2016-2017 - texas department of public safety · collected by the texas department of public safety...

288
Report Prepared By: Eric J. Fritsch, Ph.D. Chad R. Trulson, Ph.D. University of North Texas Copyright © 2018 Department of Criminal Justice University of North Texas 1155 Union Circle #305130 Denton, TX 76203 Denton, TX 76203-5017 All rights reserved Texas Department of Public Safety Analysis of Traffic Stop Data by Race/Ethnicity 2016-2017 Final Report November 2018

Upload: others

Post on 21-Jul-2020

4 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: 2016-2017 - Texas Department of Public Safety · collected by the Texas Department of Public Safety (TX DPS). According to the Texas Code of Criminal Procedure, “racial profiling

Report Prepared By: Eric J. Fritsch, Ph.D. Chad R. Trulson, Ph.D. University of North Texas Copyright © 2018 Department of Criminal Justice University of North Texas 1155 Union Circle #305130 Denton, TX 76203 Denton, TX 76203-5017 All rights reserved

Texas

Department of Public Safety

Racial Profiling Analysis 2016-2017

Draft Report

September 2018

Analysis of Traffic Stop Data by Race/Ethnicity

2016-2017

Final Report

November 2018

Page 2: 2016-2017 - Texas Department of Public Safety · collected by the Texas Department of Public Safety (TX DPS). According to the Texas Code of Criminal Procedure, “racial profiling

TABLE OF CONTENTS

Scope of Work and Methodology ................................................................................................. 1 Research Task #1 ................................................................................................................ 1 Research Task #2 ................................................................................................................ 2 Research Task #3 ................................................................................................................ 4 Research Task #4 ................................................................................................................ 4 Research Task #5 ................................................................................................................ 5 Research Task #6 ................................................................................................................ 5 Research Task #7 ................................................................................................................ 6 Research Task #8 ................................................................................................................ 7 Research Task #9 ................................................................................................................ 7

Variables ........................................................................................................................................ 8

Data Analysis Process ................................................................................................................. 10 Stage1:TrafficStopDataAnalysis .................................................................................. 11 Stage2:TrafficStopEnforcementActionAnalysis .......................................................... 13 Stage3:SearchAnalysis ................................................................................................... 17 Stage4:ContrabandHitAnalysis .................................................................................... 20 Internal Controls ......................................................................................................................... 23

Research Team ............................................................................................................................ 25

Highway Patrol – 2017 Statewide Analysis ............................................................................... 27

Highway Patrol – 2016 Statewide Analysis ............................................................................... 30

Commercial Vehicle Enforcement – 2017 Statewide Analysis ................................................ 33

Commercial Vehicle Enforcement – 2016 Statewide Analysis ................................................ 36

Appendix A – Region 1: Dallas Analysis ................................................................................... 39

Appendix B – Region 1: Dallas – District Level Analysis ........................................................ 49

Appendix C – Region 2: Houston Analysis ............................................................................... 86

Appendix D – Region 2: Houston – District Level Analysis .................................................... 96

Page 3: 2016-2017 - Texas Department of Public Safety · collected by the Texas Department of Public Safety (TX DPS). According to the Texas Code of Criminal Procedure, “racial profiling

Appendix E – Region 3: McAllen Analysis ............................................................................. 133

Appendix F – Region 3: McAllen – District Level Analysis .................................................. 143

Appendix G – Region 4: El Paso Analysis .............................................................................. 181

Appendix H – Region 4: El Paso – District Level Analysis ................................................... 191

Appendix I – Region 5: Lubbock Analysis ............................................................................. 210

Appendix J – Region 5: Lubbock – District Level Analysis .................................................. 220

Appendix K – Region 6: San Antonio Analysis ...................................................................... 248

Appendix L – Region 6: San Antonio – District Level Analysis ............................................ 258

Page 4: 2016-2017 - Texas Department of Public Safety · collected by the Texas Department of Public Safety (TX DPS). According to the Texas Code of Criminal Procedure, “racial profiling

1

The purpose of this study is to perform an analysis of traffic stop data, by race and ethnicity, collected by the Texas Department of Public Safety (TX DPS). According to the Texas Code of Criminal Procedure, “racial profiling means a law enforcement-initiated action based on an individual's race, ethnicity, or national origin rather than on the individual's behavior or on information identifying the individual as having engaged in criminal activity.”1 Scope of Work and Methodology This section reviews each research task specified in the project scope of work, discusses the methodology utilized to address each research task, and identifies where within the report each item is covered. For items in the project scope of work that do not appear in the report, an explanation for each is provided. Research Task #1 Determine if racial/ethnic disparities exist in the traffic stops at a statewide, regional, and district level Subtasks

• Examine the traffic stop data by service, Highway Patrol (HP) and Commercial Vehicle Enforcement (CVE) separately at the statewide, regional, and district level.

• Traffic stop data that is examined should include trooper-initiated enforcement. Data from crash investigations, agency assists, and commercial vehicle static inspection stations should be excluded.

• Commercial vehicle enforcement inspections as a result of a traffic stop (such as, roadside inspections) should be included in the traffic stop data.

Methodology

Racial profiling during traffic stops applies specifically to trooper-initiated (i.e., self-initiated or proactive) actions as reflected in the Texas state law definition of racial profiling. The traffic stop data assessed included all 2016 and 2017 traffic stops, separated by Highway Patrol and Commercial Vehicle Enforcement, that were trooper-initiated. For Highway Patrol, the data excluded activities such as accident investigations, agency assists, and citations for failure to pay toll since these activities are not trooper-initiated. Instead, these activities are due to a call for service, request for assistance, or electronic identification by a license plate reader.

1 Texas Code of Criminal Procedure 3.05.

DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC SAFETY SCOPE OF WORK AND METHODOLOGY

Page 5: 2016-2017 - Texas Department of Public Safety · collected by the Texas Department of Public Safety (TX DPS). According to the Texas Code of Criminal Procedure, “racial profiling

2

For Commercial Vehicle Enforcement, the traffic stops assessed were limited to roadside inspections. Roadside inspections occur pursuant to a trooper-initiated traffic stop. Inspections which occur at commercial vehicle static inspection stations and scale houses were excluded from the data because the activity is not trooper-initiated. All ports of entry weigh stations are classified as scale houses. Further, inspections completed by non-commissioned inspectors were excluded from the data. Non-commissioned inspectors are not allowed to conduct roadside inspections which is the focus of the traffic stop analysis included in this report. Instead, non-commissioned inspectors are assigned to scale houses only.

Report Location The traffic stop data, by race/ethnicity, for Highway Patrol and Commercial Vehicle Enforcement at the statewide level for 2016 and 2017 are included in the primary text. The traffic stop data, by race/ethnicity, for Highway Patrol2 and Commercial Vehicle Enforcement for 2016 and 2017 at the region and district levels are included in Appendices A-L. Research Task #2 Identify a representative population “base-rate” based on county-level demographic data from the U.S. Census Bureau for which demographic comparisons can be made to determine if racial/ethnic disparities exist. Subtasks

• Demographic comparisons should consider geographical areas of traffic stops, and race/ethnicity groupings of traffic stop violators, compared to the race/ethnicity of troopers.

Why Data are not Presented in Report

TX DPS personnel provided the data on the location of each trooper-initiated traffic stop, race/ethnicity of traffic stop violators as well as the race/ethnicity of the trooper to the UNT research team. However, county-level demographic data from the U.S. Census Bureau is not a representative population base rate for comparison purposes and thus invalid. Therefore, the UNT research team decided to exclude the analysis from this report due to its invalidity. The most common benchmark used in racial profiling research is the United States Census due to its easy availability at the city and county level. In other words, it is easy to know the percentage breakdown of Whites, Blacks, Asians and other races as well as Hispanics for any city or county

2 There were 32 stops in 2016 and 2017 for Highway Patrol where the region and district were missing. In the region and district level tables in the appendices, these 32 stops are not included as they do not correspond to any region or district.

DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC SAFETY SCOPE OF WORK AND METHODOLOGY

Page 6: 2016-2017 - Texas Department of Public Safety · collected by the Texas Department of Public Safety (TX DPS). According to the Texas Code of Criminal Procedure, “racial profiling

3

through the census.gov website (https://www.census.gov/). With the two data points of 1) percentage of traffic stops by race/ethnicity of traffic stop violator and 2) percentage of residents by race/ethnicity in a city or county, an analysis can be completed to determine if there is a disparity between the two data points. It is important to note that all TX DPS regions and districts are comprised of entire counties which makes this type of analysis feasible at the statewide, region, and district levels. As an illustration, perhaps 40% of the traffic stops made by troopers in a particular district were of Hispanics and 10% of the district residents were Hispanic. Some then use this disparity as evidence of racial profiling against Hispanics. This conclusion is invalid. In other words, a pattern of disparities in traffic stops in comparison to U.S. Census data does not establish a pattern of racial profiling. Two justifications for this statement are presented below. First, the U.S. Census is an invalid benchmark for comparison to traffic stops at the state, region, and district level. The U.S. Census is not an accurate measure of the driving population because it includes all ages, not just those who are old enough to drive and have a driver’s license. In addition, since TX DPS troopers focus their enforcement efforts on interstates and state highways, traffic stop violators are not necessarily residents of the city or county in which the traffic stop occurred. When comparisons are made to the U.S. Census, the benchmark is commonly the city or county population demographic which only includes information on the racial/ethnic composition of the residents of the city or county and residents at the time of the census. Non-residents (i.e., individuals who did not reside in the city or county at the time of the census) are subject to traffic stops, but are not included in the comparison/base rate census data. As mentioned, this is particularly true for TX DPS troopers since their enforcement efforts focus on interstates and state highways which are commonly traversed by drivers from throughout Texas and other states. For example, a resident of Dallas can receive a traffic citation on Interstate 37 outside San Antonio but will not be included in the U.S. Census data for that TX DPS region or district. Invalid conclusions are drawn if the racial/ethnic composition of individuals stopped by TX DPS troopers in a particular region or district are compared to the U.S. Census, because the U.S. Census is limited to the racial/ethnic composition of individuals who resided in the region or district when the census was collected. Second, using the U.S. Census as a benchmark is based on the false assumption that drivers are at equal risk of being stopped for a traffic violation. Every driver does not have an equal chance of being stopped for a traffic violation. For example, if a person never commits a traffic violation, the person does not have a chance of being stopped. However, the individual is included in the U.S. Census data that is used as the benchmark as long as the individual was a resident of the region or district at the time of the census. Similarly, risk levels for traffic stops vary based on an individual’s quality of driving, travel patterns (i.e., using interstates and state highways), frequency of driving, and driver exposure to TX DPS troopers. There are exposure and risk differentials across individuals for traffic stops which limits the use of the U.S. Census as a benchmark for disparity analysis.

DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC SAFETY SCOPE OF WORK AND METHODOLOGY

Page 7: 2016-2017 - Texas Department of Public Safety · collected by the Texas Department of Public Safety (TX DPS). According to the Texas Code of Criminal Procedure, “racial profiling

4

Research Task #3 Examine the changes across time in the traffic stops at the statewide, regional, and district level

Methodology Traffic stops at the statewide, region, and district levels are analyzed for 2016 and 2017.

Report Location The traffic stop data, by race/ethnicity, for Highway Patrol and Commercial Vehicle Enforcement at the statewide level for 2016 and 2017 are included in the primary text. The traffic stop data, by race/ethnicity, for Highway Patrol and Commercial Vehicle Enforcement at the region and district levels for 2016 and 2017 are included in Appendices A-L. Research Task #4 Examine DPS traffic stop findings by race/ethnicity against those of the largest city and county law enforcement agency at the statewide, regional, and district levels as available on the Texas Commission on Law Enforcement website.

Why Data are not Presented in Report Law enforcement agencies are required to submit a racial profiling report annually to the Texas Commission on Law Enforcement (TCOLE). The standardized report is available on TCOLE’s website. TX DPS personnel provided the UNT research team with the data on the location of each trooper-initiated traffic stop as well as the race/ethnicity of traffic stop violators. This same information is available for each law enforcement agency in Texas which makes traffic stops through the standardized reporting form on the TCOLE website. In order to complete the statewide comparison, the TX DPS data would have been compared to the TCOLE reporting form data from the Houston Police Department (i.e., largest city in Texas) and the Harris County Sheriff’s Office (i.e., largest county in Texas). As an example at the region level, the analysis of the TX DPS Region 6 data would have been compared to the TCOLE reporting form data from the San Antonio Police Department (i.e., largest city in TX DPS Region 6) and the Bexar County Sheriff’s Office (i.e., largest county in TX DPS Region 6). Furthermore, as an example at the district level, the analysis of the TX DPS District 1A data would have been compared to the TCOLE reporting form data from the Dallas Police Department (i.e., largest city in TX DPS District 1A) and the Dallas County Sheriff’s Office (i.e., largest county in TX DPS District 1A). The UNT research team determined that comparing the TX DPS data at the statewide, region, and district level with the largest city and county law enforcement agency in the state, region, or district, depending on the analysis performed, was invalid. TX DPS troopers focus their enforcement efforts on interstates and state highways while city and county law enforcement agencies commonly make traffic stops throughout their respective jurisdictions including arterial

DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC SAFETY SCOPE OF WORK AND METHODOLOGY

Page 8: 2016-2017 - Texas Department of Public Safety · collected by the Texas Department of Public Safety (TX DPS). According to the Texas Code of Criminal Procedure, “racial profiling

5

roadways as well as collector and residential streets. In addition, the data from the largest city and county law enforcement agency in the state, region, and district are not representative of the traffic stop data throughout the state or the respective region or district. Therefore, the UNT research team decided to exclude the analysis from the report due to its invalidity. Research Task #5 Determine if disparities exist in the likelihood of a citation versus a warning for all racial/ethnic groups, statewide, regionally, and at the district level.

Subtasks • Examine the likelihood of a citation versus a warning for all racial/ethnic groups by

service, HP and CVE separately at the statewide, regional, and district levels. Methodology

Traffic stops at the statewide, region, and district levels are analyzed for 2016 and 2017. For each traffic stop, one of two enforcement actions occurs; citation or warning. In instances in which a citation and a warning was issued (e.g., citation for speeding and warning for equipment violation) during the same traffic stop, the enforcement action was analyzed as a citation since it is the more severe outcome. For analysis purposes, only one enforcement action was analyzed per traffic stop, either citation or warning, regardless of the number of citations or warnings issued during the stop.

Report Location The traffic stop data, by race/ethnicity and enforcement action, for Highway Patrol and Commercial Vehicle Enforcement at the statewide level for 2016 and 2017 are included in the primary text. The traffic stop data, by race/ethnicity and enforcement action, for Highway Patrol and Commercial Vehicle Enforcement for 2016 and 2017, at the region and district levels are included in Appendices A-L. It is important to note that the Commercial Vehicle Enforcement analysis includes a third category of “clean” in addition to “citation” and “warning” since the outcome of a CVE stop can include no violations found. Research Task #6 Determine if disparities exist in conditional search rates for the different types of searches for racial/ethnic groups.

Subtasks • If practical, determine if disparities exist in the contraband found rates for the

different types of searches for racial/ethnic groups.

DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC SAFETY SCOPE OF WORK AND METHODOLOGY

Page 9: 2016-2017 - Texas Department of Public Safety · collected by the Texas Department of Public Safety (TX DPS). According to the Texas Code of Criminal Procedure, “racial profiling

6

Methodology For each traffic stop, if a search occurred, the data were analyzed for research task #6. The data included the four types of searches collected by TX DPS; consent, incident to arrest, probable cause, and vehicle inventory. For each search completed, whether contraband was discovered during the search was analyzed. All data were disaggregated by race/ethnicity.

Report Location The search data, by race/ethnicity and whether contraband was discovered, at the statewide level are included in the primary text. The search data, by race/ethnicity and whether contraband was discovered, at the region and district levels are included in Appendices A-L. Research Task #7 Determine if conditional search rates display different patterns across the districts and regions compared to the statewide pattern.

Subtasks • Examine the conditional search rates by service, HP and CVE separately at the

statewide, regional, and district levels. • If practical, determine if contraband found rates display different patterns across the

districts and regions when compared to statewide.

Methodology For each traffic stop, if a search occurred, the data were analyzed for research task #7. The data included four types of searches; consent, incident to arrest, probable cause, and vehicle inventory. For each search completed, whether contraband was discovered during the search was analyzed. All data were disaggregated by race/ethnicity and were analyzed at the statewide, region, and district levels for 2016 and 2017.

Report Location The search data, by race/ethnicity and whether contraband was discovered, for Highway Patrol and Commercial Vehicle Enforcement at the statewide level for 2016 and 2017 are included in the primary text. The search data, by race/ethnicity and whether contraband was discovered, for Highway Patrol and Commercial Vehicle Enforcement for 2016 and 2017 at the region and district levels are included in Appendices A-L.

DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC SAFETY SCOPE OF WORK AND METHODOLOGY

Page 10: 2016-2017 - Texas Department of Public Safety · collected by the Texas Department of Public Safety (TX DPS). According to the Texas Code of Criminal Procedure, “racial profiling

7

Research Task #8 Determine if racial/ethnic disparities exist in use of force incidents at a statewide level Why Data are not Presented in Report The UNT research team received a report from TX DPS personnel, dated April 11, 2017, on use of force from 2012-2016. The report documented: a) the number of use of force incidents by race/ethnicity from 2012-2016; b) number of use of force incidents excluding injury or death by a firearm by race/ethnicity from 2012-2016; c) number of deadly use of force incidents by firearm by race/ethnicity from 2012-2016; and, d) the number of suspect deaths by use of force by firearms by race/ethnicity from 2012-2016. The data are not limited to use of force incidents pursuant to traffic stops. For example, a use of force incident during an agency assist would be included in the use of force report, but the agency assist is not included in the traffic stop data analyzed for this report. The UNT research team decided to exclude the analysis from this report due to its limited utility for the purposes of this report. It is important to note that beginning January 1, 2018, law enforcement officers in Texas are required to collect “whether the officer used physical force that resulted in bodily injury, as that term is defined by Section 1.07, Penal Code,”3 for each traffic stop. Therefore, data on use of force, exclusive to trooper-initiated traffic stops, will be available at the end of calendar year 2018 and can be included in any future reports. Research Task #9 If race/ethnic disparities are identified, provide best practice recommendations to correct existing disparities and prevent future disparities.

Methodology The UNT research team identified and assessed the internal controls utilized within TX DPS to identify and mitigate racial profiling. In addition, the UNT research team completed a literature review of national law enforcement organizations, prominent law enforcement consulting firms, and government agencies to assess national best practices for the identification and mitigation of racial profiling. The best practices identified in the literature review were compared to TX DPS internal controls. 3 Texas Code of Criminal Procedure 2.133(b)(9).

DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC SAFETY SCOPE OF WORK AND METHODOLOGY

Page 11: 2016-2017 - Texas Department of Public Safety · collected by the Texas Department of Public Safety (TX DPS). According to the Texas Code of Criminal Procedure, “racial profiling

8

Report Location The internal control and best practice analysis is presented after the statewide level traffic stop and search data for Highway Patrol and Commercial Vehicle Enforcement for 2016 and 2017 are presented in the primary text. Variables The variables and measurement to complete the research tasks described in the previous section are discussed in this section of the report. The definitions and calculations for each variable are presented in Table 1. The variables in Table 1 are presented in the same order as in the tables throughout the report, but are presented in alphabetical order below.

• Area • Contraband Hits • Race/Ethnicity • Race Known • Searches – Includes the following types of searches and categorization

o Consent (discretionary) o Incident to arrest (non-discretionary) o Probable cause (non-discretionary) o Vehicle inventory (non-discretionary)

• Stops – Each stop includes one of the following enforcement actions o Citation o Warning

Table 1: Variable Definitions and Calculations

Variable Definition & Calculations

Area Definition: Statewide, DPS Region, or DPS District Race/Ethnicity Definition: African American, Alaska Native or American Indian,

Asian, Hispanic, Middle Eastern, Other, Unknown, White4 Note: The trooper independently determines the race/ethnicity of the violator, presents the citation or warning to the violator, and asks the violator to verify all information on the citation or warning prior to signing.

4 Beginning on January 1, 2018, race or ethnicity includes the following categories: Alaska Native or American Indian; Asian or Pacific Islander; Black; White; and Hispanic or Latino according to the Texas Code of Criminal Procedure 2.132(a)(3).

DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC SAFETY VARIABLES

Page 12: 2016-2017 - Texas Department of Public Safety · collected by the Texas Department of Public Safety (TX DPS). According to the Texas Code of Criminal Procedure, “racial profiling

9

Stops Definition: An occasion in which a peace officer stops a motor vehicle for an alleged violation of a law or ordinance5 Calculations:

1) Frequency: Number of stops, citations, or warnings by race/ethnicity

2) Percent: Number of stops, citations, or warnings by race/ethnicity divided by the number of stops, citations, or warnings for all racial/ethnic categories, times 100

3) Rate per 100 stops: Number of citations or warnings by race/ethnicity divided by number of stops by race/ethnicity, times 100

4) Example rate calculation: The rate of citations per 100 stops statewide for African-Americans in 2017 is calculated by taking the number of citations of African-Americans in 2017 by Highway Patrol troopers (96,804) divided by the total number of stops of African-Americans in 2017 (231,654) = 0.41788, times 100 = 41.79.

Note: The commercial vehicle enforcement (CVE) analysis includes a third category of “clean” in addition to “citation” and “warning” since the outcome of a CVE stop can include no violations found.

Searches Definition: Searches based on consent, incident to arrest, probable cause, and vehicle inventory Calculations:

1) Frequency: Number of all searches, discretionary searches, or non-discretionary searches by race/ethnicity

2) Percent: Number of all searches, discretionary searches, or non-discretionary searches by race/ethnicity divided by the number of all searches, discretionary searches, or non-discretionary searches for all racial/ethnic categories, times 100

3) Rate per 100 stops: Number of all searches, discretionary searches, or non-discretionary searches by race/ethnicity divided by number of stops by race/ethnicity, times 100

4) Example rate calculation: The rate of searches per 100 stops statewide for Whites in 2017 is calculated by taking the number of searches of Whites in 2017 by Highway Patrol troopers (33,453) divided by the total number of stops of Whites in 2017 (994,526) = 0.03363, times 100 = 3.36.

Contraband Hits Definition: Contraband was found during a search Calculations:

1) Frequency: Number of contraband hits by race/ethnicity 2) Percent: Number of contraband hits by race/ethnicity

divided by the number of contraband hits for all racial/ethnic categories, times 100

5 Texas Code of Criminal Procedure 2.132(a)(2).

DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC SAFETY VARIABLES

Page 13: 2016-2017 - Texas Department of Public Safety · collected by the Texas Department of Public Safety (TX DPS). According to the Texas Code of Criminal Procedure, “racial profiling

10

3) Rate per 100 searches: Number of contraband hits by race/ethnicity divided by number of all searches by race/ethnicity, times 100

4) Example rate calculation: The rate of contraband hits per 100 stops statewide for Hispanics in 2017 is calculated by taking the number of contraband hits of Hispanics in 2017 by Highway Patrol troopers (11,745) divided by the total number of searches of Hispanics in 2017 (45,812) = 0.25639, times 100 = 25.64.

Race Known Definition: Whether the peace officer knew the race or ethnicity of the driver before the motor vehicle stop6 Calculations:

1) Frequency: Number of times trooper knew the race or ethnicity of the driver before the stop by race/ethnicity7

2) Percent: Number of times trooper knew the race or ethnicity of the driver before the stop by race/ethnicity divided by number of times trooper knew the race or ethnicity of the driver before the stop for all racial/ethnic categories, times 100

3) Rate per 100 stops: Number of times trooper knew the race or ethnicity of the driver before the stop by race/ethnicity divided by number of stops by race/ethnicity, times 100

4) Example rate calculation: The rate of “race known” per 100 stops statewide for Asians in 2017 is calculated by taking the number of stops of Asians in 2017 by Highway Patrol troopers where race was indicated as known (103) divided by the total number of stops of Asians in 2017 (35,131) = 0.00293, times 100 = 0.29.

Data Analysis Process This section of the report reviews the analysis conducted by the UNT research team on the traffic stop and search data provided by TX DPS personnel. The data are analyzed within four chronological stages for each traffic stop and presented in over 200 tables throughout the report. Each table presented throughout the report has the same format to accommodate the readability of the tables.

6 Texas Code of Criminal Procedure 2.132(b)(6)(c). 7 From the original Commercial Vehicle Enforcement data, the variable indicating whether the trooper knew the race/ethnicity of the motorist prior to the stop had 290,760 blank entries, 3,096 entries indicating race was known prior to the stop, and 40,028 stops where race was not known prior to the stop. After consulting with TX DPS personnel, these 290,760 blank entries were considered “missing” versus “race not known prior to the stop”.

DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC SAFETY DATA ANALYSIS PROCESS

Page 14: 2016-2017 - Texas Department of Public Safety · collected by the Texas Department of Public Safety (TX DPS). According to the Texas Code of Criminal Procedure, “racial profiling

11

Stage 1: Traffic Stop Data Analysis In stage 1, a trooper conducts a traffic stop under a circumstance authorized by TX DPS policy. According to Texas DPS 04.02.02 Traffic Stop policy, a DPS officer:

may stop and detain a motor vehicle or an occupant for a valid law enforcement purpose, but only under the following justifiable circumstances:

a. When probable cause exists to arrest or search for any violation of law,

including traffic offenses; b. When reasonable suspicion exists to detain for any violation of law,

including traffic offenses; c. When conducting a suspicionless stop, including a traffic regulatory

checkpoint, a Commercial Motor Vehicle Enforcement checkpoint, a DWI checkpoint, or a roadblock under the provisions of this policy; or

d. When an emergency situation arises, such as delivering an emergency message or rendering some other public service. An officer may exercise reasonable discretion when determining the existence of an emergency or public service situation.

e. Community Caretaking Exception: Officers can make a stop based solely upon the belief that a subject is in need of help. This belief must be REASONABLE based upon all of the following circumstances. Officers need to be able to ARTICULATE the reasons for our belief that the subject was in need of immediate assistance and that we were the only assistance available. The Court gives us five (5) factors to consider. They are: 1) the nature and level of the distress exhibited by the

individual; 2) the location of the individual; 3) whether or not the individual was alone and/or 4) had access to assistance independent of that offered by the

officer and to 5) what extent the individual-if not assisted-presented a danger

to himself or others.

The data analyzed in this report include traffic stops under subsection (a) and (b) of the TX DPS traffic stop policy. The traffic stop data are presented in each table, by race/ethnicity. For example, Highway Patrol troopers conducted 2,171,021 traffic stops throughout the state in 2017. Of these stops, 45.81% of the violators stopped were White, 41.15% were Hispanic, 10.67% were African American, and 1.62% were Asian.

DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC SAFETY DATA ANALYSIS PROCESS

Page 15: 2016-2017 - Texas Department of Public Safety · collected by the Texas Department of Public Safety (TX DPS). According to the Texas Code of Criminal Procedure, “racial profiling

12

Using Traffic Stop Data to Assess Racial Disparities Law enforcement officers are required under the Texas racial profiling law to document whether they knew the race or ethnicity of the violator prior to the traffic stop. The data on whether the trooper knew the race or ethnicity of the violator before the motor vehicle stop is presented under the “Race Known” row in each table throughout this report. For example, of the 2,171,021 traffic stops conducted by Highway Patrol troopers throughout the state in 2017, the trooper knew the race/ethnicity of the violator prior to the stop only 11,209 times (0.52% of all traffic stops). The traffic stop data analysis cannot be used to identify racial profiling because the trooper rarely knows the race/ethnicity of the violator prior to the traffic stop. When deciding to stop someone for a traffic violation, a prerequisite to racially profiling the violator is the trooper must know the race/ethnicity of the violator prior to the stop. A trooper cannot racially profile a violator when making a traffic stop unless the trooper knows the race/ethnicity of the violator prior to the stop. As mentioned above, troopers rarely know the race/ethnicity of violators prior to traffic stops. In 2017, Highway Patrol troopers did not know the race/ethnicity of the violator prior to stop in 99.48% of all traffic stops. This percentage is consistent across law enforcement agencies throughout Texas. An analysis of all annual racial profiling reports in 2014 submitted to the Texas Commission on Law Enforcement, as required by the Texas racial profiling law, found that in 97.1% of the traffic stops in Texas the officer did not know the race or ethnicity of the violator prior to the stop.8 The analysis included 1,186 Texas law enforcement agencies and more than 3.25 million traffic stops. Based on the analysis, it is highly unlikely for an officer to know the race or ethnicity of a violator prior to a traffic stop. An officer cannot stop violators based on their race if they do not know the race of the violator prior to the stop. Similarly, an officer cannot racially profile a violator when they do not know the violator’s race or ethnicity prior to the stop. Additional factors impact the analysis of traffic stop data as well. Variations in the number of traffic stops across TX DPS regions and districts can be due to deployment practices and department initiatives. For example, in 2015, the Texas Legislature approved 250 new troopers specifically for border security in TX DPS Region 3. Previously, region deployment decisions were based on the number of accidents within the region. Therefore, although the state is divided into six regions, an equal number of troopers is not assigned to each region. In order to assess the deployment of troopers during 2016 and 2017, the UNT research team received the quarterly measures of the average number of troopers assigned within each region. The quarterly measures were then averaged to obtain an annual average (see Table 2). The numbers illustrated in Table 2 excludes vacant positions. The influx of troopers into Region 3 for border security purposes is evident in the growth from 2016-2017. In 2016, there was an average of 441 troopers assigned to Region 3, but the average increased to 549 troopers in 2017; a 24.5% increase. 8 Winkler, Jordan M. (2016). Racial Disparity in Traffic Stops: An Analysis of Racial Profiling Data in Texas. Master’s Thesis. University of North Texas.

DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC SAFETY DATA ANALYSIS PROCESS

Page 16: 2016-2017 - Texas Department of Public Safety · collected by the Texas Department of Public Safety (TX DPS). According to the Texas Code of Criminal Procedure, “racial profiling

13

As illustrated in Table 2, there are significantly more troopers assigned in Region 3: McAllen and Region 1: Dallas in comparison to Region 5: Lubbock and Region 4: El Paso. Deployment practices are important to consider as comparisons are made across TX DPS regions and districts. A higher number of traffic stops and searches are expected in regions with more assigned troopers. The variation in the number of troopers deployed in each region can impact any disparity analysis completed across regions and districts.

Table 2: Number of Troopers Assigned by Region Region 2016 2017 1:Dallas 496 540

2:Houston 442 471 3:McAllen 441 549 4:El Paso 219 242

5:Lubbock 274 288 6:San Antonio 364 396

Disparity analysis across TX DPS regions and districts is also impacted by strategic initiatives completed by TX DPS during the data analysis period of 2016 and 2017. As an example, during the data analysis period, TX DPS participated in several concentrated initiatives including a Violent Crime Task Force initiative in San Antonio, Operation North Star in Houston, and Operation Secure Texas which ended in September 2017. The deployment of troopers to strategic initiatives impacts the activity levels within the regions and districts affected and leads to a higher number of traffic stops and searches than otherwise expected. The current state of the racial profiling literature recognizes the issues discussed above and now focuses more on post stop actions which occur after the officer has made initial contact with the violator after the traffic stop. After the initial contact, the officer knows the race/ethnicity of the violator. Post stop actions include the enforcement action of the stop (i.e., citation vs. warning) and searches. These post stop actions are assessed in each table in this report. Stage 2: Traffic Stop Enforcement Action Analysis In stage 2, after a trooper initiates a traffic stop, the trooper decides on one of two enforcement actions; issue a warning or issue a citation. In instances in which a citation and a warning was issued (e.g., citation for speeding and warning for equipment violation) during the same traffic stop, the enforcement action was analyzed as a citation since it is the more severe outcome. For analysis purposes, only one enforcement action was analyzed per traffic stop, either citation or warning, regardless of the number of citations or warnings issued during the stop. It is important to note that in each commercial vehicle enforcement (CVE) table throughout this report, a third category of “clean” in addition to “citation” and “warning” is included. An enforcement action of citation or warning is not required for CVE stops since the outcome of a

DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC SAFETY DATA ANALYSIS PROCESS

Page 17: 2016-2017 - Texas Department of Public Safety · collected by the Texas Department of Public Safety (TX DPS). According to the Texas Code of Criminal Procedure, “racial profiling

14

CVE stop can include no violations found. When no violations are found, the outcome of the stop is classified as “clean.” How do troopers decide whether to issue a warning or a citation after a traffic stop? Texas DPS 05.01.05 Enforcement Policies policy, provides troopers direction on the factors to consider when making an enforcement action decision. According to the policy:

officers in deciding on enforcement action to be taken shall be guided by the policies enunciated in this Manual and shall disregard irrelevant factors such as (1) intention to violate the law, (2) attitude exhibited by the violator, (3) lack of actual hazard, and (4) frivolous excuses. The type of enforcement action taken shall be based only on (1) the seriousness of the offense, (2) the degree of the violation, or (3) the conditions and circumstances surrounding the offenses that might aggravate its potential effect.

A. Seriousness of the offense, e.g., muffler vs. DWI B. The degree of the violation, e.g., speeding 33 MPH in a 30 MPH zone

vs. speeding 55 MPH in a 30 MPH zone C. The conditions and circumstances surrounding the offense

1) A violation may be committed to a minor degree but under conditions that aggravate its potential effect. These conditions may warrant an arrest where a warning would otherwise suffice. Some of the aggravated conditions are:

a. Adverse weather b. Heavy traffic volume c. Bad road condition d. Bad vehicle condition (size, load, age,

maintenance, etc.) e. Bad driver condition (physical and mental

infirmities, drinking, fatigue, etc.) f. Multiple violations – two or more to a minor

degree g. Restricted visibility

The traffic stop enforcement action data are presented in each table, by race/ethnicity, throughout this report. For example, of the 770,936 citations issued by Highway Patrol troopers in 2017 throughout the state, 46.90% of the citations were issued to Hispanic violators, 38.08% of the citations were issued to White violators, 12.56% of the citations were issued to African American violators, and 1.63% of all citations were issued to Asian violators. In addition, of the 1,400,085 warnings issued by Highway Patrol troopers in 2017 throughout the state, 50.06% of the warnings were issued to White violators, 37.99% of the warnings were issued to Hispanic violators, 9.63% of the warnings were issued to African American violators, and 1.61% of all warnings were issued to Asian violators. Overall, of the 2,171,021 traffic stops conducted by Highway Patrol troopers

DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC SAFETY DATA ANALYSIS PROCESS

Page 18: 2016-2017 - Texas Department of Public Safety · collected by the Texas Department of Public Safety (TX DPS). According to the Texas Code of Criminal Procedure, “racial profiling

15

throughout the state in 2017, the enforcement action was a warning in 64.5% of the traffic stops while the enforcement action was a citation in 35.5% of the traffic stops. The rate per 100 stops for both citations and warnings, by race/ethnicity, is also presented in each table throughout the report. For the 2017 Highway Patrol data for the entire state, African American violators received a citation in 41.79 of every 100 stops of African American violators. On the other hand, African American violators received a warning in 58.21 of every 100 stops of African American violators. Similarly, Hispanic violators received a citation in 40.47 of every 100 stops of Hispanic violators. On the other hand, Hispanic violators received a warning in 59.53 of every 100 stops of Hispanic violators. Middle Eastern violators received a citation in 39.28 of every 100 stops of Middle Eastern violators. On the other hand, Middle Eastern violators received a warning in 60.72 of every 100 stops of Middle Eastern violators. Alaska Native/American Indian violators received a citation in 38.21 of every 100 stops of Alaska Native/American Indian violators. On the other hand, Alaska Native/American Indian violators received a warning in 61.79 of every 100 stops of Alaska Native/American Indian violators. Asian violators received a citation in 35.78 of every 100 stops of Asian violators. On the other hand, Asian violators received a warning in 64.22 of every 100 stops of Asian violators. Finally, White violators received a citation in 29.52 of every 100 stops of White violators. On the other hand, White violators received a warning in 70.48 of every 100 stops of White violators. For each race/ethnicity, the most likely enforcement action taken by Highway Patrol troopers throughout the state in 2017 was the issuance of a warning. However, under certain circumstances, written warnings cannot be issued which leaves the trooper with the options of arrest or citation. According to Texas DPS 05.01.02 Types of Enforcement Action policy:

Written warnings will not be issued under any circumstances for: a) Driving while intoxicated b) Public intoxication c) No drivers license when not licensed d) Any nontraffic offense e) Violations which contribute to a traffic crash

Using Traffic Stop Enforcement Action Data to Assess Racial Disparities

For a disparity analysis of enforcement actions in the tables throughout this report, the enforcement actions provided as the rate per 100 traffic stops are the most informative of differences by race/ethnicity. As demonstrated in the above paragraphs, there are disparities across race/ethnicity in the likelihood of receiving a citation. Per 100 stops made by Highway Patrol troopers throughout the state in 2017, African American violators received a citation in 41.79 of the stops, Hispanic violators received a citation in 40.47 of the stops, Middle Eastern violators received a citation in 39.28 of the stops, Alaska Native/American Indian violators received a citation in 38.21

DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC SAFETY DATA ANALYSIS PROCESS

Page 19: 2016-2017 - Texas Department of Public Safety · collected by the Texas Department of Public Safety (TX DPS). According to the Texas Code of Criminal Procedure, “racial profiling

16

of the stops, Asian violators received a citation in 35.78 of the stops, and White violators received a citation in 29.52 of the stops. How does the UNT research team interpret the disparity in citation rate by race/ethnicity for Highway Patrol troopers throughout the state in 2017? To state the reason for the disparity in citation rate across race/ethnicity is due to race only and thus demonstrates racial profiling on the part of Highway Patrol troopers is conjecture. As illustrated in the Texas DPS 05.01.05 Enforcement Policies policy, the enforcement action decision is both complex and nuanced. The enforcement action (i.e., citation or warning) taken by a trooper is based on several factors. As an illustration, deciding whether to issue a citation to a violator can be based on the seriousness of the offense, the degree of the violation, and the conditions and circumstances surrounding the traffic offense that may aggravate its potential effect. For example, regarding the seriousness of the offense, speeding is probably more likely to result in a citation than a defective tail light. Similarly, regarding the degree of the violation, a citation is probably more likely for driving 75 miles per hour in a 45 miles per hour zone than driving 55 miles per hour in the same 45 miles per hour zone. Finally, regarding the conditions and circumstances surrounding the traffic offense that may aggravate its potential effect, a traffic offense that may otherwise lead to a warning may lead to a citation due to adverse weather conditions, heavy traffic volume, or poor road conditions. The enforcement decisions troopers make are based on several factors and not all the factors are indicated on the citation or warning and thus included in the TX DPS database, especially the conditions and circumstances surrounding the traffic offense. Therefore, since most of the factors considered by the officer before taking the enforcement action are unknown (i.e., not in the TX DPS database), it is invalid to state the factor that explains the disparity in enforcement actions is race/ethnicity. A pattern of disparities in traffic stop enforcement actions does not establish a pattern of racial profiling. A disparity just shows a difference, but it does not provide an explanation for the difference. Concluding that a disparity in enforcement actions by race/ethnicity is evidence of racial profiling is an invalid conclusion. If a disparity alone is an indication of discrimination, then the police in the United States discriminate based on gender when making arrest decisions. According to the 2015 Uniform Crime Reports, of the over 8.3 million arrests in the United States, 73.1% of the arrestees were male while 26.9% were female. However, the 2010 U.S. Census illustrates that 49.2% of U.S. population is male. This disparity is clearly not evidence of gender discrimination by the police, but it is the same analysis done by some to claim racial profiling. As another example, according to the 2016 Uniform Crime Reports, 30.4% of the arrests in the United States were of 15-24 years old. However, the 2010 U.S. Census shows that only 14.1% of the U.S. population is 15-24 years old. Once again, this disparity is clearly not evidence of age discrimination by the police, but it is the same analysis done by some to claim racial profiling. A disparity in enforcement actions (i.e., citation vs. warning) can be due to numerous factors. It is invalid to conclude that any racial disparity in enforcement action is due to racial profiling.

DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC SAFETY DATA ANALYSIS PROCESS

Page 20: 2016-2017 - Texas Department of Public Safety · collected by the Texas Department of Public Safety (TX DPS). According to the Texas Code of Criminal Procedure, “racial profiling

17

Stage 3: Search Analysis In stage 3, a trooper may conduct a search during the traffic stop. If a search is conducted, the trooper documents the justification for the search which includes consent, incident to arrest, probable cause, and vehicle inventory. Most traffic stops do not include a search. In 2017, Highway Patrol troopers conducted 2,171,021 traffic stops throughout the state, but only 99,322 of the stops included a search. Overall, 4.57% of the traffic stops included a search. Although not required by Texas law, TX DPS requires reasonable suspicion for consent searches. This policy requirement provides additional protection to Texas motorists. Typically, a law enforcement officer, without any level of proof, can request consent to search. According to Texas DPS 05.74.00 Request for Consent to Search policy:

absent probable cause to search a vehicle, troopers must assess the circumstances present on every traffic contact made and decide, based on training and experience, whether any activity outside of a traffic violation exists. Consistent with the expectations set by the Texas Appeals Courts, it is the policy of the Texas Department of Public Safety that a decision to request consent to search a person’s vehicle shall be based only on articulable, reasonable suspicion that the occupant(s) may be engaged in criminal conduct.

For the search analysis which is presented in each table throughout this report, the UNT research team separated the justifications for the searches into two categories: discretionary and non-discretionary. Searches conducted incident to arrest, based on probable cause, and pursuant to a vehicle inventory are classified as non-discretionary since troopers are required by state law or department policy to conduct the search. In other words, the troopers are not making an independent decision to conduct the search, but instead are following law and policy in conducting searches based on probable cause, vehicle inventory, or incident to arrest. The classification of these searches as non-discretionary in analogous to limiting the traffic stop analysis to trooper-initiated stops only, as previously discussed. These searches should not be analyzed in terms of whether or not racial profiling has occurred because the officer who has searched a violator as a result of the three above factors does not independently make the decision to search, but rather, is required to search that individual regardless of any determination of race. For example, if a trooper arrests a violator for an outstanding arrest warrant, the trooper is required to complete a vehicle inventory if the vehicle is impounded. A trooper cannot be determined to be racially profiling when departmental procedures or state law compels the trooper to conduct a search. The individual’s race or ethnicity is irrelevant to the search under these non-discretionary search circumstances. Data on non-discretionary and discretionary searches are separated in each table throughout this report.

DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC SAFETY DATA ANALYSIS PROCESS

Page 21: 2016-2017 - Texas Department of Public Safety · collected by the Texas Department of Public Safety (TX DPS). According to the Texas Code of Criminal Procedure, “racial profiling

18

Despite the enhanced requirement of TX DPS which mandates reasonable suspicion for a trooper to request consent to search, consent searches are classified as discretionary searches because the trooper makes an independent decision to request permission to search. In 2017, Highway Patrol troopers conducted 2,171,021 traffic stops throughout the state, but only 33,391 of the stops included a consent search. Overall, 1.54% of the traffic stops conducted by Highway Patrol troopers in 2017 throughout the state included a consent search. As previously mentioned, the current state of the racial profiling literature focuses on post stop actions which occur after the law enforcement officer has made initial contact with the violator. After the initial contact, the officer knows the race/ethnicity of the violator. Consent searches, since they are discretionary actions, are particularly scrutinized in racial profiling analyses. It is expected that consent searches will rarely occur, but a minimum threshold has not been established in the racial profiling literature. In other words, there is no standard set that states “racial profiling should be considered as a factor when XX percent of traffic stops result in a consent search.”

Using Search Analysis Data to Assess Racial Disparities Of the 33,391 traffic stops by Highway Patrol troopers in 2017 throughout the state that resulted in a consent search, 57.46% were Hispanic violators, 30.05% were White violators, 11.00% were African American violators, and 0.82% were Asian violators. For a disparity analysis of consent searches in the tables throughout this report, the rate of consent searches per 100 traffic stops is the most informative of differences by race/ethnicity. Per 100 traffic stops made by Highway Patrol troopers throughout the state in 2017, there was a consent search in 2.15 of the stops of Hispanic violators, 2.07 of the stops of Alaska Native/American Indian violators, 1.59 of the stops of African American violators, 1.01 of the stops of White violators, 0.99 of the stops of Middle Eastern violators, and 0.88 of the stops of Asian violators. As indicated in the consent search rate in the 2017 Highway Patrol statewide data, consent searches occur in approximately two or fewer stops for every 100 stops regardless of race/ethnicity. As demonstrated in the above paragraph, there are disparities across race/ethnicity in the likelihood of being subjected to a consent search. How does the UNT research team interpret the disparity in consent search rate by race/ethnicity for Highway Patrol troopers throughout the state in 2017? In assessing the disparity in consent search rate by race/ethnicity, the research team considers four factors. First, the UNT research team assesses how often consent searches occur and expects them to be few in number which then results in a small percentage of all traffic stops resulting in a consent search. As previously mentioned, there is no standard set that states “racial profiling should be considered as a factor when XX percent of traffic stops result in a consent search.” However, only 1.54% of the traffic stops conducted by Highway Patrol troopers in 2017 throughout the state resulted in a consent search. With over 2 million traffic stops in 2017 by Highway Patrol troopers throughout the state and less than 35,000 consent searches, this is an indication to the UNT research team of the judicious use of consent searches by TX DPS troopers.

DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC SAFETY DATA ANALYSIS PROCESS

Page 22: 2016-2017 - Texas Department of Public Safety · collected by the Texas Department of Public Safety (TX DPS). According to the Texas Code of Criminal Procedure, “racial profiling

19

Second, the UNT research team assesses how often consent searches occur by race/ethnicity. Of the 33,391 consent searches in 2017 by Highway Patrol troopers throughout the state, 19,188 were of Hispanic violators, 10,035 were of White violators, 3,673 were of African American violators, 310 were of Asian violators, 139 were of Middle Eastern violators, and 46 were of Alaska Native/American Indian violators. Since some of the totals by race/ethnicity are particularly small in number (e.g., only 310 consent searches of Asian violators), any statistics can be dramatically impacted by even slight changes in the total number of consent searches for a particular racial/ethnic group. As an illustration, there were 139 consent searches out of the 14,108 traffic stops of Middle Eastern violators by Highway Patrol troopers throughout the state in 2017. The consent search rate per 100 stops of Middle Eastern violators is 0.99. If the number of consent searches is increased from 139 (actual number) to 200 (example number), the consent search rate per 100 stops of Middle Eastern violators is then 1.43. This is a 44% increase in the consent search rate with the addition of only 61 more consent searches. However, adding 61 consent searches to the 10,035 total consent searches of White violators by Highway Patrol troopers throughout the state in 2017 only increases the consent search rate per 100 stops of White violators from 1.01 (actual rate) to 1.02 (example rate). Therefore, it is important to consider the total number of consent searches for each racial/ethnic group when assessing consent search rate disparities. This issue amplifies as the data are divided by district and region level disparity analyses of consent searches in the appendices of this report. Third, the interpretation of any disparity in consent search rate by race/ethnicity is impacted by the TX DPS policy which requires troopers have reasonable suspicion before requesting permission/consent to search. Although not required by Texas law, TX DPS requires reasonable suspicion for consent searches that provides additional protection to Texas motorists. Typically, a law enforcement officer, without any level of proof, can request consent to search. However, TX DPS policy requires “articulable, reasonable suspicion that the occupant(s) may be engaged in criminal conduct” before troopers can ask for consent to search. This requirement is important in the disparity analysis of consent search rate since the troopers had a reasonable justification for requesting permission to search regardless of the race/ethnicity of the violator. For each consent search, troopers have identified legal, articulable factors to believe the violator may be engaged in criminal activity. To state the reason for the disparity in consent search rate across race/ethnicity is due to race and thus demonstrates racial profiling on the part of troopers is conjecture. Fourth, of the four types of searches in the analysis (i.e., consent, incident to arrest, probable cause, and vehicle inventory), consent searches are the only optional searches since violators can deny troopers permission/consent to search. The consent search denial cannot then be used by troopers to justify probable cause to search. It is the right of the violator to grant or deny the requests of troopers to conduct a consent search. However, troopers will conduct searches incident to arrest, searches based on probable cause, and vehicle inventories regardless of the wishes of the violator.

DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC SAFETY DATA ANALYSIS PROCESS

Page 23: 2016-2017 - Texas Department of Public Safety · collected by the Texas Department of Public Safety (TX DPS). According to the Texas Code of Criminal Procedure, “racial profiling

20

Since violators can deny consent to search, there are two subpopulations within the larger consent search category; 1) those who granted consent to search, and 2) those who denied consent to search. The data collection requirements under the Texas racial profiling law only require the documentation of race/ethnicity of the former, but requires no data collection on the latter. Therefore, the UNT research team does not know if there are any disparities by race/ethnicity in consent search denials. If there are disparities, and certain racial/ethnic groups are more or less likely to grant permission/consent to search upon request by troopers, then the interpretation of any disparities in consent search rate by race/ethnicity is further complicated. For example, if White violators are less likely to grant consent to search in comparison to African American violators, the consent search rate per 100 stops will be higher for African American violators even if the same number of White and African American violators were asked for consent to search. The lack of available data on violators who deny consent to search leaves an incomplete picture of what explains disparities, by race/ethnicity, in the consent search rate. Stage 4: Contraband Hit Analysis In stage 4, a trooper who conducts a search may seize contraband during the search. If contraband is seized during the search, the seizure is documented as a contraband hit in the TX DPS data provided to the UNT research team. The contraband hits included seizures pursuant to all types of searches in the TX DPS database; consent, incident to arrest, probable cause, and vehicle inventory. In 2017, Highway Patrol troopers conducted 99,322 searches throughout the state and 32,962 of the searches resulted in the seizure of contraband. Overall, 33.19% of the searches conducted by Highway Patrol troopers in 2017 throughout the state resulted in a contraband hit. As previously mentioned, the current state of the racial profiling literature focuses on post stop actions which occur after the law enforcement officer has made initial contact with the violator. After the initial contact, the officer knows the race/ethnicity of the violator. Some research has assessed the success rate or contraband hit rate of searches pursuant to traffic stops to determine if there are differences across racial/ethnic groups. There is an expectation that a certain percentage of searches will result in the discovery of contraband, but a minimum threshold has not been established in the racial profiling literature. In other words, there is no standard set that states “racial profiling should be considered when fewer than XX percent of searches result in the discovery of contraband.”

Using Contraband Hit Analysis Data to Assess Racial Disparities Of the 32,962 searches that resulted in the seizure of contraband (i.e., contraband hits) by Highway Patrol troopers in 2017 throughout the state, 40.35% were White violators, 35.63% were Hispanic violators, 22.63% were African American violators, and 0.85% were Asian violators. For a disparity analysis of contraband hits in the tables throughout this report, the rate of contraband hits per 100 searches is the most informative of differences by race/ethnicity. Per 100 searches made by Highway Patrol troopers throughout the state in 2017, there was a contraband

DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC SAFETY DATA ANALYSIS PROCESS

Page 24: 2016-2017 - Texas Department of Public Safety · collected by the Texas Department of Public Safety (TX DPS). According to the Texas Code of Criminal Procedure, “racial profiling

21

hit in 39.76 of the searches of White violators, 39.73 of the searches of African American violators, 37.77 of the searches of Middle Eastern violators, 36.73 of the searches of Alaska Native/American Indian violators, 34.61 of the searches of Asian violators, and 25.64 of the searches of Hispanic violators. As demonstrated in the above paragraph, there are disparities across race/ethnicity in the likelihood of a contraband hit pursuant to a search. How does the UNT research team interpret the disparity in contraband hit rate by race/ethnicity for Highway Patrol troopers throughout the state in 2017? In assessing the disparity in contraband hit rate by race/ethnicity, the research team considers two factors. First, the largest number of searches, non-discretionary searches (i.e., incident to arrest, probable cause, and vehicle inventory) and discretionary searches (i.e., consent), are of Hispanic violators, but the contraband hit rate per 100 searches is lowest for Hispanic violators. This means that Hispanic violators are most likely to be searched but least likely to have contraband discovered pursuant to the search. The contraband hit rate per 100 searches ranges from 39.76 of the searches of White violators to 34.61 of the searches of Asian violators for all the racial categories except Hispanic violators who have a contraband hit rate per 100 searches of 25.64. After assessing traffic stops, searches, and contraband hits across the TX DPS regions (tables available in the appendices), the most tenable explanation for the lower contraband hit rate per 100 searches of Hispanic violators is due to strategic border security initiatives and trooper deployment strategies. Of the 893,444 traffic stops made by Highway Patrol troopers throughout the state in 2017 of Hispanic violators, 429,427 occurred in Region 3 (48.06%). Similarly, of the 45,812 searches (i.e., consent, incident to arrest, probable cause, and vehicle inventory) made by Highway Patrol troopers throughout the state in 2017 of Hispanic violators, 18,756 occurred in Region 3 (40.94%). Furthermore, the contraband hit rate of 14.44 per 100 searches for Hispanic violators in Region 3 by Highway Patrol troopers in 2017 is the lowest rate for Hispanic violators in all TX DPS regions. Eight of the 14 counties in Texas which are adjacent to the United States border with Mexico are in TX DPS Region 3: McAllen as illustrated on the map on page 26. Second, a low contraband hit rate is expected in some circumstances since the main purpose of some of the searches is not the discovery of contraband or other evidence. For example, the main purpose of searches incident to arrest and vehicle inventories is not the discovery of contraband. Instead, the main purpose of a search incident to arrest is trooper safety; ensuring the violator does not have any items that can harm the trooper. Also, the main purpose of a vehicle inventory is the documentation and protection of the items inside the violator’s vehicle prior to impoundment, not the discovery of contraband. In these circumstances, it is expected the contraband hit rate should be low. On the other hand, the primary purpose of searches based upon probable cause and consent searches based on reasonable suspicion is the discovery of contraband or other evidence. In these instances, a higher contraband hit rate is expected.

DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC SAFETY DATA ANALYSIS PROCESS

Page 25: 2016-2017 - Texas Department of Public Safety · collected by the Texas Department of Public Safety (TX DPS). According to the Texas Code of Criminal Procedure, “racial profiling

22

As the tables are reviewed, the reader will see some of the cells within the table have --- instead of a number. These are not calculation errors. Instead, --- is put in the cell of a table when the denominator in the calculation is 0; thus making the value incalculable. For example, on the Statewide 2017 Highway Patrol table, the rate of discretionary searches per 100 stops for “other” races does not include a calculation because the calculation of the rate entails dividing the number of discretionary searches of “other” race individuals (0) by the number of stops of “other” race individuals (0), multiplied by 100 which equals not calculable.

DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC SAFETY DATA ANALYSIS PROCESS

Page 26: 2016-2017 - Texas Department of Public Safety · collected by the Texas Department of Public Safety (TX DPS). According to the Texas Code of Criminal Procedure, “racial profiling

23

Internal Controls The TX DPS has implemented proactive, internal controls in support of its zero-tolerance regarding racial profiling. The primary internal controls are discussed below.

1) Troopers are required to record audio and video of each traffic stop. The TX DPS preserves each recording for 90 days and preserves recordings of stops involving allegations of racial profiling indefinitely.

2) Troopers must set the audio/video recording unit’s operator selector switch to “automatic mode” so that as the patrol vehicle’s emergency lighting equipment is activated, the audio/video recording unit will automatically activate to begin recording the entire contact or event.

3) Patrol vehicle recording units are set to capture at least two minutes prior to the activation of the video unit so that events occurring immediately prior to a public contact are recorded.

4) TX DPS sergeants are required to conduct 20 hours of video observation review every six months for each trooper the sergeant supervises.

5) TX DPS citations and warnings are printed with a toll free phone number to the TX DPS Office of Inspector General. The Inspector General is appointed by and reports directly to the Public Safety Commission and independently receives and investigates complaints, including complaints of racial profiling, brought against TX DPS commissioned officers.

6) As previously mentioned, although not required by Texas law, TX DPS requires reasonable suspicion for consent searches that provides additional protection to Texas motorists. Typically, a law enforcement officer, without any level of proof, can request consent to search. However, TX DPS policy requires “articulable, reasonable suspicion that the occupant(s) may be engaged in criminal conduct” before troopers can ask for consent to search. For each consent search, troopers identify legal, articulable factors to believe the violator may be engaged in criminal activity before asking for permission/consent to search.

7) TX DPS has an Early Intervention System (EIS), which is designed to assist supervisors with timely identification of employees whose performance warrants review and, where appropriate, intervention. The EIS goal is to avoid or mitigate circumstances that cause negative consequences for employees, co-workers, the TX DPS, or the general public. Using a web-based software application, the EIS provides a systematic review of select activities or incidents received or generated by an employee or TX DPS. The EIS is administered by The Office of Inspector General and is designed to highlight tendencies in performance, complaints and other activities. An alert for supervisory review is generated by the EIS when an employee meets, or exceeds, an established threshold in the following areas: informal citizen concerns, counseling/coaching record, use of force incident, vehicle crashes, vehicle pursuits, and Equal Employment Opportunity complaints.

8) TX DPS 05.01.02 Types of Enforcement Action policy requires troopers write a written warning if the violator is not arrested or issued a citation. According to the policy:

DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC SAFETY INTERNAL CONTROLS

Page 27: 2016-2017 - Texas Department of Public Safety · collected by the Texas Department of Public Safety (TX DPS). According to the Texas Code of Criminal Procedure, “racial profiling

24

Persons stopped by officers for traffic law violations of a relatively minor degree and who are not arrested or issued a citation will be issued a written notice of warning.

This policy is important as an internal control regarding racial profiling. If TX DPS policy allowed verbal warnings, no data on the race/ethnicity of the violator would be collected since there is not any written documentation of the violation. By requiring a written warning, TX DPS collects the race/ethnicity of the violator on all traffic stops which provides the most comprehensive data available for racial profiling analysis.

The UNT research team compared the TX DPS internal controls with best practices recommended by the International Association of Chiefs of Police9 and the U.S. Department of Justice10 along with additional literature from national law enforcement organizations, prominent law enforcement consulting firms, and government agencies, and Texas law enforcement agencies in which the UNT research team completes annual racial profiling reports. After the review and comparison, the UNT research team concludes that the TX DPS internal controls align with documented best practices. For example, the U.S. Department of Justice states, “data collection sends a clear message that racial profiling is inconsistent with effective policing.” Not only does TX DPS collect racial profiling data, it releases the raw traffic stop data at the below publicly available website for analysis by any individual. This is an uncommon practice for law enforcement agencies and TX DPS should be lauded for it’s transparency in this area. https://www.dps.texas.gov/director_staff/highValueDataSets.htm As another example, the International Association of Chiefs of Police states department policies “should clearly convey that behavior and evidentiary standards should guide stop and search decisions, not race or ethnicity.” The TX DPS policies discussed throughout this report demonstrate that TX DPS meets this standard. As previously stated, the UNT research team concludes that the TX DPS internal controls align with documented best practices and do not offer any recommended changes to its current practices, policies, and protocols. The UNT research team also concludes that some of the TX DPS internal controls exceed documented best practices. For example, requiring reasonable suspicion for consent searches is uncommon among law enforcement agencies and provides additional protection to Texas motorists. Due to this requirement, troopers must identify legal, articulable factors to believe the violator may be engaged in criminal activity before asking for permission/consent to search. In addition, by requiring a written warning, TX DPS collects the race/ethnicity of the violator on all traffic stops which provides the most comprehensive data available for racial profiling analysis. TX DPS should be lauded for its internal control mechanisms to inhibit racial profiling.

9 Protecting Civil Rights: A Leadership Guide for State, Local, and Tribal Law Enforcement. September 2006. International Association of Chiefs of Police. 10 Ramirez, Deborah, Jack McDevitt, and Amy Farrell. November 2000. A Resource Guide on Racial Profiling Data Collection Systems: Promising Practices and Lessons Learned. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Justice.

DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC SAFETY INTERNAL CONTROLS

Page 28: 2016-2017 - Texas Department of Public Safety · collected by the Texas Department of Public Safety (TX DPS). According to the Texas Code of Criminal Procedure, “racial profiling

25

Research Team Eric J. Fritsch is Professor and Chair of the Department of Criminal Justice at the University of North Texas (UNT). He received his Ph.D. in Criminal Justice from Sam Houston State University in 1995 and has been a faculty member at UNT since August 1996. While at UNT, he has taught the department’s graduate level research methods course 19 times.

Chad R. Trulson is Professor and Associate Chair of the Department of Criminal Justice at the University of North Texas (UNT). He received his Ph.D. in 2002 from Sam Houston State University, George J. Beto College of Criminal Justice.

Dr. Trulson has published numerous articles in leading criminal justice journals in addition to four co-authored books: Juvenile Justice: System, Process, and Law (Cengage, 2006), First Available Cell: Desegregation of the Texas Prison System (University of Texas Press, 2009) Applied Research Methods in Criminal Justice and Criminology (McGraw-Hill, 2014) and Lost Causes: Blended Sentencing, Second Chances, and the Texas Youth Commission (University of Texas Press, 2016). Dr. Trulson also serves as Editor-in-Chief of the highly ranked journal, Youth Violence and Juvenile Justice (SAGE).

Dr. Fritsch and Dr. Trulson are co-authors on a research methods textbook entitled Applied Research Methods in Criminal Justice and Criminology; published by McGraw-Hill in 2014. Specifically regarding racial profiling, they complete the annual racial profiling reports for 15-20 Texas law enforcement agencies each year. The annual racial profiling reports are required under the Texas Racial Profiling Law. They began completing these reports in 2005. In addition to the annual racial profiling reports, they published a peer-reviewed article entitled Racial Profiling and the Political Demand for Data: A Pilot Study Designed to Improve Methodologies in Texas and have served as faculty advisors for a thesis on racial profiling. Furthermore, Dr. Fritsch has conducted racial profiling training for law enforcement executives at the Institute for Law Enforcement Administration in Plano, Texas.

DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC SAFETY RESEARCH TEAM

Page 29: 2016-2017 - Texas Department of Public Safety · collected by the Texas Department of Public Safety (TX DPS). According to the Texas Code of Criminal Procedure, “racial profiling

26

Falls

Bexar

GonzalesC

omal

FayetteK

err

Guadalupe

Blanco

Coryell M

cLennan

Atascosa

Bastrop

DeW

itt

Frio

JacksonK

arnes

Limestone

Medina

Freestone

Bell

Calhoun

Ham

ilton

Kendall

Lavaca

McMullen

San Saba

Travis

Victoria

William

son

Bandera

Bosque

Burnet

Caldw

ell

Gillespie

Goliad

Hays

Hill

Lampasas

Lee

LlanoM

ilam

Mills

Wilson

Potter

Sw

isher

Terry

Randall

Hall

Cochran

Haskell

Armstrong

King

RobertsStonewallYoung

Lipscomb

Fisher

Archer

Bailey

Cottle

Crosby

Deaf S

mith

Donley

Kent

Sherman

Stephens

Baylor

Hockley

Jack

Ochiltree

Oldham

Com

anche

Callahan

Foard

Hartley

Lamb

Mitchell

Moore

Yoakum

Briscoe

Hale

Scurry

Gray

Brow

n

Carson

Castro

Childress

Clay

Collingsw

orth

Coleman

Dallam

Dickens

Eastland

Floyd

Garza

Hansford

Hardeman

Hemphill

Hutchinson

Jones

Knox

Lubbock

Lynn

Montague

Motley

TaylorN

olan

Parm

er

Runnels

Shackelford

Wheeler

Wichita

Wilbarger

El

Paso

Schleicher

Presidio

Kim

ble

Martin

Terrell

Crane

Winkler

Daw

son

Andrew

s

Upton

Hudspeth

Mason

Borden

Coke

Gaines

Irion

Brew

ster

Menard

TomG

reen

How

ard

ReaganC

oncho

Crockett

Culberson

Ector

Glasscock

Jeff Davis

Sterling

Loving

McC

ulloch

Midland

Pecos

Reeves

Sutton

Ward

3D3A

US

281

Zavala

Starr

WebbZapata

Hidalgo

Duval

Bee

Jim Wells

MaverickA

ransas

Dim

mit

Edw

ards

JimH

oggK

enedy

Kinney

Kleberg

LiveO

ak

Nueces

Real

Refugio

San Patricio

Willacy

Brooks

Cam

eron

LaSalle

Uvalde

Val Verde

Newton

Trinity

Houston

Nacogdoches

Cham

bers

Waller

Orange

Montgom

ery

Polk

SanAugustine

Tyler

Angelina

Brazoria

Brazos

Liberty

WalkerH

arris

Leon

Austin

Burleson

Fort Bend

Galveston

Grimes

Jasper

Jefferson

Madison

Matagorda

Robertson

Sabine

Shelby

Washington

Colorado

Hardin

San

Jacinto

Wharton

Bow

ie

Cherokee

Harrison

Franklin

Cam

pH

opkins

Upshur

Collin

Morris

Anderson

Parker

Rains

Cooke

Dallas

Gregg

Johnson

Lamar

Marion

RedR

iver

Rockw

allD

entonC

ass

Delta

Erath

Ellis

FanninG

rayson

Henderson

Hood

Hunt

Kaufman

Navarro

Palo

Pinto

Panola

Rusk

Sm

ith

Som

ervell

Tarrant

Titus

VanZandt

Wise

Wood

Dallas

Region 11A

- Dallas

1B - Tyler

1C - H

urst1D

- Mt. Pleasant

Houston

Region 22A

- Houston

2B - B

eaumont

2C - C

onroe2D

- Bryan

San Antonio

Region 66A

- Waco

6B - Austin

6C - S

an Antonio

McA

llenR

egion 33A

- McA

llen3B

- Laredo3C

- Corpus C

hristi3D

- McA

llen3E

- Del R

io

El PasoR

egion 44A

- Midland

4B - El Paso

LubbockR

egion 5Lubbock - 5AA

marillo - 5B

Abilene - 5C

5 B

C

A

B

E

CDA

B

C

A

B C

AD

BA

B

C

D

A

64

123

Throckmorton

Page 30: 2016-2017 - Texas Department of Public Safety · collected by the Texas Department of Public Safety (TX DPS). According to the Texas Code of Criminal Procedure, “racial profiling

27

Highway Patrol 2017 Statewide Analysis

Page 31: 2016-2017 - Texas Department of Public Safety · collected by the Texas Department of Public Safety (TX DPS). According to the Texas Code of Criminal Procedure, “racial profiling

28

Highway Patrol - 2017

STATEWIDE 2017

African American

White

Hispanic

Stops

Frequency 231,654

994,526 893,444

Percent 10.67 %

45.81 %

41.15 %

Citations

Frequency

96,804 293,607

361,593 Percent

12.56 %

38.08 %

46.90 %

Rate per 100 stops 41.79

29.52 40.47

Warnings

Frequency

134,850 700,919

531,851 Percent

9.63 %

50.06 %

37.99 %

Rate per 100 stops 58.21

70.48 59.53

Searches (All)

Frequency 18,775

33,453 45,812

Percent 18.90 %

33.68 %

46.12 %

Rate per 100 stops

8.10 3.36

5.13 D

iscretionary Searches

Frequency 3,673

10,035 19,188

Percent 11.00 %

30.05 %

57.46 %

Rate per 100 stops

1.59 1.01

2.15 N

on-Discretionary Searches

Frequency

15,102 23,418

26,624 Percent

22.91 %

35.52 %

40.38 %

Rate per 100 stops 6.52

2.35 2.98

Contraband Hits

Frequency

7,460 13,300

11,745 Percent

22.63 %

40.35 %

35.63 %

Rate per 100 searches 39.73

39.76 25.64

Race Known

Frequency

1,062 5,212

4,793 Percent

9.47 %

46.50 %

42.76 %

Rate per 100 stops 0.46

0.52 0.54

DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC SAFETY HIGHWAY PATROL –2017 STATEWIDE ANALYSIS

Page 32: 2016-2017 - Texas Department of Public Safety · collected by the Texas Department of Public Safety (TX DPS). According to the Texas Code of Criminal Procedure, “racial profiling

29

Highway Patrol - 2017

STATEWIDE 2017

Asian Alaska

Native/Am

erican Indian

Middle Eastern

Other

Unknow

n

Stops

Frequency 35,131

2,227 14,018

0 21

Percent 1.62 %

0.10 %

0.65 %

0.00 %

0.00 %

Citations

Frequency

12,570 851

5,506 0

5 Percent

1.63 %

0.11 %

0.71 %

0.00 %

0.00 %

Rate per 100 stops 35.78

38.21 39.28

--- 23.81

Warnings

Frequency

22,561 1,376

8,512 0

16 Percent

1.61 %

0.10 %

0.61 %

0.00 %

0.00 %

Rate per 100 stops 64.22

61.79 60.72

--- 76.19

Searches (All)

Frequency 812

147 323

0 0

Percent 0.82 %

0.15 %

0.33 %

0.00 %

0.00 %

Rate per 100 stops

2.31 6.60

2.30 ---

0.00 D

iscretionary Searches

Frequency 310

46 139

0 0

Percent 0.93 %

0.14 %

0.42 %

0.00 %

0.00 %

Rate per 100 stops

0.88 2.07

0.99 ---

0.00 N

on-Discretionary Searches

Frequency

502 101

184 0

0 Percent

0.76 %

0.15 %

0.28 %

0.00 %

0.00 %

Rate per 100 stops 1.43

4.54 1.31

--- 0.00

Contraband Hits

Frequency

281 54

122 0

0 Percent

0.85 %

0.16 %

0.37 %

0.00 %

0.00 %

Rate per 100 searches 34.61

36.73 37.77

--- ---

Race Known

Frequency

103 6

33 0

0 Percent

0.92 %

0.05 %

0.29 %

0.00 %

0.00 %

Rate per 100 stops 0.29

0.27 0.24

--- 0.00

DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC SAFETY HIGHWAY PATROL –2017 STATEWIDE ANALYSIS

Page 33: 2016-2017 - Texas Department of Public Safety · collected by the Texas Department of Public Safety (TX DPS). According to the Texas Code of Criminal Procedure, “racial profiling

30

Highway Patrol 2016 Statewide Analysis

Page 34: 2016-2017 - Texas Department of Public Safety · collected by the Texas Department of Public Safety (TX DPS). According to the Texas Code of Criminal Procedure, “racial profiling

31

Highway Patrol - 2016

STATEWIDE 2016

African American

White

Hispanic

Stops

Frequency 184,782

872,033 700,861

Percent 10.24 %

48.32 %

38.84 %

Citations

Frequency

75,759 258,429

286,186 Percent

11.87 %

40.49 %

44.84 %

Rate per 100 stops 41.00

29.64 40.83

Warnings

Frequency

109,023 613,604

414,675 Percent

9.35 %

52.60 %

35.55 %

Rate per 100 stops 59.00

70.36 59.17

Searches (All)

Frequency 6,281

12,992 13,485

Percent 18.92 %

39.14 %

40.63 %

Rate per 100 stops

3.40 1.49

1.92 D

iscretionary Searches

Frequency 1,371

3,942 5,665

Percent 12.30 %

35.38 %

50.84 %

Rate per 100 stops

0.74 0.45

0.81 N

on-Discretionary Searches

Frequency

4,910 9,050

7,820 Percent

22.27 %

41.04 %

35.47 %

Rate per 100 stops 2.66

1.04 1.12

Contraband Hits

Frequency

3,441 7,523

5,573 Percent

20.55 %

44.92 %

33.28 %

Rate per 100 searches 54.78

57.90 41.33

Race Known

Frequency

1,054 5,614

1,953 Percent

12.00 %

63.92 %

22.24 %

Rate per 100 stops 0.57

0.64 0.28

DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC SAFETY HIGHWAY PATROL –2016 STATEWIDE ANALYSIS

Page 35: 2016-2017 - Texas Department of Public Safety · collected by the Texas Department of Public Safety (TX DPS). According to the Texas Code of Criminal Procedure, “racial profiling

32

Highway Patrol - 2016

STATEWIDE 2016

Asian Alaska

Native/Am

erican Indian

Middle Eastern

Other

Unknow

n

Stops

Frequency 27,757

1,716 17,454

16 41

Percent 1.54 %

0.10 %

0.97 %

0.00 %

0.00 %

Citations

Frequency

10,345 645

6,797 11

5 Percent

1.62 %

0.10 %

1.07 %

0.00 %

0.00 %

Rate per 100 stops 37.27

37.59 38.94

68.75 12.20

Warnings

Frequency

17,412 1,071

10,657 5

36 Percent

1.49 %

0.09 %

0.91 %

0.00 %

0.00 %

Rate per 100 stops 62.73

62.41 61.06

31.25 87.80

Searches (All)

Frequency 249

42 138

5 0

Percent 0.75 %

0.13 %

0.42 %

0.02 %

0.00 %

Rate per 100 stops

0.90 2.45

0.79 31.25

0.00 D

iscretionary Searches

Frequency 95

14 56

0 0

Percent 0.85 %

0.13 %

0.50 %

0.00 %

0.00 %

Rate per 100 stops

0.34 0.82

0.32 0.00

0.00 N

on-Discretionary Searches

Frequency

154 28

82 5

0 Percent

0.70 %

0.13 %

0.37 %

0.02 %

0.00 %

Rate per 100 stops 0.55

1.63 0.47

31.25 0.00

Contraband Hits

Frequency

125 22

59 5

0 Percent

0.75 %

0.13 %

0.35 %

0.03 %

0.00 %

Rate per 100 searches 50.20

52.38 42.75

100.00 ---

Race Known

Frequency

77 5

80 0

0 Percent

0.88 %

0.06 %

0.91 %

0.00 %

0.00 %

Rate per 100 stops 0.28

0.29 0.46

0.00 0.00

DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC SAFETY HIGHWAY PATROL –2016 STATEWIDE ANALYSIS

Page 36: 2016-2017 - Texas Department of Public Safety · collected by the Texas Department of Public Safety (TX DPS). According to the Texas Code of Criminal Procedure, “racial profiling

33

Commercial Vehicle Enforcement 2017 Statewide Analysis

Page 37: 2016-2017 - Texas Department of Public Safety · collected by the Texas Department of Public Safety (TX DPS). According to the Texas Code of Criminal Procedure, “racial profiling

34

Comm

ercial Vehicle Enforcement - 2017

STATEWIDE 2017

African American

White

Hispanic

Stops

Frequency 19,794

57,522 82,612

Percent 12.12 %

35.22 %

50.58 %

Citations

Frequency

4,250 11,271

18,094 Percent

12.54 %

33.24 %

53.37 %

Rate per 100 stops 21.47

19.59 21.90

Warnings

Frequency

10,131 27,130

43,787 Percent

12.29 %

32.92 %

53.13 %

Rate per 100 stops 51.18

47.16 53.00

Clean

Frequency 5,413

19,121 20,731

Percent 11.52 %

40.68 %

44.10 %

Rate per 100 stops

27.35 33.24

25.09 Searches (All)

Frequency

98 115

326 Percent

17.82 %

20.91 %

59.27 %

Rate per 100 stops 0.50

0.20 0.39

Discretionary Searches

Frequency

63 82

275 Percent

14.69 %

19.11 %

64.10 %

Rate per 100 stops 0.32

0.14 0.33

Non-D

iscretionary Searches

Frequency 35

33 51

Percent 28.93 %

27.27 %

42.15 %

Rate per 100 stops

0.18 0.06

0.06 Contraband H

its

Frequency 25

33 28

Percent 28.41 %

37.50 %

31.82 %

Rate per 100 searches

25.51 28.70

8.59 Race Know

n

Frequency 30

133 1,428

Percent 1.88 %

8.33 %

89.47 %

Rate per 100 stops

0.15 0.23

1.73

DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC SAFETY COMMERCIAL VEHICLE ENFORCEMENT-2017 STATEWIDE ANALYSIS

Page 38: 2016-2017 - Texas Department of Public Safety · collected by the Texas Department of Public Safety (TX DPS). According to the Texas Code of Criminal Procedure, “racial profiling

35

Comm

ercial Vehicle Enforcement - 2017

STATEWIDE 2017

Asian Alaska

Native/Am

erican Indian

Middle Eastern

Other

Unknow

n

Stops

Frequency 1,240

91 1,017

0 1,054

Percent 0.76 %

0.06 %

0.62 %

0.00 %

0.65 %

Citations

Frequency

143 14

132 0

0 Percent

0.42 %

0.04 %

0.39 %

0.00 %

0.00 %

Rate per 100 stops 11.53

15.38 12.98

--- 0.00

Warnings

Frequency

725 40

536 0

69 Percent

0.88 %

0.05 %

0.65 %

0.00 %

0.08 %

Rate per 100 stops 58.47

43.96 52.70

--- 6.55

Clean

Frequency 372

37 349

0 985

Percent 0.79 %

0.08 %

0.74 %

0.00 %

2.10 %

Rate per 100 stops

30.00 40.66

34.32 ---

93.45 Searches (All)

Frequency

9 0

1 0

1 Percent

1.64 %

0.00 %

0.18 %

0.00 %

0.18 %

Rate per 100 stops 0.73

0.00 0.10

--- 0.09

Discretionary Searches

Frequency

8 0

0 0

1 Percent

1.86 %

0.00 %

0.00 %

0.00 %

0.23 %

Rate per 100 stops 0.65

0.00 0.00

--- 0.09

Non-D

iscretionary Searches

Frequency 1

0 1

0 0

Percent 0.83 %

0.00 %

0.83 %

0.00 %

0.00 %

Rate per 100 stops

0.08 0.00

0.10 ---

0.00 Contraband H

its

Frequency 1

0 1

0 0

Percent 1.14 %

0.00 %

1.14 %

0.00 %

0.00 %

Rate per 100 searches

11.11 ---

100.00 ---

0.00 Race Know

n

Frequency 1

0 4

0 0

Percent 0.06 %

0.00 %

0.25 %

0.00 %

0.00 %

Rate per 100 stops

0.08 0.00

0.39 ---

0.00

DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC SAFETY COMMERCIAL VEHICLE ENFORCEMENT-2017 STATEWIDE ANALYSIS

Page 39: 2016-2017 - Texas Department of Public Safety · collected by the Texas Department of Public Safety (TX DPS). According to the Texas Code of Criminal Procedure, “racial profiling

36

Commercial Vehicle Enforcement 2016 Statewide Analysis

Page 40: 2016-2017 - Texas Department of Public Safety · collected by the Texas Department of Public Safety (TX DPS). According to the Texas Code of Criminal Procedure, “racial profiling

37

Comm

ercial Vehicle Enforcement - 2016

STATEW

IDE 2016

African American

White

Hispanic

Stops

Frequency 20,135

60,345 85,765

Percent 11.81 %

35.38 %

50.29 %

Citations

Frequency

3,995 11,279

17,215 Percent

12.16 %

34.33 %

52.39 %

Rate per 100 stops 19.84

18.69 20.07

Warnings

Frequency

10,581 29,136

47,096 Percent

11.95 %

32.91 %

53.20 %

Rate per 100 stops 52.55

48.28 54.91

Clean

Frequency 5,559

19,930 21,454

Percent 11.30 %

40.53 %

43.63 %

Rate per 100 stops

27.61 33.03

25.01 Searches (All)

Frequency

39 74

242 Percent

10.77 %

20.44 %

66.85 %

Rate per 100 stops 0.19

0.12 0.28

Discretionary Searches

Frequency

20 45

216 Percent

6.94 %

15.63 %

75.00 %

Rate per 100 stops 0.10

0.07 0.25

Non-D

iscretionary Searches

Frequency 19

29 26

Percent 25.68 %

39.19 %

35.14 %

Rate per 100 stops

0.09 0.05

0.03 Contraband H

its

Frequency 11

23 21

Percent 20.00 %

41.82 %

38.18 %

Rate per 100 searches

28.21 31.08

8.68 Race Know

n

Frequency 38

92 1,357

Percent 2.53 %

6.13 %

90.47 %

Rate per 100 stops

0.19 0.15

1.58

DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC SAFETY COMMERCIAL VEHICLE ENFORCEMENT-2016 STATEWIDE ANALYSIS

Page 41: 2016-2017 - Texas Department of Public Safety · collected by the Texas Department of Public Safety (TX DPS). According to the Texas Code of Criminal Procedure, “racial profiling

38

Comm

ercial Vehicle Enforcement - 2016

STATEWIDE 2016

Asian Alaska

Native/Am

erican Indian

Middle Eastern

Other

Unknow

n

Stops

Frequency 1,409

85 1,636

10 1,169

Percent 0.83 %

0.05 %

0.96 %

0.01 %

0.69 %

Citations

Frequency

162 17

188 1

0 Percent

0.49 %

0.05 %

0.57 %

0.00 %

0.00 %

Rate per 100 stops 11.50

20.00 11.49

10.00 0.00

Warnings

Frequency

759 24

837 6

81 Percent

0.86 %

0.03 %

0.95 %

0.01 %

0.09 %

Rate per 100 stops 53.87

28.24 51.16

60.00 6.93

Clean

Frequency 488

44 611

3 1,088

Percent 0.99 %

0.09 %

1.24 %

0.01 %

2.21 %

Rate per 100 stops

34.63 51.76

37.35 30.00

93.07 Searches (All)

Frequency

2 0

5 0

0 Percent

0.55 %

0.00 %

1.38 %

0.00 %

0.00 %

Rate per 100 stops 0.14

0.00 0.31

0.00 0.00

Discretionary Searches

Frequency

2 0

5 0

0 Percent

0.69 %

0.00 %

1.74 %

0.00 %

0.00 %

Rate per 100 stops 0.14

0.00 0.31

0.00 0.00

Non-D

iscretionary Searches

Frequency 0

0 0

0 0

Percent 0.00 %

0.00 %

0.00 %

0.00 %

0.00 %

Rate per 100 stops

0.00 0.00

0.00 0.00

0.00 Contraband H

its

Frequency 0

0 0

0 0

Percent 0.00 %

0.00 %

0.00 %

0.00 %

0.00 %

Rate per 100 searches

0.00 ---

0.00 ---

--- Race Know

n

Frequency 3

0 7

0 3

Percent 0.20 %

0.00 %

0.47 %

0.00 %

0.20 %

Rate per 100 stops

0.21 0.00

0.43 0.00

0.26

DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC SAFETY COMMERCIAL VEHICLE ENFORCEMENT-2016 STATEWIDE ANALYSIS

Page 42: 2016-2017 - Texas Department of Public Safety · collected by the Texas Department of Public Safety (TX DPS). According to the Texas Code of Criminal Procedure, “racial profiling

39

Appendix A Region 1: Dallas Analysis

Page 43: 2016-2017 - Texas Department of Public Safety · collected by the Texas Department of Public Safety (TX DPS). According to the Texas Code of Criminal Procedure, “racial profiling

40

Falls

Bexar

GonzalesC

omal

FayetteK

err

Guadalupe

Blanco

Coryell M

cLennan

Atascosa

Bastrop

DeW

itt

Frio

JacksonK

arnes

Limestone

Medina

Freestone

Bell

Calhoun

Ham

ilton

Kendall

Lavaca

McMullen

San Saba

Travis

Victoria

William

son

Bandera

Bosque

Burnet

Caldw

ell

Gillespie

Goliad

Hays

Hill

Lampasas

Lee

LlanoM

ilam

Mills

Wilson

Potter

Sw

isher

Terry

Randall

Hall

Cochran

Haskell

Armstrong

King

RobertsStonewallYoung

Lipscomb

Fisher

Archer

Bailey

Cottle

Crosby

Deaf S

mith

Donley

Kent

Sherman

Stephens

Baylor

Hockley

Jack

Ochiltree

Oldham

Com

anche

Callahan

Foard

Hartley

Lamb

Mitchell

Moore

Yoakum

Briscoe

Hale

Scurry

Gray

Brow

n

Carson

Castro

Childress

Clay

Collingsw

orth

Coleman

Dallam

Dickens

Eastland

Floyd

Garza

Hansford

Hardeman

Hemphill

Hutchinson

Jones

Knox

Lubbock

Lynn

Montague

Motley

TaylorN

olan

Parm

er

Runnels

Shackelford

Wheeler

Wichita

Wilbarger

El

Paso

Schleicher

Presidio

Kim

ble

Martin

Terrell

Crane

Winkler

Daw

son

Andrew

s

Upton

Hudspeth

Mason

Borden

Coke

Gaines

Irion

Brew

ster

Menard

TomG

reen

How

ard

ReaganC

oncho

Crockett

Culberson

Ector

Glasscock

Jeff Davis

Sterling

Loving

McC

ulloch

Midland

Pecos

Reeves

Sutton

Ward

3D3A

US

281

Zavala

Starr

WebbZapata

Hidalgo

Duval

Bee

Jim Wells

MaverickA

ransas

Dim

mit

Edw

ards

JimH

oggK

enedy

Kinney

Kleberg

LiveO

ak

Nueces

Real

Refugio

San Patricio

Willacy

Brooks

Cam

eron

LaSalle

Uvalde

Val Verde

Newton

Trinity

Houston

Nacogdoches

Cham

bers

Waller

Orange

Montgom

ery

Polk

SanAugustine

Tyler

Angelina

Brazoria

Brazos

Liberty

WalkerH

arris

Leon

Austin

Burleson

Fort Bend

Galveston

Grimes

Jasper

Jefferson

Madison

Matagorda

Robertson

Sabine

Shelby

Washington

Colorado

Hardin

San

Jacinto

Wharton

Bow

ie

Cherokee

Harrison

Franklin

Cam

pH

opkins

Upshur

Collin

Morris

Anderson

Parker

Rains

Cooke

Dallas

Gregg

Johnson

Lamar

Marion

RedR

iver

Rockw

allD

entonC

ass

Delta

Erath

Ellis

FanninG

rayson

Henderson

Hood

Hunt

Kaufman

Navarro

Palo

Pinto

Panola

Rusk

Sm

ith

Som

ervell

Tarrant

Titus

VanZandt

Wise

Wood

Dallas

Region 11A

- Dallas

1B - Tyler

1C - H

urst1D

- Mt. Pleasant

Houston

Region 22A

- Houston

2B - B

eaumont

2C - C

onroe2D

- Bryan

San Antonio

Region 66A

- Waco

6B - Austin

6C - S

an Antonio

McA

llenR

egion 33A

- McA

llen3B

- Laredo3C

- Corpus C

hristi3D

- McA

llen3E

- Del R

io

El PasoR

egion 44A

- Midland

4B - El Paso

LubbockR

egion 5Lubbock - 5AA

marillo - 5B

Abilene - 5C

5 B

C

A

B

E

CDA

B

C

A

BA

BA

B

C

D

A

64

123

C

D

Throckmorton

Page 44: 2016-2017 - Texas Department of Public Safety · collected by the Texas Department of Public Safety (TX DPS). According to the Texas Code of Criminal Procedure, “racial profiling

41

Highway Patrol - 2017

REGIO

N 1 2017

African American

White

Hispanic

Stops

Frequency 64,995

300,526 61,718

Percent 14.84 %

68.62 %

14.09 %

Citations

Frequency

27,186 92,071

31,856 Percent

17.51 %

59.29 %

20.52 %

Rate per 100 stops 41.83

30.64 51.62

Warnings

Frequency

37,809 208,455

29,862 Percent

13.38 %

73.74 %

10.56 %

Rate per 100 stops 58.17

69.36 48.38

Searches (All)

Frequency 5,180

9,842 3,557

Percent 27.54 %

52.33 %

18.91 %

Rate per 100 stops

7.97 3.27

5.76 D

iscretionary Searches

Frequency 816

2,814 947

Percent 17.51 %

60.39 %

20.32 %

Rate per 100 stops

1.26 0.94

1.53 N

on-Discretionary Searches

Frequency

4,364 7,028

2,610 Percent

30.84 %

49.67 %

18.45 %

Rate per 100 stops 6.71

2.34 4.23

Contraband Hits

Frequency

2,118 3,898

1,165 Percent

29.20 %

53.74 %

16.06 %

Rate per 100 searches 40.89

39.61 32.75

Race Known

Frequency

413 1,661

210 Percent

17.94 %

72.15 %

9.12 %

Rate per 100 stops 0.64

0.55 0.34

DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC SAFETY APPENDIX A – REGION 1:DALLAS ANALYSIS

Page 45: 2016-2017 - Texas Department of Public Safety · collected by the Texas Department of Public Safety (TX DPS). According to the Texas Code of Criminal Procedure, “racial profiling

42

Highway Patrol - 2017

REGIO

N 1 2017

Asian Alaska

Native/Am

erican Indian

Middle Eastern

Other

Unknow

n

Stops

Frequency 7,283

368 3,065

0 1

Percent 1.66 %

0.08 %

0.70 %

0.00 %

0.00 %

Citations

Frequency

2,749 144

1,274 0

0 Percent

1.77 %

0.09 %

0.82 %

0.00 %

0.00 %

Rate per 100 stops 37.75

39.13 41.57

--- 0.00

Warnings

Frequency

4,534 224

1,791 0

1 Percent

1.60 %

0.08 %

0.63 %

0.00 %

0.00 %

Rate per 100 stops 62.25

60.87 58.43

--- 100.00

Searches (All)

Frequency 145

19 66

0 0

Percent 0.77 %

0.10 %

0.35 %

0.00 %

0.00 %

Rate per 100 stops

1.99 5.16

2.15 ---

0.00 D

iscretionary Searches

Frequency 41

6 36

0 0

Percent 0.88 %

0.13 %

0.77 %

0.00 %

0.00 %

Rate per 100 stops

0.56 1.63

1.17 ---

0.00 N

on-Discretionary Searches

Frequency

104 13

30 0

0 Percent

0.74 %

0.09 %

0.21 %

0.00 %

0.00 %

Rate per 100 stops 1.43

3.53 0.98

--- 0.00

Contraband Hits

Frequency

39 8

25 0

0 Percent

0.54 %

0.11 %

0.34 %

0.00 %

0.00 %

Rate per 100 searches 26.90

42.11 37.88

--- ---

Race Known

Frequency

13 1

4 0

0 Percent

0.56 %

0.04 %

0.17 %

0.00 %

0.00 %

Rate per 100 stops 0.18

0.27 0.13

--- 0.00

DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC SAFETY APPENDIX A – REGION 1:DALLAS ANALYSIS

Page 46: 2016-2017 - Texas Department of Public Safety · collected by the Texas Department of Public Safety (TX DPS). According to the Texas Code of Criminal Procedure, “racial profiling

43

Highway Patrol - 2016

REGIO

N 1 2016

African American

White

Hispanic

Stops

Frequency 53,981

264,356 52,392

Percent 14.20 %

69.52 %

13.78 %

Citations

Frequency

21,635 77,097

27,004 Percent

16.72 %

59.57 %

20.87 %

Rate per 100 stops 40.08

29.16 51.54

Warnings

Frequency

32,346 187,259

25,388 Percent

12.89 %

74.65 %

10.12 %

Rate per 100 stops 59.92

70.84 48.46

Searches (All)

Frequency 1,901

3,856 1,274

Percent 26.70 %

54.15 %

17.89 %

Rate per 100 stops

3.52 1.46

2.43 D

iscretionary Searches

Frequency 329

1,167 377

Percent 17.29 %

61.32 %

19.81 %

Rate per 100 stops

0.61 0.44

0.72 N

on-Discretionary Searches

Frequency

1,572 2,689

897 Percent

30.13 %

51.53 %

17.19 %

Rate per 100 stops 2.91

1.02 1.71

Contraband Hits

Frequency

1,065 2,144

667 Percent

27.20 %

54.75 %

17.03 %

Rate per 100 searches 56.02

55.60 52.35

Race Known

Frequency

700 3,146

517 Percent

15.76 %

70.84 %

11.64 %

Rate per 100 stops 1.30

1.19 0.99

DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC SAFETY APPENDIX A – REGION 1:DALLAS ANALYSIS

Page 47: 2016-2017 - Texas Department of Public Safety · collected by the Texas Department of Public Safety (TX DPS). According to the Texas Code of Criminal Procedure, “racial profiling

44

Highway Patrol - 2016

REGIO

N 1 2016

Asian Alaska

Native/Am

erican Indian

Middle Eastern

Other

Unknow

n

Stops

Frequency 5,415

269 3,842

5 3

Percent 1.42 %

0.07 %

1.01 %

0.00 %

0.00 %

Citations

Frequency

2,100 106

1,470 5

1 Percent

1.62 %

0.08 %

1.14 %

0.00 %

0.00 %

Rate per 100 stops 38.78

39.41 38.26

100.00 33.33

Warnings

Frequency

3,315 163

2,372 0

2 Percent

1.32 %

0.06 %

0.95 %

0.00 %

0.00 %

Rate per 100 stops 61.22

60.59 61.74

0.00 66.67

Searches (All)

Frequency 53

5 27

5 0

Percent 0.74 %

0.07 %

0.38 %

0.07 %

0.00 %

Rate per 100 stops

0.98 1.86

0.70 100.00

0.00 D

iscretionary Searches

Frequency 19

0 11

0 0

Percent 1.00 %

0.00 %

0.58 %

0.00 %

0.00 %

Rate per 100 stops

0.35 0.00

0.29 0.00

0.00 N

on-Discretionary Searches

Frequency

34 5

16 5

0 Percent

0.65 %

0.10 %

0.31 %

0.10 %

0.00 %

Rate per 100 stops 0.63

1.86 0.42

100.00 0.00

Contraband Hits

Frequency

23 4

8 5

0 Percent

0.59 %

0.10 %

0.20 %

0.13 %

0.00 %

Rate per 100 searches 43.40

80.00 29.63

100.00 ---

Race Known

Frequency

31 2

45 0

0 Percent

0.70 %

0.05 %

1.01 %

0.00 %

0.00 %

Rate per 100 stops 0.57

0.74 1.17

0.00 0.00

DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC SAFETY APPENDIX A – REGION 1:DALLAS ANALYSIS

Page 48: 2016-2017 - Texas Department of Public Safety · collected by the Texas Department of Public Safety (TX DPS). According to the Texas Code of Criminal Procedure, “racial profiling

45

Comm

ercial Vehicle Enforcement - 2017

Region 1 2017 African Am

erican W

hite H

ispanic Stops

Frequency

7,145 18,557

11,785 Percent

18.56 %

48.21 %

30.62 %

Citations

Frequency 1,037

2,466 1,675

Percent 19.86 %

47.22 %

32.08 %

Rate per 100 stops

14.51 13.29

14.21 W

arnings

Frequency 4,010

9,491 7,112

Percent 19.11 %

45.24 %

33.90 %

Rate per 100 stops

56.12 51.15

60.35 Clean

Frequency

2,098 6,600

2,998 Percent

17.07 %

53.71 %

24.40 %

Rate per 100 stops 29.36

35.57 25.44

Searches (All)

Frequency 19

29 27

Percent 25.00 %

38.16 %

35.53 %

Rate per 100 stops

0.27 0.16

0.23 D

iscretionary Searches

Frequency 9

17 18

Percent 20.00 %

37.78 %

40.00 %

Rate per 100 stops

0.13 0.09

0.15 N

on-Discretionary Searches

Frequency

10 12

9 Percent

32.26 %

38.71 %

29.03 %

Rate per 100 stops 0.14

0.06 0.08

Contraband Hits

Frequency

6 14

4 Percent

25.00 %

58.33 %

16.67 %

Rate per 100 searches 31.58

48.28 14.81

Race Known

Frequency

2 13

0 Percent

13.33 %

86.67 %

0.00 %

Rate per 100 stops 0.03

0.07 0.00

DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC SAFETY APPENDIX A – REGION 1:DALLAS ANALYSIS

Page 49: 2016-2017 - Texas Department of Public Safety · collected by the Texas Department of Public Safety (TX DPS). According to the Texas Code of Criminal Procedure, “racial profiling

46

Comm

ercial Vehicle Enforcement - 2017

Region 1 2017 Asian

Alaska N

ative/American

Indian

Middle Eastern

Other

Unknow

n

Stops

Frequency 317

32 278

0 375

Percent 0.82 %

0.08 %

0.72 %

0.00 %

0.97 %

Citations

Frequency

12 4

28 0

0 Percent

0.23 %

0.08 %

0.54 %

0.00 %

0.00 %

Rate per 100 stops 3.79

12.50 10.07

--- 0.00

Warnings

Frequency

200 13

144 0

9 Percent

0.95 %

0.06 %

0.69 %

0.00 %

0.04 %

Rate per 100 stops 63.09

40.63 51.80

--- 2.40

Clean

Frequency 105

15 106

0 366

Percent 0.85 %

0.12 %

0.86 %

0.00 %

2.98 %

Rate per 100 stops

33.12 46.88

38.13 ---

97.60 Searches (All)

Frequency

1 0

0 0

0 Percent

1.32 %

0.00 %

0.00 %

0.00 %

0.00 %

Rate per 100 stops 0.32

0.00 0.00

--- 0.00

Discretionary Searches

Frequency

1 0

0 0

0 Percent

2.22 %

0.00 %

0.00 %

0.00 %

0.00 %

Rate per 100 stops 0.32

0.00 0.00

--- 0.00

Non-D

iscretionary Searches

Frequency 0

0 0

0 0

Percent 0.00 %

0.00 %

0.00 %

0.00 %

0.00 %

Rate per 100 stops

0.00 0.00

0.00 ---

0.00 Contraband H

its

Frequency 0

0 0

0 0

Percent 0.00 %

0.00 %

0.00 %

0.00 %

0.00 %

Rate per 100 searches

0.00 ---

--- ---

--- Race Know

n

Frequency 0

0 0

0 0

Percent 0.00 %

0.00 %

0.00 %

0.00 %

0.00 %

Rate per 100 stops

0.00 0.00

0.00 ---

0.00

DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC SAFETY APPENDIX A – REGION 1:DALLAS ANALYSIS

Page 50: 2016-2017 - Texas Department of Public Safety · collected by the Texas Department of Public Safety (TX DPS). According to the Texas Code of Criminal Procedure, “racial profiling

47

Comm

ercial Vehicle Enforcement - 2016

Region 1 2016 African Am

erican W

hite H

ispanic Stops

Frequency

7,200 19,676

11,228 Percent

18.34 %

50.13 %

28.60 %

Citations

Frequency 1,061

2,613 1,776

Percent 19.28 %

47.48 %

32.27 %

Rate per 100 stops

14.74 13.28

15.82 W

arnings

Frequency 4,164

10,168 6,835

Percent 19.30 %

47.14 %

31.68 %

Rate per 100 stops

57.83 51.68

60.87 Clean

Frequency

1,975 6,895

2,617 Percent

16.22 %

56.62 %

21.49 %

Rate per 100 stops 27.43

35.04 23.31

Searches (All)

Frequency 6

18 10

Percent 17.14 %

51.43 %

28.57 %

Rate per 100 stops

0.08 0.09

0.09 D

iscretionary Searches

Frequency 2

10 8

Percent 9.52 %

47.62 %

38.10 %

Rate per 100 stops

0.03 0.05

0.07 N

on-Discretionary Searches

Frequency

4 8

2 Percent

28.57 %

57.14 %

14.29 %

Rate per 100 stops 0.06

0.04 0.02

Contraband Hits

Frequency

3 7

1 Percent

27.27 %

63.64 %

9.09 %

Rate per 100 searches 50.00

38.89 10.00

Race Known

Frequency

1 8

3 Percent

8.33 %

66.67 %

25.00 %

Rate per 100 stops 0.01

0.04 0.03

DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC SAFETY APPENDIX A – REGION 1:DALLAS ANALYSIS

Page 51: 2016-2017 - Texas Department of Public Safety · collected by the Texas Department of Public Safety (TX DPS). According to the Texas Code of Criminal Procedure, “racial profiling

48

Comm

ercial Vehicle Enforcement - 2016

Region 1 2016 Asian

Alaska N

ative/American

Indian

Middle Eastern

Other

Unknow

n

Stops

Frequency 282

20 361

8 478

Percent 0.72 %

0.05 %

0.92 %

0.02 %

1.22 %

Citations

Frequency

19 2

32 0

0 Percent

0.35 %

0.04 %

0.58 %

0.00 %

0.00 %

Rate per 100 stops 6.74

10.00 8.86

0.00 0.00

Warnings

Frequency

157 5

207 5

31 Percent

0.73 %

0.02 %

0.96 %

0.02 %

0.14 %

Rate per 100 stops 55.67

25.00 57.34

62.50 6.49

Clean

Frequency 106

13 122

3 447

Percent 0.87 %

0.11 %

1.00 %

0.02 %

3.67 %

Rate per 100 stops

37.59 65.00

33.80 37.50

93.51 Searches (All)

Frequency

1 0

0 0

0 Percent

2.86 %

0.00 %

0.00 %

0.00 %

0.00 %

Rate per 100 stops 0.35

0.00 0.00

0.00 0.00

Discretionary Searches

Frequency

1 0

0 0

0 Percent

4.76 %

0.00 %

0.00 %

0.00 %

0.00 %

Rate per 100 stops 0.35

0.00 0.00

0.00 0.00

Non-D

iscretionary Searches

Frequency 0

0 0

0 0

Percent 0.00 %

0.00 %

0.00 %

0.00 %

0.00 %

Rate per 100 stops

0.00 0.00

0.00 0.00

0.00 Contraband H

its

Frequency 0

0 0

0 0

Percent 0.00 %

0.00 %

0.00 %

0.00 %

0.00 %

Rate per 100 searches

0.00 ---

--- ---

--- Race Know

n

Frequency 0

0 0

0 0

Percent 0.00 %

0.00 %

0.00 %

0.00 %

0.00 %

Rate per 100 stops

0.00 0.00

0.00 0.00

0.00

DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC SAFETY APPENDIX A – REGION 1:DALLAS ANALYSIS

Page 52: 2016-2017 - Texas Department of Public Safety · collected by the Texas Department of Public Safety (TX DPS). According to the Texas Code of Criminal Procedure, “racial profiling

49

Appendix B Region 1: Dallas

District Level Analysis

Page 53: 2016-2017 - Texas Department of Public Safety · collected by the Texas Department of Public Safety (TX DPS). According to the Texas Code of Criminal Procedure, “racial profiling

50

Falls

Bexar

GonzalesC

omal

FayetteK

err

Guadalupe

Blanco

Coryell M

cLennan

Atascosa

Bastrop

DeW

itt

Frio

JacksonK

arnes

Limestone

Medina

Freestone

Bell

Calhoun

Ham

ilton

Kendall

Lavaca

McMullen

San Saba

Travis

Victoria

William

son

Bandera

Bosque

Burnet

Caldw

ell

Gillespie

Goliad

Hays

Hill

Lampasas

Lee

LlanoM

ilam

Mills

Wilson

Potter

Sw

isher

Terry

Randall

Hall

Cochran

Haskell

Armstrong

King

RobertsStonewallYoung

Lipscomb

Fisher

Archer

Bailey

Cottle

Crosby

Deaf S

mith

Donley

Kent

Sherman

Stephens

Baylor

Hockley

Jack

Ochiltree

Oldham

Com

anche

Callahan

Foard

Hartley

Lamb

Mitchell

Moore

Yoakum

Briscoe

Hale

Scurry

Gray

Brow

n

Carson

Castro

Childress

Clay

Collingsw

orth

Coleman

Dallam

Dickens

Eastland

Floyd

Garza

Hansford

Hardeman

Hemphill

Hutchinson

Jones

Knox

Lubbock

Lynn

Montague

Motley

TaylorN

olan

Parm

er

Runnels

Shackelford

Wheeler

Wichita

Wilbarger

El

Paso

Schleicher

Presidio

Kim

ble

Martin

Terrell

Crane

Winkler

Daw

son

Andrew

s

Upton

Hudspeth

Mason

Borden

Coke

Gaines

Irion

Brew

ster

Menard

TomG

reen

How

ard

ReaganC

oncho

Crockett

Culberson

Ector

Glasscock

Jeff Davis

Sterling

Loving

McC

ulloch

Midland

Pecos

Reeves

Sutton

Ward

3D3A

US

281

Zavala

Starr

WebbZapata

Hidalgo

Duval

Bee

Jim Wells

MaverickA

ransas

Dim

mit

Edw

ards

JimH

oggK

enedy

Kinney

Kleberg

LiveO

ak

Nueces

Real

Refugio

San Patricio

Willacy

Brooks

Cam

eron

LaSalle

Uvalde

Val Verde

Newton

Trinity

Houston

Nacogdoches

Cham

bers

Waller

Orange

Montgom

ery

Polk

SanAugustine

Tyler

Angelina

Brazoria

Brazos

Liberty

WalkerH

arris

Leon

Austin

Burleson

Fort Bend

Galveston

Grimes

Jasper

Jefferson

Madison

Matagorda

Robertson

Sabine

Shelby

Washington

Colorado

Hardin

San

Jacinto

Wharton

Bow

ie

Cherokee

Harrison

Franklin

Cam

pH

opkins

Upshur

Collin

Morris

Anderson

Parker

Rains

Cooke

Dallas

Gregg

Johnson

Lamar

Marion

RedR

iver

Rockw

allD

entonC

ass

Delta

Erath

Ellis

FanninG

rayson

Henderson

Hood

Hunt

Kaufman

Navarro

Palo

Pinto

Panola

Rusk

Sm

ith

Som

ervell

Tarrant

Titus

VanZandt

Wise

Wood

Dallas

Region 11A

- Dallas

1B - Tyler

1C - H

urst1D

- Mt. Pleasant

Houston

Region 22A

- Houston

2B - B

eaumont

2C - C

onroe2D

- Bryan

San Antonio

Region 66A

- Waco

6B - Austin

6C - S

an Antonio

McA

llenR

egion 33A

- McA

llen3B

- Laredo3C

- Corpus C

hristi3D

- McA

llen3E

- Del R

io

El PasoR

egion 44A

- Midland

4B - El Paso

LubbockR

egion 5Lubbock - 5AA

marillo - 5B

Abilene - 5C

5 B

C

A

B

E

CDA

B

C

A

BA

BA

B

C

D

A

64

123

C

D

Throckmorton

Page 54: 2016-2017 - Texas Department of Public Safety · collected by the Texas Department of Public Safety (TX DPS). According to the Texas Code of Criminal Procedure, “racial profiling

51

Highway Patrol - 2017

DISTRICT 1A 2017

African American

White

Hispanic

Stops

Frequency 18,133

57,556 18,428

Percent 18.44 %

58.52 %

18.74 %

Citations

Frequency

7,826 18,420

9,512 Percent

20.93 %

49.26 %

25.44 %

Rate per 100 stops 43.16

32.00 51.62

Warnings

Frequency

10,307 39,136

8,916 Percent

16.91 %

64.20 %

14.63 %

Rate per 100 stops 56.84

68.00 48.38

Searches (All)

Frequency 1,525

1,825 999

Percent 34.50 %

41.29 %

22.60 %

Rate per 100 stops

8.41 3.17

5.42 D

iscretionary Searches

Frequency 237

561 312

Percent 20.92 %

49.51 %

27.54 %

Rate per 100 stops

1.31 0.97

1.69 N

on-Discretionary Searches

Frequency

1,288 1,264

687 Percent

39.18 %

38.45 %

20.90 %

Rate per 100 stops 7.10

2.20 3.73

Contraband Hits

Frequency

541 679

285 Percent

35.43 %

44.47 %

18.66 %

Rate per 100 searches 35.48

37.21 28.53

Race Known

Frequency

53 159

45 Percent

20.46 %

61.39 %

17.37 %

Rate per 100 stops 0.29

0.28 0.24

DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC SAFETY APPENDIX B – REGION 1:DALLAS – DISTRICT LEVEL ANALYSIS

Page 55: 2016-2017 - Texas Department of Public Safety · collected by the Texas Department of Public Safety (TX DPS). According to the Texas Code of Criminal Procedure, “racial profiling

52

Highway Patrol - 2017

DISTRICT 1A 2017

Asian Alaska

Native/Am

erican Indian

Middle Eastern

Other

Unknow

n

Stops

Frequency 3,032

101 1,100

0 0

Percent 3.08 %

0.10 %

1.12 %

0.00 %

0.00 %

Citations

Frequency

1,143 28

461 0

0 Percent

3.06 %

0.07 %

1.23 %

0.00 %

0.00 %

Rate per 100 stops 37.70

27.72 41.91

--- ---

Warnings

Frequency

1,889 73

639 0

0 Percent

3.10 %

0.12 %

1.05 %

0.00 %

0.00 %

Rate per 100 stops 62.30

72.28 58.09

--- ---

Searches (All)

Frequency 51

0 20

0 0

Percent 1.15 %

0.00 %

0.45 %

0.00 %

0.00 %

Rate per 100 stops

1.68 0.00

1.82 ---

--- D

iscretionary Searches

Frequency 13

0 10

0 0

Percent 1.15 %

0.00 %

0.88 %

0.00 %

0.00 %

Rate per 100 stops

0.43 0.00

0.91 ---

--- N

on-Discretionary Searches

Frequency

38 0

10 0

0 Percent

1.16 %

0.00 %

0.30 %

0.00 %

0.00 %

Rate per 100 stops 1.25

0.00 0.91

--- ---

Contraband Hits

Frequency

15 0

7 0

0 Percent

0.98 %

0.00 %

0.46 %

0.00 %

0.00 %

Rate per 100 searches 29.41

--- 35.00

--- ---

Race Known

Frequency

2 0

0 0

0 Percent

0.77 %

0.00 %

0.00 %

0.00 %

0.00 %

Rate per 100 stops 0.07

0.00 0.00

--- ---

DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC SAFETY APPENDIX B – REGION 1:DALLAS – DISTRICT LEVEL ANALYSIS

Page 56: 2016-2017 - Texas Department of Public Safety · collected by the Texas Department of Public Safety (TX DPS). According to the Texas Code of Criminal Procedure, “racial profiling

53

Highway Patrol - 2016

DISTRICT 1A 2016

African American

White

Hispanic

Stops

Frequency 13,349

42,624 13,331

Percent 18.43 %

58.85 %

18.41 %

Citations

Frequency

5,788 13,265

6,898 Percent

21.29 %

48.79 %

25.37 %

Rate per 100 stops 43.36

31.12 51.74

Warnings

Frequency

7,561 29,359

6,433 Percent

16.71 %

64.90 %

14.22 %

Rate per 100 stops 56.64

68.88 48.26

Searches (All)

Frequency 496

559 347

Percent 34.95 %

39.39 %

24.45 %

Rate per 100 stops

3.72 1.31

2.60 D

iscretionary Searches

Frequency 62

165 101

Percent 18.62 %

49.55 %

30.33 %

Rate per 100 stops

0.46 0.39

0.76 N

on-Discretionary Searches

Frequency

434 394

246 Percent

39.96 %

36.28 %

22.65 %

Rate per 100 stops 3.25

0.92 1.85

Contraband Hits

Frequency

270 296

165 Percent

36.49 %

40.00 %

22.30 %

Rate per 100 searches 54.44

52.95 47.55

Race Known

Frequency

43 93

24 Percent

26.54 %

57.41 %

14.81 %

Rate per 100 stops 0.32

0.22 0.18

DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC SAFETY APPENDIX B – REGION 1:DALLAS – DISTRICT LEVEL ANALYSIS

Page 57: 2016-2017 - Texas Department of Public Safety · collected by the Texas Department of Public Safety (TX DPS). According to the Texas Code of Criminal Procedure, “racial profiling

54

Highway Patrol - 2016

DISTRICT 1A 2016

Asian Alaska

Native/Am

erican Indian

Middle Eastern

Other

Unknow

n

Stops

Frequency 1,894

43 1,185

0 0

Percent 2.62 %

0.06 %

1.64 %

0.00 %

0.00 %

Citations

Frequency

767 20

450 0

0 Percent

2.82 %

0.07 %

1.66 %

0.00 %

0.00 %

Rate per 100 stops 40.50

46.51 37.97

--- ---

Warnings

Frequency

1,127 23

735 0

0 Percent

2.49 %

0.05 %

1.62 %

0.00 %

0.00 %

Rate per 100 stops 59.50

53.49 62.03

--- ---

Searches (All)

Frequency 9

0 8

0 0

Percent 0.63 %

0.00 %

0.56 %

0.00 %

0.00 %

Rate per 100 stops

0.48 0.00

0.68 ---

--- D

iscretionary Searches

Frequency 2

0 3

0 0

Percent 0.60 %

0.00 %

0.90 %

0.00 %

0.00 %

Rate per 100 stops

0.11 0.00

0.25 ---

--- N

on-Discretionary Searches

Frequency

7 0

5 0

0 Percent

0.64 %

0.00 %

0.46 %

0.00 %

0.00 %

Rate per 100 stops 0.37

0.00 0.42

--- ---

Contraband Hits

Frequency

6 0

3 0

0 Percent

0.81 %

0.00 %

0.41 %

0.00 %

0.00 %

Rate per 100 searches 66.67

--- 37.50

--- ---

Race Known

Frequency

0 0

2 0

0 Percent

0.00 %

0.00 %

1.23 %

0.00 %

0.00 %

Rate per 100 stops 0.00

0.00 0.17

--- ---

DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC SAFETY APPENDIX B – REGION 1:DALLAS – DISTRICT LEVEL ANALYSIS

Page 58: 2016-2017 - Texas Department of Public Safety · collected by the Texas Department of Public Safety (TX DPS). According to the Texas Code of Criminal Procedure, “racial profiling

55

Comm

ercial Vehicle Enforcement - 2017

District 1A 2017

African American

White

Hispanic

Stops

Frequency 2,470

4,204 4,546

Percent 21.35 %

36.34 %

39.30 %

Citations

Frequency

296 422

592 Percent

22.48 %

32.04 %

44.95 %

Rate per 100 stops 11.98

10.04 13.02

Warnings

Frequency

1,553 2,409

2,926 Percent

22.16 %

34.37 %

41.75 %

Rate per 100 stops 62.87

57.30 64.36

Clean

Frequency 621

1,373 1,028

Percent 19.16 %

42.36 %

31.72 %

Rate per 100 stops

25.14 32.66

22.61 Searches (All)

Frequency

8 8

6 Percent

36.36 %

36.36 %

27.27 %

Rate per 100 stops 0.32

0.19 0.13

Discretionary Searches

Frequency

5 5

5 Percent

33.33 %

33.33 %

33.33 %

Rate per 100 stops 0.20

0.12 0.11

Non-D

iscretionary Searches

Frequency 3

3 1

Percent 42.86 %

42.86 %

14.29 %

Rate per 100 stops

0.12 0.07

0.02 Contraband H

its

Frequency 2

4 0

Percent 33.33 %

66.67 %

0.00 %

Rate per 100 searches

25.00 50.00

0.00 Race Know

n

Frequency 1

1 0

Percent 50.00 %

50.00 %

0.00 %

Rate per 100 stops

0.04 0.02

0.00

DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC SAFETY APPENDIX B – REGION 1:DALLAS – DISTRICT LEVEL ANALYSIS

Page 59: 2016-2017 - Texas Department of Public Safety · collected by the Texas Department of Public Safety (TX DPS). According to the Texas Code of Criminal Procedure, “racial profiling

56

Comm

ercial Vehicle Enforcement - 2017

District 1A 2017

Asian Alaska

Native/Am

erican Indian

Middle Eastern

Other

Unknow

n

Stops

Frequency 94

8 64

0 181

Percent 0.81 %

0.07 %

0.55 %

0.00 %

1.56 %

Citations

Frequency

2 0

5 0

0 Percent

0.15 %

0.00 %

0.38 %

0.00 %

0.00 %

Rate per 100 stops 2.13

0.00 7.81

--- 0.00

Warnings

Frequency

68 5

41 0

7 Percent

0.97 %

0.07 %

0.58 %

0.00 %

0.10 %

Rate per 100 stops 72.34

62.50 64.06

--- 3.87

Clean

Frequency 24

3 18

0 174

Percent 0.74 %

0.09 %

0.56 %

0.00 %

5.37 %

Rate per 100 stops

25.53 37.50

28.13 ---

96.13 Searches (All)

Frequency

0 0

0 0

0 Percent

0.00 %

0.00 %

0.00 %

0.00 %

0.00 %

Rate per 100 stops 0.00

0.00 0.00

--- 0.00

Discretionary Searches

Frequency

0 0

0 0

0 Percent

0.00 %

0.00 %

0.00 %

0.00 %

0.00 %

Rate per 100 stops 0.00

0.00 0.00

--- 0.00

Non-D

iscretionary Searches

Frequency 0

0 0

0 0

Percent 0.00 %

0.00 %

0.00 %

0.00 %

0.00 %

Rate per 100 stops

0.00 0.00

0.00 ---

0.00 Contraband H

its

Frequency 0

0 0

0 0

Percent 0.00 %

0.00 %

0.00 %

0.00 %

0.00 %

Rate per 100 searches

--- ---

--- ---

--- Race Know

n

Frequency 0

0 0

0 0

Percent 0.00 %

0.00 %

0.00 %

0.00 %

0.00 %

Rate per 100 stops

0.00 0.00

0.00 ---

0.00

DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC SAFETY APPENDIX B – REGION 1:DALLAS – DISTRICT LEVEL ANALYSIS

Page 60: 2016-2017 - Texas Department of Public Safety · collected by the Texas Department of Public Safety (TX DPS). According to the Texas Code of Criminal Procedure, “racial profiling

57

Comm

ercial Vehicle Enforcement - 2016

District 1A 2016

African American

White

Hispanic

Stops

Frequency 2,123

4,071 4,058

Percent 19.83 %

38.02 %

37.90 %

Citations

Frequency

295 420

585 Percent

22.40 %

31.89 %

44.42 %

Rate per 100 stops 13.90

10.32 14.42

Warnings

Frequency

1,267 2,169

2,523 Percent

20.81 %

35.63 %

41.45 %

Rate per 100 stops 59.68

53.28 62.17

Clean

Frequency 561

1,482 950

Percent 16.98 %

44.85 %

28.75 %

Rate per 100 stops

26.42 36.40

23.41 Searches (All)

Frequency

3 3

6 Percent

25.00 %

25.00 %

50.00 %

Rate per 100 stops 0.14

0.07 0.15

Discretionary Searches

Frequency

1 3

5 Percent

11.11 %

33.33 %

55.56 %

Rate per 100 stops 0.05

0.07 0.12

Non-D

iscretionary Searches

Frequency 2

0 1

Percent 66.67 %

0.00 %

33.33 %

Rate per 100 stops

0.09 0.00

0.02 Contraband H

its

Frequency 2

2 0

Percent 50.00 %

50.00 %

0.00 %

Rate per 100 searches

66.67 66.67

0.00 Race Know

n

Frequency 0

0 1

Percent 0.00 %

0.00 %

100.00 %

Rate per 100 stops

0.00 0.00

0.02

DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC SAFETY APPENDIX B – REGION 1:DALLAS – DISTRICT LEVEL ANALYSIS

Page 61: 2016-2017 - Texas Department of Public Safety · collected by the Texas Department of Public Safety (TX DPS). According to the Texas Code of Criminal Procedure, “racial profiling

58

Comm

ercial Vehicle Enforcement - 2016

District 1A 2016

Asian Alaska

Native/Am

erican Indian

Middle Eastern

Other

Unknow

n

Stops

Frequency 82

3 95

3 273

Percent 0.77 %

0.03 %

0.89 %

0.03 %

2.55 %

Citations

Frequency

4 1

12 .0

0 Percent

0.30 %

0.08 %

0.91 %

0.00 %

0.00 %

Rate per 100 stops 4.88

33.33 12.63

0.00 0.00

Warnings

Frequency

49 1

58 1

19 Percent

0.80 %

0.02 %

0.95 %

0.02 %

0.31 %

Rate per 100 stops 59.76

33.33 61.05

33.33 6.96

Clean

Frequency 29

1 25

2 254

Percent 0.88 %

0.03 %

0.76 %

0.06 %

7.69 %

Rate per 100 stops

35.37 33.33

26.32 66.67

93.04 Searches (All)

Frequency

0 0

0 0

0 Percent

0.00 %

0.00 %

0.00 %

0.00 %

0.00 %

Rate per 100 stops 0.00

0.00 0.00

0.00 0.00

Discretionary Searches

Frequency

0 0

0 0

0 Percent

0.00 %

0.00 %

0.00 %

0.00 %

0.00 %

Rate per 100 stops 0.00

0.00 0.00

0.00 0.00

Non-D

iscretionary Searches

Frequency 0

0 0

0 0

Percent 0.00 %

0.00 %

0.00 %

0.00 %

0.00 %

Rate per 100 stops

0.00 0.00

0.00 0.00

0.00 Contraband H

its

Frequency 0

0 0

0 0

Percent 0.00 %

0.00 %

0.00 %

0.00 %

0.00 %

Rate per 100 searches

--- ---

--- ---

--- Race Know

n

Frequency 0

0 0

0 0

Percent 0.00 %

0.00 %

0.00 %

0.00 %

0.00 %

Rate per 100 stops

0.00 0.00

0.00 0.00

0.00

DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC SAFETY APPENDIX B – REGION 1:DALLAS – DISTRICT LEVEL ANALYSIS

Page 62: 2016-2017 - Texas Department of Public Safety · collected by the Texas Department of Public Safety (TX DPS). According to the Texas Code of Criminal Procedure, “racial profiling

59

Falls

Bexar

GonzalesC

omal

FayetteK

err

Guadalupe

Blanco

Coryell M

cLennan

Atascosa

Bastrop

DeW

itt

Frio

JacksonK

arnes

Limestone

Medina

Freestone

Bell

Calhoun

Ham

ilton

Kendall

Lavaca

McMullen

San Saba

Travis

Victoria

William

son

Bandera

Bosque

Burnet

Caldw

ell

Gillespie

Goliad

Hays

Hill

Lampasas

Lee

LlanoM

ilam

Mills

Wilson

Potter

Sw

isher

Terry

Randall

Hall

Cochran

Haskell

Armstrong

King

RobertsStonewallYoung

Lipscomb

Fisher

Throckmorton Archer

Bailey

Cottle

Crosby

Deaf S

mith

Donley

Kent

Sherman

Stephens

Baylor

Hockley

Jack

Ochiltree

Oldham

Com

anche

Callahan

Foard

Hartley

Lamb

Mitchell

Moore

Yoakum

Briscoe

Hale

Scurry

Gray

Brow

n

Carson

Castro

Childress

Clay

Collingsw

orth

Coleman

Dallam

Dickens

Eastland

Floyd

Garza

Hansford

Hardeman

Hemphill

Hutchinson

Jones

Knox

Lubbock

Lynn

Montague

Motley

TaylorN

olan

Parm

er

Runnels

Shackelford

Wheeler

Wichita

Wilbarger

El

Paso

Schleicher

Presidio

Kim

ble

Martin

Terrell

Crane

Winkler

Daw

son

Andrew

s

Upton

Hudspeth

Mason

Borden

Coke

Gaines

Irion

Brew

ster

Menard

TomG

reen

How

ard

ReaganC

oncho

Crockett

Culberson

Ector

Glasscock

Jeff Davis

Sterling

Loving

McC

ulloch

Midland

Pecos

Reeves

Sutton

Ward

3D3A

US

281

Zavala

Starr

WebbZapata

Hidalgo

Duval

Bee

Jim Wells

MaverickA

ransas

Dim

mit

Edw

ards

JimH

oggK

enedy

Kinney

Kleberg

LiveO

ak

Nueces

Real

Refugio

San Patricio

Willacy

Brooks

Cam

eron

LaSalle

Uvalde

Val Verde

Newton

Trinity

Houston

Nacogdoches

Cham

bers

Waller

Orange

Montgom

ery

Polk

SanAugustine

Tyler

Angelina

Brazoria

Brazos

Liberty

WalkerH

arris

Leon

Austin

Burleson

Fort Bend

Galveston

Grimes

Jasper

Jefferson

Madison

Matagorda

Robertson

Sabine

Shelby

Washington

Colorado

Hardin

San

Jacinto

Wharton

Bow

ie

Cherokee

Harrison

Franklin

Cam

pH

opkins

Upshur

Collin

Morris

Anderson

Parker

Rains

Cooke

Dallas

Gregg

Johnson

Lamar

Marion

RedR

iver

Rockw

allD

entonC

ass

Delta

Erath

Ellis

FanninG

rayson

Henderson

Hood

Hunt

Kaufman

Navarro

Palo

Pinto

Panola

Rusk

Sm

ith

Som

ervell

Tarrant

Titus

VanZandt

Wise

Wood

Dallas

Region 11A

- Dallas

1B - Tyler

1C - H

urst1D

- Mt. Pleasant

Houston

Region 22A

- Houston

2B - B

eaumont

2C - C

onroe2D

- Bryan

San Antonio

Region 66A

- Waco

6B - Austin

6C - S

an Antonio

McA

llenR

egion 33A

- McA

llen3B

- Laredo3C

- Corpus C

hristi3D

- McA

llen3E

- Del R

io

El PasoR

egion 44A

- Midland

4B - El Paso

LubbockR

egion 5Lubbock - 5AA

marillo - 5B

Abilene - 5C

5 B

C

A

B

E

CDA

B

C

A

BA

BA

B

C

D

A

64

123

C

D

Page 63: 2016-2017 - Texas Department of Public Safety · collected by the Texas Department of Public Safety (TX DPS). According to the Texas Code of Criminal Procedure, “racial profiling

60

Highway Patrol - 2017

DISTRICT 1B 2017

African American

White

Hispanic

Stops

Frequency 24,063

94,289 15,559

Percent 17.73 %

69.49 %

11.47 %

Citations

Frequency

9,471 25,060

7,797 Percent

22.08 %

58.41 %

18.17 %

Rate per 100 stops 39.36

26.58 50.11

Warnings

Frequency

14,592 69,229

7,762 Percent

15.73 %

74.62 %

8.37 %

Rate per 100 stops 60.64

73.42 49.89

Searches (All)

Frequency 1,814

3,490 975

Percent 28.70 %

55.21 %

15.42 %

Rate per 100 stops

7.54 3.70

6.27 D

iscretionary Searches

Frequency 308

980 213

Percent 20.25 %

64.43 %

14.00 %

Rate per 100 stops

1.28 1.04

1.37 N

on-Discretionary Searches

Frequency

1,506 2,510

762 Percent

31.38 %

52.29 %

15.88 %

Rate per 100 stops 6.26

2.66 4.90

Contraband Hits

Frequency

830 1,495

327 Percent

31.07 %

55.97 %

12.24 %

Rate per 100 searches 45.76

42.84 33.54

Race Known

Frequency

162 609

62 Percent

19.35 %

72.76 %

7.41 %

Rate per 100 stops 0.67

0.65 0.40

DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC SAFETY APPENDIX B – REGION 1:DALLAS – DISTRICT LEVEL ANALYSIS

Page 64: 2016-2017 - Texas Department of Public Safety · collected by the Texas Department of Public Safety (TX DPS). According to the Texas Code of Criminal Procedure, “racial profiling

61

Highway Patrol - 2017

DISTRICT 1B 2017

Asian Alaska

Native/Am

erican Indian

Middle Eastern

Other

Unknow

n

Stops

Frequency 1,154

69 548

0 0

Percent 0.85 %

0.05 %

0.40 %

0.00 %

0.00 %

Citations

Frequency

363 30

181 0

0 Percent

0.85 %

0.07 %

0.42 %

0.00 %

0.00 %

Rate per 100 stops 31.46

43.48 33.03

--- ---

Warnings

Frequency

791 39

367 0

0 Percent

0.85 %

0.04 %

0.40 %

0.00 %

0.00 %

Rate per 100 stops 68.54

56.52 66.97

--- ---

Searches (All)

Frequency 26

2 14

0 0

Percent 0.41 %

0.03 %

0.22 %

0.00 %

0.00 %

Rate per 100 stops

2.25 2.90

2.55 ---

--- D

iscretionary Searches

Frequency 8

1 11

0 0

Percent 0.53 %

0.07 %

0.72 %

0.00 %

0.00 %

Rate per 100 stops

0.69 1.45

2.01 ---

--- N

on-Discretionary Searches

Frequency

18 1

3 0

0 Percent

0.38 %

0.02 %

0.06 %

0.00 %

0.00 %

Rate per 100 stops 1.56

1.45 0.55

--- ---

Contraband Hits

Frequency

10 2

7 0

0 Percent

0.37 %

0.07 %

0.26 %

0.00 %

0.00 %

Rate per 100 searches 38.46

100.00 50.00

--- ---

Race Known

Frequency

3 0

1 0

0 Percent

0.36 %

0.00 %

0.12 %

0.00 %

0.00 %

Rate per 100 stops 0.26

0.00 0.18

--- ---

DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC SAFETY APPENDIX B – REGION 1:DALLAS – DISTRICT LEVEL ANALYSIS

Page 65: 2016-2017 - Texas Department of Public Safety · collected by the Texas Department of Public Safety (TX DPS). According to the Texas Code of Criminal Procedure, “racial profiling

62

Highway Patrol - 2016

DISTRICT 1B 2016

African American

White

Hispanic

Stops

Frequency 20,974

83,773 13,510

Percent 17.49 %

69.86 %

11.27 %

Citations

Frequency

8,015 22,255

7,016 Percent

21.18 %

58.82 %

18.54 %

Rate per 100 stops 38.21

26.57 51.93

Warnings

Frequency

12,959 61,518

6,494 Percent

15.79 %

74.95 %

7.91 %

Rate per 100 stops 61.79

73.43 48.07

Searches (All)

Frequency 750

1,442 349

Percent 29.22 %

56.17 %

13.60 %

Rate per 100 stops

3.58 1.72

2.58 D

iscretionary Searches

Frequency 141

492 101

Percent 19.03 %

66.40 %

13.63 %

Rate per 100 stops

0.67 0.59

0.75 N

on-Discretionary Searches

Frequency

609 950

248 Percent

33.35 %

52.03 %

13.58 %

Rate per 100 stops 2.90

1.13 1.84

Contraband Hits

Frequency

401 757

186 Percent

29.64 %

55.95 %

13.75 %

Rate per 100 searches 53.47

52.50 53.30

Race Known

Frequency

150 593

71 Percent

18.38 %

72.67 %

8.70 %

Rate per 100 stops 0.72

0.71 0.53

DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC SAFETY APPENDIX B – REGION 1:DALLAS – DISTRICT LEVEL ANALYSIS

Page 66: 2016-2017 - Texas Department of Public Safety · collected by the Texas Department of Public Safety (TX DPS). According to the Texas Code of Criminal Procedure, “racial profiling

63

Highway Patrol - 2016

DISTRICT 1B 2016

Asian Alaska

Native/Am

erican Indian

Middle Eastern

Other

Unknow

n

Stops

Frequency 976

52 630

5 0

Percent 0.81 %

0.04 %

0.53 %

0.00 %

0.00 %

Citations

Frequency

318 18

211 5

0 Percent

0.84 %

0.05 %

0.56 %

0.01 %

0.00 %

Rate per 100 stops 32.58

34.62 33.49

100.00 ---

Warnings

Frequency

658 34

419 0

0 Percent

0.80 %

0.04 %

0.51 %

0.00 %

0.00 %

Rate per 100 stops 67.42

65.38 66.51

0.00 ---

Searches (All)

Frequency 12

2 7

5 0

Percent 0.47 %

0.08 %

0.27 %

0.19 %

0.00 %

Rate per 100 stops

1.23 3.85

1.11 100.00

--- D

iscretionary Searches

Frequency 4

0 3

0 0

Percent 0.54 %

0.00 %

0.40 %

0.00 %

0.00 %

Rate per 100 stops

0.41 0.00

0.48 0.00

--- N

on-Discretionary Searches

Frequency

8 2

4 5

0 Percent

0.44 %

0.11 %

0.22 %

0.27 %

0.00 %

Rate per 100 stops 0.82

3.85 0.63

100.00 ---

Contraband Hits

Frequency

2 1

1 5

0 Percent

0.15 %

0.07 %

0.07 %

0.37 %

0.00 %

Rate per 100 searches 16.67

50.00 14.29

100.00 ---

Race Known

Frequency

0 1

1 0

0 Percent

0.00 %

0.12 %

0.12 %

0.00 %

0.00 %

Rate per 100 stops 0.00

1.92 0.16

0.00 ---

DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC SAFETY APPENDIX B – REGION 1:DALLAS – DISTRICT LEVEL ANALYSIS

Page 67: 2016-2017 - Texas Department of Public Safety · collected by the Texas Department of Public Safety (TX DPS). According to the Texas Code of Criminal Procedure, “racial profiling

64

Comm

ercial Vehicle Enforcement - 2017

District 1B 2017

African American

White

Hispanic

Stops

Frequency 1,668

3,772 918

Percent 25.97 %

58.73 %

14.29 %

Citations

Frequency

343 632

129 Percent

30.87 %

56.89 %

11.61 %

Rate per 100 stops 20.56

16.76 14.05

Warnings

Frequency

821 1,654

447 Percent

27.81 %

56.03 %

15.14 %

Rate per 100 stops 49.22

43.85 48.69

Clean

Frequency 504

1,486 342

Percent 21.36 %

62.97 %

14.49 %

Rate per 100 stops

30.22 39.40

37.25 Searches (All)

Frequency

1 1

3 Percent

16.67 %

16.67 %

50.00 %

Rate per 100 stops 0.06

0.03 0.33

Discretionary Searches

Frequency

1 1

2 Percent

20.00 %

20.00 %

40.00 %

Rate per 100 stops 0.06

0.03 0.22

Non-D

iscretionary Searches

Frequency 0

0 1

Percent 0.00 %

0.00 %

100.00 %

Rate per 100 stops

0.00 0.00

0.11 Contraband H

its

Frequency 0

0 0

Percent --- %

--- %

--- %

Rate per 100 searches

0.00 0.00

0.00 Race Know

n

Frequency 0

0 0

Percent --- %

--- %

--- %

Rate per 100 stops

0.00 0.00

0.00

DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC SAFETY APPENDIX B – REGION 1:DALLAS – DISTRICT LEVEL ANALYSIS

Page 68: 2016-2017 - Texas Department of Public Safety · collected by the Texas Department of Public Safety (TX DPS). According to the Texas Code of Criminal Procedure, “racial profiling

65

Comm

ercial Vehicle Enforcement - 2017

District 1B 2017

Asian Alaska

Native/Am

erican Indian

Middle Eastern

Other

Unknow

n

Stops

Frequency 31

9 25

0 0

Percent 0.48 %

0.14 %

0.39 %

0.00 %

0.00 %

Citations

Frequency

2 2

3 0

0 Percent

0.18 %

0.18 %

0.27 %

0.00 %

0.00 %

Rate per 100 stops 6.45

22.22 12.00

--- ---

Warnings

Frequency

15 3

12 0

0 Percent

0.51 %

0.10 %

0.41 %

0.00 %

0.00 %

Rate per 100 stops 48.39

33.33 48.00

--- ---

Clean

Frequency 14

4 10

0 0

Percent 0.59 %

0.17 %

0.42 %

0.00 %

0.00 %

Rate per 100 stops

45.16 44.44

40.00 ---

--- Searches (All)

Frequency

1 0

0 0

0 Percent

16.67 %

0.00 %

0.00 %

0.00 %

0.00 %

Rate per 100 stops 3.23

0.00 0.00

--- ---

Discretionary Searches

Frequency

1 0

0 0

0 Percent

20.00 %

0.00 %

0.00 %

0.00 %

0.00 %

Rate per 100 stops 3.23

0.00 0.00

--- ---

Non-D

iscretionary Searches

Frequency 0

0 0

0 0

Percent 0.00 %

0.00 %

0.00 %

0.00 %

0.00 %

Rate per 100 stops

0.00 0.00

0.00 ---

--- Contraband H

its

Frequency 0

0 0

0 0

Percent --- %

--- %

--- %

--- %

--- %

Rate per 100 searches

0.00 ---

--- ---

--- Race Know

n

Frequency 0

0 0

0 0

Percent --- %

--- %

--- %

--- %

--- %

Rate per 100 stops

0.00 0.00

0.00 ---

---

DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC SAFETY APPENDIX B – REGION 1:DALLAS – DISTRICT LEVEL ANALYSIS

Page 69: 2016-2017 - Texas Department of Public Safety · collected by the Texas Department of Public Safety (TX DPS). According to the Texas Code of Criminal Procedure, “racial profiling

66

Comm

ercial Vehicle Enforcement - 2016

District 1B 2016

African American

White

Hispanic

Stops

Frequency 2,146

5,067 1,166

Percent 25.27 %

59.67 %

13.73 %

Citations

Frequency

369 719

170 Percent

29.06 %

56.61 %

13.39 %

Rate per 100 stops 17.19

14.19 14.58

Warnings

Frequency

1,161 2,371

614 Percent

27.60 %

56.37 %

14.60 %

Rate per 100 stops 54.10

46.79 52.66

Clean

Frequency 616

1,977 382

Percent 20.42 %

65.55 %

12.67 %

Rate per 100 stops

28.70 39.02

32.76 Searches (All)

Frequency

1 2

2 Percent

20.00 %

40.00 %

40.00 %

Rate per 100 stops 0.05

0.04 0.17

Discretionary Searches

Frequency

0 1

2 Percent

0.00 %

33.33 %

66.67 %

Rate per 100 stops 0.00

0.02 0.17

Non-D

iscretionary Searches

Frequency 1

1 0

Percent 50.00 %

50.00 %

0.00 %

Rate per 100 stops

0.05 0.02

0.00 Contraband H

its

Frequency 1

1 0

Percent 50.00 %

50.00 %

0.00 %

Rate per 100 searches

100.00 50.00

0.00 Race Know

n

Frequency 0

0 0

Percent --- %

--- %

--- %

Rate per 100 stops

0.00 0.00

0.00

DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC SAFETY APPENDIX B – REGION 1:DALLAS – DISTRICT LEVEL ANALYSIS

Page 70: 2016-2017 - Texas Department of Public Safety · collected by the Texas Department of Public Safety (TX DPS). According to the Texas Code of Criminal Procedure, “racial profiling

67

Comm

ercial Vehicle Enforcement - 2016

District 1B 2016

Asian Alaska

Native/Am

erican Indian

Middle Eastern

Other

Unknow

n

Stops

Frequency 51

4 57

0 1

Percent 0.60 %

0.05 %

0.67 %

0.00 %

0.01 %

Citations

Frequency

3 .0

9 0

0 Percent

0.24 %

0.00 %

0.71 %

0.00 %

0.00 %

Rate per 100 stops 5.88

0.00 15.79

--- 0.00

Warnings

Frequency

26 2

32 0

0 Percent

0.62 %

0.05 %

0.76 %

0.00 %

0.00 %

Rate per 100 stops 50.98

50.00 56.14

--- 0.00

Clean

Frequency 22

2 16

0 1

Percent 0.73 %

0.07 %

0.53 %

0.00 %

0.03 %

Rate per 100 stops

43.14 50.00

28.07 ---

100.00 Searches (All)

Frequency

0 0

0 0

0 Percent

0.00 %

0.00 %

0.00 %

0.00 %

0.00 %

Rate per 100 stops 0.00

0.00 0.00

--- 0.00

Discretionary Searches

Frequency

0 0

0 0

0 Percent

0.00 %

0.00 %

0.00 %

0.00 %

0.00 %

Rate per 100 stops 0.00

0.00 0.00

--- 0.00

Non-D

iscretionary Searches

Frequency 0

0 0

0 0

Percent 0.00 %

0.00 %

0.00 %

0.00 %

0.00 %

Rate per 100 stops

0.00 0.00

0.00 ---

0.00 Contraband H

its

Frequency 0

0 0

0 0

Percent 0.00 %

0.00 %

0.00 %

0.00 %

0.00 %

Rate per 100 searches

--- ---

--- ---

--- Race Know

n

Frequency 0

0 0

0 0

Percent --- %

--- %

--- %

--- %

--- %

Rate per 100 stops

0.00 0.00

0.00 ---

0.00

DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC SAFETY APPENDIX B – REGION 1:DALLAS – DISTRICT LEVEL ANALYSIS

Page 71: 2016-2017 - Texas Department of Public Safety · collected by the Texas Department of Public Safety (TX DPS). According to the Texas Code of Criminal Procedure, “racial profiling

68

Falls

Bexar

GonzalesC

omal

FayetteK

err

Guadalupe

Blanco

Coryell M

cLennan

Atascosa

Bastrop

DeW

itt

Frio

JacksonK

arnes

Limestone

Medina

Freestone

Bell

Calhoun

Ham

ilton

Kendall

Lavaca

McMullen

San Saba

Travis

Victoria

William

son

Bandera

Bosque

Burnet

Caldw

ell

Gillespie

Goliad

Hays

Hill

Lampasas

Lee

LlanoM

ilam

Mills

Wilson

Potter

Sw

isher

Terry

Randall

Hall

Cochran

Haskell

Armstrong

King

RobertsStonewallYoung

Lipscomb

Fisher

Archer

Bailey

Cottle

Crosby

Deaf S

mith

Donley

Kent

Sherman

Stephens

Baylor

Hockley

Jack

Ochiltree

Oldham

Com

anche

Callahan

Foard

Hartley

Lamb

Mitchell

Moore

Yoakum

Briscoe

Hale

Scurry

Gray

Brow

n

Carson

Castro

Childress

Clay

Collingsw

orth

Coleman

Dallam

Dickens

Eastland

Floyd

Garza

Hansford

Hardeman

Hemphill

Hutchinson

Jones

Knox

Lubbock

Lynn

Montague

Motley

TaylorN

olan

Parm

er

Runnels

Shackelford

Wheeler

Wichita

Wilbarger

El

Paso

Schleicher

Presidio

Kim

ble

Martin

Terrell

Crane

Winkler

Daw

son

Andrew

s

Upton

Hudspeth

Mason

Borden

Coke

Gaines

Irion

Brew

ster

Menard

TomG

reen

How

ard

ReaganC

oncho

Crockett

Culberson

Ector

Glasscock

Jeff Davis

Sterling

Loving

McC

ulloch

Midland

Pecos

Reeves

Sutton

Ward

3D3A

US

281

Zavala

Starr

WebbZapata

Hidalgo

Duval

Bee

Jim Wells

MaverickA

ransas

Dim

mit

Edw

ards

JimH

oggK

enedy

Kinney

Kleberg

LiveO

ak

Nueces

Real

Refugio

San Patricio

Willacy

Brooks

Cam

eron

LaSalle

Uvalde

Val Verde

Newton

Trinity

Houston

Nacogdoches

Cham

bers

Waller

Orange

Montgom

ery

Polk

SanAugustine

Tyler

Angelina

Brazoria

Brazos

Liberty

WalkerH

arris

Leon

Austin

Burleson

Fort Bend

Galveston

Grimes

Jasper

Jefferson

Madison

Matagorda

Robertson

Sabine

Shelby

Washington

Colorado

Hardin

San

Jacinto

Wharton

Bow

ie

Cherokee

Harrison

Franklin

Cam

pH

opkins

Upshur

Collin

Morris

Anderson

Parker

Rains

Cooke

Dallas

Gregg

Johnson

Lamar

Marion

RedR

iver

Rockw

allD

entonC

ass

Delta

Erath

Ellis

FanninG

rayson

Henderson

Hood

Hunt

Kaufman

Navarro

Palo

Pinto

Panola

Rusk

Sm

ith

Som

ervell

Tarrant

Titus

VanZandt

Wise

Wood

Dallas

Region 11A

- Dallas

1B - Tyler

1C - H

urst1D

- Mt. Pleasant

Houston

Region 22A

- Houston

2B - B

eaumont

2C - C

onroe2D

- Bryan

San Antonio

Region 66A

- Waco

6B - Austin

6C - S

an Antonio

McA

llenR

egion 33A

- McA

llen3B

- Laredo3C

- Corpus C

hristi3D

- McA

llen3E

- Del R

io

El PasoR

egion 44A

- Midland

4B - El Paso

LubbockR

egion 5Lubbock - 5AA

marillo - 5B

Abilene - 5C

5 B

C

A

B

E

CDA

B

C

A

BA

BA

B

C

D

A

64

123

C

D

Throckmorton

Page 72: 2016-2017 - Texas Department of Public Safety · collected by the Texas Department of Public Safety (TX DPS). According to the Texas Code of Criminal Procedure, “racial profiling

69

Highway Patrol - 2017

DISTRICT 1C 2017

African American

White

Hispanic

Stops

Frequency 11,000

93,597 19,824

Percent 8.63 %

73.43 %

15.55 %

Citations

Frequency

5,438 33,319

10,787 Percent

10.69 %

65.48 %

21.20 %

Rate per 100 stops 49.44

35.60 54.41

Warnings

Frequency

5,562 60,278

9,037 Percent

7.26 %

78.72 %

11.80 %

Rate per 100 stops 50.56

64.40 45.59

Searches (All)

Frequency 918

2,661 1,087

Percent 19.37 %

56.15 %

22.94 %

Rate per 100 stops

8.35 2.84

5.48 D

iscretionary Searches

Frequency 120

654 242

Percent 11.54 %

62.88 %

23.27 %

Rate per 100 stops

1.09 0.70

1.22 N

on-Discretionary Searches

Frequency

798 2,007

845 Percent

21.57 %

54.26 %

22.84 %

Rate per 100 stops 7.25

2.14 4.26

Contraband Hits

Frequency

387 1,084

413 Percent

20.33 %

56.93 %

21.69 %

Rate per 100 searches 42.16

40.74 37.99

Race Known

Frequency

136 541

94 Percent

17.37 %

69.09 %

12.01 %

Rate per 100 stops 1.24

0.58 0.47

DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC SAFETY APPENDIX B – REGION 1:DALLAS – DISTRICT LEVEL ANALYSIS

Page 73: 2016-2017 - Texas Department of Public Safety · collected by the Texas Department of Public Safety (TX DPS). According to the Texas Code of Criminal Procedure, “racial profiling

70

Highway Patrol - 2017

DISTRICT 1C 2017

Asian Alaska

Native/Am

erican Indian

Middle Eastern

Other

Unknow

n

Stops

Frequency 2,103

111 820

0 1

Percent 1.65 %

0.09 %

0.64 %

0.00 %

0.00 %

Citations

Frequency

900 51

392 0

0 Percent

1.77 %

0.10 %

0.77 %

0.00 %

0.00 %

Rate per 100 stops 42.80

45.95 47.80

--- 0.00

Warnings

Frequency

1,203 60

428 0

1 Percent

1.57 %

0.08 %

0.56 %

0.00 %

0.00 %

Rate per 100 stops 57.20

54.05 52.20

--- 100.00

Searches (All)

Frequency 50

7 16

0 0

Percent 1.06 %

0.15 %

0.34 %

0.00 %

0.00 %

Rate per 100 stops

2.38 6.31

1.95 ---

0.00 D

iscretionary Searches

Frequency 16

3 5

0 0

Percent 1.54 %

0.29 %

0.48 %

0.00 %

0.00 %

Rate per 100 stops

0.76 2.70

0.61 ---

0.00 N

on-Discretionary Searches

Frequency

34 4

11 0

0 Percent

0.92 %

0.11 %

0.30 %

0.00 %

0.00 %

Rate per 100 stops 1.62

3.60 1.34

--- 0.00

Contraband Hits

Frequency

10 2

8 0

0 Percent

0.53 %

0.11 %

0.42 %

0.00 %

0.00 %

Rate per 100 searches 20.00

28.57 50.00

--- ---

Race Known

Frequency

8 1

3 0

0 Percent

1.02 %

0.13 %

0.38 %

0.00 %

0.00 %

Rate per 100 stops 0.38

0.90 0.37

--- 0.00

DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC SAFETY APPENDIX B – REGION 1:DALLAS – DISTRICT LEVEL ANALYSIS

Page 74: 2016-2017 - Texas Department of Public Safety · collected by the Texas Department of Public Safety (TX DPS). According to the Texas Code of Criminal Procedure, “racial profiling

71

Highway Patrol - 2016

DISTRICT 1C 2016

African American

White

Hispanic

Stops

Frequency 9,441

83,356 17,917

Percent 8.31 %

73.40 %

15.78 %

Citations

Frequency

4,269 27,676

9,558 Percent

10.00 %

64.86 %

22.40 %

Rate per 100 stops 45.22

33.20 53.35

Warnings

Frequency

5,172 55,680

8,359 Percent

7.30 %

78.55 %

11.79 %

Rate per 100 stops 54.78

66.80 46.65

Searches (All)

Frequency 425

1,370 476

Percent 18.43 %

59.41 %

20.64 %

Rate per 100 stops

4.50 1.64

2.66 D

iscretionary Searches

Frequency 91

368 143

Percent 14.80 %

59.84 %

23.25 %

Rate per 100 stops

0.96 0.44

0.80 N

on-Discretionary Searches

Frequency

334 1,002

333 Percent

19.75 %

59.25 %

19.69 %

Rate per 100 stops 3.54

1.20 1.86

Contraband Hits

Frequency

260 852

282 Percent

18.44 %

60.43 %

20.00 %

Rate per 100 searches 61.18

62.19 59.24

Race Known

Frequency

416 1,861

406 Percent

15.10 %

67.55 %

14.74 %

Rate per 100 stops 4.41

2.23 2.27

DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC SAFETY APPENDIX B – REGION 1:DALLAS – DISTRICT LEVEL ANALYSIS

Page 75: 2016-2017 - Texas Department of Public Safety · collected by the Texas Department of Public Safety (TX DPS). According to the Texas Code of Criminal Procedure, “racial profiling

72

Highway Patrol - 2016

DISTRICT 1C 2016

Asian Alaska

Native/Am

erican Indian

Middle Eastern

Other

Unknow

n

Stops

Frequency 1,615

95 1,134

0 2

Percent 1.42 %

0.08 %

1.00 %

0.00 %

0.00 %

Citations

Frequency

640 36

493 0

1 Percent

1.50 %

0.08 %

1.16 %

0.00 %

0.00 %

Rate per 100 stops 39.63

37.89 43.47

--- 50.00

Warnings

Frequency

975 59

641 0

1 Percent

1.38 %

0.08 %

0.90 %

0.00 %

0.00 %

Rate per 100 stops 60.37

62.11 56.53

--- 50.00

Searches (All)

Frequency 25

3 7

0 0

Percent 1.08 %

0.13 %

0.30 %

0.00 %

0.00 %

Rate per 100 stops

1.55 3.16

0.62 ---

0.00 D

iscretionary Searches

Frequency 11

0 2

0 0

Percent 1.79 %

0.00 %

0.33 %

0.00 %

0.00 %

Rate per 100 stops

0.68 0.00

0.18 ---

0.00 N

on-Discretionary Searches

Frequency

14 3

5 0

0 Percent

0.83 %

0.18 %

0.30 %

0.00 %

0.00 %

Rate per 100 stops 0.87

3.16 0.44

--- 0.00

Contraband Hits

Frequency

11 3

2 0

0 Percent

0.78 %

0.21 %

0.14 %

0.00 %

0.00 %

Rate per 100 searches 44.00

100.00 28.57

--- ---

Race Known

Frequency

30 0

42 0

0 Percent

1.09 %

0.00 %

1.52 %

0.00 %

0.00 %

Rate per 100 stops 1.86

0.00 3.70

--- 0.00

DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC SAFETY APPENDIX B – REGION 1:DALLAS – DISTRICT LEVEL ANALYSIS

Page 76: 2016-2017 - Texas Department of Public Safety · collected by the Texas Department of Public Safety (TX DPS). According to the Texas Code of Criminal Procedure, “racial profiling

73

Comm

ercial Vehicle Enforcement - 2017

District 1C 2017

African American

White

Hispanic

Stops

Frequency 2,185

7,015 5,479

Percent 14.44 %

46.37 %

36.22 %

Citations

Frequency

296 1,027

856 Percent

13.45 %

46.68 %

38.91 %

Rate per 100 stops 13.55

14.64 15.62

Warnings

Frequency

1,282 3,905

3,347 Percent

14.73 %

44.86 %

38.45 %

Rate per 100 stops 58.67

55.67 61.09

Clean

Frequency 607

2,083 1,276

Percent 14.37 %

49.33 %

30.22 %

Rate per 100 stops

27.78 29.69

23.29 Searches (All)

Frequency

7 10

10 Percent

25.93 %

37.04 %

37.04 %

Rate per 100 stops 0.32

0.14 0.18

Discretionary Searches

Frequency

3 5

4 Percent

25.00 %

41.67 %

33.33 %

Rate per 100 stops 0.14

0.07 0.07

Non-D

iscretionary Searches

Frequency 4

5 6

Percent 26.67 %

33.33 %

40.00 %

Rate per 100 stops

0.18 0.07

0.11 Contraband H

its

Frequency 2

7 2

Percent 18.18 %

63.64 %

18.18 %

Rate per 100 searches

28.57 70.00

20.00 Race Know

n

Frequency 0

2 0

Percent 0.00 %

100.00 %

0.00 %

Rate per 100 stops

0.00 0.03

0.00

DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC SAFETY APPENDIX B – REGION 1:DALLAS – DISTRICT LEVEL ANALYSIS

Page 77: 2016-2017 - Texas Department of Public Safety · collected by the Texas Department of Public Safety (TX DPS). According to the Texas Code of Criminal Procedure, “racial profiling

74

Comm

ercial Vehicle Enforcement - 2017

District 1C 2017

Asian Alaska

Native/Am

erican Indian

Middle Eastern

Other

Unknow

n

Stops

Frequency 159

6 130

0 154

Percent 1.05 %

0.04 %

0.86 %

0.00 %

1.02 %

Citations

Frequency

7 0

14 0

0 Percent

0.32 %

0.00 %

0.64 %

0.00 %

0.00 %

Rate per 100 stops 4.40

0.00 10.77

--- 0.00

Warnings

Frequency

99 2

68 0

2 Percent

1.14 %

0.02 %

0.78 %

00.0 %

0.02 %

Rate per 100 stops 62.26

33.33 52.31

--- 1.30

Clean

Frequency 53

4 48

0 152

Percent 1.26 %

0.09 %

1.14 %

0.00 %

3.60 %

Rate per 100 stops

33.33 66.67

36.92 ---

98.70 Searches (All)

Frequency

0 0

0 0

0 Percent

0.00 %

0.00 %

0.00 %

0.00 %

0.00 %

Rate per 100 stops 0.00

0.00 0.00

--- 0.00

Discretionary Searches

Frequency

0 0

0 0

0 Percent

0.00 %

0.00 %

0.00 %

0.00 %

0.00 %

Rate per 100 stops 0.00

0.00 0.00

--- 0.00

Non-D

iscretionary Searches

Frequency 0

0 0

0 0

Percent 0.00 %

0.00 %

0.00 %

0.00 %

0.00 %

Rate per 100 stops

0.00 0.00

0.00 ---

0.00 Contraband H

its

Frequency 0

0 0

0 0

Percent 0.00 %

0.00 %

0.00 %

0.00 %

0.00 %

Rate per 100 searches

--- ---

--- ---

--- Race Know

n

Frequency 0

0 0

0 0

Percent 0.00 %

0.00 %

0.00 %

0.00 %

0.00 %

Rate per 100 stops

0.00 0.00

0.00 ---

0.00

DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC SAFETY APPENDIX B – REGION 1:DALLAS – DISTRICT LEVEL ANALYSIS

Page 78: 2016-2017 - Texas Department of Public Safety · collected by the Texas Department of Public Safety (TX DPS). According to the Texas Code of Criminal Procedure, “racial profiling

75

Comm

ercial Vehicle Enforcement - 2016

District 1C 2016

African American

White

Hispanic

Stops

Frequency 1,980

6,805 5,141

Percent 13.80 %

47.43 %

35.83 %

Citations

Frequency

297 1,140

916 Percent

12.52 %

48.06 %

38.62 %

Rate per 100 stops 15.00

16.75 17.82

Warnings

Frequency

1,264 3,943

3,275 Percent

14.60 %

45.55 %

37.84 %

Rate per 100 stops 63.84

57.94 63.70

Clean

Frequency 419

1,722 950

Percent 12.62 %

51.88 %

28.62 %

Rate per 100 stops

21.16 25.30

18.48 Searches (All)

Frequency

2 5

1 Percent

22.22 %

55.56 %

11.11 %

Rate per 100 stops 0.10

0.07 0.02

Discretionary Searches

Frequency

1 5

1 Percent

12.50 %

62.50 %

12.50 %

Rate per 100 stops 0.05

0.07 0.02

Non-D

iscretionary Searches

Frequency 1

0 0

Percent 100.00 %

0.00 %

0.00 %

Rate per 100 stops

0.05 0.00

0.00 Contraband H

its

Frequency 0

2 0

Percent 0.00 %

100.00 %

0.00 %

Rate per 100 searches

0.00 40.00

0.00 Race Know

n

Frequency 1

4 2

Percent 14.29 %

57.14 %

28.57 %

Rate per 100 stops

0.05 0.06

0.04

DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC SAFETY APPENDIX B – REGION 1:DALLAS – DISTRICT LEVEL ANALYSIS

Page 79: 2016-2017 - Texas Department of Public Safety · collected by the Texas Department of Public Safety (TX DPS). According to the Texas Code of Criminal Procedure, “racial profiling

76

Comm

ercial Vehicle Enforcement - 2016

District 1C 2016

Asian Alaska

Native/Am

erican Indian

Middle Eastern

Other

Unknow

n

Stops

Frequency 119

4 148

5 145

Percent 0.83 %

0.03 %

1.03 %

0.03 %

1.01 %

Citations

Frequency

11 0

8 0

0 Percent

0.46 %

0.00 %

0.34 %

0.00 %

0.00 %

Rate per 100 stops 9.24

0.00 5.41

0.00 0.00

Warnings

Frequency

67 1

90 4

12 Percent

0.77 %

0.01 %

1.04 %

0.05 %

0.14 %

Rate per 100 stops 56.30

25.00 60.81

80.00 8.28

Clean

Frequency 41

3 50

1 133

Percent 1.24 %

0.09 %

1.51 %

0.03 %

4.01 %

Rate per 100 stops

34.45 75.00

33.78 20.00

91.72 Searches (All)

Frequency

1 0

0 0

0 Percent

11.11 %

0.00 %

0.00 %

0.00 %

0.00 %

Rate per 100 stops 0.84

0.00 0.00

0.00 0.00

Discretionary Searches

Frequency

1 0

0 0

0 Percent

12.50 %

0.00 %

0.00 %

0.00 %

0.00 %

Rate per 100 stops 0.84

0.00 0.00

0.00 0.00

Non-D

iscretionary Searches

Frequency 0

0 0

0 0

Percent 0.00 %

0.00 %

0.00 %

0.00 %

0.00 %

Rate per 100 stops

0.00 0.00

0.00 0.00

0.00 Contraband H

its

Frequency 0

0 0

0 0

Percent 0.00 %

0.00 %

0.00 %

0.00 %

0.00 %

Rate per 100 searches

0.00 ---

--- ---

--- Race Know

n

Frequency 0

0 0

0 0

Percent 0.00 %

0.00 %

0.00 %

0.00 %

0.00 %

Rate per 100 stops

0.00 0.00

0.00 0.00

0.00

DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC SAFETY APPENDIX B – REGION 1:DALLAS – DISTRICT LEVEL ANALYSIS

Page 80: 2016-2017 - Texas Department of Public Safety · collected by the Texas Department of Public Safety (TX DPS). According to the Texas Code of Criminal Procedure, “racial profiling

77

Falls

Bexar

GonzalesC

omal

FayetteK

err

Guadalupe

Blanco

Coryell M

cLennan

Atascosa

Bastrop

DeW

itt

Frio

JacksonK

arnes

Limestone

Medina

Freestone

Bell

Calhoun

Ham

ilton

Kendall

Lavaca

McMullen

San Saba

Travis

Victoria

William

son

Bandera

Bosque

Burnet

Caldw

ell

Gillespie

Goliad

Hays

Hill

Lampasas

Lee

LlanoM

ilam

Mills

Wilson

Potter

Sw

isher

Terry

Randall

Hall

Cochran

Haskell

Armstrong

King

RobertsStonewallYoung

Lipscomb

Fisher

Archer

Bailey

Cottle

Crosby

Deaf S

mith

Donley

Kent

Sherman

Stephens

Baylor

Hockley

Jack

Ochiltree

Oldham

Com

anche

Callahan

Foard

Hartley

Lamb

Mitchell

Moore

Yoakum

Briscoe

Hale

Scurry

Gray

Brow

n

Carson

Castro

Childress

Clay

Collingsw

orth

Coleman

Dallam

Dickens

Eastland

Floyd

Garza

Hansford

Hardeman

Hemphill

Hutchinson

Jones

Knox

Lubbock

Lynn

Montague

Motley

TaylorN

olan

Parm

er

Runnels

Shackelford

Wheeler

Wichita

Wilbarger

El

Paso

Schleicher

Presidio

Kim

ble

Martin

Terrell

Crane

Winkler

Daw

son

Andrew

s

Upton

Hudspeth

Mason

Borden

Coke

Gaines

Irion

Brew

ster

Menard

TomG

reen

How

ard

ReaganC

oncho

Crockett

Culberson

Ector

Glasscock

Jeff Davis

Sterling

Loving

McC

ulloch

Midland

Pecos

Reeves

Sutton

Ward

3D3A

US

281

Zavala

Starr

WebbZapata

Hidalgo

Duval

Bee

Jim Wells

MaverickA

ransas

Dim

mit

Edw

ards

JimH

oggK

enedy

Kinney

Kleberg

LiveO

ak

Nueces

Real

Refugio

San Patricio

Willacy

Brooks

Cam

eron

LaSalle

Uvalde

Val Verde

Newton

Trinity

Houston

Nacogdoches

Cham

bers

Waller

Orange

Montgom

ery

Polk

SanAugustine

Tyler

Angelina

Brazoria

Brazos

Liberty

WalkerH

arris

Leon

Austin

Burleson

Fort Bend

Galveston

Grimes

Jasper

Jefferson

Madison

Matagorda

Robertson

Sabine

Shelby

Washington

Colorado

Hardin

San

Jacinto

Wharton

Bow

ie

Cherokee

Harrison

Franklin

Cam

pH

opkins

Upshur

Collin

Morris

Anderson

Parker

Rains

Cooke

Dallas

Gregg

Johnson

Lamar

Marion

RedR

iver

Rockw

allD

entonC

ass

Delta

Erath

Ellis

FanninG

rayson

Henderson

Hood

Hunt

Kaufman

Navarro

Palo

Pinto

Panola

Rusk

Sm

ith

Som

ervell

Tarrant

Titus

VanZandt

Wise

Wood

Dallas

Region 11A

- Dallas

1B - Tyler

1C - H

urst1D

- Mt. Pleasant

Houston

Region 22A

- Houston

2B - B

eaumont

2C - C

onroe2D

- Bryan

San Antonio

Region 66A

- Waco

6B - Austin

6C - S

an Antonio

McA

llenR

egion 33A

- McA

llen3B

- Laredo3C

- Corpus C

hristi3D

- McA

llen3E

- Del R

io

El PasoR

egion 44A

- Midland

4B - El Paso

LubbockR

egion 5Lubbock - 5AA

marillo - 5B

Abilene - 5C

5 B

C

A

B

E

CDA

B

C

A

BA

BA

B

C

D

A

64

123

C

D

Throckmorton

Page 81: 2016-2017 - Texas Department of Public Safety · collected by the Texas Department of Public Safety (TX DPS). According to the Texas Code of Criminal Procedure, “racial profiling

78

Highway Patrol - 2017

DISTRICT 1D 2017

African American

White

Hispanic

Stops

Frequency 11,799

55,084 7,907

Percent 15.43 %

72.04 %

10.34 %

Citations

Frequency

4,451 15,272

3,760 Percent

18.47 %

63.37 %

15.60 %

Rate per 100 stops 37.72

27.72 47.55

Warnings

Frequency

7,348 39,812

4,147 Percent

14.03 %

76.02 %

7.92 %

Rate per 100 stops 62.28

72.28 52.45

Searches (All)

Frequency 923

1,866 496

Percent 27.73 %

56.05 %

14.90 %

Rate per 100 stops

7.82 3.39

6.27 D

iscretionary Searches

Frequency 151

619 180

Percent 15.63 %

64.08 %

18.63 %

Rate per 100 stops

1.28 1.12

2.28 N

on-Discretionary Searches

Frequency

772 1,247

316 Percent

32.67 %

52.77 %

13.37 %

Rate per 100 stops 6.54

2.26 4.00

Contraband Hits

Frequency

360 640

140 Percent

31.28 %

55.60 %

12.16 %

Rate per 100 searches 39.00

34.30 28.23

Race Known

Frequency

62 352

9 Percent

14.66 %

83.22 %

2.13 %

Rate per 100 stops 0.53

0.64 0.11

DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC SAFETY APPENDIX B – REGION 1:DALLAS – DISTRICT LEVEL ANALYSIS

Page 82: 2016-2017 - Texas Department of Public Safety · collected by the Texas Department of Public Safety (TX DPS). According to the Texas Code of Criminal Procedure, “racial profiling

79

Highway Patrol - 2017

DISTRICT 1D 2017

Asian Alaska

Native/Am

erican Indian

Middle Eastern

Other

Unknow

n

Stops

Frequency 994

87 597

0 0

Percent 1.30 %

0.11 %

0.78 %

0.00 %

0.00 %

Citations

Frequency

343 35

240 0

0 Percent

1.42 %

0.15 %

1.00 %

0.00 %

0.00 %

Rate per 100 stops 34.51

40.23 40.20

--- ---

Warnings

Frequency

651 52

357 0

0 Percent

1.24 %

0.10 %

0.68 %

0.00 %

0.00 %

Rate per 100 stops 65.49

59.77 59.80

--- ---

Searches (All)

Frequency 18

10 16

0 0

Percent 0.54 %

0.30 %

0.48 %

0.00 %

0.00 %

Rate per 100 stops

1.81 11.49

2.68 ---

--- D

iscretionary Searches

Frequency 4

2 10

0 0

Percent 0.41 %

0.21 %

1.04 %

0.00 %

0.00 %

Rate per 100 stops

0.40 2.30

1.68 ---

--- N

on-Discretionary Searches

Frequency

14 8

6 0

0 Percent

0.59 %

0.34 %

0.25 %

0.00 %

0.00 %

Rate per 100 stops 1.41

9.20 1.01

--- ---

Contraband Hits

Frequency

4 4

3 0

0 Percent

0.35 %

0.35 %

0.26 %

0.00 %

0.00 %

Rate per 100 searches 22.22

40.00 18.75

--- ---

Race Known

Frequency

0 0

0 0

0 Percent

0.00 %

0.00 %

0.00 %

0.00 %

0.00 %

Rate per 100 stops 0.00

0.00 0.00

--- ---

DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC SAFETY APPENDIX B – REGION 1:DALLAS – DISTRICT LEVEL ANALYSIS

Page 83: 2016-2017 - Texas Department of Public Safety · collected by the Texas Department of Public Safety (TX DPS). According to the Texas Code of Criminal Procedure, “racial profiling

80

Highway Patrol - 2016

DISTRICT 1D 2016

African American

White

Hispanic

Stops

Frequency 10,217

54,603 7,634

Percent 13.74 %

73.43 %

10.27 %

Citations

Frequency

3,563 13,901

3,532 Percent

16.40 %

64.00 %

16.26 %

Rate per 100 stops 34.87

25.46 46.27

Warnings

Frequency

6,654 40,702

4,102 Percent

12.64 %

77.32 %

7.79 %

Rate per 100 stops 65.13

74.54 53.73

Searches (All)

Frequency 230

485 102

Percent 27.74 %

58.50 %

12.30 %

Rate per 100 stops

2.25 0.89

1.34 D

iscretionary Searches

Frequency 35

142 32

Percent 16.36 %

66.36 %

14.95 %

Rate per 100 stops

0.34 0.26

0.42 N

on-Discretionary Searches

Frequency

195 343

70 Percent

31.71 %

55.77 %

11.38 %

Rate per 100 stops 1.91

0.63 0.92

Contraband Hits

Frequency

134 239

34 Percent

32.45 %

57.87 %

8.23 %

Rate per 100 searches 58.26

49.28 33.33

Race Known

Frequency

91 599

16 Percent

12.85 %

84.60 %

2.26 %

Rate per 100 stops 0.89

1.10 0.21

DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC SAFETY APPENDIX B – REGION 1:DALLAS – DISTRICT LEVEL ANALYSIS

Page 84: 2016-2017 - Texas Department of Public Safety · collected by the Texas Department of Public Safety (TX DPS). According to the Texas Code of Criminal Procedure, “racial profiling

81

Highway Patrol - 2016

DISTRICT 1D 2016

Asian Alaska

Native/Am

erican Indian

Middle Eastern

Other

Unknow

n

Stops

Frequency 930

79 893

0 1

Percent 1.25 %

0.11 %

1.20 %

0.00 %

0.00 %

Citations

Frequency

375 32

316 0

0 Percent

1.73 %

0.15 %

1.45 %

0.00 %

0.00 %

Rate per 100 stops 40.32

40.51 35.39

--- 0.00

Warnings

Frequency

555 47

577 0

1 Percent

1.05 %

0.09 %

1.10 %

0.00 %

0.00 %

Rate per 100 stops 59.68

59.49 64.61

--- 100.00

Searches (All)

Frequency 7

0 5

0 0

Percent 0.84 %

0.00 %

0.60 %

0.00 %

0.00 %

Rate per 100 stops

0.75 0.00

0.56 ---

0.00 D

iscretionary Searches

Frequency 2

0 3

0 0

Percent 0.93 %

0.00 %

1.40 %

0.00 %

0.00 %

Rate per 100 stops

0.22 0.00

0.34 ---

0.00 N

on-Discretionary Searches

Frequency

5 0

2 0

0 Percent

0.81 %

0.00 %

0.33 %

0.00 %

0.00 %

Rate per 100 stops 0.54

0.00 0.22

--- 0.00

Contraband Hits

Frequency

4 0

2 0

0 Percent

0.97 %

0.00 %

0.48 %

0.00 %

0.00 %

Rate per 100 searches 57.14

--- 40.00

--- ---

Race Known

Frequency

1 1

0 0

0 Percent

0.14 %

0.14 %

0.00 %

0.00 %

0.00 %

Rate per 100 stops 0.11

1.27 0.00

--- 0.00

DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC SAFETY APPENDIX B – REGION 1:DALLAS – DISTRICT LEVEL ANALYSIS

Page 85: 2016-2017 - Texas Department of Public Safety · collected by the Texas Department of Public Safety (TX DPS). According to the Texas Code of Criminal Procedure, “racial profiling

82

Comm

ercial Vehicle Enforcement - 2017

District 1D

2017 African Am

erican W

hite H

ispanic Stops

Frequency

822 3,566

842 Percent

15.30 %

66.39 %

15.68 %

Citations

Frequency 102

385 98

Percent 17.17 %

64.81 %

16.50 %

Rate per 100 stops

12.41 10.80

11.64 W

arnings

Frequency 354

1,523 392

Percent 15.30 %

65.85 %

16.95 %

Rate per 100 stops

43.07 42.71

46.56 Clean

Frequency

366 1,658

352 Percent

14.85 %

67.29 %

14.29 %

Rate per 100 stops 44.53

46.49 41.81

Searches (All)

Frequency 3

10 8

Percent 14.29 %

47.62 %

38.10 %

Rate per 100 stops

0.36 0.28

0.95 D

iscretionary Searches

Frequency 0

6 7

Percent 0.00 %

46.15 %

53.85 %

Rate per 100 stops

0.00 0.17

0.83 N

on-Discretionary Searches

Frequency

3 4

1 Percent

37.50 %

50.00 %

12.50 %

Rate per 100 stops 0.36

0.11 0.12

Contraband Hits

Frequency

2 3

2 Percent

28.57 %

42.86 %

28.57 %

Rate per 100 searches 66.67

30.00 25.00

Race Known

Frequency

1 10

0 Percent

9.09 %

90.91 %

0.00 %

Rate per 100 stops 0.12

0.28 0.00

DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC SAFETY APPENDIX B – REGION 1:DALLAS – DISTRICT LEVEL ANALYSIS

Page 86: 2016-2017 - Texas Department of Public Safety · collected by the Texas Department of Public Safety (TX DPS). According to the Texas Code of Criminal Procedure, “racial profiling

83

Comm

ercial Vehicle Enforcement - 2017

District 1D

2017 Asian

Alaska N

ative/American

Indian

Middle Eastern

Other

Unknow

n

Stops

Frequency 33

9 59

0 40

Percent 0.61 %

0.17 %

1.10 %

0.00 %

0.74 %

Citations

Frequency

1 2

6 0

0 Percent

0.17 %

0.34 %

1.01 %

0.00 %

0.00 %

Rate per 100 stops 3.03

22.22 10.17

--- 0.00

Warnings

Frequency

18 3

23 0

0 Percent

0.78 %

0.13 %

0.99 %

0.00 %

0.00 %

Rate per 100 stops 54.55

33.33 38.98

--- 0.00

Clean

Frequency 14

4 30

0 40

Percent 0.57 %

0.16 %

1.22 %

0.00 %

1.62 %

Rate per 100 stops

42.42 44.44

50.85 ---

100.00 Searches (All)

Frequency

0 0

0 0

0 Percent

0.00 %

0.00 %

0.00 %

0.00 %

0.00 %

Rate per 100 stops 0.00

0.00 0.00

--- 0.00

Discretionary Searches

Frequency

0 0

0 0

0 Percent

0.00 %

0.00 %

0.00 %

0.00 %

0.00 %

Rate per 100 stops 0.00

0.00 0.00

--- 0.00

Non-D

iscretionary Searches

Frequency 0

0 0

0 0

Percent 0.00 %

0.00 %

0.00 %

0.00 %

0.00 %

Rate per 100 stops

0.00 0.00

0.00 ---

0.00 Contraband H

its

Frequency 0

0 0

0 0

Percent 0.00 %

0.00 %

0.00 %

0.00 %

0.00 %

Rate per 100 searches

--- ---

--- ---

--- Race Know

n

Frequency 0

0 0

0 0

Percent 0.00 %

0.00 %

0.00 %

0.00 %

0.00 %

Rate per 100 stops

0.00 0.00

0.00 ---

0.00

DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC SAFETY APPENDIX B – REGION 1:DALLAS – DISTRICT LEVEL ANALYSIS

Page 87: 2016-2017 - Texas Department of Public Safety · collected by the Texas Department of Public Safety (TX DPS). According to the Texas Code of Criminal Procedure, “racial profiling

84

Comm

ercial Vehicle Enforcement - 2016

District 1D

2016 African Am

erican W

hite H

ispanic Stops

Frequency

951 3,733

863 Percent

16.67 %

65.42 %

15.12 %

Citations

Frequency 100

334 105

Percent 18.38 %

61.40 %

19.30 %

Rate per 100 stops

10.52 8.95

12.17 W

arnings

Frequency 472

1,685 423

Percent 17.99 %

64.24 %

16.13 %

Rate per 100 stops

49.63 45.14

49.02 Clean

Frequency

379 1,714

335 Percent

14.93 %

67.51 %

13.19 %

Rate per 100 stops 39.85

45.91 38.82

Searches (All)

Frequency 0

8 1

Percent 0.00 %

88.89 %

11.11 %

Rate per 100 stops

0.00 0.21

0.12 D

iscretionary Searches

Frequency 0

1 0

Percent 0.00 %

100.00 %

0.00 %

Rate per 100 stops

0.00 0.03

0.00 N

on-Discretionary Searches

Frequency

0 7

1 Percent

0.00 %

87.50 %

12.50 %

Rate per 100 stops 0.00

0.19 0.12

Contraband Hits

Frequency

0 2

1 Percent

0.00 %

66.67 %

33.33 %

Rate per 100 searches ---

25.00 100.00

Race Known

Frequency

0 4

0 Percent

0.00 %

100.00 %

0.00 %

Rate per 100 stops 0.00

0.11 0.00

DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC SAFETY APPENDIX B – REGION 1:DALLAS – DISTRICT LEVEL ANALYSIS

Page 88: 2016-2017 - Texas Department of Public Safety · collected by the Texas Department of Public Safety (TX DPS). According to the Texas Code of Criminal Procedure, “racial profiling

85

Comm

ercial Vehicle Enforcement - 2016

District 1D

2016 Asian

Alaska N

ative/American

Indian

Middle Eastern

Other

Unknow

n

Stops

Frequency 30

9 61

0 59

Percent 0.53 %

0.16 %

1.07 %

0.00 %

1.03 %

Citations

Frequency

1 1

3 0

0 Percent

0.18 %

0.18 %

0.55 %

0.00 %

0.00 %

Rate per 100 stops 3.33

11.11 4.92

--- 0.00

Warnings

Frequency

15 1

27 0

0 Percent

0.57 %

0.04 %

1.03 %

0.00 %

0.00 %

Rate per 100 stops 50.00

11.11 44.26

--- 0.00

Clean

Frequency 14

7 31

0 59

Percent 0.55 %

0.28 %

1.22 %

0.00 %

2.32 %

Rate per 100 stops

46.67 77.78

50.82 ---

100.00 Searches (All)

Frequency

0 0

0 0

0 Percent

0.00 %

0.00 %

0.00 %

0.00 %

0.00 %

Rate per 100 stops 0.00

0.00 0.00

--- 0.00

Discretionary Searches

Frequency

0 0

0 0

0 Percent

0.00 %

0.00 %

0.00 %

0.00 %

0.00 %

Rate per 100 stops 0.00

0.00 0.00

--- 0.00

Non-D

iscretionary Searches

Frequency 0

0 0

0 0

Percent 0.00 %

0.00 %

0.00 %

0.00 %

0.00 %

Rate per 100 stops

0.00 0.00

0.00 ---

0.00 Contraband H

its

Frequency 0

0 0

0 0

Percent 0.00 %

0.00 %

0.00 %

0.00 %

0.00 %

Rate per 100 searches

--- ---

--- ---

--- Race Know

n

Frequency 0

0 0

0 0

Percent 0.00 %

0.00 %

0.00 %

0.00 %

0.00 %

Rate per 100 stops

0.00 0.00

0.00 ---

0.00

DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC SAFETY APPENDIX B – REGION 1:DALLAS – DISTRICT LEVEL ANALYSIS

Page 89: 2016-2017 - Texas Department of Public Safety · collected by the Texas Department of Public Safety (TX DPS). According to the Texas Code of Criminal Procedure, “racial profiling

86

Appendix C Region 2: Houston Analysis

Page 90: 2016-2017 - Texas Department of Public Safety · collected by the Texas Department of Public Safety (TX DPS). According to the Texas Code of Criminal Procedure, “racial profiling

87

Falls

Bexar

GonzalesC

omal

FayetteK

err

Guadalupe

Blanco

Coryell M

cLennan

Atascosa

Bastrop

DeW

itt

Frio

JacksonK

arnes

Limestone

Medina

Freestone

Bell

Calhoun

Ham

ilton

Kendall

Lavaca

McMullen

San Saba

Travis

Victoria

William

son

Bandera

Bosque

Burnet

Caldw

ell

Gillespie

Goliad

Hays

Hill

Lampasas

Lee

LlanoM

ilam

Mills

Wilson

Potter

Sw

isher

Terry

Randall

Hall

Cochran

Haskell

Armstrong

King

RobertsStonewallYoung

Lipscomb

Fisher

Archer

Bailey

Cottle

Crosby

Deaf S

mith

Donley

Kent

Sherman

Stephens

Baylor

Hockley

Jack

Ochiltree

Oldham

Com

anche

Callahan

Foard

Hartley

Lamb

Mitchell

Moore

Yoakum

Briscoe

Hale

Scurry

Gray

Brow

n

Carson

Castro

Childress

Clay

Collingsw

orth

Coleman

Dallam

Dickens

Eastland

Floyd

Garza

Hansford

Hardeman

Hemphill

Hutchinson

Jones

Knox

Lubbock

Lynn

Montague

Motley

TaylorN

olan

Parm

er

Runnels

Shackelford

Wheeler

Wichita

Wilbarger

El

Paso

Schleicher

Presidio

Kim

ble

Martin

Terrell

Crane

Winkler

Daw

son

Andrew

s

Upton

Hudspeth

Mason

Borden

Coke

Gaines

Irion

Brew

ster

Menard

TomG

reen

How

ard

ReaganC

oncho

Crockett

Culberson

Ector

Glasscock

Jeff Davis

Sterling

Loving

McC

ulloch

Midland

Pecos

Reeves

Sutton

Ward

3D3A

US

281

Zavala

Starr

WebbZapata

Hidalgo

Duval

Bee

Jim Wells

MaverickA

ransas

Dim

mit

Edw

ards

JimH

oggK

enedy

Kinney

Kleberg

LiveO

ak

Nueces

Real

Refugio

San Patricio

Willacy

Brooks

Cam

eron

LaSalle

Uvalde

Val Verde

Newton

Trinity

Houston

Nacogdoches

Cham

bers

Waller

Orange

Montgom

ery

Polk

SanAugustine

Tyler

Angelina

Brazoria

Brazos

Liberty

WalkerH

arris

Leon

Austin

Burleson

Fort Bend

Galveston

Grimes

Jasper

Jefferson

Madison

Matagorda

Robertson

Sabine

Shelby

Washington

Colorado

Hardin

San

Jacinto

Wharton

Bow

ie

Cherokee

Harrison

Franklin

Cam

pH

opkins

Upshur

Collin

Morris

Anderson

Parker

Rains

Cooke

Dallas

Gregg

Johnson

Lamar

Marion

RedR

iver

Rockw

allD

entonC

ass

Delta

Erath

Ellis

FanninG

rayson

Henderson

Hood

Hunt

Kaufman

Navarro

Palo

Pinto

Panola

Rusk

Sm

ith

Som

ervell

Tarrant

Titus

VanZandt

Wise

Wood

Dallas

Region 11A

- Dallas

1B - Tyler

1C - H

urst1D

- Mt. Pleasant

Houston

Region 22A

- Houston

2B - B

eaumont

2C - C

onroe2D

- Bryan

San Antonio

Region 66A

- Waco

6B - Austin

6C - S

an Antonio

McA

llenR

egion 33A

- McA

llen3B

- Laredo3C

- Corpus C

hristi3D

- McA

llen3E

- Del R

io

El PasoR

egion 44A

- Midland

4B - El Paso

LubbockR

egion 5Lubbock - 5AA

marillo - 5B

Abilene - 5C

5 B

C

A

B

E

CDA

B

C

A

BC

A

D

BA

B

C

D

A

64

123

Throckmorton

Page 91: 2016-2017 - Texas Department of Public Safety · collected by the Texas Department of Public Safety (TX DPS). According to the Texas Code of Criminal Procedure, “racial profiling

88

Highway Patrol - 2017

REGIO

N 2 2017

African American

White

Hispanic

Stops

Frequency 93,233

222,653 101,906

Percent 21.43 %

51.18 %

23.42 %

Citations

Frequency

39,764 69,128

53,869 Percent

23.51 %

40.88 %

31.86 %

Rate per 100 stops 42.65

31.05 52.86

Warnings

Frequency

53,469 153,525

48,037 Percent

20.11 %

57.73 %

18.06 %

Rate per 100 stops 57.35

68.95 47.14

Searches (All)

Frequency 7,428

8,880 6,012

Percent 32.77 %

39.18 %

26.52 %

Rate per 100 stops

7.97 3.99

5.90 D

iscretionary Searches

Frequency 1,416

2,556 1,445

Percent 25.60 %

46.21 %

26.13 %

Rate per 100 stops

1.52 1.15

1.42 N

on-Discretionary Searches

Frequency

6,012 6,324

4,567 Percent

35.09 %

36.91 %

26.65 %

Rate per 100 stops 6.45

2.84 4.48

Contraband Hits

Frequency

2,801 3,521

2,149 Percent

32.57 %

40.94 %

24.99 %

Rate per 100 searches 37.71

39.65 35.75

Race Known

Frequency

364 1,294

434 Percent

17.13 %

60.89 %

20.42 %

Rate per 100 stops 0.39

0.58 0.43

DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC SAFETY APPENDIX C – REGION 2:HOUSTON ANALYSIS

Page 92: 2016-2017 - Texas Department of Public Safety · collected by the Texas Department of Public Safety (TX DPS). According to the Texas Code of Criminal Procedure, “racial profiling

89

Highway Patrol - 2017

REGIO

N 2 2017

Asian Alaska

Native/Am

erican Indian

Middle Eastern

Other

Unknow

n

Stops

Frequency 11,782

494 4,964

0 0

Percent 2.71 %

0.11 %

1.14 %

0.00 %

0.00 %

Citations

Frequency

4,144 175

2,023 0

0 Percent

2.45 %

0.10 %

1.20 %

0.00 %

0.00 %

Rate per 100 stops 35.17

35.43 40.75

--- ---

Warnings

Frequency

7,638 319

2,941 0

0 Percent

2.87 %

0.12 %

1.11 %

0.00 %

0.00 %

Rate per 100 stops 64.83

64.57 59.25

--- ---

Searches (All)

Frequency 226

18 102

0 0

Percent 1.00 %

0.08 %

0.45 %

0.00 %

0.00 %

Rate per 100 stops

1.92 3.64

2.05 ---

--- D

iscretionary Searches

Frequency 73

6 35

0 0

Percent 1.32 %

0.11 %

0.63 %

0.00 %

0.00 %

Rate per 100 stops

0.62 1.21

0.71 ---

--- N

on-Discretionary Searches

Frequency

153 12

67 0

0 Percent

0.89 %

0.07 %

0.39 %

0.00 %

0.00 %

Rate per 100 stops 1.30

2.43 1.35

--- ---

Contraband Hits

Frequency

89 5

35 0

0 Percent

1.03 %

0.06 %

0.41 %

0.00 %

0.00 %

Rate per 100 searches 39.38

27.78 34.31

--- ---

Race Known

Frequency

26 1

6 0

0 Percent

1.22 %

0.05 %

0.28 %

0.00 %

0.00 %

Rate per 100 stops 0.22

0.20 0.12

--- ---

DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC SAFETY APPENDIX C – REGION 2:HOUSTON ANALYSIS

Page 93: 2016-2017 - Texas Department of Public Safety · collected by the Texas Department of Public Safety (TX DPS). According to the Texas Code of Criminal Procedure, “racial profiling

90

Highway Patrol - 2016

REGIO

N 2 2016

African American

White

Hispanic

Stops

Frequency 69,449

195,278 80,264

Percent 19.28 %

54.21 %

22.28 %

Citations

Frequency

29,583 64,199

44,204 Percent

20.57 %

44.63 %

30.73 %

Rate per 100 stops 42.60

32.88 55.07

Warnings

Frequency

39,866 131,079

36,060 Percent

18.42 %

60.58 %

16.67 %

Rate per 100 stops 57.40

67.12 44.93

Searches (All)

Frequency 1,936

3,107 1,672

Percent 28.44 %

45.64 %

24.56 %

Rate per 100 stops

2.79 1.59

2.08 D

iscretionary Searches

Frequency 389

849 374

Percent 23.71 %

51.74 %

22.79 %

Rate per 100 stops

0.56 0.43

0.47 N

on-Discretionary Searches

Frequency

1,547 2,258

1,298 Percent

29.95 %

43.71 %

25.13 %

Rate per 100 stops 2.23

1.16 1.62

Contraband Hits

Frequency

1,014 1,835

956 Percent

26.30 %

47.60 %

24.80 %

Rate per 100 searches 52.38

59.06 57.18

Race Known

Frequency

162 702

232 Percent

14.52 %

62.90 %

20.79 %

Rate per 100 stops 0.23

0.36 0.29

DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC SAFETY APPENDIX C – REGION 2:HOUSTON ANALYSIS

Page 94: 2016-2017 - Texas Department of Public Safety · collected by the Texas Department of Public Safety (TX DPS). According to the Texas Code of Criminal Procedure, “racial profiling

91

Highway Patrol - 2016

REGIO

N 2 2016

Asian Alaska

Native/Am

erican Indian

Middle Eastern

Other

Unknow

n

Stops

Frequency 8,728

329 6,166

0 5

Percent 2.42 %

0.09 %

1.71 %

0.00 %

0.00 %

Citations

Frequency

3,230 121

2,508 0

0 Percent

2.25 %

0.08 %

1.74 %

0.00 %

0.00 %

Rate per 100 stops 37.01

36.78 40.67

--- 0.00

Warnings

Frequency

5,498 208

3,658 0

5 Percent

2.54 %

0.10 %

1.69 %

0.00 %

0.00 %

Rate per 100 stops 62.99

63.22 59.33

--- 100.00

Searches (All)

Frequency 53

3 36

0 0

Percent 0.78 %

0.04 %

0.53 %

0.00 %

0.00 %

Rate per 100 stops

0.61 0.91

0.58 ---

0.00 D

iscretionary Searches

Frequency 15

2 12

0 0

Percent 0.91 %

0.12 %

0.73 %

0.00 %

0.00 %

Rate per 100 stops

0.17 0.61

0.19 ---

0.00 N

on-Discretionary Searches

Frequency

38 1

24 0

0 Percent

0.74 %

0.02 %

0.46 %

0.00 %

0.00 %

Rate per 100 stops 0.44

0.30 0.39

--- 0.00

Contraband Hits

Frequency

29 1

20 0

0 Percent

0.75 %

0.03 %

0.52 %

0.00 %

0.00 %

Rate per 100 searches 54.72

33.33 55.56

--- ---

Race Known

Frequency

11 1

8 0

0 Percent

0.99 %

0.09 %

0.72 %

0.00 %

0.00 %

Rate per 100 stops 0.13

0.30 0.13

--- 0.00

DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC SAFETY APPENDIX C – REGION 2:HOUSTON ANALYSIS

Page 95: 2016-2017 - Texas Department of Public Safety · collected by the Texas Department of Public Safety (TX DPS). According to the Texas Code of Criminal Procedure, “racial profiling

92

Comm

ercial Vehicle Enforcement - 2017

Region 2 2017 African Am

erican W

hite H

ispanic Stops

Frequency

5,713 8,618

9,526 Percent

23.50 %

35.44 %

39.18 %

Citations

Frequency 1,780

2,327 2,672

Percent 26.03 %

34.03 %

39.08 %

Rate per 100 stops

31.16 27.00

28.05 W

arnings

Frequency 2,638

3,928 4,651

Percent 23.21 %

34.56 %

40.92 %

Rate per 100 stops

46.18 45.58

48.82 Clean

Frequency

1,295 2,363

2,203 Percent

21.19 %

38.67 %

36.05 %

Rate per 100 stops 22.67

27.42 23.13

Searches (All)

Frequency 38

24 109

Percent 22.22 %

14.04 %

63.74 %

Rate per 100 stops

0.67 0.28

1.14 D

iscretionary Searches

Frequency 30

21 103

Percent 19.48 %

13.64 %

66.88 %

Rate per 100 stops

0.53 0.24

1.08 N

on-Discretionary Searches

Frequency

8 3

6 Percent

47.06 %

17.65 %

35.29 %

Rate per 100 stops 0.14

0.03 0.06

Contraband Hits

Frequency

5 2

1 Percent

62.50 %

25.00 %

12.50 %

Rate per 100 searches 13.16

8.33 0.92

Race Known

Frequency

1 1

0 Percent

50.00 %

50.00 %

0.00 %

Rate per 100 stops 0.02

0.01 0.00

DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC SAFETY APPENDIX C – REGION 2:HOUSTON ANALYSIS

Page 96: 2016-2017 - Texas Department of Public Safety · collected by the Texas Department of Public Safety (TX DPS). According to the Texas Code of Criminal Procedure, “racial profiling

93

Comm

ercial Vehicle Enforcement - 2017

Region 2 2017 Asian

Alaska N

ative/American

Indian

Middle Eastern

Other

Unknow

n

Stops

Frequency 133

12 111

0 202

Percent 0.55 %

0.05 %

0.46 %

0.00 %

0.83 %

Citations

Frequency

33 3

23 0

0 Percent

0.48 %

0.04 %

0.34 %

0.00 %

0.00 %

Rate per 100 stops 24.81

25.00 20.72

--- 0.00

Warnings

Frequency

77 5

59 0

8 Percent

0.68 %

0.04 %

0.52 %

0.00 %

0.07 %

Rate per 100 stops 57.89

41.67 53.15

--- 3.96

Clean

Frequency 23

4 29

0 194

Percent 0.38 %

0.07 %

0.47 %

0.00 %

3.17 %

Rate per 100 stops

17.29 33.33

26.13 ---

96.04 Searches (All)

Frequency

0 0

0 0

0 Percent

0.00 %

0.00 %

0.00 %

0.00 %

0.00 %

Rate per 100 stops 0.00

0.00 0.00

--- 0.00

Discretionary Searches

Frequency

0 0

0 0

0 Percent

0.00 %

0.00 %

0.00 %

0.00 %

0.00 %

Rate per 100 stops 0.00

0.00 0.00

--- 0.00

Non-D

iscretionary Searches

Frequency 0

0 0

0 0

Percent 0.00 %

0.00 %

0.00 %

0.00 %

0.00 %

Rate per 100 stops

0.00 0.00

0.00 ---

0.00 Contraband H

its

Frequency 0

0 0

0 0

Percent 0.00 %

0.00 %

0.00 %

0.00 %

0.00 %

Rate per 100 searches

--- ---

--- ---

--- Race Know

n

Frequency 0

0 0

0 0

Percent 0.00 %

0.00 %

0.00 %

0.00 %

0.00 %

Rate per 100 stops

0.00 0.00

0.00 ---

0.00

DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC SAFETY APPENDIX C – REGION 2:HOUSTON ANALYSIS

Page 97: 2016-2017 - Texas Department of Public Safety · collected by the Texas Department of Public Safety (TX DPS). According to the Texas Code of Criminal Procedure, “racial profiling

94

Comm

ercial Vehicle Enforcement - 2016

Region 2 2016 African Am

erican W

hite H

ispanic Stops

Frequency

6,066 9,534

10,401 Percent

22.88 %

35.96 %

39.23 %

Citations

Frequency 1,678

2,433 2,812

Percent 24.05 %

34.88 %

40.31 %

Rate per 100 stops

27.66 25.52

27.04 W

arnings

Frequency 2,918

4,347 5,106

Percent 23.28 %

34.68 %

40.74 %

Rate per 100 stops

48.10 45.59

49.09 Clean

Frequency

1,470 2,754

2,483 Percent

21.00 %

39.34 %

35.47 %

Rate per 100 stops 24.23

28.89 23.87

Searches (All)

Frequency 6

7 16

Percent 20.69 %

24.14 %

55.17 %

Rate per 100 stops

0.10 0.07

0.15 D

iscretionary Searches

Frequency 3

3 15

Percent 14.29 %

14.29 %

71.43 %

Rate per 100 stops

0.05 0.03

0.14 N

on-Discretionary Searches

Frequency

3 4

1 Percent

37.50 %

50.00 %

12.50 %

Rate per 100 stops 0.05

0.04 0.01

Contraband Hits

Frequency

5 2

2 Percent

55.56 %

22.22 %

22.22 %

Rate per 100 searches 83.33

28.57 12.50

Race Known

Frequency

2 3

1 Percent

33.33 %

50.00 %

16.67 %

Rate per 100 stops 0.03

0.03 0.01

DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC SAFETY APPENDIX C – REGION 2:HOUSTON ANALYSIS

Page 98: 2016-2017 - Texas Department of Public Safety · collected by the Texas Department of Public Safety (TX DPS). According to the Texas Code of Criminal Procedure, “racial profiling

95

Comm

ercial Vehicle Enforcement - 2016

Region 2 2016 Asian

Alaska N

ative/American

Indian

Middle Eastern

Other

Unknow

n

Stops

Frequency 132

7 156

0 214

Percent 0.50 %

0.03 %

0.59 %

0.00 %

0.81 %

Citations

Frequency

21 2

30 0

0 Percent

0.30 %

0.03 %

0.43 %

0.00 %

0.00 %

Rate per 100 stops 15.91

28.57 19.23

--- 0.00

Warnings

Frequency

74 3

74 0

12 Percent

0.59 %

0.02 %

0.59 %

0.00 %

0.10 %

Rate per 100 stops 56.06

42.86 47.44

--- 5.61

Clean

Frequency 37

2 52

0 202

Percent 0.53 %

0.03 %

0.74 %

0.00 %

2.89 %

Rate per 100 stops

28.03 28.57

33.33 ---

94.39 Searches (All)

Frequency

0 0

0 0

0 Percent

0.00 %

0.00 %

0.00 %

0.00 %

0.00 %

Rate per 100 stops 0.00

0.00 0.00

--- 0.00

Discretionary Searches

Frequency

0 0

0 0

0 Percent

0.00 %

0.00 %

0.00 %

0.00 %

0.00 %

Rate per 100 stops 0.00

0.00 0.00

--- 0.00

Non-D

iscretionary Searches

Frequency 0

0 0

0 0

Percent 0.00 %

0.00 %

0.00 %

0.00 %

0.00 %

Rate per 100 stops

0.00 0.00

0.00 ---

0.00 Contraband H

its

Frequency 0

0 0

0 0

Percent 0.00 %

0.00 %

0.00 %

0.00 %

0.00 %

Rate per 100 searches

--- ---

--- ---

--- Race Know

n

Frequency 0

0 0

0 0

Percent 0.00 %

0.00 %

0.00 %

0.00 %

0.00 %

Rate per 100 stops

0.00 0.00

0.00 ---

0.00

DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC SAFETY APPENDIX C – REGION 2:HOUSTON ANALYSIS

Page 99: 2016-2017 - Texas Department of Public Safety · collected by the Texas Department of Public Safety (TX DPS). According to the Texas Code of Criminal Procedure, “racial profiling

96

Appendix D Region 2: Houston

District Level Analysis

Page 100: 2016-2017 - Texas Department of Public Safety · collected by the Texas Department of Public Safety (TX DPS). According to the Texas Code of Criminal Procedure, “racial profiling

97

Falls

Bexar

GonzalesC

omal

FayetteK

err

Guadalupe

Blanco

Coryell M

cLennan

Atascosa

Bastrop

DeW

itt

Frio

JacksonK

arnes

Limestone

Medina

Freestone

Bell

Calhoun

Ham

ilton

Kendall

Lavaca

McMullen

San Saba

Travis

Victoria

William

son

Bandera

Bosque

Burnet

Caldw

ell

Gillespie

Goliad

Hays

Hill

Lampasas

Lee

LlanoM

ilam

Mills

Wilson

Potter

Sw

isher

Terry

Randall

Hall

Cochran

Haskell

Armstrong

King

RobertsStonewallYoung

Lipscomb

Fisher

Archer

Bailey

Cottle

Crosby

Deaf S

mith

Donley

Kent

Sherman

Stephens

Baylor

Hockley

Jack

Ochiltree

Oldham

Com

anche

Callahan

Foard

Hartley

Lamb

Mitchell

Moore

Yoakum

Briscoe

Hale

Scurry

Gray

Brow

n

Carson

Castro

Childress

Clay

Collingsw

orth

Coleman

Dallam

Dickens

Eastland

Floyd

Garza

Hansford

Hardeman

Hemphill

Hutchinson

Jones

Knox

Lubbock

Lynn

Montague

Motley

TaylorN

olan

Parm

er

Runnels

Shackelford

Wheeler

Wichita

Wilbarger

El

Paso

Schleicher

Presidio

Kim

ble

Martin

Terrell

Crane

Winkler

Daw

son

Andrew

s

Upton

Hudspeth

Mason

Borden

Coke

Gaines

Irion

Brew

ster

Menard

TomG

reen

How

ard

ReaganC

oncho

Crockett

Culberson

Ector

Glasscock

Jeff Davis

Sterling

Loving

McC

ulloch

Midland

Pecos

Reeves

Sutton

Ward

3D3A

US

281

Zavala

Starr

WebbZapata

Hidalgo

Duval

Bee

Jim Wells

MaverickA

ransas

Dim

mit

Edw

ards

JimH

oggK

enedy

Kinney

Kleberg

LiveO

ak

Nueces

Real

Refugio

San Patricio

Willacy

Brooks

Cam

eron

LaSalle

Uvalde

Val Verde

Newton

Trinity

Houston

Nacogdoches

Cham

bers

Waller

Orange

Montgom

ery

Polk

SanAugustine

Tyler

Angelina

Brazoria

Brazos

Liberty

WalkerH

arris

Leon

Austin

Burleson

Fort Bend

Galveston

Grimes

Jasper

Jefferson

Madison

Matagorda

Robertson

Sabine

Shelby

Washington

Colorado

Hardin

San

Jacinto

Wharton

Bow

ie

Cherokee

Harrison

Franklin

Cam

pH

opkins

Upshur

Collin

Morris

Anderson

Parker

Rains

Cooke

Dallas

Gregg

Johnson

Lamar

Marion

RedR

iver

Rockw

allD

entonC

ass

Delta

Erath

Ellis

FanninG

rayson

Henderson

Hood

Hunt

Kaufman

Navarro

Palo

Pinto

Panola

Rusk

Sm

ith

Som

ervell

Tarrant

Titus

VanZandt

Wise

Wood

Dallas

Region 11A

- Dallas

1B - Tyler

1C - H

urst1D

- Mt. Pleasant

Houston

Region 22A

- Houston

2B - B

eaumont

2C - C

onroe2D

- Bryan

San Antonio

Region 66A

- Waco

6B - Austin

6C - S

an Antonio

McA

llenR

egion 33A

- McA

llen3B

- Laredo3C

- Corpus C

hristi3D

- McA

llen3E

- Del R

io

El PasoR

egion 44A

- Midland

4B - El Paso

LubbockR

egion 5Lubbock - 5AA

marillo - 5B

Abilene - 5C

5 B

C

A

B

E

CDA

B

C

A

BC

A

D

BA

B

C

D

A

64

123

Throckmorton

Page 101: 2016-2017 - Texas Department of Public Safety · collected by the Texas Department of Public Safety (TX DPS). According to the Texas Code of Criminal Procedure, “racial profiling

98

Highway Patrol - 2017

DISTRICT 2A 2017

African American

White

Hispanic

Stops

Frequency 41,993

49,980 48,115

Percent 28.62 %

34.06 %

32.79 %

Citations

Frequency

20,370 21,610

27,951 Percent

28.08 %

29.79 %

38.53 %

Rate per 100 stops 48.51

43.24 58.09

Warnings

Frequency

21,623 28,370

20,164 Percent

29.14 %

38.23 %

27.17 %

Rate per 100 stops 51.49

56.76 41.91

Searches (All)

Frequency 3,675

2,763 2,700

Percent 39.67 %

29.83 %

29.15 %

Rate per 100 stops

8.75 5.53

5.61 D

iscretionary Searches

Frequency 651

797 501

Percent 32.91 %

40.29 %

25.33 %

Rate per 100 stops

1.55 1.59

1.04 N

on-Discretionary Searches

Frequency

3,024 1,966

2,199 Percent

41.50 %

26.98 %

30.18 %

Rate per 100 stops 7.20

3.93 4.57

Contraband Hits

Frequency

1,318 1,140

947 Percent

38.20 %

33.04 %

27.45 %

Rate per 100 searches 35.86

41.26 35.07

Race Known

Frequency

224 691

322 Percent

17.78 %

54.84 %

25.56 %

Rate per 100 stops 0.53

1.38 0.67

DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC SAFETY APPENDIX D – REGION 2:HOUSTON – DISTRICT LEVEL ANALYSIS

Page 102: 2016-2017 - Texas Department of Public Safety · collected by the Texas Department of Public Safety (TX DPS). According to the Texas Code of Criminal Procedure, “racial profiling

99

Highway Patrol - 2017

DISTRICT 2A 2017

Asian Alaska

Native/Am

erican Indian

Middle Eastern

Other

Unknow

n

Stops

Frequency 4,627

160 1,869

0 0

Percent 3.15 %

0.11 %

1.27 %

0.00 %

0.00 %

Citations

Frequency

1,714 54

837 0

0 Percent

2.36 %

0.07 %

1.15 %

0.00 %

0.00 %

Rate per 100 stops 37.04

33.75 44.78

--- ---

Warnings

Frequency

2,913 106

1,032 0

0 Percent

3.93 %

0.14 %

1.39 %

0.00 %

0.00 %

Rate per 100 stops 62.96

66.25 55.22

--- ---

Searches (All)

Frequency 77

7 42

0 0

Percent 0.83 %

0.08 %

0.45 %

0.00 %

0.00 %

Rate per 100 stops

1.66 4.38

2.25 ---

--- D

iscretionary Searches

Frequency 19

2 8

0 0

Percent 0.96 %

0.10 %

0.40 %

0.00 %

0.00 %

Rate per 100 stops

0.41 1.25

0.43 ---

--- N

on-Discretionary Searches

Frequency

58 5

34 0

0 Percent

0.80 %

0.07 %

0.47 %

0.00 %

0.00 %

Rate per 100 stops 1.25

3.13 1.82

--- ---

Contraband Hits

Frequency

33 0

12 0

0 Percent

0.96 %

0.00 %

0.35 %

0.00 %

0.00 %

Rate per 100 searches 42.86

0.00 28.57

--- ---

Race Known

Frequency

19 1

3 0

0 Percent

1.51 %

0.08 %

0.24 %

0.00 %

0.00 %

Rate per 100 stops 0.41

0.63 0.16

--- ---

DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC SAFETY APPENDIX D – REGION 2:HOUSTON – DISTRICT LEVEL ANALYSIS

Page 103: 2016-2017 - Texas Department of Public Safety · collected by the Texas Department of Public Safety (TX DPS). According to the Texas Code of Criminal Procedure, “racial profiling

100

Highway Patrol - 2016

DISTRICT 2A 2016

African American

White

Hispanic

Stops

Frequency 24,888

42,131 31,577

Percent 23.92 %

40.49 %

30.35 %

Citations

Frequency

12,503 19,134

19,804 Percent

23.25 %

35.59 %

36.83 %

Rate per 100 stops 50.24

45.42 62.72

Warnings

Frequency

12,385 22,997

11,773 Percent

24.63 %

45.74 %

23.42 %

Rate per 100 stops 49.76

54.58 37.28

Searches (All)

Frequency 740

925 682

Percent 31.18 %

38.98 %

28.74 %

Rate per 100 stops

2.97 2.20

2.16 D

iscretionary Searches

Frequency 133

201 114

Percent 29.36 %

44.37 %

25.17 %

Rate per 100 stops

0.53 0.48

0.36 N

on-Discretionary Searches

Frequency

607 724

568 Percent

31.61 %

37.71 %

29.58 %

Rate per 100 stops 2.44

1.72 1.80

Contraband Hits

Frequency

379 575

393 Percent

27.83 %

42.22 %

28.85 %

Rate per 100 searches 51.22

62.16 57.62

Race Known

Frequency

88 183

135 Percent

21.31 %

44.31 %

32.69 %

Rate per 100 stops 0.35

0.43 0.43

DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC SAFETY APPENDIX D – REGION 2:HOUSTON – DISTRICT LEVEL ANALYSIS

Page 104: 2016-2017 - Texas Department of Public Safety · collected by the Texas Department of Public Safety (TX DPS). According to the Texas Code of Criminal Procedure, “racial profiling

101

Highway Patrol - 2016

DISTRICT 2A 2016

Asian Alaska

Native/Am

erican Indian

Middle Eastern

Other

Unknow

n

Stops

Frequency 3,337

84 2,024

0 2

Percent 3.21 %

0.08 %

1.95 %

0.00 %

0.00 %

Citations

Frequency

1,316 49

962 0

0 Percent

2.45 %

0.09 %

1.79 %

0.00 %

0.00 %

Rate per 100 stops 39.44

58.33 47.53

--- 0.00

Warnings

Frequency

2,021 35

1,062 0

2 Percent

4.02 %

0.07 %

2.11 %

0.00 %

0.00 %

Rate per 100 stops 60.56

41.67 52.47

--- 100.00

Searches (All)

Frequency 12

2 12

0 0

Percent 0.51 %

0.08 %

0.51 %

0.00 %

0.00 %

Rate per 100 stops

0.36 2.38

0.59 ---

0.00 D

iscretionary Searches

Frequency 1

1 3

0 0

Percent 0.22 %

0.22 %

0.66 %

0.00 %

0.00 %

Rate per 100 stops

0.03 1.19

0.15 ---

0.00 N

on-Discretionary Searches

Frequency

11 1

9 0

0 Percent

0.57 %

0.05 %

0.47 %

0.00 %

0.00 %

Rate per 100 stops 0.33

1.19 0.44

--- 0.00

Contraband Hits

Frequency

7 1

7 0

0 Percent

0.51 %

0.07 %

0.51 %

0.00 %

0.00 %

Rate per 100 searches 58.33

50.00 58.33

--- ---

Race Known

Frequency

5 1

1 0

0 Percent

1.21 %

0.24 %

0.24 %

0.00 %

0.00 %

Rate per 100 stops 0.15

1.19 0.05

--- 0.00

DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC SAFETY APPENDIX D – REGION 2:HOUSTON – DISTRICT LEVEL ANALYSIS

Page 105: 2016-2017 - Texas Department of Public Safety · collected by the Texas Department of Public Safety (TX DPS). According to the Texas Code of Criminal Procedure, “racial profiling

102

Comm

ercial Vehicle Enforcement - 2017

District 2A 2017

African American

White

Hispanic

Stops

Frequency 1,638

1,609 3,939

Percent 22.05 %

21.66 %

53.01 %

Citations

Frequency

440 349

1,066 Percent

23.48 %

18.62 %

56.88 %

Rate per 100 stops 26.86

21.69 27.06

Warnings

Frequency

721 658

1,894 Percent

21.70 %

19.81 %

57.01 %

Rate per 100 stops 44.02

40.89 48.08

Clean

Frequency 477

602 979

Percent 21.35 %

26.95 %

43.82 %

Rate per 100 stops

29.12 37.41

24.85 Searches (All)

Frequency

4 1

7 Percent

33.33 %

8.33 %

58.33 %

Rate per 100 stops 0.24

0.06 0.18

Discretionary Searches

Frequency

2 1

4 Percent

28.57 %

14.29 %

57.14 %

Rate per 100 stops 0.12

0.06 0.10

Non-D

iscretionary Searches

Frequency 2

0 3

Percent 40.00 %

0.00 %

60.00 %

Rate per 100 stops

0.12 0.00

0.08 Contraband H

its

Frequency 0

0 1

Percent 0.00 %

0.00 %

100.00 %

Rate per 100 searches

0.00 0.00

14.29 Race Know

n

Frequency 0

1 0

Percent 0.00 %

100.00 %

0.00 %

Rate per 100 stops

0.00 0.06

0.00

DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC SAFETY APPENDIX D – REGION 2:HOUSTON – DISTRICT LEVEL ANALYSIS

Page 106: 2016-2017 - Texas Department of Public Safety · collected by the Texas Department of Public Safety (TX DPS). According to the Texas Code of Criminal Procedure, “racial profiling

103

Comm

ercial Vehicle Enforcement - 2017

District 2A 2017

Asian Alaska

Native/Am

erican Indian

Middle Eastern

Other

Unknow

n

Stops

Frequency 48

6 35

0 155

Percent 0.65 %

0.08 %

0.47 %

0.00 %

2.09 %

Citations

Frequency

13 2

4 0

0 Percent

0.69 %

0.11 %

0.21 %

0.00 %

0.00 %

Rate per 100 stops 27.08

33.33 11.43

--- 0.00

Warnings

Frequency

28 2

19 0

0 Percent

0.84 %

0.06 %

0.57 %

0.00 %

0.00 %

Rate per 100 stops 58.33

33.33 54.29

--- 0.00

Clean

Frequency 7

2 12

0 155

Percent 0.31 %

0.09 %

0.54 %

0.00 %

6.94 %

Rate per 100 stops

14.58 33.33

34.29 ---

100.00 Searches (All)

Frequency

0 0

0 0

0 Percent

0.00 %

0.00 %

0.00 %

0.00 %

0.00 %

Rate per 100 stops 0.00

0.00 0.00

--- 0.00

Discretionary Searches

Frequency

0 0

0 0

0 Percent

0.00 %

0.00 %

0.00 %

0.00 %

0.00 %

Rate per 100 stops 0.00

0.00 0.00

--- 0.00

Non-D

iscretionary Searches

Frequency 0

0 0

0 0

Percent 0.00 %

0.00 %

0.00 %

0.00 %

0.00 %

Rate per 100 stops

0.00 0.00

0.00 ---

0.00 Contraband H

its

Frequency 0

0 0

0 0

Percent 0.00 %

0.00 %

0.00 %

0.00 %

0.00 %

Rate per 100 searches

--- ---

--- ---

--- Race Know

n

Frequency 0

0 0

0 0

Percent 0.00 %

0.00 %

0.00 %

0.00 %

0.00 %

Rate per 100 stops

0.00 0.00

0.00 ---

0.00

DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC SAFETY APPENDIX D – REGION 2:HOUSTON – DISTRICT LEVEL ANALYSIS

Page 107: 2016-2017 - Texas Department of Public Safety · collected by the Texas Department of Public Safety (TX DPS). According to the Texas Code of Criminal Procedure, “racial profiling

104

Comm

ercial Vehicle Enforcement - 2016

District 2A 2016

African American

White

Hispanic

Stops

Frequency 1,786

1,832 4,452

Percent 21.51 %

22.06 %

53.62 %

Citations

Frequency

462 429

1,253 Percent

21.31 %

19.79 %

57.80 %

Rate per 100 stops 25.87

23.42 28.14

Warnings

Frequency

823 766

2,187 Percent

21.50 %

20.01 %

57.13 %

Rate per 100 stops 46.08

41.81 49.12

Clean

Frequency 501

637 1,012

Percent 21.72 %

27.61 %

43.87 %

Rate per 100 stops

28.05 34.77

22.73 Searches (All)

Frequency

0 0

3 Percent

0.00 %

0.00 %

100.00 %

Rate per 100 stops 0.00

0.00 0.07

Discretionary Searches

Frequency

0 0

2 Percent

0.00 %

0.00 %

100.00 %

Rate per 100 stops 0.00

0.00 0.04

Non-D

iscretionary Searches

Frequency 0

0 1

Percent 0.00 %

0.00 %

100.00 %

Rate per 100 stops

0.00 0.00

0.02 Contraband H

its

Frequency 0

0 1

Percent 0.00 %

0.00 %

100.00 %

Rate per 100 searches

--- ---

33.33 Race Know

n

Frequency 0

0 1

Percent 0.00 %

0.00 %

100.00 %

Rate per 100 stops

0.00 0.00

0.02

DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC SAFETY APPENDIX D – REGION 2:HOUSTON – DISTRICT LEVEL ANALYSIS

Page 108: 2016-2017 - Texas Department of Public Safety · collected by the Texas Department of Public Safety (TX DPS). According to the Texas Code of Criminal Procedure, “racial profiling

105

Comm

ercial Vehicle Enforcement - 2016

District 2A 2016

Asian Alaska

Native/Am

erican Indian

Middle Eastern

Other

Unknow

n

Stops

Frequency 45

3 40

0 145

Percent 0.54 %

0.04 %

0.48 %

0.00 %

1.75 %

Citations

Frequency

11 1

12 0

0 Percent

0.51 %

0.05 %

0.55 %

0.00 %

0.00 %

Rate per 100 stops 24.44

33.33 30.00

--- 0.00

Warnings

Frequency

25 1

20 0

6 Percent

0.65 %

0.03 %

0.52 %

0.00 %

0.16 %

Rate per 100 stops 55.56

33.33 50.00

--- 4.14

Clean

Frequency 9

1 8

0 139

Percent 0.39

0.04 0.35

0.00 6.03

Rate per 100 stops 20.00

33.33 20.00

--- 95.86

Searches (All)

Frequency 0

0 0

0 0

Percent 0.00 %

0.00 %

0.00 %

0.00 %

0.000 %

Rate per 100 stops

0.00 0.00

0.00 ---

0.00 D

iscretionary Searches

Frequency 0

0 0

0 0

Percent 0.00 %

0.00 %

0.00 %

0.00 %

0.00 %

Rate per 100 stops

0.00 0.00

0.00 ---

0.00 N

on-Discretionary Searches

Frequency

0 0

0 0

0 Percent

0.00 %

0.00 %

0.00 %

0.00 %

0.00 %

Rate per 100 stops 0.00

0.00 0.00

--- 0.00

Contraband Hits

Frequency

0 0

0 0

0 Percent

0.00 %

0.00 %

0.00 %

0.00 %

0.00 %

Rate per 100 searches ---

--- ---

--- ---

Race Known

Frequency

0 0

0 0

0 Percent

0.00 %

0.00 %

0.00 %

0.00 %

0.00 %

Rate per 100 stops 0.00

0.00 0.00

--- 0.00

DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC SAFETY APPENDIX D – REGION 2:HOUSTON – DISTRICT LEVEL ANALYSIS

Page 109: 2016-2017 - Texas Department of Public Safety · collected by the Texas Department of Public Safety (TX DPS). According to the Texas Code of Criminal Procedure, “racial profiling

106

Falls

Bexar

GonzalesC

omal

FayetteK

err

Guadalupe

Blanco

Coryell M

cLennan

Atascosa

Bastrop

DeW

itt

Frio

JacksonK

arnes

Limestone

Medina

Freestone

Bell

Calhoun

Ham

ilton

Kendall

Lavaca

McMullen

San Saba

Travis

Victoria

William

son

Bandera

Bosque

Burnet

Caldw

ell

Gillespie

Goliad

Hays

Hill

Lampasas

Lee

LlanoM

ilam

Mills

Wilson

Potter

Sw

isher

Terry

Randall

Hall

Cochran

Haskell

Armstrong

King

RobertsStonewallYoung

Lipscomb

Fisher

Throckmorton Archer

Bailey

Cottle

Crosby

Deaf S

mith

Donley

Kent

Sherman

Stephens

Baylor

Hockley

Jack

Ochiltree

Oldham

Com

anche

Callahan

Foard

Hartley

Lamb

Mitchell

Moore

Yoakum

Briscoe

Hale

Scurry

Gray

Brow

n

Carson

Castro

Childress

Clay

Collingsw

orth

Coleman

Dallam

Dickens

Eastland

Floyd

Garza

Hansford

Hardeman

Hemphill

Hutchinson

Jones

Knox

Lubbock

Lynn

Montague

Motley

TaylorN

olan

Parm

er

Runnels

Shackelford

Wheeler

Wichita

Wilbarger

El

Paso

Schleicher

Presidio

Kim

ble

Martin

Terrell

Crane

Winkler

Daw

son

Andrew

s

Upton

Hudspeth

Mason

Borden

Coke

Gaines

Irion

Brew

ster

Menard

TomG

reen

How

ard

ReaganC

oncho

Crockett

Culberson

Ector

Glasscock

Jeff Davis

Sterling

Loving

McC

ulloch

Midland

Pecos

Reeves

Sutton

Ward

3D3A

US

281

Zavala

Starr

WebbZapata

Hidalgo

Duval

Bee

Jim Wells

MaverickA

ransas

Dim

mit

Edw

ards

JimH

oggK

enedy

Kinney

Kleberg

LiveO

ak

Nueces

Real

Refugio

San Patricio

Willacy

Brooks

Cam

eron

LaSalle

Uvalde

Val Verde

Newton

Trinity

Houston

Nacogdoches

Cham

bers

Waller

Orange

Montgom

ery

Polk

SanAugustine

Tyler

Angelina

Brazoria

Brazos

Liberty

WalkerH

arris

Leon

Austin

Burleson

Fort Bend

Galveston

Grimes

Jasper

Jefferson

Madison

Matagorda

Robertson

Sabine

Shelby

Washington

Colorado

Hardin

San

Jacinto

Wharton

Bow

ie

Cherokee

Harrison

Franklin

Cam

pH

opkins

Upshur

Collin

Morris

Anderson

Parker

Rains

Cooke

Dallas

Gregg

Johnson

Lamar

Marion

RedR

iver

Rockw

allD

entonC

ass

Delta

Erath

Ellis

FanninG

rayson

Henderson

Hood

Hunt

Kaufman

Navarro

Palo

Pinto

Panola

Rusk

Sm

ith

Som

ervell

Tarrant

Titus

VanZandt

Wise

Wood

Dallas

Region 11A

- Dallas

1B - Tyler

1C - H

urst1D

- Mt. Pleasant

Houston

Region 22A

- Houston

2B - B

eaumont

2C - C

onroe2D

- Bryan

San Antonio

Region 66A

- Waco

6B - Austin

6C - S

an Antonio

McA

llenR

egion 33A

- McA

llen3B

- Laredo3C

- Corpus C

hristi3D

- McA

llen3E

- Del R

io

El PasoR

egion 44A

- Midland

4B - El Paso

LubbockR

egion 5Lubbock - 5AA

marillo - 5B

Abilene - 5C

5 B

C

A

B

E

CDA

B

C

A

BC

A

D

BA

B

C

D

A

64

123

Page 110: 2016-2017 - Texas Department of Public Safety · collected by the Texas Department of Public Safety (TX DPS). According to the Texas Code of Criminal Procedure, “racial profiling

107

Highway Patrol - 2017

DISTRICT 2B 2017

African American

White

Hispanic

Stops

Frequency 20,393

83,600 11,966

Percent 17.31 %

70.96 %

10.16 %

Citations

Frequency

7,117 20,324

5,574 Percent

21.19 %

60.51 %

16.60 %

Rate per 100 stops 34.90

24.31 46.58

Warnings

Frequency

13,276 63,276

6,392 Percent

15.76 %

75.13 %

7.59 %

Rate per 100 stops 65.10

75.69 53.42

Searches (All)

Frequency 909

1,939 452

Percent 27.25 %

58.12 %

13.55 %

Rate per 100 stops

4.46 2.32

3.78 D

iscretionary Searches

Frequency 180

554 119

Percent 20.74 %

63.82 %

13.71 %

Rate per 100 stops

0.88 0.66

0.99 N

on-Discretionary Searches

Frequency

729 1,385

333 Percent

29.54 %

56.12 %

13.49 %

Rate per 100 stops 3.57

1.66 2.78

Contraband Hits

Frequency

317 673

144 Percent

27.71 %

58.83 %

12.59 %

Rate per 100 searches 34.87

34.71 31.86

Race Known

Frequency

31 324

12 Percent

8.45 %

88.28 %

3.27 %

Rate per 100 stops 0.15

0.39 0.10

DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC SAFETY APPENDIX D – REGION 2:HOUSTON – DISTRICT LEVEL ANALYSIS

Page 111: 2016-2017 - Texas Department of Public Safety · collected by the Texas Department of Public Safety (TX DPS). According to the Texas Code of Criminal Procedure, “racial profiling

108

Highway Patrol - 2017

DISTRICT 2B 2017

Asian Alaska

Native/Am

erican Indian

Middle Eastern

Other

Unknow

n

Stops

Frequency 1,242

105 502

0 0

Percent 1.05 %

0.09 %

0.43 %

0.00 %

0.00 %

Citations

Frequency

361 34

178 0

0 Percent

1.07 %

0.10 %

0.53 %

0.00 %

0.00 %

Rate per 100 stops 29.07

32.38 35.46

--- ---

Warnings

Frequency

881 71

324 0

0 Percent

1.05 %

0.08 %

0.38 %

0.00 %

0.00 %

Rate per 100 stops 70.93

67.62 64.54

--- ---

Searches (All)

Frequency 23

2 11

0 0

Percent 0.69 %

0.06 %

0.33 %

0.00 %

0.00 %

Rate per 100 stops

1.85 1.90

2.19 ---

--- D

iscretionary Searches

Frequency 9

1 5

0 0

Percent 1.04 %

0.12 %

0.58 %

0.00 %

0.00 %

Rate per 100 stops

0.72 0.95

1.00 ---

--- N

on-Discretionary Searches

Frequency

14 1

6 0

0 Percent

0.57 %

0.04 %

0.24 %

0.00 %

0.00 %

Rate per 100 stops 1.13

0.95 1.20

--- ---

Contraband Hits

Frequency

6 2

2 0

0 Percent

0.52 %

0.17 %

0.17 %

0.00 %

0.00 %

Rate per 100 searches 26.09

100.00 18.18

--- ---

Race Known

Frequency

0 0

0 0

0 Percent

0.00 %

0.00 %

0.00 %

0.00 %

0.00 %

Rate per 100 stops 0.00

0.00 0.00

--- ---

DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC SAFETY APPENDIX D – REGION 2:HOUSTON – DISTRICT LEVEL ANALYSIS

Page 112: 2016-2017 - Texas Department of Public Safety · collected by the Texas Department of Public Safety (TX DPS). According to the Texas Code of Criminal Procedure, “racial profiling

109

Highway Patrol - 2016

DISTRICT 2B 2016

African American

White

Hispanic

Stops

Frequency 17,703

71,909 10,506

Percent 17.36 %

70.52 %

10.30 %

Citations

Frequency

6,420 19,002

5,190 Percent

20.57 %

60.89 %

16.63 %

Rate per 100 stops 36.27

26.43 49.40

Warnings

Frequency

11,283 52,907

5,316 Percent

15.94 %

74.76 %

7.51 %

Rate per 100 stops 63.73

73.57 50.60

Searches (All)

Frequency 262

772 134

Percent 22.32 %

65.76 %

11.41 %

Rate per 100 stops

1.48 1.07

1.28 D

iscretionary Searches

Frequency 57

205 40

Percent 18.75 %

67.43 %

13.16 %

Rate per 100 stops

0.32 0.29

0.38 N

on-Discretionary Searches

Frequency

205 567

94 Percent

23.56 %

65.17 %

10.80 %

Rate per 100 stops 1.16

0.79 0.89

Contraband Hits

Frequency

132 447

61 Percent

20.56 %

69.63 %

9.50 %

Rate per 100 searches 50.38

57.90 45.52

Race Known

Frequency

22 232

10 Percent

8.21 %

86.57 %

3.73 %

Rate per 100 stops 0.12

0.32 0.10

DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC SAFETY APPENDIX D – REGION 2:HOUSTON – DISTRICT LEVEL ANALYSIS

Page 113: 2016-2017 - Texas Department of Public Safety · collected by the Texas Department of Public Safety (TX DPS). According to the Texas Code of Criminal Procedure, “racial profiling

110

Highway Patrol - 2016

DISTRICT 2B 2016

Asian Alaska

Native/Am

erican Indian

Middle Eastern

Other

Unknow

n

Stops

Frequency 981

68 808

0 0

Percent 0.96 %

0.07 %

0.79 %

0.00 %

0.00 %

Citations

Frequency

311 23

260 0

0 Percent

1.00 %

0.07 %

0.83 %

0.00 %

0.00 %

Rate per 100 stops 31.70

33.82 32.18

--- ---

Warnings

Frequency

670 45

548 0

0 Percent

0.95 %

0.06 %

0.77 %

0.00 %

0.00 %

Rate per 100 stops 68.30

66.18 67.82

--- ---

Searches (All)

Frequency 5

0 1

0 0

Percent 0.43 %

0.00 %

0.09 %

0.00 %

0.00 %

Rate per 100 stops

0.51 0.00

0.12 ---

--- D

iscretionary Searches

Frequency 1

0 1

0 0

Percent 0.33 %

0.00 %

0.33 %

0.00 %

0.00 %

Rate per 100 stops

0.10 0.00

0.12 ---

--- N

on-Discretionary Searches

Frequency

4 0

0 0

0 Percent

0.46 %

0.00 %

0.00 %

0.00 %

0.00 %

Rate per 100 stops 0.41

0.00 0.00

--- ---

Contraband Hits

Frequency

2 0

0 0

0 Percent

0.31 %

0.00 %

0.00 %

0.00 %

0.00 %

Rate per 100 searches 40.00

--- 0.00

--- ---

Race Known

Frequency

3 0

1 0

0 Percent

1.12 %

0.00 %

0.37 %

0.00 %

0.00 %

Rate per 100 stops 0.31

0.00 0.12

--- ---

DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC SAFETY APPENDIX D – REGION 2:HOUSTON – DISTRICT LEVEL ANALYSIS

Page 114: 2016-2017 - Texas Department of Public Safety · collected by the Texas Department of Public Safety (TX DPS). According to the Texas Code of Criminal Procedure, “racial profiling

111

Comm

ercial Vehicle Enforcement - 2017

District 2B 2017

African American

White

Hispanic

Stops

Frequency 2,438

4,458 1,383

Percent 29.07 %

53.16 %

16.49 %

Citations

Frequency

769 1,210

240 Percent

34.44 %

54.19 %

10.75 %

Rate per 100 stops 31.54

27.14 17.35

Warnings

Frequency

1,149 2,055

704 Percent

28.99 %

51.85 %

17.76 %

Rate per 100 stops 47.13

46.10 50.90

Clean

Frequency 520

1,193 439

Percent 23.74 %

54.47 %

20.05 %

Rate per 100 stops

21.33 26.76

31.74 Searches (All)

Frequency

5 4

2 Percent

45.45 %

36.36 %

18.18 %

Rate per 100 stops 0.21

0.09 0.14

Discretionary Searches

Frequency

1 2

2 Percent

20.00 %

40.00 %

40.00 %

Rate per 100 stops 0.04

0.04 0.14

Non-D

iscretionary Searches

Frequency 4

2 0

Percent 66.67 %

33.33 %

0.00 %

Rate per 100 stops

0.16 0.04

0.00 Contraband H

its

Frequency 5

2 0

Percent 71.43 %

28.57 %

0.00 %

Rate per 100 searches

100.00 50.00

0.00 Race Know

n

Frequency 1

0 0

Percent 100.00 %

0.00 %

0.00 %

Rate per 100 stops

0.04 0.00

0.00

DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC SAFETY APPENDIX D – REGION 2:HOUSTON – DISTRICT LEVEL ANALYSIS

Page 115: 2016-2017 - Texas Department of Public Safety · collected by the Texas Department of Public Safety (TX DPS). According to the Texas Code of Criminal Procedure, “racial profiling

112

Comm

ercial Vehicle Enforcement - 2017

District 2B 2017

Asian Alaska

Native/Am

erican Indian

Middle Eastern

Other

Unknow

n

Stops

Frequency 44

5 42

0 16

Percent 0.52 %

0.06 %

0.50 %

0.00 %

0.19 %

Citations

Frequency

8 0

6 0

0 Percent

0.36 %

0.00 %

0.27 %

0.00 %

0.00 %

Rate per 100 stops 18.18

0.00 14.29

--- 0.00

Warnings

Frequency

26 3

22 0

4 Percent

0.66 %

0.08 %

0.56 %

0.00 %

0.10 %

Rate per 100 stops 59.09

60.00 52.38

--- 25.00

Clean

Frequency 10

2 14

0 12

Percent 0.46 %

0.09 %

0.64 %

0.00 %

0.55 %

Rate per 100 stops

22.73 40.00

33.33 ---

75.00 Searches (All)

Frequency

0 0

0 0

0 Percent

0.00 %

0.00 %

0.00 %

0.00 %

0.00 %

Rate per 100 stops 0.00

0.00 0.00

--- 0.00

Discretionary Searches

Frequency

0 0

0 0

0 Percent

0.00 %

0.00 %

0.00 %

0.00 %

0.00 %

Rate per 100 stops 0.00

0.00 0.00

--- 0.00

Non-D

iscretionary Searches

Frequency 0

0 0

0 0

Percent 0.00 %

0.00 %

0.00 %

0.00 %

0.00 %

Rate per 100 stops

0.00 0.00

0.00 ---

0.00 Contraband H

its

Frequency 0

0 0

0 0

Percent 0.00 %

0.00 %

0.00 %

0.00 %

0.00 %

Rate per 100 searches

--- ---

--- ---

--- Race Know

n

Frequency 0

0 0

0 0

Percent 0.00 %

0.00 %

0.00 %

0.00 %

0.00 %

Rate per 100 stops

0.00 0.00

0.00 ---

0.00

DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC SAFETY APPENDIX D – REGION 2:HOUSTON – DISTRICT LEVEL ANALYSIS

Page 116: 2016-2017 - Texas Department of Public Safety · collected by the Texas Department of Public Safety (TX DPS). According to the Texas Code of Criminal Procedure, “racial profiling

113

Comm

ercial Vehicle Enforcement - 2016

District 2B 2016

African American

White

Hispanic

Stops

Frequency 2,589

4,977 1,481

Percent 28.21 %

54.24 %

16.14 %

Citations

Frequency

718 1,320

275 Percent

30.92 %

56.85 %

11.84 %

Rate per 100 stops 27.73

26.52 18.57

Warnings

Frequency

1,248 2,231

729 Percent

29.28 %

52.33 %

17.10 %

Rate per 100 stops 48.20

44.83 49.22

Clean

Frequency 623

1,426 477

Percent 24.04 %

55.04 %

18.41 %

Rate per 100 stops

24.06 28.65

32.21 Searches (All)

Frequency

3 5

7 Percent

20.00 %

33.33 %

46.67 %

Rate per 100 stops 0.12

0.10 0.47

Discretionary Searches

Frequency

1 1

7 Percent

11.11 %

11.11 %

77.78 %

Rate per 100 stops 0.04

0.02 0.47

Non-D

iscretionary Searches

Frequency 2

4 0

Percent 33.33 %

66.67 %

0.00 %

Rate per 100 stops

0.08 0.08

0.00 Contraband H

its

Frequency 3

2 0

Percent 60.00 %

40.00 %

0.00 %

Rate per 100 searches

100.00 40.00

0.00 Race Know

n

Frequency 1

3 0

Percent 25.00 %

75.00 %

0.00 %

Rate per 100 stops

0.04 0.06

0.00

DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC SAFETY APPENDIX D – REGION 2:HOUSTON – DISTRICT LEVEL ANALYSIS

Page 117: 2016-2017 - Texas Department of Public Safety · collected by the Texas Department of Public Safety (TX DPS). According to the Texas Code of Criminal Procedure, “racial profiling

114

Comm

ercial Vehicle Enforcement - 2016

District 2B 2016

Asian Alaska

Native/Am

erican Indian

Middle Eastern

Other

Unknow

n

Stops

Frequency 39

2 72

0 16

Percent 0.43 %

0.02 %

0.78 %

0.00 %

0.17 %

Citations

Frequency

2 1

6 0

0 Percent

0.09 %

0.04 %

0.26 %

0.00 %

0.00 %

Rate per 100 stops 5.13

50.00 8.33

--- 0.00

Warnings

Frequency

20 1

32 0

2 Percent

0.47 %

0.02 %

0.75 %

0.00 %

0.05 %

Rate per 100 stops 51.28

50.00 44.44

--- 12.50

Clean

Frequency 17

0 34

0 14

Percent 0.66 %

0.00 %

1.31 %

0.00 %

0.54 %

Rate per 100 stops

43.59 0.00

47.22 ---

87.50 Searches (All)

Frequency

0 0

0 0

0 Percent

0.00 %

0.00 %

0.00 %

0.00 %

0.00 %

Rate per 100 stops 0.00

0.00 0.00

--- 0.00

Discretionary Searches

Frequency

0 0

0 0

0 Percent

0.00 %

0.00 %

0.00 %

0.00 %

0.00 %

Rate per 100 stops 0.00

0.00 0.00

--- 0.00

Non-D

iscretionary Searches

Frequency 0

0 0

0 0

Percent 0.00 %

0.00 %

0.00 %

0.00 %

0.00 %

Rate per 100 stops

0.00 0.00

0.00 ---

0.00 Contraband H

its

Frequency 0

0 0

0 0

Percent 0.00 %

0.00 %

0.00 %

0.00 %

0.00 %

Rate per 100 searches

--- ---

--- ---

--- Race Know

n

Frequency 0

0 0

0 0

Percent 0.00 %

0.00 %

0.00 %

0.00 %

0.00 %

Rate per 100 stops

0.00 0.00

0.00 ---

0.00

DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC SAFETY APPENDIX D – REGION 2:HOUSTON – DISTRICT LEVEL ANALYSIS

Page 118: 2016-2017 - Texas Department of Public Safety · collected by the Texas Department of Public Safety (TX DPS). According to the Texas Code of Criminal Procedure, “racial profiling

115

Falls

Bexar

GonzalesC

omal

FayetteK

err

Guadalupe

Blanco

Coryell M

cLennan

Atascosa

Bastrop

DeW

itt

Frio

JacksonK

arnes

Limestone

Medina

Freestone

Bell

Calhoun

Ham

ilton

Kendall

Lavaca

McMullen

San Saba

Travis

Victoria

William

son

Bandera

Bosque

Burnet

Caldw

ell

Gillespie

Goliad

Hays

Hill

Lampasas

Lee

LlanoM

ilam

Mills

Wilson

Potter

Sw

isher

Terry

Randall

Hall

Cochran

Haskell

Armstrong

King

RobertsStonewallYoung

Lipscomb

Fisher

Archer

Bailey

Cottle

Crosby

Deaf S

mith

Donley

Kent

Sherman

Stephens

Baylor

Hockley

Jack

Ochiltree

Oldham

Com

anche

Callahan

Foard

Hartley

Lamb

Mitchell

Moore

Yoakum

Briscoe

Hale

Scurry

Gray

Brow

n

Carson

Castro

Childress

Clay

Collingsw

orth

Coleman

Dallam

Dickens

Eastland

Floyd

Garza

Hansford

Hardeman

Hemphill

Hutchinson

Jones

Knox

Lubbock

Lynn

Montague

Motley

TaylorN

olan

Parm

er

Runnels

Shackelford

Wheeler

Wichita

Wilbarger

El

Paso

Schleicher

Presidio

Kim

ble

Martin

Terrell

Crane

Winkler

Daw

son

Andrew

s

Upton

Hudspeth

Mason

Borden

Coke

Gaines

Irion

Brew

ster

Menard

TomG

reen

How

ard

ReaganC

oncho

Crockett

Culberson

Ector

Glasscock

Jeff Davis

Sterling

Loving

McC

ulloch

Midland

Pecos

Reeves

Sutton

Ward

3D3A

US

281

Zavala

Starr

WebbZapata

Hidalgo

Duval

Bee

Jim Wells

MaverickA

ransas

Dim

mit

Edw

ards

JimH

oggK

enedy

Kinney

Kleberg

LiveO

ak

Nueces

Real

Refugio

San Patricio

Willacy

Brooks

Cam

eron

LaSalle

Uvalde

Val Verde

Newton

Trinity

Houston

Nacogdoches

Cham

bers

Waller

Orange

Montgom

ery

Polk

SanAugustine

Tyler

Angelina

Brazoria

Brazos

Liberty

WalkerH

arris

Leon

Austin

Burleson

Fort Bend

Galveston

Grimes

Jasper

Jefferson

Madison

Matagorda

Robertson

Sabine

Shelby

Washington

Colorado

Hardin

San

Jacinto

Wharton

Bow

ie

Cherokee

Harrison

Franklin

Cam

pH

opkins

Upshur

Collin

Morris

Anderson

Parker

Rains

Cooke

Dallas

Gregg

Johnson

Lamar

Marion

RedR

iver

Rockw

allD

entonC

ass

Delta

Erath

Ellis

FanninG

rayson

Henderson

Hood

Hunt

Kaufman

Navarro

Palo

Pinto

Panola

Rusk

Sm

ith

Som

ervell

Tarrant

Titus

VanZandt

Wise

Wood

Dallas

Region 11A

- Dallas

1B - Tyler

1C - H

urst1D

- Mt. Pleasant

Houston

Region 22A

- Houston

2B - B

eaumont

2C - C

onroe2D

- Bryan

San Antonio

Region 66A

- Waco

6B - Austin

6C - S

an Antonio

McA

llenR

egion 33A

- McA

llen3B

- Laredo3C

- Corpus C

hristi3D

- McA

llen3E

- Del R

io

El PasoR

egion 44A

- Midland

4B - El Paso

LubbockR

egion 5Lubbock - 5AA

marillo - 5B

Abilene - 5C

5 B

C

A

B

E

CDA

B

C

A

BC

A

D

BA

B

C

D

A

64

123

Throckmorton

Page 119: 2016-2017 - Texas Department of Public Safety · collected by the Texas Department of Public Safety (TX DPS). According to the Texas Code of Criminal Procedure, “racial profiling

116

Highway Patrol - 2017

DISTRICT 2C 2017

African American

White

Hispanic

Stops

Frequency 22,540

63,078 33,294

Percent 17.96 %

50.25 %

26.52 %

Citations

Frequency

9,515 21,131

16,702 Percent

19.09 %

42.39 %

33.51 %

Rate per 100 stops 42.21

33.50 50.17

Warnings

Frequency

13,025 41,947

16,592 Percent

17.21 %

55.42 %

21.92 %

Rate per 100 stops 57.79

66.50 49.83

Searches (All)

Frequency 1,973

3,063 2,145

Percent 26.99 %

41.90 %

29.34 %

Rate per 100 stops

8.75 4.86

6.44 D

iscretionary Searches

Frequency 446

893 614

Percent 22.31 %

44.67 %

30.72 %

Rate per 100 stops

1.98 1.42

1.84 N

on-Discretionary Searches

Frequency

1,527 2,170

1,531 Percent

28.75 %

40.86 %

28.83 %

Rate per 100 stops 6.77

3.44 4.60

Contraband Hits

Frequency

810 1,191

751 Percent

28.91 %

42.51 %

26.80 %

Rate per 100 searches 41.05

38.88 35.01

Race Known

Frequency

9 58

21 Percent

10.23 %

65.91 %

23.86 %

Rate per 100 stops 0.04

0.09 0.06

DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC SAFETY APPENDIX D – REGION 2:HOUSTON – DISTRICT LEVEL ANALYSIS

Page 120: 2016-2017 - Texas Department of Public Safety · collected by the Texas Department of Public Safety (TX DPS). According to the Texas Code of Criminal Procedure, “racial profiling

117

Highway Patrol - 2017

DISTRICT 2C 2017

Asian Alaska

Native/Am

erican Indian

Middle Eastern

Other

Unknow

n

Stops

Frequency 4,354

185 2,081

0 0

Percent 3.47 %

0.15 %

1.66 %

0.00 %

0.00 %

Citations

Frequency

1,583 68

846 0

0 Percent

3.18 %

0.14 %

1.70 %

0.00 %

0.00 %

Rate per 100 stops 36.36

36.76 40.65

--- ---

Warnings

Frequency

2,771 117

1,235 0

0 Percent

3.66 %

0.15 %

1.63 %

0.00 %

0.00 %

Rate per 100 stops 63.64

63.24 59.35

--- ---

Searches (All)

Frequency 88

7 34

0 0

Percent 1.20 %

0.10 %

0.47 %

0.00 %

0.00 %

Rate per 100 stops

2.02 3.78

1.63 ---

--- D

iscretionary Searches

Frequency 28

2 16

0 0

Percent 1.40 %

0.10 %

0.80 %

0.00 %

0.00 %

Rate per 100 stops

0.64 1.08

0.77 ---

--- N

on-Discretionary Searches

Frequency

60 5

18 0

0 Percent

1.13 %

0.09 %

0.34 %

0.00 %

0.00 %

Rate per 100 stops 1.38

2.70 0.86

--- ---

Contraband Hits

Frequency

33 2

15 0

0 Percent

1.18 %

0.07 %

0.54 %

0.00 %

0.00 %

Rate per 100 searches 37.50

28.57 44.12

--- ---

Race Known

Frequency

0 0

0 0

0 Percent

0.00 %

0.00 %

0.00 %

0.00 %

0.00 %

Rate per 100 stops 0.00

0.00 0.00

--- ---

DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC SAFETY APPENDIX D – REGION 2:HOUSTON – DISTRICT LEVEL ANALYSIS

Page 121: 2016-2017 - Texas Department of Public Safety · collected by the Texas Department of Public Safety (TX DPS). According to the Texas Code of Criminal Procedure, “racial profiling

118

Highway Patrol - 2016

DISTRICT 2C 2016

African American

White

Hispanic

Stops

Frequency 19,478

57,031 30,653

Percent 17.21 %

50.39 %

27.09 %

Citations

Frequency

8,143 19,711

15,835 Percent

17.72 %

42.90 %

34.47 %

Rate per 100 stops 41.81

34.56 51.66

Warnings

Frequency

11,335 37,320

14,818 Percent

16.86 %

55.52 %

22.04 %

Rate per 100 stops 58.19

65.44 48.34

Searches (All)

Frequency 611

970 617

Percent 27.31 %

43.36 %

27.58 %

Rate per 100 stops

3.14 1.70

2.01 D

iscretionary Searches

Frequency 130

284 156

Percent 22.22 %

48.55 %

26.67 %

Rate per 100 stops

0.67 0.50

0.51 N

on-Discretionary Searches

Frequency

481 686

461 Percent

29.12 %

41.53 %

27.91 %

Rate per 100 stops 2.47

1.20 1.50

Contraband Hits

Frequency

353 580

379 Percent

26.42 %

43.41 %

28.37 %

Rate per 100 searches 57.77

59.79 61.43

Race Known

Frequency

13 52

19 Percent

15.29 %

61.18 %

22.35 %

Rate per 100 stops 0.07

0.09 0.06

DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC SAFETY APPENDIX D – REGION 2:HOUSTON – DISTRICT LEVEL ANALYSIS

Page 122: 2016-2017 - Texas Department of Public Safety · collected by the Texas Department of Public Safety (TX DPS). According to the Texas Code of Criminal Procedure, “racial profiling

119

Highway Patrol - 2016

DISTRICT 2C 2016

Asian Alaska

Native/Am

erican Indian

Middle Eastern

Other

Unknow

n

Stops

Frequency 3,247

160 2,599

0 2

Percent 2.87 %

0.14 %

2.30 %

0.00 %

0.00 %

Citations

Frequency

1,173 45

1,038 0

0 Percent

2.55 %

0.10 %

2.26 %

0.00 %

0.00 %

Rate per 100 stops 36.13

28.13 39.94

--- 0.00

Warnings

Frequency

2,074 115

1,561 0

2 Percent

3.09 %

0.17 %

2.32 %

0.00 %

0.00 %

Rate per 100 stops 63.87

71.88 60.06

--- 100.00

Searches (All)

Frequency 22

0 17

0 0

Percent 0.98 %

0.00 %

0.76 %

0.00 %

0.00 %

Rate per 100 stops

0.68 0.00

0.65 ---

0.00 D

iscretionary Searches

Frequency 9

0 6

0 0

Percent 1.54 %

0.00 %

1.03 %

0.00 %

0.00 %

Rate per 100 stops

0.28 0.00

0.23 ---

0.00 N

on-Discretionary Searches

Frequency

13 0

11 0

0 Percent

0.79 %

0.00 %

0.67 %

0.00 %

0.00 %

Rate per 100 stops 0.40

0.00 0.42

--- 0.00

Contraband Hits

Frequency

13 0

11 0

0 Percent

0.97 %

0.00 %

0.82 %

0.00 %

0.00 %

Rate per 100 searches 59.09

--- 64.71

--- ---

Race Known

Frequency

1 0

0 0

0 Percent

1.18 %

0.00 %

0.00 %

0.00 %

0.00 %

Rate per 100 stops 0.03

0.00 0.00

--- 0.00

DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC SAFETY APPENDIX D – REGION 2:HOUSTON – DISTRICT LEVEL ANALYSIS

Page 123: 2016-2017 - Texas Department of Public Safety · collected by the Texas Department of Public Safety (TX DPS). According to the Texas Code of Criminal Procedure, “racial profiling

120

Comm

ercial Vehicle Enforcement - 2017

District 2C 2017

African American

White

Hispanic

Stops

Frequency 1,012

1,505 3,288

Percent 17.27 %

25.68 %

56.10 %

Citations

Frequency

282 353

988 Percent

17.24 %

21.58 %

60.39 %

Rate per 100 stops 27.87

23.46 30.05

Warnings

Frequency

488 739

1,602 Percent

17.07 %

25.85 %

56.03 %

Rate per 100 stops 48.22

49.10 48.72

Clean

Frequency 242

413 698

Percent 17.72 %

30.23 %

51.10 %

Rate per 100 stops

23.91 27.44

21.23 Searches (All)

Frequency

29 18

98 Percent

20.00 %

12.41 %

67.59 %

Rate per 100 stops 2.87

1.20 2.98

Discretionary Searches

Frequency

27 18

96 Percent

19.15 %

12.77 %

68.09 %

Rate per 100 stops 2.67

1.20 2.92

Non-D

iscretionary Searches

Frequency 2

0 2

Percent 50.00 %

0.00 %

50.00 %

Rate per 100 stops

0.20 0.00

0.06 Contraband H

its

Frequency 0

0 0

Percent --- %

--- %

--- %

Rate per 100 searches

0.00 0.00

0.00 Race Know

n

Frequency 0

0 0

Percent --- %

--- %

--- %

Rate per 100 stops

0.00 0.00

0.00

DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC SAFETY APPENDIX D – REGION 2:HOUSTON – DISTRICT LEVEL ANALYSIS

Page 124: 2016-2017 - Texas Department of Public Safety · collected by the Texas Department of Public Safety (TX DPS). According to the Texas Code of Criminal Procedure, “racial profiling

121

Comm

ercial Vehicle Enforcement - 2017

District 2C 2017

Asian Alaska

Native/Am

erican Indian

Middle Eastern

Other

Unknow

n

Stops

Frequency 23

1 25

0 7

Percent 0.39 %

0.02 %

0.43 %

0.00 %

0.12 %

Citations

Frequency

3 1

9 0

0 Percent

0.18 %

0.06 %

0.55 %

0.00 %

0.00 %

Rate per 100 stops 13.04

100.00 36.00

--- 0.00

Warnings

Frequency

17 0

13 0

0 Percent

0.59 %

0.00 %

0.45 %

0.00 %

0.00 %

Rate per 100 stops 73.91

0.00 52.00

--- 0.00

Clean

Frequency 3

0 3

0 7

Percent 0.22 %

0.00 %

0.22 %

0.00 %

0.51 %

Rate per 100 stops

13.04 0.00

12.00 ---

100.00 Searches (All)

Frequency

0 0

0 0

0 Percent

0.00 %

0.00 %

0.00 %

0.00 %

0.00 %

Rate per 100 stops 0.00

0.00 0.00

--- 0.00

Discretionary Searches

Frequency

0 0

0 0

0 Percent

0.00 %

0.00 %

0.00 %

0.00 %

0.00 %

Rate per 100 stops 0.00

0.00 0.00

--- 0.00

Non-D

iscretionary Searches

Frequency 0

0 0

0 0

Percent 0.00 %

0.00 %

0.00 %

0.00 %

0.00 %

Rate per 100 stops

0.00 0.00

0.00 ---

0.00 Contraband H

its

Frequency 0

0 0

0 0

Percent --- %

--- %

--- %

--- %

--- %

Rate per 100 searches

--- ---

--- ---

--- Race Know

n

Frequency 0

0 0

0 0

Percent --- %

--- %

--- %

--- %

--- %

Rate per 100 stops

0.00 0.00

0.00 ---

0.00

DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC SAFETY APPENDIX D – REGION 2:HOUSTON – DISTRICT LEVEL ANALYSIS

Page 125: 2016-2017 - Texas Department of Public Safety · collected by the Texas Department of Public Safety (TX DPS). According to the Texas Code of Criminal Procedure, “racial profiling

122

Comm

ercial Vehicle Enforcement - 2016

District 2C 2016

African American

White

Hispanic

Stops

Frequency 1,120

1,694 3,703

Percent 17.00 %

25.71 %

56.19 %

Citations

Frequency

271 321

987 Percent

17.03 %

20.18 %

62.04 %

Rate per 100 stops 24.20

18.95 26.65

Warnings

Frequency

569 855

1,833 Percent

17.30 %

26.00 %

55.73 %

Rate per 100 stops 50.80

50.47 49.50

Clean

Frequency 280

518 883

Percent 16.37 %

30.29 %

51.64 %

Rate per 100 stops

25.00 30.58

23.85 Searches (All)

Frequency

2 1

5 Percent

25.00 %

12.50 %

62.50 %

Rate per 100 stops 0.18

0.06 0.14

Discretionary Searches

Frequency

2 1

5 Percent

25.00 %

12.50 %

62.50 %

Rate per 100 stops 0.18

0.06 0.14

Non-D

iscretionary Searches

Frequency 0

0 0

Percent --- %

--- %

--- %

Rate per 100 stops

0.00 0.00

0.00 Contraband H

its

Frequency 1

0 1

Percent 50.00 %

0.00 %

50.00 %

Rate per 100 searches

50.00 0.00

20.00 Race Know

n

Frequency 1

0 0

Percent 100.00 %

0.00 %

0.00 %

Rate per 100 stops

0.09 0.00

0.00

DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC SAFETY APPENDIX D – REGION 2:HOUSTON – DISTRICT LEVEL ANALYSIS

Page 126: 2016-2017 - Texas Department of Public Safety · collected by the Texas Department of Public Safety (TX DPS). According to the Texas Code of Criminal Procedure, “racial profiling

123

Comm

ercial Vehicle Enforcement - 2016

District 2C 2016

Asian Alaska

Native/Am

erican Indian

Middle Eastern

Other

Unknow

n

Stops

Frequency 31

1 30

0 11

Percent 0.47 %

0.02 %

0.46 %

0.00 %

0.17 %

Citations

Frequency

4 0

8 0

0 Percent

0.25 %

0.00 %

0.50 %

0.00 %

0.00 %

Rate per 100 stops 12.90

0.00 26.67

--- 0.00

Warnings

Frequency

18 0

13 0

1 Percent

0.55 %

0.00 %

0.40 %

0.00 %

0.03 %

Rate per 100 stops 58.06

0.00 43.33

--- 9.09

Clean

Frequency 9

1 9

0 10

Percent 0.53 %

0.06 %

0.53 %

0.00 %

0.58 %

Rate per 100 stops

29.03 100.00

30.00 ---

90.91 Searches (All)

Frequency

0 0

0 0

0 Percent

0.00 %

0.00 %

0.00 %

0.00 %

0.00 %

Rate per 100 stops 0.00

0.00 0.00

--- 0.00

Discretionary Searches

Frequency

0 0

0 0

0 Percent

0.00 %

0.00 %

0.00 %

0.00 %

0.00 %

Rate per 100 stops 0.00

0.00 0.00

--- 0.00

Non-D

iscretionary Searches

Frequency 0

0 0

0 0

Percent --- %

--- %

--- %

--- %

--- %

Rate per 100 stops

0.00 0.00

0.00 ---

0.00 Contraband H

its

Frequency 0

0 0

0 0

Percent 0.00 %

0.00 %

0.00 %

0.00 %

0.00 %

Rate per 100 searches

--- ---

--- ---

--- Race Know

n

Frequency 0

0 0

0 0

Percent 0.00 %

0.00 %

0.00 %

0.00 %

0.00 %

Rate per 100 stops

0.00 0.00

0.00 ---

0.00

DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC SAFETY APPENDIX D – REGION 2:HOUSTON – DISTRICT LEVEL ANALYSIS

Page 127: 2016-2017 - Texas Department of Public Safety · collected by the Texas Department of Public Safety (TX DPS). According to the Texas Code of Criminal Procedure, “racial profiling

124

Falls

Bexar

GonzalesC

omal

FayetteK

err

Guadalupe

Blanco

Coryell M

cLennan

Atascosa

Bastrop

DeW

itt

Frio

JacksonK

arnes

Limestone

Medina

Freestone

Bell

Calhoun

Ham

ilton

Kendall

Lavaca

McMullen

San Saba

Travis

Victoria

William

son

Bandera

Bosque

Burnet

Caldw

ell

Gillespie

Goliad

Hays

Hill

Lampasas

Lee

LlanoM

ilam

Mills

Wilson

Potter

Sw

isher

Terry

Randall

Hall

Cochran

Haskell

Armstrong

King

RobertsStonewallYoung

Lipscomb

Fisher

Archer

Bailey

Cottle

Crosby

Deaf S

mith

Donley

Kent

Sherman

Stephens

Baylor

Hockley

Jack

Ochiltree

Oldham

Com

anche

Callahan

Foard

Hartley

Lamb

Mitchell

Moore

Yoakum

Briscoe

Hale

Scurry

Gray

Brow

n

Carson

Castro

Childress

Clay

Collingsw

orth

Coleman

Dallam

Dickens

Eastland

Floyd

Garza

Hansford

Hardeman

Hemphill

Hutchinson

Jones

Knox

Lubbock

Lynn

Montague

Motley

TaylorN

olan

Parm

er

Runnels

Shackelford

Wheeler

Wichita

Wilbarger

El

Paso

Schleicher

Presidio

Kim

ble

Martin

Terrell

Crane

Winkler

Daw

son

Andrew

s

Upton

Hudspeth

Mason

Borden

Coke

Gaines

Irion

Brew

ster

Menard

TomG

reen

How

ard

ReaganC

oncho

Crockett

Culberson

Ector

Glasscock

Jeff Davis

Sterling

Loving

McC

ulloch

Midland

Pecos

Reeves

Sutton

Ward

3D3A

US

281

Zavala

Starr

WebbZapata

Hidalgo

Duval

Bee

Jim Wells

MaverickA

ransas

Dim

mit

Edw

ards

JimH

oggK

enedy

Kinney

Kleberg

LiveO

ak

Nueces

Real

Refugio

San Patricio

Willacy

Brooks

Cam

eron

LaSalle

Uvalde

Val Verde

Newton

Trinity

Houston

Nacogdoches

Cham

bers

Waller

Orange

Montgom

ery

Polk

SanAugustine

Tyler

Angelina

Brazoria

Brazos

Liberty

WalkerH

arris

Leon

Austin

Burleson

Fort Bend

Galveston

Grimes

Jasper

Jefferson

Madison

Matagorda

Robertson

Sabine

Shelby

Washington

Colorado

Hardin

San

Jacinto

Wharton

Bow

ie

Cherokee

Harrison

Franklin

Cam

pH

opkins

Upshur

Collin

Morris

Anderson

Parker

Rains

Cooke

Dallas

Gregg

Johnson

Lamar

Marion

RedR

iver

Rockw

allD

entonC

ass

Delta

Erath

Ellis

FanninG

rayson

Henderson

Hood

Hunt

Kaufman

Navarro

Palo

Pinto

Panola

Rusk

Sm

ith

Som

ervell

Tarrant

Titus

VanZandt

Wise

Wood

Dallas

Region 11A

- Dallas

1B - Tyler

1C - H

urst1D

- Mt. Pleasant

Houston

Region 22A

- Houston

2B - B

eaumont

2C - C

onroe2D

- Bryan

San Antonio

Region 66A

- Waco

6B - Austin

6C - S

an Antonio

McA

llenR

egion 33A

- McA

llen3B

- Laredo3C

- Corpus C

hristi3D

- McA

llen3E

- Del R

io

El PasoR

egion 44A

- Midland

4B - El Paso

LubbockR

egion 5Lubbock - 5AA

marillo - 5B

Abilene - 5C

5 B

C

A

B

E

CDA

B

C

A

BC

A

D

BA

B

C

D

A

64

123

Throckmorton

Page 128: 2016-2017 - Texas Department of Public Safety · collected by the Texas Department of Public Safety (TX DPS). According to the Texas Code of Criminal Procedure, “racial profiling

125

Highway Patrol - 2017

DISTRICT 2D 2017

African American

White

Hispanic

Stops

Frequency 8,307

25,995 8,531

Percent 18.48 %

57.83 %

18.98 %

Citations

Frequency

2,762 6,063

3,642 Percent

21.03 %

46.16 %

27.73 %

Rate per 100 stops 33.25

23.32 42.69

Warnings

Frequency

5,545 19,932

4,889 Percent

17.43 %

62.65 %

15.37 %

Rate per 100 stops 66.75

76.68 57.31

Searches (All)

Frequency 871

1,115 715

Percent 31.60 %

40.46 %

25.94 %

Rate per 100 stops

10.49 4.29

8.38 D

iscretionary Searches

Frequency 139

312 211

Percent 20.26 %

45.48 %

30.76 %

Rate per 100 stops

1.67 1.20

2.47 N

on-Discretionary Searches

Frequency

732 803

504 Percent

35.36 %

38.79 %

24.35 %

Rate per 100 stops 8.81

3.09 5.91

Contraband Hits

Frequency

356 517

307 Percent

29.57 %

42.94 %

25.50 %

Rate per 100 searches 40.87

46.37 42.94

Race Known

Frequency

100 221

79 Percent

24.39 %

53.90 %

19.27 %

Rate per 100 stops 1.20

0.85 0.93

DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC SAFETY APPENDIX D – REGION 2:HOUSTON – DISTRICT LEVEL ANALYSIS

Page 129: 2016-2017 - Texas Department of Public Safety · collected by the Texas Department of Public Safety (TX DPS). According to the Texas Code of Criminal Procedure, “racial profiling

126

Highway Patrol - 2017

DISTRICT 2D 2017

Asian Alaska

Native/Am

erican Indian

Middle Eastern

Other

Unknow

n

Stops

Frequency 1,559

44 512

0 0

Percent 3.47 %

0.10 %

1.14 %

0.00 %

0.00 %

Citations

Frequency

486 19

162 0

0 Percent

3.70 %

0.14 %

1.23 %

0.00 %

0.00 %

Rate per 100 stops 31.17

43.18 31.64

--- ---

Warnings

Frequency

1,073 25

350 0

0 Percent

3.37 %

0.08 %

1.10 %

0.00 %

0.00 %

Rate per 100 stops 68.83

56.82 68.36

--- ---

Searches (All)

Frequency 38

2 15

0 0

Percent 1.38 %

0.07 %

0.54 %

0.00 %

0.00 %

Rate per 100 stops

2.44 4.55

2.93 ---

--- D

iscretionary Searches

Frequency 17

1 6

0 0

Percent 2.48 %

0.15 %

0.87 %

0.00 %

0.00 %

Rate per 100 stops

1.09 2.27

1.17 ---

--- N

on-Discretionary Searches

Frequency

21 1

9 0

0 Percent

1.01 %

0.05 %

0.43 %

0.00 %

0.00 %

Rate per 100 stops 1.35

2.27 1.76

--- ---

Contraband Hits

Frequency

17 1

6 0

0 Percent

1.41 %

0.08 %

0.50 %

0.00 %

0.00 %

Rate per 100 searches 44.74

50.00 40.00

--- ---

Race Known

Frequency

7 0

3 0

0 Percent

1.71 %

0.00 %

0.73 %

0.00 %

0.00 %

Rate per 100 stops 0.45

0.00 0.59

--- ---

DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC SAFETY APPENDIX D – REGION 2:HOUSTON – DISTRICT LEVEL ANALYSIS

Page 130: 2016-2017 - Texas Department of Public Safety · collected by the Texas Department of Public Safety (TX DPS). According to the Texas Code of Criminal Procedure, “racial profiling

127

Highway Patrol - 2016

DISTRICT 2D 2016

African American

White

Hispanic

Stops

Frequency 7,380

24,207 7,528

Percent 17.99 %

59.00 %

18.35 %

Citations

Frequency

2,517 6,352

3,375 Percent

19.47 %

49.14 %

26.11 %

Rate per 100 stops 34.11

26.24 44.83

Warnings

Frequency

4,863 17,855

4,153 Percent

17.30 %

63.53 %

14.78 %

Rate per 100 stops 65.89

73.76 55.17

Searches (All)

Frequency 323

440 239

Percent 31.57 %

43.01 %

23.36 %

Rate per 100 stops

4.38 1.82

3.17 D

iscretionary Searches

Frequency 69

159 64

Percent 23.08 %

53.18 %

21.40 %

Rate per 100 stops

0.93 0.66

0.85 N

on-Discretionary Searches

Frequency

254 281

175 Percent

35.08 %

38.81 %

24.17 %

Rate per 100 stops 3.44

1.16 2.32

Contraband Hits

Frequency

150 233

123 Percent

29.13 %

45.24 %

23.88 %

Rate per 100 searches 46.44

52.95 51.46

Race Known

Frequency

39 235

68 Percent

11.14 %

67.14 %

19.43 %

Rate per 100 stops 0.53

0.97 0.90

DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC SAFETY APPENDIX D – REGION 2:HOUSTON – DISTRICT LEVEL ANALYSIS

Page 131: 2016-2017 - Texas Department of Public Safety · collected by the Texas Department of Public Safety (TX DPS). According to the Texas Code of Criminal Procedure, “racial profiling

128

Highway Patrol - 2016

DISTRICT 2D 2016

Asian Alaska

Native/Am

erican Indian

Middle Eastern

Other

Unknow

n

Stops

Frequency 1,163

17 735

0 1

Percent 2.83 %

0.04 %

1.79 %

0.00 %

0.00 %

Citations

Frequency

430 4

248 0

0 Percent

3.33 %

0.03 %

1.92 %

0.00 %

0.00 %

Rate per 100 stops 36.97

23.53 33.74

--- 0.00

Warnings

Frequency

733 13

487 0

1 Percent

2.61 %

0.05 %

1.73 %

0.00 %

0.00 %

Rate per 100 stops 63.03

76.47 66.26

--- 100.00

Searches (All)

Frequency 14

1 6

0 0

Percent 1.37 %

0.10 %

0.59 %

0.00 %

0.00 %

Rate per 100 stops

1.20 5.88

0.82 ---

0.00 D

iscretionary Searches

Frequency 4

1 2

0 0

Percent 1.34 %

0.33 %

0.67 %

0.00 %

0.00 %

Rate per 100 stops

0.34 5.88

0.27 ---

0.00 N

on-Discretionary Searches

Frequency

10 0

4 0

0 Percent

1.38 %

0.00 %

0.55 %

0.00 %

0.00 %

Rate per 100 stops 0.86

0.00 0.54

--- 0.00

Contraband Hits

Frequency

7 0

2 0

0 Percent

1.36 %

0.00 %

0.39 %

0.00 %

0.00 %

Rate per 100 searches 50.00

0.00 33.33

--- ---

Race Known

Frequency

2 0

6 0

0 Percent

0.57 %

0.00 %

1.71 %

0.00 %

0.00 %

Rate per 100 stops 0.17

0.00 0.82

--- 0.00

DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC SAFETY APPENDIX D – REGION 2:HOUSTON – DISTRICT LEVEL ANALYSIS

Page 132: 2016-2017 - Texas Department of Public Safety · collected by the Texas Department of Public Safety (TX DPS). According to the Texas Code of Criminal Procedure, “racial profiling

129

Comm

ercial Vehicle Enforcement - 2017

District 2D

2017 African Am

erican W

hite H

ispanic Stops

Frequency

625 1,046

916 Percent

23.69 %

39.65 %

34.72 %

Citations

Frequency 289

415 378

Percent 26.39 %

37.90 %

34.52 %

Rate per 100 stops

46.24 39.67

41.27 W

arnings

Frequency 280

476 451

Percent 22.91 %

38.95 %

36.91 %

Rate per 100 stops

44.80 45.51

49.24 Clean

Frequency

56 155

87 Percent

17.45 %

48.29 %

27.10 %

Rate per 100 stops 8.96

14.82 9.50

Searches (All)

Frequency 0

1 2

Percent 0.00 %

33.33 %

66.67 %

Rate per 100 stops

0.00 0.10

0.22 D

iscretionary Searches

Frequency 0

0 1

Percent 0.00 %

0.00 %

100.00 %

Rate per 100 stops

0.00 0.00

0.11 N

on-Discretionary Searches

Frequency

0 1

1 Percent

0.00 %

50.00 %

50.00 %

Rate per 100 stops 0.00

0.10 0.11

Contraband Hits

Frequency

0 0

0 Percent

--- %

--- %

--- %

Rate per 100 searches ---

0.00 0.00

Race Known

Frequency

0 0

0 Percent

--- %

--- %

--- %

Rate per 100 stops 0.00

0.00 0.00

DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC SAFETY APPENDIX D – REGION 2:HOUSTON – DISTRICT LEVEL ANALYSIS

Page 133: 2016-2017 - Texas Department of Public Safety · collected by the Texas Department of Public Safety (TX DPS). According to the Texas Code of Criminal Procedure, “racial profiling

130

Comm

ercial Vehicle Enforcement - 2017

District 2D

2017 Asian

Alaska N

ative/American

Indian

Middle Eastern

Other

Unknow

n

Stops

Frequency 18

0 9

0 24

Percent 0.68 %

0.00 %

0.34 %

0.00 %

0.91 %

Citations

Frequency

9 0

4 0

0 Percent

0.82 %

0.00 %

0.37 %

0.00 %

0.00 %

Rate per 100 stops 50.00

--- 44.44

--- 0.00

Warnings

Frequency

6 0

5 0

4 Percent

0.49 %

0.00 %

0.41 %

0.00 %

0.33 %

Rate per 100 stops 33.33

--- 55.56

--- 16.67

Clean

Frequency 3

0 0

0 20

Percent 0.93 %

0.00 %

0.00 %

0.00 %

6.23 %

Rate per 100 stops

16.67 ---

0.00 ---

83.33 Searches (All)

Frequency

0 0

0 0

0 Percent

0.00 %

0.00 %

0.00 %

0.00 %

0.00 %

Rate per 100 stops 0.00

--- 0.00

--- 0.00

Discretionary Searches

Frequency

0 0

0 0

0 Percent

0.00 %

0.00 %

0.00 %

0.00 %

0.00 %

Rate per 100 stops 0.00

--- 0.00

--- 0.00

Non-D

iscretionary Searches

Frequency 0

0 0

0 0

Percent 0.00 %

0.00 %

0.00 %

0.00 %

0.00 %

Rate per 100 stops

0.00 ---

0.00 ---

0.00 Contraband H

its

Frequency 0

0 0

0 0

Percent --- %

--- %

--- %

--- %

--- %

Rate per 100 searches

--- ---

--- ---

--- Race Know

n

Frequency 0

0 0

0 0

Percent --- %

--- %

--- %

--- %

--- %

Rate per 100 stops

0.00 ---

0.00 ---

0.00

DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC SAFETY APPENDIX D – REGION 2:HOUSTON – DISTRICT LEVEL ANALYSIS

Page 134: 2016-2017 - Texas Department of Public Safety · collected by the Texas Department of Public Safety (TX DPS). According to the Texas Code of Criminal Procedure, “racial profiling

131

Comm

ercial Vehicle Enforcement - 2016

District 2D

2016 African Am

erican W

hite H

ispanic Stops

Frequency

571 1,031

765 Percent

23.39 %

42.24 %

31.34 %

Citations

Frequency 227

363 297

Percent 25.36 %

40.56 %

33.18 %

Rate per 100 stops

39.75 35.21

38.82 W

arnings

Frequency 278

495 357

Percent 24.09 %

42.89 %

30.94 %

Rate per 100 stops

48.69 48.01

46.67 Clean

Frequency

66 173

111 Percent

16.84 %

44.13 %

28.32 %

Rate per 100 stops 11.56

16.78 14.51

Searches (All)

Frequency 1

1 1

Percent 33.33 %

33.33 %

33.33 %

Rate per 100 stops

0.18 0.10

0.13 D

iscretionary Searches

Frequency 0

1 1

Percent 0.00 %

50.00 %

50.00 %

Rate per 100 stops

0.00 0.10

0.13 N

on-Discretionary Searches

Frequency

1 0

0 Percent

100.00 %

0.00 %

0.00 %

Rate per 100 stops 0.18

0.00 0.00

Contraband Hits

Frequency

1 0

0 Percent

100.00 %

0.00 %

0.00 %

Rate per 100 searches 100.00

0.00 0.00

Race Known

Frequency

0 0

0 Percent

--- %

--- %

--- %

Rate per 100 stops 0.00

0.00 0.00

DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC SAFETY APPENDIX D – REGION 2:HOUSTON – DISTRICT LEVEL ANALYSIS

Page 135: 2016-2017 - Texas Department of Public Safety · collected by the Texas Department of Public Safety (TX DPS). According to the Texas Code of Criminal Procedure, “racial profiling

132

Comm

ercial Vehicle Enforcement - 2016

District 2D

2016 Asian

Alaska N

ative/American

Indian

Middle Eastern

Other

Unknow

n

Stops

Frequency 17

1 14

0 42

Percent 0.70 %

0.04 %

0.57 %

0.00 %

1.72 %

Citations

Frequency

4 0

4 0

0 Percent

0.45 %

0.00 %

0.45 %

0.00 %

0.00 %

Rate per 100 stops 23.53

0.00 28.57

--- 0.00

Warnings

Frequency

11 1

9 0

3 Percent

0.95 %

0.09 %

0.78 %

0.00 %

0.26 %

Rate per 100 stops 64.71

100.00 64.29

--- 7.14

Clean

Frequency 2

0 1

0 39

Percent 0.51 %

0.00 %

0.26 %

0.00 %

9.95 %

Rate per 100 stops

11.76 0.00

7.14 ---

92.86 Searches (All)

Frequency

0 0

0 0

0 Percent

0.00 %

0.00 %

0.00 %

0.00 %

0.00 %

Rate per 100 stops 0.00

0.00 0.00

--- 0.00

Discretionary Searches

Frequency

0 0

0 0

0 Percent

0.00 %

0.00 %

0.00 %

0.00 %

0.00 %

Rate per 100 stops 0.00

0.00 0.00

--- 0.00

Non-D

iscretionary Searches

Frequency 0

0 0

0 0

Percent 0.00 %

0.00 %

0.00 %

0.00 %

0.00 %

Rate per 100 stops

0.00 0.00

0.00 ---

0.00 Contraband H

its

Frequency 0

0 0

0 0

Percent 0.00 %

0.00 %

0.00 %

0.00 %

0.00 %

Rate per 100 searches

--- ---

--- ---

--- Race Know

n

Frequency 0

0 0

0 0

Percent --- %

--- %

--- %

--- %

--- %

Rate per 100 stops

0.00 0.00

0.00 ---

0.00

DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC SAFETY APPENDIX D – REGION 2:HOUSTON – DISTRICT LEVEL ANALYSIS

Page 136: 2016-2017 - Texas Department of Public Safety · collected by the Texas Department of Public Safety (TX DPS). According to the Texas Code of Criminal Procedure, “racial profiling

133

Appendix E Region 3: McAllen Analysis

Page 137: 2016-2017 - Texas Department of Public Safety · collected by the Texas Department of Public Safety (TX DPS). According to the Texas Code of Criminal Procedure, “racial profiling

134

Falls

Bexar

GonzalesC

omal

FayetteK

err

Guadalupe

Blanco

Coryell M

cLennan

Atascosa

Bastrop

DeW

itt

Frio

JacksonK

arnes

Limestone

Medina

Freestone

Bell

Calhoun

Ham

ilton

Kendall

Lavaca

McMullen

San Saba

Travis

Victoria

William

son

Bandera

Bosque

Burnet

Caldw

ell

Gillespie

Goliad

Hays

Hill

Lampasas

Lee

LlanoM

ilam

Mills

Wilson

Potter

Sw

isher

Terry

Randall

Hall

Cochran

Haskell

Armstrong

King

RobertsStonewallYoung

Lipscomb

Fisher

Archer

Bailey

Cottle

Crosby

Deaf S

mith

Donley

Kent

Sherman

Stephens

Baylor

Hockley

Jack

Ochiltree

Oldham

Com

anche

Callahan

Foard

Hartley

Lamb

Mitchell

Moore

Yoakum

Briscoe

Hale

Scurry

Gray

Brow

n

Carson

Castro

Childress

Clay

Collingsw

orth

Coleman

Dallam

Dickens

Eastland

Floyd

Garza

Hansford

Hardeman

Hemphill

Hutchinson

Jones

Knox

Lubbock

Lynn

Montague

Motley

TaylorN

olan

Parm

er

Runnels

Shackelford

Wheeler

Wichita

Wilbarger

El

Paso

Schleicher

Presidio

Kim

ble

Martin

Terrell

Crane

Winkler

Daw

son

Andrew

s

Upton

Hudspeth

Mason

Borden

Coke

Gaines

Irion

Brew

ster

Menard

TomG

reen

How

ard

ReaganC

oncho

Crockett

Culberson

Ector

Glasscock

Jeff Davis

Sterling

Loving

McC

ulloch

Midland

Pecos

Reeves

Sutton

Ward

3D3A

US

281

Zavala

Starr

WebbZapata

Hidalgo

Duval

Bee

Jim Wells

MaverickA

ransas

Dim

mit

Edw

ards

JimH

oggK

enedy

Kinney

Kleberg

LiveO

ak

Nueces

Real

Refugio

San Patricio

Willacy

Brooks

Cam

eron

LaSalle

Uvalde

Val Verde

Newton

Trinity

Houston

Nacogdoches

Cham

bers

Waller

Orange

Montgom

ery

Polk

SanAugustine

Tyler

Angelina

Brazoria

Brazos

Liberty

WalkerH

arris

Leon

Austin

Burleson

Fort Bend

Galveston

Grimes

Jasper

Jefferson

Madison

Matagorda

Robertson

Sabine

Shelby

Washington

Colorado

Hardin

San

Jacinto

Wharton

Bow

ie

Cherokee

Harrison

Franklin

Cam

pH

opkins

Upshur

Collin

Morris

Anderson

Parker

Rains

Cooke

Dallas

Gregg

Johnson

Lamar

Marion

RedR

iver

Rockw

allD

entonC

ass

Delta

Erath

Ellis

FanninG

rayson

Henderson

Hood

Hunt

Kaufman

Navarro

Palo

Pinto

Panola

Rusk

Sm

ith

Som

ervell

Tarrant

Titus

VanZandt

Wise

Wood

Dallas

Region 11A

- Dallas

1B - Tyler

1C - H

urst1D

- Mt. Pleasant

Houston

Region 22A

- Houston

2B - B

eaumont

2C - C

onroe2D

- Bryan

San Antonio

Region 66A

- Waco

6B - Austin

6C - S

an Antonio

McA

llenR

egion 33A

- McA

llen3B

- Laredo3C

- Corpus C

hristi3D

- McA

llen3E

- Del R

io

El PasoR

egion 44A

- Midland

4B - El Paso

LubbockR

egion 5Lubbock - 5AA

marillo - 5B

Abilene - 5C

5 B

C

A

B

E

CDA

B

C

A

BC

A

D

BA

B

C

D

A

64

123

Throckmorton

Page 138: 2016-2017 - Texas Department of Public Safety · collected by the Texas Department of Public Safety (TX DPS). According to the Texas Code of Criminal Procedure, “racial profiling

135

Highway Patrol - 2017

REGIO

N 3 2017

African American

White

Hispanic

Stops

Frequency 6,374

59,557 429,427

Percent 1.28 %

11.94 %

86.08 %

Citations

Frequency

2,047 15,242

151,079 Percent

1.21 %

9.00 %

89.17 %

Rate per 100 stops 32.11

25.59 35.18

Warnings

Frequency

4,327 44,315

278,348 Percent

1.31 %

13.45 %

84.49 %

Rate per 100 stops 67.89

74.41 64.82

Searches (All)

Frequency 422

2,211 18,756

Percent 1.96 %

10.27 %

87.13 %

Rate per 100 stops

6.62 3.71

4.37 D

iscretionary Searches

Frequency 160

840 10,601

Percent 1.37 %

7.20 %

90.82 %

Rate per 100 stops

2.51 1.41

2.47 N

on-Discretionary Searches

Frequency

262 1,371

8,155 Percent

2.66 %

13.91 %

82.77 %

Rate per 100 stops 4.11

2.30 1.90

Contraband Hits

Frequency

110 617

2,709 Percent

3.17 %

17.79 %

78.11 %

Rate per 100 searches 26.07

27.91 14.44

Race Known

Frequency

22 174

3,503 Percent

0.59 %

4.69 %

94.50 %

Rate per 100 stops 0.35

0.29 0.82

DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC SAFETY APPENDIX E – REGION 3:MCALLEN ANALYSIS

Page 139: 2016-2017 - Texas Department of Public Safety · collected by the Texas Department of Public Safety (TX DPS). According to the Texas Code of Criminal Procedure, “racial profiling

136

Highway Patrol - 2017

REGIO

N 3 2017

Asian Alaska

Native/Am

erican Indian

Middle Eastern

Other

Unknow

n

Stops

Frequency 2,069

379 1,057

0 4

Percent 0.41 %

0.08 %

0.21 %

0.00 %

0.00 %

Citations

Frequency

577 178

299 0

3 Percent

0.34 %

0.11 %

0.18 %

0.00 %

0.00 %

Rate per 100 stops 27.89

46.97 28.29

--- 75.00

Warnings

Frequency

1,492 201

758 0

1 Percent

0.45 %

0.06 %

0.23 %

0.00 %

0.00 %

Rate per 100 stops 72.11

53.03 71.71

--- 25.00

Searches (All)

Frequency 57

51 29

0 0

Percent 0.26 %

0.24 %

0.13 %

0.00 %

0.00 %

Rate per 100 stops

2.75 13.46

2.74 ---

0.00 D

iscretionary Searches

Frequency 35

16 21

0 0

Percent 0.30 %

0.14 %

0.18 %

0.00 %

0.00 %

Rate per 100 stops

1.69 4.22

1.99 ---

0.00 N

on-Discretionary Searches

Frequency

22 35

8 0

0 Percent

0.22 %

0.36 %

0.08 %

0.00 %

0.00 %

Rate per 100 stops 1.06

9.23 0.76

--- 0.00

Contraband Hits

Frequency

9 15

8 0

0 Percent

0.26 %

0.43 %

0.23 %

0.00 %

0.00 %

Rate per 100 searches 15.79

29.41 27.59

--- ---

Race Known

Frequency

6 0

2 0

0 Percent

0.16 %

0.00 %

0.05 %

0.00 %

0.00 %

Rate per 100 stops 0.29

0.00 0.19

--- 0.00

DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC SAFETY APPENDIX E – REGION 3:MCALLEN ANALYSIS

Page 140: 2016-2017 - Texas Department of Public Safety · collected by the Texas Department of Public Safety (TX DPS). According to the Texas Code of Criminal Procedure, “racial profiling

137

Highway Patrol - 2016

REGIO

N 3 2016

African American

White

Hispanic

Stops

Frequency 4,318

42,399 301,203

Percent 1.23 %

12.09 %

85.88 %

Citations

Frequency

1,460 11,357

104,756 Percent

1.23 %

9.58 %

88.40 %

Rate per 100 stops 33.81

26.79 34.78

Warnings

Frequency

2,858 31,042

196,447 Percent

1.23 %

13.37 %

84.59 %

Rate per 100 stops 66.19

73.21 65.22

Searches (All)

Frequency 94

512 4,174

Percent 1.96 %

10.66 %

86.92 %

Rate per 100 stops

2.18 1.21

1.39 D

iscretionary Searches

Frequency 24

219 2,388

Percent 0.91 %

8.29 %

90.42 %

Rate per 100 stops

0.56 0.52

0.79 N

on-Discretionary Searches

Frequency

70 293

1,786 Percent

3.24 %

13.56 %

82.65 %

Rate per 100 stops 1.62

0.69 0.59

Contraband Hits

Frequency

50 226

1,063 Percent

3.70 %

16.73 %

78.68 %

Rate per 100 searches 53.19

44.14 25.47

Race Known

Frequency

3 42

835 Percent

0.34 %

4.74 %

94.24 %

Rate per 100 stops 0.07

0.10 0.28

DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC SAFETY APPENDIX E – REGION 3:MCALLEN ANALYSIS

Page 141: 2016-2017 - Texas Department of Public Safety · collected by the Texas Department of Public Safety (TX DPS). According to the Texas Code of Criminal Procedure, “racial profiling

138

Highway Patrol - 2016

REGIO

N 3 2016

Asian Alaska

Native/Am

erican Indian

Middle Eastern

Other

Unknow

n

Stops

Frequency 1,432

231 1,148

2 6

Percent 0.41 %

0.07 %

0.33 %

0.00 %

0.00 %

Citations

Frequency

431 105

388 1

2 Percent

0.36 %

0.09 %

0.33 %

0.00 %

0.00 %

Rate per 100 stops 30.10

45.45 33.80

50.00 33.33

Warnings

Frequency

1,001 126

760 1

4 Percent

0.43 %

0.05 %

0.33 %

0.00 %

0.00 %

Rate per 100 stops 69.90

54.55 66.20

50.00 66.67

Searches (All)

Frequency 9

7 6

0 0

Percent 0.19 %

0.15 %

0.12 %

0.00 %

0.00 %

Rate per 100 stops

0.63 3.03

0.52 0.00

0.00 D

iscretionary Searches

Frequency 2

4 4

0 0

Percent 0.08 %

0.15 %

0.15 %

0.00 %

0.00 %

Rate per 100 stops

0.14 1.73

0.35 0.00

0.00 N

on-Discretionary Searches

Frequency

7 3

2 0

0 Percent

0.32 %

0.14 %

0.09 %

0.00 %

0.00 %

Rate per 100 stops 0.49

1.30 0.17

0.00 0.00

Contraband Hits

Frequency

6 4

2 0

0 Percent

0.44 %

0.30 %

0.15 %

0.00 %

0.00 %

Rate per 100 searches 66.67

57.14 33.33

--- ---

Race Known

Frequency

1 1

4 0

0 Percent

0.11 %

0.11 %

0.45 %

0.00 %

0.00 %

Rate per 100 stops 0.07

0.43 0.35

0.00 0.00

DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC SAFETY APPENDIX E – REGION 3:MCALLEN ANALYSIS

Page 142: 2016-2017 - Texas Department of Public Safety · collected by the Texas Department of Public Safety (TX DPS). According to the Texas Code of Criminal Procedure, “racial profiling

139

Comm

ercial Vehicle Enforcement - 2017

Region 3 2017 African Am

erican W

hite H

ispanic Stops

Frequency

1,259 4,103

27,343 Percent

3.81 %

12.41 %

82.69 %

Citations

Frequency 187

671 4,340

Percent 3.57 %

12.81 %

82.86 %

Rate per 100 stops

14.85 16.35

15.87 W

arnings

Frequency 716

2,088 15,738

Percent 3.82 %

11.14 %

83.94 %

Rate per 100 stops

56.87 50.89

57.56 Clean

Frequency

356 1,344

7,265 Percent

3.92 %

14.81 %

80.04 %

Rate per 100 stops 28.28

32.76 26.57

Searches (All)

Frequency 8

17 121

Percent 5.44 %

11.56 %

82.31 %

Rate per 100 stops

0.64 0.41

0.44 D

iscretionary Searches

Frequency 7

14 104

Percent 5.56 %

11.11 %

82.54 %

Rate per 100 stops

0.56 0.34

0.38 N

on-Discretionary Searches

Frequency

1 3

17 Percent

4.76 %

14.29 %

80.95 %

Rate per 100 stops 0.08

0.07 0.06

Contraband Hits

Frequency

2 3

10 Percent

13.33 %

20.00 %

66.67 %

Rate per 100 searches 25.00

17.65 8.26

Race Known

Frequency

19 69

1,408 Percent

1.27 %

4.60 %

93.80 %

Rate per 100 stops 1.51

1.68 5.15

DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC SAFETY APPENDIX E – REGION 3:MCALLEN ANALYSIS

Page 143: 2016-2017 - Texas Department of Public Safety · collected by the Texas Department of Public Safety (TX DPS). According to the Texas Code of Criminal Procedure, “racial profiling

140

Comm

ercial Vehicle Enforcement - 2017

Region 3 2017 Asian

Alaska N

ative/American

Indian

Middle Eastern

Other

Unknow

n

Stops

Frequency 88

13 229

0 30

Percent 0.27 %

0.04 %

0.69 %

0.00 %

0.09 %

Citations

Frequency

12 1

27 0

0 Percent

0.23 %

0.02 %

0.52 %

0.00 %

0.00 %

Rate per 100 stops 13.64

7.69 11.79

--- 0.00

Warnings

Frequency

53 7

141 0

7 Percent

0.28 %

0.04 %

0.75 %

0.00 %

0.04 %

Rate per 100 stops 60.23

53.85 61.57

--- 23.33

Clean

Frequency 23

5 61

0 23

Percent 0.25 %

0.06 %

0.67 %

0.00 %

0.25 %

Rate per 100 stops

26.14 38.46

26.64 ---

76.67 Searches (All)

Frequency

0 0

0 0

1 Percent

0.00 %

0.00 %

0.00 %

0.00 %

0.68 %

Rate per 100 stops 0.00

0.00 0.00

--- 3.33

Discretionary Searches

Frequency

0 0

0 0

1 Percent

0.00 %

0.00 %

0.00 %

0.00 %

0.79 %

Rate per 100 stops 0.00

0.00 0.00

--- 3.33

Non-D

iscretionary Searches

Frequency 0

0 0

0 0

Percent 0.00 %

0.00 %

0.00 %

0.00 %

0.00 %

Rate per 100 stops

0.00 0.00

0.00 ---

0.00 Contraband H

its

Frequency 0

0 0

0 0

Percent 0.00 %

0.00 %

0.00 %

0.00 %

0.00 %

Rate per 100 searches

--- ---

--- ---

0.00 Race Know

n

Frequency 1

0 4

0 0

Percent 0.07 %

0.00 %

0.27 %

0.00 %

0.00 %

Rate per 100 stops

1.14 0.00

1.75 ---

0.00

DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC SAFETY APPENDIX E – REGION 3:MCALLEN ANALYSIS

Page 144: 2016-2017 - Texas Department of Public Safety · collected by the Texas Department of Public Safety (TX DPS). According to the Texas Code of Criminal Procedure, “racial profiling

141

Comm

ercial Vehicle Enforcement - 2016

Region 3 2016 African Am

erican W

hite H

ispanic Stops

Frequency

1,359 4,795

29,695 Percent

3.74 %

13.19 %

81.67 %

Citations

Frequency 180

672 4,066

Percent 3.62 %

13.53 %

81.86 %

Rate per 100 stops

13.25 14.01

13.69 W

arnings

Frequency 790

2,585 18,462

Percent 3.57 %

11.69 %

83.50 %

Rate per 100 stops

58.13 53.91

62.17 Clean

Frequency

389 1,538

7,167 Percent

4.19 %

16.57 %

77.21 %

Rate per 100 stops 28.62

32.08 24.14

Searches (All)

Frequency 4

17 123

Percent 2.72 %

11.56 %

83.67 %

Rate per 100 stops

0.29 0.35

0.41 D

iscretionary Searches

Frequency 3

12 115

Percent 2.26 %

9.02 %

86.47 %

Rate per 100 stops

0.22 0.25

0.39 N

on-Discretionary Searches

Frequency

1 5

8 Percent

7.14 %

35.71 %

57.14 %

Rate per 100 stops 0.07

0.10 0.03

Contraband Hits

Frequency

0 2

10 Percent

0.00 %

16.67 %

83.33 %

Rate per 100 searches 0.00

11.76 8.13

Race Known

Frequency

33 72

1,346 Percent

2.25 %

4.92 %

91.94 %

Rate per 100 stops 2.43

1.50 4.53

DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC SAFETY APPENDIX E – REGION 3:MCALLEN ANALYSIS

Page 145: 2016-2017 - Texas Department of Public Safety · collected by the Texas Department of Public Safety (TX DPS). According to the Texas Code of Criminal Procedure, “racial profiling

142

Comm

ercial Vehicle Enforcement - 2016

Region 3 2016 Asian

Alaska N

ative/American

Indian

Middle Eastern

Other

Unknow

n

Stops

Frequency 112

12 349

0 38

Percent 0.31 %

0.03 %

0.96 %

0.00 %

0.10 %

Citations

Frequency

11 1

37 0

0 Percent

0.22 %

0.02 %

0.74 %

0.00 %

0.00 %

Rate per 100 stops 9.82

8.33 10.60

--- 0.00

Warnings

Frequency

66 6

200 0

2 Percent

0.30 %

0.03 %

0.90 %

0.00 %

0.01 %

Rate per 100 stops 58.93

50.00 57.31

--- 5.26

Clean

Frequency 35

5 112

0 36

Percent 0.38 %

0.05 %

1.21 %

0.00 %

0.39 %

Rate per 100 stops

31.25 41.67

32.09 ---

94.74 Searches (All)

Frequency

0 0

3 0

0 Percent

0.00 %

0.00 %

2.04 %

0.00 %

0.00 %

Rate per 100 stops 0.00

0.00 0.86

--- 0.00

Discretionary Searches

Frequency

0 0

3 0

0 Percent

0.00 %

0.00 %

2.26 %

0.00 %

0.00 %

Rate per 100 stops 0.00

0.00 0.86

--- 0.00

Non-D

iscretionary Searches

Frequency 0

0 0

0 0

Percent 0.00 %

0.00 %

0.00 %

0.00 %

0.00 %

Rate per 100 stops

0.00 0.00

0.00 ---

0.00 Contraband H

its

Frequency 0

0 0

0 0

Percent 0.00 %

0.00 %

0.00 %

0.00 %

0.00 %

Rate per 100 searches

--- ---

0.00 ---

--- Race Know

n

Frequency 3

0 7

0 3

Percent 0.20 %

0.00 %

0.48 %

0.00 %

0.20 %

Rate per 100 stops

2.68 0.00

2.01 ---

7.89

DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC SAFETY APPENDIX E – REGION 3:MCALLEN ANALYSIS

Page 146: 2016-2017 - Texas Department of Public Safety · collected by the Texas Department of Public Safety (TX DPS). According to the Texas Code of Criminal Procedure, “racial profiling

143

Appendix F Region 3: McAllen

District Level Analysis

Page 147: 2016-2017 - Texas Department of Public Safety · collected by the Texas Department of Public Safety (TX DPS). According to the Texas Code of Criminal Procedure, “racial profiling

144

Falls

Bexar

GonzalesC

omal

FayetteK

err

Guadalupe

Blanco

Coryell M

cLennan

Atascosa

Bastrop

DeW

itt

Frio

JacksonK

arnes

Limestone

Medina

Freestone

Bell

Calhoun

Ham

ilton

Kendall

Lavaca

McMullen

San Saba

Travis

Victoria

William

son

Bandera

Bosque

Burnet

Caldw

ell

Gillespie

Goliad

Hays

Hill

Lampasas

Lee

LlanoM

ilam

Mills

Wilson

Potter

Sw

isher

Terry

Randall

Hall

Cochran

Haskell

Armstrong

King

RobertsStonewallYoung

Lipscomb

Fisher

Archer

Bailey

Cottle

Crosby

Deaf S

mith

Donley

Kent

Sherman

Stephens

Baylor

Hockley

Jack

Ochiltree

Oldham

Com

anche

Callahan

Foard

Hartley

Lamb

Mitchell

Moore

Yoakum

Briscoe

Hale

Scurry

Gray

Brow

n

Carson

Castro

Childress

Clay

Collingsw

orth

Coleman

Dallam

Dickens

Eastland

Floyd

Garza

Hansford

Hardeman

Hemphill

Hutchinson

Jones

Knox

Lubbock

Lynn

Montague

Motley

TaylorN

olan

Parm

er

Runnels

Shackelford

Wheeler

Wichita

Wilbarger

El

Paso

Schleicher

Presidio

Kim

ble

Martin

Terrell

Crane

Winkler

Daw

son

Andrew

s

Upton

Hudspeth

Mason

Borden

Coke

Gaines

Irion

Brew

ster

Menard

TomG

reen

How

ard

ReaganC

oncho

Crockett

Culberson

Ector

Glasscock

Jeff Davis

Sterling

Loving

McC

ulloch

Midland

Pecos

Reeves

Sutton

Ward

3D3A

US

281

Zavala

Starr

WebbZapata

Hidalgo

Duval

Bee

Jim Wells

MaverickA

ransas

Dim

mit

Edw

ards

JimH

oggK

enedy

Kinney

Kleberg

LiveO

ak

Nueces

Real

Refugio

San Patricio

Willacy

Brooks

Cam

eron

LaSalle

Uvalde

Val Verde

Newton

Trinity

Houston

Nacogdoches

Cham

bers

Waller

Orange

Montgom

ery

Polk

SanAugustine

Tyler

Angelina

Brazoria

Brazos

Liberty

WalkerH

arris

Leon

Austin

Burleson

Fort Bend

Galveston

Grimes

Jasper

Jefferson

Madison

Matagorda

Robertson

Sabine

Shelby

Washington

Colorado

Hardin

San

Jacinto

Wharton

Bow

ie

Cherokee

Harrison

Franklin

Cam

pH

opkins

Upshur

Collin

Morris

Anderson

Parker

Rains

Cooke

Dallas

Gregg

Johnson

Lamar

Marion

RedR

iver

Rockw

allD

entonC

ass

Delta

Erath

Ellis

FanninG

rayson

Henderson

Hood

Hunt

Kaufman

Navarro

Palo

Pinto

Panola

Rusk

Sm

ith

Som

ervell

Tarrant

Titus

VanZandt

Wise

Wood

Dallas

Region 11A

- Dallas

1B - Tyler

1C - H

urst1D

- Mt. Pleasant

Houston

Region 22A

- Houston

2B - B

eaumont

2C - C

onroe2D

- Bryan

San Antonio

Region 66A

- Waco

6B - Austin

6C - S

an Antonio

McA

llenR

egion 33A

- McA

llen3B

- Laredo3C

- Corpus C

hristi3D

- McA

llen3E

- Del R

io

El PasoR

egion 44A

- Midland

4B - El Paso

LubbockR

egion 5Lubbock - 5AA

marillo - 5B

Abilene - 5C

5 B

C

A

B

E

CDA

B

C

A

BC

A

D

BA

B

C

D

A

64

123

Throckmorton

Page 148: 2016-2017 - Texas Department of Public Safety · collected by the Texas Department of Public Safety (TX DPS). According to the Texas Code of Criminal Procedure, “racial profiling

145

Falls

Bexar

GonzalesC

omal

FayetteK

err

Guadalupe

Blanco

Coryell M

cLennan

Atascosa

Bastrop

DeW

itt

Frio

JacksonK

arnes

Limestone

Medina

Freestone

Bell

Calhoun

Ham

ilton

Kendall

Lavaca

McMullen

San Saba

Travis

Victoria

William

son

Bandera

Bosque

Burnet

Caldw

ell

Gillespie

Goliad

Hays

Hill

Lampasas

Lee

LlanoM

ilam

Mills

Wilson

Potter

Sw

isher

Terry

Randall

Hall

Cochran

Haskell

Armstrong

King

RobertsStonewallYoung

Lipscomb

Fisher

Throckmorton Archer

Bailey

Cottle

Crosby

Deaf S

mith

Donley

Kent

Sherman

Stephens

Baylor

Hockley

Jack

Ochiltree

Oldham

Com

anche

Callahan

Foard

Hartley

Lamb

Mitchell

Moore

Yoakum

Briscoe

Hale

Scurry

Gray

Brow

n

Carson

Castro

Childress

Clay

Collingsw

orth

Coleman

Dallam

Dickens

Eastland

Floyd

Garza

Hansford

Hardeman

Hemphill

Hutchinson

Jones

Knox

Lubbock

Lynn

Montague

Motley

TaylorN

olan

Parm

er

Runnels

Shackelford

Wheeler

Wichita

Wilbarger

El

Paso

Schleicher

Presidio

Kim

ble

Martin

Terrell

Crane

Winkler

Daw

son

Andrew

s

Upton

Hudspeth

Mason

Borden

Coke

Gaines

Irion

Brew

ster

Menard

TomG

reen

How

ard

ReaganC

oncho

Crockett

Culberson

Ector

Glasscock

Jeff Davis

Sterling

Loving

McC

ulloch

Midland

Pecos

Reeves

Sutton

Ward

3D3A

US

281

Zavala

Starr

WebbZapata

Hidalgo

Duval

Bee

Jim Wells

MaverickA

ransas

Dim

mit

Edw

ards

JimH

oggK

enedy

Kinney

Kleberg

LiveO

ak

Nueces

Real

Refugio

San Patricio

Willacy

Brooks

Cam

eron

LaSalle

Uvalde

Val Verde

Newton

Trinity

Houston

Nacogdoches

Cham

bers

Waller

Orange

Montgom

ery

Polk

SanAugustine

Tyler

Angelina

Brazoria

Brazos

Liberty

WalkerH

arris

Leon

Austin

Burleson

Fort Bend

Galveston

Grimes

Jasper

Jefferson

Madison

Matagorda

Robertson

Sabine

Shelby

Washington

Colorado

Hardin

San

Jacinto

Wharton

Bow

ie

Cherokee

Harrison

Franklin

Cam

pH

opkins

Upshur

Collin

Morris

Anderson

Parker

Rains

Cooke

Dallas

Gregg

Johnson

Lamar

Marion

RedR

iver

Rockw

allD

entonC

ass

Delta

Erath

Ellis

FanninG

rayson

Henderson

Hood

Hunt

Kaufman

Navarro

Palo

Pinto

Panola

Rusk

Sm

ith

Som

ervell

Tarrant

Titus

VanZandt

Wise

Wood

Dallas

Region 11A

- Dallas

1B - Tyler

1C - H

urst1D

- Mt. Pleasant

Houston

Region 22A

- Houston

2B - B

eaumont

2C - C

onroe2D

- Bryan

San Antonio

Region 66A

- Waco

6B - Austin

6C - S

an Antonio

McA

llenR

egion 33A

- McA

llen3B

- Laredo3C

- Corpus C

hristi3D

- McA

llen3E

- Del R

io

El PasoR

egion 44A

- Midland

4B - El Paso

LubbockR

egion 5Lubbock - 5AA

marillo - 5B

Abilene - 5C

5 B

C

A

B

E

CDA

B

C

A

BC

A

D

BA

B

C

D

A

64

123

Page 149: 2016-2017 - Texas Department of Public Safety · collected by the Texas Department of Public Safety (TX DPS). According to the Texas Code of Criminal Procedure, “racial profiling

146

Highway Patrol - 2017

DISTRICT 3A and 3D

2017 African Am

erican W

hite H

ispanic Stops

Frequency

1,155 10,852

192,564 Percent

0.56 %

5.28 %

93.78 %

Citations

Frequency 403

3,850 85,211

Percent 0.45 %

4.29 %

95.04 %

Rate per 100 stops

34.89 35.48

44.25 W

arnings

Frequency 752

7,002 107,353

Percent 0.65 %

6.05 %

92.80 %

Rate per 100 stops

65.11 64.52

55.75 Searches (All)

Frequency

87 559

7,913 Percent

1.02 %

6.52 %

92.33 %

Rate per 100 stops 7.53

5.15 4.11

Discretionary Searches

Frequency

39 194

4,065 Percent

0.91 %

4.51 %

94.43 %

Rate per 100 stops 3.38

1.79 2.11

Non-D

iscretionary Searches

Frequency 48

365 3,848

Percent 1.13 %

8.56 %

90.22 %

Rate per 100 stops

4.16 3.36

2.00 Contraband H

its

Frequency 13

98 1,002

Percent 1.17 %

8.79 %

89.87 %

Rate per 100 searches

14.94 17.53

12.66 Race Know

n

Frequency 8

63 1,489

Percent 0.51 %

4.03 %

95.20 %

Rate per 100 stops

0.69 0.58

0.77

DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC SAFETY APPENDIX F – REGION 3:MCALLEN – DISTRICT LEVEL ANALYSIS

Page 150: 2016-2017 - Texas Department of Public Safety · collected by the Texas Department of Public Safety (TX DPS). According to the Texas Code of Criminal Procedure, “racial profiling

147

Highway Patrol - 2017

DISTRICT 3A and 3D

2017 Asian

Alaska N

ative/American

Indian

Middle Eastern

Other

Unknow

n

Stops

Frequency 514

25 230

0 1

Percent 0.25 %

0.01 %

0.11 %

0.00 %

0.00 %

Citations

Frequency

124 7

62 0

0 Percent

0.14 %

0.01 %

0.07 %

0.00 %

0.00 %

Rate per 100 stops 24.12

28.00 26.96

--- 0.00

Warnings

Frequency

390 18

168 0

1 Percent

0.34 %

0.02 %

0.15 %

0.00 %

0.00 %

Rate per 100 stops 75.88

72.00 73.04

--- 100.00

Searches (All)

Frequency 7

2 2

0 0

Percent 0.08 %

0.02 %

0.02 %

0.00 %

0.00 %

Rate per 100 stops

1.36 8.00

0.87 ---

0.00 D

iscretionary Searches

Frequency 5

1 1

0 0

Percent 0.12 %

0.02 %

0.02 %

0.00 %

0.00 %

Rate per 100 stops

0.97 4.00

0.43 ---

0.00 N

on-Discretionary Searches

Frequency

2 1

1 0

0 Percent

0.05 %

0.02 %

0.02 %

0.00 %

0.00 %

Rate per 100 stops 0.39

4.00 0.43

--- 0.00

Contraband Hits

Frequency

1 0

1 0

0 Percent

0.09 %

0.00 %

0.09 %

0.00 %

0.00 %

Rate per 100 searches 14.29

0.00 50.00

--- ---

Race Known

Frequency

2 0

2 0

0 Percent

0.13 %

0.00 %

0.13 %

0.00 %

0.00 %

Rate per 100 stops 0.39

0.00 0.87

--- 0.00

DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC SAFETY APPENDIX F – REGION 3:MCALLEN – DISTRICT LEVEL ANALYSIS

Page 151: 2016-2017 - Texas Department of Public Safety · collected by the Texas Department of Public Safety (TX DPS). According to the Texas Code of Criminal Procedure, “racial profiling

148

Highway Patrol - 2016

DISTRICT 3A and 3D

2016 African Am

erican W

hite H

ispanic Stops

Frequency

724 7,184

114,704 Percent

0.59 %

5.83 %

93.16 %

Citations

Frequency 223

2,518 50,412

Percent 0.42 %

4.72 %

94.55 %

Rate per 100 stops

30.80 35.05

43.95 W

arnings

Frequency 501

4,666 64,292

Percent 0.72 %

6.68 %

92.10 %

Rate per 100 stops

69.20 64.95

56.05 Searches (All)

Frequency

12 98

1,331 Percent

0.83 %

6.80 %

92.30 %

Rate per 100 stops 1.66

1.36 1.16

Discretionary Searches

Frequency

7 47

807 Percent

0.81 %

5.46 %

93.73 %

Rate per 100 stops 0.97

0.65 0.70

Non-D

iscretionary Searches

Frequency 5

51 524

Percent 0.86 %

8.78 %

90.19 %

Rate per 100 stops

0.69 0.71

0.46 Contraband H

its

Frequency 2

26 280

Percent 0.65 %

8.41 %

90.61 %

Rate per 100 searches

16.67 26.53

21.04 Race Know

n

Frequency 2

12 316

Percent 0.60 %

3.59 %

94.61 %

Rate per 100 stops

0.28 0.17

0.28

DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC SAFETY APPENDIX F – REGION 3:MCALLEN – DISTRICT LEVEL ANALYSIS

Page 152: 2016-2017 - Texas Department of Public Safety · collected by the Texas Department of Public Safety (TX DPS). According to the Texas Code of Criminal Procedure, “racial profiling

149

Highway Patrol - 2016

DISTRICT 3A and 3D

2016 Asian

Alaska N

ative/American

Indian

Middle Eastern

Other

Unknow

n

Stops

Frequency 295

19 195

0 2

Percent 0.24 %

0.02 %

0.16 %

0.00 %

0.00 %

Citations

Frequency

86 6

74 0

1 Percent

0.16 %

0.01 %

0.14 %

0.00 %

0.00 %

Rate per 100 stops 29.15

31.58 37.95

--- 50.00

Warnings

Frequency

209 13

121 0

1 Percent

0.30 %

0.02 %

0.17 %

0.00 %

0.00 %

Rate per 100 stops 70.85

68.42 62.05

--- 50.00

Searches (All)

Frequency 1

0 0

0 0

Percent 0.07 %

0.00 %

0.00 %

0.00 %

0.00 %

Rate per 100 stops

0.34 0.00

0.00 ---

0.00 D

iscretionary Searches

Frequency 0

0 0

0 0

Percent 0.00 %

0.00 %

0.00 %

0.00 %

0.00 %

Rate per 100 stops

0.00 0.00

0.00 ---

0.00 N

on-Discretionary Searches

Frequency

1 0

0 0

0 Percent

0.17 %

0.00 %

0.00 %

0.00 %

0.00 %

Rate per 100 stops 0.34

0.00 0.00

--- 0.00

Contraband Hits

Frequency

1 0

0 0

0 Percent

0.32 %

0.00 %

0.00 %

0.00 %

0.00 %

Rate per 100 searches 100.00

--- ---

--- ---

Race Known

Frequency

1 0

3 0

0 Percent

0.30 %

0.00 %

0.90 %

0.00 %

0.00 %

Rate per 100 stops 0.34

0.00 1.54

--- 0.00

DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC SAFETY APPENDIX F – REGION 3:MCALLEN – DISTRICT LEVEL ANALYSIS

Page 153: 2016-2017 - Texas Department of Public Safety · collected by the Texas Department of Public Safety (TX DPS). According to the Texas Code of Criminal Procedure, “racial profiling

150

Comm

ercial Vehicle Enforcement - 2017

District 3A and 3D 2017

African American

White

Hispanic

Stops

Frequency 168

481 11,448

Percent 1.38 %

3.95 %

94.09 %

Citations

Frequency

10 58

1,492 Percent

0.64 %

3.70 %

95.27 %

Rate per 100 stops 5.95

12.06 13.03

Warnings

Frequency

103 244

6,623 Percent

1.47 %

3.48 %

94.57 %

Rate per 100 stops 61.31

50.73 57.85

Clean

Frequency 55

179 3,333

Percent 1.53 %

4.97 %

92.63 %

Rate per 100 stops

32.74 37.21

29.11 Searches (All)

Frequency

3 6

45 Percent

5.45 %

10.91 %

81.82 %

Rate per 100 stops 1.79

1.25 0.39

Discretionary Searches

Frequency

2 6

37 Percent

4.35 %

13.04 %

80.43 %

Rate per 100 stops 1.19

1.25 0.32

Non-D

iscretionary Searches

Frequency 1

0 8

Percent 11.11 %

0.00 %

88.89 %

Rate per 100 stops

0.60 0.00

0.07 Contraband H

its

Frequency 1

0 1

Percent 50.00 %

0.00 %

50.00 %

Rate per 100 searches

33.33 0.00

2.22 Race Know

n

Frequency 2

18 952

Percent 0.21 %

1.85 %

97.84 %

Rate per 100 stops

1.19 3.74

8.32

DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC SAFETY APPENDIX F – REGION 3:MCALLEN – DISTRICT LEVEL ANALYSIS

Page 154: 2016-2017 - Texas Department of Public Safety · collected by the Texas Department of Public Safety (TX DPS). According to the Texas Code of Criminal Procedure, “racial profiling

151

Comm

ercial Vehicle Enforcement - 2017

District 3A and 3D 2017

Asian Alaska

Native/Am

erican Indian

Middle Eastern

Other

Unknow

n

Stops

Frequency 12

4 34

0 20

Percent 0.10 %

0.03 %

0.28 %

0.00 %

0.16 %

Citations

Frequency

1 0

5 0

0 Percent

0.06 %

0.00 %

0.32 %

0.00 %

0.00 %

Rate per 100 stops 8.33

0.00 14.71

--- 0.00

Warnings

Frequency

7 3

22 0

1 Percent

0.10 %

0.04 %

0.31 %

0.00 %

0.01 %

Rate per 100 stops 58.33

75.00 64.71

--- 5.00

Clean

Frequency 4

1 7

0 19

Percent 0.11 %

0.03 %

0.19 %

0.00 %

0.53 %

Rate per 100 stops

33.33 25.00

20.59 ---

95.00 Searches (All)

Frequency

0 0

0 0

1 Percent

0.00 %

0.00 %

0.00 %

0.00 %

1.82 %

Rate per 100 stops 0.00

0.00 0.00

--- 5.00

Discretionary Searches

Frequency

0 0

0 0

1 Percent

0.00 %

0.00 %

0.00 %

0.00 %

2.17 %

Rate per 100 stops 0.00

0.00 0.00

--- 5.00

Non-D

iscretionary Searches

Frequency 0

0 0

0 0

Percent 0.00 %

0.00 %

0.00 %

0.00 %

0.00 %

Rate per 100 stops

0.00 0.00

0.00 ---

0.00 Contraband H

its

Frequency 0

0 0

0 0

Percent 0.00 %

0.00 %

0.00 %

0.00 %

0.00 %

Rate per 100 searches

--- ---

--- ---

0.00 Race Know

n

Frequency 1

0 0

0 0

Percent 0.10 %

0.00 %

0.00 %

0.00 %

0.00 %

Rate per 100 stops

8.33 0.00

0.00 ---

0.00

DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC SAFETY APPENDIX F – REGION 3:MCALLEN – DISTRICT LEVEL ANALYSIS

Page 155: 2016-2017 - Texas Department of Public Safety · collected by the Texas Department of Public Safety (TX DPS). According to the Texas Code of Criminal Procedure, “racial profiling

152

Comm

ercial Vehicle Enforcement - 2016

District 3A and 3D 2016

African American

White

Hispanic

Stops

Frequency 199

580 10,460

Percent 1.76 %

5.12 %

92.41 %

Citations

Frequency

21 46

958 Percent

2.04 %

4.47 %

93.10 %

Rate per 100 stops 10.55

7.93 9.16

Warnings

Frequency

127 348

7,001 Percent

1.69 %

4.63 %

93.12 %

Rate per 100 stops 63.82

60.00 66.93

Clean

Frequency 51

186 2,501

Percent 1.84 %

6.71 %

90.22 %

Rate per 100 stops

25.63 32.07

23.91 Searches (All)

Frequency

0 3

35 Percent

0.00 %

7.69 %

89.74 %

Rate per 100 stops 0.00

0.52 0.33

Discretionary Searches

Frequency

0 2

29 Percent

0.00 %

6.25 %

90.63 %

Rate per 100 stops 0.00

0.34 0.28

Non-D

iscretionary Searches

Frequency 0

1 6

Percent 0.00 %

14.29 %

85.71 %

Rate per 100 stops

0.00 0.17

0.06 Contraband H

its

Frequency 0

0 2

Percent 0.00 %

0.00 %

100.00 %

Rate per 100 searches

--- 0.00

5.71 Race Know

n

Frequency 4

14 656

Percent 0.59 %

2.07 %

96.90 %

Rate per 100 stops

2.01 2.41

6.27

DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC SAFETY APPENDIX F – REGION 3:MCALLEN – DISTRICT LEVEL ANALYSIS

Page 156: 2016-2017 - Texas Department of Public Safety · collected by the Texas Department of Public Safety (TX DPS). According to the Texas Code of Criminal Procedure, “racial profiling

153

Comm

ercial Vehicle Enforcement - 2016

District 3A and 3D 2016

Asian Alaska

Native/Am

erican Indian

Middle Eastern

Other

Unknow

n

Stops

Frequency 13

2 45

0 20

Percent 0.11 %

0.02 %

0.40 %

0.00 %

0.18 %

Citations

Frequency

0 0

4 0

0 Percent

0.00 %

0.00 %

0.39 %

0.00 %

0.00 %

Rate per 100 stops 0.00

0.00 8.89

--- 0.00

Warnings

Frequency

8 1

31 0

2 Percent

0.11 %

0.01 %

0.41 %

0.00 %

0.03 %

Rate per 100 stops 61.54

50.00 68.89

--- 10.00

Clean

Frequency 5

1 10

0 18

Percent 0.18 %

0.04 %

0.36 %

0.00 %

0.65 %

Rate per 100 stops

38.46 50.00

22.22 ---

90.00 Searches (All)

Frequency

0 0

1 0

0 Percent

0.00 %

0.00 %

2.56 %

0.00 %

0.00 %

Rate per 100 stops 0.00

0.00 2.22

--- 0.00

Discretionary Searches

Frequency

0 0

1 0

0 Percent

0.00 %

0.00 %

3.13 %

0.00 %

0.00 %

Rate per 100 stops 0.00

0.00 2.22

--- 0.00

Non-D

iscretionary Searches

Frequency 0

0 0

0 0

Percent 0.00 %

0.00 %

0.00 %

0.00 %

0.00 %

Rate per 100 stops

0.00 0.00

0.00 ---

0.00 Contraband H

its

Frequency 0

0 0

0 0

Percent 0.00 %

0.00 %

0.00 %

0.00 %

0.00 %

Rate per 100 searches

--- ---

0.00 ---

--- Race Know

n

Frequency 0

0 3

0 0

Percent 0.00 %

0.00 %

0.44 %

0.00 %

0.00 %

Rate per 100 stops

0.00 0.00

6.67 ---

0.00

DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC SAFETY APPENDIX F – REGION 3:MCALLEN – DISTRICT LEVEL ANALYSIS

Page 157: 2016-2017 - Texas Department of Public Safety · collected by the Texas Department of Public Safety (TX DPS). According to the Texas Code of Criminal Procedure, “racial profiling

154

Falls

Bexar

GonzalesC

omal

FayetteK

err

Guadalupe

Blanco

Coryell M

cLennan

Atascosa

Bastrop

DeW

itt

Frio

JacksonK

arnes

Limestone

Medina

Freestone

Bell

Calhoun

Ham

ilton

Kendall

Lavaca

McMullen

San Saba

Travis

Victoria

William

son

Bandera

Bosque

Burnet

Caldw

ell

Gillespie

Goliad

Hays

Hill

Lampasas

Lee

LlanoM

ilam

Mills

Wilson

Potter

Sw

isher

Terry

Randall

Hall

Cochran

Haskell

Armstrong

King

RobertsStonewallYoung

Lipscomb

Fisher

Throckmorton Archer

Bailey

Cottle

Crosby

Deaf S

mith

Donley

Kent

Sherman

Stephens

Baylor

Hockley

Jack

Ochiltree

Oldham

Com

anche

Callahan

Foard

Hartley

Lamb

Mitchell

Moore

Yoakum

Briscoe

Hale

Scurry

Gray

Brow

n

Carson

Castro

Childress

Clay

Collingsw

orth

Coleman

Dallam

Dickens

Eastland

Floyd

Garza

Hansford

Hardeman

Hemphill

Hutchinson

Jones

Knox

Lubbock

Lynn

Montague

Motley

TaylorN

olan

Parm

er

Runnels

Shackelford

Wheeler

Wichita

Wilbarger

El

Paso

Schleicher

Presidio

Kim

ble

Martin

Terrell

Crane

Winkler

Daw

son

Andrew

s

Upton

Hudspeth

Mason

Borden

Coke

Gaines

Irion

Brew

ster

Menard

TomG

reen

How

ard

ReaganC

oncho

Crockett

Culberson

Ector

Glasscock

Jeff Davis

Sterling

Loving

McC

ulloch

Midland

Pecos

Reeves

Sutton

Ward

3D3A

US

281

Zavala

Starr

WebbZapata

Hidalgo

Duval

Bee

Jim Wells

MaverickA

ransas

Dim

mit

Edw

ards

JimH

oggK

enedy

Kinney

Kleberg

LiveO

ak

Nueces

Real

Refugio

San Patricio

Willacy

Brooks

Cam

eron

LaSalle

Uvalde

Val Verde

Newton

Trinity

Houston

Nacogdoches

Cham

bers

Waller

Orange

Montgom

ery

Polk

SanAugustine

Tyler

Angelina

Brazoria

Brazos

Liberty

WalkerH

arris

Leon

Austin

Burleson

Fort Bend

Galveston

Grimes

Jasper

Jefferson

Madison

Matagorda

Robertson

Sabine

Shelby

Washington

Colorado

Hardin

San

Jacinto

Wharton

Bow

ie

Cherokee

Harrison

Franklin

Cam

pH

opkins

Upshur

Collin

Morris

Anderson

Parker

Rains

Cooke

Dallas

Gregg

Johnson

Lamar

Marion

RedR

iver

Rockw

allD

entonC

ass

Delta

Erath

Ellis

FanninG

rayson

Henderson

Hood

Hunt

Kaufman

Navarro

Palo

Pinto

Panola

Rusk

Sm

ith

Som

ervell

Tarrant

Titus

VanZandt

Wise

Wood

Dallas

Region 11A

- Dallas

1B - Tyler

1C - H

urst1D

- Mt. Pleasant

Houston

Region 22A

- Houston

2B - B

eaumont

2C - C

onroe2D

- Bryan

San Antonio

Region 66A

- Waco

6B - Austin

6C - S

an Antonio

McA

llenR

egion 33A

- McA

llen3B

- Laredo3C

- Corpus C

hristi3D

- McA

llen3E

- Del R

io

El PasoR

egion 44A

- Midland

4B - El Paso

LubbockR

egion 5Lubbock - 5AA

marillo - 5B

Abilene - 5C

5 B

C

A

B

E

CDA

B

C

A

BC

A

D

BA

B

C

D

A

64

123

Page 158: 2016-2017 - Texas Department of Public Safety · collected by the Texas Department of Public Safety (TX DPS). According to the Texas Code of Criminal Procedure, “racial profiling

155

Highway Patrol - 2017

DISTRICT 3B 2017

African American

White

Hispanic

Stops

Frequency 448

3,955 102,564

Percent 0.42 %

3.69 %

95.62 %

Citations

Frequency

69 663

23,088 Percent

0.29 %

2.78 %

96.75 %

Rate per 100 stops 15.40

16.76 22.51

Warnings

Frequency

379 3,292

79,476 Percent

0.45 %

3.95 %

95.29 %

Rate per 100 stops 84.60

83.24 77.49

Searches (All)

Frequency 26

170 4,990

Percent 0.50 %

3.26 %

95.80 %

Rate per 100 stops

5.80 4.30

4.87 D

iscretionary Searches

Frequency 21

108 3,647

Percent 0.55 %

2.85 %

96.10 %

Rate per 100 stops

4.69 2.73

3.56 N

on-Discretionary Searches

Frequency

5 62

1,343 Percent

0.35 %

4.38 %

94.98 %

Rate per 100 stops 1.12

1.57 1.31

Contraband Hits

Frequency

1 21

518 Percent

0.18 %

3.87 %

95.40 %

Rate per 100 searches 3.85

12.35 10.38

Race Known

Frequency

6 55

1,851 Percent

0.31 %

2.87 %

96.66 %

Rate per 100 stops 1.34

1.39 1.80

DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC SAFETY APPENDIX F – REGION 3:MCALLEN – DISTRICT LEVEL ANALYSIS

Page 159: 2016-2017 - Texas Department of Public Safety · collected by the Texas Department of Public Safety (TX DPS). According to the Texas Code of Criminal Procedure, “racial profiling

156

Highway Patrol - 2017

DISTRICT 3B 2017

Asian Alaska

Native/Am

erican Indian

Middle Eastern

Other

Unknow

n

Stops

Frequency 193

20 82

0 1

Percent 0.18 %

0.02 %

0.08 %

0.00 %

0.00 %

Citations

Frequency

29 3

10 0

1 Percent

0.12 %

0.01 %

0.04 %

0.00 %

0.00 %

Rate per 100 stops 15.03

15.00 12.20

--- 100.00

Warnings

Frequency

164 17

72 0

0 Percent

0.20 %

0.02 %

0.09 %

0.00 %

0.00 %

Rate per 100 stops 84.97

85.00 87.80

--- 0.00

Searches (All)

Frequency 19

1 3

0 0

Percent 0.36 %

0.02 %

0.06 %

0.00 %

0.00 %

Rate per 100 stops

9.84 5.00

3.66 ---

0.00 D

iscretionary Searches

Frequency 15

1 3

0 0

Percent 0.40 %

0.03 %

0.08 %

0.00 %

0.00 %

Rate per 100 stops

7.77 5.00

3.66 ---

0.00 N

on-Discretionary Searches

Frequency

4 0

0 0

0 Percent

0.28 %

0.00 %

0.00 %

0.00 %

0.00 %

Rate per 100 stops 2.07

0.00 0.00

--- 0.00

Contraband Hits

Frequency

3 0

0 0

0 Percent

0.55 %

0.00 %

0.00 %

0.00 %

0.00 %

Rate per 100 searches 15.79

0.00 0.00

--- ---

Race Known

Frequency

3 0

0 0

0 Percent

0.16 %

0.00 %

0.00 %

0.00 %

0.00 %

Rate per 100 stops 1.55

0.00 0.00

--- 0.00

DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC SAFETY APPENDIX F – REGION 3:MCALLEN – DISTRICT LEVEL ANALYSIS

Page 160: 2016-2017 - Texas Department of Public Safety · collected by the Texas Department of Public Safety (TX DPS). According to the Texas Code of Criminal Procedure, “racial profiling

157

Highway Patrol - 2016

DISTRICT 3B 2016

African American

White

Hispanic

Stops

Frequency 414

4,798 95,689

Percent 0.41 %

4.74 %

94.55 %

Citations

Frequency

62 938

22,568 Percent

0.26 %

3.97 %

95.55 %

Rate per 100 stops 14.98

19.55 23.58

Warnings

Frequency

352 3,860

73,121 Percent

0.45 %

4.98 %

94.25 %

Rate per 100 stops 85.02

80.45 76.42

Searches (All)

Frequency 3

66 1,437

Percent 0.20 %

4.37 %

95.17 %

Rate per 100 stops

0.72 1.38

1.50 D

iscretionary Searches

Frequency 1

34 890

Percent 0.11 %

3.66 %

95.80 %

Rate per 100 stops

0.24 0.71

0.93 N

on-Discretionary Searches

Frequency

2 32

547 Percent

0.34 %

5.51 %

94.15 %

Rate per 100 stops 0.48

0.67 0.57

Contraband Hits

Frequency

0 25

331 Percent

0.00 %

6.98 %

92.46 %

Rate per 100 searches 0.00

37.88 23.03

Race Known

Frequency

0 13

464 Percent

0.00 %

2.72 %

97.07 %

Rate per 100 stops 0.00

0.27 0.48

DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC SAFETY APPENDIX F – REGION 3:MCALLEN – DISTRICT LEVEL ANALYSIS

Page 161: 2016-2017 - Texas Department of Public Safety · collected by the Texas Department of Public Safety (TX DPS). According to the Texas Code of Criminal Procedure, “racial profiling

158

Highway Patrol - 2016

DISTRICT 3B 2016

Asian Alaska

Native/Am

erican Indian

Middle Eastern

Other

Unknow

n

Stops

Frequency 178

17 103

0 4

Percent 0.18 %

0.02 %

0.10 %

0.00 %

0.00 %

Citations

Frequency

27 5

18 0

1 Percent

0.11 %

0.02 %

0.08 %

0.00 %

0.00 %

Rate per 100 stops 15.17

29.41 17.48

--- 25.00

Warnings

Frequency

151 12

85 0

3 Percent

0.19 %

0.02 %

0.11 %

0.00 %

0.00 %

Rate per 100 stops 84.83

70.59 82.52

--- 75.00

Searches (All)

Frequency 0

2 2

0 0

Percent 0.00 %

0.13 %

0.13 %

0.00 %

0.00 %

Rate per 100 stops

0.00 11.76

1.94 ---

0.00 D

iscretionary Searches

Frequency 0

2 2

0 0

Percent 0.00 %

0.22 %

0.22 %

0.00 %

0.00 %

Rate per 100 stops

0.00 11.76

1.94 ---

0.00 N

on-Discretionary Searches

Frequency

0 0

0 0

0 Percent

0.00 %

0.00 %

0.00 %

0.00 %

0.00 %

Rate per 100 stops 0.00

0.00 0.00

--- 0.00

Contraband Hits

Frequency

0 2

0 0

0 Percent

0.00 %

0.56 %

0.00 %

0.00 %

0.00 %

Rate per 100 searches ---

100.00 0.00

--- ---

Race Known

Frequency

0 0

1 0

0 Percent

0.00 %

0.00 %

0.21 %

0.00 %

0.00 %

Rate per 100 stops 0.00

0.00 0.97

--- 0.00

DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC SAFETY APPENDIX F – REGION 3:MCALLEN – DISTRICT LEVEL ANALYSIS

Page 162: 2016-2017 - Texas Department of Public Safety · collected by the Texas Department of Public Safety (TX DPS). According to the Texas Code of Criminal Procedure, “racial profiling

159

Comm

ercial Vehicle Enforcement - 2017

District 3B 2017

African American

White

Hispanic

Stops

Frequency 151

694 4,829

Percent 2.63 %

12.07 %

83.97 %

Citations

Frequency

21 123

1,015 Percent

1.80 %

10.54 %

86.98 %

Rate per 100 stops 13.91

17.72 21.02

Warnings

Frequency

87 418

2,830 Percent

2.57 %

12.35 %

83.63 %

Rate per 100 stops 57.62

60.23 58.60

Clean

Frequency 43

153 984

Percent 3.58 %

12.75 %

82.00 %

Rate per 100 stops

28.48 22.05

20.38 Searches (All)

Frequency

2 5

32 Percent

5.13 %

12.82 %

82.05 %

Rate per 100 stops 1.32

0.72 0.66

Discretionary Searches

Frequency

2 4

29 Percent

5.71 %

11.43 %

82.86 %

Rate per 100 stops 1.32

0.58 0.60

Non-D

iscretionary Searches

Frequency 0

1 3

Percent 0.00 %

25.00 %

75.00 %

Rate per 100 stops

0.00 0.14

0.06 Contraband H

its

Frequency 0

1 4

Percent 0.00 %

20.00 %

80.00 %

Rate per 100 searches

0.00 20.00

12.50 Race Know

n

Frequency 7

26 381

Percent 1.68 %

6.25 %

91.59 %

Rate per 100 stops

4.64 3.75

7.89

DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC SAFETY APPENDIX F – REGION 3:MCALLEN – DISTRICT LEVEL ANALYSIS

Page 163: 2016-2017 - Texas Department of Public Safety · collected by the Texas Department of Public Safety (TX DPS). According to the Texas Code of Criminal Procedure, “racial profiling

160

Comm

ercial Vehicle Enforcement - 2017

District 3B 2017

Asian Alaska

Native/Am

erican Indian

Middle Eastern

Other

Unknow

n

Stops

Frequency 19

2 47

0 9

Percent 0.33 %

0.03 %

0.82 %

0.00 %

0.16 %

Citations

Frequency

2 1

5 0

0 Percent

0.17 %

0.09 %

0.43 %

0.00 %

0.00 %

Rate per 100 stops 10.53

50.00 10.64

--- 0.00

Warnings

Frequency

12 0

32 0

5 Percent

0.35 %

0.00 %

0.95 %

0.00 %

0.15 %

Rate per 100 stops 63.16

0.00 68.09

--- 55.56

Clean

Frequency 5

1 10

0 4

Percent 0.42 %

0.08 %

0.83 %

0.00 %

0.33 %

Rate per 100 stops

26.32 50.00

21.28 ---

44.44 Searches (All)

Frequency

0 0

0 0

0 Percent

0.00 %

0.00 %

0.00 %

0.00 %

0.00 %

Rate per 100 stops 0.00

0.00 0.00

--- 0.00

Discretionary Searches

Frequency

0 0

0 0

0 Percent

0.00 %

0.00 %

0.00 %

0.00 %

0.00 %

Rate per 100 stops 0.00

0.00 0.00

--- 0.00

Non-D

iscretionary Searches

Frequency 0

0 0

0 0

Percent 0.00 %

0.00 %

0.00 %

0.00 %

0.00 %

Rate per 100 stops

0.00 0.00

0.00 ---

0.00 Contraband H

its

Frequency 0

0 0

0 0

Percent 0.00 %

0.00 %

0.00 %

0.00 %

0.00 %

Rate per 100 searches

--- ---

--- ---

--- Race Know

n

Frequency 0

0 2

0 0

Percent 0.00 %

0.00 %

0.48 %

0.00 %

0.00 %

Rate per 100 stops

0.00 0.00

4.26 ---

0.00

DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC SAFETY APPENDIX F – REGION 3:MCALLEN – DISTRICT LEVEL ANALYSIS

Page 164: 2016-2017 - Texas Department of Public Safety · collected by the Texas Department of Public Safety (TX DPS). According to the Texas Code of Criminal Procedure, “racial profiling

161

Comm

ercial Vehicle Enforcement - 2016

District 3B 2016

African American

White

Hispanic

Stops

Frequency 281

927 7,033

Percent 3.36 %

11.09 %

84.12 %

Citations

Frequency

31 108

1,296 Percent

2.14 %

7.46 %

89.50 %

Rate per 100 stops 11.03

11.65 18.43

Warnings

Frequency

163 520

4,349 Percent

3.20 %

10.21 %

85.37 %

Rate per 100 stops 58.01

56.09 61.84

Clean

Frequency 87

299 1,388

Percent 4.78 %

16.44 %

76.31 %

Rate per 100 stops

30.96 32.25

19.74 Searches (All)

Frequency

3 11

51 Percent

4.48 %

16.42 %

76.12 %

Rate per 100 stops 1.07

1.19 0.73

Discretionary Searches

Frequency

2 8

51 Percent

3.17 %

12.70 %

80.95 %

Rate per 100 stops 0.71

0.86 0.73

Non-D

iscretionary Searches

Frequency 1

3 0

Percent 25.00 %

75.00 %

0.00 %

Rate per 100 stops

0.36 0.32

0.00 Contraband H

its

Frequency 0

2 4

Percent 0.00 %

33.33 %

66.67 %

Rate per 100 searches

0.00 18.18

7.84 Race Know

n

Frequency 17

26 533

Percent 2.92 %

4.46 %

91.42 %

Rate per 100 stops

6.05 2.80

7.58

DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC SAFETY APPENDIX F – REGION 3:MCALLEN – DISTRICT LEVEL ANALYSIS

Page 165: 2016-2017 - Texas Department of Public Safety · collected by the Texas Department of Public Safety (TX DPS). According to the Texas Code of Criminal Procedure, “racial profiling

162

Comm

ercial Vehicle Enforcement - 2016

District 3B 2016

Asian Alaska

Native/Am

erican Indian

Middle Eastern

Other

Unknow

n

Stops

Frequency 27

4 71

0 18

Percent 0.32 %

0.05 %

0.85 %

0.00 %

0.22 %

Citations

Frequency

2 0

11 0

0 Percent

0.14 %

0.00 %

0.76 %

0.00 %

0.00 %

Rate per 100 stops 7.41

0.00 15.49

--- 0.00

Warnings

Frequency

19 1

42 0

0 Percent

0.37 %

0.02 %

0.82 %

0.00 %

0.00 %

Rate per 100 stops 70.37

25.00 59.15

--- 0.00

Clean

Frequency 6

3 18

0 18

Percent 0.33 %

0.16 %

0.99 %

0.00 %

0.99 %

Rate per 100 stops

22.22 75.00

25.35 ---

100.00 Searches (All)

Frequency

0 0

2 0

0 Percent

0.00 %

0.00 %

2.99 %

0.00 %

0.00 %

Rate per 100 stops 0.00

0.00 2.82

--- 0.00

Discretionary Searches

Frequency

0 0

2 0

0 Percent

0.00 %

0.00 %

3.17 %

0.00 %

0.00 %

Rate per 100 stops 0.00

0.00 2.82

--- 0.00

Non-D

iscretionary Searches

Frequency 0

0 0

0 0

Percent 0.00 %

0.00 %

0.00 %

0.00 %

0.00 %

Rate per 100 stops

0.00 0.00

0.00 ---

0.00 Contraband H

its

Frequency 0

0 0

0 0

Percent 0.00 %

0.00 %

0.00 %

0.00 %

0.00 %

Rate per 100 searches

--- ---

0.00 ---

--- Race Know

n

Frequency 2

0 2

0 3

Percent 0.34 %

0.00 %

0.34 %

0.00 %

0.51 %

Rate per 100 stops

7.41 0.00

2.82 ---

16.67

DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC SAFETY APPENDIX F – REGION 3:MCALLEN – DISTRICT LEVEL ANALYSIS

Page 166: 2016-2017 - Texas Department of Public Safety · collected by the Texas Department of Public Safety (TX DPS). According to the Texas Code of Criminal Procedure, “racial profiling

163

Falls

Bexar

GonzalesC

omal

FayetteK

err

Guadalupe

Blanco

Coryell M

cLennan

Atascosa

Bastrop

DeW

itt

Frio

JacksonK

arnes

Limestone

Medina

Freestone

Bell

Calhoun

Ham

ilton

Kendall

Lavaca

McMullen

San Saba

Travis

Victoria

William

son

Bandera

Bosque

Burnet

Caldw

ell

Gillespie

Goliad

Hays

Hill

Lampasas

Lee

LlanoM

ilam

Mills

Wilson

Potter

Sw

isher

Terry

Randall

Hall

Cochran

Haskell

Armstrong

King

RobertsStonewallYoung

Lipscomb

Fisher

Throckmorton Archer

Bailey

Cottle

Crosby

Deaf S

mith

Donley

Kent

Sherman

Stephens

Baylor

Hockley

Jack

Ochiltree

Oldham

Com

anche

Callahan

Foard

Hartley

Lamb

Mitchell

Moore

Yoakum

Briscoe

Hale

Scurry

Gray

Brow

n

Carson

Castro

Childress

Clay

Collingsw

orth

Coleman

Dallam

Dickens

Eastland

Floyd

Garza

Hansford

Hardeman

Hemphill

Hutchinson

Jones

Knox

Lubbock

Lynn

Montague

Motley

TaylorN

olan

Parm

er

Runnels

Shackelford

Wheeler

Wichita

Wilbarger

El

Paso

Schleicher

Presidio

Kim

ble

Martin

Terrell

Crane

Winkler

Daw

son

Andrew

s

Upton

Hudspeth

Mason

Borden

Coke

Gaines

Irion

Brew

ster

Menard

TomG

reen

How

ard

ReaganC

oncho

Crockett

Culberson

Ector

Glasscock

Jeff Davis

Sterling

Loving

McC

ulloch

Midland

Pecos

Reeves

Sutton

Ward

3D3A

US

281

Zavala

Starr

WebbZapata

Hidalgo

Duval

Bee

Jim Wells

MaverickA

ransas

Dim

mit

Edw

ards

JimH

oggK

enedy

Kinney

Kleberg

LiveO

ak

Nueces

Real

Refugio

San Patricio

Willacy

Brooks

Cam

eron

LaSalle

Uvalde

Val Verde

Newton

Trinity

Houston

Nacogdoches

Cham

bers

Waller

Orange

Montgom

ery

Polk

SanAugustine

Tyler

Angelina

Brazoria

Brazos

Liberty

WalkerH

arris

Leon

Austin

Burleson

Fort Bend

Galveston

Grimes

Jasper

Jefferson

Madison

Matagorda

Robertson

Sabine

Shelby

Washington

Colorado

Hardin

San

Jacinto

Wharton

Bow

ie

Cherokee

Harrison

Franklin

Cam

pH

opkins

Upshur

Collin

Morris

Anderson

Parker

Rains

Cooke

Dallas

Gregg

Johnson

Lamar

Marion

RedR

iver

Rockw

allD

entonC

ass

Delta

Erath

Ellis

FanninG

rayson

Henderson

Hood

Hunt

Kaufman

Navarro

Palo

Pinto

Panola

Rusk

Sm

ith

Som

ervell

Tarrant

Titus

VanZandt

Wise

Wood

Dallas

Region 11A

- Dallas

1B - Tyler

1C - H

urst1D

- Mt. Pleasant

Houston

Region 22A

- Houston

2B - B

eaumont

2C - C

onroe2D

- Bryan

San Antonio

Region 66A

- Waco

6B - Austin

6C - S

an Antonio

McA

llenR

egion 33A

- McA

llen3B

- Laredo3C

- Corpus C

hristi3D

- McA

llen3E

- Del R

io

El PasoR

egion 44A

- Midland

4B - El Paso

LubbockR

egion 5Lubbock - 5AA

marillo - 5B

Abilene - 5C

5 B

C

A

B

E

CDA

B

C

A

BC

A

D

BA

B

C

D

A

64

123

Page 167: 2016-2017 - Texas Department of Public Safety · collected by the Texas Department of Public Safety (TX DPS). According to the Texas Code of Criminal Procedure, “racial profiling

164

Highway Patrol - 2017

DISTRICT 3C 2017

African American

White

Hispanic

Stops

Frequency 3,075

26,539 62,982

Percent 3.27 %

28.20 %

66.92 %

Citations

Frequency

1,219 7,692

23,772 Percent

3.67 %

23.14 %

71.52 %

Rate per 100 stops 39.64

28.98 37.74

Warnings

Frequency

1,856 18,847

39,210 Percent

3.05 %

30.96 %

64.41 %

Rate per 100 stops 60.36

71.02 62.26

Searches (All)

Frequency 234

1,025 2,840

Percent 5.65 %

24.75 %

68.58 %

Rate per 100 stops

7.61 3.86

4.51 D

iscretionary Searches

Frequency 63

325 1,246

Percent 3.80 %

19.63 %

75.24 %

Rate per 100 stops

2.05 1.22

1.98 N

on-Discretionary Searches

Frequency

171 700

1,594 Percent

6.88 %

28.17 %

64.14 %

Rate per 100 stops 5.56

2.64 2.53

Contraband Hits

Frequency

82 406

683 Percent

6.93 %

34.29 %

57.69 %

Rate per 100 searches 35.04

39.61 24.05

Race Known

Frequency

6 32

25 Percent

9.52 %

50.79 %

39.68 %

Rate per 100 stops 0.20

0.12 0.04

DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC SAFETY APPENDIX F – REGION 3:MCALLEN – DISTRICT LEVEL ANALYSIS

Page 168: 2016-2017 - Texas Department of Public Safety · collected by the Texas Department of Public Safety (TX DPS). According to the Texas Code of Criminal Procedure, “racial profiling

165

Highway Patrol - 2017

DISTRICT 3C 2017

Asian Alaska

Native/Am

erican Indian

Middle Eastern

Other

Unknow

n

Stops

Frequency 938

63 515

0 1

Percent 1.00 %

0.07 %

0.55 %

0.00 %

0.00 %

Citations

Frequency

353 23

179 0

1 Percent

1.06 %

0.07 %

0.54 %

0.00 %

0.00 %

Rate per 100 stops 37.63

36.51 34.76

--- 100.00

Warnings

Frequency

585 40

336 0

0 Percent

0.96 %

0.07 %

0.55 %

0.00 %

0.00 %

Rate per 100 stops 62.37

63.49 65.24

--- 0.00

Searches (All)

Frequency 19

4 19

0 0

Percent 0.46 %

0.10 %

0.46 %

0.00 %

0.00 %

Rate per 100 stops

2.03 6.35

3.69 ---

0.00 D

iscretionary Searches

Frequency 8

1 13

0 0

Percent 0.48 %

0.06 %

0.79 %

0.00 %

0.00 %

Rate per 100 stops

0.85 1.59

2.52 ---

0.00 N

on-Discretionary Searches

Frequency

11 3

6 0

0 Percent

0.44 %

0.12 %

0.24 %

0.00 %

0.00 %

Rate per 100 stops 1.17

4.76 1.17

--- 0.00

Contraband Hits

Frequency

5 1

7 0

0 Percent

0.42 %

0.08 %

0.59 %

0.00 %

0.00 %

Rate per 100 searches 26.32

25.00 36.84

--- ---

Race Known

Frequency

0 0

0 0

0 Percent

0.00 %

0.00 %

0.00 %

0.00 %

0.00 %

Rate per 100 stops 0.00

0.00 0.00

--- 0.00

DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC SAFETY APPENDIX F – REGION 3:MCALLEN – DISTRICT LEVEL ANALYSIS

Page 169: 2016-2017 - Texas Department of Public Safety · collected by the Texas Department of Public Safety (TX DPS). According to the Texas Code of Criminal Procedure, “racial profiling

166

Highway Patrol - 2016

DISTRICT 3C 2016

African American

White

Hispanic

Stops

Frequency 2,209

19,203 47,970

Percent 3.12 %

27.16 %

67.86 %

Citations

Frequency

949 5,468

17,937 Percent

3.82 %

22.00 %

72.18 %

Rate per 100 stops 42.96

28.47 37.39

Warnings

Frequency

1,260 13,735

30,033 Percent

2.75 %

29.96 %

65.51 %

Rate per 100 stops 57.04

71.53 62.61

Searches (All)

Frequency 61

261 614

Percent 6.43 %

27.53 %

64.77 %

Rate per 100 stops

2.76 1.36

1.28 D

iscretionary Searches

Frequency 8

106 298

Percent 1.92 %

25.48 %

71.63 %

Rate per 100 stops

0.36 0.55

0.62 N

on-Discretionary Searches

Frequency

53 155

316 Percent

9.96 %

29.14 %

59.40 %

Rate per 100 stops 2.40

0.81 0.66

Contraband Hits

Frequency

40 143

261 Percent

8.85 %

31.64 %

57.74 %

Rate per 100 searches 65.57

54.79 42.51

Race Known

Frequency

0 11

13 Percent

0.00 %

45.83 %

54.17 %

Rate per 100 stops 0.00

0.06 0.03

DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC SAFETY APPENDIX F – REGION 3:MCALLEN – DISTRICT LEVEL ANALYSIS

Page 170: 2016-2017 - Texas Department of Public Safety · collected by the Texas Department of Public Safety (TX DPS). According to the Texas Code of Criminal Procedure, “racial profiling

167

Highway Patrol - 2016

DISTRICT 3C 2016

Asian Alaska

Native/Am

erican Indian

Middle Eastern

Other

Unknow

n

Stops

Frequency 681

20 608

2 0

Percent 0.96 %

0.03 %

0.86 %

0.00 %

0.00 %

Citations

Frequency

246 6

242 1

0 Percent

0.99 %

0.02 %

0.97 %

0.00 %

0.00 %

Rate per 100 stops 36.12

30.00 39.80

50.00 ---

Warnings

Frequency

435 14

366 1

0 Percent

0.95 %

0.03 %

0.80 %

0.00 %

0.00 %

Rate per 100 stops 63.88

70.00 60.20

50.00 ---

Searches (All)

Frequency 7

2 3

0 0

Percent 0.74 %

0.21 %

0.32 %

0.00 %

0.00 %

Rate per 100 stops

1.03 10.00

0.49 0.00

--- D

iscretionary Searches

Frequency 2

0 2

0 0

Percent 0.48 %

0.00 %

0.48 %

0.00 %

0.00 %

Rate per 100 stops

0.29 0.00

0.33 0.00

--- N

on-Discretionary Searches

Frequency

5 2

1 0

0 Percent

0.94 %

0.38 %

0.19 %

0.00 %

0.00 %

Rate per 100 stops 0.73

10.00 0.16

0.00 ---

Contraband Hits

Frequency

5 2

1 0

0 Percent

1.11 %

0.44 %

0.22 %

0.00 %

0.00 %

Rate per 100 searches 71.43

100.00 33.33

--- ---

Race Known

Frequency

0 0

0 0

0 Percent

0.00 %

0.00 %

0.00 %

0.00 %

0.00 %

Rate per 100 stops 0.00

0.00 0.00

0.00 ---

DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC SAFETY APPENDIX F – REGION 3:MCALLEN – DISTRICT LEVEL ANALYSIS

Page 171: 2016-2017 - Texas Department of Public Safety · collected by the Texas Department of Public Safety (TX DPS). According to the Texas Code of Criminal Procedure, “racial profiling

168

Comm

ercial Vehicle Enforcement - 2017

District 3C 2017

African American

White

Hispanic

Stops

Frequency 527

1,788 5,142

Percent 7.00 %

23.75 %

68.30 %

Citations

Frequency

108 344

957 Percent

7.61 %

24.23 %

67.39 %

Rate per 100 stops 20.49

19.24 18.61

Warnings

Frequency

262 772

2,535 Percent

7.25 %

21.37 %

70.18 %

Rate per 100 stops 49.72

43.18 49.30

Clean

Frequency 157

672 1,650

Percent 6.29 %

26.92 %

66.11 %

Rate per 100 stops

29.79 37.58

32.09 Searches (All)

Frequency

1 3

32 Percent

2.78 %

8.33 %

88.89 %

Rate per 100 stops 0.19

0.17 0.62

Discretionary Searches

Frequency

1 2

28 Percent

3.23 %

6.45 %

90.32 %

Rate per 100 stops 0.19

0.11 0.54

Non-D

iscretionary Searches

Frequency 0

1 4

Percent 0.00 %

20.00 %

80.00 %

Rate per 100 stops

0.00 0.06

0.08 Contraband H

its

Frequency 1

1 4

Percent 16.67 %

16.67 %

66.67 %

Rate per 100 searches

100.00 33.33

12.50 Race Know

n

Frequency 10

25 74

Percent 9.01 %

22.52 %

66.67 %

Rate per 100 stops

1.90 1.40

1.44

DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC SAFETY APPENDIX F – REGION 3:MCALLEN – DISTRICT LEVEL ANALYSIS

Page 172: 2016-2017 - Texas Department of Public Safety · collected by the Texas Department of Public Safety (TX DPS). According to the Texas Code of Criminal Procedure, “racial profiling

169

Comm

ercial Vehicle Enforcement - 2017

District 3C 2017

Asian Alaska

Native/Am

erican Indian

Middle Eastern

Other

Unknow

n

Stops

Frequency 30

1 39

0 1

Percent 0.40 %

0.01 %

0.52 %

0.00 %

0.01 %

Citations

Frequency

7 0

4 0

0 Percent

0.49 %

0.00 %

0.28 %

0.00 %

0.00 %

Rate per 100 stops 23.33

0.00 10.26

--- 0.00

Warnings

Frequency

16 1

25 0

1 Percent

0.44 %

0.03 %

0.69 %

0.00 %

0.03 %

Rate per 100 stops 53.33

100.00 64.10

--- 100.00

Clean

Frequency 7

0 10

0 0

Percent 0.28 %

0.00 %

0.40 %

0.00 %

0.00 %

Rate per 100 stops

23.33 0.00

25.64 ---

0.00 Searches (All)

Frequency

0 0

0 0

0 Percent

0.00 %

0.00 %

0.00 %

0.00 %

0.00 %

Rate per 100 stops 0.00

0.00 0.00

--- 0.00

Discretionary Searches

Frequency

0 0

0 0

0 Percent

0.00 %

0.00 %

0.00 %

0.00 %

0.00 %

Rate per 100 stops 0.00

0.00 0.00

--- 0.00

Non-D

iscretionary Searches

Frequency 0

0 0

0 0

Percent 0.00 %

0.00 %

0.00 %

0.00 %

0.00 %

Rate per 100 stops

0.00 0.00

0.00 ---

0.00 Contraband H

its

Frequency 0

0 0

0 0

Percent 0.00 %

0.00 %

0.00 %

0.00 %

0.00 %

Rate per 100 searches

--- ---

--- ---

--- Race Know

n

Frequency 0

0 2

0 0

Percent 0.00 %

0.00 %

1.80 %

0.00 %

0.00 %

Rate per 100 stops

0.00 0.00

5.13 ---

0.00

DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC SAFETY APPENDIX F – REGION 3:MCALLEN – DISTRICT LEVEL ANALYSIS

Page 173: 2016-2017 - Texas Department of Public Safety · collected by the Texas Department of Public Safety (TX DPS). According to the Texas Code of Criminal Procedure, “racial profiling

170

Comm

ercial Vehicle Enforcement - 2016

District 3C 2016

African American

White

Hispanic

Stops

Frequency 377

1,641 4,680

Percent 5.57 %

24.25 %

69.15 %

Citations

Frequency

64 289

852 Percent

5.25 %

23.73 %

69.95 %

Rate per 100 stops 16.98

17.61 18.21

Warnings

Frequency

188 773

2,346 Percent

5.62 %

23.11 %

70.13 %

Rate per 100 stops 49.87

47.11 50.13

Clean

Frequency 125

579 1,482

Percent 5.67 %

26.26 %

67.21 %

Rate per 100 stops

33.16 35.28

31.67 Searches (All)

Frequency

1 2

30 Percent

3.03 %

6.06 %

90.91 %

Rate per 100 stops 0.27

0.12 0.64

Discretionary Searches

Frequency

1 2

29 Percent

3.13 %

6.25 %

90.63 %

Rate per 100 stops 0.27

0.12 0.62

Non-D

iscretionary Searches

Frequency 0

0 1

Percent 0.00 %

0.00 %

100.00 %

Rate per 100 stops

0.00 0.00

0.02 Contraband H

its

Frequency 0

0 3

Percent 0.00 %

0.00 %

100.00 %

Rate per 100 searches

0.00 0.00

10.00 Race Know

n

Frequency 11

32 141

Percent 5.88 %

17.11 %

75.40 %

Rate per 100 stops

2.92 1.95

3.01

DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC SAFETY APPENDIX F – REGION 3:MCALLEN – DISTRICT LEVEL ANALYSIS

Page 174: 2016-2017 - Texas Department of Public Safety · collected by the Texas Department of Public Safety (TX DPS). According to the Texas Code of Criminal Procedure, “racial profiling

171

Comm

ercial Vehicle Enforcement - 2016

District 3C 2016

Asian Alaska

Native/Am

erican Indian

Middle Eastern

Other

Unknow

n

Stops

Frequency 19

2 49

0 0

Percent 0.28 %

0.03 %

0.72 %

0.00 %

0.00 %

Citations

Frequency

3 0

10 0

0 Percent

0.25 %

0.00 %

0.82 %

0.00 %

0.00 %

Rate per 100 stops 15.79

0.00 20.41

--- ---

Warnings

Frequency

9 2

27 0

0 Percent

0.27 %

0.06 %

0.81 %

0.00 %

0.00 %

Rate per 100 stops 47.37

100.00 55.10

--- ---

Clean

Frequency 7

0 12

0 0

Percent 0.32 %

0.00 %

0.54 %

0.00 %

0.00 %

Rate per 100 stops

36.84 0.00

24.49 ---

--- Searches (All)

Frequency

0 0

0 0

0 Percent

0.00 %

0.00 %

0.00 %

0.00 %

0.00 %

Rate per 100 stops 0.00

0.00 0.00

--- ---

Discretionary Searches

Frequency

0 0

0 0

0 Percent

0.00 %

0.00 %

0.00 %

0.00 %

0.00 %

Rate per 100 stops 0.00

0.00 0.00

--- ---

Non-D

iscretionary Searches

Frequency 0

0 0

0 0

Percent 0.00 %

0.00 %

0.00 %

0.00 %

0.00 %

Rate per 100 stops

0.00 0.00

0.00 ---

--- Contraband H

its

Frequency 0

0 0

0 0

Percent 0.00 %

0.00 %

0.00 %

0.00 %

0.00 %

Rate per 100 searches

--- ---

--- ---

--- Race Know

n

Frequency 1

0 2

0 0

Percent 0.53 %

0.00 %

1.07 %

0.00 %

0.00 %

Rate per 100 stops

5.26 0.00

4.08 ---

---

DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC SAFETY APPENDIX F – REGION 3:MCALLEN – DISTRICT LEVEL ANALYSIS

Page 175: 2016-2017 - Texas Department of Public Safety · collected by the Texas Department of Public Safety (TX DPS). According to the Texas Code of Criminal Procedure, “racial profiling

172

Falls

Bexar

GonzalesC

omal

FayetteK

err

Guadalupe

Blanco

Coryell M

cLennan

Atascosa

Bastrop

DeW

itt

Frio

JacksonK

arnes

Limestone

Medina

Freestone

Bell

Calhoun

Ham

ilton

Kendall

Lavaca

McMullen

San Saba

Travis

Victoria

William

son

Bandera

Bosque

Burnet

Caldw

ell

Gillespie

Goliad

Hays

Hill

Lampasas

Lee

LlanoM

ilam

Mills

Wilson

Potter

Sw

isher

Terry

Randall

Hall

Cochran

Haskell

Armstrong

King

RobertsStonewallYoung

Lipscomb

Fisher

Archer

Bailey

Cottle

Crosby

Deaf S

mith

Donley

Kent

Sherman

Stephens

Baylor

Hockley

Jack

Ochiltree

Oldham

Com

anche

Callahan

Foard

Hartley

Lamb

Mitchell

Moore

Yoakum

Briscoe

Hale

Scurry

Gray

Brow

n

Carson

Castro

Childress

Clay

Collingsw

orth

Coleman

Dallam

Dickens

Eastland

Floyd

Garza

Hansford

Hardeman

Hemphill

Hutchinson

Jones

Knox

Lubbock

Lynn

Montague

Motley

TaylorN

olan

Parm

er

Runnels

Shackelford

Wheeler

Wichita

Wilbarger

El

Paso

Schleicher

Presidio

Kim

ble

Martin

Terrell

Crane

Winkler

Daw

son

Andrew

s

Upton

Hudspeth

Mason

Borden

Coke

Gaines

Irion

Brew

ster

Menard

TomG

reen

How

ard

ReaganC

oncho

Crockett

Culberson

Ector

Glasscock

Jeff Davis

Sterling

Loving

McC

ulloch

Midland

Pecos

Reeves

Sutton

Ward

3D3A

US

281

Zavala

Starr

WebbZapata

Hidalgo

Duval

Bee

Jim Wells

MaverickA

ransas

Dim

mit

Edw

ards

JimH

oggK

enedy

Kinney

Kleberg

LiveO

ak

Nueces

Real

Refugio

San Patricio

Willacy

Brooks

Cam

eron

LaSalle

Uvalde

Val Verde

Newton

Trinity

Houston

Nacogdoches

Cham

bers

Waller

Orange

Montgom

ery

Polk

SanAugustine

Tyler

Angelina

Brazoria

Brazos

Liberty

WalkerH

arris

Leon

Austin

Burleson

Fort Bend

Galveston

Grimes

Jasper

Jefferson

Madison

Matagorda

Robertson

Sabine

Shelby

Washington

Colorado

Hardin

San

Jacinto

Wharton

Bow

ie

Cherokee

Harrison

Franklin

Cam

pH

opkins

Upshur

Collin

Morris

Anderson

Parker

Rains

Cooke

Dallas

Gregg

Johnson

Lamar

Marion

RedR

iver

Rockw

allD

entonC

ass

Delta

Erath

Ellis

FanninG

rayson

Henderson

Hood

Hunt

Kaufman

Navarro

Palo

Pinto

Panola

Rusk

Sm

ith

Som

ervell

Tarrant

Titus

VanZandt

Wise

Wood

Dallas

Region 11A

- Dallas

1B - Tyler

1C - H

urst1D

- Mt. Pleasant

Houston

Region 22A

- Houston

2B - B

eaumont

2C - C

onroe2D

- Bryan

San Antonio

Region 66A

- Waco

6B - Austin

6C - S

an Antonio

McA

llenR

egion 33A

- McA

llen3B

- Laredo3C

- Corpus C

hristi3D

- McA

llen3E

- Del R

io

El PasoR

egion 44A

- Midland

4B - El Paso

LubbockR

egion 5Lubbock - 5AA

marillo - 5B

Abilene - 5C

5 B

C

A

B

E

CDA

B

C

A

BC

A

D

BA

B

C

D

A

64

123

Throckmorton

Page 176: 2016-2017 - Texas Department of Public Safety · collected by the Texas Department of Public Safety (TX DPS). According to the Texas Code of Criminal Procedure, “racial profiling

173

Highway Patrol - 2017

DISTRICT 3E 2017

African American

White

Hispanic

Stops

Frequency 1,696

18,211 71,317

Percent 1.84 %

19.76 %

77.39 %

Citations

Frequency

356 3,037

19,008 Percent

1.57 %

13.40 %

83.86 %

Rate per 100 stops 20.99

16.68 26.65

Warnings

Frequency

1,340 15,174

52,309 Percent

1.93 %

21.84 %

75.28 %

Rate per 100 stops 79.01

83.32 73.35

Searches (All)

Frequency 75

457 3,013

Percent 2.08 %

12.67 %

83.56 %

Rate per 100 stops

4.42 2.51

4.22 D

iscretionary Searches

Frequency 37

213 1,643

Percent 1.93 %

11.11 %

85.71 %

Rate per 100 stops

2.18 1.17

2.30 N

on-Discretionary Searches

Frequency

38 244

1,370 Percent

2.25 %

14.45 %

81.11 %

Rate per 100 stops 2.24

1.34 1.92

Contraband Hits

Frequency

14 92

506 Percent

2.24 %

14.70 %

80.83 %

Rate per 100 searches 18.67

20.13 16.79

Race Known

Frequency

2 24

138 Percent

1.21 %

14.55 %

83.64 %

Rate per 100 stops 0.12

0.13 0.19

DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC SAFETY APPENDIX F – REGION 3:MCALLEN – DISTRICT LEVEL ANALYSIS

Page 177: 2016-2017 - Texas Department of Public Safety · collected by the Texas Department of Public Safety (TX DPS). According to the Texas Code of Criminal Procedure, “racial profiling

174

Highway Patrol - 2017

DISTRICT 3E 2017

Asian Alaska

Native/Am

erican Indian

Middle Eastern

Other

Unknow

n

Stops

Frequency 424

271 230

0 1

Percent 0.46 %

0.29 %

0.25 %

0.00 %

0.00 %

Citations

Frequency

71 145

48 0

1 Percent

0.31 %

0.64 %

0.21 %

0.00 %

0.00 %

Rate per 100 stops 16.75

53.51 20.87

--- 100.00

Warnings

Frequency

353 126

182 0

0 Percent

0.51 %

0.18 %

0.26 %

0.00 %

0.00 %

Rate per 100 stops 83.25

46.49 79.13

--- 0.00

Searches (All)

Frequency 12

44 5

0 0

Percent 0.33 %

1.22 %

0.14 %

0.00 %

0.00 %

Rate per 100 stops

2.83 16.24

2.17 ---

0.00 D

iscretionary Searches

Frequency 7

13 4

0 0

Percent 0.37 %

0.68 %

0.21 %

0.00 %

0.00 %

Rate per 100 stops

1.65 4.80

1.74 ---

0.00 N

on-Discretionary Searches

Frequency

5 31

1 0

0 Percent

0.30 %

1.84 %

0.06 %

0.00 %

0.00 %

Rate per 100 stops 1.18

11.44 0.43

--- 0.00

Contraband Hits

Frequency

0 14

0 0

0 Percent

0.00 %

2.24 %

0.00 %

0.00 %

0.00 %

Rate per 100 searches 0.00

31.82 0.00

--- ---

Race Known

Frequency

1 0

0 0

0 Percent

0.61 %

0.00 %

0.00 %

0.00 %

0.00 %

Rate per 100 stops 0.24

0.00 0.00

--- 0.00

DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC SAFETY APPENDIX F – REGION 3:MCALLEN – DISTRICT LEVEL ANALYSIS

Page 178: 2016-2017 - Texas Department of Public Safety · collected by the Texas Department of Public Safety (TX DPS). According to the Texas Code of Criminal Procedure, “racial profiling

175

Highway Patrol - 2016

DISTRICT 3E 2016

African American

White

Hispanic

Stops

Frequency 971

11,214 42,840

Percent 1.74 %

20.13 %

76.88 %

Citations

Frequency

226 2,433

13,839 Percent

1.35 %

14.56 %

82.81 %

Rate per 100 stops 23.27

21.70 32.30

Warnings

Frequency

745 8,781

29,001 Percent

1.91 %

22.51 %

74.35 %

Rate per 100 stops 76.73

78.30 67.70

Searches (All)

Frequency 18

87 792

Percent 2.00 %

9.65 %

87.80 %

Rate per 100 stops

1.85 0.78

1.85 D

iscretionary Searches

Frequency 8

32 393

Percent 1.84 %

7.36 %

90.34 %

Rate per 100 stops

0.82 0.29

0.92 N

on-Discretionary Searches

Frequency

10 55

399 Percent

2.14 %

11.78 %

85.44 %

Rate per 100 stops 1.03

0.49 0.93

Contraband Hits

Frequency

8 32

191 Percent

3.45 %

13.79 %

82.33 %

Rate per 100 searches 44.44

36.78 24.12

Race Known

Frequency

1 6

42 Percent

2.00 %

12.00 %

84.00 %

Rate per 100 stops 0.10

0.05 0.10

DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC SAFETY APPENDIX F – REGION 3:MCALLEN – DISTRICT LEVEL ANALYSIS

Page 179: 2016-2017 - Texas Department of Public Safety · collected by the Texas Department of Public Safety (TX DPS). According to the Texas Code of Criminal Procedure, “racial profiling

176

Highway Patrol - 2016

DISTRICT 3E 2016

Asian Alaska

Native/Am

erican Indian

Middle Eastern

Other

Unknow

n

Stops

Frequency 278

175 242

0 0

Percent 0.50 %

0.31 %

0.43 %

0.00 %

0.00 %

Citations

Frequency

72 88

54 0

0 Percent

0.43 %

0.53 %

0.32 %

0.00 %

0.00 %

Rate per 100 stops 25.90

50.29 22.31

--- ---

Warnings

Frequency

206 87

188 0

0 Percent

0.53 %

0.22 %

0.48 %

0.00 %

0.00 %

Rate per 100 stops 74.10

49.71 77.69

--- ---

Searches (All)

Frequency 1

3 1

0 0

Percent 0.11 %

0.33 %

0.11 %

0.00 %

0.00 %

Rate per 100 stops

0.36 1.71

0.41 ---

--- D

iscretionary Searches

Frequency 0

2 0

0 0

Percent 0.00 %

0.46 %

0.00 %

0.00 %

0.00 %

Rate per 100 stops

0.00 1.14

0.00 ---

--- N

on-Discretionary Searches

Frequency

1 1

1 0

0 Percent

0.21 %

0.21 %

0.21 %

0.00 %

0.00 %

Rate per 100 stops 0.36

0.57 0.41

--- ---

Contraband Hits

Frequency

0 0

1 0

0 Percent

0.00 %

0.00 %

0.43 %

0.00 %

0.00 %

Rate per 100 searches 0.00

0.00 100.00

--- ---

Race Known

Frequency

0 1

0 0

0 Percent

0.00 %

2.00 %

0.00 %

0.00 %

0.00 %

Rate per 100 stops 0.00

0.57 0.00

--- ---

DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC SAFETY APPENDIX F – REGION 3:MCALLEN – DISTRICT LEVEL ANALYSIS

Page 180: 2016-2017 - Texas Department of Public Safety · collected by the Texas Department of Public Safety (TX DPS). According to the Texas Code of Criminal Procedure, “racial profiling

177

Comm

ercial Vehicle Enforcement - 2017

District 3E 2017

African American

White

Hispanic

Stops

Frequency 413

1,140 5,924

Percent 5.42 %

14.96 %

77.75 %

Citations

Frequency

48 146

876 Percent

4.42 %

13.46 %

80.74 %

Rate per 100 stops 11.62

12.81 14.79

Warnings

Frequency

264 654

3,750 Percent

5.56 %

13.77 %

78.93 %

Rate per 100 stops 63.92

57.37 63.30

Clean

Frequency 101

340 1,298

Percent 5.66 %

19.07 %

72.80 %

Rate per 100 stops

24.46 29.82

21.91 Searches (All)

Frequency

2 3

12 Percent

11.76 %

17.65 %

70.59 %

Rate per 100 stops 0.48

0.26 0.20

Discretionary Searches

Frequency

2 2

10 Percent

14.29 %

14.29 %

71.43 %

Rate per 100 stops 0.48

0.18 0.17

Non-D

iscretionary Searches

Frequency 0

1 2

Percent 0.00 %

33.33 %

66.67 %

Rate per 100 stops

0.00 0.09

0.03 Contraband H

its

Frequency 0

1 1

Percent 0.00 %

50.00 %

50.00 %

Rate per 100 searches

0.00 33.33

8.33 Race Know

n

Frequency 0

0 1

Percent 0.00 %

0.00 %

100.00 %

Rate per 100 stops

0.00 0.00

0.02

DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC SAFETY APPENDIX F – REGION 3:MCALLEN – DISTRICT LEVEL ANALYSIS

Page 181: 2016-2017 - Texas Department of Public Safety · collected by the Texas Department of Public Safety (TX DPS). According to the Texas Code of Criminal Procedure, “racial profiling

178

Comm

ercial Vehicle Enforcement - 2017

District 3E 2017

Asian Alaska

Native/Am

erican Indian

Middle Eastern

Other

Unknow

n

Stops

Frequency 27

6 109

0 0

Percent 0.35 %

0.08 %

1.43 %

0.00 %

0.00 %

Citations

Frequency

2 0

13 0

0 Percent

0.18 %

0.00 %

1.20 %

0.00 %

0.00 %

Rate per 100 stops 7.41

0.00 11.93

--- ---

Warnings

Frequency

18 3

62 0

0 Percent

0.38 %

0.06 %

1.30 %

0.00 %

0.00 %

Rate per 100 stops 66.67

50.00 56.88

--- ---

Clean

Frequency 7

3 34

0 0

Percent 0.39 %

0.17 %

1.91 %

0.00 %

0.00 %

Rate per 100 stops

25.93 50.00

31.19 ---

--- Searches (All)

Frequency

0 0

0 0

0 Percent

0.00 %

0.00 %

0.00 %

0.00 %

0.00 %

Rate per 100 stops 0.00

0.00 0.00

--- ---

Discretionary Searches

Frequency

0 0

0 0

0 Percent

0.00 %

0.00 %

0.00 %

0.00 %

0.00 %

Rate per 100 stops 0.00

0.00 0.00

--- ---

Non-D

iscretionary Searches

Frequency 0

0 0

0 0

Percent 0.00 %

0.00 %

0.00 %

0.00 %

0.00 %

Rate per 100 stops

0.00 0.00

0.00 ---

--- Contraband H

its

Frequency 0

0 0

0 0

Percent 0.00 %

0.00 %

0.00 %

0.00 %

0.00 %

Rate per 100 searches

--- ---

--- ---

--- Race Know

n

Frequency 0

0 0

0 0

Percent 0.00 %

0.00 %

0.00 %

0.00 %

0.00 %

Rate per 100 stops

0.00 0.00

0.00 ---

---

DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC SAFETY APPENDIX F – REGION 3:MCALLEN – DISTRICT LEVEL ANALYSIS

Page 182: 2016-2017 - Texas Department of Public Safety · collected by the Texas Department of Public Safety (TX DPS). According to the Texas Code of Criminal Procedure, “racial profiling

179

Comm

ercial Vehicle Enforcement - 2016

District 3E 2016

African American

White

Hispanic

Stops

Frequency 502

1,647 7,522

Percent 5.06 %

16.62 %

75.89 %

Citations

Frequency

64 229

960 Percent

5.03 %

18.00 %

75.47 %

Rate per 100 stops 12.75

13.90 12.76

Warnings

Frequency

312 944

4,766 Percent

5.07 %

15.34 %

77.45 %

Rate per 100 stops 62.15

57.32 63.36

Clean

Frequency 126

474 1,796

Percent 5.07 %

19.07 %

72.24 %

Rate per 100 stops

25.10 28.78

23.88 Searches (All)

Frequency

0 1

7 Percent

0.00 %

12.50 %

87.50 %

Rate per 100 stops 0.00

0.06 0.09

Discretionary Searches

Frequency

0 0

6 Percent

0.00 %

0.00 %

100.00 %

Rate per 100 stops 0.00

0.00 0.08

Non-D

iscretionary Searches

Frequency 0

1 1

Percent 0.00 %

50.00 %

50.00 %

Rate per 100 stops

0.00 0.06

0.01 Contraband H

its

Frequency 0

0 1

Percent 0.00 %

0.00 %

100.00 %

Rate per 100 searches

--- 0.00

14.29 Race Know

n

Frequency 1

0 16

Percent 5.88 %

0.00 %

94.12 %

Rate per 100 stops

0.20 0.00

0.21

DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC SAFETY APPENDIX F – REGION 3:MCALLEN – DISTRICT LEVEL ANALYSIS

Page 183: 2016-2017 - Texas Department of Public Safety · collected by the Texas Department of Public Safety (TX DPS). According to the Texas Code of Criminal Procedure, “racial profiling

180

Comm

ercial Vehicle Enforcement - 2016

District 3E 2016

Asian Alaska

Native/Am

erican Indian

Middle Eastern

Other

Unknow

n

Stops

Frequency 53

4 184

0 0

Percent 0.53 %

0.04 %

1.86 %

0.00 %

0.00 %

Citations

Frequency

6 1

12 0

0 Percent

0.47 %

0.08 %

0.94 %

0.00 %

0.00 %

Rate per 100 stops 11.32

25.00 6.52

--- ---

Warnings

Frequency

30 2

100 0

0 Percent

0.49 %

0.03 %

1.62 %

0.00 %

0.00 %

Rate per 100 stops 56.60

50.00 54.35

--- ---

Clean

Frequency 17

1 72

0 0

Percent 0.68 %

0.04 %

2.90 %

0.00 %

0.00 %

Rate per 100 stops

32.08 25.00

39.13 ---

--- Searches (All)

Frequency

0 0

0 0

0 Percent

0.00 %

0.00 %

0.00 %

0.00 %

0.00 %

Rate per 100 stops 0.00

0.00 0.00

--- ---

Discretionary Searches

Frequency

0 0

0 0

0 Percent

0.00 %

0.00 %

0.00 %

0.00 %

0.00 %

Rate per 100 stops 0.00

0.00 0.00

--- ---

Non-D

iscretionary Searches

Frequency 0

0 0

0 0

Percent 0.00 %

0.00 %

0.00 %

0.00 %

0.00 %

Rate per 100 stops

0.00 0.00

0.00 ---

--- Contraband H

its

Frequency 0

0 0

0 0

Percent 0.00 %

0.00 %

0.00 %

0.00 %

0.00 %

Rate per 100 searches

--- ---

--- ---

--- Race Know

n

Frequency 0

0 0

0 0

Percent 0.00 %

0.00 %

0.00 %

0.00 %

0.00 %

Rate per 100 stops

0.00 0.00

0.00 ---

---

DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC SAFETY APPENDIX F – REGION 3:MCALLEN – DISTRICT LEVEL ANALYSIS

Page 184: 2016-2017 - Texas Department of Public Safety · collected by the Texas Department of Public Safety (TX DPS). According to the Texas Code of Criminal Procedure, “racial profiling

181

Appendix G Region 4: El Paso Analysis

Page 185: 2016-2017 - Texas Department of Public Safety · collected by the Texas Department of Public Safety (TX DPS). According to the Texas Code of Criminal Procedure, “racial profiling

182

Falls

Bexar

GonzalesC

omal

FayetteK

err

Guadalupe

Blanco

Coryell M

cLennan

Atascosa

Bastrop

DeW

itt

Frio

JacksonK

arnes

Limestone

Medina

Freestone

Bell

Calhoun

Ham

ilton

Kendall

Lavaca

McMullen

San Saba

Travis

Victoria

William

son

Bandera

Bosque

Burnet

Caldw

ell

Gillespie

Goliad

Hays

Hill

Lampasas

Lee

LlanoM

ilam

Mills

Wilson

Potter

Sw

isher

Terry

Randall

Hall

Cochran

Haskell

Armstrong

King

RobertsStonewallYoung

Lipscomb

Fisher

Throckmorton Archer

Bailey

Cottle

Crosby

Deaf S

mith

Donley

Kent

Sherman

Stephens

Baylor

Hockley

Jack

Ochiltree

Oldham

Com

anche

Callahan

Foard

Hartley

Lamb

Mitchell

Moore

Yoakum

Briscoe

Hale

Scurry

Gray

Brow

n

Carson

Castro

Childress

Clay

Collingsw

orth

Coleman

Dallam

Dickens

Eastland

Floyd

Garza

Hansford

Hardeman

Hemphill

Hutchinson

Jones

Knox

Lubbock

Lynn

Montague

Motley

TaylorN

olan

Parm

er

Runnels

Shackelford

Wheeler

Wichita

Wilbarger

El

Paso

Schleicher

Presidio

Kim

ble

Martin

Terrell

Crane

Winkler

Daw

son

Andrew

s

Upton

Hudspeth

Mason

Borden

Coke

Gaines

Irion

Brew

ster

Menard

TomG

reen

How

ard

ReaganC

oncho

Crockett

Culberson

Ector

Glasscock

Jeff Davis

Sterling

Loving

McC

ulloch

Midland

Pecos

Reeves

Sutton

Ward

3D3A

US

281

Zavala

Starr

WebbZapata

Hidalgo

Duval

Bee

Jim Wells

MaverickA

ransas

Dim

mit

Edw

ards

JimH

oggK

enedy

Kinney

Kleberg

LiveO

ak

Nueces

Real

Refugio

San Patricio

Willacy

Brooks

Cam

eron

LaSalle

Uvalde

Val Verde

Newton

Trinity

Houston

Nacogdoches

Cham

bers

Waller

Orange

Montgom

ery

Polk

SanAugustine

Tyler

Angelina

Brazoria

Brazos

Liberty

WalkerH

arris

Leon

Austin

Burleson

Fort Bend

Galveston

Grimes

Jasper

Jefferson

Madison

Matagorda

Robertson

Sabine

Shelby

Washington

Colorado

Hardin

San

Jacinto

Wharton

Bow

ie

Cherokee

Harrison

Franklin

Cam

pH

opkins

Upshur

Collin

Morris

Anderson

Parker

Rains

Cooke

Dallas

Gregg

Johnson

Lamar

Marion

RedR

iver

Rockw

allD

entonC

ass

Delta

Erath

Ellis

FanninG

rayson

Henderson

Hood

Hunt

Kaufman

Navarro

Palo

Pinto

Panola

Rusk

Sm

ith

Som

ervell

Tarrant

Titus

VanZandt

Wise

Wood

Dallas

Region 11A

- Dallas

1B - Tyler

1C - H

urst1D

- Mt. Pleasant

Houston

Region 22A

- Houston

2B - B

eaumont

2C - C

onroe2D

- Bryan

San Antonio

Region 66A

- Waco

6B - Austin

6C - S

an Antonio

McA

llenR

egion 33A

- McA

llen3B

- Laredo3C

- Corpus C

hristi3D

- McA

llen3E

- Del R

io

El PasoR

egion 44A

- Midland

4B - El Paso

LubbockR

egion 5Lubbock - 5AA

marillo - 5B

Abilene - 5C

5 B

C

A

B

E

CDA

B

C

A

BC

A

D

BA

B

C

D

A

64

123

Page 186: 2016-2017 - Texas Department of Public Safety · collected by the Texas Department of Public Safety (TX DPS). According to the Texas Code of Criminal Procedure, “racial profiling

183

Highway Patrol - 2017

REGIO

N 4 2017

African American

White

Hispanic

Stops

Frequency 12,563

76,671 125,398

Percent 5.74 %

35.03 %

57.30 %

Citations

Frequency

4,814 23,690

48,711 Percent

6.12 %

30.11 %

61.91 %

Rate per 100 stops 38.32

30.90 38.85

Warnings

Frequency

7,749 52,981

76,687 Percent

5.53 %

37.80 %

54.71 %

Rate per 100 stops 61.68

69.10 61.15

Searches (All)

Frequency 801

2,032 5,479

Percent 9.54 %

24.20 %

65.24 %

Rate per 100 stops

6.38 2.65

4.37 D

iscretionary Searches

Frequency 243

711 2,262

Percent 7.47 %

21.86 %

69.56 %

Rate per 100 stops

1.93 0.93

1.80 N

on-Discretionary Searches

Frequency

558 1,321

3,217 Percent

10.84 %

25.67 %

62.51 %

Rate per 100 stops 4.44

1.72 2.57

Contraband Hits

Frequency

255 674

1,280 Percent

11.44 %

30.24 %

57.42 %

Rate per 100 searches 31.84

33.17 23.36

Race Known

Frequency

12 47

46 Percent

11.11 %

43.52 %

42.59 %

Rate per 100 stops 0.10

0.06 0.04

DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC SAFETY APPENDIX G – REGION 4:EL PASO ANALYSIS

Page 187: 2016-2017 - Texas Department of Public Safety · collected by the Texas Department of Public Safety (TX DPS). According to the Texas Code of Criminal Procedure, “racial profiling

184

Highway Patrol - 2017

REGIO

N 4 2017

Asian Alaska

Native/Am

erican Indian

Middle Eastern

Other

Unknow

n

Stops

Frequency 2,953

209 1,067

0 0

Percent 1.35 %

0.10 %

0.49 %

0.00 %

0.00 %

Citations

Frequency

1,025 72

373 0

0 Percent

1.30 %

0.09 %

0.47 %

0.00 %

0.00 %

Rate per 100 stops 34.71

34.45 34.96

--- ---

Warnings

Frequency

1,928 137

694 0

0 Percent

1.38 %

0.10 %

0.50 %

0.00 %

0.00 %

Rate per 100 stops 65.29

65.55 65.04

--- ---

Searches (All)

Frequency 54

7 25

0 0

Percent 0.64 %

0.08 %

0.30 %

0.00 %

0.00 %

Rate per 100 stops

1.83 3.35

2.34 ---

--- D

iscretionary Searches

Frequency 20

2 14

0 0

Percent 0.62 %

0.06 %

0.43 %

0.00 %

0.00 %

Rate per 100 stops

0.68 0.96

1.31 ---

--- N

on-Discretionary Searches

Frequency

34 5

11 0

0 Percent

0.66 %

0.10 %

0.21 %

0.00 %

0.00 %

Rate per 100 stops 1.15

2.39 1.03

--- ---

Contraband Hits

Frequency

12 1

7 0

0 Percent

0.54 %

0.04 %

0.31 %

0.00 %

0.00 %

Rate per 100 searches 22.22

14.29 28.00

--- ---

Race Known

Frequency

3 0

0 0

0 Percent

2.78 %

0.00 %

0.00 %

0.00 %

0.00 %

Rate per 100 stops 0.10

0.00 0.00

--- ---

DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC SAFETY APPENDIX G – REGION 4:EL PASO ANALYSIS

Page 188: 2016-2017 - Texas Department of Public Safety · collected by the Texas Department of Public Safety (TX DPS). According to the Texas Code of Criminal Procedure, “racial profiling

185

Highway Patrol - 2016

REGIO

N 4 2016

African American

White

Hispanic

Stops

Frequency 13,504

78,867 123,151

Percent 6.12 %

35.74 %

55.82 %

Citations

Frequency

4,794 22,272

46,234 Percent

6.39 %

29.71 %

61.67 %

Rate per 100 stops 35.50

28.24 37.54

Warnings

Frequency

8,710 56,595

76,917 Percent

5.98 %

38.85 %

52.80 %

Rate per 100 stops 64.50

71.76 62.46

Searches (All)

Frequency 394

873 2,151

Percent 11.36 %

25.18 %

62.04 %

Rate per 100 stops

2.92 1.11

1.75 D

iscretionary Searches

Frequency 147

336 1,098

Percent 9.15 %

20.92 %

68.37 %

Rate per 100 stops

1.09 0.43

0.89 N

on-Discretionary Searches

Frequency

247 537

1,053 Percent

13.27 %

28.86 %

56.58 %

Rate per 100 stops 1.83

0.68 0.86

Contraband Hits

Frequency

159 413

730 Percent

12.06 %

31.34 %

55.39 %

Rate per 100 searches 40.36

47.31 33.94

Race Known

Frequency

2 8

20 Percent

6.67 %

26.67 %

66.67 %

Rate per 100 stops 0.01

0.01 0.02

DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC SAFETY APPENDIX G – REGION 4:EL PASO ANALYSIS

Page 189: 2016-2017 - Texas Department of Public Safety · collected by the Texas Department of Public Safety (TX DPS). According to the Texas Code of Criminal Procedure, “racial profiling

186

Highway Patrol - 2016

REGIO

N 4 2016

Asian Alaska

Native/Am

erican Indian

Middle Eastern

Other

Unknow

n

Stops

Frequency 3,256

213 1,646

2 2

Percent 1.48 %

0.10 %

0.75 %

0.00 %

0.00 %

Citations

Frequency

1,087 79

505 1

0 Percent

1.45 %

0.11 %

0.67 %

0.00 %

0.00 %

Rate per 100 stops 33.38

37.09 30.68

50.00 0.00

Warnings

Frequency

2,169 134

1,141 1

2 Percent

1.49 %

0.09 %

0.78 %

0.00 %

0.00 %

Rate per 100 stops 66.62

62.91 69.32

50.00 100.00

Searches (All)

Frequency 21

6 22

0 0

Percent 0.61 %

0.17 %

0.63 %

0.00 %

0.00 %

Rate per 100 stops

0.64 2.82

1.34 0.00

0.00 D

iscretionary Searches

Frequency 15

0 10

0 0

Percent 0.93 %

0.00 %

0.62 %

0.00 %

0.00 %

Rate per 100 stops

0.46 0.00

0.61 0.00

0.00 N

on-Discretionary Searches

Frequency

6 6

12 0

0 Percent

0.32 %

0.32 %

0.64 %

0.00 %

0.00 %

Rate per 100 stops 0.18

2.82 0.73

0.00 0.00

Contraband Hits

Frequency

6 4

6 0

0 Percent

0.46 %

0.30 %

0.46 %

0.00 %

0.00 %

Rate per 100 searches 28.57

66.67 27.27

--- ---

Race Known

Frequency

0 0

0 0

0 Percent

0.00 %

0.00 %

0.00 %

0.00 %

0.00 %

Rate per 100 stops 0.00

0.00 0.00

0.00 0.00

DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC SAFETY APPENDIX G – REGION 4:EL PASO ANALYSIS

Page 190: 2016-2017 - Texas Department of Public Safety · collected by the Texas Department of Public Safety (TX DPS). According to the Texas Code of Criminal Procedure, “racial profiling

187

Comm

ercial Vehicle Enforcement - 2017

Region 4 2017 African Am

erican W

hite H

ispanic Stops

Frequency

1,955 8,538

15,343 Percent

7.39 %

32.26 %

57.98 %

Citations

Frequency 439

2,038 4,215

Percent 6.51 %

30.20 %

62.46 %

Rate per 100 stops

22.46 23.87

27.47 W

arnings

Frequency 826

3,113 6,566

Percent 7.69 %

28.98 %

61.12 %

Rate per 100 stops

42.25 36.46

42.79 Clean

Frequency

690 3,387

4,562 Percent

7.69 %

37.75 %

50.84 %

Rate per 100 stops 35.29

39.67 29.73

Searches (All)

Frequency 12

18 31

Percent 19.35 %

29.03 %

50.00 %

Rate per 100 stops

0.61 0.21

0.20 D

iscretionary Searches

Frequency 7

11 19

Percent 18.42 %

28.95 %

50.00 %

Rate per 100 stops

0.36 0.13

0.12 N

on-Discretionary Searches

Frequency

5 7

12 Percent

20.83 %

29.17 %

50.00 %

Rate per 100 stops 0.26

0.08 0.08

Contraband Hits

Frequency

5 8

9 Percent

21.74 %

34.78 %

39.13 %

Rate per 100 searches 41.67

44.44 29.03

Race Known

Frequency

0 1

0 Percent

0.00 %

100.00 %

0.00 %

Rate per 100 stops 0.00

0.01 0.00

DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC SAFETY APPENDIX G – REGION 4:EL PASO ANALYSIS

Page 191: 2016-2017 - Texas Department of Public Safety · collected by the Texas Department of Public Safety (TX DPS). According to the Texas Code of Criminal Procedure, “racial profiling

188

Comm

ercial Vehicle Enforcement - 2017

Region 4 2017 Asian

Alaska N

ative/American

Indian

Middle Eastern

Other

Unknow

n

Stops

Frequency 303

14 191

0 119

Percent 1.14 %

0.05 %

0.72 %

0.00 %

0.45 %

Citations

Frequency

34 3

19 0

0 Percent

0.50 %

0.04 %

0.28 %

0.00 %

0.00 %

Rate per 100 stops 11.22

21.43 9.95

--- 0.00

Warnings

Frequency

148 6

73 0

10 Percent

1.38 %

0.06 %

0.68 %

0.00 %

0.09 %

Rate per 100 stops 48.84

42.86 38.22

--- 8.40

Clean

Frequency 121

5 99

0 109

Percent 1.35 %

0.06 %

1.10 %

0.00 %

1.21 %

Rate per 100 stops

39.93 35.71

51.83 ---

91.60 Searches (All)

Frequency

1 0

0 0

0 Percent

1.61 %

0.00 %

0.00 %

0.00 %

0.00 %

Rate per 100 stops 0.33

0.00 0.00

--- 0.00

Discretionary Searches

Frequency

1 0

0 0

0 Percent

2.63 %

0.00 %

0.00 %

0.00 %

0.00 %

Rate per 100 stops 0.33

0.00 0.00

--- 0.00

Non-D

iscretionary Searches

Frequency 0

0 0

0 0

Percent 0.00 %

0.00 %

0.00 %

0.00 %

0.00 %

Rate per 100 stops

0.00 0.00

0.00 ---

0.00 Contraband H

its

Frequency 1

0 0

0 0

Percent 4.35 %

0.00 %

0.00 %

0.00 %

0.00 %

Rate per 100 searches

100.00 ---

--- ---

--- Race Know

n

Frequency 0

0 0

0 0

Percent 0.00 %

0.00 %

0.00 %

0.00 %

0.00 %

Rate per 100 stops

0.00 0.00

0.00 ---

0.00

DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC SAFETY APPENDIX G – REGION 4:EL PASO ANALYSIS

Page 192: 2016-2017 - Texas Department of Public Safety · collected by the Texas Department of Public Safety (TX DPS). According to the Texas Code of Criminal Procedure, “racial profiling

189

Comm

ercial Vehicle Enforcement - 2016

Region 4 2016 African Am

erican W

hite H

ispanic Stops

Frequency

2,048 9,205

17,909 Percent

6.77 %

30.44 %

59.23 %

Citations

Frequency 408

2,065 4,174

Percent 6.06 %

30.65 %

61.95 %

Rate per 100 stops

19.92 22.43

23.31 W

arnings

Frequency 774

3,268 7,565

Percent 6.47 %

27.33 %

63.26 %

Rate per 100 stops

37.79 35.50

42.24 Clean

Frequency

866 3,872

6,170 Percent

7.50 %

33.56 %

53.47 %

Rate per 100 stops 42.29

42.06 34.45

Searches (All)

Frequency 9

10 50

Percent 13.04 %

14.49 %

72.46 %

Rate per 100 stops

0.44 0.11

0.28 D

iscretionary Searches

Frequency 5

4 40

Percent 10.20 %

8.16 %

81.63 %

Rate per 100 stops

0.24 0.04

0.22 N

on-Discretionary Searches

Frequency

4 6

10 Percent

20.00 %

30.00 %

50.00 %

Rate per 100 stops 0.20

0.07 0.06

Contraband Hits

Frequency

1 2

6 Percent

11.11 %

22.22 %

66.67 %

Rate per 100 searches 11.11

20.00 12.00

Race Known

Frequency

0 2

1 Percent

0.00 %

66.67 %

33.33 %

Rate per 100 stops 0.00

0.02 0.01

DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC SAFETY APPENDIX G – REGION 4:EL PASO ANALYSIS

Page 193: 2016-2017 - Texas Department of Public Safety · collected by the Texas Department of Public Safety (TX DPS). According to the Texas Code of Criminal Procedure, “racial profiling

190

Comm

ercial Vehicle Enforcement - 2016

Region 4 2016 Asian

Alaska N

ative/American

Indian

Middle Eastern

Other

Unknow

n

Stops

Frequency 459

21 421

0 173

Percent 1.52 %

0.07 %

1.39 %

0.00 %

0.57 %

Citations

Frequency

48 5

38 0

0 Percent

0.71 %

0.07 %

0.56 %

0.00 %

0.00 %

Rate per 100 stops 10.46

23.81 9.03

--- 0.00

Warnings

Frequency

194 3

142 0

13 Percent

1.62 %

0.03 %

1.19 %

0.00 %

0.11 %

Rate per 100 stops 42.27

14.29 33.73

--- 7.51

Clean

Frequency 217

13 241

0 160

Percent 1.88 %

0.11 %

2.09 %

0.00 %

1.39 %

Rate per 100 stops

47.28 61.90

57.24 ---

92.49 Searches (All)

Frequency

0 0

0 0

0 Percent

0.00 %

0.00 %

0.00 %

0.00 %

0.00 %

Rate per 100 stops 0.00

0.00 0.00

--- 0.00

Discretionary Searches

Frequency

0 0

0 0

0 Percent

0.00 %

0.00 %

0.00 %

0.00 %

0.00 %

Rate per 100 stops 0.00

0.00 0.00

--- 0.00

Non-D

iscretionary Searches

Frequency 0

0 0

0 0

Percent 0.00 %

0.00 %

0.00 %

0.00 %

0.00 %

Rate per 100 stops

0.00 0.00

0.00 ---

0.00 Contraband H

its

Frequency 0

0 0

0 0

Percent 0.00 %

0.00 %

0.00 %

0.00 %

0.00 %

Rate per 100 searches

--- ---

--- ---

--- Race Know

n

Frequency 0

0 0

0 0

Percent 0.00 %

0.00 %

0.00 %

0.00 %

0.00 %

Rate per 100 stops

0.00 0.00

0.00 ---

0.00

DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC SAFETY APPENDIX G – REGION 4:EL PASO ANALYSIS

Page 194: 2016-2017 - Texas Department of Public Safety · collected by the Texas Department of Public Safety (TX DPS). According to the Texas Code of Criminal Procedure, “racial profiling

191

Appendix H Region 4: El Paso

District Level Analysis

Page 195: 2016-2017 - Texas Department of Public Safety · collected by the Texas Department of Public Safety (TX DPS). According to the Texas Code of Criminal Procedure, “racial profiling

192

Falls

Bexar

GonzalesC

omal

FayetteK

err

Guadalupe

Blanco

Coryell M

cLennan

Atascosa

Bastrop

DeW

itt

Frio

JacksonK

arnes

Limestone

Medina

Freestone

Bell

Calhoun

Ham

ilton

Kendall

Lavaca

McMullen

San Saba

Travis

Victoria

William

son

Bandera

Bosque

Burnet

Caldw

ell

Gillespie

Goliad

Hays

Hill

Lampasas

Lee

LlanoM

ilam

Mills

Wilson

Potter

Sw

isher

Terry

Randall

Hall

Cochran

Haskell

Armstrong

King

RobertsStonewallYoung

Lipscomb

Fisher

Archer

Bailey

Cottle

Crosby

Deaf S

mith

Donley

Kent

Sherman

Stephens

Baylor

Hockley

Jack

Ochiltree

Oldham

Com

anche

Callahan

Foard

Hartley

Lamb

Mitchell

Moore

Yoakum

Briscoe

Hale

Scurry

Gray

Brow

n

Carson

Castro

Childress

Clay

Collingsw

orth

Coleman

Dallam

Dickens

Eastland

Floyd

Garza

Hansford

Hardeman

Hemphill

Hutchinson

Jones

Knox

Lubbock

Lynn

Montague

Motley

TaylorN

olan

Parm

er

Runnels

Shackelford

Wheeler

Wichita

Wilbarger

El

Paso

Schleicher

Presidio

Kim

ble

Martin

Terrell

Crane

Winkler

Daw

son

Andrew

s

Upton

Hudspeth

Mason

Borden

Coke

Gaines

Irion

Brew

ster

Menard

TomG

reen

How

ard

ReaganC

oncho

Crockett

Culberson

Ector

Glasscock

Jeff Davis

Sterling

Loving

McC

ulloch

Midland

Pecos

Reeves

Sutton

Ward

3D3A

US

281

Zavala

Starr

WebbZapata

Hidalgo

Duval

Bee

Jim Wells

MaverickA

ransas

Dim

mit

Edw

ards

JimH

oggK

enedy

Kinney

Kleberg

LiveO

ak

Nueces

Real

Refugio

San Patricio

Willacy

Brooks

Cam

eron

LaSalle

Uvalde

Val Verde

Newton

Trinity

Houston

Nacogdoches

Cham

bers

Waller

Orange

Montgom

ery

Polk

SanAugustine

Tyler

Angelina

Brazoria

Brazos

Liberty

WalkerH

arris

Leon

Austin

Burleson

Fort Bend

Galveston

Grimes

Jasper

Jefferson

Madison

Matagorda

Robertson

Sabine

Shelby

Washington

Colorado

Hardin

San

Jacinto

Wharton

Bow

ie

Cherokee

Harrison

Franklin

Cam

pH

opkins

Upshur

Collin

Morris

Anderson

Parker

Rains

Cooke

Dallas

Gregg

Johnson

Lamar

Marion

RedR

iver

Rockw

allD

entonC

ass

Delta

Erath

Ellis

FanninG

rayson

Henderson

Hood

Hunt

Kaufman

Navarro

Palo

Pinto

Panola

Rusk

Sm

ith

Som

ervell

Tarrant

Titus

VanZandt

Wise

Wood

Dallas

Region 11A

- Dallas

1B - Tyler

1C - H

urst1D

- Mt. Pleasant

Houston

Region 22A

- Houston

2B - B

eaumont

2C - C

onroe2D

- Bryan

San Antonio

Region 66A

- Waco

6B - Austin

6C - S

an Antonio

McA

llenR

egion 33A

- McA

llen3B

- Laredo3C

- Corpus C

hristi3D

- McA

llen3E

- Del R

io

El PasoR

egion 44A

- Midland

4B - El Paso

LubbockR

egion 5Lubbock - 5AA

marillo - 5B

Abilene - 5C

5 B

C

A

B

E

CDA

B

C

A

BC

A

D

BA

B

C

D

A

64

123

Throckmorton

Page 196: 2016-2017 - Texas Department of Public Safety · collected by the Texas Department of Public Safety (TX DPS). According to the Texas Code of Criminal Procedure, “racial profiling

193

Highway Patrol - 2017

DISTRICT 4A 2017

African American

White

Hispanic

Stops

Frequency 7,714

54,705 53,769

Percent 6.51 %

46.14 %

45.35 %

Citations

Frequency

3,397 19,398

25,019 Percent

6.96 %

39.73 %

51.25 %

Rate per 100 stops 44.04

35.46 46.53

Warnings

Frequency

4,317 35,307

28,750 Percent

6.19 %

50.62 %

41.22 %

Rate per 100 stops 55.96

64.54 53.47

Searches (All)

Frequency 507

1,478 2,329

Percent 11.63 %

33.90 %

53.42 %

Rate per 100 stops

6.57 2.70

4.33 D

iscretionary Searches

Frequency 146

491 861

Percent 9.62 %

32.37 %

56.76 %

Rate per 100 stops

1.89 0.90

1.60 N

on-Discretionary Searches

Frequency

361 987

1,468 Percent

12.70 %

34.72 %

51.64 %

Rate per 100 stops 4.68

1.80 2.73

Contraband Hits

Frequency

188 541

713 Percent

12.90 %

37.13 %

48.94 %

Rate per 100 searches 37.08

36.60 30.61

Race Known

Frequency

8 34

22 Percent

12.12 %

51.52 %

33.33 %

Rate per 100 stops 0.10

0.06 0.04

DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC SAFETY APPENDIX H – REGION 4:EL PASO – DISTRICT LEVEL ANALYSIS

Page 197: 2016-2017 - Texas Department of Public Safety · collected by the Texas Department of Public Safety (TX DPS). According to the Texas Code of Criminal Procedure, “racial profiling

194

Highway Patrol - 2017

DISTRICT 4A 2017

Asian Alaska

Native/Am

erican Indian

Middle Eastern

Other

Unknow

n

Stops

Frequency 1,630

138 608

0 0

Percent 1.37 %

0.12 %

0.51 %

0.00 %

0.00 %

Citations

Frequency

715 49

243 0

0 Percent

1.46 %

0.10 %

0.50 %

0.00 %

0.00 %

Rate per 100 stops 43.87

35.51 39.97

--- ---

Warnings

Frequency

915 89

365 0

0 Percent

1.31 %

0.13 %

0.52 %

0.00 %

0.00 %

Rate per 100 stops 56.13

64.49 60.03

--- ---

Searches (All)

Frequency 32

3 11

0 0

Percent 0.73 %

0.07 %

0.25 %

0.00 %

0.00 %

Rate per 100 stops

1.96 2.17

1.81 ---

--- D

iscretionary Searches

Frequency 12

1 6

0 0

Percent 0.79 %

0.07 %

0.40 %

0.00 %

0.00 %

Rate per 100 stops

0.74 0.72

0.99 ---

--- N

on-Discretionary Searches

Frequency

20 2

5 0

0 Percent

0.70 %

0.07 %

0.18 %

0.00 %

0.00 %

Rate per 100 stops 1.23

1.45 0.82

--- ---

Contraband Hits

Frequency

9 1

5 0

0 Percent

0.62 %

0.07 %

0.34 %

0.00 %

0.00 %

Rate per 100 searches 28.13

33.33 45.45

--- ---

Race Known

Frequency

2 0

0 0

0 Percent

3.03 %

0.00 %

0.00 %

0.00 %

0.00 %

Rate per 100 stops 0.12

0.00 0.00

--- ---

DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC SAFETY APPENDIX H – REGION 4:EL PASO – DISTRICT LEVEL ANALYSIS

Page 198: 2016-2017 - Texas Department of Public Safety · collected by the Texas Department of Public Safety (TX DPS). According to the Texas Code of Criminal Procedure, “racial profiling

195

Highway Patrol - 2016

DISTRICT 4A 2016

African American

White

Hispanic

Stops

Frequency 7,953

55,134 53,802

Percent 6.63 %

45.98 %

44.87 %

Citations

Frequency

3,299 17,711

23,111 Percent

7.28 %

39.08 %

51.00 %

Rate per 100 stops 41.48

32.12 42.96

Warnings

Frequency

4,654 37,423

30,691 Percent

6.24 %

50.17 %

41.14 %

Rate per 100 stops 58.52

67.88 57.04

Searches (All)

Frequency 221

614 898

Percent 12.58 %

34.95 %

51.11 %

Rate per 100 stops

2.78 1.11

1.67 D

iscretionary Searches

Frequency 68

207 349

Percent 10.74 %

32.70 %

55.13 %

Rate per 100 stops

0.86 0.38

0.65 N

on-Discretionary Searches

Frequency

153 407

549 Percent

13.61 %

36.21 %

48.84 %

Rate per 100 stops 1.92

0.74 1.02

Contraband Hits

Frequency

103 318

397 Percent

12.47 %

38.50 %

48.06 %

Rate per 100 searches 46.61

51.79 44.21

Race Known

Frequency

0 4

10 Percent

0.00 %

28.57 %

71.43 %

Rate per 100 stops 0.00

0.01 0.02

DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC SAFETY APPENDIX H – REGION 4:EL PASO – DISTRICT LEVEL ANALYSIS

Page 199: 2016-2017 - Texas Department of Public Safety · collected by the Texas Department of Public Safety (TX DPS). According to the Texas Code of Criminal Procedure, “racial profiling

196

Highway Patrol - 2016

DISTRICT 4A 2016

Asian Alaska

Native/Am

erican Indian

Middle Eastern

Other

Unknow

n

Stops

Frequency 1,919

141 960

2 1

Percent 1.60 %

0.12 %

0.80 %

0.00 %

0.00 %

Citations

Frequency

777 56

360 1

0 Percent

1.71 %

0.12 %

0.79 %

0.00 %

0.00 %

Rate per 100 stops 40.49

39.72 37.50

50.00 0.00

Warnings

Frequency

1,142 85

600 1

1 Percent

1.53 %

0.11 %

0.80 %

0.00 %

0.00 %

Rate per 100 stops 59.51

60.28 62.50

50.00 100.00

Searches (All)

Frequency 8

2 14

0 0

Percent 0.46 %

0.11 %

0.80 %

0.00 %

0.00 %

Rate per 100 stops

0.42 1.42

1.46 0.00

0.00 D

iscretionary Searches

Frequency 4

0 5

0 0

Percent 0.63 %

0.00 %

0.79 %

0.00 %

0.00 %

Rate per 100 stops

0.21 0.00

0.52 0.00

0.00 N

on-Discretionary Searches

Frequency

4 2

9 0

0 Percent

0.36 %

0.18 %

0.80 %

0.00 %

0.00 %

Rate per 100 stops 0.21

1.42 0.94

0.00 0.00

Contraband Hits

Frequency

3 0

5 0

0 Percent

0.36 %

0.00 %

0.61 %

0.00 %

0.00 %

Rate per 100 searches 37.50

0.00 35.71

--- ---

Race Known

Frequency

0 0

0 0

0 Percent

0.00 %

0.00 %

0.00 %

0.00 %

0.00 %

Rate per 100 stops 0.00

0.00 0.00

0.00 0.00

DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC SAFETY APPENDIX H – REGION 4:EL PASO – DISTRICT LEVEL ANALYSIS

Page 200: 2016-2017 - Texas Department of Public Safety · collected by the Texas Department of Public Safety (TX DPS). According to the Texas Code of Criminal Procedure, “racial profiling

197

Comm

ercial Vehicle Enforcement - 2017

District 4A 2017

African American

White

Hispanic

Stops

Frequency 1,575

7,444 11,429

Percent 7.58 %

35.83 %

55.01 %

Citations

Frequency

389 1,940

3,484 Percent

6.65 %

33.14 %

59.51 %

Rate per 100 stops 24.70

26.06 30.48

Warnings

Frequency

638 2,598

4,424 Percent

8.23 %

33.51 %

57.07 %

Rate per 100 stops 40.51

34.90 38.71

Clean

Frequency 548

2,906 3,521

Percent 7.64 %

40.52 %

49.09 %

Rate per 100 stops

34.79 39.04

30.81 Searches (All)

Frequency

8 16

25 Percent

16.33 %

32.65 %

51.02 %

Rate per 100 stops 0.51

0.21 0.22

Discretionary Searches

Frequency

6 9

14 Percent

20.69 %

31.03 %

48.28 %

Rate per 100 stops 0.38

0.12 0.12

Non-D

iscretionary Searches

Frequency 2

7 11

Percent 10.00 %

35.00 %

55.00 %

Rate per 100 stops

0.13 0.09

0.10 Contraband H

its

Frequency 4

7 9

Percent 20.00 %

35.00 %

45.00 %

Rate per 100 searches

50.00 43.75

36.00 Race Know

n

Frequency 0

0 0

Percent --- %

--- %

--- %

Rate per 100 stops

0.00 0.00

0.00

DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC SAFETY APPENDIX H – REGION 4:EL PASO – DISTRICT LEVEL ANALYSIS

Page 201: 2016-2017 - Texas Department of Public Safety · collected by the Texas Department of Public Safety (TX DPS). According to the Texas Code of Criminal Procedure, “racial profiling

198

Comm

ercial Vehicle Enforcement - 2017

District 4A 2017

Asian Alaska

Native/Am

erican Indian

Middle Eastern

Other

Unknow

n

Stops

Frequency 134

12 146

0 38

Percent 0.64 %

0.06 %

0.70 %

0.00 %

0.18 %

Citations

Frequency

20 3

18 0

0 Percent

0.34 %

0.05 %

0.31 %

0.00 %

0.00 %

Rate per 100 stops 14.93

25.00 12.33

--- 0.00

Warnings

Frequency

41 6

45 0

0 Percent

0.53 %

0.08 %

0.58 %

0.00 %

0.00 %

Rate per 100 stops 30.60

50.00 30.82

--- 0.00

Clean

Frequency 73

3 83

0 38

Percent 1.02 %

0.04 %

1.16 %

0.00 %

0.53 %

Rate per 100 stops

54.48 25.00

56.85 ---

100.00 Searches (All)

Frequency

0 0

0 0

0 Percent

0.00 %

0.00 %

0.00 %

0.00 %

0.00 %

Rate per 100 stops 0.00

0.00 0.00

--- 0.00

Discretionary Searches

Frequency

0 0

0 0

0 Percent

0.00 %

0.00 %

0.00 %

0.00 %

0.00 %

Rate per 100 stops 0.00

0.00 0.00

--- 0.00

Non-D

iscretionary Searches

Frequency 0

0 0

0 0

Percent 0.00 %

0.00 %

0.00 %

0.00 %

0.00 %

Rate per 100 stops

0.00 0.00

0.00 ---

0.00 Contraband H

its

Frequency 0

0 0

0 0

Percent 0.00 %

0.00 %

0.00 %

0.00 %

0.00 %

Rate per 100 searches

--- ---

--- ---

--- Race Know

n

Frequency 0

0 0

0 0

Percent --- %

--- %

--- %

--- %

--- %

Rate per 100 stops

0.00 0.00

0.00 ---

0.00

DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC SAFETY APPENDIX H – REGION 4:EL PASO – DISTRICT LEVEL ANALYSIS

Page 202: 2016-2017 - Texas Department of Public Safety · collected by the Texas Department of Public Safety (TX DPS). According to the Texas Code of Criminal Procedure, “racial profiling

199

Comm

ercial Vehicle Enforcement - 2016

District 4A 2016

African American

White

Hispanic

Stops

Frequency 1,547

7,642 12,472

Percent 6.96 %

34.40 %

56.14 %

Citations

Frequency

365 1,934

3,386 Percent

6.36 %

33.71 %

59.02 %

Rate per 100 stops 23.59

25.31 27.15

Warnings

Frequency

521 2,607

4,565 Percent

6.65 %

33.26 %

58.23 %

Rate per 100 stops 33.68

34.11 36.60

Clean

Frequency 661

3,101 4,521

Percent 7.65 %

35.90 %

52.33 %

Rate per 100 stops

42.73 40.58

36.25 Searches (All)

Frequency

7 7

28 Percent

16.67 %

16.67 %

66.67 %

Rate per 100 stops 0.45

0.09 0.22

Discretionary Searches

Frequency

3 2

21 Percent

11.54 %

7.69 %

80.77 %

Rate per 100 stops 0.19

0.03 0.17

Non-D

iscretionary Searches

Frequency 4

5 7

Percent 25.00 %

31.25 %

43.75 %

Rate per 100 stops

0.26 0.07

0.06 Contraband H

its

Frequency 1

2 3

Percent 16.67 %

33.33 %

50.00 %

Rate per 100 searches

14.29 28.57

10.71 Race Know

n

Frequency 0

1 1

Percent 0.00 %

50.00 %

50.00 %

Rate per 100 stops

0.00 0.01

0.01

DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC SAFETY APPENDIX H – REGION 4:EL PASO – DISTRICT LEVEL ANALYSIS

Page 203: 2016-2017 - Texas Department of Public Safety · collected by the Texas Department of Public Safety (TX DPS). According to the Texas Code of Criminal Procedure, “racial profiling

200

Comm

ercial Vehicle Enforcement - 2016

District 4A 2016

Asian Alaska

Native/Am

erican Indian

Middle Eastern

Other

Unknow

n

Stops

Frequency 208

17 305

0 24

Percent 0.94 %

0.08 %

1.37 %

0.00 %

0.11 %

Citations

Frequency

24 4

24 0

0 Percent

0.42 %

0.07 %

0.42 %

0.00 %

0.00 %

Rate per 100 stops 11.54

23.53 7.87

--- 0.00

Warnings

Frequency

60 3

81 0

2 Percent

0.77 %

0.04 %

1.03 %

0.00 %

0.03 %

Rate per 100 stops 28.85

17.65 26.56

--- 8.33

Clean

Frequency 124

10 200

0 22

Percent 1.44 %

0.12 %

2.32 %

0.00 %

0.25 %

Rate per 100 stops

59.62 58.82

65.57 ---

91.67 Searches (All)

Frequency

0 0

0 0

0 Percent

0.00 %

0.00 %

0.00 %

0.00 %

0.00 %

Rate per 100 stops 0.00

0.00 0.00

--- 0.00

Discretionary Searches

Frequency

0 0

0 0

0 Percent

0.00 %

0.00 %

0.00 %

0.00 %

0.00 %

Rate per 100 stops 0.00

0.00 0.00

--- 0.00

Non-D

iscretionary Searches

Frequency 0

0 0

0 0

Percent 0.00 %

0.00 %

0.00 %

0.00 %

0.00 %

Rate per 100 stops

0.00 0.00

0.00 ---

0.00 Contraband H

its

Frequency 0

0 0

0 0

Percent 0.00 %

0.00 %

0.00 %

0.00 %

0.00 %

Rate per 100 searches

--- ---

--- ---

--- Race Know

n

Frequency 0

0 0

0 0

Percent 0.00 %

0.00 %

0.00 %

0.00 %

0.00 %

Rate per 100 stops

0.00 0.00

0.00 ---

0.00

DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC SAFETY APPENDIX H – REGION 4:EL PASO – DISTRICT LEVEL ANALYSIS

Page 204: 2016-2017 - Texas Department of Public Safety · collected by the Texas Department of Public Safety (TX DPS). According to the Texas Code of Criminal Procedure, “racial profiling

201

Falls

Bexar

GonzalesC

omal

FayetteK

err

Guadalupe

Blanco

Coryell M

cLennan

Atascosa

Bastrop

DeW

itt

Frio

JacksonK

arnes

Limestone

Medina

Freestone

Bell

Calhoun

Ham

ilton

Kendall

Lavaca

McMullen

San Saba

Travis

Victoria

William

son

Bandera

Bosque

Burnet

Caldw

ell

Gillespie

Goliad

Hays

Hill

Lampasas

Lee

LlanoM

ilam

Mills

Wilson

Potter

Sw

isher

Terry

Randall

Hall

Cochran

Haskell

Armstrong

King

RobertsStonewallYoung

Lipscomb

Fisher

Archer

Bailey

Cottle

Crosby

Deaf S

mith

Donley

Kent

Sherman

Stephens

Baylor

Hockley

Jack

Ochiltree

Oldham

Com

anche

Callahan

Foard

Hartley

Lamb

Mitchell

Moore

Yoakum

Briscoe

Hale

Scurry

Gray

Brow

n

Carson

Castro

Childress

Clay

Collingsw

orth

Coleman

Dallam

Dickens

Eastland

Floyd

Garza

Hansford

Hardeman

Hemphill

Hutchinson

Jones

Knox

Lubbock

Lynn

Montague

Motley

TaylorN

olan

Parm

er

Runnels

Shackelford

Wheeler

Wichita

Wilbarger

El

Paso

Schleicher

Presidio

Kim

ble

Martin

Terrell

Crane

Winkler

Daw

son

Andrew

s

Upton

Hudspeth

Mason

Borden

Coke

Gaines

Irion

Brew

ster

Menard

TomG

reen

How

ard

ReaganC

oncho

Crockett

Culberson

Ector

Glasscock

Jeff Davis

Sterling

Loving

McC

ulloch

Midland

Pecos

Reeves

Sutton

Ward

3D3A

US

281

Zavala

Starr

WebbZapata

Hidalgo

Duval

Bee

Jim Wells

MaverickA

ransas

Dim

mit

Edw

ards

JimH

oggK

enedy

Kinney

Kleberg

LiveO

ak

Nueces

Real

Refugio

San Patricio

Willacy

Brooks

Cam

eron

LaSalle

Uvalde

Val Verde

Newton

Trinity

Houston

Nacogdoches

Cham

bers

Waller

Orange

Montgom

ery

Polk

SanAugustine

Tyler

Angelina

Brazoria

Brazos

Liberty

WalkerH

arris

Leon

Austin

Burleson

Fort Bend

Galveston

Grimes

Jasper

Jefferson

Madison

Matagorda

Robertson

Sabine

Shelby

Washington

Colorado

Hardin

San

Jacinto

Wharton

Bow

ie

Cherokee

Harrison

Franklin

Cam

pH

opkins

Upshur

Collin

Morris

Anderson

Parker

Rains

Cooke

Dallas

Gregg

Johnson

Lamar

Marion

RedR

iver

Rockw

allD

entonC

ass

Delta

Erath

Ellis

FanninG

rayson

Henderson

Hood

Hunt

Kaufman

Navarro

Palo

Pinto

Panola

Rusk

Sm

ith

Som

ervell

Tarrant

Titus

VanZandt

Wise

Wood

Dallas

Region 11A

- Dallas

1B - Tyler

1C - H

urst1D

- Mt. Pleasant

Houston

Region 22A

- Houston

2B - B

eaumont

2C - C

onroe2D

- Bryan

San Antonio

Region 66A

- Waco

6B - Austin

6C - S

an Antonio

McA

llenR

egion 33A

- McA

llen3B

- Laredo3C

- Corpus C

hristi3D

- McA

llen3E

- Del R

io

El PasoR

egion 44A

- Midland

4B - El Paso

LubbockR

egion 5Lubbock - 5AA

marillo - 5B

Abilene - 5C

5 B

C

A

B

E

CDA

B

C

A

BC

A

D

BA

B

C

D

A

64

123

Throckmorton

Page 205: 2016-2017 - Texas Department of Public Safety · collected by the Texas Department of Public Safety (TX DPS). According to the Texas Code of Criminal Procedure, “racial profiling

202

Highway Patrol - 2017

DISTRICT 4B 2017

African American

White

Hispanic

Stops

Frequency 4,849

21,966 71,629

Percent 4.83 %

21.90 %

71.42 %

Citations

Frequency

1,417 4,292

23,692 Percent

4.74 %

14.37 %

79.33 %

Rate per 100 stops 29.22

19.54 33.08

Warnings

Frequency

3,432 17,674

47,937 Percent

4.87 %

25.09 %

68.06 %

Rate per 100 stops 70.78

80.46 66.92

Searches (All)

Frequency 294

554 3,150

Percent 7.28 %

13.72 %

78.01 %

Rate per 100 stops

6.06 2.52

4.40 D

iscretionary Searches

Frequency 97

220 1,401

Percent 5.59 %

12.68 %

80.75 %

Rate per 100 stops

2.00 1.00

1.96 N

on-Discretionary Searches

Frequency

197 334

1,749 Percent

8.55 %

14.50 %

75.94 %

Rate per 100 stops 4.06

1.52 2.44

Contraband Hits

Frequency

67 133

567 Percent

8.68 %

17.23 %

73.45 %

Rate per 100 searches 22.79

24.01 18.00

Race Known

Frequency

4 13

24 Percent

9.52 %

30.95 %

57.14 %

Rate per 100 stops 0.08

0.06 0.03

DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC SAFETY APPENDIX H – REGION 4:EL PASO – DISTRICT LEVEL ANALYSIS

Page 206: 2016-2017 - Texas Department of Public Safety · collected by the Texas Department of Public Safety (TX DPS). According to the Texas Code of Criminal Procedure, “racial profiling

203

Highway Patrol - 2017

DISTRICT 4B 2017

Asian Alaska

Native/Am

erican Indian

Middle Eastern

Other

Unknow

n

Stops

Frequency 1,323

71 459

0 0

Percent 1.32 %

0.07 %

0.46 %

0.00 %

0.00 %

Citations

Frequency

310 23

130 0

0 Percent

1.04 %

0.08 %

0.44 %

0.00 %

0.00 %

Rate per 100 stops 23.43

32.39 28.32

--- ---

Warnings

Frequency

1,013 48

329 0

0 Percent

1.44 %

0.07 %

0.47 %

0.00 %

0.00 %

Rate per 100 stops 76.57

67.61 71.68

--- ---

Searches (All)

Frequency 22

4 14

0 0

Percent 0.54 %

0.10 %

0.35 %

0.00 %

0.00 %

Rate per 100 stops

1.66 5.63

3.05 ---

--- D

iscretionary Searches

Frequency 8

1 8

0 0

Percent 0.46 %

0.06 %

0.46 %

0.00 %

0.00 %

Rate per 100 stops

0.60 1.41

1.74 ---

--- N

on-Discretionary Searches

Frequency

14 3

6 0

0 Percent

0.61 %

0.13 %

0.26 %

0.00 %

0.00 %

Rate per 100 stops 1.06

4.23 1.31

--- ---

Contraband Hits

Frequency

3 0

2 0

0 Percent

0.39 %

0.00 %

0.26 %

0.00 %

0.00 %

Rate per 100 searches 13.64

0.00 14.29

--- ---

Race Known

Frequency

1 0

0 0

0 Percent

2.38 %

0.00 %

0.00 %

0.00 %

0.00 %

Rate per 100 stops 0.08

0.00 0.00

--- ---

DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC SAFETY APPENDIX H – REGION 4:EL PASO – DISTRICT LEVEL ANALYSIS

Page 207: 2016-2017 - Texas Department of Public Safety · collected by the Texas Department of Public Safety (TX DPS). According to the Texas Code of Criminal Procedure, “racial profiling

204

Highway Patrol - 2016

DISTRICT 4B 2016

African American

White

Hispanic

Stops

Frequency 5,551

23,733 69,349

Percent 5.51 %

23.56 %

68.85 %

Citations

Frequency

1,495 4,561

23,123 Percent

5.04 %

15.38 %

77.97 %

Rate per 100 stops 26.93

19.22 33.34

Warnings

Frequency

4,056 19,172

46,226 Percent

5.71 %

26.98 %

65.04 %

Rate per 100 stops 73.07

80.78 66.66

Searches (All)

Frequency 173

259 1,253

Percent 10.12 %

15.15 %

73.27 %

Rate per 100 stops

3.12 1.09

1.81 D

iscretionary Searches

Frequency 79

129 749

Percent 8.12 %

13.26 %

76.98 %

Rate per 100 stops

1.42 0.54

1.08 N

on-Discretionary Searches

Frequency

94 130

504 Percent

12.75 %

17.64 %

68.39 %

Rate per 100 stops 1.69

0.55 0.73

Contraband Hits

Frequency

56 95

333 Percent

11.38 %

19.31 %

67.68 %

Rate per 100 searches 32.37

36.68 26.58

Race Known

Frequency

2 4

10 Percent

12.50 %

25.00 %

62.50 %

Rate per 100 stops 0.04

0.02 0.01

DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC SAFETY APPENDIX H – REGION 4:EL PASO – DISTRICT LEVEL ANALYSIS

Page 208: 2016-2017 - Texas Department of Public Safety · collected by the Texas Department of Public Safety (TX DPS). According to the Texas Code of Criminal Procedure, “racial profiling

205

Highway Patrol - 2016

DISTRICT 4B 2016

Asian Alaska

Native/Am

erican Indian

Middle Eastern

Other

Unknow

n

Stops

Frequency 1,337

72 686

0 1

Percent 1.33 %

0.07 %

0.68 %

0.00 %

0.00 %

Citations

Frequency

310 23

145 0

0 Percent

1.05 %

0.08 %

0.49 %

0.00 %

0.00 %

Rate per 100 stops 23.19

31.94 21.14

--- 0.00

Warnings

Frequency

1,027 49

541 0

1 Percent

1.45 %

0.07 %

0.76 %

0.00 %

0.00 %

Rate per 100 stops 76.81

68.06 78.86

--- 100.00

Searches (All)

Frequency 13

4 8

0 0

Percent 0.76 %

0.23 %

0.47 %

0.00 %

0.00 %

Rate per 100 stops

0.97 5.56

1.17 ---

0.00 D

iscretionary Searches

Frequency 11

0 5

0 0

Percent 1.13 %

0.00 %

0.51 %

0.00 %

0.00 %

Rate per 100 stops

0.82 0.00

0.73 ---

0.00 N

on-Discretionary Searches

Frequency

2 4

3 0

0 Percent

0.27 %

0.54 %

0.41 %

0.00 %

0.00 %

Rate per 100 stops 0.15

5.56 0.44

--- 0.00

Contraband Hits

Frequency

3 4

1 0

0 Percent

0.61 %

0.81 %

0.20 %

0.00 %

0.00 %

Rate per 100 searches 23.08

100.00 12.50

--- ---

Race Known

Frequency

0 0

0 0

0 Percent

0.00 %

0.00 %

0.00 %

0.00 %

0.00 %

Rate per 100 stops 0.00

0.00 0.00

--- 0.00

DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC SAFETY APPENDIX H – REGION 4:EL PASO – DISTRICT LEVEL ANALYSIS

Page 209: 2016-2017 - Texas Department of Public Safety · collected by the Texas Department of Public Safety (TX DPS). According to the Texas Code of Criminal Procedure, “racial profiling

206

Comm

ercial Vehicle Enforcement - 2017

District 4B 2017

African American

White

Hispanic

Stops

Frequency 380

1,094 3,914

Percent 6.68 %

19.24 %

68.85 %

Citations

Frequency

50 98

731 Percent

5.59 %

10.96 %

81.77 %

Rate per 100 stops 13.16

8.96 18.68

Warnings

Frequency

188 515

2,142 Percent

6.29 %

17.22 %

71.64 %

Rate per 100 stops 49.47

47.07 54.73

Clean

Frequency 142

481 1,041

Percent 7.88 %

26.71 %

57.80 %

Rate per 100 stops

37.37 43.97

26.60 Searches (All)

Frequency

4 2

6 Percent

30.77 %

15.38 %

46.15 %

Rate per 100 stops 1.05

0.18 0.15

Discretionary Searches

Frequency

1 2

5 Percent

11.11 %

22.22 %

55.56 %

Rate per 100 stops 0.26

0.18 0.13

Non-D

iscretionary Searches

Frequency 3

0 1

Percent 75.00 %

0.00 %

25.00 %

Rate per 100 stops

0.79 0.00

0.03 Contraband H

its

Frequency 1

1 0

Percent 33.33 %

33.33 %

0.00 %

Rate per 100 searches

25.00 50.00

0.00 Race Know

n

Frequency 0

1 0

Percent 0.00 %

100.00 %

0.00 %

Rate per 100 stops

0.00 0.09

0.00

DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC SAFETY APPENDIX H – REGION 4:EL PASO – DISTRICT LEVEL ANALYSIS

Page 210: 2016-2017 - Texas Department of Public Safety · collected by the Texas Department of Public Safety (TX DPS). According to the Texas Code of Criminal Procedure, “racial profiling

207

Comm

ercial Vehicle Enforcement - 2017

District 4B 2017

Asian Alaska

Native/Am

erican Indian

Middle Eastern

Other

Unknow

n

Stops

Frequency 169

2 45

0 81

Percent 2.97 %

0.04 %

0.79 %

0.00 %

1.42 %

Citations

Frequency

14 0

1 0

0 Percent

1.57 %

0.00 %

0.11 %

0.00 %

0.00 %

Rate per 100 stops 8.28

0.00 2.22

--- 0.00

Warnings

Frequency

107 0

28 0

10 Percent

3.58 %

0.00 %

0.94 %

0.00 %

0.33 %

Rate per 100 stops 63.31

0.00 62.22

--- 12.35

Clean

Frequency 48

2 16

0 71

Percent 2.67 %

0.11 %

0.89 %

0.00 %

3.94 %

Rate per 100 stops

28.40 100.00

35.56 ---

87.65 Searches (All)

Frequency

1 0

0 0

0 Percent

7.69 %

0.00 %

0.00 %

0.00 %

0.00 %

Rate per 100 stops 0.59

0.00 0.00

--- 0.00

Discretionary Searches

Frequency

1 0

0 0

0 Percent

11.11 %

0.00 %

0.00 %

0.00 %

0.00 %

Rate per 100 stops 0.59

0.00 0.00

--- 0.00

Non-D

iscretionary Searches

Frequency 0

0 0

0 0

Percent 0.00 %

0.00 %

0.00 %

0.00 %

0.00 %

Rate per 100 stops

0.00 0.00

0.00 ---

0.00 Contraband H

its

Frequency 1

0 0

0 0

Percent 33.33 %

0.00 %

0.00 %

0.00 %

0.00 %

Rate per 100 searches

100.00 ---

--- ---

--- Race Know

n

Frequency 0

0 0

0 0

Percent 0.00 %

0.00 %

0.00 %

0.00 %

0.00 %

Rate per 100 stops

0.00 0.00

0.00 ---

0.00

DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC SAFETY APPENDIX H – REGION 4:EL PASO – DISTRICT LEVEL ANALYSIS

Page 211: 2016-2017 - Texas Department of Public Safety · collected by the Texas Department of Public Safety (TX DPS). According to the Texas Code of Criminal Procedure, “racial profiling

208

Comm

ercial Vehicle Enforcement - 2016

District 4B 2016

African American

White

Hispanic

Stops

Frequency 501

1,563 5,437

Percent 6.25 %

19.49 %

67.78 %

Citations

Frequency

43 131

788 Percent

4.30 %

13.09 %

78.72 %

Rate per 100 stops 8.58

8.38 14.49

Warnings

Frequency

253 661

3,000 Percent

6.14 %

16.04 %

72.82 %

Rate per 100 stops 50.50

42.29 55.18

Clean

Frequency 205

771 1,649

Percent 7.07 %

26.59 %

56.86 %

Rate per 100 stops

40.92 49.33

30.33 Searches (All)

Frequency

2 3

22 Percent

7.41 %

11.11 %

81.48 %

Rate per 100 stops 0.40

0.19 0.40

Discretionary Searches

Frequency

2 2

19 Percent

8.70 %

8.70 %

82.61 %

Rate per 100 stops 0.40

0.13 0.35

Non-D

iscretionary Searches

Frequency 0

1 3

Percent 0.00 %

25.00 %

75.00 %

Rate per 100 stops

0.00 0.06

0.06 Contraband H

its

Frequency 0

0 3

Percent 0.00 %

0.00 %

100.00 %

Rate per 100 searches

0.00 0.00

13.64 Race Know

n

Frequency 0

1 0

Percent 0.00 %

100.00 %

0.00 %

Rate per 100 stops

0.00 0.06

0.00

DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC SAFETY APPENDIX H – REGION 4:EL PASO – DISTRICT LEVEL ANALYSIS

Page 212: 2016-2017 - Texas Department of Public Safety · collected by the Texas Department of Public Safety (TX DPS). According to the Texas Code of Criminal Procedure, “racial profiling

209

Comm

ercial Vehicle Enforcement - 2016

District 4B 2016

Asian Alaska

Native/Am

erican Indian

Middle Eastern

Other

Unknow

n

Stops

Frequency 251

4 116

0 149

Percent 3.13 %

0.05 %

1.45 %

0.00 %

1.86 %

Citations

Frequency

24 1

14 0

0 Percent

2.40 %

0.10 %

1.40 %

0.00 %

0.00 %

Rate per 100 stops 9.56

25.00 12.07

--- 0.00

Warnings

Frequency

134 0

61 0

11 Percent

3.25 %

0.00 %

1.48 %

0.00 %

0.27 %

Rate per 100 stops 53.39

0.00 52.59

--- 7.38

Clean

Frequency 93

3 41

0 138

Percent 3.21 %

0.10 %

1.41 %

0.00 %

4.76 %

Rate per 100 stops

37.05 75.00

35.34 ---

92.62 Searches (All)

Frequency

0 0

0 0

0 Percent

0.00 %

0.00 %

0.00 %

0.00 %

0.00 %

Rate per 100 stops 0.00

0.00 0.00

--- 0.00

Discretionary Searches

Frequency

0 0

0 0

0 Percent

0.00 %

0.00 %

0.00 %

0.00 %

0.00 %

Rate per 100 stops 0.00

0.00 0.00

--- 0.00

Non-D

iscretionary Searches

Frequency 0

0 0

0 0

Percent 0.00 %

0.00 %

0.00 %

0.00 %

0.00 %

Rate per 100 stops

0.00 0.00

0.00 ---

0.00 Contraband H

its

Frequency 0

0 0

0 0

Percent 0.00 %

0.00 %

0.00 %

0.00 %

0.00 %

Rate per 100 searches

--- ---

--- ---

--- Race Know

n

Frequency 0

0 0

0 0

Percent 0.00 %

0.00 %

0.00 %

0.00 %

0.00 %

Rate per 100 stops

0.00 0.00

0.00 ---

0.00

DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC SAFETY APPENDIX H – REGION 4:EL PASO – DISTRICT LEVEL ANALYSIS

Page 213: 2016-2017 - Texas Department of Public Safety · collected by the Texas Department of Public Safety (TX DPS). According to the Texas Code of Criminal Procedure, “racial profiling

210

Appendix I Region 5: Lubbock Analysis

Page 214: 2016-2017 - Texas Department of Public Safety · collected by the Texas Department of Public Safety (TX DPS). According to the Texas Code of Criminal Procedure, “racial profiling

211

Falls

Bexar

GonzalesC

omal

FayetteK

err

Guadalupe

Blanco

Coryell M

cLennan

Atascosa

Bastrop

DeW

itt

Frio

JacksonK

arnes

Limestone

Medina

Freestone

Bell

Calhoun

Ham

ilton

Kendall

Lavaca

McMullen

San Saba

Travis

Victoria

William

son

Bandera

Bosque

Burnet

Caldw

ell

Gillespie

Goliad

Hays

Hill

Lampasas

Lee

LlanoM

ilam

Mills

Wilson

Potter

Sw

isher

Terry

Randall

Hall

Cochran

Haskell

Armstrong

King

RobertsStonewallYoung

Lipscomb

Fisher

Archer

Bailey

Cottle

Crosby

Deaf S

mith

Donley

Kent

Sherman

Stephens

Baylor

Hockley

Jack

Ochiltree

Oldham

Com

anche

Callahan

Foard

Hartley

Lamb

Mitchell

Moore

Yoakum

Briscoe

Hale

Scurry

Gray

Brow

n

Carson

Castro

Childress

Clay

Collingsw

orth

Coleman

Dallam

Dickens

Eastland

Floyd

Garza

Hansford

Hardeman

Hemphill

Hutchinson

Jones

Knox

Lubbock

Lynn

Montague

Motley

TaylorN

olan

Parm

er

Runnels

Shackelford

Wheeler

Wichita

Wilbarger

El

Paso

Schleicher

Presidio

Kim

ble

Martin

Terrell

Crane

Winkler

Daw

son

Andrew

s

Upton

Hudspeth

Mason

Borden

Coke

Gaines

Irion

Brew

ster

Menard

TomG

reen

How

ard

ReaganC

oncho

Crockett

Culberson

Ector

Glasscock

Jeff Davis

Sterling

Loving

McC

ulloch

Midland

Pecos

Reeves

Sutton

Ward

3D3A

US

281

Zavala

Starr

WebbZapata

Hidalgo

Duval

Bee

Jim Wells

MaverickA

ransas

Dim

mit

Edw

ards

JimH

oggK

enedy

Kinney

Kleberg

LiveO

ak

Nueces

Real

Refugio

San Patricio

Willacy

Brooks

Cam

eron

LaSalle

Uvalde

Val Verde

Newton

Trinity

Houston

Nacogdoches

Cham

bers

Waller

Orange

Montgom

ery

Polk

SanAugustine

Tyler

Angelina

Brazoria

Brazos

Liberty

WalkerH

arris

Leon

Austin

Burleson

Fort Bend

Galveston

Grimes

Jasper

Jefferson

Madison

Matagorda

Robertson

Sabine

Shelby

Washington

Colorado

Hardin

San

Jacinto

Wharton

Bow

ie

Cherokee

Harrison

Franklin

Cam

pH

opkins

Upshur

Collin

Morris

Anderson

Parker

Rains

Cooke

Dallas

Gregg

Johnson

Lamar

Marion

RedR

iver

Rockw

allD

entonC

ass

Delta

Erath

Ellis

FanninG

rayson

Henderson

Hood

Hunt

Kaufman

Navarro

Palo

Pinto

Panola

Rusk

Sm

ith

Som

ervell

Tarrant

Titus

VanZandt

Wise

Wood

Dallas

Region 11A

- Dallas

1B - Tyler

1C - H

urst1D

- Mt. Pleasant

Houston

Region 22A

- Houston

2B - B

eaumont

2C - C

onroe2D

- Bryan

San Antonio

Region 66A

- Waco

6B - Austin

6C - S

an Antonio

McA

llenR

egion 33A

- McA

llen3B

- Laredo3C

- Corpus C

hristi3D

- McA

llen3E

- Del R

io

El PasoR

egion 44A

- Midland

4B - El Paso

LubbockR

egion 5Lubbock - 5AA

marillo - 5B

Abilene - 5C

Throckmorton

5 B

C

A

B

E

CDA

B

C

A

BC

A

D

BA

B

C

D

A

64

123

Throckmorton

Page 215: 2016-2017 - Texas Department of Public Safety · collected by the Texas Department of Public Safety (TX DPS). According to the Texas Code of Criminal Procedure, “racial profiling

212

Highway Patrol - 2017

REGIO

N 5 2017

African American

White

Hispanic

Stops

Frequency 18,874

169,603 64,745

Percent 7.27 %

65.29 %

24.92 %

Citations

Frequency

7,469 39,278

24,876 Percent

10.11 %

53.18 %

33.68 %

Rate per 100 stops 39.57

23.16 38.42

Warnings

Frequency

11,405 130,325

39,869 Percent

6.13 %

70.10 %

21.45 %

Rate per 100 stops 60.43

76.84 61.58

Searches (All)

Frequency 1,714

4,944 3,978

Percent 15.66 %

45.18 %

36.35 %

Rate per 100 stops

9.08 2.92

6.14 D

iscretionary Searches

Frequency 414

1,570 1,561

Percent 11.23 %

42.57 %

42.33 %

Rate per 100 stops

2.19 0.93

2.41 N

on-Discretionary Searches

Frequency

1,300 3,374

2,417 Percent

17.92 %

46.51 %

33.31 %

Rate per 100 stops 6.89

1.99 3.73

Contraband Hits

Frequency

783 2,396

1,583 Percent

16.01 %

48.98 %

32.36 %

Rate per 100 searches 45.68

48.46 39.79

Race Known

Frequency

76 590

288 Percent

7.80 %

60.57 %

29.57 %

Rate per 100 stops 0.40

0.35 0.44

DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC SAFETY APPENDIX I – REGION 5:LUBBOCK ANALYSIS

Page 216: 2016-2017 - Texas Department of Public Safety · collected by the Texas Department of Public Safety (TX DPS). According to the Texas Code of Criminal Procedure, “racial profiling

213

Highway Patrol - 2017

REGIO

N 5 2017

Asian Alaska

Native/Am

erican Indian

Middle Eastern

Other

Unknow

n

Stops

Frequency 4,454

510 1,584

0 0

Percent 1.71 %

0.20 %

0.61 %

0.00 %

0.00 %

Citations

Frequency

1,465 167

605 0

0 Percent

1.98 %

0.23 %

0.82 %

0.00 %

0.00 %

Rate per 100 stops 32.89

32.75 38.19

--- ---

Warnings

Frequency

2,989 343

979 0

0 Percent

1.61 %

0.18 %

0.53 %

0.00 %

0.00 %

Rate per 100 stops 67.11

67.25 61.81

--- ---

Searches (All)

Frequency 213

35 59

0 0

Percent 1.95 %

0.32 %

0.54 %

0.00 %

0.00 %

Rate per 100 stops

4.78 6.86

3.72 ---

--- D

iscretionary Searches

Frequency 108

10 25

0 0

Percent 2.93 %

0.27 %

0.68 %

0.00 %

0.00 %

Rate per 100 stops

2.42 1.96

1.58 ---

--- N

on-Discretionary Searches

Frequency

105 25

34 0

0 Percent

1.45 %

0.34 %

0.47 %

0.00 %

0.00 %

Rate per 100 stops 2.36

4.90 2.15

--- ---

Contraband Hits

Frequency

86 16

28 0

0 Percent

1.76 %

0.33 %

0.57 %

0.00 %

0.00 %

Rate per 100 searches 40.38

45.71 47.46

--- ---

Race Known

Frequency

19 1

0 0

0 Percent

1.95 %

0.10 %

0.00 %

0.00 %

0.00 %

Rate per 100 stops 0.43

0.20 0.00

--- ---

DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC SAFETY APPENDIX I – REGION 5:LUBBOCK ANALYSIS

Page 217: 2016-2017 - Texas Department of Public Safety · collected by the Texas Department of Public Safety (TX DPS). According to the Texas Code of Criminal Procedure, “racial profiling

214

Highway Patrol - 2016

REGIO

N 5 2016

African American

White

Hispanic

Stops

Frequency 16,252

151,406 57,792

Percent 7.01 %

65.32 %

24.93 %

Citations

Frequency

6,386 36,391

23,447 Percent

9.32 %

53.13 %

34.23 %

Rate per 100 stops 39.29

24.04 40.57

Warnings

Frequency

9,866 115,015

34,345 Percent

6.04 %

70.44 %

21.03 %

Rate per 100 stops 60.71

75.96 59.43

Searches (All)

Frequency 874

2,587 1,927

Percent 15.85 %

46.93 %

34.95 %

Rate per 100 stops

5.38 1.71

3.33 D

iscretionary Searches

Frequency 252

776 693

Percent 14.19 %

43.69 %

39.02 %

Rate per 100 stops

1.55 0.51

1.20 N

on-Discretionary Searches

Frequency

622 1,811

1,234 Percent

16.64 %

48.46 %

33.02 %

Rate per 100 stops 3.83

1.20 2.14

Contraband Hits

Frequency

546 1,754

1,069 Percent

15.92 %

51.14 %

31.17 %

Rate per 100 searches 62.47

67.80 55.47

Race Known

Frequency

10 40

17 Percent

14.93 %

59.70 %

25.37 %

Rate per 100 stops 0.06

0.03 0.03

DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC SAFETY APPENDIX I – REGION 5:LUBBOCK ANALYSIS

Page 218: 2016-2017 - Texas Department of Public Safety · collected by the Texas Department of Public Safety (TX DPS). According to the Texas Code of Criminal Procedure, “racial profiling

215

Highway Patrol - 2016

REGIO

N 5 2016

Asian Alaska

Native/Am

erican Indian

Middle Eastern

Other

Unknow

n

Stops

Frequency 3,902

447 1,976

7 2

Percent 1.68 %

0.19 %

0.85 %

0.00 %

0.00 %

Citations

Frequency

1,364 138

766 4

1 Percent

1.99 %

0.20 %

1.12 %

0.01 %

0.00 %

Rate per 100 stops 34.96

30.87 38.77

57.14 50.00

Warnings

Frequency

2,538 309

1,210 3

1 Percent

1.55 %

0.19 %

0.74 %

0.00 %

0.00 %

Rate per 100 stops 65.04

69.13 61.23

42.86 50.00

Searches (All)

Frequency 76

18 31

0 0

Percent 1.38 %

0.33 %

0.56 %

0.00 %

0.00 %

Rate per 100 stops

1.95 4.03

1.57 0.00

0.00 D

iscretionary Searches

Frequency 34

6 15

0 0

Percent 1.91 %

0.34 %

0.84 %

0.00 %

0.00 %

Rate per 100 stops

0.87 1.34

0.76 0.00

0.00 N

on-Discretionary Searches

Frequency

42 12

16 0

0 Percent

1.12 %

0.32 %

0.43 %

0.00 %

0.00 %

Rate per 100 stops 1.08

2.68 0.81

0.00 0.00

Contraband Hits

Frequency

40 8

13 0

0 Percent

1.17 %

0.23 %

0.38 %

0.00 %

0.00 %

Rate per 100 searches 52.63

44.44 41.94

--- ---

Race Known

Frequency

0 0

0 0

0 Percent

0.00 %

0.00 %

0.00 %

0.00 %

0.00 %

Rate per 100 stops 0.00

0.00 0.00

0.00 0.00

DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC SAFETY APPENDIX I – REGION 5:LUBBOCK ANALYSIS

Page 219: 2016-2017 - Texas Department of Public Safety · collected by the Texas Department of Public Safety (TX DPS). According to the Texas Code of Criminal Procedure, “racial profiling

216

Comm

ercial Vehicle Enforcement - 2017

Region 5 2017 African Am

erican W

hite H

ispanic Stops

Frequency

1,358 9,916

6,959 Percent

7.26 %

52.98 %

37.18 %

Citations

Frequency 297

2,190 1,889

Percent 6.70 %

49.37 %

42.58 %

Rate per 100 stops

21.87 22.09

27.14 W

arnings

Frequency 675

4,620 3,449

Percent 7.49 %

51.24 %

38.25 %

Rate per 100 stops

49.71 46.59

49.56 Clean

Frequency

386 3,106

1,621 Percent

7.33 %

59.00 %

30.79 %

Rate per 100 stops 28.42

31.32 23.29

Searches (All)

Frequency 15

22 26

Percent 21.13 %

30.99 %

36.62 %

Rate per 100 stops

1.10 0.22

0.37 D

iscretionary Searches

Frequency 6

15 22

Percent 12.24 %

30.61 %

44.90 %

Rate per 100 stops

0.44 0.15

0.32 N

on-Discretionary Searches

Frequency

9 7

4 Percent

40.91 %

31.82 %

18.18 %

Rate per 100 stops 0.66

0.07 0.06

Contraband Hits

Frequency

4 6

1 Percent

33.33 %

50.00 %

8.33 %

Rate per 100 searches 26.67

27.27 3.85

Race Known

Frequency

0 3

2 Percent

0.00 %

60.00 %

40.00 %

Rate per 100 stops 0.00

0.03 0.03

DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC SAFETY APPENDIX I – REGION 5:LUBBOCK ANALYSIS

Page 220: 2016-2017 - Texas Department of Public Safety · collected by the Texas Department of Public Safety (TX DPS). According to the Texas Code of Criminal Procedure, “racial profiling

217

Comm

ercial Vehicle Enforcement - 2017

Region 5 2017 Asian

Alaska N

ative/American

Indian

Middle Eastern

Other

Unknow

n

Stops

Frequency 303

16 115

0 49

Percent 1.62 %

0.09 %

0.61 %

0.00 %

0.26 %

Citations

Frequency

38 3

19 0

0 Percent

0.86 %

0.07 %

0.43 %

0.00 %

0.00 %

Rate per 100 stops 12.54

18.75 16.52

--- 0.00

Warnings

Frequency

192 7

60 0

13 Percent

2.13 %

0.08 %

0.67 %

0.00 %

0.14 %

Rate per 100 stops 63.37

43.75 52.17

--- 26.53

Clean

Frequency 73

6 36

0 36

Percent 1.39 %

0.11 %

0.68 %

0.00 %

0.68 %

Rate per 100 stops

24.09 37.50

31.30 ---

73.47 Searches (All)

Frequency

7 0

1 0

0 Percent

9.86 %

0.00 %

1.41 %

0.00 %

0.00 %

Rate per 100 stops 2.31

0.00 0.87

--- 0.00

Discretionary Searches

Frequency

6 0

0 0

0 Percent

12.24 %

0.00 %

0.00 %

0.00 %

0.00 %

Rate per 100 stops 1.98

0.00 0.00

--- 0.00

Non-D

iscretionary Searches

Frequency 1

0 1

0 0

Percent 4.55 %

0.00 %

4.55 %

0.00 %

0.00 %

Rate per 100 stops

0.33 0.00

0.87 ---

0.00 Contraband H

its

Frequency 0

0 1

0 0

Percent 0.00 %

0.00 %

8.33 %

0.00 %

0.00 %

Rate per 100 searches

0.00 ---

100.00 ---

--- Race Know

n

Frequency 0

0 0

0 0

Percent 0.00 %

0.00 %

0.00 %

0.00 %

0.00 %

Rate per 100 stops

0.00 0.00

0.00 ---

0.00

DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC SAFETY APPENDIX I – REGION 5:LUBBOCK ANALYSIS

Page 221: 2016-2017 - Texas Department of Public Safety · collected by the Texas Department of Public Safety (TX DPS). According to the Texas Code of Criminal Procedure, “racial profiling

218

Comm

ercial Vehicle Enforcement - 2016

Region 5 2016 African Am

erican W

hite H

ispanic Stops

Frequency

1,340 9,972

6,722 Percent

7.18 %

53.41 %

36.01 %

Citations

Frequency 239

2,122 1,866

Percent 5.53 %

49.12 %

43.19 %

Rate per 100 stops

17.84 21.28

27.76 W

arnings

Frequency 710

4,840 3,409

Percent 7.62 %

51.96 %

36.60 %

Rate per 100 stops

52.99 48.54

50.71 Clean

Frequency

391 3,010

1,447 Percent

7.77 %

59.78 %

28.74 %

Rate per 100 stops 29.18

30.18 21.53

Searches (All)

Frequency 7

16 21

Percent 15.56 %

35.56 %

46.67 %

Rate per 100 stops

0.52 0.16

0.31 D

iscretionary Searches

Frequency 6

13 19

Percent 15.38 %

33.33 %

48.72 %

Rate per 100 stops

0.45 0.13

0.28 N

on-Discretionary Searches

Frequency

1 3

2 Percent

16.67 %

50.00 %

33.33 %

Rate per 100 stops 0.07

0.03 0.03

Contraband Hits

Frequency

0 7

1 Percent

0.00 %

87.50 %

12.50 %

Rate per 100 searches 0.00

43.75 4.76

Race Known

Frequency

0 0

1 Percent

0.00 %

0.00 %

100.00 %

Rate per 100 stops 0.00

0.00 0.01

DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC SAFETY APPENDIX I – REGION 5:LUBBOCK ANALYSIS

Page 222: 2016-2017 - Texas Department of Public Safety · collected by the Texas Department of Public Safety (TX DPS). According to the Texas Code of Criminal Procedure, “racial profiling

219

Comm

ercial Vehicle Enforcement - 2016

Region 5 2016 Asian

Alaska N

ative/American

Indian

Middle Eastern

Other

Unknow

n

Stops

Frequency 323

19 220

2 71

Percent 1.73 %

0.10 %

1.18 %

0.01 %

0.38 %

Citations

Frequency

51 6

35 1

0 Percent

1.18 %

0.14 %

0.81 %

0.02 %

0.00 %

Rate per 100 stops 15.79

31.58 15.91

50.00 0.00

Warnings

Frequency

211 3

135 1

5 Percent

2.27 %

0.03 %

1.45 %

0.01 %

0.05 %

Rate per 100 stops 65.33

15.79 61.36

50.00 7.04

Clean

Frequency 61

10 50

0 66

Percent 1.21 %

0.20 %

0.99 %

0.00 %

1.31 %

Rate per 100 stops

18.89 52.63

22.73 0.00

92.96 Searches (All)

Frequency

0 0

1 0

0 Percent

0.00 %

0.00 %

2.22 %

0.00 %

0.00 %

Rate per 100 stops 0.00

0.00 0.45

0.00 0.00

Discretionary Searches

Frequency

0 0

1 0

0 Percent

0.00 %

0.00 %

2.56 %

0.00 %

0.00 %

Rate per 100 stops 0.00

0.00 0.45

0.00 0.00

Non-D

iscretionary Searches

Frequency 0

0 0

0 0

Percent 0.00 %

0.00 %

0.00 %

0.00 %

0.00 %

Rate per 100 stops

0.00 0.00

0.00 0.00

0.00 Contraband H

its

Frequency 0

0 0

0 0

Percent 0.00 %

0.00 %

0.00 %

0.00 %

0.00 %

Rate per 100 searches

--- ---

0.00 ---

--- Race Know

n

Frequency 0

0 0

0 0

Percent 0.00 %

0.00 %

0.00 %

0.00 %

0.00 %

Rate per 100 stops

0.00 0.00

0.00 0.00

0.00

DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC SAFETY APPENDIX I – REGION 5:LUBBOCK ANALYSIS

Page 223: 2016-2017 - Texas Department of Public Safety · collected by the Texas Department of Public Safety (TX DPS). According to the Texas Code of Criminal Procedure, “racial profiling

220

Appendix J Region 5: Lubbock

District Level Analysis

Page 224: 2016-2017 - Texas Department of Public Safety · collected by the Texas Department of Public Safety (TX DPS). According to the Texas Code of Criminal Procedure, “racial profiling

221

Falls

Bexar

GonzalesC

omal

FayetteK

err

Guadalupe

Blanco

Coryell M

cLennan

Atascosa

Bastrop

DeW

itt

Frio

JacksonK

arnes

Limestone

Medina

Freestone

Bell

Calhoun

Ham

ilton

Kendall

Lavaca

McMullen

San Saba

Travis

Victoria

William

son

Bandera

Bosque

Burnet

Caldw

ell

Gillespie

Goliad

Hays

Hill

Lampasas

Lee

LlanoM

ilam

Mills

Wilson

Potter

Sw

isher

Terry

Randall

Hall

Cochran

Haskell

Armstrong

King

RobertsStonewallYoung

Lipscomb

Fisher

Archer

Bailey

Cottle

Crosby

Deaf S

mith

Donley

Kent

Sherman

Stephens

Baylor

Hockley

Jack

Ochiltree

Oldham

Com

anche

Callahan

Foard

Hartley

Lamb

Mitchell

Moore

Yoakum

Briscoe

Hale

Scurry

Gray

Brow

n

Carson

Castro

Childress

Clay

Collingsw

orth

Coleman

Dallam

Dickens

Eastland

Floyd

Garza

Hansford

Hardeman

Hemphill

Hutchinson

Jones

Knox

Lubbock

Lynn

Montague

Motley

TaylorN

olan

Parm

er

Runnels

Shackelford

Wheeler

Wichita

Wilbarger

El

Paso

Schleicher

Presidio

Kim

ble

Martin

Terrell

Crane

Winkler

Daw

son

Andrew

s

Upton

Hudspeth

Mason

Borden

Coke

Gaines

Irion

Brew

ster

Menard

TomG

reen

How

ard

ReaganC

oncho

Crockett

Culberson

Ector

Glasscock

Jeff Davis

Sterling

Loving

McC

ulloch

Midland

Pecos

Reeves

Sutton

Ward

3D3A

US

281

Zavala

Starr

WebbZapata

Hidalgo

Duval

Bee

Jim Wells

MaverickA

ransas

Dim

mit

Edw

ards

JimH

oggK

enedy

Kinney

Kleberg

LiveO

ak

Nueces

Real

Refugio

San Patricio

Willacy

Brooks

Cam

eron

LaSalle

Uvalde

Val Verde

Newton

Trinity

Houston

Nacogdoches

Cham

bers

Waller

Orange

Montgom

ery

Polk

SanAugustine

Tyler

Angelina

Brazoria

Brazos

Liberty

WalkerH

arris

Leon

Austin

Burleson

Fort Bend

Galveston

Grimes

Jasper

Jefferson

Madison

Matagorda

Robertson

Sabine

Shelby

Washington

Colorado

Hardin

San

Jacinto

Wharton

Bow

ie

Cherokee

Harrison

Franklin

Cam

pH

opkins

Upshur

Collin

Morris

Anderson

Parker

Rains

Cooke

Dallas

Gregg

Johnson

Lamar

Marion

RedR

iver

Rockw

allD

entonC

ass

Delta

Erath

Ellis

FanninG

rayson

Henderson

Hood

Hunt

Kaufman

Navarro

Palo

Pinto

Panola

Rusk

Sm

ith

Som

ervell

Tarrant

Titus

VanZandt

Wise

Wood

Dallas

Region 11A

- Dallas

1B - Tyler

1C - H

urst1D

- Mt. Pleasant

Houston

Region 22A

- Houston

2B - B

eaumont

2C - C

onroe2D

- Bryan

San Antonio

Region 66A

- Waco

6B - Austin

6C - S

an Antonio

McA

llenR

egion 33A

- McA

llen3B

- Laredo3C

- Corpus C

hristi3D

- McA

llen3E

- Del R

io

El PasoR

egion 44A

- Midland

4B - El Paso

LubbockR

egion 5Lubbock - 5AA

marillo - 5B

Abilene - 5C

5 B

C

A

B

E

CDA

B

C

A

BC

A

D

BA

B

C

D

A

64

123

Throckmorton

Page 225: 2016-2017 - Texas Department of Public Safety · collected by the Texas Department of Public Safety (TX DPS). According to the Texas Code of Criminal Procedure, “racial profiling

222

Highway Patrol - 2017

DISTRICT 5A 2017

African American

White

Hispanic

Stops

Frequency 6,771

60,090 23,102

Percent 7.36 %

65.35 %

25.12 %

Citations

Frequency

2,600 13,129

9,007 Percent

10.27 %

51.86 %

35.58 %

Rate per 100 stops 38.40

21.85 38.99

Warnings

Frequency

4,171 46,961

14,095 Percent

6.26 %

70.48 %

21.15 %

Rate per 100 stops 61.60

78.15 61.01

Searches (All)

Frequency 691

1,822 1,556

Percent 16.57 %

43.70 %

37.32 %

Rate per 100 stops

10.21 3.03

6.74 D

iscretionary Searches

Frequency 187

655 564

Percent 12.88 %

45.11 %

38.84 %

Rate per 100 stops

2.76 1.09

2.44 N

on-Discretionary Searches

Frequency

504 1,167

992 Percent

18.55 %

42.95 %

36.51 %

Rate per 100 stops 7.44

1.94 4.29

Contraband Hits

Frequency

327 935

711 Percent

16.20 %

46.31 %

35.22 %

Rate per 100 searches 47.32

51.32 45.69

Race Known

Frequency

72 555

276 Percent

7.80 %

60.13 %

29.90 %

Rate per 100 stops 1.06

0.92 1.19

DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC SAFETY APPENDIX J – REGION 5:LUBBOCK – DISTRICT LEVEL ANALYSIS

Page 226: 2016-2017 - Texas Department of Public Safety · collected by the Texas Department of Public Safety (TX DPS). According to the Texas Code of Criminal Procedure, “racial profiling

223

Highway Patrol - 2017

DISTRICT 5A 2017

Asian Alaska

Native/Am

erican Indian

Middle Eastern

Other

Unknow

n

Stops

Frequency 1,346

129 512

0 0

Percent 1.46 %

0.14 %

0.56 %

0.00 %

0.00 %

Citations

Frequency

376 47

158 0

0 Percent

1.49 %

0.19 %

0.62 %

0.00 %

0.00 %

Rate per 100 stops 27.93

36.43 30.86

--- ---

Warnings

Frequency

970 82

354 0

0 Percent

1.46 %

0.12 %

0.53 %

0.00 %

0.00 %

Rate per 100 stops 72.07

63.57 69.14

--- ---

Searches (All)

Frequency 65

9 26

0 0

Percent 1.56 %

0.22 %

0.62 %

0.00 %

0.00 %

Rate per 100 stops

4.83 6.98

5.08 ---

--- D

iscretionary Searches

Frequency 35

1 10

0 0

Percent 2.41 %

0.07 %

0.69 %

0.00 %

0.00 %

Rate per 100 stops

2.60 0.78

1.95 ---

--- N

on-Discretionary Searches

Frequency

30 8

16 0

0 Percent

1.10 %

0.29 %

0.59 %

0.00 %

0.00 %

Rate per 100 stops 2.23

6.20 3.13

--- ---

Contraband Hits

Frequency

25 7

14 0

0 Percent

1.24 %

0.35 %

0.69 %

0.00 %

0.00 %

Rate per 100 searches 38.46

77.78 53.85

--- ---

Race Known

Frequency

19 1

0 0

0 Percent

2.06 %

0.11 %

0.00 %

0.00 %

0.00 %

Rate per 100 stops 1.41

0.78 0.00

--- ---

DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC SAFETY APPENDIX J – REGION 5:LUBBOCK – DISTRICT LEVEL ANALYSIS

Page 227: 2016-2017 - Texas Department of Public Safety · collected by the Texas Department of Public Safety (TX DPS). According to the Texas Code of Criminal Procedure, “racial profiling

224

Highway Patrol - 2016

DISTRICT 5A 2016

African American

White

Hispanic

Stops

Frequency 5,677

53,565 19,719

Percent 7.02 %

66.20 %

24.37 %

Citations

Frequency

2,182 11,730

8,281 Percent

9.58 %

51.52 %

36.37 %

Rate per 100 stops 38.44

21.90 42.00

Warnings

Frequency

3,495 41,835

11,438 Percent

6.01 %

71.95 %

19.67 %

Rate per 100 stops 61.56

78.10 58.00

Searches (All)

Frequency 392

1,026 854

Percent 16.96 %

44.40 %

36.95 %

Rate per 100 stops

6.91 1.92

4.33 D

iscretionary Searches

Frequency 108

361 302

Percent 13.62 %

45.52 %

38.08 %

Rate per 100 stops

1.90 0.67

1.53 N

on-Discretionary Searches

Frequency

284 665

552 Percent

18.71 %

43.81 %

36.36 %

Rate per 100 stops 5.00

1.24 2.80

Contraband Hits

Frequency

255 684

489 Percent

17.66 %

47.37 %

33.86 %

Rate per 100 searches 65.05

66.67 57.26

Race Known

Frequency

9 33

10 Percent

17.31 %

63.46 %

19.23 %

Rate per 100 stops 0.16

0.06 0.05

DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC SAFETY APPENDIX J – REGION 5:LUBBOCK – DISTRICT LEVEL ANALYSIS

Page 228: 2016-2017 - Texas Department of Public Safety · collected by the Texas Department of Public Safety (TX DPS). According to the Texas Code of Criminal Procedure, “racial profiling

225

Highway Patrol - 2016

DISTRICT 5A 2016

Asian Alaska

Native/Am

erican Indian

Middle Eastern

Other

Unknow

n

Stops

Frequency 1,183

112 656

0 0

Percent 1.46 %

0.14 %

0.81 %

0.00 %

0.00 %

Citations

Frequency

332 28

213 0

0 Percent

1.46 %

0.12 %

0.94 %

0.00 %

0.00 %

Rate per 100 stops 28.06

25.00 32.47

--- ---

Warnings

Frequency

851 84

443 0

0 Percent

1.46 %

0.14 %

0.76 %

0.00 %

0.00 %

Rate per 100 stops 71.94

75.00 67.53

--- ---

Searches (All)

Frequency 22

5 12

0 0

Percent 0.95 %

0.22 %

0.52 %

0.00 %

0.00 %

Rate per 100 stops

1.86 4.46

1.83 ---

--- D

iscretionary Searches

Frequency 11

5 6

0 0

Percent 1.39 %

0.63 %

0.76 %

0.00 %

0.00 %

Rate per 100 stops

0.93 4.46

0.91 ---

--- N

on-Discretionary Searches

Frequency

11 0

6 0

0 Percent

0.72 %

0.00 %

0.40 %

0.00 %

0.00 %

Rate per 100 stops 0.93

0.00 0.91

--- ---

Contraband Hits

Frequency

9 0

7 0

0 Percent

0.62 %

0.00 %

0.48 %

0.00 %

0.00 %

Rate per 100 searches 40.91

0.00 58.33

--- ---

Race Known

Frequency

0 0

0 0

0 Percent

0.00 %

0.00 %

0.00 %

0.00 %

0.00 %

Rate per 100 stops 0.00

0.00 0.00

--- ---

DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC SAFETY APPENDIX J – REGION 5:LUBBOCK – DISTRICT LEVEL ANALYSIS

Page 229: 2016-2017 - Texas Department of Public Safety · collected by the Texas Department of Public Safety (TX DPS). According to the Texas Code of Criminal Procedure, “racial profiling

226

Comm

ercial Vehicle Enforcement - 2017

District 5A 2017

African American

White

Hispanic

Stops

Frequency 460

3,315 2,251

Percent 7.43 %

53.55 %

36.36 %

Citations

Frequency

102 811

669 Percent

6.37 %

50.66 %

41.79 %

Rate per 100 stops 22.17

24.46 29.72

Warnings

Frequency

235 1,572

1,170 Percent

7.67 %

51.34 %

38.21 %

Rate per 100 stops 51.09

47.42 51.98

Clean

Frequency 123

932 412

Percent 8.05 %

60.99 %

26.96 %

Rate per 100 stops

26.74 28.11

18.30 Searches (All)

Frequency

3 7

3 Percent

20.00 %

46.67 %

20.00 %

Rate per 100 stops 0.65

0.21 0.13

Discretionary Searches

Frequency

0 6

2 Percent

0.00 %

66.67 %

22.22 %

Rate per 100 stops 0.00

0.18 0.09

Non-D

iscretionary Searches

Frequency 3

1 1

Percent 50.00 %

16.67 %

16.67 %

Rate per 100 stops

0.65 0.03

0.04 Contraband H

its

Frequency 1

1 0

Percent 50.00 %

50.00 %

0.00 %

Rate per 100 searches

33.33 14.29

0.00 Race Know

n

Frequency 0

0 0

Percent --- %

--- %

--- %

Rate per 100 stops

0.00 0.00

0.00

DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC SAFETY APPENDIX J – REGION 5:LUBBOCK – DISTRICT LEVEL ANALYSIS

Page 230: 2016-2017 - Texas Department of Public Safety · collected by the Texas Department of Public Safety (TX DPS). According to the Texas Code of Criminal Procedure, “racial profiling

227

Comm

ercial Vehicle Enforcement - 2017

District 5A 2017

Asian Alaska

Native/Am

erican Indian

Middle Eastern

Other

Unknow

n

Stops

Frequency 70

7 39

0 49

Percent 1.13 %

0.11 %

0.63 %

0.00 %

0.79 %

Citations

Frequency

11 1

7 0

0 Percent

0.69 %

0.06 %

0.44 %

0.00 %

0.00 %

Rate per 100 stops 15.71

14.29 17.95

--- 0.00

Warnings

Frequency

47 3

22 0

13 Percent

1.53 %

0.10 %

0.72 %

0.00 %

0.42 %

Rate per 100 stops 67.14

42.86 56.41

--- 26.53

Clean

Frequency 12

3 10

0 36

Percent 0.79 %

0.20 %

0.65 %

0.00 %

2.36 %

Rate per 100 stops

17.14 42.86

25.64 ---

73.47 Searches (All)

Frequency

2 0

0 0

0 Percent

13.33 %

0.00 %

0.00 %

0.00 %

0.00 %

Rate per 100 stops 2.86

0.00 0.00

--- 0.00

Discretionary Searches

Frequency

1 0

0 0

0 Percent

11.11 %

0.00 %

0.00 %

0.00 %

0.00 %

Rate per 100 stops 1.43

0.00 0.00

--- 0.00

Non-D

iscretionary Searches

Frequency 1

0 0

0 0

Percent 16.67 %

0.00 %

0.00 %

0.00 %

0.00 %

Rate per 100 stops

1.43 0.00

0.00 ---

0.00 Contraband H

its

Frequency 0

0 0

0 0

Percent 0.00 %

0.00 %

0.00 %

0.00 %

0.00 %

Rate per 100 searches

0.00 ---

--- ---

--- Race Know

n

Frequency 0

0 0

0 0

Percent --- %

--- %

--- %

--- %

--- %

Rate per 100 stops

0.00 0.00

0.00 ---

0.00

DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC SAFETY APPENDIX J – REGION 5:LUBBOCK – DISTRICT LEVEL ANALYSIS

Page 231: 2016-2017 - Texas Department of Public Safety · collected by the Texas Department of Public Safety (TX DPS). According to the Texas Code of Criminal Procedure, “racial profiling

228

Comm

ercial Vehicle Enforcement - 2016

District 5A 2016

African American

White

Hispanic

Stops

Frequency 414

2,951 1,866

Percent 7.65 %

54.51 %

34.47 %

Citations

Frequency

93 728

651 Percent

6.20 %

48.53 %

43.40 %

Rate per 100 stops 22.46

24.67 34.89

Warnings

Frequency

200 1,392

911 Percent

7.79 %

54.18 %

35.46 %

Rate per 100 stops 48.31

47.17 48.82

Clean

Frequency 121

831 304

Percent 9.00 %

61.78 %

22.60 %

Rate per 100 stops

29.23 28.16

16.29 Searches (All)

Frequency

2 4

5 Percent

18.18 %

36.36 %

45.45 %

Rate per 100 stops 0.48

0.14 0.27

Discretionary Searches

Frequency

2 2

5 Percent

22.22 %

22.22 %

55.56 %

Rate per 100 stops 0.48

0.07 0.27

Non-D

iscretionary Searches

Frequency 0

2 0

Percent 0.00 %

100.00 %

0.00 %

Rate per 100 stops

0.00 0.07

0.00 Contraband H

its

Frequency 0

3 0

Percent 0.00 %

100.00 %

0.00 %

Rate per 100 searches

0.00 75.00

0.00 Race Know

n

Frequency 0

0 0

Percent --- %

--- %

--- %

Rate per 100 stops

0.00 0.00

0.00

DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC SAFETY APPENDIX J – REGION 5:LUBBOCK – DISTRICT LEVEL ANALYSIS

Page 232: 2016-2017 - Texas Department of Public Safety · collected by the Texas Department of Public Safety (TX DPS). According to the Texas Code of Criminal Procedure, “racial profiling

229

Comm

ercial Vehicle Enforcement - 2016

District 5A 2016

Asian Alaska

Native/Am

erican Indian

Middle Eastern

Other

Unknow

n

Stops

Frequency 70

9 41

0 63

Percent 1.29 %

0.17 %

0.76 %

0.00 %

1.16 %

Citations

Frequency

16 4

8 0

0 Percent

1.07 %

0.27 %

0.53 %

0.00 %

0.00 %

Rate per 100 stops 22.86

44.44 19.51

--- 0.00

Warnings

Frequency

38 0

23 0

5 Percent

1.48 %

0.00 %

0.90 %

0.00 %

0.19 %

Rate per 100 stops 54.29

0.00 56.10

--- 7.94

Clean

Frequency 16

5 10

0 58

Percent 1.19 %

0.37 %

0.74 %

0.00 %

4.31 %

Rate per 100 stops

22.86 55.56

24.39 ---

92.06 Searches (All)

Frequency

0 0

0 0

0 Percent

0.00 %

0.00 %

0.00 %

0.00 %

0.00 %

Rate per 100 stops 0.00

0.00 0.00

--- 0.00

Discretionary Searches

Frequency

0 0

0 0

0 Percent

0.00 %

0.00 %

0.00 %

0.00 %

0.00 %

Rate per 100 stops 0.00

0.00 0.00

--- 0.00

Non-D

iscretionary Searches

Frequency 0

0 0

0 0

Percent 0.00 %

0.00 %

0.00 %

0.00 %

0.00 %

Rate per 100 stops

0.00 0.00

0.00 ---

0.00 Contraband H

its

Frequency 0

0 0

0 0

Percent 0.00 %

0.00 %

0.00 %

0.00 %

0.00 %

Rate per 100 searches

--- ---

--- ---

--- Race Know

n

Frequency 0

0 0

0 0

Percent --- %

--- %

--- %

--- %

--- %

Rate per 100 stops

0.00 0.00

0.00 ---

0.00

DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC SAFETY APPENDIX J – REGION 5:LUBBOCK – DISTRICT LEVEL ANALYSIS

Page 233: 2016-2017 - Texas Department of Public Safety · collected by the Texas Department of Public Safety (TX DPS). According to the Texas Code of Criminal Procedure, “racial profiling

230

Falls

Bexar

GonzalesC

omal

FayetteK

err

Guadalupe

Blanco

Coryell M

cLennan

Atascosa

Bastrop

DeW

itt

Frio

JacksonK

arnes

Limestone

Medina

Freestone

Bell

Calhoun

Ham

ilton

Kendall

Lavaca

McMullen

San Saba

Travis

Victoria

William

son

Bandera

Bosque

Burnet

Caldw

ell

Gillespie

Goliad

Hays

Hill

Lampasas

Lee

LlanoM

ilam

Mills

Wilson

Potter

Sw

isher

Terry

Randall

Hall

Cochran

Haskell

Armstrong

King

RobertsStonewallYoung

Lipscomb

Fisher

Archer

Bailey

Cottle

Crosby

Deaf S

mith

Donley

Kent

Sherman

Stephens

Baylor

Hockley

Jack

Ochiltree

Oldham

Com

anche

Callahan

Foard

Hartley

Lamb

Mitchell

Moore

Yoakum

Briscoe

Hale

Scurry

Gray

Brow

n

Carson

Castro

Childress

Clay

Collingsw

orth

Coleman

Dallam

Dickens

Eastland

Floyd

Garza

Hansford

Hardeman

Hemphill

Hutchinson

Jones

Knox

Lubbock

Lynn

Montague

Motley

TaylorN

olan

Parm

er

Runnels

Shackelford

Wheeler

Wichita

Wilbarger

El

Paso

Schleicher

Presidio

Kim

ble

Martin

Terrell

Crane

Winkler

Daw

son

Andrew

s

Upton

Hudspeth

Mason

Borden

Coke

Gaines

Irion

Brew

ster

Menard

TomG

reen

How

ard

ReaganC

oncho

Crockett

Culberson

Ector

Glasscock

Jeff Davis

Sterling

Loving

McC

ulloch

Midland

Pecos

Reeves

Sutton

Ward

3D3A

US

281

Zavala

Starr

WebbZapata

Hidalgo

Duval

Bee

Jim Wells

MaverickA

ransas

Dim

mit

Edw

ards

JimH

oggK

enedy

Kinney

Kleberg

LiveO

ak

Nueces

Real

Refugio

San Patricio

Willacy

Brooks

Cam

eron

LaSalle

Uvalde

Val Verde

Newton

Trinity

Houston

Nacogdoches

Cham

bers

Waller

Orange

Montgom

ery

Polk

SanAugustine

Tyler

Angelina

Brazoria

Brazos

Liberty

WalkerH

arris

Leon

Austin

Burleson

Fort Bend

Galveston

Grimes

Jasper

Jefferson

Madison

Matagorda

Robertson

Sabine

Shelby

Washington

Colorado

Hardin

San

Jacinto

Wharton

Bow

ie

Cherokee

Harrison

Franklin

Cam

pH

opkins

Upshur

Collin

Morris

Anderson

Parker

Rains

Cooke

Dallas

Gregg

Johnson

Lamar

Marion

RedR

iver

Rockw

allD

entonC

ass

Delta

Erath

Ellis

FanninG

rayson

Henderson

Hood

Hunt

Kaufman

Navarro

Palo

Pinto

Panola

Rusk

Sm

ith

Som

ervell

Tarrant

Titus

VanZandt

Wise

Wood

Dallas

Region 11A

- Dallas

1B - Tyler

1C - H

urst1D

- Mt. Pleasant

Houston

Region 22A

- Houston

2B - B

eaumont

2C - C

onroe2D

- Bryan

San Antonio

Region 66A

- Waco

6B - Austin

6C - S

an Antonio

McA

llenR

egion 33A

- McA

llen3B

- Laredo3C

- Corpus C

hristi3D

- McA

llen3E

- Del R

io

El PasoR

egion 44A

- Midland

4B - El Paso

LubbockR

egion 5Lubbock - 5AA

marillo - 5B

Abilene - 5C

5 B

C

A

B

E

CDA

B

C

A

BC

A

D

BA

B

C

D

A

64

123

Throckmorton

Page 234: 2016-2017 - Texas Department of Public Safety · collected by the Texas Department of Public Safety (TX DPS). According to the Texas Code of Criminal Procedure, “racial profiling

231

Highway Patrol - 2017

DISTRICT 5B 2017

African American

White

Hispanic

Stops

Frequency 5,566

56,339 24,770

Percent 6.21 %

62.90 %

27.65 %

Citations

Frequency

2,221 12,606

9,168 Percent

8.88 %

50.39 %

36.64 %

Rate per 100 stops 39.90

22.38 37.01

Warnings

Frequency

3,345 43,733

15,602 Percent

5.18 %

67.75 %

24.17 %

Rate per 100 stops 60.10

77.62 62.99

Searches (All)

Frequency 643

1,868 1,623

Percent 14.92 %

43.35 %

37.67 %

Rate per 100 stops

11.55 3.32

6.55 D

iscretionary Searches

Frequency 149

553 727

Percent 9.85 %

36.55 %

48.05 %

Rate per 100 stops

2.68 0.98

2.94 N

on-Discretionary Searches

Frequency

494 1,315

896 Percent

17.67 %

47.03 %

32.05 %

Rate per 100 stops 8.88

2.33 3.62

Contraband Hits

Frequency

289 873

554 Percent

16.21 %

48.96 %

31.07 %

Rate per 100 searches 44.95

46.73 34.13

Race Known

Frequency

1 16

2 Percent

5.26 %

84.21 %

10.53 %

Rate per 100 stops 0.02

0.03 0.01

DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC SAFETY APPENDIX J – REGION 5:LUBBOCK – DISTRICT LEVEL ANALYSIS

Page 235: 2016-2017 - Texas Department of Public Safety · collected by the Texas Department of Public Safety (TX DPS). According to the Texas Code of Criminal Procedure, “racial profiling

232

Highway Patrol - 2017

DISTRICT 5B 2017

Asian Alaska

Native/Am

erican Indian

Middle Eastern

Other

Unknow

n

Stops

Frequency 2,035

304 559

0 0

Percent 2.27 %

0.34 %

0.62 %

0.00 %

0.00 %

Citations

Frequency

698 92

234 0

0 Percent

2.79 %

0.37 %

0.94 %

0.00 %

0.00 %

Rate per 100 stops 34.30

30.26 41.86

--- ---

Warnings

Frequency

1,337 212

325 0

0 Percent

2.07 %

0.33 %

0.50 %

0.00 %

0.00 %

Rate per 100 stops 65.70

69.74 58.14

--- ---

Searches (All)

Frequency 129

23 23

0 0

Percent 2.99 %

0.53 %

0.53 %

0.00 %

0.00 %

Rate per 100 stops

6.34 7.57

4.11 ---

--- D

iscretionary Searches

Frequency 63

8 13

0 0

Percent 4.16 %

0.53 %

0.86 %

0.00 %

0.00 %

Rate per 100 stops

3.10 2.63

2.33 ---

--- N

on-Discretionary Searches

Frequency

66 15

10 0

0 Percent

2.36 %

0.54 %

0.36 %

0.00 %

0.00 %

Rate per 100 stops 3.24

4.93 1.79

--- ---

Contraband Hits

Frequency

52 7

8 0

0 Percent

2.92 %

0.39 %

0.45 %

0.00 %

0.00 %

Rate per 100 searches 40.31

30.43 34.78

--- ---

Race Known

Frequency

0 0

0 0

0 Percent

0.00 %

0.00 %

0.00 %

0.00 %

0.00 %

Rate per 100 stops 0.00

0.00 0.00

--- ---

DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC SAFETY APPENDIX J – REGION 5:LUBBOCK – DISTRICT LEVEL ANALYSIS

Page 236: 2016-2017 - Texas Department of Public Safety · collected by the Texas Department of Public Safety (TX DPS). According to the Texas Code of Criminal Procedure, “racial profiling

233

Highway Patrol - 2016

DISTRICT 5B 2016

African American

White

Hispanic

Stops

Frequency 5,026

52,461 23,318

Percent 6.01 %

62.72 %

27.88 %

Citations

Frequency

2,010 13,096

9,227 Percent

7.91 %

51.57 %

36.33 %

Rate per 100 stops 39.99

24.96 39.57

Warnings

Frequency

3,016 39,365

14,091 Percent

5.18 %

67.59 %

24.19 %

Rate per 100 stops 60.01

75.04 60.43

Searches (All)

Frequency 272

989 729

Percent 13.25 %

48.17 %

35.51 %

Rate per 100 stops

5.41 1.89

3.13 D

iscretionary Searches

Frequency 87

232 257

Percent 14.55 %

38.80 %

42.98 %

Rate per 100 stops

1.73 0.44

1.10 N

on-Discretionary Searches

Frequency

185 757

472 Percent

12.71 %

52.03 %

32.44 %

Rate per 100 stops 3.68

1.44 2.02

Contraband Hits

Frequency

173 703

399 Percent

13.26 %

53.87 %

30.57 %

Rate per 100 searches 63.60

71.08 54.73

Race Known

Frequency

0 2

3 Percent

0.00 %

40.00 %

60.00 %

Rate per 100 stops 0.00

0.00 0.01

DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC SAFETY APPENDIX J – REGION 5:LUBBOCK – DISTRICT LEVEL ANALYSIS

Page 237: 2016-2017 - Texas Department of Public Safety · collected by the Texas Department of Public Safety (TX DPS). According to the Texas Code of Criminal Procedure, “racial profiling

234

Highway Patrol - 2016

DISTRICT 5B 2016

Asian Alaska

Native/Am

erican Indian

Middle Eastern

Other

Unknow

n

Stops

Frequency 1,789

264 776

5 1

Percent 2.14 %

0.32 %

0.93 %

0.01 %

0.00 %

Citations

Frequency

651 84

325 2

0 Percent

2.56 %

0.33 %

1.28 %

0.01 %

0.00 %

Rate per 100 stops 36.39

31.82 41.88

40.00 0.00

Warnings

Frequency

1,138 180

451 3

1 Percent

1.95 %

0.31 %

0.77 %

0.01 %

0.00 %

Rate per 100 stops 63.61

68.18 58.12

60.00 100.00

Searches (All)

Frequency 43

12 8

0 0

Percent 2.09 %

0.58 %

0.39 %

0.00 %

0.00 %

Rate per 100 stops

2.40 4.55

1.03 0.00

0.00 D

iscretionary Searches

Frequency 16

1 5

0 0

Percent 2.68 %

0.17 %

0.84 %

0.00 %

0.00 %

Rate per 100 stops

0.89 0.38

0.64 0.00

0.00 N

on-Discretionary Searches

Frequency

27 11

3 0

0 Percent

1.86 %

0.76 %

0.21 %

0.00 %

0.00 %

Rate per 100 stops 1.51

4.17 0.39

0.00 0.00

Contraband Hits

Frequency

23 7

0 0

0 Percent

1.76 %

0.54 %

0.00 %

0.00 %

0.00 %

Rate per 100 searches 53.49

58.33 0.00

--- ---

Race Known

Frequency

0 0

0 0

0 Percent

0.00 %

0.00 %

0.00 %

0.00 %

0.00 %

Rate per 100 stops 0.00

0.00 0.00

0.00 0.00

DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC SAFETY APPENDIX J – REGION 5:LUBBOCK – DISTRICT LEVEL ANALYSIS

Page 238: 2016-2017 - Texas Department of Public Safety · collected by the Texas Department of Public Safety (TX DPS). According to the Texas Code of Criminal Procedure, “racial profiling

235

Comm

ercial Vehicle Enforcement - 2017

District 5B 2017

African American

White

Hispanic

Stops

Frequency 422

3,786 3,048

Percent 5.64 %

50.57 %

40.72 %

Citations

Frequency

66 723

767 Percent

4.17 %

45.67 %

48.45 %

Rate per 100 stops 15.64

19.10 25.16

Warnings

Frequency

243 1,960

1,616 Percent

6.10 %

49.20 %

40.56 %

Rate per 100 stops 57.58

51.77 53.02

Clean

Frequency 113

1,103 665

Percent 5.89 %

57.48 %

34.65 %

Rate per 100 stops

26.78 29.13

21.82 Searches (All)

Frequency

4 11

8 Percent

14.29 %

39.29 %

28.57 %

Rate per 100 stops 0.95

0.29 0.26

Discretionary Searches

Frequency

1 7

6 Percent

5.56 %

38.89 %

33.33 %

Rate per 100 stops 0.24

0.18 0.20

Non-D

iscretionary Searches

Frequency 3

4 2

Percent 30.00 %

40.00 %

20.00 %

Rate per 100 stops

0.71 0.11

0.07 Contraband H

its

Frequency 2

4 0

Percent 28.57 %

57.14 %

0.00 %

Rate per 100 searches

50.00 36.36

0.00 Race Know

n

Frequency 0

3 2

Percent 0.00 %

60.00 %

40.00 %

Rate per 100 stops

0.00 0.08

0.07

DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC SAFETY APPENDIX J – REGION 5:LUBBOCK – DISTRICT LEVEL ANALYSIS

Page 239: 2016-2017 - Texas Department of Public Safety · collected by the Texas Department of Public Safety (TX DPS). According to the Texas Code of Criminal Procedure, “racial profiling

236

Comm

ercial Vehicle Enforcement - 2017

District 5B 2017

Asian Alaska

Native/Am

erican Indian

Middle Eastern

Other

Unknow

n

Stops

Frequency 171

3 56

0 0

Percent 2.28 %

0.04 %

0.75 %

0.00 %

0.00 %

Citations

Frequency

19 1

7 0

0 Percent

1.20 %

0.06 %

0.44 %

0.00 %

0.00 %

Rate per 100 stops 11.11

33.33 12.50

--- ---

Warnings

Frequency

128 1

36 0

0 Percent

3.21 %

0.03 %

0.90 %

0.00 %

0.00 %

Rate per 100 stops 74.85

33.33 64.29

--- ---

Clean

Frequency 24

1 13

0 0

Percent 1.25 %

0.05 %

0.68 %

0.00 %

0.00 %

Rate per 100 stops

14.04 33.33

23.21 ---

--- Searches (All)

Frequency

4 0

1 0

0 Percent

14.29 %

0.00 %

3.57 %

0.00 %

0.00 %

Rate per 100 stops 2.34

0.00 1.79

--- ---

Discretionary Searches

Frequency

4 0

0 0

0 Percent

22.22 %

0.00 %

0.00 %

0.00 %

0.00 %

Rate per 100 stops 2.34

0.00 0.00

--- ---

Non-D

iscretionary Searches

Frequency 0

0 1

0 0

Percent 0.00 %

0.00 %

10.00 %

0.00 %

0.00 %

Rate per 100 stops

0.00 0.00

1.79 ---

--- Contraband H

its

Frequency 0

0 1

0 0

Percent 0.00 %

0.00 %

14.29 %

0.00 %

0.00 %

Rate per 100 searches

0.00 ---

100.00 ---

--- Race Know

n

Frequency 0

0 0

0 0

Percent 0.00 %

0.00 %

0.00 %

0.00 %

0.00 %

Rate per 100 stops

0.00 0.00

0.00 ---

---

DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC SAFETY APPENDIX J – REGION 5:LUBBOCK – DISTRICT LEVEL ANALYSIS

Page 240: 2016-2017 - Texas Department of Public Safety · collected by the Texas Department of Public Safety (TX DPS). According to the Texas Code of Criminal Procedure, “racial profiling

237

Comm

ercial Vehicle Enforcement - 2016

District 5B 2016

African American

White

Hispanic

Stops

Frequency 428

3,833 3,083

Percent 5.56 %

49.83 %

40.08 %

Citations

Frequency

47 635

687 Percent

3.32 %

44.88 %

48.55 %

Rate per 100 stops 10.98

16.57 22.28

Warnings

Frequency

296 2,149

1,767 Percent

6.62 %

48.10 %

39.55 %

Rate per 100 stops 69.16

56.07 57.31

Clean

Frequency 85

1,049 629

Percent 4.70 %

57.99 %

34.77 %

Rate per 100 stops

19.86 27.37

20.40 Searches (All)

Frequency

1 5

6 Percent

7.69 %

38.46 %

46.15 %

Rate per 100 stops 0.23

0.13 0.19

Discretionary Searches

Frequency

1 5

5 Percent

8.33 %

41.67 %

41.67 %

Rate per 100 stops 0.23

0.13 0.16

Non-D

iscretionary Searches

Frequency 0

0 1

Percent 0.00 %

0.00 %

100.00 %

Rate per 100 stops

0.00 0.00

0.03 Contraband H

its

Frequency 0

1 1

Percent 0.00 %

50.00 %

50.00 %

Rate per 100 searches

0.00 20.00

16.67 Race Know

n

Frequency 0

0 1

Percent 0.00 %

0.00 %

100.00 %

Rate per 100 stops

0.00 0.00

0.03

DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC SAFETY APPENDIX J – REGION 5:LUBBOCK – DISTRICT LEVEL ANALYSIS

Page 241: 2016-2017 - Texas Department of Public Safety · collected by the Texas Department of Public Safety (TX DPS). According to the Texas Code of Criminal Procedure, “racial profiling

238

Comm

ercial Vehicle Enforcement - 2016

District 5B 2016

Asian Alaska

Native/Am

erican Indian

Middle Eastern

Other

Unknow

n

Stops

Frequency 184

6 148

2 8

Percent 2.39 %

0.08 %

1.92 %

0.03 %

0.10 %

Citations

Frequency

21 2

22 1

0 Percent

1.48 %

0.14 %

1.55 %

0.07 %

0.00 %

Rate per 100 stops 11.41

33.33 14.86

50.00 0.00

Warnings

Frequency

147 2

106 1

0 Percent

3.29 %

0.04 %

2.37 %

0.02 %

0.00 %

Rate per 100 stops 79.89

33.33 71.62

50.00 0.00

Clean

Frequency 16

2 20

0 8

Percent 0.88 %

0.11 %

1.11 %

0.00 %

0.44 %

Rate per 100 stops

8.70 33.33

13.51 0.00

100.00 Searches (All)

Frequency

0 0

1 0

0 Percent

0.00 %

0.00 %

7.69 %

0.00 %

0.00 %

Rate per 100 stops 0.00

0.00 0.68

0.00 0.00

Discretionary Searches

Frequency

0 0

1 0

0 Percent

0.00 %

0.00 %

8.33 %

0.00 %

0.00 %

Rate per 100 stops 0.00

0.00 0.68

0.00 0.00

Non-D

iscretionary Searches

Frequency 0

0 0

0 0

Percent 0.00 %

0.00 %

0.00 %

0.00 %

0.00 %

Rate per 100 stops

0.00 0.00

0.00 0.00

0.00 Contraband H

its

Frequency 0

0 0

0 0

Percent 0.00 %

0.00 %

0.00 %

0.00 %

0.00 %

Rate per 100 searches

--- ---

0.00 ---

--- Race Know

n

Frequency 0

0 0

0 0

Percent 0.00 %

0.00 %

0.00 %

0.00 %

0.00 %

Rate per 100 stops

0.00 0.00

0.00 0.00

0.00

DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC SAFETY APPENDIX J – REGION 5:LUBBOCK – DISTRICT LEVEL ANALYSIS

Page 242: 2016-2017 - Texas Department of Public Safety · collected by the Texas Department of Public Safety (TX DPS). According to the Texas Code of Criminal Procedure, “racial profiling

239

Falls

Bexar

GonzalesC

omal

FayetteK

err

Guadalupe

Blanco

Coryell M

cLennan

Atascosa

Bastrop

DeW

itt

Frio

JacksonK

arnes

Limestone

Medina

Freestone

Bell

Calhoun

Ham

ilton

Kendall

Lavaca

McMullen

San Saba

Travis

Victoria

William

son

Bandera

Bosque

Burnet

Caldw

ell

Gillespie

Goliad

Hays

Hill

Lampasas

Lee

LlanoM

ilam

Mills

Wilson

Potter

Sw

isher

Terry

Randall

Hall

Cochran

Haskell

Armstrong

King

RobertsStonewallYoung

Lipscomb

Fisher

Archer

Bailey

Cottle

Crosby

Deaf S

mith

Donley

Kent

Sherman

Stephens

Baylor

Hockley

Jack

Ochiltree

Oldham

Com

anche

Callahan

Foard

Hartley

Lamb

Mitchell

Moore

Yoakum

Briscoe

Hale

Scurry

Gray

Brow

n

Carson

Castro

Childress

Clay

Collingsw

orth

Coleman

Dallam

Dickens

Eastland

Floyd

Garza

Hansford

Hardeman

Hemphill

Hutchinson

Jones

Knox

Lubbock

Lynn

Montague

Motley

TaylorN

olan

Parm

er

Runnels

Shackelford

Wheeler

Wichita

Wilbarger

El

Paso

Schleicher

Presidio

Kim

ble

Martin

Terrell

Crane

Winkler

Daw

son

Andrew

s

Upton

Hudspeth

Mason

Borden

Coke

Gaines

Irion

Brew

ster

Menard

TomG

reen

How

ard

ReaganC

oncho

Crockett

Culberson

Ector

Glasscock

Jeff Davis

Sterling

Loving

McC

ulloch

Midland

Pecos

Reeves

Sutton

Ward

3D3A

US

281

Zavala

Starr

WebbZapata

Hidalgo

Duval

Bee

Jim Wells

MaverickA

ransas

Dim

mit

Edw

ards

JimH

oggK

enedy

Kinney

Kleberg

LiveO

ak

Nueces

Real

Refugio

San Patricio

Willacy

Brooks

Cam

eron

LaSalle

Uvalde

Val Verde

Newton

Trinity

Houston

Nacogdoches

Cham

bers

Waller

Orange

Montgom

ery

Polk

SanAugustine

Tyler

Angelina

Brazoria

Brazos

Liberty

WalkerH

arris

Leon

Austin

Burleson

Fort Bend

Galveston

Grimes

Jasper

Jefferson

Madison

Matagorda

Robertson

Sabine

Shelby

Washington

Colorado

Hardin

San

Jacinto

Wharton

Bow

ie

Cherokee

Harrison

Franklin

Cam

pH

opkins

Upshur

Collin

Morris

Anderson

Parker

Rains

Cooke

Dallas

Gregg

Johnson

Lamar

Marion

RedR

iver

Rockw

allD

entonC

ass

Delta

Erath

Ellis

FanninG

rayson

Henderson

Hood

Hunt

Kaufman

Navarro

Palo

Pinto

Panola

Rusk

Sm

ith

Som

ervell

Tarrant

Titus

VanZandt

Wise

Wood

Dallas

Region 11A

- Dallas

1B - Tyler

1C - H

urst1D

- Mt. Pleasant

Houston

Region 22A

- Houston

2B - B

eaumont

2C - C

onroe2D

- Bryan

San Antonio

Region 66A

- Waco

6B - Austin

6C - S

an Antonio

McA

llenR

egion 33A

- McA

llen3B

- Laredo3C

- Corpus C

hristi3D

- McA

llen3E

- Del R

io

El PasoR

egion 44A

- Midland

4B - El Paso

LubbockR

egion 5Lubbock - 5AA

marillo - 5B

Abilene - 5C

5 B

C

A

B

E

CDA

B

C

A

BC

A

D

BA

B

C

D

A

64

123

Throckmorton

Page 243: 2016-2017 - Texas Department of Public Safety · collected by the Texas Department of Public Safety (TX DPS). According to the Texas Code of Criminal Procedure, “racial profiling

240

Highway Patrol - 2017

DISTRICT 5C 2017

African American

White

Hispanic

Stops

Frequency 6,537

53,174 16,873

Percent 8.35 %

67.96 %

21.56 %

Citations

Frequency

2,648 13,543

6,701 Percent

11.26 %

57.57 %

28.49 %

Rate per 100 stops 40.51

25.47 39.71

Warnings

Frequency

3,889 39,631

10,172 Percent

7.11 %

72.42 %

18.59 %

Rate per 100 stops 59.49

74.53 60.29

Searches (All)

Frequency 380

1,254 799

Percent 15.42 %

50.87 %

32.41 %

Rate per 100 stops

5.81 2.36

4.74 D

iscretionary Searches

Frequency 78

362 270

Percent 10.79 %

50.07 %

37.34 %

Rate per 100 stops

1.19 0.68

1.60 N

on-Discretionary Searches

Frequency

302 892

529 Percent

17.34 %

51.21 %

30.37 %

Rate per 100 stops 4.62

1.68 3.14

Contraband Hits

Frequency

167 588

318 Percent

15.32 %

53.94 %

29.17 %

Rate per 100 searches 43.95

46.89 39.80

Race Known

Frequency

3 19

10 Percent

9.38 %

59.38 %

31.25 %

Rate per 100 stops 0.05

0.04 0.06

DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC SAFETY APPENDIX J – REGION 5:LUBBOCK – DISTRICT LEVEL ANALYSIS

Page 244: 2016-2017 - Texas Department of Public Safety · collected by the Texas Department of Public Safety (TX DPS). According to the Texas Code of Criminal Procedure, “racial profiling

241

Highway Patrol - 2017

DISTRICT 5C 2017

Asian Alaska

Native/Am

erican Indian

Middle Eastern

Other

Unknow

n

Stops

Frequency 1,073

77 513

0 0

Percent 1.37 %

0.10 %

0.66 %

0.00 %

0.00 %

Citations

Frequency

391 28

213 0

0 Percent

1.66 %

0.12 %

0.91 %

0.00 %

0.00 %

Rate per 100 stops 36.44

36.36 41.52

--- ---

Warnings

Frequency

682 49

300 0

0 Percent

1.25 %

0.09 %

0.55 %

0.00 %

0.00 %

Rate per 100 stops 63.56

63.64 58.48

--- ---

Searches (All)

Frequency 19

3 10

0 0

Percent 0.77 %

0.12 %

0.41 %

0.00 %

0.00 %

Rate per 100 stops

1.77 3.90

1.95 ---

--- D

iscretionary Searches

Frequency 10

1 2

0 0

Percent 1.38 %

0.14 %

0.28 %

0.00 %

0.00 %

Rate per 100 stops

0.93 1.30

0.39 ---

--- N

on-Discretionary Searches

Frequency

9 2

8 0

0 Percent

0.52 %

0.11 %

0.46 %

0.00 %

0.00 %

Rate per 100 stops 0.84

2.60 1.56

--- ---

Contraband Hits

Frequency

9 2

6 0

0 Percent

0.83 %

0.18 %

0.55 %

0.00 %

0.00 %

Rate per 100 searches 47.37

66.67 60.00

--- ---

Race Known

Frequency

0 0

0 0

0 Percent

0.00 %

0.00 %

0.00 %

0.00 %

0.00 %

Rate per 100 stops 0.00

0.00 0.00

--- ---

DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC SAFETY APPENDIX J – REGION 5:LUBBOCK – DISTRICT LEVEL ANALYSIS

Page 245: 2016-2017 - Texas Department of Public Safety · collected by the Texas Department of Public Safety (TX DPS). According to the Texas Code of Criminal Procedure, “racial profiling

242

Highway Patrol - 2016

DISTRICT 5C 2016

African American

White

Hispanic

Stops

Frequency 5,549

45,380 14,755

Percent 8.25 %

67.50 %

21.95 %

Citations

Frequency

2,194 11,565

5,939 Percent

10.79 %

56.87 %

29.20 %

Rate per 100 stops 39.54

25.48 40.25

Warnings

Frequency

3,355 33,815

8,816 Percent

7.15 %

72.11 %

18.80 %

Rate per 100 stops 60.46

74.52 59.75

Searches (All)

Frequency 210

572 344

Percent 18.28 %

49.78 %

29.94 %

Rate per 100 stops

3.78 1.26

2.33 D

iscretionary Searches

Frequency 57

183 134

Percent 14.81 %

47.53 %

34.81 %

Rate per 100 stops

1.03 0.40

0.91 N

on-Discretionary Searches

Frequency

153 389

210 Percent

20.03 %

50.92 %

27.49 %

Rate per 100 stops 2.76

0.86 1.42

Contraband Hits

Frequency

118 367

181 Percent

17.33 %

53.89 %

26.58 %

Rate per 100 searches 56.19

64.16 52.62

Race Known

Frequency

1 5

4 Percent

10.00 %

50.00 %

40.00 %

Rate per 100 stops 0.02

0.01 0.03

DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC SAFETY APPENDIX J – REGION 5:LUBBOCK – DISTRICT LEVEL ANALYSIS

Page 246: 2016-2017 - Texas Department of Public Safety · collected by the Texas Department of Public Safety (TX DPS). According to the Texas Code of Criminal Procedure, “racial profiling

243

Highway Patrol - 2016

DISTRICT 5C 2016

Asian Alaska

Native/Am

erican Indian

Middle Eastern

Other

Unknow

n

Stops

Frequency 930

71 544

2 1

Percent 1.38 %

0.11 %

0.81 %

0.00 %

0.00 %

Citations

Frequency

381 26

228 2

1 Percent

1.87 %

0.13 %

1.12 %

0.01 %

0.00 %

Rate per 100 stops 40.97

36.62 41.91

100.00 100.00

Warnings

Frequency

549 45

316 0

0 Percent

1.17 %

0.10 %

0.67 %

0.00 %

0.00 %

Rate per 100 stops 59.03

63.38 58.09

0.00 0.00

Searches (All)

Frequency 11

1 11

0 0

Percent 0.96 %

0.09 %

0.96 %

0.00 %

0.00 %

Rate per 100 stops

1.18 1.41

2.02 0.00

0.00 D

iscretionary Searches

Frequency 7

0 4

0 0

Percent 1.82 %

0.00 %

1.04 %

0.00 %

0.00 %

Rate per 100 stops

0.75 0.00

0.74 0.00

0.00 N

on-Discretionary Searches

Frequency

4 1

7 0

0 Percent

0.52 %

0.13 %

0.92 %

0.00 %

0.00 %

Rate per 100 stops 0.43

1.41 1.29

0.00 0.00

Contraband Hits

Frequency

8 1

6 0

0 Percent

1.17 %

0.15 %

0.88 %

0.00 %

0.00 %

Rate per 100 searches 72.73

100.00 54.55

--- ---

Race Known

Frequency

0 0

0 0

0 Percent

0.00 %

0.00 %

0.00 %

0.00 %

0.00 %

Rate per 100 stops 0.00

0.00 0.00

0.00 0.00

DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC SAFETY APPENDIX J – REGION 5:LUBBOCK – DISTRICT LEVEL ANALYSIS

Page 247: 2016-2017 - Texas Department of Public Safety · collected by the Texas Department of Public Safety (TX DPS). According to the Texas Code of Criminal Procedure, “racial profiling

244

Comm

ercial Vehicle Enforcement - 2017

District 5C 2017

African American

White

Hispanic

Stops

Frequency 476

2,815 1,660

Percent 9.45 %

55.86 %

32.94 %

Citations

Frequency

129 656

453 Percent

10.30 %

52.40 %

36.18 %

Rate per 100 stops 27.10

23.30 27.29

Warnings

Frequency

197 1,088

663 Percent

10.00 %

55.23 %

33.65 %

Rate per 100 stops 41.39

38.65 39.94

Clean

Frequency 150

1,071 544

Percent 8.26 %

58.94 %

29.94 %

Rate per 100 stops

31.51 38.05

32.77 Searches (All)

Frequency

8 4

15 Percent

28.57 %

14.29 %

53.57 %

Rate per 100 stops 1.68

0.14 0.90

Discretionary Searches

Frequency

5 2

14 Percent

22.73 %

9.09 %

63.64 %

Rate per 100 stops 1.05

0.07 0.84

Non-D

iscretionary Searches

Frequency 3

2 1

Percent 50.00 %

33.33 %

16.67 %

Rate per 100 stops

0.63 0.07

0.06 Contraband H

its

Frequency 1

1 1

Percent 33.33 %

33.33 %

33.33 %

Rate per 100 searches

12.50 25.00

6.67 Race Know

n

Frequency 0

0 0

Percent --- %

--- %

--- %

Rate per 100 stops

0.00 0.00

0.00

DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC SAFETY APPENDIX J – REGION 5:LUBBOCK – DISTRICT LEVEL ANALYSIS

Page 248: 2016-2017 - Texas Department of Public Safety · collected by the Texas Department of Public Safety (TX DPS). According to the Texas Code of Criminal Procedure, “racial profiling

245

Comm

ercial Vehicle Enforcement - 2017

District 5C 2017

Asian Alaska

Native/Am

erican Indian

Middle Eastern

Other

Unknow

n

Stops

Frequency 62

6 20

0 0

Percent 1.23 %

0.12 %

0.40 %

0.00 %

0.00 %

Citations

Frequency

8 1

5 0

0 Percent

0.64 %

0.08 %

0.40 %

0.00 %

0.00 %

Rate per 100 stops 12.90

16.67 25.00

--- ---

Warnings

Frequency

17 3

2 0

0 Percent

0.86 %

0.15 %

0.10 %

0.00 %

0.00 %

Rate per 100 stops 27.42

50.00 10.00

--- ---

Clean

Frequency 37

2 13

0 0

Percent 2.04 %

0.11 %

0.72 %

0.00 %

0.00 %

Rate per 100 stops

59.68 33.33

65.00 ---

--- Searches (All)

Frequency

1 0

0 0

0 Percent

3.57 %

0.00 %

0.00 %

0.00 %

0.00 %

Rate per 100 stops 1.61

0.00 0.00

--- ---

Discretionary Searches

Frequency

1 0

0 0

0 Percent

4.55 %

0.00 %

0.00 %

0.00 %

0.00 %

Rate per 100 stops 1.61

0.00 0.00

--- ---

Non-D

iscretionary Searches

Frequency 0

0 0

0 0

Percent 0.00 %

0.00 %

0.00 %

0.00 %

0.00 %

Rate per 100 stops

0.00 0.00

0.00 ---

--- Contraband H

its

Frequency 0

0 0

0 0

Percent 0.00 %

0.00 %

0.00 %

0.00 %

0.00 %

Rate per 100 searches

0.00 ---

--- ---

--- Race Know

n

Frequency 0

0 0

0 0

Percent --- %

--- %

--- %

--- %

--- %

Rate per 100 stops

0.00 0.00

0.00 ---

---

DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC SAFETY APPENDIX J – REGION 5:LUBBOCK – DISTRICT LEVEL ANALYSIS

Page 249: 2016-2017 - Texas Department of Public Safety · collected by the Texas Department of Public Safety (TX DPS). According to the Texas Code of Criminal Procedure, “racial profiling

246

Comm

ercial Vehicle Enforcement - 2016

District 5C 2016

African American

White

Hispanic

Stops

Frequency 498

3,188 1,773

Percent 8.95 %

57.31 %

31.87 %

Citations

Frequency

99 759

528 Percent

7.05 %

54.02 %

37.58 %

Rate per 100 stops 19.88

23.81 29.78

Warnings

Frequency

214 1,299

731 Percent

9.40 %

57.05 %

32.10 %

Rate per 100 stops 42.97

40.75 41.23

Clean

Frequency 185

1,130 514

Percent 9.84 %

60.07 %

27.33 %

Rate per 100 stops

37.15 35.45

28.99 Searches (All)

Frequency

4 7

10 Percent

19.05 %

33.33 %

47.62 %

Rate per 100 stops 0.80

0.22 0.56

Discretionary Searches

Frequency

3 6

9 Percent

16.67 %

33.33 %

50.00 %

Rate per 100 stops 0.60

0.19 0.51

Non-D

iscretionary Searches

Frequency 1

1 1

Percent 33.33 %

33.33 %

33.33 %

Rate per 100 stops

0.20 0.03

0.06 Contraband H

its

Frequency 0

3 0

Percent 0.00 %

100.00 %

0.00 %

Rate per 100 searches

0.00 42.86

0.00 Race Know

n

Frequency 0

0 0

Percent --- %

--- %

--- %

Rate per 100 stops

0.00 0.00

0.00

DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC SAFETY APPENDIX J – REGION 5:LUBBOCK – DISTRICT LEVEL ANALYSIS

Page 250: 2016-2017 - Texas Department of Public Safety · collected by the Texas Department of Public Safety (TX DPS). According to the Texas Code of Criminal Procedure, “racial profiling

247

Comm

ercial Vehicle Enforcement - 2016

District 5C 2016

Asian Alaska

Native/Am

erican Indian

Middle Eastern

Other

Unknow

n

Stops

Frequency 69

4 31

0 0

Percent 1.24 %

0.07 %

0.56 %

0.00 %

0.00 %

Citations

Frequency

14 0

5 0

0 Percent

1.00 %

0.00 %

0.36 %

0.00 %

0.00 %

Rate per 100 stops 20.29

0.00 16.13

--- ---

Warnings

Frequency

26 1

6 0

0 Percent

1.14 %

0.04 %

0.26 %

0.00 %

0.00 %

Rate per 100 stops 37.68

25.00 19.35

--- ---

Clean

Frequency 29

3 20

0 0

Percent 1.54 %

0.16 %

1.06 %

0.00 %

0.00 %

Rate per 100 stops

42.03 75.00

64.52 ---

--- Searches (All)

Frequency

0 0

0 0

0 Percent

0.00 %

0.00 %

0.00 %

0.00 %

0.00 %

Rate per 100 stops 0.00

0.00 0.00

--- ---

Discretionary Searches

Frequency

0 0

0 0

0 Percent

0.00 %

0.00 %

0.00 %

0.00 %

0.00 %

Rate per 100 stops 0.00

0.00 0.00

--- ---

Non-D

iscretionary Searches

Frequency 0

0 0

0 0

Percent 0.00 %

0.00 %

0.00 %

0.00 %

0.00 %

Rate per 100 stops

0.00 0.00

0.00 ---

--- Contraband H

its

Frequency 0

0 0

0 0

Percent 0.00 %

0.00 %

0.00 %

0.00 %

0.00 %

Rate per 100 searches

--- ---

--- ---

--- Race Know

n

Frequency 0

0 0

0 0

Percent --- %

--- %

--- %

--- %

--- %

Rate per 100 stops

0.00 0.00

0.00 ---

---

DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC SAFETY APPENDIX J – REGION 5:LUBBOCK – DISTRICT LEVEL ANALYSIS

Page 251: 2016-2017 - Texas Department of Public Safety · collected by the Texas Department of Public Safety (TX DPS). According to the Texas Code of Criminal Procedure, “racial profiling

248

Appendix K Region 6: San Antonio Analysis

Page 252: 2016-2017 - Texas Department of Public Safety · collected by the Texas Department of Public Safety (TX DPS). According to the Texas Code of Criminal Procedure, “racial profiling

249

Falls

Bexar

GonzalesC

omal

FayetteK

err

Guadalupe

Blanco

Coryell M

cLennan

Atascosa

Bastrop

DeW

itt

Frio

JacksonK

arnes

Limestone

Medina

Freestone

Bell

Calhoun

Ham

ilton

Kendall

Lavaca

McMullen

San Saba

Travis

Victoria

William

son

Bandera

Bosque

Burnet

Caldw

ell

Gillespie

Goliad

Hays

Hill

Lampasas

Lee

LlanoM

ilam

Mills

Wilson

Potter

Sw

isher

Terry

Randall

Hall

Cochran

Haskell

Armstrong

King

RobertsStonewallYoung

Lipscomb

Fisher

Throckmorton Archer

Bailey

Cottle

Crosby

Deaf S

mith

Donley

Kent

Sherman

Stephens

Baylor

Hockley

Jack

Ochiltree

Oldham

Com

anche

Callahan

Foard

Hartley

Lamb

Mitchell

Moore

Yoakum

Briscoe

Hale

Scurry

Gray

Brow

n

Carson

Castro

Childress

Clay

Collingsw

orth

Coleman

Dallam

Dickens

Eastland

Floyd

Garza

Hansford

Hardeman

Hemphill

Hutchinson

Jones

Knox

Lubbock

Lynn

Montague

Motley

TaylorN

olan

Parm

er

Runnels

Shackelford

Wheeler

Wichita

Wilbarger

El

Paso

Schleicher

Presidio

Kim

ble

Martin

Terrell

Crane

Winkler

Daw

son

Andrew

s

Upton

Hudspeth

Mason

Borden

Coke

Gaines

Irion

Brew

ster

Menard

TomG

reen

How

ard

ReaganC

oncho

Crockett

Culberson

Ector

Glasscock

Jeff Davis

Sterling

Loving

McC

ulloch

Midland

Pecos

Reeves

Sutton

Ward

3D3A

US

281

Zavala

Starr

WebbZapata

Hidalgo

Duval

Bee

Jim Wells

MaverickA

ransas

Dim

mit

Edw

ards

JimH

oggK

enedy

Kinney

Kleberg

LiveO

ak

Nueces

Real

Refugio

San Patricio

Willacy

Brooks

Cam

eron

LaSalle

Uvalde

Val Verde

Newton

Trinity

Houston

Nacogdoches

Cham

bers

Waller

Orange

Montgom

ery

Polk

SanAugustine

Tyler

Angelina

Brazoria

Brazos

Liberty

WalkerH

arris

Leon

Austin

Burleson

Fort Bend

Galveston

Grimes

Jasper

Jefferson

Madison

Matagorda

Robertson

Sabine

Shelby

Washington

Colorado

Hardin

San

Jacinto

Wharton

Bow

ie

Cherokee

Harrison

Franklin

Cam

pH

opkins

Upshur

Collin

Morris

Anderson

Parker

Rains

Cooke

Dallas

Gregg

Johnson

Lamar

Marion

RedR

iver

Rockw

allD

entonC

ass

Delta

Erath

Ellis

FanninG

rayson

Henderson

Hood

Hunt

Kaufman

Navarro

Palo

Pinto

Panola

Rusk

Sm

ith

Som

ervell

Tarrant

Titus

VanZandt

Wise

Wood

Dallas

Region 11A

- Dallas

1B - Tyler

1C - H

urst1D

- Mt. Pleasant

Houston

Region 22A

- Houston

2B - B

eaumont

2C - C

onroe2D

- Bryan

San Antonio

Region 66A

- Waco

6B - Austin

6C - S

an Antonio

McA

llenR

egion 33A

- McA

llen3B

- Laredo3C

- Corpus C

hristi3D

- McA

llen3E

- Del R

io

El PasoR

egion 44A

- Midland

4B - El Paso

LubbockR

egion 5Lubbock - 5AA

marillo - 5B

Abilene - 5C

5 B

C

A

B

E

CDA

B

C

A

BC

A

D

BA

B

C

D

A

64

123

Page 253: 2016-2017 - Texas Department of Public Safety · collected by the Texas Department of Public Safety (TX DPS). According to the Texas Code of Criminal Procedure, “racial profiling

250

Highway Patrol - 2017

REGIO

N 6 2017

African American

White

Hispanic

Stops

Frequency 35,615

165,515 110,250

Percent 11.11 %

51.64 %

34.40 %

Citations

Frequency

15,524 54,198

51,202 Percent

12.46 %

43.50 %

41.10 %

Rate per 100 stops 43.59

32.75 46.44

Warnings

Frequency

20,091 111,317

59,048 Percent

10.25 %

56.81 %

30.14 %

Rate per 100 stops 56.41

67.25 53.56

Searches (All)

Frequency 3,230

5,544 8,030

Percent 19.02 %

32.65 %

47.29 %

Rate per 100 stops

9.07 3.35

7.28 D

iscretionary Searches

Frequency 624

1,544 2,372

Percent 13.60 %

33.66 %

51.71 %

Rate per 100 stops

1.75 0.93

2.15 N

on-Discretionary Searches

Frequency

2,606 4,000

5,658 Percent

21.03 %

32.28 %

45.65 %

Rate per 100 stops 7.32

2.42 5.13

Contraband Hits

Frequency

1,393 2,194

2,859 Percent

21.37 %

33.65 %

43.85 %

Rate per 100 searches 43.13

39.57 35.60

Race Known

Frequency

175 1,446

312 Percent

8.78 %

72.55 %

15.65 %

Rate per 100 stops 0.49

0.87 0.28

DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC SAFETY APPENDIX K – REGION 6:SAN ANTONIO ANALYSIS

Page 254: 2016-2017 - Texas Department of Public Safety · collected by the Texas Department of Public Safety (TX DPS). According to the Texas Code of Criminal Procedure, “racial profiling

251

Highway Patrol - 2017

REGIO

N 6 2017

Asian Alaska

Native/Am

erican Indian

Middle Eastern

Other

Unknow

n

Stops

Frequency 6,590

267 2,281

0 4

Percent 2.06 %

0.08 %

0.71 %

0.00 %

0.00 %

Citations

Frequency

2,610 115

932 0

1 Percent

2.10 %

0.09 %

0.75 %

0.00 %

0.00 %

Rate per 100 stops 39.61

43.07 40.86

--- 25.00

Warnings

Frequency

3,980 152

1,349 0

3 Percent

2.03 %

0.08 %

0.69 %

0.00 %

0.00 %

Rate per 100 stops 60.39

56.93 59.14

--- 75.00

Searches (All)

Frequency 117

17 42

0 0

Percent 0.69 %

0.10 %

0.25 %

0.00 %

0.00 %

Rate per 100 stops

1.78 6.37

1.84 ---

0.00 D

iscretionary Searches

Frequency 33

6 8

0 0

Percent 0.72 %

0.13 %

0.17 %

0.00 %

0.00 %

Rate per 100 stops

0.50 2.25

0.35 ---

0.00 N

on-Discretionary Searches

Frequency

84 11

34 0

0 Percent

0.68 %

0.09 %

0.27 %

0.00 %

0.00 %

Rate per 100 stops 1.27

4.12 1.49

--- 0.00

Contraband Hits

Frequency

46 9

19 0

0 Percent

0.71 %

0.14 %

0.29 %

0.00 %

0.00 %

Rate per 100 searches 39.32

52.94 45.24

--- ---

Race Known

Frequency

36 3

21 0

0 Percent

1.81 %

0.15 %

1.05 %

0.00 %

0.00 %

Rate per 100 stops 0.55

1.12 0.92

--- 0.00

DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC SAFETY APPENDIX K – REGION 6:SAN ANTONIO ANALYSIS

Page 255: 2016-2017 - Texas Department of Public Safety · collected by the Texas Department of Public Safety (TX DPS). According to the Texas Code of Criminal Procedure, “racial profiling

252

Highway Patrol - 2016

REGIO

N 6 2016

African American

White

Hispanic

Stops

Frequency 27,278

139,726 86,059

Percent 10.45 %

53.54 %

32.97 %

Citations

Frequency

11,901 47,113

40,541 Percent

11.56 %

45.77 %

39.38 %

Rate per 100 stops 43.63

33.72 47.11

Warnings

Frequency

15,377 92,613

45,518 Percent

9.73 %

58.60 %

28.80 %

Rate per 100 stops 56.37

66.28 52.89

Searches (All)

Frequency 1,082

2,057 2,287

Percent 19.74 %

37.52 %

41.72 %

Rate per 100 stops

3.97 1.47

2.66 D

iscretionary Searches

Frequency 230

595 735

Percent 14.59 %

37.75 %

46.64 %

Rate per 100 stops

0.84 0.43

0.85 N

on-Discretionary Searches

Frequency

852 1,462

1,552 Percent

21.81 %

37.43 %

39.73 %

Rate per 100 stops 3.12

1.05 1.80

Contraband Hits

Frequency

607 1,151

1,088 Percent

21.09 %

39.99 %

37.80 %

Rate per 100 searches 56.10

55.96 47.57

Race Known

Frequency

177 1,676

332 Percent

7.89 %

74.72 %

14.80 %

Rate per 100 stops 0.65

1.20 0.39

DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC SAFETY APPENDIX K – REGION 6:SAN ANTONIO ANALYSIS

Page 256: 2016-2017 - Texas Department of Public Safety · collected by the Texas Department of Public Safety (TX DPS). According to the Texas Code of Criminal Procedure, “racial profiling

253

Highway Patrol - 2016

REGIO

N 6 2016

Asian Alaska

Native/Am

erican Indian

Middle Eastern

Other

Unknow

n

Stops

Frequency 5,024

227 2,676

0 5

Percent 1.92 %

0.09 %

1.03 %

0.00 %

0.00 %

Citations

Frequency

2,133 96

1,160 0

0 Percent

2.07 %

0.09 %

1.13 %

0.00 %

0.00 %

Rate per 100 stops 42.46

42.29 43.35

--- 0.00

Warnings

Frequency

2,891 131

1,516 0

5 Percent

1.83 %

0.08 %

0.96 %

0.00 %

0.00 %

Rate per 100 stops 57.54

57.71 56.65

--- 100.00

Searches (All)

Frequency 37

3 16

0 0

Percent 0.67 %

0.05 %

0.29 %

0.00 %

0.00 %

Rate per 100 stops

0.74 1.32

0.60 ---

0.00 D

iscretionary Searches

Frequency 10

2 4

0 0

Percent 0.63 %

0.13 %

0.25 %

0.00 %

0.00 %

Rate per 100 stops

0.20 0.88

0.15 ---

0.00 N

on-Discretionary Searches

Frequency

27 1

12 0

0 Percent

0.69 %

0.03 %

0.31 %

0.00 %

0.00 %

Rate per 100 stops 0.54

0.44 0.45

--- 0.00

Contraband Hits

Frequency

21 1

10 0

0 Percent

0.73 %

0.03 %

0.35 %

0.00 %

0.00 %

Rate per 100 searches 56.76

33.33 62.50

--- ---

Race Known

Frequency

34 1

23 0

0 Percent

1.52 %

0.04 %

1.03 %

0.00 %

0.00 %

Rate per 100 stops 0.68

0.44 0.86

--- 0.00

DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC SAFETY APPENDIX K – REGION 6:SAN ANTONIO ANALYSIS

Page 257: 2016-2017 - Texas Department of Public Safety · collected by the Texas Department of Public Safety (TX DPS). According to the Texas Code of Criminal Procedure, “racial profiling

254

Comm

ercial Vehicle Enforcement - 2017

Region 6 2017 African Am

erican W

hite H

ispanic Stops

Frequency

2,364 7,790

11,656 Percent

10.61 %

34.96 %

52.31 %

Citations

Frequency 510

1,579 3,303

Percent 9.41 %

29.12 %

60.92 %

Rate per 100 stops

21.57 20.27

28.34 W

arnings

Frequency 1,266

3,890 6,271

Percent 10.95 %

33.64 %

54.22 %

Rate per 100 stops

53.55 49.94

53.80 Clean

Frequency

588 2,321

2,082 Percent

11.10 %

43.83 %

39.32 %

Rate per 100 stops 24.87

29.79 17.86

Searches (All)

Frequency 6

5 12

Percent 26.09 %

21.74 %

52.17 %

Rate per 100 stops

0.25 0.06

0.10 D

iscretionary Searches

Frequency 4

4 9

Percent 23.53 %

23.53 %

52.94 %

Rate per 100 stops

0.17 0.05

0.08 N

on-Discretionary Searches

Frequency

2 1

3 Percent

33.33 %

16.67 %

50.00 %

Rate per 100 stops 0.08

0.01 0.03

Contraband Hits

Frequency

3 0

3 Percent

50.00 %

0.00 %

50.00 %

Rate per 100 searches 50.00

0.00 25.00

Race Known

Frequency

8 46

18 Percent

11.11 %

63.89 %

25.00 %

Rate per 100 stops 0.34

0.59 0.15

DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC SAFETY APPENDIX K – REGION 6:SAN ANTONIO ANALYSIS

Page 258: 2016-2017 - Texas Department of Public Safety · collected by the Texas Department of Public Safety (TX DPS). According to the Texas Code of Criminal Procedure, “racial profiling

255

Comm

ercial Vehicle Enforcement - 2017

Region 6 2017 Asian

Alaska N

ative/American

Indian

Middle Eastern

Other

Unknow

n

Stops

Frequency 96

4 93

0 279

Percent 0.43 %

0.02 %

0.42 %

0.00 %

1.25 %

Citations

Frequency

14 0

16 0

0 Percent

0.26 %

0.00 %

0.30 %

0.00 %

0.00 %

Rate per 100 stops 14.58

0.00 17.20

--- 0.00

Warnings

Frequency

55 2

59 0

22 Percent

0.48 %

0.02 %

0.51 %

0.00 %

0.19 %

Rate per 100 stops 57.29

50.00 63.44

--- 7.89

Clean

Frequency 27

2 18

0 257

Percent 0.51 %

0.04 %

0.34 %

0.00 %

4.85 %

Rate per 100 stops

28.13 50.00

19.35 ---

92.11 Searches (All)

Frequency

0 0

0 0

0 Percent

0.00 %

0.00 %

0.00 %

0.00 %

0.00 %

Rate per 100 stops 0.00

0.00 0.00

--- 0.00

Discretionary Searches

Frequency

0 0

0 0

0 Percent

0.00 %

0.00 %

0.00 %

0.00 %

0.00 %

Rate per 100 stops 0.00

0.00 0.00

--- 0.00

Non-D

iscretionary Searches

Frequency 0

0 0

0 0

Percent 0.00 %

0.00 %

0.00 %

0.00 %

0.00 %

Rate per 100 stops

0.00 0.00

0.00 ---

0.00 Contraband H

its

Frequency 0

0 0

0 0

Percent 0.00 %

0.00 %

0.00 %

0.00 %

0.00 %

Rate per 100 searches

--- ---

--- ---

--- Race Know

n

Frequency 0

0 0

0 0

Percent 0.00 %

0.00 %

0.00 %

0.00 %

0.00 %

Rate per 100 stops

0.00 0.00

0.00 ---

0.00

DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC SAFETY APPENDIX K – REGION 6:SAN ANTONIO ANALYSIS

Page 259: 2016-2017 - Texas Department of Public Safety · collected by the Texas Department of Public Safety (TX DPS). According to the Texas Code of Criminal Procedure, “racial profiling

256

Comm

ercial Vehicle Enforcement - 2016

Region 6 2016 African Am

erican W

hite H

ispanic Stops

Frequency

2,122 7,163

9,810 Percent

10.87 %

36.68 %

50.24 %

Citations

Frequency 429

1,374 2,521

Percent 9.86 %

31.56 %

57.91 %

Rate per 100 stops

20.22 19.18

25.70 W

arnings

Frequency 1,225

3,928 5,719

Percent 11.11 %

35.61 %

51.85 %

Rate per 100 stops

57.73 54.84

58.30 Clean

Frequency

468 1,861

1,570 Percent

11.30 %

44.92 %

37.90 %

Rate per 100 stops 22.05

25.98 16.00

Searches (All)

Frequency 7

6 22

Percent 18.92 %

16.22 %

59.46 %

Rate per 100 stops

0.33 0.08

0.22 D

iscretionary Searches

Frequency 1

3 19

Percent 4.00 %

12.00 %

76.00 %

Rate per 100 stops

0.05 0.04

0.19 N

on-Discretionary Searches

Frequency

6 3

3 Percent

50.00 %

25.00 %

25.00 %

Rate per 100 stops 0.28

0.04 0.03

Contraband Hits

Frequency

2 3

1 Percent

33.33 %

50.00 %

16.67 %

Rate per 100 searches 28.57

50.00 4.55

Race Known

Frequency

2 7

5 Percent

14.29 %

50.00 %

35.71 %

Rate per 100 stops 0.09

0.10 0.05

DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC SAFETY APPENDIX K – REGION 6:SAN ANTONIO ANALYSIS

Page 260: 2016-2017 - Texas Department of Public Safety · collected by the Texas Department of Public Safety (TX DPS). According to the Texas Code of Criminal Procedure, “racial profiling

257

Comm

ercial Vehicle Enforcement - 2016

Region 6 2016 Asian

Alaska N

ative/American

Indian

Middle Eastern

Other

Unknow

n

Stops

Frequency 101

6 129

0 195

Percent 0.52 %

0.03 %

0.66 %

0.00 %

1.00 %

Citations

Frequency

12 1

16 0

0 Percent

0.28 %

0.02 %

0.37 %

0.00 %

0.00 %

Rate per 100 stops 11.88

16.67 12.40

--- 0.00

Warnings

Frequency

57 4

79 0

18 Percent

0.52 %

0.04 %

0.72 %

0.00 %

0.16 %

Rate per 100 stops 56.44

66.67 61.24

--- 9.23

Clean

Frequency 32

1 34

0 177

Percent 0.77 %

0.02 %

0.82 %

0.00 %

4.27 %

Rate per 100 stops

31.68 16.67

26.36 ---

90.77 Searches (All)

Frequency

1 0

1 0

0 Percent

2.70 %

0.00 %

2.70 %

0.00 %

0.00 %

Rate per 100 stops 0.99

0.00 0.78

--- 0.00

Discretionary Searches

Frequency

1 0

1 0

0 Percent

4.00 %

0.00 %

4.00 %

0.00 %

0.00 %

Rate per 100 stops 0.99

0.00 0.78

--- 0.00

Non-D

iscretionary Searches

Frequency 0

0 0

0 0

Percent 0.00 %

0.00 %

0.00 %

0.00 %

0.00 %

Rate per 100 stops

0.00 0.00

0.00 ---

0.00 Contraband H

its

Frequency 0

0 0

0 0

Percent 0.00 %

0.00 %

0.00 %

0.00 %

0.00 %

Rate per 100 searches

0.00 ---

0.00 ---

--- Race Know

n

Frequency 0

0 0

0 0

Percent 0.00 %

0.00 %

0.00 %

0.00 %

0.00 %

Rate per 100 stops

0.00 0.00

0.00 ---

0.00

DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC SAFETY APPENDIX K – REGION 6:SAN ANTONIO ANALYSIS

Page 261: 2016-2017 - Texas Department of Public Safety · collected by the Texas Department of Public Safety (TX DPS). According to the Texas Code of Criminal Procedure, “racial profiling

258

Appendix L Region 6: San Antonio District Level Analysis

Page 262: 2016-2017 - Texas Department of Public Safety · collected by the Texas Department of Public Safety (TX DPS). According to the Texas Code of Criminal Procedure, “racial profiling

259

Falls

Bexar

GonzalesC

omal

FayetteK

err

Guadalupe

Blanco

Coryell M

cLennan

Atascosa

Bastrop

DeW

itt

Frio

JacksonK

arnes

Limestone

Medina

Freestone

Bell

Calhoun

Ham

ilton

Kendall

Lavaca

McMullen

San Saba

Travis

Victoria

William

son

Bandera

Bosque

Burnet

Caldw

ell

Gillespie

Goliad

Hays

Hill

Lampasas

Lee

LlanoM

ilam

Mills

Wilson

Potter

Sw

isher

Terry

Randall

Hall

Cochran

Haskell

Armstrong

King

RobertsStonewallYoung

Lipscomb

Fisher

Throckmorton Archer

Bailey

Cottle

Crosby

Deaf S

mith

Donley

Kent

Sherman

Stephens

Baylor

Hockley

Jack

Ochiltree

Oldham

Com

anche

Callahan

Foard

Hartley

Lamb

Mitchell

Moore

Yoakum

Briscoe

Hale

Scurry

Gray

Brow

n

Carson

Castro

Childress

Clay

Collingsw

orth

Coleman

Dallam

Dickens

Eastland

Floyd

Garza

Hansford

Hardeman

Hemphill

Hutchinson

Jones

Knox

Lubbock

Lynn

Montague

Motley

TaylorN

olan

Parm

er

Runnels

Shackelford

Wheeler

Wichita

Wilbarger

El

Paso

Schleicher

Presidio

Kim

ble

Martin

Terrell

Crane

Winkler

Daw

son

Andrew

s

Upton

Hudspeth

Mason

Borden

Coke

Gaines

Irion

Brew

ster

Menard

TomG

reen

How

ard

ReaganC

oncho

Crockett

Culberson

Ector

Glasscock

Jeff Davis

Sterling

Loving

McC

ulloch

Midland

Pecos

Reeves

Sutton

Ward

3D3A

US

281

Zavala

Starr

WebbZapata

Hidalgo

Duval

Bee

Jim Wells

MaverickA

ransas

Dim

mit

Edw

ards

JimH

oggK

enedy

Kinney

Kleberg

LiveO

ak

Nueces

Real

Refugio

San Patricio

Willacy

Brooks

Cam

eron

LaSalle

Uvalde

Val Verde

Newton

Trinity

Houston

Nacogdoches

Cham

bers

Waller

Orange

Montgom

ery

Polk

SanAugustine

Tyler

Angelina

Brazoria

Brazos

Liberty

WalkerH

arris

Leon

Austin

Burleson

Fort Bend

Galveston

Grimes

Jasper

Jefferson

Madison

Matagorda

Robertson

Sabine

Shelby

Washington

Colorado

Hardin

San

Jacinto

Wharton

Bow

ie

Cherokee

Harrison

Franklin

Cam

pH

opkins

Upshur

Collin

Morris

Anderson

Parker

Rains

Cooke

Dallas

Gregg

Johnson

Lamar

Marion

RedR

iver

Rockw

allD

entonC

ass

Delta

Erath

Ellis

FanninG

rayson

Henderson

Hood

Hunt

Kaufman

Navarro

Palo

Pinto

Panola

Rusk

Sm

ith

Som

ervell

Tarrant

Titus

VanZandt

Wise

Wood

Dallas

Region 11A

- Dallas

1B - Tyler

1C - H

urst1D

- Mt. Pleasant

Houston

Region 22A

- Houston

2B - B

eaumont

2C - C

onroe2D

- Bryan

San Antonio

Region 66A

- Waco

6B - Austin

6C - S

an Antonio

McA

llenR

egion 33A

- McA

llen3B

- Laredo3C

- Corpus C

hristi3D

- McA

llen3E

- Del R

io

El PasoR

egion 44A

- Midland

4B - El Paso

LubbockR

egion 5Lubbock - 5AA

marillo - 5B

Abilene - 5C

5 B

C

A

B

E

CDA

B

C

A

BC

A

D

BA

B

C

D

A

64

123

Page 263: 2016-2017 - Texas Department of Public Safety · collected by the Texas Department of Public Safety (TX DPS). According to the Texas Code of Criminal Procedure, “racial profiling

260

Highway Patrol - 2017

DISTRICT 6A 2017

African American

White

Hispanic

Stops

Frequency 13,793

47,944 15,462

Percent 17.30 %

60.13 %

19.39 %

Citations

Frequency

5,469 13,550

6,554 Percent

20.65 %

51.16 %

24.75 %

Rate per 100 stops 39.65

28.26 42.39

Warnings

Frequency

8,324 34,394

8,908 Percent

15.63 %

64.59 %

16.73 %

Rate per 100 stops 60.35

71.74 57.61

Searches (All)

Frequency 1,294

1,621 1,122

Percent 31.58 %

39.56 %

27.38 %

Rate per 100 stops

9.38 3.38

7.26 D

iscretionary Searches

Frequency 248

497 406

Percent 21.23 %

42.55 %

34.76 %

Rate per 100 stops

1.80 1.04

2.63 N

on-Discretionary Searches

Frequency

1,046 1,124

716 Percent

35.70 %

38.36 %

24.44 %

Rate per 100 stops 7.58

2.34 4.63

Contraband Hits

Frequency

619 687

410 Percent

35.53 %

39.44 %

23.54 %

Rate per 100 searches 47.84

42.38 36.54

Race Known

Frequency

88 1,002

165 Percent

6.91 %

78.71 %

12.96 %

Rate per 100 stops 0.64

2.09 1.07

DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC SAFETY APPENDIX L – REGION 6:SAN ANTONIO – DISTRICT LEVEL ANALYSIS

Page 264: 2016-2017 - Texas Department of Public Safety · collected by the Texas Department of Public Safety (TX DPS). According to the Texas Code of Criminal Procedure, “racial profiling

261

Highway Patrol - 2017

DISTRICT 6A 2017

Asian Alaska

Native/Am

erican Indian

Middle Eastern

Other

Unknow

n

Stops

Frequency 1,831

73 629

0 0

Percent 2.30 %

0.09 %

0.79 %

0.00 %

0.00 %

Citations

Frequency

645 25

241 0

0 Percent

2.44 %

0.09 %

0.91 %

0.00 %

0.00 %

Rate per 100 stops 35.23

34.25 38.31

--- ---

Warnings

Frequency

1,186 48

388 0

0 Percent

2.23 %

0.09 %

0.73 %

0.00 %

0.00 %

Rate per 100 stops 64.77

65.75 61.69

--- ---

Searches (All)

Frequency 41

5 15

0 0

Percent 1.00 %

0.12 %

0.37 %

0.00 %

0.00 %

Rate per 100 stops

2.24 6.85

2.38 ---

--- D

iscretionary Searches

Frequency 12

2 3

0 0

Percent 1.03 %

0.17 %

0.26 %

0.00 %

0.00 %

Rate per 100 stops

0.66 2.74

0.48 ---

--- N

on-Discretionary Searches

Frequency

29 3

12 0

0 Percent

0.99 %

0.10 %

0.41 %

0.00 %

0.00 %

Rate per 100 stops 1.58

4.11 1.91

--- ---

Contraband Hits

Frequency

16 2

8 0

0 Percent

0.92 %

0.11 %

0.46 %

0.00 %

0.00 %

Rate per 100 searches 39.02

40.00 53.33

--- ---

Race Known

Frequency

11 2

5 0

0 Percent

0.86 %

0.16 %

0.39 %

0.00 %

0.00 %

Rate per 100 stops 0.60

2.74 0.79

--- ---

DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC SAFETY APPENDIX L – REGION 6:SAN ANTONIO – DISTRICT LEVEL ANALYSIS

Page 265: 2016-2017 - Texas Department of Public Safety · collected by the Texas Department of Public Safety (TX DPS). According to the Texas Code of Criminal Procedure, “racial profiling

262

Highway Patrol - 2016

DISTRICT 6A 2016

African American

White

Hispanic

Stops

Frequency 11,542

40,175 12,615

Percent 17.37 %

60.44 %

18.98 %

Citations

Frequency

4,710 12,130

5,627 Percent

20.18 %

51.97 %

24.11 %

Rate per 100 stops 40.81

30.19 44.61

Warnings

Frequency

6,832 28,045

6,988 Percent

15.84 %

65.03 %

16.20 %

Rate per 100 stops 59.19

69.81 55.39

Searches (All)

Frequency 536

659 426

Percent 32.68 %

40.18 %

25.98 %

Rate per 100 stops

4.64 1.64

3.38 D

iscretionary Searches

Frequency 128

234 181

Percent 23.15 %

42.31 %

32.73 %

Rate per 100 stops

1.11 0.58

1.43 N

on-Discretionary Searches

Frequency

408 425

245 Percent

37.53 %

39.10 %

22.54 %

Rate per 100 stops 3.53

1.06 1.94

Contraband Hits

Frequency

273 341

188 Percent

33.66 %

42.05 %

23.18 %

Rate per 100 searches 50.93

51.75 44.13

Race Known

Frequency

104 1,279

185 Percent

6.52 %

80.19 %

11.60 %

Rate per 100 stops 0.90

3.18 1.47

DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC SAFETY APPENDIX L – REGION 6:SAN ANTONIO – DISTRICT LEVEL ANALYSIS

Page 266: 2016-2017 - Texas Department of Public Safety · collected by the Texas Department of Public Safety (TX DPS). According to the Texas Code of Criminal Procedure, “racial profiling

263

Highway Patrol - 2016

DISTRICT 6A 2016

Asian Alaska

Native/Am

erican Indian

Middle Eastern

Other

Unknow

n

Stops

Frequency 1,378

53 704

0 0

Percent 2.07 %

0.08 %

1.06 %

0.00 %

0.00 %

Citations

Frequency

566 25

281 0

0 Percent

2.43 %

0.11 %

1.20 %

0.00 %

0.00 %

Rate per 100 stops 41.07

47.17 39.91

--- ---

Warnings

Frequency

812 28

423 0

0 Percent

1.88 %

0.06 %

0.98 %

0.00 %

0.00 %

Rate per 100 stops 58.93

52.83 60.09

--- ---

Searches (All)

Frequency 16

1 2

0 0

Percent 0.98 %

0.06 %

0.12 %

0.00 %

0.00 %

Rate per 100 stops

1.16 1.89

0.28 ---

--- D

iscretionary Searches

Frequency 7

1 2

0 0

Percent 1.27 %

0.18 %

0.36 %

0.00 %

0.00 %

Rate per 100 stops

0.51 1.89

0.28 ---

--- N

on-Discretionary Searches

Frequency

9 0

0 0

0 Percent

0.83 %

0.00 %

0.00 %

0.00 %

0.00 %

Rate per 100 stops 0.65

0.00 0.00

--- ---

Contraband Hits

Frequency

8 1

0 0

0 Percent

0.99 %

0.12 %

0.00 %

0.00 %

0.00 %

Rate per 100 searches 50.00

100.00 0.00

--- ---

Race Known

Frequency

15 0

12 0

0 Percent

0.94 %

0.00 %

0.75 %

0.00 %

0.00 %

Rate per 100 stops 1.09

0.00 1.70

--- ---

DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC SAFETY APPENDIX L – REGION 6:SAN ANTONIO – DISTRICT LEVEL ANALYSIS

Page 267: 2016-2017 - Texas Department of Public Safety · collected by the Texas Department of Public Safety (TX DPS). According to the Texas Code of Criminal Procedure, “racial profiling

264

Comm

ercial Vehicle Enforcement - 2017

District 6A 2017

African American

White

Hispanic

Stops

Frequency 562

2,346 1,266

Percent 13.35 %

55.72 %

30.07 %

Citations

Frequency

108 414

314 Percent

12.80 %

49.05 %

37.20 %

Rate per 100 stops 19.22

17.65 24.80

Warnings

Frequency

274 1,130

671 Percent

13.08 %

53.94 %

32.03 %

Rate per 100 stops 48.75

48.17 53.00

Clean

Frequency 180

802 281

Percent 14.16 %

63.10 %

22.11 %

Rate per 100 stops

32.03 34.19

22.20 Searches (All)

Frequency

3 2

7 Percent

25.00 %

16.67 %

58.33 %

Rate per 100 stops 0.53

0.09 0.55

Discretionary Searches

Frequency

2 1

5 Percent

25.00 %

12.50 %

62.50 %

Rate per 100 stops 0.36

0.04 0.39

Non-D

iscretionary Searches

Frequency 1

1 2

Percent 25.00 %

25.00 %

50.00 %

Rate per 100 stops

0.18 0.04

0.16 Contraband H

its

Frequency 1

0 1

Percent 50.00 %

0.00 %

50.00 %

Rate per 100 searches

33.33 0.00

14.29 Race Know

n

Frequency 1

4 1

Percent 16.67 %

66.67 %

16.67 %

Rate per 100 stops

0.18 0.17

0.08

DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC SAFETY APPENDIX L – REGION 6:SAN ANTONIO – DISTRICT LEVEL ANALYSIS

Page 268: 2016-2017 - Texas Department of Public Safety · collected by the Texas Department of Public Safety (TX DPS). According to the Texas Code of Criminal Procedure, “racial profiling

265

Comm

ercial Vehicle Enforcement - 2017

District 6A 2017

Asian Alaska

Native/Am

erican Indian

Middle Eastern

Other

Unknow

n

Stops

Frequency 22

1 13

0 0

Percent 0.52 %

0.02 %

0.31 %

0.00 %

0.00 %

Citations

Frequency

6 0

2 0

0 Percent

0.71 %

0.00 %

0.24 %

0.00 %

0.00 %

Rate per 100 stops 27.27

0.00 15.38

--- ---

Warnings

Frequency

11 0

9 0

0 Percent

0.53 %

0.00 %

0.43 %

0.00 %

0.00 %

Rate per 100 stops 50.00

0.00 69.23

--- ---

Clean

Frequency 5

1 2

0 0

Percent 0.39 %

0.08 %

0.16 %

0.00 %

0.00 %

Rate per 100 stops

22.73 100.00

15.38 ---

--- Searches (All)

Frequency

0 0

0 0

0 Percent

0.00 %

0.00 %

0.00 %

0.00 %

0.00 %

Rate per 100 stops 0.00

0.00 0.00

--- ---

Discretionary Searches

Frequency

0 0

0 0

0 Percent

0.00 %

0.00 %

0.00 %

0.00 %

0.00 %

Rate per 100 stops 0.00

0.00 0.00

--- ---

Non-D

iscretionary Searches

Frequency 0

0 0

0 0

Percent 0.00 %

0.00 %

0.00 %

0.00 %

0.00 %

Rate per 100 stops

0.00 0.00

0.00 ---

--- Contraband H

its

Frequency 0

0 0

0 0

Percent 0.00 %

0.00 %

0.00 %

0.00 %

0.00 %

Rate per 100 searches

--- ---

--- ---

--- Race Know

n

Frequency 0

0 0

0 0

Percent 0.00 %

0.00 %

0.00 %

0.00 %

0.00 %

Rate per 100 stops

0.00 0.00

0.00 ---

---

DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC SAFETY APPENDIX L – REGION 6:SAN ANTONIO – DISTRICT LEVEL ANALYSIS

Page 269: 2016-2017 - Texas Department of Public Safety · collected by the Texas Department of Public Safety (TX DPS). According to the Texas Code of Criminal Procedure, “racial profiling

266

Comm

ercial Vehicle Enforcement - 2016

District 6A 2016

African American

White

Hispanic

Stops

Frequency 704

2,416 1,393

Percent 15.35 %

52.68 %

30.38 %

Citations

Frequency

96 309

252 Percent

14.39 %

46.33 %

37.78 %

Rate per 100 stops 13.64

12.79 18.09

Warnings

Frequency

416 1,305

877 Percent

15.73 %

49.36 %

33.17 %

Rate per 100 stops 59.09

54.01 62.96

Clean

Frequency 192

802 264

Percent 15.06 %

62.90 %

20.71 %

Rate per 100 stops

27.27 33.20

18.95 Searches (All)

Frequency

3 2

6 Percent

23.08 %

15.38 %

46.15 %

Rate per 100 stops 0.43

0.08 0.43

Discretionary Searches

Frequency

1 1

6 Percent

10.00 %

10.00 %

60.00 %

Rate per 100 stops 0.14

0.04 0.43

Non-D

iscretionary Searches

Frequency 2

1 0

Percent 66.67 %

33.33 %

0.00 %

Rate per 100 stops

0.28 0.04

0.00 Contraband H

its

Frequency 1

1 0

Percent 50.00 %

50.00 %

0.00 %

Rate per 100 searches

33.33 50.00

0.00 Race Know

n

Frequency 0

0 0

Percent --- %

--- %

--- %

Rate per 100 stops

0.00 0.00

0.00

DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC SAFETY APPENDIX L – REGION 6:SAN ANTONIO – DISTRICT LEVEL ANALYSIS

Page 270: 2016-2017 - Texas Department of Public Safety · collected by the Texas Department of Public Safety (TX DPS). According to the Texas Code of Criminal Procedure, “racial profiling

267

Comm

ercial Vehicle Enforcement - 2016

District 6A 2016

Asian Alaska

Native/Am

erican Indian

Middle Eastern

Other

Unknow

n

Stops

Frequency 27

2 44

0 0

Percent 0.59 %

0.04 %

0.96 %

0.00 %

0.00 %

Citations

Frequency

5 0

5 0

0 Percent

0.75 %

0.00 %

0.75 %

0.00 %

0.00 %

Rate per 100 stops 18.52

0.00 11.36

--- ---

Warnings

Frequency

10 2

34 0

0 Percent

0.38 %

0.08 %

1.29 %

0.00 %

0.00 %

Rate per 100 stops 37.04

100.00 77.27

--- ---

Clean

Frequency 12

0 5

0 0

Percent 0.94 %

0.00 %

0.39 %

0.00 %

0.00 %

Rate per 100 stops

44.44 0.00

11.36 ---

--- Searches (All)

Frequency

1 0

1 0

0 Percent

7.69 %

0.00 %

7.69 %

0.00 %

0.00 %

Rate per 100 stops 3.70

0.00 2.27

--- ---

Discretionary Searches

Frequency

1 0

1 0

0 Percent

10.00 %

0.00 %

10.00 %

0.00 %

0.00 %

Rate per 100 stops 3.70

0.00 2.27

--- ---

Non-D

iscretionary Searches

Frequency 0

0 0

0 0

Percent 0.00 %

0.00 %

0.00 %

0.00 %

0.00 %

Rate per 100 stops

0.00 0.00

0.00 ---

--- Contraband H

its

Frequency 0

0 0

0 0

Percent 0.00 %

0.00 %

0.00 %

0.00 %

0.00 %

Rate per 100 searches

0.00 ---

0.00 ---

--- Race Know

n

Frequency 0

0 0

0 0

Percent --- %

--- %

--- %

--- %

--- %

Rate per 100 stops

0.00 0.00

0.00 ---

---

DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC SAFETY APPENDIX L – REGION 6:SAN ANTONIO – DISTRICT LEVEL ANALYSIS

Page 271: 2016-2017 - Texas Department of Public Safety · collected by the Texas Department of Public Safety (TX DPS). According to the Texas Code of Criminal Procedure, “racial profiling

268

Falls

Bexar

GonzalesC

omal

FayetteK

err

Guadalupe

Blanco

Coryell M

cLennan

Atascosa

Bastrop

DeW

itt

Frio

JacksonK

arnes

Limestone

Medina

Freestone

Bell

Calhoun

Ham

ilton

Kendall

Lavaca

McMullen

San Saba

Travis

Victoria

William

son

Bandera

Bosque

Burnet

Caldw

ell

Gillespie

Goliad

Hays

Hill

Lampasas

Lee

LlanoM

ilam

Mills

Wilson

Potter

Sw

isher

Terry

Randall

Hall

Cochran

Haskell

Armstrong

King

RobertsStonewallYoung

Lipscomb

Fisher

Archer

Bailey

Cottle

Crosby

Deaf S

mith

Donley

Kent

Sherman

Stephens

Baylor

Hockley

Jack

Ochiltree

Oldham

Com

anche

Callahan

Foard

Hartley

Lamb

Mitchell

Moore

Yoakum

Briscoe

Hale

Scurry

Gray

Brow

n

Carson

Castro

Childress

Clay

Collingsw

orth

Coleman

Dallam

Dickens

Eastland

Floyd

Garza

Hansford

Hardeman

Hemphill

Hutchinson

Jones

Knox

Lubbock

Lynn

Montague

Motley

TaylorN

olan

Parm

er

Runnels

Shackelford

Wheeler

Wichita

Wilbarger

El

Paso

Schleicher

Presidio

Kim

ble

Martin

Terrell

Crane

Winkler

Daw

son

Andrew

s

Upton

Hudspeth

Mason

Borden

Coke

Gaines

Irion

Brew

ster

Menard

TomG

reen

How

ard

ReaganC

oncho

Crockett

Culberson

Ector

Glasscock

Jeff Davis

Sterling

Loving

McC

ulloch

Midland

Pecos

Reeves

Sutton

Ward

3D3A

US

281

Zavala

Starr

WebbZapata

Hidalgo

Duval

Bee

Jim Wells

MaverickA

ransas

Dim

mit

Edw

ards

JimH

oggK

enedy

Kinney

Kleberg

LiveO

ak

Nueces

Real

Refugio

San Patricio

Willacy

Brooks

Cam

eron

LaSalle

Uvalde

Val Verde

Newton

Trinity

Houston

Nacogdoches

Cham

bers

Waller

Orange

Montgom

ery

Polk

SanAugustine

Tyler

Angelina

Brazoria

Brazos

Liberty

WalkerH

arris

Leon

Austin

Burleson

Fort Bend

Galveston

Grimes

Jasper

Jefferson

Madison

Matagorda

Robertson

Sabine

Shelby

Washington

Colorado

Hardin

San

Jacinto

Wharton

Bow

ie

Cherokee

Harrison

Franklin

Cam

pH

opkins

Upshur

Collin

Morris

Anderson

Parker

Rains

Cooke

Dallas

Gregg

Johnson

Lamar

Marion

RedR

iver

Rockw

allD

entonC

ass

Delta

Erath

Ellis

FanninG

rayson

Henderson

Hood

Hunt

Kaufman

Navarro

Palo

Pinto

Panola

Rusk

Sm

ith

Som

ervell

Tarrant

Titus

VanZandt

Wise

Wood

Dallas

Region 11A

- Dallas

1B - Tyler

1C - H

urst1D

- Mt. Pleasant

Houston

Region 22A

- Houston

2B - B

eaumont

2C - C

onroe2D

- Bryan

San Antonio

Region 66A

- Waco

6B - Austin

6C - S

an Antonio

McA

llenR

egion 33A

- McA

llen3B

- Laredo3C

- Corpus C

hristi3D

- McA

llen3E

- Del R

io

El PasoR

egion 44A

- Midland

4B - El Paso

LubbockR

egion 5Lubbock - 5AA

marillo - 5B

Abilene - 5C

5 B

C

A

B

E

CDA

B

C

A

BC

A

D

BA

B

C

D

A

64

123

Throckmorton

Page 272: 2016-2017 - Texas Department of Public Safety · collected by the Texas Department of Public Safety (TX DPS). According to the Texas Code of Criminal Procedure, “racial profiling

269

Highway Patrol - 2017

DISTRICT 6B 2017

African American

White

Hispanic

Stops

Frequency 12,695

58,152 27,595

Percent 12.35 %

56.57 %

26.85 %

Citations

Frequency

6,202 21,380

15,309 Percent

13.87 %

47.80 %

34.23 %

Rate per 100 stops 48.85

36.77 55.48

Warnings

Frequency

6,493 36,772

12,286 Percent

11.18 %

63.33 %

21.16 %

Rate per 100 stops 51.15

63.23 44.52

Searches (All)

Frequency 897

1,671 1,635

Percent 21.12 %

39.35 %

38.50 %

Rate per 100 stops

7.07 2.87

5.92 D

iscretionary Searches

Frequency 126

444 370

Percent 13.28 %

46.79 %

38.99 %

Rate per 100 stops

0.99 0.76

1.34 N

on-Discretionary Searches

Frequency

771 1,227

1,265 Percent

23.38 %

37.20 %

38.36 %

Rate per 100 stops 6.07

2.11 4.58

Contraband Hits

Frequency

408 689

647 Percent

23.12 %

39.04 %

36.66 %

Rate per 100 searches 45.48

41.23 39.57

Race Known

Frequency

80 432

134 Percent

11.64 %

62.88 %

19.51 %

Rate per 100 stops 0.63

0.74 0.49

DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC SAFETY APPENDIX L – REGION 6:SAN ANTONIO – DISTRICT LEVEL ANALYSIS

Page 273: 2016-2017 - Texas Department of Public Safety · collected by the Texas Department of Public Safety (TX DPS). According to the Texas Code of Criminal Procedure, “racial profiling

270

Highway Patrol - 2017

DISTRICT 6B 2017

Asian Alaska

Native/Am

erican Indian

Middle Eastern

Other

Unknow

n

Stops

Frequency 3,207

129 1,013

0 0

Percent 3.12 %

0.13 %

0.99 %

0.00 %

0.00 %

Citations

Frequency

1,366 61

410 0

0 Percent

3.05 %

0.14 %

0.92 %

0.00 %

0.00 %

Rate per 100 stops 42.59

47.29 40.47

--- ---

Warnings

Frequency

1,841 68

603 0

0 Percent

3.17 %

0.12 %

1.04 %

0.00 %

0.00 %

Rate per 100 stops 57.41

52.71 59.53

--- ---

Searches (All)

Frequency 28

5 11

0 0

Percent 0.66 %

0.12 %

0.26 %

0.00 %

0.00 %

Rate per 100 stops

0.87 3.88

1.09 ---

--- D

iscretionary Searches

Frequency 4

3 2

0 0

Percent 0.42 %

0.32 %

0.21 %

0.00 %

0.00 %

Rate per 100 stops

0.12 2.33

0.20 ---

--- N

on-Discretionary Searches

Frequency

24 2

9 0

0 Percent

0.73 %

0.06 %

0.27 %

0.00 %

0.00 %

Rate per 100 stops 0.75

1.55 0.89

--- ---

Contraband Hits

Frequency

13 2

6 0

0 Percent

0.74 %

0.11 %

0.34 %

0.00 %

0.00 %

Rate per 100 searches 46.43

40.00 54.55

--- ---

Race Known

Frequency

24 1

16 0

0 Percent

3.49 %

0.15 %

2.33 %

0.00 %

0.00 %

Rate per 100 stops 0.75

0.78 1.58

--- ---

DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC SAFETY APPENDIX L – REGION 6:SAN ANTONIO – DISTRICT LEVEL ANALYSIS

Page 274: 2016-2017 - Texas Department of Public Safety · collected by the Texas Department of Public Safety (TX DPS). According to the Texas Code of Criminal Procedure, “racial profiling

271

Highway Patrol - 2016

DISTRICT 6B 2016

African American

White

Hispanic

Stops

Frequency 8,947

44,634 20,554

Percent 11.51 %

57.44 %

26.45 %

Citations

Frequency

4,346 17,088

11,566 Percent

12.58 %

49.46 %

33.48 %

Rate per 100 stops 48.57

38.28 56.27

Warnings

Frequency

4,601 27,546

8,988 Percent

10.66 %

63.83 %

20.83 %

Rate per 100 stops 51.43

61.72 43.73

Searches (All)

Frequency 373

649 618

Percent 22.34 %

38.86 %

37.01 %

Rate per 100 stops

4.17 1.45

3.01 D

iscretionary Searches

Frequency 63

167 197

Percent 14.69 %

38.93 %

45.92 %

Rate per 100 stops

0.70 0.37

0.96 N

on-Discretionary Searches

Frequency

310 482

421 Percent

24.98 %

38.84 %

33.92 %

Rate per 100 stops 3.46

1.08 2.05

Contraband Hits

Frequency

234 363

325 Percent

24.87 %

38.58 %

34.54 %

Rate per 100 searches 62.73

55.93 52.59

Race Known

Frequency

72 299

118 Percent

13.93 %

57.83 %

22.82 %

Rate per 100 stops 0.80

0.67 0.57

DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC SAFETY APPENDIX L – REGION 6:SAN ANTONIO – DISTRICT LEVEL ANALYSIS

Page 275: 2016-2017 - Texas Department of Public Safety · collected by the Texas Department of Public Safety (TX DPS). According to the Texas Code of Criminal Procedure, “racial profiling

272

Highway Patrol - 2016

DISTRICT 6B 2016

Asian Alaska

Native/Am

erican Indian

Middle Eastern

Other

Unknow

n

Stops

Frequency 2,311

103 1,150

0 4

Percent 2.97 %

0.13 %

1.48 %

0.00 %

0.01 %

Citations

Frequency

1,016 41

492 0

0 Percent

2.94 %

0.12 %

1.42 %

0.00 %

0.00 %

Rate per 100 stops 43.96

39.81 42.78

--- 0.00

Warnings

Frequency

1,295 62

658 0

4 Percent

3.00 %

0.14 %

1.52 %

0.00 %

0.01 %

Rate per 100 stops 56.04

60.19 57.22

--- 100.00

Searches (All)

Frequency 17

1 12

0 0

Percent 1.02 %

0.06 %

0.72 %

0.00 %

0.00 %

Rate per 100 stops

0.74 0.97

1.04 ---

0.00 D

iscretionary Searches

Frequency 1

0 1

0 0

Percent 0.23 %

0.00 %

0.23 %

0.00 %

0.00 %

Rate per 100 stops

0.04 0.00

0.09 ---

0.00 N

on-Discretionary Searches

Frequency

16 1

11 0

0 Percent

1.29 %

0.08 %

0.89 %

0.00 %

0.00 %

Rate per 100 stops 0.69

0.97 0.96

--- 0.00

Contraband Hits

Frequency

10 0

9 0

0 Percent

1.06 %

0.00 %

0.96 %

0.00 %

0.00 %

Rate per 100 searches 58.82

0.00 75.00

--- ---

Race Known

Frequency

16 1

11 0

0 Percent

3.09 %

0.19 %

2.13 %

0.00 %

0.00 %

Rate per 100 stops 0.69

0.97 0.96

--- 0.00

DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC SAFETY APPENDIX L – REGION 6:SAN ANTONIO – DISTRICT LEVEL ANALYSIS

Page 276: 2016-2017 - Texas Department of Public Safety · collected by the Texas Department of Public Safety (TX DPS). According to the Texas Code of Criminal Procedure, “racial profiling

273

Comm

ercial Vehicle Enforcement - 2017

District 6B 2017

African American

White

Hispanic

Stops

Frequency 896

2,262 3,564

Percent 12.98 %

32.78 %

51.64 %

Citations

Frequency

223 466

1,010 Percent

13.01 %

27.19 %

58.93 %

Rate per 100 stops 24.89

20.60 28.34

Warnings

Frequency

522 1,161

1,986 Percent

14.00 %

31.13 %

53.26 %

Rate per 100 stops 58.26

51.33 55.72

Clean

Frequency 151

635 568

Percent 10.36 %

43.55 %

38.96 %

Rate per 100 stops

16.85 28.07

15.94 Searches (All)

Frequency

2 3

4 Percent

22.22 %

33.33 %

44.44 %

Rate per 100 stops 0.22

0.13 0.11

Discretionary Searches

Frequency

1 3

3 Percent

14.29 %

42.86 %

42.86 %

Rate per 100 stops 0.11

0.13 0.08

Non-D

iscretionary Searches

Frequency 1

0 1

Percent 50.00 %

0.00 %

50.00 %

Rate per 100 stops

0.11 0.00

0.03 Contraband H

its

Frequency 1

0 2

Percent 33.33 %

0.00 %

66.67 %

Rate per 100 searches

50.00 0.00

50.00 Race Know

n

Frequency 7

42 16

Percent 10.77 %

64.62 %

24.62 %

Rate per 100 stops

0.78 1.86

0.45

DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC SAFETY APPENDIX L – REGION 6:SAN ANTONIO – DISTRICT LEVEL ANALYSIS

Page 277: 2016-2017 - Texas Department of Public Safety · collected by the Texas Department of Public Safety (TX DPS). According to the Texas Code of Criminal Procedure, “racial profiling

274

Comm

ercial Vehicle Enforcement - 2017

District 6B 2017

Asian Alaska

Native/Am

erican Indian

Middle Eastern

Other

Unknow

n

Stops

Frequency 40

1 33

0 105

Percent 0.58 %

0.01 %

0.48 %

0.00 %

1.52 %

Citations

Frequency

6 0

9 0

0 Percent

0.35 %

0.00 %

0.53 %

0.00 %

0.00 %

Rate per 100 stops 15.00

0.00 27.27

--- 0.00

Warnings

Frequency

24 1

19 0

16 Percent

0.64 %

0.03 %

0.51 %

0.00 %

0.43 %

Rate per 100 stops 60.00

100.00 57.58

--- 15.24

Clean

Frequency 10

0 5

0 89

Percent 0.69 %

0.00 %

0.34 %

0.00 %

6.10 %

Rate per 100 stops

25.00 0.00

15.15 ---

84.76 Searches (All)

Frequency

0 0

0 0

0 Percent

0.00 %

0.00 %

0.00 %

0.00 %

0.00 %

Rate per 100 stops 0.00

0.00 0.00

--- 0.00

Discretionary Searches

Frequency

0 0

0 0

0 Percent

0.00 %

0.00 %

0.00 %

0.00 %

0.00 %

Rate per 100 stops 0.00

0.00 0.00

--- 0.00

Non-D

iscretionary Searches

Frequency 0

0 0

0 0

Percent 0.00 %

0.00 %

0.00 %

0.00 %

0.00 %

Rate per 100 stops

0.00 0.00

0.00 ---

0.00 Contraband H

its

Frequency 0

0 0

0 0

Percent 0.00 %

0.00 %

0.00 %

0.00 %

0.00 %

Rate per 100 searches

--- ---

--- ---

--- Race Know

n

Frequency 0

0 0

0 0

Percent 0.00 %

0.00 %

0.00 %

0.00 %

0.00 %

Rate per 100 stops

0.00 0.00

0.00 ---

0.00

DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC SAFETY APPENDIX L – REGION 6:SAN ANTONIO – DISTRICT LEVEL ANALYSIS

Page 278: 2016-2017 - Texas Department of Public Safety · collected by the Texas Department of Public Safety (TX DPS). According to the Texas Code of Criminal Procedure, “racial profiling

275

Comm

ercial Vehicle Enforcement - 2016

District 6B 2016

African American

White

Hispanic

Stops

Frequency 700

1,930 2,677

Percent 12.79 %

35.28 %

48.93 %

Citations

Frequency

157 380

704 Percent

12.54 %

30.35 %

56.23 %

Rate per 100 stops 22.43

19.69 26.30

Warnings

Frequency

406 1,056

1,526 Percent

13.37 %

34.77 %

50.25 %

Rate per 100 stops 58.00

54.72 57.00

Clean

Frequency 137

494 447

Percent 11.59 %

41.79 %

37.82 %

Rate per 100 stops

19.57 25.60

16.70 Searches (All)

Frequency

2 1

7 Percent

20.00 %

10.00 %

70.00 %

Rate per 100 stops 0.29

0.05 0.26

Discretionary Searches

Frequency

0 0

6 Percent

0.00 %

0.00 %

100.00 %

Rate per 100 stops 0.00

0.00 0.22

Non-D

iscretionary Searches

Frequency 2

1 1

Percent 50.00 %

25.00 %

25.00 %

Rate per 100 stops

0.29 0.05

0.04 Contraband H

its

Frequency 0

1 0

Percent 0.00 %

100.00 %

0.00 %

Rate per 100 searches

0.00 100.00

0.00 Race Know

n

Frequency 2

5 4

Percent 18.18 %

45.45 %

36.36 %

Rate per 100 stops

0.29 0.26

0.15

DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC SAFETY APPENDIX L – REGION 6:SAN ANTONIO – DISTRICT LEVEL ANALYSIS

Page 279: 2016-2017 - Texas Department of Public Safety · collected by the Texas Department of Public Safety (TX DPS). According to the Texas Code of Criminal Procedure, “racial profiling

276

Comm

ercial Vehicle Enforcement - 2016

District 6B 2016

Asian Alaska

Native/Am

erican Indian

Middle Eastern

Other

Unknow

n

Stops

Frequency 30

2 28

0 104

Percent 0.55 %

0.04 %

0.51 %

0.00 %

1.90 %

Citations

Frequency

5 1

5 0

0 Percent

0.40 %

0.08 %

0.40 %

0.00 %

0.00 %

Rate per 100 stops 16.67

50.00 17.86

--- 0.00

Warnings

Frequency

18 1

14 0

16 Percent

0.59 %

0.03 %

0.46 %

0.00 %

0.53 %

Rate per 100 stops 60.00

50.00 50.00

--- 15.38

Clean

Frequency 7

0 9

0 88

Percent 0.59 %

0.00 %

0.76 %

0.00 %

7.45 %

Rate per 100 stops

23.33 0.00

32.14 ---

84.62 Searches (All)

Frequency

0 0

0 0

0 Percent

0.00 %

0.00 %

0.00 %

0.00 %

0.00 %

Rate per 100 stops 0.00

0.00 0.00

--- 0.00

Discretionary Searches

Frequency

0 0

0 0

0 Percent

0.00 %

0.00 %

0.00 %

0.00 %

0.00 %

Rate per 100 stops 0.00

0.00 0.00

--- 0.00

Non-D

iscretionary Searches

Frequency 0

0 0

0 0

Percent 0.00 %

0.00 %

0.00 %

0.00 %

0.00 %

Rate per 100 stops

0.00 0.00

0.00 ---

0.00 Contraband H

its

Frequency 0

0 0

0 0

Percent 0.00 %

0.00 %

0.00 %

0.00 %

0.00 %

Rate per 100 searches

--- ---

--- ---

--- Race Know

n

Frequency 0

0 0

0 0

Percent 0.00 %

0.00 %

0.00 %

0.00 %

0.00 %

Rate per 100 stops

0.00 0.00

0.00 ---

0.00

DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC SAFETY APPENDIX L – REGION 6:SAN ANTONIO – DISTRICT LEVEL ANALYSIS

Page 280: 2016-2017 - Texas Department of Public Safety · collected by the Texas Department of Public Safety (TX DPS). According to the Texas Code of Criminal Procedure, “racial profiling

277

Falls

Bexar

GonzalesC

omal

FayetteK

err

Guadalupe

Blanco

Coryell M

cLennan

Atascosa

Bastrop

DeW

itt

Frio

JacksonK

arnes

Limestone

Medina

Freestone

Bell

Calhoun

Ham

ilton

Kendall

Lavaca

McMullen

San Saba

Travis

Victoria

William

son

Bandera

Bosque

Burnet

Caldw

ell

Gillespie

Goliad

Hays

Hill

Lampasas

Lee

LlanoM

ilam

Mills

Wilson

Potter

Sw

isher

Terry

Randall

Hall

Cochran

Haskell

Armstrong

King

RobertsStonewallYoung

Lipscomb

Fisher

Archer

Bailey

Cottle

Crosby

Deaf S

mith

Donley

Kent

Sherman

Stephens

Baylor

Hockley

Jack

Ochiltree

Oldham

Com

anche

Callahan

Foard

Hartley

Lamb

Mitchell

Moore

Yoakum

Briscoe

Hale

Scurry

Gray

Brow

n

Carson

Castro

Childress

Clay

Collingsw

orth

Coleman

Dallam

Dickens

Eastland

Floyd

Garza

Hansford

Hardeman

Hemphill

Hutchinson

Jones

Knox

Lubbock

Lynn

Montague

Motley

TaylorN

olan

Parm

er

Runnels

Shackelford

Wheeler

Wichita

Wilbarger

El

Paso

Schleicher

Presidio

Kim

ble

Martin

Terrell

Crane

Winkler

Daw

son

Andrew

s

Upton

Hudspeth

Mason

Borden

Coke

Gaines

Irion

Brew

ster

Menard

TomG

reen

How

ard

ReaganC

oncho

Crockett

Culberson

Ector

Glasscock

Jeff Davis

Sterling

Loving

McC

ulloch

Midland

Pecos

Reeves

Sutton

Ward

3D3A

US

281

Zavala

Starr

WebbZapata

Hidalgo

Duval

Bee

Jim Wells

MaverickA

ransas

Dim

mit

Edw

ards

JimH

oggK

enedy

Kinney

Kleberg

LiveO

ak

Nueces

Real

Refugio

San Patricio

Willacy

Brooks

Cam

eron

LaSalle

Uvalde

Val Verde

Newton

Trinity

Houston

Nacogdoches

Cham

bers

Waller

Orange

Montgom

ery

Polk

SanAugustine

Tyler

Angelina

Brazoria

Brazos

Liberty

WalkerH

arris

Leon

Austin

Burleson

Fort Bend

Galveston

Grimes

Jasper

Jefferson

Madison

Matagorda

Robertson

Sabine

Shelby

Washington

Colorado

Hardin

San

Jacinto

Wharton

Bow

ie

Cherokee

Harrison

Franklin

Cam

pH

opkins

Upshur

Collin

Morris

Anderson

Parker

Rains

Cooke

Dallas

Gregg

Johnson

Lamar

Marion

RedR

iver

Rockw

allD

entonC

ass

Delta

Erath

Ellis

FanninG

rayson

Henderson

Hood

Hunt

Kaufman

Navarro

Palo

Pinto

Panola

Rusk

Sm

ith

Som

ervell

Tarrant

Titus

VanZandt

Wise

Wood

Dallas

Region 11A

- Dallas

1B - Tyler

1C - H

urst1D

- Mt. Pleasant

Houston

Region 22A

- Houston

2B - B

eaumont

2C - C

onroe2D

- Bryan

San Antonio

Region 66A

- Waco

6B - Austin

6C - S

an Antonio

McA

llenR

egion 33A

- McA

llen3B

- Laredo3C

- Corpus C

hristi3D

- McA

llen3E

- Del R

io

El PasoR

egion 44A

- Midland

4B - El Paso

LubbockR

egion 5Lubbock - 5AA

marillo - 5B

Abilene - 5C

5 B

C

A

B

E

CDA

B

C

A

BC

A

D

BA

B

C

D

A

64

123

Throckmorton

Page 281: 2016-2017 - Texas Department of Public Safety · collected by the Texas Department of Public Safety (TX DPS). According to the Texas Code of Criminal Procedure, “racial profiling

278

Highway Patrol - 2017

DISTRICT 6C 2017

African American

White

Hispanic

Stops

Frequency 9,127

59,419 67,193

Percent 6.61 %

43.06 %

48.69 %

Citations

Frequency

3,853 19,268

29,339 Percent

7.22 %

36.10 %

54.97 %

Rate per 100 stops 42.22

32.43 43.66

Warnings

Frequency

5,274 40,151

37,854 Percent

6.23 %

47.44 %

44.73 %

Rate per 100 stops 57.78

67.57 56.34

Searches (All)

Frequency 1,039

2,252 5,273

Percent 12.03 %

26.08 %

61.07 %

Rate per 100 stops

11.38 3.79

7.85 D

iscretionary Searches

Frequency 250

603 1,596

Percent 10.12 %

24.41 %

64.62 %

Rate per 100 stops

2.74 1.01

2.38 N

on-Discretionary Searches

Frequency

789 1,649

3,677 Percent

12.80 %

26.75 %

59.64 %

Rate per 100 stops 8.64

2.78 5.47

Contraband Hits

Frequency

366 818

1,802 Percent

12.15 %

27.15 %

59.81 %

Rate per 100 searches 35.23

36.32 34.17

Race Known

Frequency

7 12

13 Percent

21.21 %

36.36 %

39.39 %

Rate per 100 stops 0.08

0.02 0.02

DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC SAFETY APPENDIX L – REGION 6:SAN ANTONIO – DISTRICT LEVEL ANALYSIS

Page 282: 2016-2017 - Texas Department of Public Safety · collected by the Texas Department of Public Safety (TX DPS). According to the Texas Code of Criminal Procedure, “racial profiling

279

Highway Patrol - 2017

DISTRICT 6C 2017

Asian Alaska

Native/Am

erican Indian

Middle Eastern

Other

Unknow

n

Stops

Frequency 1,552

65 639

0 4

Percent 1.12 %

0.05 %

0.46 %

0.00 %

0.00 %

Citations

Frequency

599 29

281 0

1 Percent

1.12 %

0.05 %

0.53 %

0.00 %

0.00 %

Rate per 100 stops 38.60

44.62 43.97

--- 25.00

Warnings

Frequency

953 36

358 0

3 Percent

1.13 %

0.04 %

0.42 %

0.00 %

0.00 %

Rate per 100 stops 61.40

55.38 56.03

--- 75.00

Searches (All)

Frequency 48

7 16

0 0

Percent 0.56 %

0.08 %

0.19 %

0.00 %

0.00 %

Rate per 100 stops

3.09 10.77

2.50 ---

0.00 D

iscretionary Searches

Frequency 17

1 3

0 0

Percent 0.69 %

0.04 %

0.12 %

0.00 %

0.00 %

Rate per 100 stops

1.10 1.54

0.47 ---

0.00 N

on-Discretionary Searches

Frequency

31 6

13 0

0 Percent

0.50 %

0.10 %

0.21 %

0.00 %

0.00 %

Rate per 100 stops 2.00

9.23 2.03

--- 0.00

Contraband Hits

Frequency

17 5

5 0

0 Percent

0.56 %

0.17 %

0.17 %

0.00 %

0.00 %

Rate per 100 searches 35.42

71.43 31.25

--- ---

Race Known

Frequency

1 0

0 0

0 Percent

3.03 %

0.00 %

0.00 %

0.00 %

0.00 %

Rate per 100 stops 0.06

0.00 0.00

--- 0.00

DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC SAFETY APPENDIX L – REGION 6:SAN ANTONIO – DISTRICT LEVEL ANALYSIS

Page 283: 2016-2017 - Texas Department of Public Safety · collected by the Texas Department of Public Safety (TX DPS). According to the Texas Code of Criminal Procedure, “racial profiling

280

Highway Patrol - 2016

DISTRICT 6C 2016

African American

White

Hispanic

Stops

Frequency 6,789

54,917 52,890

Percent 5.81 %

47.01 %

45.27 %

Citations

Frequency

2,845 17,895

23,348 Percent

6.31 %

39.72 %

51.82 %

Rate per 100 stops 41.91

32.59 44.14

Warnings

Frequency

3,944 37,022

29,542 Percent

5.50 %

51.58 %

41.16 %

Rate per 100 stops 58.09

67.41 55.86

Searches (All)

Frequency 173

749 1,243

Percent 7.97 %

34.48 %

57.23 %

Rate per 100 stops

2.55 1.36

2.35 D

iscretionary Searches

Frequency 39

194 357

Percent 6.57 %

32.66 %

60.10 %

Rate per 100 stops

0.57 0.35

0.67 N

on-Discretionary Searches

Frequency

134 555

886 Percent

8.49 %

35.17 %

56.15 %

Rate per 100 stops 1.97

1.01 1.68

Contraband Hits

Frequency

100 447

575 Percent

8.88 %

39.70 %

51.07 %

Rate per 100 searches 57.80

59.68 46.26

Race Known

Frequency

1 98

29 Percent

0.76 %

74.81 %

22.14 %

Rate per 100 stops 0.01

0.18 0.05

DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC SAFETY APPENDIX L – REGION 6:SAN ANTONIO – DISTRICT LEVEL ANALYSIS

Page 284: 2016-2017 - Texas Department of Public Safety · collected by the Texas Department of Public Safety (TX DPS). According to the Texas Code of Criminal Procedure, “racial profiling

281

Highway Patrol - 2016

DISTRICT 6C 2016

Asian Alaska

Native/Am

erican Indian

Middle Eastern

Other

Unknow

n

Stops

Frequency 1,335

71 822

0 1

Percent 1.14 %

0.06 %

0.70 %

0.00 %

0.00 %

Citations

Frequency

551 30

387 0

0 Percent

1.22 %

0.07 %

0.86 %

0.00 %

0.00 %

Rate per 100 stops 41.27

42.25 47.08

--- 0.00

Warnings

Frequency

784 41

435 0

1 Percent

1.09 %

0.06 %

0.61 %

0.00 %

0.00 %

Rate per 100 stops 58.73

57.75 52.92

--- 100.00

Searches (All)

Frequency 4

1 2

0 0

Percent 0.18 %

0.05 %

0.09 %

0.00 %

0.00 %

Rate per 100 stops

0.30 1.41

0.24 ---

0.00 D

iscretionary Searches

Frequency 2

1 1

0 0

Percent 0.34 %

0.17 %

0.17 %

0.00 %

0.00 %

Rate per 100 stops

0.15 1.41

0.12 ---

0.00 N

on-Discretionary Searches

Frequency

2 0

1 0

0 Percent

0.13 %

0.00 %

0.06 %

0.00 %

0.00 %

Rate per 100 stops 0.15

0.00 0.12

--- 0.00

Contraband Hits

Frequency

3 0

1 0

0 Percent

0.27 %

0.00 %

0.09 %

0.00 %

0.00 %

Rate per 100 searches 75.00

0.00 50.00

--- ---

Race Known

Frequency

3 0

0 0

0 Percent

2.29 %

0.00 %

0.00 %

0.00 %

0.00 %

Rate per 100 stops 0.22

0.00 0.00

--- 0.00

DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC SAFETY APPENDIX L – REGION 6:SAN ANTONIO – DISTRICT LEVEL ANALYSIS

Page 285: 2016-2017 - Texas Department of Public Safety · collected by the Texas Department of Public Safety (TX DPS). According to the Texas Code of Criminal Procedure, “racial profiling

282

Comm

ercial Vehicle Enforcement - 2017

District 6C 2017

African American

White

Hispanic

Stops

Frequency 906

3,182 6,826

Percent 8.11 %

28.48 %

61.10 %

Citations

Frequency

179 699

1,979 Percent

6.25 %

24.41 %

69.10 %

Rate per 100 stops 19.76

21.97 28.99

Warnings

Frequency

470 1,599

3,614 Percent

8.19 %

27.85 %

62.95 %

Rate per 100 stops 51.88

50.25 52.94

Clean

Frequency 257

884 1,233

Percent 10.02 %

34.45 %

48.05 %

Rate per 100 stops

28.37 27.78

18.06 Searches (All)

Frequency

1 0

1 Percent

50.00 %

0.00 %

50.00 %

Rate per 100 stops 0.11

0.00 0.01

Discretionary Searches

Frequency

1 0

1 Percent

50.00 %

0.00 %

50.00 %

Rate per 100 stops 0.11

0.00 0.01

Non-D

iscretionary Searches

Frequency 0

0 0

Percent --- %

--- %

--- %

Rate per 100 stops

0.00 0.00

0.00 Contraband H

its

Frequency 1

0 0

Percent 100.00 %

0.00 %

0.00 %

Rate per 100 searches

100.00 ---

0.00 Race Know

n

Frequency 0

0 1

Percent 0.00 %

0.00 %

100.00 %

Rate per 100 stops

0.00 0.00

0.01

DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC SAFETY APPENDIX L – REGION 6:SAN ANTONIO – DISTRICT LEVEL ANALYSIS

Page 286: 2016-2017 - Texas Department of Public Safety · collected by the Texas Department of Public Safety (TX DPS). According to the Texas Code of Criminal Procedure, “racial profiling

283

Comm

ercial Vehicle Enforcement - 2017

District 6C 2017

Asian Alaska

Native/Am

erican Indian

Middle Eastern

Other

Unknow

n

Stops

Frequency 34

2 47

0 174

Percent 0.30 %

0.02 %

0.42 %

0.00 %

1.56 %

Citations

Frequency

2 0

5 0

0 Percent

0.07 %

0.00 %

0.17 %

0.00 %

0.00 %

Rate per 100 stops 5.88

0.00 10.64

--- 0.00

Warnings

Frequency

20 1

31 0

6 Percent

0.35 %

0.02 %

0.54 %

0.00 %

0.10 %

Rate per 100 stops 58.82

50.00 65.96

--- 3.45

Clean

Frequency 12

1 11

0 168

Percent 0.47 %

0.04 %

0.43 %

0.00 %

6.55 %

Rate per 100 stops

35.29 50.00

23.40 ---

96.55 Searches (All)

Frequency

0 0

0 0

0 Percent

0.00 %

0.00 %

0.00 %

0.00 %

0.00 %

Rate per 100 stops 0.00

0.00 0.00

--- 0.00

Discretionary Searches

Frequency

0 0

0 0

0 Percent

0.00 %

0.00 %

0.00 %

0.00 %

0.00 %

Rate per 100 stops 0.00

0.00 0.00

--- 0.00

Non-D

iscretionary Searches

Frequency 0

0 0

0 0

Percent --- %

--- %

--- %

--- %

--- %

Rate per 100 stops

0.00 0.00

0.00 ---

0.00 Contraband H

its

Frequency 0

0 0

0 0

Percent 0.00 %

0.00 %

0.00 %

0.00 %

0.00 %

Rate per 100 searches

--- ---

--- ---

--- Race Know

n

Frequency 0

0 0

0 0

Percent 0.00 %

0.00 %

0.00 %

0.00 %

0.00 %

Rate per 100 stops

0.00 0.00

0.00 ---

0.00

DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC SAFETY APPENDIX L – REGION 6:SAN ANTONIO – DISTRICT LEVEL ANALYSIS

Page 287: 2016-2017 - Texas Department of Public Safety · collected by the Texas Department of Public Safety (TX DPS). According to the Texas Code of Criminal Procedure, “racial profiling

284

Comm

ercial Vehicle Enforcement - 2016

District 6C 2016

African American

White

Hispanic

Stops

Frequency 718

2,817 5,740

Percent 7.58 %

29.75 %

60.62 %

Citations

Frequency

176 685

1,565 Percent

7.23 %

28.14 %

64.30 %

Rate per 100 stops 24.51

24.32 27.26

Warnings

Frequency

403 1,567

3,316 Percent

7.53 %

29.30 %

61.99 %

Rate per 100 stops 56.13

55.63 57.77

Clean

Frequency 139

565 859

Percent 8.24 %

33.51 %

50.95 %

Rate per 100 stops

19.36 20.06

14.97 Searches (All)

Frequency

2 3

9 Percent

14.29 %

21.43 %

64.29 %

Rate per 100 stops 0.28

0.11 0.16

Discretionary Searches

Frequency

0 2

7 Percent

0.00 %

22.22 %

77.78 %

Rate per 100 stops 0.00

0.07 0.12

Non-D

iscretionary Searches

Frequency 2

1 2

Percent 40.00 %

20.00 %

40.00 %

Rate per 100 stops

0.28 0.04

0.03 Contraband H

its

Frequency 1

1 1

Percent 33.33 %

33.33 %

33.33 %

Rate per 100 searches

50.00 33.33

11.11 Race Know

n

Frequency 0

2 1

Percent 0.00 %

66.67 %

33.33 %

Rate per 100 stops

0.00 0.07

0.02

DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC SAFETY APPENDIX L – REGION 6:SAN ANTONIO – DISTRICT LEVEL ANALYSIS

Page 288: 2016-2017 - Texas Department of Public Safety · collected by the Texas Department of Public Safety (TX DPS). According to the Texas Code of Criminal Procedure, “racial profiling

285

Comm

ercial Vehicle Enforcement - 2016

District 6C 2016

Asian Alaska

Native/Am

erican Indian

Middle Eastern

Other

Unknow

n

Stops

Frequency 44

2 57

0 91

Percent 0.46 %

0.02 %

0.60 %

0.00 %

0.96 %

Citations

Frequency

2 0

6 0

0 Percent

0.08 %

0.00 %

0.25 %

0.00 %

0.00 %

Rate per 100 stops 4.55

0.00 10.53

--- 0.00

Warnings

Frequency

29 1

31 0

2 Percent

0.54 %

0.02 %

0.58 %

0.00 %

0.04 %

Rate per 100 stops 65.91

50.00 54.39

--- 2.20

Clean

Frequency 13

1 20

0 89

Percent 0.77 %

0.06 %

1.19 %

0.00 %

5.28 %

Rate per 100 stops

29.55 50.00

35.09 ---

97.80 Searches (All)

Frequency

0 0

0 0

0 Percent

0.00 %

0.00 %

0.00 %

0.00 %

0.00 %

Rate per 100 stops 0.00

0.00 0.00

--- 0.00

Discretionary Searches

Frequency

0 0

0 0

0 Percent

0.00 %

0.00 %

0.00 %

0.00 %

0.00 %

Rate per 100 stops 0.00

0.00 0.00

--- 0.00

Non-D

iscretionary Searches

Frequency 0

0 0

0 0

Percent 0.00 %

0.00 %

0.00 %

0.00 %

0.00 %

Rate per 100 stops

0.00 0.00

0.00 ---

0.00 Contraband H

its

Frequency 0

0 0

0 0

Percent 0.00 %

0.00 %

0.00 %

0.00 %

0.00 %

Rate per 100 searches

--- ---

--- ---

--- Race Know

n

Frequency 0

0 0

0 0

Percent 0.00 %

0.00 %

0.00 %

0.00 %

0.00 %

Rate per 100 stops

0.00 0.00

0.00 ---

0.00

DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC SAFETY APPENDIX L – REGION 6:SAN ANTONIO – DISTRICT LEVEL ANALYSIS