4403 asug sap_presentation

Learn how to gain enhanced analysis capability

with US Eliminations in SAP BPC

Paul Rafferty, eBay PayPal

Vish Arunachalam, Perceptive Technologies

[

Real Experience. Real Advantage.

[

2

Today’s speakers

Paul Rafferty SAP Functional Lead

eBay PayPal

[email protected]

www.ebayinc.com

Vish Arunachalam Principal, EPM AdvantageFinance

Perceptive Technologies

[email protected]

www.perceptinc.com

AdvantageFinance

mailto:[email protected]



[

3

Learning Points

Learn what it takes to enable enhanced analysis

capability with US eliminations in BPC

Get real-world tips and lessons learned with designing US

Eliminations in BPC

Understand typical challenges faced during intercompany

elimination analysis while using US eliminations in BPC


[ SAP Components & Application Integration

EPM Legal and Managerial Consolidations BPC NW

BW- Data storage, Infoproviders,

Meta Data and Master Data

ECC - ERP NonSAP Data

Planning, Analysis and

Reporting

4


[ BPC NW Implementation Highlights

Legal consolidation primarily company code based

Managerial and Segment reporting handled using profit centers

Reduced IC Elim accounts with uniformity across company codes

Currency translation for FASB 52 compliance handled in SAP ECC

All reported data and master data loaded from ECC via BW to BPC

Provided enhanced journal posting capability (multi-currency/ledger)

5


[ Intercompany US Elimination: Basics

When reporting the financial results of a group of entities,

BPC identifies Intercompany activities and balances and

posts entries so these activities and balances are fully

eliminated when looking at the overall results for the

group

Intercompany elimination entries should be reflected only

in groups in which both the entity and the partner entity

are part of the group

6


[ US Eliminations

BPC US Elimination process addresses simple

intercompany requirements in financial application, where

a full legal consolidation application is not required

Multiple lower level legal entities related data is eliminated

at first common parent

Consolidation Task “US widely used Intercompany

Elimination” uses:

Process Chain /CPMB/IC_ELIMINAT ION

Script Logic ICELIM.LGF

Business Rule Table US Elimination

7


[ US Eliminations - Prerequisites

The application must include a dimension of type I,

Intercompany

The Intercompany dimension must include the property

ENTITY, whose values are entity names

The account dimension must include the property

ELIMACC, whose values are account names

The entity dimension must include the property ELIM,

whose values are Y or blank.

The appropriate business rule table and DTS must be set

up

8


[ Illustration: IC Elimination

All eliminations between X, Y, M and N are eliminated at Elimination Entity A

Reconciliation is a challenge when too many children roll up under a single parent elimination entity

Parent A

Elimination Entity A

Legal entity X

Legal entity Y

Legal entity M

Legal entity N

9


[ Illustration: IC Transaction – Basic Design

Entity

Datasource

Period

Account

Trading

Partner

Amount

$

X INPUT 2011.SEP 122000 Y 50000

Y INPUT 2011.SEP 250000 X -50000

M INPUT 2011.SEP 122000 Y 23000

Y INPUT 2011.SEP 250000 M -23000

N INPUT 2011.SEP 122000 Y 5000

Y INPUT 2011.SEP 250000 N -5000

10

Note: A/c 122000 IC Accounts Receivable | A/c 250000 IC Accounts Payable


[ Illustration: IC Elimination – Basic Design

Entity

Datasource

Period

Account

Trading

Partner

Amount

$

A ELIM 2011.SEP 122000 Y -78000

A ELIM 2011.SEP 250000 X 50000

A ELIM 2011.SEP 122000 M 23000

A ELIM 2011.SEP 250000 N 5000

Note: To simplify scenario, the ELIMACC records are excluded in above table

11

Granularity is lost post IC elimination!


[ New approach to IC Elimination

In the Financial Application data model, add an additional

user defined dimension for Entity

Normally when eliminations happen, the granularity is

retained at Elimination Entity and Trading Partner

As there’s an additional user defined dimension for Entity,

data is aggregated by Elimination entity, Trading Partner

and also by the additional user defined dimension for

Entity

A simple additional dimension in data model saves

tremendous effort later on during reporting design and

analysis

Don’t lose granularity post IC elimination!

12


[ Illustration: Intercompany Transaction - New

Entity

Datasource

Z

Legal

Entity

Period

Account

Trading

Partner

Amount

$

X INPUT X 2011.SEP 122000 Y 50000

Y INPUT Y 2011.SEP 250000 X -50000

M INPUT M 2011.SEP 122000 Y 23000

Y INPUT Y 2011.SEP 250000 M -23000

N INPUT N 2011.SEP 122000 Y 5000

Y INPUT Y 2011.SEP 250000 N -5000

13

Note: Data Model includes additional user defined dimension Z Legal Entity


[ Illustration: IC Elimination – New

Entity

Datasource

Z

Legal

Entity

Period

Account

Trading

Partner

Amount

$

A ELIM X 2011.SEP 122000 Y -50000

A ELIM Y 2011.SEP 250000 X 50000

A ELIM M 2011.SEP 122000 Y -23000

A ELIM Y 2011.SEP 250000 M 23000

A ELIM N 2011.SEP 122000 Y -5000

A ELIM Y 2011.SEP 250000 N 5000

Note: To simplify scenario, the ELIMACC records are excluded in above table

14


[ Demo

BPC NW with

Basic US elimination and

US elimination with enhanced analysis enabled

15


[ Result when enhanced analysis is enabled

16

Result when enhanced analysis is not enabled

Note: Extract of BW Data in CPMB info cube shown to illustrate granularity of data under both scenarios


[ Enhanced Analysis works with managerial

consolidation too!

User defined dimension can be added in similar manner

for managerial consolidation too

Additional user defined dimension can be added for profit

center or segment or any such managerial entity, as

applicable

Ensure that the desired data granularity for elimination is

achieved by calibrating data model to suit analysis needs

17


[ This can be achieved in EPM BPC 10 too!

US Elimination in BPC 10 works in similar manner

Adding additional user defined dimension for Entity will

allow retention of granularity at Elimination Entity, Trading

Partner and User Defined Entity

18


[

19

Best Practices

IC Reconciliation is often a challenge in close process,

address this upfront

Consider post IC elimination review and analysis process

and pain areas as critical input for designing optimal data

model for BPC consolidation

Consider all possible dimensions required for

Consolidation (Legal and Management)

What views of data do you need supported at the underlying

ledger?

Consider system performance implications with adding

dimensions?

Define and activate all potentially required dimensions on

day one to avoid complex and costly changes later


[

20

Key Learnings

Deficiency in data model could adversely impact close

process

Facilitate reconciliation by addressing granularity of IC

Elimination data

Don’t lose granularity post IC elimination. More detail

and granularity is appropriate

Optimal data model for consolidation will minimize

reporting and analysis challenges during financial close


[ Q&A

21


[

Paul Rafferty SAP Functional Lead, eBay PayPal

[email protected]

Vish Arunachalam ACA Principal, EPM AdvantageFinance , Perceptive Technologies

SAP Certified BPC Elite | linkedin.com/in/arunvis

[email protected] | www.perceptinc.com/adfin

Thanks!

22


http://www.linkedin.com/in/arunvis


http://www.perceptinc.com/adfin


[

23

[

] Thank you for participating.

SESSION CODE:

4403

Please remember to complete and return your

evaluation form following this session.

For ongoing education on this area of focus, visit the

Year-Round Community page at www.asug.com/yrc

4403 asug sap_presentation

Education