2014-01-22 amacker depo_redacted

.~·-

1

2

3

4

5

LOUISIANA ATTORNEY DISCIPLINARY BOARD

IN RE: JOYCE NANINE MCCOOL

DOCKET NO: 13 - DB - 059

6 Deposition of HONORABLE DAWN AMACKER, taken in the offices of FLANAGAN PARTNERS, 201 St.

7 c harl es Avenue, Suite 2405, New orl eans, Louisiana 70170, commencing at 1:00 P.M.on Wednesday, the 22nd

8 day of January, 2014.

:: APPEA::::::~N PARTNERS' L. L. p. OR/Cf ff AL (BY: THOMAS FLANAGAN, ESQUIRE

12 SEAN P. BRADY, ESQUIRE) 201 St. Charles Avenue, Suite 2405

13 New orl eans, Louisiana 70170 (Attorneys for the Honorable Dawn

14 Amacker)

15

16 LOUISIANA ATTORNEY DISCIPLINARY BOARD (BY: DAMON S . MANNING, ESQUIRE)

17 4000 s. Sherwood Forest Boulevard Baton Rouge, Louisiana 70816

18 (Attorney for the Louisiana Attorney Disciplinary Board)

19

20

21 DUCOTE LAW FI RM (BY: RICHARD DUCOTE, ESQUIRE)

22 4800 Liberty Avenue , Third Floor Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania 15224

23 (Attorneys for Joyce Nanine Mccool)

24

25

1

(504)831·l753 433 METAJRIE ROAD, #220

HUFFMAN & ROBINSON, INC. CERTIFIED COURT REPORTERS

(800)749·1753 METAIRIE. LA 70005

1 REPORTED BY:

2 BROOK KERRIGAN, RPR, CCR CERTIFIED COURT REPORTER

3 (22037) Huffman & Robinson, In c.

4 Suite 220, Meta i ri e office Tower 433 Metairie Road

5 Metai ri e, LA 70005

6

7

8

9 I N D E X

2

10 PAGE

11 EXAMINATION BY:

12 M R . D U C 0 T E . . . . • • . . . . • . • • • • . . • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • 12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

(504)831-1753 433 METAIRIE ROAD, #220


(800)749·1753 METAIRIE, LA 70005

1 S T I P U L A T I 0 N

2 It is stipulated and agreed by and between

3 counsel for the parties that the deposition of

4 HONORABLE DAWN AMACKER is hereby taken pursuant to

5 the Louisiana code of civil Procedure in accordance

6 with law, pursuant to Notice , on January 22, 2014,

7 at the offices of Flanagan Partners, 201 st. Charles

8 Avenue, Suite 2405, New orl eans, Louisiana 70170;

9 That the formalities of sealing, certification,

10 an d f i l i n g a r e h e r e b y s p e c i f i ca l l y w a i v e d ;

11 That the formalities of reading and signing are

12 s p e c i f i c a l l y r e s e r v e d ;

13 That all objections, save those as to the form

14 of the quest i on , are reserved u n ti l such ti me as

15 th i s de po s i ti on , o r any pa rt the re of , may be us e d o r

16 s o u g h t t o b e u s e d i n e v i d e n c e ;

17 That BROOK L. KERRIGAN, Registered Profession al

18 Re po rt e r , i n a n d f o r t h e s t at e o f Lo u i s i a n a ,

19 off i c i ate d i n ad mi n i st er i n g the oath to the

20 above-named witness.

21 * * * * * 22

23

24

25

3

(504)831-1753 433 METAIRIE ROAD. #220


(800)7 49-1753 METAIRIE, LA 70005

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

HONORABLE DAWN AMACKER

a witness named in the above stipulation,

was examined and testified as follows:

MR. BRADY:

I'm Sean Brady. I represent Judge

Amacker, who is the witness here today. She is

not the complainant in this action.

third-party witness.

she is a

And I guess we've been talking with

Mr. Ducote about the deposition that's going to

take place today for about a month. Yesterday

afternoon we received a fax from Mr. Ducote's

office telling us for the first time that the

deposition will be videoed, and we're objecting

to that - - and the reasons we're objecting to

it is -- the principle reason is this is really

a case about the use of the internet, the

alleged use of the internet and social media in

order to put pressure or influence a judge's

actions. we think that allowing the video

deposition of the Judge, which may well be

edited and posted on the internet on various

Facebook ® and petition sites that are the

subject of this particular action, simply adds

fuel to that fire. You got to balance that

4

(504)831-1753 433 METAIRIE ROAD, #220

HUFFMAN & ROBINSON, INC. CERTIFIED COURT REPOR'I'ERS

(800)749-1753 METAIRIE, LA 70005

1

2

3

4

5

against the fact that there is we don't see

any reason for the videotaping of the

deposition today. This is a discovery

deposition. The Judge is appearing here

voluntarily. she's going to be subpoenaed to

6 appear at the hearing. There's no need to

7 perpetuate her testimony or anything like that.

8 so the fact that it's right for abuse and

9 balanced against the fact that there's no real

10 reason for it, we think mandates that the video

11 be struck.

12 o n to p of t h at , t h e re i s a co u p 1 e o f o t h e r

13

14

15

things involved here . Judge Amacker,

obviously, is a judge. The deposition of the

Judge is afforded some extra protection. There

16 is code of Evidence Article 519 and a whole

17 raft of the case law that discusses the special

18 protections that are given to a judge in a

19 deposition particularly without answering

20 q u est i on s that de a 1 the j u d g e ' s de 1 i be rat i v e

21 process.

22 This proceeding also involves cases that

23 are pending in family court in the 22nd JDC,

24 some of which have been sealed, many of which

25 involve issues, contentious custody issues

5

(504)831·l753 433 METAHUE ROAD, #220


(800)749·1753 METAIRIE, LA 70005

6

1 involving the alleged sex ual abuse of minor

2 children, and those issues have been sealed

3 many of those cases have been -- the records of

4 those cases have been sealed in the 22nd JDC.

5 we think that all of those things together

6 especially balanced against the lack of a need

7 to videotape the deposition and the late notice

8 would mandate that the video be struck.

9 And I think that I should just add the

W very end here that Mrs. Mccool, who is the

11 1 aw ye r that i s u n d e r i n vest i g at i on i n th i s

12 proceedings is act ually running against

13 Judge Amacker for her seat on family court in

14 the 22nd Judicial District court. so that, I

15 th i n k , adds to the concern and I th i n k to the

16 likelihood that this video would be used for

17 p u r po s es o the r than t h i s h ea r i n g i n th i s

18 particular disciplinary proceeding.

19 MR. DUCOTE:

20 This i s Richard Ducote. I represent

21 Mrs. McCool.

22 First of all, I do not believe that

23 Mr. Brady on behalf of Judge Amacker really has

24 standing to object to the videoing of the

25 deposition. seco nd of all, Article 1443 of the

(504)831·1753 433 METAIRIE ROAD, #220


(800)749·1753 METAIRIE, LA 70005

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

code of civil Pro ce dur es specifically says ,

"Examination and cross examination record of

examination of the objections. (A) Examination

and cross examination of witnesses may proceed

as permitted at the trial under the provisions

of the Louisiana Code of Evidence. The officer

before whom the deposition is to be taken s hall

administer an oath or affirmation to the

witness and shall personally, or by someo ne

acting under hi s direction and in his presence,

record the testimony of the witness. The

testimony shall be taken ste nographi ca lly or

recorded by any other means." we have a

stenographer here, and we also have

videotaping.

Now, these other concerns that Mr. Brady

raises, which I really don't think he has

standing to raise, a re things that would have

the same concern even on the transcript of the

deposition. The sensitivity of the matters and

this case and that case, whether this is sea led

or that's sealed. The video has nothing to do

with that one way or another. If there are

any -- nobody intends to do anything improper

with the transcript or the video. That can be

7

(504)831 ·1753 433 METAIRIE ROAD, #220


(800)749·1753 METAIRIE, LA 70005

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

used interchangeably, one for the other. so

none of those objections, I think, have any

merit.

The Code of civil Procedure, which governs

the taking of this deposition, controls, you

know I note -- I believe Mr. Manning was

informed that this was going be videoed as well

on Monday. He didn't interpose any concern as

I appreciate it until Mr. Brady raised an

objection this afternoon.

of this has any merit.

so I don't think any

Mrs. McCool 's livelihood, her license is

on the line here. we believe that videoing of

the deposition is important. I think in the

event that Judge Amacker is going to be the

subject of any impeachment at the trial of this

disciplinary action, I think the actual visual

representation of the answers that may be the

subject of impeachment would be important.

I just don't think there's any basis of it.

Mrs. McCool has a right to have that

deposition -- or this deposition recorded by

video and she intends to exercise it.

MR. MANNING:

Madam chair, this is Damon Manning on

So

8

(504)831-J.753 433 METAIRlE ROAD, #220


(800)749-1753 METAIRIE, LA 70005

1 behalf of the office of Disciplinary counsel.

2 I think both sides have very eloquently stated

3 their positions. I would, I guess for the

4 reason and concern expressed on behalf of Judge

5 Amacker by her counsel, I would just point out

6 that Rule 4.4 of the Rules of Professional

7 conduct states, "In representing a client, a

8 lawyer shall not use means that have no

9 substantial purpose other than to embarrass,

10 d e l a y , o r b u r d e n a t h i r d p e r s o n . . . " a n d i t

11 continues on with some other things there.

12 And I would just ask you in making a

13 decision here today whether there is a

14 subs tan ti al p u r pose f o r vi de o i n g the de po s i ti on

15 when it's going to be captured by stenographer,

16 and there's certainly no objection to the

17 stenog rap her re cording it and it being provided

18 to t h e p a rt i e s an d co u l d b e u s e d i f t h e re i s a

19 n e e d f o r an y i m p e a c h m e n t o r o t h e r p u r po s e s ,

20 could be used as any other transcript could be.

21 Other than that, I would just rely on both

22

23

24

25

parties', again, very well-stated argument on

this issue.

MR. DUCOTE:

Ms. Goldsmith, can I just respond briefly

9

(504)831·1753 433 METAIRIE ROAD, #220


(800)749·1753 METAIRIE, LA 70005

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

to the citation to the Rules of Professional

conduct?

HEARING COMMITTEE CHAIR:

Is that Mr. Ducote?

MR. DUCOTE:

Yes, ma'am. I'm sorry.


Yes. Go ahead.

MR. DUCOTE:

I would just point out under that

reasoning, I guess, I suppose the argument is

that any attorney who intends to video any

deposition is violating that rule because it

may tend to embarrass or some how be

inappropriate. I don't think that's a

plausible argument at all. That could be said

of cross examining a witness or anything else.

I mean, representation involves a variety of

things and certainly utili z ing the procedure

set forth in the code of civil Procedure for

taking a deposition can't be presumptively

violative of the Rule of Professional conduct.


Anyone else?

MR. BRADY:

10

(504)831-17 53 433 METAIRIE ROAD, #220


(800)7119-1753 METAIRIE, LA 70005

11 1 No, Madam Chair.

2 HEARING COMMITTEE CHAIR:

3 I appreciate everyone's argument. I think

4

5

6

7

8

9

they were well stated. Although ordinarily I

think you do have a right to a videotape

deposition, I'm inclined in this case to side

with Mr. Brady's arguments. I think there is

some potential for abuse, and I think it would

be more prejudicial than a transcript. Given

w that coupled with a lack of notice when

11 noticing a deposition, I do not think that the

12 vi d e o t a p e n e e d s t o g o f o r w a rd i n t h e

13 deposition.

14 MR . DUCOTE:

15 well, if I can just respond briefly. I

16 think one remedy would be to just have the

17 videotape he 1 d i n the custody of the ch a i r.

18 That would be one remedy subject to its use at

19 the hearing. second of all, the only notice

20 that's required of a video deposition i s when

21 the video is going to be used as the means of

22 pre s er vation of the record because it then

23 requires s afeguards to be built in for the

24

25

accuracy of the deposition record. There i s no

actual notice required for a deposition that' s

(504)831·1753 433 METAIRIE ROAD, #220


(800)749·1753 METAIRIE, LA 70005

1

12 going to be videoed as well as stenographically

2 recorded.

3 MR. BRADY:

4 I think I disagree with that. I think if

5 you look at the Code of Civil Procedure 1438

6 requires reasonable notice, and code of Civil

7 Procedure 1 440 requ i re s that if the deposition

8 is to be v ideoed that the video was mentioned

9 in the notice . so read those t wo articles

10 t o g et h e r - -


12 I agree with that. I agree as a matter of

13 practice, hone s tly, that' s typically the way

14 it's done. so I am going to -- again, I do not

15 think the videotape deposition should go

16 forward.

17 MR. BRADY:

18 Thank you very much.

19 MR . DUCOTE:

20 Thank you very much.


22 Thank you. Thank you-all .

23 (Reces s taken, 1:19; resumed, 1:27.)

24 EXAMINATION BY MR. DUCOTE:

25 Q Just state your full name for the record?

(504)831-1753 433 METAIRIE ROAD, #220


(800)749-1753 METAIRIE, LA 70005

1 A Dawn Amacker.

2 Q And I'm sure you understand the rules of

3 the deposition, and just so we're all clear, I'm

4 going to ask you questions. I'll ask that you wait

5 until I finish asking them before you start to

6 answer. You have to answer in words as opposed to

7 sounds and gestures. If you don't understand the

8 question, let me know and I'll rephrase it in a way

9 that makes sense, hopefully. And if you do

10 u n d e r s t an d t h e q u e s t i o n , t r y to g i v e u s as co m p l et e

11 an answer as possible.

12 A (Nods head affirmatively.)

13 Q You have the right to read and sign the

14 deposition to ensure its accuracy or you can waive

15 that.

16 MR. DUCOTE:

17 we'll decide that at the end.

18 BY MR. DUCOTE:

19 Q so yo u a r e t h e J u d g e o f Di v i s i o n L i n t h e

20 22nd JD c ; correct?

21 A That's correct.

22 Q And you've been Judge since when?

23 A I was elected in 2008. My term began

24 January 1, 2009.

25 Q Have you ever filed a complaint against

13

(504)831-1753 433 METAIRIE ROAD, #220


(800)749-1753 METAIRIE, LA 70005

1 Joyce Nanine Mccool with the Louisiana office of

2 Di sci pl i nary counsel?

3 A No.

4 Q Is it your position that Mrs. Mccool has

5 violated any of the Rules of Professional Conduct

6 vis-a-vis any representation of any clients in your

7 court?

8 MR. MANNING:

9 I'm going to object to that question. It

14

10

11

asks the Judge to issue her opinion on the

ultimate thing in dispute here as to whether or

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

not rules have been violated, Rules of

Professional conduct. That's for the Hearing

committee to determine, and I think it's

improper for that question to be asked of the

Judge of any fact witness in this case.

MR. FLANAGAN:

Let me join in that objection before you

respond. I want to join in that objection.

object to the form to the extent it suggests

the Judge has a position in this case. She's a

witness, as you have just established, not the

complaining party.

legal opinions.

I think it also asks for

MR. DUCOTE:

(504)831-1753 HUFFMAN & ROBINSON, INC. 433 METAIRIE ROAD, #220 CERTIFIED COURT REPORTERS

(800)7 49-1753 METAIRIE, LA 70005

15 1 well, I'm not asking for her legal

2 opinions or let me rephrase the question.

3 Maybe we'll solve it this way.

4 BY MR. DUCOTE:

5 Q Do you have any knowledge of any

6 violations or any acts or omissions that you believe

7 Mrs. McCool engaged in in connection with any

8 representation in your court that would violate the

9 Rules of Professional conduct?

10 MR. FLANAGAN:

11 same objection.

12 MR. DUCOTE:

13 That's a totally different question.

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

she's a fact witness. she's listed as a

witness in this bar complaint. she's listed as

a person with knowledge. I'm trying to find

out what that knowledge is.

MR. FLANAGAN:

I think she's here to testify as a witness

about facts, and you're certainly welcome to

ask her about particular incidents that are

alleged in the formal charges. where I'm

having a problem is is that you are asking her,

kind of as Mr. Manning said, an ultimate

question whereas I think she's here as a fact

(504)831-1753 433 METAJRIE ROAD, #220


(800)749- 1753 METAJRIE, LA 70005

1

2

3

witness and someone else will apply the law of

the facts.

MR. DUCOTE:

16

4 I'm not asking for legal conclusions. I'm

5 asking her about her knowledge of the facts.

6 I'll try to rephrase it one more time that

7 maybe will solve these concerns.

8 BY MR . DUCOTE:

9 Q Are you aware of any facts in the form of

10 acts or omissions on the part of Mrs. McCool that

11 you believe -- and I'm not asking for your opinion

12 or ju di c i a 1 con c 1 us ion - - but that you be 1 i eve or

13 contend would be in violation of the Rules of

14 Profess i on a 1 conduct?

15 A I'm aware of facts which I have placed in

16 w r i t i n g to t h e off i c e o f D i s c i p 1 i n a r y co u n s e 1 , w h i c h

17 might constitute violations of the Code of

18 P r o f e s s i o n a 1 R e s p o n s i b i 1 i t y . As a judge and as a

19 1 aw ye r , I have a resp on s i bi 1 i t y i f I have know 1 edge

20 of facts w hi ch mi g ht tend i n a subs tan ti a 1

21 situation , serious situation , I have an abs o 1 u t e

22 obligation to bring this to the attention, whether

23 as a complainant or as a witness to the office of

24 Di sci pl i nary counsel.

25 Q Let's get back to the question asked and

(504)831·l753 433 METAIRIE ROAD. #220

HUFFMAN & ROBINSON. INC. CERTIFIED COURT REPORTERS

(800)749· 1753 METAIRIE, LA 70005

17

1 maybe you ans we red it. I don't believe you did.

2 Are you aware of -- setting aside because you

3 already said you didn't file any complaints with the

4 office of Di sci pl i nary counsel. so I think the

5 first question calls for "yes" or "no." Are you

6 aware of any acts or omissions on the part of

7 Mrs. McCool during a representation of any clients

8 in your court that you believe constitute violations

9 of the Rules of Professional Conduct?

10 MR. FLANAGAN:

11 I'll make the same objection as before.

12 subject to the objection.

13 A It is not for me to determine if these are

14 vi o l at i on s . The facts I will say this again,

15 M r . D u cot e . My answer is the same as before. The

16 fa c t s a r e a s I g ave t h em to t he off i c e of

17 Di sci pl i nary counsel as a witness in this case. The

18 com p l a i n t was mad e by an o t h e r j u d g e .

19 BY MR. DUCOTE:

20 Q I understand that, but that's not the

21 question I 'm ask i n g . I'm asking you if you have

22 let me ask it this way: Do you have personal

23 knowledge of any acts or omissions on the part of

24 Mrs. McCool during her representations of any

25 clients in your court that you believe constitute

(504)831-17 53 433 NIETAIRIE ROAD, #220


(800)749·1753 METAIRIE, LA 70005

1 violations of the Rules of Professional Conduct?

2

3

4

5

MR. FLANAGAN:

objection.

MR. DUCOTE:

Asked and answered.

It wasn't answered. It was, "I gave

6 something to the office of Disciplinary

7 counsel."

8 BY MR. DUCOTE:

9 Q That may be but I'm asking you now that

10 q u e s t i o n .

11 A I believe it's been asked and answered .

12 Do you want me to give you the same answer all over

13 a gain? Is that necessary?

14 Q I would like you to answer the que s tion.

15 A I have answered the question.

16 MR. FLANAGAN:

17 She answered it twice.

18 BY M R • DU C 0 TE :

18

19 Q Is that "yes" or "no"? I don't under s tand

20 the answer.

21 A The answer i s the same I gave you to the

22 earlie r exact question. That's the answer.

23 Q I'll ask it again . Let me ask this way:

24 Is it your position that in the course of

25 representing clients in your court Mrs. Mccool has

(504)831-1753 433 METAIRIE ROAD, #220


(800)749-1753 METAIRIE, LA 70005

19 1 violated the Rules of Professional conduct?

2 MR. FLANAGAN:

3 same objection . You're suggesting she has

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

a position in this case.

MR . DUCOTE:

It's not a position. It's a fact. These

are factual allegations against Mrs. McCool

that should be straightforward if they exist.

MR. FLANAGAN:

I think we can ask the facts. There's

11 form a 1 ch a r g es here w i th a 11 e g at i on s . she ' s

12 here to answer questions about these formal

13 charges.

14 BY MR. DUCOTE:

15 Q Okay . Let me ask it this way: what acts

16 or om i s s i on s do you be 1 i eve Mrs . Mccoo 1 has done i n

17 ' your court in connection with the representation of

18 clients that have violated the Rules of Professional

19 conduct?

20 MR. FLANAGAN:

21

22

23

24

25

I'm going to object. That's the same

question but a slightly different version.

MR. DUCOTE:

Not at all. It's what were they. She

gave an answer purportedly that answered that.

(504)831·17 53 433 METAIRIE ROAD, #220

HUFFMAN & ROBINSON, INC. CERTIFIED COURT REPOR'fERS

(800)749·1753 METAIRIE, LA 70005

20

1

2

3

4

I'm trying to find out what these things are

because I filed a motion and an exception to

the actual complaint, because I don't believe

there's notices to what these things are. This

5 is a witness who's been represented as being

6 somebody with knowledge of the facts, and

7 that's what I'm trying to find out.

8 BY MR. DUCOTE:

9 Q so my question is -- I'll ask you again.

10 what facts or what acts or omissions did Mrs . Mccoo 1

11 commit or not do in the course of representing

12 c 1 i e n t s i n yo u r co u r t t h at yo u b e 1 i e v e - - a n d , o f

13 course, this is going to be up to the tryer of fact

14 to see i f , i n fact , th e y do co ns ti t u t e vi o 1 at i on s of

15 t h e Ru 1 e s of P r o f e s s i o n a 1 co n d u c t - - b u t w h i c h yo u

16 believe constitute violations of the Rules of

17 Profess i on a 1 conduct .

18 MR. FLANAGAN:

19 s am e o b j e ct i o n .

20 BY MR. DUCOTE:

21 Q what are those facts?

22 A I don't have to answer the que stion,

23 Mr. o u cote .

24 Q I think you do.

25 A I think I don't, Mr. Ducote.

(504)831·l753 HUFFMAN & ROBINSON, INC. 433 METAIRIE ROAD, #220 CERTIFIED COURT REPORTERS

(800)749·1753 METAIRIE. LA 70005

21 1 MR. FLANAGAN:

2 Let's move on. Let's go the formal

3 charges and ask the questions.

4 MR. DUCOTE:

5

6

7

She is listed as a person by the office of

Disciplinary counsel who has knowledge of the

relevant facts. And that's what I'm asking.

8

9

It seems to be a basic question: what are

those facts? And she doesn't want to answer.

10 MR. FLANAGAN:

11 Are you asking what does she know about

12 the form a 1 ch a r g es?

13 MR. DUCOTE:

14 I ' m as k i n g t h e q u est i on , co u n s e 1 .

15 MR. FLANAGAN:

16 I've been objecting to the ones you have

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

been asking. I hope you can get to some that

are proper.

MR. DUCOTE:

I don't think you have grounds to object.

MR. MANNING:

Mr. Ducote, I object, too, and I think

that you are harassing the Judge. She did not

file these charges. It's, with all due

respect, irrelevant what she thinks about

(504)831·1753 433 METAIRIE ROAD, #220


(800)749·1753 METAIRIE, LA 70005

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

whether or not Mrs. McCool violated these

rules. It's what the office of Disciplinary

counsel filed and charged. The Judge's

correspondences which she referred to are in

the exhibit book that I've given to you today

and within the requested deadline, I have not

received any exhibits from you, but I've given

you mine, but they are in there, and this is

22

information that she provided to us. These are

facts or allegations, alleged facts that we

took in our investigation and did not rely on

but used to further our investigations.

so to continue to ask any witness, just

like you're prohibited from bringing in an

expert to have them answer the question about

whether or no t Mrs. McCool ha s violated the

Rules of Professional Conduct that's

improper. That's not allowed I believe it's

also improper to ask this witness if

Mr s. Mccool violated the Rule of Professional

Conduct.

If you want to ask her about a specific

fact or a specific instance, then I think

that's appropriate. Otherwise I object to the

form of question. I think it' s improper, and

(504)831 ·1753 433 METAIRIE ROAD, #220


(800)749·1753 METAIRIE, LA 70005

1 it asks for an expert op1n1on as to the

2 ultimate conclusion to be reached by the

3 Hearing committee.

4 MR. DUCOTE:

5 I'm not asking for any expert opinion

6 whatsoever.

7 MR. MANNING:

8 I preserve my objection for the record.

9 BY MR. DUCOTE:

10 Q well, Judge Amacker, do you have any

11 knowledge of -- 1 et me back up. Have you had

12 communications with the office of Disciplinary

13 counsel about Mrs. Mccool?

14 A Yes.

23

15 Q Did you contact the office of Disciplinary

16 co u n s e 1 f i rs t , or di d they contact you f i rs t?

17 A I contacted them first.

18 Q Did you contact them to file a complaint

19 a g a i n st Mrs . Mccoo 1 ?

20 A No, I did not.

21 Q For what purpose did you contact the

22 office of Disciplinary counsel about Mrs. Mccool?

23 A I was aware that a complaint has been

24 filed by Judge Gambrell in Mississippi and similar

25 conduct had occurred directed to me and also to the

(504)831·1753 433 METAIRIE ROAD, #220


(800)749·1753 ME'l'AIRIE, LA 70005

1 Louisiana supreme court. 24

As a judge and an attorney

2 in this state, I have -- as I stated earlier -- an

3 absolute obligation with this type of conduct to

4 report it to the ODC because there was a prior

5 complaint filed. I was requested just to send in my

6 information, whatever that might be, to them and

7 that' s what happened.

8 Q who requested you to send in your

9 information?

10 A I don't recall if it was the secretary,

11 the person there, or actually on that occasion if I

12 ta l k e d to M r . Man n i n g . But when I asked how would I

13 get that information that also had occurred to me

14 and di rec t e d to me person a 11 y to them , I was to l d to

15 respond in writing to them with any attachments that

16 I t h o u g h t we r e p e rt i n e n t , s e n d t h at to t h em , w h i c h I

17 did .

18 Q so are you saying that the information

19 that you had that compelled you to contact the

20 office of Disciplinary counsel was information that

21 constituted conduc t on the part of Mrs. McCool that

22 violated the Rules of Professi anal Conduct?

23 A I won't give you an opinion, Mr. Ducote,

24 on whether it viol ates the Rules of Professional

25 conduct. That's for someone else to do.


I will

(800)7 49-17 53 METAIRIE, LA 70005

25

1 tell you that there was a factual situation of which

2 you are aware. There is an accurate account of it

3 in the formal charges that have been filed by ODC.

4 what happened is commemorated in that document, and

5 as a result of that factual situation, I, as a

6 mandatory, in my opinion, reporter called ODC, asked

7 how and what format do I get in information to you.

8 There was a prior complaint filed. There was not a

9 necessity for a new complaint. simply it was sent

10 in as additional information to them.

11 Q Now, how did you know a complaint had been

12 f i 1 e d a g a i n s t - -

13 A At some point when I first got the

14 petition that was faxed to my office by

15 Mrs. Mccool' s client and/or Mrs. Mccool, there we re

16 other names on there, other judges. one was Judge

17 Deborah Gambrell in Mississippi and the others were

18 the Justices of the Supreme court of the state of

19 Lo u i s i a n a • I made a phone call to Judge Gambrell

20 because I was concerned for her safety and did not

21 know if she knew that this was on the internet,

22 which is recited in the petition.

23 I believe in that phone ca 11 she told me

24 that she had begun the process of filing a complaint

25 with the office of Di sci pl i nary counsel.

(504)831-17 53 HUFF:tvlAN & ROBINSON, INC. 433 METAIRIE ROAD, #220 CERTIFIED COURT REPORTERS

I can't

(800)749-1753 METAIRIE, LA 70005

1 tel 1 you if it was in that conversation or the only

2 other conver s ation I had with her which was at the

3 National Judicial College, a very brief

26

4 conversation. But at some point she told me she had

5 initiated that process. she was aware of the

6 petition, what was on the internet, and she had

7 begun the process.

8 Q Now, at the time, just so we're clear, you

9 contacted Judge Gambrell prior to her having any

10 o t h e r c o n t a c t w i t h yo u ; c o r r e c t ?


12 Q And at the time you contacted her, were

13 you aware that she was presiding over a case in

14 M i s s i s s i p p i t h at i n v o 1 v e d a 1 i t i g a n t w h o w a s a 1 s o

15 involved in a case in your court concerning the same

16 chi 1 d?

17 A I don't recall. I can tell you that the

18 p e t i t i o n , I ' m s u r e u po n t h e p e t i t i o n r e a c h i n g m e , i t

19 men ti one d conduct of Judge Ga m b re 11 , I be 1 i eve the

20 case name. It might have been at that point I put

21 it all together, but I had had no previous contact

22 with her, any reason to believe that we shared a

23 similar case, no.

24 Q so would you agree that the contact you

25 had with Judge Gambrell was ex parte?

(504)831· l753 HUFFlvlAN & ROBINSON, INC. 433 METAIRIE ROAD, #220 CERTIFIED COURT REPORTERS

(800)749·1753 METAIRIE, LJ\ 70005

27 1 MR. FLANAGAN:

2 object to the extent there's a legal

3 conclusion about what is ex parte communication

4 in the context of the judges speaking in this,

5 but subject to that objection.

6 A I'm not sure in what context you mean ex

7 pa rt e , Mr. Ducote. I can tell you that there was

8 nothing substantively discussed about the case .

9 This was concerning safety co nsiderations, concerns

10 t h at I h ad f o r a f e l l ow j u d g e . she told me she knew

11 about it and was handling i t through the office the

12 Di s c i p l i n a r y co u n s e l . As fa r a s e x pa rt e , i f yo u

13 mean ex pa rte as discussing the l i ti gati on, no .

. 14 BY MR. DUCOTE:

15 Q Now, what did you tell Judge Gambrell - -

16 l 'et me back up. Did you convey to Judge Gambrell

17 that Mrs. Mccool posed a danger to her physically?

18 A I don't recall conveying that to her,

19 Mr. Ducote.

20 Q You said you were concerned about her

21 safety . Safety -- who was the threat to her safety?

22 A The global internet that Mrs. Mccool sent

23 the petition to. All of the people that signed the

24 petition and, if you've read it, all of the comments

25 that were made were directed at the judges

(504)83 1 · l 753 433 METAIRIE ROAD, #220


(800)749·1753 METAIRIE, LA 70005

28

1 individually and were threatening, some of them, in

2 nature, Mr. Ducote. That's what I'm referring to.

3 Q what facts do you have that Mrs. Mccool

4 was responsible for that?

5 A Her name was the first one on the petition

6 and circumstantially we sent a letter to her as we

7 always do returning ex parte communication of their

8 clients and let both sides, the attorneys, know. I

9 received no response from Mrs. McCool, which would

10 indicate that she did not have any knowledge or

11 wanted to explain to me why this came with her name

12 on it and her cl i en t ' s name on it . TO this day I

13 haven't received anything.

14 Q The petition, are you saying, urged people

15 to harm judges?

16 A I don't have it here in front of me,

17 Mr. Ducote. The petition speaks for itself.

18 Q so are you contending that or do you

19 b e l i e v e - - w i t h o u t as k i n g yo u f o r l e gal o p i n i o n o r

20 some sort of j udi ci al determination, do you believe

21 that Mrs. Mccool signing the petition violated the

22 Rules of Professional conduct?

23

24

25

A Again, I'm not going

MR. FLANAGAN :

Same objection.

(504)831·l7 53 HUFFMAN & ROBINSON, INC. 433 METAIRIE ROAD, #220 CERTIFIED COURT REPORTERS

(800)749·1753 METAlRIE, LA 70005

29

1 A Thank you.

2 I'm not going to reach any conclusion as

3 to her violation of the Code of Professional

4 Responsibility.

5 BY MR. DUCOTE:

6 Q what facts --

7 A If you would let me finish. That would be

8 for the committee, the hearing officers that are

9 upon you.

10 I Q In fact, you put a mother in jail in a

11 case that was reversed by the First Circuit for

12 b e i n g c r i t i ca l as yo u s aw i t . Do yo u r e c al l a ca s e

13 of TD v FXA, Case No. 2013 cuo453 rendered

14 January 9, 2014?

15 MR. FLANAGAN:

16 I'm going to object to that question and

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

instruct the witness not to answer. There is

no conceivable relevance to these formal

cha rges.

MR. DUCOTE:

It does. I don't think you have the

standing to instruct her not to answer ,

counsel.

MR. FLANAGAN:

I believe I do.

(504)831·1753 HUFFMAN & ROBINSON, INC. 433 IV1ETAIRIE ROAD, #220 CERTIFIED COURT REPORTERS

(800)749· 1753 METAIRIE, LA 70005

1 MR. MANNING:

2 I'm getting prepared to lodge an

3 objection, too. I t ' s not relevant to these

4 proceedings what the Judge did or didn't do in

5 any other case.

6 MR. DUCOTE:

7 If I can respond just so we have a

8 complete record. It may be that Judge Amacker

9 is unduly sensitive to criticism on the

W internet and that clouds her perception

11 particularly the language of the facts of this

12 c as e w h e r e a mot h e r was j a i 1 e d b e ca u s e h e r

13 daughter apparently posted things on the

14 internet critical to Judge Am a cker's

15 MR. MANNING:

16

17

18

The Judge didn't file these charges. The

office of Disciplinary counsel filed these

charges. so if Judge Amacker is or is not

19 s e n s i t i v e o r o v e r 1 y s e n s i t i v e i s n o t r e 1 e van t

20 because Judge Amacker is not a party and did

30

21 not file the charge s that we're here for today.

22 BY MR. DUCOTE:

23 Q Have you read the complaint that Judge

24 Ga mbrell filed?

25 A I have read, I think, a one-page or

(504)831·1753 433 METAJRIE ROAD, #220

HUFFMAN & ROBINSON, INC. CERT1FIED COURT REPORTERS

(800)749· l 753 METAJRIE, LA 70005

31 1 one - and - a - half page letter that she wrote to ODC. I

2 don't know if that's the original complaint or not.

3 Q I'm going to show you a letter from Judge

4 Gambrell to the Louisiana office of Disciplinary

5 counsel dated December 15, 2011, purportedly from

6 Deborah Gambrell, Chancellor, court District of

7 Mississippi which has a cc to you and ask you if you

8 recognize that?

9 A I've seen at least the first two pages of

10 i t , M r . D u co t e . I'm not so sure the order granting

11 the Motion for Temporary Emergency Relief in the

12 o rd e r to s ea 1 f i l e . I don't have any independent

13 recollection of seeing those, but I have seen the

14 1 et t er . whether I rec e i v e d i t from her or i n

15 connection with these proceedings sometime in the

16 l as t t h r e e ye a r s I s aw i t , I c an n o t t e l 1 yo u .

17 Q Now, I want to read to you from this

18 1 e t t e r w h at J u d g e Ga m b r e l l s a y s ab o u t yo u . I t s a y s ,

19 quote - - th i s i s on page 1. And I wo u 1 d just 1 i k e

20 to point out that this is what the office of

21 Disciplinary counsel has referred to as the

22 com plaint in its letter from the ODC from

23 Mr. Manning on September 30, 2011. It says , quote,

24 Also Judge Dawn Amacker of Slidell, Louisiana,

25 contacted me after she learned of the articles and

(504)831-1753 433 METAIRIE ROAD, #220

HUFFMA.N & ROBINSON, INC. CERTIFIED COURT REPORTERS

(800)749-1753 METAIRIE, LA 70005

1 the petition. she was upset as I was that a

2 practicing attorney would attempt to use social

3 media in an effort to bypass the courts. This file

4 was, quote, sealed by the Court. Attorney McCool

5 appears to be disclosing information from a sealed

6 file in violation of the court's order . Also, she

7 may not be aware that the signatories to the

8 petition she is ci rcul ati ng are par ti ci pa ting in a

32

9 conspiracy to intimidate a judicial officer which is

10 a f e l o n y i n t h e Mi s s i s s i p p i Co d e , an n o t at e d 9 7 - 9 5 5 .

11 Does this accurately reflect your

12 conversation with chancellor Gambrell?

13 MR. FLANAGAN:

14 Let me just object to the form of the

15 question. I think you prefaced it by saying,

16 " Th i s i s w h at h e s a i d ab o u t J u d g e Am a c k e r . "

17 And at least towards the end, she's citing

18 Mississippi law, so I don't think she's

19 attributing that on Judge Amacker. I just want

20 to object to the form of the question.

21 MR. DUCOTE:

22 I th i n k that ' s fa i r.

23 BY MR . DUCOTE:

24 Q Let me just talk about this quote. "Also,

25 Judge Dawn Amacker of sl i dell, Louisiana, contacted

(504)831 ·1753 433 METAIRIE ROAD, #220


(800)7 49· l 7 53 METAIRIE, LA 70005

1 me after she learned of the articles in the

2 petition . she was upset as I was that a practicing

3 attorney would attempt to use social media in an

4 effort to bypass the court s , end quote.

5 Does that accura t ely reflect your

6 conversation with Gambrell?

7 A First of all, it's inaccurate that I'm

8 from Slidell. I'm not. The courthouse is situated

9 in covington. As far as the rest of the s tatement,

10 th i s has been two and a ha 1 f ye a rs ago . I don't

11 h ave i n d e p e n d e n t r e co 1 1 e ct i o n , M r . Du co t e , o f t h e

12 exact word s that J u d g e Ga m b re 11 and I used . It was

13 a very short conversation. I do rememb e r that .

14 Q well, she doe s n't mention anything here

15 about t h re at s to he r s a f et y o r any of that . It

33

16 says, "An attorney used s o c ial media in an effort to

17 by pas s the co u rt s . " I s t hat some t h i n g you s a i d to

18 c h an c e 1 1 o r Ga m b r e 1 1 ?

19 A I stand by my earlier statement. I don't

20 have an exact recollection of what word s Judge

21 Gambrel 1 and I used.

22 Q Did you have any other written

23 correspondence with chan cellor Gambrell ?

24 A Not to my knowledge, no.

25 Q Did you discus s with Judge Gambrell

(504)831-1753 433 META.IRIE ROAD, #220


(800)749-1753 METAIRIE, LA 70005

34

1 whether or not she should file a disciplinary action

2 against Mrs. Mccool?

3 A NO.

4 Q Now, you said the reason you didn't file

5 one is because one had al ready been filed, but, in

6 fact, at the time you had the conversation with

7 chancellor Gambrell no complaint had been filed by

8 her; isn't that c orrect?

9 A At the time I had the conversation with

10 Judge G am b re 11 , I th i n k I told you earl i er I don ' t

11 r em e m b e r i f i t w a s - - I ' v e h ad two co n v e r s at i o n s

12 w i t h h e r . v e r y s h o r t . on e was t h i s o n e . Th e o t h e r

13 one was at the National Judicial college . In one of

~ the two conversation s , she informed me that she had

15 act u a 1 1 y f i l e d o r , at l east , that wa s the i mp res s i on

16 that I had that she had actually filed had a

17 filing with the office of Di sci pl i nary counsel. It

18 m i g h t h ave b e e n o n t h e f i r s t co n v e r s at i o n . I t m i g h t

19 h av e b e e n o n t h e l a s t . I can't tell you which one

20 it was.

21 Q If she had indeed cc'd you, then you would

22 have seen a copy of this, I assume?

23 A we c an assume t hat. I can't tell I know

24 that from my own recollection, no.

25 Q Now, when was the conversation that you

(504)831-17 53 433 METAIRIE ROAD, #220


(800)7 49-17 53 METAIRIE, L...<\ 70005

35 1 had?

2 A Again, this has been some while ago. I

3 believe it was in 2011, but I couldn't -- I wouldn't

4 want that to be noted as a precise date. Maybe the

5 fall, the winter of 2011 and I met her there and we

6 had a very brief conversation .

7 Q what did you say to her in the

8 conversation?

9 A I don't remember exactly what I said to

10 her in the conversation, Mr. Ducote. Judge Gambrell

11 had a fellow judge. we were in different courses at

12 t h e N at i o n a 1 J u d i c i a 1 co 1 1 e g e . I was there for a

13 family law course. I believe she was there for a

14 genera 1 j u r i s di ct i on course . There was many j u d g es

15 from the across the united States that were there,

16 and someone said Judge Gambrel 1 is 1 ooki ng for you.

17 She wants to meet you. And so at some point, I saw

18 her on a break, and the breaks were literally about

19 f i v e mi n u t e s 1 o n g , i f t h e y we re t h at 1 o n g at t h e

20 Judicial college. And it was just putting a name to

21 a face sort of thing. I can't tell you the exact

22 conversation that we had.

23 Q Just to follow up, do you remember what

24 she said to you?

25 A I really don't, Mr. Ducote.

(504)831-1753 HUFFMAN & ROBINSON, INC. 433 ME'I'AIRIE ROAD, #220 CERTIFIED COURT REPOR'l'ERS

(800)749-1753 METAIRIE, LA 70005

36 1 Q was that the last time you have ever

2 spoken to her?

3 A Yes.

4 Q Are you aware that at some point she

5 issued a rule to hold Mrs. McCool i n contempt?

6 A I'm aware of that or at least that there

7 were allegations to that effect, yes.

8 Q How do you know that?

9 A I really don't know. This has gone on for

10 al most th re e ye a rs now , and I rec e i v e d i n format i on

11 f r om a l o t o f d i ff e r e n c e s o u r c e s i n cl u d i n g t h e s e

12 f o rm a l c h a r g e s , yo u k n ow , h ad t h i n g s i n t h em t h at

13 obviously I was unaware of that occurred in the

14 s tat e of Mi s s i s s i pp i , so I can ' t tel l you when I got

15 the i n format i on or who I got i t from .

16 Q were you provided by the office of

17 Di sci pl i nary counsel any of Mrs . Mccool ' s responses

18 t o t h e c om p l a i n t f i l e d by J u d g e Ga m b r e l l ?

19 A I don't recall ever getting anything from

20 Di sci pl i nary counsel that Mrs. Mccool had responded

21 to any disciplinary complaint.

22 Q Have you received anything from the office

23 of Disciplinary counsel other than the complaint

24 that Judge Gambrell filed?

25 A Yes.

(504)831·l753 433 METAIRIE ROAD, #220

I got the formal charges and your


(800)749· l 753 METAIRIE, LA 70005

1 response, I think, was attached to it when you

2 objected to vagueness or somet hing as attached to

3 the formal charges. That's all I've gotten as far

4 as comm uni ca ti on, written comm uni ca ti on, and they

5 have sent me once or twice a letter requesting

6 specific information from me to which I responded.

37

7 Q what specific information did they request

8 from you?

9 A I can't tell you, Mr. Ducote. I don't

10 have the l et t er s here i n front of me , but they would

11 list four or fives things in the investigation of

12 t h i s mat t e r a n d I w o u l d re s po n d a c co rd i n g l y i f I h ad

13 these item s in my posse ss ion or knowledge of them.

14 Q what facts do you have that you believe

15 well, are you going to testify at the proceedings

16 a g a i n st Mrs . Mccool on February 2 7?

17 A I don't know, Mr. Ducote.

18 Q Have you received any subpoenas to do so?

19 A No.

20 Q Have you discussed that with Mr. Manning?

21 A No. well, I don't think I have. I can't

22 remember if we have. At some point, I knew it was a

23 possibility . I don't know if I heard that from my

24 counsel or someone, but I don't recall having any

25 conve rs a ti on with Mr . Manning about a subpoena.

(504)831-1753 433 METAIRIE ROAD, #220


(800)7 4 9-17 53 METAIRIE, LA 70005

1 Q well, what facts -- you read the formal

2 complaint, have you not?

3 A Yes.

4 Q Do you know of any facts or do you have

5 any knowledge of any facts that support the formal

6 complaint?

7 A Yes.

8 Q what are those facts?

9 A Those that are contained in the formal

10 com p 1 a i n t . I h ave n o k n ow 1 e d g e o f t h o s e fa c t s

11 insofar as they concern me. I don't have any

12 personal knowledge of those that concerned what

13 happened with Judge Gambrell. But any of those in

14 which my name is mentioned in connection with

15 certain factual situations that occurred, I have

16 kn owl edge of those facts.

17 Q okay. Now, which of those facts do you

18 believe constitute a violation of the Rules of

19 P r o f e s s i o n a 1 co n d u ct ?

20 MR. MANNING:

21 Objection.

22 MR. FLANAGAN:

23 we're back where we started.

24 MR. MANNING:

25 I stated the objection before. Again,

38

(504)831-17 53 433 METAIRIE ROAD, #220


(800)749-1753 METAIRIE, LA 70005

1 she's a fact witness. She's not here to state

2 an opinion on what is or what is not a

3 violation of Rules of Professional conduct.

4 MR. DUCOTE:

5 I guess we'll have to file a Rule to

6 compel on that.

7 MR. MANNING:

8 It's improper to ask any witness to state

9 their opinion on whether the respondent has

10 violated the Rules of Professional conduct.

11 MR. DUCOTE:

12 That's not what I'm asking.

13 MR. MANNING:

14 That is what you're asking over and over

15 again.

16 BY MR. DUCOTE:

17 Q Do you know what this statement means,

18 q u o t e , " A p r a c t i c i n g at to r n e y w o u 1 d at t em pt to u s e

19 soc i a 1 med i a i n an effort to bypass the courts , end

20 quote. what does that mean?

21 A where are you reading this from,

22 Mr. Ducote?

23 Q I'm reading this from Judge Gambrel 1 's

24 com plaint.

2 5 A Do I know what that means?

39

(504)831·l753 433 ME'l'AlRIE ROAD, #220

HUFF!vIAN & ROBINSON, INC. CERTIFIED COURT REPORTERS

(800)749-1753 METAIRIE, LA 70005

40 1 Q Yes.

2 A I'm not so sure of the context yo u're

3 ask ing me that in. I believe I responded to earlier

4 I don't hav e any specific recollection of having

5 t hat specific -- those words used in my conversation

6 with J udge Gambre ll. It would be mere speculation

7 for me to tell you what that means.

8 Q well, i s it your position that Mrs. Mccool

9 has attempted to use social media in an effort to

10 by p a s s t h e c o u rt s ?

11 A I don't have a position in this,

12 M r . o u c o t e .

13 Q

14 A

15 Q

Do you have any knowledge of her doing it?

of her doing what?

of her attempting to use social media 1n

16 an effort to bypass the courts?

17 A I can't comment on the ultimate co nc lusion

18 of whet he r or not s he has done thi s in an effo rt to

19 by pa s s t h e c o u rt s . I do know that she ha s engaged

20 1n the us e of soc ial media exactly as the comme nt s

21 are co nt ai ned in the formal charges. I don't know

22 what to tell yo u. I cannot reach a ny conclusions

23 about why she did it or what was her purpose 1n

24 do i n g i t , Mr. o u cote .

25 Q well, what does the term - - doe s this term

(504)831-1753 433 METAIRIE ROAD, #220


(800)7 49-1753 METAIRIE, LA 70005

1 have any meaning to you -- what's your

2 understanding, if you have one, of the phrase

3 "Attempt to use social media in an effort to bypass

4 the courts"?

5

6

7 A

MR. FLANAGAN:

object to the form.

I don't have an interpretation of that .

8 I've told you I don't have any independent

9 recollection of those exact words being exchanged

W between me and Judge Gambrell; therefore, I can't

11 have or would not speculate on what the

12 i n t e r p r et at i o n o f t h at i s , M r . D u cot e .

13 BY MR. DUCOTE:

41

14 Q well, if Judge Gambrell says regarding you

15 that, quote, she was upset as I was that a

16 practicing attorney would attempt to use social

17 media in an effort to bypass the court, end quote.

18 Are you saying that you don't know what she's

19 ta 1 k i n g ab o u t ?

20 A I'm saying I don't recall specific words

21 to that effect. Quite often, I find that parties

22 paraphrase, and I don't know that any of those

23 specific words were used, Mr. Ducote, and I wi 11 not

24 spec u 1 ate on what they mean .

25 Q Did Mrs. Mccool use the social media in an

(504)831-1753 433 METAIRIE ROAD, #220


(800)7 49-1753 METAIRIE, LA 70005

42

1 effort to bypass your court?

2 A I believe I've answered that question. I

3 cannot

4 Q I haven't asked that question.

5 A If you will let me finish, Mr. Ducote. I

6 believe I've answered that question. To the latter

7 part of it, I cannot comment on what her motivations

8 were. I can't tell you why she did what she did. I

9 know -- what I know has been given to ooc, has been

10 placed in the formal charges. That ' s all I can tell

11 you about it, Mr. Ducote. I have no idea why

12 M r s . Mccoo 1 h as d o n e w h at s h e ' s d o n e .

13 Q we 11 , when you s ay what she did, what

14 knowledge do you have of what she did? What did she

15 do?

16 A I know that I got a petition with

17 Mrs. McCool 's name signed No. 1 on the petition

18 which purportedly was sent out on the internet, a

19 p e t i t i o n - - I d o n ' t h ave t h e e x a c t p et i t i o n h e r e i n

20 f r on t of me . If you have it there, you can provide

21 it to me and I can go through the various paragraphs

22 there, but I do know Judge Gambrell has mentioned in

23 her rulings in sealed c losed hearings, I am

24 mentioned in my rulings in sealed closed hearing,

25 the Supreme Court is mentioned and, again,

(504)831·l753 433 METAlRIE ROAD, #220


(800)749·1753 METAlRIE, LA 70005

43

1 paraphrasing these are not exact words but the

2 petition wa s requesting that people contact us in an

3 obvious effort to get us to change our opinion s ,

4 gave identifying information out about the judges,

5 their phone numbers, where their offices were, and

6 the petition had comments ne xt to many names

7 directed to the judges. That's what I know about

8 that.

9 Q so the petition a s ked people to contact

10 yo u a n d s a y w h at ?

11 A Mr. Ducote, I'm at a disadvantage because

12 I d o n ' t h ave t h e p e t i t i o n h e r e i n f r o n t o f me . I f

13 you want to give it to me, I'll read it to you.

14 Q

15

This might be ODCllB?

MR. FLANAGAN:

16 Is this llllB or lOA . That's marked. It

17 says 11 B for the record .

18 BY M R . DU C 0 T E :

19 Q That's marked llB in the book. I as s ume

20 that these wi 11 keep the s ame ex hi bit numbers

21 throughout the proceedings, but this is 1 of 1 that

22 the office of Di sci pl i nary counsel provided me in

23 their book of ex hi bi ts.

24 so, Judge Amacker, is that the petition

25 you're referring to?

(504)831·1753 HUFFMAN & ROBINSON, INC. 433 META.IRIE ROAD, #220 CERTIFIED COURT REPORTERS

(800)749·1753 METAIRIE, LA 70005

44 1 A It appears to be.

2 Q so the body of the petition itself says,

3 "Louisiana supreme Court Judge Dawn Amacker and

4 Judge Deborah Gambrell, quote, we the undersigned

5 insist that you ensure that the two little girls who

6 were subject of case Number 2011-14457 pending in

7 the 22nd JDC, St. Tammany Parish, Louisiana, and

8 case Number 2006-136GT, pending in the chancery

9 Court of Marion county, Mississippi, are afforded

10 al l l e g al p r o t e c t i o n s i n c l u d i n g e vi d e n t i a r y h e a r i n g

11 to e n s u r e t h at t h e y a r e p r o t e ct e d f r om ab u s e . "

12 Now, is there anything in that language

13 that you find offensive as a judge?

14 MR. FLANAGAN:

15 Do you want to see it again?

16 THE WITNESS:

17 Yes. I'm not sure what you mean by

18 offensive, Mr. Ducote. It is not my job to

19 determine whether or not statements that

20 attorneys make in ex parte communication to me

21 as a judge are offensive. Are you asking am I

22 personally offended or professionally?

23 BY MR. DUCOTE:

24 Q I'll rephrase the question. First of all,

25 how did that come into your possession? when did

(504)831-1753 433 METAIRIE ROAD, #220


(800)749-1753 METAIRIE, LA 70005

45

1 you first see that petition?

2 A well, this doesn ' t have the date on it.

3 Actually

4 Q or in what context? was it online or was

5 it something mailed to your office or what?

6 A There is another page to this because

7 there actually is identifying information that shows

8 that this comes from or purportedly comes from your

9 client's client. so on the copy that I received

10 m a y b e i t ' s o n o n e o f t h e s e p age s . I don't know

11 w he re th i s one comes from , but at the top i t shows a

12 fax n um b e r an d i t h a s Rave n Mau r e r Bo yd o n i t , I

13 believe. so I don't know where this copy comes from

14 or if there's a page that's with it, but it

15 purported to come from a litigant in a sealed

16 adoption proceeding and/or custody proceeding that

17 was pending in my court. when did I get it? In

18 answer to that, again, this one does not have the

19 date on it. The other one does. On the date that

20 it showed it was faxed from her to us, it came by

21 fax to family court's fax machine. Generally my

22 secretary handles most ex parte proceedings that

23 come in by not giving them to me, any so rt of letter

24 of communi ca ti on. These are sent back to the

25 attorneys, and they are given in admonition in the

(504)831-1753 433 METAIRIE ROAD, #220


(800)749-1753 METAIRIE, LA 70005

1 letter not to send ex parte communication to the

2 court.

3 In this case, they do 1 ook at these. My

4 secretary does and sometimes the staff attorney. I

5 can't recall who looked at this one, but generally

6 speaking everything that comes into family court is

7 reviewed to see if there is a threat or there is a

8 reason to bring on an emergency basis this to the

9 attention of the judge. This is what my secretary

10 did. And that is how I received the information

11 ab o u t t h e c om mu n i c at i o n .

12 Q So the first you saw this was via a fax?


14 Q To your office?

15 A correct .

16 Q Now, do you make any distinction if this

17 had been something simply posted online that would

18 n o t h ave b e e n fax e d to yo u r off i c e ? Do yo u s e e a

19 di ff e re n c e the re , o r i s that the same i n you r eyes?

20 MR. FLANAGAN:

21 I'm going to object to the form of the

46

22 question. see a difference in what context? I

23 th i n k it ' s u n c 1 ear.

24 BY MR. DUCOTE:

25 Q You said an ex parte communication. Do

(504)831·1753 433 METAIRIE ROAD, #220


(800)749·1753 ME'I'AIRIE, LA 70005

1 you believe that if somebody post something online

2 even though is says to you that that constitutes an

3 ex parte communication instead of something that's

4 faxed to you?

5 A It can be.

6 Q So you think something posted online can

47

7 constitute an ex parte communication with the court?

8 A I believe that it could.

9 Q Do you disagree -- I'm sorry. can I see

10 the exhibit again? Do you have any facts to

11 indicate that Mrs. McCool was, in any way,

12 r e s po n s i b l e f o r t h i s b e i n g fax e d to yo u r o ff i c e ?

13 A The only fax I have are those that are

14 noted in the formal charges. I believe they

15 referred to the respondent having filed or submitted

16 an affidavit in which certain omissions were made.

17 The only other facts I would have are circumstantial

18 in nature and those are those that I told you

19 ea r l i e r t h at we d i d s e n d a l e t t e r to M r s . Mc coo l an d

20 to the opp o s i n g counsel and I can ' t rec a 11 who that

21 is right now. And she was given a copy of the

22 communi ca ti on and the letter indicated that this had

23 come into our office and this was an ex pa rte

24 comm uni ca ti on that would not be accepted. I'm

25 paraphrasing .

(504)83 1-1753 433 METAIRIE ROAD, #220

I don't know exactly what the letter

H UFFMAN & ROBINSON, INC. CERTIFIED COURT REPORTERS

(800)749-1753 METAIRIE, LA 70005

48

1 says, but that's the general one. And I never heard

2 anything from Mrs. McCool to dispute the fact that

3 this has been sent by her or her client.

4 Q well, in the letter did you say this was

5 sent by you or your client or just by your client?

6 A I don't have the letter here in front of

7 me. I couldn't tell you, Mr. Ducote.

8 Q If it was sent by the client without

9 Mrs. Mccool' s knowledge or direction or

10 a c qui es c enc e , do you see a di st i n ct i on between

11 culpability on her part?

12 A That would not be for me to make a

13 determination. By her nam e appearing as No. 1 on

14 the pet i ti on , g e n e r al l y s peak i n g i f tha t type of

15 comm uni cat i on i s sent to an at to r n e y , a j u d g e w o u l d

16 expect a response w hi ch e i the r says , "someone ha s

17 done this and it wasn't me, Judge, and I'm going to

18 f i n d o u t " o r , " J u d g e , I ' m s o r r y . I didn't reali ze

19 th i s was a vi o l at i on . It won't happen again."

20 You would expect -- aga in, thi s is just

21 based generally s peaking on five years of being a

22 judge that if the type of letter is sent to co un se l

23 saying this has come into our office, it's

24 inappropriate communication, that there would be a

25 re spo nse if inde ed they had no kn owl edge.

(504)831-17 53 433 METAJRIE ROAD, #220


(800)749· l 753 METAIRIE, LA 70005

1 Q Let's s ee what thi s petition says. Now,

2 do you think it would be improper for you to be

3 asked to, quote, afford two little girls all legal

4 protection? There's nothing wrong with that?

5

6

7

8

MR . FLANAGAN:

Let me obje c t to that. The que s tion is

inappropriate as to what she thinks is

inappropriate. Again, s he' s not the charging

9 body nor the decision maker on this matter.

10 MR . DU C 0 TE :

11 I don't think you have s tanding to make

49

12 these objections. I know you're making a ll the

13 objections here, but

14 MR. MANNING:

15 state your question again, pl ea s e.

16 BY MR. DU COTE :

17 Q Judge Amacker, do you think it' s improper

18 f o r yo u t o b e as k e d to a ff o rd two 1 i t t 1 e g i r 1 s a 1 1

19 1 e g a 1 p r o t e ct i o n s ? Not h i n g w r o n g w i t h t h at ; r i g h t ?

20

21

22

23

24

25

MR. FLANAGAN:

same objection.

MR. MANNING:

It' s a misl e ading question in that it' s

not placed into any context. "All legal

protections" under what circumstances? And I

(504)831-1753 433 METAIRIE ROAD, #220


(800)749-1753 METAIRIE, LA 70005

1 think it's irrelevant.

2 MR. DUCOTE:

3 This petition seems to be the corpus

4 delicti, apparently, of the complaint.

5 MR. MANNING:

6 You're certainly able and have shown that

7 to form your own questions and follow the

8 questions with the charges. But if you noted

9 the charges accuse Mrs. Mccool of using social

10 media to solicit others to make direct contact

11 with judges in cases pending before them, and

12

13

14

15

it is more than just the petition. There are

many others , if you care to go through them,

that say, Article by Mrs. McCool. Here is the

information. Here is what you can do. Sign

16 t h e p et i t i o n a n d yo u c a n c a l l t h e j u d g e an d

17 here is the judge's number. So the charges

18

19

don't allege Mrs. McCool to have made an ex

parte communication. They allege that she

20 violated 8.4 A by soliciting others to do what

21 she co uld not do her se lf.

22 MR. DUCOTE:

23 I'm glad to finally hear what the

50

24

25

specifics are, and I guess we'll deal with that

in response to any discovery.

(504)831-1753 433 METAIRIE ROAD, #220


(800)749-1753 METAIRIE, LA 70005

51 1 MR. MANNING:

2 I'm pretty sure the formal charges are

3 specific as determined by the Hearing committee

4 chair.

5 BY MR . DUCOTE:

6 Q So you would agree, would you not, that

7 s omething posted on -- first posted on the internet

8 that asks you to afford the two little girl s all

9 legal protections in c luding a full evidentiary

10 he a ring to ensure t hat they were pro t ect e d from

11 abuse is something you would find that you would be

12 doing anyway; right ?

13 MR. MANNING:

14 Again, I r a ise the same objection to the

15 question. subject to that.

16 BY MR. DUCOTE:

17 Q I s it s a fe t o say that in conc e pt that you

18 s upport that you would be doing those thing s?

19 MR. FLANAG AN:

20

21

22

23

24

25

I'm going to object again. we di sagree

about my standing. we'll address that later.

My understanding of these formal charges is not

that arguments are being made dir e ctly to a

judge for eviden c e or fairness or du e proce s s

but that's someone is allegedly trying to get

(504)831-1753 433 METAIRIE ROAD, #220


(800)7 49-1753 MET AIRIE, LA 70005

52

1 third parties to make contact with the court to

2 urge for a particular result.

3 BY MR. DUCOTE:

4 Q Let's do this. You would agree, Judge

5 Amacker, that whatever this petition asks for is the

6 same rel i e-f that Mrs. McCool' s pleading asks for in

7 your court, including her writ and her appeal to the

8 First Circuit?

9 MR. FLANAGAN:

10 Objection. Foundation.

11 A You want to lay a foundation, Mr. Ducote.

12 BY MR. DUCOTE:

13 Q Do you not recall or was there anything in

14 here I'll show you ODC llB again and see if

15 the re ' s any th i n g i n h e re , i n the body of th e

16 p e t i t i o n i t s e l f , t h at was s om et h i n g t h at w a s n ' t

17 being asked for in your court?

18 A First of a 11 , I don't have the transcript

19 of what occurred in the court. I don't have the

20 pleadings. Those remained sealed. Records, they

21 are now not in my division. They're i n Judge

22 Devereux's. I would not have access to those. I

23 can't co mment on anything in connection with the

24 pl ea di n gs , ex h i bi ts , o r t rans c r i pt s that a re

25 contained in the adoption or the custody proceedings

(504)831-1753 433 METAIRIE ROAD, #220


(800)749-1753 METAIRIE, LA 70005

53 1 that were filed in the 22nd JDC, Mr . Ducote.

2 Q Do you contend or do yo u have any facts or

3 is it your -- have · you reported to the office of

4 Di sci pl i nary counsel that the petition itself

s violates the seal of the records in your court?

6 MR. FLANAGAN:

7 object to the form.

8 A can you rephrase the question, Mr. Ducote?

9 BY MR. DUCOTE:

10 Q I think it's clear.

11 MR. FLANAGAN:

12

13 one .

You gave her a couple of choices in that

Do you think A, B, or c .

14 BY MR. DUCOTE:

15 Q Does the petition on its face violate the

16 s ea l of th e rec o rd s i n you r co u rt?

17 A Again, I can't comment to that. I don't

18 h ave t h e c as e s s t i l l i n f r o n t o f me . I cannot

19 comment upon what are sealed closed proceedings that

20 are now in Judge Devereux' s court . I stand by what

21 my response is as a witness to ODC contained in

22 them, and the formal charges are accurate as a

23 reflection of what occurred insofar as I'm

24 concerned .

25 Q Did you take any steps to cite Mrs. Mccool

(504)831·1753 HUFFl\IIAN & ROBINSON, INC. 433 METAIRIE ROAD, #220 CERTIFIED COURT REPORTERS

(800)749·1753 METAIRIE, LA 70005

1 for contempt for anything she did in your court in

2 connection with anything that is alleged in the

3 formal complaint?

4 A I don't remember, Mr. Ducote, but to my

5 recollection, no.

54

6 Q Now, I'm going to show you Exhibit ooc 12,

7 which is in the book of exhibits provided by

8 Mr. Manning today and purports to be a letter from

9 you dated March 28, 2012, to Mr. Manning and ask you

10 i f t h at i s i n d e e d w h at t h at i s ?

11 A It appears to be.

12 Q And do you know how it came to be that you

13 wrote that letter?

14 A I can't tell you that. I do know that I

15 had received one or two communications during the

16 c ourse of these three years from Mr. Manning in

17 which he requested additional information from me as

18 a w i t n e s s . This may have been in response to that.

19 I don't know.

20 Q Now, did you -- you were recused from the

21 case involving Raven Maurer, M- a - u- r - e - r, were you

22 not?

23 A And by "you were recused," meaning

24 voluntarily?

25 Q well, you're no longer on the case. That

(504)831- 1753 433 METAIRIE ROAD, #220


(800)749·1753 METAIRIE, LA 70005

55 1 went to Judge Devereux; correct?

2 A That's correct.

3 Q was that in response by -- you were

4 recusing yourself or another judge ordering you to

5 recuse? Do you know?

6 A Again, I can't remember precisely if I saw

7 a standby. whatever the motion in the order says on

8 the recusal in that particular case.

9 Q Do you remember whether or not Mrs. Mccool

10 had filed a motion to recuse you?

11 A I don't specifically recall.

12 Q well, do you know whether or not in

13 response to your conversation with Judge Gambrell,

14 w hi ch was - - whatever i t was w hi ch i s ref 1 e ct e d i n

15 the complaint that Judge Gambrell filed, whether you

16 voluntarily recused yourself on the basis of your

17 having that conversation with Judge Gambrell? If

18 t h at q u e s t i o n ma k e s an y s e n s e , an d may b e i t do e s n ' t .

19 MR. FLANAGAN:

20

21

22

23

24

25

I'm going to pose an objection. Any

questions about why the Judge did something are

privileged under Article 519 of the code of

Evidence.

MR. DUCOTE:

I'm not asking her why. I'm asking her

(504)831·1753 HUFFl'vlAN & ROBINSON, INC. 433 METAIRIE ROAD, #220 CERTIFIED COURT REPORTERS

(800)749·1753 METAIRIE, LA 70005

1 when.

2 MR. FLANAGAN:

3 If i t ' s just a matter of when?

4 BY MR. DUCOTE:

5 Q Let me ask you this: How long after your

6 conversation -- I'll ask it this way: For how long

7 after you had the conversation with Judge Gambrell

8 that you continued to preside over the case?

9 A I don't remember, Mr. Ducote.

10 Q Did you immediately -- or did you after

11 speaki ng with Judge Gambrell after any period of

12 time after you spoke to Judge Gambrell self recuse

13 on the case?

14 MR. FLANAGAN:

15 It's been asked and a nswered.

16 MR. DUCOTE:

17 No.

18 MR. FLANAGAN:

19 she said she didn't know.

20 A That was my answer, Mr. Ducote.

21 BY MR. DUCOTE:

22 Q

23 A

24

25

so you don't recall?

I don't recall.

MR. MANNING:

I'm sorry. Mr. Ducote, was that with

56

(504)831·l753 433 ME'I'AIRIE ROAD, #220


(800)7 49· l 7 53 ME'l'AIRIE, LA 70005

1 regard to a specific case or in general?

2 MR. DUCOTE:

3 The case, the Raven Maurer case.

4 BY MR. DUCOTE:

5 Q Do you recall whether or not upon

6 receiving the complaint filed by Judge Gambrell and

7 seeing the reference to communication s that you and

8 Judge Gambrell had that it was at that ti me that

9 Mrs. McCool filed the motion to recuse you ?

10 A I have no idea.

57

11 Q Now, Mrs. McCool has filed several motions

12 to r e c u s e yo u i n ca s e s t h at s h e h as b e e n i n , an d yo u

13 have , as I appreciate it, on your own motion to

14 recuse d yours el f i n cases she ' s been i n vol v e d i n ;

15 correct?

16 A It's a compound question. If the first

17 part of it is ha s she filed motions to recuse me in

18 my d i v i s i o n f r om c as e s , ye s .

19 Q And have you on your own without her

20 filing a mo ti on, on your own mo ti on recused

21 yourself?

22 A Yes .

23 Q Now, in any of the recusal motions that

24 Mrs. McCool ha s filed in your division, do you know

25 of any facts in those motions that are

(504)831-1753 433 1\1ETAIRIE ROAD, #220


(800)749-1753 METAIRIE, LI\ 70005

58

1 misrepresented or inaccurate or misleading in any

2 way?

3 MR. FLANAGAN:

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

Let me object. The formal charges address

three recusal motions.

MR. DUCOTE:

I understand, counsel.

MR. FLANAGAN:

Let me make my objection.

MR. DUCOTE:

It's not your position to talk about the

formal charges. You're representing the

witness.

MR. FLANAGAN:

You can make your statement when I'm

finished, but I am going to finish my

objection. okay. Three: Keister, Cullen, and

Russel. so I'll allow you to ask questions

about those, but to the extent that you

endeavor to question a sitting judge about

other matters involving other parties, I'm not

going to allow that. So there are three that

are referenced in this document, which is the

governing document, and I'll allow questions

about those.

(504)831- 1753 433 METAIRIE ROAD, #220


(800)749-1753 METAIRIE, LA 70005

1 BY MR. DUCOTE:

2 Q okay. Let's t a ke those, Kiester, cull en

3 and

4 MR. DUCOTE:

5 what's the third one?

6 MR. FLANAGAN:

7 Russel.

8 BY MR. DUCOTE:

9 Q Are there fals e statements that

10 M r s . M cc o o l mad e i n t h o s e r e c u s a l mot i o n s ?

11 A I don't have tho s e in front of me,

12 M r . D u c o t e .

13 Q Let's go to the formal charges.

14 Did you ever have any discussions with

15 Judge Gambrell about her issuing or potentially

16 is s uing a warrant for Mrs. Mccool' s arrest?

59

17 A I believe you asked me that earlier, and I

18 believe my answer was I don't have any independent

19 r e co l l e ct i o n o f t h at .

20 Q In the formal complaint it says on page 16

21 on June 5, 2012, Kiester v Kiester, "Judge Amacker

22 s igned an order stating to the court hereby

23 voluntarily recusing herself due to the possibility

24 that the judge may be called as a witness in the

25 proceedings referenced by counsel and out of a

(504)831·17 53 433 METAIRIE ROAD, #220


(800)749·1753 METAIRIE, LA 70005

1 abundance of a caution and to avoid the appearance

2 of impropriety, the matter shall be referred to a

3 another judge in the district court for trial

4 through the random process of assignment in

s accordance with the provisions of the code of civil

6 Procedure Article 253.1." okay. Any disagreement

7 with that so far?

8

9

10

A

Q

A

Any disagreement with what?

with your signing an order saying that?

I don't have the order here in front of

60

11 me, but it sounds 1 i ke probably that that's what the

12 o r d e r s a i d .

13 Q And then the next paragraph, page 16 of

14 the formal com plaint, it says, "on June 28, 2012,

15 respondent filed a motion to recuse Judge Amacker in

16 t h e matt e r at s co t t Ed w a rd c u 1 1 e n v . K r i s t i a n n Ma r i e

17 Prob ts t cu 11 en when she fa 1 s e 1 y stated , 'The court

18 h as v o 1 u n t a r i 1 y and e x p r e s s 1 y ad m i t t e d i t s e x t r em e

19 b i as i n co n f 1 i ct i n r e c u s i n g i t s e 1 f i n two o t h e r

20 cases which grounds are equally applicable in the

21 case at bar.'" Is it your position -- do you agree

22 with this t hat that statement that I just read to

23 you from Mrs. McCool' s motion to recuse you in the

24 cu 11 en case i s fa 1 s e?

25 A Do I ag ree with the statement that that

(504)831-1753 433 METAlRIE ROAD, #220


(800)749·1753 METAIRIE, LA 70005

61

1 paragraph is false? Is that what you are saying?

2 Q Yes.

3 A I can tell you that I have no knowledge of

4 ever having voluntarily and expressly admitted

5 extreme bias a nd conflict in recusing myself in two

6 other cases as of June 28, 2012, when Mrs. Mccool

7 filed this motion .

8 Q okay. And then you s igned an order

9 stating , "The court hereby vol untari 1 y recuses

10 i t s e 1 f t o t h e po s s i b i 1 i t y t h at t h e j u d g e may b e

11 called a witness in proceedings for which count

12 movers of party and out of an abundance of caution

13 and to avoid the appearance of impropriety. Thi s

14 matte r s ho u 1 d be ref e r red to j u d g e of Di vi s i on K . "

15 And then i n the Russe 1 c ase , it was the

16 same 1 anguage, Mrs. McCool said , "The court had

17 voluntarily and expressly admitted its extreme bias

18 i n c o n f 1 i c t i n r e c u s i n g i t s e 1 f i n s eve r a 1 o t h e r

19 cases which grounds are equally applicable in the

20 case at bar . "

21 Now, when you signed the recusals in the

22 Kiester case and the Cullen ca s e, is it your

23 position that that was not on the basis of e xtreme

24 bi as and conflict?

25 A I don't have a position.

(504)831-1753 HUFFMAN & ROBINSON, INC. 433 METAlRIE ROAD, #220 CERTIFIED COURT REPORTERS

I will restate

(800)749-1753 METAIRIE, LA 70005

62

1 what I said earlier. The language that I had

2 voluntarily and expressly admitted extreme bias and

3 conflict in recusing myself in two other cases, that

4 is a false statement.

5 Q Did you recuse yourself in the Cullen case

6 after she filed a motion to recuse you?

7 A Yes.

8 Q And did you recuse yourself --

9 A I take that back. I voluntarily recused

10 myself. I don't know if it was after the motion she

11 filed or not, Mr. Ducote. Just because someone

12 files a motion on certain grounds doesn't mean that

13 the order reflects that it was granted on the basis

14 of what i s cont a i n e d i n the mot i on .

15 Q Okay.

16 MR. MANNING:

17 can she look at her orders since they're

18 here for us to look at. Here is the one from

19 the Kiester matter . Is ODC 13B as in boy.

20 (Hands document.)

21 BY MR. DUCOTE:

22 Q so those are the orders that you signed in

23 both the Russel case and the Cullen case?

24 A That is the Kiester case.

25 Q And then you signed the same order,

(504)831 ·1753 433 lVIBTAIRIE ROAD, #220

HUFFMAN & ROBINSON, INC. CERTIF IED COURT REPORTERS

(800)749·1753 METAIRIE, LA 70005

63 1 basically the same language in Cullen and Russel;

2 correct?

3 A I believe so.

4 Q Did you take any steps to cite Mrs. McCool

5 for any violations of Article 863 of the Code of

6 civil Procedure based on the allegations that she

7 made in her motions to recuse you in the Cullen case

8 and the Russel case?

9 A I don't recall that I did.

10 Q Th e R u s s e 1 c a s e yo u s et t h at f o r a

11 hearing, right, you referred that to another judge;

12 co r r e c t ? Do yo u re c a 1 1 ?

13 A I don't recall, Mr. Ducote.

14 Q And you also you never filed a

15 complaint against Mrs. McCool with office of

16 Disciplinary Counsel based on the pleadings that you

17 filed in these recusals that are mentioned on pages

18 16 a n d 1 7 ; co r r e ct?

19 A I have never filed a complaint with the

20 office of Di sci pl i nary counsel i nvol vi ng

21 Mrs. Mccool, Mr. Ducote.

22 Q Now, I believe you earlier testified that

23 the reason is because Judge Gambrell had already

24 gotten that underway, but, in fact, Judge Gambrell

25 would have not filed anything or have any concern

(504)831-1753 433 METAIRIE ROAD, #220


(800)749· l 753 METAIRIE, LA 70005

1 with what Mrs. McCool filed recusal cases in your

2 court; correct?

3 A I'm sorry you have to repeat.

4 Q Judge Gambrell would not be filing

5 complaints against Mrs . McCool based on pleadings

6 that she filed in your court to try to get you to

7 recuse

8 A I don't know that at all. As a matter of

9 fact, I think I recall from the formal charges or

10 f r om may b e h e r 1 et t e r o n e of t h e t h i n g s t h at we ' v e

11 talked about here that she specifically states

12 that's misstatements were made in the Louisiana

13 proceeding about the Mi ssi ssi ppi proceedings. so

~ the an s wer as far as I'm conce r ned would be, yes,

15 she may have the ability depending on what

16 statements were made in the Louisiana ca s es if they

17 were misstatements about what had happened in

18 Mi s s i s s i pp i that co u 1 d we 11 have been a cause or

19 pa rt of h e r comp 1 a i n t .

20 Q Now you -- do you agree that if you know

21 of an attorney violating the Rules of Professional

64

22 condu c t you have an obligation to report them to the

23 office of Disciplinary counsel ?

24

25

A

Q

(5Q£1)83 l -I 7 53

No, I don't agree with that statement.

when you were first contacted by

HUFFIV1AN & ROBI NSON. INC. 433 METAIRIE ROAD, #220 CERTIFIED COURT REPORTERS

(800)749-1753 METAIRIE, LA 70005

1 Mr. Manning concerning Mrs. McCool 1 n the course of

2 this i nvesti gati on, was he, to your kn owl edge,

3 already aware of these allegations in pages 16 and

4 17 of the formal charges or is this information you

5 gave him for the first ti me?

6 A I don't recall, Mr. Ducote. As I recall

7 Mr. Manning -- well, first of all, I can tell you

8 this: I have never had any conversation with

9 Mr. Manning in which we discussed the substance.

10 The only conversations we've had have been very

11 brief. I've never met him until today. Had to do

12 with procedurally what I needed to file and when in

13 the case, and that's what I've done.

65

14 Q Now, you're familiar with the April Curren

15 c as e ; c o r r e ct ?

16 A The name is familiar to me.

17 Q That was the case that your husband's law

18 firm was defending Mandeville Police officer who was

19 i n v o 1 vi n g a s u i t b r o u g h t a g a i n s t t h em i n f e d e r al

20 court on behalf of a child whose case you were

21 try i n g i n your court . Do you recall that?

22

23

24

25

MR. FLANAGAN:

I'm going to object to this line of

questioning. I don't think it has any

conceivable relevance to these charges.

(504)831-1753 433 METAIRIE ROAD, #220

HUFFMAN & ROB1 NSON, INC. CERTIFIED COURT REPORTERS

(800)749-1753 METAIRIE, LA 70005

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

66

MR. DUCOTE:

well, I think part of this con c erns some

allegations of something being faxed improperly

to the court, and I know that there are

allegations involving -- in the federal c ourt

case involving faxes coming from Judge

Amacker's chambers to her husband' s law firm

involved in a case where there was no

disclosure that her husband's firm was

representing the defendants in this case that

she was adjudicating

THE WITNESS:

Let me stop you right here, Mr . Ducote.

That's a juvenile case . The record is s ealed.

I'm going to ask that anything be s tricken that

you have asked that infringe s upon that

juvenile prohibition . I'm not going to allow

on thi s record or any other record -- that is a

ca s e that is juvenile case in my division of

some years ago. You cannot ask me questions or

through your question place on the record

anything that violates that confidentiality in

that juvenile case.

MR. FLANAGAN:

I didn't know it was a juvenile case. I

(504)831-1753 433 METAIRIE ROAD, #220


(800)749-1753 METAIRIE, LA 70005

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

67

move to strike and instruct the witness not to

answer any further questions about this current

matter.

MR. MANNING:

I, to some extent, agree with some things

Mr. Ducote has said earlier about I need to

also be lodging objections. I have the

standing to lodge objections that does not

diminish the role of Mr. Flanagan as the

witness's attorney here today. But so that the

record is clear I was waiting beyond you just

asking her if she recalled that case for some

question, but since we've gone beyond that and

there have been statements by you about a case,

I'll go ahead and object to the reference to

any other case or the Judge's conduct in any

other case or her actions or inaction s or

decisions or the actions or inactions of others

in any other case. They are just not relevant

to Mrs. McCool's actions in the formal charges

that we 're here to discuss. And so I object to

the relevance of those and to the extent there

has been any statement by counsel that wo uld

have infringed upon a sealed record in a

juvenile matter. I would also move to strike

(504)831-1753 433 METAIRIE ROAD. #220


(800)7 49-17 53 METAJRlE, LA 70005

68

1 those comments from the transcript.

2 BY MR. DUCOTE:

3 Q Have you been recused in cases other than

4 cases that Mrs. Mccool has been counsel?

5 MR. FLANAGAN:

6 I'm going to object. It has nothing to do

7 with these formal charges, other recusals,

8 other cases. we'll be here for days. I think

9 that's completely improper.

10 MR. DUCOTE:

11 I don't know if we'll be here for days on

12 r e c u s a 1 s .

13 BY MR. DUCOTE:

14 Q Aga in, to the extent that there are

15 allegations of sealed confidential record s being

16 i mp roper 1 y u ti 1 i zed , have you ever faxed

17 confi denti a 1 court records to your husband's 1 aw

18 firm?

19 MR. MANNING:

20 I object. I object to the relevance of

21 that.

22 MR . FLANAGAN:

23 Same objection. It has nothing to do with

24 the formal charges.

25 MR . MANNING:

(504)831-1753 . ·-

HlJFFMAN & ROBINSON, INC. 433 METAIRIE ROAD, #220 CERTIFIED COURT REPORTERS

(800)749-1753 METAIRIE, LA 70005

69 1 And the Judge is not charged with any

2 misconduct here and questions that may be

3 intending to try to expose some perceived

4 conduct by the Judge are wholly inappropriate.

5 BY MR. DUCOTE:

6 Q Judge Amacker, I want to go back to what

7 you say Mrs. Mccool did that was improper concerning

8 the internet. Do you see any difference between

9 what Mrs. McCool did as reflected in the formal

10 c h a r g e s i f , i n fact , s h e d i d a n y o f t h at com pa r e d t o

11 what you j ai 1 ed the mother in the TD v FXA case

12 concerning use of the internet to criticize you and

13 your decisions?

14 MR. MANNING:

15 Object again to the relevance of that

16 q u e s t i o n .

17 BY MR. DUCOTE:

18 Q As I pointed out in my answer that a lot

~ of these things are protected free speech in First

20 Circuit case of TD v FXA 2013 cuo453 - -

21 A Let me stop you right here, Mr. Ducote.

22 That case is sti 11 pending, and the bottom 1 i ne is I

23 cannot comment nor can Mrs. Mc Cool as a judicial

24 candidate for office and you would be her agent, you

2 5 cannot ask me questions. There can be no comment

(504)831-1753 433 lVfETAlRIE ROAD, #220


(800)749-1753 METAIRIE, LA 70005

70 1 about a case that is still pending in my division or

2 any other division. I will not answer questions

3 about that case or any other pending case,

4 Mr. Ducote.

5 MR. DUCOTE:

6 I guess I'll deal with this at the hearing

7 perhaps.

8 BY MR. DUCOTE:

9 Q Do you recall the January 22 , 2013, letter

10 s e n t to M r . Man n i n g , w h i c h h as b e e n ma r k e d as o D c 13

11 and ask you if you recognize that?

12 A

13 Q

14 A

15 Q

16 A

17 Q

I do.

okay. And that's the letter you wrote?

If you can let me read the whole thing.

sure.

Yes, I'm familiar with this.

Now, in this 1 ette r you say, quote, my

18 s t a ff at to r n e y Am b e r Mi t c h e 1 1 r e c e i v e d an o n y mo u s

19 v o i c e ma i 1 i n t h e 1 at e s um m e r o f 2 0 11 , a 1 e rt i n g h e r

20 to a website and stating that, quote, fax about a

21 case in our division are in a website along with

22 contact information directing persons to go c ontact

23 the Judge and her staff regarding this case. Due to

24 safety concerns you've relayed this information to

2 5 me and I viewed the website in question.

(504)831·1753 HUFFMAN & ROBINSON, L re. 433 wIBTAlRlE ROAD, #220 CERTIFIED COURT REPORTERS

At least

(800)749·1753 METAIRIE, LA 70005

1 two individuals unrelated to the case contacted me

2 personally or left messages conveying that

3 disturbing petitions were directed to me are on the

4 internet and the individual s were concerned and

5 wanted me to be aware of this.

6 That's the end of the quote from this

7 letter. Now, what was disturbing about the

8 petitions that were directed to you? Did they

9 threaten your safety?

71

10 A Mr . Ducote , they threaten the independence

11 and the integrity of the j udi ci ary. That is what i s

12 disturbing to me about those communications.

13 Q what was the language in the petitions

14 that th re ate n e d t h e i n de p e n den c e and i n t e g r i t y of

15 j u di c i a r y?

16 A The language that we just went over

17 earlier where the petition asked people to contact

18 t h e i n d i vi d u a 1 j u d g e s i n a n e ff o rt t o g et t h em to

19 ch an g e the i r mi n d i n connect i on w i th cert a i n cases .

20 The language in there in which confidential, sealed

21 proceedings concerning two minor children who

22 allegedly were sexually abused that , that

23 confidential, seal ed , closed information i s in the

24 petition . Those would be two things that I find

25 very disturbing. The third thing is the comments

(504)831 · l 753 433 METAIRIE ROAD, #220


(800)749· l 753 METAIRIE, LA 70005

72

1 that are made directed to and about the judges based

2 on the allegations in the petition which are very

3 disturbing and concerning, particularly to family

4 court judges who deal with very sensitive family

5 court matters and are subject to high emotion s from

6 people, and there are definitely safety concerns

7 that arise when you get these type of communications

8 directed to the public who do not have full

9 knowledge of what has occurred in these proceedings.

10 Q well, did anybody threaten you personally,

11 physically?

12 A In connection with these cases?

13 Q Yes, ma'am.

14 A Online, yes .

15 Q who did?

16 A There have been many comments made,

17 Mr. Ducote, many of which are taken down as soon as

18 t h e y we re mad e , b e ca u s e t h e y a r e t h r eat e n i n g i n

19 nature and if you know Facebook ® and other s ites,

20 you cannot keep a site up if comments deemed as

21 threaten i n g rem a i n on the sites . so there have been

22 many comments made. As far as particular comments,

23 if you look right no w probably on some of the sites,

24 some of these people make comments that I or Judge

25 Devereux are satanic. we are evil people.

(504)831·1753 HUFFMAN & ROBINSON, INC. 433 METAIRIE ROAD, #220 CERTIFIED COURT REPORTERS

we need

(800)749·1753 METAIRIE, LA 70005

73

1 to be stopped. we need to be federally indicted or

2 criminally charged. These are very threatening

3 comments, yes , they are to sitting judges. And I

4 see them as an effort to influence and intimidate me

s as a judge.

6 Q so did Mrs. McCool make any of these

7 co mments?

8 A I can't tell yo u s pecifically but my

9 recollection is that in the 1 east s he has these

10 1 o c at e d o n h e r Fa c e boo k ® s i t e s , v a r i o u s s i t e s , an d

11 has 1 inks to these. Now whether she individually

12 made them o r not , I can ' t t e 11 you r i g ht now ,

13 Mr. Ducote.

14 Q so, for example, if s omebody says, "Judge

15 Amacker should be prose c uted," do you take that as a

16 p e r s o n a 1 t h r e at ?

17 A well, fir st of all, for an example, I

18 didn't say that's exactly what it said. I don't

19 w a n t to s p e c u 1 at e o n w h e t h e r o r n o t an y t h i n g t h at

20 has n ' t been s a i d i s a p e r s on a 1 th r e at . I gave you

21 specific examples that have been on these si t es that

22 Mrs. Mc coo l is a party to and 1 inks to her sites.

23 That's what I was referring.

24 Q What language did you find to be most

25 re flect ive of a personal threat against you?

(504)831-1753 433 METAIRIE ROAD, #220

HUFFMA N & ROBINSON, INC. CERTIFIED COURT REPORTERS

(800)749-1753 METAIRIE,LA 70005

74 1 A what language? By whom ?

2 Q By anybody that you said. This was on the

3 internet?

4 A Mr. Ducote, there's so much I can't even

5 begin. Ev en the office of Disciplinary counsel, I

6 can't spend e v ery day of my life transmitting to

7 th e m the variou s comments that are made . The se are

8 in the hundreds at this point in time. Maybe

9 thousand s , Mr. Ducote, on the various sites,

10 we b s i t e , Fa c e b o o k ® p a g e s , " P r o s e c u t e J u d g e Dawn

11 Amacker. Just say no to Judge Amacker in 2014 . "

12 s h awn Am a c k e r , w h i c h i s an i m p e r s o n at i o n of me , a

13 Facebook ® page that had to be taken down in the last

14 two or three weeks in which my picture wa s placed on

15 a Face book ® s i t e and Mrs . Mccool l i k e d i t on her

16 pa g e a n d h ad a l i n k to i t f r om h e r pa g e , h e r b e i n g

17 fully a wa re, she has to know that I am not named

18 s h awn Am a c k e r an d i n w h i c h d i s p a r a g i n g l i n k s we r e

19 co n n e ct e d to m e . Fa c ebook ® has taken this do wn as

20 an imper s on at ion , Mr. Ducote . I do find that

21 di s tu rbi ng , and I do find that a threat to my

22 safety, yes, I do.

23 Q So to get back to my que s tion. what

24 language ? You s aid there are hundreds of thousands

25 so there must be something --


(800)749-1753 METAJRIE, LA 70005

1 A I did not say that, Mr. Ducote. I said,

2 "Hundreds perhaps thousands."

3 Q so can you name maybe one or two that are

4 actually threatening you in some way other than the

5 ones you mentioned or if those are the threats - -

6 A I can't name you specifically right now,

7 Mr. Ducote, and as I've said the more threatening

8 ones have been taken down.

9 Q For example, Mrs. Mccool actually had

10 J u d g e Ga m b re 11 i s s u e a war rant f o r he r a r rest i n

11 Mi ssi ssi ppi which she withdrew after Mrs. McCool

12 f i l e d a j u d i c i a r y com p l a i n t a g a i n s t h e r . was there

75

13 anything that was that you felt as threatening to

14 your person al safety as a warrant i s sued by a judge

15 who had no jurisdiction over Mrs. Mccool for her

16 a r r e s t ? An y t h i n g t h at was - -

17 A You' re speaking about a confidential

18 judiciary complaint in the state of Mississippi? Is

19 that what you're referring to? I'm asking. Is that

20 what you ' re refer r i n g to?

21 Q Yes.

22 A And you're asking me, what, in response to

23 that?

24 Q I'm asking you if there was any threat

25 that was made against you that was as real or even

(504)831·1753 433 METAIRIE ROAD, #220


(800)749·1753 METAIRIE, LA 70005

1 potentially real as a warrant for Mrs. McCool 's

2 arrest issued by Judge Gambrell?

3 A I can't answer that question.

76

4 Q Now, one of the things in the complaint is

5 on page 14 it says, "on the web site HTTP

6 sheeplessinamerica.blogspot.com on August 25, 2011.

7 Respondent posted a blog article entitled "Justice

8 for and ," when she discussed the

9 underlying case and stated, "Horrified. call the

10 j u d g es and 1 et them know . "

11 Is it your position that it is improper

12 f o r a me m b e r o f t h e p u b 1 i c t o co n t a ct yo u r o ff i c e

13 and say I'm horrified at a decision you made?

14 MR. FLANAGAN:

15 Object to the form .

16 A You want to rephrase your question,

17 M r . o u c o t e .

18 BY M R • DU C 0 TE :

19 Q Not really. I think it's pretty clear .

20 MR. MANNING:

21 could you restate the question, please?

2 2 MR. DUCOTE:

23 sure.

24 BY MR. DUCOTE:

25 Q Do you think it's improper or an ex parte

(504)831 ·1753 433 METAIRIE ROAD, #220


(800)749-1753 METAIRIE, LA 70005

77 1 communication or somehow inappropriate for a member

2 of the public who disagrees with a decision you made

3 to contact your office and s ay, "I'm horrified with

4 what you did in this case"?

5 MR. FLANAGAN:

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

I'm going to object to the for m. I think

it's a mischaracteri z ation because it doesn't

say a member of the public did that.

th e respondent did that .

But subject to t he objection.

MR. DUCOTE:

It s ays

It doesn't say t he r e spondent contacted

the office.

A You're asking me to speculate.

15 BY MR. DUCOTE:

16 Q No. I'm asking you to say if you consider

17 that something that a member of the public can't do

18 o r s h o u l d n ' t d o o r i s i n a p p r o p r i at e o r - -

19 A That would not be for me to s a y . I can

20 tell you th a t ex part e communication to a judge when

21 there is pending litigation in which you seek to

22 change th e ir opinion or bully, inti mi da t e, or harass

23 them would be s omething th a t would require, in my

24 opinion, notice to the Office of Di sci pl i na ry

25 counsel about the conduct if an attorney i s

(504)831-1753 433 IvIETAIRIE ROAD, #220


(800)749·1753 METAJRIE, LA 70005

78 1 involved.

2 Q so did Mrs. McCool intimidate, bully, or

3 harass you?

4 A I can tell you that purportedly there are

5 communications on the internet and that have been

6 sent to me in particular this petition in which her

7 name is on there. That, if indeed these come from

8 Mrs. Mccool and you know I have nothing to say about

9 that, but if indeed they come from her and they

10 p u r po rt t o , t h e y c o u 1 d b e s e e n as a n e ff o r t to

11 inti mi date, influence, bul 1 y, and change the opinion

12 of a j u d g e w h i c h d o e s , i n my o p i n i o n , p u t i n

13 jeopardy the independ e nce and the integrity of the

14 j u di c i a 1 a re a .

15 Q Di d you ever contact 1 aw enforceme nt about:

16 an y o f t h i s ?

17 A I have not contacted law enforcement:,

18 M r . o u cot e .

19 Q rs it your contention that if you seal

20 records in a case that: if anybody t:al ks about: the

21 case in any way that that: so mehow violates the seal

22 of the records?

23 MR. FLANAGAN:

24 object to the fo rm.

25

(504)831· 1753 HUFFMAN & ROBINSON, INC. 433 METAIRIE ROAD, #220 CERTIFIED COURT REPORTERS

(800)749·17 53 METAIRIE, LA 70005

1 BY MR. DUCOTE:

2 Q For example, if there's a case involving

3 John Doe and Mary Doe and they have a child named

4 Christian Doe and you seal that record and somebody

5 who has knowledge of the case says that Judge

6 Amacker gave custody of christen Doe to John Doe,

7 that that somehow violates the sealing of the

8 records?

9 A I'm not going to speculate on that,

79

10 M r . D u cot e . Th i s o b vi o u s 1 y - - a n d yo u a r e aw a r e yo u

11 have made an issue in some cases that are pending or

12 may s t i 1 1 b e p e n d i n g b e f o re t h e co u r t .

13 speculate on that.

14 Q we 11 - -

I will not

15 A Let me finish my explanation. The vast

16 majority of the cases that are sealed and perhaps

17 al 1 -- I haven't 1 ooked at al 1 of them, but al 1 of

18 t h e c as e s t h at w o u 1 d b e at i s s u e w i t h M r s . Mccoo 1

19 t h at a re s e a 1 e d a r e s e a 1 e d b y 1 aw n o t s e a 1 e d b y me .

20 They're sealed because there are adoption records.

21 This 1s by law. You can disagree with that or

22 Mrs. McCool can or not, but that is the 1 aw.

23 Also, the juvenile cases are sealed by

24 1 aw. In many of the cases, the attorneys, they

25 request because of the allegations which we get

(504)831 ·1753 433 METAIRIE ROAD, #220


(800)749· l 753 METAIRIE, LA 70005

1 tremendously serious allegations of violence and

2 abuse particularly those protected towards children

3 and they ask for r ecords to be sealed. The court

4 considers it and if there is just cause, those

5 records are sealed. I just want to make clear when

80

6 you're talking about me sealing records, the various

7 possibilities of why and when a record is sealed in

8 family court.

9 Q But in the same light a judge can also

10 s o rt o f i m p 1 y to 1 i t i g a n t s t h at i f t h e y d o n ' t s e a 1

11 the record something is wrong with them because they

12 want this stuff all over the place and that may pose

13 to risk to them of their own c ustodial status. That

14 can a 1 so happen ?

15

16

A

Q

I won't spec ulate on that, Mr. Ducote.

Do you have any knowledge about

17 Mrs . Mccoo 1 act u a 11 y ta k i n g court documents that are

18 s u b j e ct to s ea 1 a n d s om e h ow c i r c u 1 at i n g t h e

19 documents themselves as opposed to discussing facts

20 that may be contained or referenced somew here in a

21 document that is sea 1 ed?

22 A I can't tell you off the top of my head,

23 you know, that I have any particular kn owl edge of

24 her taking documents out of sea 1 ed records. I know

25 there are references to documents from sealed

(504)831-1753 433 METAIRIE ROAD, #220


(800)749-1753 METAIRIE, LA 70005

81

1 records that she makes, ye s.

2 Q And is it your belief that that's the same

3 thing if you mention something that somehow is

4 mentioned in a sealed document that that's the same

5 offense, for lack of a better term, as revealing

6 documents in itself?

7 MR. FLANAGAN:

8 I'm going to object. I think that's been

9 asked and answered. I think it also asks for a

10 1 e g a 1 co n c 1 u s i o n .

11 BY MR. DUCOTE:

12 Q

13 A

14 Q

Do you have an answer for that?

No. There wa s an objection .

I understand there was an objection, but I

15 don't that precludes you from answering.

16 A well , I'm not going to answer it.

17 Q Have you expressed any position to the

18 office of Disciplinary counsel as to whether or not

19 M r s . M cc o o 1 s h o u 1 d b e t h e s u b j e c t o f f o rm a 1

20 di sci p 1 i nary action?

21 A I would not suggest to the office of

22 Di sci pl i nary counsel that they should fi 1 e formal

23 charges against an attorney. That is their

24 de c i s i on .

25 Q Have they ever asked you, anybody in the

(504)831-17 53 433 NlETAIRIE ROAD, #220


(800)749-1753 METAIRIE, LA 70005

1 office of Disciplinary counsel, whether or not you

2 thought Mrs. McCool should be somehow disciplined

3 for her actions in your court?

4 A No. They don't ask my opinions on those

5 things, Mr . Ducote.

6

7

8

Q

A

Q

Have you ever given them your opinion?

No. I answered that.

Do you have an opinion as to whether

9 Mrs. Mccool should be di sci pl i ned?

10 MR. MANNING:

11 I object to that.

12 MR. DUCOTE:

13 This goes to bias.

14 MR. MANNING:

15 It calls for her to speculate. It calls

16 for her to render an opinion, again, on one of

82

17 the ultimate conclusions and recommendations to

18 be made by the Hearing Committee and the court

19 as w h et h e r o r n o t M r s . M c co o 1 s h o u 1 d b e

20 s an ct i one d for her conduct .

21 MR. DUCOTE:

22

23

24

25

I think I can inquire about bias. what

her opinion is about, whether there should or

should not be disciplinary proceedings against

Mrs. Mccool, I think -- especially given the

(504)831·1753 4331\!IETAIRIE ROAD, #220

HUFFJ\IIAN & ROBINSON, INC. CERTIFIED COURT REPORTERS

(800)749·1753 METAIRIE, LA 70005

83

1 facts that hav e been offered that --

2 MR. MANNING:

3 I maintain my objection especially s ince

4 the Judge has already answered the question

5 that she has never suggested to us or offered

6 her opinion as to whether or not charges should

7 be filed nor have we ever asked her for her

8 opinion.

9 MR. DUCOTE:

10 That's a different question as to whether

11 or not she has an opinion or harbor s an

12 opinion.

13 BY MR. DUCOTE:

14 Q so that's what I'm asking: Do you have in

15 your mind an opinion as to whether or not

16 Mrs . Mccoo 1 sh o u 1 d be di sci p 1 i n e d for her conduct i n

17 your court or on the internet or wherever you think

18 s h e ' s d o n e s om et h i n g ?

19 A Mr. Ducote, if I can answer. Just as I

20 try a case and all of the pieces of the puz z le have

21 to come together before I reach an opinion, I am not

22 the tryer of fact in this case. I am not the

23 Hearing committee. It would be improper for me to

24 reach a con cl usi on on whether or not she is -- she

25 has violated the code of Professional

(504)831·1753 433 METAIRIE ROAD, #220


(800)749·1753 ME'l'AIRIE, LA 70005

1 Res pon s ibility. I can t e ll you th at a s a judge the

2 fact that this has gone on for three years and has

3 dr agge d on in my opinion without a resolution and

4 the se things remain on the internet and the se

5 matters unresolved is ex tremely fru strating to a

6 judge, I would believe any judge who i s involved in

7 this. And, yes, I do want to see a co nclusion and

8 closure on this, so that we can move on to the

9 important matters that we have in family court that

10 i n v o 1 v e fa mi 1 i e s an d c h i 1 d r e n .

84

11 But I would not presume to tell ooc or any

12 o t h e r j u d g e o r h e a r i n g o ff i c i a 1 w h at t h e i r u 1 t i mate

13 conclusion should be. I just do believe in do want

14 q u i c k c 1 o s u re o n t h e i s s u e s t h at r em a i n , r em a i n - -

15 as a matter of fact prob a bly have esca lated si nce

16 t h e o r i g i n a 1 c om p 1 a i n t s h av e b e e n mad e . So, yes, I

17 do wish for a nd hope for a swift resolution to these

18 matt e r s an d d o n o t a po 1 o g i z e f o r t h at .

19 Q And appreciate that but that was n't the

20 q u es ti on as k e d . The que st ion is: Do you hav e an

21 opinion -- and I know you're not the tryer of fact.

22 I'm just asking for a personal opinion in your own

23 mind whether you desire that she been disciplined

24 for the conduct that you think she engaged in?

25 MR. MANNING:

(504)831·1753 HUFFMAN & ROBINSON, INC. 433 METAIR.IE ROAD, #220 CERTIFIED COURT REPORTERS

(800)7 49· l 7 53 METAIRIE, LA 70005

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

object to the relevancy of that question.

MR. DUCOTE:

It goes to bias. I can explore her bias.

If she has no facts but has belief that

something bad should happen to Mrs. McCool,

then that would be something that is an

appropriate subject of inquiry .

MR. MANNING:

she's not sitting as a tryer fact in this

case. Even if she had a bias sitting here

11 today, it has no bearing on the outcome of the

12 facts and the evidence that wi 11 be presented

13 to the Hearing committee who will make the

14 decision and recommendation about whether or

15 not Mrs . Mccool should be sanctioned. So,

16 again, the relevancy of that question doesn't

17 lend itself to any issue of bias that would

18 h e l p u s i n a n y way i n t h e s e p r o c e e d i n g s .

19 MR. DUCOTE:

20 Just in response, a witness can always be

21 questioned about bi as. If, in fact -- and

22 we've heard and I've asked repeatedly about

23

24

25

facts and gotten her answers. If, in fact,

that's the factual knowledge she has and is

going to be testifying in some way or another,

85

(504)831-1753 433 l\llETAJRIE ROAD, #220


(800)749-1753 ME'fAJRIE, LA 70005

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

I suppose, if she has as an opinion that she

should be somehow disciplined without facts to

back it up, then that's bias and I can ask

about it. I'm not asking her to decide the

86

case. I'm just asking her just as if this were

a criminal matter and you had a witness that

says "I believe that person ought to go to

jail."

"what did they do?"

"Well, I'm not really sure, but they

should go to jail."

That would be a proper question. That's

13 essentially what I'm asking by analogy.

14 MR . MANNING:

15 My objection has been prese rved for the

16 re co rd .

17 BY MR. DUCOTE:

18

19

Q

A

Do you have a personal opinion about that?

I'm not going to answer the question bas ed

20

21

22

23

24

25

on the objections. I will say this, Mr. Ducote, I

have an interest in seeing a resolution to the

conduct that ha s been brought to the attention of

the ODC . I definitely have an opinion that that

conduct should stop. That is the opinion that I

have in this case. I have a n opinion that this

(504)831·1753 HUFFMAN & ROBINSON, INC. 433 METAIRIE ROAD, #220 CERTIFIED COURT REPORTERS

(800)749·1753 METAIRIE, LA 70005

1 should have been stopped years ago, Mr. Ducote.

2 That is the opinion that I have. And that is where

3 I hope we' re headed, that the conduct which

4 continues to this day ends. That's the opinion I

5 have.

6 Q so let's take that conduct. what conduct

7 that has been done by Mrs. McCool needs to be

8 stopped?

87

9 A I stand by the conduct that is detailed in

10 the letters that I have responded to the office of

11 Di sci pl i nary counsel on the facts in this case. A 11

12 of those without going back through all of those

13 again, Mr. Ducote, all of those facts would be the

14 th i n gs that need to stop .

15 Q That might be -- do you know how many

16 letters you wrote to the Office of Disciplinary

17 counsel?

18 A I do not.

19 Q I showed you ooc 13. That's the

20 January 22, 2013, 1 etter. That would be one. And I

21 think you sti 11 have ODC 12, which is March 28,

22 2012, 1 etter.

23 THE WITNESS:

24 can we take a break?

25 (Recess taken, 3: 11; Resumed 3:18.)

(504)831· l7 53 433 METAIRIE ROAD, #220


(800)749· 1753 METAIRIE, LA 70005

1

2

3

4

5

MR. DU COTE:

I don't think I have any other questions.

MR . MANNING:

I have no questions, Judge. wel 1, I have

lots of question, but I'm reserving my

6 question s for the hearing in this matter.

7 MR. FLANAGAN:

8 Do you want to read and s ign?

9 THE WITNESS:

10 I ' 1 1 d e f e r to yo u .

11 MR. FLANAGAN:

12 L et ' s d o t h at .

13 Read and sign.

14 (Whereupon the Deposition concluded at 3:20. )

15 * * * * * * * 16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

88

(504)831-1753 4331\IBTAIRIE ROAD, #220


(800)749-1753 META.IRIE, LA 70005

1 WITNESS' CERTIFICATE

2

3

4 I, HONORABLE DAWN AMACKER, the undersigned, do

5 hereby certify that I have read the foregoing

6 deposition and it contains a true and correct

7 transcript of the testimony given by me:

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

( ) Without corrections.

( ) With corrections as reflected on

errata sheet(s) prepared by me and

made a part hereof.

HONORABLE DAWN AMACKER

Date

89

(504)831·l753 433 METAIRIE ROAD, #220


(800)749· l 753 METAIRIE, LA 70005

1 REPORTER'S CERTIFICATE

2

3 I, BROOK KERRIGAN, Certified court Reporter , in and

4 for the State of Louisiana, do hereby certify that

90

5 HONORABLE DAWN AMACKER, after having been duly sworn

6 by me upon authority of R.S. 37:2554, did testify as

7 hereinbefore set forth in the foregoing 89 pages;

8 that this testimony was reported by me in the

9 stenotype reporting method, was prepared and

10 t r a n s c r i b e d by m e o r u n d e r my p e r s o n a 1 d i r e c t i o n a n d

11 supervision, and is a true and correct transcript to

12 the best of my ability and understanding; that the

13 transcript or by rules of the board; that I have

14 acted i n comp 1 i an c e w i th the pro hi bi ti on on

15 co n t r act u a 1 re 1 at i o n s h i p s , as d e f i n e d by L o u i s i a n a

16 code of c i vi 1 Pro c e du re Art i c 1 e 14 3 4 and i n r u 1 es

17 and adv i so r y op i n i on s of the board ; that I am not

18 r e 1 at e d t o co u n s e 1 o r to t h e pa rt i e s h e r e i n , n o r am

19 I otherwise interested in the outcome of this

20 matter.

21

22

23

24

25

(504)831 · l753 433 METAIRIE ROAD, #220

~--~-~-----BROOK KERRIGAN, RPR, CCR

CERTIFIED COURT REPORTER


(800)749·1753 METAIRIE, LA 70005

2014-01-22 amacker depo_redacted

Documents

quest i

d i n ad mi n i

y r e s e r v e d

e d o r

n d e x

s t i p u

po s i ti

n d f o r t h e s t