a watershed approach to decentralized wastewater management
DESCRIPTION
A Watershed Approach to Decentralized Wastewater Management. Need for a watershed approach. Single-focus approaches limit the range of possibilities Many current water quality problems are from non-point sources (includes onsites) - PowerPoint PPT PresentationTRANSCRIPT
A Watershed Approach to Decentralized Wastewater Management
Need for a watershed approach
• Single-focus approaches limit the range of possibilities
• Many current water quality problems are from non-point sources (includes onsites)
• Land use/cover/management and wastewater/stormwater management are key issues
• Lack of integrated planning = poor results + wasted $$
Context for planning & management
• We have problems– Polluted waters– Organizational disconnects– Diffused authority– Few resources
• We have solutions– Interested people– Improving science & technology– Better assessment & other tools
Statutory and regulatory context
• Clean Water Act– Water quality standards– NPDES discharge permits– Stream & wetland “filling”
• Safe Drinking Water Act– Class V (large capacity systems)– Source water protection
• Public health codes– Residential wastewater
• Local Codes– Planning/zoning, subdivision, etc.
Source Water Protection Map for Slate Creek (Montgomery County
KY)
Clean Water Act Part I: Technology Based
NPDES Highlights• Point Source: Any discernable, confined,
discrete conveyance, including pipes and ditches
• Pollutant: Chemical wastes, biological materials, sewage, etc.
• Waters of the US: Interstate waters & wetlands, waters used in interstate & foreign commerce, and their tributaries & adjacent wetlands; the seas at high tide
Clean Water Act Part II:Water Quality Standards
•What are you using it for?
•What criteria support that use?
•How will you keep it from degrading?
WQS: development and implementation process
• WQS established by states and tribes; USEPA must review/approve prior to becoming effective
• If USEPA disapproves a state or tribe WQS and state or tribe doesn't revise it, USEPA promulgates a WQS
• Public review and comment at state, tribe, and federal levels
Recreational Uses– Primary contact (swimming)– Secondary contact (boating, etc.
Drinking water supply uses
– Filtered/unfiltered
Warmwater/coldwater aquatic life uses
WQS: Water Quality Criteria (WQC)
• Consistent scientifically with protecting all designated uses (DUs)
• Basic types of criteria– Narrative/numeric– Water column/sediment/ fish tissue
• Categories of criteria– Aquatic life
• Pollutant-specific/aquatic community indices– Human health (drinking/fish consumption)– Wildlife (semiaquatic/food chain effects)
Parameter Value Units
Dissolved Oxygen >5.0 milligrams/liter
pH 6-9 Standard Units
Un-ionized Amonia-N
<0.05 mg/l
Fecal Coliform <400 Colonies/100ml
Temp <25 Degrees C
Example: Numeric criteria for warmwater aquatic habitat
WQS: antidegradation provisions
• Purpose: Prevent deterioration of existing levels of good water quality
• States must have antideg policy & an implementation procedure
• Three tiers of protection– Tier 1: must maintain water quality criteria– Tier 2: must justify lowering WQ – Tier 3: outstanding waters cannot be
degraded
Identifying water quality problems
• Ongoing state monitoring to determine if WQSs are being met (Sec. 305b)
• Waters that are impaired or threatened are placed on the 303(d) list
• TMDLs must be developed for problem parameters
• TMDLs ID sources & propose needed pollutant reductions
Leading causes & sources of impairment
• Causes– Siltation (sediment)– Nutrients– Pathogens (bacteria)– Oxygen-depleting
substances– Pesticides
• Sources– Agriculture– Municipal point sources– Hydromodification– Habitat modification– Resource extraction– Urban runoff / storm
sewers
Addressing Water Quality
Issues via a Watershed Approach
EPA’s New Watershed Planning Handbook
http://www.epa.gov/owow/nps/watershed_handbook/
WatershedsWatersheds Subwatershed(14-digit HUC
or small urban
drainage)
Watershed(11-digit HUC; may
vary)
River Basin
07 07
01010202
0303
0404
05050606
A watershed approach helps to...A watershed approach helps to...
2. Facilitate Communication
and Partnerships3. Provide Means of
Cost-Effective Management
1. Encourage Sound Science
4. Focus on Environmental
Results
Watershed Mgmt. Plans
Point Source IssuesNonpoint Source Issues
TMDLs & Implementation PlansSource Water Protection PlansWater Resource Dev./Supply
PlansAnimal Feeding OperationsErosion & Sediment Control
Channel & Lake Restoration PlansCoastal Mgmt / Nat’l Estuary
ProgramDecentralized Wastewater Mgmt
Plans
Ag/Range Management PlansForest/Fisheries Management
PlansFloodplain, Parks, Planning &
Zoning
POTW 208 & CSO/SSO PlansStormwater Permit Activities
Watershed Planning Steps
STEP 1BUILD PARTNERSHIPS–ID stakeholders–ID issues of concern–Set preliminary goals–Develop indicators–Conduct outreach
Watershed Planning Steps
STEP 1BUILD PARTNERSHIPS
–ID stakeholders–ID issues of concern–Set preliminary goals–Develop indicators–Conduct outreach
STEP 2CHARACTERIZE WATERSHED
–Gather existing data–Create data inventory–ID data gaps–Collect additional data, if needed–Analyze data–ID causes and sources–Estimate pollutant loads
Watershed Planning Steps
STEP 1BUILD PARTNERSHIPS
–ID stakeholders–ID issues of concern–Set preliminary goals–Develop indicators–Conduct outreach
STEP 2CHARACTERIZE WATERSHED
–Gather existing data–Create data inventory–ID data gaps–Collect additional data, if needed–Analyze data–ID causes and sources–Estimate pollutant loads
STEP 3FINALIZE GOALS AND IDENTIFY SOLUTIONS
–Set goals and management objectives–Develop indicators/targets–Determine load reductions needed–ID critical areas–ID management measures needed
k
Watershed Planning Steps
STEP 1BUILD PARTNERSHIPS
–ID stakeholders–ID issues of concern–Set preliminary goals–Develop indicators–Conduct outreach
STEP 2CHARACTERIZE WATERSHED
–Gather existing data–Create data inventory–ID data gaps–Collect additional data, if needed–Analyze data–ID causes and sources–Estimate pollutant loads
STEP 3FINALIZE GOALS AND ID SOLUTIONS
–Set goals and management objectives–Develop indicators/targets–Determine load reductions needed–ID critical areas–ID management measures needed
STEP 4DESIGN IMPLEMENTATION PROGRAM
–Develop Implementation schedule–Set Interim milestones–Determine how you will measure success–Develop monitoring component–Develop evaluation process–ID technical and financial assistance needed–Assign responsibility
k
Watershed Planning Steps
STEP 1BUILD PARTNERSHIPS
–ID stakeholders–ID issues of concern–Set preliminary goals–Develop indicators–Conduct outreach
STEP 2CHARACTERIZE WATERSHED
–Gather existing data–Create data inventory–ID data gaps–Collect additional data, if needed–Analyze data–ID causes and sources–Estimate pollutant loads
STEP 3FINALIZE GOALS AND ID SOLUTIONS
–Set goals and management objectives–Develop indicators/targets–Determine load reductions needed–ID critical areas–ID management measures needed
STEP 4DESIGN IMPLEMENTATION PROGRAM
–Develop Implementation schedule–Set Interim milestones–Determine how you will measure success–Develop monitoring component–Develop evaluation process–ID technical and financial assistance needed–Assign responsibility
STEP 5IMPLEMENT WATERSHED PLAN
–Implement management strategies–Conduct monitoring –Conduct outreach activities
k
Watershed Planning Steps
STEP 1BUILD PARTNERSHIPS–ID stakeholders–ID issues of concern–Set preliminary goals–Develop indicators–Conduct outreach
STEP 2CHARACTERIZE WATERSHED
–Gather existing data–Create data inventory–ID data gaps–Collect additional data, if needed–Analyze data–ID causes and sources–Estimate pollutant loads
STEP 3FINALIZE GOALS AND ID SOLUTIONS
–Set goals and management objectives–Develop indicators/targets–Determine load reductions needed–ID critical areas–ID management measures needed
STEP 4DESIGN IMPLEMENTATION PROGRAM
–Develop Implementation schedule–Set Interim milestones–Determine how you will measure success–Develop monitoring component–Develop evaluation process–ID technical and financial assistance needed–Assign responsibility
STEP 5IMPLEMENT WATERSHED PLAN
–Implement management strategies–Conduct monitoring –Conduct outreach activities
STEP 6MEASURE PROGRESS AND MAKE ADJUSTMENTS
–Review and evaluate –Share results–Prepare annual plans–Make adjustments
Steps in the Watershed
Planning and Implementati
on Process
EPA’s Nine Elements for Plans
a. Identify causes & sources of pollutionb. Estimate load reductions expected c. Describe mgmt measures & targeted critical areasd. Estimate technical and financial assistance needed e. Develop education component f. Develop schedule g. Describe interim, measurable milestonesh. Identify indicators to measure progressi. Develop a monitoring component
Source: US EPA, 2004 319 Supplemental Guidelines
Incorporation of the nine minimum elements
Contents of the Watershed Plan
• Introduction– Plan area & description, partners, background
• Water quality information & analysis– WQ goals, monitoring/assessment results– Key pollutants / stressors, sources, current loads
• Proposed management measures– Load reductions needed, BMP types proposed– Reductions expected from BMPs, installation sites
• Implementation plan– Public info/education & outreach/involvement plan– BMP/$$/TA support sources, project schedule & costs
• Monitoring and adaptive management approach– Interim measurable milestones, load reduction criteria– Evaluation framework, monitoring plan & partners
Existing loads come from:• Point-source discharges (NPDES
facilities)– Info is available on the discharges (DMRs, etc.)– Some are steady-flow, others are precip-driven
• Nonpoint sources (polluted runoff)– All are (mostly) precip-driven– Calculating the “wash-off, runoff” load is tough– Literature values can be used to estimate– Modeling gets you closer . . . . do you need it?
• Air / atmospheric deposition– Can be significant in some locations
What is a “load?”
• Maybe measured by weight . . . – Kilograms of N per day– Pounds of P per week
• Maybe not . . . – Concentration-based expression of the “load”
(e.g., milligrams per liter)• mg/L x L/day = mg/day [C = m/v]
– # of treatment systems needing inspections, service/pumping, repairs, or replacement
– of miles of streambank needing stabilization or vegetation
– # of AFOs requiring nutrient plans
Combining data sources and modeling watershed “behavior”
Source: STATSGO Database, USDA-
NRCS
NRCS ratings based on soils,
slopes, and groundwater
Many assessment
tools are out there,
e.g., DRASTIC,
MANAGE, & others
Relating endpoints to models
Who will implement the plan?
Structure can vary widely– Public agencies
• Cities, counties• Water or wastewater utility• State agency or river authority• Basin planning teams
– Private entities• Watershed association• Ag producer council
Any well-organized single or multiple entity approach
can coordinate and document the effort
The good, the bad, and the unknown
Watershed assessment and management has the potential to change the way people look at wastewater treatment infrastructure
Rocky Mountain Institute
Cost/Benefit Analysis of Centralized
and Decentralized Wastewater
Options
www.rmi.org
The Good• Onsite & decentralized systems are not a big
problem in most places– Agriculture, “big pipe” treatment system CSOs & SSOs,
construction/development, urban runoff, & etc. are more significant– Notable exceptions exist in some localities, with high public
attention & interest in solutions (e.g., homes around a recreational lake)
• Decentralized wastewater treatment technologies are dependable & performing well, for the most part– Greater acceptance of new technologies in more places
• New focus on perpetual management can address poor public perceptions and improve acceptance– Management is also creating new business opportunities
• Combined sewer overflow and sanitary sewer overflow problems increase interest in decentralized approaches
CSOs locations in the US
CSOs and SSOs
• 850 billion gallons discharged annually from 43,000 combined sewer overflow events
• 9,348 CSO outfalls located in 32 states and DC
• $88 billion needed to address CSOs
• ~50,000 sanitary sewer overflows annually discharge 3-10 billion gallons
• $50.6 billion needed for SSOs
The Bad
• Approvals for new technologies still difficult in some jurisdictions
• Wastewater codes being used as de facto zoning in many locales
• System selection/design driven by site – rather than watershed – considerations
• Integration of wastewater and stormwater planning is moving slowly
• More technical expertise is needed in local regulatory and planning agencies
Folly Beach, SC Survey
The Unknown• How much $$ will be available (or not) for
wastewater treatment infrastructure?• Will public & private entities become more
willing to function as RMEs?• Will system users be willing to pay fees?• Will CSO & SSO enforcement drive more
cities to consider decentralized solutions?• Will planning & zoning ‘grow up’ during this
millennium?• Will ‘decentralized’ or ‘modular’ treatment
approaches gain widespread acceptance?• Are planners and builders making the
connection between low impact development & decentralized wastewater management?
Lot Yield Plan – Used to determine # of lots allowed by zoning, using a conventional subdivision layout
Source: Arendt, Conservation Design for Subdivisions
Source: Arendt, Conservation Design for Subdivisions
Site plan using conservation design principles