activities during reporting periodclients.aspectconsulting.com/artbrass/abp progress... · project...

August 2, 2013

Mr. Ed Jones Washington State Department of Ecology Northwest Regional Office 3190 160th Avenue SE Bellevue, Washington 98008-5452

Re: Progress Report – April through June 2013 Art Brass Plating, Seattle, Washington Agreed Order No. DE 5296 Project No. 050067-009A-02

Dear Ed:

This progress report summarizes activities conducted on the Art Brass Plating project for the period April through June 2013. This work is being completed per the referenced Agreed Order between Art Brass Plating (Art Brass) and the Department of Ecology (Ecology).

Activities during Reporting Period Activities completed during the reporting period are summarized below.

Remedial Investigation The following RI activities were completed during this reporting period:

The second quarter of groundwater monitoring was completed June 18, 2013.

EcoChem, Inc has validated data from the June groundwater sampling events. Validated results are presented in Table 1 and well locations are depicted on Figure 1. Lab certificates and the EcoChem validation reports are provided in Appendix A.

Interim Action Measures The following activities were completed during this reporting period:

The SVE system generally ran continuously during this reporting period. No significant adjustments were made to individual SVE flow rates.

The AS system generally ran continuously during this reporting period. No significant adjustments were made to individual AS flow rates.

The AS system was manually shut down on June 12, one week prior to quarterly groundwater monitoring, to allow time for equilibration before sampling activities. The system was restarted on June 18.

Quarterly groundwater sampling in June at select source area monitoring wells as part of ongoing pulsed AS operations, and in accordance with the approved site-wide groundwater monitoring program.

e a r t h + w a t e r Aspect Consulting, LLC 401 2nd Avenue S. Suite 201 Seattle, WA 98104 206.328.7443 www.aspectconsulting.com

Washington State Department of Ecology August 2, 2013 Project No. 050067-009C-02

As part of pulsed AS operations, groundwater monitoring results from June were evaluated to determine whether the decline in TCE concentrations observed since restarting the AS system in October 2012 is continuing or leveling off, the following observations were made:

Concentrations of TCE in groundwater at MW-1, MW-2, MW-3, MW-4, MW-5, MW-7, MW-8, and PMW-1 did not show a significant change from the previous monitoring event in March 2013, remaining near historically low levels comparable to those observed prior to pulse testing in December 2011; and

Concentrations of TCE in groundwater at monitoring wells upgradient and downgradient of active air sparging (MW-2, MW-7, and MW-8) have not exhibited a significant rebound throughout pulsed operation of the AS system and generally continue to show a slight decline.

Performance monitoring of the AS/SVE system in accordance with the Operation and Maintenance Plan, including:

Monthly monitoring of soil vapor extraction system operating parameters, including air flow rate, vacuum, and VOC/TCE concentrations at each SVE well, vapor sump, trench, and off-gas treatment system;

Monthly monitoring of air sparging system operating parameters, including air flow rate and pressure, if the system is re-started as part of planned pulsed operations;

Monthly monitoring of pressure at soil vapor monitoring points using a micro-manometer;

Monitoring of TCE concentrations at soil vapor monitoring points exhibiting positive pressure, using low-level detector tubes;

Monthly air sampling for VOCs by EPA Method TO-15 laboratory analysis from the treatment system effluent; and

Quarterly air sampling for VOCs by EPA Method TO-15 laboratory analysis from the treatment system influent.

Vapor Intrusion Groundwater monitoring results were evaluated with respect to VI considerations, in accordance with the requirements of the Groundwater Monitoring Plan. The completed evaluation worksheets using the June monitoring round results are attached as Appendix B.

Public Communications The project website was updated with an electronic copy of the previous progress report. No other public communications were completed during this period.


Anticipated Work in the Upcoming Quarter Work anticipated to be performed during the next progress reporting period (July through September 2013) is summarized below.

Remedial Investigation The following RI activities are anticipated to be performed during the next reporting period:

Negotiate an Agreed Order with Ecology for the planned Feasibility Study; and

Complete quarterly groundwater monitoring in September 2013.

Interim Action Measures The following interim measure activities are anticipated to be performed during the next reporting period:

Shutdown of the AS system in July as part of pulsed AS operations. The AS system will remain off through March 2014 to allow rebound of TCE concentrations in groundwater. Subsequent pulsing of the AS system is recommended at 6 month intervals thereafter. The SVE system will remain on.

Quarterly groundwater sampling in September at select source area monitoring wells as part of ongoing pulsed AS operations and in accordance with the approved site-wide groundwater monitoring program.

The results of the September groundwater monitoring effort will be evaluated for rebound in TCE concentrations.

Performance monitoring of the SVE system in accordance with the Operation and Maintenance Plan, including:

Monthly monitoring of soil vapor extraction system operating parameters, including air flow rate, vacuum, and VOC/TCE concentrations at each SVE well, vapor sump, trench, and off-gas treatment system;

Monthly monitoring of pressure at sub-slab soil vapor monitoring points inside the 220 Findlay building and the Art Brass Plating facility only using a micro-manometer;

Monitoring of TCE concentrations at soil vapor monitoring points exhibiting positive pressure, using low-level detector tubes;

Monthly air sampling for VOCs by EPA Method TO-15 laboratory analysis from the treatment system effluent; and

Quarterly air sampling for VOCs by EPA Method TO-15 laboratory analysis from the treatment system influent.

Vapor Intrusion September 2013 water table monitoring well sampling results will be evaluated with respect to VI considerations, in accordance with the requirements of the Groundwater Monitoring Plan.


Groundwater Monitoring The next groundwater monitoring event is scheduled for September 2013.

Public Communications The project website will be updated with an electronic copy of this progress report. No other public communications are anticipated in the next quarter.

The next progress report, which will summarize activities completed from July through September, will be submitted on or before November 8, 2013. If you have any questions or comments regarding this report or the project, please call at your earliest convenience.

Sincerely,

Aspect consulting, LLC

Doug Hillman, LHG Principal Hydrogeologist [email protected] Attachments Table 1 – Validated June 2013 Groundwater Quality Data Figure 1 – Monitoring Well Location Plan Appendix A – EcoChem Validation Report and Laboratory Certificates of Analyses Appendix B – VI Evaluation Worksheets using June 2013 Groundwater Quality Results

cc: Mike Merryfield, Art Brass Plating, Inc. William Joyce, Salter Joyce Ziker Tong Li, Groundwater Solutions

Email with link to electronic copy on project website: Janet Knox, Pacific Groundwater Group Peter Jewett, Farallon Consulting Bill Carroll, Arrow Environmental Bill Beck, PSC

V:\050067 Art Brass Plating\Progress Reports\2013 Q2\ABP Progress Report Q2 2013.doc

mailto:[email protected]

Table 1 - Validated June 2013 Groundwater Quality DataArt Brass Plating 050067

Aspect Consulting8/2/2013V:\050067 Art Brass Plating\Progress Reports\2013 Q2\Table 1 - Validated June 2013 GW

Table 1Page 1 of 1

Chemical Name

Volatile Organic Compounds (VOC)1,1,1-Trichloroethane in ug/L 11 1.0 U 1.0 U 1.0 U 1.0 U 1.0 U 1.0 U 1.0 U 1.0 U 1.0 U1,1-Dichloroethane in ug/L 47 1.0 U 1.0 U 1.0 U 1.0 U 1.0 U 5.0 5.0 3.4 2.41,1-Dichloroethene in ug/L 25 1.0 U 1.0 U 1.0 U 1.0 U 1.0 U 1.0 U 1.0 U 1.0 U 1.0 U1,2-Dichloroethane (EDC) in ug/L 13 1.0 U 1.0 U 1.0 U 1.0 U 1.0 U 1.0 U 1.0 U 1.0 U 1.0 UChloroethane in ug/L 461 1.0 U 1.0 U 1.0 U 1.0 U 1.0 U 1.0 U 1.0 U 1.0 U 1.0 Ucis-1,2-Dichloroethene (DCE) in ug/L 590 27 1.4 1.0 U 1.0 U 1.0 U 3.8 4.0 6.5 42Tetrachloroethene (PCE) in ug/L 3.3 1.0 U 1.0 U 1.0 U 1.0 U 1.0 U 1.0 U 1.0 U 1.0 U 1.0 Utrans-1,2-Dichloroethene in ug/L 56 1.0 U 1.0 U 1.0 U 1.0 U 1.0 U 1.0 U 1.0 U 1.0 U 1.0 UTrichloroethene (TCE) in ug/L 6.8 42 2.6 14 1.4 1.9 33 35 33 57Vinyl chloride in ug/L 1.3 1.0 U 1.0 U 1.0 U 1.0 U 1.0 U 1.0 U 1.0 U 1.0 U 1.0 U

Field ParametersDissolved Oxygen in mg/L 8.02 1.48 5.36 9.70 8.05 0.39 0.10 7.89Eh in mVolts 621.2 575.0 570.9 618.3 659.4 556.4 227.3 622.3pH in pH Units 3.91 3.86 4.00 4.48 3.83 4.30 6.31 3.97Specific Conductance in us/cm 984 481.1 892 1,220 1,230 546.1 667 1,053Temperature in deg C 16.2 15.4 15.4 16.2 15.2 13.2 14.8 16.1Turbidity in NTU 17.9 61.9 10.2 14.4 21.5 8.99 3.86 4.07

NotesConcentrations in shaded cells indicate value exceeds associated Groundwater Cleanup Level

U - Analyte was not detected at or above the reported result.FD - Field Duplicate

Water Table Interval

Groundwater Cleanup Level

MW-106/18/13

MW-806/18/13

PMW-106/18/13

MW-206/18/13

MW-306/18/13

MW-406/18/13

MW-506/18/13

MW-706/18/13

MW-706/18/13

(FD)

@A

@A

@A@A

@A@A@A

@A

@A

@A@A

@A

@A@A@A

@A

@A@A@A

@A@A

@A

@A

@A

@A@A

@A@A

@A@A

@A@A

@A@A

@A@A

@A@A

@A@A

@A @A@A

@A@A

@A@A

@A

@A

@A@A

@A@A@A

@A

@A@A

@A@A

@A@A

@A

@A

@A

@A

@A

@A@A@A@A

@A

@A@A@A

@A@A

@A@A@A

@A@A

@A@A

@A@A@A

@A@A@A

@A@A@A

@A@A

@A

@A@A

@A@A

@A@A@A

@A

@A @A

@A

@A

@A

@A

@A

@A@A

@A

@A@A

@A@A

@A@A@A@A@A@A

DUWAMISH WATERWAY

S LUCILE ST

S ORCAS ST

S MEAD ST

S FIDALGO ST

4TH AVE S

1ST AVE S

S FINDLAY STOH

IO AV

E S

5TH AVE S

E MARGINAL WAY S (HWY 99)

S FIDALGO ST

S FIDALGO ST

S BRANDON ST

2ND AVE S

PZ-01

MW-24

MW-16

MW-15

MW-14

MW-13MW-12

MW-11MW-10

MW-09

MW-08

MW-07 MW-06

MW-05

MW-04MW-03MW-02

MW-01

MW-24-50MW-24-30

MW-23-50MW-23-30

MW-22-50MW-22-30

MW-21-75MW-21-50

MW-19-60MW-19-40

MW-18-70 MW-18-50

MW-17-60MW-17-40

MW-16-75MW-16-40

MW-11-30

MW-08-70MW-08-30

MW-06-30

AB-CG-142-70

AB-CG-140-70

PSC-CG-151-25

PSC-CG-145-35

PSC-CG-144-35

PSC-CG-143-WTPSC-CG-143-40


PSC-CG-140-40PSC-CG-140-30

PSC-CG-139-40

PSC-CG-138-WT

PSC-CG-138-70PSC-CG-138-40

PSC-CG-135-50PSC-CG-135-40

PMW-01

CI-MW-08

CI-MW-07 CI-MW-06

CI-MW-05

CI-MW-04CI-MW-03

CI-MW-02

CI-15-60CI-15-40

CI-14-WTCI-14-70CI-14-35

CI-12-WT

CI-12-60CI-12-30

CI-10-WT

CI-10-65CI-10-35

CI-09-WT CI-09-70CI-09-40

CI-08-60CI-08-40

CI-07-60CI-07-40

BDC-11-WTBDC-11-60BDC-11-40

BDC-10-60BDC-10-40

BDC-06-WT

BDC-04-WT

BDC-03-WTBDC-03-60

BDC-03-40BDC-02-WT

BDC-01-WT

CI-MW-01-WTCI-MW-01-60

PSC-CG-141-WT

PSC-CG-141-50PSC-CG-141-40

PSC-CG-137-WT

PSC-CG-137-50PSC-CG-137-40


BDC-06-60BDC-06-30

CI-MW-01-40

MW-27

MW-26-55MW-26-40

MW-25-75MW-25-50 MW-20-60

MW-20-40

MW-03-50MW-03-30



PSC-CG-130-WT

GIS Path: T:\projects_8\Artbrass\RI_Workplan\Delivered\Progress_Reports\August2013\01_MW_Loc_Plan.mxd || Coordinate System: NAD 1983 StatePlane Washington North FIPS 4601 Feet || Date Saved: 7/30/2013 || User: pwittman || Print Date: 7/30/2013

C O N SU LTI N G

FIGURE NO.

1JUL-2013PROJECT NO.050067

BY:PPW

REV BY:- - -

0 200 400

Feet

Monitoring Well Location PlanArt Brass Plating RI

Quarter 2 2013 Progress ReportSeattle, Washington

Well Locations@A Art Brass Plating Network Wells

@A Network Wells Monitored by OthersTCE Isoconcentration Lines

Water Table Interval (6.8 µg/L)Shallow Interval (30 µg/L)Intermediate Interval (30 µg/L)

MW-18-70CI-MW-03

APPENDIX A

EcoChem Validation Report and Laboratory Certificates of Analyses

jc 7/23/2013 i EcoChem, Inc. l:\aspect 228\22802 abp\22802023\22802023_cvr.docx

PROJECT NARRATIVE

Basis for Data Validation

This report summarizes the results of compliance review (EPA Stage 2A) performed on groundwater and laboratory quality control (QC) data for Art Brass Plating – 2nd Quarter 2013 Groundwater Monitoring. A complete list of samples is provided in the Sample Index.

Samples were analyzed by Analytical Resources, Inc. (ARI), Tukwila, Washington. The analytical methods and EcoChem project chemists are listed below.

Analysis Method Primary Review Secondary Review Volatile Organic Compounds SW8260C Megan Failor Christine Ransom

The data were reviewed using guidance and quality control criteria documented in the analytical methods; the Quality Assurance Project Plan (QAPP) for Art Brass Plating (Sept. 25, 2008), and National Functional Guidelines for Organic Data Review (USEPA 1999, 2005).

EcoChem’s goal in assigning data validation qualifiers is to assist in proper data interpretation. If values are estimated (assigned a J), data may be used for site evaluation purposes; but reasons for data qualification should be taken into consideration when interpreting sample concentrations. Data that have been labeled as do-not-report (DNR) should not be used for any purpose. Values with no data qualifier meet all data measurement quality objectives and are acceptable for use.

Data qualifier definitions, reason codes, and validation criteria are included as Appendix A. A Qualified Data Summary Table is included in Appendix B. Data Validation Worksheets will be kept on file at EcoChem, Inc. A qualified laboratory electronic data deliverable (EDD) is also submitted with this report.

SAMPLE INDEX

Art Brass Plating - GW Monitoring 2nd QTR 2013

Sample ID Laboratory ID VOCMW-1-061813 13-12940-WU39E √MW-2-061813 13-12938-WU39C √MW-3-061813 13-12937-WU39B √MW-4-061813 13-12944-WU39I √MW-5-061813 13-12941-WU39F √MW-7-061813 13-12942-WU39G √MW-7-061813-D 13-12943-WU39H √MW-8-061813 13-12936-WU39A √PMW-1-061813 13-12939-WU39D √TB-1-061813 13-12945-WU39J √

7/23/2013 10:57 AML:\Aspect 228\22802 ABP\22802023\22802023 IDX.xlsx 1 of 1 EcoChem, Inc.

jsm 7/23/2013 VOC - 1 EcoChem, Inc. L:\Aspect 228\22802 ABP\22802023\22802023_VOC.docx

DATA VALIDATION REPORT Art Brass Plating

Groundwater Monitoring – 2nd Quarter 2013 Volatile Organic Compounds by Method SW8260C

This report documents the review of analytical data from the analysis of groundwater samples and the associated laboratory and field quality control (QC) samples. Analytical Resources, Inc., Tukwila, Washington, analyzed the samples. Refer to the Sample Index for a list of the individual samples.

SDG Number of Samples Validation Level

WU39 9 Groundwater

1 Trip Blank EPA Stage 2A

I. DATA PACKAGE COMPLETENESS

The laboratory submitted all required deliverables. The laboratory followed adequate corrective action processes and all anomalies were discussed in the case narrative.

II. EDD TO HARDCOPY VERIFICATION

Ten percent (10%) of the results in the laboratory electronic data deliverable (EDD) were verified by comparison to the laboratory data package. No errors were noted.

III. TECHNICAL DATA VALIDATION

The QC requirements that were reviewed are listed below. Sample Receipt, Preservation, and Holding Times Matrix Spike/Matrix Spike Duplicates (MS/MSD)

1 Blanks (Method and Field) 1 Field Duplicates Surrogates 2 Reported Results

Laboratory Control Samples (LCS/LCSD)

___________________________________________________________

Method quality objectives (MQO) and QC criteria have been met. No outliers are noted or discussed. 1 Quality control results are discussed below, but no data were qualified. 2 Quality control outliers that impact the reported data were noted. Data qualifiers were issued as discussed below.

Blanks

One trip blank was submitted to the laboratory. No target analytes were detected in this blank.

jsm 7/23/2013 VOC - 2 EcoChem, Inc. L:\Aspect 228\22802 ABP\22802023\22802023_VOC.docx

Field Duplicates

The relative percent difference (RPD) control limit is 35% for results greater than the reporting limit (RL). For results less than five times the RL, the difference between the sample and duplicate must be less than the RL.

One set of field duplicates, MW-7-061813 & MW-7-061813-D, were submitted. All field precision criteria were met.

Reported Results

For Sample PWM-1-061813, cis-1,2-dichloroethene exceeded the linear range of the instrument in the undiluted analysis. This result was flagged with an “E” by the laboratory. The sample was also analyzed at a 20x dilution; both sets of data were reported. The result that exceeded the linear range was flagged as do-not-report (DNR-20). Results for all other analytes in the dilution were flagged do-not-report (DNR-11) in favor of the undiluted results.

IV. OVERALL ASSESSMENT

As was determined by this evaluation, the laboratory followed the specified analytical method. Accuracy was acceptable as demonstrated by the laboratory control sample/laboratory control sample duplicate (LCS/LCSD), matrix spike/matrix spike duplicate (MS/MSD), and surrogate recoveries. Precision was also acceptable as demonstrated by the LCS/LCSD, MS/MSD and field duplicate RPD values.

Data were flagged as do-not-report (DNR) to indicate which data should not be used from multiple reported analyses. A usable result remains for all analytes in all samples; therefore completeness is unaffected.

Data that have been flagged DNR should not be used for any purpose. All other data, as reported, are acceptable for use.

4/16/09 PM EcoChem, Inc. T:\Controlled Docs\Qualifiers & Reason Codes\NFG Qual Defs.doc

DATA VALIDATION QUALIFIER CODES Based on National Functional Guidelines

The following definitions provide brief explanations of the qualifiers assigned to results in the data review process.

U The analyte was analyzed for, but was not detected above the reported sample quantitation limit.

J The analyte was positively identified; the associated numerical value is the approximate concentration of the analyte in the sample.

NJ The analysis indicates the presence of an analyte that has been “tentatively identified” and the associated numerical value represents the approximate concentration.

UJ The analyte was not detected above the reported sample quantitation limit. However, the reported quantitation limit is approximate and may or may not represent the actual limit of quantitation necessary to accurately and precisely measure the analyte in the sample.

R The sample results are rejected due to serious deficiencies in the ability to analyze the sample and meet quality control criteria. The presence or absence of the analyte cannot be verified.

The following is an EcoChem qualifier that may also be assigned during the data review process:

DNR Do not report; a more appropriate result is reported from another analysis or dilution.

T:\A_EcoChem Controlled Docs\Qualifiers & Reason Codes\Reason Codes-EcoChem rev1.doc EcoChem, Inc.

DATA QUALIFIER REASON CODES

Group Code Reason for Qualification

Sample Handling 1 Improper Sample Handling or Sample Preservation (i.e., headspace, cooler

temperature, pH, summa canister pressure); Exceeded Holding Times

Instrument Performance

24 Instrument Performance (i.e., tune, resolution, retention time window, endrin

breakdown)

5A Initial Calibration (RF, %RSD, r2)

5B Calibration Verification (ICV, CCV, CCAL; RF, %D, %R)

Use bias flags (H,L)1 where appropriate

Blank Contamination

6 Field Blank Contamination (Equipment Rinsate, Trip Blank, etc.)

7 Lab Blank Contamination (i.e., method blank, instrument blank, etc.)

Use low bias flag (L)1 for negative instrument blanks

Precision and Accuracy

8 Matrix Spike (MS &/or MSD) Recoveries


9 Precision (all replicates: LCS/LCSD, MS/MSD, Lab Replicate, Field Replicate)

10 Laboratory Control Sample Recoveries (a.k.a. Blank Spikes)


12 Reference Material


13 Surrogate Spike Recoveries (a.k.a. labeled compounds, recovery standards)


Interferences

16 ICP/ICP-MS Serial Dilution Percent Difference

17 ICP/ICP-MS Interference Check Standard Recovery


19 Internal Standard Performance (i.e., area, retention time, recovery)

22 Elevated Detection Limit due to Interference (i.e., chemical and/or matrix)

23 Bias from Matrix Interference (i.e. diphenyl ether, PCB/pesticides)

Identification and

Quantitation

2 Chromatographic pattern in sample does not match pattern of calibration standard

3 2nd column confirmation (RPD or %D)

4 Tentatively Identified Compound (TIC) (associated with NJ only)

20 Calibration Range or Linear Range Exceeded

25 Compound Identification (i.e., ion ratio, retention time, relative abundance, etc.)

Miscellaneous

11 A more appropriate result is reported (multiple reported analyses i.e., dilutions, re-

extractions, etc. Associated with “R” and “DNR” only)

14 Other (See DV report for details)

26 Method QC information not provided

1 H = high bias indicated

L = low bias indicated

DATA VALIDATION CRITERIA Table No.: NFG-VOCRevision No.: 7

Last Rev. Date: 8/23/07Page: 1 of 2

VALIDATIONQC ELEMENT

ACCEPTANCE CRITERIA ACTIONREASON

CODE

Cooler Temperature4°C±2°C

Water: HCl to pH < 2J(+)/UJ(-) if greater than 6 deg. C (EcoChem PJ) 1

Hold Time

Waters: 14 days preserved 7 Days: unpreserved (for aromatics)

Solids: 14 Days

J(+)/UJ(-) if hold times exceededIf exceeded by > 3X HT: J(+)/R(-) (EcoChem PJ)

1

TuningBFB

Beginning of each 12 hour periodMethod acceptance criteria

R(+/-) all analytes in all samplesassociated with the tune

5A

RRF > 0.05

(EcoChem PJ, see TM-06)

If MDL= reporting limit:J(+)/R(-) if RRF < 0.05

If reporting limit > MDL:note in worksheet if RRF <0.05

5A

%RSD < 30%(EcoChem PJ, see TM-06)

J(+) if %RSD > 30%5A

RRF > 0.05


If MDL= reporting limit:J(+)/R(-) if RRF < 0.05

If reporting limit > MDL:note in worksheet if RRF <0.05

5B

%D <25%


If > +/-90%: J+/R-If -90% to -26%: J+ (high bias)

If 26% to 90%: J+/UJ- (low bias)

5B

U(+) if sample (+) result is less than CRQL and less than appropriate 5X or 10X rule

(raise sample value to CRQL)7

U(+) if sample (+) result is greater than or equal to CRQL and less than appropriate 5X and 10X rule (at reported sample

value)7

No TICs present R(+) TICs using 10X rule 7

Storage BlankOne per SDG

<CRQL

U(+) the specific analyte(s) results in all assoc.samples

using the 5x or 10x rule7

Trip Blank Frequency as per project QAPPSame as method blank for positive results remaining in trip

blank after method blank qualifiers are assigned

18

Field Blanks(if required in QAPP)

No results > CRQL Apply 5X/10X rule; U(+) < action level 6

EcoChem Validation Guidelines for Volatile Analysis by GC/MS (Based on Organic NFG 1999)

Method BlankOne per matrix per batch

No results > CRQL

Initial Calibration(Minimum 5 stds.)

Continuing Calibration(Prior to each 12 hr. shift)

T:\EcoChem Controlled Docs\Criteria Tables\EcoChem Default\EcoChem NFG Organic Criteria.xlsNFG-VOC Copyright 2005 EcoChem, Inc.

DATA VALIDATION CRITERIA Table No.: NFG-VOCRevision No.: 7

Last Rev. Date: 8/23/07Page: 2 of 2

VALIDATIONQC ELEMENT

ACCEPTANCE CRITERIA ACTIONREASON

CODE

EcoChem Validation Guidelines for Volatile Analysis by GC/MS (Based on Organic NFG 1999)

MS/MSD (recovery)One per matrix per batch

Use method acceptance criteria

Qualify parent only unless other QC indicates systematic problems:J(+) if both %R > UCL

J(+)/UJ(-) if both %R < LCLJ(+)/R(-) if both %R < 10% PJ if only one %R outlier

8

MS/MSD(RPD)

One per matrix per batchUse method acceptance criteria

J(+) in parent sample if RPD > CL 9

LCSlow conc. H2O VOA

One per lab batchWithin method control limits

J(+) assoc. cmpd if > UCLJ(+)/R(-) assoc. cmpd if < LCL

J(+)/R(-) all cmpds if half are < LCL10

LCSregular VOA (H2O & solid)

One per lab batchLab or method control limits

J(+) if %R > UCL J(+)/UJ(-) if %R <LCLJ(+)/R(-) if %R < 10% (EcoChem PJ)

10

LCS/LCSD(if required)

One set per matrix and batch of 20 samplesRPD < 35%

J(+)/UJ(-) assoc. cmpd. in all samples 9

SurrogatesAdded to all samples

Within method control limits

J(+) if %R >UCLJ(+)/UJ(-) if %R <LCL but >10% (see PJ1 )

J(+)/R(-) if <10%13

Internal Standard (IS)

Added to all samplesAcceptable Range: IS area 50% to 200% of

CCAL areaRT within 30 seconds of CC RT

J(+) if > 200%J(+)/UJ(-) if < 50%J(+)/R(-) if < 25%

RT>30 seconds, narrate and Notify PM

19

Field Duplicates

Use QAPP limits. If no QAPP: Solids: RPD <50%

OR absolute diff. < 2X RL (for results < 5X RL)

Aqueous: RPD <35%OR absolute diff. < 1X RL (for results < 5X RL)

Narrate and qualify if required by project(EcoChem PJ)

9

TICsMajor ions (>10%) in reference must

be present in sample; intensitiesagree within 20%; check identification

NJ the TIC unless:R(+) common laboratory contaminants

See Technical Director for ID issues

4

Quantitation/Identification

RRT within 0.06 of standard RRTIon relative intensity within 20% of standard

All ions in std. at > 10% intensity must be present in sample

See Technical Director if outliers14

21 (false +)

PJ1 No action if there are 4+ surrogates and only 1 outlier.

T:\EcoChem Controlled Docs\Criteria Tables\EcoChem Default\EcoChem NFG Organic Criteria.xlsNFG-VOC Copyright 2005 EcoChem, Inc.

QUALIFIED DATA SUMMARY TABLEArt Brass Plating - GW Monitoring 2nd QTR 2013

Sample ID Laboratory ID Method Analyte Result Units Lab FlagDV

QualifierDV Reason

Code

PMW-1-061813 13-12939-WU39D SW8260C cis-1,2-Dichloroethene (DCE) 0.043 ug/L E DNR 20PMW-1-061813 13-12939-WU39DDL SW8260C 1,2-Dichloroethane (EDC) 1.4 ug/L U DNR 11PMW-1-061813 13-12939-WU39DDL SW8260C Tetrachloroethene (PCE) 0.94 ug/L U DNR 11PMW-1-061813 13-12939-WU39DDL SW8260C trans-1,2-Dichloroethene 0.96 ug/L U DNR 11PMW-1-061813 13-12939-WU39DDL SW8260C 1,1,1-Trichloroethane 0.82 ug/L U DNR 11PMW-1-061813 13-12939-WU39DDL SW8260C Chloroethane 1.7 ug/L U DNR 11PMW-1-061813 13-12939-WU39DDL SW8260C Vinyl chloride 1.1 ug/L U DNR 11PMW-1-061813 13-12939-WU39DDL SW8260C 1,1-Dichloroethane 1.1 ug/L U DNR 11PMW-1-061813 13-12939-WU39DDL SW8260C 1,1-Dichloroethene 1.1 ug/L U DNR 11PMW-1-061813 13-12939-WU39DDL SW8260C Trichloroethene (TCE) 0.98 ug/L DNR 11

7/23/2013 10:57 AML:\Aspect 228\22802 ABP\22802023\22802023 QDST.xlsx Page 1 of 1 EcoChem, Inc.

J/ F- Analyti cal Resou rces, I n corpo rated

-aU Analytical Chemists and Consultants

27 June2O13

Dana CannonAspect Consulting401 Second Avenue, Suite 201Seattle, WA 98104

RE: Client Proiect: 050067, Art Brass PlatingARI Job: WU39

Dear Dana:

Please find enclosed the original chain of custody records and the final results forsamples from the project referenced above. Analytical Resources, Inc. accepted ninewater samples and one trip blank in good condition on June 18, 2013. The sampleswere analyzed for VOAs as requested.

There were no incidents of note associated with these analyses.

Copies of these reports and all raw data will be kept on file at ARl. lf you have questionsor require additional information, please feel free to contact me at your convenience.

Sincerely,

ANALYTICAL RESOURCES. INC.

\^/C,()M_Maik D. HaffisProject Manager206/[email protected]

Enclosures

cc: File WU39

MDH/mdh

Page 1 of +c

4611 South 134th Place, Suite 100 0 TukwilaWAg8l68 o 206-695-6200. 206-695-6201 fax

s. E

E$EEp;s F* E

$H8 Ed.P e 2.Qtr: F*EF !s sE eN h{ (5

F*E g

ts: sgF$

E

sEt, *Tif s=Eb

?E 8.b E

$!EES$E P

E$E E*

EFsE€TEl €F

S€: lggsgiFp>(s 6iDEi.g Eg

F8E Egs#r €+

s$E ;EB b.tr E,'H R 6 6>

;$l !trH qF €g

grgaEl€* B;

E;$ €5

is$ FgSE S E E

s+$ EE

j$-g.it"=

EE?gs

EEE*gsE=En

E*;Etae n5<

oo=C'oE.2o->Gg

io(E

o.ctGJdt,oootr

Ia+

s

a(}

t-

'5\T J

-bgOFR6

apgS

on

,$

++ o9z8 {q scon

o-go-E(!

U)

v9o

I

Do2

Iv)o

)

cn)

2z

{v9O

I

c"l!=

7

z

vIOJ

I

35o

sr-9o

I

\

3t

vso

I

tn\

=5

{vI

I

rr35

AI

oO

Oo

9O\

{v_9O

,

f\2̂>t

EEo(U

.9.(E

oEEooo.9o

.9.o(d

(6

O

o

.9,

o,.Eoo-E

.gQoooa(U

I:=(U

JrD Analytical Resources, Incorporated

at Analytrcal Chemists and Consultants Cooler Receipt Forrr!A

ARlclrent 4Slr Icoc No(s). ' KDAss,snedARrJob ^,

--D[T- "Delrvered by: Fed-Ex UPS Courier H6nd Deliv\d C)ther

'"-"-----./

3,4

on ,olei //sTemp Gun lD#.

t^", 139()

e,o1".,*^^" 4rf rfr/ASS

YES

G)6lf cooler temperature rs out of compliance fill out form 00070F

*f ,/CoolerAcceptedby- r ' "

Tracking No'

Preliminary Examination Phase:

Were rntact, properly stgned and dated custody seals attached to the outsrde of to cooler?

(Ne)

Were custody papers rncluded with the cooler?

Were custody papers properly frlled out (rnk, srgned, etc.)

Temperature of Cooler(s) ("C) (recommended 2 0-6 0 'C for chemrstry).. ...

@,NO

NO

Complete forms and attach all shipping documents

LogJn Phase:

Was a temperature blank rncluded in the cooler?

What kind of packrng material was used? ...

Was sufficient ice used (rf appropriate)? . ..

Were all bottles sealed in rndrvrdual plastrc bags?

Drd all bottles arrive rn good condrtion (unbroken)?

Were all bottle labels complete and legible?

Drd the number of contarners |sted on COC match with the number of contarners received? ...

Drd all bottle labels and tags agree wrth custody papers?

Were all bottles used correct for the requested analvses?

Do any of the analyses (bottles) require preservation? (aitach preservatron sheet, excluding VOCs)

Were all VOC vrals free of arr bubbles?

Was sufilcrenl amounl of sample sent in each bottle? ..

Date VOC Trrp Blank was made at ARl..

Bubbre wrap wer rce @ Baggres [email protected]",YES 6A\\-/

Other:

NA@NoYEs @@io/-:\g> No

q(B No

€6@ YEsNA YES6NA 1/r4/rj

NO

NO

NO

@)NO

Was Sampte Split byARt , @ YES Date/Time

J vrn Date Tlme:* Notify Project Manager of discrepancies or concems *

Split by

Samples Logged by: ut1

Sample lD on Bottle Sample lD on COC Sample lD on Boftle Sample lD on COC

lditional Notes, Discrepancies, & Reso/ufions.

ft l-<iuun 5'/b

By J yll\ Date ul&ls

.$md!Air B*&iles-'3trtr

-a.):,I re*urotss lnIffiFEHffilI l-+ nrm ll 'e rn'.n I

j t.t.f :l 3 r O i

Small ) "sm"

Peabubbles ) "p5"

Large ) "lg"fleadspace ) "hs"

0016F312t10

. Revision 014

i d-4 *-'':t# !*#F:aF'&f3&j""--_.d_

#,# :-:*-#i.r \6

Cooler Receipt Form

Sample ID Cross Reference Report

ARI Job No: WU39Client: Aspect Consulting

Project Event: 050067Prorer:t Name: Art BrasS P'lat'ino

i:sns*(EINCORPORATED

Sample IDARI

Lab IDARI

LIMS ID l4atrix Sarnple Date,/Time \,1TSR

1. MW-8-0618132. MW-3-0618133. MW-2-0618134. PMW-1-0618135. MW-1-0618136. MW-5-0618131. MW-7-0618138. MW-7-061813-D9. MW-4-06181310. TB-1

06/1,8/13 O8:5006/1,8/13 09:3006/L8113 10:0506/L8/1,3 10:3506/L8/13 11:0506/1,8/1,3 11:3506/1,8/1,3 12:I006 / 1,8 / 13 t2:1.506/1.8/13 13:0006/L8/73

06/78/13 73:4006 / 1,8 / 13 73: 4006/L8/13 13:4006 / I8 / 13 1-3 4006/18/1,3 1,3:4006/18/13 13:4006/18/73 1324006 / 18 / 73 1-3: 4006/18/13 13:4006 / 78 / 1,3 1,3: 40

WU39AWU39BWU3 9CWU3 9DWU3 9EWU39FWU3 9GWU3 9HWU39IWUJ YJ

13-1293613-1293113-12938L3-12939L3-L294013-t294I13-r294273-7294373-129 4 4

1,3-12945

WaterWaterWaterWaterWaterWaterWaterWaterWaterWater

vrrnteo uo/ rd/ L3 Hage lofl

E, F,E Ff+#s ffir"-&ffiF:& 6 F-?Taa.*v* ' Etq*#-.*

JD Analyticat Resources, Incorporated

at Analyrtical Chemists and Consultants

Data Reporting QualifiersEffective 21141201'l

Inorganic Data

U Indicates that the target analyte was not detected at the reportedconcentration

* Duplicate RPD is not within established control limits

B Reported value is less than the CRDL but > the Reporting Limit

N Matrix Spike recovery not within established control limits

NA Not Applicable, analyte not spiked

H The natural concentration of the spiked element is so much greater than theconcentration spiked that an accurate determination of spike recovery is notpossible

L Analyte concentration is <5 times the Reporting Limit and the replicatecontrol limit defaults to t1 RL instead of the normal 20% RpD

Organic Data

U Indicates that the target analyte was not detected at the reportedconcentration

* Flagged value is not within established control limits

B Analyte detected in an associated Method Blank at a concentration greaterthan one-half of ARI's Reporting Limit or 5o/o of the regulatory limit or 5o/o ofthe analyte concentration in the sample.

J Estimated concentration when the value is less than ARI's establishedreporting limits

D The spiked compound was not detected due to sample extract dilution

E Estimated concentration calculated for an analyte response above the validinstrument calibration range. A dilution is required to obtain an accuratequantification of the analyte.

O Indicates a detected analyte with an initial or continuing calibration that doesnot meet established acceptance criteria (<20%RSD, <2oo/oDrift or minimumRRF).

Page 1 of 3

.!F F--54:3 r:egEdkfi&ff€--#*># _ :ws*r*trH+#

tA Anatyticat Resources, Incorporated

aj, Analyrtical Chemists and Consultants

S Indicates an analyte response that has saturated the detector. Thecalculated concentration is not valid; a dilution is required to obtain validquantification of the analyte

NA The flagged analyte was not analyzed for

NR Spiked compound recovery is not reported due to chromatographicinterference

NS The flagged analyte was not spiked into the sample

M Estimated value for an analyte detected and confirmed by an analyst but withlow spectral match parameters. This flag is used only for GC-MS analyses

M2 The sample contains PCB congeners that do not match any standard Aroclorpattern. The PCBs are identified and quantified as the Aroclor whose patternmost closely matches that of the sample. The reported value is an estimate.

N The analysis indicates the presence of an analyte for which there ispresumptive evidence to make a "tentative identification"

Y The analyte is not detected at or above the reported concentration. Thereporting limit is raised due to chromatographic interference. The Y flag isequivalent to the U flag with a raised reporting limit.

EMPC Estimated Maximum Possible Concentration (EMPC) defined in EPAStatement of Work DLMO2.2 as a value "calculated for 2,3,7,}-substitutedisomers for which the quantitation and /or confirmation ion(s) has signal tonoise in excess of 2.5, but does not m€€t identification criteda"(Dioxin/Furan analyrsis only)

C The analyte was positively identified on only one of two chromatographiccolumns. Chromatographic interference prevented a positive identification onthe second column

P The analyte was detected on both chromatographic columns but thequantified values differ by >40% RPD with no obvious chromatographicinterference

X Analyte signal includes interference from polychlorinated diphenyl ethers.(Dioxin/Furan analysis only)

Z Analyte signal includes interference from the sample matrix orperfluorokerosene ions. (Dioxin/Furan analysis only)

Page 2 of 3

F:F! !+4+ q'flbrffi f!4siFdfl-FU,# *J ' .#*.sis-*;

Jr> Anatyticat Resources, Incorporated

at Analytical Chemisrs and Consultants

Geotechnical Data

A The total of all fines fractions. This flag is used to report total fines when onlysieve analysis is requested and balances total grain size with sample weight.

F Samples were frozen prior to particle size determination

SM Sample matrix was not appropriate for the requested analysis. This normallyrefers to samples contaminated with an organic product that interferes withthe sieving process and/or moisture content, porosity and saturationcalculations

SS Sample did not contain the proportion of "fines" required to perform thepipette portion of the grain size analysis

W Weight of sample in some pipette aliquots was below the level required foraccurate weighting

Page 3 of 3

d'$; F#5{l} -d':v}t?bfftflrR*Fffi_#4.F# . :ffr#:** n

ANA| \rTraar a

oRcArrrcs AlrAlysrs DA'A sHEEr ft?TJi*trYVolatiles by Purge & Trap cclMs-tlethod Sw8260C Sample ID: MW-8-061813

/

Page 1 of 1

Lab Sample ID: WU39ALIMS ID: 13-12936Matrix: WaterData Refease Authorized:Reported : 06 / 26 / 73

fnstrument/Ana1yst : NT3/PKCDate Ana]vzed: 06/2I/13 13:26

CAS Number Analyte

SAIIPLE

Af- Pannrf NIa. Inlll?Q-Aqna.f f-nnqrr'l l- i nnv u vvrrv sr ef rrY

Drniani-. ArJ- Rrrqq Dl:l-i nn

050067Date Sampled: 06/I8/13

Date Received: 06/78/73

Samnle Amorrnf : 10.0 mLPrr rcro \/n I rrma . 10 . 0 mL

LOQ Result A

l5-0I-4 Vinyl Chloride75-00-3 Chloroethane75-35-4 1,l--Di-chloroethene75-34-3 1,l-Dichloroethane156-60-5 trans-1,2-DichloroetheneL56-59-2 cis-1,2-Dichloroethene701-06-2 1,2-Dichloroethane71-55-6 1,1,1-Trichl-oroethane79-01-6 Trichloroethenet2'7-IB-4 Tetrachloroethene

1.0 < 1.0 u1.0 < 1-.0 u1.0 < 1.0 U

1.0 3.41.0 < 1.0 u1.0 6. s1.0 < 1.0 u1.0 < 1.0 u1.0 331.0 < 1.0 u

Reported in pgll, (ppb)

Volatile Surrogate Recowery

d4-'1 ,2-Dich1oroethane 93 . 3?d8-Toluene 1008Bromofluorobenzene 9'l.B%dA-I,2-Dichlorobenzene 1013

EPA SW-846 indicates that vinyl chloride and styrene may degrade in the presence ofani rl nroqorrzrf i rro

FORM I

firsbfisrb@INCORPORATEDORGAIIICS AI.IAIYSIS DATA SHEET

Volatiles by Purge & Trap GClMS-Method St{8260CPaqe 1 of 1

LAD b MP.].E I[J: WUJYTJLIMS ID: L3-12937Matrix: Water 4Data Release Authorized,: i4Reported: 06 / 26 / 1,3

Instrument/Analyst : NT3/PKCDate Anafvzed: 06/2I/ 13 13:52

Sample ID: MW-3-061813SAMPLE

Of- Ran^r1- NIo. WII?9-Aqnoct Conqrr'l ti nav u vvrrv ur urlrY

Prai onJ- . ArJ- Err cq D l r1- i na

050067Date Sampled: 06/18/13

Date Recei-ved: 06 / L8 / 1,3

Sample Amount: 10.0 mLPurge Volume: 10.0 mL

LOQ Reeult aCAS Number Analyte

1 5-0L- 4

7s-00-375-35-47 5-34-31 5 6- 60-s756-59-21,01-06-271-55-679-01-5r27 -78-4

VinyJ- ChlorideChloroethane1, 1-Dichloroethene1, 1-Dichloroethanetrans-l-, 2-Dichloroethenec i s-1 - 2-Di chl oroollgngv4v +,

1, 2-DichloroethaneL' Lf L

Trich]-oroetheneTet rachl o roethene

Pannrf aA i n rrn /r /nnl.r\\Yyv t

Volatile Surrograte Recovery

.0

.0

.0

.0

.0

.0

.0

.0

.0

.011

U

U

UU

UUU

U

U

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

<1

.0

.0

.0

.0

.0

.0

.0

.0L4.0

d4 - L, 2 -D ichl-oroethaned8-Tol-ueneBromo fluo robenz ened4 - 7, 2 -D tchlorobenzene

98.38100?

96.5%101?

EPA SW-846 indicates that vinyl chloride and styrene may degrade in the presence ofacid preservative.

FORM I E.l? a".;i4-4 " FJEil€gS14E4&i

firsbfis*@INCORPORATEDORGA}IICS ATAIJISIS DATA SHEET

VoJ.atiles by Purge & Trap GClMS-Method SW8250CPase 1 of 1

Lab Sample ID: WU39C QCLIMS ID: 13-12938Matrix: Water z/Data Release Authorized z ,FReported: 06/26/1,3

Instrument/Analyst : NT3/PKCDate Anal-vzed: 06/2I/13 14:19

Sample ID: !4{-2-061813SAMPI.E

Report No: WU39-Aspect ConsultingPrnioct. Arf Rr:qq Pl:l-i na

0500 67Date Sampl-ed: 06 / I8 / 13

Date Received: 06/18/13

Semnlo Amorrnt. 10.0 ml-Prrrcrc \/olrrme: 10.0 mL

LOQ Result aCAS Nunber Anal-vte

75-01-475-00-375-35-475-34-3156-60-sL56-59-2101 -06-271-55-679-01-6r2'7 -tB-4

Vinyl ChforideChloroethane1, 1-DichJ-oroethene1, 1-Dichloroethanetrans - 1, 2 -Dichforoethenecis- 1, 2 -Dichloroethene1, 2-Dichloroethane1-, 1, 1-Trichl-oroethaneTrichloroettreneTetrachloroethene

Pan^ri6rl in rrnlt. /nnl-'\ll\j/ ! \yyvl

Volatile Surrogate Recovery

1.0 < 1.0 u1.0 < 1.0 u1.0 < 1.0 u1.0 < 1.0 u1.0 < 1.0 u1.0 L.4l_.0 < 1.0 u1.0 < 1.0 u1.0 2.61.0 < 1.0 u

d4 -1,, 2 -DichloroethanedB-TolueneBromofl-uorobenz ened4 -L, 2 -Dichlorobenzene

t | . 16101t

96.5t1032

EPA SW-845 indicates that vinyl chlorj-de and styrene may degrade in the presence ofacj-d preservative.

FORM I 4-F=; !q..!{:b ,fl&diis{?q 4 fliafr-#ri bt 4< En"4s J- q4

Arsbffseb@INCORPORATEDORGANICS A}TAIJYSIS DATA SHEET

volatil-eE by Purge & Trap eclMs-Method Sw8260CPaqe 1 of 1

Samp1e ID : P!,lW-1-061813SAMPLE

IdII?Q-Acnanf l'-nnorr 1 | i nnvrvJT nJPsuL uvrroufLrllvArt Brass Pl-atinq050067

na Pan^r| \I^.Drni an1- .

Lab Sample ID: WU39DLIMS ID: L3-L2939Matrix: WaterData Rel-ease Authorized:Reported:. 06/26/1,3

Instrument/Analyst : NT3/PKCDate Analyzedi 06/24/73 L3:1,2

CAS Nunber Analyte

Date Sampled: 06/78/13Date Received: 06/78/1,3

Sample Amount: 10.0 mLPrrrcre Vol rrme: 1.0.0 mL

LOQ Result a

1 5-07-475-00-31 5-35- 4

75-34-3156-60-5L56-59-2r01 -06-27 1-55-679-01-6I27 -78-4

VinyJ. Chl-orideChforoethane1,1-Dichloroethene1 , 1-Dichloroethanetrans-1, 2-Dichloroethenecis-1, 2-Dichloroethene1, 2-Di-chloroethane1, 1, 1-Trichl-oroethaneTrichloroetheneTetrachl-oroethene

Pannrt- ad i n rra /T /nnl.r\r\sPvrLeu rrr Frv/! \lJPv/

Volatile SuEogate Recowery

1.01.01.01.01.01.01.01.01.01.0

1.01.01.02.41.0

561.01.0

571.0

U

U

U

U

EU

U

d4 - 7, 2-DichloroethanedB-TolueneBromof l-uorobenzened4 - 1,, 2-Dichlorobenzene

99. 0896 .9294.32

10 6t

EPA SW-846 indicates that vinyl chl-oride and styrene may degrade in the presence ofrniA nracorrzrf irra

FORM I !,FE {-JL}', {,4{48!!ft -3 g

fiisbffsrb@INCORPORATEDORGA}IICS A}IAIYSIS DATA SHEET

Vo1atiles by Purge & Trap cclrrrs-!,lethod SW8260CPage 1 of 1

Sarople ID : PMt{-1-061813DILUTION

liilt<v-Acna^f I nharrIlf n^

Art Brass P-Iatinq050067

f)1- Ponnr'|- \ln.Prni acj- .

LAD :iAMP1E -LD: WUJYDLIMS ID: 13-I2g3gMatrix: Water ,AData Release Autho rized./rbReported: 06/26/L3

Instrument/Analyst : NT3/PKCDate Ana1yzed: 06/27/73 74:41

CAS Number Analyte

Date Sampled: 06/1,8/1,3Date Received: 06/L8/L3

Sample Amount: 0.500 mLPrrrrta \/olrrme. 10.0 mL

LOQ Result A

1 5-07-4?5-00-375-35-41 5-34-3156-60-s155-59-21,07 -06-271-55-679-01-61,2'/ -tB-4

<20 u<20 u<20 u<20 u<20 u

42<20 u<20 u

43<20 u

Vinyl ChlorideChloroethane1, 1-Dichloroethene1, 1-Di-chl-oroethanetrans- 1, 2-Dichloroethenecis-1, 2-Dichloroethene1, 2-Dichloroethane1, 1, _L-I rlCnloroetnaneTricbloroetheneTet rachloroethene

Pon^rl- 6.1 i n rra /T /hhh\v9t L \P[/pt

Volatile Suffogate Recovery

d4-1,2-Dichl,oroethane 95.1?d8-Tofuene 98.5CBromoffuorobenzene 94.I%d4-7,2-Dichlorobenzene l-06%

20202020202020202020

FORM I

Ars5fiS*(DINCORPORATEDORGAI{ICS A}TAITSIS DATA SHEEE

Volatiles by Purge & Trap cclMS-l{ethod SW8260CPage 1 of 1

QC Report No:Prn.i anf .

Sarrple ID : MI{-1-051813SAI4PI.E

WU39-Aspect ConsultingArt Brass Platinq050 0 67

Lab Sample ID: WU39ELIMS ID: 13-L2940Matrix: WaterData Refease Authorized:Reported: 06 / 26 / 13

Instrument/Ana1yst : NT3/PKCDate Analvzed. 06/24l13 13:38

CAS Nunber Analyte

Date Sampled: 06/IB/1,3Date Received: 06/L8/1,3

Semnl p Amorrnf : 10.0 mLPrrrno \/nl rrmo. 10.0 mt

LOQ Result A

1 5-07-475-00-375-35-475-34-3156-60-5155-59-21,0'1-06-27 1-55-679-01-61,2'7 -1,8- 4

Vinyl Chl-orideChl-oroethane1, 1-Dichloroethene1,1-Dichl-oroethanetrans-l-, 2-Dichloroethenecis-1, 2-Dichloroethene1, 2-Dichloroethane1, 1, 1-Tr j-chl-oroethaneTrichloroetheneTet rachloroethene

P6n^rf6r| in rrnlT /nn}. \\ y.t/v /


.0

.0

.0

.0

.0

1.01.01.01.01.02'l

1.01.0

421.0

1.01.01.01.01.0

U

U

UIT

U

It

tf

d4 -1, 2-D ichl-oroethaned8-Tol-ueneBromo fl-uoroben z ened4 -I, 2 -Dichlorobenzene

96.2298 .429't.72

103?

EPA SW-846 indiCates fh:t rrinrrl chlnridc:nd qfrrrcna m:v dpcr:dc in thtr nrcscncc nfu uf lvrre lJrErsrrvs vracid preservative.

FORM I il El !-ds-$ " 5-€{J15?B q "*g

Aisbffsrb@INCORPORATEDORGA}TICS AIIAIYSIS DATA SHEET

vo]-ati]-es by Purge & Trap GClMS-Method SW8260CPase 1 of 1

Lab Sample ID: WU39FLIMS ID: L3-L2941,Matrix: WaterData Rel-ease Authori-zed:Reported: 06/26/1,3

Samp1e ID: MW-S-051813SA!{PIJE

OC Ronnrf lrla. IITII?Q-A<naaf 1-nncrr'l f i nnPrnianf. Ari- Rrrqc Dl rl- i na! rq ef rlY

0500 67Date Sampled: 06/1,8/1,3

Date Received: 06 / 1,8 / 13

Semnl p Amrrrrnt. : 10.0 mLPrrrrrp \/nlrrma: 10.0 mL

LOQ Result A

Instrument/Analyst : NT3/PKCDate Anal-yzed: 06/2I/13 16:l,L

CAS Number Analyte

75-01-475-00-375-35-47s-34-3156-60-5r56-59-2tol -06-27 1-55- 679-01-5727 -I8-4

Vi-ny1 ChlorideChl-oroethane1, 1-Dichloroethene1,1-Dichloroethanetrans-1, 2-Dichl-oroethenecis-1, 2-Dichloroethene1, 2-Dichloroethane1, 1, 1-TrichloroethaneTrichl-oroetheneTet rachloroethene

P6n^rl-6rl in rralT /nnh\FYt u \YYut


U

U

U

U

U

UU

U

U

1.01.01.01.01.01.01.01.01.91.0

d4 -I, 2 -D:-chl-oroethanedB-TolueneBromo fluo roben z ened4 - 1, 2 -Dichf orobenzene

96. 381008

97.82103?


FORM I

ANALYTICALAoReAr{rcs A}rArysrs DA'A sHEEr fi,;Sj"LJfjitpVolatiles by Purge & Trap Gcll'ts-Method SYI8260C Sarrp]-e ID: I't!{-7-061813Page 1of1 SAMPLE

Lab Sample ID: WU39G QC Report No: WU39-Aspect ConsultingLIMS ID: 73-72942 -a Project: Art Brass platingMatrix: Water Z 050067Data Rel-ease Authorized: // Date Sampled: 06/18/73Reported: 06/26/1,3 Date Received: 06/18/73

Instrument/Analyst: NT3/PKC Sample Amount: 10.0 mLDate Anal-yzed: 06/21./13 16:38 Purge Volume: 10.0 mL

CAS Nunber Analyte LOQ Resu1t A

75-01-4 Vinyl Chloride75-00-3 Chloroethane75-35-4 1,1-Dichloroethene75-3{-3 1,l-Dichloroethane156-60-5 trans-1,2-Dichl-oroethene156-59-2 cis-1,2-DichLoroetheneIO7-06-2 1,2-Dichloroethane71-55-6 1, 1, 1--Trichl-oroethane79-01-6 TrictrloroetheneI2'7-18-4 Tetrachloroethene

1.0 < 1.0 u1.0 < 1.0 U1.0 < 1.0 u1.0 5.01.0 < 1.0 u1.0 3.81.0 < 1.0 u1.0 < 1.0 u1.0 331.0 < 1.0 u

Reported in pglL (ppb)

Vo1atile Surrogate Recovery

d4-7,2-Dichloroethane 95.'72d8-Toluene 103?Bromofluorobenzene 96.92d4-7,2-Dichl-orobenzene 101-?


I qE 9"r+4{:r'. g.dFq.4?Cpft E+FORM I

ANAr\rTr^^r a

oRGANrcs elrA,.ysrs DA'A sHEEr ft=trJ$tr$volatiles by Purge & Trap GClMS-Method Sw8260C Sanple fD: MW-7-061813-DPage 1of 1 SAIIPLE

Lab Sample ID: WU39H QC Report No: WU39-Aspect ConsultingLIMS ID: 13-1,2943 Project: Art Brass platingMatrix: Water 7p 050067Data Ref ease Authorized | ,.7/ Date Sampled: 06/18/13Reported: 06/26/13 r" Date Received: 06/L8/L3

Instrument/Analyst: NT3/PKC Sample Amount: 10.0 mLDate Anafyzed: 06/27/f3 17:05 Purge Vol-ume: 10.0 mL

CAS Nunber Analyte LOQ Reeult A

15-0I-4 Vinyl Chloride75-00-3 Chl-oroethane75-35-4 1,1-Dichloroethene75-3{-3 1,l-Dichloroethane156-60-5 trans-1,2-Dichloroethene155-59-2 cis-l,2-DichloroetheneI07-06-2 1,2-Dichloroethane71-55-6 L,1,1-Trichloroethane79-01-6 TrichloroetheneI27-IB-4 Tetrachforoethene

1.0 < 1.0 u1.0 < 1.0 u1.0 < 1.0 u1.0 5.01.0 < 1.0 u1.0 4 .01.0 < 1.0 u1.0 < 1.0 u1.0 351.0 < 1.0 u

Reported in pgll, (ppb)


d4-1,,2-Dichl-oroethane 1-02%d8-Tol-uene 99.7%Bromofluorobenzene 94.92d4-L,2-DichLorobenzene 1069

EPA SW-846 indi-cates that vinyl chloride and styrene may degrade in the presence ofacid preservati-ve.

FORM I d-;ili "t.?di-c fi&flEo? 4 #:..@q# "-' kJ - %;W:# + _.#

Arsbns*@INCORPORATEDORGAIIICS A}IAIYSIS DATA SHEET

Volatiles by Purge & Trap cClMs-Method SW8250CPage 1 of 1

Lab Sample ID: WU39ILIMS ID: 73-12944Matrlx: WaterData Release Authorizedz IReported: 06 / 26 / 1,3

Instrument/Ana1yst : NT3/PKC

Samp1e ID : !{!{-4-051813SAf.{PtJE

OC Ronnri IrIa. IdIT?Q-Aqnan1- /-nnerrl f i -^\lv r\syv! u rrv. vrvJ / nol/g9 L vvtrJul LIIIvPrnionf. Ar'l- Rraqq Pl rJ-i nn

0500 67F)ai- o (amnl arl

Date Recei-ved

Sample AmountPrrraa \/nl rrmo

06/1,8/1306/L8/L3

10.0 mL10.0 mL

LOQ Result A

Date Analyzedt 06/2I/13 71:.32

CAS Nunber Analyte

1 5-0I-475-00-375-35-475-34-31s6-60-5r56-59-2r01 -06-271-55-679-01-6I21 -IB-4

1.0 u1.0 u1.0 ul-.0 u1.0 u1.0 u1.0 U

1.0 u1.41.0 u

Vinyl Chl-orideChloroethane1,1-Dichloroethene1,1-Dichloroethanetrans-1, 2-Dichloroethenecis-1, 2-Dichloroethene1, 2-Dichloroethanel-, l-, 1-Tr j-chl-oroethaneTrichloroetheneTet rachl-oroethene

Pan^rf a.l i n rra /T. i/nn]-r\!\eyv!uuuflrFY/!\Yyet

Volatile Sunogat€ R€covery

1.01.01.01.01.01.01.01.01.01.0

d4-1, 2-DichloroethanedB-TolueneBromof l-uorobenzened4- L, 2-DLchf orobenzene

1018t_ 018

98.8s108?

EPA-SW-846 indicates that vinyl chloride and styrene may degrade in the presence ofac1(l preservatr_ve.

FORM I E 49 4-Jq;J ' C.f+CPY-+ fl JF

irsbffsrb@INCORPORATEDORGAI\TICS AIIALYSIS DATA SHEEE

Volatiles by Purge & Trap ccll'ts-l'lethod S?f8250CPage 1 of 1

QC Report No:Prni onl- .

SampJ.e ID: TB-1SAI,IPLE

vrvJl nryEvL vvrrruf Lrrlv

Art Brass Plating050067

Lab Sample ID: WU39JLIMS ID: 73-72945Matrix: WaterData Refease Authorized:Reported: 06/26/1.3

fnstrument/Analyst : NT3/PKCDate Anal-yzedz, 06/21,/13 I1259

CAS Nunber Anal.yte

Date Sampled: 06/1,8 /1,3Date Received: 06 / 1,8 / 13

S:mnl o Amnrrnf . 10.0 mLPrrrrlo \/nlrrmc. 10.0 mL

LOQ Result A

75-01-475-00-375-35-41 5-34-31 5 6- 60-51 s 6-5 9-2tol -06-271-55-61 9-07-6727 -18-4

\/in\'l /-hlnrirla

Chloroethane1, 1-Dichloroethene1, 1-Dichloroethanet rans - 1,, 2 -Dichloroethenecis-1-, 2-Dichloroethene1-, 2-Di-chloroethane1, 1, 1-TrichloroethaneTrichforoetheneTetrachloroethene

Pan^rf 6rl i n rrn /t /nnl.r\vYt u \lr}/et

Vo]-atile Surrogate Recowery

< 1.0 u< 1.0 u< 1.0 u< 1.0 u< 1.0 u< 1.0 u< 1.0 u< t-.0 u< 1.0 u< 1.0 u

d4-7, 2-Dichl-oroethanedB-TolueneBromofluo robenz ened4-I , 2-Dichforobenz ene

97.327022

94.22101_ E

EPA SW-846 indicates that vinyl chl-oride and styrene may degrade in the presence ofacid preservati-ve.

FORD{ I u.Fp a".g,4i:g " F.;Erggf"gP s E*+-rFa*a.s-.+ ' <H.#-*-- #i*

Arsbffsrb@INCORPORATED

LIMS IDt 1,3-12942Matrix: WaterData Release AuthorizedReported: 06 / 26 / L3

ORGAIIICS AI{AIYSTS DATA SHEETVolatiles by Purge & Trap cclMs-Method Slf8250CPase 1 of 1

Sample ID: lfr-7-061813T''ATRIX SPIKE

QC Report No: WU39-Aspect ConsultingPrniacf. Arl- Rrr<q Pl afi na

050067Date Sampled: 06/I8/13

Date Received: 06/I8/1,3

Sample Amount MS: 10.0 mLMSD: 10.0 mL

Prrrrro \/nlrrme [$; 10.0 mLMSD: 10.0 mL

,zInstrument/Analyst MS: NT3/PKC

MSD: NT3/PKCDate Ana1yzed MS:. 06/2I/L3 78:26

MSD: 06/27l13 18:53

Analyte Samp1e MSSpike I'ttl

Add6d-MS RecoverySpike MSD

MSD Added-MSD Recovery RPD

Chforoethane1, 1-Dichloroethene1, 1-Dichloroethanetrans-1, 2-Dichf oroethenecis- 1, 2-Dichloroethene1, 2-Dichloroethane1, 1-, 1--Trichl-oroethaneTrichloroetheneTet rachl o roethene

9 .64 10. 09.36 10.09.64 10.014.I 10.0B. BB 10.0t2.6 10.09. 63 10.09.I"7 10.043.4 10.01,0.2 10.0

Qonnrl- arl i n

91. 18 5.7286.8% 1.5296.92 0.5%93.0C 1.4?9t.42 2.9285.0? 2.4294.'72 I.'72BB.6? 3.4?87.0% 4 .0?LO2Z 0.0C

< 1.0< 1.0< 1.0

5.0< 1.0

3.8< 1.0< 1.0

33< 1.0

9. 118.689 .6914.39.r412.39 .478.8641 .'7r0.2

10.0t_0.010.010.010.01-0.010.010.01_0.010.0

U

U

U

U

U

U

96.4%93.6U96 .4291.0%BB. B?BB. O%

96.3?9r.'leo

104 %

102%

,.^ /r /^^t\\v9/ t \ytJ!/

RPD cal-cul-ated usinq sampl-e concentrations per SW846

FORM III -E-'dg Er*'1i:-3 r?gf,&#{r Ja *-'d6:is# \* ' *:SR$ *- *

ANALYTICAL ARE$ir#EgORGAI{ICS A}IAI.YSIS DATA SHEET INCoRPoRATEDVolatiles by Purge & Trap cclMs-}!,athod SW8260C Saq>le ID: tff-7-061813Page 1 of 1 ldAtRIX SPIKE

Lab SampJ-e ID: WU39c QC Report No: WU39-Aspect ConsultingLIMS ID: I3-L2942 Proiect: Art Brass Pl_atinqMatrix: Water ,./ 050067Data Release Authorized /D Date Sampled: 06/L8/1"3Reported: 06/26/13 Date Received: 06/18/13

Tnstrument/Analyst: NT3/PKC Sample Amount: l-0.0 mLDate Anal-yzedz 06/2I/73 18226 Purqe Vofume: 10.0 mL

CAS Nunber Analvte LOQ ReEuJ-t A

75-01-475-00-375-35-475-34-3156-60-5756-59-21.07 -06-271-55-61 9-0r-6727 -IB-4

\/i nrrl /-hl ari r'la

Chloroethane1r 1-Dichloroethene1, 1-Dichloroethanetrans- 1, 2-Dichloroethenecis-1-, 2-Dichloroethene1, 2-Dichloroethane1, 1, 1-Trichl-oroethaneTrichLoroetheneTetrachloroethene

Pan^rl-ari in rrnl1. /nn}.\vYt D \yyvt

Volatile guEogate Recowery

d4-t,2-Dtchl-oroethane 97.18d8-Tol-uene 1018Bromofluorobenzene 98.08d4-I,2-Dichlorobenzene 103E

1.01.01_. 01.01.01.01.0l_. 01.01.0

FORM I $.Ht9 '1*.#U " -.4FISg#1*Ff-_.qff,qsa-trJ - tu*wvs.-€

ORGA}TICS A}TAIJTSIS DATA SHEETVolatiles by Purge t Trap GClUS-ltethod SW8260CPage 1 of 1

Saq>1e ID: MW-7-061813IiiATRIX SPIKE

WU39-Aspect ConsultingArt Brass Pl-atino050067

firsbfisrb@INCORPORATED

DUP

Lab Sample ID: WU39GLIMS ID: L3-72942Matrix: Water ,ryData Refease Authorized: /i5Reported: 06/26/1,3

Instrument/Analyst : NT3/PKCDate Anal-yzed: 06/2L/ 13 18:53

CiAS Nunber Analyte

Date SampJ-ed: 06 / 18 / 73Date Received: 06/18/13

Sample Amount: 10.0 mLPrrrrro \/olrrrnc. 1.0.0 mL

LOQ Result A

na Pan^ri- NI^.Prni anJ- .

75-01-47 5-0 0-375-35-475-34-31s6-60-5r56-59-21,01 -0 6-27 1-55-67 9-Or-6I2'7 -1,8-4

v rlry r vrrrvr f us

Chforoethane1,1-Dichloroethene1,1-Dichloroethanetrans-1, 2-Dichloroethenecis-1, 2-Dichloroethene1-, 2-Dichloroethane1-, 1, 1--TrichloroethaneTri-chloroetheneTet rachloroethene

P6n^rt- 6rl i n rrn /r. /nnlr\YY. u \vvpl


d4-1,,2-Dichloroethane 97.8td8-Tofuene 99 .42Bromof l-uorobenzene 9'7 .62d4-1,2-Dichforobenzene 1048

FORM I i, Eli ti3qg ,?:Fls:€*:6'F:' ,4wi#** - YF g"+-^k-.4--- 4.

[email protected] ANAIYSIS DAIA SHEET

Volatiles by Purge & Irap cclMS-Method Sw8260CPage 1 of 1

Lab Sample ID: MB-062113ALIMS ID: L3-L2936Matrlx: Water ./zData Rel-ease Authorized' ,j/Reported: 06/26/73

Instrument/AnaJ-yst : NT3/PKCDate Anal-yzed: 06/21,/ l-3 11:18

Sanp1e ID: MB-062113AMETHOD BLAI.IK

Of- Ronnri- Nla. IaIII?Q-Aqnaci- f-nnqrrl l- i naPrnionf. Arf Rr:qq Pl rf i nn

050067l-tef c S:mnl ed: NA

Date Received: NA

Semnl c Amnrrnl- . 10.0 mLPrrrrro \/nl rrmp. 10.0 mL

LOQ Result ACAS Nunber Analyte

75-01-475-00-375-35-47 5-34-31 5 6- 60-5156-59-2101 -06-27 1-55- 61 9-0r-61,27 -rB-4

Chloroethane1 1-ni nhl nrnaf hanaf , f vavrrfv

1, 1-Dichloroethanetrans-1, 2-Dichloroethenecis- 1, 2-Dichloroethene1, 2-D j-chl-oroethane1 - 1 - 1 -Tri ch1 nrootl3ngL' L' L

TrichloroetheneTet rachloroethene

Ponnrf arl i n rt^,/T. /nnl^\\r\eyv! vgt u \PPvr

VoLatil-e Surrogate Recowery

d4-L,2-Dichl-oroethane 1028d8-Toluene 103?Bromof l-uorobenzene 95.'72d4-I,2-Dichlorobenzene 99.0?

.0 u

.0 uNIInn.0 u.0 u.0 u.0 u.0 u.0 u

FORM I 4r -?i $/},tl*-s fl.*5:,s6*a+;";3.6u_#.J r €-#:_*..*..^

firs:ils*@INGORPORATEDORGAI{ICS AI.IALYSIS DATA SHEET

volatiles by Purge & Trap cclMi-r'tethod sw8260cPase 1 of 1

Lab SampJ-e TD: MB-O62413ALIMS ID: 1.3-12939

SanpJ.e ID: MB-0624L3AMETHOD BI"A}IK

QC Report No: WU39-Aspect ConsultingProioct. Arf Rreqq Pl aJ-i na

050067l-t:to S:mnled. NA

Date Received: NA

Sample Amount: 10.0 mLPrr rrle \/n l rrma . 10 . 0 mL

LOQ Result O

Matrix: WaterData Rel-ease Authorized.Reported : 06 / 26 / 13

Instrument/Anal-yst : NT3/PKCDate Analyzed: 06/24/13 7I:22

CAg Nunber Analyte

75-01-475-00-375-35-475-34-31 s 6- 60-5L56-59-2707 -06-271-55-61 9-0I-6727 -LB-4

\/i nrrl Ch l ari rla

Chloroethane1-, 1-Dichloroethene1,1-Dichloroethanetrans-1, 2-Dichloroethenecis-1, 2-Dichloroethene1, 2-Dichloroethane1, 1, 1-TrichloroethaneTrichloroetheneTetrachl-oroethene

Pan^ri-6r{ in rralr /nnl-'\ltYt u \1t1tut


d4-1,,2-Dichloroethane 99.8td8-Tol-uene 100*Bromofl-uorobenzene 99.59d4-7,2-Drchlorobenzene 1042

1

L1

1

L

1

< 1.0 u< 1.0 u< 1.0 u< 1.0 u< 1.0 u< 1.0 u< 1.0 u< 1.0 u< 1.0 u< 1.0 u

FORM I g-iiil |6'*lqk " d-:i?9ft{&+="Ei-wq*r#!^F r :wEF.re.'F

ORGAI'IICS A]IAIYSIS DATA SHEETVolatiles by Purge & Erap cclMfi-Method SI[8260CPage 1 of 1

Lab Samp1e ID: LCS-062113ALIMS ID: I3-L2936

SampJ.e fD: LCS-062113AI,AB CONTROII

nC Ran^rt NT^. I^iII?q-A<nan1- f-nn crr I I i nnv L vvrlr uf L rrrvt)rnra.f. Art P.r:qq Dl ri-i na

Arsbilsrb@INCORPORATED

SAI'{PLE

Matrix: WaterData Release Authorized:Reported: 06 / 26 / 13

Instrument/Analyst LCS: NT3/PKCLCSD: NT3/PKC

Date Anal-yzed LCS: 06/2I/73 I0224LCSD: 06/2I/13 1O:51

Analyte

050067Date SampJ-ed: NA

Date Received: NA

Sample Amount LCS:LCSD:

Purge Volume LCS:LCSD:

Spike LCS&CS Added-LCS Recovery

10.0 mL10.0 mL10.0 mL10.0 mL

LCSDSpike

Added-LCSDLCSD

Recovery RPD

Chl-oroethane1, 1-Dichloroethene1, 1-Dlchloroethanetrans-1, 2-Dichloroethenecis-1, 2-Dichloroethene1, 2-Dichloroethane1, 1, 1-TrlchloroethaneTrichloroetheneTet rachl-o roethene

'79.82 1.5?82.62 4 .5%88. 8? 0. B*90.6? 4.'7%89 .22 I .2e"87 .2% 1.9?90.22 3.Ots91.2% 0. BB92.82 2 .4299.0% 4 . 0%

8.10I .648.95qqn

8. B18.568.759.199.0610.3

10.010.010.0t_0.010.010.010.010. 010.010.0

81.0?86.4289. s?95. 0?88.1?85. 6887.5391.9%90.6?

103U

1 .988.268.889. 06B .92I .129 .029.129.289. 90

10. 010.010.0r-0.010.0l_0.010.010.010.010.0


RPD calcul-ated using sample concentrations per SW846.

VoJ.atiJ.e Surogate Recovery

LCS LCSDd4-1,2-Dichloroethane 95.8? 93.8?d8 -Tol-uene 1018 L022Bromoffuorobenzene 101% 96.42d4-1,,2-DichLorobenzene I02Z l-03?

FORM III

ORGANICS AI.IAIYSIS DATA SHEETVolatiles by Purge & Trap cclMSt-!'lethod SW8260CPage 1 of 1

Lab Sample ID: LCS-06241LIMS ID: 13-72939Matrix: WaterData Rel-ease Authorized:Reportedz 06/26/1,3

Sanple ID: LCS-0624L3AI.AB COMIRO'.

QC Report No: WU39-Aspect ConsultingPrnioni. Arf Rrrqq Pl ati na

050067D:l-A S:mn I a.l: NA

Date Received: NA

Samnle Amount LCS: 10.0 mLLCSD: 10.0 mL

Prrrrra \/nl rrme lQg; 10.0 mLLCSD: 10.0 mL

fixsbffsrb@INCORPORATED

SAMPLE

JA

Instrument/Analyst LCS: NT3/PKCLCSD: NT3/PKC

Date Analyzed LCS z 06/24 /1.3 70:28LCSD: 06/24l13 10:55

AnalyteSp5-ke LCS

LCS Added-LCS Recovery LCSDSpike

Added-LCSDLCSD

Recovery RPD

\/i nrrl (-h l nri da

Chl-oroethane1 - 1 -ni eh1 orocthcn41, 1-Dichloroethanetrans-1, 2-Dichl-oroethenec j-s-1, 2-Dichloroethenel-, 2-Dichl-oroethane1, 1, 1-TrichloroethaneTrichLoroetheneTet rachl-o roethene

8.79 10.0B. 9s 10. 09 .47 10 . 09.91 10.09 .4'7 10. 09.36 10. 0

9.93 10.09.87 t-0.0LO.2 10.010. B 10. 0

93.Otl 5. 6B94 .'t% 5. 6%

100% 6. 1?99.92 0.2294.32 0.4394.1,% 0.5sl_04? 4.62100? 1.3?103% 1.0C1-10? 1.8?

B'7 .9%89. s?94.I299.1%94.'t%93 .6299.3298.7%

r02%108%

9.309 .4110.09 .999.439 .41,10.410.010.311.0

10.010.0r_0.010.010.010. 010. 010. 010.010.0


RPD calcufated using sample concentrations per SW846.


d4 -1, 2-Dichloroethaned8-TofueneBromofluorobenzened4 - L, 2 -Dichl-orobenzene

LCS LCSD97 .72 99.0?101% 1,042

91.92 99.0?103? 1,072

FORM III E srt 9-.-J4-3 " g:cjr5r'g4Jt'-_+&_ff_.-J-i*#_g*Ed'r&*F

Ar$fisrb@INCORPORATED

Matrix: Water

VOA ST'RROGATE RECOVERI SUM!,IARY

QC Report No: WU39-Aspect ConsultingPrniacf. Arf Rr^qq Pl rJ-i na

050067

PV DCE TOL BFB DCB TOT OUTARI ID C]-ient ID

MB-O62113A Method Bl-ankLCS-062113A Lab ControlLCSD-062113A Lab Control Dupwu39A MW-8-061813wu39B MW-3-0618 13wu39c MW-2-061813MB-062413A Method BlankLCS-062413A Lab ControlLCSD-062413A Lab Control Dupwu39D PMW-1-061813WU39DDL PMW-1-061813wu39E Mw-1-061813wu39F MW-5-061813i/iu39c MW-7-061813I/iu39GMS MW-7-061813wu39GMSD MW-7-061813wu39H MW-7-061813-Dwu39r MW-4-061813WU39J TB-1

sw8260c(DCE) : d4-1' 2-Dichl-oroethane(ToL) : d8-Tol-uene(BFB) : Bromofl-uorobenzene(DCB) : d4-1, 2-Dichlorobenzene

LCS/MB LIMITS

( 80-120 )

(80-120)(80-120)(80-120)

Prep Method: SW5030BLog Number Range z 13-12936 to L3-I2945

10 r02z10 95.8210 93.8210 93.3?10 98.3?10 91 .1,210 99.8%10 91 .1210 99.0%10 99.0?10 95.1%10 96.2210 96.3210 95.1%10 91.I210 97.8210 1_02210 101%10 9'7 .3e.

103?101%r02z100?100%101%100?101%L0 4eo

96 .9e"98.5%98 .42

100?1 03%101?

99 .4e"99.Je"

101?r02e"

95.12101%

96 .4e.9'7 .8e"96.5296.5e"qq 599-1 .9e"99.0%94.3294.1_Z91 .7297 .8296 .9298.0%97.6294 .9298.8%94.2e"

99.02I02Z103?101?101%103 ?7042103 ?I07 Z

10 6?10 6%

103%1032101%10 3?104%106%108%101U

QC LIMITS

0000000000000000000

80-130 )

80-120 )

80-120 )

80-120 )

APPENDIX B

VI Evaluation Worksheets using June 2013 Groundwater Quality Results

activities during reporting periodclients.aspectconsulting.com/artbrass/abp progress... · project...

Documents