20140511 poster dana elgeti eycsw

1
Deficient volume & structure 010 1 Corresponding contact Email: [email protected] Tel. : +49 8161 71 5327 Fax: +49 8161 71 3883 Technische Universität München Institute of Brewing and Beverage Technology Weihenstephaner Steig 20 D-85354 Freising Germany Dana Elgeti 1 , Mario Jekle , Thomas Becker Improvement of gluten-free dough aeration through adapted processing conditions and ingredients BGT - Technische Universität München Technische Universität München Center of Life and Food Sciences Weihenstephan Institute for Brewing and Beverage Technology Univ.-Prof. Dr.-Ing. Thomas Becker Strategy 1: Variation of processing conditions Strategy 2: Adaption of the medium composition [1] Keller, K.M. (2003) Monatsschrift Kinderheilkunde, 151(7), 706-714. [2] Elgeti, D., Nordlohne, S.D., Föste, M., Besl, M., Linden, M.H., Heinz, V., Jekle, M., Becker, T. (2014) Journal of Cereal Science 59(1), 41-47. [3] Föste, M., Nordlohne, S.D., Elgeti, D., Linden, M.H., Heinz, V., Jekle, M., Becker, T. (2014) European Food Research and Technology. Manuscript submitted for publication. 0 5 10 15 GVF (%) a b b Approach: An initial gluten-free recipe based on rice and corn flour [2] was modified to enable whipping: 150 g water and 4 g HPMC per 100 g flour. With varying ingredients and mixing parameters in a planetary mixer (Baer Varimixer RN10) it was aspired to achieve a maximum dough aeration without yeast. The aeration was evaluated through the gas volume fraction (GVF) according to Formula 1. 15 33 44 52 61 0 5 10 15 GVF (%) a a b a a We would like to thank Maike Föste, Lu Yu and Andreas Stüttgen for their contributions. A part of this research project was generated within the scope of the Network Bioactive Plant Foods and is supported by the German Ministry of Economics and Technology (via AIF). Literature & Abbreviations Acknowledgements 0 5 10 15 40 360 480 Geometry Filling level (%) Figure 1: Gas volume fraction (GVF) of dough depending on mixing conditions. Variation of (a) mixing geometries: whire whip, flat beater and spiral kneader, (b) mixing time and speed, (c) filling level of the mixer bowl. Significant differences are indicated by different letters (p<0.05, ANOVA, n = 6). 0 5 10 15 (b) (c) Goal High volume Fine structure Gaining knowledge Motivation for gluten-free bread Increase of the gas volume fraction in dough (%) through adapted ingredients + 190 % + 6 % + 17 % + 147 % * Fat: Baking margarine Rice + Corn flour 80 g water 100 g flour 3 g fat* 100 g flour No hydrocolloid Quinoa (w/o bran) [3] 105 g water 100 g flour No fat 2 g HPMC 100 g flour Coeliac disease: Worldwide prevalence based on screening results: 1:266 [1] No food containing gluten (a) Missing gluten- network Reduced gas retention The combination of strategy 1 and 2 successfully leads to high volume & a fine pore structure Foam stabilizing ingredients as well as aeration through mixing improve the quality of gluten-free bread Without fermentation Mixing is insufficient for aeration With fermentation Higher volume but no structure Bad gas retention With fermentation Quinoa white flour improves bread volume because of amylolytic enzymes [2] Reason for superior gas retention remains unknown Future trials Novel mixing process Combination of functional ingredients (%) = 100 × ( ) Formula 1: Gas volume fraction (GVF) in dough. V bulk : Total volume with gas; V s : Volume without gas determined via centrifugation (4500 g, 20 min). Can the entrained gas be maintained throughout baking? Not in all of the cases! Whire whip 8 min 0 5 10 15 3 kg 420 rpm GVF Gas volume fraction HPMC Hydroxy propyl methyl cellulose Rpm Revolutions per minute + 105 g water Gluten-free bread Wheat pan bread 25 g Corn starch 75 g Quinoa flour 1.5 g Yeast 2 g NaCl 2 g HPMC 3 g Margarine

Upload: dana-elgeti

Post on 13-Apr-2017

185 views

Category:

Documents


1 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: 20140511 Poster Dana Elgeti EYCSW

Deficient volume & structure

010

1Corresponding contact

Email: [email protected]

Tel. : +49 8161 71 5327

Fax: +49 8161 71 3883

Technische Universität München Institute of Brewing and Beverage Technology Weihenstephaner Steig 20 D-85354 Freising Germany

Dana Elgeti 1, Mario Jekle , Thomas Becker

Improvement of gluten-free dough aeration through adapted processing

conditions and ingredients

BGT - Technische Universität München

Technische Universität München

Center of Life and Food Sciences Weihenstephan

Institute for Brewing and Beverage Technology

Univ.-Prof. Dr.-Ing. Thomas Becker

Strategy 1: Variation of processing conditions Strategy 2: Adaption of the medium composition

[1] Keller, K.M. (2003) Monatsschrift Kinderheilkunde, 151(7), 706-714.

[2] Elgeti, D., Nordlohne, S.D., Föste, M., Besl, M., Linden, M.H., Heinz, V., Jekle, M., Becker, T. (2014) Journal of Cereal Science 59(1), 41-47.

[3] Föste, M., Nordlohne, S.D., Elgeti, D., Linden, M.H., Heinz, V., Jekle, M., Becker, T. (2014) European Food Research and Technology. Manuscript submitted for publication.

0

5

1 0

1 5

GV

F (

%)

a

b

b

Approach: An initial gluten-free recipe based on rice and corn flour [2] was modified to enable whipping: 150 g water and 4 g HPMC per 100 g flour. With varying ingredients and mixing parameters in a planetary mixer (Baer Varimixer RN10) it was aspired to achieve a maximum dough aeration without yeast. The aeration was evaluated through the gas volume fraction (GVF) according to Formula 1.

15

33

44

52 6

10

5

1 0

1 5

GV

F (

%)

a a

b

a

a

We would like to thank Maike Föste, Lu Yu and Andreas Stüttgen for their contributions. A part of this research project was generated within the scope of the Network Bioactive Plant Foods and is supported by the German Ministry of Economics and Technology (via AIF).

Literature & Abbreviations Acknowledgements

0

5

10

15

40 360 480Geometry Filling level (%)

Figure 1: Gas volume fraction (GVF) of dough depending on mixing conditions. Variation of (a) mixing geometries: whire whip, flat beater and spiral kneader, (b) mixing time and speed, (c) filling level of the mixer bowl. Significant differences are indicated by different letters (p<0.05, ANOVA, n = 6).

0

5

10

15 (b) (c)

Goal

High volume

Fine structure

Gaining knowledge

Motivation for gluten-free bread

Increase of the gas volume fraction in dough (%) through adapted ingredients

+ 190 %

+ 6 %

+ 17 %

+ 147 %

* Fat: Baking margarine

Rice + Corn flour

80 g water

100 g flour

3 g fat*

100 g flour

No hydrocolloid

Quinoa (w/o bran) [3]

105 g water

100 g flour

No fat

2 g HPMC

100 g flour

Coeliac disease: Worldwide prevalence based on screening results: 1:266 [1]

No food containing gluten

(a)

Missing gluten-network

Reduced gas retention

The combination of strategy 1 and 2

successfully leads to high volume & a fine pore structure

Foam stabilizing ingredients as well as aeration through mixing improve the quality of gluten-free bread

Without fermentation

Mixing is insufficient for

aeration

With fermentation

Higher volume but no structure

Bad gas retention

With fermentation

Quinoa white flour improves bread volume because of amylolytic enzymes [2]

Reason for superior gas retention remains unknown Future trials

Novel mixing process Combination of functional ingredients

𝑮𝑽𝑭 𝜙 (%) = 100 ×(𝑽𝒃𝒖𝒍𝒌 − 𝑽𝒔)

𝑽𝒃𝒖𝒍𝒌

Formula 1: Gas volume fraction (GVF) in dough. Vbulk: Total volume with gas; Vs: Volume without gas

determined via centrifugation (4500 g, 20 min).

Can the entrained gas be maintained throughout baking?

Not in all of the cases!

Whire whip

8 min 0

5

10

15

3 kg

420 rpm

GVF Gas volume fraction HPMC Hydroxy propyl methyl cellulose Rpm Revolutions per minute

+ 105 g water

Gluten-free bread

Wheat pan

bread

25 g Corn starch75 g Quinoa flour1.5 g Yeast2 g NaCl2 g HPMC3 g Margarine