3 7 valgustuse kalkulatsioonid

7/17/2019 3 7 Valgustuse Kalkulatsioonid

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/3-7-valgustuse-kalkulatsioonid 1/13

H A N S E N & H E N N E B E R GRÅDGIVENDE INGENIØRER

Prepared: Peder Øbro Checked: Allan Ruberg Approved: Allan Ruberg

3784not001, Rev. , 4.11.003

!"ght"ng calculat"on# $or t%p"cal #treet# and lu&"na"re#

'#ton"a Pa"de (treet !"ght"ng Pro)ect

*an"#h Po+er Con#ult

HANSEN & HENNEBERG Vibevej 20 Tel 45 • 38 16 50 00 CVR-nr 13 5! 08 85

"#ben$%vn AS " 2400 "#ben$%vn NV '%( 45 • 38 16 50 50 )))$%n*en-$enneber+,



("de

1 Street types and lighting classes

1.1Performance requirement classes

The European lighting class system as laid down in the EN 13201

Road Lighting requirements1 operates with two main types of

streets (roads!

1"treets#roads for motori$ed %ehicles of medium to high

speed& where the lighting requirements meet the need of the

dri%ers for %isual conditions'

t is recommended to use the )E* classes in Estonia with

MEW3 as the preferred class for main-streets and

traffic streets/roads'

2"treets#roads#areas for pedestrians and pedal cyclists with low

traffic intensity and lower dri%ing speed of the %ehicles' Thelighting requirements meet the needs of the pedestrians and

pedal cyclists& whereas the dri%ers must complement with

their own headlights'

The street#road#area+types are residential roads& pedestrian

streets& par,ing areas& separate foot+#cycleways along type 1

roads etc'

t is recommended to use the - classes in Estonia with

A1 as the preferred class in the inner of cities and

A2 on the calmer and more open areas'

To ma,e the system complete one has also to include requirements

for conflict areas on traffic streets#roads with motori$ed traffic& i'e'

intersections& rounda.outs& queuing areas etc' The /E+classes are

intended for this and fits in with one /E+class for each )E#)E*+

class'

The requirements in the -+classes .ased on hemispherical

illuminance are less demanding for the luminaires than the

requirements of the )E#)E* classes .ases on the road surface

luminance'

/hoosing the right class for the street#road has great influence onthe cost of the lighting'

1.2The road surface reflection (in ME/MEWclasses!

n the )E* (and the )E classes the requirement is .ased on the

road surface luminance as seen .y the dri%er' To .e a.le to

calculate the luminance one has to assume appropriate reflection

properties for the road surface'

1 The standard is in the stage of formal %ote as prEN 13201!2002' inal standard

is epected in 2003 or 200'

'rror: Re$erence #ource not $ound Rev. 'rror: Re$erence #ource not $oundA-('- '--'/'R...820447



("de 3

ased on wor,s in the /E (nternational Lighting /ommittee

there are a num.er of reflection ta.les for dry and wet road surfaces

to .e used in luminance calculations'

n the calculations .elow is used!

1 C2 is for the dry road surface

2 W4 is for the wet road surface.

/2 models a rather dar, and specular road surface& assumed to .e

an appropriate choice for roads in Estonia'

)a,ing the road surfaces .righter would sa%e considera.le

amounts of energy ma,ing it possi.le to comply with the

luminance requirements with lower wattages4

N2 and /1 are eamples of ta.les for .righter surfaces as used in5enmar,'

1."#estrictions on luminaries$ % and &classes

The EN 13201 also states methods to restrict glare and discomfort

from the luminaries on the road users and on the en%ironment'

The 6+class restricts the discomfort glare and the o.trusi%e light

onto the en%ironment

3 t is recommended that the 6+class is

+minimum 4 for all types of roads'

The 5+class restricts the discomfort glare and is mainly used where

the lighting ser%es pedestrians and pedal cyclists'

4 t is recommended that the 5+class is

+minimum !" for roads in class A1 and

-minimum !# for roads in class A2 $A3 and A4%.

2




("de 4

./in%ire* %n, li+$ */re*

The luminaries considered .elow are all for high+pressure sodium

lamps'

/lear tu.ular .ul.s are used for )E*+classes whereas diffuse

.ul.s gi%ing more soft light are used for -+classes'

The eamples .elow concentrates on luminaires with flat glass .ut

also ones with clear .owls are considered'

2.1Philips S%S2'"

The "6"203 is a good quality luminaire well suited for common

street lighting in countries with a rough climate'ts top+open facility gi%es easy access for lamp echange'

t has ad7usta.le optics in 8 positions gi%ing it optimal performance

in a wide range of applications as seen in the calculations .elow'

t is a%aila.le in flat glass screen %ersions& 6 (180* and .elow

with low glare and low light onto the en%ironment'

t is also a%aila.le in %ersions with a clear .owl screen& 9/'

-s seen in the calculations .elow& the performance is among the

.est' -t the same time the 6+ and 5+class rating is high for most of the %ersions'

2.2Philips S%S1'1 and 1'2$ Malaga

The )alaga is a simpler luminaire than the 203'

t has a clear .owl screen' :ersions with flat screen are not

a%aila.le'

The "6"101 are for lower wattages& i'e' up to ;0 * high pressure

sodium (<"T#<"E or up to 128 * )ercury (<)E'The "6"102 are for higher wattages& i'e' 100 * to 280 *'

The housing 101 and 102 are used for two %ersions of reflector

optics!

5 The original =)alaga> with a fied optic'

6 The =new> %ersion called ="treetfighter> with ad7usta.le

optics' The "6"102 optics has 8 positions while the

"6"101 has only 3 positions' ?nly photometric data for

<"T light sources ha%e .een a%aila.le for the calculations

.elow'




("de

-s seen in the calculations .elow its a.ility to produce the

luminance uniformity is lower than the a.ility of the "6"203'

<owe%er in the dou.le sided arrangement the ="treetfighter>

"6"102 ad7' 180* <"T o.tains 7ust as long spacing as the

"6"203 180* <"T'

The 6+ and 5+classes are low& so the en%ironmental and glare

restrictions are not complied with'

2.")ndalu* )+,1 and 2

The quality of this luminaire is 7udged as fair' t has a few optical

positions and %ersions with flat glass screen are a%aila.le'

t has not .een possi.le to o.tain photometric data in a standardformat& so the performance has not .een tested in calculations'

(The N5-L*N '1 program is not of much help .ecause it

cannot calculate wet road surface luminance and not hemispherical

illuminance'

The performance of the luminaire is 7udged to .e as the 9hilips

"6" 101 and 102 or may .e as the 6lamo )R-'

The 6+ and 5+class ratings are not ,nown& .ut hopefully they are

?@ with the flat glass screen %ersions'

2.-%lamo* M)#, +TP

The quality of this luminaire is 7udged as fair' The optic is not

ad7usta.le'

The :T9 is has a flat glass screen' (-lso a clear .owl %ersion is

a%aila.le'

The performance is rather good' ts a.ility to produce the

luminance uniformity is .etter than the "6"101#+102 .ut lower

than the 203'

Tilts are needed to achie%e the good performance .ut the 6+ and 5+

class ratings are high& so it can .e used with tilts up to 10A without

.rea,ing the 6+class restriction'

Tilts a.o%e 8A are not necessary in the -+classes'

2.SP S.p.,. M0#, 12/+

The quality of this luminaire is 7udged as fair' The optic is not

ad7usta.le'The appearance is considered to .e poor (gadget+li,e'




("de

The )BR- 12#: has a flat glass screen' (-lso a clear .owl %ersion

is a%aila.le'

The performance is rather good' ts a.ility to produce the

luminance uniformity is .etter than the "6"101#+102 and the

)R- :TR .ut lower than the "6"203'

t is not necessary to tilt the luminaire more than 3A or 8A to o.tain

good performance& howe%er the 6+class restriction (6 is

maintained until CA of tilt'

9lease note! The photometric cur%es shown "9Ds

internet homepage are not the correct ones' The

calculations .elow ha%e .een .ased on other

photometric files send directly from "9 "'p'- in taly'

2.)%uini ,rgo

This is a luminaire with an attracti%e appearance (9hilips ha%e a

luminaire with same type of appearance "6"33#31'

The house is aluminium (die castF and it has a flat glass screen' t

is intended for hori$ontal mounting'

The protection class is only 98& where the other luminaries are

98'

The optic is not ad7usta.le'

The performance is at the same le%el as the "6"101#+102& .ut one

has to remem.er that the -rgo has a flat hori$ontal screen gi%ing it

high 6+ and 5+class ratings i'e' high en%ironmental rating and high

comfort'

The luminaire is %ery well suited for lighting class+-1 or -2 in

areas where aesthetics and comfort are important'




("de 7

" 3ighting calculations 4ommon remar5s

The maintenance factor of 0&;8 applies for all the results'

The luminaires chosen primarily ha%e flat (glass screen' <owe%er

some of them for instance "6"102 and the "6"203 9/ ha%e a

clear .owl screen'

Tilts of the luminaries are allowed as long as the 6+ and 5+class

restrictions are complied with'

9erformance parameters mentioned in the calculation results!

• &a'eG -%arage luminance on the dry road surface• (oG Hniformity min#a%e of luminance on the dry road surface

• (lG Longitudenal uniformity on the dry road surface

• (owG Hniformity min#a%e of luminance on the wet road surface




("de 8

- ig Main #oad

-.16sing e*isting poles

ig )ain Road& Lighting /lass )E*3'

Luminaires mounted on the eisting poles with an arm to ma,e o%erhang ?< I 1 m'

"pacing! 38 m'

None of the luminaries are a.le to comply with the requirements of the lighting class

)E*3 when used in this geometry& i'e' mounted on the eisting masts'

The .est one is the 9hilips "6"203 9/ 180 * "?N+T9& howe%er the luminance le%el&

La%e is somewhat lower than the requirement and the o%erhang needs to .e at the least 1 mto meet the wet road uniformity requirement'

or all luminaries the 280* type can reach the required a%erage luminance .ut not the

uniformities'

n the following ta.le only some of luminaries are shown' The ta.le illustrates that not

e%en the .est luminaries can comply with the )E*3 requirements in the single sided

geometry at the 12 m road width' <eights up to 10 m and tilts up to 10A ha%e .een tested'

The ta.le shows which of the requirements gi%e the pro.lems' The "6"203 9/ almost

meets the requirements if the uniformity on wet road& How is disregarded'

Luminaire Lamp

<"T

*

9os' Tilt A <eight

JmK

La%e

cd#m

)e*uirements +, complied with

"pacing 38 m

?< 1m

La%eM1&0 HoM0&0 HowM0&18

hilips

"6"203 9/ 180 1 8 C 0&; La%eI0&;

"6"203 9/ 180 3 8 C 0&C La%eI0&C HowI0&0C

"6"102 ad7 180 8 8 10 0& La%eI0& HoI0&30 HowI0&0C

"6"102 ad7 280 8 8 10 1&8 HoI0&2; HowI0&0

lamo

)R- :T9 180 + 10 10 0&; La%eI0&; HoI0&31 HowI0&110 0.p.A.

'rror: Re$erence #ource not $oundRev. 'rror: Re$erence #ource not $oundA-('- '--'/'R...820447

1 &5

6"lt



("de 2

)BR- 12#: 180 + C 10 0&; La%eI0&; HoI0&33 HowI0&1

-.27e8 poles and dou9le sided arrangement

or the few .ig main roads of the width 12 m it will .e rele%ant to change the pole

arrangement'

ig )ain Road& Lighting /lass )E*3 all requirements complied with

!oule sided arrangement

Luminaire Lamp

<"T

*

9os' Tilt A <

JmK

?< "pa+

cing

JmK

La%e

cd#m

Num'

per ,m

Lum'

9rice

Lum'

9rice per

,m

hilips

"6"203 6 100 8 8 +1 0 1&0 80 238 11280

"6"203 6 180 8 8 C +1 1&12 1&; 23 10181"6"102 ad7 O 180 8 C +1 1&03 1&; 1;8 ;330C

lamo

)R- :T9 180 + 10 C +1 3 1&1 &8 233 10;1;

uini

-rgo ;0 180 + 0 C +1 1&00 8&8 ;00 213800 0.p.A.

)BR- 12#: 180 + 8 C +1 3 1&13 &8 123C 8;1

)BR- 12#: 180 + C C +1 8 1&0 & 123C 88012

O "6"102 is only 63 (luminous intensity class' 6 at the least is desired'


1 &

5

6"lt

+5



("de 10

S%ll %in r%,

"mall )ain Road& Lighting /lass )E*3

Luminaires mounted on the eisting poles with an arm to ma,e o%erhang ?< I 0 m'

"pacing! 38 m'

Luminaire Lamp

<"T

*

9os' Tilt A <eight

JmK

La%e

/d#m

Num.er

per ,m

Lum'

9rice

Lum'

9rice per

,m

"pacing 38 m

?< 0 m

hilips

"6"203 6 180 3 8 C 1&0 2& 23 C;0"6"102 ad7 O 180 10 10 0&C OO 2&

lamo

)R- :T9 180 + 10 10 0&C0 OO 2& 233 ;

0 0.p.A.

)BR- 12#: 180 + 3 C 0&C OO 2& 123C 3838

O "6"102 is only 63 (luminous intensity class' 6 at the least is desired'

OO The La%e is a .it .elow the requirement


8 &

5

6"lt



("de 11

The following luminaries do not comply with the )E*3 requirements with heights of 10

m and .elow and tilts of 10A and .elow'

Luminaire Lamp

<"T

*

9os' Tilt A <eight

JmK

La%e

cd#m

)e*uirements not complied with

"pacing 38 m

?< 0m

La%eM1&0 HoM0&0 HowM0&18

hilips

"6" 102 180 + 8 10 0& La%eI0& HowI0&11

"6"102 ad7 280 O 8 10 10 1& HowI0&0C

"6"203 9/ 280 1 8+10 10 2&0 HowI0&10

lamo

)R- :T9 280 + 10 10 1&; HowI0&12

0 0.p.A.

)BR- 12#: 280 O + 10 10 1& HoI0&3 HowI0&11iuini

-rgo ;0 180 + 10 0 0& La%eI0& HoI0&3 HowI0&13

-rgo ;1 280 + 10 0 1&; HoI0&3 HowI0&13

O These luminaries are only 63 (luminous intensity class' 6 at the least is desired'




("de 1

)nner road

or inner roads where the illumination is intended for pedestrians and cyclists& lamps withdiffuse .ul.s are recommended& .ecause of the more soft light' The lamps with diffuse

.ul.s ma,es the luminaires less effecti%e .ut it does not matter .ecause the - lighting

classes are less demanding than the )E#)E* classes'

nner street& Lighting /lass -1 or -2

The requirements in the -+classes apply on the whole profile i'e' carriageway& %erge&

wal,way etc' in this case 11m in total'

Luminaires mounted on the eisting poles' "pacing! 38 m'

The height is not critical' -lso higher pole heights are applica.le and for most of the

luminaries also lower pole heights'

The eamples in the ta.le .elow comply with class -1 howe%er the "6"102 is not

recommended .ecause of its %ery low 5+class'

Luminaire Lamp

<"E

*

9os' Tilt A <eight

JmK

6lare

inde

class

Ehs+a%e

l

Num.er

per ,m

Lum'

9rice

Lum'

9rice per

,m"pacing 38 m

?< 1 m

M58 M8 l

hilips

"6"203 6 100 8 8 58 &8 2& 238 ;3C

"6"102 100 OOO 8 53O 8& 2& 13C ;8

lamo

)R- :T9 100 + 8 58 8&3 2& 223 00;

0 0.p.A.

)BR- 12#: OO 100 + 8 58 8& 2& 120 33

5uini

-rgo ; sO 100 + 0 5 8&3 2& 800 12;00


11 &

5

6"lt



("de 13

The eamples in the ta.le .elow comply with class -2& howe%er the "6"203 6 and the

"6"101 has a .it too low 5+class'

Luminaire Lamp

<"E

*

9os' Tilt A <eight

JmK

6lare

inde

class

Ehs+a%e

l

Num.er

per ,m

Lum'

9rice

Lum'

9rice per

,m

"pacing 38 m

?< 1 m

M5 M3 l

hilips

"6"203 6 ;0 2 8 58O 3&8 2& 21;8 2208

"6"101 ;0 OOO 8 58O 3&1 2& 1213 3C2

lamo

)R- :T9 ;0 + 8 5 3&1 2& 2100 000

0 0.p.A.

)BR- 12#: ;0 + 8 5 3&3 2& CC 2285uini

-rgo ; sO ;0 + 0 5 3&8 2& 00 1280

O 6lare restriction not complied with

OO /alculations for )BR- 12#: <"E 100* ha%e .een .ase on photometric file for

<)E 0* as no .etter is a%aila.le

OOO The fied optic %ersion of )alaga "6"101 or P102 has .een used in the calculation

with the <"E light source'

sO These wattages are on special request'

'rror: Re$erence #ource not $oundRev. 'rror: Re$erence #ource not $ound

3 7 valgustuse kalkulatsioonid

Documents