#239386 toa patent claim construction p3 1....chestnut hill sound inc. v. apple inc. 10-10 chimie v....

32
Table of Authorities (References are to pages.) CASES 800 Adept, Inc. v. Murex Sec., Ltd. ............................................. 2-49 A Aatrix Software, Inc. v. Green Shades Software, Inc. ................ 2-102 A.B. Dick Co. v. Burroughs Corp. ............................................... 3-17 Abbott Labs. v. Dey L.P . ...................................................... 2-60, 3-18 Abbott Labs. v. Sandoz, Inc. ............................ 2-43, 2-44, 2-59, 2-60 AbbVie Deutschland GmbH v. Janssen Biotech, Inc. .................. 2-86 Acceleration Bay LLC v. Activision Blizzard, Inc. ........................ 6-15 Active Prods. Corp. v. A.H. Choitz & Co. ..................................... 7-2 Adams Respiratory Therapeutics, Inc. v. Perrigo Co. ......................................................... 2-11, 2-12, 2-44 ADC Telecomms., Inc. v. Siecor Corp. .......................................... 4-7 Additive Controls & Measurement Sys. v. Flowdata, Inc. ......... 2-117 Advanced Cardiovascular Sys., Inc. v. Medtronic, Inc. ................ 2-59 Agent Orange Prod. Liab. Litig., In re ......................................... 7-13 Ajinomoto Co. v. U.S. Intl Trade Commn ................................ 2-87 Akamai Techs., Inc. v. Limelight Networks, Inc. ........................ 2-14 Akzo N.V. v. U.S. Intl Trade Commn ................................... 2-5, 2-8 Alfred E. Mann Found. for Sci. Research v. Cochlear Corp. ............................................................ 2-73, 2-74 Alice Corp. Pty. Ltd. v. CLS Bank, Intl .................... 2-14, 2-42, 2-90, 2-96, 2-99, 2-100 Allen v. Zurich Ins. Co. ...................................................... 3-22, 3-23 Allen Archery, Inc. v. Browning Mfg. Co. .................................... 3-18 Alloc, Inc. v. Pergo, Inc. ................................................................. 2-5 Alloc, Inc. v. Unilin Decor, N.V . .................................................. 6-22 T 1 (Patent Claim, Rel. #5, 6/18) 3rd Proofs 05/31/18

Upload: others

Post on 15-Mar-2020

1 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: #239386 TOA Patent Claim Construction P3 1....Chestnut Hill Sound Inc. v. Apple Inc. 10-10 Chimie v. PPG Indus., Inc. 2-29, 2-49 Chiuminatta Concrete Concepts, Inc. v. Cardinal Indus

Table of Authorities

(References are to pages.)

CASES

800 Adept, Inc. v. Murex Sec., Ltd. ............................................. 2-49

A

Aatrix Software, Inc. v. Green Shades Software, Inc. ................ 2-102A.B. Dick Co. v. Burroughs Corp. ............................................... 3-17Abbott Labs. v. Dey L.P. ......................................................2-60, 3-18Abbott Labs. v. Sandoz, Inc. ............................ 2-43, 2-44, 2-59, 2-60AbbVie Deutschland GmbH v. Janssen Biotech, Inc. .................. 2-86Acceleration Bay LLC v. Activision Blizzard, Inc. ........................ 6-15Active Prods. Corp. v. A.H. Choitz & Co. ..................................... 7-2Adams Respiratory Therapeutics, Inc. v.

Perrigo Co. ......................................................... 2-11, 2-12, 2-44ADC Telecomms., Inc. v. Siecor Corp. .......................................... 4-7Additive Controls & Measurement Sys. v. Flowdata, Inc. ......... 2-117Advanced Cardiovascular Sys., Inc. v. Medtronic, Inc. ................ 2-59Agent Orange Prod. Liab. Litig., In re ......................................... 7-13Ajinomoto Co. v. U.S. Int’l Trade Comm’n ................................ 2-87Akamai Techs., Inc. v. Limelight Networks, Inc. ........................ 2-14Akzo N.V. v. U.S. Int’l Trade Comm’n ...................................2-5, 2-8Alfred E. Mann Found. for Sci. Research v.

Cochlear Corp. ............................................................2-73, 2-74Alice Corp. Pty. Ltd. v.

CLS Bank, Int’l .................... 2-14, 2-42, 2-90, 2-96, 2-99, 2-100Allen v. Zurich Ins. Co. ......................................................3-22, 3-23Allen Archery, Inc. v. Browning Mfg. Co. .................................... 3-18Alloc, Inc. v. Pergo, Inc. ................................................................. 2-5Alloc, Inc. v. Unilin Decor, N.V. .................................................. 6-22

T–1(Patent Claim, Rel. #5, 6/18)

3rd

Pro

ofs

05/3

1/18

Page 2: #239386 TOA Patent Claim Construction P3 1....Chestnut Hill Sound Inc. v. Apple Inc. 10-10 Chimie v. PPG Indus., Inc. 2-29, 2-49 Chiuminatta Concrete Concepts, Inc. v. Cardinal Indus

AllVoice Devs. US, LLC v. Microsoft Corp. ............................... 2-101Alpex Comput. Corp. v. Nintendo Co. ........................................ 7-15Altera Corp. v. PACT XXP Techs., AG ........................................ 3-16Am. Acad. of Sci. Tech Ctr., In re ............................................... 2-51Am. Med. Sys., Inc. v. Biolitec, Inc. ............................................ 2-13Am. Piledriving Equip., Inc. v. Bay Mach. Corp. ......................... 3-10Am. Piledriving Equip., Inc. v. Equip. Corp. of Am. ................... 3-10Am. Piledriving Equip., Inc. v. Geoquip, Inc. .......................3-9, 3-10Am. Piledriving Equip., Inc. v. Hydraulic Power Sys., Inc. .......... 3-10Amgen v. Chugai Pharm. Co. .................................. 2-76, 2-77, 2-78Amgen, Inc. v. F. Hoffmann-La Roche, Ltd. ........ 3-7, 3-8, 3-13, 3-23Amgen, Inc. v. Hoechst Marion Roussel, Inc. ....................2-79, 10-7Amkor Tech., Inc. v. Tessera, Inc. ............................................. 10-12Antoine v. Byers & Anderson, Inc. .............................................. 7-16Antonious v. Spalding & Evenflo Cos. ........................................ 6-15Apex Fountain Sales, Inc. v. Kleinfeld ......................................... 7-18Apple, Inc. v. Samsung Elecs. Co. ............................................... 11-3Aqua Prods., Inc. v. Matal ......................................................... 10-13Arbek Mfg., Inc. v. Moazzam .................................................... 2-117Ariad Pharm., Inc. v. Eli Lilly & Co. ........................................... 2-85Ariosa Diagnostics, Inc. v. Sequenom, Inc. ................................. 2-42Armco, Inc., In re .......................................................................... 7-2Arthur A. Collins, Inc. v. N. Telecom Ltd. .................................. 6-41Ashbrook v. Hoffman .................................................................. 7-16ASM Am., Inc. v. Genus, Inc. ..................................................... 6-41Aspex Eyewear, Inc. v. Marchon Eyewear, Inc. ............................ 3-13Ass’n for Molecular Pathology v.

Myriad Genetics, Inc. ............................... 2-92, 2-94, 2-95, 3-20AstraZeneca AB v. Hanmi USA, Inc. .......................................... 2-19Atari Games Corp. v. Nintendo of Am., Inc. .............................. 10-4Athletic Alternatives, Inc. v. Prince Mfg., Inc. ............................. 2-80Atkinson-Baker Assoc., Inc. v. Kolts ............................................ 7-16Atl. Thermoplastics Co. v. Faytex Corp. ..................................... 2-43Atmel Corp. v. Info. Storage Devices, Inc. ....... 2-37, 2-40, 2-57, 2-63Augme Techs., Inc. v. Yahoo! Inc. ............................................... 2-68Autogiro Co. of Am. v. United States ..................... 1-6, 1-7, 2-3, 2-5,

............................................................2-7, 2-32, 2-48, 2-54, 6-28Aventis Pharm. Inc. v. Amino Chems. Ltd. ................................ 2-30Avid Tech., Inc. v. Harmonic, Inc. ............................................... 2-50

B

B-50.com, LLC v. InfoSync Servs., LLC ....................................... 3-16Ballord Med. Prods. v. Allegiance Healthcare Corp. ...................... 6-6

PATENT CLAIM CONSTRUCTION AND MARKMAN HEARINGS

T–2

3rd

Pro

ofs

05/3

1/18

Page 3: #239386 TOA Patent Claim Construction P3 1....Chestnut Hill Sound Inc. v. Apple Inc. 10-10 Chimie v. PPG Indus., Inc. 2-29, 2-49 Chiuminatta Concrete Concepts, Inc. v. Cardinal Indus

Bancorp Servs., L.L.C. v. Hartford Life Ins. Co. .................2-68, 6-41Bancorp Servs., LLC v. Sun Life Assurance Co. of Can. ............ 2-103B&B Hardware, Inc. v. Hargus Indus., Inc. ........................3-16, 3-21Baran v. Med. Device Techs., Inc. ............................................... 2-38Barrett v. Harrington ................................................................... 7-16Baxter Int’l, Inc., In re ........................1-14, 2-53, 2-54, 10-10, 10-11Bayer Cropscience AG v. Dow Agrosciences LLC ........................ 2-29Becton, Dickinson & Co. v. Tyco Healthcare Grp. ...................... 2-30Bell & Howell Document Mgmt. Prods. Co. v.

Altek Sys. .....................................................................6-38, 10-5Bennerson v. Joseph ..................................................................... 7-19Bernhardt, L.L.C. v. Collezione Europa USA, Inc. .................... 2-106Berry Sterling Corp. v. Pescor Plastics, Inc. ............................... 2-108Bilski v. Kappos ....................................................... 2-41, 2-89, 2-91,

............................................................... 2-96, 2-97, 2-102, 2-103Biogen Idec, Inc. v. GlaxoSmithKline LLC .................................. 2-51Biogen Inc. v. Amgen, Inc. .......................................................... 7-20Biogen, Inc. v. Berlex Labs., Inc. .................................................... 2-7Biomedino, LLC v. Waters Techs. Corp. ...................................... 2-76Biosig Instruments, Inc. v. Nautilus, Inc. ................................... 2-67Black & Decker, Inc. v. Hoover Serv. Ctr. .................................... 10-4Blackboard, Inc. v. Desire2Learn, Inc. ......................................... 2-89Blonder-Tongue Labs., Inc. v. Univ. of Ill. Found. ................3-2, 3-18Boehringer Ingelheim Vetmedica, Inc. v.

Schering-Plough Corp. .......................................................... 2-55Brain Life, LLC v. Elekta Inc. .................3-14, 3-24, 3-25, 3-27, 3-29Braintree Labs., Inc. v. Novel Labs., Inc. ..................................... 2-19Brown v. Piper ............................................................................. 2-48Burr v. Duryee ........................................................................... 2-101buySAFE, Inc. v. Google, Inc. ............................... 2-54, 2-100, 2-101

C

Cadence Pharm., Inc. v. Paddock Labs., Inc. ............................... 7-21Cal. Artificial Stone Paving Co. v. Molitor ................................ 2-117Canvs Corp. v. Nivisys, LLC ....................................................... 3-12Cardpool, Inc. v. Plastic Jungle, Inc. ............................................ 3-13Catalina Mfg. Int’l, Inc. v. Coolsavings.com ............................... 2-13Chamberlain Grp., Inc. v.

Johnson Controls Interiors LLC ........................................... 2-35Charles Greiner & Co. v. Mari-Med Mfg., Inc. ........................... 10-2Chef Am., Inc. v. Lamb-Weston, Inc. .......................................... 2-29Chemcast Corp. v. Arco Indus. Corp. ......................................... 2-87

Table of Authorities

T–3(Patent Claim, Rel. #5, 6/18)

3rd

Pro

ofs

05/3

1/18

Page 4: #239386 TOA Patent Claim Construction P3 1....Chestnut Hill Sound Inc. v. Apple Inc. 10-10 Chimie v. PPG Indus., Inc. 2-29, 2-49 Chiuminatta Concrete Concepts, Inc. v. Cardinal Indus

Chestnut Hill Sound Inc. v. Apple Inc. ..................................... 10-10Chimie v. PPG Indus., Inc. ................................................2-29, 2-49Chiuminatta Concrete Concepts, Inc. v. Cardinal Indus. ........... 2-76Christianson v. Colt Indus. Operating Corp. ................................ 3-4CLS Bank Int’l v. Alice Corp. Pty. Ltd. ...............................2-97, 2-98Comair Rotron, Inc. v. Nippon Densan Corp. ............................ 7-12Comart Commc’ns, Inc. v. Harris Corp. ..................................... 2-33Constant v. Advanced Micro-Devices, Inc. ...........................7-5, 7-11Control Res., Inc. v. Delta Elecs., Inc. .......................... 4-2, 9-3, 10-7Convolve, Inc. v. Compaq Comput. Corp. .................................. 2-52Cooper v. Lee ............................................................................... 1-13Corning Glass Works v. Sumitomo Elec. U.S.A. ......................... 2-13Crocs, Inc. v. Int’l Trade Comm’n ............................................. 2-106Cuozzo Speed Techs. LLC v. Lee ............................ 1-13, 2-54, 10-12CVI/Beta Ventures, Inc. v. Tura LP .................. 1-10, 2-111, 3-5, 10-3CyberSource Corp. v. Retail Decisions, Inc. ................................ 2-41Cybor Corp. v. FAS Techs., Inc. ...................... 1-10, 2-32, 2-50, 2-53,

............................................................2-111, 2-112, 3-5, 7-4, 7-9

D

Dashwire, Inc. v. Synchronoss Techs., Inc. ................................. 10-9Data Point Corp. v. Standard Microsystems Corp. ....................... 4-4Datamize, LLC v. Plumtree Software, Inc. ............... 2-74, 2-75, 2-77Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharm., Inc. .....2-113, 2-115, 6-31, 8-6, 8-7DDR Holdings, LLC v. Hotels.com ....................................2-68, 2-69DealerTrack, Inc. v. Hube ....................................... 2-41, 2-89, 2-103Deering Miliken & Co. v. Temp-Resisto Corp. ............................ 7-10Diamond v. Chakrabarty ........................................ 2-40, 2-89, 2-101Diamond v. Diehr ...............................................................2-41, 2-96Digitech Image Techs., LLC. v. Elecs. for Imaging, Inc. ............ 2-101D.L. Auld Co. v. Chroma Graphics Corp. ................................... 7-10Dolly, Inc. v. Spalding & Evenflo Cos. ........................................ 2-10Dow Chem. Co. v. Nova Chems. Corp. .............................2-73, 3-15

E

e.Digital Corp. v. Futurewei Techs., Inc. ............................3-14, 3-21Edwards Lifesciences LLC v. Cook, Inc. ............................2-36, 2-46,

............................................................................ 2-49, 2-58, 6-14EEOC v. Trabucco .......................................................................... 3-7Egyptian Goddess, Inc. v. Swisa, Inc. ............................2-104, 2-105,

...................................................................... 2-106, 2-107, 2-109

PATENT CLAIM CONSTRUCTION AND MARKMAN HEARINGS

T–4

3rd

Pro

ofs

05/3

1/18

Page 5: #239386 TOA Patent Claim Construction P3 1....Chestnut Hill Sound Inc. v. Apple Inc. 10-10 Chimie v. PPG Indus., Inc. 2-29, 2-49 Chiuminatta Concrete Concepts, Inc. v. Cardinal Indus

E.I. Du Pont de Nemours & Co. v.Phillips Petroleum Co. ...................................................2-4, 2-50

Eibel Process Co. v. Minn. & Ont. Paper Co. .............................. 2-76Eidos Display, LLC v. AU Optronics Corp. ........................2-67, 2-70Ekchian v. Home Depot, Inc. ................................... 2-49, 2-55, 2-56Elekta Instrument S.A. v. O.U.R. Sci. Int’l, Inc. ......................... 2-29Elf Atochem N. Am., Inc. v.

Libbey-Owens-Ford Co. .............................. 2-112, 4-10, 6-5, 6-6Eli Lilly & Co. v. Teva Pharm. USA, Inc. .................................... 2-83Elipse Corp. v. Ford Motor Co. ................................................... 7-12Elkay Mfg. Co. v. Ebco Mfg. Co. ................................................. 2-58Enzo Biochem Inc. v. Applera Corp. ............................................ 6-28Enzo Biochem, Inc. v. Calgene, Inc. ...................................2-83, 2-84Enzo Biochem, Inc. v. Molecular Probes ........................................ 3-4Eon Corp. IP Holdings LLC v. Silver Spring Networks, Inc. ......... 4-10ePlus, Inc. v. Lawson Software, Inc. .................................1-14, 10-11ERBE Elektromedizin GmbH v. Canady Tech. LLC .................... 2-46Ergo Licensing, LLC v. CareFusion 303, Inc. .............................. 2-74Ethicon Endo-Surgery v. U.S. Surgical Corp. .......... 2-107, 2-108, 7-4Evans Med. Ltd. v. Am. Cyanamid Co. ....................................... 6-39Exergen Corp. v. Kaz USA, Inc. ................................................... 3-20Ex parte Gross ............................................................................. 2-76Ex parte Jepson ............................................................................ 2-42Ex parte Markush ........................................................................ 2-43Ex parte Peterson ........................................................................... 7-3Exxon Chem. Patents, Inc. v. Lubrizol Corp. .............................. 2-31Exxon Research & Eng’g Co. v.

United States .............................................. 1-8, 2-64, 2-77, 2-80

F

Festo Corp. v. Shoketsu KinzokuKogyo Kabushiki Co. ................... 2-8, 2-9, 2-10, 2-63, 7-5, 7-10

Finisar Corp. v. DirecTV Grp., Inc. ....................................3-10, 3-29Flo Healthcare v. Kappos & Rioux Vision ..........................2-52, 2-53Fort Props., Inc. v. Am. Master Lease LLC ................................ 2-103Fout, In re .................................................................................... 2-42Freeman, In re ....................................................................3-14, 3-17Fresenius Med. Care Holdings, Inc. v. Baxter Int’l, Inc. .............. 1-13Fresenius USA, Inc. v.

Baxter Int’l, Inc. .................................... 1-13, 2-53, 10-10, 10-11Function Media, LLC v. Google, Inc. .................................2-45, 11-8

Table of Authorities

T–5(Patent Claim, Rel. #5, 6/18)

3rd

Pro

ofs

05/3

1/18

Page 6: #239386 TOA Patent Claim Construction P3 1....Chestnut Hill Sound Inc. v. Apple Inc. 10-10 Chimie v. PPG Indus., Inc. 2-29, 2-49 Chiuminatta Concrete Concepts, Inc. v. Cardinal Indus

G

Gary W. v. Louisiana .................................................................... 7-19Gechter v. Davidson .................................................................... 10-8Gemstar-TV Guide Int’l, Inc. v. Int’l Trade Comm’n ................. 2-28Genentech, Inc. v. Boehringer Mannheim GmbH ...................... 7-20Genentech, Inc. v. Novo Nordisk A/S ......................................... 2-83Gen. Elec. Co. v. Wabash Appliance Corp. .........................2-64, 2-67Gen. Mills, Inc. v. Hunt-Wesson, Inc. ......................................... 10-7Glass, In re .................................................................................. 2-87Goldenberg v. Cytogen, Inc. ....................................... 2-7, 2-58, 2-59Goldstein v. Kelleher ..................................................................... 7-6Goodyear Dental Vulcanite Co. v. Davis ..................................... 2-48Gorham Co. v. White .....................................................2-104, 2-105Gottschalk v. Benson ..........................................................2-41, 2-96Graco Children’s Prods., Inc. v. Regalo Int’l ................................ 3-17Graco, Inc. v. Binks Mfg. ............................................................. 10-8Graham v. John Deere Co. ......................................... 2-6, 2-48, 6-27Graver Tank & Mfg. Co. v. Linde Air Prods. Co. ......... 2-8, 2-9, 2-10Gray, In re ................................................................................... 2-22Great N. Ry. Co. v. Merchants Elevator Co. ................................ 6-34Green Edge Enters., LLC v. Rubber Mulch Etc., LLC .................. 2-87Gross, Ex parte ............................................................................ 2-76Gulack, In re ............................................................................... 2-89

H

Haemonetics Corp. v.Baxter Healthcare Corp. ........................... 2-29, 2-31, 2-33, 2-36

Halderman v. Pennhurst State Sch. & Hosp. .............................. 7-19Halliburton Energy Servs. v. M-I LLC ................................2-76, 2-78Hansberry v. Lee .......................................................................... 3-18Harari v. Lee ................................................................................ 2-57Harnisch, In re ............................................................................ 2-43Hayes v. Foodmaker, Inc. ............................................................... 7-5Helene Curtis Indus., Inc. v. Sale Affiliates, Inc. .......................... 7-9Helmsderfer v. Bobrick Washroom Equip., Inc. ........................... 2-36Herz, In re ................................................................................... 2-22H.H. Robertson Co. v. United Steel Deck, Inc. ........................... 10-2Highmark Inc. v. Allcare Health Mgmt. Sys., Inc. .................... 2-113Hill v. Duriron Co. ........................................................................ 7-5Hilton Davis Chem. Co. v. Warner-Jenkinson Co. ........................ 2-9

PATENT CLAIM CONSTRUCTION AND MARKMAN HEARINGS

T–6

3rd

Pro

ofs

05/3

1/18

Page 7: #239386 TOA Patent Claim Construction P3 1....Chestnut Hill Sound Inc. v. Apple Inc. 10-10 Chimie v. PPG Indus., Inc. 2-29, 2-49 Chiuminatta Concrete Concepts, Inc. v. Cardinal Indus

Hiniker Co., In re ...................................................................1-1, 2-3Hoechst Celanese Corp. v. BP Chems. Ltd. ................................ 6-16Hoffer v. Microsoft Corp. ...................................................2-22, 2-23Hoganas AB v. Dresser Indus., Inc. ............................................. 2-31Honeywell Int’l, Inc. v. ITC ...............................................2-80, 2-81Hormel v. Helvering .................................................................... 11-7HTC Corp. v. Cellular Commc’ns Equip., LLC .......................... 11-8Hybritech Inc. v. Abbott Labs. ..................................................... 10-2

I

Ill. Tool Works, Inc. v. Grip-Pak, Inc. .......................................... 10-4iLOR, LLC v. Google, Inc. ..............................................2-115, 2-116Imaginal Systematic, LLC v. Leggett & Platt, Inc. ....................... 2-23Imbler v. Pachtman ..................................................................... 7-16In re Agent Orange Prod. Liab. Litig. .......................................... 7-13In re Am. Acad. of Sci. Tech Ctr. ................................................ 2-51In re Armco, Inc. ........................................................................... 7-2In re Baxter Int’l, Inc. .........................1-14, 2-53, 2-54, 10-10, 10-11In re Fout ..................................................................................... 2-42In re Freeman .....................................................................3-14, 3-17In re Glass ................................................................................... 2-87In re Gray .................................................................................... 2-22In re Gulack ................................................................................ 2-89In re Harnisch ............................................................................. 2-43In re Herz .................................................................................... 2-22In re Hiniker Co. ....................................................................1-1, 2-3In re Joint E. & S. Dists. Asbestos Litig. ..................................... 7-13In re Luck .................................................................................... 2-43In re Newman ............................................................................. 7-10In re Ngai .................................................................................... 2-89In re Suitco Surface ..................................................................... 2-21In re Thomas L. DiStefano ......................................................... 2-37In re Trans Tex. Holding Corp. ................................................... 3-22In re United States ...................................................................... 7-18In re Wands ................................................................................. 2-84In re Weber .................................................................................. 2-43In re Wright ................................................................................. 2-83Innova/Pure Water, Inc. v.

Safari Water Filtration Sys., Inc. ....................................1-2, 2-17Innovad Inc. v. Microsoft Corp. .................................................. 3-17Innovention Toys, LLC v. MGA Entm’t, Inc. .............................. 6-36

Table of Authorities

T–7(Patent Claim, Rel. #5, 6/18)

3rd

Pro

ofs

05/3

1/18

Page 8: #239386 TOA Patent Claim Construction P3 1....Chestnut Hill Sound Inc. v. Apple Inc. 10-10 Chimie v. PPG Indus., Inc. 2-29, 2-49 Chiuminatta Concrete Concepts, Inc. v. Cardinal Indus

Inphi Corp. v. Netlist Inc. ........................................................... 2-24Inst. of Tech. and Elecs. for Imaging v. Abacus Software ............ 2-73Interactive Gift Express Inc. v. Compuserve Inc. ....... 2-45, 4-4, 11-8Int’l Commc’n Materials, Inc. v. Ricoh Co. .......................10-3, 10-5Int’l Nickel Co. v. Ford Motor Co. ................................................ 7-3Interval Licensing LLC v. AOL, Inc. ...................................2-69, 2-71Intervet v. Meriel ......................................................................... 2-18Intervet Am., Inc. v. Kee-Vet Labs., Inc. ...................................... 2-48Invitrogen Corp. v. Biocrest Mfg., L.P. ................................2-21, 2-80IPXL Holdings, L.L.C. v. Amazon.com, Inc. ......................2-75, 2-76Israel v. Cresswell ........................................................................ 2-22I.T.S. Rubber Co. v. Essex Rubber Co. ......................................... 2-78IXI Mobile v. Samsung Elecs. (R&D) Ltd. Co. Ltd. ..................... 5-19IXI Mobile (R&D) Ltd. v. Apple Inc. ........................................... 5-19IXI Mobile (R&D) Ltd. v. BlackBerry Ltd. ................................... 5-19

J

Jack Guttman, Inc. v.Kopykake Enters., Inc. ................................ 3-5, 10-4, 10-5, 10-6

Jack Walters & Sons Corp. v. Morton Bldg., Inc. ........................ 7-19Jansen v. Rexall Sundown, Inc. ................................................... 2-49J.E.M. AG Supply, Inc. v. Pioneer Hi-Bred Int’l, Inc. ................. 2-109Jepson, Ex parte ........................................................................... 2-42Joint E. & S. Dists. Asbestos Litig., In re .................................... 7-13Jonsson v. Stanley Works ......................................................2-7, 2-58J.T. Eaton & Co. v. Atl. Paste & Glue Co. ................................... 1-10

K

Kara Tech. Inc. v. Stamps.com, Inc. ................ 2-27, 2-34, 2-36, 6-33Kearns v. Gen. Motors Corp. ....................................................... 3-24Kessler v. Eldred ................................................. 3-1, 3-26, 3-27, 3-28Kimberly v. Arms ........................................................................... 7-6King Pharm., Inc. v. Eon Labs, Inc. ............................................. 2-89Klein v. Russell ............................................................................ 2-46Knowles Elecs. LLC v. Iancu ..................................... 3-8, 10-12, 11-4Kollmorgen Corp. v. Yaskawa Elec. Corp. ..........................3-16, 3-17KSM Fastening Sys., Inc. v. H.A. Jones Co. .............................. 2-118KSR Int’l Co. v. Teleflex Inc. ......................................................... 1-3Kustom Signals, Inc. v. Applied Concepts, Inc. ........................... 2-12KX Indus., L.P. v. PUR Water Purification Prods., Inc. .......3-11, 3-17

PATENT CLAIM CONSTRUCTION AND MARKMAN HEARINGS

T–8

3rd

Pro

ofs

05/3

1/18

Page 9: #239386 TOA Patent Claim Construction P3 1....Chestnut Hill Sound Inc. v. Apple Inc. 10-10 Chimie v. PPG Indus., Inc. 2-29, 2-49 Chiuminatta Concrete Concepts, Inc. v. Cardinal Indus

L

La Buy v. Howes Leather Co. .............................................7-17, 7-18L.A. Gear, Inc. v. Thom McAn Shoe Co. .................................. 2-107Landers v. Sideways, LLC ............................................................ 6-37Lava Trading, Inc. v.

Sonic Trading Mgmt., LLC .......3-23, 6-24, 6-45, 11-4, 11-5, 11-7Lazare Kaplan Int’l, Inc. v. Photoscribe Techs., Inc. .................... 11-8Liberty Ammunition, Inc. v. United States ................................. 2-21Lighting Ballast Control LLC v. Philips Elecs. ............................. 6-29LizardTech, Inc. v. Earth Res. Mapping, Inc. ............................... 11-8Loctite Corp. v. Ultraseal Ltd. ....................................................... 2-3Loral Fairchild Corp. v.

Victor Co. of Japan, Ltd. ............................. 2-110, 2-111, 2-112,................................................................4-2, 4-3, 4-8, 6-17, 6-19

Louisville Bedding Co. v. Pillowtex Corp. .................................... 3-12Lowery v. Stovall .......................................................................... 3-22LRC Elecs. Inc. v. John Mezzalingua Assocs. Inc. ....................... 6-33Lucent Techs., Inc. v. Gateway, Inc. ............................................ 2-21Luck, In re ................................................................................... 2-43

M

Mach. Co. v. Murphy .................................................................... 2-9MacNeill Eng’g Co. v. Trisport, Ltd. ............................................ 10-7Madrigal Audio Lab., Inc. v. Cello, Ltd. ...................................... 7-18Mannesmann Demag Corp. v.

Engineered Metal Prods. Co. .................................................. 2-8MarcTec, LLC v. Johnson & Johnson ..............................2-88, 2-113,

...................................................................... 2-114, 2-115, 2-116Markman v. Westview Instruments, Inc. ............... 1-1, 1-2, 1-3, 1-4,

.................................................................1-5, 1-7, 1-8, 1-9, 1-12,

...........................................................1-13, 2-6, 2-35, 2-39, 2-48,

........................................... 2-53, 2-60, 2-64, 2-65, 2-110, 2-111,

.....................................3-2, 3-7, 3-8, 3-9, 3-11, 3-16, 3-17, 3-18,

............................... 3-19, 3-30, 3-31, 4-1, 4-2, 4-3, 4-4, 4-7, 4-8,

.............................4-10, 5-57, 5-58, 5-61, 5-62, 5-63, 5-72, 5-99,

........................ 5-100, 5-107, 5-181, 5-184, 5-186, 5-188, 5-199,

......................... 5-204, 6-4, 6-5, 6-6, 6-9, 6-10, 6-16, 6-17, 6-19,

.............................6-22, 6-24, 6-25, 6-26, 6-27, 6-28, 6-30, 6-38,

......................... 6-43, 6-44, 6-47, 6-48, 7-4, 7-15, 7-19, 8-3, 8-6,

............................ 8-7, 8-8, 9-1, 9-3, 10-1, 10-2, 10-4, 10-7, 10-9Markush, Ex parte ....................................................................... 2-43

Table of Authorities

T–9(Patent Claim, Rel. #5, 6/18)

3rd

Pro

ofs

05/3

1/18

Page 10: #239386 TOA Patent Claim Construction P3 1....Chestnut Hill Sound Inc. v. Apple Inc. 10-10 Chimie v. PPG Indus., Inc. 2-29, 2-49 Chiuminatta Concrete Concepts, Inc. v. Cardinal Indus

Marley Mouldings, Ltd. v. Mikron Indus. ................................... 2-80Marrin v. Griffin .......................................................................... 2-13Mars, Inc. v. H.J. Heinz Co. ........................................................ 2-26Martek Biosciences v. Nutrinova ................................ 1-6, 2-32, 2-33Martin v. Wilks ............................................................................ 3-18Maurice A. Garbell, Inc. v. Boeing Co. .................................7-9, 7-12Mayo Collaborative Servs. v.

Prometheus Labs., Inc. ......................... 2-89, 2-90, 2-102, 2-103McGraw Edison Co. v. Cent. Transformer Corp. ........................ 7-11MCM Portfolio LLC v. Hewlett-Packard Co. ............................... 1-13Medco Corp. v. Rates Tech., Inc. ................................................. 1-11Media Rights Techs. Inc. v. Capital One Fin. Corp. ...........2-38, 2-73MediaCom Corp. v. Rates Tech., Inc. ....................... 7-14, 7-20, 10-7Medtronic, Inc. v. Advanced Cardiovascular Sys., Inc. ................ 2-59MercExchange, L.L.C. v. eBay, Inc. ................................................ 9-3Merrill v. Yeomans ....................................................................... 2-64Metaullics Sys. Co. v. Cooper ...................................................... 10-9Metro-Goldwyn-Mayer Studios Inc. v. Grokster, Ltd. ................. 2-15Metrologic Instruments, Inc. v. Symbol Techs., Inc. ............4-7, 6-22Mformation Techs., Inc. v. Research in Motion Ltd. ................... 2-45MGA, Inc. v. Gen. Motors Corp. ................................................ 3-27Microprocessor Enhancement Corp. v.

Tex. Instruments Inc. ............................... 2-36, 2-49, 2-75, 2-76Microsoft Corp. v. i4i Ltd. ........................................................... 2-54Microsoft Corp. v. Multi-Tech Sys., Inc. ........................................ 2-7Miken Composites v. Wilson Sporting Goods Co. ........................ 3-7Miliken Research Corp. v. Dan River, Inc. .................................. 7-10Minerals Separation, Ltd. v. Hyde ......................................2-65, 2-66Minn. Mining & Mfg. Co. v.

Johnson & Johnson Orthopaedics, Inc. ................. 7-3, 7-4, 7-10Minton v. Nat’l Ass’n of Sec. Dealers, Inc. ................................. 2-22Modine Mfg. Co. v. U.S. Int’l Trade Comm’n ............................ 2-46Morton Int’l v. Cardinal Chem. Co. ........................................... 2-79Multiform Dessicants, Inc. v. Medzam ....................................... 11-6Murata Mach. USA v. Daifuku Co. ........................................... 2-118My-Mail, Ltd. v. Am. Online, Inc. .............................................. 10-7MySpace, Inc. v. GraphOn Corp. ............................. 2-90, 2-91, 2-92

N

Nautilus v. BioSig Instruments ........................ 1-8, 2-64, 2-65, 2-66,..........................................................2-67, 2-68, 2-70, 2-71, 3-15

Nazomi Commc’ns, Inc. v. ARM Holdings, PLC .................9-2, 10-8

PATENT CLAIM CONSTRUCTION AND MARKMAN HEARINGS

T–10

3rd

Pro

ofs

05/3

1/18

Page 11: #239386 TOA Patent Claim Construction P3 1....Chestnut Hill Sound Inc. v. Apple Inc. 10-10 Chimie v. PPG Indus., Inc. 2-29, 2-49 Chiuminatta Concrete Concepts, Inc. v. Cardinal Indus

Nebraska v. Wyoming .................................................................. 7-17NeoMagic Corp. v.

Trident Microsystems, Inc. ......................... 6-24, 6-32, 8-7, 11-6Network Commerce, Inc. v. Microsoft Corp. .............................. 6-32Newman, In re ............................................................................ 7-10Ngai, In re ................................................................................... 2-89Nix v. Hedden ............................................................................. 2-32NobelBiz, Inc. v. Glob. Connect, L.L.C. .............................2-19, 2-20Northbrook Dig., LLC v. Vendio Servs., Inc. ....................2-112, 6-17N. Telecom Ltd. v. Samsung Elecs. ................................................ 1-8Novartis Pharm. Corp. v. Abbott Labs. ....................................... 2-10Novo Indus., L.P. v. Micro Molds Corp. .............................2-79, 6-15

O

O2 Micro Int’l Ltd. v.Beyond Innovation Tech. Co. ..................... 2-19, 2-20, 6-5, 6-13

O2 Micro Int’l, Ltd. v.Monolithic Power Sys. ................................ 4-6, 5-17, 6-17, 6-20

Octane Fitness, LLC v. Icon Health & Fitness, Inc. .................. 2-113Oddzon Prods., Inc. v. Just Toys, Inc. .............................2-107, 2-108Omega Eng’g Inc. v. Raytech Corp. ....................................2-16, 2-50Optical Disc Corp. v. Del Mar Avionics ...................................... 10-8Ortho-McNeil Pharm., Inc. v. Caraco Pharm. Labs., Ltd. ........... 2-77

P

Pall Corp. v. Hemasure Inc. ......................................................... 11-6Palumbo v. Don-Joy ..................................................................... 2-38Parker v. Flook ............................................................................. 2-91Parker v. Hulme ............................................................................. 1-4Pass & Seymour, Inc. v. Hubbell Inc. .......................................... 7-21Pause Tech. LLC, v. TiVo Inc. ...................................................... 11-5Peretz v. United States ................................................................... 7-6Personalized Media v. ITC .......................................................... 2-78Personalized User Model, LLP v. Google, Inc. ............................. 11-2Peterson, Ex parte .......................................................................... 7-3Pfizer v. Ranbaxy Labs. Ltd. ......................................................... 2-60PHG Techs., LLC v. St. John Cos. ............................................. 2-108Phil-Insul Corp. v. Airlite Plastics Co. ........................................ 3-15

Table of Authorities

T–11(Patent Claim, Rel. #5, 6/18)

3rd

Pro

ofs

05/3

1/18

Page 12: #239386 TOA Patent Claim Construction P3 1....Chestnut Hill Sound Inc. v. Apple Inc. 10-10 Chimie v. PPG Indus., Inc. 2-29, 2-49 Chiuminatta Concrete Concepts, Inc. v. Cardinal Indus

Phillips v. AWH Corp. ...................... 1-2, 1-3, 1-4, 1-6, 1-9, 2-5, 2-6,........................................ 2-7, 2-12, 2-15, 2-16, 2-17, 2-18, 2-21,...................................... 2-24, 2-25, 2-26, 2-27, 2-28, 2-32, 2-33,...................................... 2-34, 2-35, 2-38, 2-39, 2-46, 2-47, 2-50,........................................ 2-51, 2-54, 2-60, 6-8, 6-10, 6-25, 6-30,....................................6-31, 6-33, 6-34, 6-39, 8-3, 8-7, 8-8, 11-3

Pitney Bowes, Inc. v. Hewlett-Packard Co. ........ 1-5, 2-13, 2-31, 2-61Power Integrations v. Lee ......................................................3-8, 3-22Precision Shooting Equip., Inc. v. High Country Archery ........... 5-17Pressure Prods. Med. Supplies, Inc. v.

Greatbatch Ltd. ..................................2-39, 2-40, 2-57, 7-21, 9-4Process Control Corp. v. HydReclaim Corp. ......................2-26, 2-84Promega Corp. v. Life Techs. Corp. ............................................. 2-21Proveris Sci. Corp. v. Innovasystems, Inc. ........................10-14, 11-6Prudential Ins. Co. v. U.S. Gypsum Co. ..................................... 7-18Pullman-Standard v. Swint .......................................................... 2-73Purdue Pharma L.P. v. Boehringer Ingelheim GmbH ...........3-5, 10-5Purdue Pharma L.P. v. Endo Pharm. Inc. .................................... 2-50

Q

Q-Pharma, Inc. v. Andrew Jergens Co. ...................................... 2-113Quantum Corp. v. Crossroads Sys., Inc. ..................................... 6-37

R

Rambus Inc. v. Hynix Semiconductor Inc. .................................. 3-16Rambus, Inc. v. Infineon Techs. AG .............................................. 4-8Reebok Int’l Ltd. v. J. Baker, Inc. ........................................10-2, 10-5Refac Int’l, Ltd. v. Hitachi, Ltd. ................................................... 6-17Regents of the Univ. of Cal. v. Dakocytomation Cal., Inc. ........... 11-4Reilly v. United States .................................................. 7-2, 7-3, 7-20Renishaw PLC v. Marposs Societa’ per Azioni ...................2-24, 2-46Research Corp. Techs., Inc. v. Microsoft Corp. ........ 2-75, 2-84, 2-89Retractable Techs., Inc. v. Becton, Dickinson & Co. ..........2-27, 2-35RF Del. v. Pac. Keystone Techs., Inc. ..................................1-10, 3-23Richards v. Jefferson County ....................................................... 3-18Richardson v. Stanley Works, Inc. ............................................. 2-107Ring Plus, Inc. v. Cellular Wireless Corp. ................................... 2-88Roche Palo Alto LLC v. Apotex, Inc. ........................................... 3-15Rohm & Haas Co. v. Lonza ................................................6-21, 7-20

PATENT CLAIM CONSTRUCTION AND MARKMAN HEARINGS

T–12

3rd

Pro

ofs

05/3

1/18

Page 13: #239386 TOA Patent Claim Construction P3 1....Chestnut Hill Sound Inc. v. Apple Inc. 10-10 Chimie v. PPG Indus., Inc. 2-29, 2-49 Chiuminatta Concrete Concepts, Inc. v. Cardinal Indus

S

Saffran v. Johnson & Johnson ..................................................... 2-40Sage Prods., Inc. v. Devon Indus., Inc. ........................................ 2-11Santarus, Inc. v. Par Pharm., Inc. .......................................2-23, 2-24SciMed Life Sys. v. Advanced Cardiovascular Sys. ....................... 2-26Scripps Clinic & Research Found. v. Genentech, Inc. ................. 11-6Seattle Box Co. v. Indus. Crating & Packing, Inc. ..............2-76, 2-77Senju Pharm. Co. v. Apotex Inc. ..................... 3-24, 3-25, 3-26, 3-27Shaw Indus. Grp., Inc. v. Automated Creel Sys. ......................... 3-23SimpleAir, Inc. v. Sony Ericsson Mobile Commc’ns AB .............. 2-47Singleton v. Wulff ...............................................................6-15, 11-7Skinner v. Aluminum Co. of Am. ................................................. 7-3SkyHawke Techs., LLC v. Deca Int’l Corp. .........................3-19, 11-2Smith & Nephew, Inc. v. Arthrex, Inc. ........................................ 3-16SmithKline Beecham Corp. v. Apotex Corp. ............................... 2-79SmithKline Diagnostics, Inc. v. Helena Labs. Corp. .............2-5, 2-61Snow v. Lake Shore & M.S. Ry. ................................................... 2-26Sofamor Danek Grp., Inc. v.

DePuy-Motech, Inc. .............................3-5, 4-2, 10-2, 10-4, 10-5Solvay S.A. v. Honeywell Int’l Inc. .............................................. 11-8S. Corp. v. United States ......................................................1-7, 2-32Southwall Techs. Inc. v. Cardinal IG Co. ...........................2-56, 2-58Spaulding v. Univ. of Wash. ........................................................... 7-5Spectra-Physics, Inc. v. Coherent, Inc. ........................................ 2-26Sport Dimension, Inc. v. Coleman Co. ..........................2-107, 2-108SRI Int’l v. Matsushita Elec. Corp. of Am. .........................6-23, 11-6SSIH Equip. S.A. v. U.S. Int’l Trade Comm’n ............................... 2-3Standard Oil Co. v. Am. Cyanamid Co. ...............................1-6, 2-55Star Sci. v. R.J. Reynolds Tobacco Co. ......................................... 2-80Stauble v. Warrob, Inc. ........................................................7-18, 7-19Storz Instrument Co. v. Alcon Labs. ........................................... 6-33Suitco Surface, In re .................................................................... 2-21Sun Pharm. Indus. v. Eli Lilly & Co. .......................................... 2-16Superior Indus., Inc. v. Masaba, Inc. ........................................... 11-5Synthes (USA) v. Smith & Nephew, Inc. ..................................... 2-76

T

TALtech Ltd. v. Esquel Apparel, Inc. ........................................... 2-45Tandon Corp. v. U.S. Int’l Trade Comm’n ................. 2-4, 2-33, 2-36TecSec, Inc. v. Int’l Bus. Machs. Corp. ....................... 3-6, 3-15, 11-9Telcordia Techs., Inc. v. Cisco Sys., Inc. .............................2-82, 2-83

Table of Authorities

T–13(Patent Claim, Rel. #5, 6/18)

3rd

Pro

ofs

05/3

1/18

Page 14: #239386 TOA Patent Claim Construction P3 1....Chestnut Hill Sound Inc. v. Apple Inc. 10-10 Chimie v. PPG Indus., Inc. 2-29, 2-49 Chiuminatta Concrete Concepts, Inc. v. Cardinal Indus

Telemac Cellular Corp. v. Topp Telecom, Inc. ............................. 2-56Teva Pharm. USA, Inc. v.

Sandoz, Inc. ..................... 1-9, 1-12, 2-6, 2-18, 2-60, 2-71, 2-72,.......................................... 2-73, 3-2, 3-3, 3-16, 6-19, 6-20, 6-28,.........................................................6-29, 6-32, 6-33, 6-34, 6-35,................................................................8-6, 8-7, 8-8, 11-2, 11-3

Tex. Dig. Sys., Inc. v. Telegenix, Inc. .......................... 1-6, 2-16, 2-17Tex. Instruments, Inc. v.

Linear Techs. Corp. ...................................... 3-8, 3-9, 3-10, 3-11,..........................................................3-12, 3-14, 3-16, 3-19, 3-30

Tex. Instruments, Inc. v. U.S. Int’l Trade Comm’n ..................... 2-56Therasense, Inc. v. Becton, Dickenson & Co. ............................. 2-88Thomas L. DiStefano, In re ........................................................ 2-37TI Grp. Auto. Sys. (N. Am.), Inc. v. VDO N. Am. LLC .............. 2-59Titanium Metals Corp. of Am. v. Banner ................................... 2-31TiVo Inc. v. EchoStar Corp. ..........2-116, 2-117, 2-118, 10-13, 10-14TM Patents v. Int’l Bus. Mach. Corp. ...................... 3-16, 3-17, 3-18Toter Inc. v. City of Visalia .................................................6-19, 6-22Trans Tex. Holding Corp., In re .................................................. 3-22Tridelia Indus. v. Frymaster Corp. ............................................... 6-33Trs. of Columbia Univ. v. Symantec Corp. .................................. 2-28

U

UltimatePointer, L.L.C. v. Nintendo ......................... 2-27, 2-28, 2-31Ultramercial, LLC v. Hulu, LLC .................................................. 2-41United Carbon Co. v. Binney & Smith Co. ...... 2-64, 2-65, 2-66, 2-67United States, In re ..................................................................... 7-18United States v. Montrose Chem. Corp. ..................................... 7-13United States v. Rodriguez-Pacheco ............................................... 3-8Univ. of Rochester v. G.D. Searle & Co. ..................................... 2-86U.S. Bancorp Mortg. Co. v. Bonner Mall P ’ship ......................... 3-13U.S. Gypsum Co. v. Nat’l Gypsum Co. ...................................... 2-87U.S. Pipe & Foundry Co. v. Woodard Iron Co. ............................. 7-3U.S.A. Kaifa Tech., Inc. v. New Focus, Inc. ................................... 8-8

V

Verizon Cal. Inc. v. Ronald A. Katz Tech. Licensing ...................... 3-9Versata Software, Inc. v. SAP Am., Inc. ....................................... 11-8Verve, LLC v. Crane Cams, Inc. .................................................. 2-77View Eng’g, Inc. v. Robotic Vision Sys., Inc. ............................... 6-16

PATENT CLAIM CONSTRUCTION AND MARKMAN HEARINGS

T–14

3rd

Pro

ofs

05/3

1/18

Page 15: #239386 TOA Patent Claim Construction P3 1....Chestnut Hill Sound Inc. v. Apple Inc. 10-10 Chimie v. PPG Indus., Inc. 2-29, 2-49 Chiuminatta Concrete Concepts, Inc. v. Cardinal Indus

Visto Corp. v. Sproqit Techs., Inc. ........................................3-8, 3-10Vitronics Corp. v. Conceptronic, Inc. .........................2-5, 2-29, 2-60,

.............................................................................2-61, 6-30, 6-33Vivid Techs., Inc. v. Am. Sci. & Eng’g, Inc. ..................1-11, 4-5, 4-6,

................................................................... 6-13, 6-21, 6-22, 6-23

W

Wagshal v. Foster ......................................................................... 7-16Waid v. Merrill Area Pub. Sch. .................................................... 3-24Wands, In re ................................................................................ 2-84Wang Labs., Inc. v. Am. Online, Inc. ........................2-55, 2-56, 2-58Warner-Jenkinson Co. v.

Hilton Davis Chem. Co. ................................ 1-5, 2-8, 2-9, 2-12Warsaw Orthopedic, Inc. v. NuVasive .................................2-69, 2-70Watts v. XL Sys. ........................................................................... 2-58Weber, In re ................................................................................. 2-43Westinghouse Elec. & Mfg. Co. v. Formica Insulation Co. ......... 6-28Wi-Lan, Inc. v. Apple Inc. ............................................................ 4-10Wiener v. NEC Elecs., Inc. .....................................................7-4, 7-9Williams v. Lane .......................................................................... 7-19Wilson Sporting Goods Co. v.

Hillerich & Bradsby Co. ........ 6-18, 6-24, 6-46, 11-5, 11-6, 11-7Wilver v. Fisher .............................................................................. 7-6Wright, In re ................................................................................ 2-83Wright Asphalt Prods. Co. v.

Pelican Refining Co. ......................................................4-6, 6-22

X

X2Y Attenuators, LLC v. Int’l Trade Comm’n ............................. 2-19

Y

Young v. Lumenis, Inc. .......................................................2-76, 2-77

Z

Zenon Envtl., Inc. v. U.S. Filter Corp. ........................................ 2-58

Table of Authorities

T–15(Patent Claim, Rel. #5, 6/18)

3rd

Pro

ofs

05/3

1/18

Page 16: #239386 TOA Patent Claim Construction P3 1....Chestnut Hill Sound Inc. v. Apple Inc. 10-10 Chimie v. PPG Indus., Inc. 2-29, 2-49 Chiuminatta Concrete Concepts, Inc. v. Cardinal Indus

AUTHORITIES

United States CodeTITLE 7

§ 2321 et seq. .................. 2-108

TITLE 21

§ 355 ........... 5-66, 5-81, 5-101,......... 5-137, 5-162, 5-171

TITLE 28

§ 455 ................................... 7-8§ 471–482 .......................... 7-12§ 473 ................................. 7-12§ 473(a)(6) ......................... 7-12§ 636(b)(1)(A) ..................... 7-21§ 636(b)(1)(B) ..................... 7-21§ 636(b)(1)(C) .................... 7-21§ 636(b)(2) ......................... 7-19§ 636(b)(3) ......................... 7-21§ 636(c) .............................. 7-21§ 1291 ............................... 11-1§ 1292 ............................... 1-12§ 1292(a)(1) ....................... 10-2§ 1292(b) ..................11-1, 11-2§ 1292(c)(2) ....................... 3-15§ 1295(a)(1) ....................... 11-5§ 1338 ............................... 5-88§ 1746 ............................... 6-36§ 1927 ............................... 6-15

TITLE 35

§ 31 ................................... 2-66§ 100(b) ............................. 2-97§ 101 ............. 2-14, 2-42, 2-53,

.............. 2-91, 2-92, 2-99,

.......... 2-102, 2-104, 3-20,

.............. 5-21, 5-26, 5-44,

.............. 5-55, 5-65, 5-97,

........ 5-102, 5-105, 5-109,

........ 5-112, 5-118, 5-124,

.....................5-132, 5-207

§ 102 ................. 2-5, 2-8, 2-92,............ 5-53, 5-90, 5-123,........ 5-124, 5-136, 5-150,........ 5-158, 5-159, 5-171,.....................5-179, 5-189

§ 102(b) ...... 5-91, 5-157, 5-158§ 102(c) .............................. 5-79§ 102(f) ......... 5-79, 5-91, 5-157§ 102(g) ...................5-91, 5-157§ 103 ............... 2-5, 2-53, 2-78,

............ 2-90, 2-92, 5-136,

......... 5-141, 5-158, 5-159§ 112 .......... 1-2, 1-7, 2-3, 2-23,

.............. 2-24, 2-25, 2-37,

..... 2-39, 2-40, 2-53, 2-61,

..... 2-63, 2-67, 2-75, 2-76,

..... 2-81, 2-83, 2-84, 2-85,

..... 2-86, 2-92, 2-109, 4-8,

..... 5-21, 5-26, 5-39, 5-40,

..... 5-44, 5-55, 5-59, 5-91,

.......... 5-97, 5-102, 5-105,

........ 5-109, 5-112, 5-118,

........ 5-132, 5-140, 5-147,

........ 5-167, 5-176, 5-184,

............ 5-201, 5-207, 6-9,

...... 6-11, 6-12, 6-32, 6-48§ 112(1) ........ 2-84, 5-65, 5-124§ 112(2) ......... 2-63, 2-75, 2-77,

............. 2-79, 5-65, 5-124§ 112(6) ......... 2-37, 2-39, 2-40,

.............. 2-50, 5-22, 5-27,

.............. 5-40, 5-45, 5-48,

.............. 5-50, 5-60, 5-79,

.............. 5-85, 5-91, 5-92,

............ 5-97, 5-98, 5-106,

........ 5-111, 5-112, 5-113,

........ 5-119, 5-123, 5-124,

........ 5-126, 5-127, 5-131,

........ 5-132, 5-134, 5-139,

........ 5-141, 5-146, 5-148,

........ 5-149, 5-156, 5-157,

PATENT CLAIM CONSTRUCTION AND MARKMAN HEARINGS

T–16

3rd

Pro

ofs

05/3

1/18

Page 17: #239386 TOA Patent Claim Construction P3 1....Chestnut Hill Sound Inc. v. Apple Inc. 10-10 Chimie v. PPG Indus., Inc. 2-29, 2-49 Chiuminatta Concrete Concepts, Inc. v. Cardinal Indus

........ 5-158, 5-159, 5-160,

........ 5-166, 5-167, 5-168,

........ 5-175, 5-177, 5-183,

........ 5-184, 5-185, 5-201,

....5-206, 5-207, 5-208, 6-9§ 112(a) ............................. 2-62§ 112(b) ............................. 2-62§ 112(d) ............................. 2-62§ 112(f) .......... 2-37, 2-38, 2-40,

.............. 2-57, 2-62, 2-76,

.............. 5-31, 5-55, 5-56,

.....................5-194, 5-195§ 119 ................................. 2-58§ 120 ................................. 2-58§ 161–164 ........................ 2-108§ 162 ............................... 2-109§ 171 ............................... 2-104

§ 251 ................................. 5-55§ 256 ........................5-63, 5-69§ 271 ............. 5-48, 5-89, 5-96,

........ 5-111, 5-123, 5-131,

....................5-139, 5-156,

.....................5-193, 5-206§ 271(a) ............................. 2-14§ 282 ................................. 2-54§ 282(a) ............................. 3-20§ 283 ................................. 10-2§ 285 ...................2-113, 2-115,

.......................2-116, 6-15§ 292 ........................5-63, 5-69§ 305 ................................. 3-25§ 315 ................................. 3-23§ 315(e) .............................. 3-23§ 326(e) .............................. 2-53

Statutes by Name1952 Patent Act ........................................................................... 2-89America Invents Act of 2011 .................................. 1-13, 2-41, 2-53,

................................................................... 2-62, 2-86, 2-89, 3-23§ 299 ................................................................................. 3-29

Federal Magistrates Act of 1968 .................................................. 7-20Hatch-Waxman Act ...............................5-66, 5-67, 5-69, 5-81, 5-95,

.................................... 5-101, 5-129, 5-137, 5-162, 5-164, 5-171Innovation Act of 2013 ............................................................... 6-18Judicial Reform Act of 1990 ........................................................ 7-12Patent Act

generally ...................................................................2-78, 2-97§ 101 .............................................................. 2-40, 2-89, 2-92§ 112 ................................................................................. 2-28

Plant Patent Act of 1930 (35 U.S.C. §§ 161–164) .................... 2-108Plant Variety Protection Act (7 U.S.C. § 2321 et seq.) .............. 2-108

Federal Rules of Civil Procedure1 ........................................ 6-213.2.a ................................... 5-294.1 ..................................... 5-294.2 ..................................... 5-2911 ............... 2-113, 5-149, 6-15

11(a) .................................. 6-1511(b)(1)–(3) ........................ 6-1511(c) ................................... 6-1512 .................................... 5-15516(b) .......................5-205, 6-21

Table of Authorities

T–17(Patent Claim, Rel. #5, 6/18)

3rd

Pro

ofs

05/3

1/18

Page 18: #239386 TOA Patent Claim Construction P3 1....Chestnut Hill Sound Inc. v. Apple Inc. 10-10 Chimie v. PPG Indus., Inc. 2-29, 2-49 Chiuminatta Concrete Concepts, Inc. v. Cardinal Indus

16(c) ................................. 5-20526 .................. 5-20, 5-25, 5-38,

.............. 5-43, 5-54, 5-77,

........ 5-101, 5-104, 5-106,

........ 5-108, 5-117, 5-138,

........ 5-141, 5-142, 5-145,

........ 5-148, 5-151, 5-163,

........ 5-166, 5-174, 5-182,

........ 5-199, 5-200, 5-204,

........... 5-205, 5-209, 6-4726(a) ............. 5-30, 5-47, 5-13926(a)(1) ........ 5-47, 5-49, 5-140,

.....................5-147, 5-20526(a)(2) ............................ 5-18526(b) .................................. 6-2126(b)(5)(A) .......................... 5-3426(c) ................................. 5-20526(e) ......................5-136, 5-15526(f) ............... 5-25, 5-30, 5-70,

.............. 5-71, 5-74, 5-88,

....................5-153, 5-166,

.....................5-174, 5-190

26(g) ........................5-52, 5-14933 .................................... 5-15434 .................. 5-21, 5-27, 5-44,

.....5-50, 5-56, 5-73, 5-11942(b) .................................. 6-2153 ................. 7-2, 7-3, 7-4, 7-5,

............... 7-10, 7-16, 7-1753(a) ................. 5-151, 7-4, 7-553(a)(1)(B) .......................... 7-1753(a)(2) ................................ 7-853(a)(3) .............................. 7-1653(b) .................................. 7-1953(b)(1) ................................ 7-753(b)(3) ................................ 7-853(c) ............................7-9, 7-1353(f) ................................... 7-1553(g) ..........................7-14, 7-1653(g)(2) ................................ 7-453(g)(3) .............................. 7-1754 ...................................... 11-554(b) ...... 3-15, 11-1, 11-4, 11-772–76 ................................. 7-20

Local Patent Rules of FederalDistrict Courts

California

Northern District Patent Local RulesRule 2-1 ............................................................................. 5-20Rule 3-1 ............................................................................. 5-20Rule 3-2 ............................................................................. 5-21Rule 3-3 ............................................................................. 5-21Rule 3-4 ............................................................................. 5-21Rule 3-5 ............................................................................. 5-21Rule 4-1 ............................................................................. 5-22Rule 4-2 ............................................................................. 5-22Rule 4-4 ............................................................................. 5-22Rule 4-5 ............................................................................. 5-23Rule 4-6 ............................................................................. 5-23

Southern District Patent Local RulesRule 1.3 ............................................................................. 5-25Rule 2.1 ............................................................................. 5-25Rule 2.2 ............................................................................. 5-28

PATENT CLAIM CONSTRUCTION AND MARKMAN HEARINGS

T–18

3rd

Pro

ofs

05/3

1/18

Page 19: #239386 TOA Patent Claim Construction P3 1....Chestnut Hill Sound Inc. v. Apple Inc. 10-10 Chimie v. PPG Indus., Inc. 2-29, 2-49 Chiuminatta Concrete Concepts, Inc. v. Cardinal Indus

Rule 2.3 ............................................................................. 5-29Rule 2.4 ............................................................................. 5-29Rule 2.5 ............................................................................. 5-29Rule 3.1 ............................................................................. 5-25Rule 3.2 ............................................................................. 5-26Rule 3.3 ....................................................................5-25, 5-26Rule 3.4 ............................................................................. 5-26Rule 3.5 ............................................................................. 5-26Rule 3.6 ....................................................................5-25, 5-26Rule 3.7 ............................................................................. 5-26Rule 4.1.a .......................................................................... 5-27Rule 4.1.b .......................................................................... 5-27Rule 4.1.c ........................................................................... 5-27Rule 4.1.d .......................................................................... 5-27Rule 4.1.e ........................................................................... 5-27Rule 4.2 ............................................................................. 5-24Rule 4.3 ............................................................................. 5-28Rule 4.4 ............................................................................. 5-28Rule 4.5 ............................................................................. 5-28

Georgia

Northern District Local Patent RulesRule 1.2 ............................................................................. 5-41Rule 2.1 ............................................................................. 5-41Rule 2.2 ............................................................................. 5-41Rule 3.1 ............................................................................. 5-42Rule 4.1 ....................................................................5-38, 5-39Rule 4.2 ............................................................................. 5-38Rule 4.3 ............................................................................. 5-39Rule 4.4 ....................................................................5-38, 5-39Rule 4.5 ....................................................................5-38, 5-39Rule 6.1 ............................................................................. 5-40Rule 6.2 ............................................................................. 5-40Rule 6.2(c) ......................................................................... 5-40Rule 6.3 ............................................................................. 5-38Rule 6.4 ............................................................................. 5-41Rule 6.4(b) ......................................................................... 6-20Rule 6.5 ............................................................................. 5-41Rule 6.6 ............................................................................. 5-41

Idaho

District of Idaho Local Patent RulesRule 2-1 ............................................................................. 5-54Rule 3-1 ............................................................................. 5-44

Table of Authorities

T–19(Patent Claim, Rel. #5, 6/18)

3rd

Pro

ofs

05/3

1/18

Page 20: #239386 TOA Patent Claim Construction P3 1....Chestnut Hill Sound Inc. v. Apple Inc. 10-10 Chimie v. PPG Indus., Inc. 2-29, 2-49 Chiuminatta Concrete Concepts, Inc. v. Cardinal Indus

Rule 3-2 ............................................................................. 5-44Rule 3-4 ............................................................................. 5-44Rule 3-5 ............................................................................. 5-44Rule 4-1 ............................................................................. 5-45Rule 4-2 ............................................................................. 5-45Rule 4-3 ............................................................................. 5-42Rule 4-4 ............................................................................. 5-46Rule 4-5 ............................................................................. 5-46Rule 4-6 ............................................................................. 5-46

Illinois

Northern District of Illinois Local Patent RulesRule 1.1 ............................................................................. 5-52Rule 1.3 ............................................................................. 5-51Rule 1.4 ............................................................................. 5-52Rule 1.5 ............................................................................. 5-52Rule 1.7 ............................................................................. 5-52Rule 2 .......................................................................5-47, 5-48Rule 2.1 ....................................................................5-49, 5-52Rule 2.4 ............................................................................. 5-49Rule 3 .......................................................................5-47, 5-49Rule 3.3 ....................................................................5-49, 5-50Rule 3.4 ............................................................................. 5-52Rule 4.1 ............................................................................. 5-50Rule 4.2 ............................................................................. 5-51Rule 4.3 ............................................................................. 5-52Rule 6.1 ............................................................................. 5-52

Indiana

Northern District of Indiana Local Patent RulesRule 2-1 ............................................................................. 5-54Rule 3-1(a) ......................................................................... 5-54Rule 3-1(b) ......................................................................... 5-54Rule 3-1(c) ......................................................................... 5-55Rule 3-1(e) ......................................................................... 5-55Rule 3-1(g) ......................................................................... 5-55Rule 4-1(a) ......................................................................... 5-56Rule 4-1(b) ......................................................................... 5-56Rule 4-1(c) ......................................................................... 5-53Rule 4-1(d) ......................................................................... 5-57Rule 4-1(e) ......................................................................... 5-57Rule 4-1(f) .......................................................................... 5-57

PATENT CLAIM CONSTRUCTION AND MARKMAN HEARINGS

T–20

3rd

Pro

ofs

05/3

1/18

Page 21: #239386 TOA Patent Claim Construction P3 1....Chestnut Hill Sound Inc. v. Apple Inc. 10-10 Chimie v. PPG Indus., Inc. 2-29, 2-49 Chiuminatta Concrete Concepts, Inc. v. Cardinal Indus

Southern District of Indiana Local Patent RulesPlan II A ............................................................................ 5-61Plan II C ............................................................................ 5-62Plan II H ........................................................................... 5-62Plan III C .................................................................5-59, 5-62Plan III C(6) ...................................................................... 5-60Plan III D .................................................................5-59, 5-60Plan III E ........................................................................... 5-60Plan III F ........................................................................... 5-60Plan III G .................................................................5-60, 5-61Plan III H .......................................................................... 5-60Plan III I ............................................................................ 5-61Plan III K ........................................................................... 5-58Plan III L ........................................................................... 5-58Plan III M .......................................................................... 5-61Plan III N .......................................................................... 5-61Plan V ................................................................................ 5-62Track 1 ..................................................5-57, 5-58, 5-61, 5-63Track 2 ..................................................5-57, 5-58, 5-61, 5-63Track 3 ........................................................... 5-57, 5-62, 5-63

Southern District of Indiana Patent Case Management PlansPhase II .............................................................................. 5-61Phase 2 .............................................................................. 5-57Phase 3 .............................................................................. 5-63Track 1 ..................................................5-57, 5-58, 5-61, 5-63Track 2 ..................................................5-57, 5-58, 5-61, 5-63Track 3 ........................................................... 5-57, 5-62, 5-63

Maryland

District of Maryland Local Patent RulesParagraph (B)(2) ................................................................. 5-73Paragraph (B)(3) ................................................................. 5-73Paragraph A ..............................................................5-72, 5-73Paragraph A(1) ................................................................... 5-72Paragraph A(4) ................................................................... 5-71Paragraph B(2) ................................................................... 5-72Paragraph B ........................................................................ 5-73Paragraph C ....................................................................... 5-74Paragraph D ....................................................................... 5-72Paragraph D(2) ................................................................... 5-73Rule 16.6 ........................................................................... 5-71Rule 16.6(A)(3)(b) .............................................................. 5-73Rule 801 ............................................................................ 5-63Rule 802 ............................................................................ 5-63

Table of Authorities

T–21(Patent Claim, Rel. #5, 6/18)

3rd

Pro

ofs

05/3

1/18

Page 22: #239386 TOA Patent Claim Construction P3 1....Chestnut Hill Sound Inc. v. Apple Inc. 10-10 Chimie v. PPG Indus., Inc. 2-29, 2-49 Chiuminatta Concrete Concepts, Inc. v. Cardinal Indus

Rule 803 ............................................................................ 5-64Rule 804 ............................................................................ 5-64Rule 804(5) ........................................................................ 5-69Rule 805 ............................................................................ 5-67Rule 806 ............................................................................ 5-70Rule 807 ............................................................................ 5-70

Massachusetts

District of Massachusetts Local Rules16 ...................................................................................... 5-7216.1 ................................................................................... 5-7116.6 ..........................................................................5-71, 5-72

Minnesota

District of Minnesota Local Patent RulesReport, Para. (e)(1) .............................................................5-75Report, Para. (e)(2) .............................................................5-75Report, Para. (e)(3) .............................................................5-75Report, Para. (e)(4) .............................................................5-76Report, Para. (e)(5) .............................................................5-74Report, Para. (e)(6) .............................................................5-76Report, Para. (n) ................................................................. 5-75

Missouri

Eastern District of Missouri Local Patent RulesRule 2-1 ............................................................................. 5-77Rule 3-1 ............................................................................. 5-78Rule 3-2 ............................................................................. 5-79Rule 3-4 ............................................................................. 5-78Rule 3-5 ............................................................................. 5-79Rule 4-1 ............................................................................. 5-79Rule 4-2 ............................................................................. 5-80Rule 4-3 ............................................................................. 5-76Rule 4-4 ............................................................................. 5-80Rule 4-5 ............................................................................. 5-80

Nevada

District of Nevada Local Patent RulesRule 16.1-4 ........................................................................ 5-86Rule 16.1-5 ........................................................................ 5-87Rule 16.1-6 ........................................................................ 5-82Rule 16.1-7 ........................................................................ 5-84Rule 16.1-8 ........................................................................ 5-83

PATENT CLAIM CONSTRUCTION AND MARKMAN HEARINGS

T–22

3rd

Pro

ofs

05/3

1/18

Page 23: #239386 TOA Patent Claim Construction P3 1....Chestnut Hill Sound Inc. v. Apple Inc. 10-10 Chimie v. PPG Indus., Inc. 2-29, 2-49 Chiuminatta Concrete Concepts, Inc. v. Cardinal Indus

Rule 16.1-9 ........................................................................ 5-84Rule 16.1-10 ...................................................................... 5-84Rule 16.1-11 ...................................................................... 5-85Rule 16.1-12 ...................................................................... 5-84Rule 16.1-13 ...................................................................... 5-85Rule 16.1-14 ...................................................................... 5-86Rule 16.1-15 ...................................................................... 5-81Rule 16.1-16 ...................................................................... 5-86Rule 16.1-17 ...................................................................... 5-86Rule 16.1-19 ...................................................................... 5-87Rule 16.1-20 ...................................................................... 5-87

New Hampshire

District of New Hampshire Local Patent RulesSPR 1.1 .............................................................................. 5-88SPR 2.1 .............................................................................. 5-88SPR 3.1 .............................................................................. 5-88SPR 4.1 .............................................................................. 5-89SPR 5.1 .............................................................................. 5-89SPR 6.1 .............................................................................. 5-92SPR 7.1 .............................................................................. 5-93SPR 8.1 .............................................................................. 5-94

New Jersey

District of New Jersey Local Patent RulesRule 2.1 ............................................................................. 5-96Rule 2.2 ........................................................................... 5-100Rule 2.3 ........................................................................... 5-100Rule 2.4 ........................................................................... 5-100Rule 3.1 ............................................................................. 5-96Rules 3.1 to 3.5 ............................................................... 5-101Rule 3.1(c) ....................................................................... 5-100Rule 3.1(e) ....................................................................... 5-100Rule 3.2 ............................................................................. 5-98Rule 3.2A ........................................................................... 5-96Rule 3.3 ....................................................................5-96, 5-97Rule 3.3(c) ....................................................................... 5-100Rule 3.4 ....................................................................5-97, 5-98Rule 3.4A ..................................................................5-96, 5-97Rule 3.4A(a) ..................................................................... 5-100Rule 3.5 ....................................................................5-96, 5-97Rule 3.6 ........................................................................... 5-101Rule 3.7 ............................................................................. 5-96Rule 4.1 ............................................................................. 5-98

Table of Authorities

T–23(Patent Claim, Rel. #5, 6/18)

3rd

Pro

ofs

05/3

1/18

Page 24: #239386 TOA Patent Claim Construction P3 1....Chestnut Hill Sound Inc. v. Apple Inc. 10-10 Chimie v. PPG Indus., Inc. 2-29, 2-49 Chiuminatta Concrete Concepts, Inc. v. Cardinal Indus

Rule 4.1(c) ....................................................................... 5-100Rule 4.2 ............................................................................. 5-99Rule 4.2(a) ......................................................................... 5-99Rule 4.2(e) ......................................................................... 5-99Rule 4.3 ............................................................................. 5-95Rule 4.3(g) ....................................................................... 5-100Rule 4.4 ............................................................................. 5-99Rule 4.5 ............................................................................. 5-99Rule 4.5(b) ......................................................................... 5-99Rule 4.6 ...........................................................................5-100

New York

Eastern District of New York Local Patent RulesRule 2 .............................................................................. 5-101Rule 6 .............................................................................. 5-102Rule 7 .............................................................................. 5-102Rule 11 ............................................................................ 5-101Rule 12 ............................................................................ 5-102

Northern District of New York Local Patent RulesRule 2-1 ...........................................................................5-104Rule 3-1 ...........................................................................5-105Rule 3-3 ...........................................................................5-105Rule 3-4 ...........................................................................5-106Rule 3-5 ...........................................................................5-105Rule 4-2 ...........................................................................5-106Rule 4-3 ...........................................................................5-107Rule 4-4 ...........................................................................5-103Rule 4-5 ...........................................................................5-107Rule 4-6 ...........................................................................5-107Rule 4-7 ...........................................................................5-108

Southern District of New York Local Patent RulesRule 2 .............................................................................. 5-108Rule 6 ...................................................................5-108, 5-109Rule 7 ...................................................................5-108, 5-109Rule 11 ............................................................................ 5-108Rule 12 ............................................................................ 5-109

North Carolina

Eastern District of North Carolina Local Patent RulesRule 301.2 ............................................................5-115, 5-116Rule 302.1 ....................................................................... 5-111Rule 302.2 ....................................................................... 5-114Rule 302.3 ....................................................................... 5-114Rule 302.4 ....................................................................... 5-115

PATENT CLAIM CONSTRUCTION AND MARKMAN HEARINGS

T–24

3rd

Pro

ofs

05/3

1/18

Page 25: #239386 TOA Patent Claim Construction P3 1....Chestnut Hill Sound Inc. v. Apple Inc. 10-10 Chimie v. PPG Indus., Inc. 2-29, 2-49 Chiuminatta Concrete Concepts, Inc. v. Cardinal Indus

Rule 302.5 ....................................................................... 5-115Rule 303.1 ....................................................................... 5-111Rule 303.2 ............................................................5-112, 5-115Rule 303.3 ............................................................5-111, 5-112Rule 303.4 ....................................................................... 5-112Rule 303.5 ............................................................5-115, 5-116Rule 303.6 ....................................................................... 5-115Rule 304.1 ....................................................................... 5-113Rule 304.2 ....................................................................... 5-113Rule 304.2(C) .................................................................. 5-113Rule 304.3 ....................................................................... 5-110Rule 304.4 ....................................................................... 5-113Rule 304.5 ....................................................................... 5-114Rule 304.6 ....................................................................... 5-114

Middle District of North Carolina Local Patent RulesRule 102.1 ....................................................................... 5-117Rule 103.1 ....................................................................... 5-118Rule 103.2 ....................................................................... 5-118Rule 103.3 ....................................................................... 5-118Rule 103.4 ....................................................................... 5-118Rule 104.1 ....................................................................... 5-119Rule 104.2 ....................................................................... 5-119Rule 104.3 ....................................................................... 5-117Rule 104.4 ....................................................................... 5-119Rule 104.5 ....................................................................... 5-120Rule 104.6 ....................................................................... 5-120

Western District of North Carolina Local Patent RulesP.R. 1.1 ............................................................................ 5-120P.R. 1.2 ............................................................................ 5-120P.R. 2.1 ............................................................................ 5-121P.R. 2.2 ............................................................................ 5-122P.R. 2.3 ............................................................................ 5-122P.R. 2.4 ............................................................................ 5-122P.R. 2.5 ............................................................................ 5-122P.R. 3.1 ............................................................................ 5-123P.R. 3.1(C) ....................................................................... 5-124P.R. 3.2 ............................................................................ 5-123P.R. 3.3 ............................................................................ 5-124P.R. 3.4 ............................................................................ 5-124P.R. 3.5 ............................................................................ 5-125P.R. 3.6 ............................................................................ 5-125P.R. 3.7 ............................................................................ 5-126P.R. 4.1 ............................................................................ 5-126P.R. 4.2 ............................................................................ 5-127P.R. 4.3 .................................................................5-121, 5-127

Table of Authorities

T–25(Patent Claim, Rel. #5, 6/18)

3rd

Pro

ofs

05/3

1/18

Page 26: #239386 TOA Patent Claim Construction P3 1....Chestnut Hill Sound Inc. v. Apple Inc. 10-10 Chimie v. PPG Indus., Inc. 2-29, 2-49 Chiuminatta Concrete Concepts, Inc. v. Cardinal Indus

P.R. 4.4 ............................................................................ 5-127P.R. 4.5 ............................................................................ 5-128P.R. 4.6 ............................................................................ 5-129

Ohio

Northern District of Ohio Local Patent RulesRule 1.3 ...........................................................................5-135Rule 1.5 ................................................................5-130, 5-136Rule 2.1 ...........................................................................5-130Rule 2.2 ...........................................................................5-136Rule 2.3 ...........................................................................5-136Rule 3.1 ...........................................................................5-131Rules 3.1 to 3.8 ...............................................................5-137Rule 3.2 ................................................................5-133, 5-136Rule 3.3 ...........................................................................5-131Rule 3.4 ...........................................................................5-133Rule 3.5 ................................................................5-131, 5-132Rule 3.6 ...........................................................................5-133Rule 3.7 .................................................... 5-131, 5-132, 5-133Rule 3.8 ...........................................................................5-136Rule 3.9 ...........................................................................5-137Rule 3.10 .................................................. 5-131, 5-132, 5-133Rule 4.1 ...........................................................................5-134Rule 4.2 ...........................................................................5-134Rule 4.3 ...........................................................................5-135Rule 4.4 ...........................................................................5-135Rule 4.5 ...........................................................................5-129Rule 4.6 ...........................................................................5-135Rule 4.7 ...........................................................................5-135Rule 5.1 ...........................................................................5-135Rule 5.3 ...........................................................................5-136Rule 16.3(b) ..................................................................... 5-131

Southern District of Ohio Local Patent RulesRule 101.2 ....................................................................... 5-143Rule 102.1 ....................................................................... 5-138Rule 102.2 ....................................................................... 5-143Rule 102.3 ....................................................................... 5-143Rule 102.4 ....................................................................... 5-143Rule 103.1 ............................................................5-139, 5-140Rule 103.2 ....................................................................... 5-139Rule 103.3 ....................................................................... 5-140Rule 103.4 ............................................................5-139, 5-140Rule 103.6 ............................................................5-143, 5-144Rule 103.7 ....................................................................... 5-143

PATENT CLAIM CONSTRUCTION AND MARKMAN HEARINGS

T–26

3rd

Pro

ofs

05/3

1/18

Page 27: #239386 TOA Patent Claim Construction P3 1....Chestnut Hill Sound Inc. v. Apple Inc. 10-10 Chimie v. PPG Indus., Inc. 2-29, 2-49 Chiuminatta Concrete Concepts, Inc. v. Cardinal Indus

Rule 103.8 ....................................................................... 5-142Rule 105.1 ....................................................................... 5-141Rule 105.2 ................................................ 5-138, 5-141, 5-142Rule 105.3 ....................................................................... 5-142Rule 105.4 ....................................................................... 5-142Rule 105.5 ....................................................................... 5-143Rule 106.1 ....................................................................... 5-142Rule 106.2 ....................................................................... 5-142

Pennsylvania

Western District of Pennsylvania Local Patent RulesRule 1.3 ........................................................................... 5-150Rule 2.1 ........................................................................... 5-145Rule 2.2 ........................................................................... 5-149Rule 2.3 ........................................................................... 5-149Rule 2.4 ........................................................................... 5-150Rule 2.5 ........................................................................... 5-150Rule 3.1 ................................................................5-147, 5-150Rule 3.2 ................................................................5-145, 5-146Rule 3.3 ........................................................................... 5-147Rule 3.4 ................................................................5-145, 5-146Rule 3.5 ........................................................................... 5-147Rule 3.6 ........................................................................... 5-150Rule 3.7 ........................................................................... 5-150Rule 4.1 ........................................................................... 5-148Rule 4.2 ................................................................5-145, 5-148Rule 4.3 .................................................... 5-147, 5-148, 5-149Rule 4.4 ........................................................................... 5-149Rule 4.5 ........................................................................... 5-151Rule 5.1 ........................................................................... 5-150Rule 5.2 ........................................................................... 5-150

Tennessee

Western District of Tennessee Local Patent RulesRule 1.3 ........................................................................... 5-155Rule 1.5 ........................................................................... 5-154Rule 2.1 ........................................................................... 5-153Rule 2.2 ................................................................5-155, 5-156Rule 2.3 ........................................................................... 5-155Rule 3.1 .................................................... 5-156, 5-157, 5-161Rules 3.1–3.7 ................................................................... 5-155Rules 3.1–3.8 ................................................................... 5-162Rule 3.2 ................................................................5-158, 5-163

Table of Authorities

T–27(Patent Claim, Rel. #5, 6/18)

3rd

Pro

ofs

05/3

1/18

Page 28: #239386 TOA Patent Claim Construction P3 1....Chestnut Hill Sound Inc. v. Apple Inc. 10-10 Chimie v. PPG Indus., Inc. 2-29, 2-49 Chiuminatta Concrete Concepts, Inc. v. Cardinal Indus

Rule 3.3 ..............................5-156, 5-157, 5-159, 5-161, 5-162Rule 3.4 ................................................................5-158, 5-159Rule 3.4(a) ....................................................................... 5-162Rule 3.5 ..............................5-157, 5-158, 5-159, 5-161, 5-162Rule 3.6 .........................................5-158, 5-159, 5-161, 5-162Rule 3.7 .........................................5-157, 5-158, 5-159, 5-161Rule 3.8 ................................................................5-154, 5-161Rule 3.9 ...........................................................................5-153Rule 3.10 ......................................................................... 5-162Rule 3.11 ......................................................................... 5-154Rule 3.12 ......................................................................... 5-154Rule 4.1 .................................................... 5-155, 5-159, 5-160Rule 4.2 ...........................................................................5-160Rule 4.3 ...........................................................................5-155Rule 4.4 ...........................................................................5-160Rule 4.5 ...........................................................................5-152Rule 4.6 ...........................................................................5-161Rule 4.7 ...........................................................................5-155Rule 4.8 ...........................................................................5-163Rule 5.1 ...........................................................................5-163Rule 5.2 ...........................................................................5-163Rule 5.3 ...........................................................................5-163Rule 6.1 ...........................................................................5-163Rule 6.2 ...........................................................................5-163Rule 16.1 ......................................................................... 5-154Rule 16.2 ......................................................................... 5-154

Texas

Eastern District of Texas Local Patent RulesRule 1-2 ...........................................................................5-171Rule 2-1 ................................................................5-166, 5-171Rule 2-2 ...........................................................................5-170Rule 2-3 ...........................................................................5-170Rule 3-1 ...........................................................................5-166Rules 3-1 to 3-5 ...............................................................5-171Rule 3-2 ................................................................5-168, 5-171Rule 3-3 ................................................................5-166, 5-167Rule 3-4 ...........................................................................5-168Rule 3-5 ...........................................................................5-171Rule 3-6 .................................................... 5-166, 5-167, 5-171Rule 3-8 ...........................................................................5-171Rule 4-1 ...........................................................................5-168Rule 4-2 ................................................................5-168, 5-169Rule 4-3 ...........................................................................5-180

PATENT CLAIM CONSTRUCTION AND MARKMAN HEARINGS

T–28

3rd

Pro

ofs

05/3

1/18

Page 29: #239386 TOA Patent Claim Construction P3 1....Chestnut Hill Sound Inc. v. Apple Inc. 10-10 Chimie v. PPG Indus., Inc. 2-29, 2-49 Chiuminatta Concrete Concepts, Inc. v. Cardinal Indus

Rule 4-4 ........................................................................... 5-169Rule 4-5 ................................................................5-165, 5-170Rule 4.5(d) ........................................................................... 6-3Rule 4-6 ........................................................................... 5-170

Northern District of Texas, Local Patent Procedures, Dallas DivisionParagraph 1-2 ................................................................... 5-179Paragraph 2-1 ................................................................... 5-174Paragraph 2-2 ................................................................... 5-178Paragraph 2-3 ................................................................... 5-178Paragraph 2-4 ................................................................... 5-179Paragraph 2-5 ................................................................... 5-179Paragraph 3-1 ................................................................... 5-174Paragraph 3-2 ........................................................5-176, 5-179Paragraph 3-3 ........................................................5-174, 5-175Paragraph 3-4 ................................................................... 5-176Paragraph 3-5 ................................................................... 5-179Paragraph 3-6 ........................................................5-174, 5-175Paragraph 3-7 ........................................................5-174, 5-175Paragraph 4-1 ................................................................... 5-177Paragraph 4-2 ................................................................... 5-177Paragraph 4-3 ................................................................... 5-173Paragraph 4-4 ................................................................... 5-177Paragraph 4-5 ........................................................5-173, 5-178Paragraph 4-6 ................................................................... 5-178

Southern District of Texas Local Patent RulesRule 1-2 ........................................................................... 5-189Rule 2-1 ........................................................................... 5-181Rule 2-2 ........................................................................... 5-188Rule 2-3 ........................................................................... 5-188Rule 2-4 ........................................................................... 5-188Rule 2-5 ........................................................................... 5-189Rule 3-1 ........................................................................... 5-183Rule 3-2 ................................................................5-185, 5-189Rule 3-3 ................................................................5-183, 5-184Rule 3-4 ........................................................................... 5-185Rule 3-5 ........................................................................... 5-189Rule 3-6 ................................................................5-183, 5-184Rule 3-7 ................................................................5-183, 5-184Rule 4-1 ........................................................................... 5-185Rule 4-2 ................................................................5-185, 5-186Rule 4-3 ................................................................5-180, 5-185Rule 4-4 ........................................................................... 5-187Rule 4-5 ................................................................5-180, 5-187Rule 4-6 ........................................................................... 5-188

Table of Authorities

T–29(Patent Claim, Rel. #5, 6/18)

3rd

Pro

ofs

05/3

1/18

Page 30: #239386 TOA Patent Claim Construction P3 1....Chestnut Hill Sound Inc. v. Apple Inc. 10-10 Chimie v. PPG Indus., Inc. 2-29, 2-49 Chiuminatta Concrete Concepts, Inc. v. Cardinal Indus

Utah

District of Utah Local Patent RulesLPR 1.1 ............................................................................ 5-197LPR 1.2 ............................................................................ 5-190LPR 1.3 ............................................................................ 5-191LPR 1.3(a) .............................................................5-191, 5-192LPR 1.3(b) .............................................................5-191, 5-192LPR 1.3(c) .............................................................5-191, 5-192LPR 1.5 .................................................................5-154, 5-191LPR 1.6 ............................................................................ 5-192LPR 1.7 ............................................................................ 5-191LPR 2.1 ..................................................... 5-145, 5-153, 5-191LPR 2.2 ............................................................................ 5-192LPR 2.2(a) ........................................................................ 5-191LPR 2.2(b) ........................................................................ 5-192LPR 2.3 .................................................................5-192, 5-193LPR 2.4 .................................................................5-193, 5-194LPR 2.5 .................................................................5-191, 5-192LPR 3.1 ............................................................................ 5-194LPR 3.2 ............................................................................ 5-194LPR 3.3 .................................................................5-191, 5-192LPR 3.4 ............................................................................ 5-194LPR 4.1 ..................................................... 5-191, 5-192, 5-195LPR 4.2 ............................................................................ 5-195LPR 4.3 ............................................................................ 5-196LPR 4.4 ............................................................................ 5-196LPR 5 ............................................................................... 5-197LPR 6 ............................................................................... 5-197LPR 7 ............................................................................... 5-197

Washington

Eastern District of Washington Local Patent RulesRule 110 .......................................................................... 5-199Rule 120 .......................................................................... 5-200Rule 121 .......................................................................... 5-201Rule 122 .......................................................................... 5-201Rule 123 .......................................................................... 5-201Rule 130 .......................................................................... 5-201Rule 131 .......................................................................... 5-202Rule 132 .......................................................................... 5-198Rule 133 .......................................................................... 5-202Rule 134 .......................................................................... 5-202Rule 135 .......................................................................... 5-202

PATENT CLAIM CONSTRUCTION AND MARKMAN HEARINGS

T–30

3rd

Pro

ofs

05/3

1/18

Page 31: #239386 TOA Patent Claim Construction P3 1....Chestnut Hill Sound Inc. v. Apple Inc. 10-10 Chimie v. PPG Indus., Inc. 2-29, 2-49 Chiuminatta Concrete Concepts, Inc. v. Cardinal Indus

Western District of Washington Local Patent RulesRule 101 .......................................................................... 5-210Rule 110 .......................................................................... 5-204Rule 111 .......................................................................... 5-209Rule 112 .......................................................................... 5-210Rule 120 .......................................................................... 5-205Rule 121 ...............................................................5-205, 5-207Rule 122 .......................................................................... 5-207Rule 123 .......................................................................... 5-210Rule 124 ...............................................................5-205, 5-207Rule 125 ...............................................................5-205, 5-207Rule 130 .......................................................................... 5-208Rule 131 .......................................................................... 5-208Rule 132 .......................................................................... 5-203Rule 133 .......................................................................... 5-208Rule 134 .......................................................................... 5-209Rule 135 .......................................................................... 5-209

Table of Authorities

T–31(Patent Claim, Rel. #5, 6/18)

3rd

Pro

ofs

05/3

1/18

Page 32: #239386 TOA Patent Claim Construction P3 1....Chestnut Hill Sound Inc. v. Apple Inc. 10-10 Chimie v. PPG Indus., Inc. 2-29, 2-49 Chiuminatta Concrete Concepts, Inc. v. Cardinal Indus

3rd

Pro

ofs

05/3

1/18