1,673 1,151 1,974
2005 2,563 10,837 126 2,665 1,748 3,874 3,227
2006 2,742 7,232 17 3,040 2,024 1,960 2,252
2007 671 poppy-free poppy-free 2,866 1,085 poppy-free 260
2008 475 poppy-free poppy-free 291 poppy-free poppy-free poppy-free
2009 poppy-free poppy-free poppy-free poppy-free poppy-free poppy-free poppy-free
2010 poppy-free poppy-free poppy-free poppy-free poppy-free poppy-free poppy-free
Baghlan Balkh Bamyan Faryab Jawzjan Samangan Sari Pul
Badakhshan remained the only opium poppy cultivating province in the North-eastern region In the North-eastern region, Kunduz province has been poppy-free since 2007 and Takhar province since 2008. In 2009 and 2010, Badakhshan remained the only opium cultivating province in this region. Compared to cultivating provinces in the South, the 2010 opium poppy cultivation in Badakhshan remained low at 1,100 ha, although this represents a large increase (97%) from 2009. The increase happened despite the eradication of 302 ha. 98% of the opium poppy cultivation happened in rain-fed areas.
8
Figure 3: Opium poppy cultivation in Badakhshan province (ha), 2004-2010
0
2,000
4,000
6,000
8,000
10,000
12,000
14,000
16,000
Hec
tare
s
Badakhshan 15,607 7,369 13,056 3,642 200 557 1,100
2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010
Nangarhar maintains low level of cultivation
Nangarhar province became poppy-free for the first time in 2008, but in 2009 it lost the poppy-free status as 294 ha of opium poppy were detected. In 2010, opium cultivation continued to increase and reached 719 ha. Considering that Nangarhar was traditionally a large opium growing province, the area estimated in 2010 is comparatively small, despite an increase of 145% on 2009. Due to strong resistance by AGE against eradication, only 16 ha of opium poppy cultivation could be eradicated in Nangarhar province in 2010. Figure 4: Opium cultivation in Nangarhar province (ha), 2004-2010
0
5,000
10,000
15,000
20,000
25,000
30,000
Hec
tare
s
Nangarhar 28,213 1,093 4,871 18,739 poppy-free 294 719
2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010
9
Before 2008, the level of opium cultivation in Nangarhar province was erratic. In 2004, cultivation was at 28,213 ha, the following year it dropped drastically to 1,093 ha and was confined to remote parts of the province. In 2006, it increased again to 4,872 ha and in 2007 further increased to 18,739, before becoming poppy free in 2008.
In 2010, Kunar province of the Eastern region was very close to be poppy-free with negligible amounts of cultivation (154 ha) . In Laghman province, opium cultivation increased by 73% in 2010, (234 ha) where only (10 ha) of opium poppy cultivation were eradicated in 2010.
Farah remains the main opium cultivating province in the Western region
Trends in opium cultivation level in Farah province has often been irregular. In 2008 it reached the highest cultivation level (15,010 ha). In 2009, there was a 17% decrease while in 2010, opium cultivation increased by 17%, reaching almost the same level of 2008. Farah is the most insecure province in the Western region. Figure 5: Opium cultivation in Farah and Nimroz provinces (ha), 2004-2010
0
2,000
4,000
6,000
8,000
10,000
12,000
14,000
16,000
Hec
tare
s
Farah 2,289 10,240 7,694 14,865 15,010 12,405 14,552
Nimroz 115 1,690 1,956 6,507 6,203 428 2,039
2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010
Note: Due to administrative boundary changes, the 2009 and 2010 estimates for Farah and Nimroz were calculated considering parts of Khash Rod district, the main opium cultivating district in Nimroz, as being in Farah province. Figures for 2008 and before include all of Khash Rod district in Nimroz province
Opium cultivation level in Badghis province raised steadily between 2004-2009 with the exception of 2008 when a drought and the total failure of rain-fed crops contributed to the drop in opium cultivation. In 2010, opium cultivation decreased by 45% to 2,958 ha. In 2009, good rainfall had resulted in extensive cultivation in rain-fed areas, enabling farmers to grow more poppy. This had contributed to a strong increase in opium cultivation from only 587 ha in 2008 to 5,411 ha in 2009, most of which was in areas difficult to access.
10
Figure 6: Opium cultivation in Badghis province (ha), 2004-2010
0
1,000
2,000
3,000
4,000
5,000
6,000
Hec
tare
s
Badghis 614 2,967 3,206 4,219 587 5411 2,958
2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010
Opium cultivation in Hilmand decreases by 7%
In 2010, opium cultivation in Hilmand went down by 4,788 ha or 7% compared to 2009, a decrease which is statistically not significant. Despite this reduction, Hilmand remained the largest opium cultivating province with 65,045 ha (53% of total opium cultivation in Afghanistan). Kandahar province, Hilmand’s neighbour to the east, experienced an opposite trend. Here, opium cultivation has been on the increase since 2007. In 2010, opium cultivation in Kandahar reached almost 26,000 ha, representing 21% of national cultivation. Figure 7: Opium cultivation in Hilmand and Kandahar provinces (ha), 2004-2010
0
20,000
40,000
60,000
80,000
100,000
120,000
Hec
tare
s
Hilmand 29,353 26,500 69,323 102,770 103,590 69,833 65,045
Kandahar 4,959 12,989 12,619 16,615 14,623 19,811 25,835
2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010
11
98% of opium cultivation is concentrated in the Southern and Western regions
In 2010, 82% of the Afghan opium cultivation was concentrated in the Southern region. Kandahar was the only province in this region that showed a significant increase from 19,811 ha in 2009 to 25,835 ha in 2010 (30% increase). In 2010, Kandahar was the second largest opium cultivating province after Hilmand, which still had over three times more area under opium cultivation than Kandahar. In the Western region, Farah, Badghis and Nimroz were the main opium poppy cultivating provinces with 70% of regional opium cultivation being concentrated in Farah province alone.
Security has been a major problem in the Southern and Western regions. Because the lack of security compromises the rule of law from the legitimate Government, counter-narcotic interventions are limited and these regions consistently show very high opium cultivation levels.
Table 3: Regional distribution of opium cultivation (ha), 2009-2010
Region 2009 (ha) 2010 (ha) Change 2009-2010
2010 (ha) as % of total
Southern 103,014 100,247 -3% 82%
Western 18,800 19,909 +6% 16%
Eastern 593 1,107 +87% 0.9%
North-eastern 557 1,100 +97% 0.9%
Central 132 152 +15% 0.1% Northern Poppy free Poppy free NA NA Rounded Total 123,000 123,000 0% 100%
Table 4: Main opium cultivating provinces in Afghanistan (ha), 2010
Province 2007 (ha)
2008 (ha)
2009 (ha)
2010 (ha)
Change 2009-2010
Hilmand 102,770 103,590 69,833 65,045 -7% Kandahar 16,615 14,623 19,811 25,835 +30% Farah 14,865 15,010 12,405 14,552 +17% Uruzgan 9,204 9,939 9,224 7,337 -20% Badghis 4,219 587 5,411 2,958 -45% Day Kundi 3,346 2,273 3,002 1,547 -48% Nimroz 6,507 6,203 428 2,039 +376% Rest of the country 35,455 5,028 2,982 3,202 +7%
Total 193,000 157,000 123,000 123,000 0%
12
Potential opium production in Afghanistan had a 48% decline in 2010
In 2010, opium production in Afghanistan decreased by almost half (48%) compared to 2009 and was lower than in any year since 2003. This was due to a strong decline in opium yield in the main cultivation areas in the South and West of the country, while the overall area under opium poppy cultivation remained at level of 2009. Figure 8: Potential opium production in Afghanistan (mt), 1994-2010
3,416
2,335
2,248
2,804
2,693
4,565
3,278
3,400
3,600
4,200
4,100
6,100
8,200
7,700
6,900
3,600
185
0
1,000
2,000
3,000
4,000
5,000
6,000
7,000
8,000
1994 1995 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010
mt
Table 5: Potential opium production by region (mt), 2009-2010
PROVINCE Production 2009 (mt)
Production 2010 (mt)
Change 2009-2010
(mt)
Change 2009-
2010 (%) Central Region NA* 8 NA NA Eastern Region 21 56 +35 +167% North-eastern Region 19 56 +37 +195% Northern Region Poppy-free Poppy-free NA NA Southern Region 6,026 2,979 -3047 -51% Western Region 825 478 -347 -42% Total (rounded) 6,900 3,600 -3,300 -48%
* In 2009, no specific regional production figure was calculated for the Central region due to a low number of yield measurements in that region.
Despite a low yield, the South remained the largest opium producing region in 2010 contributing 83% to total opium production, followed by the Western region (13%). Opium production fell significantly in the largest opium producing province of Hilmand (Southern region) where still over half of all opium (53%) was produced. While the largest five opium producing provinces all showed strong decreases in opium production,
13
some smaller ones such a Badakhshan and Nimroz provinces experienced a strong production increase, which, however, did not make up for the decreases elsewhere.
Table 6: Potential opium production in main opium producing provinces (mt), 2009-2010
PROVINCE Production 2009 (mt)
Production 2010 (mt)
Change 2009-2010
(mt)
Change 2009-2010
(%) Hilmand 4,085 1,933 -2,152 -53% Kandahar 1,159 768 -391 -34% Farah 545 349 -195 -36% Uruzgan 540 218 -322 -60% Badghis 238 71 -167 -70% Badakhshan 19 56 +37 +205% Nimroz 19 49 +30 +158% Day Kundi 176 46 -130 -74%
The average yield (weighted by cultivation area) for Afghanistan in 2010 was 29.2 kg/ha, a 48% reduction from the 56.1 kg/ha estimated in 2009. As a consequence, potential opium production decreased by 48% to 3,600 mt. This reduction was partly due to the fact that the number of opium poppy capsules per square meter and their average size were significantly smaller in the Western and Southern regions in 2010 than in 2009. An additional and more important factor was the occurrence of diseases in major growing areas that affected opium plants at late stage of plant development. The diseased plants exhibited wilt symptoms with leaves yellowing, drooping and finally desiccating completely indicative of a collar (stem/root interface) and/or upper root rot. These symptoms are consistent with those observed previously in the region for fungal infestations. Table 7: Average opium yield by region in Afghanistan, 2008-2009
Region 2009 average yield (kg/ha)
2010 average yield (kg/ha)
% Change
Central * NA NA NA
Eastern 36.2 NA NA
North-eastern 34.3 NA NA
Northern NA* NA NA
Southern 58.5 29.7 -49%
Western 43.9 24.0 -45%
Central, Eastern, North-eastern, Northern ** NA 51.0 NA
Weighted national average 56.1 29.2 -48%
* In 2009, no regional yield figure for the Central region was calculated due to a low number of yield measurements in this region. The Northern region was poppy-free.
** In 2010, due to a low number of yield measurements in some regions, Central, Eastern, North-eastern and Northern regions were grouped into one yield region. For these regions, direct region-by-region comparison with yields in 2009 is not possible.
14
IRA
NIR
AN
PAK
ISTA
NPA
KIS
TAN
IND
IAIN
DIA
TUR
KMEN
ISTA
NTU
RKM
ENIS
TAN
TAJI
KIS
TAN
TAJI
KIS
TAN
UZB
EKIS
TAN
UZB
EKIS
TAN
0
19909
152
100247
11001107
0
8
478
2979
56 56
75°E
75°E
70°E
70°E
65°E
65°E
60°E
60°E 35°N
35°N
30°N
30°N
Reg
iona
lopi
umcu
ltiva
tion
and
prod
uctio
nin
Afg
hani
stan
,201
0
Sou
rce:
Go
vern
men
tof
Afg
hani
sta
n-
Nat
iona
lmon
itorin
gsy
stem
impl
emen
ted
byU
NO
DC
Not
e:T
hebo
und
arie
san
dna
mes
sho
wn
and
the
desi
gnat
ion
sus
edon
this
ma
pd
on
otim
ply
offic
iale
ndo
rsem
ento
racc
epta
nce
byth
eU
nite
dN
atio
ns.
Sout
hern
Wes
tern
Cen
tral
Nor
ther
n
¯0
100
200
50Km
Geo
grap
hic
proj
ectio
n,Da
tum
WG
S84
East
ern
Nor
th-e
aste
rn
East
ern
Nor
thE
aste
rn
20581
Lege
nd Cul
tivat
ion
(ha)
Prov
inci
albo
unda
ry
Inte
rnat
iona
lbou
ndar
y
Prod
uctio
n(m
t)
15
The Southern region was the most affected region with about 42% of the area under opium cultivation damaged. The Western region was also affected by diseases but to a much lower degree. In the West, a combination of factors including frost played a role according to farmer reports.
Opium poppy diseases are a normal occurrence in Afghanistan. Farmers reported varying degrees of damage to their crops in practically all years and regions since systematic yield surveys started. Reported causes of the damage farmers observed on their poppy fields include various local names for plant diseases, frost or drought conditions and different pest including aphids/insects and worms. Use of agrochemicals to fight plant diseases or pests is rather the exception. While this information on crop damage is based on farmers’ assessment and not on scientific investigations, the comparison of farmers’ damage assessment from 2004 to 2010 clearly shows the difference between “normal” levels of crop damage and the extraordinary high levels reach in 2004 and 2010. Both in 2004 and 2010, the Southern and Western regions were the most affected, according to farmers’ damage assessment. In 2004, other regions, which at that time still had relatively high levels of cultivation, were also affected, while in 2010 this was not the case.
The pattern of diseases and other damage reported by farmers in 2010 differs clearly between the Southern and Western regions and the rest of the country. In the West, farmers most frequently identified frost as the cause of the damage. Other causes were well below 10% of responses. A large proportion of farmers in the Western region reported not to have observed any damage at all (39%). The frost damage reported by farmers may well have contributed to plant death or damage at earlier stages of plant development, resulting in low yields, which were reflected in the results of the systematic yield survey.
Photo 1: Opium poppy plants affected by disease, Hilmand province, April 2010
16
Figure 9: Proportion of damage to opium cultivation area reported by farmers, 2004-2010
0 10 20 30 40 50 60
Central
Eastern
North-eastern
Northern
Southern
Western
% of poppy area damaged (as reported by farmers)
2004 (n=150) 2005 (n=116) 2006 (n=780) 2007 (n=531)
2008 n=619) 2009 (n=818) 2010 (n=685)
In the Southern region, almost all farmers reported some kind of damage to their opium crops. Frost (23%) and drought (12%) were often mentioned. However, most causes of damage were reported by farmers as “yellowish” (35%) or “fungal disease” (7%). These observations could be related to a collar (stem/root interface) and/or upper root rot described above.
Opium farmers discovered this phenomenon only at a relatively late stage, often after flowering or just before the opium poppy fields were ready for harvest. The pre-mature drying of the plant greatly reduced the amount of opium which could be harvested as the harvesting technique used in Afghanistan consists of lancing the fully developed but still green opium capsules. Liquid plant juice (opium latex) oozes out of the cuts, dries on the capsules to turn into opium gum, and is scratched off the other day. If capsules turn dry earlier, less opium can be harvested. Opium yields on disease-affected fields were only 13% to 39% of the amount farmers would have normally harvested from fields with similar numbers and sizes of capsules.7
7 This finding is based on weight measurements of harvested opium conducted on disease-affected fields in Hilmand and Kandahar in 2010. The results were compared to the potential yield estimated from poppy capsule volumes per square meter, which is the established method used in UNODC-supported opium surveys in Afghanistan, Lao PDR and Myanmar. See United Nations (2001), Guidelines for Yield Assessment of Opium Gum and Coca Leaf from Brief Field Visits. New York. ST/NAR/33.
17
Photo 2: Opium poppy field affected by disease, Hilmand province, April 2010
Eradication was at the lowest level since the monitoring system started in 2005
A total of 2,316 ha of Governor-led eradication (GLE) were verified by MCN/UNODC. GLE was carried out in 11 provinces. The final figures of eradication in Hilmand, Farah, Hirat and Badakhshan provinces were adjusted after verification using satellite images.
Table 8: Eradication and opium cultivation in Afghanistan (ha) 2005-2010
Year 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 Governor-led eradication (GLE)
(ha) 4000 13050 15898 4306 2687 2316
Poppy Eradication Force (PEF) (ha) 210 2250 3149 1174 2663 0
Total (ha) 4210 15300 19510 5480 5351 2316 Opium cultivation (ha) * 104,000 165,000 193,000 157,253 119,141 123,000 % poppy in insecure provinces
of South and West 56% 68% 80% 98% 99% 98%
Poppy-free provinces 8 6 13 18 20 20 * Net opium cultivation after eradication
Comparing the 2010 and 2009 eradication campaigns, the following can be noted:
The 2010 eradication campaign started in February in Hilmand and Farah provinces. In 2009, eradication started at the same time in Hilmand and Hirat provinces.
Eradication progressed at a slower pace in 2010 compared to 2009 throughout the country.
The 2010 eradication campaign was mostly active in South, West, and North-eastern regions while last year there was more eradication in the Eastern region. In 2010 the
18
eradication in Nangarhar province was not intense due to frequent attacks on eradication teams.
In 2010, the number of security incidents was less than in 2009. GLE teams were attacked 12 times in 2010 while there were 34 attacks on GLE in 2009. However, the number of fatalities was higher this year as compared to 2009. This year about 28 eradication campaign related fatalities were reported against 21 in 2009.
In 2010, only GLE eradication took place whereas in 2009, the Poppy Eradication Force (PEF) had eradicated about half of the total area.
Table 9: Security incidents eradication, 2009-2010
2008 2009 2010 Change 2009-2010 % Persons injured >100 52 36 -31%
Fatalities 78 21 28 33%
As reported by eradication verification surveyors.
Although the highest number of hectares eradicated (1,602 ha) was verified in Hilmand province, this amount was negligible (2.4%) considering the amount of opium cultivation in this province (65,045 ha). Eradication in Uruzgan (15 ha) was also negligible in comparison to its total cultivation of 7,337 ha. No eradication was carried out in Kandahar province in 2010. In Farah, 198 ha of eradication were verified (1.3%), however this amount is also negligible compared to the total opium cultivation (14,552 ha). In Badakhshan and Hirat, the percentage eradication were 27% and 44% respectively of the total area under opium cultivation in these provinces.
Table 10: Governor-led eradication by province (ha), 2010
Province Eradication (ha)
verified
No. of fields
eradication reported
No. of villages
eradication reported
Badakhshan 302 1,760 103 Farah 198 431 35 Hilmand 1,602 3,573 178 Hirat 159 741 42 Kabul 0 9 1 Kapisa 1 28 11 Laghman 10 27 4 Nangarhar 16 45 5 Nimroz 0 14 2 Takhar 12 51 7 Uruzgan 15 197 14 Total 2316 6876 402
19
Figure 10: Eradication comparison by province in 2009 and 2010
0 500 1000 1500 2000 2500 3000
Badakhshan
Day Kundi
Farah
Faryab
Hilmand
Hirat
Kabul
Kandahar
Kapisa
Kunar
Laghman
Nangarhar
Nimroz
Takhar
Uruzgan
GLE-2010 GLE-2009 PEF-2009
Note: In 2010, no PEF eradication took place.
20
TUR
KM
ENIS
TAN
TUR
KM
ENIS
TAN
UZB
EKIS
TAN
UZB
EKIS
TAN
TAJI
KIS
TAN
TAJI
KIS
TAN
PAK
ISTA
NPA
KIS
TAN
IND
IAIN
DIA
IRA
NIR
AN
Hira
t
Fara
h
Gho
r
Hilm
and
Nim
roz
Kand
ahar
Bada
khsh
an
Gha
zni
Balk
h
Zabu
l
Fary
abBa
ghla
n
Badg
his
Pakt
ika
Sari
Pul
Takh
ar
Bam
yan
Day
Kun
di
Jaw
zjan
Uru
zgan
War
dak
Nur
ista
n
Kund
uz
Sam
anga
n
Pakt
ya
Parw
an
Loga
r
Kuna
r
Kabu
lN
anga
rhar
Khos
t
Panj
shir La
ghm
anKa
pisa
75°E
75°E
70°E
70°E
65°E
65°E
35°N
35°N
30°N
30°N
Afg
hani
stan
:Ver
ified
Gov
erno
r-le
dEr
adic
atio
n,20
10(b
ypr
ovin
ce)
Sou
rce:
Gov
ernm
ento
fAfg
han
ista
n-
Na
tion
alm
oni
torin
gsy
ste
mim
plem
ente
dby
UN
OD
CN
ote:
The
boun
dari
esan
dn
ames
show
nan
dth
ed
esig
natio
nsus
edon
this
ma
pdo
noti
mpl
yof
ficia
lend
ors
em
ent
orac
cept
anc
eb
yth
eU
nite
dN
atio
ns.
Geo
grap
hic
Pro
ject
ion
Dat
um:W
GS
84
015
030
075
km
Lege
nd
Erad
icat
ion
(ha)
No
erad
icat
ion
Neg
ligib
le
10-1
00
101
-500
501
-160
2
Inte
rnat
iona
lbou
ndar
y
Prov
inci
albo
unda
ry
21
IRA
N
PAK
ISTA
N
IND
IA
TUR
KM
ENIS
TAN
TAJI
KIS
TAN
UZB
EKIS
TAN
Hira
t
Fara
h
Gho
r
Hilm
and
Kan
daha
rN
imro
z
Bad
akhs
han
Gha
zni
Fary
ab
Zabu
l
Bal
kh
Pakt
ika
Bad
ghis
Bam
yan
Bag
hlan
Sari
Pul
Takh
ar
Day
kund
i
Jaw
zjan
War
dak
Uru
zgan
Sam
anga
n
Kun
duz
Nur
ista
n
Kho
stNan
garh
arKun
ar
Kab
ul
Parw
an Loga
r
Pakt
iya
Panj
shir
Lagh
man
Kap
isa
Reg
Dis
hu
Cha
harB
urja
k
Wak
han
Adra
skan
Gar
mSe
rJaw
and
Anar
Dar
ah
Gul
ran
Gho
ryan
Gul
ista
n
Naw
ur
Shin
dand
Reg
-i-K
han
Nis
hin
Yaka
wla
ng
Nad
Ali
Obe
Giz
ab
Gom
al
Kohi
stan
at
Qad
is
Dam
an
Was
her
Asl-i
-Cha
khan
sur
Mar
uf
Panj
way
ee
PurC
ham
an
Shah
rak
Khas
hR
od
Tula
k
Now
zad
Bala
Bul
uk
Khul
m
War
as
Kiti
Spin
Bol
dak
Do
Lain
ah
Pasa
band
Tayw
ara
Cho
rah
Shor
abak
War
saj
Argh
ista
n
Fers
i
Shig
hnan
Qai
sar
Balk
hab
Lash
-i-Ju
way
n
Bagh
ran
Sagh
ar
Enjil
Dus
hi
Qal
a-i-K
ah
Bala
Mur
ghab
Kaja
ki
Mai
wan
d
Shin
kai
Bakw
ah
Kohs
an
Shib
Koh
Kajra
nJa
ghur
i
Naw
a
Del
aram
Rus
taq
MirA
mor
Panj
ab
Jurm
Kohi
stan
Wor
Mam
ay
Alm
ar
Karr
ukh
Nes
h
Khed
ir
Taga
b
Roi
-Do-
Ab
Turw
o
Argo
KufA
b
Dow
lata
bad
Zari
Ajris
tan
Saig
han
Pary
an
Giro
Gur
ziw
an
Gho
rak
Qar
qin
Jalre
z
Miz
an
Azra
Isht
arla
y
Shor
Tepa
Sang
-i-Ta
kht
Kahm
ard
Kald
arD
owla
taba
d
Kira
nw
aM
unja
n
Man
dol
Shem
elza
i
Cha
ghch
aran
(Pro
vinc
ialC
ente
r)La
lwa
Sarja
ngal
Ch i
mta
l
Pash
tun
Kot
Kang
Yam
gan
Shah
Wal
iKot
Zayb
ak
Qal
a-i-Z
al
Zend
ahJa
n
Mal
ista
n
Gho
rmac
h
Zurm
at
Suru
bi
Shah
Joi
Khak
rez
Mar
kaz-
i-B
ehsu
d
Shol
gara
h
Khas
Uru
zgan
Tala
hw
aB
arfa
k
Gel
an
Shah
rista
n
Jaji
Muq
ur
Barm
al
Sheb
ar
Shuh
ada
Chi
isht
-i-S
harif
AbK
amar
i
Sayy
ad
Dih
raw
udDow
laty
ar
Fark
har
Shiri
nTa
gab
Dar
ah-i-
Soof
-i-B
ala
Bagh
lan-
i-Jad
eed
Mus
aQ
ala
Naw
a-i-B
aruk
zai
Burk
a
Barg
-i-M
atal
Qar
aB
agh
Khin
jan
Day
chop
an
Khw
ajah
DuK
oh
Muq
ur
Shik
i
Khak
-i-Sa
fed
Argh
anda
b
Fara
h(P
rovi
ncia
lCen
ter)
Kush
k(R
abat
-i-Sa
ngi)
Nar
i
Rag
hist
an
Kam
desh
Faiz
abad
Waz
ahkh
wah
Min
gajik
Kish
inde
h
Zhire
Khos
twa
Firin
gG
osfa
ndi
Shah
idiH
asas
Anda
rab
Alin
gar
Kish
im
Anda
r
Dar
ah
War
dooj
AbB
and
Kusk
-i-K
ohna
h
Khan
abad
Naw
Bah
ar
Nah
reen
Nah
er-i-
Sara
j
BilC
hira
gh
Pash
tun
Zarg
hun
Pul-i
-Ala
m
Eshk
ashi
m
Nijr
ab
Jani
Khe
l
Way
gal
Khur
amw
aSa
rBag
h
Bang
i
Cha
hab
Tash
kan
Qar
amQ
ul
Du
Ab
Niiz
am-i-
Sha
hid
(Guz
arah
)
Dai
mird
ad Sayy
idab
ad
Qur
ghan
Nah
r-i-S
hahi
Balk
h
Dah
ana-
i-G
huri
Cha
harS
adah
Sang
char
ak
Kham
yab
Dar
ah-i-
Suf-i
-Pay
in
Cha
harD
arah
Ner
kh
Shay
khA
li
Haz
rati
Imam
Sahi
b
Taga
b
Qar
ghay
ee
Pul-i
-His
ar
Surk
h-i-P
arsaSh
inw
ari
Cha
harK
ent
Deh
Yak
Mar
dyan
Tarn
akw
aJa
ldak
Khw
ahan
Sper
aHes
arak
Tana
y
Mar
mul
Achi
n
Urg
un
Sari
Pul(
Pro
vinc
ialC
ente
r)
His
ah-i-
Aw
alB
ehsu
d
Eshk
amis
h
Om
na
Jagh
atu
Sheb
ergh
an(P
rovi
ncia
lCen
ter)
Cha
k-i-W
arda
k
Sala
ng
Qus
hTe
pah
Miy
aN
eshi
n Qal
at(P
rovi
ncia
lCen
ter)
Atgh
ar
Gos
hta
Kohi
stan
Dar
ayim
Khug
yani
Shah
riBu
zurg
Bam
yan
(Pro
vinc
ialC
ente
r)
Yaw
an
Fayr
ozN
akhc
heer
Haz
rat-i
-Sul
tan
Khos
hi
Lalp
oor
Tirin
Kot(
Pro
vinc
ialC
ente
r)
Das
hti-i
-Arc
hi
SarR
owza
Dila
hw
aK
hwos
ham
and
Kabu
l
Dar
waz
-i-B
ala
(nes
ay)
Koh-
i-Saf
iNam
akA
b
Kala
fgan
Dar
qad
Khar
war
AliA
bad
Khan
aqa
Sar-
i-Pol
Dar
waz
-iP
ayin
(mam
ay)
Argh
anda
b
Wag
haz
Cha
paD
ara
Khan
iCha
harB
agh
Yafta
l-i-S
ufla
Yosu
fKhe
l
Gha
ziA
bad
Suru
biKhak
-i-Ja
bar
Andk
hoy
Bak
Ziru
k
Sozm
aQ
ala
Khas
h
Argh
anjK
hwah
Deh
Bal
a
Ras
hida
n
Behs
ud
Nur
ista
nP
aroo
n(P
rovi
ncia
lCen
ter)
Cha
harB
olak
Baha
rak
Gur
buz
Kam
a
Push
tRod
Sang
inQ
ala
Giy
an
Mat
aK
han
Noo
rga
l
Shut
ul
Sam
kani
Khw
aja
Gha
r
Khas
Kun
ar
Lash
karg
ah(P
rovi
ncia
lCen
ter)
Zana
khan
Hira
t
Jaji
Mai
dan
Nik
a
Baha
rak
Dur
Baba
Zara
nj(P
rovi
ncia
lCen
ter)
Naz
yan
Firin
gw
aG
haru
Das
htiQ
ala
Kand
ahar
(Pro
vinc
lalC
ente
r)
Qal
a-i-N
ow(P
rovi
ncia
lCen
ter)
Nili
(Pro
vinc
ialC
ente
r)
Shig
alw
aSh
elta
n
Yang
iQal
a
Dan
gam
S arK
ani
Tera
yzai
(Ali
She
r)Sh
wak
Moh
man
dD
ara
Mar
aw
arah
Shah
rak-
i-Hai
rata
n
75°E
75°E
70°E
70°E
65°E
65°E
60°E
60°E
35°N
35°N
30°N
30°N
Sour
ce:G
over
nmen
tofA
fgha
nist
an-N
atio
nalm
onito
ring
syst
emim
plem
ente
dby
UN
OD
CN
ote:
The
boun
darie
san
dna
mes
show
nan
dth
ede
sign
atio
nsus
edon
this
map
dono
tim
ply
offic
iale
ndor
sem
ento
racc
epta
nce
byth
eU
nite
dN
atio
ns.
Afg
hani
stan
:Ver
ified
Gov
erno
r-le
dEr
adic
atio
n,20
10(b
ydi
stri
ct)
Nur
ista
n
Kun
ar
abul
ogar
Nan
garh
ar
Panj
shir
Lagh
man
Kap
isa
Suru
bi Jaji
Man
dol
Azra
Alin
gar
Dar
ah
Nijr
ab
Way
gal
Du
Ab
Taga
b
Qar
ghay
ee
Noo
rG
ram
Hes
arak
Achi
n
Alis
heng
Gos
hta La
lpoo
r
Koh-
i-Saf
i
Dow
latS
hah
Kot
Deh
Sab
z
AlaS
aiBa
gram
Wam
a
Kam
aSu
rkh
Rud
Khug
yani
Khos
hi
Rod
at
Sher
zad
Sala
ng
Cha
paD
ara Dar
a-i-P
ech
Khak
-i-Ja
bar
Deh
Bal
a
Behs
ud
Noo
rga
l
Kabu
l
Shut
ul
Muh
amm
adAg
hah
Bagr
ami
Pach
irw
agam
Khas
Kun
arKu
zkun
ar
Kam
desh
Pul-i
-Ala
mSa
mka
ni
Nur
ista
nP
aroo
n(P
rovi
ncia
lCen
ter)
Dur
Baba
Naz
yan
Ahm
adab
ad
Cho
wke
y
Una
ba
Wat
ahpo
or
SarK
ani
Meh
tarL
am(P
rovi
ncia
lCen
ter)
Laja
Ahm
adK
hel
Cha
parh
arSh
inw
ar
Ruk
hah
Dar
ah-i-
Noo
r
Bati
Kot
Mus
ahi
Sayy
idK
aram
Koh
Band
Dan
dP
atan
Moh
man
dD
ara
Mar
aw
arah
Nar
ang
wa
Bad
il
Anda
rab
Pary
an
Kala
kan
Sayy
idK
hel
Jala
laba
d
Jaji
Mai
dan
Dan
gam
East
ern
Reg
ion
No
erad
icat
ion
Neg
ligib
le
Dis
trict
boun
dary
Erad
icat
ion
(ha)
Inte
rnat
iona
lbou
ndar
yPr
ovin
cial
boun
dary
11-1
00
101-
200
201-
400
401-
964
22
Opium prices show rapid increasing trends in 2010
In 2010, the average farm-gate price of dry opium at harvest time (weighted by production) was US$ 169/kg, a 164% increase from 2009. The rapid increasing trend is a market response to the drastic reduction of the opium production which is due to the spreading of the opium disease in the major growing areas.
After a steady decline between 2005-2009, opium price started a rapid increase in 2010 reaching nominal levels observed only at the end of 2004, a year when opium cultivation was also heavily affected by diseases. The long-time trend of opium price observed in the two provinces of Nangarhar and Kandahar shows that the price trend in 2010 followed a similar trend observed in 2004, but that the peak is still far from the very high levels reached in 2001 and 2003 when the market was affected by the lowest level of production.
Price trends in the next months will show how the opium market will be affected by the production decrease in 2010, however, the current high price may play an encouraging factor for farmers to cultivate opium. In 2009 data on famers motivation to cultivate opium had started to show an increasing number of farmers stopping opium cultivation due to its low sale price. It is worrying that the current high sale price of opium in combination with a lower wheat price may encourage famers to go back to opium cultivation. Figure 10: Opium prices reported by traders in Kandahar and Nangarhar, Jul 1997 – Aug 2010 (US$/kg)
0
100
200
300
400
500
600
700
Jul-9
7
Jan-
98
Jul-9
8
Jan-
99
Jul-9
9
Jan-
00
Jul-0
0
Jan-
01
Jul-0
1
Jan-
02
Jul-0
2
Jan-
03
Jul-0
3
Jan-
04
Jul-0
4
Jan-
05
Jul-0
5
Jan-
06
Jul-0
6
Jan-
07
Jul-0
7
Jan-
08
Jul-0
8
Jan-
09
Jul-0
9
Jan-
10
Jul-1
0
US$
/kg
Nangarhar (Eastern Afghanistan) Kandahar (Southern Afghanistan) Unweighted average Nominal prices converted to US$ at local exchange rate, not adjusted for inflation.
MCN/UNODC has monitored opium prices on a monthly basis in selected provinces of Afghanistan since 1994. In all regions monthly prices showed a decreasing trend since
23
2005. Since mid-2007, opium prices at the trading level in the Western and Eastern regions tended to be higher than prices in other regions. Between July and November 2009 opium started to increase in all regions with the Western, Southern and Eastern regions reaching the highest levels . Figure 11: Dry opium prices reported by traders, by region (US$/kg), January 2005 to August 2010
0
50
100
150
200
250
300
350
Jan-
05M
ar-0
5M
ay-0
5Ju
l-05
Sep-
05N
ov-0
5Ja
n-06
Mar
-06
May
-06
Jul-0
6Se
p-06
Nov
-06
Jan-
07M
ar-0
7M
ay-0
7Ju
l-07
Sep-
07N
ov-0
7Ja
n-08
Mar
-08
May
-08
Jul-0
8Se
p-08
Nov
-08
Jan-
09M
ar-0
9M
ay-0
9Ju
l-09
Sep-
09N
ov-0
9Ja
n-10
Mar
-10
May
-10
Jul-1
0
Nom
inal
pri
ce in
(US$
/Kg)
Eastern Southern Western North-eastern Northern
Table 11: Regional farm-gate prices of dry opium at harvest time (US$/kg), 2009-2010
Region Average Dry Opium Price
(US$/kg) 2009
Average Dry Opium Price
(US$/kg) 2010 Change
Central 160 133 -17%
Eastern 90 130 +44%
North-eastern 75 91 +21%
Northern 64 104 +63%
Southern 62 181 +192%
Western 72 108 +50% National average weighted by production* 64 169 +164%
* Prices for the Central region were taken from the annual village survey as there is no monthly opium price monitoring in the Central region. Prices for all other regions were derived from the opium price monitoring system and refer to the month when opium harvest took actually place in different regions of the country.
24
Total farm-gate value of opium increased by 38% in 2010
Based on potential opium production and reported opium prices, the farm-gate value of the 2010 opium harvest amounted to US$ 604 million increasing by 38% from 2009. The farm-gate value of opium as a proportion of GDP also increased in 2010 to 5% compared to 4% in 2009. Despite the considerably lower amount of opium produced in 2010, the increase in opium price made overall the opium business more productive. While many farmers in the disease-affected areas lost much of their expected income from opium, other farmers not affected by the disease or affected only marginally had a large increase in their profits.
Gross income from opium increased by 36% to US$ 4,900 per ha
Due to the high price of opium in 2010, the gross income for farmers per hectare increased by 36% to US$ 4,900. This reversed the decreasing trend observed since 2007. At the same time, the gross income per hectare of wheat decreased to US$ 770. This is higher than in the years 2003-2007 but considerably lower than in 2008 and 2009, when wheat prices reach peak levels worldwide. These diverging price trends increased the discrepancy between (illicit) gross income from opium and (licit) income from wheat.
Table 12: Gross income from opium and wheat (US$/ha), 2003-2010
Income in US$/ha Year
Opium Wheat
Ratio opium/wheat
income
2003 12,700 470 27:1 2004 4,600 390 12:1 2005 5,400 550 10:1 2006 4,600 530 9:1 2007 5,200 550 10:1 2008 4,700 1600 3:1 2009 3,600 1200 3:1 2010 4,900 770 6:1
In prices of the reporting year, not adjusted for inflation. Income from poppy stalks and seeds and from wheat straw is not considered in this calculation.
25
Reasons for cultivating opium poppy
The high sale price was the most important reason cited by farmers (47%) for cultivating opium poppy in 2010. Provision of basic food and shelter for the family, improving living condition and high income from little land were other important reasons given. Figure 12: Reasons for cultivating opium in 2010 (n=392 farmers)
1%
1%
2%
2%
2%
5%
11%
13%
15%
47%
0.3%
0.6%
0% 25% 50%
Land/climate conditions suitable
Possibility of getting loan
Lack of support from Government/other sources
Unemployment
To cope up w ith high domestic expenditures
Other
It is a custom
High demand for opium
High income from little land
To improve living condition
Poverty (Provision of basic food and shelter)
High sale price of opium
Reasons for stopping cultivation
In 2010, farmers who stopped cultivating opium in 2010 or before were asked about their major reason for doing so. The Government ban on opium cultivation was mentioned by about 25% of the respondents, making it the most frequently cited reason for stopping. Considering opium cultivation as being against Islam was the second main reason (13%). 7% of farmers mentioned low opium price as the reason for stopping cultivation. This is a decrease from the 18% observed in 2009 and it reflects the choice made during the planting season (November 2009 in the main cultivating areas) when opium prices were still relatively low.
Reasons for never cultivating opium poppy
Religious belief is the most dominant reason for never having cultivated opium poppy. 63% of farmers who never grew opium reported that they did not do it because it is forbidden (haraam) in Islam. The ban by the Government was another main reason for never cultivating opium poppy.
26
Figure 13: Reasons for stopping opium cultivation in or before 2010 (n=1507 farmers)
1%
1%
2%
2%
2%
2%
2%
3%
4%
6%
7%
8%
10%
11%
13%
25%
0.3%
0.4%
0.5%
0.6%
0% 15% 30%
Low demand for opium
Received support from Government
In-anticipation of support from Governement
It is an illegal crop
Lack of experience
Satisfied w ith w ith income from licit crops
Other
Cultivation is more labor intensive
Land/climate conditions not suitable
High cost of inputs (fertilizer, labors etc.)
Because of disease
It is harmful for human beings
Lack of w ater
Fear of eradication
Low sale price of opium comeared to before
Elders and Shura decision
Fear of Government
Not enough yield
It is against Islam
It w as banned by Government
Figure 14: Reasons for never cultivating opium (n=2460 farmers)
1%
1%
1%
1%
2%
2%
2%
3%
3%
3%
3%
3%
5%
8%
63%
0% 35% 70%
Lack of w ater
Fear of eradication
Small land holdings
It is an illegal crop
Land/climate conditions not suitable
Fear of Government
Satisf ied w ith income from licit crops
Not enough yield
It is not a custom
Other
Elders and Shura decision
Lack of experience
It is harmful for human beings
It w as banned by Government
It is against Islam
27
Strong correlation between lack of security and opium cultivation
Eighty two per cent of the opium cultivated in 2010 was concentrated in Hilmand, Kandahar, Uruzgan, Day Kundi, and Zabul provinces of the Southern region and 16% was concentrated in Farah, Badghis, Nimroz provinces in the Western region. These are the most insecure provinces where security conditions are classified as high or extreme risk by the United Nations Department of Safety and Security (UNDSS). Most of the districts in this region were not accessible to the United Nations and non-governmental organisations.
Overall, 98% of the total opium cultivation took place in the Southern and Western regions. Anti-government elements (AGE) as well as drug traders are very active in the Western region. Provinces in the south are the strongholds of AGEs, while provinces in the west (Farah, Badghis and Nimroz) are known to have organized criminal networks. The link between lack of security and opium cultivation was also evident in Nangarhar province (Eastern region) and Kabul province (Central region), where cultivation was located in districts classified as having high or extreme security risk.
Security incidents in Afghanistan have been on the rise every year since 2003, especially in the south and south-western provinces. Security level (as of 30 March 2010) and opium cultivation in Nangarhar, 2010
Hesarak
Achin
Goshta
Khugyani
Lalpoor
Rodat
Sherzad
Kot
Deh Bala
KamaBehsud
Surkh Rud
Pachir wagam
Kuzkunar
Dur Baba
Nazyan
Chaparhar
Shinwar
Darah-i- Noor
Bati Kot
Mohmand Dara
Jalalabad
70°E
70°E
SecurityExtreme Risk
Medium Risk
Low Risk
LegendCultivation
High Risk
Opium poppy field locations
Agricultural area
Paktiya
Kabul
Logar
Laghman
Nangarhar
Parwan
Kapisa
Kunar
Khost Geographic projection: WGS 84
0 10 205km
¯
The boundaries and names shown and the designations used on this map do not imply official endorsement or acceptance by the United Nations. Source security map: United Nations Department of Safety and Security.
28
Security level (as of 30 March 2010) and opium cultivation in Kabul, 2010
SurubiKabul
DehSabz
Khak-i-Jabar
Paghman
Bagrami
Shakar Dara
Qara Bagh
Chahar Asyab
Estalef
Musahi
Gulara
FarzahKalakan
Mir Bacha Kot
70°E
70°E
Logar
Wardak
Nangarhar
Parwan Kapisa
Laghman
SecurityExtreme Risk
Medium Risk
Low Risk
LegendCultivation
High Risk
Opium poppy field locations
Agricultural area
Kabul
Geographic projection: WGS 84
0 10 205km
¯
The boundaries and names shown and the designations used on this map do not imply official endorsement or acceptance by the United Nations. Source security map: United Nations Department of Safety and Security.
Figure 15: Number of security incidents by month, January 2003 to July 2010
0
200
400
600
800
1000
1200
1400
1600
1800
2000
2200
2400
Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec
20032004200520062007200820092010
0
200
400
600
800
1000
1200
1400
1600
1800
2000
2200
2400
Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec
20032004200520062007200820092010
Source: United Nations Department of Safety and Security
29
IRA
NPA
KIS
TAN
TUR
KM
ENIS
TAN
TAJI
KIS
TAN
UZB
EKIS
TAN
Hira
t
Fara
h
Gho
r
Hilm
and
Nim
roz
Kand
ahar
Bada
khsh
anBa
lkh
Gha
zni
Zabu
l
Fary
ab
Pakt
ika
Badg
his
Bagh
lan
Bam
yan
Sari
Pul
Takh
ar
Day
Kun
di
Jaw
zjan
Uru
zgan
War
dak
Nur
ista
n
Kund
uz
Sam
anga
n
Kuna
r
Loga
r
Pakt
ya
Kabu
l
Parw
an
Khos
t
Nan
garh
ar
Panj
shir Lagh
man
Kapi
sa
360
1100
2583
5
1455
2
2039
483
2958
1547
7337
719
154
6504
5
152
234
75°E
75°E
70°E
70°E
65°E
65°E
35°N
35°N
30°N
30°N
719
154
152
234
Kabu
l
Loga
r
Khos
t
Pakt
iya
Kuna
r
Nan
garh
ar
Parw
an
War
dak Pa
ktik
a
Lagh
manNur
ista
nKa
pisa
Gha
zni
Panj
shir
Sour
cese
curit
ym
ap:U
ND
SSSo
urce
culti
vatio
n:G
over
nmen
tofA
fgha
nist
an-N
atio
nalm
onito
ring
syst
emim
plem
ente
dby
UN
OD
CN
ote:
The
boun
drie
san
dna
mes
show
nan
dth
ede
sign
atio
nsus
edon
this
map
dono
tim
ply
offic
iale
ndor
sem
ento
racc
epta
nce
byth
eU
nite
dN
atio
ns
Secu
rity
map
(as
at30
Mar
ch20
10)a
ndop
ium
culti
vatio
nin
Afg
hani
stan
bypr
ovin
ce,2
010
Secu
rity O
pium
culti
vatio
n(h
a)by
prov
ince
10,0
00
Extre
me
Ris
k
Hig
hR
isk
Med
ium
Ris
k
Low
Ris
k
Inte
rnat
iona
lbou
ndar
yPr
ovin
cial
boun
dary
Dis
trict
boun
dary
¯0
100
200
50km
Geo
grap
hic
proj
ectio
n:W
GS
84