adaptation planning for action and investmenttep-a.org/wp-content/uploads/2018/05/gcf-.pdf ·...
TRANSCRIPT
Adaptation planning for
action and investment
TEM-A 2018
10 May 2018 | Bonn, Germany
Session Overview
1. Status and good practices in accessing GCF support for Adaptation Planning
2. Country insight:
• Antigua and Barbuda (Lia Nicholson)• Liberia (Benjamin Karmorh)• Uruguay (Ignacio Lorenzo)
3. Adaptation Fund insight (Daouda Ndiaye)
4. Discussants’ insights (European Investment Bank, Teltabba, NAP GSP)
5. Open discussion
6. Summary (Carolina Fuentes, GCF)
Status of GCF Adaptation Planning Support
Antigua & Barbuda
DRC
Madagascar
Liberia
PakistanNepal
Mongolia
Tanzania
Colombia
Uruguay
Argentina
Ecuador
Armenia
Niger
Dominican Republic
Bosnia & Herzegovina
Kenya
Mauritania
Malawi
Zimbabwe
Bangladesh
BeninCosta Rica
Gabon
Honduras
Serbia
South Sudan
Sudan
Swaziland
Mali
UzbekistanMontenegro
Egypt
Myanmar
Cote d’Ivoire
Bhutan
Ghana
NigeriaCameroon
Seychelle
Albania
Iraq
Mauritius
PNG
GuatemalaDominica
Lesotho
Uganda
Haiti
Pending resubmission
Status on 30 April 2018 50 20 (14+6) 5 25
Status on 1 Jan 2018 40 8 (3+5) 14 18
Mexico
Liberia – Adaptation Planning process launch - 13 March
Country programming process for high quality pipelines that GCF can finance
GCF Programming
READINESS(including adaptation planning)
GCF SUPPORT
PROJECT PREPAR-ATION
FUNDING PROPOSALS
NDCs
Partners to support implementation
Capacity needs
COUNTRY VISION
CLIMATE IMPACT• Emission
reductions• Increased
resilience
Development priorities
ProjectConceptNotes
Accredited Entities
Readiness Delivery Partners
1a) Climate impacts the project/programme aims to address
1b) Vulnerabilities and risks of these climate impacts
2) Prioritized interventions based on analysis of most effective options
3) Integration into broader domestic and international policy and decision-making
Elements of Climate Adaptaton Rationale
10 Review Criteriabased on good practices
1. Focus strategically within
a national vision
2. Plan to address specific climate
impacts and vulnerabilities
3. Develop financing strategy
for each adaptation priority
4. Articulate theory of change
5. Avoid duplication of effort
6. Engage stakeholders proactively
7. Build gender considerations
8. Cultivate private sector investment
9. Monitor and report
systematically
10. Coherence and complementarity with other funds
10 Review Criteriabased on good practices
1. Focus strategically within
a national vision
2. Plan to address specific climate
impacts and vulnerabilities
3. Develop financing strategy
for each adaptation priority
4. Articulate theory of change
5. Avoid duplication of effort
6. Engage stakeholders proactively
7. Build gender considerations
8. Cultivate private sector investment
9. Monitor and report
systematically
10. Coherence and complementarity with other funds
Focus questions:
1. How can countries use GCF adaptation planning support to
a) produce and communicate a scientific and economic case for attracting investment?
a) catalyse action and investment for adaptation at a local level?
2. How can adaptation planning enable investment decision-making by the Adaptation Fund and other sources of adaptation finance?
Objectives:
1. Share experiences of countries in adaptation planning to catalyse action and finance
2. Update on status and good practices in accessing GCF resources for adaptation planning
3. Gain insight about how adaptation planning can attract finance climate financiers
GCF Background: Four Areas of Readiness Support
1. NDA strengthening
2. Strategic frameworks
3. Support for direct access entities
4. Adaptation planning processesUp to USD 3M percountry (not per year)
Up to USD 1M percountry per year
Options to delivery GCF NAP support
GCF can provide technical assistance to NDAs to assist in drafting proposals for NAP and PPF support.
Deliver Partner Options:
• National• International• Regional
• Not accredited: FMCA required • Accredited Entities: FMCA not required
Status: GCF NAP Support
Moving forwards
Increase # of approved proposals (30+ in 2018)
Increase quality and impact to catalyse implementation
Support NDAs with national delivery partners
Progress
Established transparent review criteria
Improved timelines and consistency of feedback
Communicated good practices through 20+ workshops and webinars of LEG, NAP GSP,
NAP GN, and others
Challenges
Proposals design based on national context
Plan to attract financing for implementation
Diversity of delivery partners