31 march 2004 fpcf floating production cooperative forum michael taggart aberdeen maritime...

31 March 2004

FPCF FPCF FLOATING PRODUCTION COOPERATIVE FORUMFLOATING PRODUCTION COOPERATIVE FORUM

Michael Taggartwww.aberdeenmaritime.com

Aberdeen Maritime Consultants Ltd.

31 March 2004 D\Floating production Cooperative Forum 2\\www.aberdeenmaritime.com

Aberdeen Maritime Consultants ltd.PESENTATION SUMMARY

LEARNING PROCESS

DIFFERENCES FPSO TO TANKER

ECONOMIC CONSIDERATIONS

EFFECTIVE KNOWLEDGE TRANSFER

FPCF PROPOSAL


Aberdeen Maritime Consultants ltd.

THE LEARNING PROCESS



0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

70%

80%

90%

100%

0 1 2 3 4 5 6

REPETITIONS PERFORMED

% L

EA

RN

TLEARNING CURVES

INDIVIDUAL

FPSO PROJECT ?

BUILD2 YEARS

PRODUCTION OPERATIONS : 15 YEARS

SERIES WARSHIP

PRODUCTION

EX

TR

A



0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

70%

80%

90%

100%

0 1 2 3 4 5 6

REPETITIONS PERFORMED

% L

EA

RN

TLEARNING CURVES

INDIVIDUAL

FPSO PROJECTS ?

SERIES WARSHIP

PRODUCTION

EX

TR

A



COATED CARBON STEEL CAISSON

PUMP CAISSONS .......... ANYTHING TO LEARN AFTER 40 YRS?

CENTRALISERS

UNCOATED Cu Ni PUMP STRING

SS PUMP BOWL WITH STRAINER BELOW

INJECT HYPOCHLORITE

COATING DAMAGE ?


Aberdeen Maritime Consultants ltd.FACTORS AFFECTING LEARNING PROCESS

LEARNING FACILITATORS

LARGE REPEAT SERIES

UP TO DATE PRESCRIPTIVE CODES

JOB / TEAM STABILITY

ANTICIPATING PROBLEMS ***

STRAIGHT DEALING FOR TRUE VALUE

LEARNING INHIBITORS

SHORT RUN / ONE OFF SOLUTIONS

GOAL SETTING RISK BASED CODES

CONSTANT RE-ORGANISATION

REACTIVE ENGINEERING ONLY

CONTRACTUAL GAMES & COST CUTS

SCHEDULE PRESSURE ***



SOME DIFFERENCES BETWEEN FPSOS AND TANKERS



0

5

10

15

20

25

30

35

40

45

50

55

0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16 18 20

YEARS AFTER START UP

SA

VIN

GS

NE

ED

ED

IN Y

EA

R 'n

' TO

JU

STI

FY

1 U

NIT

PR

OJE

CT

EX

PE

ND

ITU

RE

REQUIRED OPEX SAVINGS / UNIT CAPEX

10% RETURN p.a.

20% RETURN p.a.

SHIP STEEL REPLACEMENT (DRYDOCK)

FPSO STEEL REPLACEMENT (AT FIELD….NO DRYDOCK)

P&I CLUB

MAJOR COATING ISSUES & STEEL REPLACEMENT

IN TANKERS


Aberdeen Maritime Consultants ltd.CAN AFFORD EXTRA BUILD QUALITY

POOR ROOT PASS COMMON ON LESS CRITICAL SHIP’S PIPEWORK

SOLVE

TIG ROOT PASS

EXTRA RADIOGRAPHY

REPAIR & INSPECT 2 MORE / FAILURE (or ASME B31.3 INSTEAD OF CLASS)

CAN EASILY JUSTIFY Cu Ni FOR SOME DUTIES IN LONG SERVICE LIFE



SOME ECONOMIC CONSIDERATIONS


Aberdeen Maritime Consultants ltd.EFFECT OF NPV ON PRODUCTION INCOME

-5 0 5 10 15 20

YEARS FROM START UP

NP

V O

F 6

MO

NTH

S P

RO

DU

CTI

ON

-5 0 5 10 15 20

YEARS FROM START UP

BB

LS /

DA

Y

PR

OD

UC

TIO

N

AREA 1 >> AREA 2 …… EARLIEST START UP DATE IS PROJECT KING

AREA 1

AREA 2

PLATEAUPLATEAU



0

10

20

30

40

50

60

EN

GIN

EE

RIN

G M

AN

-MO

NTH

SRELATIVE VALUE OF TIME SPENT DURING PROJECT DEFINITION

1 D

AY

DE

LA

Y H

OO

K U

P

OR

IN

ST

AL

LA

TIO

N

1 D

AY

DE

LA

Y S

TA

RT

O

F P

RO

DU

CT

ION

1 D

AY

OF

PR

OD

UC

TIO

N

LO

ST

5 Y

EA

RS

AF

TE

R

ST

AR

T U

P

1 T

ON

NE

OF

ST

EE

L A

DD

ED

5 Y

EA

RS

AF

TE

R S

TA

RT

UP

MA

IN G

EN

ER

AT

ION

GA

S C

OM

PR

ES

SIO

N



KNOWLEDGE TRANSFER


Aberdeen Maritime Consultants ltd.TYPICAL KNOWLEDGE TRANSFER

LAST BUILD

ONGOING PRODUCTION OPERATIONS

BUILD2 YEARS


-5 0 5 10 15 20

YEARS FROM START UP

NP

V O

F 6

MO

NT

HS

PR

OD

UC

TIO

N

EARLIEST START UP DATE IS PROJECT KING

AREA 1

AREA 2

START UP DATE !

SCHEDULEPRESSURE

INHIBITSLEARNING

HOWEVERSCHEDULE PRESSURE

IMPROVES VALUE

IT IS GOOD!

GATHER LESSONS &

INPUT WHEN PRESSURE IS

LOWER


Aberdeen Maritime Consultants ltd.IMPROVED KNOWLEDGE TRANSFER

LASTBUILD

ONGOING PRODUCTION OPERATIONS

BUILD2 YEARS


SEPARATE LESSONS INTO BUILD SPECIFICATION PROJECT

OTHERBUILD

OTHER PRODUCTION OPERATIONS & INDUSTRIES

LESSONS INTO OPERATING & MAINTENANCE TECHNIQUES

BETTER TAKEN OUT OF PROJECT

TIMESCALE! / PARTLYOUTSOURCED?

ALSO EXCHANGESDATA WITH OTHER OPERATORS AND

INDUSTRIES


Aberdeen Maritime Consultants ltd.REASON FOR FPCF

IF A COMPANY CANNOT OR WILL NOT INVEST IN DOING THIS IN HOUSE

THEN…….

IF IT MAKES ECONOMIC SENSE TO STIFLE LONG TERM FEED BACK DURING THE BUILD PHASE TO ENSURE MEETING START UP DATE,

THEN…….

IT CERTAINLY MAKES ECONOMIC SENSE TO GATHER LESSONS OFFLINE & ANTICIPATE PROBLEMS EXPERIENCED BY OTHERS.

YOU HAVEN’T IMPLEMENTED ANY LESSON UNTIL IT IS PUT INTO A BUILD SPECIFICATION OR A MAINTENANCE / OPERATING ROUTINE.

EVEN THEN – ONLY WHEN THE YARD ACTUALLY DOES IT!

IT WOULD MAKE SENSE TO JOIN WITH OTHER COMPANIES AND USE A CONSULTANCY

PROVIDED THAT

THE SERVICE PROVIDER GENERATES INPUTS THAT CAN BE PASTED STRAIGHT INTO A BUILD SPECIFICATION, MAINTENANCE ROUTINE OR

OPERATING PROCEDURE.



FLOATING PRODUCTION CO-OPERATIVE FORUM


Aberdeen Maritime Consultants ltd.PROPOSAL

PHASE 0 ESTABLISH INDUSTRY INTEREST + ACTIVE CONTRIBUTION

PHASE 1 GATHER OPERATOR PROJECT & OPERATIONAL EXPERIENCE

GATHER SHIPYARD PROJECT EXPERIENCE

GATHER TANKER MAINTENANCE EXPERIENCE

PHASE 2 WRITE BEST PRACTICE NOTES

MOUNT ON WEBSITE

PHASE 3 RESTRUCTURE FOR ONGOING KNOWLEDGE SHARING


Aberdeen Maritime Consultants ltd.FPCF WORKING PRINCIPLES

ACTIVE INPUT REQUIRED FROM PARTICIPANTS

CASE HISTORY & WHERE POSSIBLE PHOTOGRAPHS

SOLUTION ADOPTED / PROPOSED

ORDER OF MAGNITUDE COSTS

OUTPUT FROM ABERDEEN MARITIME (WEB BASED)

ISSUE ALERTS ON WEB SITE

DRAFT BEST PRACTICE, WITH COST INFORMATION, WHERE AVAILABLE

OUTPUT TO BE ANOMYNOUS (IN TERMS OF OPERATOR & FPSO)


Aberdeen Maritime Consultants ltd.COST & TIME

PARTICPATING FEE

3 off £5000 INSTALLMENTS (2004, 2005, 2006)

BASED ON MINIMUM 12 PARTICIPANTS

THREE YEAR RUN

SCHEDULE

Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4 Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4 Q1 Q2 Q30A Secure Participant Agreement0B Prioritise Problem Areas to address

1A Analyse User / Regulator's FPSO case histories1B Analyse Shipyard FPSO case histories1C Analyse Tanker Maintenance data1D Phase 1 Forum Meeting

2A Organise Participants For Writing Best Practice2B Write Best Practice2C Mount Best Practice on Website / Publish2D Phase 2 Forum Meeting

3A Wind Up Initiative, 3B Restructure for ongoing knowledge sharing.

2004 2005Phase Activity

2006


Aberdeen Maritime Consultants ltd.ORGANISATION

PROJECT MANAGER

INFORMATION SHARING & BEST PRACTICE DEVELOPMENT

TANKER MAINTENANCE

M.LEWIN

CONSULTANT PARTICIPANTS

SHIPBUILDING / CONVERSION SPECIALIST

FPSO OPERATIONS / MAINTENANCE

M.TAGGART

SPONSOR ELECTED FROM

STEERING COMMITTEE

STEERING COMMITTEE COMPRISING 1 SENIOR REPRESENTATIVE FROM EACH

PARTICIPATING ORGANISATION. CONSULTED AT FORUM MEETINGS BUT REPRESENTED BY PROJECT SPONSOR

DAY TO DAY.

PARTICIPANT'S TECHNICAL EXPERTS CAPABLE OF PROVIDING CASE HISTORY INPUT AND AGREEING BEST PRACTICE. 1 OR MORE FROM EACH PARTICIPANT


Aberdeen Maritime Consultants ltd.BENEFITS / FURTHER INFORMATION

ANTICIPATED PAYBACKS

COST SAVINGS - REDUCED REWORK OFFSHORE IN EARLY OPERATIONS

COST SAVINGS - BETTER CAPEX Vs. OPEX DECISIONS

COST SAVINGS - REDUCED SHUTDOWN FOR UNPLANNED MAINTENANCE

INCREASED REVENUE – PROJECT SCHEDULE COMPRESSION WITHOUT COMPROMISING TECHNICAL INTEGRITY

REDUCED WASTE - ‘ENGINEERING’ AT THE RIGHT TIME REDUCING REWORK

CONTACT FOR MORE DETAILS

WEBPAGE www.aberdeenmaritime.com

E-MAIL [email protected]

PHONE +44 7969 682 969


Aberdeen Maritime Consultants ltd.ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS

Aberdeen Maritime would like to thank the following for their valuable and ongoing input in developing this concept:-

EM&I

– Danny Constantinis

– Judy Burdett

Dr. J.R MacGregor

Marine Technical Limits

– Matt Lewin

31 march 2004 fpcf floating production cooperative forum michael taggart aberdeen maritime...

Documents

aberdeen maritime consultants

years production operations

production income area

day of production lost

learning process slide

plateau slide

lower slide

knowledge transfer slide