accessibility - florida building · type a and type b dwelling units are not used by the florida...
TRANSCRIPT
AccessibilityProposed Code Modifications
Glitch Modifications
This document created by the Florida Department of Business and Professional Regulation -
850-487-1824
Page 1 of 32
27/06/2013 Page 1 of 32
TAC: AccessibilityTotal Mods for Accessibility in Approved as Submitted: 14
Total Mods for report: 14
Accessibility2013 Glitch
Page 2 of 32
27/06/2013 Page 2 of 32
Sub Code: Building
Attachments
T Stafford
No
4/27/2013
Approved as Submitted
202
Pending Review
No
Proponent
Affects HVHZ
Date Submitted
TAC Recommendation
Section
Commission Action
A6191
2Chapter
Related Modifications
Summary of Modification
Corrects a conflict within the updated code. Type A and Type B Dwelling units are not used by the Florida Accessibility Code.
Rationale
Corrects a conflict within the updated code. The terms Type A and Type B Dwelling Units are not used by the Florida Accessibility
Code.
Fiscal Impact Statement
Impact to local entity relative to enforcement of code
No impact to local entities.
Impact to building and property owners relative to cost of compliance with code
No impact to building and property owners.
Impact to industry relative to the cost of compliance with code
No impact to industry.
Requirements
Has a reasonable and substantial connection with the health, safety, and welfare of the general public
Corrects a conflict within the updated code.
Strengthens or improves the code, and provides equivalent or better products, methods, or systems of construction
Corrects a conflict within the updated code.
Does not discriminate against materials, products, methods, or systems of construction of demonstrated capabilities
Corrects a conflict within the updated code.
Does not degrade the effectiveness of the code
Corrects a conflict within the updated code.
Is the proposed code modification part of a prior code version?
YES
The provisions contained in the proposed amendment are addressed in the applicable international code?
NO
The amendment demonstrates by evidence or data that the geographical jurisdiction of Florida exihibits a need to strengthen
the foundation code beyond the needs or regional variation addressed by the foundation code and why the proposed
amendment applies to the state?
YES
The proposed amendment was submitted or attempted to be included in the foundation codes to avoid resubmission to the
Florida Building Code amendment process?
NO
(a.) Conflicts within the updated code;X
(b.) Conflicts between the updated code and the Florida Fire Prevention Code adopted pursuant to chapter
633;
(c.) Unintended results from the integration of previously adopted Florida-specific amendments with the
model code;
(d.) Equivalency of standards;
(e.) Changes to or inconsistencies with federal or state law;
(f.) Adoption of an updated edition of the National Electrical Code if the commission finds that delay of
implementing the updated edition causes undue hardship to stakeholders or otherwise threatens the public
health, safety, and welfare.
Accessibility2013 Glitch
Page 3 of 32
27/06/2013 Page 3 of 32
Pa
ge
: 1
http://w
ww
.flo
ridabuild
ing.o
rg/U
plo
ad/M
odifi
catio
ns/
Rendere
d/M
od_6191_T
ext
OfM
odifi
catio
n_1.p
ng
A6191 T
ex
t M
od
ific
ati
on
Accessibility2013 Glitch
Page 4 of 32
27/06/2013 Page 4 of 32
Attachments
T Stafford
No
4/27/2013
Approved as Submitted
403.4.8
Pending Review
No
Proponent
Affects HVHZ
Date Submitted
TAC Recommendation
Section
Commission Action
A6193
4Chapter
Related Modifications
Summary of Modification
Corrects a conflict within the updated code. Corrects section references.
Rationale
Corrects a conflict within the updated code. Corrects section references. Section 1007 has been deleted and references the Florida
Accessibility Code.
Fiscal Impact Statement
Impact to local entity relative to enforcement of code
No impact to local entities.
Impact to building and property owners relative to cost of compliance with code
No impact to building and property owners.
Impact to industry relative to the cost of compliance with code
No impact to industry.
Requirements
Has a reasonable and substantial connection with the health, safety, and welfare of the general public
Corrects a conflict within the updated code.
Strengthens or improves the code, and provides equivalent or better products, methods, or systems of construction
Corrects a conflict within the updated code.
Does not discriminate against materials, products, methods, or systems of construction of demonstrated capabilities
Corrects a conflict within the updated code.
Does not degrade the effectiveness of the code
Corrects a conflict within the updated code.
Is the proposed code modification part of a prior code version?
YES
The provisions contained in the proposed amendment are addressed in the applicable international code?
NO
The amendment demonstrates by evidence or data that the geographical jurisdiction of Florida exihibits a need to strengthen
the foundation code beyond the needs or regional variation addressed by the foundation code and why the proposed
amendment applies to the state?
OTHER
Explanation of Choice
Corrects and incorrect section reference.
The proposed amendment was submitted or attempted to be included in the foundation codes to avoid resubmission to the
Florida Building Code amendment process?
NO
(a.) Conflicts within the updated code;X
(b.) Conflicts between the updated code and the Florida Fire Prevention Code adopted pursuant to chapter
633;
(c.) Unintended results from the integration of previously adopted Florida-specific amendments with the
model code;
(d.) Equivalency of standards;
(e.) Changes to or inconsistencies with federal or state law;
(f.) Adoption of an updated edition of the National Electrical Code if the commission finds that delay of
implementing the updated edition causes undue hardship to stakeholders or otherwise threatens the public
health, safety, and welfare.
Accessibility2013 Glitch
Page 5 of 32
27/06/2013 Page 5 of 32
Pa
ge
: 1
http://w
ww
.flo
ridabuild
ing.o
rg/U
plo
ad/M
odifi
catio
ns/
Rendere
d/M
od_6193_T
ext
OfM
odifi
catio
n_1.p
ng
A6193 T
ex
t M
od
ific
ati
on
Accessibility2013 Glitch
Page 6 of 32
27/06/2013 Page 6 of 32
Attachments
T Stafford
No
4/27/2013
Approved as Submitted
406.4.1
Pending Review
No
Proponent
Affects HVHZ
Date Submitted
TAC Recommendation
Section
Commission Action
A6194
4Chapter
Related Modifications
Summary of Modification
Corrects a conflict within the updated code. Corrects section references.
Rationale
Corrects a conflict within the updated code. Corrects section references. Chapter 11 has been deleted and references the Florida
Accessibility Code.
Fiscal Impact Statement
Impact to local entity relative to enforcement of code
No impact to local entities.
Impact to building and property owners relative to cost of compliance with code
No impact to building and property owners.
Impact to industry relative to the cost of compliance with code
No impact to industry.
Requirements
Has a reasonable and substantial connection with the health, safety, and welfare of the general public
Corrects a conflict within the updated code.
Strengthens or improves the code, and provides equivalent or better products, methods, or systems of construction
Corrects a conflict within the updated code.
Does not discriminate against materials, products, methods, or systems of construction of demonstrated capabilities
Corrects a conflict within the updated code.
Does not degrade the effectiveness of the code
Corrects a conflict within the updated code.
Is the proposed code modification part of a prior code version?
YES
The provisions contained in the proposed amendment are addressed in the applicable international code?
NO
The amendment demonstrates by evidence or data that the geographical jurisdiction of Florida exihibits a need to strengthen
the foundation code beyond the needs or regional variation addressed by the foundation code and why the proposed
amendment applies to the state?
OTHER
Explanation of Choice
Corrects and incorrect section reference.
The proposed amendment was submitted or attempted to be included in the foundation codes to avoid resubmission to the
Florida Building Code amendment process?
NO
(a.) Conflicts within the updated code;X
(b.) Conflicts between the updated code and the Florida Fire Prevention Code adopted pursuant to chapter
633;
(c.) Unintended results from the integration of previously adopted Florida-specific amendments with the
model code;
(d.) Equivalency of standards;
(e.) Changes to or inconsistencies with federal or state law;
(f.) Adoption of an updated edition of the National Electrical Code if the commission finds that delay of
implementing the updated edition causes undue hardship to stakeholders or otherwise threatens the public
health, safety, and welfare.
Accessibility2013 Glitch
Page 7 of 32
27/06/2013 Page 7 of 32
Pa
ge
: 1
http://w
ww
.flo
ridabuild
ing.o
rg/U
plo
ad/M
odifi
catio
ns/
Rendere
d/M
od_6194_T
ext
OfM
odifi
catio
n_1.p
ng
A6194 T
ex
t M
od
ific
ati
on
Accessibility2013 Glitch
Page 8 of 32
27/06/2013 Page 8 of 32
Attachments
T Stafford
No
4/27/2013
Approved as Submitted
419.9
Pending Review
No
Proponent
Affects HVHZ
Date Submitted
TAC Recommendation
Section
Commission Action
A6195
4Chapter
Related Modifications
Summary of Modification
Corrects a conflict within the updated code. Corrects section references.
Rationale
Corrects a conflict within the updated code. Corrects section references. Chapter 11 has been deleted and references the Florida
Accessibility Code.
Fiscal Impact Statement
Impact to local entity relative to enforcement of code
No impact to local entities.
Impact to building and property owners relative to cost of compliance with code
No impact to building and property owners.
Impact to industry relative to the cost of compliance with code
No impact to industry.
Requirements
Has a reasonable and substantial connection with the health, safety, and welfare of the general public
Corrects a conflict within the updated code.
Strengthens or improves the code, and provides equivalent or better products, methods, or systems of construction
Corrects a conflict within the updated code.
Does not discriminate against materials, products, methods, or systems of construction of demonstrated capabilities
Corrects a conflict within the updated code.
Does not degrade the effectiveness of the code
Corrects a conflict within the updated code.
Is the proposed code modification part of a prior code version?
YES
The provisions contained in the proposed amendment are addressed in the applicable international code?
NO
The amendment demonstrates by evidence or data that the geographical jurisdiction of Florida exihibits a need to strengthen
the foundation code beyond the needs or regional variation addressed by the foundation code and why the proposed
amendment applies to the state?
OTHER
Explanation of Choice
Correct and incorrect section reference.
The proposed amendment was submitted or attempted to be included in the foundation codes to avoid resubmission to the
Florida Building Code amendment process?
NO
(a.) Conflicts within the updated code;X
(b.) Conflicts between the updated code and the Florida Fire Prevention Code adopted pursuant to chapter
633;
(c.) Unintended results from the integration of previously adopted Florida-specific amendments with the
model code;
(d.) Equivalency of standards;
(e.) Changes to or inconsistencies with federal or state law;
(f.) Adoption of an updated edition of the National Electrical Code if the commission finds that delay of
implementing the updated edition causes undue hardship to stakeholders or otherwise threatens the public
health, safety, and welfare.
Accessibility2013 Glitch
Page 9 of 32
27/06/2013 Page 9 of 32
Pa
ge
: 1
http://w
ww
.flo
ridabuild
ing.o
rg/U
plo
ad/M
odifi
catio
ns/
Rendere
d/M
od_6195_T
ext
OfM
odifi
catio
n_1.p
ng
A6195 T
ex
t M
od
ific
ati
on
Accessibility2013 Glitch
Page 10 of 32
27/06/2013 Page 10 of 32
Attachments
T Stafford
No
4/27/2013
Approved as Submitted
709.4
Pending Review
No
Proponent
Affects HVHZ
Date Submitted
TAC Recommendation
Section
Commission Action
A6197
7Chapter
Related Modifications
Summary of Modification
Corrects a conflict within the updated code.
Rationale
Conflict with updated code. The provisions of Section 1007 have been deleted and references the Florida Accessibility Code.
Fiscal Impact Statement
Impact to local entity relative to enforcement of code
No impact to local entities.
Impact to building and property owners relative to cost of compliance with code
No impact to building and property owners.
Impact to industry relative to the cost of compliance with code
No impact to industry.
Requirements
Has a reasonable and substantial connection with the health, safety, and welfare of the general public
Corrects a conflict within the updated code.
Strengthens or improves the code, and provides equivalent or better products, methods, or systems of construction
Corrects a conflict within the updated code.
Does not discriminate against materials, products, methods, or systems of construction of demonstrated capabilities
Corrects a conflict within the updated code.
Does not degrade the effectiveness of the code
Corrects a conflict within the updated code.
Is the proposed code modification part of a prior code version?
YES
The provisions contained in the proposed amendment are addressed in the applicable international code?
NO
The amendment demonstrates by evidence or data that the geographical jurisdiction of Florida exihibits a need to strengthen
the foundation code beyond the needs or regional variation addressed by the foundation code and why the proposed
amendment applies to the state?
OTHER
Explanation of Choice
corrects incorrect section reference.
The proposed amendment was submitted or attempted to be included in the foundation codes to avoid resubmission to the
Florida Building Code amendment process?
NO
(a.) Conflicts within the updated code;X
(b.) Conflicts between the updated code and the Florida Fire Prevention Code adopted pursuant to chapter
633;
(c.) Unintended results from the integration of previously adopted Florida-specific amendments with the
model code;
(d.) Equivalency of standards;
(e.) Changes to or inconsistencies with federal or state law;
(f.) Adoption of an updated edition of the National Electrical Code if the commission finds that delay of
implementing the updated edition causes undue hardship to stakeholders or otherwise threatens the public
health, safety, and welfare.
Accessibility2013 Glitch
Page 11 of 32
27/06/2013 Page 11 of 32
Pa
ge
: 1
http://w
ww
.flo
ridabuild
ing.o
rg/U
plo
ad/M
odifi
catio
ns/
Rendere
d/M
od_6197_T
ext
OfM
odifi
catio
n_1.p
ng
A6197 T
ex
t M
od
ific
ati
on
Accessibility2013 Glitch
Page 12 of 32
27/06/2013 Page 12 of 32
Attachments
T Stafford
No
4/27/2013
Approved as Submitted
907.5.2.2.4
Pending Review
No
Proponent
Affects HVHZ
Date Submitted
TAC Recommendation
Section
Commission Action
A6198
9Chapter
Related Modifications
Summary of Modification
Corrects a conflict within the updated code.
Rationale
Conflict with updated code. The provisions of Chapter 11 have been deleted and references the Florida Accessibility Code.
Fiscal Impact Statement
Impact to local entity relative to enforcement of code
No impact to local entities.
Impact to building and property owners relative to cost of compliance with code
No impact to building and property owners.
Impact to industry relative to the cost of compliance with code
No impact to industry.
Requirements
Has a reasonable and substantial connection with the health, safety, and welfare of the general public
Corrects a conflict within the updated code.
Strengthens or improves the code, and provides equivalent or better products, methods, or systems of construction
Corrects a conflict within the updated code.
Does not discriminate against materials, products, methods, or systems of construction of demonstrated capabilities
Corrects a conflict within the updated code.
Does not degrade the effectiveness of the code
Corrects a conflict within the updated code.
Is the proposed code modification part of a prior code version?
YES
The provisions contained in the proposed amendment are addressed in the applicable international code?
NO
The amendment demonstrates by evidence or data that the geographical jurisdiction of Florida exihibits a need to strengthen
the foundation code beyond the needs or regional variation addressed by the foundation code and why the proposed
amendment applies to the state?
OTHER
Explanation of Choice
Corrects and incorrect section reference.
The proposed amendment was submitted or attempted to be included in the foundation codes to avoid resubmission to the
Florida Building Code amendment process?
NO
(a.) Conflicts within the updated code;X
(b.) Conflicts between the updated code and the Florida Fire Prevention Code adopted pursuant to chapter
633;
(c.) Unintended results from the integration of previously adopted Florida-specific amendments with the
model code;
(d.) Equivalency of standards;
(e.) Changes to or inconsistencies with federal or state law;
(f.) Adoption of an updated edition of the National Electrical Code if the commission finds that delay of
implementing the updated edition causes undue hardship to stakeholders or otherwise threatens the public
health, safety, and welfare.
Accessibility2013 Glitch
Page 13 of 32
27/06/2013 Page 13 of 32
Pa
ge
: 1
http://w
ww
.flo
ridabuild
ing.o
rg/U
plo
ad/M
odifi
catio
ns/
Rendere
d/M
od_6198_T
ext
OfM
odifi
catio
n_1.p
ng
A6198 T
ex
t M
od
ific
ati
on
Accessibility2013 Glitch
Page 14 of 32
27/06/2013 Page 14 of 32
Attachments
T Stafford
No
4/27/2013
Approved as Submitted
1003.7
Pending Review
No
Proponent
Affects HVHZ
Date Submitted
TAC Recommendation
Section
Commission Action
A6200
10Chapter
Related Modifications
Summary of Modification
Corrects a conflict within the updated code.
Rationale
Conflict with updated code. the provisions of section 1007 have been deleted and reference the Florida Accessibility Code.
Fiscal Impact Statement
Impact to local entity relative to enforcement of code
No impact to local entities.
Impact to building and property owners relative to cost of compliance with code
No impact to building and property owners.
Impact to industry relative to the cost of compliance with code
No impact to industry.
Requirements
Has a reasonable and substantial connection with the health, safety, and welfare of the general public
Corrects a conflict within the updated code.
Strengthens or improves the code, and provides equivalent or better products, methods, or systems of construction
Corrects a conflict within the updated code.
Does not discriminate against materials, products, methods, or systems of construction of demonstrated capabilities
Corrects a conflict within the updated code.
Does not degrade the effectiveness of the code
Corrects a conflict within the updated code.
Is the proposed code modification part of a prior code version?
YES
The provisions contained in the proposed amendment are addressed in the applicable international code?
NO
The amendment demonstrates by evidence or data that the geographical jurisdiction of Florida exihibits a need to strengthen
the foundation code beyond the needs or regional variation addressed by the foundation code and why the proposed
amendment applies to the state?
OTHER
Explanation of Choice
Corrects an incorrect section reference.
The proposed amendment was submitted or attempted to be included in the foundation codes to avoid resubmission to the
Florida Building Code amendment process?
NO
(a.) Conflicts within the updated code;X
(b.) Conflicts between the updated code and the Florida Fire Prevention Code adopted pursuant to chapter
633;
(c.) Unintended results from the integration of previously adopted Florida-specific amendments with the
model code;
(d.) Equivalency of standards;
(e.) Changes to or inconsistencies with federal or state law;
(f.) Adoption of an updated edition of the National Electrical Code if the commission finds that delay of
implementing the updated edition causes undue hardship to stakeholders or otherwise threatens the public
health, safety, and welfare.
Accessibility2013 Glitch
Page 15 of 32
27/06/2013 Page 15 of 32
Pa
ge
: 1
http://w
ww
.flo
ridabuild
ing.o
rg/U
plo
ad/M
odifi
catio
ns/
Rendere
d/M
od_6200_T
ext
OfM
odifi
catio
n_1.p
ng
A6200 T
ex
t M
od
ific
ati
on
Accessibility2013 Glitch
Page 16 of 32
27/06/2013 Page 16 of 32
Attachments
T Stafford
No
4/27/2013
Approved as Submitted
1004.4
Pending Review
No
Proponent
Affects HVHZ
Date Submitted
TAC Recommendation
Section
Commission Action
A6201
10Chapter
Related Modifications
Summary of Modification
Corrects a conflict within the updated code.
Rationale
Conflict with updated code. The provisions of Chapter 11 have been deleted and reference the Florida Accessibility Code.
Fiscal Impact Statement
Impact to local entity relative to enforcement of code
No impact to local entities.
Impact to building and property owners relative to cost of compliance with code
No impact to building and property owners.
Impact to industry relative to the cost of compliance with code
No impact to industry.
Requirements
Has a reasonable and substantial connection with the health, safety, and welfare of the general public
Corrects a conflict within the updated code.
Strengthens or improves the code, and provides equivalent or better products, methods, or systems of construction
Corrects a conflict within the updated code.
Does not discriminate against materials, products, methods, or systems of construction of demonstrated capabilities
Corrects a conflict within the updated code.
Does not degrade the effectiveness of the code
Corrects a conflict within the updated code.
Is the proposed code modification part of a prior code version?
YES
The provisions contained in the proposed amendment are addressed in the applicable international code?
NO
The amendment demonstrates by evidence or data that the geographical jurisdiction of Florida exihibits a need to strengthen
the foundation code beyond the needs or regional variation addressed by the foundation code and why the proposed
amendment applies to the state?
OTHER
Explanation of Choice
Corrects and incorrect section reference.
The proposed amendment was submitted or attempted to be included in the foundation codes to avoid resubmission to the
Florida Building Code amendment process?
NO
(a.) Conflicts within the updated code;X
(b.) Conflicts between the updated code and the Florida Fire Prevention Code adopted pursuant to chapter
633;
(c.) Unintended results from the integration of previously adopted Florida-specific amendments with the
model code;
(d.) Equivalency of standards;
(e.) Changes to or inconsistencies with federal or state law;
(f.) Adoption of an updated edition of the National Electrical Code if the commission finds that delay of
implementing the updated edition causes undue hardship to stakeholders or otherwise threatens the public
health, safety, and welfare.
Accessibility2013 Glitch
Page 17 of 32
27/06/2013 Page 17 of 32
Pa
ge
: 1
http://w
ww
.flo
ridabuild
ing.o
rg/U
plo
ad/M
odifi
catio
ns/
Rendere
d/M
od_6201_T
ext
OfM
odifi
catio
n_1.p
ng
A6201 T
ex
t M
od
ific
ati
on
Accessibility2013 Glitch
Page 18 of 32
27/06/2013 Page 18 of 32
Attachments
T Stafford
No
4/27/2013
Approved as Submitted
1008.1.5
Pending Review
No
Proponent
Affects HVHZ
Date Submitted
TAC Recommendation
Section
Commission Action
A6202
10Chapter
Related Modifications
Summary of Modification
Corrects a conflict within the updated code.
Rationale
Conflict with updated code. The terms Type A and Type B Dwelling Units are not used by the Florida Accessibility Code.
Fiscal Impact Statement
Impact to local entity relative to enforcement of code
No impact to local entities.
Impact to building and property owners relative to cost of compliance with code
No impact to building and property owners.
Impact to industry relative to the cost of compliance with code
No impact to industry.
Requirements
Has a reasonable and substantial connection with the health, safety, and welfare of the general public
Corrects a conflict within the updated code.
Strengthens or improves the code, and provides equivalent or better products, methods, or systems of construction
Corrects a conflict within the updated code.
Does not discriminate against materials, products, methods, or systems of construction of demonstrated capabilities
Corrects a conflict within the updated code.
Does not degrade the effectiveness of the code
Corrects a conflict within the updated code.
Is the proposed code modification part of a prior code version?
YES
The provisions contained in the proposed amendment are addressed in the applicable international code?
NO
The amendment demonstrates by evidence or data that the geographical jurisdiction of Florida exihibits a need to strengthen
the foundation code beyond the needs or regional variation addressed by the foundation code and why the proposed
amendment applies to the state?
OTHER
Explanation of Choice
Corrects and incorrect section reference.
The proposed amendment was submitted or attempted to be included in the foundation codes to avoid resubmission to the
Florida Building Code amendment process?
NO
(a.) Conflicts within the updated code;X
(b.) Conflicts between the updated code and the Florida Fire Prevention Code adopted pursuant to chapter
633;
(c.) Unintended results from the integration of previously adopted Florida-specific amendments with the
model code;
(d.) Equivalency of standards;
(e.) Changes to or inconsistencies with federal or state law;
(f.) Adoption of an updated edition of the National Electrical Code if the commission finds that delay of
implementing the updated edition causes undue hardship to stakeholders or otherwise threatens the public
health, safety, and welfare.
Accessibility2013 Glitch
Page 19 of 32
27/06/2013 Page 19 of 32
Pa
ge
: 1
http://w
ww
.flo
ridabuild
ing.o
rg/U
plo
ad/M
odifi
catio
ns/
Rendere
d/M
od_6202_T
ext
OfM
odifi
catio
n_1.p
ng
A6202 T
ex
t M
od
ific
ati
on
Accessibility2013 Glitch
Page 20 of 32
27/06/2013 Page 20 of 32
Attachments
T Stafford
No
4/27/2013
Approved as Submitted
1009.4
Pending Review
No
Proponent
Affects HVHZ
Date Submitted
TAC Recommendation
Section
Commission Action
A6203
10Chapter
Related Modifications
Summary of Modification
Corrects a conflict within the updated code.
Rationale
Conflict with updated code. The provisions of Section 1007 have been deleted and reference the Florida Accessibility Code.
Fiscal Impact Statement
Impact to local entity relative to enforcement of code
No impact to local entities.
Impact to building and property owners relative to cost of compliance with code
No impact to building and property owners.
Impact to industry relative to the cost of compliance with code
No impact to industry.
Requirements
Has a reasonable and substantial connection with the health, safety, and welfare of the general public
Corrects a conflict within the updated code.
Strengthens or improves the code, and provides equivalent or better products, methods, or systems of construction
Corrects a conflict within the updated code.
Does not discriminate against materials, products, methods, or systems of construction of demonstrated capabilities
Corrects a conflict within the updated code.
Does not degrade the effectiveness of the code
Corrects a conflict within the updated code.
Is the proposed code modification part of a prior code version?
YES
The provisions contained in the proposed amendment are addressed in the applicable international code?
NO
The amendment demonstrates by evidence or data that the geographical jurisdiction of Florida exihibits a need to strengthen
the foundation code beyond the needs or regional variation addressed by the foundation code and why the proposed
amendment applies to the state?
OTHER
Explanation of Choice
Corrects and incorrect section reference.
The proposed amendment was submitted or attempted to be included in the foundation codes to avoid resubmission to the
Florida Building Code amendment process?
NO
(a.) Conflicts within the updated code;X
(b.) Conflicts between the updated code and the Florida Fire Prevention Code adopted pursuant to chapter
633;
(c.) Unintended results from the integration of previously adopted Florida-specific amendments with the
model code;
(d.) Equivalency of standards;
(e.) Changes to or inconsistencies with federal or state law;
(f.) Adoption of an updated edition of the National Electrical Code if the commission finds that delay of
implementing the updated edition causes undue hardship to stakeholders or otherwise threatens the public
health, safety, and welfare.
Accessibility2013 Glitch
Page 21 of 32
27/06/2013 Page 21 of 32
Pa
ge
: 1
http://w
ww
.flo
ridabuild
ing.o
rg/U
plo
ad/M
odifi
catio
ns/
Rendere
d/M
od_6203_T
ext
OfM
odifi
catio
n_1.p
ng
A6203 T
ex
t M
od
ific
ati
on
Accessibility2013 Glitch
Page 22 of 32
27/06/2013 Page 22 of 32
Attachments
T Stafford
No
4/27/2013
Approved as Submitted
1009.7.5.3
Pending Review
No
Proponent
Affects HVHZ
Date Submitted
TAC Recommendation
Section
Commission Action
A6204
10Chapter
Related Modifications
Summary of Modification
Corrects a conflict within the updated code.
Rationale
Conflict with updated code. The provisions of Section 1007 have been deleted and reference the Florida Accessibility Code.
Fiscal Impact Statement
Impact to local entity relative to enforcement of code
No impact to local entities.
Impact to building and property owners relative to cost of compliance with code
No impact to building and property owners.
Impact to industry relative to the cost of compliance with code
No impact to industry.
Requirements
Has a reasonable and substantial connection with the health, safety, and welfare of the general public
Corrects a conflict within the updated code.
Strengthens or improves the code, and provides equivalent or better products, methods, or systems of construction
Corrects a conflict within the updated code.
Does not discriminate against materials, products, methods, or systems of construction of demonstrated capabilities
Corrects a conflict within the updated code.
Does not degrade the effectiveness of the code
Corrects a conflict within the updated code.
Is the proposed code modification part of a prior code version?
YES
The provisions contained in the proposed amendment are addressed in the applicable international code?
NO
The amendment demonstrates by evidence or data that the geographical jurisdiction of Florida exihibits a need to strengthen
the foundation code beyond the needs or regional variation addressed by the foundation code and why the proposed
amendment applies to the state?
OTHER
Explanation of Choice
Corrects an incorrect section reference.
The proposed amendment was submitted or attempted to be included in the foundation codes to avoid resubmission to the
Florida Building Code amendment process?
NO
(a.) Conflicts within the updated code;X
(b.) Conflicts between the updated code and the Florida Fire Prevention Code adopted pursuant to chapter
633;
(c.) Unintended results from the integration of previously adopted Florida-specific amendments with the
model code;
(d.) Equivalency of standards;
(e.) Changes to or inconsistencies with federal or state law;
(f.) Adoption of an updated edition of the National Electrical Code if the commission finds that delay of
implementing the updated edition causes undue hardship to stakeholders or otherwise threatens the public
health, safety, and welfare.
Accessibility2013 Glitch
Page 23 of 32
27/06/2013 Page 23 of 32
Pa
ge
: 1
http://w
ww
.flo
ridabuild
ing.o
rg/U
plo
ad/M
odifi
catio
ns/
Rendere
d/M
od_6204_T
ext
OfM
odifi
catio
n_1.p
ng
A6204 T
ex
t M
od
ific
ati
on
Accessibility2013 Glitch
Page 24 of 32
27/06/2013 Page 24 of 32
Attachments
T Stafford
No
4/27/2013
Approved as Submitted
1010.7.4
Pending Review
No
Proponent
Affects HVHZ
Date Submitted
TAC Recommendation
Section
Commission Action
A6205
10Chapter
Related Modifications
Summary of Modification
Corrects a conflict within the updated code.
Rationale
Conflict with updated code. The provisions of Chapter 11 have been deleted and reference the Florida Accessibility Code.
Fiscal Impact Statement
Impact to local entity relative to enforcement of code
No impact to local entities.
Impact to building and property owners relative to cost of compliance with code
No impact to building and property owners.
Impact to industry relative to the cost of compliance with code
No impact to industry.
Requirements
Has a reasonable and substantial connection with the health, safety, and welfare of the general public
Corrects a conflict within the updated code.
Strengthens or improves the code, and provides equivalent or better products, methods, or systems of construction
Corrects a conflict within the updated code.
Does not discriminate against materials, products, methods, or systems of construction of demonstrated capabilities
Corrects a conflict within the updated code.
Does not degrade the effectiveness of the code
Corrects a conflict within the updated code.
Is the proposed code modification part of a prior code version?
YES
The provisions contained in the proposed amendment are addressed in the applicable international code?
NO
The amendment demonstrates by evidence or data that the geographical jurisdiction of Florida exihibits a need to strengthen
the foundation code beyond the needs or regional variation addressed by the foundation code and why the proposed
amendment applies to the state?
OTHER
Explanation of Choice
Corrects and incorrect section reference.
The proposed amendment was submitted or attempted to be included in the foundation codes to avoid resubmission to the
Florida Building Code amendment process?
NO
(a.) Conflicts within the updated code;X
(b.) Conflicts between the updated code and the Florida Fire Prevention Code adopted pursuant to chapter
633;
(c.) Unintended results from the integration of previously adopted Florida-specific amendments with the
model code;
(d.) Equivalency of standards;
(e.) Changes to or inconsistencies with federal or state law;
(f.) Adoption of an updated edition of the National Electrical Code if the commission finds that delay of
implementing the updated edition causes undue hardship to stakeholders or otherwise threatens the public
health, safety, and welfare.
Accessibility2013 Glitch
Page 25 of 32
27/06/2013 Page 25 of 32
Pa
ge
: 1
http://w
ww
.flo
ridabuild
ing.o
rg/U
plo
ad/M
odifi
catio
ns/
Rendere
d/M
od_6205_T
ext
OfM
odifi
catio
n_1.p
ng
A6205 T
ex
t M
od
ific
ati
on
Accessibility2013 Glitch
Page 26 of 32
27/06/2013 Page 26 of 32
Attachments
Ken Cureton
No
4/19/2013
Approved as Submitted
106
Pending Review
Yes
Proponent
Affects HVHZ
Date Submitted
TAC Recommendation
Section
Commission Action
A6083
11Chapter
Related Modifications
None
Summary of Modification
Revise the definition for the term “Commercial Facilities” for consistency with 28 CFR Part 36 (2010).
Rationale
Revise definition for “Commercial Facilities” for consistency with 28 CFR Part 36 (2010). See attached.
Fiscal Impact Statement
Impact to local entity relative to enforcement of code
None
Impact to building and property owners relative to cost of compliance with code
None
Impact to industry relative to the cost of compliance with code
None
Requirements
Has a reasonable and substantial connection with the health, safety, and welfare of the general public
Yes
Strengthens or improves the code, and provides equivalent or better products, methods, or systems of construction
Yes
Does not discriminate against materials, products, methods, or systems of construction of demonstrated capabilities
Does not discriminate against materials, products, methods, or systems of construction of demonstrated capabilities.
Does not degrade the effectiveness of the code
Does not degrade the effectiveness of the code.
Is the proposed code modification part of a prior code version?
YES
The provisions contained in the proposed amendment are addressed in the applicable international code?
NO
The amendment demonstrates by evidence or data that the geographical jurisdiction of Florida exihibits a need to strengthen
the foundation code beyond the needs or regional variation addressed by the foundation code and why the proposed
amendment applies to the state?
OTHER
Explanation of Choice
For consistency with Federal Law
The proposed amendment was submitted or attempted to be included in the foundation codes to avoid resubmission to the
Florida Building Code amendment process?
NO
(a.) Conflicts within the updated code;
(b.) Conflicts between the updated code and the Florida Fire Prevention Code adopted pursuant to chapter
633;
(c.) Unintended results from the integration of previously adopted Florida-specific amendments with the
model code;
(d.) Equivalency of standards;
(e.) Changes to or inconsistencies with federal or state law;X
(f.) Adoption of an updated edition of the National Electrical Code if the commission finds that delay of
implementing the updated edition causes undue hardship to stakeholders or otherwise threatens the public
health, safety, and welfare.
Accessibility2013 Glitch
Page 27 of 32
27/06/2013 Page 27 of 32
Pa
ge
: 1
http://w
ww
.flo
ridabuild
ing.o
rg/U
plo
ad/M
odifi
catio
ns/
Rendere
d/M
od_6083_T
ext
OfM
odifi
catio
n_1.p
ng
A6083 T
ex
t M
od
ific
ati
on
Accessibility2013 Glitch
Page 28 of 32
27/06/2013 Page 28 of 32
Pa
ge
: 1
http://w
ww
.flo
ridabuild
ing.o
rg/U
plo
ad/M
odifi
catio
ns/
Rendere
d/M
od_6083_R
atio
nale
_M
od 6
083 A
ttach
ment A
1_1.p
ng
A6083 R
ati
on
ale
Accessibility2013 Glitch
Page 29 of 32
27/06/2013 Page 29 of 32
Attachments
Ken Cureton
No
4/19/2013
Approved as Submitted
224
Pending Review
No
Proponent
Affects HVHZ
Date Submitted
TAC Recommendation
Section
Commission Action
A6084
11Chapter
Related Modifications
None
Summary of Modification
Revise Table 224.2 to correct tabular reference to indicate Section 224.6.3, which includes language regarding values in Table 224.2.
Rationale
Corrects tabular reference to indicate Section 224.6.3, which includes language regarding values in Table 224.2.
Fiscal Impact Statement
Impact to local entity relative to enforcement of code
None
Impact to building and property owners relative to cost of compliance with code
None
Impact to industry relative to the cost of compliance with code
None
Requirements
Has a reasonable and substantial connection with the health, safety, and welfare of the general public
Yes
Strengthens or improves the code, and provides equivalent or better products, methods, or systems of construction
Yes
Does not discriminate against materials, products, methods, or systems of construction of demonstrated capabilities
Does not discriminate against materials, products, methods, or systems of construction of demonstrated capabilities.
Does not degrade the effectiveness of the code
Does not degrade the effectiveness of the code.
Is the proposed code modification part of a prior code version?
YES
The provisions contained in the proposed amendment are addressed in the applicable international code?
NO
The amendment demonstrates by evidence or data that the geographical jurisdiction of Florida exihibits a need to strengthen
the foundation code beyond the needs or regional variation addressed by the foundation code and why the proposed
amendment applies to the state?
OTHER
Explanation of Choice
Editorial / correct reference section.
The proposed amendment was submitted or attempted to be included in the foundation codes to avoid resubmission to the
Florida Building Code amendment process?
NO
(a.) Conflicts within the updated code;X
(b.) Conflicts between the updated code and the Florida Fire Prevention Code adopted pursuant to chapter
633;
(c.) Unintended results from the integration of previously adopted Florida-specific amendments with the
model code;
(d.) Equivalency of standards;
(e.) Changes to or inconsistencies with federal or state law;
(f.) Adoption of an updated edition of the National Electrical Code if the commission finds that delay of
implementing the updated edition causes undue hardship to stakeholders or otherwise threatens the public
health, safety, and welfare.
Accessibility2013 Glitch
Page 30 of 32
27/06/2013 Page 30 of 32
Pa
ge
: 1
http://w
ww
.flo
ridabuild
ing.o
rg/U
plo
ad/M
odifi
catio
ns/
Rendere
d/M
od_6084_T
ext
OfM
odifi
catio
n_1.p
ng
A6084 T
ex
t M
od
ific
ati
on
Accessibility2013 Glitch
Page 31 of 32
27/06/2013 Page 31 of 32
Accessibility2013 Glitch
Page 32 of 32
27/06/2013 Page 32 of 32