2015 state accountability ratings report report of 2017 student … · 2017. 9. 14. · 2015 state...
TRANSCRIPT
![Page 1: 2015 State Accountability Ratings Report Report of 2017 Student … · 2017. 9. 14. · 2015 State Accountability Ratings ReportReport of 2017 Student Assessment Results September](https://reader035.vdocuments.mx/reader035/viewer/2022081621/6132958bdfd10f4dd73a8b93/html5/thumbnails/1.jpg)
2015 State Accountability
Ratings ReportReport of 2017 Student
Assessment Results
September 12, 2017
![Page 2: 2015 State Accountability Ratings Report Report of 2017 Student … · 2017. 9. 14. · 2015 State Accountability Ratings ReportReport of 2017 Student Assessment Results September](https://reader035.vdocuments.mx/reader035/viewer/2022081621/6132958bdfd10f4dd73a8b93/html5/thumbnails/2.jpg)
Agenda
• Performance Index System for State
Accountability Ratings
• District Rating Summary Report
• Campus Ratings
• Distinction Designations
• Comparison of Students Served
• Key Focus Areas & Instructional
Responses
2
![Page 3: 2015 State Accountability Ratings Report Report of 2017 Student … · 2017. 9. 14. · 2015 State Accountability Ratings ReportReport of 2017 Student Assessment Results September](https://reader035.vdocuments.mx/reader035/viewer/2022081621/6132958bdfd10f4dd73a8b93/html5/thumbnails/3.jpg)
2017 Performance Index System
Index 1: Student Achievement
Index 2: Student Progress
Index 3: Closing Performance Gaps
Index 4: Postsecondary Readiness
3
![Page 4: 2015 State Accountability Ratings Report Report of 2017 Student … · 2017. 9. 14. · 2015 State Accountability Ratings ReportReport of 2017 Student Assessment Results September](https://reader035.vdocuments.mx/reader035/viewer/2022081621/6132958bdfd10f4dd73a8b93/html5/thumbnails/4.jpg)
Index 1: Student Achievement
Index 1 measures satisfactory student achievement for all students combined across all subjects
reading/ELA
writing
mathematics
science
social studies
4
![Page 5: 2015 State Accountability Ratings Report Report of 2017 Student … · 2017. 9. 14. · 2015 State Accountability Ratings ReportReport of 2017 Student Assessment Results September](https://reader035.vdocuments.mx/reader035/viewer/2022081621/6132958bdfd10f4dd73a8b93/html5/thumbnails/5.jpg)
Index 2: Student Progress
Index 2 measures student progress of each
race/ethnicity, English Language Learners, and special education group in
reading/ELA
mathematics
Met Progress: 1 point
Exceeded Progress: 2 points
5
![Page 6: 2015 State Accountability Ratings Report Report of 2017 Student … · 2017. 9. 14. · 2015 State Accountability Ratings ReportReport of 2017 Student Assessment Results September](https://reader035.vdocuments.mx/reader035/viewer/2022081621/6132958bdfd10f4dd73a8b93/html5/thumbnails/6.jpg)
Index 3: Closing the Performance Gaps
Index 3 emphasizes the academic achievement of
• economically disadvantaged students
• two lowest performing race/ethnicity groups reading/ELA
writing
mathematics
science
social studies
6
![Page 7: 2015 State Accountability Ratings Report Report of 2017 Student … · 2017. 9. 14. · 2015 State Accountability Ratings ReportReport of 2017 Student Assessment Results September](https://reader035.vdocuments.mx/reader035/viewer/2022081621/6132958bdfd10f4dd73a8b93/html5/thumbnails/7.jpg)
Index 4: Postsecondary Readiness
Index 4 emphasizes –
• the role of elementary and middle school in preparing students for the rigors of high school
• earning a high school diploma to provide students with the foundation necessary for success in college, the workforce, job training programs, or the military
7
![Page 8: 2015 State Accountability Ratings Report Report of 2017 Student … · 2017. 9. 14. · 2015 State Accountability Ratings ReportReport of 2017 Student Assessment Results September](https://reader035.vdocuments.mx/reader035/viewer/2022081621/6132958bdfd10f4dd73a8b93/html5/thumbnails/8.jpg)
Index 4: Postsecondary Readiness
• All Students and race/ethnicity student groups
• Reading/ELA, writing, mathematics, science, and social studies
8
Index 4 Components Weight
STAAR at Meets Grade Level Standard 25%
Graduation Rate (or Dropout Rate) 25%
Graduation Diploma Plan 25%
Postsecondary Component: College and Career Readiness
25%
![Page 9: 2015 State Accountability Ratings Report Report of 2017 Student … · 2017. 9. 14. · 2015 State Accountability Ratings ReportReport of 2017 Student Assessment Results September](https://reader035.vdocuments.mx/reader035/viewer/2022081621/6132958bdfd10f4dd73a8b93/html5/thumbnails/9.jpg)
2017 Ratings Criteria
To receive a Met Standard rating, campuses and districts must meet the following performance index target criteria:
Index 1 OR Index 2 AND Index 3 AND Index 4
9
![Page 10: 2015 State Accountability Ratings Report Report of 2017 Student … · 2017. 9. 14. · 2015 State Accountability Ratings ReportReport of 2017 Student Assessment Results September](https://reader035.vdocuments.mx/reader035/viewer/2022081621/6132958bdfd10f4dd73a8b93/html5/thumbnails/10.jpg)
2017 Performance Index Targets
Performance Index Campuses District
Elementary Middle High
Index 1: Student Achievement 60 60 60 60
Index 2: Student Progress 32 30 17 22
Index 3: Closing Performance Gaps 28 26 30 28
Index 4: Postsecondary Readiness
All Components NA NA 60 60
STAAR Component Only 12 13 21 13
10
![Page 11: 2015 State Accountability Ratings Report Report of 2017 Student … · 2017. 9. 14. · 2015 State Accountability Ratings ReportReport of 2017 Student Assessment Results September](https://reader035.vdocuments.mx/reader035/viewer/2022081621/6132958bdfd10f4dd73a8b93/html5/thumbnails/11.jpg)
11
![Page 12: 2015 State Accountability Ratings Report Report of 2017 Student … · 2017. 9. 14. · 2015 State Accountability Ratings ReportReport of 2017 Student Assessment Results September](https://reader035.vdocuments.mx/reader035/viewer/2022081621/6132958bdfd10f4dd73a8b93/html5/thumbnails/12.jpg)
Performance Index Report
FWISD Met Standard
![Page 13: 2015 State Accountability Ratings Report Report of 2017 Student … · 2017. 9. 14. · 2015 State Accountability Ratings ReportReport of 2017 Student Assessment Results September](https://reader035.vdocuments.mx/reader035/viewer/2022081621/6132958bdfd10f4dd73a8b93/html5/thumbnails/13.jpg)
2017 FWISD Campus Ratings
116 out of 130 rated MET STANDARD
14 rated Improvement Required
13
116
14 RATING
MET STANDARD
IMPROVEMENTREQUIRED
![Page 14: 2015 State Accountability Ratings Report Report of 2017 Student … · 2017. 9. 14. · 2015 State Accountability Ratings ReportReport of 2017 Student Assessment Results September](https://reader035.vdocuments.mx/reader035/viewer/2022081621/6132958bdfd10f4dd73a8b93/html5/thumbnails/14.jpg)
2017 Campuses Rated Improvement Required
14
Polytechnic HSGlencrest 6th
West Handley ESCarrol Peak ESGeorge Clarke ESComo ESMaude Logan ES
John T. White ESHarlean Beal ESMitchell Blvd. ESMaudrie Walton ESSunrise McMillan ESI.M. Terrell ESClifford Davis ES
![Page 15: 2015 State Accountability Ratings Report Report of 2017 Student … · 2017. 9. 14. · 2015 State Accountability Ratings ReportReport of 2017 Student Assessment Results September](https://reader035.vdocuments.mx/reader035/viewer/2022081621/6132958bdfd10f4dd73a8b93/html5/thumbnails/15.jpg)
2017 Campuses Now Rated MET STANDARD
Eastern Hills HS
Daggett MS
Wedgwood 6th Gr
Forest Oak MS
Handley MS
Morningside MS
Riverside MS
J. Martin Jacquet MS
Leonard MS
Rosemont 6th Gr
Jean McClung MS
Daggett ES
De Zavala ESBill J. Elliot ES
15
![Page 16: 2015 State Accountability Ratings Report Report of 2017 Student … · 2017. 9. 14. · 2015 State Accountability Ratings ReportReport of 2017 Student Assessment Results September](https://reader035.vdocuments.mx/reader035/viewer/2022081621/6132958bdfd10f4dd73a8b93/html5/thumbnails/16.jpg)
Distinction Designations57 FWISD campuses received one or more Distinction Designations:
– Academic Achievement in English Language Arts/Reading
– Academic Achievement in Mathematics
– Academic Achievement in Science
– Academic Achievement in Social Studies
– Top 25 Percent: Student Progress
– Top 25 Percent: Closing Performance Gaps
– Postsecondary Readiness
16
![Page 17: 2015 State Accountability Ratings Report Report of 2017 Student … · 2017. 9. 14. · 2015 State Accountability Ratings ReportReport of 2017 Student Assessment Results September](https://reader035.vdocuments.mx/reader035/viewer/2022081621/6132958bdfd10f4dd73a8b93/html5/thumbnails/17.jpg)
Distinction Designations
Young Women’s Leadership Academy received all eligible distinction designations.
Kirkpatrick MS,
Rosemont MS,
M.L. Phillips ES, and
Tanglewood ES
each received all but one eligible distinction designations.
17
![Page 18: 2015 State Accountability Ratings Report Report of 2017 Student … · 2017. 9. 14. · 2015 State Accountability Ratings ReportReport of 2017 Student Assessment Results September](https://reader035.vdocuments.mx/reader035/viewer/2022081621/6132958bdfd10f4dd73a8b93/html5/thumbnails/18.jpg)
Commit! District to District Comparison
18
![Page 19: 2015 State Accountability Ratings Report Report of 2017 Student … · 2017. 9. 14. · 2015 State Accountability Ratings ReportReport of 2017 Student Assessment Results September](https://reader035.vdocuments.mx/reader035/viewer/2022081621/6132958bdfd10f4dd73a8b93/html5/thumbnails/19.jpg)
19
![Page 20: 2015 State Accountability Ratings Report Report of 2017 Student … · 2017. 9. 14. · 2015 State Accountability Ratings ReportReport of 2017 Student Assessment Results September](https://reader035.vdocuments.mx/reader035/viewer/2022081621/6132958bdfd10f4dd73a8b93/html5/thumbnails/20.jpg)
Planning for Additional Supports for Improvement Required campuses
• Instructional Leadership Teams –
– Interdepartmental teams to support teaching and learning through coaching and professional learning communities
• Campus Improvement Plans –
– Identify professional learning needs based on their data so that professional learning is customized to meet each campus’ needs
20
![Page 21: 2015 State Accountability Ratings Report Report of 2017 Student … · 2017. 9. 14. · 2015 State Accountability Ratings ReportReport of 2017 Student Assessment Results September](https://reader035.vdocuments.mx/reader035/viewer/2022081621/6132958bdfd10f4dd73a8b93/html5/thumbnails/21.jpg)
District Key Focus Areas: Reading – grade 3Writing – grade 4 & 7; English I & IIMath – grades 6, 7, & 8; Algebra I
21
![Page 22: 2015 State Accountability Ratings Report Report of 2017 Student … · 2017. 9. 14. · 2015 State Accountability Ratings ReportReport of 2017 Student Assessment Results September](https://reader035.vdocuments.mx/reader035/viewer/2022081621/6132958bdfd10f4dd73a8b93/html5/thumbnails/22.jpg)
Key Focus Area: Our DataReading – grade 3
22
![Page 23: 2015 State Accountability Ratings Report Report of 2017 Student … · 2017. 9. 14. · 2015 State Accountability Ratings ReportReport of 2017 Student Assessment Results September](https://reader035.vdocuments.mx/reader035/viewer/2022081621/6132958bdfd10f4dd73a8b93/html5/thumbnails/23.jpg)
Fort Worth ISD STAAR TrendsPercent Met 2012-2017
23
64%66%
61%65%
60% 60%
76%79%
76% 77%74%
72%
0%
20%
40%
60%
80%
100%
2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017*
% M
et
Year
Reading Grade 3 English
District State*Approaches Grade Level Standard
![Page 24: 2015 State Accountability Ratings Report Report of 2017 Student … · 2017. 9. 14. · 2015 State Accountability Ratings ReportReport of 2017 Student Assessment Results September](https://reader035.vdocuments.mx/reader035/viewer/2022081621/6132958bdfd10f4dd73a8b93/html5/thumbnails/24.jpg)
Fort Worth ISD STAAR TrendsPercent Met 2012-2017
24
62%66% 66%
63%
58% 58%
65%68%
65% 65% 64% 63%
0%
20%
40%
60%
80%
100%
2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017*
% M
et
Year
Reading Grade 3 Spanish
District State*Approaches Grade Level Standard
![Page 25: 2015 State Accountability Ratings Report Report of 2017 Student … · 2017. 9. 14. · 2015 State Accountability Ratings ReportReport of 2017 Student Assessment Results September](https://reader035.vdocuments.mx/reader035/viewer/2022081621/6132958bdfd10f4dd73a8b93/html5/thumbnails/25.jpg)
Big 8 Comparison: Grade 3 Reading
25
![Page 26: 2015 State Accountability Ratings Report Report of 2017 Student … · 2017. 9. 14. · 2015 State Accountability Ratings ReportReport of 2017 Student Assessment Results September](https://reader035.vdocuments.mx/reader035/viewer/2022081621/6132958bdfd10f4dd73a8b93/html5/thumbnails/26.jpg)
Key Focus Area: Instructional ResponseReading – grade 3
26
![Page 27: 2015 State Accountability Ratings Report Report of 2017 Student … · 2017. 9. 14. · 2015 State Accountability Ratings ReportReport of 2017 Student Assessment Results September](https://reader035.vdocuments.mx/reader035/viewer/2022081621/6132958bdfd10f4dd73a8b93/html5/thumbnails/27.jpg)
Key Focus Area: Instructional ResponseReading – grade 3
27
• TX-KEA – new Kindergarten Readiness assessment• Year 2 Dyslexia Instructional Model• Yearlong plan for instructional coaches and specialists• Primary Literacy - grades K-2
• 16 campuses - phonics• Smarty Ants – foundational literacy practice
• Core Instruction & Progress Monitoring – grades 2-12• Achieve 3000 • Lexile Levels • Instructional Walks
• Teacher Professional Learning • FWISD Learning Model• Fort Worth Literacy Partnership • Benchmark
![Page 28: 2015 State Accountability Ratings Report Report of 2017 Student … · 2017. 9. 14. · 2015 State Accountability Ratings ReportReport of 2017 Student Assessment Results September](https://reader035.vdocuments.mx/reader035/viewer/2022081621/6132958bdfd10f4dd73a8b93/html5/thumbnails/28.jpg)
Key Focus Area: Our DataWriting – grades 4 & 7; English I & II
28
![Page 29: 2015 State Accountability Ratings Report Report of 2017 Student … · 2017. 9. 14. · 2015 State Accountability Ratings ReportReport of 2017 Student Assessment Results September](https://reader035.vdocuments.mx/reader035/viewer/2022081621/6132958bdfd10f4dd73a8b93/html5/thumbnails/29.jpg)
Fort Worth ISD STAAR TrendsPercent Met 2012-2017
29
59% 59%62%
59% 60%
53%
71% 71%73%
70% 69%
63%
0%
20%
40%
60%
80%
100%
2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017*
% M
et
Year
Writing Grade 4 English
District State*Approaches Grade Level Standard
![Page 30: 2015 State Accountability Ratings Report Report of 2017 Student … · 2017. 9. 14. · 2015 State Accountability Ratings ReportReport of 2017 Student Assessment Results September](https://reader035.vdocuments.mx/reader035/viewer/2022081621/6132958bdfd10f4dd73a8b93/html5/thumbnails/30.jpg)
Fort Worth ISD STAAR TrendsPercent Met 2012-2017
30
69%
63%
61%
66%68%
63%64%
59%
64%
64%66%
64%
0%
20%
40%
60%
80%
100%
2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017*
% M
et
Year
Writing Grade 4 Spanish
District State*Approaches Grade Level Standard
![Page 31: 2015 State Accountability Ratings Report Report of 2017 Student … · 2017. 9. 14. · 2015 State Accountability Ratings ReportReport of 2017 Student Assessment Results September](https://reader035.vdocuments.mx/reader035/viewer/2022081621/6132958bdfd10f4dd73a8b93/html5/thumbnails/31.jpg)
Fort Worth ISD STAAR TrendsPercent Met 2012-2017
31
58% 57% 58%60%
57%55%
71% 70% 70%72%
70%68%
0%
20%
40%
60%
80%
100%
2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017*
% M
et
Year
Writing Grade 7
District State*Approaches Grade Level Standard
![Page 32: 2015 State Accountability Ratings Report Report of 2017 Student … · 2017. 9. 14. · 2015 State Accountability Ratings ReportReport of 2017 Student Assessment Results September](https://reader035.vdocuments.mx/reader035/viewer/2022081621/6132958bdfd10f4dd73a8b93/html5/thumbnails/32.jpg)
Fort Worth ISD STAAR TrendsPercent Met 2014-2017
32
52% 51% 51%48%
62% 63% 63%60%
0%
20%
40%
60%
80%
100%
2014 2015 2016 2017
% M
et
Year
English I
District State
![Page 33: 2015 State Accountability Ratings Report Report of 2017 Student … · 2017. 9. 14. · 2015 State Accountability Ratings ReportReport of 2017 Student Assessment Results September](https://reader035.vdocuments.mx/reader035/viewer/2022081621/6132958bdfd10f4dd73a8b93/html5/thumbnails/33.jpg)
Fort Worth ISD STAAR TrendsPercent Met 2014-2017
33
54% 54%57%
52%
66% 66% 66%62%
0%
20%
40%
60%
80%
100%
2014 2015 2016 2017
% M
et
Year
English II
District State
![Page 34: 2015 State Accountability Ratings Report Report of 2017 Student … · 2017. 9. 14. · 2015 State Accountability Ratings ReportReport of 2017 Student Assessment Results September](https://reader035.vdocuments.mx/reader035/viewer/2022081621/6132958bdfd10f4dd73a8b93/html5/thumbnails/34.jpg)
Key Focus Area: Instructional ResponseWriting – Grades 4 & 7; English I & II
34
![Page 35: 2015 State Accountability Ratings Report Report of 2017 Student … · 2017. 9. 14. · 2015 State Accountability Ratings ReportReport of 2017 Student Assessment Results September](https://reader035.vdocuments.mx/reader035/viewer/2022081621/6132958bdfd10f4dd73a8b93/html5/thumbnails/35.jpg)
Key Focus Area: Instructional ResponseWriting – grades 4 & 7; English I & II
35
• Expectations by grade level – PK through high school• Writing Portfolios• Learning Walks focused on content area literacy• Teacher Professional Learning
• Abydos• Writing Rubrics • Criteria Calibration
• Writing Quick Checks• Benchmark
![Page 36: 2015 State Accountability Ratings Report Report of 2017 Student … · 2017. 9. 14. · 2015 State Accountability Ratings ReportReport of 2017 Student Assessment Results September](https://reader035.vdocuments.mx/reader035/viewer/2022081621/6132958bdfd10f4dd73a8b93/html5/thumbnails/36.jpg)
Key Focus Area: Our DataMath – grades 6, 7, & 8; Algebra I
36
![Page 37: 2015 State Accountability Ratings Report Report of 2017 Student … · 2017. 9. 14. · 2015 State Accountability Ratings ReportReport of 2017 Student Assessment Results September](https://reader035.vdocuments.mx/reader035/viewer/2022081621/6132958bdfd10f4dd73a8b93/html5/thumbnails/37.jpg)
Fort Worth ISD STAAR TrendsPercent Met 2012-2017
37
67%
60%
66%
60%57%
60%
77%74%
79%75% 74% 75%
0%
20%
40%
60%
80%
100%
2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017*
% M
et
Year
Math Grade 6
District State*Approaches Grade Level Standard
![Page 38: 2015 State Accountability Ratings Report Report of 2017 Student … · 2017. 9. 14. · 2015 State Accountability Ratings ReportReport of 2017 Student Assessment Results September](https://reader035.vdocuments.mx/reader035/viewer/2022081621/6132958bdfd10f4dd73a8b93/html5/thumbnails/38.jpg)
Fort Worth ISD STAAR TrendsPercent Met 2012-2017
38
58%
47%
41%
46%
40% 40%
71% 71%67%
72% 71%68%
0%
20%
40%
60%
80%
100%
2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017*
% M
et
Year
Math Grade 7
District State*Approaches Grade Level Standard
![Page 39: 2015 State Accountability Ratings Report Report of 2017 Student … · 2017. 9. 14. · 2015 State Accountability Ratings ReportReport of 2017 Student Assessment Results September](https://reader035.vdocuments.mx/reader035/viewer/2022081621/6132958bdfd10f4dd73a8b93/html5/thumbnails/39.jpg)
Fort Worth ISD STAAR TrendsPercent Met 2012-2017
39
59%
71%73%
69%65%
67%
76% 77%79%
75%73% 74%
0%
20%
40%
60%
80%
100%
2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017*
% M
et
Year
Math Grade 8
District State*Approaches Grade Level Standard
![Page 40: 2015 State Accountability Ratings Report Report of 2017 Student … · 2017. 9. 14. · 2015 State Accountability Ratings ReportReport of 2017 Student Assessment Results September](https://reader035.vdocuments.mx/reader035/viewer/2022081621/6132958bdfd10f4dd73a8b93/html5/thumbnails/40.jpg)
Fort Worth ISD STAAR TrendsPercent Met 2012-2017
40
78%
70%72% 72%
74%76%
83%
78%81% 81% 81% 82%
0%
20%
40%
60%
80%
100%
2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017
% M
et
Year
Algebra I
District State
![Page 41: 2015 State Accountability Ratings Report Report of 2017 Student … · 2017. 9. 14. · 2015 State Accountability Ratings ReportReport of 2017 Student Assessment Results September](https://reader035.vdocuments.mx/reader035/viewer/2022081621/6132958bdfd10f4dd73a8b93/html5/thumbnails/41.jpg)
Algebra I Completed by Grade 9
41
Algebra I: Percent of students who pass Algebra I EOC by the end of Grade 9.
2014%
Met
2015%
Met
2016%
Met
2017%
Met
Change from 2016
to 2017
79 76 77 83 + 6
![Page 42: 2015 State Accountability Ratings Report Report of 2017 Student … · 2017. 9. 14. · 2015 State Accountability Ratings ReportReport of 2017 Student Assessment Results September](https://reader035.vdocuments.mx/reader035/viewer/2022081621/6132958bdfd10f4dd73a8b93/html5/thumbnails/42.jpg)
Key Focus Area: Instructional ResponseMath – grades 6, 7, & 8; Algebra I
42
![Page 43: 2015 State Accountability Ratings Report Report of 2017 Student … · 2017. 9. 14. · 2015 State Accountability Ratings ReportReport of 2017 Student Assessment Results September](https://reader035.vdocuments.mx/reader035/viewer/2022081621/6132958bdfd10f4dd73a8b93/html5/thumbnails/43.jpg)
Key Focus Area: Instructional ResponseMath – grades 6, 7, & 8; Algebra I
43
• Foundations in Number Sense for PK • K – 12 Comprehensive Mathematics Plan• Academic Indicators of Mastery• Teacher Professional Learning
• Teacher Leader Cadre• Learning Walks focused on content area literacy• MAP Progress Screener – beginning, middle, and end of year• MAP Skills Navigator – additional instructional and assessment
resources for teachers and students• Interim Assessments• Benchmark
![Page 44: 2015 State Accountability Ratings Report Report of 2017 Student … · 2017. 9. 14. · 2015 State Accountability Ratings ReportReport of 2017 Student Assessment Results September](https://reader035.vdocuments.mx/reader035/viewer/2022081621/6132958bdfd10f4dd73a8b93/html5/thumbnails/44.jpg)
44