67-1 mem iso doyn mtn to dismiss
TRANSCRIPT
-
5/25/2018 67-1 Mem Iso Doyn Mtn to Dismiss
1/32
r ~ 60~
-
5/25/2018 67-1 Mem Iso Doyn Mtn to Dismiss
2/32
T BLE OF CONTENTS
INTRODUCTION .............. .......... ................... ............... .................... ..........STATEMENT OF THE CASE ....................................................................LEGAL ANALySIS .....................................................................................A The Standard for Dismissal Pursuant to Rule 12(b)(6) ......................B The Standard for Dismissal Due to Lack of Subject MatteJurisdiction Pursuant to Rule 12(b )(1) ...............................................C CCFC and LEXEVIA Lack Capacity To Bring Any Action .............D Plaintiffs Claims Are Time Barred ...................................................
1. Plaintiffs Claims Under 42 U.S.C. sections 1983, 1985, an1986 Are Time Barred .............................................................11 The Lanham Act Cause ofAction Is Time Barred ..................111 The Unjust Enrichment Cause ofAction is Time Barred ........IV. The RICO Causes ofAction Are Time Barred ........................
E Plaintiff Cannot Establish a 42 U.S.C. 1983 Cause ofAction ........F Plaintiff Cannot Establish Any 42 U.S.C. 1985 Cause ofAction ..G Plaintiffs Complaint Fails To Establish The Elements of A CiviRICO Claim ........................................................................................H Plaintiff Cannot Establish A Claim Under The Lanham Act.. ...........1 Plaintiffs Cannot Establish Federal Jurisdiction ...............................
1.
11
All Claims Arising From Dr. DOYNE s Participation ISTUART s FamilyLaw Matter Are Barred By The DomestiRelations Exception To Federal Jurisdiction ...........................To The Extent That This Action Seeks To Challenge AnyOrder OfThe Family Law Court t Is Barred By The RookerFeldman Doctrine .....................................................................
J Plaintiffs Claims Are Barred By The Doctrine Of Quasi-JudiciaImmunity ............................................................................................K The Complaint Fails To Establish A Claim for Prospective Relief ..L Dr. DOYNE is Immune from Liability Based Upon Reports oSuspected Child Abuse .......................................................................
l3cvI944 CAB (BLM))1
MEMORANDUM OF POINTS AND AUTHORITIES IN SUPOF STEPHEN E DOYNE S MOTION TO DISMISS
Case 3:13-cv-01944-CAB-BLM Document 67-1 Filed 12/11/13 Page 2 of 32
-
5/25/2018 67-1 Mem Iso Doyn Mtn to Dismiss
3/32
M. The Complaint Fails to Comply with Rule 8 .....................................CONCLUSION .............................................................................................
(l3cv1944 CAB (BLM)) MEMORANDUM OF POINTS AND AUTHORITIES IN SUPOF STEPHEN E DOYNE S MOTION TO DISMISS
Case 3:13-cv-01944-CAB-BLM Document 67-1 Filed 12/11/13 Page 3 of 32
-
5/25/2018 67-1 Mem Iso Doyn Mtn to Dismiss
4/32
0,.........( z;;;[If,
0If-ZI..;r;v
1 T BLE OF UTHORITIES2 Cases3 Agency Holding Corp. v Malley-Duff Associates, Inc., 483 U.S. 143, 156 .......4 Am. Mfrs. Mut. Ins. Co v Sullivan, 526 U.S. 40, 49-50 (U.S. 1999) ....................5 Ankenbrandt ............................................................................................................678910111213141516171819202122232425262728
Ankenbrant v Richards (1992) 504 U.S. 689, 703, 112 S.Ct. 2206,2215, 119 L.E2d 468.................. ...... .... ....................... ...............................................................
Arbaugh v Y H Corp., 546 U.S. 500, 506 (U.S. 2006) ......................................Arnoldv. Tiffany, 359 F. Supp. 1034, 1036 (C.D. Cal. 1973) .................................Balistreri v Pacifica Police Dep t., 901 F.2d 696, 699 (9th Cir. 1988) .................Barber v Barber (1859) 62 U.S. 582,21 HOW 582, 16 L. Ed. 226 ......................Bell Atl. Corp. v Twombly, 550 U.S. 544 (U.S. 2007) ........................................... Briscoe v Lahue (U.S. 1983) 460 U.S. 325, 103 S Ct. 1108, 75 L. Ed. 2d 96 1Buckley v Fitzsimmons (1993) 509 U.S. 259, 268, 113 S Ct. 2606, 2612-13, 125
L.Ed. 2d 209 ........................................................................................................Buechold v Ortiz (9th Cir. 1968) 401 F.2d 371 ......................................................Cal-Western Business Services, Inc. v Corning Capital Group, 2013 Cal. App.
LEXIS 899,9-10 (Cal. App. 2d Dist. Nov. 6, 2013) ...........................................Coastal Abstract Serv., Inc. v First Am. Title Ins. Co., 173 F.3d 725, 730 (9th Ci
Cal. 1999) ............................................................................................................Cook, Perkiss Liehe, Inc. v Northern California Collection Service, Inc., 911
F.2d 242 (9th Cir. Cal. 1990) ..............................................................................Crowe v County o San Diego, 608 F.3d 406,417 (9th Cir. Cal. 2010) ................DeSantis v Pacific Telephone Telegraph Co., 608 F.2d 327,333 (9th Cir. 197
.............................................................................................................................District o Columbia Court o Appeal v Feldman (U.S. 1983) 460 U.S. 462, 103
Ct. 1303, 75 L. Ed. 2d 206 ..................................................................................
l3cvl944 CAB (BLM))- 111 -
MEMORANDUM OF POINTS AND AUTHORITIES IN SUPOF STEPHEN E DOYNE S MOTION TO DISMISS
Case 3:13-cv-01944-CAB-BLM Document 67-1 Filed 12/11/13 Page 4 of 32
-
5/25/2018 67-1 Mem Iso Doyn Mtn to Dismiss
5/32
00
-
5/25/2018 67-1 Mem Iso Doyn Mtn to Dismiss
6/32
00~
-
5/25/2018 67-1 Mem Iso Doyn Mtn to Dismiss
7/32
123456789
10
120Ig 13IfiIf 140
15:r:z16...3 171819202122232425262728
Business Professions Code section 17200..........................................................Business Professions Code section 17208 ..........................................................California Code of Civil Procedure section 335.1 ..................................................California Code of Civil Procedure section 337 .....................................................California Code of Civil Procedure section 340.5 ..................................................California Corporation Code section 2205 .............................................................California Evidence Code section 730 ....................................................................California Penal Code section 11165.7(21) ............................................................California Penal Code section 11166 ......................................................................California Penal Code section 11172......................................................................California Revenue and Taxation Code section 23301 ...........................................Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, Rule 12(b)(1 ..................................................iFederal Rules of Civil Procedure, Rule 12(b)(6) .......................................... i, 1 4Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, Rule 8 ...............................................................
(l3cv1944 CAB (BLM))- VI -
MEMORANDUM OF POINTS AND AUTHORITIES IN SUPOF STEPHEN E. DOYNE S MOTION TO DISMISS
Case 3:13-cv-01944-CAB-BLM Document 67-1 Filed 12/11/13 Page 7 of 32
-
5/25/2018 67-1 Mem Iso Doyn Mtn to Dismiss
8/32
123456789
10
~ ~ 1112..,...--. z:2 13LIIif5 14S lS ' 15e;IfZ 16
-
5/25/2018 67-1 Mem Iso Doyn Mtn to Dismiss
9/32
123456789
1011(:j6 120~
::;; 13If< 14::r
15- JfZ 16
-
5/25/2018 67-1 Mem Iso Doyn Mtn to Dismiss
10/32
...5mlo0~