8:14-cv-02421 #33

20
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF FLORIDA TAMPA DIVISION UNITED STATES EQUAL EMPLOYMENT OPPORTUNITY COMMISSION, Plaintiff, v. Case No: 8:14-cv-2421-T-35AEP LAKELAND EYE CLINIC, P.A., Defendant. / ORDER THIS CAUSE comes before the Court for consideration of the parties’ Joint Motion for Approval of Consent Decree. (Dkt. 32) Upon consideration of all relevant filings and case law, and being otherwise fully advised, the Court determines that the parties’ Motion is due to be GRANTED. Notwithstanding the language contained in the Consent Decree, this Order is entered on the STIPULATION of the parties, not based on any independent review or findings by the Court other than as to venue and jurisdiction. More specifically and pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 65(d)(1)(A) and the Parties’ agreement, this Order is entered to avoid further costs of litigation, to further the objectives of Title VII, and to adequately protect the rights of Plaintiff and the public interest. Furthermore, the parties agree that the final resolution of this action under the Consent Decree’s adequate, fair, reasonable, equitable, and just terms is in the best interests of Brandi Branson, Lakeland Eye Clinic, P.A., the United States Equal Opportunity Employment Commission, and the public. Case 8:14-cv-02421-MSS-AEP Document 33 Filed 04/09/15 Page 1 of 2 PageID 243

Upload: equality-case-files

Post on 17-Jul-2016

43 views

Category:

Documents


7 download

DESCRIPTION

Doc 33 - Order granting parties' joint motion for approval of consent decree

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: 8:14-cv-02421 #33

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

TAMPA DIVISION UNITED STATES EQUAL EMPLOYMENT OPPORTUNITY COMMISSION, Plaintiff, v. Case No: 8:14-cv-2421-T-35AEP LAKELAND EYE CLINIC, P.A., Defendant. /

ORDER

THIS CAUSE comes before the Court for consideration of the parties’ Joint Motion

for Approval of Consent Decree. (Dkt. 32) Upon consideration of all relevant filings and

case law, and being otherwise fully advised, the Court determines that the parties’ Motion

is due to be GRANTED. Notwithstanding the language contained in the Consent

Decree, this Order is entered on the STIPULATION of the parties, not based on any

independent review or findings by the Court other than as to venue and jurisdiction.

More specifically and pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 65(d)(1)(A) and the

Parties’ agreement, this Order is entered to avoid further costs of litigation, to further the

objectives of Title VII, and to adequately protect the rights of Plaintiff and the public

interest. Furthermore, the parties agree that the final resolution of this action under the

Consent Decree’s adequate, fair, reasonable, equitable, and just terms is in the best

interests of Brandi Branson, Lakeland Eye Clinic, P.A., the United States Equal

Opportunity Employment Commission, and the public.

Case 8:14-cv-02421-MSS-AEP Document 33 Filed 04/09/15 Page 1 of 2 PageID 243

Page 2: 8:14-cv-02421 #33

Accordingly, it is hereby ORDERED that:

1. The parties’ Motion for Approval of Consent Decree (Dkt. 32) is GRANTED.

The Consent Decree (Dkt. 32-1), attached as an Exhibit hereto and

incorporated by reference herein, is APPROVED and ENTERED by the

Court.

2. This case is DISMISSED, with the Court retaining jurisdiction for a period of

two years the purpose of enforcement of the Consent Decree.

3. The CLERK is directed to terminate any pending motions and CLOSE this

case.

DONE and ORDERED in Tampa, Florida, this 9th day of April, 2015.

Copies furnished to: Counsel of Record Any Unrepresented Person

2

Case 8:14-cv-02421-MSS-AEP Document 33 Filed 04/09/15 Page 2 of 2 PageID 244

Page 3: 8:14-cv-02421 #33

Case 8:14-cv-02421-MSS-AEP Document 32-1 Filed 04/01/15 Page 1 of 18 PageID 225Case 8:14-cv-02421-MSS-AEP Document 33-1 Filed 04/09/15 Page 1 of 18 PageID 245

Page 4: 8:14-cv-02421 #33

Case 8:14-cv-02421-MSS-AEP Document 32-1 Filed 04/01/15 Page 2 of 18 PageID 226Case 8:14-cv-02421-MSS-AEP Document 33-1 Filed 04/09/15 Page 2 of 18 PageID 246

Page 5: 8:14-cv-02421 #33

Case 8:14-cv-02421-MSS-AEP Document 32-1 Filed 04/01/15 Page 3 of 18 PageID 227Case 8:14-cv-02421-MSS-AEP Document 33-1 Filed 04/09/15 Page 3 of 18 PageID 247

Page 6: 8:14-cv-02421 #33

Case 8:14-cv-02421-MSS-AEP Document 32-1 Filed 04/01/15 Page 4 of 18 PageID 228Case 8:14-cv-02421-MSS-AEP Document 33-1 Filed 04/09/15 Page 4 of 18 PageID 248

Page 7: 8:14-cv-02421 #33

Case 8:14-cv-02421-MSS-AEP Document 32-1 Filed 04/01/15 Page 5 of 18 PageID 229Case 8:14-cv-02421-MSS-AEP Document 33-1 Filed 04/09/15 Page 5 of 18 PageID 249

Page 8: 8:14-cv-02421 #33

Case 8:14-cv-02421-MSS-AEP Document 32-1 Filed 04/01/15 Page 6 of 18 PageID 230Case 8:14-cv-02421-MSS-AEP Document 33-1 Filed 04/09/15 Page 6 of 18 PageID 250

Page 9: 8:14-cv-02421 #33

Case 8:14-cv-02421-MSS-AEP Document 32-1 Filed 04/01/15 Page 7 of 18 PageID 231Case 8:14-cv-02421-MSS-AEP Document 33-1 Filed 04/09/15 Page 7 of 18 PageID 251

Page 10: 8:14-cv-02421 #33

Case 8:14-cv-02421-MSS-AEP Document 32-1 Filed 04/01/15 Page 8 of 18 PageID 232Case 8:14-cv-02421-MSS-AEP Document 33-1 Filed 04/09/15 Page 8 of 18 PageID 252

Page 11: 8:14-cv-02421 #33

Case 8:14-cv-02421-MSS-AEP Document 32-1 Filed 04/01/15 Page 9 of 18 PageID 233Case 8:14-cv-02421-MSS-AEP Document 33-1 Filed 04/09/15 Page 9 of 18 PageID 253

Page 12: 8:14-cv-02421 #33

Case 8:14-cv-02421-MSS-AEP Document 32-1 Filed 04/01/15 Page 10 of 18 PageID 234Case 8:14-cv-02421-MSS-AEP Document 33-1 Filed 04/09/15 Page 10 of 18 PageID 254

Page 13: 8:14-cv-02421 #33

Case 8:14-cv-02421-MSS-AEP Document 32-1 Filed 04/01/15 Page 11 of 18 PageID 235Case 8:14-cv-02421-MSS-AEP Document 33-1 Filed 04/09/15 Page 11 of 18 PageID 255

Page 14: 8:14-cv-02421 #33

Case 8:14-cv-02421-MSS-AEP Document 32-1 Filed 04/01/15 Page 12 of 18 PageID 236Case 8:14-cv-02421-MSS-AEP Document 33-1 Filed 04/09/15 Page 12 of 18 PageID 256

Page 15: 8:14-cv-02421 #33

Case 8:14-cv-02421-MSS-AEP Document 32-1 Filed 04/01/15 Page 13 of 18 PageID 237Case 8:14-cv-02421-MSS-AEP Document 33-1 Filed 04/09/15 Page 13 of 18 PageID 257

Page 16: 8:14-cv-02421 #33

Case 8:14-cv-02421-MSS-AEP Document 32-1 Filed 04/01/15 Page 14 of 18 PageID 238Case 8:14-cv-02421-MSS-AEP Document 33-1 Filed 04/09/15 Page 14 of 18 PageID 258

Page 17: 8:14-cv-02421 #33

Case 8:14-cv-02421-MSS-AEP Document 32-1 Filed 04/01/15 Page 15 of 18 PageID 239Case 8:14-cv-02421-MSS-AEP Document 33-1 Filed 04/09/15 Page 15 of 18 PageID 259

Page 18: 8:14-cv-02421 #33

Case 8:14-cv-02421-MSS-AEP Document 32-1 Filed 04/01/15 Page 16 of 18 PageID 240Case 8:14-cv-02421-MSS-AEP Document 33-1 Filed 04/09/15 Page 16 of 18 PageID 260

Page 19: 8:14-cv-02421 #33

Case 8:14-cv-02421-MSS-AEP Document 32-1 Filed 04/01/15 Page 17 of 18 PageID 241Case 8:14-cv-02421-MSS-AEP Document 33-1 Filed 04/09/15 Page 17 of 18 PageID 261

Page 20: 8:14-cv-02421 #33

Case 8:14-cv-02421-MSS-AEP Document 32-1 Filed 04/01/15 Page 18 of 18 PageID 242Case 8:14-cv-02421-MSS-AEP Document 33-1 Filed 04/09/15 Page 18 of 18 PageID 262