4.5. minimum spanning trees

31
1 4.5. Minimum Spanning Trees •Definition of MST •Generic MST algorithm •Kruskal's algorithm •Prim's algorithm

Upload: konane

Post on 13-Jan-2016

34 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

DESCRIPTION

4.5. Minimum Spanning Trees. Definition of MST Generic MST algorithm Kruskal's algorithm Prim's algorithm. Definition of MST. Let G=(V,E) be a connected, undirected graph. For each edge (u,v) in E , we have a weight w(u,v) specifying the cost (length of edge) to connect u and v. - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: 4.5. Minimum Spanning Trees

1

4.5. Minimum Spanning Trees

•Definition of MST

•Generic MST algorithm

•Kruskal's algorithm

•Prim's algorithm

Page 2: 4.5. Minimum Spanning Trees

2

Definition of MST

• Let G=(V,E) be a connected, undirected graph.

• For each edge (u,v) in E, we have a weight w(u,v) specifying the cost (length of edge) to connect u and v.

• We wish to find a (acyclic) subset T of E that connects all of the vertices in V and whose total weight is minimized.

• Since the total weight is minimized, the subset T must be acyclic (no circuit).

• Thus, T is a tree. We call it a spanning tree.

• The problem of determining the tree T is called the minimum-spanning-tree problem.

Page 3: 4.5. Minimum Spanning Trees

3

Application of MST: an example

• In the design of electronic circuitry, it is often necessary to make a set of pins electrically equivalent by wiring them together.

• To interconnect n pins, we can use n-1 wires, each connecting two pins.

• We want to minimize the total length of the wires.• Minimum Spanning Trees can be used to model

this problem.

Page 4: 4.5. Minimum Spanning Trees

4

Electronic Circuits:

Page 5: 4.5. Minimum Spanning Trees

5

Electronic Circuits:

Page 6: 4.5. Minimum Spanning Trees

6

Here is an example of a connected graph and its minimum spanning tree:

a

b

h

c d

e

fg

i

4

8 79

10

1442

2

6

1

711

8

Notice that the tree is not unique: replacing (b,c) with (a,h) yields another spanning tree with the same minimum weight.

Page 7: 4.5. Minimum Spanning Trees

7

Growing a MST(Generic Algorithm)

• Set A is always a subset of some minimum spanning tree. This property is called the invariant Property.

• An edge (u,v) is a safe edge for A if adding the edge to A does not destroy the invariant.

• A safe edge is just the CORRECT edge to choose to add to T.

GENERIC_MST(G,w)1 A:={}2 while A does not form a spanning tree do3 find an edge (u,v) that is safe for A4 A:=A∪{(u,v)}5 return A

Page 8: 4.5. Minimum Spanning Trees

8

How to find a safe edge

We need some definitions and a theorem.• A cut (S,V-S) of an undirected graph G=(V,E) is a

partition of V.• An edge crosses the cut (S,V-S) if one of its

endpoints is in S and the other is in V-S.• An edge is a light edge crossing a cut if its weight

is the minimum of any edge crossing the cut.

Page 9: 4.5. Minimum Spanning Trees

9

V-S↓

a

b

h

c d

e

fg

i

4

8 79

10

1442

2

6

1

711

8

S↑ ↑ S

↓ V-S

• This figure shows a cut (S,V-S) of the graph.

• The edge (d,c) is the unique light edge crossing the cut.

Page 10: 4.5. Minimum Spanning Trees

10

Theorem 1• Let G=(V,E) be a connected, undirected graph with a real-

valued weight function w defined on E.• Let A be a subset of E that is included in some minimum

spanning tree for G.• Let (S,V-S) be any cut of G such that for any edge (u, v) in

A, {u, v} S or {u, v} (V-S). • Let (u,v) be a light edge crossing (S,V-S).• Then, edge (u,v) is safe for A.• Proof: Let Topt be a minimum spanning tree.(Blue)• A --a subset of Topt and (u,v)-- a light edge crossing (S, V-S)• If (u,v) is NOT safe, then (u,v) is not in T. (See the red edge in Figure)• There MUST be another edge (u’, v’) in Topt crossing (S, V-S).(Green)• We can replace (u’,v’) in Topt with (u, v) and get another treeT’opt

• Since (u, v) is light , T’opt is also optimal. 1

2

11 1

1 1

1

Page 11: 4.5. Minimum Spanning Trees

11

Corollary .2• Let G=(V,E) be a connected, undirected graph with a real-

valued weight function w defined on E.• Let A be a subset of E that is included in some minimum

spanning tree for G.• Let C be a connected component (tree) in the forest

GA=(V,A).• Let (u,v) be a light edge (shortest among all edges

connecting C with other components) connecting C to some other component in GA.

• Then, edge (u,v) is safe for A. (For Kruskal’s algorithm)

Page 12: 4.5. Minimum Spanning Trees

12

The algorithms of Kruskal and Prim• The two algorithms are elaborations of the generic

algorithm.• They each use a specific rule to determine a safe

edge in line 3 of GENERIC_MST.• In Kruskal's algorithm,

– The set A is a forest.– The safe edge added to A is always a least-weight edge

in the graph that connects two distinct components.• In Prim's algorithm,

– The set A forms a single tree.– The safe edge added to A is always a least-weight edge

connecting the tree to a vertex not in the tree.

Page 13: 4.5. Minimum Spanning Trees

13

Kruskal's algorithm(basic part)

1 (Sort the edges in an increasing order)2 A:={}3 while E is not empty do {3 take an edge (u, v) that is shortest in E and delete it from E4 if u and v are in different components then add (u, v) to A }Note: each time a shortest edge in E is considered.

Page 14: 4.5. Minimum Spanning Trees

14

Kruskal's algorithmMST_KRUSKAL(G,w)1 A:={}2 for each vertex v in V[G]3 do MAKE_SET(v)4 sort the edges of E by nondecreasing weight w5 for each edge (u,v) in E, in order by nondecreasing

weight6 do if FIND_SET(u) != FIND_SET(v)7 then A:=A {(u,v)}∪8 UNION(u,v)9 return A(Disjoint set is discussed in Chapter 21, Page 498)

Page 15: 4.5. Minimum Spanning Trees

15

Disjoint-Set (Chapter 21, Page 498)• Keep a collection of sets S1, S2, .., Sk,

– Each Si is a set, e,g, S1={v1, v2, v8}.

• Three operations

– Make-Set(x)-creates a new set whose only member is x.

– Union(x, y) –unites the sets that contain x and y, say, Sx and Sy, into a new set that is the union of the two sets.

– Find-Set(x)-returns a pointer to the representative of the set containing x.

– Each operation takes O(log n) time.

Page 16: 4.5. Minimum Spanning Trees

16

• Our implementation uses a disjoint-set data structure to maintain several disjoint sets of elements.

• Each set contains the vertices in a tree of the current forest.

• The operation FIND_SET(u) returns a representative element from the set that contains u.

• Thus, we can determine whether two vertices u and v belong to the same tree by testing whether FIND_SET(u) equals FIND_SET(v).

• The combining of trees is accomplished by the UNION procedure.

• Running time O(|E| lg (|E|)).

Page 17: 4.5. Minimum Spanning Trees

17

a

b

h

c d

e

fg

i

4

8 79

10

1442

2

6

1

711

8

The execution of Kruskal's algorithm (Moderate part)

•The edges are considered by the algorithm in sorted order by weight.

•The edge under consideration at each step is shown with a red weight number.

Page 18: 4.5. Minimum Spanning Trees

18

a

b

h

c d

e

fg

i

4

8 79

10

1442

2

6

1

711

8

a

b

h

c d

e

fg

i

4

8 79

10

1442

2

6

1

711

8

Page 19: 4.5. Minimum Spanning Trees

19

a

b

h

c d

e

fg

i

4

8 79

10

1442

2

6

1

711

8

a

b

h

c d

e

fg

i

4

8 79

10

1442

2

6

1

711

8

Page 20: 4.5. Minimum Spanning Trees

20

a

b

h

c d

e

fg

i

4

8 79

10

1442

2

6

1

711

8

a

b

h

c d

e

fg

i

4

8 79

10

1442

2

6

1

711

8

Page 21: 4.5. Minimum Spanning Trees

21

a

b

h

c d

e

fg

i

4

8 79

10

1442

2

6

1

711

8

a

b

h

c d

e

fg

i

4

8 79

10

1442

2

6

1

711

8

Page 22: 4.5. Minimum Spanning Trees

22

a

b

h

c d

e

fg

i

4

8 79

10

1442

2

6

1

711

8

a

b

h

c d

e

fg

i

4

8 79

10

1442

2

6

1

711

8

Page 23: 4.5. Minimum Spanning Trees

23

Prim's algorithm(basic part)

MST_PRIM(G,w,r)1. A={}2. S:={r} (r is an arbitrary node in V)

3. Q=V-{r};

4. while Q is not empty do {5 take an edge (u, v) such that (1) u S and v Q (v S ) and

(u, v) is the shortest edge satisfying (1)

6 add (u, v) to A, add v to S and delete v from Q

}

Page 24: 4.5. Minimum Spanning Trees

24

Prim's algorithmMST_PRIM(G,w,r)1 for each u in Q do2 key[u]:=∞3 parent[u]:=NIL4 key[r]:=0; parent[r]=NIL;5 QV[Q]6 while Q!={} do7 u:=EXTRACT_MIN(Q); if parent[u]Nil print (u,

parent[u])8 for each v in Adj[u] do9 if v in Q and w(u,v)<key[v]10 then parent[v]:=u11 key[v]:=w(u,v)

Page 25: 4.5. Minimum Spanning Trees

25

priority queue Q: three important operations– EXTRACT-MIN(Q) –takes log (n) times if

there are n items in Q.– Insert an element (key u) into Q- takes log(n)

time.– Update(u, k): update the key value of element u

into k. It takes Olog (n) time for adaptable priority queue (heap).

Page 26: 4.5. Minimum Spanning Trees

26

• Grow the minimum spanning tree from the root vertex r.

• Q is a priority queue, holding all vertices that are not in the tree now.

• key[v] is the minimum weight of any edge connecting v to a vertex in the tree.

• parent[v] names the parent of v in the tree.• When the algorithm terminates, Q is empty; the

minimum spanning tree A for G is thus A={(v,parent[v]):v∈V-{r}}.

• Running time: O(||E||lg |V|).

Page 27: 4.5. Minimum Spanning Trees

27

a

b

h

c d

e

fg

i

4

8 79

10

1442

2

6

1

711

8

a

b

h

c d

e

fg

i

4

8 79

10

1442

2

6

1

711

8

The execution of Prim's algorithm(basic part)

the root vertex

Page 28: 4.5. Minimum Spanning Trees

28

a

b

h

c d

e

fg

i

4

8 79

10

1442

2

6

1

711

8

a

b

h

c d

e

fg

i

4

8 79

10

1442

2

6

1

711

8

Page 29: 4.5. Minimum Spanning Trees

29

a

b

h

c d

e

fg

i

4

8 79

10

1442

2

6

1

711

8

a

b

h

c d

e

fg

i

4

8 79

10

1442

2

6

1

711

8

Page 30: 4.5. Minimum Spanning Trees

30

a

b

h

c d

e

fg

i

4

8 79

10

1442

2

6

1

711

8

a

b

h

c d

e

fg

i

4

8 79

10

1442

2

6

1

711

8

Page 31: 4.5. Minimum Spanning Trees

31

a

b

h

c d

e

fg

i

4

8 79

10

1442

2

6

1

711

8

Bottleneck spanning tree: A spanning tree of G whose largest edge weight is minimum over all spanning trees of G. The value of the bottleneck spanning tree is the weight of the

maximum-weight edge in T.

Theorem: A minimum spanning tree is also a bottleneck spanning tree. (Challenge problem)