26-10 ü en 110109 dioxin futterfett rev 3 · pdf filete-who dioxin ng/kg te-who ... 10530...

Dioxin in Feed Fats from Schleswig-Holstein

Situation Report of the Federal Government

& First Conclusions

As per 10. January 2011

Dr.Michael Winter

2

Outline

• State of play– Feed fats– Compound feedingstuffs

• Results of the investigation• Regulatory action• Conclusions

Dr.Michael Winter

3

Trigger:

Self-checking of a compound feed producer:1,56 ng/kg PCDD/F – WHO TEQCompound feed, produced using feed fat from thefeed fat manufacturer in Uetersen

Analytical findings on 21.12.2010Information of the authority on 22.12.2010

Cause: Contaminated feed fat

State of Play

Dr.Michael Winter

4

Feed Fat Producerin UetersenTrader O.

Rotterdam, NL Logistic L.Bösel

Bio Gas Oil Producer P.

Emden

Lieferung von 7 * 25 t

Technische

7 deliveries ofa total of 179.2 tof technical mixed fatty acids from 11.11. to

16.11.2010

25 compound feed producers in GER (from 12.11.2010 to 23.12.2010)

No supply of feed fat to other member states or to third countries

2,256 t of feed fat

Technical fats => Feed fatsState of Play

Dr.Michael Winter

5

North-Rhine-Westphalia (2)

Lower Saxony(20)

Feed Fat ProducerUetersen (Logistic/Bösel)

Feed fats => compound feed

Hamburg (1) Saxony-Anhalt(2)

Compound feed with a 2-10% share of contaminated feed fat to: 4,760 agricultural holdings in five German Länder

(Poultry fattening, laying hens, pig fattening, cattle fattening, dairy herds, rabbit fattening)

State of Play

Dr.Michael Winter

6

Analytical findings of the reserve samples of the Feed Fat plant in Uetersen (as per 5.1.2011)

179.92Total

2.462.01Technical mixed fatty acid

26.707.12.2010

2.692.43Technical mixed fatty acid24.323.12.2010


24.681.12.2010


25.7225.11.2010


27.0019.11.2010



Total Dioxin dl-PCB ng/kg TE-WHO

Dioxin ng/kg TE-WHO

Total Dioxin dl-PCB ng/kg TE-WHO

Dioxin ng/kg TE-WHO

Subsequent testingInitial testing

NameQuantity in tDate of

Delivery

Results of the Investigation

Dr.Michael Winter

7

0,50112.11.201026.320HJ 20 P

5,2419.11.201027.320HJ 15 SRP

8,0716.11.201027.600HJ 15 SRP

3,7816.11.201027.260HJ 15 SRP

1,0512.11.201027.500HJ 15 SRP

7,8712.11.201026.960HJ 15 SRP

0,43323.12.201025.72010596

0,62120.12.201010.68010530

0,64815.12.201010.04010530

0,64815.12.201011.22010530

36,0025.11.20107.88010530

6,9925.11.201027.00010532

Dioxine in ng PCDD/F -

WHO -TEQ/kgLieferdatumMenge in kgArtikel

Analytic results of the manufactured feed fats following the inspectionof the reserve samples of the feed fat plant (as per 6.1.2011).

0.50112.11.201026,320HJ 20 P

5.2419.11.201027,320HJ 15 SRP

8.0716.11.201027,600HJ 15 SRP

3.7816.11.201027,260HJ 15 SRP

1.0512.11.201027,500HJ 15 SRP

7.8712.11.201026,960HJ 15 SRP

0.43323.12.201025,72010596

0.62120.12.201010,68010530

0.64815.12.201010,04010530

0.64815.12.201011,22010530

36. .0025.11.20107,88010530

6.9925.11.201027,00010532

Dioxins in ng PCDD/F -

WHO -TEQ/kg

Date of delivery

Quantity in kgItem

0.56117.11.201025,000HJ 2 SRP

36.0025.11.20107,880HJ 2 SRP

7.5619.11.201026,420HJ 25 SRP

6.9518.11.201010,000HJ 2 SRP

28.716.11.20109,980HJ 25 SRP

16.716.11.201025,440HJ 25 SRP

12.819.11.201027,290HJ 15 SRP

0.58617.11.201026,980HJ 25 SRP

10.515.11.201026,910HJ 25 SRP

4.320.11.201027,280HJ 20 P

11.713.11.201027,380HJ 20 P

4.3619.11.201026,460HJ 20 P

0.90616.11.201026,600HJ 20 P

Dioxins in ng

PCDD/F -WHO -TEQ/kgDate of delivery

Quantity in kgItem


Dr.Michael Winter

8

Development of the residues in feed fatofficial analyses

0

20

40

60

80

1 5 9 13 17 21 25 29 33 37 41 45 49 53

samples

ng/k

g di

oxin

(who

-teq)

Anl.3

Dr.Michael Winter

9

0,156 (+/- 0,047)0,086 (+/- 0,026)Ferkelaufzuchtfutter II00311 /004110,51 (+/- 0,15)0,41 (+/- 0,12)Broilerendmastfutter00111 / 00211-0,056 (+/- 0,008)Ergänzungsfuttermittel MilchküheMF 1016.00/11-0,065 (+/- 0,010)

Ergänzungsfuttermittel MastschweineMF 1015.00/11

-0,065 (+/- 0,010)Alleinfuttermittel ZuchtsauenMF 1014.00/11-0,328 (+/- 0,049)Alleinfuttermittel ZuchtsauenMF 1013.00/11-0,214 (+/- 0,032)

Ergänzungsfuttermittel ZuchtschweineMF 1012.00/11

-0,063 (+/- 0,009)Alleinfuttermittel ZuchtsauenMF 1011.00/11-0,313 (+/- 0,05)PflanzenölMF 1106.00/11-0,054 (+/- 0,008)Alleinfuttermittel für LegehennenMF 1010.00/11-0,057 (+/- 0,009)Alleinfuttermittel für LegehennenMF 1009.00/11-0,048 (+/- 0,007)Alleinfuttermittel für LegehennenMF 1008.00/11-0,044 (+/- 0,007)Ergänzungsfuttermittel Milchkühe MF 1007.00/11-0,130 (+/- 0,020)FerkelaufzuchtfutterMF 1002.00/11-0,122 (+/- 0,018) LegehennenfutterMF 1001.00/11

Summe Dioxine und dl PCB in ng PCDD/F und

PCB WHO - TEQ/kg

Dioxin in ngPCDD/F - WHO -

TEQ/kgMischfuttermittelNr.

Dr.Michael Winter

10

Test results for eggs (as per 8.1.2011)

1 [6%]>12 pg/g

3 [16%]

6-12 pg/g

14 [78%]

3-6 pg/g

18182157

Number of samples withconcentrationsabove themaximum residuelevel of 3 pgWHO-PCDD/F-TEQ per g Fett

Number of samples withconcentrationsabove the actionlevel and belowthe maximumresidue level

Number of samples withconcentrationsbelow the actionlevel

Number of samples


Dr.Michael Winter

11

Test results for laying hens (as per 8.1.2011)

11Total11North-Rhine-Westphalia

Number of samples above themaximum residue level

Number of samplesFederal Land

03Total03Hessia



Test results for chickens for fattening (as per 8.1.2011)

Test results for fattening turkeys (as per 10.1.2011)


04Total

03North-Rhine-Westphalia

01Lower saxony

Numbeer of samoles above themaximim residue level

Number of samolesFederal Land

Dr.Michael Winter

12

Test results for pigs (as per 10.1.2011)

Test results for cow milk (as per 10.1.2011)


013Total04Saxona -Anhaltina08Northrhine-Westfalia01Lower Saxony



016Total

010Northrhine-Westfalia n

06Lower Saxony



Dr.Michael Winter

13

01Total

01Lower Saxony

Number of samples abovethe maximum residuelevel

Number of samplesFederal

Test results for cattle (as per 10.1.2011)


Dr.Michael Winter

14

Regulatory action prior to the lifting of restrictions on closed farms

• Analysis of reserve samples of feedingstuffs and feed fats

• Analysis of foods• Calculation of the dioxin levels of

feed batches already consumed• Linking feed batches to holdings on

the basis of supply data• Cross-linking this information to

produce individual risk assessments

Regulatory Action I

Dr.Michael Winter

15

Seite 15

558Total

0Thuringia

62Schleswig-Holstein

13Saxony-Anhalt

4Saxony

0Saarland

0Rhineland-Palatinate

143North Rhine-Westphalia

330Lower Saxony

7Mecklenburg-Western Pomerania

1Hessen

0Hamburg

0Bremen

1Brandenburg

0Berlin

0Bavaria

1Baden-Wuerttemberg

Closed farms

As per: 10.1.2011Federal Land

Regulatory Action II

143

330

762

1

1

1

4

13

Dr.Michael Winter

16 Regulatory Action III

55801893461233239´Total

119.1.2010Thuringia

626119.1.2010Schleswig-Holstein

136439.1.2010Saxony-Anhalt

09.1.2010Saxony

09.1.2010Saarland

09.1.2010Rhineland-Palatinate

14389118539.1.2010North Rhine-Westphalia

33015811227339.1.2010Lower Saxony

7259.1.2010Mecklenburg-Western Pomerania

119.1.2010Hessen

09.1.2010Hamburg

09.1.2010Bremen

119.1.2010Brandenburg

09.1.2010Berlin

09.1.2010Bavaria

119.1.2010Baden-Wuerttemberg

Ducks/geese

Fattening rabbit

Fattening cattle

Dairy cattlePigs

Fattening

turkeys

Chickens for

fatteningLaying hens

TotalType of production

As perName of the Land

Information on the scope of the closure of agricultural holdings in Germany, As per: 10.1.2011, 19:00 hrs

Dr.Michael Winter

17 Conclusions I

• Separation of product flowsSeparate the processing of technical fats which arepossibly contaminated from the processing of fatswhich are intended for the feed chain and eventuallyfor the food chain

• More stringent requirement of official approvalfor holdings which supply raw materials to thefeed industry

• Binding positive list for individual feedingstuffsat European level

Dr.Michael Winter

18

• Put rules on liability for sanctions to the test

Effects of such incidents– No longer only local, but also supraregional

and sometimes even global – With regard to both health and macroeconomic

adverse impacts. – Entire industries affected and adversely

impacted without being responsible for anyculpable negligence

Conclusions II

Dr.Michael Winter

19 Conclusions III

• Continue to reinforce dioxinmonitoring

– Record the contamination situationeven better

– Aim to integrate all test results, including the self-checking of companies

26-10 ü en 110109 dioxin futterfett rev 3 · pdf filete-who dioxin ng/kg te-who ... 10530...

Documents