a comparison of two public works programs toni n
TRANSCRIPT
Research Question & Analysis
• I look at whether the American Jobs Act needs
or needed to resemble a public works program
in order to be truly beneficial to Americans
• I look at the model and objectives of this Act
compared to a successful public works program.
• The Public Works Administration (PWA).
1933
• In 1933 there was the Great Depression
• Franklin D. R. became the 32nd President
• He started a program to liberate the economy
from the economic crisis caused by the
depression
• He called it the New Deal Initiative
PWA
• PWA stands for Public Work Administration
• This program model is said to have been beneficial
to the economy from 1933 to 1939
• It has a large scope, it is based on the East Coast
• It has a particular design in which spending is
controlled, spending is done nationally to increase
purchasing power, and it prolonged American jobs.
Total Funds Appropriated 1933
Investors Amounts
The Act(Fed. Gov.) $329,660,000.00
Congress $3,300,000,000.00
Congress(sale of bonds): $1,655,000,000.00
Total Funds $5,284,660,000.00
Cited: America Builds
PWA Goals
Public Works Administration (PWA)
Provide jobs to stimulate business
Increase the national purchasing power
Help fulfill the needs of the people for permanent public services
Help fulfill the needs of the people for useful public services (infrastructure)
The Regenerative Effect
• “A worker gets a PWA job. He receives his first pay envelope.
He buys clothes, spending a part of his day at the
department store. The clothing store dealer takes a part of
the money and pays the jobber (wholesaler). The jobber
(wholesaler) takes part of the money and pays his
manufacturer. The manufacturer pays his workers and buys
more cloth from the mill. The mill owner takes part of the
money and buys more wool and cotton and so on.” (America
Builds)
The Benefits of the Model
• It Provided Jobs• Increased Spending• Increased the National Purchasing Power• Created an Increase in Net Demands• Did not Interfere with other Businesses
Growth• Was used to Supply Goods and Provide Money
to Produce More Goods
The American Jobs Act 2011 - 12
• Created in 2011 by the Obama Administration
• Its Objectives are its Key Components
• They were made public September 8th
The American Jobs Act 5 key Objectives
The American Jobs Act 2011 - 2012
Tax cuts to help America’s small businesses hire and grow
Put workers back on the job while rebuilding and modernizing America
Provide pathways back to work for Americans looking for jobs
Tax relief for every American worker and family
Fully paid for as part of the President’s long-term deficit reduction plan
The American Jobs Act Factsheet and Overview, the White House
The ComparisonIssues PWA The American Jobs Act
Funds for the Act $329,660,000.00 0The Act is Paid For (no borrowing) No Yes
Reduce Deficit No Yes
Improve infrastructure Yes Yes
Provide Jobs Yes Yes
Job Types Construction Unclear
Project Types non-Federal Unclear
U.S. States Affiliated 29 All States
U.S. Section Affiliated East Coast Nation-wide
Payroll Tax Cuts No Yes
Prevent Layoffs Yes Yes
Give Tax Reliefs No Yes
American Jobs Act Factsheet and Overview
PWA (+)
• + Clear Jobs description• + Clearly asks for funding• + An area is emphasized for this program• + Improve Infrastructure• + Prevented Layoffs• + Has a national income creating, generating,
spending model
American Jobs Act (+)
• + Planned to not need money• + No borrowing• + Improve Infrastructure• + Payroll Tax Cuts • + Give Tax Reliefs• + Prevent Layoffs• + Provide Jobs
American Jobs Act (-)
• - Job Descriptions Unclear• - Program Base Areas Unclear• - Has No National or International Model for
national income creating, generating or spending.
Note• The American Jobs Act was rejected because
several sources reported that Capitol Hill said it was another Stimulus
• It was said to cost over 400 billion dollars over 10 years
• The PWA Cost over 7 billion over 5 years• In 5 years the American Jobs Act would have
cost over 200 billion dollars• The plan within this act for Veterans was
adopted, the rest thrown out
Conclusion: Final Note• Basic issues that a public works program needs to
address
• Could have looked at the design of a Public Works Program under the New Deal to answer questions, concerns about issues today
• I think it could be or would have been beneficial if it had a model: show they have control
• The PWA model sold the program and made it beneficial to people, it answered questions
• Because of the model, the program was worth a try.