a history of the first regiment of massachusetts cavalry volunteers

714

Click here to load reader

Upload: akmmiller

Post on 22-Nov-2015

170 views

Category:

Documents


64 download

DESCRIPTION

A history of the First regiment of Massachusetts cavalry in the Civil War.

TRANSCRIPT

  • 4 o

  • ; ^^Ho, ^^-n. .-^9.

  • I

  • COLORS OF THE FIRST MASSACHUSETTS CAVALRY

    The Silver Eog'le ivas ffiren hy his associate Aides o7i Gov. Andrevi's

    staff as a compliinent to Lt. Col. H. B. Sargent.

  • A HISTORY

    OF THE FIRST REGIMENT OFMASSACHUSETTS CAVALRY

    VOLUNTEERS

    BY

    BENJAMIN W. CROWNINSHIELDMAJOR FIRST MASSACHUSICTTS CAVALRY AND BREVET COLONEL U. S. V.

    Wiit}) Hoster anu ^mistka

    By D. H. L. GLEASONBREVET MAJOR

    FOR THE FIRST MASSACHUSETTS CAVALRYASSOCIATION

    .

    ,i,, or coA/^-

    AIM 2 ]m

    BOSTON AND NEW YORKHOUGHTON, MIFFLIN AND COMPANY

    1891

  • A HISTORY

    OF THE FIRST REGIMENT OFMASSACHUSETTS CAVALRY

    VOLUNTEERS

    BY

    BENJAMIN W. CROWNINSHIELDMAJOR FIRST MASSACHUSICTTS CAvibRY AND BREVET COLONEL U. S. V.

    Mitt) Ho6ter anu ^mi&tit&

    By D. H. L. GLEASONBREVET MAJOR

    FOR THE FIRST MASSACHUSETTS CAVALRYASSOCIATION

    ^f^fnt^kr

    IAN 2^^.N^^K^'f^

    BOSTON AND NEW YORKHOUGHTON, MIFFLIN AND COMPANY

    1891

  • GO ^ M

    Copyright, 1891,

    Bt b. w. crowninshield.

    All rights reserved.

    The Riverside Press, Cambridge, ^fass., U. S. A.Electrotyped and Printed by H. O. Houghton & Co.

  • PREFACE.

    This history, written after so many years have gone by, is

    necessarily imperfect. It is mainly the recollections of an offi-

    cer of the regiment who was present with the colors continu-

    ously longer than any other. He has relied largely upon a

    good memory, fortified by a daily journal and his letters sent

    home ; but has also consulted the journals and letters of many

    other officers of the regiment, and, in considering many events,

    has had discussion of such with all available authorities.

    Opinions as to some events have differed considerably ; but

    the following pages are very nearly accurate. Individuals nat-

    urally see the same thing with different eyes, and in the con-

    fusion of a battle two men seldom see precisely the same thing

    when together. How, then, shall two at different parts of the

    field agree as to what took place ?

    Since much of the work was completed, late volumes of the" Rebellion Records," published by the United States Govern-

    ment, have given information and dispatches which were at the

    time of writing unobtainable. It is probable, also, that new

    light will for some time be given, as more is written about

    the war.

    The author wishes to acknowledge valuable assistance given

    by Colonel Greely S. Curtis, Majors D. H. L. Gleason, CharlesG. Davis, George H. Teague, Captain J. J. Higginson, Lieu-

  • IV PREFACE.

    tenants C. A. Longfellow and Parsons, Sergeant A. A. Sher-man, Co. C, S. N. Davenport, Co. A., and many others.On July 27, 1864, the writer was detached from tlie regi-

    ment, and the history from that date has been written fromdiaries and letters sent him, principally by H. T. Bartlett,Co. H, who at the time Avas detailed as orderly at division head-quarters.

    The history of the old companies I, K, L, and M, later theIndependent Battalion, has been comj)iled from various sources,largely from the notes and letters of Sergeant Andrew J. Clem-ent, of Company M (old).The statistical part of the history, involving great labor and

    time, has been written by Major D. H. L. Gleason. It hassaved the record of no' less than one hundred private soldiers,improperly reported on the rolls as deserters, principally be-

    cause correct information at the time could not be acquired.

    No doubt many soldiers of the regiment will look in vain tofind an account of something in which they were particularlyengaged. It aims to be rather the history of the regiment than

    of individuals. As already said, it is mainly the recollectionof one officer. This will explain Avhy some events seem to be

    given undue prominence over others which, perhaps, deservedmore notice.

    Such as it is, it has taken no small amount of the writer's

    time. He has aimed at truth and justice. If it shall assist inrecalling the stirring days from September, 1861, to July, 1865,

    in many fields of strife where the men of the First Massa-chusetts Cavalry followed the flag, the writer will be content.

    In its preparation he has been actuated by no other feelingthan the most cordial affection for aU his brother soldiers of theregiment.

    B. W. C.

  • CONTENTS.

    HISTORY OF THE REGIMENT 1

    CHAPTER I.

    Cavalry in Virginia during the War of the Rebellion .... 3

    CHAPTER II.

    In Massachusetts, September 11 to December 30, 1861 40

    CHAPTER III.

    In South Carolina, January 1 to August 19, 1862 51

    CHAPTER IV.

    Antietam Campaign, September 1 to November 28, 1862 68

    CHAPTER V.

    Winter before Fredericksburg, November 28, 1862, to April 12, 1863 93

    CHAPTER VI.

    Spring Campaign, April 12 to June 17, 1863 118

    CHAPTER VII.Battle of Aldie, June 17, and Gettysburg Campaign, to August 1, 1863 143

    CHAPTER VIII.

    Summer along the Rappahannock. To Centreville and back inquick time. Mine Run and to Winter Quarters at Warrenton,August, 1863, to January, 1864 167

  • VI CONTENTS.

    CHAPTER IX.Winter Quarters at Warrenton. Reenlistment. New Battalion,January to May, 18G4 193

    CHAPTER X.Spring and Summer Campaign. Rapidan to Petersburg, Mat to Sep-tember, 1864 203

    CHAPTER XI.Muster out of Old Men. Reorganization of Regiment. WinterBEFORE Petersburg, August 1, 1864, to July 18, 1865 237

    CHAPTER XII.The Third Battalion, from August 19, 1862 255

    CHAPTER XIII.Miscellaneous Recollections. Horses, Arms, Equipments. Names ofBattles on the Flag, etc 283

    ROSTER OF FIELD, LINE, AND STAFF OFFICERS, ETC 311Statistics of Companies 339

    APPENDIX 459The Regimental Band 461Engagements of the 1st Massachusetts Cavalry 466

    Engagements of Cos. I, K, L, and M, old 3d Battalion 468Losses of 1st Massachusetts Cavalry 469

    Casualties of 1st Massachusetts Cavalry 469

    Summary of Losses in the Union Armies 471Who raised the First National Flag at Richmond ? 474Commemorative Monuments 475

  • LIST OF ILLUSTRATIONS.For alphabetical arrangement, see Index, under " Illustrations."

    Colors of the First Massachusetts Cavalry Frontispiece

    Map to illustrate the Campaigns of the First Massachusetts Cavalry in Vir-ginia and Maryland, 1862-1865 in pocket

    Abraham Lincoln ^Gov. John A. Andrew Generals U. S. Grant, George B. McClellan, George G. Meade, P. H. Sheri-

    dan 12

    Generals W. W. Averell, A. N. Duffi^, Judson Kilpatrick, J. Irvin Gregg,J. B. Mcintosh, H. E. Davies 18

    Generals Alfred Pleasonton, David McM. Gregg, John Buford, George Stone-man, George A. Custer, A. T. Torbert 22

    Capt. Robert Williams, 1861 28

    The Ideal Cavalryman ; the Real Cavalryman 32

    Col. Robert Williams 38

    Col. Horace Binney Sargent 42

    Camp Brigham, Readville, Mass., Sept. 6 to Dec. 29, 1861 46Col. Samuel E. Chamberlain 52

    Beaufort Island 56

    G Company, Drayton Plantation, S. C '^Hilton Head, Jan., 1862, to Aug. 19, 1862 62

    Camp Williams, Beaufort, S. C, Jan. 21 to Aug. 19, 1862 64Lieut.-Col. Greely S. Curtis 72

    Antietam Bridge, Md. ; Potomac Creek Bridge, Va 78

    Lieut.-Col. Lucius M. Sargent "-'

    Lieut.-Col. John L. Tewksbury 88

    Plan of Camp at Potomac Run, Winter of '62-'63 94

    The Soldier's Dream ; Hut at Potomac Creek, Va 96

    Hartwood Church and Vicinity 1""'' Mai. Wm. F. White 1^^Maj. Henry Lee Higginson ^^"Maj. Atherton H. Stevens, Jr H"Mai. T. Lawrence Motley 12^

    Maj. Benjamin W. CrowninshieldMaj. Charles G. Davis 1^^

    Maj. Edward A. Flint 1^^

    Maj. Amos L. HopkinsMaj. Geo. H. Teague 1'*^

    Surg.-Maj. James Holland J^^Surg.-Maj. Albert Wood 1^^

  • vm LIST OF ILLUSTRATIONS.

    Surg.-Maj. Samuel W. Abbott 160Asst.-Surg. Albert R. Rice 164Asst.-Surg. Homer H. Warner 170Group of Officers, Horse Artillery 174Asst.-Surg. George S. Osborne 180Asst.-Surg. Samuel H. Durgin 184Lieut. Lucius W. Knigbt 190Camp at Warrentou, Va 194Lieut. Jolin L. Brigbara 200Lieut. Benjamin G. Mann 204Captains Lucius Ricbmond, D. B. Keith, Caspar Crowninsbield 210Captains Jas. H. Case, Horace N. Weld, Arnold A. Rand 214Captains Henry P. Bowditch, Randolph M. Clark, Myron C. Pratt .... 220Captains Moses F. Webster, Joseph C. Murphy, Herbert P. Curtis .... 224Captains D, H. L. Gleason, James J. Higginson, John Drew 230Captains James A. Baldwin, David W. Herrick, George L. Bradbury . . . 234Lieutenants Walter Miles, Edw. R. Merrill, Francis Washburn 240Lieutenants Lucius H. Morrill, George Blagden, Alton E. Phillips 246Adjutants Nathaniel Bowditch, Greenleaf W. Batchelder, William W. War-

    dell 250Lieutenants Albert F. Ray, C. Chauncey Parsons, George M. Fillebrown . . 256Lieutenants Charles A. Longfellow, P. T. Jackson 260Lieutenants Edward J. Russell, L. N. Duchesney, John W. Martin, Timothy

    P. Lyman 266Lieutenants Harry D. Littlefield, George W. Flagg 272Lieutenants C. W. Dyer, Duett C. Clark, J. O. Josselyu 276Q. M. Sergeants Edw. H. Adams, Horatio Wood, Josiah N. Brackett . . . 280Capt. B. W. Crowninsbield 288

    Regimental Band.

    William Finney, W. J. Caswell, A. R. Bryant, E. H. Gooding, Frank M. Lund 292Dugald Mclnnis, Henry F. Wood, S. N. Davenport, A. W. Tyler, Henry C.

    W^eston 296Tyler Harding, Geo. A. Abel, George W. Filley, William H. Rice, Gerry R.Walker " . . 302

    A Company.J. Heinrich Hess, Lorenzo L. Howes, Thos. F. B. McDevitt, Corp. Gustave

    Evers, Edw. W. F. Macinaw, Chauncey Pettibone, Herbert Maycock . . . 308Sergt. Richard Walsh, Sergt. George H. Cavanaugh, Josiah D. Patterson, J. W.

    Richardson, Sebastian Zimmerman, Elijah Willard 314

    B Company.Lemuel Wood 318Corp. Joseph Gay, Peter S. King, Alexander McDonald, Isaac H. Preseott,

    Albert S. Shepard, Herbert L. Sliepard, Corp. George M. Washburne . . 322Alvan Barrus, Corp. William B. Buchanan, Sergt. William Tobey, Sergt.Thomas Preston, Jeremiah T. Daly, Andrew J. Dunham, Edward Fahey . . 328

  • LIST OF ILLUSTRATIONS. ix

    C Company.

    Lucius B. Angier, William Boyd, Henry C. Davis, Alfred H. Keay, WilliauaH. Legg, William H. Overton, George H. Whitney 332

    Com. Sergt. Ethan E. Cobb, Sergt. William N. Davis, Sergt. John A. Glines,Q. M. Sergt. Samuel D. Gale, Sergt. A. H. D. Hobbs 336

    Corp. George Kendall, Corp. Oren H. Webber, Sergt. Charles A. Legg, Corp.Augustus Severance, Bugler Joseph F. Ennis 344

    D Company.Officers and Non-Commissioned Officers D Company, Gen. Meade's Escort . 348Bugler Murray V. Livingston, Daniel Shannon, S. D. Rogers, Q. M. Sergi. Eli

    A. Smith, Almon L. Switzer, Chas. H. Whiting 354D Company, Gen. Meade's Escort 358William Blasland, George Hobson, Sergt. John H. George, Wagoner Nathan

    C. Hooper, Richard W. Lakeman 364

    E Company.Robert J. Cochran, Henry H. Galloway, Sherman W. Hubbard, Sergt. Horace

    A. Sunbury, John D. Littlehale, John Melenfy^ Andrew A. Mason .... 370Amasa C. Morse, Jarius H. Shaw, Farnum Southwick, Hosea L. Thayer, Ed-ward W. Vial, Sergt. William O. White 374

    Caleb F. Abbott, Robert Bellew, Marcus Butler, Corp. Charles M. Smith,James W. Carpenter, Franklin Chase, Alphonzo F. Childs 380

    F Company.Sanford W. Lasor, Bugler William H. Sisson, Ciarles Lynde, Joseph E. Stack-

    pole, William E. Stewart 384Joseph Beals, Franklin L. Cannon, Com. Sergt. Edwin O. Hyde, Chauncey E.

    Peck, Sad. Daniel B. Couch, Benjamin F. Davenport 390Joseph E. Felch, John M. Fiske, Corp. Ichabod Sampson, Corp. George E.

    Woodbury, Seymour Gardiner, Andrew J. Hunt 396

    G Company.George H. Lombard, Bugler James T. Walsh, Sergt. J. Warren Ball, Sergt.

    Albert A. Sherman^qq

    Irving R. Cheney, Nathaniel H. Fish, Sergt. Frederick O. Crocker, Sergt. Or-rin W. Harris, Robert P. Skelton 406

    H Company.Michael Nennery, Daniel M. Ross, Bugler Henry T. Bartlett, Bugler William

    S. Sampson, Bartlett Shaw 410Bugler William Barker, E. A. Burnham, Sergt. Samuel W. Bartlett, Lewis

    Jones, Charles A. Kihlgreen 416

    I Company (Old).VirgU Marcellus Blaisdell, Com. Sergt. Edw. T. George, Samuel M. Patterson,

    Q. M. Sergt. J. H. Walker, Moody K. Stacy, William A. Vining, CharlesE. Groton

    ^ 422

  • X LIST OF ILLUSTRATIONS

    I Company (New).Irving Waterman, Stanton P. Allen, Corp. Charles B. Belcher, Nelson O.Bowen 426

    K Company (Old).Corp. L. Bartel, Alfred C. Belcher, Com. Sergt. Charles D. Bacon, Sergt.Frank A. Blaisdell, Bradford Hawes, William Welch 432

    K Company (New).Com. Sergt. Thomas H. Coville, Jacob Jackley 436

    L Company (Old).Corp. Amos Pierce, Corp. Gabriel Strang, Sergt. Edwin Chapman, Corp. James

    A. Willard, Lorenzo Bruce 442Sewall P. Ridley, Corp. A. R. Storer, Sergt. Lindley H. Stockbridge, Sad.

    William H. H. Wall, Preston Wood 448Merrick Cowles, Henry J. Hanks, Q. M. Sergt. William H. Fessendon, GeorgeH. Hill, Oliver D. Pratt 452

    L Company (New).Q. M. Sergt. H. W. Otis, Augustus M. Davis 456

    M Company (Old).Sergt. Robert Glenn, Sergt. Thomas Hickey, Orlando S. Kiff, Farrier Herman

    Mills 462

    M Company (New).1st Sergt. John Fisher, Edward Crabtree, George Crabtree, Farrier CharlesW. White 468

    Monument First Massachusetts Cavalry, Gettysburg, Pa 474Monument First Massachusetts Cavalry, Aldie, Va 476

  • HISTORY OF THE REGIMENT.

  • ABRAHAM LINCOLN

  • FIRST MASSACHUSETTS CAVALRY.

    CHAPTER I.

    CAVALRY IN VIRGINIA DURING THE WAR OF THEREBELLION.

    Before entering upon the history itself of the regiment, a good pre- Prelimi-paration will be to consider the general story of the cavalry of the two ^i^^-

    opposing armies in Virginia during the war of the Rebellion.The following account, in which the cavalry of the Army of the Poto-

    mac is described, with its difficulty of organization, its painful and slowsteps towards excellence, then its sudden burst into power, and finally itstriumph, contrasts the Union cavalry with the cavalry of Lee's armv, inwhich tlie march of events was just the contrary. There, almost in thebeginning, was a combination which gave it the supremacy. Gradually,as the Northern cavalry approached it in equality, the Southern cavalrybegan to decline. The two became equal in the spring of 18G3. In 18G4the superiority of the Northern riders was very marked, and at the end,in 1865, Lee's cavalry was almost annihilated, while Grant's began at FiveForks the downfall of the Army of Northern Virginia, and pressed it toits end at Appomattox.

    This article was written for, and delivered before, the MassachusettsMilitary Historical Society by the writer of this history in 188G.

    Several of the statements contained in this account will appear later iuthe regimental history, more elaborated. It has been thought better tobrave the repetition this causes, rather than make either account barrenby omission of anything that seems necessary to make it complete.

    When the war broke out, the North was by far less The Northprepared for the struggle than the South. The two prepTrnsections afforded a very different material from which the South.to organize an army.

  • 4 FIRST MASSACHUSETTS CAVALRY.

    The North In the North, particularly in the East, the populationunaccus- ii-i itomed to ot tarmers and mechanics, devoted to peaceful ])ursuits,amis.

    1 11was unaccustomed to all manner of arms, and as a rulestrange to any horse but a work-horse

    ; and not one ina hundred a good rider, while a very large propor-tion had never fired a gun. Nearly all horses keptfor pleasure were trotters used in harness and never

    miifa"*^mounted. In the South, every man and boy was fami-

    withweap- liar with all kinds of weapons, and especially skilled inthe use of firearms. The entire population was used tohorses, and all were good riders.

    Regular The regular army remained with all its organizationmained (cxccpt such officcrs as " wcut with their States " to thewith the

    r^ c ^ n-iititiNorth. Contederate army) with the North, and furnished the

    model for all three branches of the service. This modeldeveloped a steady infantry, a superlatively good artil-lery, never equaled in the South, and a cavalry betteradapted to fight in line than the Confederate, which ex-celled in individuality, and consequently for scoutingand irregular work. The Confederate cavalry waslargely composed of Virginia regiments, Avho foughton their own soil and were familiar with the remarka-ble system of by-roads, and who furnished scouts, spies,and raiders on our lines of communication, of singularability.

    The regru- To tlic Federal army were left the five old regularlarcavah"y.

    . , . .

    cavalry regiments, to which was added in April, 1861,a sixth. It was at first proposed to confine the cavalryof the Federal army to these six regular regiments

    ;

    and for good reasons, as things looked then. Thatwas the time when many of those who ought to haveknown thought the war would be an affair of ninetydays.

  • CAVALRY IN VIEGINIA. O

    Accordino: to European ideas, a cavalry soldier is not The cav-o i '^ 1 t o

    airy soldier

    supposed to be of any use in the field before a very ^^i^J^^^'^^^^^

    careful training at a cavalry depot, lasting from one to training.

    two years; and his horse requires the same time, or

    longer. In many armies the horses are specially reared

    for cavalry service in immense breeding establishments

    by government, and in time of peace the cavalry is

    mounted exclusively on such animals. Each regiment

    has a depot battalion, where the men are drilled and

    horses prepared for service in the field. Such an estab-

    lishment is thought indispensable. The regular cavalry

    of the United States has a cavalry depot at Jefferson United1 , T , States cav-

    Barracks, Missouri ; but, owing to the great distance airy depot.

    from where the cavalry is stationed, few horses are

    trained there, and the men are " licked into shape " in

    much less time than is the custom in Europe. Theterm of enlistment three years here and at least seven

    in Europe largely determines this, and the recruit has

    to learn his duty with his regiment principally. Fortu-

    nately, a large proportion of the enlisted men are vet-

    erans of many terms of enlistment.At the beirinnino' of the war it was impossible to Training

    properly train cavalry before putting it into the field, possible.

    and consequently whole regiments of exquisite green-

    ness were thrust into the Virginia mud in winter, thereto try to learn, practically without a teacher, from

    books and hard knocks, in a few weeks or months at

    best, what in Europe in the best schools, under chosen

    instructors and on trained horses, years only can accom-

    plish.

    It cannot, then, be wondered at that the government

    hesitated to enhst volunteer cavalry, and only yielded

    when the battle of Bull Run had shown the hoUowness

  • 6 FIRST MASSACHUSETTS CAVALRY.

    Expense ofequippingmountedtroops.

    Early cav-alry com-panies.

    of the ninety-day idea. Another obstacle was the enor-mous expense o equipping and maintaining cavah*y.

    The equipments for a regiment of twelve hundredmen alone cost nearly $300,000, the officers' pay wasgreater than that of the infantry, and a larger numberof artificers was necessary. It cost, in favorable times,

    probably fifty cents a day for each horse, and in inac-cessible places three or four times that, for forage alone.

    It was obviously questionable whether at any expensean effective cavalry force could be evolved out of the

    peaceful Yankee citizen, unused to horses and arms, inany reasonable time. But mounted troops were a ne-cessity, and with its lavish bounty the government didnot shrink at the expense, nor hesitate at the difficulty

    of the task.

    At first, the volunteer regiments were made up ofthe militia cavah-y companies, both North and South

    ;

    and all the companies in the first organized regimentsbore high-sounding names, which, in the Federal service

    at least, were soon forgotten. In the Confederate cav-

    alry the troopers generally owned their horses, and con-tracted for a certain pay (forty cents a day) to keepmounted. I can recall only one regiment in the Armyof the Potomac where the soldiers owned their horses,the 3d Indiana cavalry.We find in a Southern book, McClellan's" Campaigns

    of Stuart's Cavalry," the following apropos of horses

    and equipments :

    Cavalry of A consideration of the difficulties under which the cavahy of theof NortTJ Army of Northern Virginia labored will not be uninteresting to one

    who would form a true estimate of the services rendered by it.At the beginning of the war, the Confederate government, charged

    as it was with the creation of an army and of war material of all

    ern Vir-ginia.

  • CAVALEY IN VIRGINIA. 7

    kinds, felt itself unable to provide horses for the numerous cavalry

    companies which offered their services, especially from the State of

    Virginia. Many companies, organized as cavalry, were rejected.With those that were enrolled the government entered into a con- Contract111 1 with thetract, the substance of which was that the cavah-ymen sliould supply goveru-and own their horses, which would be mustered into service at a fair ^

    "

    valuation ; that the government should provide feed, shoes, and a

    smith to do the shoeing, and should pay the men a per diem of forty

    cents for the use of their horses. Should a horse be killed in action,

    the government agreed to pay to the owner the muster valuation.

    Should the horse be captured in battle, worn out, or disabled by any

    of the many other causes which were incident to the service, the loss

    fell upon the owner, who was compelled to furnish another horse,under the same conditions, or be transferred to some other arm of

    the service.

    That the government should have adopted such a policy at the

    beoinning of the war was a misfortune ; that it should have adhered

    to it to the very end was a calamity against which no amount of zeal

    or patriotism could successfully contend.

    It is not in the spirit of unfriendly criticism that we to-day pro- Unwisdom

    claim the unwisdom of such a policy. At the time, all acquiesced poUey.in it ; the cavalryman most cheerfully of all. Virginia was full of

    horses of noble blood. The descendants of such racers as Sir Ar- BloodedhorsGs

    chy, Boston, Eclipse, Timoleon, Diomede, Exchequer, Red-Eye, and

    many others more or less famous on the turf, were scattered over

    the State. Gentlemen fond of following the hounds had raised these

    horses for their own use. They knew their fine qualities, their speed,

    endurance, and sure-footedness, and they greatly preferred to intrust

    their safety in battle to their favorite steeds rather than to any that

    the government could furnish. But the government might have fur-

    nished these horses at the outset, and by suitable activity it might

    have provided for replenishing the losses incurred in the service.

    The cavalrymen were kept mounted, but at an enormous loss of effi-

    ciency in the army, and by a system of absenteeism which sometimes Absentee-

    deprived the cavalry of more than half its numbers. Why should ithave been thought that the people of Virginia would hold back their

    horses, when they refused nothing else to the government?

    The evil results of this system were soon apparent, and rapidly

    increased as the war progressed. Perhaps the least of these was the

    personal loss it entailed upon the men. Many a gallant fellow whose

    ism.

  • 8 FIRST MASSACHUSETTS CAVALRY.

    Loss sus- liorse had been irrecoverably lamed for the want of a shoe, or rld-

    the^menf ^^" ^^ death at the command of his officer, or abandoned in the en-emy's country, that his owner might escajje capture, impoverishedhimself and his family in order that he might keep his place in theranks of his comrades and neighbors. Nor should it be a cause forwonder if this property question affected the courage of many arider ; for experience soon proved that the horse as well as the man

    was in danger during the rough cavalry melee. If the horse werekilled the owner was compensated ; but a wounded horse was a badinvestment.

    Loss to the By far the greatest evil of the system was the fact that whenever

    from'^dis- ^ cavalryman was dismounted, it was necessary to send him to hismounted liome to procure a remount. To accomplish this required frommen.

    __

    ' ^

    thirty to sixty days. The inevitable result was that an enormousproportion of the command was continuously absent. Many of themen were unable to procure fresh horses within the time specified

    in their " details," and the column of "Absent without leave " alwayspresented an unsightly appearance. To punish such men seemed an

    injustice, and the relaxation of discipline on this point was abusedby some with impunity. We have already seen that Fitz Lee's bri-gade, which should never have presented less than twenty-five hun-

    dred sabres in the field, was reduced to less than eight hundred at

    Kelly's Ford, on the 17th of March, and numbered less than fifteenhundred men at the time of the battle of Chancellorsville, whenmany of the absentees had returned.

    Detriment Great as was this evil among the Virginia regiments, it operated

    ton'sTrl- with tenfold force upon the cavalry of Hampton's brigade. Thinkgade.

    ^ ggj,(j}ng a man from Virginia to South Carolina, North Carolina,

    Georgia, or Mississippi, to procure a horse! Recruiting camps were

    established in Virginia and in North and South Carolina, and every

    means which the cavalry commanders could devise were used toameliorate this state of affairs. But the inevitable tendency was

    downwards ; and in the last year of the war hundreds of men were

    gathered together in the " Dismounted Camp," or, as the men called

    it, " Company Q," in the vain attempt to utilize good, but misi)lacedmaterial. Special officers were appointed for these men, and the

    attempt was made to use them, dismounted, in various ways ; butDisheart- with no success. The men were disheartened. Esjyrlt du corps

    could by no possibility be infused into such an assemblage. Every

    man looked and longed for the time when his horse might be re-

    ened men.

  • :#^

    GOV, JOHN A. ANDREW

  • CAVALEY IN VIRGINIA. 9turned from the recruiting camp, or when some other kind provi-dence might remount him, and return him to his comrades. Thepenitentiary could not be more loathsome to him than his presentcondition, and yet even this was better than to give up all hope, andconsent to a transfer to the infantry or artillery.The want of proper arms and equipments placed the Southern Deficien-

    cavalry at a disadvantage which can hardly be overestimated. At equipment,the beginning of the war the troopers furnished their own saddlesand bridles. The English round-tree saddle was in common use,and sore-backed horses multiplied with great rapidity. After a timethe government furnished an unsightly saddle which answered avery good purpose ; for although the comfort of the rider was disre-garded, the back of the horse was protected. Our best equipmentswere borrowed from our cousins of the North. The question ofarming the cavalry was far more serious. Some of the more wealthy Armingof the Virginia counties armed their cavalry companies with pistols ^^''^^'when they were mustered into service, but whole regiments weredestitute of them. Breech-loading carbines were procured only inlimited quantities, never more than enough to arm one, or at mosttwo squadrons in a regiment. The deficiency was made up, gener-ally, by Enfield rifles. Robertson's two North Carolina regiments,which joined Stuart in May, 1863, were armed with sabres andEnfield rifles. The difPerence between a Spencer carbine and anEnfield rifle is by no means a mere matter of sentiment.

    Horseshoes, nails, and forges were procured with difiiculty ; andit was not an uncommon occurrence to see a cavalryman leading hislimping horse along the road, while from his saddle dangled thehoofs of a dead horse, which he had cut off for the sake of the soundshoes nailed to them.

    But in both armies the cavalry was a sort o elite Thecav-corps, and men preferred to enhst in that branch, prob- l/S corps,ably at the North because the would-be trooper pre-ferred riding to walking, with perhaps an idea that atthe end of a march his horse would be put up at someperipatetic livery stable. Certainly none had any defi-nite idea of the duties.The men were enlisted from all ranks of life with no

  • 10 FIRST MASSACHUSETTS CAVALRY.

    Enlist- reference to previous occupation and capability. Nofrom all selcction was even made according to size and weight,life. In Europe, except for the showy, expensive, and almost

    useless heavy cavalry which graces processions, opera-

    house entrances, imperial or royal drawing-rooms and

    staircases, and such pomps and vanities, a cavalry sol-

    dier must be light and active, and is especially selected

    for that branch of the service. An EngHsh authority.Beamish, says :

    European The men, therefore, intended for cavalry service should be se-

    "^"**u'alil-Ifi^^ted with the utmost care respecting their disposition, size, and

    cations for vigor of constitution, and should, above all, be chosen from thosetliis sGr~vice. who have been accustomed to horses from their youth, such as the

    sons of farmers, hostlers, and others who love horses, and are capable

    of taking care of them and likewise of the harness and equipments

    with which they are intrusted. From other men than these it is

    difficult, almost impossible, to form a good cavalry. "What, for in-

    stance, can be expected from a stocking manufacturer, or a linen

    weaver, who considers the horse a wild beast ? We all know thatsucli men rarely have confidence in their horses, but look upon them

    as their greatest enemies, against whom, for the future, they must

    struggle for their lives. They never learn to ride, never can pre-

    serve their balance, but hang on the horse like a senseless lump,

    which, in order to preserve its equilibrium, unnecessarily wastes a

    large portion of its strength, and on this account is soon wasted.

    The injudicious selection of men for cavalry may be productive of

    infinite mischief.

    Fitness But such principles were ignored in the great United

    Federfi'" States voluutccr army, and the men ranged from pigmy'"^*

    to giant, and there was never any authority for chang-

    intr them, after enlistment, into other branches of the

    service, according to fitness. Even later in the war,

    when experience should have taught better, whole regi-

    ments were recruited after the same ideas ; and as late

    as 1864 perfectly inexperienced company officers were

  • CAVALEY IN VIRGINIA. 11

    put over them, and in some cases even the field of&cers

    were quite as ignorant as the men.

    In the South things were better managed. The cav- Southern

    alrv service was especially well ora^anized. All South- better or-'111 i? 1 1 gamzed.

    erners were good riders, particularly those or the better

    class. A good horse was a gentleman's pride, and themore important the gentleman, the better his horse.

    Consequently, their cavalry combined the men of the

    best class, mounted on the best horses in the early

    days of the war largely thoroughbred or very well-bred

    animals.

    The officers were well-known men, of good social Well offi- cered.

    standing, and the field officers were many or them ot

    the old regular United States cavalry, I have under-

    stood that a considerable number of the old cavalry vet-

    erans of the regular army went South with their officers

    in 1861. Thus at the very beginning the Confederacy

    had a large force of capital cavalry ; every man a bold

    rider, well mounted, expert with revolver and rifle.

    In one respect alone was the Federal cavalry supe- Federal

    rior, namely, in arms and equii)ments, for these were oi better'

    '''

    '- ^\ ^

    armed andthe newest pattern. And yet even in this respect the equipped.advantage was questionable, for the government issued

    an overwhelming outfit. The poor soldier was oppressedwith his trappino-s and arms, and mounted for a marcli An over-

    >~ >~ ^^

    ^

    whelming'with three days' rations for himself and his horse, with outfit.

    saddle and bridle, wateruig bridle, lariat rope and picket

    pin, nose-bag, carbine and its sling, revolver and its

    holster, ammunition for both in their receptacles, sabre

    and belt, he looked little like the trooper Detaille or De

    Neuville loved to paint. The most difficult thing a re-cruit had to do when ready for the march was to get in

    and out of the saddle, and a derrick, sometimes, would

    not have been a bad thing.

  • 12 FIRST MASSACHUSETTS CAVALRY.

    Disposition The regulars, arriving from tlieir Western fields, wereof the reg- ii* iniii -r>uiars. at first pushed into the field by companies. Reorgan-

    ized later, they were so largely used as orderlies andheadquarter guards as to seriously impair their effi-

    ciency. As regiments they were not brigaded until1863, and were then small.

    Should It has always seemed to me that they should haveformed a becii filled up to the maximum and formed as a divi-

    sion, of three brigades of two regiments each ; whichshould have held in check, if it did not destroy, the

    Confederate cavalry in those early days when volunteerregiments were no match for the rough riders of theSouth, who also possessed the immense advantage of" fighting upon their own dunghill."

    At first, The regulars, in larger or smaller detachments, dur-smaii \\\cr the fii'st part of the war did brave work ; but theybodies. o 1

    _

    ? J

    were almost always used in small bodies, were usually

    outnumbered by the Confederate cavalry, and their ef-forts were frequently unsuccessful. At Gaines's Millsa most gallant charge was made by a small body of the5th cavalry, a desperate diversion to enable a new line

    to be formed, which succeeded in its object at the ex-pense of the cavalry, a gallant and heroic service.

    Nosepa- The volunteer cavalry, until 1863, took the fieldairy organ- usually as regimciits attached to separate commands;

    and also, occasionally, by brigades. Under good com-manders, notably under Buford, it did some handsomefighting. There was no cavalry bureau at Washingtoncharged with its organization and equipment, and par-ticularly there was no general having command overthe whole cavalry to direct its detail, and combine it forfield work. Thus the regiments were not systematicallyrecruited, or remounted as the horses became used up

  • GEO. B. McCLE_LAN

    Major General

    U, S. GRANT

    General

    GEO. G. MEADE

    Mnjor General

    P. H. SHERIDAN

    General

  • CAVALRY IN VIRGINIA. 13

    or killed. There was no combined movement of cav-alry, and no separate cavalry organization. The officerscommanding divisions and corps to which cavalry wasattached seemed greedy for as large a force of cavalryas possible, and very commonly nsed it up with unnec-essary and thankless work. There were many defeats,great discouragement, and demoralization resulting fromthis abuse. As a rule, success attended the Confeder-ates, and it seemed doubtful if volunteer cavalry in theFederal army was to be of any good.

    Until the summer of 1862, in the Federal army, the stuart ori-cavalry was groping about for its place in the field, the raid.while learning the elements of its duty. During thePeninsular campaign, under change of commanders, itdid nothing to gain a name, being hardly mentioned indispatches ; while Stuart won a brilhant reputation byhis march around McClellan's army, and originated the"raid" which afterwards became such a feature inevery campaign. Pope, in his retreat, exhausted his Pope ex-mounted troops by hurrying them hither and thither in mountedwild-goose chases. If his cavalry had been kept,on hisflanks and always close to his enemy, he would not havelost sight of him, and eventually found him in his rear.This short campaign illustrates most forcibly what I in-sist upon, that the Federal cavalry at that time hadno general who understood its proper use. On the con- Use oftrary, it was wasted and ruined in a service which stu- troops not

    .-.-

    .

    understoodpidly not only e^ave it no rest to prepare for an emer- by Federal

    ^. .

    eommand-gency, but placed it where it could not even do good ers.

    service. Lee used his intelligently, and with half thework it did not only good service, but gained a brilliantrenown.

    During the Antietam campaign the cavalry of Mc-

  • 14 FIEST MASSACHUSETTS CAVALRY.

    Inaction of Clellaii's armv did nothing; worthy of it. It moved aim-lan's cav- lesslj about. At the battle itself, about 8 a. m., theAutietam. wliolc division ci'ossed the Antietam on the Sharpsburg

    pike, and took a position close to Lee's centre, where hehad concentrated about thirty-five pieces of artillery,with which, at times, without infantry support, he held

    the town.

    Porter Portcr's entire corps, also, was within striking dis-

    strikeLee. tance, but lay all day just out of fire on this road, andamong the lost opportunities of the whole war none wasmore conspicuous than this. General Lee spoke of the

    Federal cavalry, " with a bravery worthy of a bettercause " taking up this menacing position. Several timesduring the day the men mounted, and sabres weredrawn, as all supposed, to charge, but the men were dis-

    mounted again without attempting anything.The artillery fire of Lee's guns Avas fierce, and to-

    gether with the fire of our own, of probably double the

    same number, across the Antietam Creek, the noise wasinfernal. This fire lasted all day, and this division ofcavalry lay here accomplishing nothing, losing a fewmen by artillery fire. McClellan, by his inaction, per-

    McCiei- mitted Lee to take troops from his right (while Bum-tionanad- sidc did Hot cross) to rchcvc his sorely pressed left.

    Lee. And then, after he had, with their help, stayed the ad-verse tide there, he took them and others back andfought Burnside's tardy troops when they did cross.On both right and left there were natural obstacles toMcClellan's troops getting into position to attack, be-

    sides Lee's veterans. In the centre was no natural ob-

    stacle. The bridge was intact and securely held, theroad excellent. It led straight to Lee's centre. More-

    over, it was already crossed by the cavalry, 4320

  • CAVALEY IN VIRGINIA. 15

    strong, and this force was within five hundred yards The roadof Lee's centre, well protected by the ground, and all centre.ready formed for battle. Antietam was my first largebattle, and I vividly recall the crossing of the creek.We suddenly came into the artillery fire before reach-ing the bridge, and it seemed as if the whole groundwas ploughed up by shells, and the air full of them.The bridge was particularly exposed. On it, as Icrossed, lay the dead body of the colonel of the 4thPennsylvania cavalry and his horse. He had just beenkilled by a shell. The casualties were here numerous.But very soon after crossing, cover was found for thecavalry division, and could have been found for Porter'scorps had it crossed, and a better place to put in troopswas impossible. Attention has lately been called to thisby an officer of the regular United States infantry,Avhose command was ordered out in front of the massedcavalry as skirmishers. He noticed the weakness of Weakness

    .

    of Lee'sLee s centre, unsupported by mfantry, and the excellent centre.

    opportunity to pierce it. He returned to General Por-ter and reported the situation in McClellan's presence,and entreated him to make the attack. At the momentPorter did not answer, but said later to McClellan," Recollect, my corps is your only reserve." ^

    The morning after Lee had, with perfect success. The daycrossed the Potomac, the cavalry rode down to the high retreatriver banks, looked across, stood and received the fire Potomac.of twenty-seven guns in battery at Shepherdstown for along time, and collected the very meagre leavings ofLee's army, a few abandoned wagons, a caisson or two,and other worthless trash. This was heralded in Mc-Clellan's dispatches as "the cavalry pursuing Lee's

    1 This story has been denied by General Porter, although asserted byothers.

  • 16 FIRST MASSACHUSETTS CAVALRY.

    routed columns across the Potomac, with captures of

    guns," etc.

    The (lay before (September 18), Lee's army wasMagnifi- beaten, not routed, and a magnificent opportunity of-tunityiost. fered for a dashing commander to score a real victory,

    one that might have gone far to end the war. That

    day the whole army rested while Lee prepared to cross

    the river. How he must have rejoiced that the Federalcommander was not an enterprising man !

    During the rest of the autumn the cavalry of botharmies was rendered almost useless by an epidemic,

    Stuart called " greased heel," among the horses. Yet Stuart,prestige, in wliosc commaud the same disease raged, managed to

    ride around McClellan's whole army, without any loss

    to his cavalry, capturing over a thousand horses and

    much other plunder, and causing our men no end ofwild-goose chases ; but, better than all that, so adding

    to his already great prestige, that his cavalry was feared

    as masked batteries were at one time.

    Picketing The following winter, in front of Fredericksburg,

    S ^ Whi- the Federal cavalry did picketing and scouting, notiil!" " merely on the flanks of Burnside's and Hooker's army,

    but kept open and protected the rear and in fact all the

    country from Washington down to the Rappahannock,and all about Washington, a duty that required the ut-

    most exposure, wear, and tear ; and at the same time

    added nothing to the glory of that ill-used branch of

    the service.

    In the spring of 1863 came a great change, which,

    for the Federal cavalry, might be called an emancipa-

    Hooker tiou. In February Hooker reorganized the entire Army

    izeTfed- of the Potomac. The cavalry was newly divided into

    airy.''^''' brigades and divisions, better officered than before.

  • CAVALEY IN VIRGINIA. 17

    Probably at no time during the war was tlie army inso good condition as in May, 1863. The cavah-y had May, i863.been ill-used during the winter, and the horses were notin good condition, but the discipline was first-rate, theregiments well officered, and fairly well drilled. Whilenot in comparatively such good condition as the in-fantry, the cavalry had greatly improved, and wantedbut a dashing general to win laurels.

    General Stoneman was supposed to be such a man ; stone-but he made quite as marked a failure with the mounted ure.troops as Hooker did with the whole army in thewretched battles about Chancellorsville. His carefullyprepared raid came to naught. For this the exceedinglybad weather was largely to blame.

    For nearly eighteen months the work had been scout-ing, picketing, and little encounters by companies orregiments, without any general leadership, without dash,enterprise, or success. How diiferent in the Confeder-ate cavalry ! TJiere, at the very outset, was an efficient

    force led to victory, and under such leaders as Ashby, Confeder-Stuart, and Fitzhugh Lee, made to feel they could do S^eadere.anything. They twice rode round the entire Federalarmy, in front of Richmond, and in Maryland, each timewith perfect success, and almost with impunity, underJ. E. B. Stuart, accomplishing excellent results in de-stroying and capturing, but particularly in learning thatconstant motion is the cavalry's forte, and boldness andaudacity are its protection.

    But the younger officers were getting to know theirduties, and the troopers were becoming educated to theirwork, and in the spring of 1863, under a new leader-ship, the Federal cavalry first asserted itself against theConfederate troopers at Kelly's Ford, and showed itself

  • 18 FIRST MASSACHUSETTS CAVALRY.

    At Kelly's at the battle of Brandy Station, June 9, 1863, fully aFord and

    i p ri ? i i'J

    Brandy match foi* Stuart s cavalry, and never afterwards provedotation.

    .

    ''

    a contemptible foe.

    I do not intend to say there were not gallant fightsmade by some cavalry commands, but that on the whole

    Unsuccess- the rcsult was thus far unsuccessful and unsatisfactory.Stuart and Fitzhug-h Lee and Hampton were con-stantly making successful raids upon the cavalry linesof pickets, and capturing men, horses, and wagons.They had the prestige, or, as it came to be expressed," the bulge " on us.The battle of Brandy Station was a severe fight, in

    which the Federal cavalry, about ten thousand strong,crossed the Rappahannock on a reconnoissance in force.

    Attack on and attacked all Stuart's cavalrv, of nearly the sameStuart. II- .^ J

    strength, on his own ground. The artillery was freelyused on both sides, and the number of guns was verynearly equal. After heavy and successful fighting allday, the enemy was put on the defensive, and made todevelop his entire force, and even bring up his in-fantry. In the late afternoon our troops recrossed the

    river unmolested, having fully accomplished the objectaimed at. There Avas more fighting than generalshij).This was, for the cavalry, the turning point in the war.^

    Confeder- The Confederates were never met before or afterwardsate pres-

    . i i itige lost, in such force. They here lost their prestige and never

    recovered it.

    Daily skir- 111 rapid successioii followed severe contests of theluislies.

    cavalry, successful for the Federals at Aldie, Upper-

    ville, etc., June 17 to 22, and engagements of more orless importance daily all through the campaign. Thecavalry of both armies was in constant contact.

    ^ McClellan says " it made the Federal cavalry."

  • GENL. W. W. AVERELL GENL. A. N. DUFFIE

    GENL. JUDSON KILPATRICK GENL. J. IRVIN GREGG

    GENL. J. B. MclNTOSH GENL. H. E. DAVIES

  • CAVALEY IN VIRGINIA. 19

    Ordered by Lee to keep on his right flank, and im- Stuart sep-

    able to break through the Federal cavalry, Stuart rode trom Lee.

    round its rear and crossed the Potomac between it and

    Washington, and, severed from him by the whole Fed-

    eral army, only joined Lee at Gettysburg the secondday of the battle.

    General Lee has claimed that Stuart's absence caused

    him great inconvenience, and perhaps ruined his cam-paign of invasion. Stuart's historian indignantly denies

    this, and apparently gives good reasons. Be this as it

    may, it is sure that during this campaign, in a series of

    almost daily encounters, the Federal cavalry came out

    best, not without getting roughly handled at times, but

    always making itself respected ; and up to July 3 keptLee's cavalry separated from his army, and prevented

    their help when most needed by him.Durin

  • 20 FIRST MASSACHUSETTS CAVALRY.

    The Con-federatepartisan.

    Meade'scavalry-grains inefficiency.

    GeneralSheridantakes com-mand.

    brought up the rear in the retreat. It was well handled

    and beautifully manoeuvred, and won the admirationof all who saw it ; but no chance for great distinctionoccurred.

    This year developed the Confederate partisan. Theflank of Meade's army and his long line of communica-tion by the Orange and Alexandria Railroad were ex-posed to constant attack by Mosby's battalion, White'sbattalion, company H of the 4th Virginia cavalry,the so-called " Black Horse Cavalry," and by othercommands who operated in that district, where the menwere at home. These attacks, which with little dangerto the attacking force were very sure of success, caused

    the presence of a large body of Meade's cavalry atWarrenton and other points on his flank and rear, be-sides a cavalry brigade at or near Centreville. TheFederal force accomplished little against Mosby andthe other partisan battalions, but this service allowed

    something like rest to Meade's cavalry, and guardedthe flanks and rear against any attack from regularConfederate troops.

    Meade was not a believer in mounted troops, yet heused his cavalry better than any previous commander,and under him that branch gained largely in efficiencyand prestige. Wintering in places where with the leastwear and tear the flanks of the army could be protected,and at the same time the men and horses drilled, it im-j^roved by good care and good food during the winterof 1863-64.

    Just before the campaign of 1864 opened, GeneralSheridan took command of the cavalry corps of theArmy of the Potomac, reviewing each of the three divi-sions in turn. May 2, 1864, his cavalry crossed the

  • CAVALBY IN VIRGINIA. 21

    fords of the Rappahannock, uncovered the roads on the

    south side, reconnoitred, and cleared the way until

    Meade and Lee were face to face. In doing this therewas some severe fighting with Stuart's cavalry, in which

    the Federal cavalry invariably had the best of it.On May 9, as the Wilderness offered no chance for

    mounted troops, the raid to Richmond began, followedby a series of bloody engagements which ended at Yel-low Tavern and Richmond. Stuart's cavalry was veryrouo;hly handled and he himself killed. This loss to Death of

    .

    Generalthe Confederacy was never made good. There were Stuart.

    enough good leaders amongst his generals, notably Fitz-hugh Lee ; but Stuart had been the leader for nearlythree years. Nobody doubted his right to the place,and after his death nobody quite filled it. He died ata good time for his own fame, for not even he couldhave chanofed the inevitable result that followed. It

    is no discredit that it was so. The Confederate cav-alry had fought long and well. The material for therank and file was constantly deteriorating. Their pres-tige became always comparatively less as it increased onour own side. Now we had a leader, and not one only.From inferior grades had sprung up a plenty of ablecommanders of divisions, brigades, and regiments. Cas-ualties in any rank, with a change of personnel, did notchange the efficiency of organization.

    The Confederate cavalrymen became better armed as Deteriora-the war went on, largely from captured weapons. Their Southern

    fine, well-bred horses went, never to return, and in 1864 men.

    they were not so well mounted as their Federal oppo-nents. Their granaries were laid waste, and a generaldecay set in that could not be stayed. All this was not

    without its consequences ; and we find all tlu^ough the

  • 22 FIRST MASSACHUSETTS CAVALRY.

    rest of the war an almost invariable success attendingthe Federal cavalry in its battles.

    Reverses Somc rcvcrscs wcrc inevitable. Success urjres alwaysand sue- " jcesses. to morc daugcrous deeds, and sooner or later to the

    impossible. Such was Wilson's raid to destroy Lee'ssouthwestern communication with Petersburg. Sheri-dan's Trevillian Station raid resulted in hard fio^htino:and equal honors. It did irre23arable damage to Lee'scavalry, for the losses of men and horses, particularlythe latter, could not be replaced. The Federal cavalryaccomplished little else that was tangible.The desperate attempt of Early to make a diversion

    in favor of Lee, by invading Maryland, led to theThe Vai- Valley campaio^n, and Sheridan took with him the lai-leycam- ^ ^ ^ ^ .paign. gest part of the cavalry, which in turn caused Lee to

    send most of his to oppose it.Here was a better country for cavalry than we had

    seen before during the war, and here the supremacy ofthe Federal cavalry was most marked. Here, for thefirst time, did the cavalry attack infantry in line on a

    large scale. By small bodies this had been done be-fore on both sides.

    Capture of At the battle of Winchester, the Confederate divisiona Lonied- 'eratedivi-

    ^f Gcucral Wliartou was ridden over in perfectly opencountry by our cavalry, and almost the entire division a small one was captured. I will go into this

    somewhat in detail, as it has been often asserted thatcavalry never during the war accomplished this feat.At the end of August, 1864, Sheridan, in obedience

    to his instructions, had withdrawn his army to Hall-town, near Harper's Ferry, on account of Anderson'sdivision of Longstreet's corps coming to reinforceEarly ; the Confederate infantry was pushed close up.

  • ALFRED PLEASONTON

    Major Geiil. U. S. V.DAVID McWI. GREGG

    Brvi. Major Genl. U. S. V.

    JOHN BUFORD

    Major Genl. U. S. VGEORGE STONEMAN

    Ma/or Genl. U. S. V.

    GEO. A, CUSTER

    Major Genl. U. S. V.A. T. TCRBET

    Major Genl. U. S. V.

  • CAVALRY IN VIRGINIA. 23

    While General Sheridan was at Halltown, he wanted Skirmish-. n . p PI- ing of pick-

    to have prompt inrormation oi any movement oi this eta.

    division, and accordingly Colonel Lowell, in commandof the " reserve brigade," ordered, in the early morn-

    ing, an attack by two squadrons of the 2d Massachu-setts cavalry ujion the infantry pickets. The charge wassuccessfully made upon what proved to be a South Car-olina brigade, and the greater part of a regiment wascaptured most gallantly. The attack was made at thesame hour and the same place on two successive days.On the IGtli of September, the 3d New Jersey cavalry a recently organized regiment captured an entire

    infantry regiment (the 8th South Carolina of Conner's sth Southbrigade, colors, colonel, officers, and men) in front of infantryWinchester, on the Berryville pike. These small affairswere duly heralded, and inspired the cavalry with dar-ing.

    The battle of Winchester was fought on the 19tli of Battle ofWinciiGS"September, Grant allowing Sheridan to attack Early, ter.

    after going to meet him at Charlestown. Grant says,speaking of General Sheridan : " I met him at Charles-town, and he pointed out so distinctly how each armylay, what he could do the moment he was authorized,and expressed such confidence of success, that I saw Grant bids

    , 111 IP* Sheridan,there were but two words or instruction necessary, "Go in."Go IN."At this time. Early, with his inferior force, had his Early's po-

    army spread out between Winchester and Martinsburg.His communications were upon a splendid road, the val-ley pike, and he could rapidly concentrate ; but his ex-treme divisions were twenty-two miles apart.

    Sheridan was at Berryville, eight miles from Win- Sheridan'sChester, his army well in hand and fortified with breast-

  • 24 FIRST MASSACHUSETTS CAVALRY.

    works along part of the line. The road to Winchesterwas fairly good, but the Opequan, with steep banks onthe east side, lay between, and had to be crossed. Adifficidt and narrow defile lay between the Opequan andWinchester, and it Avas not easy to rapidly concentratein front of Winchester, though the distance was not sogreat as that of Early's most distant division from thatplace.

    Attempts Sheridan previously sent all his cavalry but one divi-Early's siou, wliicli protcctcd the left flank, down to Summit

    Point, to cross there, and then march up the road toWinchester and come in on the enemy's flank. If histroops could get into position quickly enough, Early's

    divisions could be beaten in detail, and perhaps thegreater part captured.

    A very slight obstacle of water will cause great delayin crossing, and the little stream of the Opequan, nottwo feet deep, proved no exception.

    A race for Earlv soou fouud out wliat was ffoina: on, and forWinches-

    -i , ^ ^ .ter. hours it was a race between the armies to get into po-

    sition, one to attack and the other to defend Winches-ter. The gi'ound becomes open and quite clear asthe town is approached, and AVinchester is surroundedby rising ground, which commands all the approaches.Here Early's infantry was posted. The battle wasfought at most points in perfectly open country. Themovements of the Confederate troops about the town

    could be plainly seen, as they were placed by the offi-cers behind walls, and in some places were slight for-tifications with artillery. This was the case where

    Wharton's division was in line, late in the afternoon.

    As the troops came up slowly, Sheridan, impatient ofthe delay, attacked with the 6th and 19th corps, be-

  • CAVALBY IN VIRGINIA. 25

    fore either Crook's 8th corps or the cavalry got on the

    field.

    The attack was delivered just as Early had put his Sheridan

    infantry in position. On his left he had placed Gor- liariy.don's division in a piece of woods at a considerable an-

    gle with his front. The horse artillery was in battery

    on our right flank and poured in a very severe fire as

    our fine advanced. The 6th corps attacking on the left

    and centre was successful, with its 2d division on the

    left. On the right the 3d division, 6th corps, and 2ddivision, 19th corps on the extreme right, were repulsed

    and had to retreat, but the enemy made no attempt tofollow up his advantage at this point. The reserve,

    Russell's splendid 1st division, 6th corps, advanced and

    restored the 6th corps fine, Russell being killed; and

    on the right Dwight's 1st division, 19th corps, came

    into line and put things to rights there. Meanwhile,

    the 8th corps was coming up, and the cavalry in the

    distance was engaging Early's troopers. His flank be- Early's

    ing thus threatened by our cavalry. Early withdrew the thr|at-

    horse artillery and Gordon's division, closing in nearer

    to the town.

    Torbert, in command of the Federal cavalry, was driv- J^'^f^^s^ing Fitzhugh Lee steadily, slowly at first, then more treats.

    rapidly, and when the attack in front of Winchester was

    renewed with the 8th corps, he came up in chase of

    Fitzhugh Lee, whose forces speedily and energetically

    retreated towards and through the town.

    Our cavalry in pursuit, in line of battle, more or less

    disturbed by the speed of pursuit, came through the

    open fields until they suddenly saw in front of them

    Wharton's division of infantry in Hue, protected by a

    small fortification and by artillery. Instantly taking in

  • 26 FIEST MASSACHUSETTS CAVALRY.

    Our men tlie situatioii, tliey charged the line and carried all be-

    Wharton's forc them, riding over the opposing infantry and cap-

    turing many prisoners. I went over the ground the nextmorning at daylight, and carefully examined the place

    where this successful charge was made. Where Whar-ton's division had been in line was a slight hill sloping

    away north ; a large house was on his right, and in

    front of it a small work, in which had been apparently

    two pieces of artillery. Wharton's infantry had been

    in Hue to the northwest from the house, facing about

    northeast. Their arms lay in piles, or windrows rather,

    Where the wliere they had dropped them when the cavalry struckchl^^. them. The plain across which the cavalry had charged

    was dotted with dead horses, and many dead cavalry sol-

    diers lay about; one, that I particularly noticed, be-

    cause one half of his head was shot away down the lineof his nose so cleanly that not a drop of blood was vis-

    ible, lay just in front of Avhere a gun had been. I

    judged him to have been killed by the last discharge ofthe gun, when the soldier was close to it, trying to cap-

    ture it. An officer in Colonel Lowell's brigade saysColonel Lowell ordered him to charge this Hne of in-

    fantry and the guns, but before he could accompUsh it, having to collect his regiment, another body of

    Wharton's cavalry had done the work. Wharton's division at this

    moraUzed. time was the extreme rear guard, had been working

    hard all day, and was undoubtedly demoralized. Ear-

    ly's troops were going to pieces behind them. Defeat

    was inevitable and imminent. It v.as not a formidable

    force on account of these things. It was a small divi-

    sion in line of battle ; a good line admirably situated

    to deliver an effective fire. Two guns were there and

    in use. But the cavalry saw them only to charge

  • CAVALRY IN VIRGINIA. 27

    them instantly, and they did it well. In his book,

    " The Shenandoah Valley Campaign," Pond says noth-

    ing' of this.

    We captured in the battle o Winchester five guns, Captures,some colors, and about 2000 prisoners, chiefly of Whar-

    ton's division. Most of Sheridan's cavalry folloAved up

    that of the Confederate army, and drove it up the little

    valley, or Page Valley, as it is called, and was not pres-

    ent at the battle of Fisher's Hill, two days after Win-

    chester, where Early's infantry and artillery were drawn

    up behind works. Averell's brigade, however, was there. General

    In the afternoon he went into camp behind the right relieved.

    of Sheridan's line without orders, and when Sheridan,

    by a wonderful couj) cVml, had utilized his opportunity,

    turning a reconnoissance into a real attack, he sent for

    Averell to follow up the victory. Finding he had gone

    into camp, Sheridan relieved him on the spot.

    Recalled to the main army, Sheridan's cavalry pressed

    Early back beyond Staunton, in a succession of eager

    but small engagements.

    The Confederate cavalry, unable to cope with Tor-

    bert's bold riders, was reinforced by another brigade

    under General Rosser. Rosser on taking command

    boastingly proclaimed what he would do. What he did

    was to be fairly dashed out of the way, October 9^ at

    the battle of " Woodstock Races," as our men called it. ^'^Wood-

    His squadrons were ridden over and pursued twenty-six Races."

    miles, at a gallop. Rosser's artillery was all captured

    entire, guns, horses, men, and even officers. Rosser's

    headquarter Avagons Avere taken, or, as Sheridan re-

    ported it, " everything he had on wheels," and Custer

    came to headquarters wearing Rosser's best uniform.

    Fitzhuffh Lee was wounded at Winchester, and Rosser

  • 28 FIRST MASSACHUSETTS CAVALRY.

    Rosser sooii after assumed command of all Early's cavalry. Heinaiid. was not a West Point graduate/ but so well thought of

    that he was selected to fill Fitzhugh Lee's place, andwas heralded by somebody at the South, in advance, as"the saviour of the valley." He kept this title after-wards, and I fancy it proved somewhat distressing tohim.

    One of the Confederate batteries captured at " Wood-A fallen stock Raccs " had in it as a private soldier a West Point

    graduate, an old United States officer, who, at thebreaking out of the war, Avent with the South. At firsthe had a higfh command. Rum ruined him, and hishumiliation must have been complete as the West Point-

    ers among Sheridan's officers recognized him that night,when dirty, hungry, a private, and a prisoner, he helpeddrive his own guns to his captors' headquarters.

    (General General Early's own report to General Lee of this

    woes!'' battle gives a pathetic account of his woes, and an ex-

    cellent and impartial account of his cavalry. It is asfollows :

    This is very distressing to me, and God knows I have done all inmy power to avert the disasters which have befallen this command ;but the fact is, that the enemy's cavalry is so much superior to ours,both in numbers and equipment, and the country is so favorable to

    the operations of cavalry, that it is impossible for ours to compete

    with his. Lomax's cavalry is armed entirely with rifles, and has no

    sabres, and the consequence Is that they cannot fight on horseback,

    and in this open country they cannot successfully fight on foot

    against large bodies of cavalry ; besides, the command is and hasbeen demoralized all the time. It would be better if they could all

    be put into the infantry ; but if that were tried I am afraid they

    would all run off.

    1 Was at West Point about four years, and resigned on account of thewar.

  • ROBERT /'/ILLIAV1S

    Capt. 2nd U. S. Dragoons, iSbt

  • CAVALEY IN VIRGINIA. 29

    The Confederate cavalry was fairly used up and un-

    able to take the field in any considerable force, and it

    made no show at the battle of Cedar Creek, October 19,beino- brushed away almost ignominiously by Custer

    early in the day. Not so the Federal cavalry, who came increasing1 1 1 T\T effective-

    into line with the infantry {Custer on the right and Mer- nessof our^ ^

    /->( 1 cavalry.

    ritt and Lowell on the left, the whole under General

    Torbert). On both flanks they fought infantry, andLowell particularly put in his men mounted against

    Kershaw's division of Longstreet's corps, who were notmerely in open country, but were protected by stone

    walls. For hours did our cavalry attack and keep back

    Kershaw's fine division, and they charged up to the

    stone walls, and here Lowell lost his life, and many

    brave officers and men were killed and wounded.

    Charles Russell Lowell was a man made by nature for Charles1 1 T r 1 n Russell

    a cavalry leader. Durnig the eight weeks oi the valley Lowell,

    campaign his command, the regular brigade of 1st, 2d,and 5th United States, and 2d Massachusetts cavalry,

    was almost daily engaged ; and at one time for twenty-

    four consecutive days was in a fight of more or less im-

    portance. He had in the eight weeks no less than fif-teen horses killed under him. What he did so conspic-uously, all the rest did in high degree. The losses weresevere, the glory great, the success splendid. Sheridan

    had picked Lowell out almost at once as an officer ofexceeding merit.

    Cedar Creek may be considered the end of this cam-paign, for no fighting of any importance followed.

    In the spring of 1865 Sheridan's cavalry rode downto Grant before Petersburg, sweeping up all that re-

    mained north of the James, capturing the last guns left. Early re-and putting a military quietus on Jubal Early, General quietus.

  • 30 FIBST MASSACHUSETTS CAVALRY.

    Lee's " bad old man," as he was called. His undoubted

    ability as a soldier, his perseverance and couraoe, de-

    served a better fate. We knew him as a hard fighterand o-ood hater, and he is still irreconcilable.

    Before Pe- Arriving before Petersburg, March 27, Sheridan wasere urg.

    ^^ ^^^^^ ^^^^ ^^^ ^j^^ j^|.^ flank witli his cavalry, and howhe helped to push the Army of Northern Virginia to its

    At Five fate is a matter of history. At the battle of Five Forks

    the cavalry fought infantry, besides what remained of

    the Confederate cavalry.

    In the final and successful attack in that battle, it

    was the 5th corps, particularly Ayres' division, that

    turned the flank of the breastworks, and made the vic-tory complete ; but on the front the cavalry, before the

    arrival of the 5th corps, drove all the Confederate troops

    behind their works and held them there ; and later, at

    Cavalry the final battle, rode over the breastworks and followed

    the breast- up tlic victory. General Pickett, commanding the Con-

    federate infantry at Five Forks, said that while giving

    his final orders that day, just behind the breastworks," a Federal cavalry soldier, mounted on a mule, jumpedover the works and called on me to ' surrender, and be

    damned.' "

    At Appo- No one can doubt to-day, that the final surrender at

    Appomattox was due very largely to the cavalry, which

    constantly, during those splendid days, pressed against

    the Confederate army in front, flank, and rear ; never

    hesitating to inquire whether the force in their way was

    cavalry or infantry. Like the Irishman with his shille-

    lah, " they hit a head wherever they saw it."

    ^Vlten Lee It was ouly Avlieu General Lee found Sheridan's cav-

    that'^the airy finally between his army and its supplies at Appo-

    come.' mattox that he reaHzed the end had come, and surren-

  • CAVALEY IN VIRGINIA. 31

    clered. Whether the cavahy directly caused the surren-der or not, it is safe to say that the surrender wouldnot have occurred then and there but for the boldness,dash, and perseverance with which Sheridan, with hissplendid force, attacked Lee's army, and relentlessly fol-'lowed his retreating^ columns.

    In the Army of the Potomac there were in 1863 about Numericalforty regiments of cavalry, originally of 1200 men andhorses each. In 1864 there were about forty-two. Asthese were recruited from the States in which they wereenlisted, and as the desire was to recruit as many regi-ments as possible, rather than to keep full the regimentsalready in the field, it resulted that these soon becamevery small. Seldom could one be found, unless veryrecently put in the field, with over three hundred men.And many were smaller. To say that this was a very A faultyfaulty way of administration falls far short of a propercondemnation. It prevented efficiency in those regi-ments which were best disciplined, for want of strength.It not only brought into the field useless regiments, be-cause wanting in drill and experience, but it usuallyfurnished plenty of inexperienced field officers, of highrank, who would by mere seniority come into j^romi-nent command, unless specially got out of the way.

    This was managed better in Lee's army, where thecompanies of old regiments were kept filled up, insteadof creating new and consequently useless battalions.Their regiments were almost invariably stronger thanours. A comparison by number of regiments^, therefore,gives an incorrect idea of the strength of the cavalry inthe two armies. Lee had about thirty-six regiments.Nobody who has not served in the cavalry can appre- Sources of

    ciate the many sources of demoralization constantly at Lldon!

  • 32 FIRST MASSACHUSETTS CAVALRY.

    Cavalryservice nosinecure.

    Heavylosses incavalryfights.

    Unremit-ting hardwork.

    work. The man and horse are essentially one ; any ill-ness of either affects both. A false fold in the horse'sblanket may ruin him. Epidemic diseases may formonths paralyze the entire force. " Greased heel " and" glanders" were the most formidable epidemics.

    It has been thought by many infantry soldiers, men

    and officers, that the cavalry service is easy and not

    dangerous. Joe Hooker's exclamation, " Who ever sawa dead cavalryman

    !

    " was hugely relished by the in-

    fantry.

    I have already shown that for want of experience and

    training, and of proper cavalry generals, until June,

    1863, the cavalry of the Army of the Potomac neverhad a fair chance to show its prowess. When it did,later, it improved it nobly, and made up for formerwant of opportunity ; and many of the cavalry battles

    were remarkable for the losses. At Aldie, the 1st Mas-

    sachusetts cavalry lost, in about an hour, one hundred

    and sixty one officers and men out of three hundred.

    During the Richmond raid in 1864, the same regimentlost eight of fifteen officers, and nearly half its men, in

    eleven days, without fighting a general engagement, but

    constantly engaged in small affairs. It is not likely

    that such figures are at all peculiar to this regiment.

    Certainly General Hooker would never have made hisfamous remark a little later, nor was it deserved then.

    As to the work done by the cavalry, it was severe

    at all times, and was never remitted, even in winter.

    The same terrible picket duty and patrol, with constantskirmishes and hard marches, continued the whole year.

    Such a thing as a permanent camp behind w^orks was

    unknown. Terms of picket duty sometimes continued,

    with the same men, in winter, for two weeks at a time.

  • '"^^^^J>

    THE IDEAL CAVALRYMAN

  • THE REAL CAVALRYMAN

  • CAVALBY IN VIRGINIA. 33

    In the winter of 1863-64 the men averaged more thanhalf their time on picket, and raids and reconnoissances

    were extra.

    The vedettes were on post alone (not by twos andthrees) two hours at a time. During the winter of1862-63, when Hooker's army was in front of Freder-icksburg, the picket duty was something horrible. The Exp9suresoldiers had only shelter tents, the horses no protection, duty.

    The roads were, in places, two feet deep with mud,slush, and water. Sometimes on relieving the vedettes,

    horses would be found dead from exposure and hunger.

    Oats alone could be taken on picket as forage, and the

    horses were always kept saddled. In their hunger they

    ate off each other's manes and tails, and a more mis-

    erable spectacle than the cavalry horses during this

    winter could hardly be found. They died by hun-dreds.

    Be it remembered, this was not necessary. It was a Unneees-

    wanton and disgraceful and costly misuse of a splendid ships.

    body of men and horses. But this misuse was notwithout its benefit. It was an effective school, if ex-

    pensive, for when a man has found out what he will notdo, he is on the way to knowledge at any rate.

    The daily work of the cavalry soldier cannot be called Cavalry T> 1 n 1 T duties not

    easy, even when m camp. Besides all the ordinary du- easy.

    ties of the infantry soldier is the care of the horse.

    And the soldier has not only his own horse to clean,but the horses of all the men on camp guard, the sick,

    and any on extra duty. The forage is to be hauled,and all the horse equipments are to be kept in order,

    besides carbine, pistol, and sabre.During a campaign, at the end of a long march, be-

    fore a tent is pitched or any attempt at individual com-

  • rest

    34 FIRST MASSACHUSETTS CAVALRY.

    fort can be made, forage must be procured, frequently

    from a distance. The horses must be unsaddled, cleanedand watered twice a day in camp. *^ Stable call " lasts

    Never at two hours cvcry day. In fact, the cavalry soldier is

    never at rest, and while in the field all these thingsmust be done in intervals of fighting.

    I have known horses to remain saddled fifteen daysand nights at a time, and only a part cleaned and fed.The only sleep the troopers got during the first twoweeks of May, 1864, was on the ground in front of thehorses, holding the bridle in their hands ; and oflicershad to do the same. During the 1864 campaign allofficers had shelter tents, the same as the troopers. Thetroopers acquired a faculty of sleeping on horseback on

    the march.

    Faacina- As to the comfort, there can be no comparison be-tween cavalry and infantry service, none as to theamount of work. But there is something very attrac-

    tive in the service in spite of all. It is more venture-

    some and varied. Here to-day, there to-morrow. Morechance for foraging. Sometimes better food ; never somuch hardtack and pork, but not unfrequently greathunsrer and want.

    The sauce During the Antietam campaign, from September 2duntil the 20th, neither forage nor rations were issued to

    the cavalry. The troopers fed upon green corn, apples,and past recollections, with an occasional feast at some

    farmhouse. The sauce of hunger was always plentifuland strono-. The horses fed on screen cornstalks almostentirely, a very poor food by the way, and supposed tohave much to do with producing the epidemic of"greased heel," which broke out among them soonafter.

    tion of theservice

    of hunger.

  • CAVALRY IN VIRGINIA. 35

    In many respects the equipments were faulty and Faulty and, . T f^ . f unneces-

    senseless. Cavalry is supposed to enect surprises, it sary equip-

    should be able to march silently. Why then the jing-ling- sabre ? The metal scabbard and metal fasteningsmake the noise. They also keep the sabre dull, inviterust, and add to the soldier's work. A wooden orleather scabbard lined with wood is better, would benoiseless, and keep the sabre bright and sharp ; for thesabre is supj^osed to be sharp.

    Of the horse equipment much was useless. The lariatrope and picket-pin were born of service on the plains,

    where they were necessary in feeding the horses on

    grass;parts of the saddle had the same origin, as, for

    examnle, the hooded stirrups. The soldier had too Burden-^

    1 /~i p 1 ' 1 c ^some out-

    many arms. The Confederate, instead or arming the fit.

    entire regiment with rifles or carbines, had sharpshooter

    companies, thus leaving a part of the regiment with

    only pistol and carbine. Until towards the end of1863, their carbines and rifles were muzzle-loading. Bythat time they had captured enough breech-loaders tolargely arm their reduced numbers with them. TheFederal cavalry had breech-loaders of various systems,principally Sharps, and the Michigan brigade had theSpencer magazine seven shooters " coffee mills," theConfederates called them. The various carbines wereof different calibre, and with a variety of ammunitionthat caused confusion.

    Compared with this the Confederate outfit was mea-gre and simple, but strong in essential points. I havespoken of their well-trained and well-bred horses. Whenmy own regiment was mounted, the horses were boughtof contractors, and were said at the time to include all ment of

    viciousthe vicious and unmanagfeable animals in the State of animals.

  • 36 FinST MASSACHUSETTS CAVALRY.

    Canadianliorses.

    Dash andenterpriseof rebelcavsilry.

    Par nobilefratrum.

    ]\Iassacliiisetts. They were a motley lot, few havingever been ridden, generally " Canucks," as the Canadahorses are called short-leo-ged animals with thickmane and tail, about fifteen hands high. They provedexcellent animals, and seemed able to endure hardshii)and hunger nearly in proportion to their Canadianblood. These Canucks are supposed to be Norman-French horses, degenerated in size

    ;good-tempered, and

    exceedingly hardy. When they could not get hay theywould eat the bark of trees, leaves, almost anything;and would thrive where horses of some other breedwould starve. The last of these Massachusetts horsesin the regiment was stolen in crossing the Pamunky, atHanovertown, in June, 18G-i, much to the grief of hisrider.

    The Confederate cavalry was efficient, well-mounted,and led with dash and enterprise from the very start.It obtained at once the prestige, and held it until June,1863.

    Our Southern friends in the cavalry certainly foughtwell, and some of them are evidently as strong with thepen as with the sword, notably Von Borcke, Gilmor,and Mosby.

    General J. E. B. Stuart not only commanded theConfederate cavalry, he made it. At Chancellorsville,after Stonewall Jackson's death, he commanded hiscorps, and showed himself a general of very high order.Fitzhugh Lee was far and away next best after Stuart,if not his equal. He Avas called to the chief commandat a time when the task was desperate.The Confederate cavalry started its career in pride,

    sti-ength, and success; the Federal cavalry in confu-sion and inefficiency, and had to make itself. This was

  • CAVALBY IN VIRGINIA. 37

    naturally not done in a day, nor did any leader of mag-

    netic influence call out its powers. It was done pain-

    fully, slowly, and with many a humiliating experience.Hard knocks and defeats taught it vigilance, and themost able officers grew up with and out of it.The Federal cavalry, for a long time, was not fortu-

    nate in its leaders. Perhaps it is fairer to say that the

    faulty system, or want of system, prevented the leaders

    from accomplishing anything. A cavalry general is not Rarity ofeasily found in even trained armies, and none appeared generals.

    in the Army of the Potomac to hasten the natural pro-cess.

    Sheridan, who was the most brilliant commander thewar furnished, perhaps, on either side, was not trained

    in the United States cavalry, having been an infantryofficer, and for some time serving as quartermaster.

    I find in a most interesting book on cavalry, by Bis-marck (Lectures on the Tactics of Cavalry, 1818), thefollowino' :o

    "A sufficient number of able generals of infantry has been found at Bismarck'sall times, in all armies, but very rarely ojie of cavalry." " Cavalry

    will jjroljably in future times no longer occupy a place in line of bat-

    tle, until some eminent talent on a throne discerns its strength, andout of the whole body of officers places the ablest, most resolute,steady, and boldest at its head, and in future wars overcomes thosenations who, following the spirit of our time (ever less productive of

    truly warlike characters), neglect the cavalry." " But all command-ers of armies have not known how to derive advantage from cav-alry," etc., etc.

    " The secret of bringing about great effects by cavalry lies in the Secret ofpersonal qualities of the leader. Striking instances are recorded of f^^^,^

    "

    the opposite effects produced l)y different commanders upon the sametroops. When Murat upbraided Junot for his inaction after cross-ing the Prudisi, Junot alleged in excuse that he had no orders to at-tack, that his Wurtemberg cavalry were shy, etc., that they could

  • 38 FIRST MASSACHUSETTS CAVALRY.

    never be brought to charge the enemy's battalions. These wordsInspiration Murat answered by deeds. He rushed on at the head of the troopsleader. who, with a different leader, were quite different men ; he urged

    them on, launched them against the Russians, overthrew their sku'-mishers, and then returning to Junot said, ' Now finish the business

    !

    your glory and your marshal's staff are before you.' A similar an-ecdote is told of Colonel Rousset, an oflBcer of Louis XIV., and Cap-tain Churchill, afterwards Duke of Marlborough, at the siege ofNimeguen (1672). On this occasion the French colonel had beenobliged to abandon a post. Turenne, who witnessed the retreat,betted that Churchill, with half the force, would regain it. He gavehim the command, and after a desperate struggle the future duke, inpresence of the whole army, recovered the position."

    " In these wars (1756) amongst other ai'mies were actions ofsingle cavalry detachments and regiments worthy of being handeddown to military posterity. But there was nothing done upon alarge scale. There was hut one Seidlitz."

    General Sheridan was selected by General Grant onthis principle, and fully justified his intelligence. Un-der Sheridan only did the Federal cavalry gain theprominence it deserved.

    What Think of what might have been effected at severalhave been, battles iu tlic War had there been in command a generalat Antie-

    , , ^

    ^^

    tarn.^i^Q ii^^i i\^Q power of seeing his opportunity and im-proving it when it occurred ! At Antietam, McClellanin the centre, above tlie Antietam Creek, on highground, with Porter's large and efficient corps at hiselbow, and all his cavalry within five hundred yards ofLee's guns, which alone connected the two wings of hisarmy, should have seen his opportunity. He was not ac-customed, as was Sheridan, to be on the ground visit-ing in turn all the critical positions, in contact with his

    generals, and almost with his enemy, ready to fight hisbattle as opportmiity offered, taking advantage of his

    enemy's errors, and snatching victory from him. But

  • ^th.:' ",'*.0^^^i:

    m.M

    %l\

    ROBERT WILLIAMS

    Co/, nnd Brvt. Briif. Geiil. U. S. A.

  • CAVALEY IN VIRGINIA. 39

    he could not help seeing the chance at Antietam, for it

    was thundered into his ears, and must have burned hiseyes. He was of the generals who fight battles in tents,on paper, at a table the day before. His enthusiasmwas shown at reviews, or before the battle. The battle-field showed him nothing.

    After Gettysburg, a general of marked ability in com- Duty ofmand of all the combined cavalry of Meade's army after Oet-should have at least captured all Lee's wagons andmuch of his artillery, if not have prevented his crossingthe Potomac.

    It is not without interest to notice the remarkable

    number of distinguished officers of the Confederacy whoserved in the United States cavalry before 1861 ; mostof them were always cavalry officers : Generals R. E. Galaxy ofLee, A. S. Johnston, J. E. Johnston, Kirby Smith, Har- ate cavalry

    oB.C6rsdee, J. E. B. Stuart, Fitzhugh Lee, W. W. Loring,VanDorn, G. B. Crittenden, J. B. Hood, Field, Evans,George H. Stuart, Richard B. Ewell, and many more ofless note.

    In the Federal army the list is not so long nor so re- Sedgwickmarkable, John Sedgwick and George H. Thomas being Thomas.the most distinguished.

    My sketch is of necessity very imperfect, since, to be Imperfectgeneral, it had to be greatly condensed. I trust it mayhave illustrated to infantry listeners some peculiaritiesof the cavalry. To cavalry listeners I almost feel I owean apology for saying so much that is trite, and partic-ularly in seeming to labor to prove propositions that totliem must be self-evident.

  • CHAPTER 11.

    m MASSACHUSETTS, SEPTEMBER TO DECEMBER30, 1861.

    The first volunteer rej^iments of cavalry were raised Tiie regu-about September 1, 1861. Prior to that time there formed the

    1 TT 1 o model ofwere of resfular cavah-y troops m the United States volunteer~

    .

    regiments.

    army six regiments, of twelve companies each. These

    formed the model upon which the volunteer regiments

    were built. And in almost all cases volunteer regi-ments Avere organized from the militia cavalry organ-

    izations in the different States.

    As cavalry was considered a chosen corps, and the

    volunteer soldiers had an idea that the work would be

    easier, and as the idea of riding upon a horse was an

    attractive one, these regiments filled up very rapidly. Volunteer

    But no attempt was made to enlist the men with regard regiments. . 1 n 1 p 1

    nil rapidly.

    to a previous occupation, which should fit them lor that

    peculiar service. It would have been better to have se-

    lected men of light weight, accustomed to horses, rather

    than men of heavy weight who were strange to the ani-mal ; but this is merely one of the things that were not

    done as they should have been, owing to the vast un-

    dertaking of organizing an immense army suddenly.

    The 1st Massachusetts cavalry was made up almostentirely from existing military organizations. Compa- Origin ofnies A and B were made out of the Boston Dragoons ; panies?"'companies C, D, and G from the Boston Lancers ; com-

  • IN MASSACHUSETTS. 41

    panies L and M from the Waltliam Dragoons (the lat- isei,ter company received a large number of men recruited ber.in Haverhill by Lieutenant Batchelder); companies Iand K from the North Bridgewater Dragoons, in theOld Colony ; E and F from near Springfield, from theSpringfield Horseguards ; company H was raised inEssex County, from no cavalry militia company. Its

    original officers were from Marblehead.Not a few of the men who had been drilled in these

    militia companies enlisted for the service in the regi-

    ment. All of these companies elected their officers ac- OfficersdGC