2015-16 mca data discoveries - rrcnetgraphics/rrcmca.pdf · 2016. 8. 31. · 2015-16 mca data...

2015-16 MCA Data Discoveries

What does Minnesota think is important?

What do we want kids to do?

▪ Pass important tests “Be Proficient”

▪ Grow in their knowledge “Growth”

▪ Have equal opportunity to learn Close the “Achievement Gap”

▪ Graduate from high school “Graduation”

Minnesota believes each of the above things

are equally important so…

Because each of these things are equally important, they should be treated that way…

▪ Pieces of the MMR Pie for High Schools

Elementary and Middle Schools don’t graduate students so for them the pie looks like this…

▪ Pieces of the MMR Pie for Elementary and Junior High Schools

Focus Rating

Consists of:

▪ Focused Proficiency

▪ Achievement Gap Reduction

Title I schools can fall into 5 groups based on MMR and FR

• Reward Schools: These schools are the top 15 percent of Title I schools based on the MMR. They represent the highest-performing schools on the four domains in the MMR.

• Celebration Eligible: These are the 25 percent of schools directly below the Reward school

cutoff. These schools may apply to be Celebration schools, and MDE selects approximately 10 percent of Title I schools to receive the Celebration school recognition.

• Continuous Improvement: These are the bottom 25 percent of Title I schools that have not already been identified as Priority or Focus. Continuous Improvement schools must work with their districts to create and implement improvement plans as well as set aside 20 percent of Title I funds to support school improvement efforts.

• Focus: All Minnesota schools receive a Focus Rating (FR) that measures their contribution to

the state’s achievement gap. The 10 percent of Title I schools with the lowest FR are identified as Focus Schools. Focus schools are required to set aside 20 percent of Title I funds to support school improvement efforts. These schools are identified every three years. Some Focus schools are identified for persistent low graduation rates. These are schools with a six-year graduation rate, averaged over three years, below 60 percent. This separate group of low graduation rate

• Priority: These are the 5 percent most persistently low-performing Title I schools based on the

MMR. Priority schools are required to set aside 20 percent of Title I funds to support turnaround efforts, and these schools are also identified every three years.

Reading

Attention:

MCA III started in 2013 for 3rd-8th

grades & 10th grade

MCA Reading Results

We are over 12% above the state!!

2016 District Reading Proficiency

2016 RRC ELEMENTARY Reading Proficiency

2016 RRC SECONDARY Reading Proficiency

District Reading Proficiency Trends

Elementary Reading Proficiency Trends

Secondary/High School Reading Proficiency Trends

Student Group Reading Proficiency Data

• Looking at your demographics, is there a student-group that makes up a significant part of your student population?

RRC District SpEd vs. Non-SpEd Trend Data

RRC ELEMENTARY SpEd vs. Non-SpEd Trend Data

RRC SECONDARY SpEd vs. Non-SpEd Trend Data

RRC DISTRICT VS STATEWIDE SpEd Trend Data

RRC ELEMENTARY VS STATEWIDE SpEd Trend Data

RRC SECONDARY VS STATEWIDE SpEd Trend Data

RRC District FRP vs. non-FRP Trend Data

RRC ELEMENTARY FRP vs. non-FRP Trend Data

RRC SECONDARY FRP vs. non-FRP Trend Data

RRC DISTRICT VS STATEWIDE FRP TREND DATE

RRC ELEMENTARY VS STATEWIDE FRP TREND DATE

RRC SECONDARY VS STATEWIDE FRP TREND DATE

Add Cohort trend data slides if you wish

• Cohort follows the same group of students from year to year.

Cohort follows the same group of students from year to year.

0

0.1

0.2

0.3

0.4

0.5

0.6

0.7

0.8

0.9

1

8thGrade

10thGrade

Axis

Tit

le

Class of 2017 Cohort Reading Trend Data

District

State



0

0.1

0.2

0.3

0.4

0.5

0.6

0.7

0.8

0.9

1

7thGrade

8thGrade

10thGrade

Axis

Tit

le

Class of 2018 Cohort Reading Trend Data

District

State



0

0.1

0.2

0.3

0.4

0.5

0.6

0.7

0.8

0.9

1

6thGrade

7thGrade

8thGrade

10thGrade

Axis

Tit

le

Class of ___2019__ Cohort Reading Trend Data

District

State



0

0.1

0.2

0.3

0.4

0.5

0.6

0.7

0.8

0.9

1

5thGrade

6thGrade

7thGrade

8thGrade

10thGrade

Axis

Tit

le

Class of __2020___ Cohort Reading Trend Data

District

State



0.00%

10.00%

20.00%

30.00%

40.00%

50.00%

60.00%

70.00%

80.00%

90.00%

100.00%

4thGrade

5thGrade

6thGrade

7thGrade

8thGrade

10thGrade

Axis

Tit

le


District

State



0.00%

10.00%

20.00%

30.00%

40.00%

50.00%

60.00%

70.00%

80.00%

90.00%

100.00%

3rdGrade

4thGrade

5thGrade

6thGrade

7thGrade

8thGrade

10thGrade

Axis

Tit

le

Class of ___2022__ Cohort Reading Trend Data

District

State



0.00%

10.00%

20.00%

30.00%

40.00%

50.00%

60.00%

70.00%

80.00%

90.00%

100.00%

3rdGrade

4thGrade

5thGrade

6thGrade

7thGrade

8thGrade

10thGrade

Axis

Tit

le


District

State



0.00%

10.00%

20.00%

30.00%

40.00%

50.00%

60.00%

70.00%

80.00%

90.00%

100.00%

3rd Grade 4th Grade 5th Grade 6th Grade 7th Grade 8th Grade 10th Grade

Axis

Title


District State



0.00%

10.00%

20.00%

30.00%

40.00%

50.00%

60.00%

70.00%

80.00%

90.00%

100.00%


Axis

Title


District State

3rd Grade Reading Proficiency Trend Data

4th Grade Reading Proficiency Trend Data

2013 MCA Reading Strand Data

5.4 5.4 4.9 4.9

5.6 5.8 6 5.6 5.5

4.9 5.3 5.5

5.9 6.0

0

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

3rd Grade4th Grade5th Grade6th Grade7th Grade8th Grade 10thGrade

Literature

Inf Text


5.9 5.6

5.3 5.3 5.2 5.7 5.9 6.0

5.7

5.0 5.3

5.0 5.5

5.9

0

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9


Literature

Inf Text


5.2

5.9 5.6

5.2 5.4 5.6 5.8

5.2

6.3

5.3 5.1 4.9

5.5 5.8

0

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9


Literature

Inf Text


5.38 4.85

5.39 5.48 5.54 5.75 5.69 5.6 5.3

5.1 5.4

5.9 5.5

5.8

0

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9


Literature

Inf Text

Math

Attention:

MCA III’s started in:

• 2011 for 3rd-8th grades

• 2014 for 11th Grade

MCA Math results

We are 12% above the state!!

District Math Proficiency

2016 RRC ELEMENTARY Math Proficiency

2016 RRC SECONDARY Math Proficiency

District Math Proficiency Trends

Elementary Math Proficiency Trends

Secondary/High School Math Proficiency Trends

Examining Data - D.I.E. Protocol

• D: Describe

• I: Interpret

• E: Evaluate

https://docs.google.com/document/d/18-nBwri13Gw2qNrpPC3f8MsaD0aJ3agib-5AxfSI1JE/edit

https://docs.google.com/document/d/18-nBwri13Gw2qNrpPC3f8MsaD0aJ3agib-5AxfSI1JE/edit

Student Group Math Proficiency Data

• Looking at your demographics, is there a student-group that makes up a significant part of your student population?

SpEd vs. Non-SpEd Trend Data

FRP vs. non-FRP Trend Data

Class of 2017 Cohort Math trend

0

0.1

0.2

0.3

0.4

0.5

0.6

0.7

0.8

0.9

3rd grade 4th grade 5th grade 6th grade 7th Grade 8th Grade 11th Grade

District

State


0.00%

10.00%

20.00%

30.00%

40.00%

50.00%

60.00%

70.00%

80.00%

90.00%

100.00%

3rd grade 4th grade 5th grade 6th grade 7th Grade 8th Grade 11thGrade

District

State


0.00%

10.00%

20.00%

30.00%

40.00%

50.00%

60.00%

70.00%

80.00%

90.00%

100.00%


District

State


0.00%

10.00%

20.00%

30.00%

40.00%

50.00%

60.00%

70.00%

80.00%

90.00%


District

State


68.00%

69.00%

70.00%

71.00%

72.00%

73.00%

74.00%

75.00%

76.00%


District

State

3rd Grade Math Proficiency Trend Data

4th Grade Math Proficiency Trend Data

2016 MCA Math Strand Data

0.0

1.0

2.0

3.0

4.0

5.0

6.0

7.0


Number & Operation

Algebra

Geometry & Measurement

Data Analysis

District Science Proficiency

RRC 5th grade Science Proficiency

District Science Proficiency Trends

MCA Science 5-year Trend

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

80

90

2011-2012 2012-2013 2013-2014 2014-2015 2015-2016

Grade 5

Grade 8

Grade 10

MCA Science grades 5, 8 & 10

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

80

90

2012 2013 2014 2015 2016

Grade 5

Grade 8

Grade 10

5th grade Science Proficiency Trends

2015-16 mca data discoveries - rrcnetgraphics/rrcmca.pdf · 2016. 8. 31. · 2015-16 mca data...

Documents