ACADEMICPERFORMANCEREPORTEaton Academy

November 2019

OUR MISSIONTo transform public education through accountability, innovation andaccess to quality education for all students.

OUR VISIONWe envision a diverse and dynamic public education marketplacethat fosters academic excellence for all children.

OUR VALUESIntegrity | Respect | Compassion | InclusivenessSocial Responsibility | Excellence | Innovation

Eaton AcademyTable of Contents

ACADEMY OVERVIEW

4 Demographics

5 Composite Resident District

ACADEMIC

6 Reading Achievement & Growth

8 Math Achievement & Growth

10 Michigan Test of Educational Progress (M-STEP) Achievement

11 Student Growth

12 Preliminary Scholastic Aptitude Test (PSAT) Achievement

14 Scholastic Aptitude Test (SAT) Achievement

END NOTES

15 Sources & Citations

© 2019 The Governor John Engler Center for Charter Schools at Central Michigan University Academic Performance Report 3

Eaton AcademyDemographics

99%

100%

99%

99%

98%

79%

86%

66%

76%

74%

12%

14%

14%

13%

15%

1%

1%

0%

0%

36%

38%

35%

36%

41%

Studentsof Color

Free/ReducedLunch

SpecialEducation

EnglishLanguageLearner

Enrolled3 or MoreYears

0% 25% 50% 75% 100%

2018−2019 2017−2018 2016−2017

2015−2016 2014−2015

ENROLLMENT BY SUBGROUP

Fig. D−1

346333345313

350

0

100

200

300

400

500

2014

−201

5

2015

−201

6

2016

−201

7

2017

−201

8

2018

−201

9

Stu

dent

s

TOTAL ENROLLMENT BY YEAR

Fig. D−2

63

3019

24

16

18

15

31

15

15

20

17

16

21

27

6

0

20

40

60

80

K 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8

Stu

dent

s

Students Enrolled 0−2 Years

Students Enrolled 3+ Years

STUDENTS PER GRADE

Fig. D−3

African American

YourSchool

American Indian

CMUAverage

Asian

StateAverage

Hawaiian

Hispanic

Multiracial

White

98.0%

0.0%

0.3%

0.0%

0.0%

0.8%

0.8%

44.9%

0.3%

3.3%

0.0%

3.3%

8.0%

40.1%

17.6%

0.6%

3.5%

0.1%

8.0%

4.2%

66.0%

RACIAL/ETHNIC BREAKDOWN

Fig. D−4

4 Academic Performance Report © 2019 The Governor John Engler Center for Charter Schools at Central Michigan University

Eaton AcademyComposite Resident District

The Composite Resident District (CRD) illustrates the public school district to which students would be assigned if they were notenrolled in the Academy. Due to geographical constraints, the map may not show all districts.

!(

Oakland County

WayneCounty

Macomb County

Detroit106

Roseville13

Grosse Pointe3

Van Dyke20

East Detroit201

Lake Shore1

Harper Woods5

!(

0 2.5 5Miles

EatonAcademy

!( SchoolStudentPopulation:

Lowest 25%25% - 50%50% - 75%Highest 25%

Student’s Resident District Number of Students Percent of Students

Eastpointe Community Schools 201 56.9%Detroit Public Schools Community District 106 30.0%Van Dyke Public Schools 20 5.7%Roseville Community Schools 13 3.7%Harper Woods, The School District of the City of 5 1.4%

Clinton Community Schools 4 1.1%Grosse Pointe Public Schools 3 0.8%Lake Shore Public Schools (Macomb) 1 0.3%

Fig. D-5

© 2019 The Governor John Engler Center for Charter Schools at Central Michigan University Academic Performance Report 5

Eaton AcademyReading Achievement

175

196

194

209

204

150

200

250

300

3 4 5 6 7Grade

Ave

rage

Sca

led

Sco

re

2016−2017 2017−2018 2018−2019 Achievement Targets

STUDENTS ENROLLED FOR THREE OR MORE YEARS AS COMPARED TO THE ACHIEVEMENT TARGETS

MAP® SPRING RESULTS − READING ACHIEVEMENT

25%

25% Students Met Target

75% Students Did Not Meet Target

2016−2017

11%

11% Students Met Target

89% Students Did Not Meet Target

2017−2018

14%

14% Students Met Target

86% Students Did Not Meet Target

2018−2019

PERCENT OF STUDENTS MEETING THE TARGET

Fig. A−1

6 Academic Performance Report © 2019 The Governor John Engler Center for Charter Schools at Central Michigan University

Eaton AcademyReading Growth

Grade 3

160

180

200

220

Fall Spring

Grade 3

Grade 3

Grade 4

Fall Spring

Grade 4

Grade 3

Grade 4

Grade 5

Fall Spring

Grade 5

Grade 4

Grade 5

Grade 6

160

180

200

220

Fall Spring

Grade 6

Grade 5

Grade 6

Grade 7

Fall Spring

Grade 7

Fall Spring

NA

2016−2017 2017−2018 2018−2019

Very Low (1−44) Low (45−49) Moderate (50−64) High (65−99)

MAP FALL−TO−SPRING RESULTS − READING GROWTH

49%

14%

5%

32%

64

2016−2017

20%

11%

3%66%

29

2017−2018

31%

15%5%

48% 46

2018−2019

Very Low (1−44) Low (45−49) Moderate (50−64) High (65−99)

MEDIAN GROWTH PERCENTILE & PERCENT OF STUDENTS IN PERCENTILE CATEGORIES

Fig. A−2

© 2019 The Governor John Engler Center for Charter Schools at Central Michigan University Academic Performance Report 7

Eaton AcademyMath Achievement

182

196

198

209

209

150

200

250

300

3 4 5 6 7Grade

Ave

rage

Sca

led

Sco

re

2016−2017 2017−2018 2018−2019 Achievement Targets

STUDENTS ENROLLED FOR THREE OR MORE YEARS AS COMPARED TO THE ACHIEVEMENT TARGETS

MAP SPRING RESULTS − MATH ACHIEVEMENT

16%

16% Students Met Target

84% Students Did Not Meet Target

2016−2017

8%

8% Students Met Target

92% Students Did Not Meet Target

2017−2018

<5%

2018−2019

PERCENT OF STUDENTS MEETING THE TARGET

Fig. A−3

8 Academic Performance Report © 2019 The Governor John Engler Center for Charter Schools at Central Michigan University

Eaton AcademyMath Growth

Grade 3

160

180

200

220

Fall Spring

Grade 3

Grade 3

Grade 4

Fall Spring

Grade 4

Grade 3

Grade 4

Grade 5

Fall Spring

Grade 5

Grade 4

Grade 5

Grade 6

160

180

200

220

Fall Spring

Grade 6

Grade 5

Grade 6

Grade 7

Fall Spring

Grade 7

Fall Spring

NA

2016−2017 2017−2018 2018−2019

Very Low (1−44) Low (45−49) Moderate (50−64) High (65−99)

MAP FALL−TO−SPRING RESULTS − MATH GROWTH

42%

14%6%

38%

56

2016−2017

13%

8%

1%

78%

27

2017−2018

18%

14%

3%66%

31

2018−2019

Very Low (1−44) Low (45−49) Moderate (50−64) High (65−99)

MEDIAN GROWTH PERCENTILE & PERCENT OF STUDENTS IN PERCENTILE CATEGORIES

Fig. A−4

© 2019 The Governor John Engler Center for Charter Schools at Central Michigan University Academic Performance Report 9

Eaton AcademyMichigan Test of Educational Progress (M-STEP) Achievement

9.2% 12.5% 9.8% 11.6%

19.5%21.6%

16.3%

17.0%

17.0%19.4% 16.5%

16.8%

47.3% 46.0%43.9%

44.3%

0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

2015−2016 2016−2017 2017−2018 2018−2019

Per

cent

Pro

ficie

nt

Academy Composite Resident District Local District State Average

PERCENT PROFICIENT FOR ALL STUDENTS IN GRADES 3 THROUGH 7 AS COMPARED TO THE COMPOSITE RESIDENTDISTRICT, LOCAL DISTRICT AND STATE AVERAGE

M−STEP ENGLISH LANGUAGE ARTS

* * * *

9.5%11.4%

9.4%

13.4%

9.3%10.9%

10.9%12.8%

37.3%

37.9% 37.4% 38.7%

0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

2015−2016 2016−2017 2017−2018 2018−2019

Per

cent

Pro

ficie

nt

Academy Composite Resident District Local District State Average

PERCENT PROFICIENT FOR ALL STUDENTS IN GRADES 3 THROUGH 7 AS COMPARED TO THE COMPOSITE RESIDENTDISTRICT, LOCAL DISTRICT AND STATE AVERAGE

M−STEP MATH

Fig. A−5

* Family Education Rights and Privacy Act (FERPA) – Federal law that prohibits student-identifiable education data from being publicly disseminated.A group of 10 or fewer students or percentage values of 5% or less is considered to contain student-identifiable data.

10 Academic Performance Report © 2019 The Governor John Engler Center for Charter Schools at Central Michigan University

Eaton AcademyStudent Growth

49

5250 5045 48 46

4043

4845 43

50 50 50 50

20

40

60

80

2015−2016 2016−2017 2017−2018 2018−2019

Mea

n S

tude

nt G

row

th P

erce

ntile

Academy Composite Resident District Local District State Average

MEAN STUDENT GROWTH PERCENTILE FOR ALL STUDENTS AS COMPARED TO THE COMPOSITE RESIDENTDISTRICT, LOCAL DISTRICT AND STATE AVERAGE

ENGLISH LANGUAGE ARTS

42

37

42 4342 4444

4240

45 46 45

50 50 50 50

20

40

60

80

2015−2016 2016−2017 2017−2018 2018−2019

Mea

n S

tude

nt G

row

th P

erce

ntile

Academy Composite Resident District Local District State Average

MEAN STUDENT GROWTH PERCENTILE FOR ALL STUDENTS AS COMPARED TO THE COMPOSITE RESIDENTDISTRICT, LOCAL DISTRICT AND STATE AVERAGE

MATH

Fig. A−6

© 2019 The Governor John Engler Center for Charter Schools at Central Michigan University Academic Performance Report 11

Eaton AcademyPreliminary Scholastic Aptitude Test (PSAT) Achievement

23.3%24.8%29.0%

61.9

%

0%

20%

40%

60%

80%

2018−2019

Per

cent

Pro

ficie

nt

Academy Composite Resident District Local District State Average

PERCENT OF STUDENTS ADVANCED OR PROFICIENT

PSAT GRADE 8 EVIDENCE−BASED READING AND WRITING

*3.5%6.5% 41

.4%

0%

20%

40%

60%

80%

2018−2019

Per

cent

Pro

ficie

nt

Academy Composite Resident District Local District State Average

PERCENT OF STUDENTS ADVANCED OR PROFICIENT

PSAT GRADE 8 MATH

Fig. A−7

* Family Education Rights and Privacy Act (FERPA) – Federal law that prohibits student-identifiable education data from being publicly disseminated.A group of 10 or fewer students or percentage values of 5% or less is considered to contain student-identifiable data.

12 Academic Performance Report © 2019 The Governor John Engler Center for Charter Schools at Central Michigan University

Eaton AcademyPSAT Achievement

Not Applicable

0%

25%

50%

75%

100%

Per

cent

Pro

ficie

nt

PERCENT OF STUDENTS ADVANCED OR PROFICIENT

PSAT GRADES 9 & 10 EVIDENCE−BASED READING AND WRITING

Not Applicable

0%

25%

50%

75%

100%

Per

cent

Pro

ficie

nt

PERCENT OF STUDENTS ADVANCED OR PROFICIENT

PSAT GRADES 9 & 10 MATH

Fig. A−8

© 2019 The Governor John Engler Center for Charter Schools at Central Michigan University Academic Performance Report 13

Eaton AcademyScholastic Aptitude Test (SAT) Achievement

Not Applicable

0%

25%

50%

75%

100%

Per

cent

Pro

ficie

nt

PERCENT PROFICIENT FOR ALL STUDENTS IN GRADE 11 AS COMPARED TO THE COMPOSITE RESIDENTDISTRICT, LOCAL DISTRICT AND STATE AVERAGE

GRADE 11 SAT EVIDENCE−BASED READING AND WRITING

Not Applicable

0%

25%

50%

75%

100%

Per

cent

Pro

ficie

nt

PERCENT PROFICIENT FOR ALL STUDENTS IN GRADE 11 AS COMPARED TO THE COMPOSITE RESIDENTDISTRICT, LOCAL DISTRICT AND STATE AVERAGE

GRADE 11 SAT MATH

Fig. A−9

14 Academic Performance Report © 2019 The Governor John Engler Center for Charter Schools at Central Michigan University

Eaton AcademySources & Citations

Fig. D-1 CEPI Public Data; Michigan Student Data System (MSDS) fall – UnauditedFig. D-2 CEPI Public DataFig. D-3 MSDS fall – Unaudited; The display of 3+ students in kindergarten and first grade is due to the enrollment date provided in the fall MSDS.Fig. D-4 MSDS fall – UnauditedFig. D-5 MSDS fall – UnauditedFig. A-1 NWEA’s MAP: reading – spring; MSDS fall – UnauditedFig. A-2 NWEA’s MAP: reading – springFig. A-3 NWEA’s MAP: math – spring; MSDS fall – UnauditedFig. A-4 NWEA’s MAP: math – springFig. A-5 Spring M-STEP – Student-level and Public DataFig. A-6 Spring MI-Access, M-STEP, PSAT 8, SAT – Student-level and Public DataFig. A-7 Spring PSAT 8 – Student-level and Public DataFig. A-8 Spring PSAT 9 & 10 – Student-levelFig. A-9 Spring SAT – Student-level and Public Data

© 2019 The Governor John Engler Center for Charter Schools at Central Michigan University Academic Performance Report 15

THE GOVERNOR JOHN ENGLER CENTER FOR CHARTER SCHOOLSCENTRAL MICHIGAN UNIVERSITY | MOUNT PLEASANT, MI 48859

(989) 774-2100 | www.TheCenterForCharters.org