201104 american renaissance

8/6/2019 201104 American Renaissance

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/201104-american-renaissance 1/16American Renaissance - 1 - April 2011

The Colonization of Europe

Vol. 22 No. 4

There is not a truth existing which I fear or would wish unknown to the whole world.— Thomas Jefferson

April 2011

American Renaissance

How Europe could becomeEurabia.

by Filip Dewinter

I would like to start with the wordsof the leader of a Belgian Muslimorganization with the straightfor-

ward name of Sharia4Belgium. OnJune 15, 2010, Abu Imran said: “Wewon’t rest until Europe has become anIslamic state. And then we will marchon towards the White House and theVatican. We will carry out the promiseof our dear Prophet. In a peaceful way,but we will continue until the Lordgrants us victory.”

As far back as 1974, Algerian Presi-dent Houari Boumedienne told the Gen-eral Assembly of the United Nations:“One day, millions of men will leavethe Southern Hemisphere to go to the

Northern Hemisphere. And they willnot go there as friends. Because theywill go there to conquer it. And they willconquer it with their sons. The wombs of our women will give us victory.”

Boumedienne’s prediction is becom-

migration for marriage, and asylum,each year about two million non-Euro-peans receive residence permits fromthe European Union.

And just as immigration and highbirth rates are dramatically increasingthe number of non-European immi-

grants, white Europe is on the verge of extinction. With the exception of Alba-nia, which consists mainly of Muslims,not a single European country has a birthrate high enough to maintain its popula-tion. The number of native Europeanscould fall to half in less than 50 years.

This means the ethnic composition of Europe is dramatically changing. Oneout of seven of Germany’s 82 millioninhabitants is of foreign descent. For

United Kingdom, one out of nine peoplewas born abroad. In the Netherlands, one

In Belgium, immigrants account for one

sixth of the population. An astonishing70 percent of the people of Brussels,the capital of Europe, are immigrants(including other Europeans), and thatpercentage will rise to 85 per cent by

2020. In my own city of Antwerp, 40percent of the population is foreign,

in 2020.

live in Europe, mostly in Germany,France, the Netherlands, and Austria.

in Europe, primarily in France, Spain,

the Netherlands, Belgium, and Sweden.

Europe, mostly in France and Britain.The number of Asians in Europe runsto about four million, with one millionPakistanis in Britain alone. Europealso counts about 2.2 million SouthAmericans, mainly in Spain, Portugal,

and Italy.The Western World is being invad-ed—not by armed men, but by millionsof penniless immigrants. The result isrising crime rates, overburdened socialservices, unemployment, school failure,immigrant riots, a white exodus fromareas dominated by immigrants, andthe arrival of such barbaric practices asforced marriages, honor killings, ritualslaughter of animals, and female genital

Continued on page 3

Just as AIDS weakensthe physical resistance

of human beings, multi-culturalism weakens theidentity of a people and a

civilization.

Public prayer in Milan in the square before the famous cathedral.


http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/201104-american-renaissance 2/16

American Renaissance - 2 - April 2011

Letters from ReadersSir — I have long had an interest in

monitoring the academic and politicalcareer of Daniel Patrick Moynihan,

since both his forbears and mine areburied in the same Irish cemetery. Theauthor of “Saving the Negro Fam-ily” in the March 2011 issue of AR isright about Moynihan. Yes, he was “a

showed very little political courage inhis long and relatively undistinguishedcareer in the US Senate, where he es-sentially functioned as a political hack.Only an academic “intellectual” such asMoynihan would be surprised to learnthat if you actually paid people not towork, they would not work! In many

respects Moynihan the politician was asphony as his affected Oxford accent.Daniel Patrick Hayes, Rego Park,

N.Y.

Sir — Bravo to Stephen Websterfor his exhaustively researched Janu-ary cover story on the 2010 midtermelections, “The Great White Wave.”He demonstrated pretty conclusivelythat the white vote was the overwhelm-ing reason for the huge GOP victories.Interestingly, noted demographer Wil-

liam Frey at the left-of-center BrookingsInstitution was quoted in a recent articleon the subject of blacks moving into theSouth in large numbers. He warned thatsince blacks vote Democratic, Southernpoliticians had better listen to themcome election time. Mr. Frey, like al-most every establishment demographerand political analyst, is always lookingfor ways to increase the electoral powerof non-whites. He ignores the big el-ephant in the room: the votes of the great

unwashed white electorate. It’s hard tobelieve this is anything other than racialhostility to whites (par for the course foracademia).

Mr. Webster’s cover story, however,

may just be the elephant that knocksdown Mr. Frey’s door and barges intohis room. If the elephant gets in, willhe have to sit on Mr. Frey to make himunderstand the importance of the whitevote and of his own racial animositiesand biases?

Ken Reynolds, Bronx, N.Y.

Sir — I recently stumbledonto an “interesting” bookin the prison library: NatureKnows No Color Line , written

in the 1950s by a black mannamed J. A. Rogers. He ap-parently wrote other books onrace, including one called Sex and Race .

The point of the book canbe inferred from the title: thatmiscegenation is both naturaland common. So common, infact, that this Jim Crow-erablack author claims that actual“racism” is rather rare, andthat most whites either engagein race-mixing or at least approve of it.

After reading the book, one would thinkthat all whites lust after blacks, idolize

etc., and that white women in particularare taken with black men. His evidence?Accounts of several instances of black/ white pairings.

Rogers claims that most Europeanshave African blood and do not realizeit, and that many millions of Americanwhites are part black. He says manyblacks disappeared into the white race

by “passing” as whites, thus contribut-ing black genes to future generations.He also claims Beethoven, Goethe, andother famous Europeans were actuallyblacks passing for whites. I think it issafe to assume he is not taken seriouslyas a scholar.

I’m 39 and have been in prison for17 years. Younger whites who end uphere tell me “times have changed,” thatmiscegenation is on the rise, and that“white girls date black guys left andright.” Granted, I’ve been inside a longtime, but I have managed to keep opena channel to the outside world. I am notconvinced that race-mixing is all thatprevalent.

As AR itself has reported, marriagestatistics continue to show that of allgroups, white women are least likely tomarry outside their race. Since peopletend to marry the people they date, I as-

sume this holds true for dating as well.White men are naturally conscious of white women. Therefore, when we seea white woman with a non-white man,it sticks in our consciousness more thanother mixed-race parings. For example,we don’t generally care when we see anIndian man with a Chinese woman. Atthe end of a day, if we see three or fourwhite woman/black man pairings, it will

seem as if we saw themeverywhere, forget-ting that we may havepassed several hundred

white couples at thesame time. In the end,white women recog-nize that white men aresmarter, better looking,and more reliable thanmen of other races,and the overwhelmingmajority will stick withtheir race. With all duerespect to Mr. Rog-ers, nature does indeedknow color, and quite

well at that.

Eric Schroeder, Lawrenceville Cor-rectional Center, Lawrenceville, Va.

Sir — Why, oh why, do you sprinklefull stops—periods, I think you callthem—over or around (almost) everycaption and sub-heading in your other-wise superbly literate magazine? Theyare utterly unnecessary, pointless, and—to me at least—infuriating!

Anthony Young, London, England




mutilation.As the native European population

shrinks, there is still an enormous popu-lation growth in Third-World countries.Sixty years ago, there were three timesas many Europeans as black Africans;now black Africans outnumber Europe-ans. By 2030, there will be almost twiceas many black Africans as Europeans.At current growth rates, the populationof black Africa will reach one billion by2017 and 1.3 billion by 2030. If Europedoes not stand up to the immigrationinvasion and enforce a strict immigra-tion policy, its population threatens to

be overrun by a tsunami of indigentThird-World immigrants.

Another threat Europe faces is thepossible admission of Turkey to theEuropean Union. In 1987, Turkey ap-

vetoed admission, but withdrew its vetoin 1999, and since that time, Turkey has

In 2005, the EU began negotiating withTurkey for possible admission.

In 2010, there were 501 million peo-

ple living in the 27 member states of theEU. The accession of a non-EuropeanMuslim country with almost 80 millioninhabitants would be pure madness. Forhundreds of years, Europe had to pro-tect its eastern borders against Turkishimperialism. It was not until the 19th

almost freed from Turkish invaders. If Turkey were to gain EU membership,Europe’s gates would be opened to itsancient hereditary enemy.

If Turkey joins the EU, it will meannot only mill ions

more immigrants. Itwill mean a powerfulIslamic country caninfluence Europeanpolicy. It is impor-tant to note that since2003, Turkey has beengoverned by Islamicfundamentalists. Tur-key’s prime-minis-ter Tayyip Erdoganshowed his true colorsin 1997—before heentered the govern-

ment—when he said,“Mosques are our bar-racks, domes our helmets,

minarets our bayonets, believers oursoldiers.” He has also said, “Democracyis like a train, we shall get out when wearrive at the station we want.”

It would be unacceptable for Euro-pean elites to decide on the accession of Turkey without consulting the Europeanpeople. Therefore, a coalition of patri-otic parties—the Vlaams Belang in Bel-

gium, the Austrian Freedom Party, theLega Nord in Italy, the Danish PeoplesParty, and the Swedish Democrats—announced in October 2010 that theywould organize a popular initiative, asstipulated by the Lisbon Treaty, to putthis matter before the European people.We intend to organize a referendumin the entire EU on the accession of Turkey.

After communism

In the 1980s and ’90s, we werepleased to witness the fall of commu-nism. After the Soviet Union collapsedand its terrible crimes were revealed,communism lost its credibility. TheNew Left then used the immigrationproblem to dress communism up as

something new. Communists trans-formed themselves into anti-racists, andthe struggle for multiculturalism andagainst racism replaced the communistclass struggle and the proletarian revo-lution. Immigrants and other so-calledminority groups now play the role of the working-class proletariat. “Dis-crimination” rather than oppression of the workers has become the Left’s greatdemon. Minorities and immigrants mustbe emancipated, raised up, and trainedin multiculturalist thinking.

Ultimately, the objectives of com-munism and multiculturalism are thesame. Both strive for the equality of cultures and people, and want to createa new type of man, who is no longerdetermined by his cultural environment,but formed according to multiculturalprinciples.

In recent years, the working classhas changed sides politically. Manyordinary Europeans who might havesupported the Left during the heyday

Continued from page 1

American Renaissance is published monthly by theNew Century Foundation. NCF is governed by section501 (c) (3) of the Internal Revenue Code; contributionsto it are tax deductible.

Subscriptions to American Renaissance are $28.00 per year. First-class postage is

outside Canada and the U.S. (air mail) are $40.00. Back issues are $4.00 each. Foreignsubscribers should send U.S. dollars or equivalent in convertible bank notes.

Please make checks payable to: American Renaissance, P.O. Box 527, Oakton, VA

Web Page Address: www.AmRen.com

American Renaissance

Jared Taylor, EditorStephen Webster, Assistant EditorRonald N. Neff, Web Site Editor

Could be anywhere in Europe but happens to be Holland.

Erdogan: Only as much democracyas suits us.




and will stay that way!!! Autonomous Nationalists.”

earlier that Western Europe counts morethan 20 million Muslims, including il-legal immigrants. If we add Russia and

than 50 million Muslims in the wholeof Europe. According to projections,that number could grow to 73 millionby 2030.

Islam is like a typical predator: Itattacks only the weak, and Europe isweak. Our continent has lost its iden-

becoming an economic giant with feetof clay. Thanks to the transformationof communism into anti-racism andmulticulturalism, Europe is afraid todefend the norms and values of its owncivilization. Just as AIDS weakens thephysical resistance of human beings,multiculturalism weakens the identityand demographic resistance of a peopleand a civilization. Islam takes advantage

of this weakness. It is like a cuckoothat lays its egg in the warm Europeannest. We, Europeans, are unsuspect-ingly hatching this cuckoo egg and willeventually be cast out!

The cult of multiculturalism hasblinded Europe to the threat of Muslimfundamentalism. Since the 1980s, ex-

but governments and security serviceshave done nothing. Europe thus allowed

European soil. Extremist organizationsnot only plan terrorist attacks on Euro-

pean soil, they also spread fundamen-talist ideas among the growing Muslimcommunities in Europe. It is hardly

surprising that not just the bombings inMadrid and London but the September11 attacks on New York were planned

by Muslims living in Europe.Most Muslim extremists, of course,

do not commit terrorist attacks. Their -sion, intimidating dissenters, incitingMuslims who live in the West, andundermining Western civilization. In

Islamic circles, terrorism is simply amatter of tactics, not one of principle.

Meanwhile, the Muslim enclavesin European cities are getting biggerand bigger, and the authorities can

hardly maintain control overthem. Fundamentalist Muslimsuse these ghettos as bridgeheadsfor conquering the entire society.Fundamentalists control the Mus-lim community and replace demo-cratic rule and European normswith sharia, the system of Islamiclaw. In the suburbs of Paris, whereyoung Muslims often riot, there

zones in which the French authori-ties have almost completely lostcontrol. It is from these centers thatIslam spreads its tentacles.

Winston Churchill once said:“An appeaser is one who feeds acrocodile, hoping it will eat himlast.” The European establishmenthas tried to buy social peace by

making one concession after another toIslam. This strategy is suicidal. We givethe impression that we are weak, which

only strengthens Islam in its belief thatvictory is at hand.

Europe must make a choice: submitto invasion and Islamization, or resistand force Islam back. Unfortunately, thesupporters of multiculturalism are stillin control of the social debate in Europe.

Although the grip of the multicultural-ists is weakening, they still control

European politics and media, and haveeven managed to muzzle free speechwith so-called “hate speech” laws.

spirit. A European Renaissance is pos-sible only if we tear off the multiculturalstraitjacket, renounce cultural nihilism,resume our identity and cultural unique-ness, and dare to proclaim the superior-ity of our own civilization.

In order to save their continent, Eu-

their borders and stop the immigrationinvasion. Immigration policy must serve

our social and cultural needs, not thoseof foreign invaders.Europe must also confront Islam. It is

no use to declare a “war on terror” andat the same time ignore the political-religious reasons for the violence. Wemust dismantle the structures of Islam inEurope and force Islam back. Muslimsmust embrace Europe and integrate, orreturn to their countries of origin.

We should not be defeatist. All acrossEurope there are political parties that

British-born Anjem Choudary was a spokesman forIslam4UK before the British government banned the

over the White House.”



Are they illegals or are they on H-2B visas?

understand what is at stake. The partiesI mentioned earlier—my own VlaamsBelang, along with the Danish People’sParty, the Freedom Party of Austria,the Swedish Democrats, the Northern

League, as well as others—are fullyaware of the failures of multiculturalismand recognize the demographic threat.With enough effort and commitment,Europe will remain European.

Filip Dewinter is a senator in theFlemish parliament and a leader of theVlaams Belang. This article is adapted

from his talk at the 2011 American Re-naissance conference.

Desperate Shortage of Dishwashers!Scamming the system tokeep wages down.

by Henry Wolff

In his matter-of-fact way, Pat Buch-anan recently asked, “ Why are weimporting a million-plus workers a

year when 17 million Americans can’t

-

legally

H-2B guestworker program, the cousin

Because the H-2B program brings in

-

A January 2010 report by the Cen-

H-2B program, as well as its impact

rather than Americans or immigrants

or less automatic right to bring spouses

-

-

-

non-farm workers such as

-

-

The employer is notrunning ads because hewants US workers, but

because he wants to provethere aren’t any

US workers.




-

website ,the H-2B program allows businesses “to

-

-

show that H-2B guestworkers will notlower the wages or worsen the working

goes through a recruiter who has con-

-

-

can then return on another

--

-

how long H-2B workers stay,we know where they come

-

-

-

-

largest sources are Jamaica,-

94,304.

However, guestworkers whoextend their visas (which means theyhave not even gone back to their owncountry and are therefore not “return-ing”) do not count against the cap, whichis why laborers from Mexico alone

In 2005, President George W. Bushsigned the Save Our Small and SeasonalBusinesses Act (SOSSBA) that allowedfor yet more visas by exempting return-

ing H-2B guestworkers from counting

that once you got an H-2B visa, youcould keep “returning” year after year,and you would not be counted againstthe cap. As a result, more than 120,000returning workers got special “H-2R”

visas from 2005 to 2007, over and abovethe already exceeded fig-leaf cap of

-ness interests, however, SOSSBA wasallowed to expire in September 2007.

Some observers think Nancy

Between new, renewing, and return-ing H-2B guestworkers, numbers have

high of 129,547 in 2007. H-2B continuesto be popular, and many businesses arelobbying for the renewal of SOSSBA.

-

-

-The biggest joke of all.

Anchor children.




Who would you rather hire: these guys or Mexicans?

there aren’t any

-

-

-

newspaper whether H-2B employers

on the Internet, so they ask us to take it

Why do employers want foreign

found that for the unskilled jobs that are-

ers prefer Mexicans over Americans“because they perceive them as more

highly motivated, less likely to makedemands for raises, take sick days,or ask for improvements in workingconditions.” Many of the Americanswho would take these jobs are black,and Mr. Seminara writes that racialstereotypes help explain why employerswould rather hire Mexicans. He citesVanderbilt law professor Carol Swain,who says that “African American work-ers can be perceived as too demanding,[and] employers like the idea of beingable to import more docile workers, andsome black leaders have expressed a re-luctance to criticize another [allegedly]downtrodden group.”

There are other reasons to preferforeigners. The legal status of a H-2Bworker is completely dependent on hisemployer. If a worker fails to show up

his visa. He is tied to one employer,

and cannot just go out and look for an-other job. He knows he is lucky to havework at all, and that there is nothing forhim back in Mexico or Jamaica. Thismakes guestworkers very diligent, un-demanding employees. It is no wonderbusinesses want them, and that there iscorner-cutting to get them. What arethe safeguards against fraud? As DavidSeminara writes in his report, “[N] either

-

The Govern-ment Ac-count-

a fraud investigation in which its em-ployees phoned up H-2B labor recruitersand pretended to be looking for foreignworkers. In a September 2010 report,the GAO noted that although many

of the recruiters did not encourage thecallers to violate H-2B regulations,one Texas recruiter “suggested that wediscourage American workers from ac-cepting our landscaping job openings byhaving applicants run around the shopcarrying a 50-pound bag to determine

The recruiter also suggested conducting

interviews before 7 a.m. and requiringdrug testing prior to the interview as a

applicants. In addition, the recruitersuggested that our current American

a petition for H-2B workers to avoidarousing suspicion by Labor.”

Clearly, businesses can easily comeup with phony “proof” that there aren’tenough Americans for the jobs, and the

occupied by H-2B guestworkers suggest

their proofs are mostly rubbish. TheEconomic Policy Institute found that in

seven areas—food preparation, lodging,construction, motor freight, packing andmaterials handling, extraction occupa-tions, and grounds maintenance—that

employment averaged 7.4 percent,compared to national rates of 4.4 and

the differential is even greater, now that

Now, lug these around.




. . . and more family photos like these.

underestimates because they assumethat the fertility of immigrants will soonfall to that of Europeans, which it maywell not.

The projected increase in the numbersof non-Europeans in these countries isnot as great as in the United States or inBritain. Nevertheless, it is evident that if current trends continue, non-Europeanswill eventually become majorities.

Professor Coleman has called thesemomentous changes in European popu-lations “the third demographic transi-

the decline in mortality andfertility that took place in the19th century. He calls thesecond transition “shackingup and breaking up,” that isto say, “the radical changesin living arrangements, sexualhabits, and marriage, which

have bequeathed to this cen-tury a diversity of householdand living arrangements hith-erto unknown.” He points outthat these changes have:

upset the centuries-old pat-tern in much of Western

since the 1980s, [and] havespread to some Eastern Europeancountries as well. Divorce and abor-tion are nearly universally legalizedand in most cases made readily acces-

sible. Welfare arrangements and lawhave abolished the former distinctionbetween legitimate and illegitimatebirths. Sexual activity begins atyounger ages and is nearly universalbefore marriage. Cohabitation beforemarriage is regarded as normal in

many countries, with the popularity of marriage falling as its mean age risesto levels not seen since the 1930s.

Professor Coleman’s third demo-graphic transition is the replacement of indigenous Europeans by non-Europe-ans. He writes:

International migration may bring,in the long run, the most dramaticchanges of all in the social, cultural,political, and racial characteristics of

European and other developed coun-tries. If immigration persists at cur-rent levels it will transform Europe’s

ethnic and racial composition. Theforeign population in the EuropeanUnion is now about 24 million, of whom about 14 million are fromnon-European countries. That total,based on citizenship, considerablyunderstates—perhaps by up to one-

quarter—the number of foreign im-migrants, because of the rapid pace of naturalization. In France over the last20 years, naturalization has turnedforeigners into citizens faster thanthey arrive by immigration.

Professor Coleman concludes that“the growth of populations of foreignorigin … [will] render the populationsof 2100 unrecognizably different fromthose of 2000.”

The complacency of the Europeancitizens in the United Statesand Western Europe aboutthe mass immigration of alienpeoples, and the future pros-pect of becoming minori-ties in their own countries isunique in human history. Howthis mindset has come about

is contrary to what RobertArdrey described in his book,The Territorial Imperative , asthe human instinct to defendnational territory against in-vaders, yet somehow duringthe last half century the Eu-ropean peoples have lost thisinstinct.

References

Coleman, D. Immigration and ethnicchange in low-fertility countries: a third

demographic transition. Populationand Development Review

Coleman, D. Europe’s demographicfuture: Determinants, dimensions, andchallenges. Population and Develop-ment Review,

How Far Will They Go?The limits of conservativecommentary.

by Jared Taylor

CPAC (Conservative PoliticalAction Conference) was buzzingwith activity at its 2011 meeting,

which it held in Washington, DC, fromFebruary 10 through 12. CPAC hasbecome the largest mainstream con-servative gathering in the country, andattracted an estimated 11,000 people,including many of the stars of what

passes for American conservatism: Ronand Rand Paul, Tim Pawlenty, Newt

Gingrich, Mitt Romney, John Bolton,Michelle Bachman, Ann Coulter, andothers.

There were more than 170 speakersand panels, and much celebration of Ronald Reagan. There were talks on

traditional marriage, new media activ-ism, pop culture, rediscovering God,defense spending, grass roots activism,money raising, conservative women,careers in journalism, the Patriot Act,and Obamacare. There was even apanel called “Winning with Minorities,Women, and Independents,” chairedby an El Diario columnist and frequentTelemundo guest, Al Cardenas.

There were only four presentationsspecifically about immigration. The




Kevin Deanna and Bay Buchanan.

-tions for Real Immigration Reform,”with Mark Krikorian of the Center forImmigration Studies, and Kris Kobach,the newly-elected Secretary of Stateof Kansas. The group Citizens Unitedshowed its feature-length movie, Border War: The Battle Over Illegal Immigra-

tion , and Ayaan Hirsi Ali who wrote (see review, “Telling It As It Is,”AR, Dec. 2010) and former CIA direc-tor Jim Woolsey spoke on “The ShariaChallenge in the West.”

The most pointed discussion of im-migration, however, was sponsored by acampus group, Youth for Western Civi-lization, and was called “Will Immigra-tion Kill the GOP?” Panelists were Bay

Buchanan (sister of Patrick and head of Team America PAC), former congress-men Tom Tancredo and Virgil Goode,and brand-new congressman and formermayor of Hazleton, Pennsylvania, LouBarletta. I attended this panel to see howfar mainstream, immigration-controlconservatives were prepared to go.

Mr. Tancredo, who spoke first,certainly did more than any other con-gressman of his time to call attention tothe problem of immigration. In his talk,however, though he argued that thereare reasons to oppose current levels of

immigration, the GOP may not havemuch reason to worry about Hispanics.

of Hispanics both in Arizona and in therest of the country favored SB 1070,the Arizona bill to increase the state’spowers to combat illegal immigration.(In fact, an early 2011 poll by the PewHispanic center found that, nationwide,whites approved SB 1070 72 to 24 whileHispanics opposed it 70 to 27.)

Mr. Tancredo also cited a poll ac-

cording to which he won more of theHispanic vote than his Democratic op-ponent in his recent unsuccessful runfor governor of Colorado: 41 percentof Hispanics versus 40 percent for JohnHickenlooper. He claimed that Repub-licans will have no trouble attractingHispanics, “so long as they make it

clear that the issue is not race.”He also said he favors gettingmore Hispanics elected to of-

In Mr. Tancredo’s view theonly real problem is illegal immigration. Referring to thehead of the Department of Homeland Security as Janet“Incompetano,” he said “it istreasonous not to secure theborder; it’s impeachable.” Hesaid that our porous border

not only “puts the securityof the United States at risk,”it means illegal immigrants benefitfrom expensive services. Every week

get dialysis, thanks to the taxpayer. Hestressed, however, that the problem isnot the origins of today’s immigrantsbut the fact that they broke the rules toget here.

The second speaker, Virgil Goode,was more direct. A congressman fromcentral Virginia from 2000 to 2008, hewarned that current levels of immigra-

tion, both legal and illegal “will not justkill the GOP; they will kill the UnitedStates.” He decried the preferences

some want to give illegals, such as theright to in-state tuition at universities.“Today being a citizen means you’resecond class,” he said. “We need tomake being a citizen mean somethingagain.” Mr. Goode would stamp out

illegal immigration through more ef-fective border control, deport illegals,and sharply reduce legal immigration.He would eliminate the “diversity visa”farce, and go back to requiring that allimmigrants have a sponsor who wouldfoot the bill if they are unable to supportthemselves. “Obama should have to payfor that aunt of his,” he noted, to muchapplause. Mr. Goode did not volunteerany opinions on the current mix of im-migrants, but made it very clear that hewould be happy to see immigration cutessentially to zero.

Bay Buchanan seconded Mr. Goode’s

view that the health of the GOP is anafterthought; immigration is killing theentire United States. She noted that theTea Party arose because the GOP hasfailed the people on all matters, not justimmigration. She blasted politicians and

the border is “racist,” and who make afetish of trying to please Hispanics. Thepeople, she reminded the audience, havebeen strongly opposed to mass immigra-

is entrusted to the hands of the Americanpeople,” she said, loosely quoting Wash-

ington, and noted that elites do not rec-ognize a grass roots movement until itthreatens them. Immigration can only becontrolled, she said, if Americans maketheir voices heard at every level.

Lou Barletta spoke mostly about hisexperiences as mayor of Hazleton, Penn-sylvania. After running a business formany years, he decided to run for mayoron a campaign to govern the city more

much about immigration but discov-

Virgil Goode.

Lou Barletta.




Jessie Daniels.

Joe Feagin, who was present, recognizedme and told her to be sure not to call onme for questions.

The title of Prof. Daniels talk was“Cyber Racism,” and she said shewould discuss whether “more technol-ogy equates to more social justice” Shebegan, however, with the kind of mush

these people love: “I want to stand insolidarity with all those who pursuesocial justice.” Social justice, she ex-plained, has the modest goal of requiringthat “we transform Texas A&M and thewhole world.”

The Internet is a hotbed of “cyberracism,” she explained, because thereare sites such as Stormfront, and be-cause Russian skinheads post videos of violence they have committed againstpeople they don’t want in their country.Prof. Daniels also called martinlutherk-ing.org and jewwatch.org “hate sites”

(but never mentioned American Re-naissance ), and twice she showed us aphotograph of David Duke.

The US, she said, has an “abysmal re-cord” on race and human rights and eventhe UN complains about it. The evidencefor this “abysmal record”? The fact that98 percent of inmates at Rikers Islandin New York are black and brown. Shealso explained that “racism is to blame

Prof. Daniels says the problem withthe Internet is that there is “no gatekeeper;” anyone can put up anything.

She says the government should keep“hate speech” off our computers, just

selling Third Reich memorabilia toFrenchmen. She noted that ever sincethe 2003 Supreme Court ruling in Vir-ginia v. Black it has been illegal to burn across because “burning crosses does notcontribute to discourse in a democracy.”She worries, however, that it is possibleto “burn a cross” online.

Fortunately, the authorities are wak-

ing up to the racist potential of theInternet. Prof. Daniels told us about thecase of Richard Machado, who was the

student at UC Irvine, and thought therewere too many Asians on campus. Hegot the e-mail addresses of 59 Asian stu-dents and sent them a message with thesubject line, “F**k You Asian S**t,” inwhich he threatened to “kill everyone of you personally.” In 1998, Mr. Machadowas convicted and sentenced to a year inprison. Prof. Daniels is disappointed thatMr. Machado is not white but explainedthat he had “bought into the white su-premacist framework.”

have many questions for Prof. Daniels,but we did. One of us, a lawyer, pointedout that race-based crime is very simi-lar the world over, so why was she so

critical of the US? She rejected the ideathat other countries had the same kindof racial problems. Someone else in ourgroup asked her if she could name asingle claim about Martin Luther Kingon the martinlutherking.org website thatwas factually incorrect. She could not.He also wanted to know whether shewould ban martinlutherking.org fromthe Internet if she had the power to doso. “That’s a tough call,” she said.

I had questions for her, but Prof.Feagin had warned her against me, soshe refused to call on me. This was so

obvious that when she called on a black

man who had already asked a question,-

nally let me speak.

I said that Mr. Shabbaz of the NewBlack Panther Party has called for themurder of white-cracker babies andthat Jose Gutierrez, a professor at theUniversity of Texas at Arlington, sayswhites must either be run off the NorthAmerican continent or exterminated. I

view of the United States as a whitesupremacist country. She said she hadnever heard of those things.

When someone asked Prof. Danielsabout calls on the Internet for violenceagainst whites, she said that this “speaksto the hegemony of white supremacy”and that “it is understandable that non-

whites call for violence.”The last question was from a stu-dent. He disputed Prof. Daniels’ claimthat “white supremacists” have morepower on the Internet than the NAACP.Stormfront may have had a website be-fore the NAACP did, but the prevailingclimate of political correctness gives theNAACP far more power than Storm-front. Prof. Daniels seemed stunned tobe challenged by a student.

For us, the evening was a great suc-cess. It is about time loony anti-whiteshad some of their contradictions and

double standards shoved down theirthroats. They are almost never chal-lenged in class, since only anti-whitestake their courses and anyone who straysoff the plantation can be punished with abad grade. But when they give a publiclecture it is open season.

The next time you hear that an “anti-racist” is going to give a talk, gather afew friends and go have some fun.

Tom Short is a pen name .

Joe Feagin.




O Tempora, O Mores!

Benito Juarez monument in Ciudad Juarez.

Mexico on the RopesCiudad Juarez, just across the Rio

Grande from El Paso, Texas, used to bea city of 1.4 million people. Now it isdying. During 2010, it had an estimated3,000 murders, making it one of the mostdangerous places on earth. As many as

in fear, as the Juarez and Sinaloa drugcartels battle for control of what wasonce a bustling border town.

that year, and many that remain payprotection money. One wholesaler ex-plained that in September 2009 he gota visit from a group of enforcers fromthe Juarez Cartel, along with corrupt

with them. They told him he would have

to pay 4,000 pesos—about $330—everyweek if he wanted to stay in business.“They came to see me in a very friendlyway,” he reports. “Everyone is paying.Those who aren’t paying are out of busi-ness, even dead.”

Every week, the businessman getsa call in a distorted voice that giveshim a bank account number. He takescash where he is told and makes a de-posit. As people cleared out of Juarezand business got worse, the enforcers

kindly reduced his weekly payment toabout $205. The protection racket is sowidespread it now has a name: cobrasdel piso

The Mexican Army has taken to go-ing door to door to see how many peoplehave left the city, but many residentsdon’t answer the knock. They are afraidsoldiers will shake them down, just ascriminals do.

In many cases, it is easy to tell whohas left town. Once people are gone,vandals strip a house of everything of value—even the light fixtures—and

closed businesses have been torched.Not surprisingly, those who can are

moving across the river to El Paso,where there were only three violentdeaths in 2010—and a single murder-suicide accounted for two of them. [WillWeissert, Countless Juarez ResidentsFlee ‘Dying City,’ MSNBC, Dec. 29,2010.]

In the meantime, the town of Gua-dalupe, about 40 miles to the southeast,is without a police force, after the last

Drug criminals burned down her housebefore they made off with her. Everyoneelse on the force had either been killed

or ran away. Not far off is the hamlet of Praxedis Guadalupe Guerreror, wherea 20-year-old college student got the

job of police chief because no one elsewanted it. [No Police in Mexico TownAfter Last Officer Kidnapped, BBCNews, Dec. 28, 2010.]

Iranian IreMajor General Hassan Firouzabadi,

Chief of Staff of Iran’s military forces,sounds like an Ivy-Leaguer. In an ad-dress in late February, he said:

“Today, Americans are the symbol of paradox and hypocrisy when it comesto the campaign against racism in theworld. They are trying to brand them-

and human rights in the world but . . .-

ern racism. Although the US claims tobe supporting democracy and humanrights in the world, they have ignored theinalienable rights of a major segment of the country’s population due to racism.

The poor and the black are second-classcitizens . . . .” He cited the response toHurricane Katrina as evidence of theUS government’s alleged hostility toblacks. [Commander Lambasts ModernRacism in US, FARS News Agency,Feb. 27, 2011.]

Canadian Values

four Sikhs entry to the Quebec “nation-al” assembly because they were carryingkirpans, six-inch long ceremonial dag-gers which Sikh men wear at all timesand consider an object of faith ratherthan a weapon. The men were to testify

about “reasonable accommodations” forcultural beliefs, including the wearing of veils by Muslim women. To the guards,the knives were weapons, not religiousobjects, and they kept the Sikhs out.

Sikhs across the country were out-raged. Navdeep Bains, a Sikh memberof the Canadian parliament from theleft-wing Liberal Party denounced theaction as “un-Canadian.” “I’ve worn mykirpan to the Supreme Court, I’ve evengone to the U.S. Congress and met with

he says. “So I don’t see what the issueis.” Quebec’s Parti Quebecois, whichcontrols the national assembly, says it’s

just a security precaution, and that thefederal parliament in Ottawa would bewell-advised to adopt the same policy.

of Canada ruled 8-0 that a Sikh studentin Montreal could carry a kirpan toschool, that it was not a weapon, andbarring it would violate guarantees of freedom of religion. [Mike de Souza,Bloc Proposal to Ban Sikh Kirpans inParliament Called ‘Un-Canadian,’ Na-tional Post, Jan. 19, 2011.]

A kirpan.




Members of the English Defense League.

Fear or Hope?British “anti-racists” are fretting over

a recent poll that found 48 percent of thepopulation would consider voting for an“anti-immigration English nationalist

party” so long as it eschewed “violenceand fascist imagery.” Among the posi-tions voters say they would support:taking on Islamic extremism, drastically

reducing immigration, and passing lawsrequiring public buildings to fly the

suggests that Britain may be even morereceptive to nationalism than those Eu-ropean countries where nationalist par-ties are strongest, including Denmark,Holland and Austria.

The Searchlight Educational Trust,the hard-left “anti-racist” group thatcommissioned the poll, says that if nationalist movements have not donewell in Britain “it is not because Britishpeople are more moderate, but simply

because their views have not found apolitical articulation.”Interestingly enough, 39 percent of

“Asian Britons,” 34 percent of “whiteBritons” and 21 percent of “black Brit-ons” want all immigration into the UKstopped permanently, or at least until theeconomy improves. Sixty-three percentof British whites, 43 percent of Asians(which in Britain means Indians andPakistanis), and 17 percent of blacksagree with the statement that “im-migration into Britain has been a badthing for the country.” Just over half of

respondents—52 percent—agree that“Muslims create problems in the UK.”The poll also has some on the left

worried that the country may be see-ing a “resurgence of English identity.”The evidence? Thirty-nine percent of respondents prefer to call themselvesEnglish rather than British, and just5 percent call themselves European.Left-wing Labour MP Jon Cruddas, whocampaigned against the British NationalParty in East London, worries that the

poll has uncovered a “very real threat of a new potent political constituency builtaround an assertive English national-ism.” [Mark Townsend, SearchlightPoll Finds Huge Support for Far Right‘If They Gave Up Violence,’ Guardian

Adios, TexasDemographer Steve Murdock,

former director of the US Census Bu-reau and current director of the Hob-by Center for the Study of Texas atRice University in Houston, doesn’tsee much of a future for white peoplein Texas. Speaking before the state

House Mexican American LegislativeCaucus, Mr. Murdock noted that twoout of every three Texas children arealready non-white and that this trendis accelerating. His conclusion? “It’s

basically over for Anglos.”The population of Texas consists of two groups: a shrinking number of rap-idly aging whites and a growing numberof young non-whites. Harris County,home to Houston, the fourth-largest cityin the US, is shedding whites in droves,and will have half a million fewer in2040 than it did in 2000. At the sametime, its Hispanic population will haveincreased by 2.5 million. Statewide, theproportion of white school children willcontinue to decline, and is expected toreach 20 percent by 2040, down from

33.3 percent in 2010. Mr. Murdockprojects Hispanic enrollment in Texaspublic schools to have increased 213percent between 2000 and 2040. Manyof these students will be children of illegal aliens; Mr. Murdock estimatesthat illegals are six percent of the state’s

population.Mr. Murdock doesn’t seem to see

much of a future for Texas, either, giventhe low education and income levelsof Hispanics. Unless trends reverse,he says that 30 percent of the state’s

high school, and that average household

was in 2000—in real 2000 dollars, not

situation that you are in,” he told hisHispanic audience. “I am worried.”[Texas Demographer: ‘It’s BasicallyOver for Anglos,’ Houston Chronicle,Feb. 24, 2011.]

Colorado, TooAccording to new data from the US

Census Bureau, Colorado is becomingincreasingly “diverse.” In 2000, “non-

Hispanic whites” were 75 percent of thestate’s population. Ten years later, the

went from 17 to 21 percent. The numberof blacks and Asians has also increased.

their proportion of white residents fall,meaning “diversity” isn’t coming onlyto cities.

and Adams, saw their white percentagesdrop by more than 10 percent, and the

-rado city with a minority majority: 53

percent. Denver was expected to joinAurora as a majority non-white city, butwhites hung on at 52 percent.

under 18 were white. In 2010, only 58percent were white, and their actualnumbers declined by 3 percent. [John

The Alamo: What was it that happened here?



Ingold, Census: Colorado’s PopulationSubstantially More Diverse, DenverPost, Feb. 24, 2011.]

Good Sense on the BenchOn October 12, 2007, the Carmike

Cineplex in Dover, Delaware, wasshowing a popular “black-themed” mov-ie, “Why Did I Get Married?” on threescreens simultaneously. The audienceswere large and overwhelmingly black.There were security guards checking

message appeared on the screens askingpatrons to turn off their cell phones, andin the largest of the three theaters, themanager, David Stewart, who is white,made the same announcement in person.Some blacks in the audience thought

Mr. Stewart’s tone was “offensive andcondescending, as if he were speaking

to children,” and, since the crowd washeavily black, they thought he was im-plying that blacks don’t know how tobehave in a theater.

One of the offended happened to beJuana Fuentes-Bowles, then-directorof Delaware’s Human Relations Divi-sion. She stood up and announced thatshe was a lawyer and began taking thenames of people who said they wereoffended by Mr. Stewart’s “racism.”She did not identify herself by title.A member of her staff then contactedthe 33 offended patrons and drew up a

Human Relations Commission— whichwas part of the division she headed .Miss Fuentes-Bowles name was on theoriginal complaint, but she later took itoff so it would not be a “distraction.”

In 2008, a three-member panel of thecommission ruled that the announce-ment violated Delaware’s equal accesslaw, (even though everyone in the the-ater was able to see the movie), becausethe “circumstances were hostile and

one that any reasonable person would -

$5,000, and ordered it to pay more than$20,000 in attorney’s fees and costs.

The theater appealed, and on February22 the Delaware Supreme Court threwout the commission’s ruling. The courtconcluded that the announcement—which was part of a since-discontinuedcompany protocol for sold-out movies—was “reasonable” and “non-racial” in itsintent, noting that the manager had madethe same announcement to a largelyteen-aged audience watching a horrormovie the week before. The court alsoaccepted the theater’s explanation thatextra security was needed because of arecent robbery, and that staff checkedticket stubs to make sure patrons of three

sold-out showings went to theright theater so everyone could

have a seat.Miss Fuentes-Bowles, whohas left the Human Rights Di-vision, could not be reachedfor comment. Christopher R.Portante, a spokesman for theDelaware Department of State,which oversees the Human Re-lations Commission, said thedepartment “stands behind” thecommission’s original ruling.[Sean O’Sullivan, Delaware

Supreme Court Overturns Cinema Rul-ing, News Journal (Wilmington), Feb.

23, 2011.]

Washington’s Legacy

people with the surname “Washington,”90 percent of whom are black. This isthe highest black percentage for anycommon American name. Indeed, mostAmericans today assume anyone namedWashington is probably black, whichhas led to complaints about “discrimi-nation” from white Washingtons. Manypeople mistakenly assume that blacks

named Washington are descended fromGeorge Washington’s slaves. In fact,

his own surname, and most freedmensimply chose for themselves.

For example, Booker T. Washington,was not one of Washington’s slaves, norwas he owned by a family named Wash-ington. Born on a Virginia plantation, hehad always just been called Booker. Hewrote in his autobiography that when

other black children had last names andchose Washington.

Adam Goodheart, a professor atWashington College, says the choice of

history. He continues: “That they [for-mer slaves] would embrace the name of this person who was an imperfect heroshows there was a certain understandingof this country as an imperfect place, animperfect experiment, and a willingnessto embrace that tradition of liberty withall its contradictions.” ( Editors note:This sounds like nonsense. Blacks prob-ably chose the names of people they had heard spoken of admiringly. )

The name Washington has been blackfor a long time. Censuses conductedbetween 1880 and 1930 found thatthe black percentage was between 82to 94 percent. The 2000 census foundthat Jefferson is the second-“blackest”

name at 70 percent. Fifty-three per-cent of the people named Jackson areblack. The most common name among

“blackest.” Interestingly, the name Black

is 19 percent black. [Jesse Washington,Washington: The ‘Blackest Name’ inAmerica, AP, Feb. 21, 2011.]

HomebodiesAccording to a study by the Institute

of International Education, although -rollments they account for 81 percent of the students who study overseas. Blacks,who are 13.5 percent of college studentsand Hispanics, 12 percent, are just 4.2

-gy Blumenthal, executive vice presidentof the Institute of International Educa-tion, wants this to change. “It’s really amatter of persuading young students of color that this is possible for them andthis is necessary for them,” she says. Theinstitute also claims that foreign study

is “crucial” to student development andeven a “key to national security.”Why don’t non-whites study abroad?

Experts say some of the reasons arelack of funds, fear of “racism,” worriesabout delaying graduation, and the factthat non-whites are less likely to knowanyone who has traveled internationally.(Presumably hopping the border doesnot count.) [Kathy Matheson, Educa-tors Seek Out More Minorities to StudyAbroad, AP, Feb. 21, 2011.]

201104 american renaissance

Documents