6.5 lw red-line of lighting report

331
Appendix D Lighting Study

Upload: others

Post on 11-Sep-2021

1 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: 6.5 LW Red-line of Lighting Report

 

Appendix D Lighting Study

Page 2: 6.5 LW Red-line of Lighting Report

Archer Forward: Campus Preservation and Improvement Plan - Lighting Study Page 1 The Archer School for Girls July 2013

. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT LIGHTING STUDY

THE ARCHER SCHOOL FOR GIRLS Archer Forward: Campus Preservation and Improvement Plan

Francis Krahe & Associates, Inc. Architectural Lighting Design

304 South Broadway, Suite 500 Los Angeles, California 90013

Phone 213.617.0477 Fax 213.617.0482

Project: AS000

July 2013

Page 3: 6.5 LW Red-line of Lighting Report

Archer Forward: Campus Preservation and Improvement Plan - Lighting Study Page 2 The Archer School for Girls July 2013

TABLE OF CONTENTS 1 INTRODUCTION .................................................................................................................................. 8

1.1 Summary of Study Organization ................................................................................................... 8 1.2 Outline of Study ............................................................................................................................. 8 1.3 Project Description ........................................................................................................................ 8

1.3.1 New Facilities ........................................................................................................................ 8 1.3.2 Lighting Strategy ................................................................................................................. 12 1.3.3 Lighting Techniques and Stipulations within the Project ..................................................... 13

1.4 Summary of Methodology ........................................................................................................... 15 1.4.1 Field Study .......................................................................................................................... 16 1.4.2 Future Impacts of the Project .............................................................................................. 16 1.4.3 Existing Regulations and Best Practices ............................................................................ 17

a) Existing Regulations ................................................................................................................ 17 b) Recommended Practices ........................................................................................................ 18

1.5 Lighting Concepts Overview ....................................................................................................... 19 a) Luminance, Visual Perception and Light Adaptation .............................................................. 19 b) Light Pollution .......................................................................................................................... 20

1.6 Significance Thresholds .............................................................................................................. 21 1.6.1 State of California CEQA Threshold ................................................................................... 21 1.6.2 City of Los Angeles CEQA Thresholds Guide .................................................................... 21 1.6.3 Criteria for Significance of Impacts ..................................................................................... 21

1.7 Summary of Study Conclusions .................................................................................................. 22 1.7.1 Summary of Illuminance Conclusions: ................................................................................ 22 1.7.2 Summary of Contrast Conclusions:..................................................................................... 24

2 GLOSSARY OF LIGHTING TERMINOLOGY .................................................................................... 28 3 EXISTING LIGHTING CONDITIONS ................................................................................................. 37

3.1 Introduction .................................................................................................................................. 37 3.1.1 Criteria for Site Locations .................................................................................................... 37 3.1.2 Receptor Site Locations ...................................................................................................... 38

3.2 Criteria ......................................................................................................................................... 42 3.3 Analysis of Survey Data .............................................................................................................. 43 3.4 Existing Conditions, Observations from Receptor Sites ............................................................. 46

3.4.1 Receptor Site A ................................................................................................................... 46 3.4.2 Receptor Site B ................................................................................................................... 50 3.4.3 Receptor Site C ................................................................................................................... 54 3.4.4 Receptor Site C-1 ................................................................................................................ 58 3.4.5 Receptor Site D ................................................................................................................... 62 3.4.6 Receptor Site D-1 ................................................................................................................ 66 3.4.7 Receptor Site E ................................................................................................................... 70 3.4.8 Receptor Site F ................................................................................................................... 74 3.4.9 Receptor Site G ................................................................................................................... 78 3.4.10 Receptor Site H ................................................................................................................... 82 3.4.11 Receptor Site J .................................................................................................................... 86

4 ANALYSIS OF PROJECT LIGHTING IMPACTS ............................................................................... 90 4.1 Introduction .................................................................................................................................. 90 4.2 Modeling Lighting Impacts .......................................................................................................... 90 4.3 Project Improvements Computer Model Data ............................................................................. 92

4.3.1 Main Building ....................................................................................................................... 93 4.3.2 North Wing Renovation ....................................................................................................... 95 4.3.3 Multipurpose Facility, Visual Arts Center, Performing Arts Center ..................................... 97 4.3.4 Underground Parking Structure ........................................................................................ 100

Page 4: 6.5 LW Red-line of Lighting Report

Archer Forward: Campus Preservation and Improvement Plan - Lighting Study Page 3 The Archer School for Girls July 2013

4.3.5 Athletic Fields for Soccer and Softball .............................................................................. 103 4.3.6 Athletic Fields Lighting ...................................................................................................... 104 4.3.7 Exterior Lightings: Courtyards, Landscape Plazas, Pedestrian Walkways....................... 109 4.3.8 Lighting Guidelines Employed in Model ............................................................................ 113

a) Exterior Lighting .................................................................................................................... 113 b) Athletic Lighting ..................................................................................................................... 113 c) Site Lighting ........................................................................................................................... 113 d) Parking Lot and Parking Structure Lighting .......................................................................... 113 e) Building Mounted Lighting ..................................................................................................... 113 f) Interior Architectural Lighting ................................................................................................ 114 g) Site Design ............................................................................................................................ 114

4.3.9 Lighting Techniques relating to Light Pollution: Light Trespass, Glare and Skyglow ....... 114 4.4 Summary of Calculated Future Conditions ............................................................................... 116

4.4.1 Future Conditions at Receptor Site A ............................................................................... 122 4.4.2 Future Conditions at Receptor Site B ............................................................................... 125 4.4.3 Future Conditions at Receptor Site C ............................................................................... 127 4.4.4 Future Conditions at Receptor Site C-1 ............................................................................ 130 4.4.5 Future Conditions at Receptor Site D ............................................................................... 133 4.4.6 Future Conditions at Receptor Site D-1 ............................................................................ 138 4.4.7 Future Conditions at Receptor Site E ............................................................................... 141 4.4.8 Future Conditions at Receptor Site F ................................................................................ 146 4.4.9 Future Conditions at Receptor Site G ............................................................................... 151 4.4.10 Future Conditions at Receptor Site H ............................................................................... 154 4.4.11 Future Conditions at Receptor Site J ................................................................................ 157

4.5 Summary of Analysis Findings .................................................................................................. 162 4.5.1 Existing Conditions ............................................................................................................ 162 4.5.2 Future Conditions Computer Model Comparison .............................................................. 165

a) Summary Illuminance Findings ............................................................................................. 165 b) Contrast ................................................................................................................................. 167

Page 5: 6.5 LW Red-line of Lighting Report

Archer Forward: Campus Preservation and Improvement Plan - Lighting Study Page 4 The Archer School for Girls July 2013

LIST OF FIGURES Figure 1: Athletic Fields Lighting, Conceptual Illustration, Mounting Height of 40 feet vs. 70 feet. ............ 15 Figure 2: IES TM-15-07 Appendix BUG rating thresholds, Tables A-1 and A-2 ......................................... 29 Figure 3: IES TM-15-07 Appendix BUG rating thresholds, Table A-3 ........................................................ 30 Figure 4: IES TM-15-07 Appendix BUG rating example ............................................................................. 31 Figure 5: Defined Directional Light Output Configurations ......................................................................... 33 Figure 6: IESNA Luminaire Cutoff Classifications, See also IES TM-15-07 BUG Ratings

Addendum ................................................................................................................................. 34 Figure 7: Lighting Units ............................................................................................................................... 35 Figure 8: Receptor Site Locations ............................................................................................................... 38 Figure 9: Receptor Site A, Reference Photograph ..................................................................................... 46 Figure 10:Receptor Site A, Nighttime View ................................................................................................. 46 Figure 11: Measurement grid for Luminance Values at Receptor Site A ................................................... 47 Figure 12: Map of Receptor Site A .............................................................................................................. 47 Figure 13: Receptor Site B, Reference Photograph ................................................................................... 50 Figure 14: Receptor Site B, Nighttime View ................................................................................................ 50 Figure 15: Measurement grid for Luminance Values at Receptor Site B ................................................... 51 Figure 16: Map of Receptor Site B .............................................................................................................. 51 Figure 17: Receptor Site C, Reference Photograph ................................................................................... 54 Figure 18: Receptor Site C, Nighttime View ............................................................................................... 54 Figure 19: Measurement grid for Luminance Values at Receptor Site C ................................................... 54 Figure 20: Map of Receptor Site C ............................................................................................................. 55 Figure 21: Receptor Site C-1, Reference Photograph ................................................................................ 58 Figure 22: Receptor Site C-1, Nighttime View ............................................................................................ 58 Figure 23: Measurement grid for Luminance Values at Receptor Site C-1 ................................................ 59 Figure 24: Map of Receptor Site C-1 .......................................................................................................... 59 Figure 25: Receptor Site D, Reference Photograph ................................................................................... 62 Figure 26: Receptor Site D, Nighttime View ............................................................................................... 62 Figure 27: Measurement grid for Luminance Values at Receptor Site D ................................................... 63 Figure 28: Map of Receptor Site D ............................................................................................................. 63 Figure 29: Receptor Site D-1, Reference Photograph ................................................................................ 66 Figure 30: Receptor Site D-1, Nighttime View ............................................................................................ 66 Figure 31: Measurement grid for Luminance Values at Receptor Site D-1 ................................................ 67 Figure 32: Map of Receptor Site D-1 .......................................................................................................... 67 Figure 33: Receptor Site E, Reference Photograph ................................................................................... 70 Figure 34: Receptor Site E, Nighttime View ................................................................................................ 70 Figure 35: Measurement grid for Luminance Values at Receptor Site E ................................................... 71 Figure 36: Map of Receptor Site E .............................................................................................................. 71 Figure 37: Receptor Site F, Reference Photograph ................................................................................... 74 Figure 38: Receptor Site F, Nighttime View ................................................................................................ 74 Figure 39: Measurement grid for Luminance Values at Receptor Site F .................................................... 75 Figure 40: Map of Receptor Site F .............................................................................................................. 75 Figure 41: Receptor Site G, Reference Photograph ................................................................................... 78 Figure 42: Receptor Site G, Nighttime View ............................................................................................... 78 Figure 43: Measurement grid for Luminance Values at Receptor Site G ................................................... 78 Figure 44: Map of Receptor Site G ............................................................................................................. 79 Figure 45: Receptor Site H, Reference Photograph ................................................................................... 82 Figure 46: Receptor Site H, Nighttime View ............................................................................................... 83 Figure 47: Measurement grid for Luminance Values at Receptor Site H ................................................... 83 Figure 48: Map of Receptor Site H ............................................................................................................. 83 Figure 49: Receptor Site J, Reference Photograph .................................................................................... 86 Figure 50: Receptor Site J, Nighttime View ................................................................................................ 86 Figure 51: Measurement grid for Luminance Values at Receptor Site J .................................................... 87 Figure 52: Map of Receptor Site J .............................................................................................................. 87 Figure 53: Field of View for Computer Simulation ...................................................................................... 91

Page 6: 6.5 LW Red-line of Lighting Report

Archer Forward: Campus Preservation and Improvement Plan - Lighting Study Page 5 The Archer School for Girls July 2013

Figure 54: Map of Project Area ................................................................................................................... 92 Figure 55: Modeled interior illuminance of Main Building with calculation points. ...................................... 95 Figure 56: Modeled interior illuminance of North Wing Renovation. .......................................................... 96 Figure 57: Modeled interior illuminance of Multipurpose Facility, large multi-use rooms. .......................... 98 Figure 58: Modeled interior illuminance of Multipurpose Facility, Ambulatory and open activity

areas .......................................................................................................................................... 98 Figure 59: Modeled interior illuminance of Aquatics Center, locker room locations. .................................. 99 Figure 60: Modeled interior illuminance of Performing Arts Center, Office and Dance Studio ................... 99 Figure 61: Modeled illuminance Underground Parking Structure – Northeast corner .............................. 101 Figure 62: Modeled illuminance North Garden ......................................................................................... 102 Figure 63: Modeled illuminance Underground Parking Structure – Southwest corner ............................. 102 Figure 64: Fixture Types SJ, SJ-1 and SJ-2 ............................................................................................. 105 Figure 65: Fixture Types SJ-3, SJ-4 and SJ-5 .......................................................................................... 106 Figure 66: Athletic Fields Lighting Pole Locations and Luminaires .......................................................... 107 Figure 67: Modeled illuminance of the Athletic Fields .............................................................................. 108 Figure 68: Modeled illuminance of the Exterior Walkways and Plazas around Performing Arts

Center ...................................................................................................................................... 111 Figure 69: Modeled illuminance of the Exterior Walkways/ Court of Leaders .......................................... 111 Figure 70: Modeled illuminance of the Exterior Walkways ....................................................................... 112 Figure 71: Modeled illuminance of the Exterior Walkways and Plazas around Visual Arts Center

and Aquatics Center ................................................................................................................ 112 Figure 72: Illustration of useful light vs. light pollution .............................................................................. 114 Figure 73: Field of View shown at Receptor Site A .................................................................................. 122 Figure 74: Field of View shown at Receptor Site B .................................................................................. 125 Figure 75: Field of View shown at Receptor Site C .................................................................................. 127 Figure 76: Field of View shown at Receptor Site C-1 ............................................................................... 130 Figure 77: Field of View shown at Receptor Site D .................................................................................. 133 Figure 78: Map of Sight Line Studies for Athletics Fields shows specific Luminaire locations and

Receptor Site D ....................................................................................................................... 136 Figure 79: View study of luminaire shows the shielding blocks the view of lamp. .................................... 137 Figure 80: View study from Receptor Site to Luminaire shows the shielding blocks the view of

lamp. ........................................................................................................................................ 137 Figure 81: Field of view shown at Receptor Site D-1 ................................................................................ 138 Figure 82: Field of View shown at Receptor Site E .................................................................................. 141 Figure 83: Map of Sight Line Studies for Athletics Fields shows specific Luminaire locations and

Receptor Site E. ...................................................................................................................... 144 Figure 84: View study of luminaire shows the shielding blocks the view of lamp. .................................... 145 Figure 85: View study from Receptor Site to Luminaire shows the shielding blocks the view of

lamp. ........................................................................................................................................ 145 Figure 86: Field of view shown at Receptor Site F, Facing East .............................................................. 146 Figure 87: Map of Sight Line Studies for Athletics Fields shows specific Luminaire locations and

Receptor Site F........................................................................................................................ 149 Figure 88: View study of luminaire shows the shielding blocks the view of lamp. .................................... 150 Figure 89: View study from Receptor Site to Luminaire shows the shielding blocks the view of

lamp. ........................................................................................................................................ 150 Figure 90: Field of View shown at Receptor Site G .................................................................................. 151 Figure 91: Field of View shown at Receptor Site H .................................................................................. 154 Figure 92: Field of View shown at Receptor Site J ................................................................................... 157 Figure 93: Map of Sight Line Studies for Athletics Fields shows specific Luminaire locations and

Receptor Site J ........................................................................................................................ 160 Figure 94: View study of luminaire shows the shielding blocks the view of lamp. .................................... 161 Figure 95: View study from Receptor Site to Luminaire shows the shielding blocks the view of

lamp. ........................................................................................................................................ 161

Page 7: 6.5 LW Red-line of Lighting Report

Archer Forward: Campus Preservation and Improvement Plan - Lighting Study Page 6 The Archer School for Girls July 2013

LIST OF TABLES Table 1: Summary Comparison of Measured and Calculated Illuminance Conditions .............................. 23 Table 2: Summary of Calculated Illuminance Values at Boundary of Project ............................................ 24 Table 3: Summary Comparison of Measured and Calculated Luminance Conditions ............................... 26 Table 4: Summary of Coverage for Existing and Project ............................................................................ 27 Table 5: Summary of Context for Existing and Project ............................................................................... 27 Table 6: Lighting Criteria ............................................................................................................................. 42 Table 7: Summary of Existing Luminance Data .......................................................................................... 44 Table 8: Summary of Existing Field Observation Conditions ...................................................................... 45 Table 9: Analysis of Existing Conditions at Receptor Site A ....................................................................... 48 Table 10: Existing Contrast, Calculated Luminance Ratios (footLamberts) at Receptor Site A ................. 48 Table 11: Existing Luminance Measurements at Receptor Site A.............................................................. 49 Table 12: Analysis of Existing Conditions at Receptor Site B ..................................................................... 52 Table 13: Existing Contrast, Calculated Luminance Ratios (footLamberts) at Receptor Site B ................. 52 Table 14: Existing Luminance Measurements at Receptor Site B.............................................................. 53 Table 15: Analysis of Existing Conditions at Site C .................................................................................... 56 Table 16: Existing Contrast, Calculated Luminance Ratios (footLamberts) at Receptor Site C ................. 57 Table 17: Existing Luminance Measurements at Receptor Site C ............................................................. 57 Table 18: Analysis of Existing Conditions at Site C-1 ................................................................................. 60 Table 19: Existing Contrast, Calculated Luminance Ratios (footLamberts) at Receptor Site C-1 ............. 61 Table 20: Existing Luminance Measurements at Receptor Site C-1 .......................................................... 61 Table 21: Analysis of Existing Conditions at Receptor Site D .................................................................... 64 Table 22: Existing Contrast, Calculated Luminance Ratios (footLamberts) at Receptor Site D ................. 64 Table 23: Existing Luminance Measurements at Receptor Site D ............................................................. 65 Table 24: Analysis of Existing Conditions at Site D-1 ................................................................................. 68 Table 25: Existing Contrast, Calculated Luminance Ratios (footLamberts) at Receptor Site D-1 ............. 69 Table 26: Existing Luminance Measurements at Receptor Site D-1 .......................................................... 69 Table 27: Analysis of Existing Conditions at Receptor Site E ..................................................................... 72 Table 28: Existing Contrast, Calculated Luminance Ratios (footLamberts) at Receptor Site E ................. 73 Table 29: Existing Luminance Measurements at Receptor Site E.............................................................. 73 Table 30: Analysis of Existing Conditions at Receptor Site F ..................................................................... 76 Table 31: Existing Contrast, Calculated Luminance Ratios (footLamberts) at Receptor Site F ................. 77 Table 32: Existing Luminance Measurements at Receptor Site F .............................................................. 77 Table 33: Analysis of Existing Conditions at Receptor Site G .................................................................... 80 Table 34: Existing Contrast, Calculated Luminance Ratios (footLamberts) at Receptor Site G ................ 80 Table 35: Existing Luminance Measurements at Receptor Site G ............................................................. 81 Table 36: Analysis of Existing Conditions at Receptor Site H .................................................................... 84 Table 37: Existing Contrast, Calculated Luminance Ratios (footLamberts) at Receptor Site H ................. 85 Table 38: Existing Luminance Measurements at Receptor Site H ............................................................. 85 Table 39: Analysis of Existing Conditions at Receptor Site J ..................................................................... 88 Table 40: Existing Contrast, Calculated Luminance Ratios (footLamberts) at Receptor Site J ................. 88 Table 41: Existing Luminance Measurements at Receptor Site J .............................................................. 89 Table 42: Typical classroom Interior Luminaire Schedule .......................................................................... 94 Table 43: Calculation Summary of Main Building ....................................................................................... 95 Table 44: Typical classroom Interior Luminaire Schedule .......................................................................... 96 Table 45: Calculation Summary of North Wing Renovation ....................................................................... 97 Table 46: Interior Luminaire Schedule ........................................................................................................ 97 Table 47: The Underground Parking Structure Exterior Luminaire Schedule .......................................... 100 Table 48: Calculation Summary of Underground Parking Structure ......................................................... 103 Table 49: Athletic Fields Luminaire Schedule ........................................................................................... 104 Table 50: Modeled illuminance of the Athletic Fields* .............................................................................. 108 Table 51: Exterior Luminaire Schedule ..................................................................................................... 110 Table 52: Summary of Calculated Illuminance Values at Receptor Sites ................................................ 116 Table 53: Summary of Calculated Illuminance values at Boundary of Project ......................................... 117 Table 54: Summary of Calculated Illuminance Values at Receptor Sites ................................................ 119

Page 8: 6.5 LW Red-line of Lighting Report

Archer Forward: Campus Preservation and Improvement Plan - Lighting Study Page 7 The Archer School for Girls July 2013

Table 55: Summary of Coverage for Existing and Project ........................................................................ 120 Table 56: Summary of Context for Existing and Project ........................................................................... 120 Table 57: Visual Analysis of Future Conditions at Receptor Site A .......................................................... 123 Table 58: Calculation Results of Project at Receptor Site A with Athletic Fields Lighting On .................. 124 Table 59: Calculation Results of Project at Receptor Site A with Athletic Field Lighting Off .................... 124 Table 60: Visual Analysis of Future Conditions at Receptor Site B .......................................................... 125 Table 61: Calculations Results of Project at Receptor Site B with Athletic Fields Lighting On ................ 126 Table 62: Calculation Results of Project Receptor Site B with Athletic Fields Lighting Off ...................... 126 Table 63: Visual Analysis of Future Conditions at Site C ......................................................................... 128 Table 64: Calculations Results of Project at Receptor Site C with Athletic Fields Lighting On ................ 129 Table 65: Calculation Results of Project at Receptor Site C with Athletic Fields Lighting Off .................. 129 Table 66: Visual Analysis of Future Conditions at Site C-1 ...................................................................... 130 Table 67: Calculations Results of Project at Receptor Site C-1 with Athletic Fields Lighting On ............. 132 Table 68: Calculation Results of Project at Receptor Site C-1 with Athletic Fields Lighting Off ............... 132 Table 69: Visual Analysis of Future Conditions at Site D ......................................................................... 134 Table 70: Calculation Results of Project at Receptor Site D with Athletic Fields Lighting On .................. 135 Table 71: Calculation Results of Project at Receptor Site D with Athletic Fields Lighting Off .................. 135 Table 72: View Angle Analysis for Lamp Shielding for Receptor Site D ................................................... 137 Table 73: Visual Analysis of Future Conditions at Site D-1 ...................................................................... 138 Table 74: Calculations Results of Project at Receptor Site D-1 with Athletic Fields Lighting On ............. 140 Table 75: Calculation Results of Project at Receptor Site D-1 with Athletic Fields Lighting Off ............... 140 Table 76: Visual Analysis of Future Conditions at Site E .......................................................................... 141 Table 77: Calculation Results of Project at Receptor Site E with Athletic Fields Lighting On .................. 143 Table 78: Calculation Results of Project at Receptor Site E with Athletic Fields Lighting Off .................. 143 Table 79: View Angle Analysis for Lamp Shielding for Receptor Site E ................................................... 145 Table 80: Visual Analysis of Future Conditions at Receptor Site F .......................................................... 147 Table 81: Calculation Results of Project at Receptor Site F with Athletic Fields Lighting On .................. 148 Table 82: Calculation Results of Project at Receptor Site F with Athletic Fields Lighting Off .................. 148 Table 83: View Angle Analysis for Lamp Shielding for Receptor Site F ................................................... 150 Table 84: Visual Analysis of Future Conditions at Receptor Site G.......................................................... 152 Table 85: Calculations Results at Receptor Site G with Athletic Fields Lighting On ................................ 153 Table 86: Calculation Results of Project at Receptor Site G with Athletic Fields Lighting Off .................. 153 Table 87: Visual Analysis of Future Conditions at Receptor Site H .......................................................... 154 Table 88: Calculations Results at Receptor Site H with Athletic Fields Lighting On ................................ 156 Table 89: Calculation Results of Project at Receptor Site H with Athletic Fields Lighting Off .................. 156 Table 90: Visual Analysis of Future Conditions at Receptor Site J........................................................... 158 Table 91: Calculations Results at Receptor Site J with Athletic Fields Lighting On ................................. 159 Table 92: Calculation Results of Project at Receptor Site J with Athletic Fields Lighting Off ................... 159 Table 93: View Angle Analysis for Lamp Shielding for Receptor Site J ................................................... 161 Table 94: Summary of Existing Field Observation Conditions .................................................................. 163 Table 95: Summary of Existing Field Luminance Data ............................................................................. 164 Table 96: Summary Comparison of Measured and Calculated Illuminance Conditions .......................... 166 Table 97: Summary of Calculated Illuminance Values at Boundary of Project ........................................ 167 Table 98: Summary Comparison of Measured and Calculated Luminance Conditions ........................... 169 Table 99: Summary of Coverage for Existing and Project ........................................................................ 170 Table 100: Summary of Context for Existing and Project ......................................................................... 170

Page 9: 6.5 LW Red-line of Lighting Report

Archer Forward: Campus Preservation and Improvement Plan - Lighting Study Page 8 The Archer School for Girls July 2013

1 INTRODUCTION

1.1 Summary of Study Organization This Environmental Impact Lighting Analysis Study (Study) has been prepared by Francis Krahe & Associates, Inc. to analyze Project lighting related to the proposed Archer Forward: Campus Preservation and Improvement Plan (Project) at The Archer School for Girls (Archer). This Study defines the existing lighting conditions within and surrounding the Project Site, reviews the applicable lighting regulations in the area, and models the lighting of the proposed Project to evaluate the potential Project lighting impacts on surrounding areas.

1.2 Outline of Study This Introduction, Section 1, outlines the scope and intent of this Study, describes the Project and establishes relevant thresholds and criteria. Section 2 contains a glossary of illumination terminology used in this Study. Section 3 describes existing lighting conditions within the Project vicinity. In addition, Section 4 evaluates potential lighting impacts associated with the Project.

1.3 Project Description The Project Site is comprised of approximately 7.31 acres, including the existing 6.2 acre Archer campus, which includes the Main Building, outdoor athletic fields, surface parking, and associated landscaped plazas, courtyards, and pedestrian paths. The remainder of the Project Site is comprised of two adjacent properties currently owned by Archer that comprise approximately 1.1 acres. The Project proposes to provide Archer with modern, 21st century facilities to continue fulfilling its educational mission now and in the future. The Project proposes to replace the existing North Wing of the Main Building with an entirely new North Wing that would provide upgraded classrooms and improved lighting, air conditioning, and information technologies (North Wing Renovation). A kitchen, a faculty workroom, offices, and renovation of the existing courtyards located between the North Wing and the Main Building also would be included as part of the North Wing Renovation. During construction of the North Wing, Archer would establish a Temporary Classroom Village on the existing outdoor athletic fields. The Project also proposes the development of new athletic, performing arts, and visual arts facilities, including an approximately 41,400-square-foot Multipurpose Facility, an approximately 22,600-square-foot Performing Arts Center, an approximately 7,400-square-foot Visual Arts Center, and an approximately 2,300-square-foot Aquatics Center. The existing outdoor athletic fields would also be improved and would include regulation-size soccer and softball fields. In addition, parking is proposed in a new underground parking structure to accommodate approximately 212 cars within the western portion of the campus. The Project also includes associated landscaped plazas, courtyards, and pedestrian paths. The Project’s new facilities are described in more detail below.

1.3.1 New Facilities 1) Multipurpose Facility, North Garden and Court of Leaders The proposed Multipurpose Facility would be constructed in the northeast portion of the Project Site. This new building would include approximately 41,400 square feet that would provide indoor athletics facilities for the Middle School and Upper School. The proposed Multipurpose Facility would also be designed to allow the Upper School gymnasium to host all-school assemblies. In addition, the Multipurpose Facility would support ancillary uses, such as a campus store and concession area, staff offices, conference and meeting rooms, a medical office, a training room, a weight room, a cardio-aerobics room, a yoga and dance studio, Upper School and Middle School locker rooms, a stage, a laundry room and uniform storage area, and storage for building support equipment.

Page 10: 6.5 LW Red-line of Lighting Report

Archer Forward: Campus Preservation and Improvement Plan - Lighting Study Page 9 The Archer School for Girls July 2013

The Multipurpose Facility would be comprised of two general levels, with a Middle School gymnasium on the lower level and an Upper School gymnasium on the upper level. The lower level would be located below grade and partially open to the sunken North Garden to the west. Lighting techniques in the Multipurpose Facility would facilitate visual acuity and comfort within uniformly illuminated classrooms, offices, athletic facilities, and circulation areas. Minimum average illuminance levels would range from 10 footcandles for circulation to 50 footcandles within the Middle School and Upper School gymnasiums. Lighting techniques would minimize high luminance values on the interior ceilings and walls. To enhance interconnection to the North Garden, decorative pendants with concealed light sources would provide a subdued accent adjacent to the full height glazing on the western façade of the Multipurpose Facility. The sunken North Garden, which would serve as the primary access point to and from the underground parking structure at the campus level, would include a garden and overlook area with seating, planted steps, an open lawn, a grove of trees with paths and seating at the edges, and planted steps leading to the underground parking structure. Directly south of the Multipurpose Facility and the North Garden would be the Court of Leaders, a landscaped plaza area and pedestrian path that would serve as a new focal point on campus, support small outdoor gatherings, and provide connections for the on-site buildings. Lighting techniques within the North Garden, Court of Leaders and other pedestrian areas would primarily illuminate the ground plane. Shielded light sources would minimize glare and upwardly directed light. Accent lighting of trees, landscape and wayfinding elements would create visual interest and develop a comfortable, pleasant night space and sense of place. Lighting techniques would emphasize uniformity and visual comfort. Illuminance levels would be subdued while appropriate for safety and security within an exterior pedestrian area. Adjacent to building entries, illuminance levels would increase to welcome the Archer community and facilitate a comfortable transition between exterior and interior illumination levels. The Project lighting would incorporate components and methods following recommended best practice to minimize glare and light trespass. All lighting fixtures would be shielded to minimize direct view of lamps, eliminate high brightness glare, and aimed so that light is contained within the Project Site. Exit pathways would be illuminated to provide code required illumination for public safety with shielded light sources directed downward. 2) Performing Arts Center The proposed Performing Arts Center would be located along the eastern boundary of the campus, east of the new North Wing, north of the apartment building located at 125 North Barrington Avenue and south of the proposed Visual Arts Center and the residential properties located at 11718 West Chaparal Street and 11706 West Chaparal Street. The Performing Arts Center would provide stage, auditorium, and rehearsal facilities for Archer’s performing arts program. Specifically, the Performing Arts Center would support uses such as a gallery, auditorium and theater, stage, dressing rooms and a green room, set design and scene-shop, a black box theater, a dance studio, an instrumental music room, a vocal music room, faculty offices, costume storage and laundry area, stage storage, and general building support equipment. Lighting in the Performing Arts Center that is visible from the exterior of the building is located at the north stairwell as well as the northwestern and western facades. The program within these areas would range from circulation to offices and a dance studio. The illumination techniques in these locations would prioritize uniformity, utilize low brightness light fixtures that shield light sources and provide adequate illumination for visual acuity, safety, and security. Lighting for theatrical and production purposes is not visible from the exterior of the Performing Arts Center. The Project lighting would incorporate components and methods following recommended best

Page 11: 6.5 LW Red-line of Lighting Report

Archer Forward: Campus Preservation and Improvement Plan - Lighting Study Page 10 The Archer School for Girls July 2013

practice to minimize glare and light trespass. All lighting fixtures would be shielded to minimize direct view of lamps, eliminate high brightness glare, and aimed so that light is contained within the Project Site. 3) Visual Arts Center The proposed Visual Arts Center would be located along the eastern boundary of the campus, north of the Performing Arts Center and west of the residential property located at 11718 West Chaparal Street. This new building would provide studio and gallery space. The Visual Arts Center would specifically include a gallery, two fine art studios, a digital art studio, a photography lab, a ceramics lab, a kiln room, faculty offices, conference rooms, and dark room for photography. Lighting in the Visual Arts Center would provide for uniform illumination within conference rooms, classrooms and studios to facilitate visual acuity, safety and security. The illumination techniques in these locations would prioritize uniformity and utilize low brightness light fixtures that shield light sources. The lighting system in the art gallery would prioritize flexibility and facilitate variation in illuminance and focus. The Project lighting would incorporate components and methods following recommended best practice to minimize glare and light trespass. All lighting fixtures would be shielded to minimize direct view of lamps, eliminate high brightness glare, and aimed so that light is contained within the Project Site. 4) Aquatics Center The proposed Aquatics Center would be located within the northeastern portion of the Project Site, north of the Visual Arts Center and west of the residential property located at 11718 West Chaparal Street. The Aquatics Center would provide a six-lane, 25-meter, all-deep-water swimming pool. The Aquatics Center would also provide for a girls locker room, a coaches locker room, coaches offices, pool equipment storage, and building support equipment. The Aquatics Center’s design would locate the swimming pool internal to the campus and the building along the eastern boundary of the campus. This orientation, as well as the continuous bermed planter strip along the eastern side of the Visual Arts Center and the Aquatics Center, would serve as a buffer for the residential uses to the east from Visual Arts Center and Aquatics Center-related activities. The pool would be illuminated by recessed wall mounted underwater pool lights for safety and security. The deck would be illuminated for safety and security with low level bollards and trellis mounted shielded lighting aimed in a downward orientation. The pool is not proposed to be illuminated for nighttime competition or spectator use; however, the adjacent pathway areas would be illuminated during the evening for safety. The Project lighting would incorporate lighting components and methods following recommended best practice to minimize glare and light trespass. All exterior light fixtures adjacent to and surrounding the pool would be shielded and directed downward to minimize direct view of lamps, eliminate high brightness glare, and aimed so that light is contained within the Project Site. 5) Underground Parking Structure The underground parking structure would be located within the northwestern portion of the Project Site where the Athletic Fields are currently located. The underground parking structure would accommodate all on campus parking in one location and would be open to natural light and outside air along more than 40 percent of its perimeter, allowing for natural ventilation of the structure.

Page 12: 6.5 LW Red-line of Lighting Report

Archer Forward: Campus Preservation and Improvement Plan - Lighting Study Page 11 The Archer School for Girls July 2013

Lighting within the underground parking structure would provide adequate illumination for safety and security. Within the drop off area, as well as zones adjacent to the open perimeter along the southern portion of the underground parking structure, indirect lighting would be utilized to eliminate direct beam illumination from light sources, increase visual comfort and prevent light trespass. Lighting fixtures within the underground parking structure would be aimed up at the ceiling to prevent any direct view of the lamp and to generate soft diffuse light within the structure. Lighting fixtures are located on the southern retaining wall, adjacent to 11747 and 11767 Sunset Boulevard, below the floor level of these locations. The light fixtures at this location are fully shielded and downward aimed. The Project would lighting incorporate components and methods following recommended best practice to minimize glare and light trespass. All lighting fixtures would be shielded to minimize direct view of lamps, eliminate high brightness glare, and aimed so that light is contained within the Project Site. 6) Outdoor Athletic Fields Located above the new underground parking structure and directly west of the North Garden would be new regulation-sized soccer and softball fields. These new fields would be used for practice and interscholastic games hosted by Archer. The soccer field is proposed to be located on the northwest corner of the campus with the long axis of the field running east to west (parallel to the north property line). The soccer field would also be used for field hockey. The softball field is proposed to be located in the southwest corner of the campus and would be oriented to direct softballs toward the interior of the campus away from adjacent properties. Lighting for the Athletic Fields is proposed to consist of six 70-foot tall poles with twenty-six luminaires mounted on the poles around the perimeter of the Athletic Fields to illuminate the soccer field for games. It is anticipated that three poles, supporting 12 luminaires would be located on the north edge of the athletic field adjacent to Chaparal Street; while the remaining three poles supporting 14 luminaires would be located along the southeast, south and southwest edge of the Athletic Fields. The Project lighting would incorporate components and methods following recommended best practice to minimize glare and light trespass. All lighting fixtures would be shielded to minimize direct view of lamps, eliminate high brightness glare, and aimed so that light is contained within the Project Site. 7) North Wing Renovation The proposed North Wing Renovation consists of replacing the entire existing North Wing of the Main Building, including demolition of two floors of former dormitory space currently used for classrooms, as well as demolition of the existing kitchen adjacent to the North Wing in the Main Building to address structural and accessibility issues. The new North Wing would provide larger classrooms, a kitchen, and a faculty workroom on the lower level, and larger classrooms and offices on the upper level. Rooms for ancillary functions such as restrooms and storage would also be provided within the new North Wing. With the proposed renovations, the floor area of the North Wing would increase by approximately 9,000 square feet. In addition, the North Wing Renovation would include an upgrade of and enhancements to the existing courtyards located between the North Wing and the Main Building and would provide an outdoor student seating area within the westerly courtyard. In addition to improvements to classroom sizes, the North Wing Renovation would also provide upgrades to lighting, air conditioning, and information technologies. Lighting in the North Wing Renovation would provide for uniform illumination within offices, classrooms and circulation to facilitate visual acuity, safety and security. The illumination techniques in these locations would prioritize uniformity and utilize low brightness light fixtures that shield light sources. The Project lighting would incorporate components and methods following recommended best practice to minimize glare and light trespass. All lighting fixtures

Page 13: 6.5 LW Red-line of Lighting Report

Archer Forward: Campus Preservation and Improvement Plan - Lighting Study Page 12 The Archer School for Girls July 2013

would be shielded to minimize direct view of lamps, eliminate high brightness glare, and aimed so that light is contained within the Project Site. 8) Phasing The Project would be developed in phases referred to as the North Wing Renovation, Phase 1, and Phase 2. Each phase would be designed and timed to facilitate continued school operations on site and minimize disruptions to neighbors. Phase 1 of the Project would include the construction of the underground parking structure, improved outdoor athletic fields above the new parking structure, the construction of the Multipurpose Facility, and the construction of new landscaped open space areas including the North Garden, and new plazas and pedestrian pathways, including the Court of Leaders. Phase 2 of the Project would provide the Performing Arts Center, Visual Arts Center, and Aquatics Center.

1.3.2 Lighting Strategy The Project lighting would enhance the Project Site and would be sensitive to the surrounding community. The Project design would incorporate lighting components and methods following recommended best practice to minimize glare and light trespass. All lighting fixtures would be shielded to minimize direct view of lamps, eliminate high brightness glare, and aimed so that light is contained within the Project Site. Project Site lighting techniques would uniformly illuminate the ground plane; and minimize high contrast conditions. Further, to ensure this, the following lighting strategies would guide the design, construction, commissioning and operation of lighting system.

• Identity

The method of applying light to the exterior space would support the unique blend of architectural styles with a contemporary design aesthetic.

• Architecture and Cohesion

Light would unify the Project by creating consistent and distinct light quality throughout the exterior space. Light would emphasize the distinct architectural design features within each building, pedestrian route, and plaza to create landmarks.

• Wayfinding

Light would help to define the entrances to and the circulation within the Project Site including the drop off areas, vehicle circulation, pedestrian routes, and plazas.

• Durability

Light fixtures would be attractive and durable to create a lasting sense of quality, dignity and integrity for Archer.

• Efficiency

Light would be generated by efficient light sources to save energy and minimize operating costs.

• Environment

Light would be generated from environmentally-friendly solutions that limit light pollution and the disposal of harmful waste products. Pole mounted luminaires would be designed to limit sky illumination and light trespass.

• Security

Light would create a sense of safety and security throughout the Project Site with appropriately-lit spaces providing clear identification of circulation, gathering spaces, and parking facilities.

• Visibility

Page 14: 6.5 LW Red-line of Lighting Report

Archer Forward: Campus Preservation and Improvement Plan - Lighting Study Page 13 The Archer School for Girls July 2013

The building entrances within the Project would be emphasized at night and welcome the Archer community. This environment would be designed from the user’s perspective, with a dedicated effort to maximizing the student, faculty and staff experience. Light quality affects our impression of a place, and should add to the sense of quality.

• Celebration of Internal Campus Plazas and Pathways

The Project buildings would face into the Project Site and shield the neighborhood from campus activities. Internally-facing facades and entries would be welcoming, while externally-facing facades would be subdued, while still providing adequate illumination for safety and security.

1.3.3 Lighting Techniques and Stipulations within the Project The lighting for the Project would have the following characteristics.

• Site Lighting

o Pedestrian plazas and small courtyards:

Low intensity level lighting would be integrated at architectural planters, site walls, and benches to illuminate pedestrian areas for safety and security. When necessary, shielded low brightness, pedestrian pole mounted luminaires (maximum zonal luminaire classification: B2-U2-G1, maximum code allowed, or whichever more restrictive) shielded pole mounted pedestrian luminaires would provide supplemental illumination required for code compliance. Such pedestrian poles would have a maximum mounting height of 16 feet Above Finished Grade (AFG). All luminaires would be designed and oriented to limit light pollution and light trespass.

o North Garden

Lighting system within the North Garden would provide an environment that clearly defines circulation and welcomes students and families.

o Underground Parking Structure

Lighting within the underground parking structure would be shielded to block direct view of the light source from the exterior of the underground parking structure.

• Athletic Lighting

o Athletic Fields

For adjustable luminaires, such as the Athletic Fields lighting, increased mounting heights and steeper aiming angles reduce light trespass and skyglow. To the greatest extent possible, the Athletic Fields lighting would conform to the Illuminating Engineering Society of North America (IESNA) recommendations for soccer as an aerial sport with respect to the recommended minimum average illuminance, maintained average illuminance, uniformity of illuminance, location and method of measurement of illuminance, and lighting strategies. However, in order to prevent significant impacts, the Project lighting design would compromise the uniformity of the Illuminance on the soccer field to avoid light trespass at the western edge of the soccer field. IESNA recommended uniformity is 3:1, while the achieved uniformity is 4.03:1.

For the soccer field, pole-mounted luminaires would illuminate the play area to 30 footcandles. A total of six 70-foot tall poles would line the perimeter of the Athletic Fields. Three poles would be located on the north edge of the Athletic Fields, adjacent to Chaparal Street, and three poles would be located on the southeast, south and southwest edge of the Athletic Fields.

Page 15: 6.5 LW Red-line of Lighting Report

Archer Forward: Campus Preservation and Improvement Plan - Lighting Study Page 14 The Archer School for Girls July 2013

Lighting of the Athletic Fields would be limited to 24 days per year to allow athletics activities to continue when natural light is no longer sufficient. Use would be limited to no later than 8:00 p.m., with flexibility provided for overtime.

Francis Krahe & Associates, Inc. also evaluated a lighting system that would utilize eight 40-foot tall poles with 39 luminaires around the perimeter of the outdoor Athletic Fields in lieu of the six 70-foot tall poles with 25 luminaires. After evaluating this option, Francis Krahe & Associates, Inc. determined that the lower mounting height results in increased off site view of glare and impaired on site use of the field. Lower mounting heights (40-foot poles) require more light fixtures to achieve equivalent uniformity to the higher mounting height (70-foot poles). Lower mounting heights also require higher aiming angles that result in more light projected off the Project Site and onto adjacent residential properties. This light projected beyond the Project Site is both a source of high brightness glare and light trespass. The impact from the 40-foot pole option would result in illuminance values on the Chaparal Street residential property boundary of 2.3 footcandles and up to 4.1 footcandles on the western property boundary. These illuminance values would result in a lighting impact, since they are above the threshold of significance (2.0 footcandles), established in Section 1.6.

The 40-foot pole option requires near horizontal aiming angles to adequately illuminate the field uniformly. Such aiming angles result in glare conditions for the surrounding community as well as significant impacts of illuminance to the surrounding community. For the players, such low aiming angles create a source of glare that may reduce visual acuity and impair their performance on the soccer field.

Because of the high illuminance values calculated at adjacent residential properties, the resulting glare for both neighbors and players, Francis Krahe & Associates, Inc. recommended that the Project include six 70-foot tall poles. Figure 1, below, illustrates the variation of required aiming angles, at mounting heights of 40 feet and 70 feet for the Athletic Fields lighting.

Page 16: 6.5 LW Red-line of Lighting Report

Archer Forward: Campus Preservation and Improvement Plan - Lighting Study Page 15 The Archer School for Girls July 2013

.

Figure 1: Athletic Fields Lighting, Conceptual Illustration, Mounting Height of 40 feet vs. 70 feet.

o Aquatics Center

The pool at the Aquatics Center would be illuminated by internal underwater lighting for safety and security. The pool is not proposed to be illuminated for night time competition or spectator use. Site lighting at the Aquatics Center is required by code for pedestrian movement and user safety only.

1.4 Summary of Methodology This Study analyzes whether new lighting would significantly impact areas beyond the Project Site. Existing conditions are quantified through field studies. Future conditions are assessed through the use of a computer model to predict the amount and direction of light. Because the Athletic Fields lighting would be used for a limited number of days per year, and for a short period of the evening, this Study analyzes the Project Site with both the Athletic Fields lights turned on as well as the most common scenario of the Athletic Fields lights turned off, see Section 4. Significance thresholds are defined to establish uniform standards of evaluation to measure existing and future conditions, and create a comparison analysis (see Section 1.6). The significance thresholds are evaluated at Receptor Sites within the existing and modeled calculations. Receptor Sites are representative sample locations that have the potential to be affected by Project lighting. Additionally, the model calculations address lighting at the property line, to determine the maximum impact value.

Page 17: 6.5 LW Red-line of Lighting Report

Archer Forward: Campus Preservation and Improvement Plan - Lighting Study Page 16 The Archer School for Girls July 2013

Measurements were conducted following recommended practice procedures defined by the IESNA in RP-33-00 Lighting for Outdoor Environments, TM-10-00 Addressing Obtrusive Light (Urban Sky Glow and Light Trespass) in Conjunction with Roadway Lighting, and TM-11-00 Light Trespass: Research, Results and Recommendations. Field measurements were conducted to accurately document all existing incident light at each Receptor Site location. Incident light can be understood as a vector of luminous flux moving through space. As the vector (light) is incident upon a surface, the intensity of the resulting illuminance will vary depending upon the relative orientation of the vector to the surface. The greatest illuminance will result when the surface and vector are perpendicular. The least illuminance will result when the surface and vector are parallel. In the field conditions, where there are multiple sources of light originating from varied positions, illuminance measurements are taken horizontally with the photosensor facing up, and vertically in four orientations (with the photosensor facing the Project and three additional measurements at rotations of 90°, 180°, and 270°). These measurements document the total horizontal illuminance received at the Receptor Site as well as the direction and intensity of light converging on the Receptor Site from all surrounding directions. A computer model was used to evaluate the future condition that results from the proposed Project Site lighting. The computer model includes the Project components, the existing Main Building, the surrounding topographical context, and a select number of the existing roadway luminaires located on Sunset Boulevard, Chaparal Street and Barrington Avenue in order to best predict impacts at the selected Receptor Sites. As a result, the model represents only the lighting impacts created by Project and the existing features that would remain once the Project is complete (e.g., the Main Building). The computer model software calculates the horizontal illuminance incident at the Receptor Sites. The software also calculates the vertical illuminance for a grid of points located on a continuous 40 foot tall plane at the adjacent residential property boundaries. Because the purpose of the software calculation is to evaluate the Project lighting, the vertical calculation points rotated 90°, 180°, and 270° from the Project are omitted, as these would define vectors from light sources off of the Project Site, and since no off site sources are included in the model all of these values are zero. The methods of analysis utilized in this Study are based upon the City of Los Angeles CEQA Thresholds Guide, as informed by the City of Los Angeles Municipal Code, the City of Los Angeles Building Code, and recommended practices established by the IESNA for the practice of illumination engineering design and application as well as measurement of light sources and illuminated surfaces. Further definition of the methodology utilized is presented in Section 2, Glossary of Lighting Terminology, and Section 4.2, Analysis of Project Lighting Impacts, Modeling Lighting Impacts.

1.4.1 Field Study A field study was conducted to measure and document visible light from a series of test locations to establish the existing lighting conditions. Representative measurement locations, or Receptor Sites, were chosen based on the Project’s design and the availability of views to the existing conditions. Field data was collected from October 2011 to January 2013. Field data collected included photographs and measurements of the existing illuminance and luminance at each Receptor Site.

1.4.2 Future Impacts of the Project New Project Site lighting and existing Project Site lighting to remain (e.g. the Main Building) was analyzed using a computer model to evaluate future light conditions relative to the lighting impact thresholds, as defined in Section 1.6. The brightness contrast ratio and illuminance at residential property lines are calculated for lighting configurations that support the program of the proposed Project in order to create a representative scenario for lighting impacts. For a complete discussion of the evaluated Project Site lighting configurations, see Section 4.3

Page 18: 6.5 LW Red-line of Lighting Report

Archer Forward: Campus Preservation and Improvement Plan - Lighting Study Page 17 The Archer School for Girls July 2013

1.4.3 Existing Regulations and Best Practices The Project studied in this analysis is governed by various existing regulations and operational performance requirements. Lighting installations are subject to various local codes and standards. The computer models and analysis of potential lighting impacts assume that the Project meets all applicable codes and regulations. In addition to addressing zoning and planning codes, the proposed lighting improvements must address established standards and performance criteria. For lighting performance issues, where local regulations are undefined, professional best-practice recommendations as established by the IESNA are used. To the greatest extent possible, the Athletic Fields lighting should conform to the California Interscholastic Federation (CIF) guidelines, which are based upon the IESNA recommendations. In order to minimize light trespass on the western Project boundary the uniformity on the soccer field falls outside of the IESNA recommendations. The Athletic Fields lighting must compromise the illuminance uniformity criteria to minimize light trespass and to avoid a significant impact in illuminance at the western edge of the soccer field. As noted above, the IESNA recommended uniformity for Class 3 soccer field lighting is 3:1. The achieved uniformity of the proposed Athletic Fields lighting is 4.03:1, which is above the recommended standard.

a) Existing Regulations

City of Los Angles Municipal Code (LAMC) The City of Los Angeles regulates lighting with respect to building and safety, transportation, and light trespass (i.e., the spillover of light onto adjacent light-sensitive properties). The City also enforces the building code requirements of the California Building Code and the California Electrical Code. Exterior lighting, such as streetlights and illuminated signs, is regulated by the LAMC. Applicable regulations for the Project include the following: • Chapter 1, Article 2, Sec. 12.21 A 5(k). All lights used to illuminate a parking area shall be

designed, located and arranged so as to reflect the light away from any streets and adjacent premises.

• Chapter 1, Article 4.4, Sec. 14.4.4 E. No sign shall be arranged and illuminated in such a manner as to produce a light intensity greater than 3 foot-candles above ambient lighting, as measured at the property line of the nearest residentially zoned property.

• Chapter 1, Article 7, Sec. 17.08 C. Plans for street lighting shall be submitted to and approved by the Bureau of Street Lighting for subdivision maps.

• Chapter 9, Article 3, Div. 1, Sec. 93.0117(b). No exterior light may cause more than 2 foot-candles of lighting intensity or generate direct glare onto exterior glazed windows or glass doors on any property containing residential units; elevated habitable porch, deck, or balcony on any property containing residential units; or any ground surface intended for uses such as recreation, barbecue or lawn areas or any other property containing a residential unit or units.

• Chapter 9, Article 9, Division 5, Sec 99.05.106.8. Comply with lighting power requirements in the California Energy Code, California Code of Regulations, Title 24, Part 6. Meet or exceed exterior light levels and uniformity ratios for lighting zone 3 as defined in Chapter 10 of the California Administrative Code, Title 24, Part 1.

California Code of Regulations, Title 24 Title 24 of the California Code of Regulations (CCR), also known as the California Building Standards Code, consists of regulations to control building standards throughout the State. The following components of Title 24 include standards related to lighting:

Page 19: 6.5 LW Red-line of Lighting Report

Archer Forward: Campus Preservation and Improvement Plan - Lighting Study Page 18 The Archer School for Girls July 2013

(a) California Building Code (Title 24, Part 1) and California Electrical Code (Title 24, Part 3)

The California Building Code (Title 24, Part 1) and the California Electrical Code (Title 24, Part 3) stipulate minimum light intensities for pedestrian pathways, circulation ways, and paths of egress.

(b) California Energy Code (Title 24, Part 6)

The California Energy Code (CEC) stipulates allowances for lighting power and provides lighting control requirements for various lighting systems, with the aim of reducing energy consumption through efficient and effective use of lighting equipment. Section 147 of the CEC sets forth outdoor lighting allowances in terms of watts per area for lighting sources other than signage. The lighting allowances are provided by Lighting Zone, as defined in Section 10-114 of the CEC. Under Section 10-114, all urban areas within California are designated as Lighting Zone 3. Section 148 of the CEC sets forth lighting power restrictions for signs.

California Green Building Standards Code (Title 24, Part 11) The California Green Building Standards Code, which is Part 11 of Title 24, is commonly referred to as the CALGreen Code. The CALGreen Code stipulates efficiency requirements for lighting, miscellaneous control requirements, and lighting power density for electric lighting. In April 2011, Section 5.106.8 of the CALGreen Code, which applies to non-residential uses, was amended in response to a public petition regarding concerns over security aspects of the light pollution reduction provisions. The revised provisions require outdoor lighting systems to be designed and installed to comply with the following: • The minimum requirements in the CEC for Lighting Zones 1–4 as defined in Chapter 10 of

the California Administrative Code; and

• Backlight, Uplight and Glare (BUG) ratings as defined in the Illuminating Engineering Society of North America’s Technical Memorandum on Luminaire Classification Systems for Outdoor Luminaires (IESNA TM-15-07); and

• Allowable BUG ratings not exceeding those shown in Table A5.106.8 in Section 5.106.8 of the CALGreen Code.

b) Recommended Practices Illuminating Engineering Society of North America (IESNA) The IESNA provides recommended illumination standards for a wide variety of building and development types. These recommendations are widely recognized and accepted as best practices and are therefore a consistent predictor of the type and direction of illumination for any given building type. Within this analysis, for all areas not stipulated by the regulatory building code, municipal code, or specifically defined requirements, the IESNA standards are used as the basis for establishing the amount and direction of light for the Project. To ensure the accuracy of the calculation model, the Project Site is modeled based upon the functional minimum illuminance values recommended by the IESNA. When not stipulated by local code, the IESNA recommendations provide the basis of design for the construction of lighting systems. As a result, the use of the IESNA illuminance recommendations ensures the accuracy of the model in predicting the built condition of the Project.

Page 20: 6.5 LW Red-line of Lighting Report

Archer Forward: Campus Preservation and Improvement Plan - Lighting Study Page 19 The Archer School for Girls July 2013

California Interscholastic Federation (CIF) Facility Requirements CIF uses the standards established by the IESNA, as described above, to determine illuminance requirements for member schools athletic facilities.

1.5 Lighting Concepts Overview

a) Luminance, Visual Perception and Light Adaptation Light directly affects vision, therefore vision depends on light. Quality lighting provides visual conditions in which people can function effectively, efficiently, and comfortably. In contrast, poor lighting environments can influence visual discomfort and create distracting visual noise.

The human visual system perceives the luminance of an object, or the amount of light emitted or reflected off of a surface, measured in footLamberts (fL). Luminance is the luminous flux per unit of projected area (Aθ) per unit solid angle (dω) leaving a given point in a given direction. The subjective evaluation of luminance is commonly known as brightness. Luminance ratios are dependent on surface reflectance values and the resultant illuminance (incident light) that reach surfaces.

The more common measurement of lighting is illuminance, which is the measure of light energy (luminous flux) incident at a specific point on a surface over a standard area (footcandles (fc)), or lumens per square foot. This term describes light intensity on a surface. The human eye can perceive an illuminance range including approximately three orders of magnitude. For example, the eye can successfully see from about 1fc to 1000fc or from 100fc to 100,000fc. The ambient illuminance on a moonlit night may range from .01fc to 1fc, while on a bright sunlit day such illuminance may range between 5000fc-10,000fc.

The adaptation of the eye allows a range of illuminance to be perceived and involves an eye’s response to increase or decrease in light levels that occurs within a fraction of a second. The pupil of an eye constricts in response to increase of light levels about five times faster than it can dilate in response to a drop in light levels. Therefore, a person can adapt more quickly from a darker environment to a brighter environment than vice versa. The aging eyes of older people are slower to adapt, thus will be more sensitive to changes in light levels.

The eye can so readily adapt to different light levels, that it is generally not a good judge of absolute illuminance levels. Human perception tends to compare relative brightness between the darkest and brightest areas within the field of view. As a result, a person adapted to a dimly lit environment will perceive a lit environment as very bright, and moments later, once moved into a darker environment, the same person will perceive the new environment as very dark. In the case of a night environment, people adapted to bright interior light levels may be temporarily “night blind” when they step into the dark exterior. Furthermore, the eye perceives changes in luminance and brightness in a nonlinear fashion, based on a logarithmic relationship. For example the increase of luminance from 1fc to 10fc, will be perceived as being twice as bright, rather than ten times as bright.

The visual size of an object is also one of the most important factors in how one perceives an object. The larger the object is relative to our visual field, the easier it is to see. Thus, as things are closer to our eye, they appear larger, and we are able to discern smaller details. In addition, the higher the light levels, the more precisely we can see detail. Lastly, humans can perceive smaller objects if they stand out against a contrasting background such as dark sky, just as a star is perceived against a black sky and a speck of dirt is visible against a clean white piece of paper. As a result, distance and contrast have a strong bearing upon visual acuity. In the daytime, the human visual system utilizes cone photoreceptors, operating under photopic, or pure cone vision. Under photopic vision, the human eye can detect a pulse of light that acts for

Page 21: 6.5 LW Red-line of Lighting Report

Archer Forward: Campus Preservation and Improvement Plan - Lighting Study Page 20 The Archer School for Girls July 2013

only 1/1000 second. It can detect a second pulse if the time interval between the two pulses is 1/10s. In the nighttime, rod photoreceptors, function under low light levels less than 0.3 cd/ft2, also known as scotopic vision. Rods are a thousand times more sensitive to intensity than the cones are at low levels of illuminance.

Time is another factor in visual acuity. The human eye lags in processing visual cues to the brain. As the level of background luminance increases, the time required to interpret details will decrease. Just as the camera requires a longer exposure time in dim light than in bright light, so does the eye. The eye can distinguish and discriminate details at low luminance levels if given enough time.

b) Light Pollution “Light Pollution” is a phrase that encompasses all potential negative impacts of artificial lighting. The International Dark-Sky Association defines Light Pollution as, “Any adverse effect of artificial light including sky glow, glare, light trespass, light clutter, decreased visibility at night, and energy waste.”

(i) Skyglow Skyglow is created when light is reflected and scattered by dust and gas particles in the atmosphere. Nighttime skyglow is caused primarily by light that is emitted upward, but can also be caused by light that is reflected from the ground, or by natural sources such as the moon and stars. Skyglow is inherently inconsistent, and can vary widely depending on weather conditions, the amount of dust and gas in the atmosphere and even the viewing angle. Skyglow creates increased background luminance (or brightness) and therefore results in decreased contrast. Currently, there is no standard metric to analyze or evaluate skyglow to determine any impact. Recommended best practice solutions to minimize skyglow include using full cutoff fixtures, shielding that reduces or eliminates uplight, reducing light levels or eliminating unneeded light, and limiting lighting hours wherever possible.

(ii) Glare Impacts Substantial glare impacts can adversely affect day or nighttime views. The magnitude of the sensation of glare depends on such factors as the size, position, and luminance of a source; the number of sources; and the luminance to which the eyes are adapted. Glare is defined as high contrast condition. Mid and low contrast conditions do not result in glare. See Section 2, Glossary of Lighting Terminology for a detailed description of glare.

(iii) Light Trespass or Nuisance Light trespass is a condition where excessive artificial lighting falls outside the property line. Light trespass is one of the most common forms of light pollution, and is of particular concern with neighboring residential properties. While, light pollution is a largely subjective consideration, some municipalities have established numerical definitions for what constitutes excessive light trespass.

Page 22: 6.5 LW Red-line of Lighting Report

Archer Forward: Campus Preservation and Improvement Plan - Lighting Study Page 21 The Archer School for Girls July 2013

1.6 Significance Thresholds

1.6.1 State of California CEQA Threshold Appendix G of the CEQA Guidelines provides a set of sample questions that address impacts with regard to aesthetics. With regards to light and glare Appendix G of the CEQA Guidelines asks would the project: d) Create a new source of substantial light or glare which would adversely affect day or nighttime views in the area? This Study analyzes the Appendix G question by evaluating visual contrast created by the Project. New sources of substantial light or glare are defined by the extent of visible light sources or bright illuminated surfaces (footLamberts). To accurately predict the visible light or glare from the Project, it is critical to assess the observer’s view of the Project Site, the ambient brightness within the field of view, and the visible brightness of the new Project light sources. This is analyzed in the contrast, coverage, and context factors discussed further below. The illuminance factor discussed below also informs the analysis of the Appendix G question.

1.6.2 City of Los Angeles CEQA Thresholds Guide In the context of the questions from Appendix G of the CEQA Guidelines, the Los Angeles CEQA Thresholds Guide (2006) states that the determination of significance regarding artificial light impacts shall be made on a case-by-case basis, considering the following factors:

• The change in ambient illumination levels as a result of project sources; and • The extent to which project lighting would spill off the project site and affect adjacent light-

sensitive areas.

The L.A. CEQA Thresholds Guide references the illuminance thresholds contained within the LAMC Sec. 93.0117(b). This Study analyzes the City of Los Angeles CEQA Thresholds Guide factors by evaluating the change in the incident light (footcandles) at the adjacent property(s) resulting from the Project Site lighting. To conduct this analysis, the existing measured illuminance values are compared to the calculated illuminance values resulting from the Project. This is analyzed in the illuminance factor discussed further below. The context factor discussed below also informs the analysis of the City of Los Angeles CEQA Thresholds Guide factors.

1.6.3 Criteria for Significance of Impacts Based upon the above CEQA thresholds, the following criteria are utilized to determine whether the lighting impacts of the Project exceed the thresholds established by CEQA:

1) Illuminance: The Illuminance threshold evaluates the incident light and changes in ambient illuminance created by the Project and evaluates the extent to which project lighting would spill off the Project Site. The Project would create a significant impact with respect to illuminance if it creates a substantial change in light levels at residential property boundaries adjacent to the Project Site, also known as light trespass. The threshold for light trespass of 2.0 footcandles will be used to determine if the Project results in a significant impact. This threshold is consistent with the LAMC § 93.0117.

2) Contrast: The Contrast threshold evaluates potential glare and changes in Project Site lighting conditions, from the viewpoint from the Receptor Site locations. Contrast is defined by the following criteria:

Page 23: 6.5 LW Red-line of Lighting Report

Archer Forward: Campus Preservation and Improvement Plan - Lighting Study Page 22 The Archer School for Girls July 2013

a. The Luminance Ratio is the ratio of the maximum luminance value (footLamberts at bright surfaces) within the Project Site relative to the average luminance value (footLamberts) within the observer’s field of view. For the purposes of this study, glare is defined as a high contrast luminance (see definition of “glare” in Glossary of Lighting Terminology, Section 2).

b. Coverage describes the observer’s ability to view the Project Site and the visible extent of the Project from a particular location and field of view (Receptor Sites) as a percentage of the total field of view from that location. See Section 2, Glossary of Lighting Terminology for definition of Coverage.

c. Context describes the view towards the Project from the Receptor Site including visible light sources or surfaces (luminance, footLamberts) and visual obstructions. See Section 2, Glossary of Lighting Terminology for definition of Context

The Project would create a significant impact for Contrast if it creates high brightness surfaces resulting in glare conditions and if such conditions are visible within the field of view of a Receptor Site that also exhibits high context and coverage of the Project Site.

1.7 Summary of Study Conclusions Sections 1.7.1 and 1.7.2 summarize the findings of the Study, based on the criteria established above, in Section 1.6.

1.7.1 Summary of Illuminance Conclusions: This criterion evaluates the Project’s potential to create light trespass, or excess light levels beyond the Project Site. As established in Section 1.6, the threshold for illuminance impacts is 2.0 footcandles. To evaluate this threshold, in the existing condition, horizontal and vertical illuminance measurements were taken at Receptor Sites located adjacent to neighboring residential property boundaries. To evaluate this threshold for the Project Site lighting, the computer model calculated horizontal illuminance conditions at Receptor Site locations representative of sensitive off-site locations as well as vertical illuminance conditions boundary (the calculation plane is located at the ground and 40’ height) at the perimeter of the Project Site and adjacent residential property boundaries. Of the various elements analyzed in the computer models, the majority of the illuminance contribution came from the Athletic Fields lighting. Because Archer proposes that the use of the Athletic Fields lighting would be limited to 24 days per year to allow athletic activities to continue when natural light is no longer sufficient, but in no event later than 8:00 p.m. with flexibility provided for overtime, this Study analyzed the Project lighting with the Athletic Fields lighting on and off. The Project Site lighting with Athletic Fields lighting on results in contributed illuminance that is below the threshold of significant impact. The highest calculated contributed illuminance at a Receptor Site was calculated at Receptor Site E, 0.960 footcandles, see Table 1, while the Athletic Fields lighting is on. At the Project Site boundary, the highest contributed illuminance value was calculated on the Chaparal Street western Project Site boundary, 1.48 footcandles, see Table 2 while the Athletic Fields lighting is on. The lowest calculated contributed illuminance was noted at Receptor Site A, 0.00 footcandles, while the Athletic Fields lighting is on. The lowest calculated contributed illuminance at the Project Site boundary is the Sunset Boulevard south boundary, 0.00 footcandles. When compared with the impact of street lighting (measured at 1.01 footcandles at Receptor Site J), illuminance resulting from pathway lighting for neighboring residences (1.43 footcandles measured adjacent to Receptor Site E and 1.6 footcandles adjacent to Receptor Site H) and reviewed in reference to thresholds of significance for light trespass, such contribution of illumination does not constitute a significant impact. These values are all below the established threshold level of 2.0 footcandles. The Project Site lighting with Athletic Fields lighting off results in contributed illuminance that is below the threshold of significance impact. With the Athletic Fields lighting off, at a Receptor Site, the highest calculated illuminance value was at Receptor Site F, 0.65 footcandles, and the lowest measured

Page 24: 6.5 LW Red-line of Lighting Report

Archer Forward: Campus Preservation and Improvement Plan - Lighting Study Page 23 The Archer School for Girls July 2013

illuminance value was at Receptor Sties A, D, D-1, and E, 0.00 footcandles, see Table 1. At the Project boundary, with the Athletic Fields lighting off, the highest illuminance value was noted east of the Visual Arts Center and north of the Performing Arts Center, 0.60 footcandles, and the lowest illuminance values were measured on the Chaparal Street western Project Site boundary and on Sunset Boulevard, 0.00 footcandles, see Table 2. The Project would result in future contributed Illuminance that is below the threshold of significance when the Athletic Fields lighting is on and off. When the Athletic Fields lighting is on, the highest calculated value, on the western residential boundary (1.48 footcandles, see Table 2) is 26% below the threshold of significant impact. When the Athletic fields lighting is off, the highest calculated value, at Receptor Site F (0.65 footcandles, see Table 1) is 67.5% below the threshold of significant impact. The methods used to minimize Project illuminance are outlined in Sections 4.3.8 and 4.3.9.

Table 1: Summary Comparison of Measured and Calculated Illuminance Conditions

Rec

epto

r Site

Mea

sure

d Ex

istin

gIll

umin

ance

Proj

ect

Illum

inan

ce

with

Ath

letic

Fi

elds

Li

ghtin

g on

(foot

cand

les)

Impa

ct

Proj

ect

Illum

inan

ce

with

Ath

letic

Fi

eld

Ligh

ting

off

(foot

cand

les)

Impa

ct

RS A0.089 0.000 0.000

RS B0.110 0.360 0.360

RS C2.680 0.004 0.004

RS C-10.050 0.050 0.050

RS D0.011 0.150 0.000

RS D-10.045 0.170 0.000

RS E0.004 0.960 0.000

RS F0.020 0.750 0.650

RS G0.680 0.480 0.480

RS H0.003 0.040 0.040

RS J1.010 0.190 0.040

below threshold

below threshold

below threshold

below threshold

below threshold

below threshold

below threshold

below threshold

below threshold

below threshold

below threshold

below threshold

below threshold

below threshold

below threshold

below threshold

below threshold

below threshold

below threshold

beow threshold

below threshold

below threshold

Page 25: 6.5 LW Red-line of Lighting Report

Archer Forward: Campus Preservation and Improvement Plan - Lighting Study Page 24 The Archer School for Girls July 2013

Table 2: Summary of Calculated Illuminance Values at Boundary of Project

Loca

tions

Proj

ect

Illum

inan

ceA

thle

tic

Fiel

ds

Ligh

ing

on(fo

otca

ndle

s)

Impa

ct

Proj

ect

Illum

inan

ce,

Ath

letic

Fie

ld

Ligh

ting

off

(foot

cand

les)

Impa

ct

0.71 0.10

1.39 0.20

1.48 0.00

0.62 0.20

0.60 0.60

0.60 0.60

0.40 0.40

0.10 0.10

0.10 0.10

0.00 0.00

Below Threshold

Below Threshold

Below Threshold

Below ThresholdSunset Boulevard - Project Boundary

East of Aquatic and Visual Arts Centers - Project Boundary

North of New Performing Art Center - Project Boundary

South of New Performing Art Center - Project Boundary

East of Main Building - Project Boundary

West of Main Building - Project Boundary

Chaparal Street, Residential Property Boundary

Chaparal Street - Project Boundary

West of Athletic Field - Project Boundary

South of Athletic Field - Project Boundary

Below Threshold

Below Threshold

Below Threshold

Below Threshold

Below Threshold

Below Threshold

Below Threshold

Below Threshold

Below Threshold

Below Threshold

Below Threshold

Below Threshold

Below Threshold

Below Threshold

Below Threshold

Below Threshold

1.7.2 Summary of Contrast Conclusions: This criterion evaluates the Project’s potential to create high brightness conditions that would create high contrast or glare at the established Receptor Sites. As established in Section 1.6, high contrast conditions, that are visible from the field of view located at a Receptor Site, would result in a significant impact. Contrast is a predictor of the human eye’s perceived brightness of a particular object or surface relative to the surrounding. If a high contrast condition exists, and is visible from off site, and represents a substantial portion of the field of view, then a significant impact would result. The existing and future Project contrast conditions were analyzed by calculating the ratio of the maximum luminance value (bright surfaces) within the Project Site relative to the average luminance within the observer’s field of view. For the purposes of this Study, glare is defined as a high contrast luminance. The Project’s proposed lighting improvements result in low to mid-level contrast values and do not result in glare. For all Receptor Site locations the maximum surface brightness created by the Project is well below the maximum measured existing luminance. Further, the resulting contrast values are less than the existing conditions (see Table 3). The overall decrease in contrast conditions results from the Project lighting strategies and techniques (described in Section 4.3.8). As a result of the Project lighting improvements, the view of the Project would change from the existing high contrast condition, in which visible light sources against a general dark background create glare, to future mid contrast condition, in which light sources are shielded from view and the illuminated ground plane surfaces has a uniform illumination level and consistent surface brightness. To clarify the role of contrast conditions upon the perceived visible brightness within the field of view, this Study reviewed the portion of the Project occupied in the field of view (or coverage) from a Receptor Site. In light of the overall decrease in contrast conditions, changes in coverage do not result in a significant impact for Contrast. Receptor Sites A, B, D, D-1, E, F, G, and H showed an increase of coverage less than 10%, the coverage at Receptor Sties C, C-1, and J increased between 25%, at Receptor Site C-1, to 33%, at Receptor Site C.

Page 26: 6.5 LW Red-line of Lighting Report

Archer Forward: Campus Preservation and Improvement Plan - Lighting Study Page 25 The Archer School for Girls July 2013

While such increases in coverage show that the Project would occupy a larger portion of the view from these Receptor Sites, such increased coverage would not result in a visual impact because the visible contrast is below the threshold and less than the existing conditions. At Receptor Sites C, C-1, G, and H, the existing contrast conditions are high, and currently result in glare. The future calculated contrast conditions would be mid contrast, below the threshold of glare (see Table 3). At Receptor Site C, the contrast ratio would change from 105.8:1 to 27.9:1 when the Athletic Fields lighting is on or off. At Receptor Site C-1, the contrast ratio would change from 112.2:1 to 14.0:1 when the Athletic Fields lighting is on or off. At Receptor Site G, the contrast ratio would change from 116.7:1 to 5.1:1 when the Athletic Fields lighting is on or off. At Receptor Site H, the contrast ratio would change from 78.5:1 to 8.9:1 with the Athletic Fields lighting on and 6.7:1 with the Athletic Fields lighting off. Due to the decrease in future contrast conditions, the increase of the Project as a portion of view, does not result in an impact relating to contrast. These increases of coverage do not result in a visual impact that results from contrast. Like coverage, context relates to visual prominence in conjunction with the field of view at a Receptor Site. Context describes the portion of the Project that is visible from each Receptor Site, based on view angle, visual obstructions and topography. The context of the Project shows a small increase in the percent of the Project visible within the Receptor Site views. Overall, the Receptor Sites show a range of change from none (0% change), at Receptor Sites A, C, E, and F, to an increase of 10% at Receptor Sites B, G and H. As with coverage, minor changes in context do not create conditions that expose the field of view from Receptor Sites to high contrast conditions. As a result, changes in context do not result in a visual impact that results from contrast. The Project does not result in visual impacts from contrast, because the design of the Project incorporates lighting components and methods following recommended best practice to minimize glare and light trespass. All lighting fixtures would be shielded to minimize direct views of lamps, eliminate high brightness glare, and aimed so that light is contained within the Project Site. Lighting techniques described in Sections 4.3.8 and 4.3.9 outline the methods used to reduce the contrast below the existing levels.

Page 27: 6.5 LW Red-line of Lighting Report

Archer Forward: Campus Preservation and Improvement Plan - Lighting Study Page 26 The Archer School for Girls July 2013

Table 3: Summary Comparison of Measured and Calculated Luminance Conditions

Receptor SitesReceptor Site A

Average 0.751 0.077 0.077Maximum 72.620 1.100 1.100Minimum 0.005 0.000 0.000Max:Avg 96.683 :1 14.2 Max:Avg 14.2 Max:Avg

Receptor Site BAverage 1.181 0.167 0.167

Maximum 135.200 3.500 3.500Maximum 0.000 0.000 0.000Max:Avg 114.507 :1 21.0 Max:Avg 21.0 Max:Avg

Receptor Site CAverage 0.533 0.291 0.291

Maximum 56.450 8.100 8.100Minimum 0.002 0.000 0.000Max:Avg 105.827 :1 27.9 Max:Avg 27.9 Max:Avg

Receptor Site DAverage 7.522 0.167 0.115

Maximum 867.700 3.200 3.200Minimum 0.002 0.000 0.000Max:Avg 115.350 :1 19.2 Max:Avg 27.8 Max:Avg

Receptor Site FAverage 0.857 0.536 0.343

Maximum 59.450 4.100 3.600Minimum 0.003 0.000 0.000Max:Avg 69.380 :1 7.6 Max:Avg 10.5 Max:Avg

Receptor Site C-1Average 8.531 0.229 0.229

Maximum 957.300 3.200 3.200Minimum 0.001 0.000 0.000Max:Avg 112.209 :1 14.0 Max:Avg 14.0 Max:Avg

Receptor Site D-1Average 7.423 0.290 0.156

Maximum 866.000 5.200 4.300Minimum 0.002 0.000 0.000Max:Avg 116.661 :1 18.0 Max:Avg 27.6 Max:Avg

Receptor Site EAverage 0.262 1.163 0.122

Maximum 13.450 5.700 3.420Minimum 0.001 0.000 0.000Max:Avg 51.301 :1 4.9 Max:Avg 28.0 Max:Avg

Receptor Site GAverage 2.183 1.717 1.717

Maximum 254.800 8.800 8.800Minimum 0.000 0.000 0.000Max:Avg 116.731 :1 5.1 Max:Avg 5.1 Max:Avg

Receptor Site HAverage 0.521 0.660 0.551

Maximum 40.920 5.900 3.700Minimum 0.000 0.000 0.000Max:Avg 78.594 :1 8.9 Max:Avg 6.7 Max:Avg

Receptor Site JAverage 0.333 0.213 0.212

Maximum 9.191 3.300 3.300Minimum 0.003 0.000 0.000Max:Avg 27.591 :1 15.5 Max:Avg 15.5 Max:Avg

1:1 - 10:1 Low Contrast10:1 - 30:1 Mid Contrast>30:1 High Contrast

Project with Athletic Fields Lighting OFF

Summary Comparison of Measured and Calculated Luminance Conditions

Measured Existing Contrast

Project with Athletic Fields Lighting ON

Page 28: 6.5 LW Red-line of Lighting Report

Archer Forward: Campus Preservation and Improvement Plan - Lighting Study Page 27 The Archer School for Girls July 2013

Table 4: Summary of Coverage for Existing and Project

ExistingCoverage

ProjectCoverage

Project Change

% % %

Field of view Field of view Field of view

A 21% 21% 0%B 20% 26% 6%C 27% 60% 33%C-1 35% 60% 25%D 26% 35% 9%D-1 27% 35% 8%E 62% 62% 0%F 62% 62% 0%G 75% 80% 5%H 75% 80% 5%J 35% 62% 27%

Receptor Site

Table 5: Summary of Context for Existing and Project

ExistingContext

ProjectContext

Project Change

% % %

Field of view Field of view Field of view

A 10% - 15% 10% - 15% 0%B 5% 15% 10%C 15% - 25% 20-25% 0%C-1 18% - 28% 20-25% 3%D 10% - 15% 15-20% 5%D-1 12% - 17% 15-20% 3%E 35% - 40% 35-40% 0%F 25% - 35% 25-35% 0%G 5% 15% 10%H 5% 15% 10%J 15-25% 20-25% 5%

Receptor Site

Page 29: 6.5 LW Red-line of Lighting Report

Archer Forward: Campus Preservation and Improvement Plan - Lighting Study Page 28 The Archer School for Girls July 2013

2 GLOSSARY OF LIGHTING TERMINOLOGY Discussions of lighting issues include precise definitions, descriptions or terminology of the specific lighting technical parameters. The following glossary summarizes explanations of the technical lighting terms utilized within the Study and the related practice standards to facilitate discussion of these issues. The following technical terms are presented in this Study. Brightness: The magnitude of sensation that results from viewing surfaces from which light

comes to the eye. This sensation is determined partly by the measurable Luminance of the source and partly by the conditions of observation (Context), such as the state of adaptation of the eye. For example, very bright lamps at night appear dim during the day, because the eye adapts to the higher brightness of daylight.

BUG Rating: A luminaire classification system established in IES TM-15-07, BUG Ratings

Addendum that provides for uniform assessment of the directional characteristics of illumination for exterior area lighting. BUG is an acronym composed of Backlight, Uplight, and Glare. BUG ratings are based on a zonal lumen calculations for secondary solid angles defined in IES TM-15-07. The zonal lumen thresholds listed in the following three tables are based on data from photometric testing procedures approved by the IESNA for outdoor luminaries (LM-31 or LM-35)

Page 30: 6.5 LW Red-line of Lighting Report

Archer Forward: Campus Preservation and Improvement Plan - Lighting Study Page 29 The Archer School for Girls July 2013

Figure 2: IES TM-15-07 Appendix BUG rating thresholds, Tables A-1 and A-2

Page 31: 6.5 LW Red-line of Lighting Report

Archer Forward: Campus Preservation and Improvement Plan - Lighting Study Page 30 The Archer School for Girls July 2013

Figure 3: IES TM-15-07 Appendix BUG rating thresholds, Table A-3

Page 32: 6.5 LW Red-line of Lighting Report

Archer Forward: Campus Preservation and Improvement Plan - Lighting Study Page 31 The Archer School for Girls July 2013

Figure 4: IES TM-15-07 Appendix BUG rating example

Candela: Measure of light energy from a source at a specific standard angle and

distance. Candela (cd) is a convenient measure to evaluate output of light from a lamp or light fixture in terms of both the intensity of light and the direction of travel of the light energy away from the source. The Luminous Flux from a 100-watt household incandescent lamp at 90 degrees (horizontal) is approximately 150 candelas, and from a 200 watt incandescent lamp it is approximately 300 candelas.

Context: Describes the view towards the Project from the Receptor Site including visible

light sources or surfaces (luminance, footLamberts) and visual obstructions. Contrast: Calculated evaluation of high, medium and low contrast of visible light sources

or surfaces within the Project Site by a ratio of Luminance values. Contrast is ratio of one surface Luminance to a second surface Luminance or to the field of view. Contrast values exceeding 30 to 1 are usually deemed uncomfortable; 10 to 1 are clearly visible; and less than 3 to 1 appear to be of equal value.

Coverage: Extent portion of the field of view covered by visible Project Site area. Exitance: The areal density of Luminous Flux leaving a surface at a point. This is the

total Luminous Flux emitted, reflected, and transmitted from the surface and is independent of direction. Measured in Lumen per square feet.

Extent: Visual description of prominence of the Project Site and lighting elements

within the field of view. Describes visible illuminated features, and the extent of the field of view (180 degrees) covered by the Project Site and illuminated objects.

Fully Shielded: A lighting fixture constructed in such a manner that all light emitted by the

fixture, either directly from the lamp or a diffusing element, or indirectly by reflection or refraction from any part of the Luminaire, is projected below the

Page 33: 6.5 LW Red-line of Lighting Report

Archer Forward: Campus Preservation and Improvement Plan - Lighting Study Page 32 The Archer School for Girls July 2013

horizontal as determined by photometric test or certified by the manufacturer. Any structural part of the light fixture providing this shielding must be permanently affixed. In other words, no light shines above the horizontal from any part of the fixture.

Glare: Glare is visual discomfort experienced from high contrast. The light energy

incident at a point is measured by a scale of footcandles or lux, and is described in the technical term Illuminance. This incident light is not visible to the eye until it is reflected from a surface, such as pavement, wall, dust in the atmosphere or the surface of a light bulb. The visible brightness of a surface is measured in footLamberts and is described by the term Luminance.

The human eye processes brightness variations across a very broad spectrum of intensities. The ratio of brightness values generated by direct noon sun versus a moonlight evening is over 5000 to 1. Eyes can accommodate this range of intensities given adequate time to adjust. However, the eye cannot process brightness ratios of more than 30 to 1 within a view without discomfort. For the purpose of this analysis, brightness of light sources may be described subjectively by the following criteria: High Contrast Conditions: View of light fixture emitting surface, such as a lens, reflector, or lamp, where brightness contrast ratio exceeds 30 to 1 (source Luminance to background Luminance ratio in footLamberts). Medium Contrast Conditions: Brightly lighted surfaces where contrast ratio exceeds 10 to 1, but is less than 30 to 1 (lighted surface Luminance to background Luminance ratio in footLamberts). Low Contrast Conditions: Illuminated surfaces where contrast ratio exceeds 3 to 1, but less than 10 to 1 (source Luminance to background Luminance ratio in footLamberts).

Illuminance: Illuminance is the means of evaluating the density of Luminous Flux. It

indicates the amount of Luminous Flux from a light source falling on a given area. Illuminance is measured in footcandle (fc), which is lumen per square foot, or Lux (lumen per square meter). Illuminance need not necessarily be related to a real surface. It can be measured at any point within a space. Illuminance can be determined from the Luminous intensity of the light source. Illuminance decreases with the square of the distance from the light source (Inverse Square Law).

Horizontal Illuminance: Illuminance incident upon a horizontal plane. The orientation of the illuminance

meter or calculation point will be 180° from Nadir. Vertical Illuminance: Illuminance incident upon a vertical plane. The orientation of the illuminance

meter or calculation point will be 90° from Nadir. Lambertian Surface: A surface that emits or reflects light in accordance with Lambert’s cosine law.

A Lambertian surface has the same Luminance regardless of viewing angle. Light Output Direction: Luminaires for general lighting are classified in accordance with the

percentages of total Luminaire output emitted above and below horizontal. The light distribution curves may take many forms within the limits of upward and

Page 34: 6.5 LW Red-line of Lighting Report

Archer Forward: Campus Preservation and Improvement Plan - Lighting Study Page 33 The Archer School for Girls July 2013

downward distribution, depending upon the type of light and the design of the Luminaire. The following diagrams show examples of light output direction.

Figure 5: Defined Directional Light Output Configurations

Lighting Array: An installation of multiple light sources or lamps where the distance between each lamp or light source within the Lighting Array is less than 5 feet on center in any direction from any other source.

Light Source: Device which emits light energy from an electric power source. Light Trespass: Electric light from subject property incident onto adjacent properties, measured in

footcandles, usually analyzed by measurement at or near the adjacent property line.

Luminaire: A complete lighting unit consisting of a lamp or lamps and ballast(s) (when

applicable) together with the parts designed to distribute the light, to position and protect the lamps, and to connect the lamps to the power supply. Also referred to as a Light Fixture.

Luminaire Cutoff: A classification system created by the IESNA to describe light distribution from

exterior luminaires. Full Cutoff: A Luminaire light distribution where zero Candela intensity occurs at

or above an angle of 90° above nadir. Additionally, the Candela per 1,000 lamp lumens does not numerically exceed 100 (10 percent) at or above a vertical angle of 80° above nadir. This applies to all lateral angles around the Luminaire.

Cutoff: A Luminaire light distribution where the candela per 1,000 lamp lumens

does not numerically exceed 25 (2.5 percent) at or above an angle of 90° above nadir, and 100 (10 percent) at or above vertical angle 80° above nadir. This applies to all lateral angles around the Luminaire.

Page 35: 6.5 LW Red-line of Lighting Report

Archer Forward: Campus Preservation and Improvement Plan - Lighting Study Page 34 The Archer School for Girls July 2013

Semicutoff: A Luminaire light distribution where the Candela per 100 lamp lumens does not numerically exceed 50 (5 percent) at or above an angle of 90° above nadir, and 200 (20 percent) at or above a vertical angle 80° above nadir. This applies to all lateral angles around the Luminaire.

Noncutoff: A Luminaire light distribution where there is no Candela limitation in

the zone above maximum Candela.

Figure 6: IESNA Luminaire Cutoff Classifications, See also IES TM-15-07 BUG Ratings Addendum

Luminance: Luminance: Luminance is a measure of reflected light from a specific surface

in a specific direction over a standard area. Luminance is measured in footLamberts (fL) (Candela per square foot) or cd/m2 (Candela per square meter). 1fL = 3.43 cd/m2

Whereas Illuminance indicates the amount of Luminous Flux falling on a given surface, Luminance describes the brightness of an illuminated or luminous surface. Luminance is defined as the ratio of luminous intensity of a surface (Candela) to the projected area of this surface (m2or ft2).

Page 36: 6.5 LW Red-line of Lighting Report

Archer Forward: Campus Preservation and Improvement Plan - Lighting Study Page 35 The Archer School for Girls July 2013

Figure 7: Lighting Units

The diagram indicates the relationship between Candelas (cd), footcandles (fc), and lumens (lm). A point source [luminous intensity = 1 Candela] is shown at the center of a sphere of unit radius whose surface has a reflectance of zero. The Illuminance of any point on the sphere is 1fc if the radius is 1 foot. The solid angle subtended by the area ABCD is 1 steradian (sr). The flux density is therefore 1 lm/sr which corresponds to a luminous intensity of 1 cd as originally assumed. The sphere has a total area of 4 pi ft2, and there is a Luminous Flux of 1 lm falling on each unit area. Thus, the source provides a total of 4pi lm (12.56 lm).

Luminous Flux: Mean value of total Candelas produced by a light source. Luminous Flux describes the total amount of light emitted by a light source. The unit for measuring of Luminous Flux is lumen (lm).

This radiation could basically be measured or expressed in watts. This does not, however, describe the optical effect of a light source adequately, since the varying spectral sensitivity of the eye is not taken into account. To include the spectral sensitivity of the eye the Luminous Flux is measured in lumen. Radiant Flux of 1 W emitted at the peak of the spectral sensitivity (in the photopic range at 555 nanometers (nm) produces a Luminous Flux of 683 lumen (lm). The unit of lumen does not define direction.

Skyglow: Skyglow is the description of luminous atmospheric background and results from both natural and human made conditions. Natural causes of skyglow include sunlight reflected from the surface of the earth and moon, sunlight illuminating the upper atmosphere, and visible illumination from other interplanetary sources. Human made causes of skyglow include electric light that is emitted directly upward into the sky (Uplight), or reflected off of the ground. Such light illuminates the aerosol particles within the atmosphere and results in a luminous background.

Uplight: Uplight is the primary cause of skyglow and can be differentiated into two zones, (1) Lower Uplight and (2) Upper Uplight. Lower Uplight describes light between

Page 37: 6.5 LW Red-line of Lighting Report

Archer Forward: Campus Preservation and Improvement Plan - Lighting Study Page 36 The Archer School for Girls July 2013

90° and 100° above nadir. Upper Uplight describes light between 100° and 180° above nadir. Most skyglow is caused by Lower Uplight. Upper Uplight results primarily in energy waste.

Page 38: 6.5 LW Red-line of Lighting Report

Archer Forward: Campus Preservation and Improvement Plan - Lighting Study Page 37 The Archer School for Girls July 2013

3 EXISTING LIGHTING CONDITIONS

3.1 Introduction Francis Krahe & Associates Inc. conducted a series of lighting surveys at Receptor Site locations surrounding the Project Site to evaluate the existing lighting conditions from the viewpoint of the surrounding area. The Receptor Sites selected for detailed study correspond with representative locations along and within the Project Site boundary and sensitive locations adjacent to neighboring residential boundaries and the Project Site boundary. The position of the Receptor Sites was established in consideration of the Project design, as a means of evaluating potential impacts at all surrounding residential properties that may result from the Project. The Receptor Sites are both at the ground plane and elevated to simulate views from second floor windows or balconies. The following section provides a detailed description of each Receptor Site location and elaborates on the conditions at each Receptor Site and aspects of the Project analyzed.

3.1.1 Criteria for Site Locations The following criteria is used to evaluate potential Receptor Site locations:

• Future Light Intensity – Potential Receptor Sites are analyzed that provide direct views of the areas of greatest light intensity.

• Proximity – Potential Receptor Sites at a minimum distance to the Project are analyzed. This is because light intensity decreases1 exponentially with distance, locations at a greater distance would experience less light intensity than nearby locations.

• Coverage – Potential Receptor Sites that view a large portion of the Project are evaluated.

• Context – Potential Receptor Sites in which the Project occupies a large portion of the viewpoint,

are evaluated.

1 The Inverse Square Law shows that the intensity of light diminishes at the square of the distance traveled. See the definition of “Illuminance” in Section 2, Glossary of Lighting Terminology for additional discussion.

Page 39: 6.5 LW Red-line of Lighting Report

Archer Forward: Campus Preservation and Improvement Plan - Lighting Study Page 38 The Archer School for Girls July 2013

3.1.2 Receptor Site Locations Receptor Sites are listed below and their locations are illustrated in the map, Figure 8.

Figure 8: Receptor Site Locations

Receptor Site A: South sidewalk of Sunset Boulevard, adjacent to 11724 West Sunset

Boulevard, located across from the existing main entrance of the campus on Sunset Boulevard.

Receptor Site A is representative of the view of the Project lighting from south of the Project Site adjacent to 11724 West Sunset Boulevard. Receptor Site A includes a partial view of the entry drive and Athletic Field lighting. Receptor Site A evaluates a position located at the street level. Horizontal Illuminance measurements show values 3’ AFG. Vertical Illuminance measurements show values 5’ AFG. Luminance measurements show values 5’ AFG.

Receptor Site B: West sidewalk of Barrington Avenue, east of the proposed Performing

Arts Center.

Page 40: 6.5 LW Red-line of Lighting Report

Archer Forward: Campus Preservation and Improvement Plan - Lighting Study Page 39 The Archer School for Girls July 2013

Receptor Site B is representative of the view of the Project lighting from the adjacent residence at 11706 Chaparal Street. Receptor Site B includes views of the Barrington Avenue driveway and the perimeter edge of the Performing Arts Center. Receptor Site B is a worst case scenario along this Project edge due to the adjacency to the Project. Receptor Site B evaluates a position located at the street level. Horizontal Illuminance measurements show values 3’ AFG. Vertical Illuminance measurements show values 5’ AFG. Luminance measurements show values 5’ AFG.

Receptor Site C: North side of Chaparal Street, across from the existing gate, at the approximate property boundary of 11743 and 11731 Chaparal Street.

Receptor Site C is representative of the view of the Project lighting from the north side of Chaparal Street, adjacent to 11743 Chaparal Street. Receptor Site C includes views of the north and eastern facades and window apertures of the Multipurpose Facility, the Aquatics Center, and the exterior lighting that occurs on the fire lane within the Project Site. Receptor Site C evaluates a position located at the street level. Horizontal Illuminance measurements show values 3’ AFG. Vertical Illuminance measurements show values 5’ AFG. Luminance measurements show values 5’ AFG.

Receptor Site C-1: Located in the same position as Receptor Site C, but at an elevation of 10’ AFG, Receptor Site C-1 evaluates an angular relationship to the Project similar to a view from a typical second floor in a neighboring residential property, including 11797, 11755, 11743 and 11731 Chaparal Street.

Similar to Receptor Site C, Receptor Site C-1 is representative of the view of the Project lighting from the north side of Chaparal Street, adjacent to 11743 Chaparal Street. Receptor Site C-1 includes views of the north and eastern facades and window apertures of the Multipurpose Facility, the Aquatics Center, and the exterior lighting that occurs on the fire lane within the Project Site. Receptor Site C-1 evaluates a position located 10’ above the street level. Horizontal Illuminance measurements show values 10’ AFG. Vertical illuminance measurements show values 12’ AFG. Luminance measurements show values 10’ AFG.

Receptor Site D: North side of Chaparal Street, adjacent to 11835 Chaparal Street,

northwest of the existing Athletic Fields.

Receptor Site D is representative of the view of the Project lighting from the north side of Chaparal Street, adjacent to 11835 Chaparal Street. Receptor Site D includes views of the Athletic Fields lighting and the north and eastern facades and window apertures of the Multipurpose Facility. Receptor Site D evaluates a position located at the street level. Horizontal Illuminance measurements show values 3’ AFG. Vertical

Page 41: 6.5 LW Red-line of Lighting Report

Archer Forward: Campus Preservation and Improvement Plan - Lighting Study Page 40 The Archer School for Girls July 2013

Illuminance measurements show values 5’ AFG. Luminance measurements show values 5’ AFG.

Receptor Site D-1: Located in the same location as Receptor Site D, but at an elevation of 10’ AFG, Receptor Site D-1 evaluates an angular relationship to the Project similar to a view from a typical second floor in a neighboring residence including 11845, 11835, 11831 and 11827 Chaparal Street.

Similar to Receptor Site D, Receptor Site D-1 is representative of the view of the Project lighting from the north side of Chaparal Street, adjacent to 11835 Chaparal Street. Receptor Site D-1 includes views of the Athletic Fields lighting and the north and eastern facades and window apertures of the Multipurpose Facility. Receptor Site D-1 evaluates a position located 10’ above the street level. Horizontal Illuminance measurements show values 10’ AFG. Vertical Illuminance measurements show values 10’ AFG. Luminance measurements show values 10’ AFG.

Receptor Site E: Within the Project Site, at the northwest edge of the existing Athletic Fields. The position of Receptor Site E is 10’ above the field, approximately 2’ above the wall to the west of the Athletic Fields.

Receptor Site E is representative of the view of the Project lighting from the northwest edge of the Athletic Fields. Receptor Site E includes views of the Athletic Fields lighting, the west and north façade and window apertures of the Multipurpose Facility, and the North Wing Renovation. Receptor Site E provides a view similar, but more conservative than, the views of neighboring residential property, such as 11840 Chaparal Street, 134 North Westgate Avenue and 130 North Westgate Avenue, that have multiple levels and views not restricted by the fence surrounding the Project Site. Receptor Site E evaluates a position located at 10’ AFG. Horizontal Illuminance measurements show values 10’ AFG. Vertical Illuminance measurements show values 10’ AFG. Luminance measurements show values 10’ AFG.

Receptor Site F: Within the Project Site, at the southeast corner of the existing surface

parking lot, across the driveway from the southwest corner of the North Wing.

Receptor Site F is representative of the view of the Project lighting from the southwest corner of the North Wing. Receptor Site F includes views of the Athletic Fields lighting, the west and north façade and window apertures of the Multipurpose Facility, the North Wing Renovation, and the underground parking structure. Receptor Site F provides analysis of views similar to those available from the north side of the neighboring multifamily residential properties located to the south of the Athletic Fields (11749 and 11767 West Sunset Boulevard). Receptor Site F evaluates a position located at 10’ AFG. Horizontal Illuminance measurements show values 10’ AFG. Vertical Illuminance measurements show values 10’ AFG. Luminance measurements show values 10’ AFG.

Page 42: 6.5 LW Red-line of Lighting Report

Archer Forward: Campus Preservation and Improvement Plan - Lighting Study Page 41 The Archer School for Girls July 2013

Receptor Site G: South, southwestern boundary of 141 N. Barrington Avenue parcel,

located north of 125 N. Barrington Avenue parcel, and located south and west of the proposed Performing Arts Center.

Receptor Site G is representative of the view of the Project lighting from the eastern elevation of the renovated North Wing. Receptor Site G includes views of the North Wing Renovation, the eastern elevation of the proposed Multipurpose Facility, and the southwestern edge of the proposed Performing Arts Center. Receptor Site G provides analysis of views similar to, but more conservative than, those available from the neighboring multifamily residential property located at 125 N. Barrington Avenue.

Receptor Site G evaluates a position located at 10’ AFG. Horizontal Illuminance measurements show values 10’ AFG. Vertical Illuminance measurements show values 10’ AFG. Luminance measurements show values 10’ AFG.

Receptor Site H: Western boundary of the 11728 Chaparal Street parcel, east of the proposed Visual Arts Center and north of the proposed Performing Arts Center.

Receptor Site H is representative of the view of the Project lighting from the western boundary of 11728 Chaparal Street. Receptor Site H includes views of the eastern elevation of the Visual Arts Center and the northern elevation of the Performing Arts Center, as well as the adjacent pedestrian pathways. Receptor Site G provides analysis of views similar to those available from the neighboring residential property located at 11718 Chaparal Street.

Receptor Site H evaluates a position located at 14’ AFG. Horizontal Illuminance measurements show values 14’ AFG. Vertical Illuminance measurements show values 14’ AFG. Luminance measurements show values 14’ AFG.

Receptor Site J: North side of Chaparal Street, adjacent to 11797 Chaparal Street.

Receptor Site J is representative of the view of the Project lighting from the north side of Chaparal Street, adjacent to 11797 Chaparal Street. Receptor Site J includes views of the western elevation of the proposed Multipurpose Facility, the north and eastern facades and window apertures of the Multipurpose Facility, the northern elevation of the North Wing Renovation, and the proposed Athletic Fields lighting. Receptor Site G provides analysis of views similar to those available from the neighboring residential properties located at 11797, 11755, 11743 and 11731 Chaparal Street. Receptor Site J evaluates a position located at the street level. Horizontal Illuminance measurements show values 10’ AFG. Vertical Illuminance measurements show values 10’ AFG. Luminance measurements show values 10’ AFG.

Page 43: 6.5 LW Red-line of Lighting Report

Archer Forward: Campus Preservation and Improvement Plan - Lighting Study Page 42 The Archer School for Girls July 2013

3.2 Criteria As established in Section 1.6, the following factors were used to assess the existing conditions at each Receptor Site:

Table 6: Lighting Criteria

Criteria Metric Procedure Threshold

Illuminance

Measured illuminance (fc) documented at each Receptor Site and adjacent residential property boundary

Horizontal and vertical illuminance measurements at each Receptor Site with Minolta illuminance meter.2 Vertical illuminance is measured at residential property boundaries in computer calculations with a 30’ field of data points, that measure the incident light

2.0 footcandles

Contrast

Calculated ratio of maximum:average luminance measurements

Contrast ratio calculated from measured luminance (brightness) values within view at each Receptor Site. Contrast values classified as HIGH, MID or LOW

High contrast

Coverage

Visual description of the portion of the view occupied by the Project.

Describe visible illuminated features, describe the extent of the view covered by the obstructions; photograph for reference

Qualitative review

Context

Visual description of view to the Project Site

Photograph view to the Project Site from the Receptor Sites, describe the extent of the view in radian degrees, and describe major physical features. Describe the unobstructed portion of the view from the Receptor Site to the Project Site, including luminance and visual obstructions

Qualitative review

2 Horizontal illuminance measurements are made with light meter held horizontally and the sensor 180 degrees from nadir. Vertical illuminance measurements are made with light meter held in the vertical position and the sensor located 90 degrees from nadir.

Page 44: 6.5 LW Red-line of Lighting Report

Archer Forward: Campus Preservation and Improvement Plan - Lighting Study Page 43 The Archer School for Girls July 2013

3.3 Analysis of Survey Data The existing Project Site conditions and observations are summarized below in relation to the criteria established in Section 1.6: Illuminance: Illuminance values measured at the Receptor Sites document the existing incident light at that location from both the Project Site and the other adjacent areas surrounding the Receptor Sites. Four (4) Receptor Sites are located within the Project Site, while the remaining seven (7) Receptor Sites are located outside of the Project Site. Illuminance levels measured at the Receptor Sites were generally low, see Table 8 below. The highest existing horizontal illuminance level was recorded at Receptor Site C, with 2.68 footcandles, while the lowest was recorded at Receptor Site H, with 0.003 footcandles. The high illuminance level recorded at Receptor C resulted from an adjacent street light. The highest existing vertical illuminance level facing to the Project Site was recorded at Receptor Site D with 0.400 footcandles, and the lowest was recorded at Receptor Site E, with 0.000 footcandles. The highest existing vertical illuminance level facing away from the Project Site was recorded at Receptor Site A with 0.416 footcandles, and the lowest was recorded at Receptor Site E, with 0.001 footcandles. Values recorded at the other Receptor Sites ranged between these values. The highest illuminance values recorded at the Receptor Sites do not result from luminous flux originating from within the Project Site, but from municipal roadway lighting, see Table 8. Contrast: The visual evaluation of High, Medium and Low Contrast describes the perception of how bright a visible object appears to the surrounding objects. The measured values of luminance document the brightness of visible light sources and surrounding illuminated surfaces from the view of the Receptor Site, summarized in Table 7. The ratio of the most intense brightness to the overall average field brightness is the calculated value for contrast. High contrast conditions were measured at ten (10) of eleven (11) Receptor Site locations, as shown in Table 7. Only at Receptor Site J were Medium contrast conditions measured. The highest contrast condition was 116.731:1, measured at Receptor Site G. The highest luminance value was measured at Receptor Site C-1, with 957.300 footLamberts and resulted from the unshielded light source located on a residential gate at 11835 Chaparal Street. The lowest measured contrast ratio was 27.591:1, measured at Receptor Site J. The lowest maximum luminance value was measured at Receptor Site J, with 9.191 footLamberts and resulted from the visibility of a lamp within a decorative sconce mounted to the north wall of the existing North Wing.

Page 45: 6.5 LW Red-line of Lighting Report

Archer Forward: Campus Preservation and Improvement Plan - Lighting Study Page 44 The Archer School for Girls July 2013

Table 7: Summary of Existing Luminance Data

Summary of Existing Field Luminance Data

Receptor Site Number

Maximum Luminance(footLamberts)

Average Luminance(footLamberts)

Contrast Ratio(Calculated)

Relative Value(based on Calculated Contrast Ratio)

A 72.620 0.751 96.683 :1 HIGHB 135.200 1.181 114.507 :1 HIGHC 56.450 0.533 105.827 :1 HIGHC-1 957.300 8.531 112.209 :1 HIGHD 867.700 7.522 115.350 :1 HIGHD-1 866.000 7.423 116.661 :1 HIGHE 13.450 0.262 51.301 :1 HIGHF 59.450 0.857 69.380 :1 HIGHG 254.800 2.183 116.731 :1 HIGHH 40.920 0.521 78.594 :1 HIGHJ 9.191 0.333 27.591 :1 MEDIUM

Coverage: Since some of the Receptor Sites have a distant or obscured view of the Project Site. Coverage is a key indicator with respect to the significance of light. Bright objects or surfaces which are blocked from view by other buildings would have little to no impact. Coverage varies at the different Receptor Sites from 20% at Receptor Site B to 75% at Receptor Sites G and H. Context: Context includes both the Project Site and the adjacent buildings and landscape. Percent values in the table indicate the extent of the Project Site which is visible from the Receptor Site and is a good indicator of prominence. Context varies among the Receptor Sites. The Context ranges from 5% at Receptor Sites B, G, and H to 35% - 40% at Receptor Site E.

Page 46: 6.5 LW Red-line of Lighting Report

Archer Forward: Campus Preservation and Improvement Plan - Lighting Study Page 45 The Archer School for Girls July 2013

Table 8: Summary of Existing Field Observation Conditions

Contrast Coverage

Ratio % % Footcandles Footcandles

Source to Background*(Point/ Surface)

Field of view Site visible Horizontal Vertical

A HIGH/ LOW 21% 10% - 15% 0.089 0.090B HIGH/ LOW 20% 5% 0.110 0.330C HIGH/ LOW 27% 15% - 25% 2.680 0.320C-1 HIGH/ LOW 35% 18% - 28% 0.050 0.114D HIGH/ LOW 26% 10% - 15% 0.011 0.400D-1 HIGH/ LOW 27% 12% - 17% 0.045 0.008E HIGH/ LOW 62% 35% - 40% 0.004 0.000F HIGH/ LOW 62% 25% - 35% 0.020 0.054G HIGH/ LOW 75% 5% 0.680 0.078H HIGH/ LOW 75% 5% 0.003 0.013J HIGH/ LOW 35% 15-25% 1.010 0.228

LOW = 1:3 - 1:10MID = 1:10 - 1:30HIGH = > 1:30

Illuminance

Receptor Site

LOW = < 1.0MED = 1.0 - 2.0

HIGH = > 2.0

Context

Note: Summary of Field Observation Criteria, Contrast indicates the perceived contrast of the brightest source to the overall background as observed during the field studies at each Receptor Site. Note: Maximum values are noted with bold typeface.

Page 47: 6.5 LW Red-line of Lighting Report

Archer Forward: Campus Preservation and Improvement Plan - Lighting Study Page 46 The Archer School for Girls July 2013

3.4 Existing Conditions, Observations from Receptor Sites

3.4.1 Receptor Site A South sidewalk of Sunset Boulevard, adjacent to 11750 West Sunset Boulevard, located across from the existing main entrance of the campus on Sunset Boulevard.

Record of Observations Date: October 17, 2011 8:00-8:30 pm Weather Conditions: Foggy

Figure 9: Receptor Site A, Reference Photograph

(Main Building and entrance drive are indicated by dashed box)

Figure 10: Receptor Site A, Nighttime View

(Main Building and entrance drive are indicated by dashed box)

Page 48: 6.5 LW Red-line of Lighting Report

Archer Forward: Campus Preservation and Improvement Plan - Lighting Study Page 47 The Archer School for Girls July 2013

Figure 11: Measurement grid for Luminance Values at Receptor Site A

Figure 12: Map of Receptor Site A

Page 49: 6.5 LW Red-line of Lighting Report

Archer Forward: Campus Preservation and Improvement Plan - Lighting Study Page 48 The Archer School for Girls July 2013

Existing conditions at Receptor Site A are summarized below in Table 9, as related to the criteria established in Section 1.6

Table 9: Analysis of Existing Conditions at Receptor Site A

Illuminance Horizontal: 0.089 footcandles Vertical facing forward: 0.090 footcandles Vertical facing back: 0.416 footcandles High vertical illuminance results from floodlights of apartment building located to south of Receptor Site A, 11724 West Sunset.

Contrast High The view from Receptor Site A encompasses a wide portion of the main entrance to the Project Site. Existing pathway lighting elements create high contrast conditions when viewed from across Sunset Boulevard. Further, Receptor Site A is typical of an active roadway with conditions of a mixed use area with multidirectional and high traffic movement, resulting in glare from headlights. The brightness of the landscape lighting and path lighting elements is intensified by the relatively dark background.

Coverage 21% The Main Building and the entrance drive are visible from Receptor Site A. While the Main Building and the entrance drive extend across the majority of the width of the view, 79% of the Main Building and Project Site are not visible from Receptor Site A.

Context 10% - 15% Receptor Site A is located on the south sidewalk of Sunset Boulevard, a principle arterial route (Map 21, National Highway System) and includes the view of oncoming traffic headlights from both east and west traffic. The highest luminance value measured resulting from an unshielded landscape luminaire (72.62 fL). The view to the Main Building and entrance drive are partially obstructed by trees and shrubs, leaving approximately 10% - 15% visible.

Existing contrast and luminance conditions at Receptor Site A are summarized in Table 10 and Table 11 below. Table 10 identifies contrast ratios from all sources of luminance, including point sources of light and illuminated surfaces. It also distinguishes between values that are within the Project Site and values that are in other areas of the view to better determine the source of existing glare conditions. Table 11 shows a point-by-point break down of existing luminance values, as well as highlighting points of interest that are described below the table.

Table 10: Existing Contrast, Calculated Luminance Ratios (footLamberts) at Receptor Site A

Receptor Site A Location(x,y)

View Max 15, -15 96.68 :1Project Site Max 15, -15 96.68 :1View Max 60, -5 0.261 :1Project Site Max -30, 0 0.096 :1

HIGHRelative Value

0.7510.7510.7510.751

ContrastRatio

72.62072.6200.196

MaximumLuminance

AverageLuminance

Point

Surface 0.072

HIGHLOWLOW

Page 50: 6.5 LW Red-line of Lighting Report

Archer Forward: Campus Preservation and Improvement Plan - Lighting Study Page 49 The Archer School for Girls July 2013

Table 11: Existing Luminance Measurements at Receptor Site A

Receptor Site A

(deg) Y ↓

30 0.024 0.037 0.037 0.037 0.034 0.034 0.038 0.043 0.05325 0.011 0.005 0.038 0.038 0.035 0.033 0.037 0.041 0.05220 0.023 0.013 0.041 0.039 0.036 0.032 0.036 0.038 0.05115 0.012 0.017 0.043 0.041 0.037 0.031 0.033 0.036 0.04810 0.006 0.009 0.049 0.041 0.039 0.010 0.032 0.036 0.0475 0.017 0.027 0.072 0.016 0.053 0.009 0.010 0.011 0.0400 0.023 0.015 0.072 0.014 0.115 0.009 0.016 0.014 0.046-5 0.033 0.019 8.569 0.011 0.3 0.011 0.020 0.036 0.196-10 0.019 0.014 0.014 0.009 0.143 0.206 2.300 0.026 0.043-15 0.072 0.019 0.047 0.016 0.048 72.620 0.024 0.028 0.050-20 0.036 0.018 0.050 0.018 0.027 0.147 0.021 0.035 0.047-25 0.052 0.018 0.035 0.020 0.046 0.046 0.024 0.021 0.057-30 0.040 0.014 0.013 0.018 0.022 0.031 0.016 0.021 0.031

(deg) X → -60 -45 -30 -15 0 15 30 45 60

Y Axis is the vertical field of view from -30 to+30 degrees above the horizon. X Axis is the Horizontal field of view from -60 to +60 degrees. Values at the component site are hilighted in gray. Points of interest hilighted in bold. Highest value in italic.

Average Luminance: 0.751 fL Points of Interest highlighted in bold in Table 11, above The highest value shown in italic in Table 11, above Existing landscape lighting: 72.620 fL (15, -15), 2.3 fL (30, -10), 0.115 fL (0,0), 0.196 fL (60,-5) Pathway lighting: 0.143 fL (0, -10) Existing lighting on Main Building: 8.569 fL (-30,-5), 0.072 fL (-30,0)

Page 51: 6.5 LW Red-line of Lighting Report

Archer Forward: Campus Preservation and Improvement Plan - Lighting Study Page 50 The Archer School for Girls July 2013

3.4.2 Receptor Site B West sidewalk of Barrington Avenue, adjacent to the single-family residence at 141 North Barrington Avenue. At the time of the site visit, no site lighting was activated at the residence.

Record of Observations Date: October 17, 2011 8:00-8:30 pm Weather Conditions: Foggy

Figure 13: Receptor Site B, Reference Photograph

(The existing single family residence, driveway and pathways are noted by the dashed box)

*Dark portions of image have been lightened, for descriptive purposes

Figure 14: Receptor Site B, Nighttime View

(The existing single family residence, driveway and pathways are noted by the dashed box)

Page 52: 6.5 LW Red-line of Lighting Report

Archer Forward: Campus Preservation and Improvement Plan - Lighting Study Page 51 The Archer School for Girls July 2013

Figure 15: Measurement grid for Luminance Values at Receptor Site B

Figure 16: Map of Receptor Site B

Page 53: 6.5 LW Red-line of Lighting Report

Archer Forward: Campus Preservation and Improvement Plan - Lighting Study Page 52 The Archer School for Girls July 2013

Existing conditions at Receptor Site B are summarized below in Table 12, as related to the criteria established in Section 1.6

Table 12: Analysis of Existing Conditions at Receptor Site B

Illuminance Horizontal: 0.110 footcandles Vertical facing forward: 0.330 footcandles Vertical facing back: 0.210 footcandles

Contrast High The view from Receptor Site B is of one side of the single-family residence at 141 North Barrington Avenue. The brightness of the street lighting element is intensified by the darkness of the existing residential buildings in the background and the canopies of trees in the foreground.

Coverage 20% The existing Main Building, North Wing, Athletic Fields, surface parking area, and driveways are not visible from Receptor Site B. A single family home located at 141 North Barrington Avenue is visible. This represents 26% of the coverage of Receptor Site B.

Context 5% The view from Receptor Site B, of the parcel at 141 North Barrington Avenue, includes the street light located on the sidewalk adjacent to 141 North Barrington Avenue, which is the highest brightness element within the view (135.2 fL) The view from Receptor Site B represents 5% of the total Project Site.

Existing contrast and luminance conditions at Receptor Site B are summarized in Table 13 and Table 14 below. Table 13 identifies contrast ratios for both point sources of light as well as illuminated surfaces, and distinguishes between values that are within the Project Site and values that are in other areas of the view in order to better determine the source of existing glare conditions. Table 14 shows a point-by-point break down of existing luminance values, as well as highlighting points of interest which are described below the table.

Table 13: Existing Contrast, Calculated Luminance Ratios (footLamberts) at Receptor Site B

Receptor Site B Location(x,y)

View Max -60, 15 115 :1Project Site Max 0,0 0.006 :1View Max -60, -15 0.535 :1Project Site Max 0, 0 0.006 :1

MaximumLuminance

AverageLuminance

ContrastRatio Relative Value

Surface 0.632 1.181 LOW0.007 1.181 LOW

Point 135.20 1.181 HIGH0.007 1.181 LOW

Page 54: 6.5 LW Red-line of Lighting Report

Archer Forward: Campus Preservation and Improvement Plan - Lighting Study Page 53 The Archer School for Girls July 2013

Table 14: Existing Luminance Measurements at Receptor Site B

Receptor Site B

(deg) Y ↓

30 0.025 0.002 0.007 0.001 0.001 0.001 0.001 0.001 0.00125 0.006 0.004 0.003 0.001 0.001 0.001 0.004 0.001 0.00120 0.071 0.042 0.006 0.002 0.008 0.002 0.002 0.002 0.00115 135.2 0.070 0.008 0.002 0.001 0.001 0.001 0.002 0.00110 0.182 0.027 0.007 0.001 0.002 0.006 0.004 0.002 0.0015 0.158 0.055 0.006 0.002 0.002 0.003 0.006 0.002 0.0000 0.079 0.056 0.005 0.002 0.007 0.003 0.007 0.003 0.003-5 0.130 0.010 0.003 0.002 0.007 0.003 0.003 0.006 0.003-10 0.605 0.013 0.011 0.003 0.008 0.004 0.003 0.013 0.002-15 0.632 0.018 0.012 0.002 0.006 0.005 0.002 0.004 0.002-20 0.165 0.019 0.010 0.007 0.003 0.004 0.001 0.004 0.003-25 0.138 0.011 0.009 0.007 0.003 0.005 0.002 0.004 0.001-30 0.096 0.006 0.005 0.004 0.001 0.003 0.002 0.002 0.001

(deg) X → -60 -45 -30 -15 0 15 30 45 60

Y Axis is the vertical field of view from -30 to+30 degrees above the horizon. X Axis is the Horizontal field of view from -60 to +60 degrees. Values at the component site are hilighted in gray. Points of interest hilighted in bold. Highest value in italic.

Average Luminance: 1.181 fL Points of Interest (highlighted in bold in Table 14, above): The Highest value (italic in Table 14, above): Existing street lighting: 135.2 fL (-60, 15) Illuminated walkway (from existing street lighting): 0.632 fL (-60,-15) Lighting from interior of the existing residence (125 North Barrington Avenue): 0.007 fL (0,0), 0.007 fL (30,0)

Page 55: 6.5 LW Red-line of Lighting Report

Archer Forward: Campus Preservation and Improvement Plan - Lighting Study Page 54 The Archer School for Girls July 2013

3.4.3 Receptor Site C (Receptor Site C is located across Chaparal Street from the Archer gate, adjacent to 11731 Chaparal Street.)

Record of Observations Date: October 17, 2011 7:15 - 7:30 pm Weather Conditions: Foggy

Figure 17: Receptor Site C, Reference Photograph

(The existing wall, North Wing and surface parking light fixtures are noted by the dashed box)

Figure 18: Receptor Site C, Nighttime View

(The existing wall, North Wing and surface parking light fixtures are noted by the dashed box)

Figure 19: Measurement grid for Luminance Values at Receptor Site C

Page 56: 6.5 LW Red-line of Lighting Report

Archer Forward: Campus Preservation and Improvement Plan - Lighting Study Page 55 The Archer School for Girls July 2013

Figure 20: Map of Receptor Site C

Page 57: 6.5 LW Red-line of Lighting Report

Archer Forward: Campus Preservation and Improvement Plan - Lighting Study Page 56 The Archer School for Girls July 2013

Existing conditions at Receptor Site C are summarized below in Table 15, as related to the criteria established in Section 1.6

Table 15: Analysis of Existing Conditions at Site C

Illuminance Horizontal: 2.680 footcandles Vertical facing forward: 0.320 footcandles Vertical facing back: 0.330 footcandles

Contrast High The view from Receptor Site C encompasses a large portion of the Project Site, including the North Wing of the Main Building and the Athletic Fields. The existing North Wing of the Main Building lighting elements create high contrast situations in the generally dark nighttime view. The existing streetlight results in high contrast conditions. The surrounding illuminated surfaces were low brightness and dark background.

Coverage 27.35% The existing second floor of the North Wing of the Main Building is visible from Receptor Site C. Though the North Wing and the Athletic Fields extend across the majority of the width of the view, the first level of the existing North Wing and the entire Athletic Fields are not visible from Receptor Site C, because the view is blocked by the solid eight foot wall along Chaparal Street. In addition to the existing structures mentioned above, the single-family residence located at 11728 Chaparal Street is encompassed in the view.

Context 15% - 25% The view from Receptor Site C includes Chaparal Street (a low volume residential street), street lighting poles and luminaires and surface parking pole mounted luminaires. The highest luminance values was measured at the street light located on Chaparal Street, 56.45 fL. The view to the existing North Wing of the Main Building and the Athletic Fields are partially obstructed by trees and the wall, leaving approximately 15% - 25% of the Project Site visible.

Existing contrast and luminance conditions at Receptor Site C are summarized in Table 16 and Table 17 below. Table 16 identifies contrast ratios for both point sources of light as well as illuminated surfaces, and distinguishes between values that are within the Project Site and values that are in other areas of the view in order to better determine the source of existing glare conditions. Table 17 shows a point-by-point break down of existing luminance values, as well as highlighting points of interest that are described below the table.

Page 58: 6.5 LW Red-line of Lighting Report

Archer Forward: Campus Preservation and Improvement Plan - Lighting Study Page 57 The Archer School for Girls July 2013

Table 16: Existing Contrast, Calculated Luminance Ratios (footLamberts) at Receptor Site C

Receptor Site C Location(x,y)

View Max -60,30 106 :1Project Site Max n/a n/a :1View Max -60, 25 0.367 :1Project Site Max -30,0 0.152 :1

MaximumLuminance

AverageLuminance

Surface 0.196 0.533 LOW0.081 0.533 LOW

ContrastRatio Relative Value

Point 56.450 0.533 HIGHn/a 0.533 LOW

Table 17: Existing Luminance Measurements at Receptor Site C

Receptor Site C

(deg) Y ↓

30 56.450 0.168 0.086 0.049 0.047 0.040 0.033 0.030 0.02825 0.494 0.164 0.095 0.061 0.055 0.046 0.037 0.032 0.03320 0.286 0.098 0.114 0.073 0.061 0.051 0.006 0.035 0.02815 0.228 0.043 0.089 0.084 0.076 0.060 0.006 0.035 0.03010 0.136 0.034 0.081 0.017 0.092 0.069 0.003 0.005 0.0315 0.070 0.067 0.010 0.084 0.100 0.004 0.006 0.004 0.0180 0.060 0.010 0.081 0.025 0.005 0.002 0.004 0.003 0.006-5 0.070 0.006 0.025 0.004 0.006 0.006 0.004 0.003 0.003-10 0.020 0.004 0.018 0.004 0.006 0.007 0.009 0.011 0.024-15 0.005 0.063 0.052 0.043 0.026 0.022 0.013 0.004 0.010-20 0.112 0.105 0.089 0.073 0.045 0.035 0.031 0.025 0.020-25 0.118 0.098 0.074 0.069 0.046 0.043 0.035 0.030 0.027-30 0.095 0.080 0.074 0.066 0.042 0.041 0.032 0.033 0.026

(deg) X → -60 -45 -30 -15 0 15 30 45 60

Y Axis is the vertical field of view from -30 to+30 degrees above the horizon. X Axis is the Horizontal field of view from -60 to +60 degrees. Values at the component site are hilighted in gray. Points of interest hilighted in bold. Highest value in italic.

Average Luminance: 0.533 fL Points of Interest highlighted in bold in Table 17, above The Highest value italic in Table 17, above Existing street lighting: 56.450 fL (-60, 30) Illuminated surface on pole from existing street lighting: 0.494 fL (-60, 25) Illuminated surface on tree canopy from the parking lot lighting: 0.081 fL (-30,0)

Page 59: 6.5 LW Red-line of Lighting Report

Archer Forward: Campus Preservation and Improvement Plan - Lighting Study Page 58 The Archer School for Girls July 2013

3.4.4 Receptor Site C-1 (Receptor Site C-1 is located across Chaparal Street from the Archer gate, adjacent to 11731 Chaparal Street, and located 10’ AFG)

Record of Observations Date: December 20, 2012 9:07 – 9:23 pm Weather Conditions: Clear Sky – Half moon

Figure 21: Receptor Site C-1, Reference Photograph

(The existing wall, North Wing and surface parking light fixtures are noted by the dashed box)

Figure 22: Receptor Site C-1, Nighttime View

(The existing wall, North Wing and surface parking light fixtures are noted by the dashed box)

Page 60: 6.5 LW Red-line of Lighting Report

Archer Forward: Campus Preservation and Improvement Plan - Lighting Study Page 59 The Archer School for Girls July 2013

Figure 23: Measurement grid for Luminance Values at Receptor Site C-1

Figure 24: Map of Receptor Site C-1

Page 61: 6.5 LW Red-line of Lighting Report

Archer Forward: Campus Preservation and Improvement Plan - Lighting Study Page 60 The Archer School for Girls July 2013

Existing conditions at Receptor Site C-1 are summarized below in Table 18, as related to the criteria established in Section 1.6.

Table 18: Analysis of Existing Conditions at Site C-1

Illuminance Horizontal: 0.050 footcandles Vertical facing forward: 0.114 footcandles Vertical facing back: 0.005 footcandles

Contrast High The view from Receptor Site C-1 encompasses a large portion of the Project Site, including the North Wing of the Main Building and the Athletic Fields. The existing North Wing of the Main Building lighting elements create high contrast conditions in the generally dark nighttime view. The existing streetlight results in high contrast conditions. The surrounding illuminated surfaces were low brightness and dark background.

Coverage 35% The existing second floor of the North Wing of the Main Building is visible from Receptor Site C-1. While both the North Wing of the Main Building and the Athletic Fields extend across the majority of the width of the view, the first level of the existing North Wing and the entire Athletic Field are not visible from Receptor Site C as the view is blocked by the solid 8 feet wall along Chaparal Street. In addition to the existing structures mentioned above, the single-family residence located at 11728 Chaparal Street is also encompassed in the view.

Context 18% - 28% The view from Receptor Site C-1 includes Chaparal Street, a street light, surface parking pole mounted luminaires, and wall mounted luminaires on the North Wing of the Main Building. The street light is the highest brightness element within the view, 957.3 fL. The brightness of the surface parking pole mounted luminaires ranged between 32.72 fL to 4.573 fL. The view to the existing North Wing of the Main Building and the Athletic Fields are partially obstructed by trees and the wall, leaving approximately 18% - 28% of the Project Site visible.

Page 62: 6.5 LW Red-line of Lighting Report

Archer Forward: Campus Preservation and Improvement Plan - Lighting Study Page 61 The Archer School for Girls July 2013

Existing contrast and luminance conditions at Receptor Site C-1 are summarized in Table 19 and Table 20 below. Table 19 identifies contrast ratios for both point sources of light as well as illuminated surfaces, and distinguishes between values that are within the Project Site and values that are in other areas of the view in order to better determine the source of existing glare conditions. Table 20 shows a point-by-point break down of existing luminance values, as well as highlighting points of interest which are described below the table.

Table 19: Existing Contrast, Calculated Luminance Ratios (footLamberts) at Receptor Site C-1

Receptor Site C-1 Location(x,y)

View Max -60,30 112 :1Project Site Max 15,5 3.835 :1View Max -30, 5 0.069 :1Project Site Max -30, 5 0.069 :10.59 8.531 LOWSurface 0.59 8.531 LOW

Point 957.300 8.531 HIGH8.531 LOW32.720

MaximumLuminance

AverageLuminance

ContrastRatio Relative Value

Table 20: Existing Luminance Measurements at Receptor Site C-1

Receptor Site C-1

(deg) Y ↓

30 0.020 0.010 0.010 0.009 0.010 0.008 0.008 0.006 0.00625 957.3 0.009 0.017 0.011 0.013 0.010 0.009 0.008 0.00620 0.046 0.015 0.018 0.014 0.016 0.006 0.004 0.009 0.00715 0.211 0.015 0.007 0.018 0.020 0.009 0.006 0.006 0.00310 0.083 0.018 4.573 0.026 0.029 0.021 0.008 0.003 0.0045 0.047 0.020 0.590 0.003 0.032 32.720 0.023 0.004 0.0020 0.016 0.039 0.453 0.005 0.007 0.114 0.008 0.006 0.003-5 0.010 0.022 0.006 0.022 0.009 0.004 0.011 0.004 0.004-10 0.021 0.009 0.231 0.028 0.016 0.003 0.002 0.002 0.001-15 0.105 0.007 0.206 0.021 0.030 0.008 0.004 0.001 0.002-20 0.081 0.109 0.033 0.013 0.012 0.011 0.013 0.008 0.005-25 0.062 0.056 0.027 0.012 0.010 0.008 0.010 0.008 0.003-30 0.044 0.039 0.024 0.011 0.010 0.007 0.005 0.004 0.004

(deg) X → -60 -45 -30 -15 0 15 30 45 60

Y Axis is the vertical field of view from -30 to+30 degrees above the horizon. X Axis is the Horizontal field of view from -60 to +60 degrees. Values at the component site are hilighted in gray. Points of interest hilighted in bold. Highest value in italic.

Average Luminance: 8.531 fL Points of Interest (highlighted in bold in Table 20, above): The Highest value (italic in Table 20, above): Existing street lighting: 957.3 fL (-60, 25) Existing Parking lot lighting (Shoebox fixture with house side shielded): 32.720 fL (15,5) Existing Parking lot lighting (Shoebox fixture with house side shielded): 4.573 fL (-30,10) Illuminated surface on pole from existing parking lot lighting: 0.59 fL (-30,5)

Page 63: 6.5 LW Red-line of Lighting Report

Archer Forward: Campus Preservation and Improvement Plan - Lighting Study Page 62 The Archer School for Girls July 2013

3.4.5 Receptor Site D (On Chaparal Street, at northwest corner of the Athletic Fields, adjacent to 11385 Chaparal Street)

Record of Observations Date: November 1, 2011 7:15 - 7:30 pm Weather Conditions: Foggy

Figure 25: Receptor Site D, Reference Photograph

(The existing wall is noted by the dashed box)

Figure 26: Receptor Site D, Nighttime View

(Nighttime photograph includes additional view of area to right of Project Site. The existing wall is noted by the dashed box)

Page 64: 6.5 LW Red-line of Lighting Report

Archer Forward: Campus Preservation and Improvement Plan - Lighting Study Page 63 The Archer School for Girls July 2013

Figure 27: Measurement grid for Luminance Values at Receptor Site D

Figure 28: Map of Receptor Site D

Page 65: 6.5 LW Red-line of Lighting Report

Archer Forward: Campus Preservation and Improvement Plan - Lighting Study Page 64 The Archer School for Girls July 2013

Existing conditions at Receptor Site D are summarized below in Table 21, as related to the criteria established in Section 1.6

Table 21: Analysis of Existing Conditions at Receptor Site D

Illuminance Horizontal: 0.011 footcandles Vertical facing forward: 0.400 footcandles Vertical facing back: 0.163 footcandles

Contrast High The view from Receptor Site D captures only some portion of the Athletic Fields. The eight foot wall along the Project Site blocks the view to the Main Building and North Wing. The brightness of the driveway light of 11835 Chaparal Street is intensified by the low brightness of the background.

Coverage 25% Only the wall located at the Project Site boundary, adjacent to the Athletic Fields is visible from Receptor Site D. While the Athletic Fields, the Main Building, and the North Wing extend across the majority of the width of the view, they are not visible from Receptor Site D as their visibility is blocked by the solid eight foot wall on Chaparal Street.

Context 10 - 15% The view from Receptor Site D includes Chaparal Street, the solid eight foot wall at the northern Project boundary and the residential properties on the north side of Chaparal Street, as well as 11840 Chaparal Street, on the south side of Chaparal Street. The brightest measured element within the view of Receptor Site D is the pedestal mounted gate light located at 11835 Chaparal Street, 867.7 fL. The view to the North Wing of the Main Building and the Athletic Field are obstructed by trees and the wall, leaving approximately 10 - 15% of the Project Site visible.

Existing contrast and luminance conditions at Receptor Site D are summarized in Table 22 and Table 23 below. Table 22 identifies contrast ratios for both point sources of light as well as illuminated surfaces, and distinguishes between values that are within the Project Site and values that are in other areas of the view in order to better determine the source of existing glare conditions. Table 23 shows a point-by-point break down of existing luminance values, as well as highlighting points of interest which are described below the table.

Table 22: Existing Contrast, Calculated Luminance Ratios (footLamberts) at Receptor Site D

Receptor Site D Location(x,y)

View Max -60, 10 115 :1Project Site Max n/a n/a :1View Max 60, -5 0.173 :1Project Site Max 15, 5 0.008 :1

MaximumLuminance

AverageLuminance

ContrastRatio

Surface 1.304 7.522 LOW0.061 7.522 LOW

Relative Value

Point 867.700 7.522 HIGHn/a 7.522 LOW

Page 66: 6.5 LW Red-line of Lighting Report

Archer Forward: Campus Preservation and Improvement Plan - Lighting Study Page 65 The Archer School for Girls July 2013

Table 23: Existing Luminance Measurements at Receptor Site D

Receptor Site D

(deg) Y ↓

30 0.020 0.016 0.012 0.008 0.011 0.013 0.020 0.008 0.02025 0.018 0.021 0.015 0.007 0.015 0.017 0.024 0.016 0.02820 0.021 0.024 0.005 0.004 0.018 0.022 0.026 0.004 0.03915 0.031 0.027 0.005 0.005 0.022 0.032 0.028 0.004 0.04910 867.7 0.029 0.008 0.007 0.028 0.035 0.041 0.003 0.0725 0.115 0.015 0.007 0.009 0.033 0.061 0.006 0.004 0.2910 0.053 0.014 0.006 0.006 0.055 0.006 0.007 0.005 8.461-5 0.029 0.029 0.008 0.008 0.003 0.005 0.004 0.006 1.304-10 0.016 0.021 0.011 0.009 0.002 0.004 0.008 0.007 0.200-15 0.043 0.015 0.021 0.008 0.003 0.006 0.008 0.008 0.180-20 0.020 0.053 0.017 0.012 0.011 0.007 0.008 0.006 0.022-25 0.021 0.058 0.015 0.011 0.008 0.007 0.011 0.009 0.013-30 0.018 0.016 0.012 0.006 0.009 0.008 0.011 0.008 0.014

(deg) X → -60 -45 -30 -15 0 15 30 45 60

Y Axis is the vertical field of view from -30 to+30 degrees above the horizon. X Axis is the Horizontal field of view from -60 to +60 degrees. Values at the component site are hilighted in gray. Points of interest hilighted in bold. Highest value in italic.

Average Luminance: 7.522 fL Points of Interest (highlighted in bold in Table 23, above): The Highest value (italic in Table 23, above): Existing driveway light from neighbor’s residence, 11835 Chaparal Street: 867.7 fL (-60, 10) Illuminated surface on a gate located at 11835 Chaparal Street: 0.115 fL (-60, 5) Skyglow above 11743 Sunset Boulevard: 0.061 fL (15, 5) Existing interior lighting from neighbor’s garage, 11840 Chaparal Street: 8.461 fL (60, 0) Illuminated surface from neighbor’s garage, 11840 Chaparal Street: 1.304 fL (60, -5), 0.291 fL (-60, 5), 0.200 fL (60,-10)

Page 67: 6.5 LW Red-line of Lighting Report

Archer Forward: Campus Preservation and Improvement Plan - Lighting Study Page 66 The Archer School for Girls July 2013

3.4.6 Receptor Site D-1 (On Chaparal Street, at northwest corner of the Athletic Fields adjacent to 11385 Chaparal Street and is located 10’ AFG)

Record of Observations Date: December 20, 2012 9:07 – 9:23 pm Weather Conditions: Clear Sky – Half moon

Figure 29: Receptor Site D-1, Reference Photograph

(The existing wall, North Wing, Main Building and surface parking light fixtures are noted by the dashed box)

Figure 30: Receptor Site D-1, Nighttime View

(The existing wall, North Wing, Main Building, and surface parking light fixtures are noted by the dashed box)

Page 68: 6.5 LW Red-line of Lighting Report

Archer Forward: Campus Preservation and Improvement Plan - Lighting Study Page 67 The Archer School for Girls July 2013

Figure 31: Measurement grid for Luminance Values at Receptor Site D-1

Figure 32: Map of Receptor Site D-1

Page 69: 6.5 LW Red-line of Lighting Report

Archer Forward: Campus Preservation and Improvement Plan - Lighting Study Page 68 The Archer School for Girls July 2013

Existing conditions at Receptor Site D-1 are summarized below in Table 24, as related to the criteria established in Section 1.6.

Table 24: Analysis of Existing Conditions at Site D-1

Illuminance Horizontal: 0.045 footcandles Vertical facing forward: 0.008 footcandles Vertical facing back: 0.138 footcandles

Contrast High The view from Receptor Site D-1 encompasses the eight foot wall along the Project Site as well as the second level of the Main Building and North Wing. The brightness of the driveway light on the north side of Chaparal Street, 11835 Chaparal Street, is intensified by the low brightness of the background

Coverage 27% The existing second floor of the North Wing of the Main Building is visible from Receptor Site D-1. While the North Wing of the Main Building and the Athletic Fields extend across the majority of the width of the view, the level one of the existing North Wing and the entire Athletic Field are not visible from Receptor Site D-1 as the view were blocked by the solid 8 feet wall along the length of the campus on Chaparal Street. In addition to the existing structures mentioned above, the single-family residence located at 11728 Chaparal Street is encompassed in the view.

Context 12% - 17% The view from Receptor Site D-1 includes Chaparal Street, the solid eight foot wall at the northern Project boundary and the residential properties on the north side of Chaparal Street, as well as 11840 Chaparal Street. The brightest measured element within the view of Receptor Site D-1 is the pedestal mounted gate light located at 11835 Chaparal Street, 866.0 fL. The measured brightness of the surface parking pole mounted luminaire is 0.822 fL. The view to the existing North Wing of the Main Building and the Athletic Fields are partially obstructed by trees and the wall, leaving approximately 12% - 17% of the Project Site visible.

Existing contrast and luminance conditions at Receptor Site D-1 are summarized in Table 25 and Table 26 below. Table 25 identifies contrast ratios for both point sources of light as well as illuminated surfaces, and distinguishes between values that are within the Project Site and values that are in other areas of the view in order to better determine the source of existing glare conditions. Table 26 shows a point-by-point break down of existing luminance values, as well as highlighting points of interest which are described below the table.

Page 70: 6.5 LW Red-line of Lighting Report

Archer Forward: Campus Preservation and Improvement Plan - Lighting Study Page 69 The Archer School for Girls July 2013

Table 25: Existing Contrast, Calculated Luminance Ratios (footLamberts) at Receptor Site D-1

Receptor Site D-1 Location(x,y)

View Max 15, 5 117 :1Project Site Max 0, 0 0.111 :1View Max -30,0 0.026 :1Project Site Max -30,0 0.026 :1

0.195 7.423 LOW0.195 7.423Surface

Relative Value

LOW

0.822 7.423 LOWPoint 866.000 7.423 HIGH

MaximumLuminance

AverageLuminance

ContrastRatio

Table 26: Existing Luminance Measurements at Receptor Site D-1

Receptor Site D-1

(deg) Y ↓

30 0.006 0.006 0.003 0.008 0.010 0.006 0.009 0.010 0.00825 0.008 0.009 0.005 0.005 0.013 0.008 0.006 0.013 0.00820 0.009 0.012 0.006 0.008 0.018 0.010 0.004 0.009 0.00415 0.011 0.013 0.005 0.007 0.029 0.014 0.019 0.004 0.00810 0.010 0.013 0.005 0.027 0.036 0.021 0.067 0.002 0.0065 0.026 0.004 0.002 0.010 0.041 0.030 0.226 0.002 0.0320 0.030 0.004 0.195 0.031 0.822 0.030 0.006 0.002 0.030-5 866.0 0.005 0.005 0.004 0.002 0.025 0.004 0.006 0.028-10 0.027 0.019 0.008 0.006 0.006 0.006 0.003 0.005 0.006-15 0.050 0.007 0.006 0.006 0.006 0.007 0.006 0.006 0.003-20 0.006 0.012 0.004 0.003 0.007 0.006 0.012 0.005 0.003-25 0.018 0.028 0.004 0.004 0.003 0.003 0.009 0.004 0.005-30 0.015 0.022 0.006 0.005 0.003 0.003 0.004 0.010 0.011

(deg) X → -60 -45 -30 -15 0 15 30 45 60

Y Axis is the vertical field of view from -30 to+30 degrees above the horizon. X Axis is the Horizontal field of view from -60 to +60 degrees. Values at the component site are hilighted in gray. Points of interest hilighted in bold. Highest value in italic.

Average Luminance: 7.423 fL Points of Interest (highlighted in bold in Table 26, above): The Highest value (italic in Table 26, above): Existing residential gate lighting: 11831 Chaparal Street: 866.000 fL (-60,-5) Existing parking lot lighting (Shoe box fixture located on Project Site, with glare shield ): 0.822 fL (0,0) Existing interior lighting from apartment (11767 Sunset Boulevard):0.226 fL (30,5) Skyglow: 0.195 fL (-30,0)

Page 71: 6.5 LW Red-line of Lighting Report

Archer Forward: Campus Preservation and Improvement Plan - Lighting Study Page 70 The Archer School for Girls July 2013

3.4.7 Receptor Site E (Northwest corner of the existing Athletic Fields located at 10’ AFG)

Record of Observations Date: January 8, 2013 6:12 – 6:33 pm Weather Conditions: Clear Sky

Figure 33: Receptor Site E, Reference Photograph

(The existing Athletic Fields, North Wing and Main Building, and surface parking locations indicated by the dashed box)

Figure 34: Receptor Site E, Nighttime View

(The existing Athletic Fields, North Wing and Main Building, and surface parking locations indicated by the dashed box. Note, the nighttime image includes additional areas to the right of the Project Site.)

Page 72: 6.5 LW Red-line of Lighting Report

Archer Forward: Campus Preservation and Improvement Plan - Lighting Study Page 71 The Archer School for Girls July 2013

Figure 35: Measurement grid for Luminance Values at Receptor Site E

Figure 36: Map of Receptor Site E

Page 73: 6.5 LW Red-line of Lighting Report

Archer Forward: Campus Preservation and Improvement Plan - Lighting Study Page 72 The Archer School for Girls July 2013

Existing conditions at Receptor Site E are summarized below in Table 27, as related to the criteria established in Section 1.6

Table 27: Analysis of Existing Conditions at Receptor Site E

Illuminance Horizontal: 0.004 footcandles Vertical facing forward: 0.000 footcandles Vertical facing back: 1.139 footcandles Maximum Vertical facing back (at adjacent western property boundary): 1.430 footcandles

Contrast High The view from Receptor Site E encompasses a large portion of the Project Site, with existing on-site lighting elements and lighting from neighbors creating high contrast situations in the generally dark nighttime view. The existing surface parking area lighting is fully shielded and results in low contrast conditions while the unshielded wall-mounted luminaire located on the north façade of the North Wing results in high contrast conditions.

Coverage 62% The Main Building, including the North Wing, Athletic Fields, and surface parking are visible from Receptor Site E.

Context 35% - 40% The brightest measured element within the view of Receptor Site E is an interior chandelier at 11745 Sunset Boulevard, 13.45 fL. The surface parking pole mounted luminaire with glare shielding was measured at 7.39 fL. The brightness of the street light located on Chaparal Street was measured at 3.33 fL. The visibility of this street light is partially obscured by the trees on the south side of Chaparal Street. The wall mounted light fixtures located on the North Wing result in surface brightness of 3.056 fL, located at the wall directly adjacent to the luminaire. From Receptor Site E, approximately 35% - 40% of the Project Site is visible. The Athletic Fields, surface parking, North Wing, and the northwest corner of the Main Building are visible from Receptor Site E.

Existing contrast and luminance conditions at Receptor Site E are summarized in Table 28 and Table 29 below. Table 28 identifies contrast ratios for both point sources of light as well as illuminated surfaces, and distinguishes between values that are within the Project Site and values that are in other areas of the view in order to better determine the source of existing glare conditions. Table 29 shows a point-by-point break down of existing luminance values, as well as highlighting points of interest which are described below the table.

Page 74: 6.5 LW Red-line of Lighting Report

Archer Forward: Campus Preservation and Improvement Plan - Lighting Study Page 73 The Archer School for Girls July 2013

Table 28: Existing Contrast, Calculated Luminance Ratios (footLamberts) at Receptor Site E

Receptor Site E Location(x,y)

View Max (15, 0) 51 :1Project Site Max (15, 0) n/a :1View Max (-15,0) 11.656 :1Project Site Max (-15,0) 11.656 :1

MaximumLuminance

AverageLuminance

ContrastRatio Relative Value

Point 13.450 0.262 HIGH13.450 0.262 LOW

LOWLOWSurface 3.056 0.262

3.056 0.262

Table 29: Existing Luminance Measurements at Receptor Site E

Receptor Site E

(deg) Y ↓

30 0.002 0.006 0.008 0.009 0.015 0.015 0.013 0.019 0.00425 0.002 0.007 0.008 0.011 0.019 0.018 0.016 0.022 0.00420 0.003 0.007 0.009 0.012 0.020 0.023 0.019 0.025 0.00515 0.002 0.007 0.010 0.013 0.031 0.024 0.026 0.028 0.00610 0.002 0.008 0.010 0.014 0.033 0.028 0.036 0.033 0.0105 0.002 3.330 0.005 0.005 0.029 0.035 0.088 0.039 0.0180 0.355 0.003 7.390 3.056 1.715 13.450 0.237 0.008 0.100-5 0.001 0.001 0.037 0.005 0.003 0.018 0.002 0.001 0.002-10 0.002 0.001 0.004 0.003 0.002 0.002 0.002 0.001 0.002-15 0.001 0.001 0.002 0.004 0.002 0.001 0.002 0.001 0.001-20 0.001 0.001 0.002 0.006 0.004 0.003 0.007 0.001 0.001-25 0.001 0.001 0.002 0.001 0.005 0.006 0.003 0.001 0.001-30 0.001 0.001 0.001 0.001 0.001 0.009 0.001 0.001 0.001

(deg) X → -60 -45 -30 -15 0 15 30 45 60

Y Axis is the vertical field of view from -30 to+30 degrees above the horizon. X Axis is the Horizontal field of view from -60 to +60 degrees. Values at the component site are hilighted in gray. Points of interest hilighted in bold. Highest value in italic.

Average Luminance: 0.262 fL Points of Interest (highlighted in bold in Table 29, above): The Highest value (italic in Table 29, above): Interior lighting from apartment (dining room chandelier, 11745 Sunset Boulevard): 13.45 fL (15,0) Existing parking lot lighting (Shoe box fixture with glare shield, located on surface parking lot on Project Site): 7.39 fL (-30, 0) Existing street lighting on Chaparal Street: 3.33 fL (-45,5) Illuminated surfaces on the Main Building: 3.056 fL (-15,0)

Page 75: 6.5 LW Red-line of Lighting Report

Archer Forward: Campus Preservation and Improvement Plan - Lighting Study Page 74 The Archer School for Girls July 2013

3.4.8 Receptor Site F (At the southeast corner of the surface parking lot located at 10’ AFG)

Record of Observations Date: November 1, 2011 6:30 – 7:05 pm Weather Conditions: Foggy

Figure 37: Receptor Site F, Reference Photograph

(The North Wing, Main Building, Athletic Fields, and surface parking lot indicated by dashed box)

Figure 38: Receptor Site F, Nighttime View

(The North Wing, Main Building, Athletic Fields, and surface parking lot indicated by dashed box)

Page 76: 6.5 LW Red-line of Lighting Report

Archer Forward: Campus Preservation and Improvement Plan - Lighting Study Page 75 The Archer School for Girls July 2013

Figure 39: Measurement grid for Luminance Values at Receptor Site F

Figure 40: Map of Receptor Site F

Page 77: 6.5 LW Red-line of Lighting Report

Archer Forward: Campus Preservation and Improvement Plan - Lighting Study Page 76 The Archer School for Girls July 2013

Existing conditions at Receptor Site F are summarized below in Table 30, as related to the criteria established in Section 1.6.

Table 30: Analysis of Existing Conditions at Receptor Site F

Illuminance Horizontal: 0.020 footcandles Vertical facing forward: 0.054 footcandles Vertical facing back: 0.009 footcandles

Contrast High The view from Receptor Site F encompasses the existing North Wing, Main Building, surface parking, and Athletic Fields. The visible light source of wall-mounted area lighting located on the existing North Wing results in high contrast conditions. The surface parking lighting is fully shielded and results in low contrast conditions.

Coverage 62% The existing North Wing, Main Building, surface parking, and Athletic Fields are visible from Receptor Site F. While the Athletic Fields extend across the majority of the width of the view, the southern portion is not visible from Receptor Site F as the view is blocked by tree canopies and utility structures.

Context 25% - 35% The brightest measured element within the view of Receptor Site F is the wall-mounted area lighting located on the existing North Wing, 59.45 fL. The surface brightness of the adjacent wall is 8.207 fL. The luminance of the street light located on Chaparal Street is 18.41 fL. The view to the existing North Wing, Main Building, surface parking, and Athletic Fields represents approximately 25% - 35% of the Project Site.

Existing contrast and luminance conditions at Receptor Site F are summarized in Table 31 and Table 32 below. Table 31 identifies contrast ratios for both point sources of light as well as illuminated surfaces, and distinguishes between values that are within the Project Site and values that are in other areas of the view in order to better determine the source of existing glare conditions.

Page 78: 6.5 LW Red-line of Lighting Report

Archer Forward: Campus Preservation and Improvement Plan - Lighting Study Page 77 The Archer School for Girls July 2013

Table 32 shows a point-by-point break down of existing luminance values, as well as highlighting points of interest which are described below the table.

Table 31: Existing Contrast, Calculated Luminance Ratios (footLamberts) at Receptor Site F

Receptor Site F Location(x,y)

View Max 15, 5 69 :1Project Site Max 15, 5 69.380 :1View Max 0, -5 9.578 :1Project Site Max 0, -5 9.578 :1

MaximumLuminance

AverageLuminance

ContrastRatio

Relative Value

Surface 8.207 0.857 LOW8.207 0.857 LOW

0.857 HIGH59.450 0.857 HIGHPoint 59.450

Table 32: Existing Luminance Measurements at Receptor Site F

Receptor Site F

(deg) Y ↓

30 0.005 0.004 0.005 0.006 0.006 0.008 0.008 0.011 0.01525 0.005 0.005 0.006 0.006 0.008 0.008 0.011 0.014 0.02220 0.005 0.005 0.006 0.007 0.009 0.011 0.014 0.015 0.01215 0.006 0.006 0.007 0.008 0.012 0.013 0.015 0.024 0.67410 0.006 0.006 0.008 0.132 0.016 0.015 0.013 2.105 0.0755 0.006 0.007 0.010 0.114 0.026 59.45 0.039 0.109 0.0190 0.007 0.008 0.032 0.051 0.031 8.207 0.032 0.02 1.298-5 0.007 0.010 0.025 0.26 18.41 1.733 0.061 2.02 0.106-10 0.007 0.006 0.012 0.107 0.031 0.07 0.041 0.024 0.016-15 0.007 0.003 0.007 0.918 0.056 0.182 0.147 0.038 0.012-20 0.009 0.004 0.039 0.721 0.194 0.259 0.043 0.034 0.022-25 0.003 0.014 0.014 0.191 0.672 0.339 0.132 0.034 0.025-30 0.005 0.009 0.012 0.114 0.059 0.075 0.032 0.023 0.014

(deg) X → 0.005 -45 -30 -15 0 15 30 45 60

Y Axis is the vertical field of view from -30 to+30 degrees above the horizon. X Axis is the Horizontal field of view from -60 to +60 degrees. Values at the component site are hilighted in gray. Points of interest hilighted in bold. Highest value in italic.

Average Luminance: 0.857 fL Points of Interest (highlighted in bold in Table 32, above): The Highest value (italic in Table 32, above): Security lighting located on the existing North Wing: 59.45 fL (15, 5) Interior lighting of the existing North Wing stairwell: 2.105 fL (45,10), 2.02 fL (45, -5) Illuminated surface on existing North Wing: 8.207 fL (15, 0), 1.733 fL (15, -5) Street lighting from Chaparal Street: 18.41 fL (0, -5) Illuminated paved surface on surface parking: 0.918 fL (-15, -15)

Page 79: 6.5 LW Red-line of Lighting Report

Archer Forward: Campus Preservation and Improvement Plan - Lighting Study Page 78 The Archer School for Girls July 2013

3.4.9 Receptor Site G (Southwest corner of 141 N. Barrington Avenue property located at 10’ AFG)

Record of Observations Date: January 8, 2013 6:44 – 6:59 PM Weather Conditions: Clear Sky

Figure 41: Receptor Site G, Reference Photograph

(Existing Main Building, North Wing and surface parking locations are indicated by dashed box)

Figure 42: Receptor Site G, Nighttime View

(Existing Main Building, North Wing and surface parking locations are indicated by dashed box)

Figure 43: Measurement grid for Luminance Values at Receptor Site G

Page 80: 6.5 LW Red-line of Lighting Report

Archer Forward: Campus Preservation and Improvement Plan - Lighting Study Page 79 The Archer School for Girls July 2013

Figure 44: Map of Receptor Site G

Page 81: 6.5 LW Red-line of Lighting Report

Archer Forward: Campus Preservation and Improvement Plan - Lighting Study Page 80 The Archer School for Girls July 2013

Existing conditions at Receptor Site G are summarized below in Table 33 as related to the criteria established in Section 1.6

Table 33: Analysis of Existing Conditions at Receptor Site G

Illuminance Horizontal: 0.680 footcandles Vertical facing forward: 0.079 footcandles Vertical facing back: 0.025 footcandles

Contrast High The view from Receptor Site G encompasses a large portion of the Project Site, with existing lighting elements, and lighting from neighbors creating high contrast situations in the generally dark nighttime view. The existing surface parking area lighting is fully shielded and results in low contrast conditions while the unshielded building mounted luminaire results in high contrast conditions.

Coverage 75% Though screened by shrubs and trees, the existing Main Building, including the North Wing, and surface parking are visible from Receptor Site G. The private residence located at 141 N. Barrington Avenue is fully visible from Receptor Stie G. These elements encompass 75% of the field of view from Receptor Site G.

Context 5% The element of highest brightness within the view of Receptor Site G is the fence mounted security light, 254.8 fL. The view of the Main Building is filtered by foliage. Through this filtered view, the luminance of the Main Building interior is 0.057 fL. From Receptor Site G, approximately 5% of the Project Site is visible. Though screened by trees and shrubs, surface parking, existing North Wing, and the northwest corner of the Main Building are visible from Receptor Site G. However, foliage of trees and shrubs block most visibility of the Project Site.

Existing contrast and luminance conditions at Receptor Site G are summarized in Table 34 and Table 35 below. Table 34 identifies contrast ratios for both point sources of light as well as illuminated surfaces, and distinguishes between values that are within the Project Site and values that are in other areas of the view in order to better determine the source of existing glare conditions. Table 35 shows a point-by-point break down of existing luminance values, as well as highlighting points of interest, which are described below the table.

Table 34: Existing Contrast, Calculated Luminance Ratios (footLamberts) at Receptor Site G

Receptor Site G Location(x,y)

View Max (45,0) 117 :1Project Site Max (45,0) 116.731 :1View Max (-45,5) 0.026 :1Project Site Max (-45,5) 0.026 :1

MaximumLuminance

AverageLuminance

ContrastRatio

Relative Value

2.183 HIGH254.800 2.183 HIGHPoint 254.800

LOW0.057Surface LOW0.057 2.183

2.183

Page 82: 6.5 LW Red-line of Lighting Report

Archer Forward: Campus Preservation and Improvement Plan - Lighting Study Page 81 The Archer School for Girls July 2013

Table 35: Existing Luminance Measurements at Receptor Site G

Receptor Site G

(deg) Y ↓

30 0.001 0.003 0.006 0.002 0.003 0.004 0.004 0.004 0.00425 0.002 0.005 0.003 0.004 0.004 0.003 0.004 0.004 0.00420 0.003 0.004 0.002 0.003 0.004 0.002 0.004 0.004 0.00515 0.003 0.004 0.002 0.004 0.004 0.002 0.003 0.008 0.00610 0.001 0.008 0.002 0.003 0.002 0.004 0.002 0.008 0.0075 0.004 0.057 0.003 0.001 0.002 0.003 0.004 0.006 0.0110 0.005 0.001 0.003 0.002 0.003 0.005 0.004 254.8 0.004-5 0.001 0.001 0.004 0.001 0.004 0.005 0.005 0.059 0.012-10 0.004 0.001 0.003 0.001 0.006 0.005 0.008 0.039 0.038-15 0.002 0.002 0.000 0.003 0.007 0.004 0.007 0.005 0.004-20 0.002 0.001 0.001 0.001 0.007 0.004 0.003 0.002 0.003-25 0.002 0.005 0.000 0.001 0.002 0.002 0.004 0.004 0.004-30 0.004 0.003 0.002 0.002 0.001 0.001 0.003 0.003 0.003

(deg) X → -60 -45 -30 -15 0 15 30 45 60

Y Axis is the vertical field of view from -30 to+30 degrees above the horizon. X Axis is the Horizontal field of view from -60 to +60 degrees. Values at the component site are hilighted in gray. Points of interest hilighted in bold. Highest value in italic.

Average Luminance: 2.183 fL Points of Interest (highlighted in bold in Table 35, above) The Highest value (italic in Table 35, above) Existing security flood light: 254.8 fL (45,0) Illuminated surfaces on the Main Building window screen: 0.057 fL (-45, -5)

Page 83: 6.5 LW Red-line of Lighting Report

Archer Forward: Campus Preservation and Improvement Plan - Lighting Study Page 82 The Archer School for Girls July 2013

3.4.10 Receptor Site H (East edge of 11728 Chaparal Street property, adjacent to pool house at 11718 Chaparal Street located at 14’ AFG)

Record of Observations Date: January 9, 2013 6:44 - 7:02 PM Weather Conditions: Clear Sky

Figure 45: Receptor Site H, Reference Photograph

(Existing Main Building, North Wing, Athletic Fields, and surface parking locations are indicated by dashed box)

Page 84: 6.5 LW Red-line of Lighting Report

Archer Forward: Campus Preservation and Improvement Plan - Lighting Study Page 83 The Archer School for Girls July 2013

Figure 46: Receptor Site H, Nighttime View

(Existing Main Building, North Wing, Athletic Fields, and surface parking locations are indicated by dashed box)

Figure 47: Measurement grid for Luminance Values at Receptor Site H

Figure 48: Map of Receptor Site H

Page 85: 6.5 LW Red-line of Lighting Report

Archer Forward: Campus Preservation and Improvement Plan - Lighting Study Page 84 The Archer School for Girls July 2013

Existing conditions at Receptor Site H are summarized below in Table 36, as related to the criteria established in Section 1.6.

Table 36: Analysis of Existing Conditions at Receptor Site H

Illuminance Horizontal: 0.003 footcandles Vertical facing forward: 0.013 footcandles Vertical facing back: 1.600 footcandles

Contrast High The view from Receptor Site H encompasses a large portion of the Project Site, with existing lighting elements, and lighting from neighbors creating high contrast situations in the generally dark nighttime view. The existing surface parking area lighting is fully shielded and results in low contrast conditions while the unshielded building mounted luminaire results in high contrast conditions.

Coverage 75% Though screened by trees, shrubs, and fencing, the existing Main Building, including the North Wing, and surface parking are visible from Receptor Site H. Though within the adjacent area the Athletic Fields are completely screened by trees, shrubs, and fencing. The single family home located at 11728 Chaparal Street is fully visible from Receptor Site H. These elements encompass 75% of the field of view from Receptor Site H.

Context 5% The element of highest brightness within the the view of Receptor Site H is the landscape pathway lights, 40.92 fL. Due to the near horizontal aiming angle, the light source is visible. The measured luminance of the wall mounted sconces located on the rear of wall of 11728 Chaparal Street is 17.29 fL. From Receptor Site H, approximately 5% of the Project Site is visible. Though screened by trees, shrubs, and fencing, the Athletic Fields, surface parking, existing North Wing, and the northwest corner of the Main Building are visible from Receptor Site H.

Existing contrast and luminance conditions at Receptor Site H are summarized in Table 37 and Table 38 below. Table 37 identifies contrast ratios for both point sources of light as well as illuminated surfaces, and distinguishes between values that are within the Project Site and values that are in other areas of the view in order to better determine the source of existing glare conditions. Table 38 shows a point-by-point break down of existing luminance values, as well as highlighting points of interest which are described below the table.

Page 86: 6.5 LW Red-line of Lighting Report

Archer Forward: Campus Preservation and Improvement Plan - Lighting Study Page 85 The Archer School for Girls July 2013

Table 37: Existing Contrast, Calculated Luminance Ratios (footLamberts) at Receptor Site H

Receptor Site H Location(x,y)

View Max (30,0) 79 :1Project Site Max (30,0) 79 :1View Max (-15,-5) 1 :1Project Site Max (0,-5) 0 :1

Point

0.521 LOWSurface 0.067

40.920 0.521LOW

0.521 LOW

ContrastRatio

MaximumLuminance

AverageLuminance

0.39340.920 0.521

HIGHRelative Value

Table 38: Existing Luminance Measurements at Receptor Site H

Receptor Site H

(deg) Y ↓

30 0.000 0.000 0.001 0.008 0.050 0.047 0.041 0.003 0.03125 0.001 0.001 0.001 0.002 0.058 0.048 0.011 0.003 0.00520 0.000 0.000 0.001 0.002 0.054 0.046 0.007 0.014 0.01615 0.000 0.000 0.001 0.004 0.002 0.015 0.004 0.006 0.03210 0.001 0.001 0.001 0.005 0.004 0.003 0.010 0.008 0.0255 0.000 0.001 0.010 0.002 0.003 0.300 0.008 0.018 0.0010 0.000 0.001 0.052 0.021 0.025 0.011 40.920 0.019 0.010-5 0.000 0.002 0.022 0.393 0.067 0.006 0.032 0.016 17.290-10 0.000 0.013 0.001 0.004 0.004 0.005 0.009 0.009 0.150-15 0.001 0.002 0.001 0.003 0.004 0.004 0.006 0.011 0.520-20 0.001 0.001 0.001 0.001 0.003 0.003 0.008 0.009 0.120-25 0.001 0.001 0.001 0.001 0.004 0.002 0.005 0.003 0.180-30 0.001 0.001 0.001 0.001 0.002 0.001 0.003 0.002 0.009

(deg) X → -60 -45 -30 -15 0 15 30 45 60

Y Axis is the vertical field of view from -30 to+30 degrees above the horizon. X Axis is the Horizontal field of view from -60 to +60 degrees. Values at the component site are hilighted in gray. Points of interest hilighted in bold. Highest value in italic.

Average Luminance: 0.521fL Points of Interest (highlighted in bold in Table 38, above) The Highest value (italic in Table 38, above) Existing landscape lighting: 40.920 fL (30,0), 0.067 fL (0,-5) Existing sconce at outdoor grill area: 17.29 fL (60,-5) Illuminated surfaces at counter at outdoor grill area 0.150 fL (60,-10) Illuminated surfaces at gate: 0.300 fL (15,5) Illuminated surfaces at bush: 0.393 fL (-15,-5)

Page 87: 6.5 LW Red-line of Lighting Report

Archer Forward: Campus Preservation and Improvement Plan - Lighting Study Page 86 The Archer School for Girls July 2013

3.4.11 Receptor Site J (Adjacent to 11799 Chaparal Street, north of the existing Athletic Fields located at 10’ AFG)

Record of Observations Date: January 9, 2013 7:11 - 7:44 PM Weather Conditions: Clear Sky

Figure 49: Receptor Site J, Reference Photograph

(The existing wall, Athletic Fields, North Wing and surface parking locations indicated by dashed box)

Figure 50: Receptor Site J, Nighttime View

(The existing wall, Athletic Fields, North Wing and surface parking locations indicated by dashed box)

Page 88: 6.5 LW Red-line of Lighting Report

Archer Forward: Campus Preservation and Improvement Plan - Lighting Study Page 87 The Archer School for Girls July 2013

Figure 51: Measurement grid for Luminance Values at Receptor Site J

Figure 52: Map of Receptor Site J

Page 89: 6.5 LW Red-line of Lighting Report

Archer Forward: Campus Preservation and Improvement Plan - Lighting Study Page 88 The Archer School for Girls July 2013

Existing conditions at Receptor Site J are summarized below in Table 39, as related to the criteria established in Section 1.6.

Table 39: Analysis of Existing Conditions at Receptor Site J

Illuminance Horizontal: 1.010 footcandles Vertical facing forward: 0.228 footcandles Vertical facing back: 0.365 footcandles

Contrast High The view from Receptor Site J encompasses a large portion of the Project Site, with existing lighting elements creating high contrast situations in the generally dark nighttime view. The existing surface parking area lighting is fully shielded and results in low contrast conditions while the unshielded building mounted luminaire located on the north façade of the North Wing results in high contrast conditions.

Coverage 62% The North Wing, Athletic Fields, and surface parking are visible from Receptor Site J.

Context 15% - 25% The brightest element within the field of view at Receptor Site J is the wall mounted security luminaire at the North Wing, 9.191 fL. This value is far below the street light adjacent to Receptor Site J, on Chaparal Street, 6657 fL. Within the view from Receptor Site J, approximately 15% - 25% of the Project Site is visible. The North Wing, Athletic Fields, and surface parking are visible from Receptor Site J.

Existing contrast and luminance conditions at Receptor Site J are summarized in Table 40 and Table 41 below. Table 40 identifies contrast ratios for both point sources of light as well as illuminated surfaces, and distinguishes between values that are within the Project Site and values that are in other areas of the view in order to better determine the source of existing glare conditions. Table 41 shows a point-by-point break down of existing luminance values, as well as highlighting points of interest which are described below the table.

Table 40: Existing Contrast, Calculated Luminance Ratios (footLamberts) at Receptor Site J

Receptor Site J Location(x,y)

View Max (15,5) 27.591 :1Project Site Max (15, 5) 27.591 :1View Max (0,-5) 24.700 :1Project Site Max (0,-5) 24.700 :1

Point

Surface LOWLOW

8.228

9.1910.333

HIGH8.228

ContrastRatio

0.333

0.333

9.191

AverageLuminance

0.333 HIGH

Relative Value

MaximumLuminance

Page 90: 6.5 LW Red-line of Lighting Report

Archer Forward: Campus Preservation and Improvement Plan - Lighting Study Page 89 The Archer School for Girls July 2013

Table 41: Existing Luminance Measurements at Receptor Site J

Receptor Site J

(deg) Y ↓

30 0.036 0.087 0.087 0.078 0.078 0.007 0.068 0.054 0.01125 0.006 0.089 0.098 0.086 0.101 0.086 0.068 0.054 0.01720 0.024 0.090 0.104 0.091 0.11 0.012 0.052 0.055 0.01815 0.011 0.084 0.101 0.101 0.108 0.079 0.042 0.068 0.03610 0.015 0.030 0.03 0.106 0.126 0.088 0.077 0.091 0.0145 0.019 0.132 0.033 0.161 0.153 0.035 0.025 0.097 0.0110 0.020 0.442 9.191 5.820 0.17 0.201 7.392 0.79 0.037-5 0.060 0.005 0.003 0.021 8.228 0.008 0.021 0.019 0.039-10 0.070 0.032 0.021 0.03 0.009 0.012 0.069 0.116 0.095-15 0.037 0.059 0.029 0.085 0.004 0.058 0.098 0.088 0.104-20 0.031 0.039 0.035 0.05 0.060 0.121 0.103 0.114 0.107-25 0.031 0.034 0.044 0.048 0.08 0.068 0.104 0.112 0.127-30 0.035 0.035 0.035 0.044 0.069 0.077 0.097 0.114 0.134

(deg) X → 60 -45 -30 -15 0 15 30 45 60

Y Axis is the vertical field of view from -30 to+30 degrees above the horizon. X Axis is the Horizontal field of view from -60 to +60 degrees. Values at the component site are hilighted in gray. Points of interest hilighted in bold. Highest value in italic.

Average Luminance: 0.333 fL Points of Interest (highlighted in bold in Table 41, above) The Highest value (italic in Table 41, above) Existing security lighting on North Wing: 9.191 fL (-30,0) Illuminated surfaces on the North Wing: 8.228 fL (0, -5), 0.442 fL (-45,0) Interior lighting (linear fluorescent) on North Wing: 5.82 fL (-15,0) Interior lighting from neighbor apartment (11745 Sunset Boulevard): 7.392 fL (30,0) Note: The streetlight adjacent to Receptor Site J measured 6657 fL.

This value was not recorded within the view of Receptor Site J, because it is 50 feet to the west of Receptor Site J.

Page 91: 6.5 LW Red-line of Lighting Report

Archer Forward: Campus Preservation and Improvement Plan - Lighting Study Page 90 The Archer School for Girls July 2013

4 ANALYSIS OF PROJECT LIGHTING IMPACTS

4.1 Introduction A computer model of future lighting improvements is used to predict the resultant illumination from light fixtures and lighted surfaces within and surrounding the proposed Project. In addition, a view angle analysis of proposed lighting improvements predicts the visibility of lighting equipment from the established Receptor Sites and the Project boundary. The analysis includes evaluations of the lighting impacts resulting from the Project at each Receptor Site. These light impacts as seen from the Receptor Site locations are analyzed relative to the significance thresholds and criteria established in Section 1.6 above. The results of the computer model are assessed in conjunction with the thresholds and criteria established in Section 1.6 to determine the extent of the lighting impacts resulting from the Project.

4.2 Modeling Lighting Impacts A computer model was used to calculate the potential lighting impacts of the Project. All calculations for this study were produced using a software program (AGi32 version 2.30 by Lighting Analysts, Illumination Engineering Software, Boulder, Colorado) to model the site context and light fixtures proposed within the Project Site. The computer modeling software utilizes radiance and ray trace calculations to accurately predict the direct illumination of surfaces as well as the inter-reflected light from adjacent surfaces. The software is also a reliable predictor of surface luminance. A three dimensional model of the Project and the topographical context was created in the AGi32 software to provide a basis for the quantity and locations of the luminaires used in the calculation. Prototypical building and landscape forms were created based on descriptions of each feature of the Project (summarized in Section 1.3 of this Study). To predict lighting impacts, luminaires were placed in the model based on professional best practices for the various Project buildings and facilities (luminaire choice and placement is outlined below in Section 4.3). The luminaire data utilized in the computer model follow IESNA procedures under controlled laboratory conditions. Luminaire performance is calculated at initial output, representing the maximum possible light energy output (actual light energy output would degrade slightly over time). Modeled lighting for the Athletic Fields represent the highest standard for achieving high quality lighting on the field while limiting light trespass and glare impacts. In order to predict lighting impacts from the Project, calculation points were placed at each Receptor Site. For the calculation of illuminance, calculation points were placed at ground level at each Receptor Site, to calculate the horizontal illuminance contribution from the Project. To calculate vertical illuminance values at adjacent residential property boundaries, calculation points were located on a coincident 40 foot vertical theoretical plane. In order to calculate contrast, a field of view was established at each Receptor Site to measure luminance data. The field of view at each Receptor Site extends 30 degrees from top to bottom, and 90 degrees from left to right, with calculation points placed at 6 degree increments horizontally and 3 degree increments vertically (see Figure 53). From these calculated luminance values, maximum and average values are derived to determine the contrast ratio at each Receptor Site.

Page 92: 6.5 LW Red-line of Lighting Report

Archer Forward: Campus Preservation and Improvement Plan - Lighting Study Page 91 The Archer School for Girls July 2013

Figure 53: Field of View for Computer Simulation

The computer model includes the Project components, the existing Main Building, the surrounding topographical context, and a select number of the existing roadway luminaires located on Sunset Boulevard, Chaparal Street and Barrington Avenue in order to best predict impacts at the selected Receptor Sites. Existing buildings and architectural lighting on or within existing buildings, as well as existing landscape and vegetation, are not included in the model, with the exception of the Main Building. As a result, the model represents only the lighting impacts created by Project and the existing features that would remain once the Project is complete (e.g., the Main Building). The results of the calculations represent a conservative prediction of the actual lighting impacts. Illuminance impacts would likely be somewhat lower than predicted in the model because of existing buildings and vegetation that would block some of the light energy from reaching Receptor Sites. Also, the computer model does not include all existing light sources, resulting in a lower average luminance value. This lower average luminance value results in exaggerated contrast ratios. Contrast values of the Project would likely be lower than those predicted in the model. This effect is further compounded by the lack of sky reflectance in the computer model. The darkness of existing surrounding residences are impacted by light sources from the streets, as well as by weather conditions and the amount of moisture in the air. The computer model does not consider atmospheric conditions, further exaggerating the calculated contrast values. In total, values calculated in the computer model likely overstate lighting impacts. Actual impacts are expected to be lower.

Page 93: 6.5 LW Red-line of Lighting Report

Archer Forward: Campus Preservation and Improvement Plan - Lighting Study Page 92 The Archer School for Girls July 2013

Figure 54: Map of Project Area

4.3 Project Improvements Computer Model Data As described above, the Project and Receptor Sites are modeled in relation to the surrounding context. Each improvement proposed in the Project is unique, and has been modeled in accordance with the proposed Project design (the Project is summarized in Section 1.3). Lighting elements for the Project are modeled based on professional best practices and established light level requirements, and they vary from component to component. Details of modeled conditions for the Project are described below. Where the Project includes a building, the building’s exterior is modeled as partial glass with 80% transparency, and the remaining surfaces are modeled as opaque with 50% reflectance to represent a light colored exterior cladding material consistent with Project design. The exterior surroundings, including ground and landscape elements, are modeled with opaque surfaces with 50% reflectance. The Athletic Fields grass is modeled with 8% reflectance, which is consistent with the existing dark grass. Light fixtures modeled in and around the Project buildings approximate appropriate lighting improvements based on the building types and scale, and are specific to the function of each facilities. All proposed exterior and site lighting around the Project would be full cutoff in order to minimize skyglow. Lighting configurations used in the computer model for the Project are described and illustrated below (see Appendices for Fixture Specification and Exterior Lighting Guidelines). The model evaluates the initial illuminance levels of the lighting systems. For lighting systems, the illuminance levels are greatest at the time of commissioning. For a variety of factors, that include lamp lumen depreciation, accumulation of dust, and lamp burnout, lighting systems decrease in illuminance over time. As a result, the initial illuminance levels may be 20% to 30% greater than the IESNA

Page 94: 6.5 LW Red-line of Lighting Report

Archer Forward: Campus Preservation and Improvement Plan - Lighting Study Page 93 The Archer School for Girls July 2013

recommended maintained illuminance for a given application. Because the maintained illuminance would likely be lower than the illuminance analyzed in the model, the analysis described below is conservative. The average maintained illuminance levels are based upon IESNA recommendations per use and activity (see IESNA, The Lighting Handbook, 10th Edition).

Existing Main Building Office: 30 footcandles Classrooms: 50 footcandles Circulation and Lobby: 10 footcandles North Wing Renovation: Office: 30 footcandles Classrooms: 50 footcandles Circulation and Lobby: 10 footcandles Multipurpose Facility: Physical Education: 50 footcandles Office: 30 footcandles Classrooms: 50 footcandles Circulation and Lobby: 10 footcandles Performing Arts Center: Office: 30 footcandles Classrooms: 50 footcandles Studios: 50 footcandles Circulation and Lobby: 10 footcandles Visual Arts Center: Office: 30 footcandles Gallery: 30 footcandles Classrooms: 50 footcandles Studios: 50 footcandles Circulation and Lobby: 10 footcandles Aquatics Center: Office: 30 footcandles Locker Rooms: 15 footcandles

4.3.1 Main Building The existing Main Building is located and modeled based on a 3D model that represents its existing configuration. (The facilities descriptions are summarized in Section 1.3). The model’s exterior wall structure is approximately 50% glass material. Parameters of study model are as follows:

Building Type: Main Buildings - Classrooms Exterior façade reflectance: 0.5 Glass façade light transmittance: 0.7 Interior surface reflectance: floor – 0.2; walls – 0.5; ceiling – 0.8 Site environment model reflectance (ground level around building): 0.5 (Units measure albedo, which ranges between 0 and 1)

Light Configurations:

Page 95: 6.5 LW Red-line of Lighting Report

Archer Forward: Campus Preservation and Improvement Plan - Lighting Study Page 94 The Archer School for Girls July 2013

Table 42: Typical classroom Interior Luminaire Schedule

INTERIOR LUMINAIRE SCHEDULE

FA Axis : Cubic Direct/ Indirect T5 Pendant 20% Up 80% Down Fluor. 28W 4' Silhouette T5

Typical classroom locatiions:Main Building, North Wing Renovation, Visual Arts Center, Multipurpose Facility

2900

FIXT TYPE MANUFACTURE PART NUMBER/ DESCRIPTION LAMP LOCATION LUMENS

Page 96: 6.5 LW Red-line of Lighting Report

Archer Forward: Campus Preservation and Improvement Plan - Lighting Study Page 95 The Archer School for Girls July 2013

Example of Calculations of Typical Class Rooms in existing Main Building:

Figure 55: Modeled interior illuminance of Main Building with calculation points.

Table 43: Calculation Summary of Main Building

4.3.2 North Wing Renovation The North Wing Renovation is located and modeled based on descriptions provided in Section II, Project Description, of the Draft Environmental Impact Report for the Archer Forward: Campus Preservation and Improvement Plan, 2013 and a 3D model representing the schematic design of Project (the Project is summarized in Section 1.3). Parameters of study model are as follows:

Building Type: Classrooms Exterior façade reflectance: 0.5 Glass façade light transmittance: 0.7 Interior surface reflectance: floor – 0.2; walls – 0.5; ceiling – 0.8

Page 97: 6.5 LW Red-line of Lighting Report

Archer Forward: Campus Preservation and Improvement Plan - Lighting Study Page 96 The Archer School for Girls July 2013

Site environment model reflectance (ground level around building): 0.5 (Units measure albedo, which ranges between 0 and 1)

Light Configurations:

Table 44: Typical classroom Interior Luminaire Schedule

INTERIOR LUMINAIRE SCHEDULE

FA Axis : Cubic Direct/ Indirect T5 Pendant 20% Up 80% Down Fluor. 28W 4' Silhouette T5

Typical classroom locatiions:Main Building, North Wing Renovation, Visual Arts Center, Multipurpose Facility

2900

FIXT TYPE MANUFACTURE PART NUMBER/ DESCRIPTION LAMP LOCATION LUMENS

Example of Calculations of Typical Class Rooms in North Wing Renovation:

Figure 56: Modeled interior illuminance of North Wing Renovation.

Page 98: 6.5 LW Red-line of Lighting Report

Archer Forward: Campus Preservation and Improvement Plan - Lighting Study Page 97 The Archer School for Girls July 2013

Table 45: Calculation Summary of North Wing Renovation

4.3.3 Multipurpose Facility, Visual Arts Center, Performing Arts Center The Multipurpose Facility, Visual Arts Center, and Performing Arts Center are located and modeled based on descriptions provided in Section II, Project Description, of the Draft Environmental Impact Report for the Archer Forward: Campus Preservation and Improvement Plan, 2013 and a 3D model representing the schematic design of Project (the Project is summarized in Section 1.3). Parameters of study model are as follows:

Building Type: facilities buildings Exterior façade reflectance: 0.5 Glass façade light transmittance: 0.8 Interior surface reflectance: floor – 0.2; walls – 0.5; ceiling – 0.8 Site environment model reflectance (ground level around building): 0.5 (Units measure albedo, which ranges between 0 and 1)

Light Configurations:

Table 46: Interior Luminaire Schedule

INTERIOR LUMINAIRE SCHEDULE

FA Axis : Cubic Direct/ Indirect T5 Pendant 20% Up 80% Down

Fluor. 28W 4' Silhouette T5

Typical classroom and office locatiions:Main Building, North Wing Renovation, Visual Arts Center, Aquatics Center, Performing Arts Center and Multipurpose Facility

2900

FBAxis-Beam 4, BBR-SB-FL-Length-T5-1Recessed 4" slot fixture with metal baffles to decrease surface brightness, T5 fluorescent source

Fluor. 28W 4' Silhouette T5 Multipurpose Facility, Small Rooms 2900

FB-1 Holophane : Enduratron ED21PPE 210W CLEAR PROTECTED CDM ELITE

Multipurpose Facility, Gymnasium 23100

FB-2 Louis Poulsen: SnowballPHS-171-WHITE

200W Halogen Multipurpose Facility, Western Ambulatory

3930

FD Kurt Versen : P921Recessed CFL Downlight

(1) 32W CF TRIPLE Multipurpose Facility, Entry Vesibules and Corridors

2400

FIXT TYPE MANUFACTURE PART NUMBER/ DESCRIPTION LOCATIONLAMP LUMENS

Page 99: 6.5 LW Red-line of Lighting Report

Archer Forward: Campus Preservation and Improvement Plan - Lighting Study Page 98 The Archer School for Girls July 2013

Example of Calculations of Proposed Lighting for New Facilities:

Figure 57: Modeled interior illuminance of Multipurpose Facility, large multi-use rooms.

Figure 58: Modeled interior illuminance of Multipurpose Facility, Ambulatory and open activity areas

Page 100: 6.5 LW Red-line of Lighting Report

Archer Forward: Campus Preservation and Improvement Plan - Lighting Study Page 99 The Archer School for Girls July 2013

Figure 59: Modeled interior illuminance of Aquatics Center, locker room locations.

Figure 60: Modeled interior illuminance of Performing Arts Center, Office and Dance Studio

Page 101: 6.5 LW Red-line of Lighting Report

Archer Forward: Campus Preservation and Improvement Plan - Lighting Study Page 100 The Archer School for Girls July 2013

4.3.4 Underground Parking Structure The underground parking structure is located and modeled based on descriptions provided in Section II, Project Description, of the Draft Environmental Impact Report for the Archer Forward: Campus Preservation and Improvement Plan, 2013 and a 3D model representing the schematic design of Project (the Project is summarized in Section 1.3). The underground parking structure was modeled to meet IESNA recommendations for illumination of interior parking garages during the night time, outlined at follows:

Minimum Horizontal Illuminance: 1 footcandle Horizontal Uniformity: 10:1

Parameters of study model are as follows:

Site environment model reflectance: 0.5 Parking structure model reflectance: 0.5 (Units measure albedo, which ranges between 0 and 1)

Light Configurations:

Table 47: The Underground Parking Structure Exterior Luminaire Schedule

UNDERGROUND PARKING STRUCTUREEXTERIOR LUMINAIRE SCHEDULE

SB-3

BEGA: 8677MHSHIELDED BOLLARDS WITH SINGLE-SIDED FLAT-BEAM DISTRIBUTIONHOUSING: One piece extruded aluminum with a one piece die-cast aluminum top housing and a base i

(1) 20W T4 GU6.5 MH UNDERGROUND PARKING STRUCTURE

1615

SD-3

BEGA: 3042PRecessed wall luminaires with asymmetrical distributionHOUSING: Die-cast aluminum with integral wiring compartment.

(1) 18W CF QUAD-4P UNDERGROUND PARKING STRUCTURE - ENT/EXIT RAMPS

1250

SP

PRUDENTIAL LIGHTING: PRU3P2T8Wlinear indirect lightingHOUSING: Available in 4-, 8- or 12-foot standardlengths

(2) PHILIPS F32T8/TL841 32 WATT FLUORESCENT LAMPS.

UNDERGROUND PARKING STRUCTURE 2950

LUMENSFIXT TYPE MANUFACTURE PART NUMBER/ DESCRIPTION LAMP LOCATION

Page 102: 6.5 LW Red-line of Lighting Report

Archer Forward: Campus Preservation and Improvement Plan - Lighting Study Page 101 The Archer School for Girls July 2013

Figure 61: Modeled illuminance Underground Parking Structure – Northeast corner

(access to the North Garden)

Page 103: 6.5 LW Red-line of Lighting Report

Archer Forward: Campus Preservation and Improvement Plan - Lighting Study Page 102 The Archer School for Girls July 2013

Figure 62: Modeled illuminance North Garden

Figure 63: Modeled illuminance Underground Parking Structure – Southwest corner

(At the border of the underground parking structure)

Page 104: 6.5 LW Red-line of Lighting Report

Archer Forward: Campus Preservation and Improvement Plan - Lighting Study Page 103 The Archer School for Girls July 2013

Table 48: Calculation Summary of Underground Parking Structure

4.3.5 Athletic Fields for Soccer and Softball When possible, the Athletic Fields lighting would be based upon IESNA recommendations, however, the lighting compromises uniformity to avoid light trespass at the western edge of the soccer field. The physical characteristics of the Athletic Fields as modeled in this study are consistent with the description established in Section II, Project Description, of the Draft Environmental Impact Report for the Archer Forward: Campus Preservation and Improvement Plan, 2013 and 3D model representing the schematic design of the proposed facility (the Project is summarized in Section 1.3). The Project proposes lighting the soccer field to allow for nighttime use. Lighting the softball field is not proposed. To light the soccer field for nighttime use, the Athletic Fields were modeled to the IESNA recommendations for Class III use, for soccer. IESNA recommendations for Class III stipulates lighting as follows:

Soccer Horizontal Illuminance: 30 fc Horizontal Uniformity: 3:1 or less Vertical Illuminance: No criteria Vertical Uniformity: No criteria

Based on these recommendations, the Athletic Fields lighting is modeled as follows. For the soccer field, pole mounted luminaires would illuminate the play area to 30fc (footcandles). A total of six, 70-foot high poles would line the perimeter of the Athletic Fields. Three poles would be located on the north edge of the Athletic Fields, adjacent to Chaparal Street, and three poles would be located on the southeast, south and southwest edge of the Athletic Fields.

The shielding and aiming were designed to best limit light spill outside of the Project Site. The Athletic Fields lighting equipment is aimed to minimize fixture pointing to the west as much as possible. Further, the shielding used at the fixtures serves to direct the light downward and onto the Athletic Fields to minimize skyglow. Parameters of study model are as follows:

Site environment model reflectance: 0.5 Athletic Field turf reflectance: 0.08 (Units measure albedo, which ranges between 0 and 1)

Light Configurations:

Page 105: 6.5 LW Red-line of Lighting Report

Archer Forward: Campus Preservation and Improvement Plan - Lighting Study Page 104 The Archer School for Girls July 2013

4.3.6 Athletic Fields Lighting

Table 49: Athletic Fields Luminaire Schedule

ATHLETICS FIELDS LUMINAIRE SCHEDULE

SJ QUALITE: 4X4X INTERNATIONALPole mounted Sport fields flood light. (1) 2000W T8

ATHLETIC FIELD, POLE MOUNTING 70' AFG

180,000 ITL51144 18

SJ-2 QUALITE: 4X3V INTERNATIONALPole mounted Sport fields flood light. (1) 1500W T8

ATHLETIC FIELD, POLE MOUNTING 70' AFG

150,000 ITL45726 4

SJ-5NORTHSTAR, CSI-1000-P-HOODPrismatic Lens, 360degree Glare Sheild

(1) 1000W PAR64ATHLETIC FIELD, POLE MOUNTING 70' AFG

63,000 CSI-1000-P-HOOD 4

MFG PART NO. QTYFIXT

TYPEMANUFACTURE PART NUMBER/

DESCRIPTION LAMP LOCATION LUMENS

Page 106: 6.5 LW Red-line of Lighting Report

Archer Forward: Campus Preservation and Improvement Plan - Lighting Study Page 105 The Archer School for Girls July 2013

Figure 64: Fixture Types SJ, SJ-1 and SJ-2

Page 107: 6.5 LW Red-line of Lighting Report

Archer Forward: Campus Preservation and Improvement Plan - Lighting Study Page 106 The Archer School for Girls July 2013

Figure 65: Fixture Types SJ-3, SJ-4 and SJ-5

Page 108: 6.5 LW Red-line of Lighting Report

Archer Forward: Campus Preservation and Improvement Plan - Lighting Study Page 107 The Archer School for Girls July 2013

Figure 66: Athletic Fields Lighting Pole Locations and Luminaires

Page 109: 6.5 LW Red-line of Lighting Report

Archer Forward: Campus Preservation and Improvement Plan - Lighting Study Page 108 The Archer School for Girls July 2013

Figure 67: Modeled illuminance of the Athletic Fields

Table 50: Modeled illuminance of the Athletic Fields*

Area CalcType Units Ave Uniformity (Ave/Min)

Soccer Field ILLUM FC 34.24 4.03:1 *Illuminance levels reflect Initial Lamp Lumens and would decrease.

Page 110: 6.5 LW Red-line of Lighting Report

Archer Forward: Campus Preservation and Improvement Plan - Lighting Study Page 109 The Archer School for Girls July 2013

4.3.7 Exterior Lightings: Courtyards, Landscape Plazas, Pedestrian Walkways The exterior spaces are located and modeled based on descriptions provided in Section II, Project Description, of the Draft Environmental Impact Report for the Archer Forward: Campus Preservation and Improvement Plan, 2013 and 3D model representing the schematic design of the proposed facilities (the Project is summarized in Section 1.3). Parameters of study model are as follows:

Space Type: The Exterior Courtyard, Landscape Plazas, and Pedestrian Walkways Site environment model reflectance (ground level around building): 0.5 (Units measure albedo, which ranges between 0 and 1)

Page 111: 6.5 LW Red-line of Lighting Report

Archer Forward: Campus Preservation and Improvement Plan - Lighting Study Page 110 The Archer School for Girls July 2013

Light Configurations:

Table 51: Exterior Luminaire Schedule

EXTERIOR FIXTURE SCHEDULE

SA

BEGA: 8309 MHINDIRECT POST TOP LUMINARIE BLACK INTERIOR WITH DIFFUSE REFLECTOR, CLEAR FLAT GLASS LENS AND WHITE COVEHOUSING: Heavy one piece die-cast aluminum opticalhousing with integrally cast transition ”fitter“ as well as a diecast aluminum diffuser retaining ring.

(1) PHILIPS 150 WATT CMH - NORTH-SOUTH PEDESTRIAN CORRIDOR - NORTH GARDEN

14000

SA-1

BETA LED: ARE-EDG-3M-DLThe Edge LED Area Light - Type III Medium distributionHOUSING: Rugged cast aluminum with integral, weather-tight LED driver compartments and high performance aluminum heatsinks.

144W LED - NORTH OF PERFORMING ARTS CENTER - NORTH ENTRANCE

7023

SB-1

BEGA : 8450PBollards with Shielded Light DistrbutionHOUSING: One piece extruded aluminum Housing, 3⁄16" wall thickness with one piece die-cast aluminum top housing and base

(1) 42W CF TRIPLE-4P

- COURTYARDS - MAIN BUILDING - E-W CORRIDOR NORTH OF MULTIPURPOSE FACILITY - AQUATICS CENTER

3200

SB-2

BEGA: 7785 MHSHIELDED BOLLARD W/FOUR-SIDED OUTPUT AND LOW MOUNTING [MORE] HEIGHT. HOUSING: Two piece die-cast aluminum construction consisting of a die-cast post and a die-cast top casting

(1) 39W T6 G12 MHCENTRAL COURT / E-W CORRIDOR NORTH OF MULTIPURPOSE FACILITY AND AQUATICS CENTER

3300

SB-3

BEGA: 8677MHSHIELDED BOLLARDS WITH SINGLE-SIDED FLAT-BEAM DISTRIBUTIONHOUSING: One piece extruded aluminum with a one piece die-cast aluminum top housing and a base i

(1) 20W T4 GU6.5 MH UNDERGROUND PARKING STRUCTURE 1615

SC

BEGA: 3576PSurface Wall Luminaire w/ shield, Housing: One piece die-cast aluminum supplied withuniversal mounting bracket for direct attachment to 31⁄2" or 4" octagonal wiring box.

(1) 18W CF TRIPLE-4PPERFORMING ARTS CENTER / VISUAL ARTS CENTER / UNDERGROUND PARKING STRUCTURE

1200

SD-1

BEGA: 2277PRECESSED WALL LUMINAIRES WITH SHIELDED LIGHT DISTRIBUTIONHOUSING: Die-cast aluminum with integral wiring compartment.

(1) 42W CF TRIPLE-4P ATHLETIC FIELD STAIRS / NORTH GARDEN / COURT OF LEADERS 3200

SD-2

BEGA: 2277PRECESSED WALL LUMINAIRES WITH SHIELDED LIGHT DISTRIBUTIONHOUSING: Die-cast aluminum with integral wiring compartment.

(1) 42W CF TRIPLE-4P LOWER GARDEN / NORTH-SOUTH PEDESTRIAN CORRIDOR 3200

SD-3

BEGA: 3042PRecessed wall luminaires with asymmetrical distributionHOUSING: Die-cast aluminum with integral wiring compartment.

(1) 18W CF QUAD-4P UNDERGROUND PARKING STRUCTURE - ENT/EXIT RAMPS 1250

SD-4

BEGA: 2038LEDRecessed wall luminaires with shielded distributionHOUSING: Die-cast aluminum with integral wiring compartment.

10W LED PERFORMING ARTS CENTER - SOUTH EXTERIOR PATHWAY 810

SF-1

LED LINEAR:VARIOLED FLEX VENUS TV W827/1228Linear LEDHOUSING: FLEXIBLE TRANSLUCENT WHITE PLASTIC HOUSING WITH INTEGRAL TRANSLUCENT PLASTIC LENS.

LED ATHLETIC FIELDS/ E-W CORRIDOR NORTH OF GYM 333

SF-2

LED LINEAR:VARIOLED FLEX VENUS TV W827/1228Linear LEDHOUSING: FLEXIBLE TRANSLUCENT WHITE PLASTIC HOUSING WITH INTEGRAL TRANSLUCENT PLASTIC LENS.

LED COURTYARDS - COURT OF LEADERS / NORTH GARDEN / ARTS PLAZA 333

SF-3

LED LINEAR:VARIOLED FLEX VENUS TV W827/1228Linear LEDHOUSING: FLEXIBLE TRANSLUCENT WHITE PLASTIC HOUSING WITH INTEGRAL TRANSLUCENT PLASTIC LENS.

LED COURTYARDS - COURT OF LEADERS 333

SH-1

BEGA: 3576PSurface Wall Luminaire w/ shield, HOUSING: One piece die-cast aluminum supplied withuniversal mounting bracket for direct attachment to 31⁄2" or 4" octagonal wiring box.

(1) 18W CF TRIPLE-4P

COURTYARDS - CENTRAL COURT / ARTS PLAZA / POOL AND DECK / COURT OF LEADERS / NORTH-SOUTH CORRIDOR

1200

SP

PRUDENTIAL LIGHTING: PRU3P2T8Wlinear indirect lightingHOUSING: Available in 4-, 8- or 12-foot standardlengths

(2) PHILIPS F32T8/TL841 32 WATT FLUORESCENT LAMPS.

UNDERGROUND PARKING STRUCTURE 2950

LUMENSFIXT TYPE MANUFACTURE PART NUMBER/ DESCRIPTION LAMP LOCATION

Page 112: 6.5 LW Red-line of Lighting Report

Archer Forward: Campus Preservation and Improvement Plan - Lighting Study Page 111 The Archer School for Girls July 2013

Figure 68: Modeled illuminance of the Exterior Walkways and Plazas around Performing Arts Center

Figure 69: Modeled illuminance of the Exterior Walkways/ Court of Leaders

Page 113: 6.5 LW Red-line of Lighting Report

Archer Forward: Campus Preservation and Improvement Plan - Lighting Study Page 112 The Archer School for Girls July 2013

Figure 70: Modeled illuminance of the Exterior Walkways

Figure 71: Modeled illuminance of the Exterior Walkways and Plazas around Visual Arts Center and Aquatics Center

Page 114: 6.5 LW Red-line of Lighting Report

Archer Forward: Campus Preservation and Improvement Plan - Lighting Study Page 113 The Archer School for Girls July 2013

4.3.8 Lighting Guidelines Employed in Model The modeled Project employs Lighting Guidelines adopted from design principles and recommendations provided by the IESNA and the IDA (International Dark-Sky Association) to minimize all forms of light pollution, including glare, light trespass and skyglow. Skyglow is minimized by using full cutoff fixtures for exterior and site lighting and using shielding and aiming to prevent upward light from the athletic lighting fixtures.

a) Exterior Lighting

• Pole- and post-mounted lighting within direct view of any residential property shall be located and/or shielded so that view of the fixture source, lens and reflector is minimized.

• Bollard luminaires shall be specified to prevent direct view of the light source. Where louvered bollards are specified, they shall utilize coated lamps.

• All up lighting fixtures shall be aimed and/or shielded to constrain the light to the object being illuminated and minimize the amount of illumination escaping into the night sky.

• All up lighting fixtures shall be focused on highlighting or emphasizing architectural features and significant landscaping elements.

b) Athletic Lighting

• Sports lighting fixtures shall be aimed at an angle of not more than 62° (from nadir, normal to the horizon), or sports lighting fixtures must be aimed 18° less than the angle of direct view (from the property boundary), whichever is less.

c) Site Lighting

• All pole- and post-mounted luminaires over fifteen feet in height shall meet all IESNA requirements for Uplight Rating of U0 or U1 (e.g., B_-U1-G_, B_-U0-G_) and shall be aimed downward.

• All pole and post mount luminaires less than fifteen and greater than six feet in height shall meet all IESNA requirements for Uplight Rating of U0 or U1 (e.g., B_-U1-G_, B_-U0-G_).

• All luminaires of less than six feet in height, such as bollards, shall meet all IESNA requirements for for Uplight Rating of U0, U1, U2 (e.g., B_-U2-G_, B_-U1-G_, B_-U0-G_).

• For pedestrian walkways and plazas, all lighting configurations shall comply with IESNA RP-33-99 14.0 Walkway and Bikeway Lighting, best practice recommendations.

d) Parking Lot and Parking Structure Lighting

• All interior lighting for parking structures that is visible from areas exterior of the parking structure shall utilize shielding that blocks direct view of the light source and minimizes the view of reflector or diffuser.

• At interior perimeter of parking structures, all lighting shall provide indirect illumination of the interior parking area.

• For parking structures, all lighting configurations shall comply with IESNA RP-20-98, 10.0 Illuminance Recommendations – Garages, best practice recommendations for typical conditions.

e) Building Mounted Lighting

• Building mounted fixtures shall be shielded so that source is not directly visible and the view of the fixture lens and reflector is minimized.

Page 115: 6.5 LW Red-line of Lighting Report

Archer Forward: Campus Preservation and Improvement Plan - Lighting Study Page 114 The Archer School for Girls July 2013

• Building mounted fixtures that are not full-cutoff shall be primarily decorative in nature. The predominance of illumination for such areas shall be provided by other luminaires.

f) Interior Architectural Lighting

• Interior light sources of 800 lumens our more, should be shielded from exterior view

g) Site Design

• Surface of Athletic Fields is to be of similar reflectance to the existing dark grass, 8%.

4.3.9 Lighting Techniques relating to Light Pollution: Light Trespass, Glare and Skyglow For all exterior lighting elements, the lighting system is designed to reduce light pollution, including light trespass and skyglow. Such light pollution impacts would be prevented by using full cutoff fixtures for all exterior lighting, as well as shielding and downward aiming, for the Athletic Fields lighting.

Figure 72: Illustration of useful light vs. light pollution3

• The yellow highlighted areas illustrate useful light. The lighting techniques outlined above, and employed in the Project, limit the light output to the area of useful light only. Further, such techniques would ensure that the Project does not result in light pollution such as spill light, light trespass, direct glare, and direct upward light.

• The dashed arrow illustrates the light that is not useful, including the potential of direct glare that can result from unshielded light sources. The use of full cutoff and shielded luminaires would limit the direct glare in the Project.

3 Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute, NLPIC http://www.lrc.rpi.edu/programs/nlpip/lightinganswers/lightpollution/img/figure2.gif

Page 116: 6.5 LW Red-line of Lighting Report

Archer Forward: Campus Preservation and Improvement Plan - Lighting Study Page 115 The Archer School for Girls July 2013

• The upper sections designated as spill light and glare zone, as well as the dashed arrow labeled direct upward light, illustrate the angular distribution of light that often results in light trespass and glare. Further, such light distribution is the greatest contribution to skyglow. The use of downward aiming, full cutoff luminaires and shielded light sources, ensures that the Project would not result in light pollution such as light trespass and skyglow.

Page 117: 6.5 LW Red-line of Lighting Report

Archer Forward: Campus Preservation and Improvement Plan - Lighting Study Page 116 The Archer School for Girls July 2013

4.4 Summary of Calculated Future Conditions Outlined below is a summary of the results of lighting impacts from the calculation model. Summary of Illuminance Conclusions:

Table 52 and Table 53 below show the calculated illuminance resultant from the Project, measured at each Receptor Site location (Table 52) and the Project boundary (Table 53). These illuminance values represent the amount of light arriving at each location, and are used to evaluate light trespass impacts with both the Athletic Fields lighting on and off. The proposed Project would not result in significant impacts related to illuminance at any of the eleven Receptor Sites or along the Project boundary with either the Athletic Fields lighting on or off.

Table 52: Summary of Calculated Illuminance Values at Receptor Sites

Rec

epto

r Site

Mea

sure

d Ex

istin

gIll

umin

ance

Proj

ect

Illum

inan

ce

with

Ath

letic

Fi

elds

Li

ghtin

g on

(foot

cand

les)

Impa

ct

Proj

ect

Illum

inan

ce

with

Ath

letic

Fi

eld

Ligh

ting

off

(foot

cand

les)

Impa

ct

RS A0.089 0.000 0.000

RS B0.110 0.360 0.360

RS C2.680 0.004 0.004

RS C-10.050 0.050 0.050

RS D0.011 0.150 0.000

RS D-10.045 0.170 0.000

RS E0.004 0.960 0.000

RS F0.020 0.750 0.650

RS G0.680 0.480 0.480

RS H0.003 0.040 0.040

RS J1.010 0.190 0.040

below threshold

below threshold

below threshold

below threshold

below threshold

below threshold

below threshold

below threshold

below threshold

below threshold

below threshold

below threshold

below threshold

below threshold

below threshold

below threshold

below threshold

below threshold

below threshold

beow threshold

below threshold

below threshold

Page 118: 6.5 LW Red-line of Lighting Report

Archer Forward: Campus Preservation and Improvement Plan - Lighting Study Page 117 The Archer School for Girls July 2013

Table 53: Summary of Calculated Illuminance values at Boundary of Project

Loca

tions

Proj

ect

Illum

inan

ceA

thle

tic

Fiel

ds

Ligh

ing

on(fo

otca

ndle

s)

Impa

ct

Proj

ect

Illum

inan

ce,

Ath

letic

Fie

ld

Ligh

ting

off

(foot

cand

les)

Impa

ct

0.71 0.10

1.39 0.20

1.48 0.00

0.62 0.20

0.60 0.60

0.60 0.60

0.40 0.40

0.10 0.10

0.10 0.10

0.00 0.00

Below Threshold

Below Threshold

Below Threshold

Below ThresholdSunset Boulevard - Project Boundary

East of Aquatic and Visual Arts Centers - Project Boundary

North of New Performing Art Center - Project Boundary

South of New Performing Art Center - Project Boundary

East of Main Building - Project Boundary

West of Main Building - Project Boundary

Chaparal Street, Residential Property Boundary

Chaparal Street - Project Boundary

West of Athletic Field - Project Boundary

South of Athletic Field - Project Boundary

Below Threshold

Below Threshold

Below Threshold

Below Threshold

Below Threshold

Below Threshold

Below Threshold

Below Threshold

Below Threshold

Below Threshold

Below Threshold

Below Threshold

Below Threshold

Below Threshold

Below Threshold

Below Threshold

Page 119: 6.5 LW Red-line of Lighting Report

Archer Forward: Campus Preservation and Improvement Plan - Lighting Study Page 118 The Archer School for Girls July 2013

Summary of Contrast Conclusions:

Luminance data presented in Table 54, below, represents future calculated contrast ratios and is relevant to the criteria of contrast, as defined in Section 1.6. The Project results in low to middle contrast conditions, below the threshold for contrast, at all eleven Receptor Site locations with either the Athletic Fields lighting on or off. To clarify the role of contrast Table 55 and Table 56 present the existing and future coverage and context for the Project.

Page 120: 6.5 LW Red-line of Lighting Report

Archer Forward: Campus Preservation and Improvement Plan - Lighting Study Page 119 The Archer School for Girls July 2013

Table 54: Summary of Calculated Illuminance Values at Receptor Sites

Receptor SitesReceptor Site A

Average 0.751 0.077 0.077Maximum 72.620 1.100 1.100Minimum 0.005 0.000 0.000Max:Avg 96.683 :1 14.2 Max:Avg 14.2 Max:Avg

Receptor Site BAverage 1.181 0.167 0.167

Maximum 135.200 3.500 3.500Maximum 0.000 0.000 0.000Max:Avg 114.507 :1 21.0 Max:Avg 21.0 Max:Avg

Receptor Site CAverage 0.533 0.291 0.291

Maximum 56.450 8.100 8.100Minimum 0.002 0.000 0.000Max:Avg 105.827 :1 27.9 Max:Avg 27.9 Max:Avg

Receptor Site DAverage 7.522 0.167 0.115

Maximum 867.700 3.200 3.200Minimum 0.002 0.000 0.000Max:Avg 115.350 :1 19.2 Max:Avg 27.8 Max:Avg

Receptor Site FAverage 0.857 0.536 0.343

Maximum 59.450 4.100 3.600Minimum 0.003 0.000 0.000Max:Avg 69.380 :1 7.6 Max:Avg 10.5 Max:Avg

Receptor Site C-1Average 8.531 0.229 0.229

Maximum 957.300 3.200 3.200Minimum 0.001 0.000 0.000Max:Avg 112.209 :1 14.0 Max:Avg 14.0 Max:Avg

Receptor Site D-1Average 7.423 0.290 0.156

Maximum 866.000 5.200 4.300Minimum 0.002 0.000 0.000Max:Avg 116.661 :1 18.0 Max:Avg 27.6 Max:Avg

Receptor Site EAverage 0.262 1.163 0.122

Maximum 13.450 5.700 3.420Minimum 0.001 0.000 0.000Max:Avg 51.301 :1 4.9 Max:Avg 28.0 Max:Avg

Receptor Site GAverage 2.183 1.717 1.717

Maximum 254.800 8.800 8.800Minimum 0.000 0.000 0.000Max:Avg 116.731 :1 5.1 Max:Avg 5.1 Max:Avg

Receptor Site HAverage 0.521 0.660 0.551

Maximum 40.920 5.900 3.700Minimum 0.000 0.000 0.000Max:Avg 78.594 :1 8.9 Max:Avg 6.7 Max:Avg

Receptor Site JAverage 0.333 0.213 0.212

Maximum 9.191 3.300 3.300Minimum 0.003 0.000 0.000Max:Avg 27.591 :1 15.5 Max:Avg 15.5 Max:Avg

1:1 - 10:1 Low Contrast10:1 - 30:1 Mid Contrast>30:1 High Contrast

Project with Athletic Fields Lighting OFF

Measured Existing Contrast

Project with Athletic Fields Lighting ON

Page 121: 6.5 LW Red-line of Lighting Report

Archer Forward: Campus Preservation and Improvement Plan - Lighting Study Page 120 The Archer School for Girls July 2013

Table 55: Summary of Coverage for Existing and Project

ExistingCoverage

ProjectCoverage

Project Change

% % %

Field of view Field of view Field of view

A 21% 21% 0%B 20% 26% 6%C 27% 60% 33%C-1 35% 60% 25%D 26% 35% 9%D-1 27% 35% 8%E 62% 62% 0%F 62% 62% 0%G 75% 80% 5%H 75% 80% 5%J 35% 62% 27%

Receptor Site

Table 56: Summary of Context for Existing and Project

ExistingContext

ProjectContext

Project Change

% % %

Field of view Field of view Field of view

A 10% - 15% 10% - 15% 0%B 5% 15% 10%C 15% - 25% 20-25% 0%C-1 18% - 28% 20-25% 3%D 10% - 15% 15-20% 5%D-1 12% - 17% 15-20% 3%E 35% - 40% 35-40% 0%F 25% - 35% 25-35% 0%G 5% 15% 10%H 5% 15% 10%J 15-25% 20-25% 5%

Receptor Site

Page 122: 6.5 LW Red-line of Lighting Report

Archer Forward: Campus Preservation and Improvement Plan - Lighting Study Page 121 The Archer School for Girls July 2013

Sections (4.4.1 – 4.4.11) review the calculated future conditions at each Receptor Site. Each site is evaluated on the basis of the criteria of significance as established in Section 1.6 (IIlluminance, Contrast, Coverage and Context).

Page 123: 6.5 LW Red-line of Lighting Report

Archer Forward: Campus Preservation and Improvement Plan - Lighting Study Page 122 The Archer School for Girls July 2013

4.4.1 Future Conditions at Receptor Site A

Figure 73: Field of View shown at Receptor Site A

Page 124: 6.5 LW Red-line of Lighting Report

Archer Forward: Campus Preservation and Improvement Plan - Lighting Study Page 123 The Archer School for Girls July 2013

Table 57 summarizes the calculated future conditions resulting from the proposed Project at Receptor Site A in relation to the criteria established in Section 1.6.

Table 57: Visual Analysis of Future Conditions at Receptor Site A

Illuminance Horizontal: 0.000 footcandles with Athletic Fields Lighting On or Off, below the threshold of 2.0 footcandles. Calculations are presented in Table 58 and Table 59.

Contrast Mid Contrast With Athletic Field Lighting on or off, contrast conditions would not result in a substantial visual impact. Calculations are presented in Table 58 and Table 59.

Coverage 21% The existing Main Building, Athletic Fields lighting and the entrance-exit ramp to the underground parking structure would be visible from Receptor Site A. The visibility of the Athletic Fields lighting and entrance-exit ramp to the underground parking structure would slightly increase the portion of the view (coverage) from Receptor Site A. Of the six Athletic Fields lighting pole locations, one pole located in the southeast corner of the Athletic Fields is visible, however the steep aiming angle and fixture shielding limits the increase in visual coverage. The lighting at the entrance ramps would result in an increased visual coverage. However, the shielded luminaires would limit visual impacts by preventing any views to the lamp source, and reducing views of the fixture reflectors. The Project’s proposed lighting improvements visible from Receptor Site A would not result in a substantial visual impact.

Context

10% - 15% The maximum calculated luminance at Receptor Site A results from the interior lighting of the Performing Arts Center, 1.10 fL. While the view of the Performing Arts Center would be fully screened by existing trees at the boundary of the Project and 125 Barrington Avenue, as noted in Section 4.2, the computer model does not include existing trees or vegetation and therefore, under the computer model, the Performing Art Center lighting would be visible from Receptor Site A. This lighting is significantly lower than the measured luminance of 72.62 fL, resulting from the adjacent landscape lighting. While the existing Main Building and the exit ramps to the underground parking structure extend across the south side of the Project Site, along the width of the view, trees partial obscure these structures. Approximately 10% - 15% of the Project is visible from Receptor Site A. As discussed above, the proposed lighting at the entrance and exit ramp would slightly increase visibility of the Project, thereby slightly increasing the visible portion (context). However, the aiming and shielding strategies employed in the lighting design would limit impacts resulting from the proposed lighting. The visibility of the Athletic Fields lighting would slightly increase the context, however, the shielding and downward aiming in the opposite direction would minimize the visual prominence of the lighting equipment. The proposed lighting improvements visible from Receptor Site A would not result in a substantial visual impact.

Page 125: 6.5 LW Red-line of Lighting Report

Archer Forward: Campus Preservation and Improvement Plan - Lighting Study Page 124 The Archer School for Girls July 2013

Table 58 and Table 59 show the calculated results in more detail. Table 58 summarizes calculated illuminance and contrast (luminance) values in relation to the stated thresholds, for all areas of the Project, including periods when the Athletic Fields lighting is on, while Table 59 summarizes the same such values, during periods when the Athletic Fields lighting is off, at Receptor Site A.

Table 58: Calculation Results of Project at Receptor Site A with Athletic Fields Lighting On

Receptor Site AProject with

Athletic Fields Lighting on Impact

Average Illuminance (fc) 0.000 below threshold

Luminance (footLamberts)Avg 0.077Max 1.100Min 0.000

Contrast Max:Avg 14.2 :1

Mid Contrast

Table 59: Calculation Results of Project at Receptor Site A with Athletic Field Lighting Off

Receptor Site AProject with

Athletic Fields Lighting off Impact

Average Illuminance (fc) 0.000 below threshold

Luminance (footLamberts)Avg 0.077Max 1.100Min 0.000

Contrast Max:Avg 14.2 :1

Mid Contrast

Page 126: 6.5 LW Red-line of Lighting Report

Archer Forward: Campus Preservation and Improvement Plan - Lighting Study Page 125 The Archer School for Girls July 2013

4.4.2 Future Conditions at Receptor Site B

Figure 74: Field of View shown at Receptor Site B

Table 60 summarizes the calculated future conditions resulting from the Project at Receptor Site B in relation to the criteria established in Section 1.6.

Table 60: Visual Analysis of Future Conditions at Receptor Site B

Illuminance Horizontal: 0.360 footcandles with Athletic Fields Lighting On or Off, below the threshold of 2.0 footcandles. Calculations are presented in Table 61 and Table 62.

Contrast Low Contrast With Athletic Field Lighting on or off, contrast conditions would not result in a substantial visual impact. Calculations are presented in Table 61 and Table 62.

Coverage 26% The fencing and gates enclosing the Performing Arts Center, a portion of the Performing Arts Center, and a small part of the Visual Arts Center would be partially visible from Receptor Site B. The proposed lighting at the Performing Arts Center and the Visual Arts Center would slightly increase the coverage of these sites. However, the selected cut off fixture and fully shielded pathway lighting would limit visual impacts by preventing any views to the lamp source, and reducing views of the fixture reflectors. Further, such equipment would

Page 127: 6.5 LW Red-line of Lighting Report

Archer Forward: Campus Preservation and Improvement Plan - Lighting Study Page 126 The Archer School for Girls July 2013

shield views of lighting equipment from adjacent residences, such as 11706 Chaparal Street. The Project’s proposed lighting improvements visible from Receptor Site B would not result in a substantial visual impact.

Context

15% The maximum calculated luminance results from the interior lighting of the Performing Arts Center, 3.50 fL. This is significantly lower than the measured existing luminance resulting from the adjacent street light, 135.2 fL. The view to the Performing Arts Center and Visual Arts Center would be partially obstructed by trees and the surrounding residences, leaving approximately 15% visible. The Project would slightly increase the context, the increased height of the two buildings would increase the visible portion (context). However, as discussed above, using the cut off fixtures employed in the lighting design would limit impacts resulting from the proposed lighting. The proposed lighting improvements visible from Receptor Site B would not result in a substantial visual impact.

Table 61 and Table 62 show the calculated results in more detail. Table 61 summarizes calculated illuminance and contrast (luminance) values in relation to the stated thresholds, for all areas of the Project, including periods when the Athletic Fields lighting is on, while Table 62 summarizes the same such values, during periods when the Athletic Fields lighting is off, at Receptor Site B.

Table 61: Calculations Results of Project at Receptor Site B with Athletic Fields Lighting On

Receptor Site BProject with

Athletic Fields Lighting on Impact

Average Illuminance (fc) 0.360 below threshold

Exitance (footLamberts)Avg 0.167Max 3.500Min 0.000

Contrast Max:Avg 21.0 :1

Mid Contrast

Table 62: Calculation Results of Project Receptor Site B with Athletic Fields Lighting Off

Receptor Site BProject with

Athletic Fields Lighting off Impact

Average Illuminance (fc) 0.360 below threshold

Exitance (footLamberts)Avg 0.167Max 3.500Min 0.000

Contrast Max:Avg 21.0 :1

Mid Contrast

Page 128: 6.5 LW Red-line of Lighting Report

Archer Forward: Campus Preservation and Improvement Plan - Lighting Study Page 127 The Archer School for Girls July 2013

4.4.3 Future Conditions at Receptor Site C

Figure 75: Field of View shown at Receptor Site C

Page 129: 6.5 LW Red-line of Lighting Report

Archer Forward: Campus Preservation and Improvement Plan - Lighting Study Page 128 The Archer School for Girls July 2013

Table 63 summarizes the calculated future conditions resulting from the proposed Project at Receptor Site C in relation to the criteria established in Section 1.6.

Table 63: Visual Analysis of Future Conditions at Site C

Illuminance Horizontal: 0.004 footcandles with Athletic Fields Lighting On or Off, below the threshold of 2.0 footcandles. Calculations are presented in Table 64 and Table 65.

Contrast Mid Contrast With Athletic Field Lighting on or off, contrast conditions would not result in a substantial visual impact. Calculations are presented in Table 64 and Table 65.

Coverage 60% The Athletic Field lighting, the upper levels of the Multipurpose Facility, Aquatics Center, Visual Arts Center, Performing Arts Center, and the North Wing Renovation are visible from Receptor Site C. The solid eight foot wall along Chaparal Street blocks the view of the lower levels of these locations as well as the Athletic Fields and pedestrian areas. The height of the new buildings would increase the portion of the view (coverage). However, the proposed lighting would not create a visual impact because the shielding and aiming angles of the lighting would shield direct views to the lamp source. The Athletic Fields lighting would be only partially visible at Receptor Site C, and the shielding and aiming angles of the Athletic Fields lighting would shield direct views to the lamp source. The Project’s proposed lighting improvements visible from Receptor Site C would not result in a substantial visual impact.

Context

20 – 25% The maximum calculated luminance results from the interior lighting of the Multipurpose Facility, 8.10 fL. This is significantly lower than the measured existing streetlight, 56.45 fL. As described above, the Athletics Fields lighting, Multipurpose Facility, Aquatics Center, Visual Arts Center, Performing Arts Center, and North Wing Renovation would be partially visible from Receptor Site C. While these facilities extend across the majority of the width of the view, a solid eight foot wall on Chaparal Street blocks the view of all structures below 10 feet, and the whole extent of the ground plane, leaving approximately 20 – 25% of the Project Site visible. The height of the new buildings would increase the visible portion (context) above the eight foot wall. However, as discussed above, using the cut off fixtures employed in the lighting design combined with the shielding and aiming strategies of Athletic Field lighting would limit lighting impacts. The proposed lighting improvements visible from Receptor Site C would not result in a substantial visual impact.

Page 130: 6.5 LW Red-line of Lighting Report

Archer Forward: Campus Preservation and Improvement Plan - Lighting Study Page 129 The Archer School for Girls July 2013

Table 64 and Table 65 show the calculated results in more detail. Table 64 summarizes calculated illuminance and contrast (luminance) values in relation to the stated thresholds, for all areas of the Project, including periods when the Athletic Field lighting is on, while Table 65 summarizes the same such values, during periods when the Athletic Field lighting is off, at Receptor Site C.

Table 64: Calculations Results of Project at Receptor Site C with Athletic Fields Lighting On

Receptor Site CProject with

Athletic Fields Lighting on Impact

Average Illuminance (fc) 0.004 below threshold

Exitance (footLamberts)Avg 0.291Max 8.100Min 0.000

Contrast Max:Avg 27.9 :1

Mid Contrast

Table 65: Calculation Results of Project at Receptor Site C with Athletic Fields Lighting Off

Receptor Site CProject with

Athletic Fields Lighting off Impact

Average Illuminance (fc) 0.004 below threshold

Exitance (footLamberts)Avg 0.291Max 8.100Min 0.000

Contrast Max:Avg 27.9 :1

Mid Contrast

Page 131: 6.5 LW Red-line of Lighting Report

Archer Forward: Campus Preservation and Improvement Plan - Lighting Study Page 130 The Archer School for Girls July 2013

4.4.4 Future Conditions at Receptor Site C-1

Figure 76: Field of View shown at Receptor Site C-1

Table 66 summarizes the calculated future conditions resulting from the Project at Receptor Site C-1 in relation to the criteria established in Section 1.6.

Table 66: Visual Analysis of Future Conditions at Site C-1

Illuminance Horizontal: 0.050 footcandles with Athletic Fields Lighting On or Off, below the threshold of 2.0 footcandles. Calculations are presented in Table 67 and Table 68.

Contrast Mid Contrast With Athletic Field Lighting on or off, contrast conditions would not result in a substantial visual impact. Calculations are presented in Table 67 and Table 68.

Coverage 60% The Athletic Fields lighting, the upper levels of the Multipurpose Facility, Aquatics Center, Visual Arts Center, Performing Arts Center, and the North Wing Renovation are visible from Receptor Site C-1. The solid eight foot wall on Chaparal Street blocks the view of the lower levels of these locations as well as the Athletic Fields and pedestrian areas. The height of the new buildings would

Page 132: 6.5 LW Red-line of Lighting Report

Archer Forward: Campus Preservation and Improvement Plan - Lighting Study Page 131 The Archer School for Girls July 2013

increase the portion of the view (coverage). However, the proposed lighting would not create a visual impact because the shielding and aiming angles of the lighting would shield direct views to the lamp source. The Athletic Field lighting would be only partially visible at Receptor Site C-1, and the shielding and aiming angles of the Athletic Field lighting would shield direct views to the lamp source. Project’s proposed lighting improvements visible from Receptor Site C-1 would not result in a substantial visual impact.

Context

20 – 25% The maximum calculated luminance results from the interior lighting of the Multipurpose Facility, 3.20 fL. This is significantly lower than the measured existing streetlight, 957.2 fL. As described above, the Athletics Fields lighting, Multipurpose Facility, Aquatics Center, Visual Arts Center, Performing Arts Center, and North Wing Renovation would be partially visible from Receptor Site C-1. While these facilities extend across the majority of the width of the view, a solid eight foot wall on Chaparal Street blocks the view of the extent of the ground plane, leaving approximately 20 – 25% of the Project Site visible. The height of the new buildings would increase the visible portion (context) above the eight foot wall. However, as discussed above, using the cut off fixtures employed in the lighting design combined with the shielding and aiming strategies of Athletic Field lighting would limit lighting impacts. The proposed lighting improvements visible from Receptor Site C-1 would not result in a substantial visual impact.

Page 133: 6.5 LW Red-line of Lighting Report

Archer Forward: Campus Preservation and Improvement Plan - Lighting Study Page 132 The Archer School for Girls July 2013

Table 67 and Table 68 show the calculated results in more detail. Table 67 summarizes calculated illuminance and contrast (luminance) values in relation to the stated thresholds, for all areas of the Project, including periods when the Athletic Field lighting is on, while Table 68 summarizes the same such values, during periods when the Athletic Field lighting is off, at Receptor Site C-1.

Table 67: Calculations Results of Project at Receptor Site C-1 with Athletic Fields Lighting On

Receptor Site C-1Project with

Athletic Fields Lighting on Impact

Average Illuminance (fc) 0.050 below threshold

Exitance (footLamberts)Avg 0.229Max 3.200Min 0.000

Contrast Max:Avg 14.0 :1

Mid Contrast

Table 68: Calculation Results of Project at Receptor Site C-1 with Athletic Fields Lighting Off

Receptor Site C-1Project with

Athletic Fields Lighting off Impact

Average Illuminance (fc) 0.050 below threshold

Exitance (footLamberts)Avg 0.229Max 3.200Min 0.000

Contrast Max:Avg 14.0 :1

Mid Contrast

Page 134: 6.5 LW Red-line of Lighting Report

Archer Forward: Campus Preservation and Improvement Plan - Lighting Study Page 133 The Archer School for Girls July 2013

4.4.5 Future Conditions at Receptor Site D

Figure 77: Field of View shown at Receptor Site D

Page 135: 6.5 LW Red-line of Lighting Report

Archer Forward: Campus Preservation and Improvement Plan - Lighting Study Page 134 The Archer School for Girls July 2013

Table 69 summarizes the calculated future conditions resulting from the Project at Receptor Site D in relation to the criteria established in Section 1.6.

Table 69: Visual Analysis of Future Conditions at Site D

Illuminance Horizontal: 0.150 footcandles, while Athletic Field Lighting is on, below the threshold of 2.0 footcandles. Horizontal: 0.000 footcandles, while Athletic Field Lighting is off, below the threshold of 2.0 footcandles. Calculations are presented in Table 70 and Table 71

Contrast Mid Contrast With Athletic Field Lighting on or off, contrast conditions would not result in a substantial visual impact. Calculations are presented in Table 70 and Table 71.

Coverage 35% The Athletic Fields, Multipurpose Facility, North Wing Renovation, and Main Building would be visible from Receptor Site D. The height of the new buildings and 70’ mounting height of Athletic Fields lighting would increase the portion of the view (coverage). The solid eight foot wall on Chaparal Street blocks much of the view of the lower levels of these locations as well as the Athletic Fields and pedestrian areas. The proposed Athletic Fields lighting consists of fully shielded fixtures, aimed to minimize light trespass and glare. The visible lighting within the interior of the Multipurpose Facility, North Wing Renovation, and existing Main Building is indirect and blocks the direct view of the light source. Both Athletic Fields lighting and interior building lighting limit direct view of the light source, minimize glare, and would limit possible visual impacts. The Project’s proposed lighting improvements visible from Receptor Site D would not result in a substantial visual impact.

Context

15 – 20 % The maximum calculated luminance results from the interior lighting of the Multipurpose Facility, 3.20 fL. This is significantly lower than the measured existing gate mounted light at 11835 Chaparal Street, 867.7 fL. As discussed above, while the Athletic Fields extend across the majority of the width of the view, the lower portion of the Athletic Fields are not visible from Receptor Site D as the view is blocked by the solid eight foot wall on Chaparal Street, leaving approximately 15 – 20% of the Project Site visible. The height of the new buildings and the 70’ mounting height of the Athletic Field lighting would increase the visible portion of the view (context). Further, the surface brightness of the Project buildings would be minimally increased, as a result of the added illumination of the Athletic Fields lighting. The proposed lighting would limit the lighting impact. The shielding and aiming angles of the Athletic Field lighting would limit direct views to the lamp source. See Table 72, Figure 79, and Figure 80 for detailed view angle study of Athletic Field lighting visible from Receptor Site D. The proposed lighting improvements visible from Receptor Site D would not result in a substantial visual impact.

Page 136: 6.5 LW Red-line of Lighting Report

Archer Forward: Campus Preservation and Improvement Plan - Lighting Study Page 135 The Archer School for Girls July 2013

Table 70 and Table 71 show the calculated results in more detail. Table 70 summarizes calculated illuminance and contrast (luminance) values in relation to the stated thresholds, for all areas of the Project, including periods when the Athletic Field lighting is on, while Table 71 summarizes the same such values, during periods when the Athletic Field lighting is off, at Receptor Site D. Table 70: Calculation Results of Project at Receptor Site D with Athletic Fields Lighting On

Receptor Site DProject with

Athletic Fields Lighting on Impact

Average Illuminance (fc) 0.150 below threshold

Exitance (footLamberts)Avg 0.167Max 3.200Min 0.000

Contrast Max:Avg 19.2 :1

Mid Contrast

Table 71: Calculation Results of Project at Receptor Site D with Athletic Fields Lighting Off

Receptor Site DProject with

Athletic Fields Lighting off Impact

Average Illuminance (fc) 0.000 below threshold

Exitance (footLamberts)Avg 0.115Max 3.200Min 0.000

Contrast Max:Avg 27.8 :1

Mid Contrast

Page 137: 6.5 LW Red-line of Lighting Report

Archer Forward: Campus Preservation and Improvement Plan - Lighting Study Page 136 The Archer School for Girls July 2013

In addition to calculated luminance and illuminance values, view angle studies were performed, assessing the visibility of the proposed Athletic Fields lighting equipment at Receptor Site D. As shown below, shielding use at each luminaire blocks all direct visibility to the light source (lamp). In addition, visibility of the reflector within the luminaire would be minimized to the greatest extent possible. The below view angle study analyzes the representative aiming angels for each pole, when viewed from Receptor Site D. This study establishes the maximum aiming angle (above Nadir) for each location, to eliminate direct view of the light source and incorporates this aiming angle as a design criterion into the modeled Athletic Fields lighting. In each case, a maximum aiming angle was established to ensure that none of the Athletic Fields fixtures allow direct views to the lamp source. The proposed Athletic Fields lighting utilizes glare shields with a 17 degree glare shield. Thus, the luminaire would shield the light source from direct view if the luminaire is aimed 17 degrees below the angle of direct view. In each case, all Athletic Fields lighting fixtures utilize aiming angles that allow for full shielding of the light source.

Figure 78: Map of Sight Line Studies for Athletics Fields shows specific Luminaire locations and Receptor Site D

Page 138: 6.5 LW Red-line of Lighting Report

Archer Forward: Campus Preservation and Improvement Plan - Lighting Study Page 137 The Archer School for Girls July 2013

Table 72: View Angle Analysis for Lamp Shielding for Receptor Site D

View Angle Analysis for Lamp Shielding RS_D (All angles are measured from Nadir)

POLE# POLETYPE LOCATION RECEPTOR

SITE

LUMINAIREHEIGHT

(FT.)

DIRECT VIEW

SITE ANGLE

MAXIMUMAIMING ANGLE

FIXTURE ANGLE

CUTOFF REQUIRED

MODELEDAIMING ANGLE

LAMPVISIBILITY

4 CA-1 SW corner of the field D 70 75 58 17 58 NONE

5 CA-1 S, boundary of field, centeredadjacent to the S on ground parking lot

D 70 79 62 17 62 NONE

6 CA-1 SE corner of the field D 70 80 63 17 56 NONE

Figure 79: View study of luminaire shows the shielding blocks the view of lamp.

Figure 80: View study from Receptor Site to Luminaire shows the shielding blocks the view of lamp.

Page 139: 6.5 LW Red-line of Lighting Report

Archer Forward: Campus Preservation and Improvement Plan - Lighting Study Page 138 The Archer School for Girls July 2013

4.4.6 Future Conditions at Receptor Site D-1

Figure 81: Field of view shown at Receptor Site D-1

Table 73 summarizes the calculated future conditions resulting from the Project at Receptor Site D-1 in relation to the criteria established in Section 1.6.

Table 73: Visual Analysis of Future Conditions at Site D-1

Illuminance Horizontal: 0.170 footcandles, while Athletic Field Lighting is on, below the threshold of 2.0 footcandles. Horizontal: 0.000 footcandles, while Athletic Field Lighting is off, below the threshold of 2.0 footcandles. Calculations are presented in Table 74 and Table 75.

Contrast Mid Contrast With Athletic Field Lighting on or off, contrast conditions would not result in a substantial visual impact. Calculations are presented in Table 74 and Table 75.

Coverage 35% The proposed Athletic Fields, Multipurpose Facility, and North Wing Renovation would be visible from Receptor Site D-1. The sold eight foot wall on Chaparal Street blocks much of the view of the lower levels of these locations as well as the Athletic Fields and pedestrian areas. The height of the new buildings and 70’

Page 140: 6.5 LW Red-line of Lighting Report

Archer Forward: Campus Preservation and Improvement Plan - Lighting Study Page 139 The Archer School for Girls July 2013

mounting height of Athletic Fields lighting would increase the portion of the view (coverage). The proposed Athletic Fields lighting consists of fully shielded fixtures, aimed to minimize light trespass and glare. The visible lighting within the interior of the North Wing Renovation and existing Main Building is indirect and blocks the direct view of the light source. Both Athletic Fields lighting and interior building lighting limit direct view of the light source, minimize glare, and would limit possible visual impacts. The Project’s proposed lighting improvements visible from Receptor Site D-1 would not result in a substantial visual impact.

Context

15 – 20 % The maximum calculated luminance results from the Athletic Fields lighting, 5.20 fL with the Athletics Field lighting on and from the Multipurpose Facility 4.3 fL with the Athletics Field Lighting off. This is significantly lower than the measured existing gate mounted light at 11835 Chaparal Street, 866.00 fL. As discussed above, while the Athletic Fields extend across the majority of the width of the view, much of the Athletic Fields are not visible from Receptor Site D-1 as the view is blocked by the solid eight foot wall on Chaparal Street, leaving 15 – 20% of the Project Site visible. However, the height of the new buildings and the 70’ mounting height of the Athletic Fields lighting would also increase the visible portion of the view (context). Further, the surface brightness of the Project buildings would be minimally increased, as a result of the added illumination of the Athletic Field lighting. The proposed lighting would limit the lighting impact. The shielding and aiming angles of the Athletic Fields lighting would limit direct views to the lamp source. The proposed lighting improvements visible from Receptor Site D-1 would not result in a substantial visual impact.

Page 141: 6.5 LW Red-line of Lighting Report

Archer Forward: Campus Preservation and Improvement Plan - Lighting Study Page 140 The Archer School for Girls July 2013

Table 74 and Table 75 show the calculated results in more detail. Table 74 summarizes calculated illuminance and contrast (luminance) values in relation to the stated thresholds, for all areas of the Project, including periods when the Athletic Fields lighting is on, while Table 75 summarizes the same such values, during periods when the Athletic Field lighting is off, at Receptor Site D-1.

Table 74: Calculations Results of Project at Receptor Site D-1 with Athletic Fields Lighting On

Receptor Site D-1Project with

Athletic Fields Lighting on Impact

Average Illuminance (fc) 0.170 below threshold

Exitance (footLamberts)Avg 0.290Max 5.200Min 0.000

Contrast Max:Avg 18.0 :1

Mid Contrast

Table 75: Calculation Results of Project at Receptor Site D-1 with Athletic Fields Lighting Off

Receptor Site D-1Project with

Athletic Fields Lighting off Impact

Average Illuminance (fc) 0.000 below threshold

Exitance (footLamberts)Avg 0.156Max 4.300Min 0.000

Contrast Max:Avg 27.6 :1

Mid Contrast

Page 142: 6.5 LW Red-line of Lighting Report

Archer Forward: Campus Preservation and Improvement Plan - Lighting Study Page 141 The Archer School for Girls July 2013

4.4.7 Future Conditions at Receptor Site E

Figure 82: Field of View shown at Receptor Site E

Table 76 summarizes the calculated future conditions resulting from the Project at Receptor Site E in relation to the criteria established in Section 1.6. The view from the 10’ AFG is intended to accurately measure the lighting conditions at the top of the 8’ perimeter wall adjacent to the residential property at 11840 Chaparal Street.

Table 76: Visual Analysis of Future Conditions at Site E

Illuminance Horizontal: 0.960 footcandles, while Athletic Fields Lighting is on, below the threshold of 2.0 footcandles. Horizontal: 0.000 footcandles, while Athletic Fields Lighting is off, below the threshold of 2.0 footcandles. Calculations are presented in Table 77 and Table 78.

Contrast Low to Mid Contrast With Athletic Field Lighting on or off, contrast conditions would not result in a substantial visual impact. Calculations are presented in Table 77 and Table 78.

Coverage 62% The North Wing Renovation, existing Main Building, Athletic Fields and Multipurpose Facility would be visible from Receptor Site E. The Aquatics Center and Visual Arts Center would be partially visible from Receptor Site E. The

Page 143: 6.5 LW Red-line of Lighting Report

Archer Forward: Campus Preservation and Improvement Plan - Lighting Study Page 142 The Archer School for Girls July 2013

height of the new buildings would increase the portion of the view (coverage). The proposed Athletic Fields lighting, the site lighting, and the under bench, low wall and planter lighting would be visible at the Receptor Site E. However, the design of the proposed lighting would limit the lighting impact. The shielding and aiming angles of the Athletic Fields lighting would shield direct views to the lamp source. The building and the site lighting along the walkway are cut off, and shield view of lamps or are concealed by the hardscape elements. The Project’s proposed lighting improvements visible from Receptor Site E would not result in a substantial visual impact.

Context

35 – 40 % The maximum calculated luminance results from the Athletic Fields lighting, 5.70 fL with the Athletics Field lighting on and from the Multipurpose Facility 3.42 fL with the Athletics Field Lighting off. This is a decrease from the maximum measured luminance value of 13.45 fL from the interior lighting from the apartment building at 11745 Sunset Boulevard and is consistent with the existing luminance measured from Receptor Site E, on the Main Building of 3.056 fL. As discussed above, many of the existing and proposed facilities are visible from Receptor Site E without any obstruction, with 35 – 40 % of the Project Site visible. The height of the new buildings would also increase the visible portion of the view (context). The design of the proposed lighting would limit the lighting impact. The shielding and aiming angles of the Athletic Fields lighting would shield direct views to the lamp source. The building and site lighting also shield view of lamps. The proposed lighting improvements visible from Receptor Site E would not result in a substantial visual impact.

Page 144: 6.5 LW Red-line of Lighting Report

Archer Forward: Campus Preservation and Improvement Plan - Lighting Study Page 143 The Archer School for Girls July 2013

Table 77 and Table 78 show the calculated results in more detail. Table 77 summarizes calculated illuminance and contrast (luminance) values in relation to the stated thresholds, for all areas of the Project, including periods when the Athletic Field lighting is on, while Table 78 summarizes the same such values, during periods when the Athletic Field lighting is off, at Receptor Site E.

Table 77: Calculation Results of Project at Receptor Site E with Athletic Fields Lighting On

Receptor Site EProject with

Athletic Fields Lighting on Impact

Average Illuminance (fc) 0.960 below threshold

Exitance (footLamberts)Avg 1.163Max 5.700Min 0.000

Contrast Max:Avg 4.9 :1

Low Contrast

Table 78: Calculation Results of Project at Receptor Site E with Athletic Fields Lighting Off

Receptor Site EProject with

Athletic Fields Lighting off Impact

Average Illuminance (fc) 0.000 below threshold

Exitance (footLamberts)Avg 0.122Max 3.420Min 0.000

Contrast Max:Avg 28.0 :1

Mid Contrast

In addition to calculated luminance and illuminance values, view angle studies were performed, assessing the visibility of the proposed Athletic Fields lighting equipment at Receptor Site E. As shown below, shielding used at each luminaire blocks all direct visibility to the light source (lamp). In addition, visibility of the reflector within the luminaire would be minimized to the greatest extent possible. The below view angle study analyzes the representative aiming angels for each pole, when viewed from Receptor Site E. This study establishes the maximum aiming angle (above Nadir) for each location, to eliminate direct view of the light source and incorporates this aiming angle as a design criterion into the modeled Athletic Fields lighting. In each case, a maximum aiming angle was established to ensure that none of the Athletic Fields fixtures allow direct views to the lamp source. In addition to aiming the luminaires away from the western edge of the Athletic Fields, to the maximum extent possible, the proposed Athletic Fields lighting utilizes glare shields with 17 degree glare shield. Thus, the luminaire would shield the light source from direct view if the luminaire is aimed 17 degrees below the angle of direct view. In each case, all Athletic Fields lighting fixtures utilize aiming angles that allow for full shielding of the light source.

Page 145: 6.5 LW Red-line of Lighting Report

Archer Forward: Campus Preservation and Improvement Plan - Lighting Study Page 144 The Archer School for Girls July 2013

Figure 83: Map of Sight Line Studies for Athletics Fields shows specific Luminaire locations and Receptor Site E.

Page 146: 6.5 LW Red-line of Lighting Report

Archer Forward: Campus Preservation and Improvement Plan - Lighting Study Page 145 The Archer School for Girls July 2013

Table 79: View Angle Analysis for Lamp Shielding for Receptor Site E

View Angle Analysis for Lamp Shielding RS_E (All angles are measured from Nadir)

POLE# POLETYPE LOCATION RECEPTOR

SITE

LUMINAIREHEIGHT

(FT.)

DIRECT VIEWSITE ANGLE

MAXIMUMAIMING ANGLE

ALLOW

MODELEDAIMING ANGLE

LAMPVISIBILITY

1 CA-1 NE corner of the field E 60 76 59 58 NONE

2 CA-1 NW corner of the field E 70 49 32 22 NONE

3 CA-1 SW corner of the fieldadjacent to the W border of the campus E 60 74 NONE

4 CA-1 SW corner of the fieldadjacent to the SW on ground parking lot E 70 78 61 55 NONE

5 CA-1 S, boundary of field, centeredadjacent to the S on ground parking lot E 60 80 63 54 NONE

6 CA-1 SE corner of the field E 70 79 62 53 NONE

Sources to be aimed away from Receptor Site E. Location will not

have visibility of Light Source

Figure 84: View study of luminaire shows the shielding blocks the view of lamp.

Figure 85: View study from Receptor Site to Luminaire shows the shielding blocks the view of lamp.

Page 147: 6.5 LW Red-line of Lighting Report

Archer Forward: Campus Preservation and Improvement Plan - Lighting Study Page 146 The Archer School for Girls July 2013

4.4.8 Future Conditions at Receptor Site F

Figure 86: Field of view shown at Receptor Site F, Facing East

Page 148: 6.5 LW Red-line of Lighting Report

Archer Forward: Campus Preservation and Improvement Plan - Lighting Study Page 147 The Archer School for Girls July 2013

Table 80 summarizes the calculated future conditions resulting from the proposed Project at Receptor Site F in relation to the criteria established in Section 1.6.

Table 80: Visual Analysis of Future Conditions at Receptor Site F

Illuminance Horizontal: 0.750 footcandles, while Athletic Field Lighting is onN, below the threshold of 2.0 footcandles. Horizontal: 0.650 footcandles, while Athletic Field Lighting is off, below the threshold of 2.0 footcandles. Calculations are presented in Table 81 and Table 82.

Contrast Low to Mid Contrast With Athletic Field Lighting on or off, contrast conditions would not result in a substantial visual impact. Calculations are presented in Table 81 and Table 82.

Coverage 62% The existing Main Building, the North Wing Renovation, Athletic Fields, and underground parking structure are visible from Receptor Site F. The Athletic Fields extend across the majority of the width of the view; the lower portion of the Athletic Fields are not visible from Receptor Site F, due to the hand-height wall located adjacent to the pedestrian pathway that runs on the south side of the Athletic Fields, which would separate the open underground parking structure, below, from the walkway.and raised elevation. The proposed underground parking structure would be partially visible from the Receptor Site F and slightly increase the portion of the view (coverage). The design of the underground parking structure results in no lighting impact. The shielding and aiming angles of the Athletic Fields lighting would block direct views to the lamp source. The proposed lighting at the underground parking structure is fully shielded, and site lightings are concealed with in the landscape elements. The Project’s proposed lighting improvements visible from Receptor Site F would not result in a substantial visual impact.

Context

25 – 35 % The maximum calculated luminance results from the Athletic Fields lighting, 4.10 fL with the Athletics Field lighting on and from the underground parking structure 3.60 fL with the Athletics Field Lighting off. This is significantly below the existing luminance measured from Receptor Site F, resulting from wall mounted area lighting located on the existing North Wing, 59.45 fL. The view of most of the Project is obscured by the Main Building and the North Wing Renovation, leaving approximately 25-35% visible from Receptor Site F. As noted above, the existing Main Building, the North Wing Renovation, Athletic Fields and underground parking structure would be partially visible from this location. The proposed lighting improvements visible from Receptor Site F would not result in a substantial visual impact.

Page 149: 6.5 LW Red-line of Lighting Report

Archer Forward: Campus Preservation and Improvement Plan - Lighting Study Page 148 The Archer School for Girls July 2013

Table 81 and Table 82 show the calculated results in more detail. Table 81 summarizes calculated illuminance and contrast (luminance) values in relation to the stated thresholds, for all areas of the Project, including periods when the Athletic Field lighting is on, while Table 82 summarizes the same such values, during periods when the Athletic Field lighting is off, at Receptor Site F.

Table 81: Calculation Results of Project at Receptor Site F with Athletic Fields Lighting On

Receptor Site FProject with

Athletic Fields Lighting on Impact

Average Illuminance (fc) 0.750 below threshold

Exitance (footLamberts)Avg 0.536Max 4.100Min 0.000

Contrast Max:Avg 7.6 :1

Low Contrast

Table 82: Calculation Results of Project at Receptor Site F with Athletic Fields Lighting Off

Receptor Site FProject with

Athletic Fields Lighting off Impact

Average Illuminance (fc) 0.650 below threshold

Exitance (footLamberts)Avg 0.343Max 3.600Min 0.000

Contrast Max:Avg 10.5 :1

Mid Contrast

Page 150: 6.5 LW Red-line of Lighting Report

Archer Forward: Campus Preservation and Improvement Plan - Lighting Study Page 149 The Archer School for Girls July 2013

In addition to calculated luminance and illuminance values, view angle studies were performed, assessing the visibility of the proposed Athletic Fields lighting equipment at Receptor Site F. As shown below, shielding use at each luminaire blocks all direct visibility to the light source (lamp). In addition, visibility of the reflector within the luminaire would be minimized to the greatest extent possible. The below view angle study analyzes the representative aiming angels for each pole, when viewed from Receptor Site F. This study establishes the maximum aiming angle (above Nadir) for each location, to eliminate direct view of the light source and incorporates this aiming angle as a design criterion into the modeled Athletic Fields lighting. In each case, a maximum aiming angle was established to ensure that none of the Athletic Fields fixtures allow direct views to the lamp source. The proposed Athletic Fields lighting utilizes glare shields with 17 degree glare shield. Thus, the luminaire would shield the light source from direct view if the luminaire is aimed 17 degrees below the angle of direct view. In each case, all Athletic Fields lighting fixtures utilize aiming angles that allow for full shielding of the light source.

Figure 87: Map of Sight Line Studies for Athletics Fields shows specific Luminaire locations and Receptor Site F.

Page 151: 6.5 LW Red-line of Lighting Report

Archer Forward: Campus Preservation and Improvement Plan - Lighting Study Page 150 The Archer School for Girls July 2013

Table 83: View Angle Analysis for Lamp Shielding for Receptor Site F

View Angle Analysis for Lamp Shielding RS_F (All angles are measured from Nadir)

POLE# POLETYPE LOCATION RECEPTOR

SITE

LUMINAIREHEIGHT

(FT.)

DIRECT VIEW

SITE ANGLE

MAXIMUMAIMING ANGLEALLOW

FIXTURE ANGLE

CUTOFF REQUIRED

MODELEDAIMING ANGLE

LAMPVISIBILITY

1 CA-1 NE corner of the field F 70 76 59 17 57 NONE

2 CA-1 N center of the field F 70 77 60 17 57 NONE

3 CA-1 NW corner of the field F 70 80 63 17 57 NONE

Figure 88: View study of luminaire shows the shielding blocks the view of lamp.

Figure 89: View study from Receptor Site to Luminaire shows the shielding blocks the view of lamp.

Page 152: 6.5 LW Red-line of Lighting Report

Archer Forward: Campus Preservation and Improvement Plan - Lighting Study Page 151 The Archer School for Girls July 2013

4.4.9 Future Conditions at Receptor Site G

Figure 90: Field of View shown at Receptor Site G

Page 153: 6.5 LW Red-line of Lighting Report

Archer Forward: Campus Preservation and Improvement Plan - Lighting Study Page 152 The Archer School for Girls July 2013

Table 84 summarizes the calculated future conditions resulting from the proposed Project at Receptor Site G in relation to the criteria established in Section 1.6.

Table 84: Visual Analysis of Future Conditions at Receptor Site G

Illuminance Horizontal: 0.480 footcandles with Athletic Fields Lighting On or Off, below the threshold of 2.0 footcandles. Calculations are presented in Table 85 and Table 86.

Contrast Low Contrast With Athletic Field Lighting on or off, contrast conditions would not result in a substantial visual impact. Calculations are presented in Table 85 and Table 86.

Coverage 80% The Multipurpose Facility, Performing Arts Center, and North Wing Renovation are visible from Receptor Site G. Visible pedestrian pathways include a walkway to the south of the Performing Arts Center, the Court of Leaders, and the pathway adjacent to the North Wing Renovation. The height of the new buildings would increase the portion of the view (coverage). However, the proposed lighting is of similar intensities to that found in residential uses and the existing North Wing and would not result in a visual impact. The pedestrian pathway lighting would use cut off fixtures and shield direct view of the light source and would be oriented for illumination of the ground plane. The Project’s proposed lighting improvements visible from Receptor Site G would not result in a substantial visual impact.

Context

15% The maximum calculated luminance results from the interior lighting of the North Wing, 8.8 fL. This is significantly less than the existing luminance measured from Receptor Site G, resulting from a security light, 254.8 fL. Not only is the calculated future illuminance level significantly below the existing, the view of the North Wing would be screened by trees leaving approximately 15% of the Project Site visible. The resulting contrast would be less than that calculated. The Multipurpose Facility, Performing Arts Center, and North Wing Renovation are visible from Receptor Site G. Visible pedestrian pathways include a walkway to the south of the Performing Arts Center, the Court of Leaders, and the pathway adjacent to the North Wing Renovation. The height of the new buildings would increase the visible portion (context). However, as discussed above, using the cut off and shielded fixtures employed in the lighting design would limit lighting impacts. The proposed lighting improvements visible from Receptor Site G would not result in a substantial visual impact.

Page 154: 6.5 LW Red-line of Lighting Report

Archer Forward: Campus Preservation and Improvement Plan - Lighting Study Page 153 The Archer School for Girls July 2013

Table 85 and Table 86 show the calculated results in more detail. Table 85 summarizes calculated illuminance and contrast (luminance) values in relation to the stated thresholds, for all areas of the Project, including periods when the Athletic Field lighting is on, while Table 86 summarizes the same such values, during periods when the Athletic Field lighting is off, at Receptor Site G.

Table 85: Calculations Results at Receptor Site G with Athletic Fields Lighting On

Receptor Site GProject with

Athletic Fields Lighting on Impact

Average Illuminance (fc) 0.480 below threshold

Exitance (footLamberts)Avg 1.717Max 8.800Min 0.000

Contrast Max:Avg 5.1 :1

Low Contrast

Table 86: Calculation Results of Project at Receptor Site G with Athletic Fields Lighting Off

Receptor Site GProject with

Athletic Fields Lighting off Impact

Average Illuminance (fc) 0.480 below threshold

Exitance (footLamberts)Avg 1.717Max 8.800Min 0.000

Contrast Max:Avg 5.1 :1

Low Contrast

Page 155: 6.5 LW Red-line of Lighting Report

Archer Forward: Campus Preservation and Improvement Plan - Lighting Study Page 154 The Archer School for Girls July 2013

4.4.10 Future Conditions at Receptor Site H

Figure 91: Field of View shown at Receptor Site H

Table 87 summarizes the calculated future conditions resulting from the proposed Project at Receptor Site H in relation to the criteria established in Section 1.6.

Table 87: Visual Analysis of Future Conditions at Receptor Site H

Illuminance Horizontal: 0.040 footcandles with Athletic Fields Lighting On or Off, below the threshold of 2.0 footcandles. Calculations are presented in Table 88 and Table 89.

Contrast Low Contrast With Athletic Field Lighting on or off, contrast conditions would not result in a substantial visual impact. Calculations are presented in Table 88 and Table 89.

Coverage 80% The Aquatics Center, Visual Arts Center, and Performing Arts Center are visible from Receptor Site H. The visible pedestrian pathways include the Arts Plaza and a pathway east of the Visual Arts Center. The height of the new buildings would increase the portion of the view (coverage). However, the proposed lighting is of similar intensities to that found in residential uses, which would not

Page 156: 6.5 LW Red-line of Lighting Report

Archer Forward: Campus Preservation and Improvement Plan - Lighting Study Page 155 The Archer School for Girls July 2013

result in a visual impact. The pedestrian pathway lighting would cut off and shield direct view of the light source and would be oriented for illumination of the ground plane. The Project’s proposed lighting improvements visible from Receptor Site H would not result in a substantial visual impact.

Context

15% The maximum calculated luminance results from the interior lighting of the Performing Arts Center, 3.70 fL. This is significantly less than the existing luminance measured from Receptor Site H, resulting from unshielded pathway lighting, 40.9 fL. Not only is the calculated future illuminance level significantly below the existing, the view of the Performing Arts Center would be screened by trees, with 15% of the Project Site visible. The resulting contrast would be less than that calculated. Aquatics Center, Visual Arts Center, and Performing Arts Center are visible from Receptor Site H. The visible pedestrian pathways include the Arts Plaza and a pathway east of the Visual Arts Center. The height of the new buildings would increase the portion of the view (context). However, the proposed lighting is of similar intensities to that found in residential uses, which would not result in a visual impact. The pedestrian pathway lighting would cut off and shield direct view of the light source and would be oriented for illumination of the ground plane. The proposed lighting improvements visible from Receptor Site H would not result in a substantial visual impact.

Page 157: 6.5 LW Red-line of Lighting Report

Archer Forward: Campus Preservation and Improvement Plan - Lighting Study Page 156 The Archer School for Girls July 2013

Table 88 and Table 89 show the calculated results in more detail. Table 88 summarizes calculated illuminance and contrast (luminance) values in relation to the stated thresholds, for all areas of the Project, including periods when the Athletic Field lighting is on, while Table 89 summarizes the same such values, during periods when the Athletic Field lighting is off, at Receptor Site H.

Table 88: Calculations Results at Receptor Site H with Athletic Fields Lighting On

Receptor Site HProject with

Athletic Fields Lighting on Impact

Average Illuminance (fc) 0.040 below threshold

Exitance (footLamberts)Avg 0.660Max 5.900Min 0.000

Contrast Max:Avg 8.9 :1

Low Contrast

Table 89: Calculation Results of Project at Receptor Site H with Athletic Fields Lighting Off

Receptor Site HProject with

Athletic Fields Lighting off Impact

Average Illuminance (fc) 0.040 below threshold

Exitance (footLamberts)Avg 0.551Max 3.700Min 0.000

Contrast Max:Avg 6.7 :1

Low Contrast

Page 158: 6.5 LW Red-line of Lighting Report

Archer Forward: Campus Preservation and Improvement Plan - Lighting Study Page 157 The Archer School for Girls July 2013

4.4.11 Future Conditions at Receptor Site J

Figure 92: Field of View shown at Receptor Site J

Page 159: 6.5 LW Red-line of Lighting Report

Archer Forward: Campus Preservation and Improvement Plan - Lighting Study Page 158 The Archer School for Girls July 2013

Table 90 summarizes the calculated future conditions resulting from the Project at Receptor Site J in relation to the criteria established in Section 1.6.

Table 90: Visual Analysis of Future Conditions at Receptor Site J

Illuminance Horizontal: 0.190 footcandles, while Athletic Field Lighting is on, below the threshold of 2.0 footcandles. Horizontal: 0.040 footcandles, while Athletic Field Lighting is off, below the threshold of 2.0 footcandles. Calculations are presented in Table 91 and Table 92.

Contrast Mid Contrast With Athletic Field Lighting on or off, contrast conditions would not result in a substantial visual impact. Calculations are presented in Table 91 and Table 92.

Coverage 62% The Athletic Fields lighting, the upper levels of the Multipurpose Facility, and North Wing Renovation are visible from Receptor Site J. The solid eight foot wall on Chaparal Street blocks the view of the lower levels of these locations as well as much of the Athletic Fields and pedestrian areas. The height of the new buildings would increase the portion of the view (coverage). However, the proposed lighting would not create a visual impact. The Athletic Fields lighting would be visible at Receptor Site J, and the shielding and aiming angles of the Athletic Fields lighting would shield direct views to the lamp source. The Project’s proposed lighting improvements visible from Receptor Site J would not result in a substantial visual impact.

Context

20 – 25% The maximum calculated luminance results from the interior lighting of the Multipurpose Facility, 3.30 fL. This is significantly lower than the measured existing security light wall mounted at the existing North Wing, 9.191 fL. Further, the calculated value is significantly below the measured luminance value of the existing street light 50 feet west of Receptor Site J, 6657 fL. The Athletic Fields lighting, the upper levels of the Multipurpose Facility, and renovated North Wing are visible from Receptor Site J, with 20 – 25% of the Project Site visible. The solid eight foot wall on Chaparal Street blocks the view of the lower levels of these locations as well as the much of the Athletic Field and pedestrian areas. The height of the new buildings would increase the portion of the view (context). However, the proposed lighting would not create a visual impact. The Athletic Fields lighting would be visible at Receptor Site J, and the shielding and aiming angles of the Athletic Fields lighting would shield direct views to the lamp source. The proposed lighting improvements visible from Receptor Site J would not result in a substantial visual impact.

Page 160: 6.5 LW Red-line of Lighting Report

Archer Forward: Campus Preservation and Improvement Plan - Lighting Study Page 159 The Archer School for Girls July 2013

Table 91 and Table 92 show the calculated results in more detail. Table 91 summarizes calculated illuminance and contrast (luminance) values in relation to the stated thresholds, for all areas of the Project, including periods when the Athletic Field lighting is on, while Table 92 summarizes the same such values, during periods when the Athletic Field lighting is off, at Receptor Site J.

Table 91: Calculations Results at Receptor Site J with Athletic Fields Lighting On

Receptor Site JProject with

Athletic Fields Lighting on Impact

Average Illuminance (fc) 0.190 below threshold

Exitance (footLamberts)Avg 0.213Max 3.300Min 0.000

Contrast Max:Avg 15.5 :1

Mid Contrast

Table 92: Calculation Results of Project at Receptor Site J with Athletic Fields Lighting Off

Receptor Site JProject with

Athletic Fields Lighting off Impact

Average Illuminance (fc) 0.040 below threshold

Exitance (footLamberts)Avg 0.212Max 3.300Min 0.000

Contrast Max:Avg 15.5 :1

Mid Contrast

Page 161: 6.5 LW Red-line of Lighting Report

Archer Forward: Campus Preservation and Improvement Plan - Lighting Study Page 160 The Archer School for Girls July 2013

In addition to calculated luminance and illuminance values, view angle studies were performed, assessing the visibility of the proposed Athletic Fields lighting equipment at Receptor Site J. As shown below, shielding use at each luminaire blocks all direct visibility to the light source (lamp). In addition, visibility of the reflector within the luminaire would be minimized to the greatest extent possible. The below view angle study analyzes the representative aiming angels for each pole, when viewed from Receptor Site J. This study establishes the maximum aiming angle (above Nadir) for each location, to eliminate direct view of the light source and incorporates this aiming angle as a design criterion into the modeled Athletic Fields lighting. In each case, a maximum aiming angle was established to ensure that none of the Athletic Fields fixtures allow direct views to the lamp source. The proposed Athletic Field lighting utilizes glare shields with 17 degree glare shield. Thus, the luminaire would shield the light source from direct view if the luminaire is aimed 17 degrees below the angle of direct view. In each case, all Athletic Field lighting fixtures utilize aiming angles that allow for full shielding of the light source.

Figure 93: Map of Sight Line Studies for Athletics Fields shows specific Luminaire locations and Receptor Site J

Page 162: 6.5 LW Red-line of Lighting Report

Archer Forward: Campus Preservation and Improvement Plan - Lighting Study Page 161 The Archer School for Girls July 2013

Table 93: View Angle Analysis for Lamp Shielding for Receptor Site J

View Angle Analysis for Lamp Shielding RS_J (All angles are measured from Nadir)

POLE# POLETYPE LOCATION RECEPTOR

SITE

LUMINAIREHEIGHT

(FT.)

DIRECT VIEW

SITE ANGLE

MAXIMUMAIMING ANGLEALLOW

FIXTURE ANGLE

CUTOFF REQUIRED

MODELEDAIMING ANGLE

LAMPVISIBILITY

4 CA-1 SW corner of the field J 70 80 63 17 58 NONE

5 CA-1S, boundary of field, centeredadjacent to the S on ground parking lot J 70 80 63 17 63 NONE

6 CA-1 SE corner of the field J 70 75 58 17 57 NONE

Figure 94: View study of luminaire shows the shielding blocks the view of lamp.

Figure 95: View study from Receptor Site to Luminaire shows the shielding blocks the view of lamp.

Page 163: 6.5 LW Red-line of Lighting Report

Archer Forward: Campus Preservation and Improvement Plan - Lighting Study Page 162 The Archer School for Girls July 2013

4.5 Summary of Analysis Findings The analysis of lighting impacts includes comparison of two data sets: existing lighting conditions and future simulated conditions (computer model). Results are summarized for each of these categories below:

4.5.1 Existing Conditions Existing conditions at the eleven measurement sites are summarized here for comparison to simulation results: Illuminance: Illuminance values measured at the Receptor Sites document the existing incident light at that location from both the Project Site and the other adjacent areas surrounding the Receptor Sites. Four (4) Receptor Sites are located within the Project Site, while the remaining seven (7) Receptor Sites are located outside of the Project Site. Illuminance levels measured at the Receptor Sites were generally low, see Table 94 below. The highest existing horizontal illuminance level was recorded at Receptor Site C, with 2.68 footcandles, while the lowest was recorded at Receptor Site H, with 0.003 footcandles. The high illuminance level recorded at Receptor C resulted from an adjacent street light. The highest existing vertical illuminance level facing to the Project Site was recorded at Receptor Site D with 0.400 footcandles, and the lowest was recorded at Receptor Site E, with 0.000 footcandles. The highest existing vertical illuminance level facing away from the Project Site was recorded at Receptor Site A with 0.416 footcandles, and the lowest was recorded at Receptor Site E, with 0.001 footcandles. Values recorded at the other Receptor Sites ranged between these values. The highest illuminance values recorded at the Receptor Sites do not result from luminous flux originating within the Project, but from municipal roadway lighting, see Table 94.

Page 164: 6.5 LW Red-line of Lighting Report

Archer Forward: Campus Preservation and Improvement Plan - Lighting Study Page 163 The Archer School for Girls July 2013

Table 94: Summary of Existing Field Observation Conditions

Contrast Coverage

Ratio % % Footcandles Footcandles

Source to Background*(Point/ Surface)

Field of view Site visible Horizontal Vertical

A HIGH/ LOW 21% 10% - 15% 0.089 0.090B HIGH/ LOW 20% 5% 0.110 0.330C HIGH/ LOW 27% 15% - 25% 2.680 0.320C-1 HIGH/ LOW 35% 18% - 28% 0.050 0.114D HIGH/ LOW 26% 10% - 15% 0.011 0.400D-1 HIGH/ LOW 27% 12% - 17% 0.045 0.008E HIGH/ LOW 62% 35% - 40% 0.004 0.000F HIGH/ LOW 62% 25% - 35% 0.020 0.054G HIGH/ LOW 75% 5% 0.680 0.078H HIGH/ LOW 75% 5% 0.003 0.013J HIGH/ LOW 35% 15-25% 1.010 0.228

LOW = 1:3 - 1:10MID = 1:10 - 1:30HIGH = > 1:30

Illuminance

Receptor Site

LOW = < 1.0MED = 1.0 - 2.0

HIGH = > 2.0

Context

Note: Summary of Field Observation Criteria, Contrast indicates the perceived contrast of the brightest source to the overall background as observed during the field studies at each Receptor Site. Note: Maximum values are noted with bold typeface.

Page 165: 6.5 LW Red-line of Lighting Report

Archer Forward: Campus Preservation and Improvement Plan - Lighting Study Page 164 The Archer School for Girls July 2013

Contrast: The visual evaluation of High, Medium and Low Contrast describes the perception of how bright a visible object appears to the surrounding objects. The measured values of luminance document the brightness of visible light sources and surrounding illuminated surfaces from the view of the Receptor site, summarized in Table 95. The ratio of the most intense brightness to the overall average field brightness is the calculated value for contrast. High contrast conditions were measured at ten (10) of eleven (11) Receptor Sites, as shown in Table 95. Only at Receptor Site J were Medium contrast conditions measured. The highest contrast ratio was 116.731:1, measured at Receptor Site G. The highest luminance value was measured at Receptor Site C-1, 957.300 footLamberts and resulted from the unshielded light source located on a residential gate at 11835 Chaparal Street. The lowest measured contrast ratio was 27.591:1, measured at Receptor Site J. The lowest maximum luminance value was measured at Receptor Site J, 9.191 footLamberts and resulted from the visibility of a lamp within a decorative sconce mounted to the north wall of the existing North Wing.

Table 95: Summary of Existing Field Luminance Data

Summary of Existing Field Luminance Data

Receptor Site Number

Maximum Luminance(footLamberts)

Average Luminance(footLamberts)

Contrast Ratio(Calculated)

Relative Value(based on Calculated Contrast Ratio)

A 72.620 0.751 96.683 :1 HIGHB 135.200 1.181 114.507 :1 HIGHC 56.450 0.533 105.827 :1 HIGHC-1 957.300 8.531 112.209 :1 HIGHD 867.700 7.522 115.350 :1 HIGHD-1 866.000 7.423 116.661 :1 HIGHE 13.450 0.262 51.301 :1 HIGHF 59.450 0.857 69.380 :1 HIGHG 254.800 2.183 116.731 :1 HIGHH 40.920 0.521 78.594 :1 HIGHJ 9.191 0.333 27.591 :1 MEDIUM

Coverage: Since some of the Receptor Sites have a distant or obscured view of the Project Site. Coverage is a key indicator with respect to the significance of light. Bright objects or surfaces which are blocked from view by other buildings would have little to no impact. Coverage varies at the different Receptor Sites from 20% at Receptor Site B to 75% at Receptor Sites G and H. Context: Context includes both the Project Site and the adjacent buildings and landscape. Percent values in the table indicate the extent of the Project Site which is visible from the Receptor Site and is a good indicator of prominence. Context varies among the Receptor Sites. The Context ranges from 5% at Receptor Sites B, G, and H to 35% - 40% at Receptor Site E.

Page 166: 6.5 LW Red-line of Lighting Report

Archer Forward: Campus Preservation and Improvement Plan - Lighting Study Page 165 The Archer School for Girls July 2013

4.5.2 Future Conditions Computer Model Comparison Data from the computer simulation model was analyzed in relation to the criteria established in Section 1.6: contrast, illuminance, coverage, and context. Skyglow is minimized by using cutoff fixtures for exterior and site lighting, and by using shielding and aiming to prevent uplight from the Athletic Fields lighting fixtures. The computer simulation model of Project lighting installations at the proposed development areas, support the following conclusions:

a) Summary Illuminance Findings

Illuminance evaluates the Project’s potential to create light trespass, or excess light levels beyond the Project Site. As established in Section 1.6, the threshold for illuminance impacts is 2.0 footcandles. To evaluate this threshold, in the existing condition, horizontal and vertical illuminance measurements were taken at Receptor Sites located adjacent to neighboring residential property boundaries. To evaluate this threshold for the Project Site lighting, the computer model calculated horizontal illuminance conditions at Receptor Site locations representative of sensitive off-site locations as well as vertical illuminance conditions (the calculation plane is located at the ground and 40’ height) at the perimeter of the Project Site and adjacent residential property boundaries. Of the various elements analyzed in the computer models, the majority of the illuminance contribution came from the Athletic Fields lighting. Because Archer proposes that the use of the Athletic Fields lighting would be limited to 24 days per year to allow athletic activities to continue when natural light is no longer sufficient, but in no event later than 8:00 p.m. with flexibility provided for overtime, this Study analyzed the Project lighting with the Athletic Fields lighting on and off. The Project Site lighting with Athletic Fields lighting on results in contributed illuminance that is below the threshold of significant impact. The highest calculated contributed illuminance at a Receptor Site was calculated at Receptor Site E, 0.960 footcandles, see Table 96, while the Athletic Fields lighting is on. At the Project Site boundary, the highest contributed illuminance value was calculated on the Chaparal Street western Project Site boundary, 1.48 footcandles, see Table 97 while the Athletic Fields lighting is on. The lowest calculated contributed illuminance was noted at Receptor Site A, 0.00 footcandles, while the Athletic Fields lighting is on. The lowest calculated contributed illuminance at the Project Site boundary is the Sunset Boulevard south boundary, 0.00 footcandles. When compared with the impact of street lighting (measured at 1.01 footcandles at Receptor Site J), illuminance resulting from pathway lighting for neighboring residences (1.43 footcandles measured adjacent to Receptor Site E and 1.6 footcandles adjacent to Receptor Site H) and reviewed in reference to thresholds of significance for light trespass, such contribution of illumination does not constitute a significant impact. These values are all below the established threshold level of 2.0 footcandles. The Project Site lighting with Athletic Fields lighting off results in contributed illuminance that is below the threshold of significance impact. With the Athletic Fields lighting off, at a Receptor Site, the highest calculated illuminance value was at Receptor Site F, 0.65 footcandles, and the lowest measured illuminance value was at Receptor Sties A, D, D-1, and E, 0.00 footcandles, see Table 96. At the Project boundary, with the Athletic Fields lighting off, the highest illuminance value was noted east of the Visual Arts Center and north of the Performing Arts Center, 0.60 footcandles, and the lowest illuminance values were measured on the Chaparal Street western Project Site boundary and on Sunset Boulevard, 0.00 footcandles, see Table 97. The Project would result in future contributed Illuminance that is below the threshold of significance when the Athletic Fields lighting is on and off. When the Athletic Fields lighting is on, the highest calculated value, on the western residential boundary (1.48 footcandles, see Table 97) is 26% below the threshold of significant impact. When the Athletic fields lighting is off, the highest calculated value, at Receptor Site F (0.65 footcandles, see Table 96) is 67.5% below the threshold of significant impact.

Page 167: 6.5 LW Red-line of Lighting Report

Archer Forward: Campus Preservation and Improvement Plan - Lighting Study Page 166 The Archer School for Girls July 2013

The methods used to minimize Project illuminance are outlined in Sections 4.3.8 and 4.3.9.

Table 96: Summary Comparison of Measured and Calculated Illuminance Conditions R

ecep

tor S

ite

Mea

sure

d Ex

istin

gIll

umin

ance

Proj

ect

Illum

inan

ce

with

Ath

letic

Fi

elds

Li

ghtin

g on

(foot

cand

les)

Impa

ct

Proj

ect

Illum

inan

ce

with

Ath

letic

Fi

eld

Ligh

ting

off

(foot

cand

les)

Impa

ct

RS A0.089 0.000 0.000

RS B0.110 0.360 0.360

RS C2.680 0.004 0.004

RS C-10.050 0.050 0.050

RS D0.011 0.150 0.000

RS D-10.045 0.170 0.000

RS E0.004 0.960 0.000

RS F0.020 0.750 0.650

RS G0.680 0.480 0.480

RS H0.003 0.040 0.040

RS J1.010 0.190 0.040

below threshold

below threshold

below threshold

below threshold

below threshold

below threshold

below threshold

below threshold

below threshold

below threshold

below threshold

below threshold

below threshold

below threshold

below threshold

below threshold

below threshold

below threshold

below threshold

beow threshold

below threshold

below threshold

Page 168: 6.5 LW Red-line of Lighting Report

Archer Forward: Campus Preservation and Improvement Plan - Lighting Study Page 167 The Archer School for Girls July 2013

Table 97: Summary of Calculated Illuminance Values at Boundary of Project

Loca

tions

Proj

ect

Illum

inan

ceA

thle

tic

Fiel

ds

Ligh

ing

on(fo

otca

ndle

s)

Impa

ct

Proj

ect

Illum

inan

ce,

Ath

letic

Fie

ld

Ligh

ting

off

(foot

cand

les)

Impa

ct

0.71 0.10

1.39 0.20

1.48 0.00

0.62 0.20

0.60 0.60

0.60 0.60

0.40 0.40

0.10 0.10

0.10 0.10

0.00 0.00

Below Threshold

Below Threshold

Below Threshold

Below ThresholdSunset Boulevard - Project Boundary

East of Aquatic and Visual Arts Centers - Project Boundary

North of New Performing Art Center - Project Boundary

South of New Performing Art Center - Project Boundary

East of Main Building - Project Boundary

West of Main Building - Project Boundary

Chaparal Street, Residential Property Boundary

Chaparal Street - Project Boundary

West of Athletic Field - Project Boundary

South of Athletic Field - Project Boundary

Below Threshold

Below Threshold

Below Threshold

Below Threshold

Below Threshold

Below Threshold

Below Threshold

Below Threshold

Below Threshold

Below Threshold

Below Threshold

Below Threshold

Below Threshold

Below Threshold

Below Threshold

Below Threshold

b) Contrast

This criterion evaluates the Project’s potential to create high brightness conditions that would create high contrast or glare at the established Receptor Sites. As established in Section 1.6, high contrast conditions, that are visible from the field of view located at a Receptor Site, would result in a significant impact. Contrast is a predictor of the human eye’s perceived brightness of a particular object or surface relative to the surrounding. If a high contrast condition exists, and is visible from off site, and represents a substantial portion of the field of view, then a significant impact would result. The existing and future Project contrast conditions were analyzed by calculating the ratio of the maximum luminance value (bright surfaces) within the Project Site relative to the average luminance within the observer’s field of view. For the purposes of this Study, glare is defined as a high contrast luminance. The Project’s proposed lighting improvements result in low to mid-level contrast values and do not result in glare. For all Receptor Site locations the maximum surface brightness created by the Project is well below the maximum measured existing luminance. Further, the resulting contrast values are less than the existing conditions (see Table 98). The overall decrease in contrast conditions results from the Project lighting strategies and techniques (described in Section 4.3.8). As a result of the Project lighting improvements, the view of the Project would change from the existing high contrast condition, in which visible light sources against a general dark background create glare, to future mid contrast condition, in which light sources are shielded from view and the illuminated ground plane surfaces has a uniform illumination level and consistent surface brightness. To clarify the role of contrast conditions upon the perceived visible brightness within the field of view, this Study reviewed the portion of the Project occupied in the field of view (or coverage) from a Receptor Site.

Page 169: 6.5 LW Red-line of Lighting Report

Archer Forward: Campus Preservation and Improvement Plan - Lighting Study Page 168 The Archer School for Girls July 2013

In light of the overall decrease in contrast conditions, changes in coverage do not result in a significant impact for Contrast. Receptor Sites A, B, D, D-1, E, F, G, and H showed an increase of coverage less than 10%, the coverage at Receptor Sties C, C-1, and J increased between 25%, at Receptor Site C-1, to 33%, at Receptor Site C. While such increases in coverage show that the Project would occupy a larger portion of the view from these Receptor Sites, such increased coverage would not result in a visual impact because the visible contrast is below the threshold and less than the existing conditions. At Receptor Sites C, C-1, G, and H, the existing contrast conditions are high, and currently result in glare. The future calculated contrast conditions would be mid contrast, below the threshold of glare (see Table 98). At Receptor Site C, the contrast ratio would change from 105.8:1 to 27.9:1 when the Athletic Fields lighting is on or off. At Receptor Site C-1, the contrast ratio would change from 112.2:1 to 14.0:1 when the Athletic Fields lighting is on or off. At Receptor Site G, the contrast ratio would change from 116.7:1 to 5.1:1 when the Athletic Fields lighting is on or off. At Receptor Site H, the contrast ratio would change from 78.5:1 to 8.9:1 with the Athletic Fields lighting on and 6.7:1 with the Athletic Fields lighting off. Due to the decrease in future contrast conditions, the increase of the Project as a portion of view, does not result in an impact relating to contrast. These increases of coverage do not result in a visual impact that results from contrast. Like coverage, context relates to visual prominence in conjunction with the field of view at a Receptor Site. Context describes the portion of the Project that is visible from each Receptor Site, based on view angle, visual obstructions and topography. The context of the Project shows a small increase in the percent of the Project visible within the Receptor Site views. Overall, the Receptor Sites show a range of change from none (0% change), at Receptor Sites A, C, E, and F, to an increase of 10% at Receptor Sites B, G and H. As with coverage, minor changes in context do not create conditions that expose the field of view from Receptor Sites to high contrast conditions. As a result, changes in context do not result in a visual impact that results from contrast. The Project does not result in visual impacts from contrast, because the design of the Project incorporates lighting components and methods following recommended best practice to minimize glare and light trespass. All lighting fixtures would be shielded to minimize direct views of lamps, eliminate high brightness glare, and aimed so that light is contained within the Project Site. Lighting techniques described in Sections 4.3.8 and 4.3.9 outline the methods used to reduce the contrast below the existing levels.

Page 170: 6.5 LW Red-line of Lighting Report

Archer Forward: Campus Preservation and Improvement Plan - Lighting Study Page 169 The Archer School for Girls July 2013

Table 98: Summary Comparison of Measured and Calculated Luminance Conditions

Receptor SitesReceptor Site A

Average 0.751 0.077 0.077Maximum 72.620 1.100 1.100Minimum 0.005 0.000 0.000Max:Avg 96.683 :1 14.2 Max:Avg 14.2 Max:Avg

Receptor Site BAverage 1.181 0.167 0.167

Maximum 135.200 3.500 3.500Maximum 0.000 0.000 0.000Max:Avg 114.507 :1 21.0 Max:Avg 21.0 Max:Avg

Receptor Site CAverage 0.533 0.291 0.291

Maximum 56.450 8.100 8.100Minimum 0.002 0.000 0.000Max:Avg 105.827 :1 27.9 Max:Avg 27.9 Max:Avg

Receptor Site DAverage 7.522 0.167 0.115

Maximum 867.700 3.200 3.200Minimum 0.002 0.000 0.000Max:Avg 115.350 :1 19.2 Max:Avg 27.8 Max:Avg

Receptor Site FAverage 0.857 0.536 0.343

Maximum 59.450 4.100 3.600Minimum 0.003 0.000 0.000Max:Avg 69.380 :1 7.6 Max:Avg 10.5 Max:Avg

Receptor Site C-1Average 8.531 0.229 0.229

Maximum 957.300 3.200 3.200Minimum 0.001 0.000 0.000Max:Avg 112.209 :1 14.0 Max:Avg 14.0 Max:Avg

Receptor Site D-1Average 7.423 0.290 0.156

Maximum 866.000 5.200 4.300Minimum 0.002 0.000 0.000Max:Avg 116.661 :1 18.0 Max:Avg 27.6 Max:Avg

Receptor Site EAverage 0.262 1.163 0.122

Maximum 13.450 5.700 3.420Minimum 0.001 0.000 0.000Max:Avg 51.301 :1 4.9 Max:Avg 28.0 Max:Avg

Receptor Site GAverage 2.183 1.717 1.717

Maximum 254.800 8.800 8.800Minimum 0.000 0.000 0.000Max:Avg 116.731 :1 5.1 Max:Avg 5.1 Max:Avg

Receptor Site HAverage 0.521 0.660 0.551

Maximum 40.920 5.900 3.700Minimum 0.000 0.000 0.000Max:Avg 78.594 :1 8.9 Max:Avg 6.7 Max:Avg

Receptor Site JAverage 0.333 0.213 0.212

Maximum 9.191 3.300 3.300Minimum 0.003 0.000 0.000Max:Avg 27.591 :1 15.5 Max:Avg 15.5 Max:Avg

1:1 - 10:1 Low Contrast10:1 - 30:1 Mid Contrast>30:1 High Contrast

Project with Athletic Fields Lighting OFF

Summary Comparison of Measured and Calculated Luminance Conditions

Measured Existing Contrast

Project with Athletic Fields Lighting ON

Page 171: 6.5 LW Red-line of Lighting Report

Archer Forward: Campus Preservation and Improvement Plan - Lighting Study Page 170 The Archer School for Girls July 2013

Table 99: Summary of Coverage for Existing and Project

ExistingCoverage

ProjectCoverage

Project Change

% % %

Field of view Field of view Field of view

A 21% 21% 0%B 20% 26% 6%C 27% 60% 33%C-1 35% 60% 25%D 26% 35% 9%D-1 27% 35% 8%E 62% 62% 0%F 62% 62% 0%G 75% 80% 5%H 75% 80% 5%J 35% 62% 27%

Receptor Site

Table 100: Summary of Context for Existing and Project

ExistingContext

ProjectContext

Project Change

% % %

Field of view Field of view Field of view

A 10% - 15% 10% - 15% 0%B 5% 15% 10%C 15% - 25% 20-25% 0%C-1 18% - 28% 20-25% 3%D 10% - 15% 15-20% 5%D-1 12% - 17% 15-20% 3%E 35% - 40% 35-40% 0%F 25% - 35% 25-35% 0%G 5% 15% 10%H 5% 15% 10%J 15-25% 20-25% 5%

Receptor Site

Page 172: 6.5 LW Red-line of Lighting Report

Archer Forward: Campus Preservation and Improvement Plan - Lighting Analysis, Appendix Page 1

The Archer School for Girls July 2013

ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT LIGHTING ANALYSIS

APPENDIX

THE ARCHER SCHOOL FOR GIRLS Archer Forward: Campus Preservation and Improvement Plan

Francis Krahe & Associates, Inc. Architectural Lighting Design

304 South Broadway, Suite 500 Los Angeles, California 90013

Phone 213.617.0477 Fax 213.617.0482

Project: AS000

July 2013

Page 173: 6.5 LW Red-line of Lighting Report

Archer Forward: Campus Preservation and Improvement Plan - Lighting Analysis, Appendix Page 2

The Archer School for Girls July 2013

1. APPENDIX A : LUMINAIRE SPECIFICATION ............................................................. 5

1.1 Specified Luminaire Schedule .......................................................................................... 5 1.2 Specified Luminaire Cutsheet ........................................................................................... 8 1.3 Lamp Specifications for Athletics Field Flood Light ........................................................ 39 1.4 IES FILE FORMAT ......................................................................................................... 41 1.5 IESNA LM-63: IESNA Standard File Format for Electronic Transfer of

Photometric Data ............................................................................................................ 42 1.6 IESNA LM-63-02: IESNA Standard File Format for the Electronic Transfer of

Photometric Data and Related Information .................................................................... 56 1.7 IESNA LM-74-05: ESNA Standard File Format for the Electronic Transfer of

Luminaire Component Data ........................................................................................... 75 2. APPENDIX C : IES FILES FOR SPECIFIED LUMINAIRE ......................................... 80

3. APPENDIX D : EXTERIOR LIGHTING GUIDELINES .............................................. 139

3.1 Exterior Lighting ............................................................................................................ 139 3.2 Athletic Lighting ............................................................................................................ 139 3.3 Site Lighting .................................................................................................................. 139 3.4 Parking Lot and Parking Structure Lighting .................................................................. 139 3.5 Building Mounted Lighting ............................................................................................ 139 3.6 Interior Architectural Lighting ........................................................................................ 140 3.7 Site Design ................................................................................................................... 140

4. APPENDIX E : REGULATIONS ................................................................................ 141

4.1 City of Los Angeles Regulations: .................................................................................. 141 4.2 CIF Guidelines .............................................................................................................. 143 4.3 CEQA Guidelines .......................................................................................................... 144 4.4 IES Guidelines .............................................................................................................. 145 4.5 CEC LIGHTING ZONE ................................................................................................. 146

5. APPENDIX F : REVIEWED OBSERVATION SITE LOCATIONS ............................ 147

5.1 Observation Location #1: ............................................................................................ 147 5.2 Observation Location #2: ............................................................................................ 147 5.3 Observation Location #3: ............................................................................................ 148 5.4 Observation Location #4: ............................................................................................ 148 5.5 Observation Location #5: ............................................................................................ 148 5.6 Observation Location #6: ............................................................................................ 148 5.7 Observation Location #7: ............................................................................................ 148 5.8 Observation Location #8: ............................................................................................ 148 5.9 Observation Location #9: ............................................................................................ 148

6. APPENDIX F : CALCULATED LUMINANCE DATA ................................................ 149

Page 174: 6.5 LW Red-line of Lighting Report

Archer Forward: Campus Preservation and Improvement Plan - Lighting Analysis, Appendix Page 3

The Archer School for Girls July 2013

LIST OF TABLES Table 1: New Facilities Interior Luminaire Schedule .....................................................................................5 Table 2 : New Facilities Exterior Luminaire Schedule ...................................................................................6 Table 3 : The Underground Parking Structure Exterior Luminaire Schedule ................................................7 Table 4: Athletic Fields Luminaire Schedule .................................................................................................7 Table 5 : Athletics Field Lamp Specification ............................................................................................... 39 Table 6: Calculated Luminance Summary - Project - Receptor Site A .................................................... 149 Table 7: Calculated Luminance Summary - Project - Receptor Site B .................................................... 149 Table 8: Calculated Luminance Summary - Project - Receptor Site C .................................................... 150 Table 9: Calculated Luminance Summary - Project - Receptor Site C-1 ................................................. 150 Table 10: Calculated Luminance Summary - Project - Receptor Site D .................................................. 151 Table 11: Calculated Luminance Summary - Project - Receptor Site D-1 ............................................... 151 Table 12: Calculated Luminance Summary - Project - Receptor Site E .................................................. 152 Table 13: Calculated Luminance Summary - Project - Receptor Site F................................................... 152 Table 14: Calculated Luminance Summary - Project - Receptor Site G .................................................. 153 Table 15: Calculated Luminance Summary - Project - Receptor Site H .................................................. 153 Table 16: Calculated Luminance Summary - Project - Receptor Site J ................................................... 154 Table 17: Calculated Luminance Summary - Project with Athletics Field lighting OFF- Receptor

Site A ........................................................................................................................................ 154 Table 18: Calculated Luminance Summary - Project with Athletics Field lighting OFF - Receptor

Site B ........................................................................................................................................ 155 Table 19: Calculated Luminance Summary - Project with Athletics Field lighting OFF - Receptor

Site C ........................................................................................................................................ 155 Table 20: Calculated Luminance Summary - Project with Athletics Field lighting OFF - Receptor

Site C-1..................................................................................................................................... 156 Table 21: Calculated Luminance Summary - Project with Athletics Field lighting OFF - Receptor

Site D ........................................................................................................................................ 156 Table 22: Calculated Luminance Summary - Project with Athletics Field lighting OFF - Receptor

Site D-1..................................................................................................................................... 157 Table 23: Calculated Luminance Summary - Project with Athletics Field lighting OFF - Receptor

Site E ........................................................................................................................................ 157 Table 24: Calculated Luminance Summary - Project with Athletics Field lighting OFF - Receptor

Site F ........................................................................................................................................ 158 Table 25: Calculated Luminance Summary - Project with Athletics Field lighting OFF - Receptor

Site G........................................................................................................................................ 158 Table 26: Calculated Luminance Summary - Project with Athletics Field lighting OFF - Receptor

Site H ........................................................................................................................................ 159 Table 27: Calculated Luminance Summary - Project with Athletics Field lighting OFF - Receptor

Site J ......................................................................................................................................... 159

Page 175: 6.5 LW Red-line of Lighting Report

Archer Forward: Campus Preservation and Improvement Plan - Lighting Analysis, Appendix Page 4

The Archer School for Girls July 2013

LIST OF FIGURES Figure 1 : IESNA file format ........................................................................................................................ 41 Figure 2 : SEC.93.0117. OUTDOOR LIGHTING AFFECTING RESIDENTIAL PROPERTY .................. 141 Figure 3 : SEC.93.0201. PERMIT REQUIRED AND SEC.93.0202. PERMIT NOT REQUIRED............. 142 Figure 4 : CIF (CALIFORNIA INTERSCHORLASTIC FEDERATION) REGULATIONS .......................... 143 Figure 5 : CEQA GUIDELINES APPENDIX G ......................................................................................... 144 Figure 6 : IES – Nighttime Outdoor Lighting Zone Definitions ................................................................. 145 Figure 7 : IES – Nighttime Outdoor Lighting Zone Definitions ................................................................. 146 Figure 8: Observation locations that were not selected as Receptor Site locations ................................ 147

Page 176: 6.5 LW Red-line of Lighting Report

Archer Forward: Campus Preservation and Improvement Plan - Lighting Analysis, Appendix Page 5

The Archer School for Girls July 2013

1. APPENDIX A : LUMINAIRE SPECIFICATION

1.1 Specified Luminaire Schedule

Table 1: New Facilities Interior Luminaire Schedule INTERIOR LUMINAIRE SCHEDULE

FA Axis : Cubic Direct/ Indirect T5 Pendant 20% Up 80% Down

Fluor. 28W 4' Silhouette T5

Typical classroom and office locatiions:Main Building, North Wing Renovation, Visual Arts Center, Aquatics Center, Performing Arts Center and Multipurpose Facility

2900

FBAxis-Beam 4, BBR-SB-FL-Length-T5-1Recessed 4" slot fixture with metal baffles to decrease surface brightness, T5 fluorescent source

Fluor. 28W 4' Silhouette T5 Multipurpose Facility, Small Rooms 2900

FB-1 Holophane : Enduratron ED21PPE 210W CLEAR PROTECTED CDM ELITE

Multipurpose Facility, Gymnasium 23100

FB-2 Louis Poulsen: SnowballPHS-171-WHITE

200W Halogen Multipurpose Facility, Western Ambulatory

3930

FD Kurt Versen : P921Recessed CFL Downlight

(1) 32W CF TRIPLE Multipurpose Facility, Entry Vesibules and Corridors

2400

FIXT TYPE MANUFACTURE PART NUMBER/ DESCRIPTION LOCATIONLAMP LUMENS

Page 177: 6.5 LW Red-line of Lighting Report

Archer Forward: Campus Preservation and Improvement Plan - Lighting Analysis, Appendix Page 6

The Archer School for Girls July 2013

Table 2 : New Facilities Exterior Luminaire Schedule EXTERIOR LUMINAIRE SCHEDULE

SA

BEGA: 8309 MHINDIRECT POST TOP LUMINARIE BLACK INTERIOR WITH DIFFUSE REFLECTOR, CLEAR FLAT GLASS LENS AND WHITE COVEHOUSING: Heavy one piece die-cast aluminum opticalhousing with integrally cast transition ”fitter“ as well as a diecast aluminum diffuser retaining ring.

(1) PHILIPS 150 WATT CMH - NORTH-SOUTH PEDESTRIAN CORRIDOR - LOWER GARDEN

14000

SA-1

BETA LED: ARE-EDG-3M-DLThe Edge LED Area Light - Type III Medium distributionHOUSING: Rugged cast aluminum with integral, weather-tight LED driver compartments and high performance aluminum heatsinks.

144W LED - NORTH OF PERFORMING ARTS CENTER - NORTH ENTRANCE

7023

SB-1

BEGA : 8450PBollards with Shielded Light DistrbutionHOUSING: One piece extruded aluminum Housing, 3⁄16" wall thickness with one piece die-cast aluminum top housing and base

(1) 42W CF TRIPLE-4P

- COURTYARDS - CENTRAL COURT - E-W CORRIDOR NORTH OF MULTIPURPOSE FACILITY - AQUATICS CENTER

3200

SB-2

BEGA: 7785 MHSHIELDED BOLLARD W/FOUR-SIDED OUTPUT AND LOW MOUNTING [MORE] HEIGHT. HOUSING: Two piece die-cast aluminum construction consisting of a die-cast post and a die-cast top casting

(1) 39W T6 G12 MHCENTRAL COURT / E-W CORRIDOR NORTH OF MULTIPURPOSE FACILITY AND AQUATICS CENTER

3300

SB-3

BEGA: 8677MHSHIELDED BOLLARDS WITH SINGLE-SIDED FLAT-BEAM DISTRIBUTIONHOUSING: One piece extruded aluminum with a one piece die-cast aluminum top housing and a base i

(1) 20W T4 GU6.5 MH UNDERGROUND PARKING STRUCTURE

1615

SC

BEGA: 3576PSurface Wall Luminaire w/ shield, Housing: One piece die-cast aluminum supplied withuniversal mounting bracket for direct attachment to 31⁄2" or 4" octagonal wiring box.

(1) 18W CF TRIPLE-4PPERFORMING ARTS CENTER / VISUAL ARTS CENTER 1200

SD-1

BEGA: 2277PRECESSED WALL LUMINAIRES WITH SHIELDED LIGHT DISTRIBUTIONHOUSING: Die-cast aluminum with integral wiring compartment.

(1) 42W CF TRIPLE-4P ATHLETIC FIELD STAIRS / LOWER GARDEN / COURT OF LEADERS

3200

SD-2

BEGA: 2277PRECESSED WALL LUMINAIRES WITH SHIELDED LIGHT DISTRIBUTIONHOUSING: Die-cast aluminum with integral wiring compartment.

(1) 42W CF TRIPLE-4P LOWER GARDEN / NORTH-SOUTH PEDESTRIAN CORRIDOR

3200

SD-3

BEGA: 3042PRecessed wall luminaires with asymmetrical distributionHOUSING: Die-cast aluminum with integral wiring compartment.

(1) 18W CF QUAD-4P UNDERGROUND PARKING STRUCTURE - ENT/EXIT RAMPS

1250

SD-4

BEGA: 2038LEDRecessed wall luminaires with shielded distributionHOUSING: Die-cast aluminum with integral wiring compartment.

10W LEDPERFORMING ARTS CENTER - SOUTH EXTERIOR PATHWAY 810

SF-1

LED LINEAR:VARIOLED FLEX VENUS TV W827/1228Linear LEDHOUSING: FLEXIBLE TRANSLUCENT WHITE PLASTIC HOUSING WITH INTEGRAL TRANSLUCENT PLASTIC LENS.

LEDATHLETIC FIELDS/ E-W CORRIDOR NORTH OF GYM 333

SF-2

LED LINEAR:VARIOLED FLEX VENUS TV W827/1228Linear LEDHOUSING: FLEXIBLE TRANSLUCENT WHITE PLASTIC HOUSING WITH INTEGRAL TRANSLUCENT PLASTIC LENS.

LEDCOURTYARDS - COURT OF LEADERS / LOWER GARDEN / ARTS PLAZA 333

SF-3

LED LINEAR:VARIOLED FLEX VENUS TV W827/1228Linear LEDHOUSING: FLEXIBLE TRANSLUCENT WHITE PLASTIC HOUSING WITH INTEGRAL TRANSLUCENT PLASTIC LENS.

LED COURTYARDS - COURT OF LEADERS 333

SH-1

BEGA: 3576PSurface Wall Luminaire w/ shield, HOUSING: One piece die-cast aluminum supplied withuniversal mounting bracket for direct attachment to 31⁄2" or 4" octagonal wiring box.

(1) 18W CF TRIPLE-4P

COURTYARDS - CENTRAL COURT / ARTS PLAZA / POOL AND DECK / COURT OF LEADERS / NORTH-SOUTH CORRIDOR

1200

SP

PRUDENTIAL LIGHTING: PRU3P2T8Wlinear indirect lightingHOUSING: Available in 4-, 8- or 12-foot standardlengths

(2) PHILIPS F32T8/TL841 32 WATT FLUORESCENT LAMPS.

UNDERGROUND PARKING STRUCTURE 2950

FIXT TYPE MANUFACTURE PART NUMBER/ DESCRIPTION LAMP LOCATION LUMENS

Page 178: 6.5 LW Red-line of Lighting Report

Archer Forward: Campus Preservation and Improvement Plan - Lighting Analysis, Appendix Page 7

The Archer School for Girls July 2013

Table 3 : The Underground Parking Structure Exterior Luminaire Schedule

Table 4: Athletic Fields Luminaire Schedule

ATHLETICS FIELDS LUMINAIRE SCHEDULE

SJ QUALITE: 4X4X INTERNATIONALPole mounted Sport fields flood light. (1) 2000W T8

ATHLETIC FIELD, POLE MOUNTING 70' AFG

180,000 ITL51144 18

SJ-2 QUALITE: 4X3V INTERNATIONALPole mounted Sport fields flood light. (1) 1500W T8

ATHLETIC FIELD, POLE MOUNTING 70' AFG

150,000 ITL45726 4

SJ-5NORTHSTAR, CSI-1000-P-HOODPrismatic Lens, 360degree Glare Sheild

(1) 1000W PAR64ATHLETIC FIELD, POLE MOUNTING 70' AFG

63,000 CSI-1000-P-HOOD 4

MFG PART NO. QTYFIXT

TYPEMANUFACTURE PART NUMBER/

DESCRIPTION LAMP LOCATION LUMENS

UNDERGROUND PARKING STRUCTUREEXTERIOR LUMINAIRE SCHEDULE

SB-3

BEGA: 8677MHSHIELDED BOLLARDS WITH SINGLE-SIDED FLAT-BEAM DISTRIBUTIONHOUSING: One piece extruded aluminum with a one piece die-cast aluminum top housing and a base i

(1) 20W T4 GU6.5 MH UNDERGROUND PARKING STRUCTURE

1615

SD-3

BEGA: 3042PRecessed wall luminaires with asymmetrical distributionHOUSING: Die-cast aluminum with integral wiring compartment.

(1) 18W CF QUAD-4P UNDERGROUND PARKING STRUCTURE - ENT/EXIT RAMPS

1250

SP

PRUDENTIAL LIGHTING: PRU3P2T8Wlinear indirect lightingHOUSING: Available in 4-, 8- or 12-foot standardlengths

(2) PHILIPS F32T8/TL841 32 WATT FLUORESCENT LAMPS.

UNDERGROUND PARKING STRUCTURE 2950

LUMENSFIXT TYPE MANUFACTURE PART NUMBER/ DESCRIPTION LAMP LOCATION

Page 179: 6.5 LW Red-line of Lighting Report

Archer Forward: Campus Preservation and Improvement Plan - Lighting Analysis, Appendix Page 8

The Archer School for Girls July 2013

1.2 Specified Luminaire Cutsheet 1.2.1 Fixture Type FA

Page 180: 6.5 LW Red-line of Lighting Report

Archer Forward: Campus Preservation and Improvement Plan - Lighting Analysis, Appendix Page 9

The Archer School for Girls July 2013

Page 181: 6.5 LW Red-line of Lighting Report

Archer Forward: Campus Preservation and Improvement Plan - Lighting Analysis, Appendix Page 10

The Archer School for Girls July 2013

1.2.2 Fixture Type FB

FB

Page 182: 6.5 LW Red-line of Lighting Report

Archer Forward: Campus Preservation and Improvement Plan - Lighting Analysis, Appendix Page 11

The Archer School for Girls July 2013

FB

Page 183: 6.5 LW Red-line of Lighting Report

Archer Forward: Campus Preservation and Improvement Plan - Lighting Analysis, Appendix Page 12

The Archer School for Girls July 2013

1.2.3 Fixture Type FB-1

Page 184: 6.5 LW Red-line of Lighting Report

Archer Forward: Campus Preservation and Improvement Plan - Lighting Analysis, Appendix Page 13

The Archer School for Girls July 2013

Page 185: 6.5 LW Red-line of Lighting Report

Archer Forward: Campus Preservation and Improvement Plan - Lighting Analysis, Appendix Page 14

The Archer School for Girls July 2013

Page 186: 6.5 LW Red-line of Lighting Report

Archer Forward: Campus Preservation and Improvement Plan - Lighting Analysis, Appendix Page 15

The Archer School for Girls July 2013

1.2.4 Fixture Type FB-1

FB-2

Page 187: 6.5 LW Red-line of Lighting Report

Archer Forward: Campus Preservation and Improvement Plan - Lighting Analysis, Appendix Page 16

The Archer School for Girls July 2013

FB-2

Page 188: 6.5 LW Red-line of Lighting Report

Archer Forward: Campus Preservation and Improvement Plan - Lighting Analysis, Appendix Page 17

The Archer School for Girls July 2013

1.2.5 Fixture Type FD

Page 189: 6.5 LW Red-line of Lighting Report

Archer Forward: Campus Preservation and Improvement Plan - Lighting Analysis, Appendix Page 18

The Archer School for Girls July 2013

Page 190: 6.5 LW Red-line of Lighting Report

Archer Forward: Campus Preservation and Improvement Plan - Lighting Analysis, Appendix Page 19

The Archer School for Girls July 2013

1.2.6 Fixture Type SA

Page 191: 6.5 LW Red-line of Lighting Report

Archer Forward: Campus Preservation and Improvement Plan - Lighting Analysis, Appendix Page 20

The Archer School for Girls July 2013

Page 192: 6.5 LW Red-line of Lighting Report

Archer Forward: Campus Preservation and Improvement Plan - Lighting Analysis, Appendix Page 21

The Archer School for Girls July 2013

1.2.7 Fixture Type SA-1

Page 193: 6.5 LW Red-line of Lighting Report

Archer Forward: Campus Preservation and Improvement Plan - Lighting Analysis, Appendix Page 22

The Archer School for Girls July 2013

Page 194: 6.5 LW Red-line of Lighting Report

Archer Forward: Campus Preservation and Improvement Plan - Lighting Analysis, Appendix Page 23

The Archer School for Girls July 2013

Page 195: 6.5 LW Red-line of Lighting Report

Archer Forward: Campus Preservation and Improvement Plan - Lighting Analysis, Appendix Page 24

The Archer School for Girls July 2013

1.2.8 Fixture Type SB-1

Page 196: 6.5 LW Red-line of Lighting Report

Archer Forward: Campus Preservation and Improvement Plan - Lighting Analysis, Appendix Page 25

The Archer School for Girls July 2013

1.2.9 Fixture Type SB-2

Page 197: 6.5 LW Red-line of Lighting Report

Archer Forward: Campus Preservation and Improvement Plan - Lighting Analysis, Appendix Page 26

The Archer School for Girls July 2013

1.2.10 Fixture Type SB-3

Page 198: 6.5 LW Red-line of Lighting Report

Archer Forward: Campus Preservation and Improvement Plan - Lighting Analysis, Appendix Page 27

The Archer School for Girls July 2013

1.2.11 Fixture Type SC and SH-1

Page 199: 6.5 LW Red-line of Lighting Report

Archer Forward: Campus Preservation and Improvement Plan - Lighting Analysis, Appendix Page 28

The Archer School for Girls July 2013

Page 200: 6.5 LW Red-line of Lighting Report

Archer Forward: Campus Preservation and Improvement Plan - Lighting Analysis, Appendix Page 29

The Archer School for Girls July 2013

1.2.12 Fixture Type SD-1 and SD-2

Page 201: 6.5 LW Red-line of Lighting Report

Archer Forward: Campus Preservation and Improvement Plan - Lighting Analysis, Appendix Page 30

The Archer School for Girls July 2013

1.2.13 Fixture Type SD-3

Page 202: 6.5 LW Red-line of Lighting Report

Archer Forward: Campus Preservation and Improvement Plan - Lighting Analysis, Appendix Page 31

The Archer School for Girls July 2013

1.2.14 Fixture Type SD-4

Page 203: 6.5 LW Red-line of Lighting Report

Archer Forward: Campus Preservation and Improvement Plan - Lighting Analysis, Appendix Page 32

The Archer School for Girls July 2013

1.2.15 Fixture Type SF1, SF-2, and SF-3

Page 204: 6.5 LW Red-line of Lighting Report

Archer Forward: Campus Preservation and Improvement Plan - Lighting Analysis, Appendix Page 33

The Archer School for Girls July 2013

1.2.16 Fixture Type SP

Page 205: 6.5 LW Red-line of Lighting Report

Archer Forward: Campus Preservation and Improvement Plan - Lighting Analysis, Appendix Page 34

The Archer School for Girls July 2013

1.2.17 Fixture Type SJ, SJ-1 and SJ-2

Page 206: 6.5 LW Red-line of Lighting Report

Archer Forward: Campus Preservation and Improvement Plan - Lighting Analysis, Appendix Page 35

The Archer School for Girls July 2013

Page 207: 6.5 LW Red-line of Lighting Report

Archer Forward: Campus Preservation and Improvement Plan - Lighting Analysis, Appendix Page 36

The Archer School for Girls July 2013

Page 208: 6.5 LW Red-line of Lighting Report

Archer Forward: Campus Preservation and Improvement Plan - Lighting Analysis, Appendix Page 37

The Archer School for Girls July 2013

Page 209: 6.5 LW Red-line of Lighting Report

Archer Forward: Campus Preservation and Improvement Plan - Lighting Analysis, Appendix Page 38

The Archer School for Girls July 2013

1.2.18 Fixture Type SJ-5

SJ-5

Page 210: 6.5 LW Red-line of Lighting Report

Archer Forward: Campus Preservation and Improvement Plan - Lighting Analysis, Appendix Page 39

The Archer School for Girls July 2013

1.3 Lamp Specifications for Athletics Field Flood Light

Lamp: 1500W Double Ended Metal Halide (150,000 lumens, 3,000 hrs, 4200K CCT, 65 CRI). Lamp: 2000W Double Ended Metal Halide (180,000 lumens, 3,000 hrs, 4200K CCT, 65 CRI). Manufacturer: Sylvania Series: Metalarc Briteline – double ended high output metal halide

Table 5 : Athletics Field Lamp Specification

CAMPUS PRESERVATION AND IMPROVEMENT PLAN : ARCHER SCHOOL FOR GIRLSATHLETICS FIELDS LAMP SPECIFICATION

66632 M1500T8/DE 1500CER #8-10 SPADE

CLEARM133/F 6,000 150000 127500 4200 65

66627 M2000T8/DE 2000 RX7s RSC M_F 3,000 200000 170000 4000 65

66631 M2000T9/DE 2000CER #8-10 SPADE

CLEARM134/F 6,000 180000 153000 4200 65

INITIALLUMENS

MEAN LUMENSLAMP CCT CRI

AVG. RATED LIFE

(HOURS)

PRODUCT NUMBER

ORDERING ABBREVIATION WATTS ANSI BALLAST

Page 211: 6.5 LW Red-line of Lighting Report

Archer Forward: Campus Preservation and Improvement Plan - Lighting Analysis, Appendix Page 40

The Archer School for Girls July 2013

Appendix B : IESNA File Format The IESNA (Illuminating Engineering Society of North America) defines specific file format for the summary of luminaire photometric test data (candelas) for use in lighting system design and within lighting calculation software. The file format, known as the IES File Format, is described in several documents published by the IESNA since 1995. The photometric data files utilized in this calculation model were created using IESNA Standard LM-63-1995, which is the original version of this file format, or LM-63-2002, which is the first updated version. LM-63-1995 is described in document LM-63 (see copy below entitled IESNA Standard File Format for Electronic Transfer of Photometric Data). LM-63-2002 is described in document LM-63-02 (see copy below entitled IESNA Standard File Format for the Electronic Transfer of Photometric Data and Related Information). For the purpose of this study, the data presented in these two formats is unchanged. The current version of the IESNA File Format is expanded to include photometric file data summaries (candelas) along with other non-photometric data in the XML file format, as described in IESNA document LM-74-05, IESNA Standard File Format for the Electronic Transfer of Luminaire Component Data, ( see partial copy included below).

Page 212: 6.5 LW Red-line of Lighting Report

Archer Forward: Campus Preservation and Improvement Plan - Lighting Analysis, Appendix Page 41

The Archer School for Girls July 2013

1.4 IES FILE FORMAT This file format is listed at the beginning of the individual luminaire data file. See example below:

Figure 1 : IESNA file format

Page 213: 6.5 LW Red-line of Lighting Report

Archer Forward: Campus Preservation and Improvement Plan - Lighting Analysis, Appendix Page 42

The Archer School for Girls July 2013

1.5 IESNA LM-63: IESNA Standard File Format for Electronic Transfer of Photometric Data

Page 214: 6.5 LW Red-line of Lighting Report

Archer Forward: Campus Preservation and Improvement Plan - Lighting Analysis, Appendix Page 43

The Archer School for Girls July 2013

Page 215: 6.5 LW Red-line of Lighting Report

Archer Forward: Campus Preservation and Improvement Plan - Lighting Analysis, Appendix Page 44

The Archer School for Girls July 2013

Page 216: 6.5 LW Red-line of Lighting Report

Archer Forward: Campus Preservation and Improvement Plan - Lighting Analysis, Appendix Page 45

The Archer School for Girls July 2013

Page 217: 6.5 LW Red-line of Lighting Report

Archer Forward: Campus Preservation and Improvement Plan - Lighting Analysis, Appendix Page 46

The Archer School for Girls July 2013

Page 218: 6.5 LW Red-line of Lighting Report

Archer Forward: Campus Preservation and Improvement Plan - Lighting Analysis, Appendix Page 47

The Archer School for Girls July 2013

Page 219: 6.5 LW Red-line of Lighting Report

Archer Forward: Campus Preservation and Improvement Plan - Lighting Analysis, Appendix Page 48

The Archer School for Girls July 2013

Page 220: 6.5 LW Red-line of Lighting Report

Archer Forward: Campus Preservation and Improvement Plan - Lighting Analysis, Appendix Page 49

The Archer School for Girls July 2013

Page 221: 6.5 LW Red-line of Lighting Report

Archer Forward: Campus Preservation and Improvement Plan - Lighting Analysis, Appendix Page 50

The Archer School for Girls July 2013

Page 222: 6.5 LW Red-line of Lighting Report

Archer Forward: Campus Preservation and Improvement Plan - Lighting Analysis, Appendix Page 51

The Archer School for Girls July 2013

Page 223: 6.5 LW Red-line of Lighting Report

Archer Forward: Campus Preservation and Improvement Plan - Lighting Analysis, Appendix Page 52

The Archer School for Girls July 2013

Page 224: 6.5 LW Red-line of Lighting Report

Archer Forward: Campus Preservation and Improvement Plan - Lighting Analysis, Appendix Page 53

The Archer School for Girls July 2013

Page 225: 6.5 LW Red-line of Lighting Report

Archer Forward: Campus Preservation and Improvement Plan - Lighting Analysis, Appendix Page 54

The Archer School for Girls July 2013

Page 226: 6.5 LW Red-line of Lighting Report

Archer Forward: Campus Preservation and Improvement Plan - Lighting Analysis, Appendix Page 55

The Archer School for Girls July 2013

Page 227: 6.5 LW Red-line of Lighting Report

Archer Forward: Campus Preservation and Improvement Plan - Lighting Analysis, Appendix Page 56

The Archer School for Girls July 2013

1.6 IESNA LM-63-02: IESNA Standard File Format for the Electronic Transfer of Photometric Data and Related Information

Page 228: 6.5 LW Red-line of Lighting Report

Archer Forward: Campus Preservation and Improvement Plan - Lighting Analysis, Appendix Page 57

The Archer School for Girls July 2013

Page 229: 6.5 LW Red-line of Lighting Report

Archer Forward: Campus Preservation and Improvement Plan - Lighting Analysis, Appendix Page 58

The Archer School for Girls July 2013

Page 230: 6.5 LW Red-line of Lighting Report

Archer Forward: Campus Preservation and Improvement Plan - Lighting Analysis, Appendix Page 59

The Archer School for Girls July 2013

Page 231: 6.5 LW Red-line of Lighting Report

Archer Forward: Campus Preservation and Improvement Plan - Lighting Analysis, Appendix Page 60

The Archer School for Girls July 2013

Page 232: 6.5 LW Red-line of Lighting Report

Archer Forward: Campus Preservation and Improvement Plan - Lighting Analysis, Appendix Page 61

The Archer School for Girls July 2013

Page 233: 6.5 LW Red-line of Lighting Report

Archer Forward: Campus Preservation and Improvement Plan - Lighting Analysis, Appendix Page 62

The Archer School for Girls July 2013

Page 234: 6.5 LW Red-line of Lighting Report

Archer Forward: Campus Preservation and Improvement Plan - Lighting Analysis, Appendix Page 63

The Archer School for Girls July 2013

Page 235: 6.5 LW Red-line of Lighting Report

Archer Forward: Campus Preservation and Improvement Plan - Lighting Analysis, Appendix Page 64

The Archer School for Girls July 2013

Page 236: 6.5 LW Red-line of Lighting Report

Archer Forward: Campus Preservation and Improvement Plan - Lighting Analysis, Appendix Page 65

The Archer School for Girls July 2013

Page 237: 6.5 LW Red-line of Lighting Report

Archer Forward: Campus Preservation and Improvement Plan - Lighting Analysis, Appendix Page 66

The Archer School for Girls July 2013

Page 238: 6.5 LW Red-line of Lighting Report

Archer Forward: Campus Preservation and Improvement Plan - Lighting Analysis, Appendix Page 67

The Archer School for Girls July 2013

Page 239: 6.5 LW Red-line of Lighting Report

Archer Forward: Campus Preservation and Improvement Plan - Lighting Analysis, Appendix Page 68

The Archer School for Girls July 2013

Page 240: 6.5 LW Red-line of Lighting Report

Archer Forward: Campus Preservation and Improvement Plan - Lighting Analysis, Appendix Page 69

The Archer School for Girls July 2013

Page 241: 6.5 LW Red-line of Lighting Report

Archer Forward: Campus Preservation and Improvement Plan - Lighting Analysis, Appendix Page 70

The Archer School for Girls July 2013

Page 242: 6.5 LW Red-line of Lighting Report

Archer Forward: Campus Preservation and Improvement Plan - Lighting Analysis, Appendix Page 71

The Archer School for Girls July 2013

Page 243: 6.5 LW Red-line of Lighting Report

Archer Forward: Campus Preservation and Improvement Plan - Lighting Analysis, Appendix Page 72

The Archer School for Girls July 2013

Page 244: 6.5 LW Red-line of Lighting Report

Archer Forward: Campus Preservation and Improvement Plan - Lighting Analysis, Appendix Page 73

The Archer School for Girls July 2013

Page 245: 6.5 LW Red-line of Lighting Report

Archer Forward: Campus Preservation and Improvement Plan - Lighting Analysis, Appendix Page 74

The Archer School for Girls July 2013

Page 246: 6.5 LW Red-line of Lighting Report

Archer Forward: Campus Preservation and Improvement Plan - Lighting Analysis, Appendix Page 75

The Archer School for Girls July 2013

1.7 IESNA LM-74-05: ESNA Standard File Format for the Electronic Transfer of Luminaire Component Data

Page 247: 6.5 LW Red-line of Lighting Report

Archer Forward: Campus Preservation and Improvement Plan - Lighting Analysis, Appendix Page 76

The Archer School for Girls July 2013

Page 248: 6.5 LW Red-line of Lighting Report

Archer Forward: Campus Preservation and Improvement Plan - Lighting Analysis, Appendix Page 77

The Archer School for Girls July 2013

Page 249: 6.5 LW Red-line of Lighting Report

Archer Forward: Campus Preservation and Improvement Plan - Lighting Analysis, Appendix Page 78

The Archer School for Girls July 2013

Page 250: 6.5 LW Red-line of Lighting Report

Archer Forward: Campus Preservation and Improvement Plan - Lighting Analysis, Appendix Page 79

The Archer School for Girls July 2013

Page 251: 6.5 LW Red-line of Lighting Report

Archer Forward: Campus Preservation and Improvement Plan - Lighting Analysis, Appendix Page 80

The Archer School for Girls July 2013

2. APPENDIX C : IES FILES FOR SPECIFIED LUMINAIRE

2.1 FIXTURE TYPE FA AXIS- CUBIC: DIRECT/ INDIRECT T5 PENDANT

IESNA:LM-63-2002 [ISSUEDATE] [TEST] 1 [TESTDATE] Mon Feb 07 15:20:16 2011 [MANUFAC] [LUMINAIRE] CUB-PL-4-T5-2-0-0 [LAMP] Fluor. 28W 4' Silhouette T5 [LAMPCAT] F28/T5 [OTHER] OPTIONS: [OTHER] Performing lamp shadow check up to 500 tries. [OTHER] Writing 250 rays to a DXF file. [OTHER] Spawning 1 ray for each reaction. [OTHER] Random number generator seed: 8. [OTHER] Tracing 25 reactions. [OTHER] Stop tracing ray at 1.0% of initial magnitude. [OTHER] Tracing 2500192 initial lamp rays. [OTHER] Photometric test distance of 20.00 feet. [OTHER] [OTHER] LUMENS EXITING SYSTEM: [OTHER] Lumens(%) Reaction [OTHER] 2757( 47.5%) 0 [OTHER] 968( 16.7%) 1 [OTHER] 402( 6.9%) 2 [OTHER] 217( 3.7%) 3 [OTHER] 124( 2.2%) 4 [OTHER] 75( 1.3%) 5 [OTHER] 48( 0.8%) 6 [OTHER] 31( 0.5%) 7 [OTHER] 21( 0.4%) 8 [OTHER] 14( 0.3%) 9 [OTHER] 10( 0.2%) 10 [OTHER] 7( 0.1%) 11 [OTHER] 5( 0.1%) 12 [OTHER] 4( 0.1%) 13 [OTHER] 3( 0.1%) 14 [OTHER] 2( 0.0%) 15 [OTHER] 1( 0.0%) 16 [OTHER] 1( 0.0%) 17 [OTHER] 0( 0.0%) 18 [OTHER] 0( 0.0%) 19 [OTHER] 0( 0.0%) 20 [OTHER] 0( 0.0%) 21 [OTHER] 0( 0.0%) 22 [OTHER] 0( 0.0%) 23 [OTHER] 0( 0.0%) 24 [OTHER] 0( 0.0%) 25

Page 252: 6.5 LW Red-line of Lighting Report

Archer Forward: Campus Preservation and Improvement Plan - Lighting Analysis, Appendix Page 81

The Archer School for Girls July 2013

[OTHER] 4701( 81.1%) Total [OTHER] [OTHER] LUMEN INTERACTION WITH SYSTEM: [OTHER] Absorbed(%) Incident(%) Layer Name [OTHER] 126( 2.2%) 573( 9.9%) CUB EX+BLK+EC [OTHER] 91( 1.6%) 1860( 32.1%) CUB INT REF PL+SB [OTHER] 727( 12.5%) 2758( 47.6%) CUB PL [OTHER] 3( 0.1%) 68( 1.2%) CUB SKT BRKT AND END BRKT [OTHER] 138( 2.4%) 2215( 38.2%) LAMP-F28T51 [OTHER] 5( 0.1%) 87( 1.5%) LAMP-F28T52 [OTHER] 3( 0.1%) 16( 0.3%) LAMP-F28T53 [OTHER] 1096( 18.9%) 7580(130.7%) Total [OTHER] Absorbed(%) Incident(%) Material Name [OTHER] 144( 2.5%) 2302( 39.7%) PHOSGLAS [OTHER] 3( 0.1%) 16( 0.3%) SUPPORT1 [OTHER] 126( 2.2%) 573( 9.9%) AXWHTEXT [OTHER] 94( 1.6%) 1928( 33.3%) DUPDLR96 [OTHER] 727( 12.5%) 2758( 47.6%) AXMTLOUV [OTHER] 1096( 18.9%) 7580(130.7%) Total [OTHER] [OTHER] UNACCOUNTED LUMENS: [OTHER] reached interreflection limit: 0.77 ( 0.0%) [OTHER] fell below continuation minimum: 0.62 ( 0.0%) [OTHER] could not find in/out refractor facet: 0.00 ( 0.0%) [OTHER] reached try limit for scatter bounce: 0.00 ( 0.0%) [OTHER] lost elsewhere(i.e. outside distrib): 0.00 ( 0.0%) TILT=NONE 2 2900 1 37 5 1 1 0.543342 4.52679 0.183132 1 1 62 0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50 55 60 65 70 75 80 85 90 95 100 105 110 115 120 125 130 135 140 145 150 155 160 165 170 175 180 0 22.5 45 67.5 90 688.3 667.62 641.87 612.33 572.11 537.69 481.28 428.75 360.3 273.31 203.75 145.63 94.06 59.29 35.29 19.05 8.23 2.07 4.59 75.79 150.54 223.22 290.22 367.76 442.01 512.61 579.85 641.34 688.97 752.35 793.75 828.49 853.86 875.24 876.26 922.94 880.79 688.3 693.27 650.82 616.25 586.41 558.84 496.37 443.46 362.76 287.95 212 152.36 103.22 64.18 38.99 21.48 10.94 3.09 3.19 64.29 194.96 303.63 392.25 465.68 536.22 600.07 656.74 712.23 753 795.58 831.76 856.37 876.26 885.2 902.79 906.55 880.79 688.3 678.65 654.72 636.29 617.62 556.3 504.14 435.22 377.24 316.59 264.36 193.72 125.72 80.47 48.94 29.27 14.4 4.27 3.36 35.28 153.01 291.15 436.27 557.77 648.01 700.1 748.94 789.82 830.56 865.02 883.83 901.96 900.85 910.94 910.37 921.81 880.79 688.3 667.09 671.72 684.01 633.98 569.55 506.85 452.08 422.64 405.59 336.68 237.93 152.47 101.2 59.84 34.53 18.17 5.43 3.45 26.66 117.03 267.71 414.37 559.15 686.92 779.29 829.19 849.83 880.96 900.52 925.44 938.73 932.65 934.74 906.12 915.57 880.79 688.3 684.23 675.66 682.13 635.37 583.04 536.42 486.34 482.32 486.19 378.84 266.96 185.39 128.14 77.47 41.45 21.03 6.81 3.72 26.79 105.96 254.37 398.33 550.81 686.78 796.43 860.54 888.35 899.92 931.06 936.31 947.5 937.13 936.9 914.52 869.82 880.79

Page 253: 6.5 LW Red-line of Lighting Report

Archer Forward: Campus Preservation and Improvement Plan - Lighting Analysis, Appendix Page 82

The Archer School for Girls July 2013

2.2 FIXTURE TYPE FB AXIS-BEAM DI- BDI-F-C-4-T5-1: DIRECT/ INDIRECT T5 PENDANT OR WALL MOUNT

IESNA:LM-63-2002 [ISSUEDATE] [TEST] 1 [TESTDATE] Thu Jun 30 09:39:53 2011 [MANUFAC] [LUMINAIRE] BDI-F-C-4-T5-1 [LAMP] Fluor. 28W 4' Silhouette T5 [LAMPCAT] F28/T5 [OTHER] OPTIONS: [OTHER] Performing lamp shadow check up to 500 tries. [OTHER] Writing 250 rays to a DXF file. [OTHER] Spawning 1 ray for each reaction. [OTHER] Random number generator seed: 8. [OTHER] Tracing 25 reactions. [OTHER] Stop tracing ray at 1.0% of initial magnitude. [OTHER] Tracing 2000052 initial lamp rays. [OTHER] Photometric test distance of 20.00 feet. [OTHER] [OTHER] LUMENS EXITING SYSTEM: [OTHER] Lumens(%) Reaction [OTHER] 0( 0.0%) 0 [OTHER] 0( 0.0%) 1 [OTHER] 883( 30.4%) 2 [OTHER] 446( 15.4%) 3 [OTHER] 325( 11.2%) 4 [OTHER] 201( 7.0%) 5 [OTHER] 135( 4.7%) 6 [OTHER] 90( 3.1%) 7 [OTHER] 63( 2.2%) 8 [OTHER] 45( 1.6%) 9 [OTHER] 34( 1.2%) 10 [OTHER] 26( 0.9%) 11 [OTHER] 21( 0.7%) 12 [OTHER] 16( 0.6%) 13 [OTHER] 12( 0.4%) 14 [OTHER] 10( 0.4%) 15 [OTHER] 7( 0.3%) 16 [OTHER] 6( 0.2%) 17 [OTHER] 4( 0.2%) 18 [OTHER] 3( 0.1%) 19 [OTHER] 3( 0.1%) 20 [OTHER] 2( 0.1%) 21 [OTHER] 1( 0.1%) 22 [OTHER] 1( 0.1%) 23 [OTHER] 1( 0.0%) 24 [OTHER] 0( 0.0%) 25 [OTHER] 2348( 81.0%) Total [OTHER]

Page 254: 6.5 LW Red-line of Lighting Report

Archer Forward: Campus Preservation and Improvement Plan - Lighting Analysis, Appendix Page 83

The Archer School for Girls July 2013

[OTHER] LUMEN INTERACTION WITH SYSTEM: [OTHER] Absorbed(%) Incident(%) Layer Name [OTHER] 99( 3.4%) 1589( 54.8%) LAMP-F28T51 [OTHER] 4( 0.1%) 65( 2.2%) LAMP-F28T52 [OTHER] 167( 5.8%) 753( 26.0%) body [OTHER] 78( 2.7%) 3107(107.2%) bottom lens [OTHER] 195( 6.7%) 4016(138.5%) reflector [OTHER] 1( 0.1%) 3022(104.2%) top lens [OTHER] 546( 18.8%) 12555(432.9%) Total [OTHER] Absorbed(%) Incident(%) Material Name [OTHER] 103( 3.6%) 1655( 57.1%) PHOSGLAS [OTHER] 167( 5.8%) 753( 26.0%) AXWHTEXT [OTHER] 195( 6.7%) 4016(138.5%) DUPDLR96 [OTHER] 78( 2.7%) 3107(107.2%) AXFRLENSS [OTHER] 1( 0.1%) 3022(104.2%) ACRYLICS [OTHER] 546( 18.8%) 12555(432.9%) Total [OTHER] [OTHER] UNACCOUNTED LUMENS: [OTHER] reached interreflection limit: 5.44 ( 0.2%) [OTHER] fell below continuation minimum: 0.11 ( 0.0%) [OTHER] could not find in/out refractor facet: 0.00 ( 0.0%) [OTHER] reached try limit for scatter bounce: 0.00 ( 0.0%) [OTHER] lost elsewhere(i.e. outside distrib): 0.00 ( 0.0%) TILT=NONE 1 2900 1 37 5 1 1 0.1875 3.875 0.3025 1 1 33 0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50 55 60 65 70 75 80 85 90 95 100 105 110 115 120 125 130 135 140 145 150 155 160 165 170 175 180 0 22.5 45 67.5 90 483.83 474.49 470.97 451.29 418.26 388.54 364.04 319.06 284.98 249.83 215.9 177.7 146.83 114.61 88.09 64.38 41.25 19.31 1.81 5.19 27.47 65.21 113.82 165.23 216.32 257.64 293.25 328.82 368.21 393.21 413.33 437.1 453.25 461.94 464.2 475.59 471.83 483.83 475.13 461.18 449.56 423.33 394.27 360.15 321.96 283.91 248.86 207.79 173.61 143.9 114.88 85.99 61.93 39.82 19.69 1.27 3.77 16.74 46.22 91.28 152.82 222.06 279.75 332.65 380.4 415.96 439.84 461.2 472.71 470.98 479.31 469.99 474.88 471.83 483.83 473.79 462 445.25 419.23 390.27 356.9 319.6 276.57 238.6 204.09 167.16 136.28 108.64 82.27 58.04 36.84 16.26 0.64 2.55 11.78 29.96 54.94 92.08 143.35 210.1 285.92 350.21 406.76 453.57 483.97 512.08 515.42 501.57 480.94 477.64 471.83 483.83 478.34 468.39 439.98 418.73 389.77 347.42 309.94 268.35 228.97 194.11 161.69 130.04 102.52 76.92 54.2 35.35 14.55 0.42 2.09 9.49 25.75 43.2 68.1 103.16 151.94 213.6 296.65 373.01 429.14 481.63 509.82 538.38 519.9 509.14 480.61 471.83 483.83 480.53 470.21 450.44 416.38 384.08 354.68 302.64 267.61 225.48 191.73 157.79 127.36 101.43 74.88 51.66 34.14 14.07 0.47 1.92 8.51 23.47 41.7 64.79 91.16 137.81 189.27 269.65 358.39 414.95 463.22 508.02 540.67 529.65 501.43 468.85 471.83

Page 255: 6.5 LW Red-line of Lighting Report

Archer Forward: Campus Preservation and Improvement Plan - Lighting Analysis, Appendix Page 84

The Archer School for Girls July 2013

2.3 FIXTURE TYPE FB-1 HOLOPHANE- ENDURATRON ED21PPE:

IESNA:LM-63-2002 [TEST] 105394 [TESTDATE] 1/11/2010 [ISSUEDATE] 4/8/2010 [TESTLAB] HOLOPHANE TESTING LABORATORIES [MANUFAC] Holophane [LUMCAT] ED21PPEVWCEXXX [LUMINAIRE] ENDURATRON [LAMPCAT] CDM 210W/930/U/O T9 [LAMP] 210W CLEAR PROTECTED CDM ELITE [BALLAST] ELECTRONIC [BALLASTCAT] BL-1115 [DISTRIBUTION] DIRECT, SC-0=1.72, SC-90=1.72 [_LAMPPOSITION] 0 , 0 [_LAMPTYPE] METAL HALIDE [_LAMPWATTAGE] 210 [_LAMPLUMENS] 23100 [_MOUNTING] Suspended [_FAMILY] Enduratron [_PRODUCTID] f6397cc7-8296-4530-8fc1-069fdcf7ccb3 [OTHER] WIDE DISTRIBUTION, COVERED, ENCLOSED [_TERCAT] Highbay, Nonlinear [_TER] 38 TILT=NONE 1 23100 1 73 1 1 1 -1.46 -1.46 0 1 1 233 0 2.5 5 7.5 10 12.5 15 17.5 20 22.5 25 27.5 30 32.5 35 37.5 40 42.5 45 47.5 50 52.5 55 57.5 60 62.5 65 67.5 70 72.5 75 77.5 80 82.5 85 87.5 90 92.5 95 97.5 100 102.5 105 107.5 110 112.5 115 117.5 120 122.5 125 127.5 130 132.5 135 137.5 140 142.5 145 147.5 150 152.5 155 157.5 160 162.5 165 167.5 170 172.5 175 177.5 180 0 4976.8 4864.2 4425.8 4022.6 4056.3 4289 4563.7 5104.8 5580.3 5868.6 6038.5 6149.6 6203.2 6342.9 6666.6 6428.8 5898.7 5887.7 6319.3 6418.3 5183.9 3817.4 2504.1 1534.8 973.9 681.1 491.5 351.3 244.9 167.1 112.2 73.1 44.4 24.3 11.8 4.5 1.4 0.9 0.9 1.1 1.1 1.2 1.2 1.4 1.9 2.7 3.7 4.8 5.9 7.2 8.9 10 11.4 12.7 13.9 15.1 15.9 16.4 17.4 17.8 18 18.5 18.4 18.9 19.4 20 21 21.8 22.3 22.4 23 23.4 23.3

Page 256: 6.5 LW Red-line of Lighting Report

Archer Forward: Campus Preservation and Improvement Plan - Lighting Analysis, Appendix Page 85

The Archer School for Girls July 2013

2.4 FIXTURE TYPE FD KURT VERSEN- P921: RECESSED CFL DOWNLIGHT

IESNA91 [TEST]3084 [MANUFAC]KURT VERSEN [LUMCAT]P921 [LUMINAIRE]DOWNLIGHT [LAMPCAT]PL/T PHILLIPS [LAMP]32W TILT=NONE 1 2400 1 19 3 1 1 -.49 0.00 0 1 1 32 0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50 55 60 65 70 75 80 85 90 0 45 90 869 881 886 846 807 780 725 672 559 350 129 48 11 3 0 0 0 0 0 869 884 891 861 792 753 721 679 572 356 138 60 13 4 0 0 0 0 0 869 4 887 854 791 729 703 641 564 366 159 68 12 4 0 0 0 0 0

Page 257: 6.5 LW Red-line of Lighting Report

Archer Forward: Campus Preservation and Improvement Plan - Lighting Analysis, Appendix Page 86

The Archer School for Girls July 2013

2.5 FIXTURE TYPE SA BEGA- 8309 MH: INDIRECT POST TOP LUMINARIE

IESNA:LM-63-2002 [TEST] 24141 [TESTLAB] LIGHTING SCIENCES, INC. [ISSUEDATE] 8-21-2008 [MANUFAC]BEGA-US [LUMCAT]8309MH [LUMINAIRE]INDIRECT POST TOP LUMINARIE BLACK INTERIOR WITH DIFFUSE REFLECTOR, CLEAR FLAT GLASS LENS AND WHITE COVER [LAMP]ONE PHILIPS 150 WATT CMH LAMP [LAMPCAT]CDM150/T6/830. LUMEN RATING: 14000 Lms. [OTHER]LAMP OPERATING AT 150 WATTS TILT=NONE 1 14000 1 73 1 1 1 0 0 0 1 1 170 0.00 2.50 5.00 7.50 10.00 12.50 15.00 17.50 20.00 22.50 25.00 27.50 30.00 32.50 35.00 37.50 40.00 42.50 45.00 47.50 50.00 52.50 55.00 57.50 60.00 62.50 65.00 67.50 70.00 72.50 75.00 77.50 80.00 82.50 85.00 87.50 90.00 92.50 95.00 97.50 100.00 102.50 105.00 107.50 110.00 112.50 115.00 117.50 120.00 122.50 125.00 127.50 130.00 132.50 135.00 137.50 140.00 142.50 145.00 147.50 150.00 152.50 155.00 157.50 160.00 162.50 165.00 167.50 170.00 172.50 175.00 177.50 180.00 0.00 1204.40 1214.00 1250.50 1299.40 1350.80 1392.00 1412.30 1414.50 1406.00 1389.60 1369.10 1346.80 1324.30 1301.10 1277.00 1251.20 1222.00 1188.50 1150.20 1105.20 1055.10 998.20 936.80 872.60 806.70 738.90 669.10 597.70 524.90 451.40 376.90 300.90 221.00 140.00 73.80 30.10 11.40 10.80 11.50 11.80 11.50 10.80 9.80 9.20 9.50 10.40 8.60 4.60 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.10 0.10 0.10 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00

Page 258: 6.5 LW Red-line of Lighting Report

Archer Forward: Campus Preservation and Improvement Plan - Lighting Analysis, Appendix Page 87

The Archer School for Girls July 2013

2.6 FIXTURE TYPE SA-1 BETA LED- ARE-EDG-3M-DL: LED AREA LIGHT

IESNA:LM-63-2002 [TEST]ITL64565 [TESTLAB]INDEPENDENT TESTING LABORATORIES, INC. [ISSUEDATE]04/07/10 [MANUFAC]BETALED, A DIVISION OF RUUD LIGHTING [LUMCAT]ARE-EDG-3MB-**-12-C-UL-BK or BXAL1H12C-UT (350mA) [LUMINAIRE]120 LED TYPE III MEDIUM EDGE WITH BACKLIGHT SHIELD 350mA [LAMP]ONE HUNDRED TWENTY WHITE LIGHT EMITTING DIODES (LEDS), [MORE]VERTICAL BASE-UP POSITION. [OTHER]TOTAL INPUT WATTS = 144.8 AT 240.0 VOLTS [_LEDDRIVER]BETA LED CE366X01R0 [_NOTE]DATA SHOWN IS ABSOLUTE FOR THE SAMPLE PROVIDED AT RATED INPUT [MORE]VOLTAGE (240VAC, 60Hz) TO THE LED DRIVER. CLIENT STATES LEDS [MORE]HAVE BEEN SEASONED FOR A MINIMUM OF 100 HOURS. DATA AVERAGED [MORE]TO BILATERAL SYMMETRY AT CLIENT'S REQUEST. [OTHER]TEST PROCEDURE: IESNA LM-79-08 [OTHER]TEST DISTANCE = 25.25 FEET [_ABSOLUTELUMENS]7023 TILT=NONE 120 -1 1 74 22 1 1 0.96875 0.765625 0 1 1 144.8 0 2.5 5 7.5 10 12.5 15 17.5 20 22.5 25 27.5 30 32.5 35 37.5 40 42.5 45 47.5 50 52.5 55 57.5 60 62.5 65 67.5 69 70 72.5 75 77.5 80 82.5 85 87.5 90 92.5 95 97.5 100 102.5 105 107.5 110 112.5 115 117.5 120 122.5 125 127.5 130 132.5 135 137.5 140 142.5 145 147.5 150 152.5 155 157.5 160 162.5 165 167.5 170 172.5 175 177.5 180 0 5 15 25 35 45 55 58.5 65 75 85 90 95 105 115 125 135 145 155 165 175 180 448.00 466.00 499.00 606.00 713.00 837.00 962.00 1091.00 1172.00 1242.00 1337.00 1368.00 1445.00 1550.00 1662.00 1786.00 1932.00 2229.00 2841.00 3231.00 3489.00 3863.00 4282.00 4155.00 3583.00 2840.00 2006.00 1212.00 810.00 697.00 374.00 234.00 244.00 349.00 395.00 81.00 21.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 448.00 467.00 499.00 606.00 712.00 837.00 959.00 1081.00 1162.00 1232.00 1325.00 1369.00 1451.00 1561.00 1680.00 1803.00 1951.00 2248.00 2853.00 3245.00 3486.00 3842.00 4260.00 4157.00 3596.00 2856.00 2034.00 1251.00 833.00 710.00 385.00 238.00 245.00 324.00 370.00 101.00 20.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 448.00 467.00 498.00 599.00 710.00 824.00 934.00 1034.00 1119.00 1200.00 1288.00 1376.00 1485.00 1616.00 1755.00 1887.00 2030.00 2310.00 2897.00 3277.00 3481.00 3722.00 4131.00 4247.00 3824.00 3146.00 2372.00 1553.00 1064.00 897.00 487.00 289.00 220.00 191.00 163.00 131.00 70.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00

Page 259: 6.5 LW Red-line of Lighting Report

Archer Forward: Campus Preservation and Improvement Plan - Lighting Analysis, Appendix Page 88

The Archer School for Girls July 2013

448.00 467.00 496.00 586.00 703.00 818.00 926.00 1026.00 1117.00 1207.00 1303.00 1410.00 1537.00 1685.00 1843.00 1987.00 2130.00 2365.00 2881.00 3219.00 3374.00 3519.00 3831.00 4251.00 4220.00 3722.00 3000.00 2115.00 1551.00 1344.00 797.00 455.00 265.00 163.00 106.00 60.00 25.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 448.00 467.00 497.00 573.00 687.00 815.00 938.00 1050.00 1152.00 1249.00 1343.00 1443.00 1555.00 1689.00 1840.00 1982.00 2126.00 2341.00 2789.00 3085.00 3185.00 3244.00 3318.00 3625.00 4060.00 4069.00 3603.00 2872.00 2327.00 2100.00 1457.00 971.00 609.00 358.00 183.00 56.00 13.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 448.00 467.00 497.00 563.00 669.00 793.00 931.00 1061.00 1182.00 1294.00 1393.00 1478.00 1559.00 1648.00 1761.00 1871.00 1973.00 2175.00 2618.00 2938.00 3052.00 3121.00 3107.00 3124.00 3360.00 3789.00 4011.00 3793.00 3408.00 3164.00 2337.00 1591.00 1052.00 677.00 386.00 80.00 11.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 448.00 465.00 497.00 553.00 647.00 765.00 895.00 1026.00 1150.00 1263.00 1363.00 1447.00 1512.00 1572.00 1673.00 1793.00 1920.00 2284.00 2846.00 3243.00 3475.00 3603.00 3625.00 3572.00 3550.00 3712.00 4091.00 4442.00 4476.00 4382.00 3892.00 3122.00 2274.00 1538.00 904.00 384.00 65.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 448.00 465.00 498.00 551.00 638.00 750.00 874.00 1000.00 1119.00 1225.00 1317.00 1395.00 1458.00 1520.00 1622.00 1751.00 1914.00 2335.00 2882.00 3266.00 3510.00 3639.00 3679.00 3668.00 3667.00 3799.00 4112.00 4466.00 4580.00 4553.00 4219.00 3536.00 2704.00 1878.00 1073.00 492.00 98.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 448.00 463.00 497.00 548.00 624.00 720.00 831.00 945.00 1053.00 1147.00 1228.00 1298.00 1361.00 1434.00 1550.00 1692.00 1905.00 2343.00 2785.00 3088.00 3300.00 3405.00 3445.00 3468.00 3519.00 3686.00 3949.00 4159.00 4175.00 4173.00 3877.00 3282.00 2530.00 1777.00 1002.00 460.00 77.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 448.00 461.00 492.00 539.00 602.00 675.00 755.00 835.00 909.00 977.00 1043.00 1119.00 1211.00 1314.00 1443.00 1581.00 1763.00 2112.00 2473.00 2757.00 2954.00 3055.00 3097.00 3138.00 3339.00 3687.00 3979.00 4094.00 4052.00 3912.00 3448.00 2767.00 2008.00 1322.00 680.00 260.00 44.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00

Page 260: 6.5 LW Red-line of Lighting Report

Archer Forward: Campus Preservation and Improvement Plan - Lighting Analysis, Appendix Page 89

The Archer School for Girls July 2013

448.00 457.00 482.00 523.00 577.00 638.00 703.00 760.00 809.00 854.00 908.00 984.00 1070.00 1139.00 1208.00 1282.00 1355.00 1535.00 1854.00 2152.00 2392.00 2560.00 2679.00 2839.00 3214.00 3629.00 3895.00 3901.00 3677.00 3566.00 2971.00 2213.00 1496.00 896.00 409.00 112.00 9.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 448.00 454.00 476.00 514.00 566.00 624.00 682.00 734.00 778.00 823.00 877.00 943.00 1008.00 1052.00 1090.00 1139.00 1187.00 1299.00 1578.00 1870.00 2114.00 2309.00 2447.00 2623.00 2994.00 3346.00 3506.00 3416.00 3153.00 3047.00 2460.00 1777.00 1155.00 625.00 246.00 60.00 7.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 448.00 452.00 470.00 506.00 555.00 608.00 663.00 713.00 758.00 804.00 853.00 904.00 949.00 984.00 1022.00 1070.00 1107.00 1170.00 1365.00 1590.00 1783.00 1940.00 2049.00 2187.00 2480.00 2702.00 2718.00 2558.00 2287.00 2208.00 1718.00 1202.00 712.00 244.00 53.00 12.00 5.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 448.00 447.00 459.00 487.00 529.00 579.00 631.00 677.00 710.00 731.00 745.00 769.00 799.00 818.00 818.00 807.00 791.00 769.00 754.00 743.00 716.00 678.00 624.00 571.00 539.00 475.00 373.00 264.00 175.00 169.00 104.00 65.00 41.00 27.00 16.00 8.00 5.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 448.00 443.00 446.00 467.00 503.00 544.00 574.00 577.00 553.00 523.00 504.00 487.00 456.00 421.00 387.00 350.00 312.00 268.00 228.00 194.00 163.00 135.00 110.00 88.00 69.00 56.00 45.00 36.00 30.00 29.00 23.00 19.00 15.00 12.00 10.00 8.00 5.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 448.00 437.00 432.00 444.00 467.00 475.00 449.00 404.00 361.00 321.00 276.00 227.00 183.00 154.00 147.00 155.00 168.00 173.00 167.00 154.00 135.00 112.00 91.00 72.00 57.00 45.00 36.00 30.00 25.00 23.00 18.00 14.00 10.00 8.00 7.00 6.00 4.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 448.00 431.00 419.00 420.00 416.00 375.00 325.00 272.00 220.00 168.00 116.00 86.00 82.00 95.00 107.00 119.00 124.00 122.00 113.00 99.00 84.00 72.00 61.00 52.00 45.00 37.00 30.00 23.00 19.00 18.00 13.00 9.00 6.00 4.00 3.00 2.00 2.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 448.00 427.00 407.00 394.00 355.00 292.00 234.00 177.00 120.00 76.00 58.00 61.00 71.00 82.00 90.00 93.00 91.00 84.00 76.00 68.00 60.00 53.00 46.00 39.00 31.00 24.00 17.00 12.00 9.00 8.00 6.00 4.00 2.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00

Page 261: 6.5 LW Red-line of Lighting Report

Archer Forward: Campus Preservation and Improvement Plan - Lighting Analysis, Appendix Page 90

The Archer School for Girls July 2013

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 448.00 423.00 396.00 370.00 303.00 234.00 169.00 111.00 64.00 47.00 48.00 56.00 68.00 78.00 85.00 86.00 82.00 73.00 64.00 56.00 49.00 42.00 34.00 26.00 19.00 13.00 9.00 6.00 5.00 4.00 3.00 2.00 1.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 448.00 422.00 388.00 349.00 270.00 194.00 135.00 73.00 46.00 43.00 46.00 55.00 68.00 77.00 82.00 81.00 76.00 68.00 59.00 51.00 43.00 34.00 26.00 20.00 14.00 10.00 6.00 3.00 2.00 2.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 448.00 420.00 384.00 337.00 254.00 175.00 115.00 58.00 42.00 41.00 46.00 55.00 68.00 76.00 79.00 78.00 74.00 66.00 58.00 49.00 40.00 30.00 23.00 17.00 12.00 8.00 5.00 2.00 2.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 448.00 421.00 385.00 336.00 253.00 173.00 108.00 57.00 41.00 41.00 45.00 55.00 69.00 76.00 79.00 78.00 73.00 66.00 58.00 49.00 39.00 30.00 22.00 17.00 12.00 8.00 5.00 2.00 2.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00

Page 262: 6.5 LW Red-line of Lighting Report

Archer Forward: Campus Preservation and Improvement Plan - Lighting Analysis, Appendix Page 91

The Archer School for Girls July 2013

2.7 FIXTURE TYPE SB-1 BEGA -8450P: BOLLARDS WITH SHIELDED LIGHT DISTRIBUTION

IESNA:LM-63-1995 [TEST] BE3019 [DATE] 9/9/2009 [MANUFAC] BEGA-US [LUMCAT] 8450P [LUMINAIRE] BOLLARDS WITH SHIELDED LIGHT DISTRIBUTION [LAMPCAT] (1) 42W CF TRIPLE-4P TILT=NONE 1 3200 3.2 73 73 1 2 0.065 0.17 0 1 1 46 0 2.5 5 7.5 10 12.5 15 17.5 20 22.5 25 27.5 30 32.5 35 37.5 40 42.5 45 47.5 50 52.5 55 57.5 60 62.5 65 67.5 70 72.5 75 77.5 80 82.5 85 87.5 90 92.5 95 97.5 100 102.5 105 107.5 110 112.5 115 117.5 120 122.5 125 127.5 130 132.5 135 137.5 140 142.5 145 147.5 150 152.5 155 157.5 160 162.5 165 167.5 170 172.5 175 177.5 180 0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50 55 60 65 70 75 80 85 90 95 100 105 110 115 120 125 130 135 140 145 150 155 160 165 170 175 180 185 190 195 200 205 210 215 220 225 230 235 240 245 250 255 260 265 270 275 280 285 290 295 300 305 310 315 320 325 330 335 340 345 350 355 360 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.02 0.08 0.14 0.19 0.25 0.31 0.36 0.39 0.32 0.33 0.33 0.31 0.28 0.26 0.25 0.22 0.19 0.16 0.14 0.11 0.09 0.08 0.08 0.07 0.06 0.06 0.06 0.06 0.06 0.04 0.04 0.05 0.05 0.04 0.03 0.03 0.03 0.03 0.03 0.02 0.02 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.04 0.20 0.39 0.37 0.68 1.05 1.47 1.90 2.32 2.71 3.15 3.39 3.51 3.57 3.54 3.40 3.14 2.86 2.54 2.26 1.97 1.67 1.39 1.10 0.81 0.57 0.38 0.25 0.19 0.16 0.17 0.15 0.13 0.12 0.11 0.11 0.11 0.09 0.09 0.08 0.08 0.08 0.07 0.07 0.07 0.06 0.06 0.06 0.05 0.04 0.03 0.04 0.04 0.04 0.04 0.03 0.03 0.02 0.01 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.02 0.29 0.35 0.89 1.63 2.56 3.68 4.86 6.05 7.14 8.07 8.91 9.35 9.65 9.76 9.68 9.47 8.93 8.20 7.40 6.50 5.65 4.87 4.10 3.32 2.57 1.88 1.27 0.75 0.46 0.36 0.29 0.28 0.26 0.24 0.22 0.20 0.19 0.18 0.17 0.16 0.15 0.14 0.13 0.12 0.11 0.11 0.11 0.10 0.08 0.08 0.08 0.07 0.06 0.05 0.06 0.06 0.05 0.05 0.04 0.04 0.03 0.03 0.01 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.02 0.38 0.66 1.63 2.98 4.67 6.68 8.87 11.36 13.21 14.76 16.05 17.12 17.77 18.00 17.87 17.27 16.38 15.25 13.90 12.48 10.94 9.47 8.10 6.75 5.44 4.22 3.06 2.07 1.22 0.72 0.55 0.41 0.38 0.37 0.35 0.32 0.29 0.28 0.26 0.25 0.23 0.21 0.20 0.19 0.18

Page 263: 6.5 LW Red-line of Lighting Report

Archer Forward: Campus Preservation and Improvement Plan - Lighting Analysis, Appendix Page 92

The Archer School for Girls July 2013

0.18 0.16 0.14 0.13 0.13 0.12 0.11 0.10 0.09 0.08 0.08 0.07 0.07 0.06 0.04 0.03 0.04 0.04 0.03 0.01 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.26 0.63 1.90 3.72 6.20 9.24 12.97 15.96 18.36 20.92 23.29 25.63 26.56 26.74 26.24 25.36 24.11 22.70 21.00 19.08 17.00 14.82 12.80 10.95 9.15 7.42 5.80 4.26 2.93 1.75 1.05 0.84 0.63 0.57 0.53 0.50 0.48 0.45 0.39 0.36 0.35 0.33 0.29 0.28 0.28 0.26 0.24 0.20 0.18 0.19 0.18 0.17 0.16 0.14 0.13 0.12 0.10 0.09 0.08 0.08 0.07 0.04 0.04 0.04 0.04 0.03 0.01 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.59 1.53 3.71 6.70 10.62 15.33 19.29 22.74 26.60 30.80 33.17 34.24 34.60 34.26 33.26 31.77 29.86 27.66 25.24 22.67 20.11 17.67 15.33 13.13 11.06 9.06 7.16 5.37 3.82 2.44 1.55 1.18 0.92 0.87 0.80 0.73 0.67 0.61 0.56 0.52 0.47 0.43 0.39 0.37 0.34 0.32 0.30 0.27 0.25 0.23 0.22 0.20 0.19 0.19 0.17 0.15 0.14 0.13 0.10 0.08 0.08 0.06 0.04 0.04 0.04 0.04 0.01 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.13 0.72 2.75 5.95 10.51 16.15 20.68 25.72 31.69 36.16 39.03 40.87 41.83 41.68 40.66 38.96 36.59 33.97 31.09 28.12 25.30 22.59 19.95 17.38 14.94 12.65 10.48 8.44 6.52 4.73 3.17 2.10 1.63 1.29 1.15 1.10 1.02 0.89 0.80 0.73 0.67 0.61 0.54 0.50 0.46 0.44 0.41 0.38 0.33 0.31 0.28 0.27 0.25 0.22 0.20 0.19 0.16 0.15 0.13 0.13 0.10 0.08 0.08 0.06 0.05 0.04 0.04 0.03 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.29 1.32 4.13 8.74 15.28 21.06 26.71 33.97 39.64 43.65 46.36 47.94 48.09 47.25 45.43 42.93 39.88 36.68 33.35 30.28 27.41 24.60 21.83 19.15 16.51 14.06 11.79 9.61 7.58 5.69 4.10 2.79 2.16 1.73 1.53 1.43 1.32 1.19 1.09 0.98 0.87 0.78 0.72 0.65 0.60 0.53 0.49 0.46 0.43 0.37 0.34 0.31 0.28 0.26 0.23 0.22 0.19 0.17 0.15 0.14 0.12 0.10 0.10 0.07 0.07 0.04 0.03 0.04 0.01 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.47 2.04 5.85 12.48 19.36 25.74 33.89 40.95 46.50 50.40 52.76 53.55 53.22 51.51 48.85 45.67 42.18 38.64 35.33 32.24 29.24 26.34 23.50 20.72 18.02 15.41 13.04 10.79 8.65 6.69 4.97 3.53 2.68 2.15 1.92 1.77 1.63 1.49 1.35 1.21 1.09 0.98 0.88 0.80 0.70 0.64 0.58 0.52 0.46 0.43 0.40 0.36 0.34 0.30 0.28 0.25 0.23 0.21 0.18 0.16 0.15 0.12 0.10 0.09 0.08 0.06 0.04 0.04 0.01 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.33 2.84 7.72 15.65 22.90 31.06 40.13 47.25 52.45 56.09 57.95 58.52 57.25 54.72 51.45 47.88 44.15 40.68 37.37 34.13 31.03 28.02 25.13 22.30 19.52 16.85 14.29 11.95 9.74 7.69 5.88 4.31 3.22 2.59 2.30 2.13 1.97 1.81 1.65 1.47 1.31 1.16 1.04 0.95 0.85 0.76 0.68 0.63 0.56 0.53 0.47 0.42 0.38 0.35 0.31 0.29 0.26 0.22 0.21 0.18 0.16 0.15 0.12 0.09 0.07 0.07 0.04 0.04 0.02 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.54 3.68 9.66 18.62 26.70 36.83 45.97 52.79 57.66 60.75 62.59 62.26 60.17 57.17 53.62 49.72 45.97 42.51 39.18 35.91 32.66 29.59 26.61 23.71 20.91 18.20 15.54 13.04 10.78 8.65 6.73 5.09 3.79 3.04 2.68 2.49 2.33 2.15 1.94 1.73 1.55 1.39 1.24 1.12 0.98 0.87 0.80 0.72 0.64 0.58 0.53 0.47 0.42 0.39 0.35 0.32 0.30 0.25 0.22 0.21 0.17 0.15 0.12 0.10 0.07 0.06 0.04 0.04 0.03 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.76 4.40 11.59 21.27 30.40 41.49 50.95 57.64 62.14 64.97 66.02 64.84 62.44 59.15 55.27 51.43 47.77 44.23 40.77 37.44 34.21 31.00 27.94 25.00 22.14 19.39 16.73 14.13 11.73 9.54 7.55 5.77 4.36 3.46 3.02 2.80 2.63 2.41 2.20 1.98 1.77 1.59 1.42 1.25

Page 264: 6.5 LW Red-line of Lighting Report

Archer Forward: Campus Preservation and Improvement Plan - Lighting Analysis, Appendix Page 93

The Archer School for Girls July 2013

1.12 1.00 0.90 0.81 0.73 0.64 0.58 0.53 0.48 0.43 0.38 0.35 0.32 0.28 0.24 0.22 0.19 0.15 0.13 0.11 0.08 0.06 0.04 0.04 0.03 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.99 5.20 13.98 23.27 33.91 45.56 55.15 61.69 66.22 68.84 68.63 67.02 64.15 60.66 56.67 52.86 49.35 45.82 42.38 38.89 35.52 32.36 29.23 26.20 23.31 20.52 17.81 15.18 12.66 10.36 8.29 6.42 4.89 3.88 3.34 3.08 2.92 2.70 2.45 2.21 1.99 1.79 1.56 1.40 1.25 1.12 0.99 0.87 0.80 0.71 0.64 0.57 0.50 0.46 0.41 0.37 0.34 0.30 0.25 0.22 0.21 0.16 0.14 0.12 0.09 0.06 0.05 0.04 0.03 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 1.19 5.91 15.47 25.28 37.39 49.38 58.69 65.06 69.49 71.71 71.30 69.30 65.77 61.83 57.79 54.21 50.71 47.27 43.82 40.34 37.00 33.63 30.47 27.43 24.44 21.50 18.76 16.10 13.57 11.18 8.95 7.04 5.38 4.23 3.60 3.32 3.15 2.95 2.67 2.44 2.18 1.93 1.72 1.54 1.37 1.22 1.09 0.95 0.87 0.76 0.69 0.61 0.54 0.50 0.43 0.40 0.36 0.31 0.27 0.24 0.22 0.17 0.16 0.14 0.10 0.07 0.05 0.04 0.04 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 1.36 6.50 16.66 26.94 39.77 52.09 61.21 67.84 72.23 73.82 73.28 70.91 67.47 63.40 59.34 55.55 51.92 48.44 44.94 41.61 38.22 35.01 31.84 28.63 25.50 22.55 19.68 16.97 14.34 11.90 9.64 7.55 5.85 4.57 3.85 3.52 3.35 3.13 2.88 2.58 2.32 2.07 1.87 1.65 1.46 1.31 1.16 1.03 0.92 0.81 0.73 0.66 0.58 0.53 0.46 0.40 0.36 0.32 0.28 0.24 0.22 0.18 0.15 0.14 0.11 0.07 0.06 0.04 0.04 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 1.49 6.95 17.52 28.16 41.49 54.02 63.10 69.74 74.01 75.54 74.82 72.22 68.63 64.43 60.62 56.91 53.36 49.72 46.20 42.56 39.18 35.94 32.75 29.58 26.56 23.51 20.63 17.70 15.05 12.51 10.13 8.04 6.23 4.87 4.05 3.71 3.50 3.32 3.00 2.74 2.45 2.19 1.96 1.74 1.53 1.37 1.21 1.08 0.96 0.86 0.77 0.67 0.60 0.53 0.47 0.42 0.37 0.33 0.29 0.24 0.22 0.18 0.15 0.14 0.11 0.07 0.07 0.04 0.04 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 1.58 7.24 18.04 28.92 42.53 55.17 64.23 70.84 75.04 76.49 75.65 72.95 69.33 65.15 61.39 57.69 54.15 50.53 46.99 43.47 40.13 36.87 33.52 30.36 27.19 24.16 21.09 18.29 15.58 13.01 10.61 8.38 6.49 5.08 4.20 3.82 3.63 3.40 3.12 2.83 2.53 2.27 2.04 1.78 1.59 1.41 1.24 1.11 0.98 0.88 0.79 0.69 0.62 0.54 0.49 0.43 0.38 0.34 0.30 0.25 0.23 0.19 0.15 0.12 0.11 0.08 0.07 0.04 0.04 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 1.60 7.33 18.21 29.17 42.88 55.56 64.61 71.21 75.37 76.79 75.91 73.20 69.53 65.37 61.63 57.96 54.45 50.82 47.31 43.80 40.47 37.23 33.87 30.74 27.53 24.55 21.50 18.67 15.88 13.29 10.84 8.55 6.64 5.15 4.28 3.86 3.67 3.48 3.14 2.84 2.57 2.27 2.04 1.82 1.59 1.44 1.25 1.14 0.98 0.91 0.79 0.68 0.61 0.53 0.49 0.45 0.38 0.34 0.30 0.26 0.23 0.19 0.15 0.11 0.11 0.08 0.08 0.04 0.04 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 1.58 7.24 18.04 28.92 42.53 55.17 64.23 70.84 75.04 76.49 75.65 72.95 69.33 65.15 61.39 57.69 54.15 50.53 46.99 43.47 40.13 36.87 33.52 30.36 27.19 24.16 21.09 18.29 15.58 13.01 10.61 8.38 6.49 5.08 4.20 3.82 3.63 3.40 3.12 2.83 2.53 2.27 2.04 1.78 1.59 1.41 1.24 1.11 0.98 0.88 0.79 0.69 0.62 0.54 0.49 0.43 0.38 0.34 0.30 0.25 0.23 0.19 0.15 0.12 0.11 0.08 0.07 0.04 0.04 0.00 0.00

Page 265: 6.5 LW Red-line of Lighting Report

Archer Forward: Campus Preservation and Improvement Plan - Lighting Analysis, Appendix Page 94

The Archer School for Girls July 2013

0.00 0.00 1.49 6.95 17.52 28.16 41.49 54.02 63.10 69.74 74.01 75.54 74.82 72.22 68.63 64.43 60.62 56.91 53.36 49.72 46.20 42.56 39.18 35.94 32.75 29.58 26.56 23.51 20.63 17.70 15.05 12.51 10.13 8.04 6.23 4.87 4.05 3.71 3.50 3.32 3.00 2.74 2.45 2.19 1.96 1.74 1.53 1.37 1.21 1.08 0.96 0.86 0.77 0.67 0.60 0.53 0.47 0.42 0.37 0.33 0.29 0.24 0.22 0.18 0.15 0.14 0.11 0.07 0.07 0.04 0.04 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 1.36 6.50 16.66 26.94 39.77 52.09 61.21 67.84 72.23 73.82 73.28 70.91 67.47 63.40 59.34 55.55 51.92 48.44 44.94 41.61 38.22 35.01 31.84 28.63 25.50 22.55 19.68 16.97 14.34 11.90 9.64 7.55 5.85 4.57 3.85 3.52 3.35 3.13 2.88 2.58 2.32 2.07 1.87 1.65 1.46 1.31 1.16 1.03 0.92 0.81 0.73 0.66 0.58 0.53 0.46 0.40 0.36 0.32 0.28 0.24 0.22 0.18 0.15 0.14 0.11 0.07 0.06 0.04 0.04 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 1.19 5.91 15.47 25.28 37.39 49.38 58.69 65.06 69.49 71.71 71.30 69.30 65.77 61.83 57.79 54.21 50.71 47.27 43.82 40.34 37.00 33.63 30.47 27.43 24.44 21.50 18.76 16.10 13.57 11.18 8.95 7.04 5.38 4.23 3.60 3.32 3.15 2.95 2.67 2.44 2.18 1.93 1.72 1.54 1.37 1.22 1.09 0.95 0.87 0.76 0.69 0.61 0.54 0.50 0.43 0.40 0.36 0.31 0.27 0.24 0.22 0.17 0.16 0.14 0.10 0.07 0.05 0.04 0.04 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.99 5.20 13.98 23.27 33.91 45.56 55.15 61.69 66.22 68.84 68.63 67.02 64.15 60.66 56.67 52.86 49.35 45.82 42.38 38.89 35.52 32.36 29.23 26.20 23.31 20.52 17.81 15.18 12.66 10.36 8.29 6.42 4.89 3.88 3.34 3.08 2.92 2.70 2.45 2.21 1.99 1.79 1.56 1.40 1.25 1.12 0.99 0.87 0.80 0.71 0.64 0.57 0.50 0.46 0.41 0.37 0.34 0.30 0.25 0.22 0.21 0.16 0.14 0.12 0.09 0.06 0.05 0.04 0.03 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.76 4.40 11.59 21.27 30.40 41.49 50.95 57.64 62.14 64.97 66.02 64.84 62.44 59.15 55.27 51.43 47.77 44.23 40.77 37.44 34.21 31.00 27.94 25.00 22.14 19.39 16.73 14.13 11.73 9.54 7.55 5.77 4.36 3.46 3.02 2.80 2.63 2.41 2.20 1.98 1.77 1.59 1.42 1.25 1.12 1.00 0.90 0.81 0.73 0.64 0.58 0.53 0.48 0.43 0.38 0.35 0.32 0.28 0.24 0.22 0.19 0.15 0.13 0.11 0.08 0.06 0.04 0.04 0.03 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.54 3.68 9.66 18.62 26.70 36.83 45.97 52.79 57.66 60.75 62.59 62.26 60.17 57.17 53.62 49.72 45.97 42.51 39.18 35.91 32.66 29.59 26.61 23.71 20.91 18.20 15.54 13.04 10.78 8.65 6.73 5.09 3.79 3.04 2.68 2.49 2.33 2.15 1.94 1.73 1.55 1.39 1.24 1.12 0.98 0.87 0.80 0.72 0.64 0.58 0.53 0.47 0.42 0.39 0.35 0.32 0.30 0.25 0.22 0.21 0.17 0.15 0.12 0.10 0.07 0.06 0.04 0.04 0.03 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.33 2.84 7.72 15.65 22.90 31.06 40.13 47.25 52.45 56.09 57.95 58.52 57.25 54.72 51.45 47.88 44.15 40.68 37.37 34.13 31.03 28.02 25.13 22.30 19.52 16.85 14.29 11.95 9.74 7.69 5.88 4.31 3.22 2.59 2.30 2.13 1.97 1.81 1.65 1.47 1.31 1.16 1.04 0.95 0.85 0.76 0.68 0.63 0.56 0.53 0.47 0.42 0.38 0.35 0.31 0.29 0.26 0.22 0.21 0.18 0.16 0.15 0.12 0.09 0.07 0.07 0.04 0.04 0.02 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.47 2.04 5.85 12.48 19.36 25.74 33.89 40.95 46.50 50.40 52.76 53.55 53.22 51.51 48.85 45.67 42.18 38.64 35.33 32.24

Page 266: 6.5 LW Red-line of Lighting Report

Archer Forward: Campus Preservation and Improvement Plan - Lighting Analysis, Appendix Page 95

The Archer School for Girls July 2013

29.24 26.34 23.50 20.72 18.02 15.41 13.04 10.79 8.65 6.69 4.97 3.53 2.68 2.15 1.92 1.77 1.63 1.49 1.35 1.21 1.09 0.98 0.88 0.80 0.70 0.64 0.58 0.52 0.46 0.43 0.40 0.36 0.34 0.30 0.28 0.25 0.23 0.21 0.18 0.16 0.15 0.12 0.10 0.09 0.08 0.06 0.04 0.04 0.01 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.29 1.32 4.13 8.74 15.28 21.06 26.71 33.97 39.64 43.65 46.36 47.94 48.09 47.25 45.43 42.93 39.88 36.68 33.35 30.28 27.41 24.60 21.83 19.15 16.51 14.06 11.79 9.61 7.58 5.69 4.10 2.79 2.16 1.73 1.53 1.43 1.32 1.19 1.09 0.98 0.87 0.78 0.72 0.65 0.60 0.53 0.49 0.46 0.43 0.37 0.34 0.31 0.28 0.26 0.23 0.22 0.19 0.17 0.15 0.14 0.12 0.10 0.10 0.07 0.07 0.04 0.03 0.04 0.01 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.13 0.72 2.75 5.95 10.51 16.15 20.68 25.72 31.69 36.16 39.03 40.87 41.83 41.68 40.66 38.96 36.59 33.97 31.09 28.12 25.30 22.59 19.95 17.38 14.94 12.65 10.48 8.44 6.52 4.73 3.17 2.10 1.63 1.29 1.15 1.10 1.02 0.89 0.80 0.73 0.67 0.61 0.54 0.50 0.46 0.44 0.41 0.38 0.33 0.31 0.28 0.27 0.25 0.22 0.20 0.19 0.16 0.15 0.13 0.13 0.10 0.08 0.08 0.06 0.05 0.04 0.04 0.03 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.59 1.53 3.71 6.70 10.62 15.33 19.29 22.74 26.60 30.80 33.17 34.24 34.60 34.26 33.26 31.77 29.86 27.66 25.24 22.67 20.11 17.67 15.33 13.13 11.06 9.06 7.16 5.37 3.82 2.44 1.55 1.18 0.92 0.87 0.80 0.73 0.67 0.61 0.56 0.52 0.47 0.43 0.39 0.37 0.34 0.32 0.30 0.27 0.25 0.23 0.22 0.20 0.19 0.19 0.17 0.15 0.14 0.13 0.10 0.08 0.08 0.06 0.04 0.04 0.04 0.04 0.01 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.26 0.63 1.90 3.72 6.20 9.24 12.97 15.96 18.36 20.92 23.29 25.63 26.56 26.74 26.24 25.36 24.11 22.70 21.00 19.08 17.00 14.82 12.80 10.95 9.15 7.42 5.80 4.26 2.93 1.75 1.05 0.84 0.63 0.57 0.53 0.50 0.48 0.45 0.39 0.36 0.35 0.33 0.29 0.28 0.28 0.26 0.24 0.20 0.18 0.19 0.18 0.17 0.16 0.14 0.13 0.12 0.10 0.09 0.08 0.08 0.07 0.04 0.04 0.04 0.04 0.03 0.01 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.02 0.38 0.66 1.63 2.98 4.67 6.68 8.87 11.36 13.21 14.76 16.05 17.12 17.77 18.00 17.87 17.27 16.38 15.25 13.90 12.48 10.94 9.47 8.10 6.75 5.44 4.22 3.06 2.07 1.22 0.72 0.55 0.41 0.38 0.37 0.35 0.32 0.29 0.28 0.26 0.25 0.23 0.21 0.20 0.19 0.18 0.18 0.16 0.14 0.13 0.13 0.12 0.11 0.10 0.09 0.08 0.08 0.07 0.07 0.06 0.04 0.03 0.04 0.04 0.03 0.01 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.02 0.29 0.35 0.89 1.63 2.56 3.68 4.86 6.05 7.14 8.07 8.91 9.35 9.65 9.76 9.68 9.47 8.93 8.20 7.40 6.50 5.65 4.87 4.10 3.32 2.57 1.88 1.27 0.75 0.46 0.36 0.29 0.28 0.26 0.24 0.22 0.20 0.19 0.18 0.17 0.16 0.15 0.14 0.13 0.12 0.11 0.11 0.11 0.10 0.08 0.08 0.08 0.07 0.06 0.05 0.06 0.06 0.05 0.05 0.04 0.04 0.03 0.03 0.01 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.04 0.20 0.39 0.37 0.68 1.05 1.47 1.90 2.32 2.71 3.15 3.39 3.51 3.57 3.54 3.40 3.14 2.86 2.54 2.26 1.97 1.67 1.39 1.10 0.81 0.57 0.38 0.25 0.19 0.16 0.17 0.15 0.13 0.12 0.11 0.11 0.11 0.09 0.09 0.08 0.08 0.08 0.07 0.07 0.07 0.06 0.06 0.06 0.05 0.04 0.03 0.04 0.04 0.04 0.04 0.03 0.03 0.02 0.01 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.02 0.08 0.14 0.19 0.25 0.31 0.36 0.39 0.32 0.33 0.33 0.31 0.28 0.26 0.25 0.22 0.19 0.16 0.14 0.11 0.09 0.08 0.08 0.07 0.06 0.06 0.06 0.06 0.06 0.04 0.04 0.05 0.05 0.04 0.03 0.03 0.03 0.03 0.03 0.02

Page 267: 6.5 LW Red-line of Lighting Report

Archer Forward: Campus Preservation and Improvement Plan - Lighting Analysis, Appendix Page 96

The Archer School for Girls July 2013

0.02 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00

Page 268: 6.5 LW Red-line of Lighting Report

Archer Forward: Campus Preservation and Improvement Plan - Lighting Analysis, Appendix Page 97

The Archer School for Girls July 2013

2.8 FIXTURE TYPE SB-2 BEGA- 7785 MH: SHIELDED BOLLARD

IESNA:LM-63-1995 [TEST] BE2829 [DATE] 03-10-08 [MANUFAC] BEGA-US [LUMCAT] 7785MH [LUMINAIRE] SHIELDED BOLLARD W/FOUR-SIDED OUTPUT AND LOW MOUNTING [MORE] HEIGHT [LAMP] (1) 39W T6 G12 MH TILT=NONE 1 3300 3.3 73 19 1 2 0.32 0.32 0 1 1 45 0 2.5 5 7.5 10 12.5 15 17.5 20 22.5 25 27.5 30 32.5 35 37.5 40 42.5 45 47.5 50 52.5 55 57.5 60 62.5 65 67.5 70 72.5 75 77.5 80 82.5 85 87.5 90 92.5 95 97.5 100 102.5 105 107.5 110 112.5 115 117.5 120 122.5 125 127.5 130 132.5 135 137.5 140 142.5 145 147.5 150 152.5 155 157.5 160 162.5 165 167.5 170 172.5 175 177.5 180 0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50 55 60 65 70 75 80 85 90 0.01 0.15 1.01 2.04 2.97 3.78 4.53 5.35 6.41 7.61 9.40 11.75 14.41 17.20 20.16 23.03 24.56 25.15 25.19 24.96 24.27 23.23 21.90 20.13 17.75 15.89 14.66 13.72 14.16 14.62 18.07 21.50 20.53 17.25 10.11 4.10 1.29 1.16 1.07 0.98 0.90 0.84 0.78 0.73 0.67 0.61 0.57 0.52 0.45 0.39 0.36 0.30 0.27 0.24 0.21 0.19 0.16 0.13 0.12 0.12 0.09 0.09 0.06 0.06 0.05 0.05 0.04 0.04 0.03 0.03 0.03 0.03 0.03 0.01 0.14 1.01 2.03 2.96 3.76 4.52 5.35 6.42 7.64 9.46 11.82 14.49 17.31 20.25 23.20 24.80 25.46 25.52 25.29 24.62 23.60 22.32 20.59 18.10 16.37 15.29 14.23 14.47 15.52 18.26 21.19 20.62 17.53 10.36 4.30 1.29 1.16 1.06 0.97 0.90 0.84 0.78 0.73 0.67 0.62 0.57 0.51 0.45 0.39 0.36 0.30 0.27 0.23 0.21 0.19 0.16 0.15 0.12 0.12 0.09 0.09 0.06 0.06 0.06 0.05 0.04 0.03 0.03 0.03 0.03 0.03 0.03 0.01 0.14 0.98 1.99 2.94 3.80 4.65 5.55 6.70 7.98 9.77 12.15 14.83 17.70 20.61 23.68 25.48 26.33 26.39 26.17 25.49 24.53 23.38 21.75 19.28 17.57 16.34 15.15 15.50 16.32 18.99 21.88 21.33 18.25 10.62 4.74 1.29 1.15 1.05 0.96 0.89 0.83 0.77 0.72 0.68 0.62 0.57 0.51 0.45 0.39 0.36 0.30 0.26 0.22 0.21 0.19 0.16 0.14 0.12 0.12 0.09 0.09 0.07 0.06 0.06 0.06 0.04 0.03 0.03 0.03 0.03 0.03 0.03 0.01 0.13 0.96 1.97 3.03 4.01 4.97 5.93 7.14 8.44 10.18 12.48 15.11 17.95 20.79 23.92 25.96 27.03 27.11 26.94 26.30 25.36 24.30 22.80 20.45 18.62 17.09 16.05 16.38 17.33 19.43 22.12 21.47 18.79 10.72 4.86 1.28 1.13 1.03 0.95 0.88 0.82 0.76 0.71 0.66 0.61 0.56 0.50 0.45 0.39 0.35 0.30 0.26 0.21 0.20 0.20 0.16 0.14 0.12 0.12 0.10 0.09 0.07 0.06 0.06 0.06 0.05 0.05 0.03 0.03 0.03 0.03 0.03 0.01 0.10 0.91 2.02 3.20 4.27 5.31 6.32 7.54 8.84 10.47 12.57 15.13 17.85 20.58 23.60 25.96 27.24 27.46 27.38 26.78 25.94 24.97 23.63 21.54 19.63 17.99 16.95 17.24 18.94 19.61 21.93 22.25 20.74 11.23 5.05 1.27 1.11 1.02 0.94 0.87 0.81 0.76 0.70 0.65 0.59 0.54 0.49 0.43 0.37 0.34 0.28 0.24 0.21 0.20 0.19 0.16 0.14 0.12 0.12 0.10 0.09 0.07 0.06 0.06 0.06 0.05 0.04 0.03 0.03 0.04 0.03 0.03 0.01 0.09 0.89 2.13 3.35 4.52 5.64 6.67 7.88 9.13 10.62 12.46 14.85 17.40 20.10 22.91 25.47 27.08 27.65 27.61 27.10 26.30 25.45

Page 269: 6.5 LW Red-line of Lighting Report

Archer Forward: Campus Preservation and Improvement Plan - Lighting Analysis, Appendix Page 98

The Archer School for Girls July 2013

24.26 22.57 20.62 18.90 17.71 18.23 20.14 20.38 22.58 22.84 22.35 12.60 5.55 1.28 1.11 1.03 0.94 0.87 0.80 0.74 0.69 0.64 0.59 0.53 0.47 0.41 0.36 0.33 0.27 0.23 0.21 0.21 0.19 0.15 0.14 0.12 0.12 0.10 0.09 0.08 0.06 0.06 0.06 0.05 0.04 0.03 0.03 0.03 0.03 0.03 0.01 0.08 0.89 2.20 3.50 4.74 5.93 6.96 8.10 9.30 10.66 12.24 14.40 16.81 19.45 22.08 24.69 26.69 27.62 27.63 27.25 26.46 25.58 24.46 23.06 21.38 19.65 18.36 18.59 20.63 20.80 22.89 23.59 23.01 14.48 6.21 1.31 1.15 1.04 0.96 0.89 0.83 0.76 0.70 0.63 0.57 0.51 0.45 0.39 0.35 0.31 0.27 0.23 0.20 0.20 0.20 0.16 0.14 0.12 0.12 0.10 0.09 0.09 0.06 0.06 0.06 0.06 0.04 0.03 0.03 0.03 0.03 0.03 0.01 0.05 0.93 2.26 3.62 4.92 6.14 7.19 8.24 9.37 10.64 12.07 13.96 16.23 18.65 21.24 23.65 25.95 27.20 27.53 27.11 26.29 25.32 24.19 22.90 21.57 19.82 18.61 18.19 19.26 19.25 20.91 24.49 23.33 17.16 6.89 1.38 1.21 1.11 1.01 0.94 0.86 0.78 0.71 0.64 0.58 0.50 0.44 0.38 0.33 0.30 0.25 0.21 0.19 0.20 0.19 0.16 0.13 0.12 0.12 0.11 0.09 0.09 0.06 0.06 0.06 0.06 0.03 0.04 0.03 0.03 0.03 0.03 0.01 0.03 0.96 2.31 3.70 5.02 6.27 7.33 8.33 9.36 10.61 12.03 13.68 15.66 17.92 20.42 22.72 24.87 26.36 26.93 26.66 25.88 24.79 23.50 22.00 20.35 18.43 17.02 15.93 14.86 13.72 12.76 12.18 11.83 9.23 4.48 1.45 1.28 1.17 1.08 0.98 0.90 0.81 0.74 0.66 0.58 0.51 0.43 0.37 0.32 0.28 0.24 0.21 0.19 0.20 0.19 0.15 0.13 0.12 0.12 0.10 0.09 0.08 0.06 0.06 0.06 0.05 0.04 0.03 0.03 0.03 0.03 0.03 0.01 0.02 0.98 2.32 3.72 5.07 6.31 7.38 8.36 9.34 10.63 12.03 13.57 15.41 17.65 20.04 22.37 24.39 25.87 26.47 26.34 25.61 24.56 23.23 21.60 19.96 18.20 16.68 15.62 14.68 13.33 11.62 9.92 8.27 5.81 2.94 1.48 1.30 1.20 1.10 1.01 0.92 0.83 0.75 0.67 0.59 0.52 0.43 0.37 0.31 0.28 0.24 0.21 0.19 0.21 0.19 0.15 0.14 0.13 0.12 0.11 0.09 0.08 0.06 0.06 0.06 0.05 0.04 0.04 0.03 0.03 0.03 0.03 0.01 0.03 0.96 2.31 3.70 5.02 6.27 7.33 8.33 9.36 10.61 12.03 13.68 15.66 17.92 20.42 22.72 24.87 26.36 26.93 26.66 25.88 24.79 23.50 22.00 20.35 18.43 17.02 15.93 14.86 13.72 12.76 12.18 11.83 9.23 4.48 1.45 1.28 1.17 1.08 0.98 0.90 0.81 0.74 0.66 0.58 0.51 0.43 0.37 0.32 0.28 0.24 0.21 0.19 0.20 0.19 0.15 0.13 0.12 0.12 0.10 0.09 0.08 0.06 0.06 0.06 0.05 0.04 0.03 0.03 0.03 0.03 0.03 0.01 0.05 0.93 2.26 3.62 4.92 6.14 7.19 8.24 9.37 10.64 12.07 13.96 16.23 18.65 21.24 23.65 25.95 27.20 27.53 27.11 26.29 25.32 24.19 22.90 21.57 19.82 18.61 18.19 19.26 19.25 20.91 24.49 23.33 17.16 6.89 1.38 1.21 1.11 1.01 0.94 0.86 0.78 0.71 0.64 0.58 0.50 0.44 0.38 0.33 0.30 0.25 0.21 0.19 0.20 0.19 0.16 0.13 0.12 0.12 0.11 0.09 0.09 0.06 0.06 0.06 0.06 0.03 0.04 0.03 0.03 0.03 0.03 0.01 0.08 0.89 2.20 3.50 4.74 5.93 6.96 8.10 9.30 10.66 12.24 14.40 16.81 19.45 22.08 24.69 26.69 27.62 27.63 27.25 26.46 25.58 24.46 23.06 21.38 19.65 18.36 18.59 20.63 20.80 22.89 23.59 23.01 14.48 6.21 1.31 1.15 1.04 0.96 0.89 0.83 0.76 0.70 0.63 0.57 0.51 0.45 0.39 0.35 0.31 0.27 0.23 0.20 0.20 0.20 0.16 0.14 0.12 0.12 0.10 0.09 0.09 0.06 0.06 0.06 0.06 0.04 0.03 0.03 0.03 0.03 0.03 0.01 0.09 0.89 2.13 3.35 4.52 5.64 6.67 7.88 9.13 10.62 12.46 14.85 17.40 20.10 22.91 25.47 27.08 27.65 27.61 27.10 26.30 25.45 24.26 22.57 20.62 18.90 17.71 18.23 20.14 20.38 22.58 22.84 22.35 12.60 5.55 1.28 1.11 1.03 0.94 0.87 0.80 0.74 0.69 0.64 0.59 0.53 0.47 0.41 0.36 0.33 0.27 0.23 0.21 0.21 0.19 0.15 0.14 0.12 0.12 0.10 0.09 0.08 0.06 0.06 0.06 0.05 0.04 0.03 0.03 0.03 0.03 0.03

Page 270: 6.5 LW Red-line of Lighting Report

Archer Forward: Campus Preservation and Improvement Plan - Lighting Analysis, Appendix Page 99

The Archer School for Girls July 2013

0.01 0.10 0.91 2.02 3.20 4.27 5.31 6.32 7.54 8.84 10.47 12.57 15.13 17.85 20.58 23.60 25.96 27.24 27.46 27.38 26.78 25.94 24.97 23.63 21.54 19.63 17.99 16.95 17.24 18.94 19.61 21.93 22.25 20.74 11.23 5.05 1.27 1.11 1.02 0.94 0.87 0.81 0.76 0.70 0.65 0.59 0.54 0.49 0.43 0.37 0.34 0.28 0.24 0.21 0.20 0.19 0.16 0.14 0.12 0.12 0.10 0.09 0.07 0.06 0.06 0.06 0.05 0.04 0.03 0.03 0.04 0.03 0.03 0.01 0.13 0.96 1.97 3.03 4.01 4.97 5.93 7.14 8.44 10.18 12.48 15.11 17.95 20.79 23.92 25.96 27.03 27.11 26.94 26.30 25.36 24.30 22.80 20.45 18.62 17.09 16.05 16.38 17.33 19.43 22.12 21.47 18.79 10.72 4.86 1.28 1.13 1.03 0.95 0.88 0.82 0.76 0.71 0.66 0.61 0.56 0.50 0.45 0.39 0.35 0.30 0.26 0.21 0.20 0.20 0.16 0.14 0.12 0.12 0.10 0.09 0.07 0.06 0.06 0.06 0.05 0.05 0.03 0.03 0.03 0.03 0.03 0.01 0.14 0.98 1.99 2.94 3.80 4.65 5.55 6.70 7.98 9.77 12.15 14.83 17.70 20.61 23.68 25.48 26.33 26.39 26.17 25.49 24.53 23.38 21.75 19.28 17.57 16.34 15.15 15.50 16.32 18.99 21.88 21.33 18.25 10.62 4.74 1.29 1.15 1.05 0.96 0.89 0.83 0.77 0.72 0.68 0.62 0.57 0.51 0.45 0.39 0.36 0.30 0.26 0.22 0.21 0.19 0.16 0.14 0.12 0.12 0.09 0.09 0.07 0.06 0.06 0.06 0.04 0.03 0.03 0.03 0.03 0.03 0.03 0.01 0.14 1.01 2.03 2.96 3.76 4.52 5.35 6.42 7.64 9.46 11.82 14.49 17.31 20.25 23.20 24.80 25.46 25.52 25.29 24.62 23.60 22.32 20.59 18.10 16.37 15.29 14.23 14.47 15.52 18.26 21.19 20.62 17.53 10.36 4.30 1.29 1.16 1.06 0.97 0.90 0.84 0.78 0.73 0.67 0.62 0.57 0.51 0.45 0.39 0.36 0.30 0.27 0.23 0.21 0.19 0.16 0.15 0.12 0.12 0.09 0.09 0.06 0.06 0.06 0.05 0.04 0.03 0.03 0.03 0.03 0.03 0.03 0.01 0.15 1.01 2.04 2.97 3.78 4.53 5.35 6.41 7.61 9.40 11.75 14.41 17.20 20.16 23.03 24.56 25.15 25.19 24.96 24.27 23.23 21.90 20.13 17.75 15.89 14.66 13.72 14.16 14.62 18.07 21.50 20.53 17.25 10.11 4.10 1.29 1.16 1.07 0.98 0.90 0.84 0.78 0.73 0.67 0.61 0.57 0.52 0.45 0.39 0.36 0.30 0.27 0.24 0.21 0.19 0.16 0.13 0.12 0.12 0.09 0.09 0.06 0.06 0.05 0.05 0.04 0.04 0.03 0.03 0.03 0.03 0.03

Page 271: 6.5 LW Red-line of Lighting Report

Archer Forward: Campus Preservation and Improvement Plan - Lighting Analysis, Appendix Page 100

The Archer School for Girls July 2013

2.9 FIXTURE TYPE SB-3 BEGA- 8677MH: SHIELDED BOLLARD

IESNA:LM-63-1995 [TEST] BE2919 [DATE] 3/24/2009 [MANUFAC] BEGA-US [LUMCAT] 8677MH [LUMINAIRE] SHIELDED BOLLARDS WITH SINGLE-SIDED FLAT-BEAM [MORE] DISTRIBUTION [LAMPCAT] (1) 20W T4 GU6.5 MH TILT=NONE 1 1615 1 73 145 1 2 0.045 0.08 0 1 1 23 0 2.5 5 7.5 10 12.5 15 17.5 20 22.5 25 27.5 30 32.5 35 37.5 40 42.5 45 47.5 50 52.5 55 57.5 60 62.5 65 67.5 70 72.5 75 77.5 80 82.5 85 87.5 90 92.5 95 97.5 100 102.5 105 107.5 110 112.5 115 117.5 120 122.5 125 127.5 130 132.5 135 137.5 140 142.5 145 147.5 150 152.5 155 157.5 160 162.5 165 167.5 170 172.5 175 177.5 180 0 2.5 5 7.5 10 12.5 15 17.5 20 22.5 25 27.5 30 32.5 35 37.5 40 42.5 45 47.5 50 52.5 55 57.5 60 62.5 65 67.5 70 72.5 75 77.5 80 82.5 85 87.5 90 92.5 95 97.5 100 102.5 105 107.5 110 112.5 115 117.5 120 122.5 125 127.5 130 132.5 135 137.5 140 142.5 145 147.5 150 152.5 155 157.5 160 162.5 165 167.5 170 172.5 175 177.5 180 182.5 185 187.5 190 192.5 195 197.5 200 202.5 205 207.5 210 212.5 215 217.5 220 222.5 225 227.5 230 232.5 235 237.5 240 242.5 245 247.5 250 252.5 255 257.5 260 262.5 265 267.5 270 272.5 275 277.5 280 282.5 285 287.5 290 292.5 295 297.5 300 302.5 305 307.5 310 312.5 315 317.5 320 322.5 325 327.5 330 332.5 335 337.5 340 342.5 345 347.5 350 352.5 355 357.5 360 0.00 0.00 8.00 230.00 254.00 270.00 278.00 284.00 290.00 293.00 281.00 271.00 255.00 238.00 232.00 215.00 203.00 193.00 182.00 173.00 162.00 153.00 145.00 133.00 124.00 114.00 110.00 70.00 46.00 16.00 8.00 7.00 6.00 5.00 4.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 7.00 222.00 245.00 260.00 268.00 275.00 281.00 285.00 275.00 265.00 249.00 232.00 227.00 208.00 196.00 187.00 176.00 167.00 157.00 148.00 140.00 129.00 120.00 111.00 102.00 70.00 45.00 16.00 8.00 6.00 5.00 5.00 4.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 7.00 214.00 236.00 251.00 259.00 266.00 272.00 276.00 268.00 259.00 244.00 226.00 221.00 202.00 189.00 180.00 169.00 161.00 151.00 142.00 135.00 125.00 116.00 107.00 94.00 71.00 44.00 15.00 7.00 6.00 5.00 5.00 4.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00

Page 272: 6.5 LW Red-line of Lighting Report

Archer Forward: Campus Preservation and Improvement Plan - Lighting Analysis, Appendix Page 101

The Archer School for Girls July 2013

0.00 0.00 7.00 214.00 236.00 252.00 261.00 269.00 277.00 283.00 276.00 269.00 256.00 232.00 228.00 208.00 193.00 183.00 172.00 163.00 153.00 144.00 136.00 126.00 117.00 108.00 95.00 73.00 46.00 16.00 7.00 6.00 5.00 5.00 4.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 7.00 214.00 236.00 254.00 263.00 273.00 282.00 289.00 284.00 280.00 267.00 239.00 235.00 213.00 196.00 185.00 174.00 165.00 155.00 145.00 138.00 128.00 119.00 109.00 96.00 74.00 48.00 16.00 7.00 6.00 5.00 5.00 4.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 7.00 225.00 249.00 270.00 282.00 294.00 307.00 317.00 315.00 314.00 302.00 266.00 256.00 234.00 216.00 203.00 186.00 176.00 165.00 155.00 147.00 136.00 127.00 116.00 105.00 81.00 53.00 18.00 8.00 6.00 5.00 5.00 4.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 7.00 237.00 263.00 286.00 300.00 315.00 332.00 345.00 345.00 348.00 337.00 292.00 278.00 254.00 235.00 220.00 199.00 188.00 176.00 166.00 156.00 145.00 135.00 123.00 113.00 87.00 58.00 20.00 8.00 7.00 6.00 5.00 4.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 6.00 236.00 263.00 288.00 305.00 321.00 341.00 357.00 360.00 363.00 353.00 303.00 282.00 263.00 250.00 233.00 204.00 190.00 178.00 168.00 157.00 146.00 137.00 125.00 114.00 93.00 62.00 23.00 8.00 7.00 6.00 5.00 4.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 6.00 235.00 263.00 290.00 310.00 327.00 351.00 369.00 374.00 378.00 370.00 314.00 287.00 272.00 265.00 245.00 209.00 193.00 181.00 170.00 159.00 148.00 139.00 127.00 115.00 100.00 66.00 26.00 9.00 7.00 6.00 5.00 4.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 6.00 251.00 282.00 314.00 338.00 359.00 386.00 406.00 410.00 412.00 391.00 338.00 316.00 304.00 299.00 283.00 233.00 212.00 198.00 186.00 174.00 163.00 154.00 141.00 127.00 110.00 79.00 33.00 10.00 7.00 6.00 5.00 4.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 6.00 266.00 302.00 339.00 366.00 390.00 421.00 444.00 447.00 445.00 413.00 363.00 344.00 336.00 333.00 320.00 258.00

Page 273: 6.5 LW Red-line of Lighting Report

Archer Forward: Campus Preservation and Improvement Plan - Lighting Analysis, Appendix Page 102

The Archer School for Girls July 2013

232.00 215.00 203.00 190.00 179.00 170.00 155.00 139.00 119.00 92.00 41.00 11.00 8.00 6.00 5.00 5.00 4.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 6.00 256.00 300.00 339.00 368.00 392.00 423.00 441.00 438.00 433.00 402.00 365.00 363.00 363.00 344.00 330.00 275.00 242.00 222.00 208.00 196.00 185.00 177.00 164.00 147.00 125.00 99.00 51.00 13.00 8.00 6.00 5.00 5.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 5.00 246.00 299.00 339.00 370.00 395.00 425.00 439.00 429.00 421.00 391.00 367.00 381.00 389.00 356.00 340.00 292.00 251.00 229.00 213.00 203.00 192.00 184.00 174.00 155.00 131.00 107.00 61.00 14.00 8.00 6.00 5.00 4.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 5.00 180.00 297.00 338.00 369.00 393.00 418.00 428.00 415.00 407.00 387.00 376.00 401.00 415.00 380.00 353.00 321.00 268.00 239.00 222.00 212.00 201.00 195.00 191.00 178.00 143.00 116.00 74.00 20.00 11.00 6.00 5.00 4.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 5.00 113.00 295.00 337.00 368.00 392.00 412.00 417.00 402.00 392.00 383.00 386.00 421.00 441.00 404.00 365.00 350.00 285.00 250.00 231.00 221.00 210.00 206.00 207.00 202.00 155.00 125.00 88.00 26.00 14.00 7.00 5.00 4.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 5.00 76.00 294.00 335.00 365.00 385.00 401.00 402.00 387.00 383.00 385.00 400.00 434.00 452.00 434.00 389.00 367.00 317.00 269.00 244.00 232.00 225.00 224.00 233.00 232.00 180.00 138.00 104.00 41.00 22.00 8.00 5.00 4.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 5.00 39.00 293.00 332.00 361.00 379.00 391.00 387.00 373.00 373.00 387.00 415.00 448.00 464.00 464.00 413.00 384.00 348.00 289.00 256.00 242.00 240.00 241.00 259.00 263.00 206.00 151.00 120.00 55.00 30.00 10.00 5.00 4.00 3.00 3.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 6.00 32.00 284.00 320.00 345.00 361.00 369.00 363.00 353.00 359.00 382.00 414.00 445.00 460.00 470.00 438.00 394.00 359.00 311.00 272.00 252.00 252.00 266.00 289.00 294.00 238.00 166.00 129.00 77.00 40.00 15.00 5.00 4.00 3.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00

Page 274: 6.5 LW Red-line of Lighting Report

Archer Forward: Campus Preservation and Improvement Plan - Lighting Analysis, Appendix Page 103

The Archer School for Girls July 2013

2.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 7.00 25.00 275.00 309.00 330.00 344.00 348.00 339.00 334.00 345.00 378.00 414.00 441.00 457.00 476.00 463.00 404.00 370.00 333.00 287.00 263.00 263.00 290.00 320.00 325.00 269.00 180.00 138.00 99.00 50.00 21.00 5.00 4.00 3.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 7.00 23.00 272.00 303.00 323.00 334.00 335.00 329.00 327.00 345.00 383.00 417.00 443.00 464.00 487.00 474.00 424.00 386.00 356.00 323.00 293.00 287.00 318.00 354.00 367.00 318.00 215.00 148.00 108.00 59.00 36.00 6.00 4.00 3.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 7.00 21.00 269.00 298.00 315.00 324.00 323.00 320.00 319.00 345.00 388.00 420.00 446.00 471.00 498.00 485.00 444.00 402.00 380.00 359.00 323.00 311.00 346.00 387.00 410.00 366.00 249.00 157.00 117.00 67.00 51.00 6.00 3.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 7.00 20.00 267.00 292.00 307.00 313.00 312.00 312.00 316.00 347.00 391.00 421.00 447.00 475.00 503.00 495.00 451.00 413.00 397.00 384.00 360.00 347.00 374.00 406.00 426.00 390.00 284.00 170.00 101.00 72.00 66.00 11.00 3.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 7.00 18.00 264.00 285.00 299.00 302.00 302.00 304.00 312.00 348.00 394.00 423.00 449.00 478.00 507.00 505.00 458.00 424.00 414.00 410.00 397.00 384.00 401.00 425.00 442.00 414.00 318.00 184.00 86.00 77.00 81.00 16.00 3.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 7.00 17.00 256.00 274.00 286.00 289.00 289.00 292.00 303.00 339.00 384.00 411.00 440.00 468.00 485.00 469.00 434.00 416.00 413.00 413.00 399.00 384.00 407.00 428.00 435.00 403.00 320.00 198.00 79.00 77.00 83.00 28.00 3.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 7.00 16.00 249.00 263.00 274.00 275.00 276.00 280.00 294.00 330.00 373.00 400.00 431.00 457.00 463.00 434.00 411.00 408.00 412.00 416.00 401.00 384.00 413.00 432.00 428.00 392.00 321.00 212.00 73.00 77.00 85.00 41.00 3.00 2.00 2.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00

Page 275: 6.5 LW Red-line of Lighting Report

Archer Forward: Campus Preservation and Improvement Plan - Lighting Analysis, Appendix Page 104

The Archer School for Girls July 2013

0.00 0.00 6.00 16.00 246.00 259.00 268.00 269.00 270.00 275.00 287.00 320.00 359.00 385.00 419.00 444.00 441.00 416.00 402.00 405.00 411.00 413.00 392.00 385.00 414.00 430.00 424.00 380.00 307.00 195.00 73.00 72.00 81.00 49.00 4.00 2.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 6.00 16.00 243.00 255.00 263.00 263.00 264.00 269.00 280.00 310.00 345.00 370.00 406.00 431.00 418.00 399.00 393.00 402.00 409.00 411.00 382.00 385.00 415.00 429.00 419.00 368.00 294.00 177.00 74.00 67.00 77.00 57.00 5.00 2.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 6.00 28.00 241.00 252.00 259.00 259.00 260.00 264.00 272.00 296.00 323.00 346.00 377.00 399.00 390.00 378.00 378.00 389.00 396.00 395.00 369.00 383.00 413.00 427.00 416.00 362.00 283.00 147.00 59.00 59.00 71.00 55.00 5.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 5.00 39.00 239.00 249.00 255.00 255.00 256.00 260.00 264.00 282.00 302.00 321.00 348.00 367.00 361.00 358.00 362.00 375.00 383.00 379.00 355.00 380.00 411.00 426.00 414.00 355.00 273.00 116.00 44.00 51.00 65.00 52.00 5.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 6.00 72.00 237.00 247.00 252.00 252.00 252.00 256.00 258.00 271.00 287.00 301.00 324.00 338.00 335.00 333.00 337.00 349.00 356.00 348.00 336.00 364.00 397.00 414.00 401.00 338.00 255.00 99.00 40.00 47.00 62.00 51.00 5.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 6.00 106.00 236.00 245.00 249.00 248.00 249.00 252.00 252.00 260.00 271.00 281.00 299.00 309.00 309.00 308.00 312.00 323.00 330.00 318.00 318.00 348.00 382.00 401.00 387.00 322.00 237.00 81.00 35.00 42.00 59.00 49.00 4.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 6.00 129.00 234.00 243.00 247.00 246.00 246.00 248.00 247.00 254.00 261.00 268.00 283.00 289.00 290.00 289.00 294.00 304.00 307.00 293.00 296.00 320.00 347.00 361.00 344.00 278.00 187.00 59.00 30.00 37.00 52.00 44.00 4.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 6.00 151.00 232.00 242.00 245.00 243.00 243.00 245.00 242.00 247.00 252.00 256.00 266.00 269.00 271.00 271.00 277.00

Page 276: 6.5 LW Red-line of Lighting Report

Archer Forward: Campus Preservation and Improvement Plan - Lighting Analysis, Appendix Page 105

The Archer School for Girls July 2013

285.00 285.00 268.00 274.00 292.00 311.00 320.00 301.00 235.00 137.00 37.00 25.00 33.00 46.00 38.00 3.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 5.00 162.00 231.00 240.00 242.00 241.00 241.00 242.00 239.00 242.00 246.00 249.00 257.00 258.00 261.00 263.00 268.00 274.00 269.00 252.00 255.00 265.00 276.00 278.00 261.00 205.00 107.00 27.00 19.00 23.00 32.00 25.00 3.00 1.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 5.00 173.00 229.00 238.00 240.00 239.00 239.00 239.00 235.00 238.00 241.00 242.00 247.00 248.00 252.00 254.00 259.00 263.00 254.00 236.00 236.00 238.00 241.00 236.00 221.00 174.00 76.00 16.00 12.00 14.00 17.00 12.00 2.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 5.00 161.00 211.00 219.00 221.00 220.00 219.00 220.00 216.00 219.00 221.00 222.00 226.00 226.00 230.00 233.00 238.00 240.00 228.00 212.00 211.00 211.00 211.00 205.00 192.00 154.00 62.00 13.00 9.00 9.00 11.00 8.00 1.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 4.00 148.00 193.00 200.00 202.00 200.00 200.00 200.00 197.00 199.00 201.00 202.00 205.00 205.00 209.00 213.00 216.00 218.00 203.00 188.00 186.00 184.00 181.00 174.00 163.00 134.00 47.00 10.00 6.00 5.00 5.00 4.00 1.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 4.00 144.00 189.00 196.00 198.00 197.00 196.00 196.00 193.00 194.00 196.00 197.00 199.00 200.00 202.00 206.00 208.00 208.00 194.00 181.00 179.00 175.00 171.00 163.00 153.00 127.00 42.00 8.00 5.00 4.00 4.00 3.00 1.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 4.00 141.00 185.00 191.00 194.00 193.00 191.00 192.00 188.00 189.00 191.00 193.00 193.00 195.00 195.00 199.00 199.00 198.00 186.00 174.00 171.00 166.00 161.00 153.00 142.00 120.00 37.00 7.00 4.00 3.00 3.00 2.00 1.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 4.00 126.00 181.00 187.00 189.00 189.00 187.00 187.00 183.00 184.00 185.00 186.00 187.00 188.00 188.00 191.00 190.00 189.00 178.00 167.00 165.00 160.00 155.00 148.00 137.00 115.00 35.00 6.00 4.00 3.00 3.00 2.00 1.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00

Page 277: 6.5 LW Red-line of Lighting Report

Archer Forward: Campus Preservation and Improvement Plan - Lighting Analysis, Appendix Page 106

The Archer School for Girls July 2013

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 4.00 112.00 177.00 183.00 185.00 184.00 182.00 183.00 178.00 179.00 179.00 180.00 180.00 182.00 181.00 183.00 182.00 179.00 170.00 161.00 159.00 155.00 150.00 143.00 132.00 110.00 33.00 6.00 4.00 3.00 2.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 4.00 65.00 114.00 117.00 118.00 118.00 117.00 117.00 114.00 114.00 115.00 116.00 116.00 117.00 116.00 117.00 117.00 115.00 110.00 104.00 104.00 101.00 99.00 94.00 87.00 73.00 23.00 6.00 4.00 3.00 2.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 4.00 19.00 50.00 51.00 52.00 51.00 51.00 51.00 50.00 50.00 51.00 51.00 51.00 52.00 52.00 52.00 52.00 51.00 50.00 48.00 48.00 48.00 47.00 46.00 43.00 35.00 13.00 5.00 4.00 3.00 2.00 1.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 3.00 11.00 28.00 29.00 30.00 30.00 30.00 30.00 29.00 29.00 30.00 30.00 30.00 31.00 31.00 31.00 31.00 31.00 30.00 29.00 29.00 29.00 29.00 27.00 26.00 21.00 9.00 5.00 4.00 3.00 2.00 1.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 3.00 4.00 7.00 8.00 8.00 8.00 8.00 8.00 8.00 9.00 9.00 9.00 9.00 10.00 10.00 10.00 10.00 10.00 10.00 10.00 10.00 10.00 10.00 9.00 9.00 8.00 6.00 4.00 3.00 2.00 2.00 1.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 3.00 4.00 6.00 6.00 7.00 7.00 7.00 7.00 7.00 7.00 7.00 7.00 8.00 8.00 8.00 8.00 8.00 8.00 8.00 8.00 8.00 8.00 8.00 7.00 7.00 6.00 5.00 4.00 3.00 2.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 3.00 3.00 4.00 5.00 5.00 5.00 5.00 5.00 5.00 5.00 6.00 6.00 6.00 6.00 6.00 6.00 6.00 7.00 7.00 6.00 6.00 6.00 6.00 6.00 5.00 5.00 4.00 3.00 2.00 2.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 2.00 3.00 4.00 4.00 4.00 4.00 4.00 5.00 5.00 5.00 5.00 5.00 5.00 5.00 6.00 6.00 6.00 6.00 6.00 6.00 5.00 5.00 5.00 5.00 5.00 5.00 4.00 3.00 2.00 2.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00

Page 278: 6.5 LW Red-line of Lighting Report

Archer Forward: Campus Preservation and Improvement Plan - Lighting Analysis, Appendix Page 107

The Archer School for Girls July 2013

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 2.00 2.00 3.00 4.00 4.00 4.00 4.00 4.00 4.00 4.00 4.00 4.00 5.00 5.00 5.00 5.00 5.00 5.00 5.00 5.00 5.00 5.00 5.00 4.00 4.00 4.00 4.00 3.00 2.00 2.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 2.00 2.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 4.00 4.00 4.00 4.00 4.00 4.00 4.00 4.00 4.00 4.00 4.00 4.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 2.00 2.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 1.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 2.00 2.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 1.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 2.00 1.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00

Page 279: 6.5 LW Red-line of Lighting Report

Archer Forward: Campus Preservation and Improvement Plan - Lighting Analysis, Appendix Page 108

The Archer School for Girls July 2013

1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 1.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 1.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00

Page 280: 6.5 LW Red-line of Lighting Report

Archer Forward: Campus Preservation and Improvement Plan - Lighting Analysis, Appendix Page 109

The Archer School for Girls July 2013

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00

Page 281: 6.5 LW Red-line of Lighting Report

Archer Forward: Campus Preservation and Improvement Plan - Lighting Analysis, Appendix Page 110

The Archer School for Girls July 2013

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00

Page 282: 6.5 LW Red-line of Lighting Report

Archer Forward: Campus Preservation and Improvement Plan - Lighting Analysis, Appendix Page 111

The Archer School for Girls July 2013

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 1.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 1.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 2.00 1.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00

Page 283: 6.5 LW Red-line of Lighting Report

Archer Forward: Campus Preservation and Improvement Plan - Lighting Analysis, Appendix Page 112

The Archer School for Girls July 2013

0.00 0.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 1.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 1.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 2.00 2.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 2.00 2.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 4.00 4.00 4.00 4.00 4.00 4.00 4.00 4.00 4.00 4.00 4.00 4.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 2.00 2.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 2.00 2.00 3.00 4.00 4.00 4.00 4.00 4.00 4.00 4.00 4.00 4.00 5.00 5.00 5.00 5.00 5.00 5.00 5.00 5.00 5.00 5.00 5.00 4.00 4.00 4.00 4.00 3.00 2.00 2.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 2.00 3.00 4.00 4.00 4.00 4.00 4.00 5.00 5.00 5.00 5.00 5.00 5.00 5.00 6.00 6.00 6.00 6.00 6.00 6.00 5.00 5.00 5.00 5.00 5.00 5.00 4.00 3.00 2.00 2.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 3.00 3.00 4.00 5.00 5.00 5.00 5.00 5.00 5.00 5.00 6.00 6.00 6.00 6.00 6.00 6.00 6.00 7.00 7.00 6.00 6.00 6.00 6.00 6.00 5.00 5.00 4.00 3.00 2.00 2.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 3.00 4.00 6.00 6.00 7.00 7.00 7.00 7.00 7.00 7.00 7.00 7.00 8.00 8.00 8.00 8.00 8.00 8.00 8.00 8.00 8.00 8.00 8.00 7.00 7.00 6.00 5.00 4.00 3.00 2.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00

Page 284: 6.5 LW Red-line of Lighting Report

Archer Forward: Campus Preservation and Improvement Plan - Lighting Analysis, Appendix Page 113

The Archer School for Girls July 2013

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 3.00 4.00 7.00 8.00 8.00 8.00 8.00 8.00 8.00 9.00 9.00 9.00 9.00 10.00 10.00 10.00 10.00 10.00 10.00 10.00 10.00 10.00 10.00 9.00 9.00 8.00 6.00 4.00 3.00 2.00 2.00 1.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 3.00 11.00 28.00 29.00 30.00 30.00 30.00 30.00 29.00 29.00 30.00 30.00 30.00 31.00 31.00 31.00 31.00 31.00 30.00 29.00 29.00 29.00 29.00 27.00 26.00 21.00 9.00 5.00 4.00 3.00 2.00 1.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 4.00 19.00 50.00 51.00 52.00 51.00 51.00 51.00 50.00 50.00 51.00 51.00 51.00 52.00 52.00 52.00 52.00 51.00 50.00 48.00 48.00 48.00 47.00 46.00 43.00 35.00 13.00 5.00 4.00 3.00 2.00 1.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 4.00 65.00 114.00 117.00 118.00 118.00 117.00 117.00 114.00 114.00 115.00 116.00 116.00 117.00 116.00 117.00 117.00 115.00 110.00 104.00 104.00 101.00 99.00 94.00 87.00 73.00 23.00 6.00 4.00 3.00 2.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 4.00 112.00 177.00 183.00 185.00 184.00 182.00 183.00 178.00 179.00 179.00 180.00 180.00 182.00 181.00 183.00 182.00 179.00 170.00 161.00 159.00 155.00 150.00 143.00 132.00 110.00 33.00 6.00 4.00 3.00 2.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 4.00 126.00 181.00 187.00 189.00 189.00 187.00 187.00 183.00 184.00 185.00 186.00 187.00 188.00 188.00 191.00 190.00 189.00 178.00 167.00 165.00 160.00 155.00 148.00 137.00 115.00 35.00 6.00 4.00 3.00 3.00 2.00 1.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 4.00 141.00 185.00 191.00 194.00 193.00 191.00 192.00 188.00 189.00 191.00 193.00 193.00 195.00 195.00 199.00 199.00 198.00 186.00 174.00 171.00 166.00 161.00 153.00 142.00 120.00 37.00 7.00 4.00 3.00 3.00 2.00 1.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 4.00 144.00 189.00 196.00 198.00 197.00 196.00 196.00 193.00 194.00 196.00 197.00 199.00 200.00 202.00 206.00 208.00 208.00 194.00 181.00 179.00 175.00 171.00 163.00 153.00 127.00 42.00 8.00 5.00 4.00 4.00 3.00 1.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00

Page 285: 6.5 LW Red-line of Lighting Report

Archer Forward: Campus Preservation and Improvement Plan - Lighting Analysis, Appendix Page 114

The Archer School for Girls July 2013

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 4.00 148.00 193.00 200.00 202.00 200.00 200.00 200.00 197.00 199.00 201.00 202.00 205.00 205.00 209.00 213.00 216.00 218.00 203.00 188.00 186.00 184.00 181.00 174.00 163.00 134.00 47.00 10.00 6.00 5.00 5.00 4.00 1.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 5.00 161.00 211.00 219.00 221.00 220.00 219.00 220.00 216.00 219.00 221.00 222.00 226.00 226.00 230.00 233.00 238.00 240.00 228.00 212.00 211.00 211.00 211.00 205.00 192.00 154.00 62.00 13.00 9.00 9.00 11.00 8.00 1.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 5.00 173.00 229.00 238.00 240.00 239.00 239.00 239.00 235.00 238.00 241.00 242.00 247.00 248.00 252.00 254.00 259.00 263.00 254.00 236.00 236.00 238.00 241.00 236.00 221.00 174.00 76.00 16.00 12.00 14.00 17.00 12.00 2.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 5.00 162.00 231.00 240.00 242.00 241.00 241.00 242.00 239.00 242.00 246.00 249.00 257.00 258.00 261.00 263.00 268.00 274.00 269.00 252.00 255.00 265.00 276.00 278.00 261.00 205.00 107.00 27.00 19.00 23.00 32.00 25.00 3.00 1.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 6.00 151.00 232.00 242.00 245.00 243.00 243.00 245.00 242.00 247.00 252.00 256.00 266.00 269.00 271.00 271.00 277.00 285.00 285.00 268.00 274.00 292.00 311.00 320.00 301.00 235.00 137.00 37.00 25.00 33.00 46.00 38.00 3.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 6.00 129.00 234.00 243.00 247.00 246.00 246.00 248.00 247.00 254.00 261.00 268.00 283.00 289.00 290.00 289.00 294.00 304.00 307.00 293.00 296.00 320.00 347.00 361.00 344.00 278.00 187.00 59.00 30.00 37.00 52.00 44.00 4.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 6.00 106.00 236.00 245.00 249.00 248.00 249.00 252.00 252.00 260.00 271.00 281.00 299.00 309.00 309.00 307.00 312.00 323.00 330.00 318.00 318.00 348.00 382.00 401.00 387.00 322.00 237.00 81.00 35.00 42.00 59.00 49.00 4.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00

Page 286: 6.5 LW Red-line of Lighting Report

Archer Forward: Campus Preservation and Improvement Plan - Lighting Analysis, Appendix Page 115

The Archer School for Girls July 2013

0.00 0.00 6.00 72.00 237.00 247.00 252.00 252.00 252.00 256.00 258.00 271.00 287.00 301.00 324.00 338.00 335.00 333.00 337.00 349.00 356.00 348.00 336.00 364.00 397.00 414.00 401.00 338.00 255.00 99.00 40.00 47.00 62.00 51.00 5.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 5.00 39.00 239.00 249.00 255.00 255.00 256.00 260.00 264.00 282.00 302.00 321.00 348.00 367.00 361.00 358.00 362.00 375.00 383.00 379.00 355.00 380.00 411.00 426.00 414.00 355.00 273.00 116.00 44.00 51.00 65.00 52.00 5.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 6.00 28.00 241.00 252.00 259.00 259.00 260.00 264.00 272.00 296.00 323.00 346.00 377.00 399.00 390.00 378.00 378.00 389.00 396.00 395.00 369.00 383.00 413.00 427.00 416.00 362.00 283.00 147.00 59.00 59.00 71.00 55.00 5.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 6.00 16.00 243.00 255.00 263.00 263.00 264.00 269.00 280.00 310.00 345.00 370.00 406.00 431.00 418.00 399.00 393.00 402.00 409.00 411.00 382.00 385.00 415.00 429.00 419.00 368.00 294.00 177.00 74.00 67.00 77.00 57.00 5.00 2.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 6.00 16.00 246.00 259.00 268.00 269.00 270.00 275.00 287.00 320.00 359.00 385.00 419.00 444.00 441.00 416.00 402.00 405.00 411.00 413.00 392.00 385.00 414.00 430.00 424.00 380.00 307.00 195.00 73.00 72.00 81.00 49.00 4.00 2.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 7.00 16.00 249.00 263.00 274.00 275.00 276.00 280.00 294.00 330.00 373.00 400.00 431.00 457.00 463.00 434.00 411.00 408.00 412.00 416.00 401.00 384.00 413.00 432.00 428.00 392.00 321.00 212.00 73.00 77.00 85.00 41.00 3.00 2.00 2.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 7.00 17.00 256.00 274.00 286.00 289.00 289.00 292.00 303.00 339.00 384.00 411.00 440.00 468.00 485.00 469.00 434.00 416.00 413.00 413.00 399.00 384.00 407.00 428.00 435.00 403.00 320.00 198.00 79.00 77.00 83.00 28.00 3.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 7.00 18.00 264.00 285.00 299.00 302.00 302.00 304.00 312.00 348.00 394.00 423.00 449.00 478.00 507.00 505.00 458.00

Page 287: 6.5 LW Red-line of Lighting Report

Archer Forward: Campus Preservation and Improvement Plan - Lighting Analysis, Appendix Page 116

The Archer School for Girls July 2013

424.00 414.00 410.00 397.00 384.00 401.00 425.00 442.00 414.00 318.00 184.00 86.00 77.00 81.00 16.00 3.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 7.00 20.00 267.00 292.00 307.00 313.00 312.00 312.00 316.00 347.00 391.00 421.00 447.00 475.00 503.00 495.00 451.00 413.00 397.00 384.00 360.00 347.00 374.00 406.00 426.00 390.00 284.00 170.00 101.00 72.00 66.00 11.00 3.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 7.00 21.00 269.00 298.00 315.00 324.00 323.00 320.00 319.00 345.00 388.00 420.00 446.00 471.00 498.00 485.00 444.00 402.00 380.00 359.00 323.00 311.00 346.00 387.00 410.00 366.00 249.00 157.00 117.00 67.00 51.00 6.00 3.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 7.00 23.00 272.00 303.00 323.00 334.00 335.00 329.00 327.00 345.00 383.00 417.00 443.00 464.00 487.00 474.00 424.00 386.00 356.00 323.00 293.00 287.00 318.00 354.00 367.00 318.00 215.00 148.00 108.00 59.00 36.00 6.00 4.00 3.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 7.00 25.00 275.00 309.00 330.00 344.00 348.00 339.00 334.00 345.00 378.00 414.00 441.00 457.00 476.00 463.00 404.00 370.00 333.00 287.00 263.00 263.00 290.00 320.00 325.00 269.00 180.00 138.00 99.00 50.00 21.00 5.00 4.00 3.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 6.00 32.00 284.00 320.00 345.00 361.00 369.00 363.00 353.00 359.00 382.00 414.00 445.00 460.00 470.00 438.00 394.00 359.00 311.00 272.00 252.00 252.00 266.00 289.00 294.00 238.00 166.00 129.00 77.00 40.00 15.00 5.00 4.00 3.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 5.00 39.00 293.00 332.00 361.00 379.00 391.00 387.00 373.00 373.00 387.00 415.00 448.00 464.00 464.00 413.00 384.00 348.00 289.00 256.00 242.00 240.00 241.00 259.00 263.00 206.00 151.00 120.00 55.00 30.00 10.00 5.00 4.00 3.00 3.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 5.00 76.00 294.00 335.00 365.00 385.00 401.00 402.00 387.00 383.00 385.00 400.00 434.00 452.00 434.00 389.00 367.00 317.00 269.00 244.00 232.00 225.00 224.00 233.00 232.00 180.00 138.00 104.00 41.00 22.00 8.00 5.00 4.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 2.00 2.00

Page 288: 6.5 LW Red-line of Lighting Report

Archer Forward: Campus Preservation and Improvement Plan - Lighting Analysis, Appendix Page 117

The Archer School for Girls July 2013

2.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 5.00 113.00 295.00 337.00 368.00 392.00 412.00 417.00 402.00 392.00 383.00 386.00 421.00 441.00 404.00 365.00 350.00 285.00 250.00 231.00 221.00 210.00 206.00 207.00 202.00 155.00 125.00 88.00 26.00 14.00 7.00 5.00 4.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 5.00 180.00 297.00 338.00 369.00 393.00 418.00 428.00 415.00 407.00 387.00 376.00 401.00 415.00 380.00 353.00 321.00 268.00 239.00 222.00 212.00 201.00 195.00 191.00 178.00 143.00 116.00 74.00 20.00 11.00 6.00 5.00 4.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 5.00 246.00 299.00 339.00 370.00 395.00 425.00 439.00 429.00 421.00 391.00 367.00 381.00 389.00 356.00 340.00 292.00 251.00 229.00 213.00 203.00 192.00 184.00 174.00 155.00 131.00 107.00 61.00 14.00 8.00 6.00 5.00 4.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 6.00 256.00 300.00 339.00 368.00 392.00 423.00 441.00 438.00 433.00 402.00 365.00 363.00 363.00 344.00 330.00 275.00 242.00 222.00 208.00 196.00 185.00 177.00 164.00 147.00 125.00 99.00 51.00 13.00 8.00 6.00 5.00 5.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 6.00 266.00 302.00 339.00 366.00 390.00 421.00 444.00 447.00 445.00 413.00 363.00 344.00 336.00 333.00 320.00 258.00 232.00 215.00 203.00 190.00 179.00 170.00 155.00 139.00 119.00 92.00 41.00 11.00 8.00 6.00 5.00 5.00 4.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 6.00 251.00 282.00 314.00 338.00 359.00 386.00 406.00 410.00 412.00 391.00 338.00 316.00 304.00 299.00 283.00 233.00 212.00 198.00 186.00 174.00 163.00 154.00 141.00 127.00 110.00 79.00 33.00 10.00 7.00 6.00 5.00 4.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 6.00 235.00 263.00 290.00 310.00 327.00 351.00 369.00 374.00 378.00 370.00 314.00 287.00 272.00 265.00 245.00 209.00 193.00 181.00 170.00 159.00 148.00 139.00 127.00 115.00 100.00 66.00 26.00 9.00 7.00 6.00 5.00 4.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00

Page 289: 6.5 LW Red-line of Lighting Report

Archer Forward: Campus Preservation and Improvement Plan - Lighting Analysis, Appendix Page 118

The Archer School for Girls July 2013

0.00 0.00 6.00 236.00 263.00 288.00 305.00 321.00 341.00 357.00 360.00 363.00 353.00 303.00 282.00 263.00 250.00 233.00 204.00 190.00 178.00 168.00 157.00 146.00 137.00 125.00 114.00 93.00 62.00 23.00 8.00 7.00 6.00 5.00 4.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 7.00 237.00 263.00 286.00 300.00 315.00 332.00 345.00 345.00 348.00 337.00 292.00 278.00 254.00 235.00 220.00 199.00 188.00 176.00 166.00 156.00 145.00 135.00 123.00 113.00 87.00 58.00 20.00 8.00 7.00 6.00 5.00 4.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 7.00 225.00 249.00 270.00 282.00 294.00 307.00 317.00 315.00 314.00 302.00 266.00 256.00 234.00 216.00 203.00 186.00 176.00 165.00 155.00 147.00 136.00 127.00 116.00 105.00 81.00 53.00 18.00 8.00 6.00 5.00 5.00 4.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 7.00 214.00 236.00 254.00 263.00 273.00 282.00 289.00 284.00 280.00 267.00 239.00 235.00 213.00 196.00 185.00 174.00 165.00 155.00 145.00 138.00 128.00 119.00 109.00 96.00 74.00 48.00 16.00 7.00 6.00 5.00 5.00 4.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 7.00 214.00 236.00 252.00 261.00 269.00 277.00 283.00 276.00 269.00 256.00 232.00 228.00 208.00 193.00 183.00 172.00 163.00 153.00 144.00 136.00 126.00 117.00 108.00 95.00 73.00 46.00 16.00 7.00 6.00 5.00 5.00 4.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 7.00 214.00 236.00 251.00 259.00 266.00 272.00 276.00 268.00 259.00 244.00 226.00 221.00 202.00 189.00 180.00 169.00 161.00 151.00 142.00 135.00 125.00 116.00 107.00 94.00 71.00 44.00 15.00 7.00 6.00 5.00 5.00 4.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 7.00 222.00 245.00 260.00 268.00 275.00 281.00 285.00 275.00 265.00 249.00 232.00 227.00 208.00 196.00 187.00 176.00 167.00 157.00 148.00 140.00 129.00 120.00 111.00 102.00 70.00 45.00 16.00 8.00 6.00 5.00 5.00 4.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 8.00 230.00 254.00 270.00 278.00 284.00 290.00 293.00 281.00 271.00 255.00 238.00 232.00 215.00 203.00 193.00 182.00

Page 290: 6.5 LW Red-line of Lighting Report

Archer Forward: Campus Preservation and Improvement Plan - Lighting Analysis, Appendix Page 119

The Archer School for Girls July 2013

173.00 162.00 153.00 145.00 133.00 124.00 114.00 110.00 70.00 46.00 16.00 8.00 7.00 6.00 5.00 4.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00

Page 291: 6.5 LW Red-line of Lighting Report

Archer Forward: Campus Preservation and Improvement Plan - Lighting Analysis, Appendix Page 120

The Archer School for Girls July 2013

2.10 FIXTURE TYPE SC, SH-1 BEGA- 3576P: SURFACE WALL LUMINAIRE W/ SHIELD

IESNA:LM-63-1995 [TEST] BE3183 [DATE] 4/6/2010 [MANUFAC] BEGA-US [LUMCAT] 3576P [LUMINAIRE] FULLY SHIELDED WALL MOUNTED LUMINAIRE. TEXTURED SAFETY GLASS. [LAMPCAT] (1) 18W CF TRIPLE-4P TILT=NONE 1 1200 1.15 37 37 1 2 0.11 0.09 0 1 1 20 0 2.5 5 7.5 10 12.5 15 17.5 20 22.5 25 27.5 30 32.5 35 37.5 40 42.5 45 47.5 50 52.5 55 57.5 60 62.5 65 67.5 70 72.5 75 77.5 80 82.5 85 87.5 90 0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50 55 60 65 70 75 80 85 90 95 100 105 110 115 120 125 130 135 140 145 150 155 160 165 170 175 180 214.017 215.583 217.148 218.922 220.80 222.157 222.887 222.678 221.113 217.983 212.87 206.087 196.904 185.53 172.487 157.983 143.061 127.409 112.383 97.357 83.478 70.226 58.539 47.791 37.878 29.739 22.539 16.696 11.687 7.826 4.80 2.609 1.148 0.313 0.104 0.00 0.00 214.017 215.583 217.148 218.922 220.696 222.157 222.887 222.678 221.113 217.983 212.974 206.191 197.113 185.635 172.696 158.191 143.374 127.722 112.696 97.565 83.791 70.539 58.748 48.00 38.191 29.948 22.748 16.80 11.896 7.93 4.904 2.609 1.148 0.313 0.104 0.104 0.00 214.017 215.478 217.043 218.817 220.696 222.052 222.887 222.678 221.217 218.191 213.183 206.40 197.426 186.157 173.322 158.817 144.00 128.348 113.217 98.296 84.313 71.165 59.165 48.522 38.817 30.261 23.061 16.904 12.00 7.93 4.904 2.609 1.148 0.417 0.104 0.104 0.00 214.017 215.478 217.043 218.713 220.591 221.948 222.678 222.574 221.113 218.191 213.391 206.922 198.157 187.096 174.261 160.07 144.835 129.60 113.948 99.339 84.939 71.896 59.583 48.73 39.026 30.47 23.061 17.009 12.00 8.035 4.904 2.609 1.148 0.417 0.104 0.104 0.00 214.017 215.478 216.939 218.713 220.383 221.739 222.47 222.365 221.009 218.40 213.913 207.235 198.783 188.035 175.304 161.217 145.878 130.643 114.991 99.965 85.565 71.791 59.687 48.417 38.817 30.365 23.061 16.904 12.00 8.035 4.904 2.609 1.148 0.417 0.104 0.00 0.00 214.017 215.374 216.835 218.504 220.07 221.426 222.157 222.365 221.113 218.296 213.913 207.443 199.304 188.765 176.139 162.261 147.235 131.27 115.409 99.757 85.252 71.583 59.061 48.104 38.191 29.739 22.643 16.591 11.687 7.722 4.696 2.504 1.148 0.417 0.104 0.00 0.00 214.017 215.374 216.73 218.296 219.757 221.009 221.948 221.948 220.696 217.983 213.913 207.652 199.20 189.391 176.87 162.574 147.13

Page 292: 6.5 LW Red-line of Lighting Report

Archer Forward: Campus Preservation and Improvement Plan - Lighting Analysis, Appendix Page 121

The Archer School for Girls July 2013

131.27 114.991 99.443 84.417 70.643 58.33 46.957 37.252 28.904 21.809 15.861 11.061 7.20 4.383 2.296 1.043 0.313 0.104 0.00 0.00 214.017 215.27 216.626 217.983 219.339 220.487 221.426 221.322 220.07 217.67 213.183 207.13 199.096 188.765 176.557 161.843 146.504 130.435 114.47 98.609 83.583 69.809 56.974 45.913 36.209 27.861 20.87 15.026 10.33 6.678 3.965 2.087 1.043 0.417 0.104 0.104 0.00 214.017 215.165 216.417 217.67 218.922 220.278 220.80 220.487 219.339 216.73 212.243 206.296 198.052 187.409 174.887 161.113 145.148 129.287 113.113 97.565 82.539 68.452 55.826 44.765 35.061 26.817 19.826 14.191 9.704 6.157 3.652 1.983 0.939 0.417 0.104 0.00 0.00 214.017 215.061 216.209 217.252 218.40 219.548 219.861 219.652 218.191 215.27 211.20 204.626 195.965 185.113 172.591 158.504 143.687 127.617 111.548 95.791 81.078 67.304 54.887 43.826 34.226 25.983 19.096 13.565 9.287 5.843 3.443 1.983 0.939 0.417 0.209 0.00 0.00 214.017 214.957 216.00 216.939 218.191 218.817 218.922 218.504 216.626 213.913 209.113 202.226 193.043 182.191 169.461 155.687 140.765 125.53 109.983 94.435 79.826 66.157 53.948 43.20 33.60 25.461 18.783 13.252 8.974 5.739 3.339 1.878 0.835 0.313 0.104 0.00 0.00 214.017 214.852 215.791 216.522 217.565 217.983 217.774 217.043 214.957 211.826 206.504 198.991 189.809 178.539 165.913 152.243 137.426 122.609 107.374 92.661 78.365 65.322 53.426 42.678 33.183 25.252 18.678 13.252 8.87 5.635 3.339 1.774 0.939 0.313 0.104 0.00 0.00 214.017 214.748 215.583 216.209 217.043 217.148 216.939 215.478 213.078 209.426 203.583 195.652 186.157 174.574 162.052 148.07 133.774 118.748 104.452 90.365 77.009 64.383 52.696 42.157 33.078 25.252 18.678 13.357 8.974 5.739 3.443 1.774 0.939 0.313 0.104 0.00 0.00 214.017 214.643 215.27 215.791 216.417 216.209 215.687 213.913 211.409 206.922 200.348 192.209 181.983 170.504 157.878 143.896 129.809 115.20 101.113 87.443 74.609 62.817 51.757 41.53 32.765 25.043 18.678 13.357 9.183 5.843 3.548 1.878 0.939 0.313 0.104 0.00 0.00 214.017 214.539 215.061 215.374 215.791 215.374 214.435 212.348 209.426 204.313 197.322 188.661 178.122 166.435 153.391 139.93 125.53 111.548 97.565 84.417 72.104 60.522 49.878 40.278 31.93 24.626 18.365 13.148 9.078 5.843 3.548 1.878 0.939 0.313 0.209 0.00 0.00 214.017 214.435 214.748 214.957 215.165 214.539 213.287 210.887 207.443 201.913 194.40 185.426 174.574 162.678 149.53 136.07 121.878 108.209 94.539 81.704 69.60 58.33 47.896 38.609 30.574 23.583 17.739 12.73 8.87 5.739 3.443 1.878 0.939 0.313 0.104 0.00 0.00 214.017 214.226 214.539 214.643 214.643 213.704 212.243 209.53 205.774 199.826 191.896 182.609 171.548 159.548 146.296 132.835 118.852 105.287 91.722 79.20 67.304 56.243 46.017 37.043 29.322 22.539 16.904 12.209 8.557 5.53 3.339 1.774 0.835 0.313 0.104 0.00 0.00

Page 293: 6.5 LW Red-line of Lighting Report

Archer Forward: Campus Preservation and Improvement Plan - Lighting Analysis, Appendix Page 122

The Archer School for Girls July 2013

214.017 214.122 214.226 214.226 214.017 212.974 211.304 208.278 204.209 198.052 190.017 180.417 169.148 157.043 143.896 130.435 116.452 102.991 89.739 77.322 65.53 54.678 44.661 35.896 28.278 21.809 16.383 11.791 8.243 5.322 3.235 1.774 0.939 0.313 0.104 0.00 0.00 214.017 214.017 214.017 213.913 213.496 212.452 210.47 207.443 203.061 196.591 188.452 178.643 167.478 155.165 142.122 128.661 114.887 101.426 88.383 75.965 64.383 53.53 43.722 35.165 27.652 21.287 15.965 11.583 8.035 5.217 3.235 1.774 0.835 0.417 0.104 0.00 0.00 214.017 213.913 213.704 213.391 212.974 211.722 209.739 206.504 202.122 195.757 187.513 177.809 166.539 154.435 141.287 127.93 114.052 100.80 87.652 75.443 63.861 53.217 43.409 34.852 27.443 21.078 15.861 11.478 7.93 5.217 3.13 1.67 0.835 0.313 0.104 0.00 0.00 214.017 213.809 213.496 213.078 212.557 211.096 209.113 205.774 201.496 195.026 186.783 177.183 165.913 153.913 140.87 127.617 113.843 100.487 87.339 75.235 63.757 53.113 43.304 34.852 27.443 21.078 15.757 11.374 7.93 5.113 3.13 1.67 0.835 0.313 0.104 0.00 0.00 214.017 213.704 213.287 212.765 212.139 210.574 208.591 205.252 200.974 194.609 186.574 176.974 165.809 153.913 140.87 127.617 113.739 100.487 87.443 75.235 63.757 53.217 43.304 34.643 27.13 20.765 15.443 11.061 7.617 4.904 2.922 1.565 0.73 0.209 0.104 0.00 0.00 214.017 213.496 213.078 212.452 211.722 210.157 208.07 204.73 200.557 194.40 186.365 176.87 165.809 153.913 140.974 127.722 113.948 100.591 87.548 75.13 63.339 52.591 42.678 33.913 26.504 20.139 14.817 10.539 7.20 4.591 2.713 1.357 0.73 0.209 0.104 0.00 0.00 214.017 213.391 212.87 212.139 211.304 209.739 207.652 204.313 200.139 194.087 186.157 176.87 165.913 154.017 141.391 127.826 114.157 100.07 86.817 73.983 62.296 51.443 41.739 33.078 25.565 19.304 14.191 10.017 6.678 4.278 2.504 1.252 0.73 0.209 0.104 0.00 0.00 214.017 213.287 212.661 211.826 210.887 209.217 207.13 203.791 199.304 193.67 186.157 176.87 166.226 154.017 141.183 127.20 113.217 98.922 85.461 72.522 60.73 50.087 40.487 31.93 24.626 18.574 13.461 9.496 6.261 3.965 2.296 1.252 0.626 0.209 0.104 0.00 0.00 214.017 213.287 212.452 211.513 210.47 208.80 206.40 203.27 198.783 193.252 185.843 176.661 166.017 153.60 140.243 126.261 111.757 97.67 84.00 71.27 59.478 48.835 39.339 31.096 23.896 18.052 13.148 9.183 6.157 3.861 2.191 1.252 0.626 0.209 0.104 0.00 0.00 214.017 213.183 212.243 211.20 210.157 208.383 205.774 202.643 198.157 192.626 185.322 176.243 165.287 152.87 138.887 124.904 110.504 96.522 82.957 70.122 58.539 48.00 38.609 30.47 23.583 17.739 13.043 9.183 6.157 3.965 2.296 1.252 0.522 0.209 0.104 0.00 0.00 214.017 213.078 212.139 210.887 209.53 207.861 205.148 201.913 197.426 191.478 184.383 175.304 164.243 151.409 138.157 123.965 109.67 95.687 82.435 69.704 58.226 47.791 38.713 30.678 23.791 17.948 13.148 9.391 6.365 4.07 2.296 1.252 0.522 0.209 0.104 0.00 0.00

Page 294: 6.5 LW Red-line of Lighting Report

Archer Forward: Campus Preservation and Improvement Plan - Lighting Analysis, Appendix Page 123

The Archer School for Girls July 2013

214.017 212.974 211.93 210.678 209.113 207.339 204.626 200.974 196.487 190.435 182.922 173.843 162.574 150.47 137.113 123.339 109.357 95.791 82.435 70.226 58.957 48.626 39.339 31.304 24.522 18.678 13.67 9.704 6.678 4.174 2.40 1.252 0.522 0.209 0.00 0.00 0.00 214.017 212.974 211.826 210.47 208.696 206.609 204.00 200.243 195.339 189.287 181.565 171.652 161.113 149.113 136.278 123.026 109.357 96.00 83.27 71.374 60.00 49.774 40.591 32.557 25.461 19.617 14.504 10.33 7.096 4.487 2.504 1.252 0.522 0.104 0.00 0.00 0.00 214.017 212.87 211.722 210.261 208.383 206.087 203.374 199.409 194.296 188.035 179.687 169.983 159.339 147.652 135.548 122.609 109.565 96.939 84.626 72.417 61.461 51.235 41.948 33.913 26.713 20.557 15.443 11.165 7.617 4.80 2.817 1.252 0.522 0.104 0.104 0.00 0.00 214.017 212.87 211.513 210.052 208.07 205.67 202.435 198.574 193.357 186.678 178.017 168.417 157.67 146.40 134.296 122.191 109.878 97.67 85.252 73.878 62.817 52.591 43.513 35.061 27.861 21.60 16.174 11.687 8.139 5.217 2.922 1.357 0.417 0.209 0.104 0.00 0.00 214.017 212.765 211.409 209.843 207.861 205.252 201.913 197.635 192.209 185.426 176.661 167.061 156.313 145.252 133.461 121.565 109.67 97.565 85.983 74.609 63.757 53.739 44.452 36.104 28.696 22.226 16.80 12.209 8.348 5.322 3.026 1.357 0.522 0.104 0.104 0.00 0.00 214.017 212.765 211.304 209.739 207.652 204.939 201.496 197.009 191.478 183.965 175.304 165.704 155.374 144.209 132.73 121.148 109.252 97.357 85.878 74.609 64.07 54.052 44.974 36.522 29.217 22.852 17.217 12.417 8.557 5.426 3.026 1.357 0.417 0.104 0.104 0.00 0.00 214.017 212.765 211.304 209.635 207.443 204.73 201.183 196.487 190.852 183.13 174.47 164.661 154.435 143.27 132.104 120.73 108.73 97.252 85.565 74.504 63.861 53.948 44.765 36.522 29.217 22.852 17.217 12.522 8.557 5.426 3.026 1.357 0.417 0.104 0.104 0.00 0.00 214.017 212.661 211.304 209.53 207.339 204.522 200.87 196.174 190.435 182.609 173.843 164.139 153.913 142.852 131.791 120.417 108.417 96.939 85.252 74.40 63.652 53.843 44.557 36.417 29.113 22.643 17.113 12.313 8.557 5.426 3.026 1.252 0.417 0.104 0.104 0.00 0.00 214.017 212.661 211.20 209.53 207.339 204.522 200.87 196.07 190.33 182.40 173.739 163.93 153.704 142.643 131.583 120.313 108.417 96.939 85.252 74.296 63.548 53.739 44.452 36.313 29.113 22.539 17.113 12.313 8.452 5.322 3.026 1.252 0.417 0.104 0.104 0.00 0.00

Page 295: 6.5 LW Red-line of Lighting Report

Archer Forward: Campus Preservation and Improvement Plan - Lighting Analysis, Appendix Page 124

The Archer School for Girls July 2013

2.11 FIXTURE TYPE SD-1, SD-2 BEGA- 2277P: RECESSED WALL LUMINAIRES WITH SHIELD

IESNA:LM-63-1995 [TEST] BE2990 [DATE] 9/9/2009 [MANUFAC] BEGA-US [LUMCAT] 2277P [LUMINAIRE] RECESSED WALL LUMINAIRES WITH SHIELDED LIGHT [MORE] DISTRIBUTION [LAMPCAT] (1) 42W CF TRIPLE-4P TILT=NONE 1 3200 3.2 73 37 1 2 0.17 0.065 0 1 1 46 0 2.5 5 7.5 10 12.5 15 17.5 20 22.5 25 27.5 30 32.5 35 37.5 40 42.5 45 47.5 50 52.5 55 57.5 60 62.5 65 67.5 70 72.5 75 77.5 80 82.5 85 87.5 90 92.5 95 97.5 100 102.5 105 107.5 110 112.5 115 117.5 120 122.5 125 127.5 130 132.5 135 137.5 140 142.5 145 147.5 150 152.5 155 157.5 160 162.5 165 167.5 170 172.5 175 177.5 180 0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50 55 60 65 70 75 80 85 90 95 100 105 110 115 120 125 130 135 140 145 150 155 160 165 170 175 180 0.00 0.00 1.60 7.33 18.21 29.17 42.88 55.56 64.61 71.21 75.37 76.79 75.91 73.20 69.53 65.37 61.63 57.96 54.45 50.82 47.31 43.80 40.47 37.23 33.87 30.74 27.53 24.55 21.50 18.67 15.88 13.29 10.84 8.55 6.64 5.15 4.28 3.86 3.67 3.48 3.14 2.84 2.57 2.27 2.04 1.82 1.59 1.44 1.25 1.14 0.98 0.91 0.79 0.68 0.61 0.53 0.49 0.45 0.38 0.34 0.30 0.26 0.23 0.19 0.15 0.11 0.11 0.08 0.08 0.04 0.04 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 1.58 7.24 18.04 28.92 42.53 55.17 64.23 70.84 75.04 76.49 75.65 72.95 69.33 65.15 61.39 57.69 54.15 50.53 46.99 43.47 40.13 36.87 33.52 30.36 27.19 24.16 21.09 18.29 15.58 13.01 10.61 8.38 6.49 5.08 4.20 3.82 3.63 3.40 3.12 2.83 2.53 2.27 2.04 1.78 1.59 1.41 1.24 1.11 0.98 0.88 0.79 0.69 0.62 0.54 0.49 0.43 0.38 0.34 0.30 0.25 0.23 0.19 0.15 0.12 0.11 0.08 0.07 0.04 0.04 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 1.49 6.95 17.52 28.16 41.49 54.02 63.10 69.74 74.01 75.54 74.82 72.22 68.63 64.43 60.62 56.91 53.36 49.72 46.20 42.56 39.18 35.94 32.75 29.58 26.56 23.51 20.63 17.70 15.05 12.51 10.13 8.04 6.23 4.87 4.05 3.71 3.50 3.32 3.00 2.74 2.45 2.19 1.96 1.74 1.53 1.37 1.21 1.08 0.96 0.86 0.77 0.67 0.60 0.53 0.47 0.42 0.37 0.33 0.29 0.24 0.22 0.18 0.15 0.14 0.11 0.07 0.07 0.04 0.04 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 1.36 6.50 16.66 26.94 39.77 52.09 61.21 67.84 72.23 73.82 73.28 70.91 67.47 63.40 59.34 55.55 51.92 48.44 44.94 41.61 38.22 35.01 31.84 28.63 25.50 22.55 19.68 16.97 14.34 11.90 9.64 7.55 5.85 4.57 3.85 3.52 3.35 3.13 2.88 2.58 2.32 2.07 1.87 1.65 1.46 1.31 1.16 1.03 0.92 0.81 0.73 0.66 0.58 0.53 0.46 0.40 0.36 0.32 0.28 0.24 0.22 0.18 0.15 0.14 0.11 0.07 0.06 0.04 0.04 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 1.19 5.91 15.47 25.28 37.39 49.38 58.69 65.06 69.49 71.71 71.30 69.30 65.77 61.83 57.79 54.21 50.71 47.27 43.82 40.34

Page 296: 6.5 LW Red-line of Lighting Report

Archer Forward: Campus Preservation and Improvement Plan - Lighting Analysis, Appendix Page 125

The Archer School for Girls July 2013

37.00 33.63 30.47 27.43 24.44 21.50 18.76 16.10 13.57 11.18 8.95 7.04 5.38 4.23 3.60 3.32 3.15 2.95 2.67 2.44 2.18 1.93 1.72 1.54 1.37 1.22 1.09 0.95 0.87 0.76 0.69 0.61 0.54 0.50 0.43 0.40 0.36 0.31 0.27 0.24 0.22 0.17 0.16 0.14 0.10 0.07 0.05 0.04 0.04 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.99 5.20 13.98 23.27 33.91 45.56 55.15 61.69 66.22 68.84 68.63 67.02 64.15 60.66 56.67 52.86 49.35 45.82 42.38 38.89 35.52 32.36 29.23 26.20 23.31 20.52 17.81 15.18 12.66 10.36 8.29 6.42 4.89 3.88 3.34 3.08 2.92 2.70 2.45 2.21 1.99 1.79 1.56 1.40 1.25 1.12 0.99 0.87 0.80 0.71 0.64 0.57 0.50 0.46 0.41 0.37 0.34 0.30 0.25 0.22 0.21 0.16 0.14 0.12 0.09 0.06 0.05 0.04 0.03 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.76 4.40 11.59 21.27 30.40 41.49 50.95 57.64 62.14 64.97 66.02 64.84 62.44 59.15 55.27 51.43 47.77 44.23 40.77 37.44 34.21 31.00 27.94 25.00 22.14 19.39 16.73 14.13 11.73 9.54 7.55 5.77 4.36 3.46 3.02 2.80 2.63 2.41 2.20 1.98 1.77 1.59 1.42 1.25 1.12 1.00 0.90 0.81 0.73 0.64 0.58 0.53 0.48 0.43 0.38 0.35 0.32 0.28 0.24 0.22 0.19 0.15 0.13 0.11 0.08 0.06 0.04 0.04 0.03 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.54 3.68 9.66 18.62 26.70 36.83 45.97 52.79 57.66 60.75 62.59 62.26 60.17 57.17 53.62 49.72 45.97 42.51 39.18 35.91 32.66 29.59 26.61 23.71 20.91 18.20 15.54 13.04 10.78 8.65 6.73 5.09 3.79 3.04 2.68 2.49 2.33 2.15 1.94 1.73 1.55 1.39 1.24 1.12 0.98 0.87 0.80 0.72 0.64 0.58 0.53 0.47 0.42 0.39 0.35 0.32 0.30 0.25 0.22 0.21 0.17 0.15 0.12 0.10 0.07 0.06 0.04 0.04 0.03 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.33 2.84 7.72 15.65 22.90 31.06 40.13 47.25 52.45 56.09 57.95 58.52 57.25 54.72 51.45 47.88 44.15 40.68 37.37 34.13 31.03 28.02 25.13 22.30 19.52 16.85 14.29 11.95 9.74 7.69 5.88 4.31 3.22 2.59 2.30 2.13 1.97 1.81 1.65 1.47 1.31 1.16 1.04 0.95 0.85 0.76 0.68 0.63 0.56 0.53 0.47 0.42 0.38 0.35 0.31 0.29 0.26 0.22 0.21 0.18 0.16 0.15 0.12 0.09 0.07 0.07 0.04 0.04 0.02 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.47 2.04 5.85 12.48 19.36 25.74 33.89 40.95 46.50 50.40 52.76 53.55 53.22 51.51 48.85 45.67 42.18 38.64 35.33 32.24 29.24 26.34 23.50 20.72 18.02 15.41 13.04 10.79 8.65 6.69 4.97 3.53 2.68 2.15 1.92 1.77 1.63 1.49 1.35 1.21 1.09 0.98 0.88 0.80 0.70 0.64 0.58 0.52 0.46 0.43 0.40 0.36 0.34 0.30 0.28 0.25 0.23 0.21 0.18 0.16 0.15 0.12 0.10 0.09 0.08 0.06 0.04 0.04 0.01 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.29 1.32 4.13 8.74 15.28 21.06 26.71 33.97 39.64 43.65 46.36 47.94 48.09 47.25 45.43 42.93 39.88 36.68 33.35 30.28 27.41 24.60 21.83 19.15 16.51 14.06 11.79 9.61 7.58 5.69 4.10 2.79 2.16 1.73 1.53 1.43 1.32 1.19 1.09 0.98 0.87 0.78 0.72 0.65 0.60 0.53 0.49 0.46 0.43 0.37 0.34 0.31 0.28 0.26 0.23 0.22 0.19 0.17 0.15 0.14 0.12 0.10 0.10 0.07 0.07 0.04 0.03 0.04 0.01 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.13 0.72 2.75 5.95 10.51 16.15 20.68 25.72 31.69 36.16 39.03 40.87 41.83 41.68 40.66 38.96 36.59 33.97 31.09 28.12 25.30 22.59 19.95 17.38 14.94 12.65 10.48 8.44 6.52 4.73 3.17 2.10 1.63 1.29 1.15 1.10 1.02 0.89 0.80 0.73 0.67 0.61 0.54 0.50 0.46 0.44 0.41 0.38 0.33 0.31 0.28 0.27 0.25 0.22 0.20 0.19 0.16 0.15 0.13 0.13 0.10 0.08 0.08 0.06 0.05 0.04 0.04 0.03 0.00 0.00 0.00

Page 297: 6.5 LW Red-line of Lighting Report

Archer Forward: Campus Preservation and Improvement Plan - Lighting Analysis, Appendix Page 126

The Archer School for Girls July 2013

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.59 1.53 3.71 6.70 10.62 15.33 19.29 22.74 26.60 30.80 33.17 34.24 34.60 34.26 33.26 31.77 29.86 27.66 25.24 22.67 20.11 17.67 15.33 13.13 11.06 9.06 7.16 5.37 3.82 2.44 1.55 1.18 0.92 0.87 0.80 0.73 0.67 0.61 0.56 0.52 0.47 0.43 0.39 0.37 0.34 0.32 0.30 0.27 0.25 0.23 0.22 0.20 0.19 0.19 0.17 0.15 0.14 0.13 0.10 0.08 0.08 0.06 0.04 0.04 0.04 0.04 0.01 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.26 0.63 1.90 3.72 6.20 9.24 12.97 15.96 18.36 20.92 23.29 25.63 26.56 26.74 26.24 25.36 24.11 22.70 21.00 19.08 17.00 14.82 12.80 10.95 9.15 7.42 5.80 4.26 2.93 1.75 1.05 0.84 0.63 0.57 0.53 0.50 0.48 0.45 0.39 0.36 0.35 0.33 0.29 0.28 0.28 0.26 0.24 0.20 0.18 0.19 0.18 0.17 0.16 0.14 0.13 0.12 0.10 0.09 0.08 0.08 0.07 0.04 0.04 0.04 0.04 0.03 0.01 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.02 0.38 0.66 1.63 2.98 4.67 6.68 8.87 11.36 13.21 14.76 16.05 17.12 17.77 18.00 17.87 17.27 16.38 15.25 13.90 12.48 10.94 9.47 8.10 6.75 5.44 4.22 3.06 2.07 1.22 0.72 0.55 0.41 0.38 0.37 0.35 0.32 0.29 0.28 0.26 0.25 0.23 0.21 0.20 0.19 0.18 0.18 0.16 0.14 0.13 0.13 0.12 0.11 0.10 0.09 0.08 0.08 0.07 0.07 0.06 0.04 0.03 0.04 0.04 0.03 0.01 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.02 0.29 0.35 0.89 1.63 2.56 3.68 4.86 6.05 7.14 8.07 8.91 9.35 9.65 9.76 9.68 9.47 8.93 8.20 7.40 6.50 5.65 4.87 4.10 3.32 2.57 1.88 1.27 0.75 0.46 0.36 0.29 0.28 0.26 0.24 0.22 0.20 0.19 0.18 0.17 0.16 0.15 0.14 0.13 0.12 0.11 0.11 0.11 0.10 0.08 0.08 0.08 0.07 0.06 0.05 0.06 0.06 0.05 0.05 0.04 0.04 0.03 0.03 0.01 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.04 0.20 0.39 0.37 0.68 1.05 1.47 1.90 2.32 2.71 3.15 3.39 3.51 3.57 3.54 3.40 3.14 2.86 2.54 2.26 1.97 1.67 1.39 1.10 0.81 0.57 0.38 0.25 0.19 0.16 0.17 0.15 0.13 0.12 0.11 0.11 0.11 0.09 0.09 0.08 0.08 0.08 0.07 0.07 0.07 0.06 0.06 0.06 0.05 0.04 0.03 0.04 0.04 0.04 0.04 0.03 0.03 0.02 0.01 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.02 0.08 0.14 0.19 0.25 0.31 0.36 0.39 0.32 0.33 0.33 0.31 0.28 0.26 0.25 0.22 0.19 0.16 0.14 0.11 0.09 0.08 0.08 0.07 0.06 0.06 0.06 0.06 0.06 0.04 0.04 0.05 0.05 0.04 0.03 0.03 0.03 0.03 0.03 0.02 0.02 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00

Page 298: 6.5 LW Red-line of Lighting Report

Archer Forward: Campus Preservation and Improvement Plan - Lighting Analysis, Appendix Page 127

The Archer School for Girls July 2013

2.12 FIXTURE TYPE SD-3 BEGA- 3042P: RECESSED WALL LUMINAIRES

IESNA:LM-63-1995 [TEST] BE2118 [DATE] 07-28-00 [MANUFAC] BEGA-US [LUMCAT] 3042P [LUMINAIRE] RECESSED WALL LUMINAIRE WITH STEPPED BAFFLE AND ASYMMETRICAL REFLECTOR [LAMP] (1) 18W CF QUAD-4P TILT=NONE 1 1250 .8 73 37 1 2 0.18 0.0001 0.055 1 1 18 0.00 2.50 5.00 7.50 10.00 12.50 15.00 17.50 20.00 22.50 25.00 27.50 30.00 32.50 35.00 37.50 40.00 42.50 45.00 47.50 50.00 52.50 55.00 57.50 60.00 62.50 65.00 67.50 70.00 72.50 75.00 77.50 80.00 82.50 85.00 87.50 90.00 92.50 95.00 97.50 100.00 102.50 105.00 107.50 110.00 112.50 115.00 117.50 120.00 122.50 125.00 127.50 130.00 132.50 135.00 137.50 140.00 142.50 145.00 147.50 150.00 152.50 155.00 157.50 160.00 162.50 165.00 167.50 170.00 172.50 175.00 177.50 180.00 0.00 5.00 10.00 15.00 20.00 25.00 30.00 35.00 40.00 45.00 50.00 55.00 60.00 65.00 70.00 75.00 80.00 85.00 90.00 95.00 100.00 105.00 110.00 115.00 120.00 125.00 130.00 135.00 140.00 145.00 150.00 155.00 160.00 165.00 170.00 175.00 180.00 0.00 0.08 0.23 0.30 0.68 1.37 2.89 5.09 8.36 43.90 82.66 97.86 192.10 206.60 221.80 256.30 290.40 306.30 307.50 322.10 349.80 373.40 391.30 381.90 373.80 354.00 341.10 320.00 298.30 214.70 182.60 113.80 94.02 86.04 80.65 66.28 19.46 9.68 6.73 5.11 4.30 3.95 3.68 3.41 2.96 2.47 1.79 1.35 0.90 0.90 0.67 0.45 0.45 0.45 0.22 0.22 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.22 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.09 0.09 0.09 0.09 0.09 0.09 0.09 0.09 0.00 0.00 0.08 0.23 0.30 0.68 1.35 2.84 5.01 7.75 42.80 81.39 94.66 187.90 203.50 218.30 251.80 284.00 300.20 300.20 314.20 342.00 366.00 384.10 376.60 366.10 349.20 329.60 318.30 244.30 213.50 176.50 118.50 94.87 86.64 82.46 69.15 19.57 8.98 6.61 5.25 4.44 4.04 3.71 3.32 2.96 2.39 1.91 1.26 0.97 0.72 0.66 0.56 0.44 0.45 0.43 0.21 0.09 0.21 0.08 0.04 0.00 0.07 0.00 0.00 0.10 0.09 0.09 0.09 0.09 0.09 0.09 0.09 0.00 0.00 0.07 0.22 0.29 0.65 1.29 2.71 4.74 6.11 39.54 77.46 89.00 176.60 198.10 210.50 241.50 270.40 284.60 283.30 294.80 321.30 345.90 361.70 361.90 351.10 332.90 322.20 296.10 281.00 205.60 183.40 119.90 96.42 88.95 84.96 71.64 19.79 8.40 6.31 5.28 4.67 4.15 3.73 3.33 2.72 2.30 1.74 1.22 0.92 0.71 0.66 0.58 0.43 0.45 0.42 0.29 0.15 0.05 0.10 0.00 0.03 0.11 0.00 0.00 0.13 0.08 0.09 0.09 0.09 0.09 0.09 0.09 0.00 0.00 0.07 0.22 0.27 0.61 1.22 2.50 4.35 3.92 34.11 70.92 77.99 154.20 190.60 202.50 222.10 255.10 268.70 268.50 268.70 291.90 317.80 338.80 338.90 338.00 321.00 305.70 280.60 269.70 198.50 181.00 122.40 100.30 92.58 88.17 74.56 20.02 7.65 5.88 5.04 4.51

Page 299: 6.5 LW Red-line of Lighting Report

Archer Forward: Campus Preservation and Improvement Plan - Lighting Analysis, Appendix Page 128

The Archer School for Girls July 2013

4.01 3.53 3.00 2.61 2.06 1.53 1.17 0.80 0.64 0.55 0.45 0.45 0.46 0.36 0.25 0.08 0.08 0.10 0.14 0.17 0.08 0.00 0.04 0.14 0.08 0.09 0.09 0.09 0.09 0.09 0.09 0.00 0.00 0.07 0.21 0.21 0.55 1.11 2.24 3.86 6.41 20.74 61.21 87.74 122.50 186.70 193.40 205.70 238.80 255.50 254.70 251.10 263.80 288.90 308.80 319.90 320.40 307.60 294.60 271.90 279.90 216.80 176.60 127.60 100.80 94.81 91.02 73.87 19.99 5.94 5.10 4.40 3.84 3.47 3.13 2.71 2.27 1.78 1.37 1.02 0.76 0.64 0.47 0.44 0.45 0.41 0.29 0.21 0.22 0.11 0.12 0.25 0.12 0.01 0.07 0.12 0.13 0.09 0.09 0.09 0.09 0.09 0.09 0.09 0.00 0.00 0.07 0.20 0.19 0.48 0.97 1.92 3.43 5.45 11.05 51.59 76.81 140.10 176.00 186.80 199.10 217.50 245.90 251.00 241.50 245.80 262.90 284.40 304.80 305.30 298.90 281.00 266.00 259.50 198.40 167.20 132.90 90.03 90.74 88.64 74.11 18.61 5.19 4.08 3.54 3.11 2.88 2.60 2.23 1.99 1.46 1.18 0.95 0.64 0.55 0.46 0.44 0.45 0.41 0.20 0.12 0.23 0.06 0.12 0.18 0.00 0.04 0.12 0.13 0.18 0.10 0.09 0.09 0.09 0.09 0.09 0.08 0.00 0.00 0.06 0.17 0.17 0.39 0.89 1.60 2.85 4.41 3.37 38.15 70.16 97.51 170.00 181.80 191.90 209.50 233.40 247.60 243.70 235.90 247.30 266.70 286.70 291.70 288.00 269.70 262.00 250.10 182.60 143.10 130.70 79.43 79.22 76.14 67.31 16.05 4.76 3.39 2.75 2.47 2.29 2.02 1.85 1.61 1.27 0.91 0.74 0.67 0.58 0.44 0.46 0.42 0.30 0.24 0.12 0.15 0.00 0.01 0.08 0.09 0.12 0.12 0.13 0.18 0.09 0.09 0.09 0.09 0.09 0.08 0.08 0.00 0.00 0.06 0.16 0.22 0.31 0.74 1.28 2.26 3.40 5.24 11.21 55.55 68.64 112.60 180.40 187.40 195.60 217.70 241.30 244.00 233.10 228.20 244.10 256.40 268.50 262.70 253.20 238.30 231.60 215.00 135.50 117.50 75.96 60.81 60.90 52.78 12.56 4.13 2.74 2.25 2.02 1.93 1.69 1.52 1.27 1.06 0.70 0.61 0.56 0.46 0.43 0.35 0.28 0.21 0.12 0.13 0.24 0.20 0.12 0.04 0.01 0.09 0.09 0.11 0.14 0.08 0.09 0.09 0.09 0.09 0.08 0.08 0.00 0.00 0.05 0.15 0.21 0.24 0.59 1.00 1.71 2.63 3.63 0.96 20.43 63.49 69.92 113.20 181.50 189.70 199.70 214.20 223.30 216.30 194.50 186.00 188.50 192.50 189.80 179.40 171.30 161.80 165.10 121.90 63.95 38.05 31.22 28.41 24.56 7.44 3.10 2.11 1.85 1.69 1.59 1.48 1.30 1.04 0.84 0.68 0.59 0.47 0.45 0.37 0.32 0.18 0.11 0.21 0.12 0.12 0.10 0.12 0.01 0.00 0.11 0.09 0.09 0.09 0.09 0.09 0.09 0.09 0.09 0.08 0.07 0.00 0.00 0.05 0.12 0.20 0.19 0.45 0.81 1.25 1.91 2.72 3.49 2.76 21.62 53.25 63.71 120.70 153.30 155.60 165.00 165.10 162.60 144.60 125.50 111.50 108.10 104.30 101.40 93.15 92.16 90.50 78.63 30.98 11.00 5.29 4.19 3.50 2.47 2.09 1.82 1.62 1.56 1.36 1.25 1.11 0.96 0.77 0.60 0.46 0.45 0.37 0.23 0.18 0.01 0.03 0.11 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.08 0.00 0.12 0.14 0.09 0.09 0.09 0.09 0.09 0.09 0.09 0.09 0.06 0.07 0.00 0.00 0.04 0.10 0.18 0.19 0.32 0.59 0.92 1.36 1.87 2.52 2.94 7.32 14.75 21.31 37.08 62.17 69.95 74.01 71.92 74.98 69.08 63.25 52.06 46.80 45.57 41.94 42.04 45.88 44.93 35.91 9.82 0.00 3.01 2.63 2.24 1.86 1.57 1.36 1.24 1.33 1.34 1.21 1.10 0.94 0.73 0.60 0.46 0.37 0.23 0.18 0.14 0.03 0.10 0.05 0.20 0.18 0.20 0.20 0.13 0.10 0.09 0.09 0.08 0.09 0.09 0.09 0.09 0.09 0.09 0.05 0.07 0.00

Page 300: 6.5 LW Red-line of Lighting Report

Archer Forward: Campus Preservation and Improvement Plan - Lighting Analysis, Appendix Page 129

The Archer School for Girls July 2013

0.00 0.04 0.09 0.17 0.24 0.24 0.41 0.64 0.92 1.28 1.74 2.30 1.92 4.05 3.25 6.04 1.49 6.31 7.15 5.92 11.05 7.45 10.22 11.33 6.94 8.37 9.66 7.41 6.37 7.49 7.93 10.10 5.09 1.81 1.77 1.45 1.34 1.28 1.23 1.15 1.18 1.30 1.35 1.23 0.95 0.69 0.42 0.31 0.20 0.19 0.12 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.02 0.14 0.12 0.11 0.10 0.13 0.09 0.09 0.09 0.09 0.09 0.09 0.09 0.08 0.05 0.06 0.00 0.00 0.03 0.08 0.12 0.23 0.26 0.29 0.43 0.61 0.86 1.16 1.58 2.12 2.72 3.31 4.01 4.35 4.53 4.64 4.29 4.30 4.21 3.95 3.79 3.65 3.52 3.38 3.16 2.95 2.72 2.45 2.16 1.92 1.63 1.29 1.10 1.03 1.10 1.17 1.25 1.37 1.53 1.44 1.22 0.79 0.49 0.46 0.32 0.16 0.08 0.00 0.00 0.11 0.13 0.12 0.13 0.17 0.18 0.13 0.10 0.13 0.10 0.09 0.09 0.09 0.09 0.09 0.09 0.09 0.06 0.05 0.04 0.00 0.00 0.03 0.06 0.10 0.19 0.24 0.22 0.29 0.36 0.53 0.72 1.00 1.39 1.88 2.50 3.23 3.82 4.24 4.42 4.44 4.20 3.90 3.63 3.36 2.97 2.70 2.56 2.42 2.29 2.10 1.87 1.62 1.29 1.10 1.04 0.97 0.93 1.18 1.41 1.62 1.72 1.72 1.42 0.80 0.45 0.26 0.14 0.11 0.07 0.14 0.13 0.15 0.16 0.10 0.08 0.09 0.10 0.09 0.08 0.09 0.09 0.08 0.09 0.09 0.09 0.09 0.09 0.09 0.09 0.05 0.05 0.04 0.00 0.00 0.02 0.06 0.08 0.11 0.19 0.20 0.22 0.20 0.27 0.39 0.53 0.72 1.01 1.45 1.87 2.37 2.77 3.18 3.31 3.14 2.95 2.65 2.35 2.08 1.86 1.72 1.61 1.53 1.41 1.28 1.15 1.03 0.90 0.78 0.78 0.87 1.20 1.44 1.66 1.59 1.15 0.76 0.36 0.17 0.12 0.09 0.13 0.13 0.08 0.09 0.14 0.13 0.09 0.08 0.09 0.09 0.09 0.09 0.09 0.09 0.09 0.09 0.09 0.09 0.09 0.09 0.09 0.09 0.05 0.05 0.04 0.00 0.00 0.02 0.05 0.06 0.08 0.10 0.14 0.15 0.16 0.19 0.21 0.26 0.33 0.42 0.53 0.70 0.82 0.96 1.04 1.12 1.17 1.20 1.23 1.19 1.07 1.01 0.98 0.90 0.87 0.81 0.73 0.67 0.60 0.53 0.45 0.41 0.41 0.56 0.62 0.55 0.45 0.28 0.17 0.10 0.08 0.11 0.10 0.10 0.09 0.08 0.09 0.12 0.12 0.09 0.09 0.09 0.09 0.09 0.09 0.09 0.09 0.09 0.09 0.09 0.09 0.08 0.07 0.09 0.09 0.05 0.05 0.03 0.00 0.00 0.02 0.05 0.05 0.06 0.07 0.08 0.08 0.06 0.11 0.15 0.16 0.15 0.17 0.20 0.20 0.17 0.22 0.29 0.34 0.37 0.40 0.42 0.44 0.47 0.49 0.48 0.45 0.40 0.37 0.34 0.31 0.28 0.26 0.25 0.21 0.17 0.17 0.16 0.14 0.12 0.09 0.08 0.08 0.08 0.08 0.09 0.09 0.09 0.09 0.09 0.09 0.09 0.09 0.09 0.09 0.09 0.09 0.09 0.09 0.09 0.09 0.08 0.09 0.09 0.06 0.05 0.08 0.08 0.06 0.09 0.03 0.00 0.00 0.01 0.04 0.07 0.08 0.08 0.05 0.05 0.03 0.04 0.07 0.05 0.00 0.01 0.05 0.07 0.09 0.10 0.10 0.09 0.09 0.12 0.15 0.15 0.13 0.13 0.14 0.13 0.10 0.12 0.16 0.15 0.12 0.12 0.13 0.11 0.08 0.08 0.08 0.08 0.08 0.08 0.08 0.08 0.08 0.08 0.09 0.09 0.09 0.09 0.09 0.09 0.09 0.09 0.09 0.09 0.09 0.09 0.09 0.09 0.09 0.05 0.04 0.08 0.09 0.05 0.04 0.06 0.06 0.09 0.09 0.03 0.00 0.00 0.01 0.04 0.06 0.08 0.06 0.04 0.06 0.08 0.06 0.04 0.05 0.08 0.08 0.08 0.06 0.04 0.01 0.00 0.04 0.08 0.08 0.08 0.08 0.08 0.03 0.00 0.04 0.08 0.09 0.08 0.08 0.08 0.06 0.04 0.06 0.08 0.06 0.04 0.06 0.08 0.09 0.08 0.06 0.04 0.06 0.09 0.09 0.09 0.09 0.09 0.09 0.09 0.09 0.09 0.06 0.04 0.06 0.09 0.09 0.09 0.09 0.09 0.09 0.09 0.07 0.04 0.04 0.05 0.07 0.09 0.04 0.00 0.00 0.01 0.03 0.05 0.06 0.05 0.01 0.01 0.02 0.01 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00

Page 301: 6.5 LW Red-line of Lighting Report

Archer Forward: Campus Preservation and Improvement Plan - Lighting Analysis, Appendix Page 130

The Archer School for Girls July 2013

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.01 0.01 0.02 0.02 0.02 0.02 0.03 0.07 0.08 0.02 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.02 0.02 0.02 0.01 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.01 0.03 0.07 0.02 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.01 0.01 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.01 0.03 0.01 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.01 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00

Page 302: 6.5 LW Red-line of Lighting Report

Archer Forward: Campus Preservation and Improvement Plan - Lighting Analysis, Appendix Page 131

The Archer School for Girls July 2013

2.13 FIXTURE TYPE SD-4 BEGA- 2038LED: RECESSED WALL LUMINAIRES

IESNA:LM-63-2002 [TEST] 18976 [TESTLAB] LUMINAIRE TESTING LABORATORY, INC. [ISSUEDATE] 04-26-2010 [MANUFAC] BEGA-US [LUMCAT] 2038LED [LUMINAIRE] CAST ALUMINUM HOUSING, FROSTED GLASS ENCLOSURE WITH SLOTTED [MORE] CAST ALUMINUM FACE PLATE. [LAMP] NINE WHITE LEDS [LAMPCAT] [BALLAST] LED POWER SUPPLY: ONE THOMAS RESEARCH PRODUCTS [MORE] MODEL: LED12W-36-C0350 [OTHER] ELECTRICAL VALUES: 120.0VAC, 0.1030A, 11.86W, PF=0.959 [OTHER] NOTE: THIS TEST WAS PERFORMED USING THE CALIBRATED [OTHER] PHOTODETECTOR METHOD OF ABSOLUTE PHOTOMETRY.* [OTHER] MOUNTING: RECESSED WALL TILT=NONE 1 -1 1 361 9 1 1 0.854 0 0 1 1 11.9 0 0.5 1 1.5 2 2.5 3 3.5 4 4.5 5 5.5 6 6.5 7 7.5 8 8.5 9 9.5 10 10.5 11 11.5 12 12.5 13 13.5 14 14.5 15 15.5 16 16.5 17 17.5 18 18.5 19 19.5 20 20.5 21 21.5 22 22.5 23 23.5 24 24.5 25 25.5 26 26.5 27 27.5 28 28.5 29 29.5 30 30.5 31 31.5 32 32.5 33 33.5 34 34.5 35 35.5 36 36.5 37 37.5 38 38.5 39 39.5 40 40.5 41 41.5 42 42.5 43 43.5 44 44.5 45 45.5 46 46.5 47 47.5 48 48.5 49 49.5 50 50.5 51 51.5 52 52.5 53 53.5 54 54.5 55 55.5 56 56.5 57 57.5 58 58.5 59 59.5 60 60.5 61 61.5 62 62.5 63 63.5 64 64.5 65 65.5 66 66.5 67 67.5 68 68.5 69 69.5 70 70.5 71 71.5 72 72.5 73 73.5 74 74.5 75 75.5 76 76.5 77 77.5 78 78.5 79 79.5 80 80.5 81 81.5 82 82.5 83 83.5 84 84.5 85 85.5 86 86.5 87 87.5 88 88.5 89 89.5 90 90.5 91 91.5 92 92.5 93 93.5 94 94.5 95 95.5 96 96.5 97 97.5 98 98.5 99 99.5 100 100.5 101 101.5 102 102.5 103 103.5 104 104.5 105 105.5 106 106.5 107 107.5 108 108.5 109 109.5 110 110.5 111 111.5 112 112.5 113 113.5 114 114.5 115 115.5 116 116.5 117 117.5 118 118.5 119 119.5 120 120.5 121 121.5 122 122.5 123 123.5 124 124.5 125 125.5 126 126.5 127 127.5 128 128.5 129 129.5 130 130.5 131 131.5 132 132.5 133 133.5 134 134.5 135 135.5 136 136.5 137 137.5 138 138.5 139 139.5 140 140.5 141 141.5 142 142.5 143 143.5 144 144.5 145 145.5 146 146.5 147 147.5 148 148.5 149 149.5 150 150.5 151 151.5 152 152.5 153 153.5 154 154.5 155 155.5 156 156.5 157 157.5 158 158.5 159 159.5 160 160.5 161 161.5 162 162.5 163 163.5 164 164.5 165 165.5 166 166.5 167 167.5 168 168.5 169 169.5 170 170.5 171 171.5 172 172.5 173 173.5 174 174.5 175 175.5 176 176.5 177 177.5 178 178.5 179 179.5 180 0 22.5 45 67.5 90 112.5 135 157.5 180 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.06 0.09 0.12 0.15 0.21 0.24 0.30 0.36 0.39 0.45 0.51 0.57 0.63 0.69 0.78 0.84 0.90 0.96 1.11 1.14 1.26 1.35 1.44 1.56 1.68 1.74 1.77 1.80 1.88 1.91 1.91 1.94 2.00 2.06 2.09 2.09 2.15 2.21 2.24 2.27 2.27 2.33 2.39 2.42 2.51 2.57 2.63 2.63 2.72 2.81 2.93 2.99 3.05 3.08 3.17 3.20 3.29 3.38 3.44 3.53 3.62 3.71 3.80 3.95 4.07 4.19 4.37 4.52 4.70 4.91 5.12 5.36 5.62 5.92 6.22 6.61 7.03 7.54 8.02 8.56 9.15 9.87 10.65 11.52 12.54 13.64 14.72 15.98

Page 303: 6.5 LW Red-line of Lighting Report

Archer Forward: Campus Preservation and Improvement Plan - Lighting Analysis, Appendix Page 132

The Archer School for Girls July 2013

17.38 18.73 20.28 22.08 23.99 25.91 27.79 29.68 31.50 33.36 35.12 36.62 37.91 38.98 39.70 40.21 40.33 40.15 39.73 39.16 38.44 37.70 36.83 35.96 35.06 34.23 33.48 32.73 31.95 31.23 30.55 29.86 29.23 28.69 28.21 27.76 27.37 27.02 26.69 26.39 26.03 25.76 25.58 25.46 25.46 25.61 25.94 26.36 26.75 27.26 27.85 28.15 28.27 28.21 27.82 27.17 26.51 25.43 24.23 23.07 21.96 20.88 19.90 18.85 17.71 16.60 15.62 14.57 13.40 12.27 11.37 10.50 9.39 8.41 7.48 6.31 5.36 4.25 3.23 2.36 1.47 0.87 0.42 0.18 0.15 0.15 0.12 0.12 0.09 0.09 0.09 0.09 0.06 0.09 0.06 0.03 0.06 0.03 0.03 0.03 0.03 0.03 0.03 0.03 0.03 0.03 0.03 0.03 0.03 0.03 0.03 0.03 0.03 0.03 0.03 0.03 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.06 0.09 0.12 0.18 0.19 0.22 0.25 0.33 0.39 0.43 0.49 0.55 0.61 0.69 0.72 0.79 0.85 0.96 1.00 1.09 1.15 1.23 1.30 1.36 1.48 1.56 1.66 1.71 1.75 1.81 1.84 1.85 1.90 1.94 1.97 2.02 2.05 2.08 2.09 2.12 2.15 2.20 2.24 2.26 2.30 2.33 2.39 2.39 2.48 2.56 2.60 2.68 2.74 2.83 2.89 2.95 2.99 3.05 3.11 3.19 3.28 3.37 3.46 3.53 3.65 3.69 3.84 3.96 4.11 4.26 4.44 4.62 4.86 5.04 5.28 5.55 5.83 6.16 6.54 6.97 7.39 7.91 8.44 9.04 9.71 10.44 11.16 12.01 12.97 14.02 15.11 16.25 17.61 18.94 20.30 21.74 23.17 24.70 26.22 27.48 28.75 29.86 30.73 31.43 31.97 32.21 32.28 32.09 31.65 31.19 30.53 29.87 29.11 28.39 27.64 27.00 26.24 25.64 25.01 24.41 23.78 23.20 22.69 22.24 21.86 21.53 21.32 21.14 21.02 20.93 20.88 20.91 20.93 21.02 21.18 21.32 21.47 21.71 21.80 21.86 21.78 21.57 21.12 20.61 19.93 19.06 18.26 17.43 16.50 15.68 14.61 13.99 13.13 12.27 11.37 10.58 9.66 8.92 8.12 7.43 6.61 5.82 5.07 4.31 3.64 2.89 2.17 1.48 0.94 0.49 0.25 0.15 0.16 0.15 0.12 0.09 0.09 0.07 0.04 0.09 0.06 0.09 0.06 0.06 0.04 0.04 0.04 0.04 0.04 0.03 0.03 0.03 0.03 0.03 0.03 0.03 0.01 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 .00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.01 0.03 0.04 0.04 0.09 0.09 0.10 0.13 0.18 0.19 0.22 0.27 0.28 0.31 0.37 0.39 0.45 0.48 0.52 0.55 0.60 0.64 0.69 0.72 0.78 0.82 0.87 0.93 1.00 1.06 1.11 1.20 1.26 1.30 1.39 1.47 1.54 1.59 1.63 1.69 1.71 1.74 1.75 1.74 1.78 1.81 1.84 1.87 1.90 1.91 1.94 1.96 1.99 2.02 2.05 2.08 2.09 2.14 2.17 2.21 2.24 2.30 2.38 2.42 2.50 2.56 2.63 2.74 2.83 2.92 2.96 3.05 3.13 3.20 3.31 3.40 3.47 3.61 3.74 3.86 4.01 4.19 4.35 4.55 4.76 4.98 5.21 5.45 5.73 6.06 6.39 6.76 7.18 7.60 8.06 8.54 9.05 9.59 10.20 10.83 11.47 12.13 12.80 13.49 14.17 14.73 15.27 15.80 16.25 16.60 16.86 17.08 17.14 17.10 16.98 16.72 16.42 16.07 15.65 15.27 14.81 14.42 14.00 13.64 13.27 12.95 12.66 12.42 12.18 11.92 11.76 11.56 11.41

Page 304: 6.5 LW Red-line of Lighting Report

Archer Forward: Campus Preservation and Improvement Plan - Lighting Analysis, Appendix Page 133

The Archer School for Girls July 2013

11.32 11.28 11.22 11.19 11.20 11.20 11.17 11.14 11.04 10.89 10.68 10.41 9.99 9.69 9.32 8.83 8.36 7.91 7.43 6.94 6.48 6.06 5.59 5.13 4.67 4.19 3.77 3.32 2.89 2.53 2.14 1.74 1.35 0.94 0.64 0.39 0.22 0.15 0.10 0.13 0.10 0.07 0.06 0.04 0.06 0.04 0.07 0.04 0.07 0.04 0.03 0.03 0.04 0.03 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.01 0.01 0.04 0.03 0.04 0.06 0.06 0.09 0.09 0.10 0.13 0.13 0.15 0.18 0.19 0.21 0.21 0.24 0.24 0.27 0.28 0.31 0.33 0.34 0.37 0.39 0.40 0.43 0.46 0.48 0.51 0.52 0.52 0.58 0.63 0.64 0.63 0.66 0.72 0.73 0.75 0.76 0.81 0.84 0.85 0.88 0.91 0.94 0.97 1.00 1.02 1.06 1.09 1.12 1.09 1.17 1.21 1.23 1.26 1.26 1.26 1.27 1.27 1.29 1.29 1.30 1.30 1.33 1.35 1.36 1.39 1.41 1.42 1.44 1.48 1.50 1.54 1.57 1.63 1.68 1.74 1.80 1.88 1.97 2.11 2.18 2.33 2.48 2.63 2.81 2.99 3.14 3.26 3.41 3.52 3.64 3.78 3.90 4.05 4.19 4.32 4.43 4.59 4.70 4.85 4.89 5.03 5.10 5.15 5.18 5.21 5.18 5.18 5.12 5.04 4.95 4.86 4.74 4.65 4.50 4.38 4.26 4.11 4.01 3.90 3.77 3.69 3.62 3.53 3.44 3.37 3.26 3.22 3.13 3.01 2.93 2.83 2.68 2.59 2.45 2.33 2.14 2.00 1.87 1.69 1.51 1.35 1.24 1.08 0.93 0.81 0.72 0.58 0.48 0.37 0.24 0.16 0.10 0.04 0.03 0.03 0.06 0.04 0.03 0.03 0.03 0.01 0.01 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.01 0.01 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.01 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.01 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.01 0.00 0.00 0.01 0.00 0.01 0.00 0.00 0.01 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.01 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.01 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00

Page 305: 6.5 LW Red-line of Lighting Report

Archer Forward: Campus Preservation and Improvement Plan - Lighting Analysis, Appendix Page 134

The Archer School for Girls July 2013

2.14 FIXTURE TYPE SF-1, SF-2, SF-3 LED LINEAR-VARIOLED FLEX VENUS: LINEAR LED

IESNA:LM-63-2002 [TEST]ITL66372 [TESTLAB]INDEPENDENT TESTING LABORATORIES, INC. [ISSUEDATE]10/19/10 [MANUFAC]LED-LINEAR GmbH [LUMCAT]VARIOLED FLEX VENUS TV W827/1228 [LUMINAIRE]FLEXIBLE TRANSLUCENT WHITE PLASTIC HOUSING WITH INTEGRAL [MORE]TRANSLUCENT PLASTIC LENS. INTERIOR PROPERTIES UNKNOWN AS

THIS [MORE]IS A SEALED UNIT. [LAMP]UNKNOWN NUMBER AND TYPE OF LIGHT EMITTING DIODES (LEDS). [OTHER]TOTAL INPUT WATTS = 14.7 AT 120.0 VOLTS [_MOUNTING]RECESSED [_LEDDRIVER]PHIHONG PSA15R-240P [_NOTE]DATA SHOWN IS ABSOLUTE FOR THE SAMPLE PROVIDED AT RATED

INPUT [MORE]VOLTAGE (120VAC, 60Hz) TO THE LED DRIVER. [OTHER]TEST PROCEDURE: IESNA LM-79-08 [OTHER]TEST DISTANCE = 25.25 FEET [_ABSOLUTELUMENS]333 TILT=NONE 1 -1 .1 37 5 1 1 4.031250 0.052083 0.000000 1.000 1 14.7 0 2.5 5 7.5 10 12.5 15 17.5 20 22.5 25 27.5 30 32.5 35 37.5 40 42.5 45 47.5 50 52.5 55 57.5 60 62.5 65 67.5 70 72.5 75 77.5 80 82.5 85 87.5 90 0 22.5 45 67.5 90 1100 1104 1103 1100 1095 1088 1078 1066 1051 1035 1016 995 971 945 917 886 853 817 781 743 703 661 618 574 528 481 433 384 334 284 234 185 137 92 52 21 0 1100 1100 1099 1096 1090 1083 1073 1061 1047 1031 1012 991 968 943 915 885 854 821 785 748 708 667 624 580 534 488 440 391 341 290 240 190 141 95 54 21 0 1100 1097 1095 1091 1086 1078 1067 1055 1040 1023 1004 982 959 934 907 878 847 814 779 743 704 664 622 579 534 488 440 392 342 292 241 191 142 95 54 20 0 1100 1099 1096 1092 1085 1076 1065 1052 1036 1018 999 977 954 929 901 872 841 808 773 737 698 657 616 572 527 480 432 383 333 283 232 182 134 89 49 18 0 1100 1104 1101 1096 1089 1079 1067 1052 1036 1017 996 973 948 921 893 862 829 795 9 721 682 640 598 554 508 462 415 366 317 268 219 170 122 78 40 13 0

Page 306: 6.5 LW Red-line of Lighting Report

Archer Forward: Campus Preservation and Improvement Plan - Lighting Analysis, Appendix Page 135

The Archer School for Girls July 2013

2.15 FIXTURE TYPE SP PRUDENTIAL LIGHTING- PRU3P2T8W: LINEAR INDIRECT LIGHTING

IESNA:LM-63-1995 [MANUFAC] PRUDENTIAL LIGHTING [TEST] 13484 [LUMCAT] PRU3-P-2T8-04-W [LUMINAIRE] WITH WHITE REFLECTOR AND WHITE PLASTIC LENS OVER PERFORATIONS [LAMP] TWO PHILIPS F32T8/TL841 32 WATT FLUORESCENT LAMPS. LUMEN RATING = 2950 LMS. [BALLAST] ONE ADVANCE R-2S40-1-TP BALLAST OPERATING AT 120 VAC AND 101 WATTS TILT=NONE 2 2950 1 73 5 1 1 .83 4 0 1 1 101 0 2.5 5 7.5 10 12.5 15 17.5 20 22.5 25 27.5 30 32.5 35 37.5 40 42.5 45 47.5 50 52.5 55 57.5 60 62.5 65 67.5 70 72.5 75 77.5 80 82.5 85 87.5 90 92.5 95 97.5 100 102.5 105 107.5 110 112.5 115 117.5 120 122.5 125 127.5 130 132.5 135 137.5 140 142.5 145 147.5 150 152.5 155 157.5 160 162.5 165 167.5 170 172.5 175 177.5 180 0 22.5 45 67.5 90 9 9 8 9 9 9 8 8 8 8 8 7 7 6 6 5 5 4 4 4 2 3 2 1 1 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 4 19 49 90 139 193 249 307 362 418 475 530 585 639 689 739 783 830 876 918 960 997 1037 1067 1098 1131 1156 1182 1205 1226 1240 1254 1269 1279 1284 1289 1276 9 9 7 8 9 9 8 9 8 8 7 7 7 7 6 6 6 6 5 5 5 5 4 4 4 5 4 4 4 4 4 3 3 2 0 0 10 84 179 275 352 411 470 512 554 589 625 659 697 736 774 813 852 887 928 966 999 1028 1065 1096 1122 1146 1170 1192 1215 1231 1242 1257 1267 1274 1282 1281 1276 9 9 8 9 9 9 9 8 9 9 9 8 9 9 9 9 9 10 9 10 10 11 9 11 10 10 12 11 11 11 11 11 9 7 7 6 33 92 216 345 461 559 642 712 767 814 858 894 925 955 981 1000 1021 1040 1058 1081 1098 1119 1136 1158 1175 1188 1207 1221 1234 1244 1257 1265 1268 1274 1276 1278 1276 9 9 8 8 8 9 9 8 8 9 9 9 10 10 11 11 11 12 12 13 13 14 14 14 15 15 15 15 15 15 15 14 13 11 11 9 19 106 233 362 519 635 742 819 887 944 992 1030 1066 1095 1118 1137 1153 1164 1176 1184 1189 1196 1202 1209 1218 1226 1231 1241 1245 1249 1255 1261 1260 1265 1264 1265 1276 9 8 8 9 9 9 9 9 9 10 10 10 11 11 12 11 12 12 14 15 14 14 15 15 16 17 17 17 17 17 16 16 15 13 12 13 36 100 230 374 519 650 755 843 919 983 1034 1077 1114 1143 1168 1188 1203 1215 1221 1228 1228 1235 1234 1238 1243 1246 1250 1252 1258 1261 1260 1266 1265 1266 1266 5 1276

Page 307: 6.5 LW Red-line of Lighting Report

Archer Forward: Campus Preservation and Improvement Plan - Lighting Analysis, Appendix Page 136

The Archer School for Girls July 2013

2.16 FIXTURE TYPE SJ QUALITE 4X4X INTERNATIONAL: POLE MOUNTED SPORTS FIELD FLOOD LIGHT

IESNA:LM-63-1995 [DATE]06/13/01 [TEST]ITL51144 [MANUFAC]QUALITE SPORTS LIGHTING, INC. [LUMCAT]INTERNATIONAL SERIES - PROTOTYPE VISOR [LUMINAIRE]CAST METAL SOCKET HOUSING. SPUN SEMI-SPECULAR METAL

REFLECTOR [MORE]WITH FORMED SPECULAR METAL SEMI-HEMISPHERICAL REAR INSERT, [MORE]FABRICATED METAL PANEL ABOVE LAMP WITH PREMIUM SPECULAR

FINISH, [MORE]FABRICATED DIFFUSE METAL FORWARD UPPER INSERT. CLEAR FLAT

GLASS [MORE]LENS IN FABRICATED METAL TRIM RING. FABRICATED BLACK PAINTED TILT=NONE 1 1000 1 31 18 2 1 -1.9479 0 0 1 1 1500 -90 -85 -75 -65 -55 -47.5 -42.5 -37.5 -32.5 -27.5 -22.5 -17.5 -12.5 -7.5 -2.5 0 2.5 7.5 12.5 17.5 22.5 27.5 32.5 37.5 42.5 47.5 55 65 75 85 90 0 1.5 4.5 7.5 10.5 13.5 16.5 19.5 22.5 25.5 28.5 35 45 55 65 75 85 90 0 1 1 3 4 7 165 300 552 795 830 881 959 1064 2224 2230 1869 1348 213 49 18 6 2 1 1

0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 3 4 8 163 300 554 795 828 885 972 1103 2196 2153 1918 1331 220 47 17 6 2 1 1

0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 4 6 15 141 304 553 775 816 862 997 1273 2270 2155 2141 1158 192 44 16 6 2 1 1

0 0 0 0 00 0 1 1 4 5 5 137 304 551 756 809 813 925 1329 1855 2076 2085 792 133 38 15 5 2 1 1 0

0 0 0 0 0 0 1 2 4 4 5 111 278 547 709 735 788 837 1195 1670 1695 1465 509 96 30 14 5 2 11 0 0

0 0 1 0 0 1 2 4 4 5 75 240 516 636 624 633 685 924 1033 990 806 279 59 24 12 4 2 1 1 10 1 1 1

0 0 1 2 3 4 4 44 170 410 562 520 476 440 580 602 514 379 164 39 19 10 4 2 1 1 1 1 1 1 1

0 0 1 2 3 4 3 16 90 263 419 421 376 280 345 336 282 205 113 26 15 8 4 2 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 0 0 1 2 3 4 3 5 30 123 247 250 242 180 231 190 160 123 67 21 12 6 3 2 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 0 0 1 2 2 3 3 4 6 30 93 122 112 84 113 93 75 58 26 16 9 4 2 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 0 0 1 2 2 3 3 3 5 8 10 23 30 28 36 29 28 24 16 11 7 4 2 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 0 0 1 2 1 2 2 2 3 3 4 6 7 9 12 14 14 14 11 5 4 3 2 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 2 0 0 1 2 1 1 2 2 2 2 2 3 3 4 4 4 4 5 3 3 3 2 2 2 1 1 2 1 2 2 2 0 0 1 1 1 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 0 0 1 1 1 1 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 1 0 0 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 1 1 1 1 0 0 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

Page 308: 6.5 LW Red-line of Lighting Report

Archer Forward: Campus Preservation and Improvement Plan - Lighting Analysis, Appendix Page 137

The Archer School for Girls July 2013

2.17 FIXTURE TYPE SJ-1 QUALITE 4X4V INTERNATIONAL: POLE MOUNTED SPORTS FIELD FLOOD LIGHT

IESNA91 [TEST]ITL45729 [MANUFAC]INTERNATIONAL SPORTS LIGHTING [LUMCAT]TEST #4 [LUMINAIRE]SPUN SEMI-DIFFUSE METAL REFLECTOR, FABRICATED FLAT

SPECULAR [MORE]METAL UPPER INSERT, FORMED SPECULAR METAL INSERT BEHIND

LAMP [MORE]WITH FABRICATED SEGMENTED SPECULAR METAL INSERT ABOVE LAMP, [MORE]CLEAR FLAT GLASS ENCLOSURE IN METAL TRIM FRAME WITH BLACK [MORE]PAINTED METAL VISOR ATTACHED. [LAMP]ONE 2000-WATT CLEAR T-9 DOUBLE ENDED METAL HALIDE, HORIZONTAL [MORE]POSITION. [MANUALMAX] 3153.3 0.0 0.8 TILT=NONE 1 1000 1 35 16 2 1 -1.9479 0 0 1 1 2000 -90 -85 -75 -65 -55 -45 -35 -28.5 -25.5 -22.5 -19.5 -16.5 -13.5 -10.5 -7.5 -4.5 -1.5 0 1.5 4.5 7.5 10.5 13.5 16.5 19.5 22.5 25.5 28.5 35 45 55 65 75 85 90 0 2.5 7.5 12.5 17.5 22.5 27.5 32.5 37.5 42.5 47.5 55 65 75 85 90 0 1 2 4 4 81 191 317 368 440 574 827 1119 1481 1718 2118 2856 3123 3088 2377 1557 782 481 331 172 88 51 30 7 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 2 4 6 81 195 314 357 426 561 806 1105 1444 1666 1967 2541 2833 2902 2252 1488 747 471 324 163 87 49 31 8 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 2 5 7 78 203 279 303 376 491 713 1010 1262 1411 1474 1620 1773 1891 1622 1063 559 411 246 133 70 42 25 7 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 2 5 7 71 186 230 286 377 492 635 799 951 1051 1080 1060 1024 972 822 614 416 288 145 84 51 30 19 6 1 0 1 1 3 0 0 2 2 5 7 63 149 195 257 349 461 579 676 737 764 764 720 685 654 554 397 220 128 82 51 33 22 14 6 3 3 2 2 2 0 0 2 2 4 8 35 97 177 228 291 368 448 521 575 601 571 491 444 398 299 181 94 59 39 27 19 12 9 5 2 1 2 2 2 0 0 2 2 3 9 10 50 91 168 246 304 340 364 376 371 331 264 227 189 122 71 36 26 19 14 10 8 6 4 2 2 2 2 3 0 0 2 2 3 8 6 20 20 48 92 127 161 158 141 120 100 74 58 45 27 18 14 12 9 8 6 5 5 3 3 2 2 2 3 0 0 2 2 2 7 6 6 5 7 9 11 13 11 11 11 9 10 10 10 9 8 8 7 6 5 5 4 4 3 3 3 3 3 3 0 0 2 2 2 6 7 5 5 5 4 4 5 5 5 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 5 5 5 4 4 4 4 3 3 3 3 3 3 0 0 2 2 2 3 6 5 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 2 0 0 2 2 2 2 3 4 4 4 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 2 3 0 0 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 2 0 0 1 1 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 3 3 3 3 2 2 2 2 2 0 0 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

Page 309: 6.5 LW Red-line of Lighting Report

Archer Forward: Campus Preservation and Improvement Plan - Lighting Analysis, Appendix Page 138

The Archer School for Girls July 2013

2.18 FIXTURE TYPE SJ-2 QUALITE 4X3V INTERNATIONAL: POLE MOUNTED SPORTS FIELD FLOOD LIGHT

IESNA91 [TEST]ITL45726 [MANUFAC]INTERNATIONAL SPORTS LIGHTING [LUMCAT]TEST #1 [LUMINAIRE]SPUN SEMI-DIFFUSE METAL REFLECTOR, FABRICATED FLAT

SPECULAR [MORE]METAL UPPER INSERT, FORMED SPECULAR METAL INSERT BEHIND

LAMP, [MORE]CLEAR FLAT GLASS ENCLOSURE IN METAL TRIM FRAME WITH BLACK [MORE]PAINTED METAL VISOR ATTACHED. [LAMP]ONE 2000-WATT CLEAR T-9 DOUBLE ENDED METAL HALIDE, HORIZONTAL [MORE]POSITION. [MANUALMAX] 4321.3 0.0 0.4 TILT=NONE 1 1000 1 35 16 2 1 -1.9479 0 0 1 1 2000 -90 -85 -75 -65 -55 -45 -35 -28.5 -25.5 -22.5 -19.5 -16.5 -13.5 -10.5 -7.5 -4.5 -1.5 0 1.5 4.5 7.5 10.5 13.5 16.5 19.5 22.5 25.5 28.5 35 45 55 65 75 85 90 0 2.5 7.5 12.5 17.5 22.5 27.5 32.5 37.5 42.5 47.5 55 65 75 85 90 0 2 3 5 9 20 126 187 191 222 306 547 1115 1980 2733 3612 4187 4302 4063 2630 1414 683 296 130 49 27 14 9 4 2 1 1 0 1 0 0 1 3 5 10 20 127 186 192 223 315 567 1159 1990 2794 3453 3765 3822 3642 2394 1333 649 286 132 47 26 14 9 4 2 1 1 1 1 0 0 1 3 6 10 20 125 175 192 244 360 680 1180 1757 2278 2570 2443 2242 2029 1475 950 463 230 89 40 22 12 8 4 2 1 1 1 1 0 0 2 2 5 9 17 107 163 194 263 393 702 1032 1297 1433 1447 1305 1184 1055 775 503 280 165 79 28 17 10 7 4 2 1 2 2 2 0 0 2 2 5 8 14 70 155 200 267 385 606 840 980 1013 964 841 759 641 467 325 216 138 56 19 12 9 7 4 3 2 2 1 2 0 0 2 2 4 8 11 29 143 198 258 348 495 648 737 771 701 591 536 477 364 265 162 69 19 13 10 7 6 4 2 2 2 2 2 0 0 2 2 4 8 9 11 76 154 231 300 385 476 514 522 480 395 350 304 199 104 39 14 12 10 7 6 5 3 3 2 2 2 2 0 0 2 2 3 7 8 10 19 50 97 134 171 175 162 138 112 80 63 47 24 12 11 10 9 7 6 5 5 4 2 2 2 2 2 0 0 2 2 3 6 7 8 8 10 11 15 17 14 13 12 10 10 10 10 9 9 8 7 6 6 5 5 4 3 3 2 2 2 2 0 0 2 2 2 5 7 7 6 6 7 7 6 7 8 7 7 8 8 7 7 6 6 5 5 5 4 4 4 3 2 2 2 2 2 0 0 2 2 2 3 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 5 6 5 5 5 5 4 5 5 4 4 4 3 3 3 2 2 2 2 2 0 0 2 2 2 2 3 5 5 5 5 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 3 3 3 3 3 2 2 2 2 0 0 2 2 2 2 3 2 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 0 0 1 1 2 2 2 3 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 0 0 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

Page 310: 6.5 LW Red-line of Lighting Report

Archer Forward: Campus Preservation and Improvement Plan - Lighting Analysis, Appendix Page 139

The Archer School for Girls July 2013

3. APPENDIX D : EXTERIOR LIGHTING GUIDELINES

3.1 Exterior Lighting 1. Pole- and post-mounted lighting within direct view of any residential property shall be

located and/or shielded so that view of the fixture source, lens and reflector is minimized. 2. Bollard luminaires shall be specified to prevent direct view of the light source. Where

louvered bollards are specified, they shall utilize coated lamps. 3. All up lighting fixtures shall be aimed and/or shielded to constrain the light to the object

being illuminated and minimize the amount of illumination escaping into the night sky. 4. All up lighting fixtures shall be focused on highlighting or emphasizing architectural

features and significant landscaping elements.

3.2 Athletic Lighting 1. Sports lighting fixtures shall be aimed at an angle of not more than 62° (from nadir,

normal to the horizon), or sports lighting fixtures must be aimed 18° less than the angle of direct view (from the property boundary), whichever is less.

3.3 Site Lighting 1. All pole- and post-mounted luminaires over fifteen feet in height shall meet all IESNA

requirements for Uplight Rating of U0 or U1 (e.g., B_-U1-G_, B_-U0-G_) and shall be aimed downward.

2. All pole and post mount luminaires less than fifteen and greater than six feet in height shall meet all IESNA requirements for Uplight Rating of U0 or U1 (e.g., B_-U1-G_, B_-U0-G_).

3. All luminaires of less than six feet in height, such as bollards, shall meet all IESNA requirements for for Uplight Rating of U0, U1, U2 (e.g., B_-U2-G_, B_-U1-G_, B_-U0-G_).

4. For pedestrian walkways and plazas, all lighting configurations shall comply with IESNA RP-33-99 14.0 Walkway and Bikeway Lighting, best practice recommendations.

3.4 Parking Lot and Parking Structure Lighting 1. All interior lighting for parking structures that is visible from areas exterior of the parking

structure shall utilize shielding that blocks direct view of the light source and minimizes the view of reflector or diffuser.

2. At interior perimeter of parking structures, all lighting shall provide indirect illumination of the interior parking area.

3. For parking structures, all lighting configurations shall comply with IESNA RP-20-98, 10.0 Illuminance Recommendations – Garages, best practice recommendations for typical conditions.

3.5 Building Mounted Lighting 1. Building mounted fixtures shall be shielded so that source is not directly visible and the

view of the fixture lens and reflector is minimized. 2. Building mounted fixtures that are not full-cutoff shall be primarily decorative in nature.

The predominance of illumination for such areas shall be provided by other luminaires.

Page 311: 6.5 LW Red-line of Lighting Report

Archer Forward: Campus Preservation and Improvement Plan - Lighting Analysis, Appendix Page 140

The Archer School for Girls July 2013

3.6 Interior Architectural Lighting 1. Interior light sources of 800 lumens our more, should be shielded from exterior view

3.7 Site Design 1. Surface of Athletic Fields is to be of similar reflectance to the existing dark grass, 8%.

Page 312: 6.5 LW Red-line of Lighting Report

Archer Forward: Campus Preservation and Improvement Plan - Lighting Analysis, Appendix Page 141

The Archer School for Girls July 2013

4. APPENDIX E : REGULATIONS

4.1 City of Los Angeles Regulations:

Figure 2 : SEC.93.0117. OUTDOOR LIGHTING AFFECTING RESIDENTIAL PROPERTY

Page 313: 6.5 LW Red-line of Lighting Report

Archer Forward: Campus Preservation and Improvement Plan - Lighting Analysis, Appendix Page 142

The Archer School for Girls July 2013

Figure 3 : SEC.93.0201. PERMIT REQUIRED AND SEC.93.0202. PERMIT NOT REQUIRED

Page 314: 6.5 LW Red-line of Lighting Report

Archer Forward: Campus Preservation and Improvement Plan - Lighting Analysis, Appendix Page 143

The Archer School for Girls July 2013

4.2 CIF Guidelines

Figure 4 : CIF (CALIFORNIA INTERSCHORLASTIC FEDERATION) REGULATIONS

Page 315: 6.5 LW Red-line of Lighting Report

Archer Forward: Campus Preservation and Improvement Plan - Lighting Analysis, Appendix Page 144

The Archer School for Girls July 2013

4.3 CEQA Guidelines

Figure 5 : CEQA GUIDELINES APPENDIX G

Page 316: 6.5 LW Red-line of Lighting Report

Archer Forward: Campus Preservation and Improvement Plan - Lighting Analysis, Appendix Page 145

The Archer School for Girls July 2013

4.4 IES Guidelines

Figure 6 : IES – Nighttime Outdoor Lighting Zone Definitions

Page 317: 6.5 LW Red-line of Lighting Report

Archer Forward: Campus Preservation and Improvement Plan - Lighting Analysis, Appendix Page 146

The Archer School for Girls July 2013

4.5 CEC LIGHTING ZONE

Figure 7 : IES – Nighttime Outdoor Lighting Zone Definitions

Page 318: 6.5 LW Red-line of Lighting Report

Archer Forward: Campus Preservation and Improvement Plan - Lighting Analysis, Appendix Page 147

The Archer School for Girls July 2013

5. APPENDIX F : REVIEWED OBSERVATION SITE LOCATIONS

For complete discussion of Receptor Site location selection criteria and description, see section 3.1.2 of the Lighting Analysis Report. In addition to section 3.2.1, Figure 8, below provides description of additional observation locations that were not selected as Receptor Site locations.

Figure 8: Observation locations that were not selected as Receptor Site locations

5.1 Observation Location #1: (South of underground parking structure and Athletic Fields) Observation Location #1 was not selected as a Receptor Site, because Receptor Site F provides analysis of a similar relationship to the Athletic Fields, while Receptor Site F provides analysis of greater exposure to potential impacts from the North Wing Renovation.

5.2 Observation Location #2: (Southwest of underground parking structure and Athletic Fields) Observation Location #2 was not selected as a Receptor Site, because Receptor Site E provides analysis of a similar relationship to the Athletic Fields, while Receptor Site E provides analysis of greater exposure to potential impacts from the Multipurpose Facility.

Page 319: 6.5 LW Red-line of Lighting Report

Archer Forward: Campus Preservation and Improvement Plan - Lighting Analysis, Appendix Page 148

The Archer School for Girls July 2013

5.3 Observation Location #3: (West of Athletic Fields) (Southwest of underground parking structure and Athletic Fields) Observation Location #3 was not selected as a Receptor Site, because Receptor Site E provides analysis of a similar relationship to the Athletic Fields, while Receptor Site E provides analysis of greater exposure to potential impacts from the Multipurpose Facility.

5.4 Observation Location #4: (West of Main Building, south of underground parking structure and Athletic Fields) Observation Location #4 was not selected as a Receptor Site, because Receptor Site F provides analysis of greater exposure to potential impacts from the North Wing Renovation and the underground parking structure.

5.5 Observation Location #5: (East of Main Building, south of Performing Arts Center) Observation Location #5 was not selected as a Receptor Site, because Receptor Site G provides analysis of greater exposure to potential impacts from the North Wing Renovation and the Performing Arts Center.

5.6 Observation Location #6: (Southeast of Main Building, south of Sunset Boulevard) Observation Location #6 was not selected as a Receptor Site, because Receptor Site A provides analysis of similar exposure to potential impacts from the Athletic Field lighting, and greater exposure to potential impacts from the Performing Arts Center.

5.7 Observation Location #7: (South of Performing Arts Center, mid lot) Observation Location #7 was not selected as a Receptor Site, because Receptor Site G provides analysis of greater exposure to potential impacts from the North Wing Renovation, the Performing Arts Center, and the Multipurpose Facility.

5.8 Observation Location #8: (Southeast of Performing Arts Center, east side of Barrington Avenue) Observation Location #8 was not selected as a Receptor Site, because Receptor Sites B and G provide analysis of greater exposure to potential impacts from the Performing Arts Center.

5.9 Observation Location #9: (South East corner of the parking lot) Observation Location #9 was not selected as a Receptor Site, because Receptor Sites H and B provide analysis of greater exposure to potential impacts from the Performing Arts Center.

Page 320: 6.5 LW Red-line of Lighting Report

Archer Forward: Campus Preservation and Improvement Plan - Lighting Analysis, Appendix Page 149

The Archer School for Girls July 2013

6. APPENDIX F : CALCULATED LUMINANCE DATA

Table 6: Calculated Luminance Summary - Project - Receptor Site A

Calculated Luminance Summary - All Proposed Project Elements with Existing LightingReceptor Site A

-35 -30 -25 -20 -15 -10 -5 0 5 10 15 20 25 30 3522.5 0.00 0.00 0.10 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.0017.5 0.00 0.00 0.10 0.10 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.0012.5 0.00 0.00 0.10 0.10 0.10 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.007.5 0.00 0.00 0.10 0.10 0.20 0.00 0.00 0.00 1.10 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.002.5 0.00 0.00 0.10 0.10 0.20 0.40 0.00 0.00 1.10 0.80 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00-2.5 0.00 0.00 0.10 0.20 0.30 0.50 1.00 0.00 0.00 0.10 0.00 0.40 0.40 0.10 0.00-7.5 0.00 0.00 0.10 0.20 0.40 0.10 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.10 0.00-12.5 0.00 0.00 0.10 0.00 0.00 0.10 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.10 0.50 0.30 0.00-17.5 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00-22.5

Average 0.077Maximum 1.10 Performing Arts Center

Minimum 0.00Max:Avg 14.2 :1

*Empty cells were outside of the modeled area for the calculation, and therefore did not record any data.

Table 7: Calculated Luminance Summary - Project - Receptor Site B

Calculated Luminance Summary - All Proposed Project Elements with Existing LightingReceptor Site B

-35 -30 -25 -20 -15 -10 -5 0 5 10 15 20 25 30 3522.5 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.0017.5 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.0012.5 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.10 0.10 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.007.5 0.10 0.00 0.10 0.20 0.10 0.10 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.002.5 0.20 0.10 0.30 0.20 0.10 0.20 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.20 0.00 0.00-2.5 0.90 0.30 0.60 0.20 0.10 0.20 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.20 0.00 0.00-7.5 0.10 0.00 0.80 0.00 0.00 0.70 0.70 0.10 0.30 0.00 0.00 0.00 3.50 0.00 0.00-12.5 0.50 0.40 0.70 0.60 0.70 0.30 0.10 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00-17.5 0.40 0.80 1.40 1.40 0.80 0.50 0.20 0.10 0.00 0.00 0.10 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00-22.5 0.00 1.20 1.10 0.70 0.30 0.50 0.30 0.30 0.20 0.10 0.10 0.10 0.10 0.10 0.10

Average 0.167Maximum 3.50 Performing Arts Center

Minimum 0.00Max:Avg 21.0 :1

Page 321: 6.5 LW Red-line of Lighting Report

Archer Forward: Campus Preservation and Improvement Plan - Lighting Analysis, Appendix Page 150

The Archer School for Girls July 2013

Table 8: Calculated Luminance Summary - Project - Receptor Site C

Calculated Luminance Summary - All Proposed Project Elements with Existing LightingReceptor Site C

0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 5 10 15 20 25 30 3522.5 0.20 0.20 0.20 0.30 0.30 0.40 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.10 0.0017.5 0.20 0.20 0.00 0.00 0.10 0.40 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.10 0.00 0.00 0.20 0.1012.5 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.10 0.70 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.10 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.007.5 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.60 5.60 8.10 0.00 0.00 0.50 0.10 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.002.5 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.10 0.20 0.10 0.40 0.30 0.60 0.10 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00-2.5 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.10 0.10 0.00 0.10 0.00 0.10 0.00 0.00-7.5 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.10-12.5-17.5-22.5

Average 0.291Maximum 8.10 Multipurpose Facility

Minimum 0.00Max:Avg 27.9 :1

*Empty cells were outside of the modeled area for the calculation, and therefore did not record any data.

Table 9: Calculated Luminance Summary - Project - Receptor Site C-1

Calculated Luminance Summary - All Proposed Project Elements with Existing LightingReceptor Site C-1

-35 -30 -25 -20 -15 -10 -5 0 5 10 15 20 25 30 3522.5 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.0017.5 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.30 0.40 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.0012.5 0.20 0.20 0.20 0.20 0.30 0.40 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.10 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.007.5 0.40 0.30 0.30 0.40 0.50 0.60 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.002.5 0.40 0.20 0.20 0.20 0.20 0.30 0.80 0.20 0.20 0.60 0.40 0.30 0.30 0.40 0.20-2.5 0.00 0.10 0.10 0.10 0.10 0.50 0.30 0.00 0.30 0.60 0.30 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00-7.5 1.80 0.10 0.10 0.00 0.00 0.20 0.50 2.70 0.60 0.10 0.10 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00-12.5 0.20 0.50 0.90 1.20 3.20 1.10-17.5-22.5

Average 0.229Maximum 3.20 Multipurpose Facility

Minimum 0.00Max:Avg 14.0 :1

*Empty cells w ere outside of the modeled area for the calculation, and therefore did not record any data.

Page 322: 6.5 LW Red-line of Lighting Report

Archer Forward: Campus Preservation and Improvement Plan - Lighting Analysis, Appendix Page 151

The Archer School for Girls July 2013

Table 10: Calculated Luminance Summary - Project - Receptor Site D

Calculated Luminance Summary - All Proposed Project Elements with Existing LightingReceptor Site D*

-35 -30 -25 -20 -15 -10 -5 0 5 10 15 20 25 30 3522.5 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.0017.5 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.0012.5 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.007.5 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.002.5 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 1.20 0.00 0.00 0.70 0.80 0.00 1.30 3.20 0.30-2.5 1.90 1.60 1.30 0.20 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.20 0.30 0.30 0.30 0.20 0.20-7.5 0.20 0.10 0.10 0.10 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00-12.5-17.5-22.5

Average 0.167Maximum 3.20 North Wing

Minimum 0.00Max:Avg 19.2 :1

*Empty cells were outside of the modeled area for the calculation, and therefore did not record any data.

Table 11: Calculated Luminance Summary - Project - Receptor Site D-1

Calculated Luminance Summary - All Proposed Project Elements with Existing LightingReceptor Site D-1

-35 -30 -25 -20 -15 -10 -5 0 5 10 15 20 25 30 3522.5 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.0017.5 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.0012.5 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.007.5 0.20 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.10 0.20 0.00 0.002.5 0.10 0.20 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.10 0.20 0.20 0.00-2.5 4.10 4.30 2.10 0.20 0.20 0.20 0.20 0.20 0.20 0.20 0.20 0.20 0.20 0.20 0.20-7.5 0.10 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 3.20 3.10 4.30 5.20 0.20 0.10 0.00-12.5-17.5-22.5

Average 0.290Maximum 5.20 Athletic Fields

Minimum 0.00Max:Avg 18.0 :1

*Empty cells w ere outside of the modeled area for the calculation, and therefore did not record any data.

Page 323: 6.5 LW Red-line of Lighting Report

Archer Forward: Campus Preservation and Improvement Plan - Lighting Analysis, Appendix Page 152

The Archer School for Girls July 2013

Table 12: Calculated Luminance Summary - Project - Receptor Site E

Calculated Luminance Summary - All Proposed Project Elements with Existing LightingReceptor Site E

-35 -30 -25 -20 -15 -10 -5 0 5 10 15 20 25 30 3522.5 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.0017.5 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.0012.5 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.007.5 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.002.5 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.10 0.10 0.20 1.30 0.20 0.40 0.60 0.20 0.20 0.20 0.20-2.5 0.00 1.10 1.00 1.50 1.10 1.00 1.00 3.42 2.96 0.30 0.20 0.20 0.20 0.40 0.10-7.5 1.00 2.60 3.70 3.60 3.40 4.20 4.70 4.40 4.50 4.20 3.80 3.50 3.00 2.00 0.70-12.5 1.00 1.70 2.30 2.80 3.20 3.40 3.50 3.40 3.20 2.90 2.60 2.00 1.50 0.90 0.50-17.5 0.80 1.40 2.40 3.40 4.20 4.50 4.10 3.60 2.90 2.40 1.80 1.30 1.00 0.60 0.40-22.5 0.50 1.00 2.10 3.90 5.40 5.70 5.40 3.50 3.50 2.30 1.50 1.10 0.70 0.40 0.20

Average 1.163Maximum 5.70 Athletics field

Minimum 0.00Max:Avg 4.9 :1

Table 13: Calculated Luminance Summary - Project - Receptor Site F

Calculated Luminance Summary - All Proposed Project Elements with Existing LightingReceptor Site F

-35 -30 -25 -20 -15 -10 -5 0 5 10 15 20 25 30 3522.5 1.70 0.60 0.70 0.10 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.0017.5 0.50 1.80 1.90 0.80 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.10 0.00 0.00 0.0012.5 0.70 0.80 0.90 1.00 1.10 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.10 0.10 0.10 0.00 0.007.5 0.40 0.70 0.40 0.80 0.50 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.10 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.002.5 0.40 0.40 0.40 0.50 0.60 0.10 0.10 0.10 0.10 0.00 0.10 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00-2.5 0.50 1.10 0.40 0.60 0.80 0.90 1.00 1.20 0.70 0.60 0.10 0.10 0.00 0.00 0.00-7.5 2.80 2.30 2.00 2.40 3.00 3.90 4.10 3.00 1.60 0.40 0.10 0.10 0.00 0.00 0.00-12.5 0.60 0.70 0.80 0.20 0.50 0.40 3.40 1.20 0.10 0.20 0.00 0.10 0.00 0.00 0.00-17.5 0.40 0.50 0.60 0.80 0.20 3.20 0.20 1.60 0.10 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.10-22.5 0.10 0.40 0.60 1.50 2.60 3.60 0.20 1.90 0.50 0.00 0.10 0.00 0.00 0.50 0.10

Average 0.536Maximum 4.10 Athletic Fields

Minimum 0.00Max:Avg 7.6 :1

Page 324: 6.5 LW Red-line of Lighting Report

Archer Forward: Campus Preservation and Improvement Plan - Lighting Analysis, Appendix Page 153

The Archer School for Girls July 2013

Table 14: Calculated Luminance Summary - Project - Receptor Site G

Calculated Luminance Summary - All Proposed Project Elements with Existing LightingReceptor Site G

-35 -30 -25 -20 -15 -10 -5 0 5 10 15 20 25 30 3522.5 0.30 0.60 0.60 0.70 0.80 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 1.20 1.80 2.30 5.20 3.3017.5 0.10 0.40 0.20 0.20 0.20 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.80 0.90 8.80 4.20 4.60 4.10 3.8012.5 0.60 0.70 0.80 0.10 0.20 0.00 0.00 0.80 4.80 4.20 3.90 3.00 8.70 2.70 2.707.5 0.80 1.00 1.20 1.50 1.70 0.00 0.40 2.50 0.30 6.10 2.00 3.10 4.00 7.10 2.502.5 0.40 1.20 0.70 0.70 1.00 0.10 0.20 0.40 0.40 0.30 0.40 0.90 2.80 6.20 2.60-2.5 0.40 3.20 1.00 1.00 1.50 2.30 0.20 0.50 0.40 0.40 0.60 0.40 0.70 1.30 2.70-7.5 0.30 4.20 1.30 1.20 2.20 2.10 0.80 0.50 3.50 0.30 0.30 0.30 0.60 6.20 4.20-12.5 0.10 0.20 0.20 0.40 1.10 2.10 1.80 1.20 1.30 1.60 2.10 2.30 1.90 6.40 4.00-17.5 0.10 0.10 0.20 0.60 2.00 4.00 4.70 3.50 2.10 1.80 2.20 2.00 1.60 1.40 4.10-22.5 0.10 0.10 0.20 0.70 2.50 4.70 1.20 4.30 2.90 1.70 3.20 2.00 0.70 0.10 0.70

Average 1.717Maximum 8.80 North Wing

Minimum 0.00Max:Avg 5.1 :1

Table 15: Calculated Luminance Summary - Project - Receptor Site H

Calculated Luminance Summary - All Proposed Project Elements with Existing LightingReceptor Site H

-35 -30 -25 -20 -15 -10 -5 0 5 10 15 20 25 30 3522.5 0.40 0.50 0.50 0.50 0.50 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.0017.5 0.70 0.40 0.50 0.50 0.50 0.50 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.10 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.0012.5 0.50 0.50 0.50 0.50 0.50 0.50 0.50 0.50 0.00 0.10 0.10 0.20 0.20 0.00 0.007.5 2.00 0.50 1.60 0.50 0.30 0.30 0.30 0.30 0.10 0.10 0.10 2.60 2.10 0.80 0.302.5 0.60 0.60 0.30 0.50 0.30 0.30 0.30 0.30 1.40 0.10 0.00 2.60 2.50 3.70 0.50-2.5 0.60 0.50 0.30 0.50 0.30 0.30 0.30 0.30 0.20 0.20 0.10 2.60 2.40 2.10 1.80-7.5 1.00 0.60 0.30 5.90 4.20 3.50 3.30 0.30 0.20 0.10 0.00 2.80 2.20 1.90 1.70-12.5 1.50 0.30 0.10 0.30 0.20 0.20 0.20 0.20 0.10 0.20 0.00 2.00 1.90 1.70 1.60-17.5 0.50 0.20 0.10 0.10 0.10 0.10 0.10 0.10 0.10 0.20 0.00 1.70 1.60 2.70 2.80-22.5 0.10 0.10 0.10 0.10 0.10 0.10 0.10 0.10 0.00 0.20 0.00 0.00 0.20 0.10 0.20

Average 0.660Maximum 5.90 Perfroming Arts Center

Minimum 0.00Max:Avg 8.9 :1

Page 325: 6.5 LW Red-line of Lighting Report

Archer Forward: Campus Preservation and Improvement Plan - Lighting Analysis, Appendix Page 154

The Archer School for Girls July 2013

Table 16: Calculated Luminance Summary - Project - Receptor Site J

Calculated Luminance Summary - All Proposed Project Elements with Existing LightingReceptor Site J

-35 -30 -25 -20 -15 -10 -5 0 5 10 15 20 25 30 3522.5 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.0017.5 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.0012.5 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.50 0.407.5 3.30 0.70 1.20 1.20 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.10 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.40 0.30 0.20 0.702.5 0.50 0.40 0.40 0.40 0.30 0.40 0.40 0.30 0.30 0.30 0.30 0.20 0.20 0.30 0.20-2.5 0.40 0.40 0.30 0.40 0.30 0.40 0.30 0.30 0.30 0.30 0.30 0.20 0.20 0.30 0.20-7.5 0.30 0.30 0.20 0.30 0.20 0.30 0.30 0.30 0.30 0.30 0.30 0.20 0.20 0.20 0.20-12.5-17.5-22.5

Average 0.213Maximum 3.30 Multipurpose Facility

Minimum 0.00Max:Avg 15.5 :1

*Empty cells w ere outside of the modeled area for the calculation, and therefore did not record any data.

Without athletics lighting Table 17: Calculated Luminance Summary - Project with Athletics Field lighting OFF- Receptor Site A

Calculated Luminance Summary - All Proposed Project Elements Except Athletics Filed LightingReceptor Site A

-35 -30 -25 -20 -15 -10 -5 0 5 10 15 20 25 30 3522.5 0.00 0.00 0.10 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.0017.5 0.00 0.00 0.10 0.10 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.0012.5 0.00 0.00 0.10 0.10 0.10 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.007.5 0.00 0.00 0.10 0.10 0.20 0.00 0.00 0.00 1.10 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.002.5 0.00 0.00 0.10 0.10 0.20 0.40 0.00 0.00 1.10 0.80 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00-2.5 0.00 0.00 0.10 0.20 0.30 0.50 1.00 0.00 0.00 0.10 0.00 0.40 0.40 0.10 0.00-7.5 0.00 0.00 0.10 0.20 0.40 0.10 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.10 0.00-12.5 0.00 0.00 0.10 0.00 0.00 0.10 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.10 0.50 0.30 0.00-17.5 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00-22.5

Average 0.077Maximum 1.10 Performing Arts Center

Minimum 0.00Max:Avg 14.2 :1

*Empty cells were outside of the modeled area for the calculation, and therefore did not record any data.

Page 326: 6.5 LW Red-line of Lighting Report

Archer Forward: Campus Preservation and Improvement Plan - Lighting Analysis, Appendix Page 155

The Archer School for Girls July 2013

Table 18: Calculated Luminance Summary - Project with Athletics Field lighting OFF - Receptor Site B

Calculated Luminance Summary - All Proposed Project Elements Except Athletics Filed LightingReceptor Site B

-35 -30 -25 -20 -15 -10 -5 0 5 10 15 20 25 30 3522.5 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.0017.5 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.0012.5 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.10 0.10 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.007.5 0.10 0.00 0.10 0.20 0.10 0.10 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.002.5 0.20 0.10 0.30 0.20 0.10 0.20 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.20 0.00 0.00-2.5 0.90 0.30 0.60 0.20 0.10 0.20 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.20 0.00 0.00-7.5 0.10 0.00 0.80 0.00 0.00 0.70 0.70 0.10 0.30 0.00 0.00 0.00 3.50 0.00 0.00-12.5 0.50 0.40 0.70 0.60 0.70 0.30 0.10 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00-17.5 0.40 0.80 1.40 1.40 0.80 0.50 0.20 0.10 0.00 0.00 0.10 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00-22.5 0.00 1.20 1.10 0.70 0.30 0.50 0.30 0.30 0.20 0.10 0.10 0.10 0.10 0.10 0.10

Average 0.167Maximum 3.50 Performing Arts Center

Minimum 0.00Max:Avg 21.0 :1

*Empty cells were outside of the modeled area for the calculation, and therefore did not record any data.

Table 19: Calculated Luminance Summary - Project with Athletics Field lighting OFF - Receptor Site C

Calculated Luminance Summary - All Proposed Project Elements Except Athletics Filed LightingReceptor Site C

-35 -30 -25 -20 -15 -10 -5 0 5 10 15 20 25 30 3522.5 0.20 0.20 0.20 0.30 0.30 0.40 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.10 0.0017.5 0.20 0.20 0.00 0.00 0.10 0.40 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.10 0.00 0.00 0.20 0.1012.5 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.10 0.70 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.10 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.007.5 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.60 5.60 8.10 0.00 0.00 0.50 0.10 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.002.5 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.10 0.20 0.10 0.40 0.30 0.60 0.10 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00-2.5 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.10 0.10 0.00 0.10 0.00 0.10 0.00 0.00-7.5 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.10-12.5-17.5-22.5

Average 0.291Maximum 8.10 Multipurpose Facility

Minimum 0.00Max:Avg 27.9 :1

*Empty cells were outside of the modeled area for the calculation, and therefore did not record any data.

Page 327: 6.5 LW Red-line of Lighting Report

Archer Forward: Campus Preservation and Improvement Plan - Lighting Analysis, Appendix Page 156

The Archer School for Girls July 2013

Table 20: Calculated Luminance Summary - Project with Athletics Field lighting OFF - Receptor Site C-1

Calculated Luminance Summary - All Proposed Project Elements Except Athletics Filed LightingReceptor Site C-1

-35 -30 -25 -20 -15 -10 -5 0 5 10 15 20 25 30 3522.5 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.0017.5 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.30 0.40 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.0012.5 0.20 0.20 0.20 0.20 0.30 0.40 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.10 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.007.5 0.40 0.30 0.30 0.40 0.50 0.60 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.002.5 0.40 0.20 0.20 0.20 0.20 0.30 0.80 0.20 0.20 0.60 0.40 0.30 0.30 0.40 0.20-2.5 0.00 0.10 0.10 0.10 0.10 0.50 0.30 0.00 0.30 0.60 0.30 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00-7.5 1.80 0.10 0.10 0.00 0.00 0.20 0.50 2.70 0.60 0.10 0.10 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00-12.5 0.20 0.50 0.90 1.20 3.20 1.10-17.5-22.5

Average 0.229Maximum 3.20 Mulitpurpose Facility

Minimum 0.00Max:Avg 14.0 :1

*Empty cells were outside of the modeled area for the calculation, and therefore did not record any data.

Table 21: Calculated Luminance Summary - Project with Athletics Field lighting OFF - Receptor Site D

Calculated Luminance Summary - All Proposed Project Elements Except Athletics Filed LightingReceptor Site D*

-35 -30 -25 -20 -15 -10 -5 0 5 10 15 20 25 30 3522.5 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.0017.5 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.0012.5 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.007.5 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.002.5 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.10 0.00 0.00 1.30 3.20 0.00-2.5 1.90 1.60 1.30 0.20 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.10 0.30 0.00 0.00-7.5 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00-12.5-17.5-22.5

Average 0.115Maximum 3.20 Multipurpose Facility

Minimum 0.00Max:Avg 27.8 :1

*Empty cells were outside of the modeled area for the calculation, and therefore did not record any data.

Page 328: 6.5 LW Red-line of Lighting Report

Archer Forward: Campus Preservation and Improvement Plan - Lighting Analysis, Appendix Page 157

The Archer School for Girls July 2013

Table 22: Calculated Luminance Summary - Project with Athletics Field lighting OFF - Receptor Site D-1

Calculated Luminance Summary - All Proposed Project Elements Except Athletics Filed LightingReceptor Site D-1

-35 -30 -25 -20 -15 -10 -5 0 5 10 15 20 25 30 3522.5 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.0017.5 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.0012.5 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.007.5 0.20 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.10 0.20 0.00 0.002.5 0.10 0.20 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.10 0.20 0.00 0.00-2.5 4.10 4.30 2.10 0.20 0.20 0.20 0.20 0.20 0.20 0.20 0.20 0.20 0.20 0.20 0.20-7.5 0.10-12.5-17.5-22.5

Average 0.155Maximum 4.30 Multipurpose Facility

Minimum 0.00Max:Avg 27.8 :1

*Empty cells were outside of the modeled area for the calculation, and therefore did not record any data.

Table 23: Calculated Luminance Summary - Project with Athletics Field lighting OFF - Receptor Site E

Calculated Luminance Summary - All Proposed Project Elements Except Athletics Filed LightingReceptor Site E

-35 -30 -25 -20 -15 -10 -5 0 5 10 15 20 25 30 3522.5 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.0017.5 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.0012.5 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.007.5 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.002.5 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.10 0.10 0.20 1.30 0.20 0.40 0.60 0.10 0.20 0.20 0.20-2.5 1.10 1.00 1.00 1.10 1.00 1.00 3.42 2.96 0.10 0.10 0.00 0.20 0.40 0.10-7.5 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00-12.5 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00-17.5 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00-22.5 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00

Average 0.122Maximum 3.42 Multipurpose Facility

Minimum 0.00Max:Avg 28.0 :1

Page 329: 6.5 LW Red-line of Lighting Report

Archer Forward: Campus Preservation and Improvement Plan - Lighting Analysis, Appendix Page 158

The Archer School for Girls July 2013

Table 24: Calculated Luminance Summary - Project with Athletics Field lighting OFF - Receptor Site F

Calculated Luminance Summary - All Proposed Project Elements Except Athletics Filed LightingReceptor Site F

-35 -30 -25 -20 -15 -10 -5 0 5 10 15 20 25 30 3522.5 1.70 0.60 0.70 0.10 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.0017.5 0.50 1.80 1.90 0.80 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.0012.5 0.70 0.80 0.90 1.00 1.10 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.007.5 0.40 0.70 0.40 0.80 0.50 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.002.5 0.40 0.40 0.40 0.50 0.60 0.00 0.10 0.10 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00-2.5 0.50 0.70 0.40 0.60 0.60 0.20 0.10 0.00 0.00 0.60 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00-7.5 0.40 0.30 0.40 0.50 0.50 0.10 0.10 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00-12.5 0.60 0.70 0.80 0.20 0.50 0.40 3.40 1.20 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00-17.5 0.40 0.50 0.60 0.80 0.20 3.20 0.20 1.60 0.10 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.10-22.5 0.10 0.40 0.60 1.50 2.60 3.60 0.20 1.90 0.50 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.50 0.10

Average 0.343Maximum 3.60 Underground Parking Structure

Minimum 0.00Max:Avg 10.5 :1

Table 25: Calculated Luminance Summary - Project with Athletics Field lighting OFF - Receptor Site G

Calculated Luminance Summary - All Proposed Project Elements Except Athletics Filed LightingReceptor Site G

-35 -30 -25 -20 -15 -10 -5 0 5 10 15 20 25 30 3522.5 0.30 0.60 0.60 0.70 0.80 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 1.20 1.80 2.30 5.20 3.3017.5 0.10 0.40 0.20 0.20 0.20 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.80 0.90 8.80 4.20 4.60 4.10 3.8012.5 0.60 0.70 0.80 0.10 0.20 0.00 0.00 0.80 4.80 4.20 3.90 3.00 8.70 2.70 2.707.5 0.80 1.00 1.20 1.50 1.70 0.00 0.40 2.50 0.30 6.10 2.00 3.10 4.00 7.10 2.502.5 0.40 1.20 0.70 0.70 1.00 0.00 0.20 0.40 0.40 0.30 0.40 0.90 2.80 6.20 2.60-2.5 0.40 3.20 1.00 1.00 1.50 2.30 0.20 0.50 0.40 0.40 0.60 0.40 0.70 1.30 2.70-7.5 0.30 4.20 1.30 1.20 2.20 2.10 0.80 0.50 3.50 0.30 0.30 0.30 0.60 6.20 4.20-12.5 0.10 0.20 0.20 0.40 1.10 2.10 1.80 1.20 1.30 1.60 2.10 2.30 1.90 6.40 4.00-17.5 0.10 0.10 0.20 0.60 2.00 4.00 4.70 3.50 2.10 1.80 2.20 2.00 1.60 1.40 4.10-22.5 0.10 0.10 0.20 0.70 2.50 4.70 1.20 4.30 2.90 1.70 3.20 2.00 0.70 0.10 0.70

Average 1.717Maximum 8.80 Performing Arts Center

Minimum 0.00Max:Avg 5.1 :1

Page 330: 6.5 LW Red-line of Lighting Report

Archer Forward: Campus Preservation and Improvement Plan - Lighting Analysis, Appendix Page 159

The Archer School for Girls July 2013

Table 26: Calculated Luminance Summary - Project with Athletics Field lighting OFF - Receptor Site H

Calculated Luminance Summary - All Proposed Project Elements Except Athletics Filed LightingReceptor Site H

-35 -30 -25 -20 -15 -10 -5 0 5 10 15 20 25 30 3522.5 0.40 0.50 0.50 0.50 0.50 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.0017.5 0.70 0.40 0.50 0.50 0.50 0.50 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.10 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.0012.5 0.50 0.50 0.50 0.50 0.50 0.50 0.50 0.50 0.00 0.10 0.10 0.20 0.20 0.00 0.007.5 2.00 0.50 1.60 0.50 0.30 0.30 0.30 0.30 0.10 0.10 0.10 2.60 2.10 0.80 0.302.5 0.60 0.60 0.30 0.50 0.30 0.30 0.30 0.30 1.40 0.10 0.00 2.60 2.50 3.70 0.50-2.5 0.60 0.50 0.30 0.50 0.30 0.30 0.30 0.30 0.20 0.20 0.10 2.60 2.40 2.10 1.80-7.5 1.00 0.60 0.30 0.40 0.30 0.20 0.30 0.30 0.20 0.10 0.00 2.80 2.20 1.90 1.70-12.5 1.50 0.30 0.10 0.30 0.20 0.20 0.20 0.20 0.10 0.20 0.00 2.00 1.90 1.70 1.60-17.5 0.50 0.20 0.10 0.10 0.10 0.10 0.10 0.10 0.10 0.20 0.00 1.70 1.60 2.70 2.80-22.5 0.10 0.10 0.10 0.10 0.10 0.10 0.10 0.10 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00

Average 0.551Maximum 3.70 Visual Arts Center

Minimum 0.00Max:Avg 6.7 :1

Table 27: Calculated Luminance Summary - Project with Athletics Field lighting OFF - Receptor Site J

Calculated Luminance Summary - All Proposed Project Elements Except Athletics Filed LightingReceptor Site J

-35 -30 -25 -20 -15 -10 -5 0 5 10 15 20 25 30 3522.5 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.0017.5 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.0012.5 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.50 0.407.5 3.30 0.70 1.20 1.20 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.40 0.30 0.20 0.702.5 0.50 0.40 0.40 0.40 0.30 0.40 0.40 0.30 0.30 0.30 0.30 0.20 0.20 0.30 0.20-2.5 0.40 0.40 0.30 0.40 0.30 0.40 0.30 0.30 0.30 0.30 0.30 0.20 0.20 0.30 0.20-7.5 0.30 0.30 0.20 0.30 0.20 0.30 0.30 0.30 0.30 0.30 0.30 0.20 0.20 0.20 0.20-12.5-17.5-22.5

Average 0.212Maximum 3.30 Multipurpose Facility

Minimum 0.00Max:Avg 15.5 :1

*Empty cells were outside of the modeled area for the calculation, and therefore did not record any data.

Page 331: 6.5 LW Red-line of Lighting Report

Archer Forward: Campus Preservation and Improvement Plan - Lighting Analysis, Appendix Page 160

The Archer School for Girls July 2013

Reference

Lighting for Exterior Environments an IESNA Recommended Practice, IESNA RP-33-99, February 27, 1999.

Lighting for Exteriors, IESNA The Lighting Handbook 10th Edition, 2011\\

International Dark-Sky Association – Information Sheet 76, http://www.darksky.org/infoshts/is076.html,

Exterior Lighting: Glare and Light Trespass, July 1996.

American National Standard Practice for Roadway Lighting, ANSI/IESNA RP-8-00, Illuminance Criteria June 27, 2000.

American National Standard Practice for Roadway Lighting, ANSI/IESNA RP-8-00,

Illuminance Method Recommended Values, pg. 8, June 27, 2000.

Title 24, www.energy.ca.gov/title24/, Outdoor Lighting, October 1, 2005.

Lighting for Energy Efficient Luminous Environments, by Helms, Ronald L., and Belcher, M. Clay,

Vertical Limits of the Field of View, 1991.

International Commission on Illumination, CIE 112-1994

Advanced Lighting Guidelines, Illumination Range – Lighting and Human Performance, 2003 Edition.